Professional Documents
Culture Documents
WAP and XML-Unit V
WAP and XML-Unit V
Attributes,
Empty Tags,
5
C H A P T E R
✦ ✦ ✦ ✦
Attributes
Attributes versus
Y
elements
ou can encode a given set of data in XML in nearly
an infinite number of ways. There’s no one right Empty tags
way to do it although some ways are more right than others,
and some are more appropriate for particular uses. In this XSL
chapter, we explore a different solution to the problem of
marking up baseball statistics in XML, carrying over the ✦ ✦ ✦ ✦
baseball example from the previous chapter. Specifically,
we will address the use of attributes to store information
and empty tags to define element positions. In addition,
since CSS doesn’t work well with content-less XML
elements of this form, we’ll examine an alternative —
and more powerful — style sheet language called XSL.
Attributes
In the last chapter, all data was categorized into the name of
a tag or the contents of an element. This is a straightforward
and easy-to-understand approach, but it’s not the only one.
As in HTML, XML elements may have attributes. An attribute
is a name-value pair associated with an element. The name
and the value are each strings, and no element may contain
two attributes with the same name.
It has four attributes, the SRC attribute whose value is cup.gif, the WIDTH attribute
whose value is 89, the HEIGHT attribute whose value is 67, and the ALT attribute
whose value is Cup of coffee. However, in XML-unlike HTML-attribute values
must always be quoted and start tags must have matching close tags. Thus, the
XML equivalent of this tag is:
Note Another difference between HTML and XML is that XML assigns no particular
meaning to the IMG tag and its attributes. In particular, there’s no guarantee that
an XML browser will interpret this tag as an instruction to load and display the
image in the file cup.gif.
You can apply attribute syntax to the baseball example quite easily. This has the
advantage of making the markup somewhat more concise. For example, instead of
containing a YEAR child element, the SEASON element only needs a YEAR attribute.
<SEASON YEAR=”1998”>
</SEASON>
On the other hand, LEAGUE should be a child of the SEASON element rather than an
attribute. For one thing, there are two leagues in a season. Anytime there’s likely to
be more than one of something child elements are called for. Attribute names must
be unique within an element. Thus you should not, for example, write a SEASON
element like this:
The second reason LEAGUE is naturally a child element rather than an attribute is
that it has substructure; it is subdivided into DIVISION elements. Attribute values
are flat text. XML elements can conveniently encode structure-attribute values
cannot.
However, the name of a league is unstructured, flat text; and there’s only one name
per league so LEAGUE elements can easily have a NAME attribute instead of a
LEAGUE_NAME child element:
Since an attribute is more closely tied to its element than a child element is, you
don’t run into problems by using NAME instead of LEAGUE_NAME for the name of the
attribute. Divisions and teams can also have NAME attributes without any fear of
confusion with the name of a league. Since a tag can have more than one attribute
(as long as the attributes have different names), you can make a team’s city an
attribute as well, as shown below:
3236-7 ch05.F.qc 6/29/99 1:04 PM Page 97
Players will have a lot of attributes if you choose to make each statistic an attribute.
For example, here are Joe Girardi’s 1998 statistics as attributes:
Listing 5-1 uses this new attribute style for a complete XML document containing
the baseball statistics for the 1998 major league season. It displays the same
information (i.e., two leagues, six divisions, 30 teams, and nine players) as does
Listing 4-1 in the last chapter. It is merely marked up differently. Figure 5-1 shows
this document loaded into Internet Explorer 5.0 without a style sheet.
CAUGHT_STEALING=”3” SACRIFICE_HITS=”1”
SACRIFICE_FLIES=”8” ERRORS=”5” WALKS=”30”
STRUCK_OUT=”85” HIT_BY_PITCH=”6”>
</PLAYER>
<PLAYER GIVEN_NAME=”Ryan” SURNAME=”Klesko”
POSITION=”Outfield” GAMES=”129” GAMES_STARTED=”124”
AT_BATS=”427” RUNS=”69” HITS=”117” DOUBLES=”29”
TRIPLES=”1” HOME_RUNS=”18” RBI=”70” STEALS=”5”
CAUGHT_STEALING=”3” SACRIFICE_HITS=”0”
SACRIFICE_FLIES=”4” ERRORS=”2” WALKS=”56”
STRUCK_OUT=”66” HIT_BY_PITCH=”3”>
</PLAYER>
<PLAYER GIVEN_NAME=”Andres” SURNAME=”Galarraga”
POSITION=”First Base” GAMES=”153” GAMES_STARTED=”151”
AT_BATS=”555” RUNS=”103” HITS=”169” DOUBLES=”27”
TRIPLES=”1” HOME_RUNS=”44” RBI=”121” STEALS=”7”
CAUGHT_STEALING=”6” SACRIFICE_HITS=”0”
SACRIFICE_FLIES=”5” ERRORS=”11” WALKS=”63”
STRUCK_OUT=”146” HIT_BY_PITCH=”25”>
</PLAYER>
<PLAYER GIVEN_NAME=”Wes” SURNAME=”Helms”
POSITION=”Third Base” GAMES=”7” GAMES_STARTED=”2”
AT_BATS=”13” RUNS=”2” HITS=”4” DOUBLES=”1”
TRIPLES=”0” HOME_RUNS=”1” RBI=”2” STEALS=”0”
CAUGHT_STEALING=”0” SACRIFICE_HITS=”0”
SACRIFICE_FLIES=”0” ERRORS=”1” WALKS=”0”
STRUCK_OUT=”4” HIT_BY_PITCH=”0”>
</PLAYER>
</TEAM>
<TEAM CITY=”Florida” NAME=”Marlins”>
</TEAM>
<TEAM CITY=”Montreal” NAME=”Expos”>
</TEAM>
<TEAM CITY=”New York” NAME=”Mets”>
</TEAM>
<TEAM CITY=”Philadelphia” NAME=”Phillies”>
</TEAM>
</DIVISION>
<DIVISION NAME=”Central”>
<TEAM CITY=”Chicago” NAME=”Cubs”>
</TEAM>
<TEAM CITY=”Cincinnati” NAME=”Reds”>
</TEAM>
<TEAM CITY=”Houston” NAME=”Astros”>
</TEAM>
<TEAM CITY=”Milwaukee” NAME=”Brewers”>
</TEAM>
<TEAM CITY=”Pittsburgh” NAME=”Pirates”>
</TEAM>
<TEAM CITY=”St. Louis” NAME=”Cardinals”>
</TEAM>
</DIVISION>
Continued
3236-7 ch05.F.qc 6/29/99 1:04 PM Page 100
Listing 5-1 uses only attributes for player information. Listing 4-1 used only element
content. There are intermediate approaches as well. For example, you could make
the player’s name part of element content while leaving the rest of the statistics as
attributes, like this:
<P>
On Tuesday <PLAYER GAMES=”78” AT_BATS=”254” RUNS=”31”
HITS=”70” DOUBLES=”11” TRIPLES=”4” HOME_RUNS=”3”
RUNS_BATTED_IN=”31” WALKS=”14” STRIKE_OUTS=”38”
STOLEN_BASES=”2” CAUGHT_STEALING=”4”
SACRIFICE_FLY=”1” SACRIFICE_HIT=”8”
HIT_BY_PITCH=”2”>Joe Girardi</PLAYER> struck out twice
and...
</P>
This would include Joe Girardi’s name in the text of a page while still making his
statistics available to readers who want to look deeper, as a hypertext footnote or
tool tip. There’s always more than one way to encode the same data. Which way
you pick generally depends on the needs of your specific application.
To differentiate between data and meta-data, ask yourself whether someone reading
the document would want to see a particular piece of information. If the answer is
yes, then the information probably belongs in a child element. If the answer is no,
then the information probably belongs in an attribute. If all tags were stripped from
the document along with all the attributes, the basic information should still be
present. Attributes are good places to put ID numbers, URLs, references, and other
information not directly or immediately relevant to the reader. However, there are
many exceptions to the basic principal of storing meta-data as attributes. These
include:
Structured Meta-data
One important principal to remember is that elements can have substructure and
attributes can’t. This makes elements far more flexible, and may convince you to
encode meta-data as child elements. For example, suppose you’re writing a paper
and you want to include a source for a fact. It might look something like this:
Clearly the information “The Biographical History of Baseball, Donald Dewey and
Nicholas Acocella (New York: Carroll & Graf Publishers, Inc. 1995) p. 169” is
meta-data. It is not the fact itself. Rather it is information about the fact. However,
the SOURCE attribute contains a lot of implicit substructure. You might find it more
useful to organize the information like this:
<SOURCE>
<AUTHOR>Donald Dewey</AUTHOR>
<AUTHOR>Nicholas Acocella</AUTHOR>
<BOOK>
<TITLE>The Biographical History of Baseball</TITLE>
<PAGES>169</PAGES>
<YEAR>1995</YEAR>
</BOOK>
</SOURCE>
Dates are another common example. One common piece of meta-data about
scholarly articles is the date the article was first received. This is important for
establishing priority of discovery and invention. It’s easy to include a DATE
attribute in an ARTICLE tag like this:
<ARTICLE DATE=”06/28/1969”>
Polymerase Reactions in Organic Compounds
</ARTICLE>
However, the DATE attribute has substructure signified by the /. Getting that
structure out of the attribute value, however, is much more difficult than reading
child elements of a DATE element, as shown below:
3236-7 ch05.F.qc 6/29/99 1:04 PM Page 103
<DATE>
<YEAR>1969</YEAR>
<MONTH>06</MONTH>
<DAY>28</DAY>
</DATE>
For instance, with CSS or XSL, it’s easy to format the day and month invisibly so
that only the year appears. For example, using CSS:
If the DATE is stored as an attribute, however, there’s no easy way to access only
part of it. You must write a separate program in a programming language like
ECMAScript or Java that can parse your date format. It’s easier to use the standard
XML tools and child elements.
Furthermore, the attribute syntax is ambiguous. What does the date “10/11/1999”
signify? In particular, is it October 11th or November 10th? Readers from different
countries will interpret this data differently. Even if your parser understands one
format, there’s no guarantee the people entering the data will enter it correctly. The
XML, by contrast, is unambiguous.
