Test Beam Report

Project
Address
Report
GRAITEC INNOVATION Designed by Date
www.graitec.com Verified by Date
17 Burospace 91572 Bièvres Revision 0 Drawing
Reinforced concrete beam

Table of Contents
1 Geometry description.............................................................................................................. 2
2 Loads and combinations......................................................................................................... 2
3 Global assumptions................................................................................................................. 3
3.1 Localisation...................................................................................................................................4
3.2 Units..............................................................................................................................................4
3.3 Materials........................................................................................................................................4
4 Creep coefficient...................................................................................................................... 5
5 Fire resistance minimum conditions...................................................................................... 6
6 Internal forces......................................................................................................................... 6
6.1 Envelope of ULS combinations....................................................................................................8
6.2 Envelope of SLS combinations.....................................................................................................8
7 Longitudinal reinforcement................................................................................................... 9
7.1 Detailed calculation.....................................................................................................................10
8 Transversal reinforcement................................................................................................... 18
8.1 Transversal reinforcement global assumptions...........................................................................18
8.2 Detailed calculation.....................................................................................................................19
8.3 Minimal constructive dispositions..............................................................................................21
9 Stresses verification............................................................................................................... 22
9.1 Envelope of SLS-CRQ combinations.........................................................................................22
9.2 Envelope of SLS-FRQ combinations..........................................................................................22
9.3 Envelope of SLS-QP combinations............................................................................................23
10 Crack width check................................................................................................................. 26
11 Anchorage calculation.......................................................................................................... 28
12 Support strut verification..................................................................................................... 29
12.1 Support strut stresses verification...............................................................................................29
12.2 Sliding reinforcement verification..............................................................................................31
13 Support reactions.................................................................................................................. 32
14 Rotation capacity................................................................................................................... 33
15 Deflections.............................................................................................................................. 33
16 Bill of materials..................................................................................................................... 34
Advance Design RC Beam 2024 Page 1 of 35

Project: Date: 08-20-2023
1 Geometry description
Span: 1
Span: 2
Span: 3
Length
Width of the beam web
Total height of the beam
Width of the left support
Width of the right support
2 Loads and combinations
Load cases description

ID Title
1 Dead loads 1 - - - 1.1 1.35 0.9 1
2 Live loads 1 0.7 0.5 0.3 1.5 1.5 0 0

Uniform linear loads

Load Span Case ID f x L h'
(kN/m) (mm)
1 1 1 5.00 0 7300 -
2 1 1 5.00 7300 7300 -
3 1 1 5.00 14600 7300 -
4 1 2 5.00 0 7300 -
5 1 2 5.00 7300 7300 -
6 1 2 5.00 14600 7300 -
Combinations description
ID Combination Code Type
101 1x[1 G] ECELUSTR ULS
102 1.35x[1 G] ECELUSTR ULS
103 1x[1 G]+1.5x[2 Q] ECELUSTR ULS
104 1.35x[1 G]+1.5x[2 Q] ECELUSTR ULS
105 1x[1 G] ECELSCQ SLS
106 1x[1 G]+1x[2 Q] ECELSCQ SLS
107 1x[1 G] ECELSFQ SLS
108 1x[1 G]+0.5x[2 Q] ECELSFQ SLS
109 1x[1 G] ECELSQP SLS
110 1x[1 G]+0.3x[2 Q] ECELSQP SLS
3 Global assumptions
Concrete design calculation: EN1992-1-1 / EN1992-1-2.
Loadings and combinations: EN1990 / EN1991.
Longitudinal reinforcement design: EN1992-1-1 / 6.1 - 'Limit reduced moment' method
Transversal reinforcement design: Standard method (EN1992-1-1, 6.2.2 / 6.2.3).
Concrete: No concrete with silica fume
No high performance concrete
Reinforcement diagram: Bilinear stress-strain diagram
Seismic dispositions: No seismic dispositions.
Medium ductility
Main beam.
Fire resistance: R0
Self weight: Self weight considered without compression flanges.
Calculation section type: T-section design.

