ASSIGNMENT EDU 406

ID: bc230429834

Question No 01:

Critical analysis of David Boud (1985) and Atkins & Murphy (1994) reflective model.

Solution:

Introduction
Reflective practice is an essential component of learning and personal growth. Two prominent
models, David Boud's (1985) model and Atkins & Murphy's (1994) model, contribute to this
field by offering frameworks that guide individuals in reflecting on their experiences and
promoting effective learning. In this analysis, we will delve into both models, examining their
strengths and weaknesses, and ultimately explore how they can be combined to a more
comprehensive approach to thinking.
David Boud1985) Model
Davidoud's model of reflection is a cyclical process, allows for continuous learning and
improvement time. It encourages individuals to reflect on concrete experiences, providing a
practical and hands-on approach to learning. One of the key strengths of this model is its
emphasis on acting based on reflection. This critical step is vital for translating insights gained
through reflection into practical outcomes.
However, Boud's model also has its weaknesses. One of the notable weaknesses is its lack of
specificity. The model is relatively broad, offering minimal guidance on structuring reflective
thinking. This can make it challenging for individuals, especially novices, to effectively apply
the model. Additionally, the model assumes that individuals possess inherent reflective skills,
disregarding the fact that some individuals may require more guidance on engaging in effective
reflection.
Atkins & Murphy's (1994) Model
Atkins & Murphy's model of reflection provides a structured framework with clear stages,
making it accessible for individuals who are new to reflective practice. Recognizing the role of
emotions in the reflective process, this model integrates personal feelings and reactions,
acknowledging that they are integral to learning from experiences. Furthermore, this model is
designed with practical application in mind, making it suitable for various professions and
contexts.
However, the linear approach of Atkins & Murphy's model might oversimplify the complex and
iterative nature of reflective practice. Reflection in real-life often involves revisiting and
reassessing earlier stages, which the linear progression fails to fully capture. Moreover, some
individuals may perceive the model as too rigid, preferring more flexibility in their reflective
practice. This rigidity may make it difficult to neatly fit certain experiences into the prescribed
stages.

Comparative Analysis
Let's compare the two models to gain a deeper understanding of their strengths and weaknesses:

Flexibility vs. Structure

Boud's model prioritizes flexibility and adaptability, making it well-suited for various contexts.
On the other hand, Atkins & Murphy's model offers a clear structure with defined stages. The
choice between the two depends on individual preferences and the specific nature of the
reflective task at hand.
Emphasis on Action
Both models acknowledge the importance of translating reflection into action. They align with
the notion that reflective practice should lead to practical improvements by actively applying the
insights gained through reflection.
Consideration of Emotions

Atkins & Murphy's model explicitly integrates emotions into the reflective process, recognizing
their profound role in shaping perceptions and facilitating learning. This emphasis on emotions
adds depth and authenticity to the reflective practice.
Conclusion
In conclusion, both Boud's (1985) model and Atkins & Murphy's (1994) model boast unique
strengths and weaknesses. The suitability of each model depends on individual preferences and
the specific context in which reflective practice is applied. However, by combining elements
from both models, we can create a more comprehensive and effective approach to reflective
thinking. Remember, reflective practice is a journey of personal growth, and finding the model or
combination that resonates with you is key to unlocking its full potential.

Question No: 02

Suggestions regarding suitability of model in terms of its application along with

justification

Solution:

Reflective Models: Choosing the Right Approach

When it comes to reflective practice, selecting the most suitable reflective model depends on
various factors. These factors include personal preferences, the specific context in which
reflection takes place, and the nature of the experiences being reflected upon. In this article, we
will explore three different models and their justifications for application. Let's dive in!
1. David Boud's Model: Embracing Open-Ended Reflection

Suitability:
Experienced Reflectors: Boud's model is best suited for individuals who already possess strong
reflective skills and appreciate a more open-ended and cyclical approach.
Justification:
Flexibility for Diverse Contexts: Boud's model offers flexibility that can be applied across
diverse professional contexts. Its cyclical nature is particularly conducive to ongoing, continuous
improvement, making it valuable in settings where learning is a continual process.
Encouraging Self-Directed Learning: This model fosters self-directed learning, empowering
individuals to take ownership of their reflective practice. It encourages autonomy, allowing
individuals to adapt the model to their own needs and styles.

2. Atkins & Murphy's Model: A Systematic Approach

Suitability:
Novice Reflectors: Atkins & Murphy's model is more suitable for individuals who are new to
reflective practice or those who benefit from a more structured and systematic approach.
Justification:

Clear Structure for Beginners: Atkins & Murphy's model provides a step-by-step guide, making
it accessible for individuals who may find open-ended reflection challenging. It offers a clear
starting point for those less familiar with the reflective process.
Integration of Emotions: For professions where emotions play a significant role, such as
healthcare or teaching, this model's explicit consideration of emotions can be highly beneficial. It
allows individuals to delve into and better understand the emotional aspects of their experiences.

3. The Combined Approach: Achieving Comprehensive Reflection

Suitability:
Comprehensive Reflection: Combining elements of both models can provide a more holistic
approach to reflection. Starting with Atkins & Murphy's structured stages and incorporating
Boud's cyclical reflection allows for a balanced and comprehensive reflective practice.
Justification:
Structured Beginning and Cyclical Refinement: Atkins & Murphy's model lays a structured
foundation for reflection, ensuring individuals systematically engage with their experiences. As
individuals gain more experience, incorporating Boud's cyclical approach allows for ongoing
improvement and refinement.

Adaptability to Varied Experiences: A combined approach offers the flexibility to adapt reflective
practice to different types of experiences. The structured beginning provides a systematic
approach, while cyclical refinement accommodates the dynamic and iterative nature of reflective
learning.

Ultimately, the choice between these models or a combined approach depends on the individual
reflector's preferences, the specific context, and the learning objectives of the reflective practice.
There is no one-size-fits-all solution, and individuals may find value in experimenting with
different approaches to discover what works best for them. Remember, reflective practice is a
personal journey that can be tailored to fit individual needs and contexts. So, embrace the model
that resonates with you and embark on your reflective journey today!