Finally, using DATE children rather than attributes allows more than one date to be
associated with an element. For instance, scholarly articles are often returned to
the author for revisions. In these cases, it can also be important to note when the
revised article was received. For example:
<ARTICLE>
<TITLE>
Maximum Projectile Velocity in an Augmented Railgun
</TITLE>
<AUTHOR>Elliotte Harold</AUTHOR>
<AUTHOR>Bruce Bukiet</AUTHOR>
<AUTHOR>William Peter</AUTHOR>
<DATE>
<YEAR>1992</YEAR>
<MONTH>10</MONTH>
<DAY>29</DAY>
</DATE>
<DATE>
<YEAR>1993</YEAR>
<MONTH>10</MONTH>
<DAY>26</DAY>
</DATE>
</ARTICLE>
3236-7 ch05.F.qc 6/29/99 1:04 PM Page 104
As another example, consider the ALT attribute of an IMG tag in HTML. This is
limited to a single string of text. However, given that a picture is worth a thousand
words, you might well want to replace an IMG with marked up text. For instance,
consider the pie chart shown in Figure 5-2.
6%
7% 20%
6%
6%
19% 27%
9%
Starting Pitcher Relief Pitcher Catcher Outfield First Base Shortstop Second Base Third Base
Using an ALT attribute, the best description of this picture you can provide is:
<IMG SRC=”05021.gif”
ALT=”Pie Chart of Positions in Major League Baseball”
WIDTH=”819” HEIGHT=”623”>
</IMG>
However, with an ALT child element, you have more flexibility because you can
embed markup. For example, you might provide a table of the relevant numbers
instead of a pie chart.
3236-7 ch05.F.qc 6/29/99 1:04 PM Page 105
You might even provide the actual Postscript, SVG, or VML code to render the
picture in the event that the bitmap image is not available.
Meta-Meta-Data
Using elements for meta-data also easily allows for meta-meta-data, or information
about the information about the information. For example, the author of a poem
may be considered to be meta-data about the poem. The language in which that
author’s name is written is data about the meta-data about the poem. This isn’t a
trivial concern, especially for distinctly non-Roman languages. For instance, is the
author of the Odyssey Homer or ______? If you use elements, it’s easy to write:
<POET LANGUAGE=”English”>Homer</POET>
<POET LANGUAGE=”Greek”>______</POET>
3236-7 ch05.F.qc 6/29/99 1:04 PM Page 106
However, if POET is an attribute rather than a child element, you’re stuck with
unwieldy constructs like this:
And it’s even more bulky if you want to provide both the poet’s English and Greek
names.
In fact, you may change your mind about what’s meta and what’s data. What’s only
tangentially relevant today, may become crucial to you next week. You can use style
sheets to hide unimportant elements today, and change the style sheets to reveal
them later. However, it’s more difficult to later reveal information that was first
stored in an attribute. Usually, this requires rewriting the document itself rather
than simply changing the style sheet.
For instance, you may now only need to store the name of the author of an article,
and you may not need to distinguish between the first and last names. However, in
the future you may uncover a need to store first and last names, e-mail addresses,
institution, snail mail address, URL, and more. If you’ve stored the author of the
article as an element, then it’s easy to add child elements to include this additional
information.
3236-7 ch05.F.qc 6/29/99 1:04 PM Page 107
Although any such change will probably require some revision of your documents,
style sheets, and associated programs, it’s still much easier to change a simple
element to a tree of elements than it is to make an attribute a tree of elements.
However, if you used an attribute, then you’re stuck. It’s quite difficult to extend
your attribute syntax beyond the region it was originally designed for.
Furthermore, attributes are appropriate for simple information about the document
that has nothing to do with the content of the document. For example, it is often
useful to assign an ID attribute to each element. This is a unique string possessed
only by one element in the document. You can then use this string for a variety of
tasks including linking to particular elements of the document, even if the elements
move around as the document changes over time. For example:
<SOURCE ID=”S1”>
<AUTHOR ID=”A1”>Donald Dewey</AUTHOR>
<AUTHOR ID=”A2”>Nicholas Acocella</AUTHOR>
<BOOK ID=”B1”>
<TITLE ID=”B2”>
The Biographical History of Baseball
</TITLE>
<PAGES ID=”B3”>169</PAGES>
<YEAR ID=”B4”>1995</YEAR>
</BOOK>
</SOURCE>
Cross- You’ll see more examples of this when XLL, the Extensible Linking Language, is dis-
Reference cussed in Chapter 16, XLinks, and Chapter 17, XPointers.
3236-7 ch05.F.qc 6/29/99 1:04 PM Page 108
Attributes are also often used to store document-specific style information. For
example, if TITLE elements are generally rendered as bold text but if you want
to make just one TITLE element both bold and italic, you might write something
like this:
This enables the style information to be embedded without changing the tree
structure of the document. While ideally you’d like to use a separate element, this
scheme gives document authors somewhat more control when they cannot add
elements to the tag set they’re working with. For example, the Webmaster of a site
might require the use of a particular DTD and not want to allow everyone to modify
the DTD. Nonetheless, they want to allow them to make minor adjustments to
individual pages. Use this scheme with restraint, however, or you’ll soon find
yourself back in the HTML hell XML was supposed to save us from, where
formatting is freely intermixed with meaning and documents are no longer
maintainable.
The final reason to use attributes is to maintain compatibility with HTML. To the
extent that you’re using tags that at least look similar to HTML such as <IMG>, <P>,
and <TD>, you might as well employ the standard HTML attributes for these tags.
This has the double advantage of enabling legacy browsers to at least partially
parse and display your document, and of being more familiar to the people writing
the documents.
Empty Tags
Last chapter’s no-attribute approach was an extreme position. It’s also possible to
swing to the other extreme — storing all the information in the attributes and none
in the content. In general, I don’t recommend this approach. Storing all the
information in element content — while equally extreme — is much easier to work
with in practice. However, this section entertains the possibility of using only
attributes for the sake of elucidation.
As long as you know the element will have no content, you can use empty tags as a
short cut. Rather than including both a start and an end tag you can include one
empty tag. Empty tags are distinguished from start tags by a closing /> instead of
simply a closing >. For instance, instead of <PLAYER></PLAYER> you would write
<PLAYER/>.
Empty tags may contain attributes. For example, here’s an empty tag for Joe Girardi
with several attributes:
SACRIFICE_FLY=”1” SACRIFICE_HIT=”8”
HIT_BY_PITCH=”2”/>
XML parsers treat this identically to the non-empty equivalent. This PLAYER
element is precisely equal (though not identical) to the previous PLAYER element
formed with an empty tag.
XSL
Attributes are visible in an XML source view of the document as shown in Figure
5-1. However, once a CSS style sheet is applied the attributes disappear. Figure 5-3
shows Listing 5-1 once the baseball stats style sheet from the previous chapter is
applied. It looks like a blank document because CSS styles only apply to element
content, not to attributes. If you use CSS, any data you want to display to the
reader should be part of an element’s content rather than one of its attributes.
However, there is an alternative style sheet language that does allow you to access
and display attribute data. This language is the Extensible Style Language (XSL);
and it is also supported by Internet Explorer 5.0, at least in part. XSL is divided into
two sections, transformations and formatting.
The transformation part of XSL enables you to replace one tag with another. You
can define rules that replace your XML tags with standard HTML tags, or with
HTML tags plus CSS attributes. You can also do a lot more including reordering the
elements in the document and adding additional content that was never present in
the XML document.
<HTML>
<HEAD>
<TITLE>
XSL Instructions to get the title
</TITLE>
</HEAD>
<H1>XSL Instructions to get the title</H1>
<BODY>
XSL Instructions to get the statistics
</BODY>
</HTML>
The italicized sections will be replaced by particular XSL elements that copy data
from the underlying XML document into this template. You can apply this template
to many different data sets. For instance, if the template is designed to work with
the baseball example, then the same style sheet can display statistics from different
seasons.
3236-7 ch05.F.qc 6/29/99 1:04 PM Page 111
This may remind you of some server-side include schemes for HTML. In fact, this
is very much like server-side includes. However, the actual transformation of the
source XML document and XSL style sheet takes place on the client rather than on
the server. Furthermore, the output document does not have to be HTML. It can be
any well-formed XML.
XSL instructions can retrieve any data stored in the elements of the XML document.
This includes element content, element names, and, most importantly for our
example, element attributes. Particular elements are chosen by a pattern that
considers the element’s name, its value, its attributes’ names and values, its
absolute and relative position in the tree structure of the XML document, and
more. Once the data is extracted from an element, it can be moved, copied, and
manipulated in a variety of ways. We won’t cover everything you can do with XML
transformations in this brief introduction. However, you will learn to use XSL to
write some pretty amazing documents that can be viewed on the Web right away.
<xsl:template match=”/”>
<HTML xmlns:xsl=”http://www.w3.org/TR/WD-xsl”>
<HEAD>
<TITLE>
Major League Baseball Statistics
</TITLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY>
<H1>Major League Baseball Statistics</H1>
<HR></HR>
Copyright 1999
<A HREF=”http://www.macfaq.com/personal.html”>
Elliotte Rusty Harold
</A>
Continued
3236-7 ch05.F.qc 6/29/99 1:04 PM Page 112
</BODY>
</HTML>
</xsl:template>
</xsl:stylesheet>
<?xml version=”1.0”?>
<xsl:stylesheet xmlns:xsl=”http://www.w3.org/TR/WD-xsl”>
<xsl:template match=”/”>
HTML file goes here
</xsl:template>
</xsl:stylesheet>
Listing 5-2 is not only an XSL style sheet; it’s also a well-formed XML document.
It begins with an XML declaration. The root element of this document is xsl:
stylesheet. This style sheet contains a single template for the XML data
encoded as an xsl:template element. The xsl:template element has a match
attribute with the value / and its content is a well-formed HTML document. It’s
not a coincidence that the output HTML is well-formed. Because the HTML must
first be part of an XSL style sheet, and because XSL style sheets are well-formed
XML documents, all the HTML in a XSL style sheet must be well-formed.
