Professional Documents
Culture Documents
High Voltage Technology Summary
High Voltage Technology Summary
The objective of High Voltage Technology is to control the electrical field strength
Under all operating conditions and circumstances, the electrical field strength should be
(significantly) less than the breakdown field strength.
Conformal mapping
An electric field of 1kV/mm in air (εr=1) releases a surface charge of roughly 9μC/m2
Background field vs field inside!
Field strength is highest in the low permittivity material optimal geometry, differentiate
to zero -> Ropt = R/2, Eopt =
Higher er -> lower field 2U/r 4U/R
Circuit breaker:
• Suitable for distribution voltage levels (up to 132kV is available)
• Short circuit currents up to 10’s of kA
• Major function: current interruption
• High-speed moving contacts → magnetic operated spring
system
• Current distribution across the contact surface established by
magnetic field
system with special construction, why?
• Short arc-extinguishing time
• Gap distances of 0.5mm to 5 mm
• High di/dt transients can be generated
(current breaking)
High pressure 1) Anode initiated streamer, x_cr = d
Minimum condition for breakdown
2) Mid-gap streamer, xcr < d
Streamer mechanism:
• Time to breakdown is much shorter than can be
derived from Townsend mechanism (ns instead of μs)
• Breakdown voltage is not dependent on cathode
material, feedback occurs in the gas itself
• Breakdown channels are sharp and narrow as
opposed to the diffuse Townsend discharges
F = f1 * f2
Barriers in a power transformer Liquid insulation Dissolved gas in oil analysis (DGA)
Analysis of released gasses in transformer oil is
helpful to determine
the processes inside the transformer
DGA “Duval” triangle: Method helps to
assess the nature of a transformer
degradation mechanism and severity
DGA “Duval” pentagon: More elaborated
than “triangle” (recent update based on
180 DGA results) –proportion of gases has
to be calculated
General properties:
Solid insulation is always required, either as support or as insulating medium
Advantages:
Self supporting
No tank is needed as is required for liquid or gas
High breakdown strength Determine cavity size?
Disadvantages: calculate d for 1kV
D>B>A>C
NOT self-healing
Higher permittivities, sometimes higher losses
often combustible
Less effective cooling than liquid or gas
Intrinsic breakdown
Occurs at extremely high electric fields, only when all interfering effects are
Answer: paschen curve
prevented. The intrinsic breakdown strength is only obtained in the laboratory.
Precautions:
Ultra clean materials; no inclusions, no impurities, no micro-cavities, no moisture
Perfectly smooth electrodes, Rogowski profile
Testing of small volumes to reduce the probability of imperfections
Short test periods to prevent heating and thermal breakdown
Mechanism:
Breakdown initiated by electrons → 10 ns
If electrons are sufficiently energized by the applied E-field to cross the bandgap
(~20-50 W/m heating power)
they can move freely, and their kinetic energy will increase Voltage life L
To stabilize this situation the energy has to be dissipated
This occurs through collisions with the lattice structure of the material
When the lattice can no longer absorb all the energy an electron multiplication
process starts
Narrow channels become conductive → breakdown
capacitive
they occur, are filled with oil, inclusions and defects are
surrounded by oil, so that any air is excluded
The structure is built up of layers. A possible defect is
always restricted to the thickness of one layer
Calculating strikes to a lines: Electro-Geometric Method
Lightning
Lightning Attraction to Structures
Performance
Final stage of leader development: For AC structures < 60 m (Up to EHV)
Negatively charged cloud Reasonable prediction of shielding failures
Downward leader – ionized channel from For AC structures > 60 m (UHV)
Cloud Electrification cloud to earth Predictions underestimate shielding failure rate
Rising air –cools with altitude Charge is concentrated at tip For HVDC
Turbulence and friction of water drops, snow, and Moved in stepped fashion Not able to predict effect of pole voltage
ice E-field gradient ≈ 1kV/m Positive pole suffer highest outage rate
