Case Study Window Regulator Assembly Line 2016 02 03 Case Study Window Regulator

You might also like

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 12

Case Study: Window Regulator Assembly Line

Hankinson Inc.
Julian Hankinson

www.hankinsoninc.com
Performance & NVH Test Station
Accelerometer Actuators

Rail Bracket Motor


Example Data & Test Criteria
Rail Vibration Data for Cable Grinding Issue

Good Unit
0

1 Cable Pass Period


Moderate Cable Grinding
Accel [G]

Cable Pass Period


1
Severe Cable Grinding

1
1.4 1.45 1.5 1.55 1.6
Time [sec]
Rail Vibration Spectrums

0.05
Cable Grinding
No Cable Grinding
0.04
Band of Consistent
Difference
0.03
G rms

0.02

0.01

0
0 200 400 600 800 1000
Frequency [Hz]
Filtered & Enveloped Rail Vibration Data

Good Unit
0

1 Cable Pass Period

Moderate Cable Grinding


Accel [G]

Cable Pass Period


1
Severe Cable Grinding

1
1.4 1.45 1.5 1.55 1.6
Time [sec]
Spectrums of Enveloped Data

0.04
Good Unit
0.035 Moderate Cable Grinding
Severe Cable Grinding
0.03
Cable Coil
Pass Frequency
0.025
G rms

0.02

0.015

0.01

0.005

0
0 50 100 150 200
Frequency [Hz]
Statistical Analysis of Envelope Criteria
for Cable Grinding Issue

50
"Good" Units ( 3 )
"Bad" Units
40
Number of Units

30

20
Moderate Severe Cable
Cable Grinding Grinding
10

0
0 0.02 0.04 0.06
Envelope Magnitude @ Cable Pass Frequency
Statistical Analysis of Kurtosis Criteria
for Cable Grinding Issue

140
"Good" Units ( 3 )
120 "Bad" Units

100
Number of Units

80

60

40

20

0
2 3 4 5 6
Kurtosis
Acoustic Spectrum Comparison
for Motor Noise Issue

1
Volts peak

Quiet Motor
0.5

0
0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000

1
Volts peak

Loud Motor High Frequency


Content
0.5

0
0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000
Frequency [Hz]
Statistical Analysis of High Frequency
Energy Band Criteria for Motor Noise Issue

100
"Good" Units ( 3 )
"Bad" Units
80
Number of Units

60

40

20

0
0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6
Frequency Band Energy, Motor Microphone

You might also like