The Web browser tries to match parts of the XML document against each
xsl:template element. The / template matches the root of the document; that is
the entire document itself. The browser reads the template and inserts data from
the XML document where indicated by XSL instructions. However, this particular
template contains no XSL instructions, so its contents are merely copied verbatim
into the Web browser, producing the output you see in Figure 5-4. Notice that Figure
5-4 does not display any data from the XML document, only from the XSL template.
3236-7 ch05.F.qc 6/29/99 1:04 PM Page 113
Attaching the XSL style sheet of Listing 5-2 to the XML document in Listing 5-1 is
straightforward. Simply add a <?xml-stylesheet?> processing instruction with a
type attribute with value text/xsl and an href attribute that points to the style
sheet between the XML declaration and the root element. For example:
<?xml version=”1.0”?>
<?xml-stylesheet type=”text/xsl” href=”5-2.xsl”?>
<SEASON YEAR=”1998”>
...
This is the same way a CSS style sheet is attached to a document. The only
difference is that the type attribute is text/xsl instead of text/css.
Figure 5-4: The data from the XML document, not the XSL
template, is missing after application of the XSL style sheet in
Listing 5-2.
The Title
Of course there was something rather obvious missing from Figure 5-4 — the data!
Although the style sheet in Listing 5-2 displays something (unlike the CSS style
sheet of Figure 5-3) it doesn’t show any data from the XML document. To add this,
you need to use XSL instruction elements to copy data from the source XML
document into the XSL template. Listing 5-3 adds the necessary XSL instructions to
extract the YEAR attribute from the SEASON element and insert it in the TITLE and
H1 header of the resulting document. Figure 5-5 shows the rendered document.
3236-7 ch05.F.qc 6/29/99 1:04 PM Page 114
<xsl:template match=”/”>
<HTML xmlns:xsl=”http://www.w3.org/TR/WD-xsl”>
<HEAD>
<TITLE>
<xsl:for-each select=”SEASON”>
<xsl:value-of select=”@YEAR”/>
</xsl:for-each>
Major League Baseball Statistics
</TITLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY>
<xsl:for-each select=”SEASON”>
<H1>
<xsl:value-of select=”@YEAR”/>
Major League Baseball Statistics
</H1>
</xsl:for-each>
<HR></HR>
Copyright 1999
<A HREF=”http://www.macfaq.com/personal.html”>
Elliotte Rusty Harold
</A>
<BR />
<A HREF=”mailto:elharo@metalab.unc.edu”>
elharo@metalab.unc.edu
</A>
</BODY>
</HTML>
</xsl:template>
</xsl:stylesheet>
The new XSL instructions that extract the YEAR attribute from the SEASON element are:
<xsl:for-each select=”SEASON”>
<xsl:value-of select=”@YEAR”/>
</xsl:for-each>
3236-7 ch05.F.qc 6/29/99 1:04 PM Page 115
Figure 5-5: Listing 5-1 after application of the XSL style sheet
in Listing 5-3
These instructions appear twice because we want the year to appear twice in the
output document-once in the H1 header and once in the TITLE. Each time they
appear, these instructions do the same thing. <xsl:for-each select=”SEASON”>
finds all SEASON elements. <xsl:value-of select=”@YEAR”/> inserts the value
of the YEAR attribute of the SEASON element — that is, the string “1998” — found by
<xsl:for-each select=”SEASON”>.
XSL instructions are distinguished from output elements like HTML and H1 because
the instructions are in the xsl namespace. That is, the names of all XSL elements
begin with xsl:. The namespace is identified by the xmlns:xsl attribute of the
root element of the style sheet. In Listings 5-2, 5-3, and all other examples in this
book, the value of that attribute is http://www.w3.org/TR/WD-xsl.
<xsl:template match=”/”>
<HTML xmlns:xsl=”http://www.w3.org/TR/WD-xsl”>
<HEAD>
<TITLE>
<xsl:for-each select=”SEASON”>
<xsl:value-of select=”@YEAR”/>
</xsl:for-each>
<xsl:for-each select=”SEASON”>
<H1>
<xsl:value-of select=”@YEAR”/>
Major League Baseball Statistics
</H1>
<xsl:for-each select=”LEAGUE”>
<H2 ALIGN=”CENTER”>
<xsl:value-of select=”@NAME”/>
</H2>
</xsl:for-each>
</xsl:for-each>
<HR></HR>
Copyright 1999
<A HREF=”http://www.macfaq.com/personal.html”>
Elliotte Rusty Harold
</A>
<BR />
<A HREF=”mailto:elharo@metalab.unc.edu”>
elharo@metalab.unc.edu
</A>
</BODY>
</HTML>
</xsl:template>
</xsl:stylesheet>
3236-7 ch05.F.qc 6/29/99 1:04 PM Page 117
<xsl:for-each select=”SEASON”>
<H1>
<xsl:value-of select=”@YEAR”/>
Major League Baseball Statistics
</H1>
<xsl:for-each select=”LEAGUE”>
<H2 ALIGN=”CENTER”>
<xsl:value-of select=”@NAME”/>
</H2>
</xsl:for-each>
</xsl:for-each>
The outermost instruction says to select the SEASON element. With that element
selected, we then find the YEAR attribute of that element and place it between <H1>
and </H1> along with the extra text Major League Baseball Statistics. Next,
the browser loops through each LEAGUE child of the selected SEASON and places
the value of its NAME attribute between <H2 ALIGN=”CENTER”> and </H2>.
Although there’s only one xsl:for-each matching a LEAGUE element, it loops over
all the LEAGUE elements that are immediate children of the SEASON element. Thus,
this template works for anywhere from zero to an indefinite number of leagues.
The same technique can be used to assign H3 headers to divisions and H4 headers to
teams. Listing 5-5 demonstrates the procedure and Figure 5-7 shows the document
rendered with this style sheet. The names of the divisions and teams are read from
the XML data.
3236-7 ch05.F.qc 6/29/99 1:04 PM Page 118
<xsl:template match=”/”>
<HTML xmlns:xsl=”http://www.w3.org/TR/WD-xsl”>
<HEAD>
<TITLE>
<xsl:for-each select=”SEASON”>
<xsl:value-of select=”@YEAR”/>
</xsl:for-each>
<xsl:for-each select=”SEASON”>
<H1>
<xsl:value-of select=”@YEAR”/>
Major League Baseball Statistics
</H1>
<xsl:for-each select=”LEAGUE”>
<H2 ALIGN=”CENTER”>
<xsl:value-of select=”@NAME”/>
</H2>
<xsl:for-each select=”DIVISION”>
<H3 ALIGN=”CENTER”>
<xsl:value-of select=”@NAME”/>
</H3>
<xsl:for-each select=”TEAM”>
<H4 ALIGN=”CENTER”>
<xsl:value-of select=”@CITY”/>
<xsl:value-of select=”@NAME”/>
</H4>
</xsl:for-each>
</xsl:for-each>
</xsl:for-each>
</xsl:for-each>
<HR></HR>
Copyright 1999
<A HREF=”http://www.macfaq.com/personal.html”>
3236-7 ch05.F.qc 6/29/99 1:04 PM Page 119
</BODY>
</HTML>
</xsl:template>
</xsl:stylesheet>
In the case of the TEAM elements, the values of both its CITY and NAME attributes
are used as contents for the H4 header. Also notice that the nesting of the xsl:for-
each elements that selects seasons, leagues, divisions, and teams mirrors the
hierarchy of the document itself. That’s not a coincidence. While other schemes are
possible that don’t require matching hierarchies, this is the simplest, especially for
highly structured data like the baseball statistics of Listing 5-1.
3236-7 ch05.F.qc 6/29/99 1:04 PM Page 120
Players
The next step is to add statistics for individual players on a team. The most natural
way to do this is in a table. Listing 5-6 shows an XSL style sheet that arranges the
players and their stats in a table. No new XSL elements are introduced. The same
xsl:for-each and xsl:value-of elements are used on the PLAYER element and
its attributes. The output is standard HTML table tags. Figure 5-8 displays the
results.
