Monsato vs. Factoran Gr. No. 78239

You might also like

Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 1

MONSATO V. FACTORAN, G.R. NO.

78239, February 9, 1989

FACTS:

The Sandiganbayan convicted petitioner Salvacion A. Monsanto (then assistant treasurer of


Calbayog City) and three other accused, of the complex crime of estafa thru falsification of
public documents and sentenced them to imprisonment of four (4) years, two (2) months and one
(1) day of prision correccional as minimum, to ten (10) years and one (1) day of prision mayor as
maximum, and to pay a fine of P3,500. They were further ordered to jointly and severally
indemnify the government in the sum of P4,892.50 representing the balance of the amount
defrauded and to pay the costs proportionately.

She then filed a motion for reconsideration but while said motion was pending, she was extended
by then President Marcos absolute pardon which she accepted. By reason of said pardon,
petitioner wrote the Calbayog City treasurer requesting that she be restored to her former post as
assistant city treasurer.

ISSUE:

Whether or not a public officer, who has been granted an absolute pardon by the Chief
Executive, is entitled to reinstatement to her former position without need of a new appointment.

RULING:

NO. The public officer, who is granted an absolute pardon cannot be reinstated to her former
position.

The Court ruled that to insist on automatic reinstatement because of a mistaken notion that the
pardon virtually acquitted one from the offense of estafa would be grossly untenable. A pardon,
albeit full and plenary, cannot preclude the appointing power from refusing appointment to
anyone deemed to be of bad character, a poor moral risk, or who is unsuitable by reason of the
pardoned conviction.

The absolute disqualification or ineligibility from public office forms part of the punishment
prescribed by the Revised Penal Code for estafa thru falsification of public documents. It is clear
from the authorities referred to that when her guilt and punishment were expunged by her
pardon, this particular disability was likewise removed. Stated differently, the pardon granted to
petitioner has resulted in removing her disqualification from holding public employment but it
cannot go beyond that.

Therefore, to regain her former post as assistant city treasurer, she must re-apply and undergo the
usual procedure required for a new appointment.

You might also like