Name of the Department

88%

50%

15% 15%
10% 10%
0% 0% 0% 0%
Excellent Exceed Expectation Meet Expectation Needs Improvement Unacceptable

Ideal Scenario Actual Result

Exceed Meet Needs

Excellent Unacceptable Total
Expectation Expectation Improvement
Ideal Scenario 10% 15% 50% 15% 10% 100%

Actual Result 0% 88% 0% 0% 0% 88%

Summary
Total No. of Increment As Special Total Salary After Salary Before
Employees per Policy Increment Increment Increment Increment

In Amount 8 800 1,600 2,400 500,464 498,064

In (%) 0 0 1%
 Nature of
SL ID Name Designation Department
Employment

DGM, Head of Sales, Sales & Marketing,

1 2528 Md. Zahurul Haque Permanent
Adhesive & Glue Adhesive & Glue
Sales & Marketing,
2 2561 Md. Abul Kalam Azad Sales Manager Permanent
Adhesive & Glue
Sales & Marketing,
3 2849 Md. Rubel Islam Sales Manager Permanent
Adhesive & Glue
Sales & Marketing,
4 2833 Md. Arif Hossain Executive, Corporate Sales Permanent
Adhesive & Glue
Sales & Marketing,
5 2530 Md. Moktar Hossain Sr. Executive (Sales Admin) Permanent
Adhesive & Glue
Sales & Marketing,
6 2832 Md. Shoriful Islam Executive, Corporate Sales Permanent
Adhesive & Glue
Executive, Sales & Sales & Marketing,
7 2819 Md. Sohel Arman Permanent
Marketing (Construction Adhesive & Glue
Sales & Marketing,
8 2660 Md. Zahid Hasan Executive, Corporate Sales Permanent
Adhesive & Glue
1.2

0.8

0.6

0.4

0.2

0
0.8 1
 Samuda Chemical Chomplex Limited
Proposed Increment and Promotion Sheet For the year 202
Effective From 1st January, 2023
Last Interium Present
Location Joining Service Length Increment Increment Salary

Date Amount Date Amount Cash Part

1 years 8 months 28
Head Office 4-Apr-21 1-Jan-22 40,000.00 130,000
days
1 years 5 months 0
Head Office 1-Aug-21 -
days
1 years 4 months 8
Head Office 24-Aug-21 -
days
1 years 1 months 4
Head Office 28-Nov-21 -
days
1 years 6 months 18
Head Office 14-Jun-21 1-Jan-22 5,064.00 -
days
1 years 1 months 4
Head Office 28-Nov-21 -
days
1 years 2 months 29
Head Office 3-Oct-21 -
days
1 years 3 months 23
Head Office 9-Sep-21 -
days
130,000
 Chart Title
1.2

0.8

0.6

0.4

0.2

0
0.8 1 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2
homplex Limited
ion Sheet For the year 2022
January, 2023
Present Yearly Proposed Special
Total Increment
Salary Performance Increment Increment
Result -2022
Bank Part Total Salary Amount (%) Amount (%) Amount (%)

150,000 280,000 100 0% 200 0% 300 0%

50,000 50,000 Exceed Expectation 100 0% 200 0% 300 1%

50,000 50,000 Exceed Expectation 100 0% 200 0% 300 1%

17,000 17,000 Exceed Expectation 100 1% 200 1% 300 2%

35,064 35,064 Exceed Expectation 100 0% 200 1% 300 1%

17,000 17,000 Exceed Expectation 100 1% 200 1% 300 2%

32,000 32,000 Exceed Expectation 100 0% 200 1% 300 1%

17,000 17,000 Exceed Expectation 100 1% 200 1% 300 2%

368,064 498,064 8 800 0% 1,600 1% 2,400 1%

Salary After Last Promotion Status Propose
Remarks
Increment Promotion
Date From To

280,300 Promoted to:

50,300 Promoted to:

50,300 Promoted to:

17,300 Promoted to:

35,364 Promoted to:

17,300 Promoted to:

32,300 Promoted to:

17,300 Promoted to:

500,464
Samuda Group
Employee Database for Performance Appraisal - 2022

SL ID Name Present Designation Joining Designation

1 2528 Md. Zahurul Haque DGM, Head of Sales, Adhesive & GlDGM, Head of Sales, Adhesive & Glue
2 2561 Md. Abul Kalam Azad Sales Manager Sales Manager
3 2849 Md. Rubel Islam Sales Manager Sales Manager
4 2833 Md. Arif Hossain Executive, Corporate Sales Executive, Corporate Sales
5 2530 Md. Moktar Hossain Sr. Executive (Sales Admin) Sr. Executive (Sales Admin)
6 2832 Md. Shoriful Islam Executive, Corporate Sales Executive, Corporate Sales
7 2819 Md. Sohel Arman Executive, Sales & Marketing (ConstExecutive, Sales & Marketing (Construction
8 2660 Md. Zahid Hasan Executive, Corporate Sales Executive, Corporate Sales
 Last Education Department Joining Date Service Length Location Section