Listing 5-6: An XSL style sheet that places players and their
statistics in a table
<?xml version=”1.0”?>
<xsl:stylesheet xmlns:xsl=”http://www.w3.org/TR/WD-xsl”>
<xsl:template match=”/”>
<HTML xmlns:xsl=”http://www.w3.org/TR/WD-xsl”>
<HEAD>
<TITLE>
<xsl:for-each select=”SEASON”>
<xsl:value-of select=”@YEAR”/>
</xsl:for-each>
<xsl:for-each select=”SEASON”>
<H1>
<xsl:value-of select=”@YEAR”/>
Major League Baseball Statistics
</H1>
<xsl:for-each select=”LEAGUE”>
<H2 ALIGN=”CENTER”>
<xsl:value-of select=”@NAME”/>
</H2>
<xsl:for-each select=”DIVISION”>
<H3 ALIGN=”CENTER”>
<xsl:value-of select=”@NAME”/>
</H3>
<xsl:for-each select=”TEAM”>
<H4 ALIGN=”CENTER”>
<xsl:value-of select=”@CITY”/>
<xsl:value-of select=”@NAME”/>
</H4>
<TABLE>
3236-7 ch05.F.qc 6/29/99 1:04 PM Page 121
<THEAD>
<TR>
<TH>Player</TH><TH>P</TH><TH>G</TH>
<TH>GS</TH><TH>AB</TH><TH>R</TH><TH>H</TH>
<TH>D</TH><TH>T</TH><TH>HR</TH><TH>RBI</TH>
<TH>S</TH><TH>CS</TH><TH>SH</TH><TH>SF</TH>
<TH>E</TH><TH>BB</TH><TH>SO</TH><TH>HBP</TH>
</TR>
</THEAD>
<TBODY>
<xsl:for-each select=”PLAYER”>
<TR>
<TD>
<xsl:value-of select=”@GIVEN_NAME”/>
<xsl:value-of select=”@SURNAME”/>
</TD>
<TD><xsl:value-of select=”@POSITION”/></TD>
<TD><xsl:value-of select=”@GAMES”/></TD>
<TD>
<xsl:value-of select=”@GAMES_STARTED”/>
</TD>
<TD><xsl:value-of select=”@AT_BATS”/></TD>
<TD><xsl:value-of select=”@RUNS”/></TD>
<TD><xsl:value-of select=”@HITS”/></TD>
<TD><xsl:value-of select=”@DOUBLES”/></TD>
<TD><xsl:value-of select=”@TRIPLES”/></TD>
<TD><xsl:value-of select=”@HOME_RUNS”/></TD>
<TD><xsl:value-of select=”@RBI”/></TD>
<TD><xsl:value-of select=”@STEALS”/></TD>
<TD>
<xsl:value-of select=”@CAUGHT_STEALING”/>
</TD>
<TD>
<xsl:value-of select=”@SACRIFICE_HITS”/>
</TD>
<TD>
<xsl:value-of select=”@SACRIFICE_FLIES”/>
</TD>
<TD><xsl:value-of select=”@ERRORS”/></TD>
<TD><xsl:value-of select=”@WALKS”/></TD>
<TD>
<xsl:value-of select=”@STRUCK_OUT”/>
</TD>
<TD>
<xsl:value-of select=”@HIT_BY_PITCH”/>
</TD>
</TR>
</xsl:for-each>
</TBODY>
</TABLE>
</xsl:for-each>
Continued
3236-7 ch05.F.qc 6/29/99 1:04 PM Page 122
</xsl:for-each>
</xsl:for-each>
<HR></HR>
Copyright 1999
<A HREF=”http://www.macfaq.com/personal.html”>
Elliotte Rusty Harold
</A>
<BR />
<A HREF=”mailto:elharo@metalab.unc.edu”>
elharo@metalab.unc.edu
</A>
</BODY>
</HTML>
</xsl:template>
</xsl:stylesheet>
To do this, you have to add additional code to the xsl:for-each element that
selects the players. You don’t select all players. Instead, you select those players
whose POSITION attribute is not pitcher. The syntax looks like this:
But because the XML document distinguishes between starting and relief pitchers,
the true answer must test both cases:
Figure 5-8: Player statistics are displayed after applying the XSL style
sheet in Listing 5-6.
For the table of pitchers, you logically reverse this to the position being equal to
either “Starting Pitcher” or “Relief Pitcher”. (It is not sufficient to just change not
equal to equal. You also have to change and to or.) The syntax looks like this:
Note Only a single equals sign is used to test for equality rather than the double equals
sign used in C and Java. That’s because there’s no equivalent of an assignment
operator in XSL.
Listing 5-7 shows an XSL style sheet separating the batters and pitchers into two
different tables. The pitchers’ table adds columns for all the usual pitcher statistics.
Listing 5-1 encodes in attributes: wins, losses, saves, shutouts, etc. Abbreviations
are used for the column labels to keep the table to a manageable width. Figure 5-9
shows the results.
3236-7 ch05.F.qc 6/29/99 1:04 PM Page 124
<xsl:template match=”/”>
<HTML xmlns:xsl=”http://www.w3.org/TR/WD-xsl”>
<HEAD>
<TITLE>
<xsl:for-each select=”SEASON”>
<xsl:value-of select=”@YEAR”/>
</xsl:for-each>
<xsl:for-each select=”SEASON”>
<H1>
<xsl:value-of select=”@YEAR”/>
Major League Baseball Statistics
</H1>
<xsl:for-each select=”LEAGUE”>
<H2 ALIGN=”CENTER”>
<xsl:value-of select=”@NAME”/>
</H2>
<xsl:for-each select=”DIVISION”>
<H3 ALIGN=”CENTER”>
<xsl:value-of select=”@NAME”/>
</H3>
<xsl:for-each select=”TEAM”>
<H4 ALIGN=”CENTER”>
<xsl:value-of select=”@CITY”/>
<xsl:value-of select=”@NAME”/>
</H4>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION><B>Batters</B></CAPTION>
<THEAD>
<TR>
<TH>Player</TH><TH>P</TH><TH>G</TH>
<TH>GS</TH><TH>AB</TH><TH>R</TH><TH>H</TH>
<TH>D</TH><TH>T</TH><TH>HR</TH><TH>RBI</TH>
<TH>S</TH><TH>CS</TH><TH>SH</TH><TH>SF</TH>
<TH>E</TH><TH>BB</TH><TH>SO</TH>
<TH>HBP</TH>
</TR>
</THEAD>
3236-7 ch05.F.qc 6/29/99 1:04 PM Page 125
<TBODY>
<xsl:for-each select=”PLAYER[(@POSITION
!= ‘Starting Pitcher’)
$and$ (@POSITION != ‘Relief Pitcher’)]”>
<TR>
<TD>
<xsl:value-of select=”@GIVEN_NAME”/>
<xsl:value-of select=”@SURNAME”/>
</TD>
<TD><xsl:value-of select=”@POSITION”/></TD>
<TD><xsl:value-of select=”@GAMES”/></TD>
<TD>
<xsl:value-of select=”@GAMES_STARTED”/>
</TD>
<TD><xsl:value-of select=”@AT_BATS”/></TD>
<TD><xsl:value-of select=”@RUNS”/></TD>
<TD><xsl:value-of select=”@HITS”/></TD>
<TD><xsl:value-of select=”@DOUBLES”/></TD>
<TD><xsl:value-of select=”@TRIPLES”/></TD>
<TD>
<xsl:value-of select=”@HOME_RUNS”/>
</TD>
<TD><xsl:value-of select=”@RBI”/></TD>
<TD><xsl:value-of select=”@STEALS”/></TD>
<TD>
<xsl:value-of select=”@CAUGHT_STEALING”/>
</TD>
<TD>
<xsl:value-of select=”@SACRIFICE_HITS”/>
</TD>
<TD>
<xsl:value-of select=”@SACRIFICE_FLIES”/>
</TD>
<TD><xsl:value-of select=”@ERRORS”/></TD>
<TD><xsl:value-of select=”@WALKS”/></TD>
<TD>
<xsl:value-of select=”@STRUCK_OUT”/>
</TD>
<TD>
<xsl:value-of select=”@HIT_BY_PITCH”/>
</TD>
</TR>
</xsl:for-each> <!— PLAYER —>
</TBODY>
</TABLE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION><B>Pitchers</B></CAPTION>
<THEAD>
<TR>
<TH>Player</TH><TH>P</TH><TH>G</TH>
<TH>GS</TH><TH>W</TH><TH>L</TH><TH>S</TH>
Continued
3236-7 ch05.F.qc 6/29/99 1:04 PM Page 126
<xsl:value-of select=”@STRUCK_OUT_BATTER”/>
</TD>
</TR>
</xsl:for-each> <!— PLAYER —>
</TBODY>
</TABLE>
<HR></HR>
Copyright 1999
<A HREF=”http://www.macfaq.com/personal.html”>
Elliotte Rusty Harold
</A>
<BR />
<A HREF=”mailto:elharo@metalab.unc.edu”>
elharo@metalab.unc.edu
</A>
</BODY>
</HTML>
</xsl:template>
</xsl:stylesheet>
Element Contents and the select Attribute In this chapter, I focused on using XSL to
format data stored in the attributes of an element because it isn’t accessible when
using CSS. However, XSL works equally well when you want to include an element’s
character data rather than (or in addition to) its attributes. To indicate that an
element’s text is to be copied into the output document, simply use the element’s
name as the value of the select attribute of the xsl:value-of element. For
example, consider, once again, Listing 5-8:
Let’s suppose you want to copy the greeting “Hello XML!” into an H1 header. First,
you use xsl:for-each to select the GREETING element:
<xsl:for-each select=”GREETING”>
<H1>
</H1>
</xsl:for-each>
This alone is enough to copy the two H1 tags into the output. To place the text of
the GREETING element between them, use xsl:value-of with no select attribute.
Then, by default, the contents of the current element (GREETING) are selected.
Listing 5-9 shows the complete style sheet.
You can also use select to choose the contents of a child element. Simply make the
name of the child element the value of the select attribute of xsl:value-of. For
instance, consider the baseball example from the previous chapter in which each
player’s statistics were stored in child elements rather than in attributes. Given this
structure of the document (which is actually far more likely than the attribute-based
structure of this chapter) the XSL for the batters’ table looks like this:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION><B>Batters</B></CAPTION>
<THEAD>
<TR>
<TH>Player</TH><TH>P</TH><TH>G</TH>
<TH>GS</TH><TH>AB</TH><TH>R</TH><TH>H</TH>
<TH>D</TH><TH>T</TH><TH>HR</TH><TH>RBI</TH>
<TH>S</TH><TH>CS</TH><TH>SH</TH><TH>SF</TH>
<TH>E</TH><TH>BB</TH><TH>SO</TH><TH>HBP</TH>
</TR>
</THEAD>
<TBODY>
<xsl:for-each select=”PLAYER[(POSITION
!= ‘Starting Pitcher’)
$and$ (POSITION != ‘Relief Pitcher’)]”>
<TR>
<TD>
<xsl:value-of select=”GIVEN_NAME”/>
<xsl:value-of select=”SURNAME”/>
</TD>
<TD><xsl:value-of select=”POSITION”/></TD>
<TD><xsl:value-of select=”GAMES”/></TD>
<TD>
<xsl:value-of select=”GAMES_STARTED”/>
</TD>
<TD><xsl:value-of select=”AT_BATS”/></TD>
<TD><xsl:value-of select=”RUNS”/></TD>
<TD><xsl:value-of select=”HITS”/></TD>
<TD><xsl:value-of select=”DOUBLES”/></TD>
<TD><xsl:value-of select=”TRIPLES”/></TD>
<TD><xsl:value-of select=”HOME_RUNS”/></TD>
<TD><xsl:value-of select=”RBI”/></TD>
<TD><xsl:value-of select=”STEALS”/></TD>
<TD>
<xsl:value-of select=”CAUGHT_STEALING”/>
</TD>
<TD>
<xsl:value-of select=”SACRIFICE_HITS”/>
</TD>
<TD>
<xsl:value-of select=”SACRIFICE_FLIES”/>
</TD>
<TD><xsl:value-of select=”ERRORS”/></TD>
3236-7 ch05.F.qc 6/29/99 1:04 PM Page 130
<TD><xsl:value-of select=”WALKS”/></TD>
<TD>
<xsl:value-of select=”STRUCK_OUT”/>
</TD>
<TD>
<xsl:value-of select=”HIT_BY_PITCH”/>
</TD>
</TR>
</xsl:for-each> <!— PLAYER —>
</TBODY>
</TABLE>
In this case, within each PLAYER element, the contents of that element’s
GIVEN_NAME, SURNAME, POSITION, GAMES, GAMES_STARTED, AT_BATS, RUNS,
HITS, DOUBLES, TRIPLES, HOME_RUNS, RBI, STEALS, CAUGHT_STEALING,
SACRIFICE_HITS, SACRIFICE_FLIES, ERRORS, WALKS, STRUCK_OUT and
HIT_BY_PITCH children are extracted and copied to the output. Since we used
the same names for the attributes in this chapter as we did for the PLAYER child
elements in the last chapter, this example is almost identical to the equivalent
section of Listing 5-7. The main difference is that the @ signs are missing. They
indicate an attribute rather than a child.
