Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Mga Tao Sa Kapehan
Mga Tao Sa Kapehan
A. Introduction
2. The audit was conducted in accordance with applicable legal and regulatory
requirements, and the Philippine Public Sector Standards on Auditing. Those
standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain a reasonable basis for
our conclusions.
3. The audit covered the accounts and operations of the municipal government
for the year 2019 and was aimed at ascertaining the propriety of financial
transactions, management’s compliance to prescribed rules and regulations and the
fairness of the presentation of the financial statements. Value for money audit was
also conducted on the selection and implementation of projects funded out of the
20% Development Fund and Trust Fund, with the objective to determine whether
the purposes of the projects were attained in the most efficient, effective and
economical manner.
B. Financial Highlights
C. Audit Opinion
ii. The Municipality failed to record in the books of accounts the unused
portion of the employees earned leave credits amounting to P14,202,034.78 as
of December 31, 2019 contrary to Paragraph 11 of the Philippine Accounting
Standards (PAS) 19 and no fund was set-up for the same thereby may affect
the timely and expeditious release of the retirement pay and other benefits of
all retiring employees of the Municipality as required in Section 1 of Republic
Act No. 101541.
5. For the above-mentioned audit observations which have caused the issuance
of a qualified opinion, we recommended the following:
i. The Municipality was not able to administer the Harmonized Gender and
Development Guidelines (HGDG) tool in the conduct of gender analysis on
its program, projects and activities (PPAs) contrary to Section 3.1 (a) of
PCW-DILG- DBM-NEDA Joint Memorandum Circular No. 2016-01 dated
January 12, 2016, thus, casting doubts on the propriety of LGU’s programs
and projects that the LGU attributed to the GAD Budget.
ii. Collections were not recorded daily in the cashbooks. Recording was
made only upon remittance which is not in compliant with Section 181 of
Government Accounting and Auditing Manual (GAAM) Vol. I, Handling,
custody and disposition of the cashbook.
iii. Infrastructure projects inspected did not have the prescribed signboards
containing the necessary information and specifications pursuant to COA
Circular No. 2013-004 dated January 30, 2013, thus, promotion of good
governance through transparency and accountability, and to secure the right
of the people to information of matters of public concern was not optimally
delivered to the general public.