Sales & Marketing, Adhesive & Glue 4-Apr-21 Head Office

MA in History from Sales & Marketing, Adhesive & Glue 1-Aug-21 Head Office
BSS (Economics) froSales & Marketing, Adhesive & Glue 24-Aug-21 Head Office
B.Sc and M.Sc (GeoSales & Marketing, Adhesive & Glue 28-Nov-21 Head Office
MBA in Accounting fSales & Marketing, Adhesive & Glue 14-Jun-21 Head Office
BBS and MBS in AccoSales & Marketing, Adhesive & Glue 28-Nov-21 Head Office
Diploma EngineeringSales
i & Marketing, Adhesive & Glue 3-Oct-21 Head Office
BBA from American Sales & Marketing, Adhesive & Glue 9-Sep-21 Head Office
 Present Other Total Last Increment Interim Review
Area Zone Appraisal Status Gross Allowance Present
Salary (if any) Salary Date Grade Amount Date Grade
150,000 130,000 280,000 1-Jan-22 40,000.00
50,000 50,000
50,000 50,000
17,000 17,000
35,064 35,064 1-Jan-22 5,064.00
17,000 17,000
32,000 32,000
17,000 17,000
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Interim Review Last Promotion Attendance Status
Total Working Total Present Total Late Unauthorized
Amount Date From To Days Leave
Days Days
 Disciplinery
Remarks
Authorized Case
Leave
 Samuda Chemical Complex Limited
Head office/ Dhaka Factory/Chattogram Factory
Performance Evaluation Form for Management Employee
Performance year - 2022
1. Basic Information:

Staff ID 2528 Present Designation DGM, Head of Sales, Adhesive &

Glue
Name Md. Zahurul Haque Joining Designation DGM, Head of Sales, Adhesive &
Glue
Date of Joining 04-Apr-21 Department Sales & Marketing, Adhesive &
Glue

Academic Qualification 0 Location Head Office

Performance Evaluation Instruction: Rate the employee's performance during the review period by checking the most
appropriate numerical value in each section. To determine the overall performance rating, please ensure multiplication of
rating score with weightage and then finally add all the criteria’s value together to get the final score below. Rating scale:
# 5 for Excellent Performer (consistently exceeds standards),
# 4 for Exceed Expectation (frequently exceeds standards),
# 3 Meet Expectations (generally meets standards),
# 2 Needs improvement (frequently fails to meet standards),
# 1 Unacceptable (fails to meet standards).

2. Evaluation Criteria:

SL Evaluation Criteria Weightag Performance Weighted

e (%) Rating Rating

Job Knowledge
1 (Knowledge of products, policies and procedures; OR knowledge of 15% Rating Option 0
techniques, skills, equipment, procedures, and materials)

2 Quality of work
(Freedom from errors and mistakes. Accuracy, quality of work in general)
20% Rating Option 0

Quantity of work:
3 (Volume of the work completed (as per target) or Productivity of the 20% Rating Option 0
employee)

Reliability
4 (The extent to which the employee can be depended upon for work, to
complete work properly; on time. The degree to which the employee is
10% Rating Option 0
reliable, trustworthy, and persistent)

Initiative and Creativity

5 (The ability to plan work and to proceed with a task without being told 5% Rating Option 0
every detail and the ability to make constructive suggestions)

Judgment
6 (The extent to which the employee makes decisions that are sound. The 10% Rating Option 0
ability to base decisions on fact rather than emotion)

Cooperation
7 (Willingness to work harmoniously with others in getting a job done. 5% Rating Option 0
Readiness to respond positively to instructions and procedures)

Planning and Organizing

8 (The ability to analyze work, set goals, develop plans of action, 5% Rating Option 0
utilize time. Understanding of supervision requirement to achieve
the goals.)

Decision-Making
9 (The ability to make decisions and the quality and timeliness of 5% Rating Option 0
those decisions.)

Directing and Controlling

10 (The ability to create a motivating working environment,
teamwork, train and develop, measure work in progress, take
5% Rating Option 0
corrective action)
 Total score: 100% 0
Please put the weightage % in terms of importance. High weightage high importance, low weightage low importance.

3. Areas requiring improvement in job performance

(attach the performance improvement plan for any areas rated
needs improvement or unacceptable):

4. Professional development goals or Training recommendations

for further development:

5. Employee Achievement (Please tick as per the above weightage average score):
Exceed
Unacceptable Performer Needs improvement Meets Expectations Expectation
(01.00 to 1.50) (1.51 to <2.50) ( 2.51 to 3.5) (3.51 to 4.5)

Yearly Performance Result

6. Employee Acknowledgement on Evaluation Remarks
Signature
I do hereby acknowledge the evaluation remarks of my functional supervisor

7. Administrative Information
Last Increment Date 01-Jan-22 Total Working days
Last Increment (TK) 40,000 Total Present Days
Interim Increment Date 30-Dec-99 Total late attendance days
Interim Increment (TK) - Total unauthorized Leave days
Last Promotion Date 30-Dec-99 Total authorized Leave days
Last Promotion From 0 Disciplinary cases (if any)
Last Promotion To 0 Special Achivement
Present Salary 280,000

8. Final Judgement on Evaluation Remarks

General Grade Increment - Special Increment

Partial Increment 300 Total Increment

Promotion(Yes/No) Promoted to: If Yes, Justification:

Hold Increment (ü) Justification:

9. Approval Work Flow:

Approval Authority Comments Signature

Proposed by
(Immediate Supervisor)

Agreed by
(Head of Department)

Recommended by
(Functional Head /
Plant In Charge)

Processed by,
(Head of HR)
Endorsed by,
(Chief Business Officer)

Approved by,
(Advisor /
Managing Director)
amuda Chemical Complex Limited
ice/ Dhaka Factory/Chattogram Factory
Evaluation Form for Management Employee
Performance year - 2022

DGM, Head of Sales, Adhesive &

Glue
DGM, Head of Sales, Adhesive &
Glue
Sales & Marketing, Adhesive &
Glue

Head Office

he employee's performance during the review period by checking the most

n. To determine the overall performance rating, please ensure multiplication of
y add all the criteria’s value together to get the final score below. Rating scale:
ntly exceeds standards),
y exceeds standards),
ts standards),
ails to meet standards),
ards).