You can do even more with the select attribute. You can select elements: by
position (for example the first, second, last, seventeenth element, and so forth);
with particular contents; with specific attribute values; or whose parents or
children have certain contents or attribute values. You can even apply a complete
set
of Boolean logical operators to combine different selection conditions. We will
explore more of these possibilities when we return to XSL in Chapters 14 and 15.
CSS or XSL?
CSS and XSL overlap to some extent. XSL is certainly more powerful than CSS.
However XSL’s power is matched by its complexity. This chapter only touched on
the basics of what you can do with XSL. XSL is more complicated, and harder to
learn and use than CSS, which raises the question, “When should you use CSS and
when should you use XSL?”
CSS is more broadly supported than XSL. Parts of CSS Level 1 are supported for
HTML elements by Netscape 4 and Internet Explorer 4 (although annoying
differences exist). Furthermore, most of CSS Level 1 and some of CSS Level 2 is
likely to be well supported by Internet Explorer 5.0 and Mozilla 5.0 for both XML
and HTML. Thus, choosing CSS gives you more compatibility with a broader range
of browsers.
Additionally, CSS is more stable. CSS level 1 (which covers all the CSS you’ve seen
so far) and CSS Level 2 are W3C recommendations. XSL is still a very early working
3236-7 ch05.F.qc 6/29/99 1:04 PM Page 131
draft, and probably won’t be finalized until after this book is printed. Early adopters
of XSL have already been burned once, and will be burned again before standards
gel. Choosing CSS means you’re less likely to have to rewrite your style sheets from
month to month just to track evolving software and standards. Eventually, however,
XSL will settle down to a usable standard.
However, XSLis definitely more powerful than CSS. CSS only allows you to apply
formatting to element contents. It does not allow you to change or reorder those
contents; choose different formatting for elements based on their contents or
attributes; or add simple, extra text like a signature block. XSL is far more appro-
priate when the XML documents contain only the minimum of data and none of
the HTML frou-frou that surrounds the data.
With XSL, you can separate the crucial data from everything else on the page,
like mastheads, navigation bars, and signatures. With CSS, you have to include all
these pieces in your data documents. XML+XSL allows the data documents to live
separately from the Web page documents. This makes XML+XSL documents more
maintainable and easier to work with.
In the long run XSL should become the preferred choice for real-world, data-intensive
applications. CSS is more suitable for simple pages like grandparents use to post
pictures of their grandchildren. But for these uses, HTML alone is sufficient. If you’ve
really hit the wall with HTML, XML+CSS doesn’t take you much further before you run
into another wall. XML+XSL, by contrast, takes you far past the walls of HTML. You
still need CSS to work with legacy browsers, but long-term XSL is the way to go.
Summary
In this chapter, you saw examples of creating an XML document from scratch.
Specifically, you learned:
Well-Formed
XML Documents
6
C H A P T E R
✦ ✦ ✦ ✦
In This Chapter
Markup and
more powerful than HTML, you might think you need to know
character data
even more tags, but you don’t. XML gets its power through
simplicity and extensibility, not through a plethora of tags.
Well-formed XML
In fact, XML predefines almost no tags at all. Instead XML in stand-alone
allows you to define your own tags as needed. However these documents
tags and the documents built from them are not completely
arbitrary. Instead they have to follow a specific set of rules Well-formed HTML
which we will elaborate upon in this chapter. A document that
follows these rules is said to be well-formed. Well-formedness ✦ ✦ ✦ ✦
is the minimum criteria necessary for XML processors and
browsers to read files. In this chapter, you’ll examine the rules
for well-formed XML documents and well-formed HTML.
Particular attention is paid to how XML differs from HTML.
✦ Be stored in a database
✦ Be created on the fly in memory by a CGI program
✦ Be some combination of several different files, each of
which is embedded in another
✦ Never exist in a file of its own
3236-7 ch06.F.qc 6/29/99 1:04 PM Page 134
However, nothing essential is lost if you think of an XML document as a file, as long
as you keep in the back of your mind that it might not really be a file on a hard drive.
XML documents are made up of storage units called entities. Each entity contains
either text or binary data, never both. Text data is comprised of characters. Binary
data is used for images and applets and the like. To use a concrete example, a raw
HTML file that includes <IMG> tags is an entity but not a document. An HTML file
plus all the pictures embedded in it with <IMG> tags is a complete document.
In this chapter, and the next several chapters, I will treat only simple XML
documents that are made up of a single entity, the document itself. Furthermore,
these documents are only going to contain text data, not binary data like images or
applets. Such documents can be understood completely on their own without
reading any other files. In other words they stand alone. Such a document normally
contains a standalone attribute in its XML declaration with the value yes, like the
one following:
External entities and entity references can be used to combine multiple files and
other data sources to create a single XML document. These documents cannot be
parsed without reference to other files. These documents normally contain a
standalone attribute in the XML declaration with the value no.
Cross- External entities and entity references will be discussed in Chapter 9, Entities and
Reference External DTD Subsets.
Cross- International character sets are discussed in Chapter 7, Foreign Languages and
Reference Non-Roman Text.
The text of an XML document serves two purposes, character data and markup.
Character data is the basic information of the document. Markup, on the other
hand, mostly describes a document’s logical structure. For example, recall Listing
3-2, greeting.xml, from Chapter 3, repeated below:
3236-7 ch06.F.qc 6/29/99 1:04 PM Page 135
Comments
XML comments are almost exactly like HTML comments. They begin with <!— and
end with —> . All data between the <!— and —> is ignored by the XML processor. It’s
as if it wasn’t there. Comments can be used to make notes to yourself or to
temporarily comment out sections of the document that aren’t ready. For example,
There are some rules that must be followed when using comments. These rules are
outlined below:
1. Comments may not come before the XML declaration, which absolutely must
be the very first thing in the document. For example, the following is not
acceptable:
<!—This is Listing 3-2 from The XML Bible—>
<?xml version=”1.0” standalone=”yes”?>
<GREETING>
Hello XML!
<!—Goodbye XML—>
</GREETING>
3236-7 ch06.F.qc 6/29/99 1:04 PM Page 136
2. Comments may not be placed inside a tag. For example, the following is
illegal:
<?xml version=”1.0” standalone=”yes”?>
<GREETING>
Hello XML!
</GREETING <!—Goodbye—> >
3. Comments may be used to surround and hide tags. In the following example,
the <antigreeting> tag and all its children are commented out; they are not
shown when the document is rendered, as if they don’t exist:
<?xml version=”1.0” standalone=”yes”?>
<DOCUMENT>
<GREETING>
Hello XML!
</GREETING>
<!—
<ANTIGREETING>
Goodbye XML!
</ANTIGREETING>
—>
</DOCUMENT>
Since comments effectively delete sections of text, care must be taken to
ensure that the remaining text is still a well-formed XML document. For
instance, be careful not to comment out a start tag unless you also comment
out the corresponding end tag. For example, the following is illegal:
<?xml version=”1.0” standalone=”yes”?>
<GREETING>
Hello XML!
<!—
</GREETING>
—>
Once the commented text is removed what remains is:
<?xml version=”1.0” standalone=”yes”?>
<GREETING>
Hello XML!
Since the <GREETING> tag is no longer matched by a closing </GREETING>
tag, this is no longer a well-formed XML document.
4. The two-hyphen string (—) may not occur inside a comment except as part of
its opening or closing tag. For example, the following is an illegal comment:
<!—The red door—that is, the second one—was left open—>
This means, among other things, that you cannot nest comments like this:
<?xml version=”1.0” standalone=”yes”?>
<DOCUMENT>
<GREETING>
3236-7 ch06.F.qc 6/29/99 1:04 PM Page 137
Hello XML!
</GREETING>
<!—
<ANTIGREETING>
<!—Goodbye XML!—>
</ANTIGREETING>
—>
</DOCUMENT>
It also means that you may run into trouble if you’re commenting out a lot
of C, Java, or JavaScript source code that’s full of expressions like i— or
numberLeft—. Generally it’s not too hard to work around this problem
once you recognize it.
Entity References
Entity references are markup that is replaced with character data when the
document is parsed. XML predefines the five entity references listed in Table 6-1.
Entity references are used in XML documents in place of specific characters that
would otherwise be interpreted as part of markup. For instance, the entity
reference < stands for the less-than sign (<), which would otherwise be
interpreted as the beginning of a tag.
Table 6-1
XML Predefined Entity References
Entity Reference Character
& &
< <
> >
" “
' ‘
Caution In XML, unlike HTML, entity references must end with a semicolon. Therefore,
> is a correct entity reference and > is not.
