Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 8 views

    3.4 Assignment 3 - CPM

    Uploaded by

    std29757
    The document presents a competitive profile matrix comparing three cement companies - Lucky Cement, DG Khan Cement, and Kohinoor – Maple Leaf - across 10 critical success factors such as production strength, market share, financial performance, and energy generation. Lucky Cement received the highest total weighted score of 3.71, followed closely by DG Khan Cement at 3.65, with Kohinoor – Maple Leaf receiving a score of 3.36. The matrix provides a comparison of the three companies' performance on key metrics used to evaluate competitiveness in the cement industry.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content

    You might also like

    3.4 Assignment 3 - CPM

    Uploaded by

    std29757
    8 views2 pages
    The document presents a competitive profile matrix comparing three cement companies - Lucky Cement, DG Khan Cement, and Kohinoor – Maple Leaf - across 10 critical success factors such as production strength, market share, financial performance, and energy generation. Lucky Cement received the highest total weighted score of 3.71, followed closely by DG Khan Cement at 3.65, with Kohinoor – Maple Leaf receiving a score of 3.36. The matrix provides a comparison of the three companies' performance on key metrics used to evaluate competitiveness in the cement industry.

    Original Description:

    Original Title

    3.4 Assignment 3_CPM

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The document presents a competitive profile matrix comparing three cement companies - Lucky Cement, DG Khan Cement, and Kohinoor – Maple Leaf - across 10 critical success factors such as production strength, market share, financial performance, and energy generation. Lucky Cement received the highest total weighted score of 3.71, followed closely by DG Khan Cement at 3.65, with Kohinoor – Maple Leaf receiving a score of 3.36. The matrix provides a comparison of the three companies' performance on key metrics used to evaluate competitiveness in the cement industry.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf or txt
    8 views2 pages

    3.4 Assignment 3 - CPM

    Uploaded by

    std29757
    The document presents a competitive profile matrix comparing three cement companies - Lucky Cement, DG Khan Cement, and Kohinoor – Maple Leaf - across 10 critical success factors such as production strength, market share, financial performance, and energy generation. Lucky Cement received the highest total weighted score of 3.71, followed closely by DG Khan Cement at 3.65, with Kohinoor – Maple Leaf receiving a score of 3.36. The matrix provides a comparison of the three companies' performance on key metrics used to evaluate competitiveness in the cement industry.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf or txt
    of 2

    Presented to : Mr Naveed M.

    Khan

    Competitive Profile Matrix

    Maham Qazi
    Mohammad Rashid
    Rao Ehtisham
    Fatima Naseem
    Ayaz Noor Khan
    Competitive Profile Matrix Lucky Cement DG Khan Cement Kohinoor – Maple Leaf

    Critical Success Factors Weight Rating Weighted Score Rating Weighted Score Rating Weighted
    Score

    Production Strength 0.12 4 0.48 4 0.48 3 0.36

    Parent Group Name 0.08 4 0.32 4 0.32 4 0.32

    Market Share 0.14 4 0.56 4 0.56 3 0.42

    Supply Efficiency 0.09 3 0.27 3 0.27 4 0.36

    Financial Performance 0.11 3 0.33 4 0.44 3 0.33

    Distribution Coverage 0.08 4 0.32 3 0.24 3 0.24

    Technology Capitalization 0.09 4 0.36 3 0.27 3 0.27

    Quality Orientation 0.09 3 0.27 3 0.27 4 0.36

    Management Efficacy 0.10 4 0.4 4 0.4 4 0.4

    Energy Generation 0.10 4 0.4 3 0.4 3 0.3

    TOTAL 1 3.71 3.65 3.36

    You might also like