Comments /
Special ach.
rms of importance. High weightage high importance, low weightage low importance.

s per the above weightage average score):

Excellent Performer
(4.51 to 5.00)

ation Remarks
Signature

0
0
0
0
0
0

ks

200

300

If Yes, Justification:

Signature
 Samuda Chemical Complex Limited
Head office/ Dhaka Factory/Chattogram Factory
Performance Evaluation Form for Management Employee
Performance year - 2022
1. Basic Information:

Staff ID 2561 Present Designation Sales Manager

Name Md. Abul Kalam Azad Joining Designation Sales Manager

Date of Joining 01-Aug-21 Department Sales & Marketing, Adhesive & Glue

MA in History from Jagannath

Academic Qualification University Location Head Office

Performance Evaluation Instruction: Rate the employee's performance during the review period by checking the most appropriate numerical value in each section.
To determine the overall performance rating, please ensure multiplication of rating score with weightage and then finally add all the criteria’s value together to get
the final score below. Rating scale:
# 5 for Excellent Performer (consistently exceeds standards),
# 4 for Exceed Expectation (frequently exceeds standards),
# 3 Meet Expectations (generally meets standards),
# 2 Needs improvement (frequently fails to meet standards),
# 1 Unacceptable (fails to meet standards).

2. Evaluation Criteria:
Weightag
SL Evaluation Criteria e (%) Performance Rating Weighted Rating Comments / Special ach.

Job Knowledge
1 (Knowledge of products, policies and procedures; OR knowledge of 15% Meet Expectations 0.45
techniques, skills, equipment, procedures, and materials)

I am really happy to his quality of work

2 Quality of work
(Freedom from errors and mistakes. Accuracy, quality of work in general)
20% Exceed Expectation 0.8 outcome.
He is managing his work successfully and
Quantity of work: also concentrate the other outcome area
3 (Volume of the work completed (as per target) or Productivity of the 20% Exceed Expectation 0.8 so that no issue untouched and it helps
employee)
me to take right decision.
Reliability
He is reliable to all level of confidential
4 (The extent to which the employee can be depended upon for work, to
complete work properly; on time. The degree to which the employee is
10% Exceed Expectation 0.4 work
reliable, trustworthy, and persistent)

Initiative and Creativity

5 (The ability to plan work and to proceed with a task without being told 5% Meet Expectations 0.15
every detail and the ability to make constructive suggestions)

Judgment
6 (The extent to which the employee makes decisions that are sound. The 10% Meet Expectations 0.3
ability to base decisions on fact rather than emotion)

Cooperation He is very helpful to all his team mates

7 (Willingness to work harmoniously with others in getting a job done. 5% Exceed Expectation 0.2 and extend all possible support for
Readiness to respond positively to instructions and procedures) management insight.
Planning and Organizing
8 (The ability to analyze work, set goals, develop plans of action, 5% Meet Expectations 0.15
utilize time. Understanding of supervision requirement to achieve
the goals.)

Decision-Making He needs to be more cautious in taking

9 (The ability to make decisions and the quality and timeliness of 5% Meet Expectations 0.15 decisions.
those decisions.)

Directing and Controlling

He is doing exceptionally good in
10 (The ability to create a motivating working environment,
teamwork, train and develop, measure work in progress, take
5% Exceed Expectation 0.2 managing task and team performance.
corrective action)

Total score: 100% 3.6

Please put the weightage % in terms of importance. High weightage high importance, low weightage low importance.

3. Areas requiring improvement in job performance Communication skills Decision Making Skill
(attach the performance improvement plan for any areas rated
needs improvement or unacceptable): Time Management

4. Professional development goals or Training recommendations Leadership training

for further development: Communication skills

5. Employee Achievement (Please tick as per the above weightage average score):

Unacceptable Performer Needs improvement Meets Expectations Exceed Expectation Excellent Performer
(01.00 to 1.50) (1.51 to <2.50) ( 2.51 to 3.5) (3.51 to 4.5) (4.51 to 5.00)

Yearly Performance Result Exceed Expectation 😮

6. Employee Acknowledgement on Evaluation Remarks
Signature
I do hereby acknowledge the evaluation remarks of my functional supervisor
7. Administrative Information
Last Increment Date 30-Dec-99 Total Working days 0
Last Increment (TK) - Total Present Days 0
Interim Increment Date 30-Dec-99 Total late attendance days 0
Interim Increment (TK) - Total unauthorized Leave days 0
Last Promotion Date 30-Dec-99 Total authorized Leave days 0
Last Promotion From 0 Disciplinary cases (if any) 0
Last Promotion To 0 Special Achivement
Present Salary 50,000

8. Final Judgement on Evaluation Remarks

General Grade Increment 6,000 Special Increment 200

Partial Increment 300 Total Increment 300

Promotion(Yes/No) Promoted to: If Yes, Justification:

Hold Increment (ü) Justification:

9. Approval Work Flow:

Approval Authority Comments Signature

Proposed by
(Immediate Supervisor)

Agreed by
(Head of Department)

Recommended by
(Functional Head /
Plant In Charge)

Processed by,
(Head of HR)

Endorsed by,
(Chief Business Officer)

Approved by,
(Advisor /
Managing Director)
 Samuda Chemical Complex Limited
Head office/ Dhaka Factory/Chattogram Factory
Performance Evaluation Form for Management Employee
Performance year - 2022
1. Basic Information:

Staff ID 2849 Present Designation Sales Manager

Name Md. Rubel Islam Joining Designation Sales Manager

Date of Joining 24-Aug-21 Department Sales & Marketing, Adhesive & Glue

BSS (Economics) from National

Academic Qualification University Location Head Office

Performance Evaluation Instruction: Rate the employee's performance during the review period by checking the most appropriate numerical value in
each section. To determine the overall performance rating, please ensure multiplication of rating score with weightage and then finally add all the
criteria’s value together to get the final score below. Rating scale:
# 5 for Excellent Performer (consistently exceeds standards),
# 4 for Exceed Expectation (frequently exceeds standards),
# 3 Meet Expectations (generally meets standards),
# 2 Needs improvement (frequently fails to meet standards),
# 1 Unacceptable (fails to meet standards).