3.1 Localisation
Localisation France
Element type Standard Beam
Element ID 1
Position Poutre n° 1 Niveau n° 1
Drawing -
Level 0.00 m NGF
Coordinates X₁ = 0.00 m; Y₁ = 0.00 m; Z₁ = 0.00 m
X₂ = 21.90 m; Y₂ = 0.00 m; Z₂ = 0.00 m
3.2 Units
Lengths mm
Forces kN
Moments kN⋅m
Stresses MPa (N/mm²)
Angles °
Reinforcement areas cm²
Crack Width mm
3.3 Materials
Concrete quality Span 1
(EN1992-1-1 / 3.1) Concrete class: C25/30
Span 2
Concrete class: C25/30
Span 3
Concrete class: C25/30
ULS :
ULS-A :
ULS-S :

Steel grade Span 1

(EN1992-1-1 / Section 3 / Annex C) Logitudinal steel class: B500B
Transversal steel class: B500B
Span 2
Logitudinal steel class: B500B
Span 3
Logitudinal steel class: B500B
Ductility class: B
Horizontal plastic branch

k = 1.08
ULS:
ULS-A:
ULS-S :
Concrete Covers
Top Bottom Lateral
Span Cover Cover Cover
(mm) (mm) (mm) (mm) (mm) (mm) (mm) (mm) (mm)
1 25 25 14 25 25 14 25 25 14
2 25 25 14 25 25 14 25 25 14
3 25 25 14 25 25 14 25 25 14
Minimal cover value for durability (4.4.1.2 (5))
Execution tolerance (4.4.1.1 2(P))
Security tolerance (4.4.1.2 (6))
Reduction for stainless steel (4.4.1.2 (7))
Reduction for supplementary protection (4.4.1.2 (8))
4 Creep coefficient
The creep coefficient calculation is done according to Annex B of EN1992-1-1.
Relative Humidity
Time at initial loading (in days)
Coefficient to describe the development
of creep with time after loading
Span 1
Notional size of the member in mm
(B.6)

Humidity influence (B.3a)
Influence of concrete resistance (B.4)
Age of loading t₀, considering the effect

of the cement type (B.9), in days
Influence of concrete maturity (B.5)
Long term creep coefficient (B.2)

Creep coefficient (B.1)
Span 2
(B.6)


Span 3
(B.6)


5 Fire resistance minimum conditions
Fire resistance class R0
6 Internal forces
Synthetic values table
In the table below, data corresponding to the ULS and SLS envelopes is displayed.

Span - Section Abscissa Face

(m) (kN⋅m) (kN⋅m) (kN⋅m) (kN⋅m) (kN) (kN⋅m)
1 - Left support 0.00 Top -13.17 -9.29 -7.21 -6.38 52.89 0.00
Bottom 8.13 5.75 4.53 4.04 0.00 0.00
1 - Right support 7.00 Top -74.04 -52.27 -40.67 -36.03 0.00 0.00
Bottom 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 -73.14 0.00
1 - MInf 3.01 Top 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.38 0.00
Bottom 87.79 61.94 48.04 42.48 -3.64 0.00
1 - VMax 7.00 Top -74.04 -52.27 -40.67 -36.03 0.00 0.00
Bottom 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 -73.14 0.00
1 - wk Max 2.03 Top 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 17.24 0.00
Bottom 79.32 56.03 43.77 38.87 0.00 0.00
1 - Max Concrete Stress 2.03 Top 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 17.24 0.00
Bottom 79.32 56.03 43.77 38.87 0.00 0.00
1 - Max Steel Stress 2.03 Top 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 17.24 0.00
Bottom 79.32 56.03 43.77 38.87 0.00 0.00
1 - Max Deflection 0.00 Top -13.17 -9.29 -7.21 -6.38 52.89 0.00
Bottom 8.13 5.75 4.53 4.04 0.00 0.00
2 - Left support 0.00 Top -75.21 -53.11 -41.44 -36.77 65.34 0.00
Bottom 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Bottom 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 -65.34 0.00
2 - MInf 3.50 Top -1.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 3.88 0.00
Bottom 54.42 37.87 26.88 22.48 -3.88 0.00
2 - VMax 7.00 Top -75.21 -53.11 -41.44 -36.77 0.00 0.00
Bottom 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 -65.34 0.00
2 - wk Max 0.00 Top -75.21 -53.11 -41.44 -36.77 65.34 0.00
Bottom 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
2 - Max Concrete Stress 0.00 Top -75.21 -53.11 -41.44 -36.77 65.34 0.00
Bottom 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
2 - Max Steel Stress 0.00 Top -75.21 -53.11 -41.44 -36.77 65.34 0.00
Bottom 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Bottom 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
3 - Left support 0.00 Top -74.04 -52.27 -40.67 -36.03 73.14 0.00
Bottom 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Bottom 8.13 5.75 4.53 4.04 -52.89 0.00
3 - MInf 3.99 Top 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3.64 0.00
Bottom 87.79 61.94 48.04 42.48 -0.38 0.00
3 - VMax 0.00 Top -74.04 -52.27 -40.67 -36.03 73.14 0.00
Bottom 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
3 - wk Max 4.97 Top 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Bottom 79.32 56.03 43.77 38.87 -17.24 0.00
3 - Max Concrete Stress 4.97 Top 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Bottom 79.32 56.03 43.77 38.87 -17.24 0.00
3 - Max Steel Stress 4.97 Top 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Bottom 79.32 56.03 43.77 38.87 -17.24 0.00

