Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 22

Chapter 2: Opportunity Identification and Selection:

Strategic Planning for New Products

MSc. Pham Thi Hong Ngoc


New Product Strategy Inputs
and Identifying Opportunities

Chapter 2.
Opportunity Product Innovation Charter
Identification
and Selection

Product Portfolio

MSc. Pham Thi Hong Ngoc


2.1 New Product Strategy Inputs
and Identifying Opportunities

MSc. Pham Thi Hong Ngoc


MSc. Pham Thi Hong Ngoc
Product Platform Planning

• Many firms find that it is not efficient to develop a single product.


• Hence, they use platforms to create product families that share similarities in
design, development, or production process.
‐ Car industry: $3 billion price tag on a new car platform is spread out over several
models.
‐ Sony: four platforms for Walkman launched 160 product variations.
‐ Boeing: passenger, cargo, short- and long-haul planes made from same platform.
‐ P&G: Liquid Ariel for European market, Liquid Tide for North America, and Liquid
Cheer for Japanese market.
‐ Black & Decker: uses a single electric motor for dozens of consumer power tools.

MSc. Pham Thi Hong Ngoc


MSc. Pham Thi Hong Ngoc
Product Platform Planning

Product Platform defined as:


• “a set of common components, modules, or parts from which a stream of derivative
products can be efficiently developed and launched” (Meyer & Lehnerd, 1997, p. 7).
• “a collection of the common elements, especially the underlying core technology,
implemented across a range of products” (McGrath, 1995, p. 39).
• “the collection of assets [i.e., components, processes, knowledge, people and
relationships] that are shared by a set of products” (Robertson & Ulrich, 1998, p.
20).
• “a basis for all individual product projects within a family of products” (Crawford &
Benedetto , 2015, p.61).
MSc. Pham Thi Hong Ngoc
MSc. Pham Thi Hong Ngoc
Opportunity Identification:
Greenfield Markets
• Find another location or venue Once McDonald’s had taken up the best locations for
traditional fast-food restaurants, it continued its U.S. expansion by placing stores inside
Wal-Marts, in sports arenas, and elsewhere. Starbucks Coffee complemented coffee-
shop sales by selling its coffee beans and ice creams in supermarkets.
• Leverage your firm’s strengths in a new activity center. Nike moved into golf and hockey,
and Honeywell is looking into casino opportunities.
• Identify a fast-growing need, and adapt your products to that need. HP followed the
need for “total information solutions” that led it to develop computing and
communications products for the World Cup and other sporting events.
• Find a “new to you” industry. P&G in pharmaceuticals, GE in broadcasting (NBC), Disney
in cruises, Rubbermaid in gardening products – either through alliance, acquisition, or
internal development.
MSc. Pham Thi Hong Ngoc
MSc. Pham Thi Hong Ngoc
Opportunity Identification:
Emerging Societal Trends
Six Catalysts shaping the future: (tutorial)
1. “Just-in-time” life
2. Sensing consumers
3. The transparent self
4. In search of “enoughness”
5. Virtual made real
6. Co-creation

MSc. Pham Thi Hong Ngoc


MSc. Pham Thi Hong Ngoc
2.2 Product Innovation Charter
(PIC)

MSc. Pham Thi Hong Ngoc


MSc. Pham Thi Hong Ngoc
What is the Product Innovation Charter (PIC) ?

• It is the new product team’s strategy.


‐ It is for Products (not processes).
‐ It is for Innovation (think of the definition of new product).
‐ It is a Charter (a document specifying the conditions under which a
firm will operate).
• Typically, it is a document prepared by senior management designed to
provide guidance to the strategic business units (SBUs) on the role of
innovation.

MSc. Pham Thi Hong Ngoc


MSc. Pham Thi Hong Ngoc
Do Many Firms Have a PIC?

• Most do, according to research, even if they don’t call it by that name.
• Also:
‐ 75% of firms have a formal new product policy of some type (a partial PIC).
‐ 29% have a formal, written complete PIC.
‐ 80% of firms have formalized at least a few of the phases in the new products process.
‐ 86% of the “Best” firms have a PIC and only 69% of the “Rest.”
‐ The more detailed and specific the PIC, the higher are the firm’s innovation rates.
‐ The more specific the corporate mission and senior management direction is spelled out
in the PIC, the better is the performance of the firm’s new products.
MSc. Pham Thi Hong Ngoc
MSc. Pham Thi Hong Ngoc
Purposes of PIC

1. Focus and integrate team effort


2. Permit delegation
3. Establish the size and range of the “sandbox”

MSc. Pham Thi Hong Ngoc


MSc. Pham Thi Hong Ngoc
Risks of Poor PIC Development

• Scope creep: Product definition keeps changing: who is the customer?