2. Evaluation Criteria:
Weightag Performance Weighted
SL Evaluation Criteria e (%) Rating Rating Comments / Special ach.

Job Knowledge Meet

1 (Knowledge of products, policies and procedures; OR knowledge of 15% Expectations 0.45
techniques, skills, equipment, procedures, and materials)

Exceed
2 Quality of work
(Freedom from errors and mistakes. Accuracy, quality of work in general)
20% Expectation 0.8

Quantity of work: Exceed

3 (Volume of the work completed (as per target) or Productivity of the 20% Expectation 0.8
employee)

Reliability
Exceed He has performed very independently and I trust
4 (The extent to which the employee can be depended upon for work, to
complete work properly; on time. The degree to which the employee is
10% Expectation 0.4 his capability doing more than expectations.
reliable, trustworthy, and persistent)

Initiative and Creativity Meet

5 (The ability to plan work and to proceed with a task without being told 5% Expectations 0.15
every detail and the ability to make constructive suggestions)

Judgment Meet
6 (The extent to which the employee makes decisions that are sound. The 10% Expectations 0.3
ability to base decisions on fact rather than emotion)

Cooperation Exceed He is doing excellent cooperation to the team and

7 (Willingness to work harmoniously with others in getting a job done. 5% Expectation 0.2 others stakeholders.
Readiness to respond positively to instructions and procedures)

Planning and Organizing

8 (The ability to analyze work, set goals, develop plans of action, 5% Meet 0.15
utilize time. Understanding of supervision requirement to achieve Expectations
the goals.)

Decision-Making Meet
9 (The ability to make decisions and the quality and timeliness of 5% Expectations 0.15 He needs to be more cautious in taking decisions.
those decisions.)

Directing and Controlling

Meet
10 (The ability to create a motivating working environment,
teamwork, train and develop, measure work in progress, take
5% Expectations 0.15
corrective action)

Total score: 100% 3.55

Please put the weightage % in terms of importance. High weightage high importance, low weightage low importance.

3. Areas requiring improvement in job performance Communication Skills Decision Manaking

(attach the performance improvement plan for any areas rated
needs improvement or unacceptable): Time management

4. Professional development goals or Training recommendations Leadership training

for further development: Communication skills Team Building

5. Employee Achievement (Please tick as per the above weightage average score):
Exceed
Unacceptable Performer Needs improvement Meets Expectations Expectation Excellent Performer
(01.00 to 1.50) (1.51 to <2.50) ( 2.51 to 3.5) (3.51 to 4.5) (4.51 to 5.00)

Yearly Performance Result Exceed Expectation 😮

6. Employee Acknowledgement on Evaluation Remarks
Signature
I do hereby acknowledge the evaluation remarks of my functional supervisor
I do hereby acknowledge the evaluation remarks of my functional supervisor
7. Administrative Information
Last Increment Date 30-Dec-99 Total Working days 0
Last Increment (TK) - Total Present Days 0
Interim Increment Date 30-Dec-99 Total late attendance days 0
Interim Increment (TK) - Total unauthorized Leave days 0
Last Promotion Date 30-Dec-99 Total authorized Leave days 0
Last Promotion From 0 Disciplinary cases (if any) 0
Last Promotion To 0 Special Achivement
Present Salary 50,000

8. Final Judgement on Evaluation Remarks

General Grade Increment 6,000 Special Increment 200

Partial Increment 300 Total Increment 300

Promotion(Yes/No) Promoted to: If Yes, Justification:

Hold Increment (ü) Justification:

9. Approval Work Flow:

Approval Authority Comments Signature

Proposed by
(Immediate Supervisor)

Agreed by
(Head of Department)

Recommended by
(Functional Head /
Plant In Charge)

Processed by,
(Head of HR)

Endorsed by,
(Chief Business Officer)

Approved by,
(Advisor /
Managing Director)
 Samuda Chemical Complex Limited
Head office/ Dhaka Factory/Chattogram Factory
Performance Evaluation Form for Management Employee
Performance year - 2022
1. Basic Information:

Staff ID 2833 Present Designation Executive, Corporate Sales

Name Md. Arif Hossain Joining Designation Executive, Corporate Sales

Date of Joining 28-Nov-21 Department Sales & Marketing, Adhesive & Glue

B.Sc and M.Sc (Geography &

Academic Qualification Environment) from Dhaka University Location Head Office

Performance Evaluation Instruction: Rate the employee's performance during the review period by checking the most appropriate numerical value in
each section. To determine the overall performance rating, please ensure multiplication of rating score with weightage and then finally add all the
criteria’s value together to get the final score below. Rating scale:
# 5 for Excellent Performer (consistently exceeds standards),
# 4 for Exceed Expectation (frequently exceeds standards),
# 3 Meet Expectations (generally meets standards),
# 2 Needs improvement (frequently fails to meet standards),
# 1 Unacceptable (fails to meet standards).