Raw less-than signs (<) and ampersands (&) in normal XML text are always
interpreted as starting tags and entity references, respectively. (The abnormal text
is CDATA sections, described below.) Therefore, less-than signs and ampersands
must always be encoded as < and & respectively. For example, you would
write the phrase “Ben & Jerry’s New York Super Fudge Chunk Ice Cream” as Ben
& Jerry’s New York Super Fudge Chunk Ice Cream.
3236-7 ch06.F.qc 6/29/99 1:04 PM Page 138
Greater-than signs, double quotes, and apostrophes must be encoded when they
would otherwise be interpreted as part of markup. However, it’s easier just to get in
the habit of encoding all of them rather than trying to figure out whether a
particular use would or would not be interpreted as markup.
CDATA
Most of the time anything inside a pair of angle brackets (<>) is markup and
anything that’s not is character data. However there is one exception. In CDATA
sections all text is pure character data. Anything that looks like a tag or an entity
reference is really just the text of the tag or the entity reference. The XML processor
does not try to interpret it in any way.
CDATA sections are used when you want all text to be interpreted as pure character
data rather than as markup. This is primarily useful when you have a large block of
text that contains a lot of <, >, &, or “ characters, but no markup. This would be true
for much C and Java source code.
CDATA sections are also extremely useful if you’re trying to write about XML in
XML. For example, this book contains many small blocks of XML code. The word
processor I’m using doesn’t care about that. But if I were to convert this book to
XML, I’d have to painstakingly replace all the less-than signs with < and all the
ampersands with & as I did in the following:
To avoid having to do this, I can instead use a CDATA section to indicate that a
block of text is to be presented as is with no translation. CDATA sections begin with
<![CDATA[ and end with ]]>. For example:
<![CDATA[
<?xml version=”1.0” standalone=”yes”?>
<GREETING>
Hello XML!
</GREETING>
]]>
The only text that’s not allowed within a CDATA section is the closing CDATA
delimiter ]]>. Comments may appear in CDATA sections, but do not act as
comments. That is, both the comment tags and all the text they contain will be
rendered.
3236-7 ch06.F.qc 6/29/99 1:04 PM Page 139
Note Since ]]> may not appear in a CDATA section, CDATA sections cannot nest. This
makes it relatively difficult to write about CDATA sections in XML. If you need to do
this, you just have to bite the bullet and use the < and & entity references.
CDATA sections aren’t needed that often, but when they are needed, they’re needed
badly.
Tags
What distinguishes XML files from plain text files is markup. The largest part of the
markup is the tags. While you saw how tags are used in the previous chapter, this
section will define what tags are and provide a broader picture of how they’re used.
In brief, a tag is anything in an XML document that begins with < and ends with >
and is not inside a comment or a CDATA section. Thus, an XML tag has the same
form as an HTML tag. Start or opening tags begin with a < which is followed by the
name of the tag. End or closing tags begin with a </ which is followed by the name
of the tag. The first > encountered closes the tag.
Tag Names
Every tag has a name. Tag names must begin with a letter or an underscore (_).
Subsequent characters in the name may include letters, digits, underscores,
hyphens, and periods. They may not include white space. (The underscore often
substitutes for white space.) The following are some legal XML tags:
<HELP>
<Book>
<volume>
<heading1>
<section.paragraph>
<Mary_Smith>
<_8ball>
Cross- Colons are also technically legal in tag names. However, these are reserved for use
Reference with namespaces. Namespaces enable you to mix and match tag sets that may
use the same tag names. Namespaces are discussed in Chapter 18, Namespaces.
<Book%7>
<volume control>
<1heading>
3236-7 ch06.F.qc 6/29/99 1:04 PM Page 140
<Mary Smith>
<.employee.salary>
Note The rules for tag names actually apply to names of many other things as well. The
same rules are used for attribute names, ID attribute values, entity names, and a
number of other constructs you’ll encounter in the next several chapters.
Closing tags have the same name as their opening tag but are prefixed with a / after
the initial angle bracket. For example, if the opening tag is <FOO>, then the closing
tag is </FOO>. These are the end tags for the previous set of legal start tags.
</HELP>
</Book>
</volume>
</heading1>
</section.paragraph>
</Mary_Smith>
</_8ball>
XML names are case sensitive. This is different from HTML where <P> and <p> are
the same tag, and a </p> can close a <P> tag. The following are not end tags for the
set of legal start tags we’ve been discussing.
</help>
</book>
</Volume>
</HEADING1>
</Section.Paragraph>
</MARY_SMITH>
</_8BALL>
Although both lower- and uppercase letters may be used in XML tags, from this
point forward I will mostly follow the convention of making my tags uppercase,
mainly because this makes them stand out better in the pages of this book.
However, on occasion when I’m using a tag set developed by someone else it will be
necessary to adopt that person’s case convention.
Empty Tags
Many HTML tags that do not contain data do not have closing tags. For example,
there are no </LI>, </IMG>, </HR>, or </BR> tags in HTML. Some page authors do
3236-7 ch06.F.qc 6/29/99 1:04 PM Page 141
include </LI> tags after their list items, and some HTML tools also use </LI>.
However the HTML 4.0 standard specifically denies that this is required. Like all
unrecognized tags in HTML, the presence of an unnecessary </LI> has no effect on
the rendered output.
This is not the case in XML. The whole point of XML is to allow new tags to be
discovered as a document is parsed. Thus unrecognized tags may not simply be
ignored. Furthermore, an XML processor must be able to determine on the fly
whether a tag it’s never seen before does or does not have an end tag.
XML distinguishes between tags that have closing tags and tags that do not, called
empty tags. Empty tags are closed with a slash and a closing angle bracket (/>). For
example, <BR/> or <HR/>.
Current Web browsers deal inconsistently with tags like this. However, if you’re
trying to maintain backwards compatibility, you can use closing tags instead, and
just not include any text in them. For example,
<BR></BR>
<HR></HR>
<IMG></IMG>
When you learn about DTDs and style sheets in the next few chapters, you’ll see a
couple more ways to maintain backward and forward compatibility with HTML in
documents that must be parsed by legacy browsers.
Attributes
As discussed in the previous chapter, start tags and empty tags may optionally
contain attributes. Attributes are name-value pairs separated by an equals sign (=).
For example,
<GREETING LANGUAGE=”English”>
Hello XML!
<MOVIE SRC=”WavingHand.mov”/>
</GREETING>
Here the <GREETING> tag has a LANGUAGE attribute, which has the value English.
The <MOVIE> tag has a SRC attribute, which has the value WavingHand.mov.
Attribute Names
Attribute names are strings that follow the same rules as tag names. That is,
attribute names must begin with a letter or an underscore (_). Subsequent letters in
the name may include letters, digits, underscores, hyphens, and periods. They may
not include white space. (The underscore often substitutes for whitespace.)
3236-7 ch06.F.qc 6/29/99 1:04 PM Page 142
The same tag may not have two attributes with the same name. For example, the
following is illegal:
Attribute names are case sensitive. The SIDE attribute is not the same as the side
or the Side attribute. Therefore the following is acceptable:
However, this is extremely confusing, and I strongly urge you not to write markup
like this.
Attribute Values
Attributes values are also strings. Even when the string shows a number, as in the
LENGTH attribute below, that number is the two characters 7 and 2, not the binary
number 72.
<RULE LENGTH=”72”/>
If you’re writing code to process XML, you’ll need to convert the string to a number
before performing arithmetic on it.
Unlike attribute names, there are few limits on the content of an attribute value.
Attribute values may contain white space, begin with a number, or contain any
punctuation characters (except, sometimes, single and double quotes).
XML attribute values are delimited by quote marks. Unlike HTML attributes, XML
attributes must be enclosed in quotes. Most of the time double quotes are used.
However, if the attribute value itself contains a double quote, then single quotes
may be used. For example:
If the attribute value contains both single and double quotes, then the one that’s
not used to delimit the string must be replaced with the proper entity references. I
generally just go ahead and replace both, which is always okay. For example:
Foreign
Languages and
7
C H A P T E R
✦ ✦ ✦ ✦
Understanding the
effects of non-Roman
scripts on the Web
✦ ✦ ✦ ✦
Non-Roman Scripts on the Web
Although the Web is international, much of its text is in
English. Because of the Web’s expansiveness, however, you
can still surf through Web pages in French, Spanish, Chinese,
Arabic, Hebrew, Russian, Hindi, and other languages. Most
of the time, though, these pages come out looking less than
ideal. Figure 7-1 shows the October 1998 cover page of one of
the United States Information Agency’s propaganda journals,
Issues in Democracy (http://www.usia.gov/journals/
itdhr/1098/ijdr/ijdr1098.htm), in Russian translation
viewed in an English encoding. The red Cyrillic text in the
upper left is a bitmapped image file so it’s legible (if you
speak Russian) and so are a few words in English such as
“Adobe Acrobat.” However, the rest of the text is mostly a
bunch of accented Roman vowels, not the Cyrillic letters
they are supposed to be.
3236-7 ch07.F.qc 6/29/99 1:04 PM Page 162
The quality of Web pages deteriorates even further when complicated, non-
Western scripts like Chinese and Japanese are used. Figure 7-2 shows the home
page for the Japanese translation of my book JavaBeans (IDG Books, 1997,
http://www. ohmsha.co.jp/data/books/contents/4-274-06271-6.htm)
viewed in an English browser. Once again the bitmapped image shows the proper
Japanese (and English) text, but the rest of the text on the page looks almost like a
random collection of characters except for a few recognizable English words like
JavaBeans. The Kanji characters you’re supposed to see are completely absent.
These pages look as they’re intended to look if viewed with the right encoding and
application software, and if the correct font is installed. Figure 7-3 shows Issues in
Democracy viewed with the Windows 1251 encoding of Cyrillic. As you can see, the
text below the picture is now readable (if you can read Russian).
You can select the encoding for a Web page from the View/Encoding menu in
Netscape Navigator or Internet Explorer. In an ideal world, the Web server would
tell the Web browser what encoding to use, and the Web browser would listen. It
would also be nice if the Web server could send the Web browser the fonts it
needed to display the page. In practice, however, you often need to select the
encoding manually, even trying several to find the exact right one when more than
one encoding is available for a script. For instance, a Cyrillic page might be
3236-7 ch07.F.qc 6/29/99 1:04 PM Page 163
encoded in Windows 1251, ISO 8859-5, or KOI6-R. Picking the wrong encoding may
make Cyrillic letters appear, but the words will be gibberish.