Span - Section Abscissa Face

(m) (kN⋅m) (kN⋅m) (kN⋅m) (kN⋅m) (kN) (kN⋅m)
Bottom 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
6.1 Envelope of ULS combinations
6.2 Envelope of SLS combinations

7 Longitudinal reinforcement
Reinforcement is calculated considering a design bending moment which is different than the bending
moment from actions, according to article 9.2.1.3, figure 9.2, from EN1992-1-1.
Longitudinal reinforcement
Position Bending moments Reinforcement
Span - Section Abscissa Comb Face WR Theo Real Min
(mm) (kN⋅m) (kN⋅m) (cm²) (cm²) (cm²)
1 - Left support 0 104 Top -13.17 -86.22 15.27 % 1.19 4.62 1.19
1 - Right support 7000 104 Top -74.04 -86.22 85.88 % 4.07 4.62 1.19
1 - MInf 3010 104 Bottom 87.79 162.92 53.89 % 4.89 9.24 1.19
2 - Left support 0 104 Top -75.21 -86.22 87.23 % 4.14 4.62 1.19
2 - MInf 3500 104 Bottom 54.42 160.67 33.87 % 2.94 9.10 1.19
3 - Left support 0 104 Top -74.04 -86.22 85.88 % 4.07 4.62 1.19
3 - MInf 3990 104 Bottom 87.79 162.92 53.89 % 4.89 9.24 1.19
Real longitudinal reinforcement

Span Position Family Reinforcement
Bottom 1 3 × ø14 + 3 × ø14 (9.24 cm²)
1
Top 1 3 × ø14 (4.62 cm²)

Bottom 1 3 × ø14 + 3 × ø14 (9.24 cm²)

2
Top 1 3 × ø14 (4.62 cm²)
Bottom 1 3 × ø14 + 3 × ø14 (9.24 cm²)
3
Top 1 3 × ø14 (4.62 cm²)
Real longitudinal reinforcement over supports

Support Family Reinforcement
1 1 (0.00 cm²)
2 1 (0.00 cm²)
3 1 (0.00 cm²)
4 1 (0.00 cm²)
The value of the effective height (d) is defined automatically according to the real reinforcement in place.
7.1 Detailed calculation
Span T 1.1, Section MInf, Abscissa 3010 mm, (Bottom bars)

Combination ULS 104 : 1.35x[1 G]+1.5x[2 Q]
Design bending moment
Reduced moment value
Reduced moment limit

Compressed reinforcement is not
required
Neutral axis
Inner lever arm
Steel stress in tension

Tension reinforcement area
The minimal and maximal percentages of longitudinal reinforcement in the beam are defined by the article
9.2.1.1 from EN1992-1-1
Minimal percentage (9.1N)
Bending moment resistance

Bending moment verification
Work Ratio 53.89 % (Passed)

