Prerious Year 151

Soed Ouestions - Civil

PART- B
MADHYA PRADESH

1, MP 1996
agreed to sell it to plaintiff Xunder an
Yowns a house in Bhopal. It is alleged that he
Plaintiff X, says that he paid Rs.
agreementof sale dated 30th June, 1996 for a sum of Rs. 8,000. deed within
agreement of sale, to execute
2000as earnest money and that Y was, under the terms of to Zfor a sum
however Ysold the house
six months from the date of its execution. Subsequently,
December, 1996. The plaintiff alleges thbat Z was aware of the previous
of Rs. 10,000 on 2nd
favour. He has, therefore, filed this suit for specific performance of the
agreement of sale in his admitted execution of
Y And Z contested suit. In his written statement Y
contract in his favour.
received Rs. 2,000 as earnest money. But he
admitted to have
agreement of sale with X. He further of consideration, sohe
plaintiff was unable to arrange remaining amount
took the defence that
favour. Z took thedefence that he had no knowledge
executedin his
declined toget the sale deed plaintiffs' favour. He contends that he
purchased
respect of the suit house in
of theagreement in entitled to sell the house to him. In the
was
faith and believing that Y and, therefore, he
the suit house in good to arrange for the money
unable
plaintiffwas
alternative he also alleged that the
declined topurchase the house.
pleadings
Insupport of their
himself. (PW1) sale deed in favour
(i) X examined agreement tosale in favour of X, and also
scribe of
(i) Witness A who is
of Z (PW-2) execution of sale deed in favour of Z.
before whom, X objected
sub-registrar
(iüi) Then C,
(PW-3) documents:
filed and proved the following
Plaintiff
Agreement to sell (Ex. P-1)
()
favour of Z(Ex. P-2)
(ii) Sale deed in sub-registrar (Ex. P-3)
before
(iii) Objection application filed
Defence evidence his presence X
himself (DW-1) and one witness 'B' who deposed that in
examined declined to get sale deed executed
(i) Y arrange remaining amount and
showed inability to
(DW-2)
 SHIKHA
Date

PIRST
(HHATTTSG ARH CC.q)
CLASS,
Cpouided lby-)
iil sit ho
Date o insttation..

Age
AddS.
Vvus

Abls Degendant

Dgondaut
Present wni
My
Mr Hor Dehend cunta.
JuDyMENr
(prnauned today on.)
The
dfnts wntl Seion
Page No.
Date
SHIKHA
Chniotosmnat30,06.V1996
datd
e me i a eement
CL KRA
Se
ugading
l. Sale
ituate d in
Suit
Euton oaqeenent
(hueinatar
an ad nntted
fat aund cetendantao1lso
nat he
s 2,00 000 from heHemed eamn est adnited
money
The Hhe planHgtin bxiet
\S at dlhndaunt nb
that
the
enteedinto a On 30
Sale houe
for a `wm latendant ho
Qut o uhich
Rs 2,00, 000 wwas 0ud as eamest

menydeendant no 1 Las to
he Sle deed wuhin 6 rnonthu
the date of aaremnt. But,
Vdegndant
Aelndaunt
salal he houe to
no2 fox Rs 10, 000 on 2nd peutmbey
1996. e ae cpiod Aording to plaintit
atndant no. was aware
eeniw aq rement in his
heeto, Plainti dhas ided suit
is ou IEwas Aitaed aded
Hhat Hhi' Suut is nd
junsdition Hin
also propor
ha ben
faid Page No
 SHIKHA
Date

hic wnitlen stetement

Deendant no.1 in d ok Sale ag enet
admited the eoeur Ps2,00, 000
seeipt
X and Beethei
pldinti 6nency'He
witheanest t
as
Reithet ctated
Hhe
taat he Sold H
gmaining coconieato'nA
p e t y to defend ant no2 Se, fed
Sit s iable to be dism
Suit
th Sut
plaintit
os4
in hic wttn Statement
Detend ant no.
elladedthat he he ho Kneldg
o.,peuiou agneem ent in espert o the
Mt n pdaintths iowi and
He hadpuhaie d t e Suit
n qitemaltne he aso
dlegea that plainthËs coas cnable to ama
he emaining comuicler aton and therufor
he deeli hed
wit tplaintt s eablo to e dismissed
with sit cest.
Her the aunayn
Cowt shau
ple
ÍSSues
trane
S.NO Tssues
lhetht time is he RASential
elen ent kor the eneuion ok
|Rndiny
Sale agreáment in between'
plaink and de7nd aat nol2
whetherdagendant
bonaft az uuna
ne2 is Dikproved
whethe ndant no, ?Is poned
Page No.
 SHIKHA
Date

i able
agnement in between
plaintist and dogendand no.T?
hethe þlaintióf is eady Proned
and widing. t pltoman
sald' aeementl
his pat in Sale
ulhether Hhe plaint66 1s Le
sale aqrement 'against
no.
Aordíngto.