Is it a standalone product or a platform?
• Unstable product specifications: Required performance level keeps
changing.
The above risks occur due to vague targets (“moving goalposts”) – the
sandbox was never defined, or poorly defined.

MSc. Pham Thi Hong Ngoc


MSc. Pham Thi Hong Ngoc
Background

Key ideas from the situation analysis; special forces such as managerial dicta; reasons for
preparing a new PIC at this time.

Focus

At least one clear technology dimension and one clear market dimension. They match and
have good potential.

The Contents
of a PIC Goals-Objectives

What the project will accomplish, either short-term as objectives or longer-term as goals.
Evaluation measurements.

Guidelines

Any "rules of the road," requirements imposed by the situation or by upper management.
Innovativeness, order of market entry, time/quality/cost, miscellaneous.

MSc. Pham Thi Hong Ngoc MSc. Pham Thi Hong Ngoc
PIC Steps:
Background, Focus, and Goals

• Background: “Why did we develop this strategy?”


• Focus, or Area: technology and market drivers that (1) fit and
(2) have good potential.
• Goals and Objectives: profit, growth, market status

MSc. Pham Thi Hong Ngoc


MSc. Pham Thi Hong Ngoc
PIC Steps:
Special Guidelines
• Degree of Innovativeness • Miscellaneous
‐ First-to-market ‐ Avoidance of competition with certain
‐ Adaptive product firms
‐ Imitation (emulation) ‐ Recognition of weaknesses
‐ Patentability
• Timing
‐ Product Integrity
‐ First
‐ Quick second
‐ Slow
‐ Late

MSc. Pham Thi Hong Ngoc


MSc. Pham Thi Hong Ngoc
An Illustrative PIC for the Apple iPad
• Focus: Technology strengths include Apple’s operating system, hardware, applications, and
services, product design and development skills. Marketing requirements include products on
the “cutting edge” that offer seamless integration and high performance, yet are intuitive,
simple, and fun to use.
• Goals: Revolutionary new products should also be platforms for future products, due to the
cost of “really new” product development. New products should occupy the leadership
position in the market.
• Special Guidelines: Apple aims to be the best, not necessarily the first, in new product
categories.
• The Result: Apple’s first “tablet computer,” a revolutionary new product seen by many at the
time as the “next big thing.” No one tablet computer had established a dominant position yet,
so Apple could be the standard bearer with the iPad. The plan for the future was to add
capabilities and applications to future iPads.
MSc. Pham Thi Hong Ngoc
MSc. Pham Thi Hong Ngoc
2.3 Product Portfolios

MSc. Pham Thi Hong Ngoc


MSc. Pham Thi Hong Ngoc
Product Portfolio:
The New Product’s Strategic Fit
• Strategic goals (defending current • Market familiarity (existing markets,
base of products versus extending extensions of current ones, or totally
the base) new ones)
• Project types (fundamental • Technology familiarity (existing
research, process improvements, platforms, extensions of current ones,
or maintenance projects) or totally new ones)
• Short-term vs long-term projects • Ease of development
• High-risk vs low-risk projects • Geographical markets (North America,
Europe, Asia)
MSc. Pham Thi Hong Ngoc
MSc. Pham Thi Hong Ngoc
Strategic Portfolio Model for One SBU in
Exxon Chemical
Low Market Newness High Market Newness

Low Product Newness Improvements to Existing Products Additions to Existing Product Lines
(35%) (20%)

Medium Product Newness Cost Reductions New Product Lines


(20%) (15%)

High Product Newness Repositioning New-to-the-World Products


(6%) (4%)

Source: Adapted from Robert G. Cooper, Scott J. Edgett, and Elko J. Kleinschmidt. Portfolio Management
for New Products, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada, 1997, p. 63.

MSc. Pham Thi Hong Ngoc


MSc. Pham Thi Hong Ngoc
A Portfolio
Diagram at a
Hewlett-Packard
Division

MSc. Pham Thi Hong Ngoc MSc. Pham Thi Hong Ngoc
Strategic
Decision Group
Portfolio
Evaluation
Model

MSc. Pham Thi Hong Ngoc MSc. Pham Thi Hong Ngoc
Chapter 1-2
Summary

MSc. Pham Thi Hong Ngoc MSc. Pham Thi Hong Ngoc

You might also like