Span T 1.1, Section Right support, Abscissa 7000 mm, (Top bars)

required
Neutral axis
Inner lever arm

9.2.1.1 from EN1992-1-1


Span T 1.1, Section Left support, Abscissa 0 mm, (Top bars)


required
Neutral axis
Inner lever arm

9.2.1.1 from EN1992-1-1




required
Neutral axis
Inner lever arm

9.2.1.1 from EN1992-1-1



required
Neutral axis
Inner lever arm

9.2.1.1 from EN1992-1-1




required
Neutral axis
Inner lever arm

9.2.1.1 from EN1992-1-1




required
Neutral axis
Inner lever arm

9.2.1.1 from EN1992-1-1



required
Neutral axis
Inner lever arm

9.2.1.1 from EN1992-1-1




required
Neutral axis
Inner lever arm

9.2.1.1 from EN1992-1-1

8 Transversal reinforcement
8.1 Transversal reinforcement global assumptions

The transversal reinforcement calculation is done according article 6.2 of EN1992-1-1.
No direct transmission for shear force.

Transversal reinforcement
Span - Section Abscissa Comb WR
(kN) (cm²/m) (kN)
1 - VMax 7000 104 73.14 33.62 360.45 4.20 1.60 4.71 84.73 86.32 %
2 - VMax 7000 104 65.34 33.62 360.45 3.75 1.60 3.77 67.78 96.40 %
3 - VMax 0 104 73.14 33.62 360.45 4.20 1.60 4.71 84.73 86.32 %
Real transversal reinforcement

Span Pack Reinforcement
1 1 × ø6 / 90 mm
2 1 × ø6 / 100 mm
1 3 32 × ø6 / 180 mm
4 3 × ø6 / 150 mm
5 5 × ø6 / 120 mm
1 5 × ø6 / 150 mm
2 3 × ø6 / 153 mm
2
3 28 × ø6 / 180 mm
4 5 × ø6 / 150 mm
1 5 × ø6 / 120 mm
2 3 × ø6 / 150 mm
3 3 32 × ø6 / 180 mm
4 1 × ø6 / 100 mm
5 1 × ø6 / 90 mm
8.2 Detailed calculation

The shear verification and dimensioning of the shear reinforcement is done according article 6.2 of the
EN1992-1-1
Span T 1.1, Section VMax, Abscissa 7000 mm
Combination 104 : 1.35x[1 G]+1.5x[2 Q]


Reduced design shear force
Strut angle
Inner lever arm
(6.2.2 (1))
Factor taking account the effective

height
Longitudinal reinforcement ratio, (6.2.2
(1))
Minimal resistant shear force (6.3N)
Design value for the shear resistance

(6.2.a) & (6.2.b)
Coefficient taking account of the state

of the stress in the compression chord
Strength reduction factor for concrete
cracked in shear (6.6N)
Design value of the maximum shear
force (6.9)
Concrete cross section satisfies the

crushing condition
Theoretical shear reinforcement area
(6.8)
Real shear reinforcement area

with real value of shear reinforcement,
expression (6.8)
Shear force verification



Reduced design shear force
Strut angle
Inner lever arm
(6.2.2 (1))
Factor taking account the effective

height
Longitudinal reinforcement ratio, (6.2.2
(1))
Minimal resistant shear force (6.3N)

(6.2.a) & (6.2.b)
Coefficient taking account of the state

of the stress in the compression chord
Strength reduction factor for concrete
cracked in shear (6.6N)
Design value of the maximum shear
force (6.9)
Concrete cross section satisfies the

crushing condition
Theoretical shear reinforcement area
(6.8)
Real shear reinforcement area

with real value of shear reinforcement,
expression (6.8)
Shear force verification

8.3 Minimal constructive dispositions

The minimal transversal reinforcement is defined according 9.2.2 from NF EN1992-1-1.
Minimal percentage
Minimal transversal reinforcement area

The maximum spacing is calculated according 9.2.2 from EN 1992-1-1.

