This document identifies problems at the personal, team, and organizational level using various models. At the personal level, models like IPO Triangle, DMR, and VIPES-H can help identify problems with self-management and learning. At the team level, models like Team Effectiveness and DMR can shed light on issues with emergent states and psychological safety. For organizations, models such as Star Alignment and Performance Management are proposed to examine cultural alignment and leadership development problems. Readings provide further context on developing excellence through mundane work and managing workplaces at a high intensity. An action plan should analyze the situation, rehearse potential outcomes, implement iteratively based on new information, and consider both short and long term objectives
This document identifies problems at the personal, team, and organizational level using various models. At the personal level, models like IPO Triangle, DMR, and VIPES-H can help identify problems with self-management and learning. At the team level, models like Team Effectiveness and DMR can shed light on issues with emergent states and psychological safety. For organizations, models such as Star Alignment and Performance Management are proposed to examine cultural alignment and leadership development problems. Readings provide further context on developing excellence through mundane work and managing workplaces at a high intensity. An action plan should analyze the situation, rehearse potential outcomes, implement iteratively based on new information, and consider both short and long term objectives
This document identifies problems at the personal, team, and organizational level using various models. At the personal level, models like IPO Triangle, DMR, and VIPES-H can help identify problems with self-management and learning. At the team level, models like Team Effectiveness and DMR can shed light on issues with emergent states and psychological safety. For organizations, models such as Star Alignment and Performance Management are proposed to examine cultural alignment and leadership development problems. Readings provide further context on developing excellence through mundane work and managing workplaces at a high intensity. An action plan should analyze the situation, rehearse potential outcomes, implement iteratively based on new information, and consider both short and long term objectives
This document identifies problems at the personal, team, and organizational level using various models. At the personal level, models like IPO Triangle, DMR, and VIPES-H can help identify problems with self-management and learning. At the team level, models like Team Effectiveness and DMR can shed light on issues with emergent states and psychological safety. For organizations, models such as Star Alignment and Performance Management are proposed to examine cultural alignment and leadership development problems. Readings provide further context on developing excellence through mundane work and managing workplaces at a high intensity. An action plan should analyze the situation, rehearse potential outcomes, implement iteratively based on new information, and consider both short and long term objectives
Models Models - IPO Triangle - IPO Triangle - Psychological Safety – Apathy Zones - DMR - Team Effectiveness Model (Emergent States) - Self-Management: Learning (VIPES-H) - DMR - Performance Management Readings Readings - Teaming - Mundanity of Excellence Executing and learning at the same time Excellence is qualitative Scope, structure, sort Talent is a useless concept - Team Effectiveness Excellence is mundane (change the way you Input – Process – Output work) Interaction, climate, cohesion, efficiency, - Managing the High Intensity Workplace conflict Accepting, passing, revealing Psychological safety - Performance Management and Motivation - Secret of great Teams Motivation – expectancy of how actions will lead Compelling direction to positive or negative outcomes Strong structure Needs produce forces with a person that need Supportive context to be satisfied Shared mindset Action – results – evaluations – outcomes – - Collaboration Rules need satisfaction Common work discipline - Managing your Boss Communication Key factors in a good relationship – results, information, Leaders as connectors support and loyalty Intrinsic motivation trust - Making Star Teams out of Star players Talent management, mission critical projects, tough leadership ORGANIZATIONAL PROBLEMS LEADERSHIP PROBLEMS Models Models - IPO Triangle - Congruence Model - Congruent Model - DMR - DMR - Leadership Styles - Star Alignment Model - Leader Development - Performance Management - Process Model for Leadership Readings Readings - Note on Organizational Culture - DMR Defines normative order Systematic Risk – (1) success, (5) failure Widespread consensus and endorsement that Adaptability – (1) inadaptable, (5) adaptable facilitates control Bias – (1) rational, (5) complete - Multiply it all by culture - Imperative of Learning Clarity, signalling, consistency Make it safe - Organization culture: values and fit Provide process guidelines Valued factors: benevolence, self-direction, Encourage collaboration understanding Identify process improvement Personal match - Leader(ship) Development - Organizational Design Leadership – interpersonal influence process Value proposition directed in pursuit of a shared goal Activities that deliver on value proposition Leadership interpersonal relationships – Organization structure and mitigation of its social downside Leader intrapersonal competence – human Leadership and culture capital Organizational practices - Becoming Boss Gain Authority: demonstrate character, competence, influence ACTION PLAN - What is the predicament/situation? - How did the protagonist get into the predicament/situation? Self-Management: Learning – VIPES-H (PERSONAL) Team Effectiveness Model – Emergent States (TEAM) Star Alignment Model (ORGANIZATIONAL) Leadership Styles and Leadership Development *2 (LEADER) - How can the protagonist get out of the predicament/situation? Reference model used to identify the problem and how you can turn that into a positive feedback loop Key Elements of Action Planning - Step 1: Analysis An action plan can only be only as good as the diagnosis of the situation – opportunity or problem - Step 2: Rehearse the Action Plan Identify likely outcomes and critical contingencies Use action plan to clarify your diagnosis and goals - Step 3: Implementation Evolutionary and iterative As you implement the action plan you will you will discover and generate new information – based on the new information reassess and revise your action plan - Step 4: Long and Short Term Develop a strategy and a ways to keep you on track as you proceed Identify steps Be specific about early steps and flexibility in later ones Key Criteria - Defined objectives (short and term) - Strategy action plan consistent with analysis Key assumptions of the underlying strategy and evidence Feasible given the constraints and opportunities pay particular attention to timing Action plan realistic given your sources of power - Impact of the action plan Who will it be effective for? Personal or organizational Is it ethical Performance Management Model What are the trade-offs Who is directly vs. indirectly affected DMR Model Stakes and risks involved and those impacted by the action plan - Timing and sequence of decisions and actions Differentiation between urgent and important problems or opportunities Are you taking care of urgent matters in a timely fashion Star Alignment Model – fix the culture to get the desired outcome Incremental steps so you can “test the waters” and thereby reduce unnecessary risks Early action planning steps transition into long term plan - Possible contingencies and planned Probability of success at each step of the action plan What are the alternatives if the probability of success is low – have you developed a contingency plan - Process to ensure evaluation and the ability to revaluate and modify the action plan - Learn from successes and failures Leading Teams Leading Organization Cultures Leading People - How and why people behave in - Determinants of organizational - How and why people interact in certain ways in their teams with culture certain ways with their peers, respect to their tasks, their team - Cultural effects on employees and subordinates and superiors members, and their external contacts organizational performance - Managing performance cress a outside the team - Leadership is a key factor in diverse set of interpersonal - Team decision making developing and maintaining a positive relationships, task settings, - Team problem solving culture that enhances organizational social networks and - Team conflict and crisis effectiveness and performance organizational levels