The document discusses factors that contribute to the bullwhip effect in supply chains and methods to reduce it. It describes four key factors that increase bullwhip: demand signal processing, rationing and shortage gaming, price variations, and order batching. Countermeasures proposed include information sharing, forecasting methods, and collaborative planning. The document also discusses the beer game simulation, differences between Forrester and Burbridge models of demand amplification, input-output diagrams, forecasting logic and instability, and four principles - control systems, time compression, information transparency, and echelon elimination - for reducing bullwhip.
The document discusses factors that contribute to the bullwhip effect in supply chains and methods to reduce it. It describes four key factors that increase bullwhip: demand signal processing, rationing and shortage gaming, price variations, and order batching. Countermeasures proposed include information sharing, forecasting methods, and collaborative planning. The document also discusses the beer game simulation, differences between Forrester and Burbridge models of demand amplification, input-output diagrams, forecasting logic and instability, and four principles - control systems, time compression, information transparency, and echelon elimination - for reducing bullwhip.
The document discusses factors that contribute to the bullwhip effect in supply chains and methods to reduce it. It describes four key factors that increase bullwhip: demand signal processing, rationing and shortage gaming, price variations, and order batching. Countermeasures proposed include information sharing, forecasting methods, and collaborative planning. The document also discusses the beer game simulation, differences between Forrester and Burbridge models of demand amplification, input-output diagrams, forecasting logic and instability, and four principles - control systems, time compression, information transparency, and echelon elimination - for reducing bullwhip.
The document discusses factors that contribute to the bullwhip effect in supply chains and methods to reduce it. It describes four key factors that increase bullwhip: demand signal processing, rationing and shortage gaming, price variations, and order batching. Countermeasures proposed include information sharing, forecasting methods, and collaborative planning. The document also discusses the beer game simulation, differences between Forrester and Burbridge models of demand amplification, input-output diagrams, forecasting logic and instability, and four principles - control systems, time compression, information transparency, and echelon elimination - for reducing bullwhip.
1. Illustrate the bullwhip effect! Describe any four factors that have impact on the bullwhip effect and propose counter measures.
• Name four factors that have impact on the bullwhip effect:
• Counter measures:
2. What is the purpose of the beer game?
The exercise focus is on the relationships between suppliers, OEMs, distributors and customers and the effects that can occur in a supply chain. • To understand the basics of the Supply Chain • To learn how to manage orders and the changing inventory along with the orders • To see the difficulties in managing the supply chain with delays and bottlenecks 3. Explain the difference between Forrester and Burbridge effect! Use a diagram. • Forrester: Forrester developed a simulation model of a representative production-distribution system. The methodology is based on control theory and employed continuous functions to model system performance. • Burbridge: In contrast to F. this approach emphasized the “sharp edge” and discontinuous nature of production
4. Please label the following Input-Output diagram showing Forrester and
Burbridge sources of demand amplification. 5. Define the feedforward logic! How can this forecasting mechanism contribute the system instability? Feedforward logic refers to the way in which forecasting algorithms are used to determine production and target inventories for future periods. The forecasting methods can however contribute to the instability by over-reacting to a temporary sales blip and building unnecessary inventory that must be depleted by cuts in future production.
6. Describe the four material flow principles for bullwhip reduction!
• Control systems principle Involves selection of decision support systems, including synchronization and avoidance of the batch-and-queue scenario. Being appropriate to good dynamic control of the total supply chain • Time compression principle Involves re-engineering in order to compress material and information-processing lead times. Shorter time delays enable faster inventory adjustments and limit the extent of inventory discrepancies. Shorter wavelength as the feedback loops are closer. • Information transparency principle Involves the widespread provision of high integrity operations information throughout the supply chain. Due to Web-based supply chain systems information transparency is very easy for companies. How-ever the stream of information from the end-customer to the raw material supplier is still a sensitive issue. • Echelon elimination principle Involves the elimination of redundant echelons and functional interfaces. This removes the time delay and information distortion, but may lead to a substantially different channel of distribution