2. Evaluation Criteria:
Weightag Performance Weighted
SL Evaluation Criteria e (%) Rating Rating Comments / Special ach.

Job Knowledge
1 (Knowledge of products, policies and procedures; OR knowledge of 15% Exceed Expectation 0.6
techniques, skills, equipment, procedures, and materials)

I am really happy to his quality of

2 Quality of work
(Freedom from errors and mistakes. Accuracy, quality of work in general)
20% Exceed Expectation 0.8 work outcome.
He is managing his work successfully
Quantity of work: and also concentrate the other
3 (Volume of the work completed (as per target) or Productivity of the 20% Meet Expectations 0.6 outcome area so that no issue
employee) untouched and it helps me to take
right decision.
Reliability
He is reliable to all level of
4 (The extent to which the employee can be depended upon for work, to
complete work properly; on time. The degree to which the employee is
10% Exceed Expectation 0.4 confidential work
reliable, trustworthy, and persistent)

Initiative and Creativity

5 (The ability to plan work and to proceed with a task without being told 5% Meet Expectations 0.15
every detail and the ability to make constructive suggestions)

Judgment
6 (The extent to which the employee makes decisions that are sound. The 10% Meet Expectations 0.3
ability to base decisions on fact rather than emotion)

Cooperation Need to focus on improving

7 (Willingness to work harmoniously with others in getting a job done. 5% Exceed Expectation 0.2 cooperation & teamwork
Readiness to respond positively to instructions and procedures)

Planning and Organizing

8 (The ability to analyze work, set goals, develop plans of action, 5% Meet Expectations 0.15
utilize time. Understanding of supervision requirement to achieve
the goals.)

Decision-Making Need to improve decision making

9 (The ability to make decisions and the quality and timeliness of 5% Meet Expectations 0.15 skill in day to day function.
those decisions.)

Directing and Controlling He is doing exceptionally good in

10 (The ability to create a motivating working environment,
teamwork, train and develop, measure work in progress, take
5% Exceed Expectation 0.2 managing task and team
corrective action) performance.

Total score: 100% 3.55

Please put the weightage % in terms of importance. High weightage high importance, low weightage low importance.

3. Areas requiring improvement in job performance MS Excel Time management

(attach the performance improvement plan for any areas rated
needs improvement or unacceptable): Communication Skills Decision Manaking

4. Professional development goals or Training recommendations MS Excel Communication Skill

for further development: Teamwork Leadership Training

5. Employee Achievement (Please tick as per the above weightage average score):
Exceed
Unacceptable Performer Needs improvement Meets Expectations Expectation Excellent Performer
(01.00 to 1.50) (1.51 to <2.50) ( 2.51 to 3.5) (3.51 to 4.5) (4.51 to 5.00)

Yearly Performance Result Exceed Expectation 😮

6. Employee Acknowledgement on Evaluation Remarks
Signature
I do hereby acknowledge the evaluation remarks of my functional supervisor
7. Administrative Information
Last Increment Date 30-Dec-99 Total Working days 0
Last Increment (TK) - Total Present Days 0
Interim Increment Date 30-Dec-99 Total late attendance days 0
Interim Increment (TK) - Total unauthorized Leave days 0
Last Promotion Date 30-Dec-99 Total authorized Leave days 0
Last Promotion From 0 Disciplinary cases (if any) 0
Last Promotion To 0 Special Achivement
Present Salary 17,000

8. Final Judgement on Evaluation Remarks

General Grade Increment 2,040 Special Increment 200

Partial Increment 300 Total Increment 300

Promotion(Yes/No) Promoted to: If Yes, Justification:

Hold Increment (ü) Justification:

9. Approval Work Flow:

Approval Authority Comments Signature

Proposed by
(Immediate Supervisor)

Agreed by
(Head of Department)

Recommended by
(Functional Head /
Plant In Charge)

Processed by,
(Head of HR)

Endorsed by,
(Chief Business Officer)

Approved by,
(Advisor /
Managing Director)
 Samuda Chemical Complex Limited
Head office/ Dhaka Factory/Chattogram Factory
Performance Evaluation Form for Management Employee
Performance year - 2022
1. Basic Information:

Staff ID 2530 Present Designation Sr. Executive (Sales Admin)

Name Md. Moktar Hossain Joining Designation Sr. Executive (Sales Admin)

Date of Joining 14-Jun-21 Department Sales & Marketing, Adhesive & Glue

Academic Qualification MBA in Accounting from Kabi Nazrul Location Head Office
College under DU.

Performance Evaluation Instruction: Rate the employee's performance during the review period by checking the most appropriate numerical value in each section. To
determine the overall performance rating, please ensure multiplication of rating score with weightage and then finally add all the criteria’s value together to get the
final score below. Rating scale:
# 5 for Excellent Performer (consistently exceeds standards),
# 4 for Exceed Expectation (frequently exceeds standards),
# 3 Meet Expectations (generally meets standards),
# 2 Needs improvement (frequently fails to meet standards),
# 1 Unacceptable (fails to meet standards).

2. Evaluation Criteria:

SL Evaluation Criteria Weightag Performance Weighted Rating Comments / Special ach.

e (%) Rating

Job Knowledge Meet

1 (Knowledge of products, policies and procedures; OR knowledge of 15% 0.45
techniques, skills, equipment, procedures, and materials)
Expectations

2 Quality of work 20% Exceed 0.8

(Freedom from errors and mistakes. Accuracy, quality of work in general) Expectation

Quantity of work: Exceed

3 (Volume of the work completed (as per target) or Productivity of the 20% 0.8
employee) Expectation

Reliability
4 (The extent to which the employee can be depended upon for work, to 10% Exceed 0.4 He is very reliable person in the job
complete work properly; on time. The degree to which the employee is Expectation
reliable, trustworthy, and persistent)

Initiative and Creativity Meet

5 (The ability to plan work and to proceed with a task without being told 5% 0.15 Worked on removing unnecessary data in the ERP
every detail and the ability to make constructive suggestions) Expectations

Judgment Meet
6 (The extent to which the employee makes decisions that are sound. The 10% 0.3
ability to base decisions on fact rather than emotion) Expectations

Cooperation Exceed
7 (Willingness to work harmoniously with others in getting a job done. 5% 0.2 Needs to work on improving cooperation
Readiness to respond positively to instructions and procedures) Expectation

Planning and Organizing

8 (The ability to analyze work, set goals, develop plans of action, 5% Meet 0.15
utilize time. Understanding of supervision requirement to achieve Expectations
the goals.)