Maximum spacing
9 Stresses verification
9.1 Envelope of SLS-CRQ combinations
Concrete compressive stress
Reinforcement tension stress
9.2 Envelope of SLS-FRQ combinations

9.3 Envelope of SLS-QP combinations

Synthetic values table
In the table below, data corresponding to the SLS envelopes is displayed.
Stresses verification
Span - Section Abscissa Envelope Stresses (MPa)
Type
(mm) WR WR
CRQ 2.94 18.67 7.10 28.41 % 291.20 72.80 %
1 - Max Concrete Stress 2030 FRQ 2.94 22.12 5.06 20.25 % 228.29 57.07 %
QP 3.79 24.11 4.29 17.14 % 203.05 50.76 %
CRQ 2.94 18.67 7.10 28.41 % 291.20 72.80 %
1 - Max Steel Stress 2030 FRQ 2.94 22.12 5.06 20.25 % 228.29 57.07 %
QP 3.79 24.11 4.29 17.14 % 203.05 50.76 %
CRQ 2.93 18.65 6.42 25.66 % 277.10 69.28 %
QP 3.79 24.11 3.86 15.43 % 192.80 48.20 %
CRQ 2.93 18.65 6.42 25.66 % 277.10 69.28 %
QP 3.79 24.11 3.86 15.43 % 192.80 48.20 %
CRQ 2.94 18.67 7.10 28.41 % 291.20 72.80 %
QP 3.79 24.11 4.29 17.14 % 203.05 50.76 %
CRQ 2.94 18.67 7.10 28.41 % 291.20 72.80 %
QP 3.79 24.11 4.29 17.14 % 203.05 50.76 %
Span T 1.1, Section Max Steel Stress, Abscissa 2030 mm

Combination Envelope of SLS QP combinations


SLS bending moment
Tensioned reinforcement area
Compressed reinforcement area
Equivalence coefficient for long term
loads
Height of compressed concrete
The moment of inertia
Reinforcement compression stress
Concrete compression stress
Concrete tension stress

SLS bending moment
Tensioned reinforcement area
Compressed reinforcement area
Equivalence coefficient for long term
loads
Height of compressed concrete
The moment of inertia
Reinforcement compression stress
Concrete compression stress
Concrete tension stress

10 Crack width check
Specific SLS envelope combinations were not found (SLS quasi-permanent). Verifications have been
performed with the defined SLS combination.
In the table below, data corresponding to the SLS envelopes is displayed.
Crack width verification

Span - Section Abscissa Section WR
(mm) Position (mm) (mm) (mm) (‰) (mm) (mm)
1 - wk Max 2030 Bottom 0.000 0.152 206 0.74 0.152 0.400 37.89 %
2 - wk Max 0 Top 0.138 0.000 196 0.71 0.138 0.400 34.56 %
3 - wk Max 4970 Bottom 0.000 0.152 206 0.74 0.152 0.400 37.89 %
The crack opening calculation is done according EN 1992-1-1, 7.3.4 (1).
Span T 1.1, Section wk Max, Abscissa 2030 mm, Position: bottom
Neutral axis position
Effective tension area, surrounding the
tension reinforcement
(7.3.4(2), Fig. 7.1)
Maximum crack spacing

(7.3.4(3), 7.11)
Secant Young modulus
Short term equivalence coefficient
Difference between average strains

(7.3.4 (2))

Crack width (7.3.4 (1))

Passed
Span T 1.2, Section wk Max, Abscissa 0 mm, Position: top

(7.3.4(2), Fig. 7.1)

(7.3.4(3), 7.11)

(7.3.4 (2))


Passed
Span T 1.3, Section wk Max, Abscissa 4970 mm, Position: bottom

(7.3.4(2), Fig. 7.1)

(7.3.4(3), 7.11)

(7.3.4 (2))

Passed
11 Anchorage calculation
Anchorage calculation
Bar Position
mark
(kN) (mm) (MPa) (mm) (mm)
1 Start 14.68 60 95.35 124 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 140

Anchorage calculation
Bar Position
mark
(kN) (mm) (MPa) (mm) (mm)
End 0.00 0 0.00 0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 140
2 Start 0.00 0 434.78 565 1.00 0.88 1.00 1.00 1.00 498
End 0.00 0 434.78 565 1.00 0.88 1.00 1.00 1.00 498
5 Start 0.00 0 0.00 0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 140
End 0.00 0 0.00 0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 140
6 Start 0.00 0 434.78 565 1.00 0.88 1.00 1.00 1.00 498
End 0.00 0 434.78 565 1.00 0.88 1.00 1.00 1.00 498
9 Start 0.00 0 0.00 0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 140
End 14.68 60 95.35 124 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 140
10 Start 0.00 0 434.78 565 1.00 0.88 1.00 1.00 1.00 498
End 0.00 0 434.78 565 1.00 0.88 1.00 1.00 1.00 498
Anchorage calculation: anchorage at a s0.cot(teta) distance.
Anchorage calculation is done according to EN1992-1, 8.4.
12 Support strut verification
The support strut verification and dimensioning of the sliding reinforcement is done according article 6.5
and 9.2.1.4/ 9.2.1.5 of EN 1992-1-1.
In the table below, data corresponding to the ULS envelopes is displayed.
Support strut verification