results in charge separation Ground is positively charged EGM predict highest outage rate on negative
Negative: -15° to -30° C High E-field at tip of leader pole
Positive: up to 0° C, < -30° C E-field proportional to charge in channel
Results in Propagation of lightning surges on insulated conductors
Negative at bottom of cloud Final jump: Lightning strokes to lines produce traveling waves
Positive pockets High E-field at tip of leader Line represented by surge impedance
Strong positive at top E-field proportional to charge in channel
Ground becomes charged positively Streamer breakdown at tip of leader Lightning surges on insulated conductors Lightning Stroke to the Shielding System
Formation of Streamer Zone • Overhead shield wires (A)
Negative Cloud-to-Ground Flash (CG) E-field gradient ≈ 500 kV/m • Intercept lightning
Flash – entire electrical discharge from cloud to Final jump when streamer zone extend across • Shielding of phase conductors
object remaining gap • Conduct lightning current
Comprise one or more strokes Length of final jump (leader potential/ 500Kv/m) • Less current than
Stroke – single high-current component in a flash Strike distance same as final jump ground electrode
First stroke Striking distance • Earth electrode (B)
Subsequent strokes Striking Distance S: • Low impedance path to ground
Cloud-to-ground (CG) lightning comes from the sky S = AI^b
down, but the part you see comes from the ground up. Wavefront Steepness
Used to determine stroke attraction to structures
Maximum Rate of Rise (Steepness)
Rolling sphere concept
Rate of rise correlated with current
Striking distance the same to all objects
peak value
Not applicable to overhead lines
≈ 2 μs virtual front time
Upward Leader
Formation downward leader same as before
Ground and structures are positively charged
Ionization of air at grounded object extremities
(high E-field)
Positive upward leader grows towards downward leader Lightning Overvoltages in Substation
Transformer
Ground Flash Density GFD = Flashes per square km per year Final jump when streamer zones extend across remaining gap Backflashover on line Acts as open circuit, Voltage doubling
• Obtained from National Lightning Detection Network (NLDN) Strike distance not same as final jump Lightning current “captured” on insulated phase Voltage on transformer
conductor Arrester residual voltage
• Historically calculated from number of thunderstorm days Includes final jump and length of upward leader Steepness of incoming surge
• Need at least 11 years (solar cycle) of data for computations Strike distance depending on: Propagate to substation Distance to backflashover location
Prospective lightning current, Height of structure, Applied voltage Refelect at the “open” end (transformer) Distance from arrester
Current distribution: Current in Surge arrester
Magnitude of incoming surge
Lightning is an ideal current source
Surge impedance of the line
Characterized by peak current Arrester residual voltage
Negative First strokes
50% of strokes current higher than 30 000 A
Subsequent strokes (average 3 per flash)
Peak current lower than first stroke current
Flashovers usually caused by first strokes
Not accounted for in calculations
Positive strokes (< 10% of total flashes)
Highest currents
Not a large contributor to outages on Tx lines
Not accounted for in calculations
The impulse breakdown characteristic of solid insulation material is “flatter” than for gas
The time to breakdown decreases with increasing voltage
Impulse Tests: most important is the clearance distance to the wall and ceiling
The statistical waiting time depends on the overvoltage ratio (U impulse -Ustatic )/U static
The impulse breakdown voltage depends on the shape of the impulse
Flashover probability function for lightning impulse Flashover models that predict breakdown time
V-T Curve Penetration
Simple evaluation of time to breakdown DE limit > DE? - flashover
Integration Models
Quantifies the applied voltage “stress” by integrating the voltage over time
Appropriate for lightning (implemented in TFlash)
Leader progression method
Models the development of the discharge across the gap
More appropriate for Switching Surges or long gaps where leader
development is dominant.
Testing procedures Seems to work OK for lighting flashovers with correct parameters.