Even when you can identify the encoding, there’s no guarantee you have fonts
available to display it. Figure 7-4 shows the Japanese home page for JavaBeans with
Japanese encoding, but without a Japanese font installed on the computer. Most
of the characters in the text are shown as a box, which indicates an unavailable
character glyph. Fortunately, Netscape Navigator can recognize that some of the
bytes on the page are double-byte Japanese characters rather than two one-byte
Western characters.
If you do have a Japanese localized edition of your operating system that includes
the necessary fonts, or additional software like Apple’s Japanese Language Kit or
NJStar’s NJWin (http://www.njstar.com/) that adds Japanese-language support
to your existing system, you would be able to see the text more or less as it was
meant to be seen as shown in Figure 7-5.
Note Of course, the higher quality fonts you use, the better the text will look. Chinese
and Japanese fonts tend to be quite large (there are over 80,000 characters in
Chinese alone) and the distinctions between individual ideographs can be quite
subtle. Japanese publishers generally require higher-quality paper and printing
than Western publishers, so they can maintain the fine detail necessary to print
Japanese letters. Regrettably a 72-dpi computer monitor can’t do justice to most
Japanese and Chinese characters unless they’re displayed at almost obscenely
large point sizes.
3236-7 ch07.F.qc 6/29/99 1:04 PM Page 165
Because each page can only have a single encoding, it is difficult to write a Web
page that integrates multiple scripts, such as a French commentary on a Chinese
text. For a reasons such as this the Web community needs a single, universal
character set to display all characters for all computers and Web browsers.
We don’t have such a character set yet, but XML and Unicode get as close
as is currently possible.
XML files are written in Unicode, a double-byte character set that can represent
most characters in most of the world’s languages. If a Web page is written in
Unicode, as XML pages are, and if the browser understands Unicode, as XML
browsers should, then it’s not a problem for characters from different languages
to be included on the same page.
Note The word script is also often used to refer to programs written in weakly typed,
interpreted languages like JavaScript, Perl, and TCL. In this chapter, the word script
always refers to the characters used to write a language and not to any sort of
program.
Some languages can even be written in different scripts. Serbian and Croatian are
virtually identical and are generally referred to as Serbo-Croatian. However, Serbian
is written in a modified Cyrillic script, and Croatian is written in a modified Roman
script. As long as a computer doesn’t attempt to grasp the meaning of the words it
processes, working with a script is equivalent to working with any language that
can be written in that script.
Unfortunately, XML alone is not enough to read a script. For each script a computer
processes, four things are required:
If any of these four elements are missing, you won’t be able to work easily in the
script, though XML does provide a work-around that’s adequate for occasional use.
If the only thing your application is missing is an input method, you’ll be able to
read text written in the script. You just won’t be able to write in it.
Exactly how the glyphs are stored varies from system to system. They may be
bitmaps or vector drawings; they may even consist of hot lead on a printing press.
The form they take doesn’t concern us here. The key idea is that a font tells the
computer how to draw each character in the character set.
Radically different character sets like Cyrillic, Hebrew, Arabic, and Greek are more
difficult to input. There’s a finite number of keys on the keyboard, generally not
enough for Arabic and Roman letters, or Roman and Greek letters. Assuming both
are needed though, a keyboard can have a Greek lock key that shifts the keyboard
from Roman to Greek and back. Both Greek and Roman letters can be printed on
the keys in different colors. The same scheme works for Hebrew, Arabic, Cyrillic,
and other non-Roman alphabetic character sets.
However, this scheme really breaks down when faced with ideographic scripts
like Chinese and Japanese. Japanese keyboards can have in the ballpark of 5,000
different keys; and that’s still less than 10% of the language! Syllabic, phonetic,
and radical representations exist that can reduce the number of keys; but it is
questionable whether a keyboard is really an appropriate means of entering text
in these languages. Reliable speech and handwriting recognition have even
greater potential in Asia than in the West.
Since speech and handwriting recognition still haven’t reached the reliability of
even a mediocre typist like myself, most input methods today are map multiple
sequences of keys on the keyboard to a single character. For example, to type the
Chinese character for sheep, you might hold down the Alt key and type a tilde (~),
then type yang, then hit the enter key. The input method would then present you
with a list of words that are pronounced more or less like yang. For example:
3236-7 ch07.F.qc 6/29/99 1:04 PM Page 168
You would then choose the character you wanted, _. The exact details of both the
GUI and the transliteration system used to convert typed keys like yang to the
ideographic characters like _ vary from program to program, operating system to
operating system, and language to language.
MacOS 7.1 and later can handle most common scripts in the world today. However,
the base operating system only supports Western European languages. Chinese,
Japanese, Korean, Arabic, Hebrew, and Cyrillic are available as language kits that
cost about $100 a piece. Each provides fonts and input methods for languages
written in those scripts. There’s also an Indian language kit, which handles the
Devanagari, Gujarati, and Gurmukhu scripts common on the Indian subcontinent.
MacOS 8.5 adds optional, limited support for Unicode (which most applications
don’t yet take advantage of).
Windows NT 4.0 uses Unicode as its native character set. NT 4.0 does a fairly good
job with Roman languages, Cyrillic, Greek, Hebrew, and a few others. The Lucida
Sans Unicode font covers about 1300 of the most common of Unicode’s 40,000 or so
characters. Microsoft Office 97 includes Chinese, Japanese, and Korean fonts that
you can install to read text in these languages. (Look in the Fareast folder in the
Valupack folder on your Office CD-ROM.)
Microsoft claims Windows 2000 (previously known as NT 5.0) will also include
fonts covering most of the Chinese-Japanese-Korean ideographs, as well as input
methods for these scripts. However they also promised that Windows 95 would
include Unicode support, and that got dropped before shipment. Consequently,
I’m not holding my breath. Certainly, it would be nice if they do provide full
international support in all versions of NT rather than relying on localized
systems.
Microsoft’s consumer operating systems, Windows 3.1, 95, and 98, do not fully
support Unicode. Instead they rely on localized systems that can only handle basic
English characters plus the localized script.
The major Unix variants have varying levels of support for Unicode. Solaris 2.6
supports European languages, Greek, and Cyrillic. Chinese, Japanese, and Korean
are supported by localized versions using different encodings rather than Unicode.
Linux has embryonic support for Unicode, which may grow to something useful in
the near future.
3236-7 ch07.F.qc 6/29/99 1:04 PM Page 169
In the United States, Macs use the MacRoman character set, Windows PCs use a
character set called Windows ANSI, and most Unix workstations use ISO Latin-1.
These are all extensions of ASCII that support additional characters like ç and ¿
that are needed for Western European languages like French and Spanish. In other
locales like Japan, Greece, and Israel, computers use a still more confusing hodge-
podge of character sets that mostly support ASCII plus the local language.
This doesn’t work on the Internet. It’s unlikely that while you’re reading the San
Jose Mercury News you’ll turn the page and be confronted with several columns
written in German or Chinese. However, on the Web it’s entirely possible a user will
follow a link and end up staring at a page of Japanese. Even if the surfer can’t read
Japanese it would still be nice if they saw a correct version of the language, as seen
in Figure 7-5, instead of a random collection of characters like those shown in
Figure 7-2.
XML addresses this problem by moving beyond small, local character sets to one
large set that’s supposed to encompass all scripts used in all living languages (and a
few dead ones) on planet Earth. This character set is called Unicode. As previously
noted, Unicode is a double-byte character set that provides representations of over
40,000 different characters in dozens of scripts and hundreds of languages. All XML
processors are required to understand Unicode, even if they can’t fully display it.
As you learned in Chapter 6, an XML document is divided into text and binary
entities. Each text entity has an encoding. If the encoding is not explicitly specified
in the entity’s definition, then the default is UTF-8 — a compressed form of Unicode
which leaves pure ASCII text unchanged. Thus XML files that contain nothing but
the common ASCII characters may be edited with tools that are unaware of the
complications of dealing with multi-byte character sets like Unicode.
Table 7-1
The ASCII Character Set
Code Character Code Char- Code Char- Code Char-
acter acter acter
0 null(Control-@) 32 Space 64 @ 96 `
1 start of heading 33 ! 65 A 97 a
(Control-A)
2 start of text 34 “ 66 B 98 b
(Control-B)
3 end of text 35 # 67 C 99 c
(Control-C)
4 end of transmis- 36 $ 68 D 100 d
sion (Control-D)
5 enquiry 37 % 69 E 101 e
(Control-E)
6 acknowledge 38 & 70 F 102 f
(Control-F)
7 bell (Control-G) 39 ‘ 71 G 103 g
8 backspace 40 ( 72 H 104 h
(Control-H)
9 tab(Control-I) 41 ) 73 I 105 i
10 linefeed 42 * 74 J 106 j
(Control-J)
11 vertical tab) 43 + 75 K 107 k
(Control-K
12 formfeed 44 , 76 L 108 l
(Control-L)
13 carriage return 45 - 77 M 109 m
(Control-M)
14 shift out 46 . 78 N 110 n
(Control-N)
15 shift in 47 / 79 O 111 o
(Control-O)
16 data link escape 48 0 80 P 112 p
(Control-P)
17 device control 1 49 1 81 Q 113 q
(Control-Q)
3236-7 ch07.F.qc 6/29/99 1:04 PM Page 171
Most other character sets you’re likely to encounter are supersets of ASCII. In other
words, they define 0 though 127 exactly the same as ASCII, but add additional char-
acters from 128 on up.