Tssue mo l analysis and dekminatiom

As pe Selton (02 Indian Evidene Aet

18 72 nanin
heneinattex asLEA) and as per
Latin manm Atoi iumait (9nu boban?
Hhe bwolen of po iu on plainits
To dis charge Hhi's londen , ptelintit
Riout enahined himgedf as praseion
uitncs (Pw-)x, He "depeed in his
uiea eranination Hhat enteed nto
lten agreemert wuith
weith clekendant no.I
Sale ot o6 defend ant no1, y.
a Sum o00 Hesih
Hhat he Wad paid Rs 2,0 o, 000 as
eainet money Suh agnement eneuted
20 th une 996 . an os this
peemeut withi n 6 mon mthe
dat of aement Plaintijs cepoit
Page No.
 SHIKHA
Date|

Hhend umaining eonsi deraton to

e sheu eeeute a Sale
defendantno 1.
debd io
fanowr ot plai ottfk but dind ant no1
fraudulently seldhe suit to

defendat no.
6 monh At
pdesati on
Ru to, o0,D0 0 pn 2nd D'eemb B9 6.
Hhe ime of sale, he
ohjuti on appicaton i Sub
ReojtstaY C a CEX p2) , He produe d
(Ep) Sal gme ement (EX-e cectity
e Sale Udeed o detendant no.2
a p i c ion sale adieutln Ex -P3)
is testmong.Ln cos
enaniddion, "esimong is annettecd.
(Puw-2), A duped in hi s
anunatHon tht e Sal scibe
and
Coneement in beueen
aelendant and plainil the ontent
w CAcodi
dintB on q the paties. Dn
eraninaon tatimony is wnrebutted.
Sub- Raqistrar
erainatio
epoec in
cehen egstoud
hen fildd cn afpilaton
he
He pnduled
uhih is

Page No.
 enannaton, oepied on
-enaninati 2
admited nen no semafing
ge abou'
Kow
not
-PI)
Er
C dendant
Plaintbndantenaninaton
noss
Ln
uith ne
D anclon a a loetwan Page
No.
oedain
uy kt hat eted &
no.3
detntant
a
no.1
e ent fosrainti SaletHe
pymnt nold
(Du-) s
He
unretted, cros
degendant
Y agrum
enainaton to is2no,
Bdeendart
wnebtted.
2 wven
elaineton
e nebtct. in
Dn Ln
to ement
nable o4 Hed
.
nd hen efusll
He Gannot
he isofsale 2 oh
witin6nonhno.need'
money
TEA into
ented mstbe
amest
money
plaint$t
paymen tmong
tes
o! 8,00,vo%
Rs Condleat
aferdont
s
LeUe Pw-3)z
hiaHhegree -Comideaton Tpeio
19 ehci sale
Ror he tesimony testm
ony ph
SetionDw) deer (Dw-2)
then' en
to beccuse
Hhat is
Date
M the he Scle
V
 lauttin
te
sipad
SHIKHA-eeainaticopatiu
he plantft
from
the on
plaintt beidting
sunaeand Suek
fhe
termu wittg72
exeuutt towads
the at
Fhe
opon
tntentiont
befoeSale
dementCowt
Lgreement(EX
-pl)
eicleuues pe
itHae
dafendantra!
has
to
he and A cotçn
th tor a to
nsed eeution
for
dement makes
i at aut Page
No.
csDSS botth essentiaJ ho.d it Conto
whee
Reil Suit
a Gmonthscontent,
atqeestion
alsne (wCUs
t
degandant parsSu
dH
In Todian ubntrau
So,
in.this
tme
veldahle
is
citneses o00
hau CUment B
podes
hat e n
but
not
akendant
tin
imortnt
0o, Sale
deed
a
he 2,he o
d to
dsuo
atono
emainNng
cue
Hisneny
o nd tue m Pamise
He
matle
to
ct benes
peipiea
Amel
Hhe Ry
that tin 55
of uhet and
tsimony
and
condoT Loth
tdmoy on at
hestatu
d the Tn SeH
mest adnied to said
Contrat
money the
/
to cae
Cowxt
tixed gree
Date A he he Hhe
A o
 plaintK
and
nol
nel
noC,
Issve and
and ot sHme
Hhe
at bel-weenon puwhuer
esentl
en
betwe
(ou)
Lestmong
vodable
sContrat
by
t dui
Sale
andSale
on
acheement
deett
daeerm