Decision-Making Meet
9 (The ability to make decisions and the quality and timeliness of 5% 0.15
those decisions.) Expectations

Directing and Controlling

10 (The ability to create a motivating working environment, 5% Meet 0.15
teamwork, train and develop, measure work in progress, take Expectations
corrective action)
Total score: 100% 3.55
Please put the weightage % in terms of importance. High weightage high importance, low weightage low importance.

3. Areas requiring improvement in job performance MS Excel Communication Skill

(attach the performance improvement plan for any areas rated
needs improvement or unacceptable): Teamwork Office Ettiquete & Personal Grooming

4. Professional development goals or Training recommendations MS Office Leadership

for further development: Communication skill Office ettiquetes & Personal Grooming

5. Employee Achievement (Please tick as per the above weightage average score):

Unacceptable Performer Needs improvement Meets Expectations Exceed Expectation Excellent Performer
(01.00 to 1.50) (1.51 to <2.50) ( 2.51 to 3.5) (3.51 to 4.5) (4.51 to 5.00)

Yearly Performance Result Exceed Expectation 😮

6. Employee Acknowledgement on Evaluation Remarks
Signature
I do hereby acknowledge the evaluation remarks of my functional supervisor
7. Administrative Information
Last Increment Date 01-Jan-22 Total Working days 0
Last Increment (TK) 5,064 Total Present Days 0
Interim Increment Date 30-Dec-99 Total late attendance days 0
Interim Increment (TK) - Total unauthorized Leave days 0
Last Promotion Date 30-Dec-99 Total authorized Leave days 0
Last Promotion From 0 Disciplinary cases (if any) 0
Last Promotion To 0 Special Achivement
Present Salary 35,064

8. Final Judgement on Evaluation Remarks

General Grade Increment 4,208 Special Increment 200

Partial Increment 300 Total Increment 300

Promotion(Yes/No) Promoted to: If Yes, Justification:

Hold Increment (ü) Justification:

9. Approval Work Flow:

Approval Authority Comments Signature

Proposed by
(Immediate Supervisor)

Agreed by
(Head of Department)

Recommended by
(Functional Head /
Plant In Charge)

Processed by,
(Head of HR)

Endorsed by,
(Chief Business Officer)

Approved by,
(Advisor /
Managing Director)
 Samuda Chemical Complex Limited
Head office/ Dhaka Factory/Chattogram Factory
Performance Evaluation Form for Management Employee
Performance year - 2022
1. Basic Information:

Staff ID 2832 Present Designation Executive, Corporate Sales

Name Md. Shoriful Islam Joining Designation Executive, Corporate Sales

Date of Joining 28-Nov-21 Department Sales & Marketing, Adhesive & Glue

Academic Qualification BBS and MBS in Accounting from Location Head Office
Mirpure Bangla College.

Performance Evaluation Instruction: Rate the employee's performance during the review period by checking the most appropriate numerical value in each
section. To determine the overall performance rating, please ensure multiplication of rating score with weightage and then finally add all the criteria’s value
together to get the final score below. Rating scale:
# 5 for Excellent Performer (consistently exceeds standards),
# 4 for Exceed Expectation (frequently exceeds standards),
# 3 Meet Expectations (generally meets standards),
# 2 Needs improvement (frequently fails to meet standards),
# 1 Unacceptable (fails to meet standards).

2. Evaluation Criteria:

SL Evaluation Criteria Weightag Performance Weighted Rating Comments / Special ach.

e (%) Rating

Job Knowledge He has very sound knowledge to do the job

1 (Knowledge of products, policies and procedures; OR knowledge of 15% Meet Expectations 0.45
techniques, skills, equipment, procedures, and materials)
effectively

He is managing his work successfully and also

2 Quality of work 20% Exceed Expectation 0.8 concentrate the other outcome area so that
(Freedom from errors and mistakes. Accuracy, quality of work in general) no issue untouched and it helps me to take
right decision.

Quantity of work:
3 (Volume of the work completed (as per target) or Productivity of the 20% Exceed Expectation 0.8 He is reliable to all level of confidential work
employee)

Reliability
He made some excellent approach in terms of
4 (The extent to which the employee can be depended upon for work, to
complete work properly; on time. The degree to which the employee is
10% Meet Expectations 0.3 negotiating customer and get the job done.
reliable, trustworthy, and persistent)

Initiative and Creativity

5 (The ability to plan work and to proceed with a task without being told 5% Meet Expectations 0.15
every detail and the ability to make constructive suggestions)

Judgment
6 (The extent to which the employee makes decisions that are sound. The 10% Meet Expectations 0.3
ability to base decisions on fact rather than emotion)

Cooperation He has outstanding management of team and

7 (Willingness to work harmoniously with others in getting a job done. 5% Exceed Expectation 0.2
Readiness to respond positively to instructions and procedures) its performance.

Planning and Organizing

8 (The ability to analyze work, set goals, develop plans of action, 5% Meet Expectations 0.15
utilize time. Understanding of supervision requirement to achieve
the goals.)

Decision-Making Impressive skill and expect to bring him to

9 (The ability to make decisions and the quality and timeliness of 5% Exceed Expectation 0.2
those decisions.) the next level.

Directing and Controlling

10 (The ability to create a motivating working environment,
teamwork, train and develop, measure work in progress, take
5% Exceed Expectation 0.2 I am impressed.
corrective action)
Total score: 100% 3.55
Please put the weightage % in terms of importance. High weightage high importance, low weightage low importance.