Span Sliding reinforcement Support strut stress
ID Position Real Minimum θ' Work Status
(cm²) (cm²) (°) (MPa) (MPa) Ratio
1 Left 4.62 1.01 50.22 1.42 12.75 11.13 % Passed
Right 4.62 0.00 - 2.32 15.00 15.45 % Passed
2 Left 4.62 0.00 - 2.32 15.00 15.45 % Passed
Right 4.62 0.00 - 2.32 15.00 15.45 % Passed
3 Left 4.62 0.00 - 2.32 15.00 15.45 % Passed
Right 4.62 1.01 0.00 1.42 12.75 11.13 % Passed
12.1 Support strut stresses verification
Support strut verification is done according to Figure 9.101NF.
Span T 1.1, Section Left support, Abscissa 0 mm
Envelope ULS
Maximum stress which can be applied at the
edges of the node (edge support) (6.5.4(4b))
Effective support stress
Support reaction

Compressed strut width
Distance from beam bottom edge to bottom

bars on support axis
Effective width of support
Inner lever arm
Inclination of the strut on support
11.13 % (Passed)
Span T 1.1, Section Right support, Abscissa 7000 mm
Envelope ULS
edges of the node (intermediate support) (6.5.4
(4a))
Support reaction
15.45 % (Passed)
Envelope ULS
(4a))
Support reaction
15.45 % (Passed)
Envelope ULS
(4a))
Support reaction
15.45 % (Passed)

Envelope ULS
(4a))
Support reaction
15.45 % (Passed)
Envelope ULS
edges of the node (edge support) (6.5.4(4b))
Support reaction
Compressed strut width
Distance from beam bottom edge to bottom

bars on support axis
Effective width of support
Inner lever arm
Inclination of the strut on support
11.13 % (Passed)
12.2 Sliding reinforcement verification

Envelope ULS
Reinforcement verification
Bottom longitudinal reinforcement which is
anchored in support verification
Tensile force to be anchored in support
(9.2.1.4 (2))
456.00 % (Passed)
Additional sliding reinforcement not needed
Envelope ULS

Tensile force to be anchored in support
(9.2.1.4 (2))
100.00 % (Passed)
Envelope ULS
100.00 % (Passed)
Envelope ULS
100.00 % (Passed)
Envelope ULS
100.00 % (Passed)
Envelope ULS
456.00 % (Passed)
13 Support reactions
Fz (kN)
Load case / combination Supp. My (kN⋅m)
Normal Uplift

1 -22.58 0.00 -5.13

2 -59.03 0.00 0.00
1 Dead loads 1
3 -59.03 0.00 0.00
4 -22.58 0.00 5.13
1 -16.70 1.55 -4.18
2 -42.71 3.10 0.00
2 Live loads 1
3 -42.71 3.10 0.00
4 -16.70 1.55 4.18
1 -55.53 2.33 -13.17
2 -143.74 4.65 0.00
Max(ULS)
3 -143.74 4.65 0.00
4 -55.53 2.33 13.17
1 -39.28 1.55 -9.29
2 -101.73 3.10 0.00
Max(SLS)
3 -101.73 3.10 0.00
4 -39.28 1.55 9.29
14 Rotation capacity
The rotation capacity estimation is done according to article 5.6.3 from EN1992-1-1.
Rotation capacity
Support Load Work Status
ID Combination (kN⋅m) (kN) (mrad) (mrad) Ratio
2 (Mmin) 104 63.83 -69.87 2.72 11.81 23.03 % Passed
2 (Vmax) 104 85.21 -74.99 2.72 11.81 23.03 % Passed
3 (Mmin) 104 63.83 69.87 2.72 11.81 23.03 % Passed
3 (Vmax) 104 85.21 74.99 2.72 11.81 23.03 % Passed
15 Deflections