miat
and Issve
plauet6
aeement
dee the
Hhe

that
yeneas
thet
time
dStepulate
Atkefisesed
out
2,
no. subRugis
I on icragseenent
uzirdiscws fide det
the

no.
dCooboYate
plainih6coendantto
ing
PstabDosad
tm
Hme

andof
analysis
att
no1 detemi

betore conts
on boia
is of

Hhe
detndant
and
prainst dant
solaldesen
Pw)
has aceoYin
scbbed
e
sale ansed Ex-pu)b
obeton
deed Hhate
ha
of
Cis
nobmed
non
d Capendant
no propo
2dendantu 4
of "Hae'
befoe
no noti
So, h lcontent
fheon
monydant
(Pw-i) ed etemnt uestt Tsse
Ctai opion caibb
Rom Ater
Issue degen
t
.he esti
Date
he
 cobss-eamunatton
SHIKHA Vnabe adising qood
teaith hethe
dlendantno
note
to
Ponent a
not'
Lhdian
çmitotion
Aet uuth
in noimportant
analysis
and qeston
deteminaton
erept cs and 1SSe
no.
Isue aneehnn
Hepopocy
be pe'son
ph But
in
his
cuhich Speife lohcy care
a o pvp
ald
Set
cidejpoty
Heue,
Tss.
ma le
in
Qen
contcs duit po Dh Page
No.
plointo
monaybet at
and die
done
badtait
aton
y notawith the Sut
he
had conts wnlue
is
ent
dyneem
and t
any Hhe Diqinal
contrut he
theutor,
Bhe
cout
cst
detemin
te no. to
inpuulhased
to doe
- t e&o rtranfoee
m
e tor ad ad
ted agmeement
that (w the
Hing d.Dispove
that
(pw-3)
19 P o n unt
that dent He bedoe
Aftr
Selon ane
Dw-3 (Pu-3)
nietire
Subse
ottenion fawew sbe
nota nd oused
it Sale
196 kutl
Date
 he
liou
31

a hu'piyomad
met
ontsat s
pmiss
pelire
faintihp
'maletd
agreement he
also
but feyodant
end
theno.i
hat
s n6
diable
'for

ueson
q
ab
e
het
uing
sala
Past
jn

money
eanet erutie
Ror
Rinanuely
appoalhe
Qnel
No.
Page
SeiÔnbespelineno
hat mles ahis dude
t Dssue and atcnt
inpo
nent
dalendant cout
deteminetion
ndant
tuatfe
cnd shous
kutale plaiatitt LAhalysis nd
pnpoty
suit on
e, he
gune no.
to
eny
that ite
paet(EX-PI) Hen the ant
degernd
the
|87
2At, pe
Hhelr ceoly 8t Cyoeenment
efoepertomedetendaut
neto nss
'Heas
ontratW,
prnis At of plainit Sreund
Lonst to
omise
intentin
wch ependa poned
tofailed
no
te
aused
id is
taulid Rte
Date A
 Date
-p/) he
Sale aqreement (Ex defnant na2
suiE
LadCon tenHonpojeort to (Dw-z)
4nd he pw-)ehlble to
Hhat the plaint4$ semaiing
CArahge
Congidation
thoneyo
not
pay
enle becule
provcles thot no
feton peited
be
to be det n to contaddd

toong enidonws (Ex -P)P2)

ded by plaintt sho ug t h t he has
tekten pebther `eps fo the fetoman
contocut
was heady and u
he
to is Part contaut.
ned
Aftes Hhe detemindHon q 16s nor ,a
n t qwwton cuised befere te
whethee plainkt s oniHe for speukt'e
fetoanel controt. Ac
corci nq to
pergomnanee congts a t sha
ehorud Hhe
sulaet to He
is iong Vontained
Sution ) , setion 4 anc seuhion)6.
n immovao
wnden Seton 9
is n t RA,
CCye
adeqeat ouluef n
Sueh trtrut .
Cet oncucle
RutiH eet
Page No.
Date

cOrtscut . Hene ssue no.V 1S

dobemnination
Tsse 0 anclysis and
ters dutenn ation 6t abee issues,
C
olewee ha
contact
ndl
ihst dgndent no,
SRA well as
eheis
Salu deed n
Depenantod shalU ee t
fave date
plaunt6f deeee
hal be dopo t a seImainirq
Ry 6, opDo0thin 1 month

hau ber on suit cost as

Delndantno. I shol
Sut cost
Aceorcing to Avole Aet, p6 l, a tecty
adocote pee is jncuded in Suit Cos
sign
lass,
ennent is
deudt somed and
ponouned in open
cot today
laus