3. Areas requiring improvement in job performance MS Excel Communication Skill

(attach the performance improvement plan for any areas rated
needs improvement or unacceptable): Teamwork Office Ettiquete & Personal Grooming
Time Management

4. Professional development goals or Training recommendations MS Excel Communication Skill

for further development: Teamwork Office Ettiquetes & Personal Grooming

5. Employee Achievement (Please tick as per the above weightage average score):

Unacceptable Performer Needs improvement Meets Expectations Exceed Expectation Excellent Performer
(01.00 to 1.50) (1.51 to <2.50) ( 2.51 to 3.5) (3.51 to 4.5) (4.51 to 5.00)

Yearly Performance Result Exceed Expectation 😮

6. Employee Acknowledgement on Evaluation Remarks
Signature
I do hereby acknowledge the evaluation remarks of my functional supervisor
7. Administrative Information
Last Increment Date 30-Dec-99 Total Working days 0
Last Increment (TK) - Total Present Days 0
Interim Increment Date 30-Dec-99 Total late attendance days 0
Interim Increment (TK) - Total unauthorized Leave days 0
Last Promotion Date 30-Dec-99 Total authorized Leave days 0
Last Promotion From 0 Disciplinary cases (if any) 0
Last Promotion To 0 Special Achivement
Present Salary 17,000

8. Final Judgement on Evaluation Remarks

General Grade Increment 2,040 Special Increment 200

Partial Increment 300 Total Increment 300

Promotion(Yes/No) Promoted to: If Yes, Justification:

Hold Increment (ü) Justification:

9. Approval Work Flow:

Approval Authority Comments Signature

Proposed by
(Immediate Supervisor)

Agreed by
(Head of Department)

Recommended by
(Functional Head /
Plant In Charge)

Processed by,
(Head of HR)

Endorsed by,
(Chief Business Officer)

Approved by,
(Advisor /
Managing Director)
 Samuda Chemical Complex Limited
Head office/ Dhaka Factory/Chattogram Factory
Performance Evaluation Form for Management Employee
Performance year - 2022
1. Basic Information:

Staff ID 2819 Present Designation Executive, Sales & Marketing (Construction

Name Md. Sohel Arman Joining Designation Executive, Sales & Marketing (Construction

Date of Joining 03-Oct-21 Department Sales & Marketing, Adhesive & Glue

Diploma Engineering in Civil from

Academic Qualification National Polytecnic Institute Location Head Office

Performance Evaluation Instruction: Rate the employee's performance during the review period by checking the most appropriate numerical value in
each section. To determine the overall performance rating, please ensure multiplication of rating score with weightage and then finally add all the
criteria’s value together to get the final score below. Rating scale:
# 5 for Excellent Performer (consistently exceeds standards),
# 4 for Exceed Expectation (frequently exceeds standards),
# 3 Meet Expectations (generally meets standards),
# 2 Needs improvement (frequently fails to meet standards),
# 1 Unacceptable (fails to meet standards).

2. Evaluation Criteria:
Weightage
SL Evaluation Criteria (%) Performance Rating Weighted Rating Comments / Special ach.

Job Knowledge He has shown very good

1 (Knowledge of products, policies and procedures; OR knowledge of 15% Exceed Expectation 0.6 understanding to manage the
techniques, skills, equipment, procedures, and materials) tasks.

2 Quality of work
(Freedom from errors and mistakes. Accuracy, quality of work in general)
20% Meet Expectations 0.6
He is managing his work
successfully and also
Quantity of work: concentrate the other outcome
3 (Volume of the work completed (as per target) or Productivity of the 20% Exceed Expectation 0.8 area so that no issue untouched
employee)
and it helps me to take right
Reliability decision.
He is reliable to all level of
4 (The extent to which the employee can be depended upon for work, to
complete work properly; on time. The degree to which the employee is
10% Exceed Expectation 0.4 confidential work
reliable, trustworthy, and persistent)

Initiative and Creativity He made some excellent approach in

5 (The ability to plan work and to proceed with a task without being told 5% Exceed Expectation 0.2 terms of negotiating customer and get
every detail and the ability to make constructive suggestions) the job done.

Judgment
6 (The extent to which the employee makes decisions that are sound. The 10% Meet Expectations 0.3
ability to base decisions on fact rather than emotion)

Cooperation
7 (Willingness to work harmoniously with others in getting a job done. 5% Exceed Expectation 0.2
Readiness to respond positively to instructions and procedures)

Planning and Organizing

8 (The ability to analyze work, set goals, develop plans of action, 5% Meet Expectations 0.15
utilize time. Understanding of supervision requirement to achieve
the goals.)

Decision-Making Need to focus on improving

9 (The ability to make decisions and the quality and timeliness of 5% Meet Expectations 0.15 cooperation & teamwork
those decisions.)

Directing and Controlling

10 (The ability to create a motivating working environment,
teamwork, train and develop, measure work in progress, take
5% Meet Expectations 0.15
corrective action)

Total score: 100% 3.55

Please put the weightage % in terms of importance. High weightage high importance, low weightage low importance.

3. Areas requiring improvement in job performance MS Excel Time management

(attach the performance improvement plan for any areas rated
needs improvement or unacceptable): Communication Skills Decision Manaking

4. Professional development goals or Training recommendations Communication Skill Supervisory Skill

for further development: Office Ettiquetes & Personal Grooming

5. Employee Achievement (Please tick as per the above weightage average score):

Unacceptable Performer Needs improvement Meets Expectations Exceed Expectation Excellent Performer
(01.00 to 1.50) (1.51 to <2.50) ( 2.51 to 3.5) (3.51 to 4.5) (4.51 to 5.00)

Yearly Performance Result Exceed Expectation 😮

6. Employee Acknowledgement on Evaluation Remarks
Signature
I do hereby acknowledge the evaluation remarks of my functional supervisor
7. Administrative Information
Last Increment Date 30-Dec-99 Total Working days 0
Last Increment (TK) - Total Present Days 0
Interim Increment Date 30-Dec-99 Total late attendance days 0
Interim Increment (TK) - Total unauthorized Leave days 0
Last Promotion Date 30-Dec-99 Total authorized Leave days 0
Last Promotion From 0 Disciplinary cases (if any) 0
Last Promotion To 0 Special Achivement
Present Salary 32,000