3236-7 ch07.F.qc 6/29/99 1:04 PM Page 172
Table 7-2
The ISO 8859-1 Latin-1 Character Set
Code Character Code Character Code Character Code Character
Latin-1 still lacks many useful characters including those needed for Greek, Cyrillic,
Chinese, and many other scripts and languages. You might think these could just be
moved into the numbers from 256 up. However there’s a catch. A single byte can only
hold values from 0 to 255. To go beyond that, you need to use a multi-byte character
set. For historical reasons most programs are written under the assumption that
characters and bytes are identical, and they tend to break when faced with multi-byte
character sets. Therefore, most current operating systems (Windows NT being the
notable exception) use different, single-byte character sets rather than one large
multi-byte set. Latin-1 is the most common such set, but other sets are needed to
handle additional languages.
ISO 8859 defines ten other character sets (8859-2 through 8859-10 and 8859-15)
suitable for different scripts, with four more (8859-11 through 8859-14) in active
development. Table 7-3 lists the ISO character sets and the languages and scripts
they can be used for. All share the same ASCII characters from 0 to 127, and then
each includes additional characters from 128 to 255.
3236-7 ch07.F.qc 6/29/99 1:04 PM Page 174
Table 7-3
The ISO Character Sets
Also
Known
Character Set As Languages
ISO 8859-1 Latin-1 ASCII plus the characters required for most Western European
languages including Albanian, Afrikaans, Basque, Catalan,
Danish, Dutch, English, Faroese, Finnish, Flemish, Galician,
German, Icelandic, Irish, Italian, Norwegian, Portuguese,
Scottish, Spanish, and Swedish. However it omits the ligatures
ij (Dutch), Œ (French), and German quotation marks.
ISO 8859-2 Latin-2 ASCII plus the characters required for most Central European
languages including Czech, English, German, Hungarian,
Polish, Romanian, Croatian, Slovak, Slovene, and Sorbian.
ISO 8859-3 Latin-3 ASCII plus the characters required for English, Esperanto,
German, Maltese, and Galician.
ISO 8859-4 Latin-4 ASCII plus the characters required for the Baltic languages
Latvian, Lithuanian, German, Greenlandic, and Lappish;
superseded by ISO 8859-10, Latin-6
ISO 8859-5 ASCII plus Cyrillic characters required for Byelorussian,
Bulgarian, Macedonian, Russian, Serbian, and Ukrainian.
ISO 8859-6 ASCII plus Arabic.
ISO 8859-7 ASCII plus Greek.
ISO 8859-8 ASCII plus Hebrew.
ISO 8859-9 Latin-5 Latin-1 except that the Turkish letters , ı, , , , and take
the place of the less commonly used Icelandic letters , , T,
y, W, and e.
ISO 8859-10 Latin-6 ASCII plus characters for the Nordic languages Lithuanian,
Inuit (Greenlandic Eskimo), non-Skolt Sami (Lappish), and
Icelandic.
ISO 8859-11 ASCII plus Thai.
ISO 8859-12 This may eventually be used for ASCII plus Devanagari (Hindi,
Sanskrit, etc.) but no proposal is yet available.
ISO 8859-13 Latin-7 ASCII plus the Baltic Rim, particularly Latvian.
ISO 8859-14 Latin-8 ASCII plus Gaelic and Welsh.
ISO 8859-15 Latin-9, Essentially the same as Latin-1 but with a Euro sign instead
Latin-0 of the international currency sign . Furthermore, the Finnish
characters , , , replace the uncommon symbols B, ¨, ¸.
And the French Œ, œ, and Ÿ characters replace the fractions
1/4, 1/2, 3/4.
3236-7 ch07.F.qc 6/29/99 1:04 PM Page 175
These sets often overlap. Several languages, most notably English and German, can
be written in more than one of the character sets. To some extent the different sets
are designed to allow different combinations of languages. For instance Latin-1 can
combine most Western languages and Icelandic whereas Latin-5 combines most
Western languages with Turkish instead of Icelandic. Thus if you needed a document
in English, French, and Icelandic, you’d use Latin-1. However a document containing
English, French, and Turkish would use Latin-5. However, a document that required
English, Hebrew, and Turkish, would have to use Unicode since no single-byte
character set handles all three languages and scripts.
A single-byte set is insufficient for Chinese, Japanese, and Korean. These languages
have more than 256 characters apiece, so they must use multi-byte character sets.
Table 7-4
The MacRoman Character Set
Code Character Code Character Code Character Code Character
Continued
3236-7 ch07.F.qc 6/29/99 1:04 PM Page 176
Table 7-5
The Windows ANSI Character Set
Code Character Code Character Code Character Code Character
Since Macs and PCs use different character sets, more people fail these criteria
than not. Obviously what is needed is a single character set that everyone agrees
on and that encodes all characters in all the world’s scripts. Creating such a set is
difficult. It requires a detailed understanding of hundreds of languages and their
scripts. Getting software developers to agree to use that set once it’s been created
is even harder. Nonetheless work is ongoing to create exactly such a set called
Unicode, and the major vendors (Microsoft, Apple, IBM, Sun, Be, and many others)
are slowly moving toward complying with it. XML specifies Unicode as its default
character set.
I’d love to show you a table of all the characters in Unicode, but if I did this book
would consist entirely of this table and not much else. If you need to know more
about the specific encodings of the different characters in Unicode, get a copy of
3236-7 ch07.F.qc 6/29/99 1:04 PM Page 178
Table 7-6
Unicode Script Blocks
Script Range Purpose
Continued
3236-7 ch07.F.qc 6/29/99 1:04 PM Page 180
Continued
3236-7 ch07.F.qc 6/29/99 1:04 PM Page 182
UTF 8
Since Unicode uses two bytes for each character, files of English text are about twice
as large in Unicode as they would be in ASCII or Latin-1. UTF-8 is a compressed ver-
sion of Unicode that uses only a single byte for the most common characters, that is
the ASCII characters 0-127, at the expense of having to use three bytes for the less
common characters, particularly the Hangul syllables and Han ideographs. If you’re
writing mostly in English, UTF-8 can reduce your file sizes by as much as 50 percent.
On the other hand if you’re writing mostly in Chinese, Korean, or Japanese, UTF-8 can
increase your file size by as much as 50 percent — so it should be used with caution.
UTF-8 has mostly no effect on non-Roman, non-CJK scripts like Greek, Arabic, Cyrillic,
and Hebrew.
XML processors assume text data is in the UTF-8 format unless told otherwise. This
means they can read ASCII files, but other formats like MacRoman or Latin-1 cause
them trouble. You’ll learn how to fix this problem shortly.
UCS (Universal Character System), also known as ISO 10646, uses four bytes per
character (more precisely, 31 bits) to provide space for over two billion different
3236-7 ch07.F.qc 6/29/99 1:04 PM Page 183
characters. This easily covers every character ever used in any language in any
script on the planet Earth. Among other things this enables a full set of characters
to be assigned to each language so that the French “e” is not the same as the
English “e” is not the same as the German “e,” and so on.
Like Unicode, UCS defines a number of different variants and compressed forms.
Pure Unicode is sometimes referred to as UCS-2, which is two-byte UCS. UTF-16 is a
special encoding that maps some of the UCS characters into byte strings of varying
length in such a fashion that Unicode (UCS-2) data is unchanged.
At this point, the advantage of UCS over Unicode is mostly theoretical. The only
characters that have actually been defined in UCS are precisely those already in
Unicode. However, it does provide more room for future expansion.
1. Write in a localized character set like Latin-3; then convert your file to Unicode.
2. Include Unicode character references in the text that numerically identify
particular characters.
The first option is preferable when you’ve got a large amount of text to enter in
essentially one script, or one script plus ASCII. The second works best when you
need to mix small portions of multiple scripts into your document.
A Unicode character reference consists of the two characters &# followed by the
character code, followed by a semicolon. For instance, the Greek letter π has
Unicode value 960 so it may be inserted in an XML file as π. The Cyrillic
character has Unicode value 1206 so it can be included in an XML file with the
character reference Ҷ
All you need to do is include an x after the &# to signify that you’re using a hexa-
decimal value. For example, π has hexadecimal value 3C0 so it may be inserted in
an XML file as π. The Cyrillic character has hexadecimal value 4B6 so it
can be included in an XML file with the escape sequence Ҷ. Because two
bytes always produce exactly four hexadecimal digits, it’s customary (though not
required) to include leading zeros in hexadecimal character references so they are
rounded out to four digits.
For example, the following command converts a text file named myfile.txt from the
platform’s default encoding to Unicode
You can also reverse the process to go from Unicode to a local encoding with the -
reverse option:
If the output file name is left off, the converted file is printed out.
The native2ascii program also processes Java-style Unicode escapes, which are
characters embedded as \u09E3. These are not in the same format as XML
numeric character references, though they’re similar. If you convert to Unicode
using native2ascii, you can still use XML character references — the viewer will
still recognize them.
3236-7 ch07.F.qc 6/29/99 1:04 PM Page 185
The only character set other than UTF-8 that an XML processor is required to
understand is raw Unicode. If you cannot convert your text into either UTF-8 or
raw Unicode, you can leave the text in its native character set and tell the XML
processor which set that is. This should be a last resort, though, because there’s
no guarantee an arbitrary XML processor can process other encodings. Nonethe-
less Netscape Navigator and Internet Explorer both do a pretty good job of inter-
preting the common character sets.
To warn the XML processor that you’re using a non-Unicode encoding, you include
an encoding attribute in the XML declaration at the start of the file. For example,
to specify that the entire document uses Latin-1 by default (unless overridden by
another processing instruction in a nested entity) you would use this XML
declaration:
You can also include the encoding declaration as part of a separate processing
instruction after the XML declaration but before any character data appears.
<?xml encoding=”ISO-8859-1”?>
Table 7-7 lists the official names of the most common character sets used today, as
they would be given in XML encoding attributes. For encodings not found in this list,
consult the official list maintained by the Internet Assigned Numbers Authority
(IANA) at http://www.isi.edu/in-notes/iana/assignments/character-sets.
Table 7-7
Names of Common Character Sets
Character Set Name Languages/Countries
US-ASCII English
UTF-8 Compressed Unicode
UTF-16 Compressed UCS
ISO-10646-UCS-2 Raw Unicode
ISO-10646-UCS-4 Raw UCS
Continued
3236-7 ch07.F.qc 6/29/99 1:04 PM Page 186