Intermediate values
Span d K Correction
(mm) (‰) (‰) (‰)
1 441 5.50 0.00 5.00 1.30 1.88
2 441 3.33 0.07 5.00 1.50 3.10
3 441 5.50 0.00 5.00 1.30 1.88
Deflection verification
Span Limit L/d WR
(cm²) (cm²) (cm²) (cm²)
1 4.85 0.00 9.10 4.62 43.51 16.55 38.04 %
2 2.94 0.07 9.10 4.62 129.65 16.55 12.77 %
3 4.85 0.00 9.10 4.62 43.51 16.55 38.04 %
The limit for L/d is calculated according to EN 1992-1-1, 7.4.2, (7.16.a or 7.16.b).
K is read from Table7.4NF
(Additional K values may be found in 'Calcul des structures en béton, Jean-Marie PAILLÉ')
Correction is computed from formula (7.17)
16 Bill of materials
Formwork dimensions summary

Span L r b
(mm) (mm) (mm)
T 1.1 7450 500 200
T 1.2 7300 500 200
T 1.3 7450 500 200
Reinforcement summary
Diameter Length Weight
HA14 15833.6 cm 190.23 kg
HA6 17587.2 cm 37.35 kg
Beam Concrete Formwork Steel Reinf. Ratio

Level 1 Quantity Price Quantity Price Quantity Price
(m³) (€) (m²) (€) (kg) (€) (kg/m³)
T 1.1 0.75 0.00 8.40 0.00 98.04 0.00 131.60
T 1.2 0.73 0.00 8.40 0.00 100.97 0.00 138.31
T 1.3 0.75 0.00 8.40 0.00 28.57 0.00 38.35

Total 2.22 0.00 25.20 0.00 227.58 0.00 102.51

Total Price 0.00 €
Average Diameter: 11 mm

Test Beam Report

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Description:

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Test Beam Report

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Project

Reinforced concrete beam

Advance Design RC Beam 2024 Page 1 of 35

2 Loads and combinations

Load cases description

Advance Design RC Beam 2024 Page 2 of 35

Uniform linear loads

Advance Design RC Beam 2024 Page 3 of 35

Advance Design RC Beam 2024 Page 4 of 35

Steel grade Span 1

Horizontal plastic branch

Advance Design RC Beam 2024 Page 5 of 35

Humidity influence (B.3a)

Influence of concrete resistance (B.4)

Age of loading t₀, considering the effect

Influence of concrete maturity (B.5)

Long term creep coefficient (B.2)

Influence of concrete resistance (B.4)

Age of loading t₀, considering the effect

Influence of concrete maturity (B.5)

Long term creep coefficient (B.2)

Influence of concrete resistance (B.4)

Age of loading t₀, considering the effect

Influence of concrete maturity (B.5)

Long term creep coefficient (B.2)

5 Fire resistance minimum conditions

Fire resistance class R0

Synthetic values table

Advance Design RC Beam 2024 Page 6 of 35

Span - Section Abscissa Face

Advance Design RC Beam 2024 Page 7 of 35

Span - Section Abscissa Face

6.2 Envelope of SLS combinations

Advance Design RC Beam 2024 Page 8 of 35

Real longitudinal reinforcement

Advance Design RC Beam 2024 Page 9 of 35

Bottom 1 3 × ø14 + 3 × ø14 (9.24 cm²)

Real longitudinal reinforcement over supports

7.1 Detailed calculation

Span T 1.1, Section MInf, Abscissa 3010 mm, (Bottom bars)

Reduced moment limit

Inner lever arm

Steel stress in tension

Bending moment resistance

Advance Design RC Beam 2024 Page 10 of 35

Reduced moment limit

Inner lever arm

Steel stress in tension

Bending moment resistance

Advance Design RC Beam 2024 Page 11 of 35

Span T 1.1, Section Left support, Abscissa 0 mm, (Top bars)

Reduced moment limit

Inner lever arm

Steel stress in tension

Bending moment resistance

Advance Design RC Beam 2024 Page 12 of 35

Span T 1.2, Section MInf, Abscissa 3500 mm, (Bottom bars)

Reduced moment limit

Inner lever arm

Steel stress in tension

Bending moment resistance

Advance Design RC Beam 2024 Page 13 of 35