8. Final Judgement on Evaluation Remarks

General Grade Increment 3,840 Special Increment 200

Partial Increment 300 Total Increment 300

Promotion(Yes/No) Promoted to: If Yes, Justification:

Hold Increment (ü) Justification:

9. Approval Work Flow:

Approval Authority Comments Signature

Proposed by
(Immediate Supervisor)

Agreed by
(Head of Department)

Recommended by
(Functional Head /
Plant In Charge)

Processed by,
(Head of HR)

Endorsed by,
(Chief Business Officer)

Approved by,
(Advisor /
Managing Director)
 Samuda Chemical Complex Limited
Head office/ Dhaka Factory/Chattogram Factory
Performance Evaluation Form for Management Employee
Performance year - 2022
1. Basic Information:

Staff ID 2660 Present Designation Executive, Corporate Sales

Name Md. Zahid Hasan Joining Designation Executive, Corporate Sales

Date of Joining 09-Sep-21 Department Sales & Marketing, Adhesive & Glue

BBA from American Bangladesh

Academic Qualification University Location Head Office

Performance Evaluation Instruction: Rate the employee's performance during the review period by checking the most appropriate
numerical value in each section. To determine the overall performance rating, please ensure multiplication of rating score with weightage
and then finally add all the criteria’s value together to get the final score below. Rating scale:
# 5 for Excellent Performer (consistently exceeds standards),
# 4 for Exceed Expectation (frequently exceeds standards),
# 3 Meet Expectations (generally meets standards),
# 2 Needs improvement (frequently fails to meet standards),
# 1 Unacceptable (fails to meet standards).

2. Evaluation Criteria:
Weightag Performance Weighted
SL Evaluation Criteria e (%) Rating Rating Comments / Special ach.

Job Knowledge Meet

1 (Knowledge of products, policies and procedures; OR knowledge of 15% Expectations 0.45
techniques, skills, equipment, procedures, and materials)

Exceed I am really happy to his quality of

2 Quality of work
(Freedom from errors and mistakes. Accuracy, quality of work in general)
20% Expectation 0.8 work outcome.
He is managing his work
Quantity of work: Exceed successfully and also concentrate
3 (Volume of the work completed (as per target) or Productivity of the 20% Expectation 0.8 the other outcome area so that no
employee) issue untouched and it helps me
to take right decision.
Reliability
Exceed He is reliable to all level of
4 (The extent to which the employee can be depended upon for work, to
complete work properly; on time. The degree to which the employee is
10% Expectation 0.4 confidential work
reliable, trustworthy, and persistent)

Initiative and Creativity Meet

5 (The ability to plan work and to proceed with a task without being told 5% Expectations 0.15
every detail and the ability to make constructive suggestions)

Judgment Meet
6 (The extent to which the employee makes decisions that are sound. The 10% Expectations 0.3
ability to base decisions on fact rather than emotion)

Cooperation Meet Need to focus on improving

7 (Willingness to work harmoniously with others in getting a job done. 5% Expectations 0.15 cooperation & teamwork
Readiness to respond positively to instructions and procedures)

Planning and Organizing

8 (The ability to analyze work, set goals, develop plans of action, 5% Meet 0.15
utilize time. Understanding of supervision requirement to achieve Expectations
the goals.)

Decision-Making Meet Need to improve decision making

9 (The ability to make decisions and the quality and timeliness of 5% Expectations 0.15 skill in day to function.
those decisions.)

Directing and Controlling He is doing exceptionally good in

Exceed
10 (The ability to create a motivating working environment,
teamwork, train and develop, measure work in progress, take
5% Expectation 0.2 managing task and team
corrective action) performance.

Total score: 100% 3.55

Please put the weightage % in terms of importance. High weightage high importance, low weightage low importance.

MS Excel Time management

3. Areas requiring improvement in job performance
(attach the performance improvement plan for any areas rated
needs improvement or unacceptable): Communication Skills Decision Manaking

MS Excel Communication Skill

4. Professional development goals or Training recommendations
for further development: Teamwork

5. Employee Achievement (Please tick as per the above weightage average score):
Exceed
Unacceptable Performer Needs improvement Meets Expectations Expectation Excellent Performer
(01.00 to 1.50) (1.51 to <2.50) ( 2.51 to 3.5) (3.51 to 4.5) (4.51 to 5.00)

Yearly Performance Result Exceed Expectation 😮

6. Employee Acknowledgement on Evaluation Remarks
Signature
I do hereby acknowledge the evaluation remarks of my functional supervisor
I do hereby acknowledge the evaluation remarks of my functional supervisor
7. Administrative Information
Last Increment Date 30-Dec-99 Total Working days 0
Last Increment (TK) - Total Present Days 0
Interim Increment Date 30-Dec-99 Total late attendance days 0
Interim Increment (TK) - Total unauthorized Leave days 0
Last Promotion Date 30-Dec-99 Total authorized Leave days 0
Last Promotion From 0 Disciplinary cases (if any) 0
Last Promotion To 0 Special Achivement
Present Salary 17,000

8. Final Judgement on Evaluation Remarks

General Grade Increment 2,040 Special Increment 200

Partial Increment 300 Total Increment 300

Promotion(Yes/No) Promoted to: If Yes, Justification:

Hold Increment (ü) Justification:

9. Approval Work Flow:

Approval Authority Comments Signature

Proposed by
(Immediate Supervisor)

Agreed by
(Head of Department)

Recommended by
(Functional Head /
Plant In Charge)

Processed by,
(Head of HR)

Endorsed by,
(Chief Business Officer)

Approved by,
(Advisor /
Managing Director)