Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Appendix Tables - Nature of Fraud and Computer Misuse, Year Ending March 2023
Appendix Tables - Nature of Fraud and Computer Misuse, Year Ending March 2023
Information
Data tables shown in this workbook relate to the Crime Survey for England and Wales (CSEW) and the
For dates of future publications please see the Office for National Statistics (ONS) Release Calendar.
For explanatory notes on these statistics see the User Guide to Crime Statistics for England and Wales
revisions policy is in Section 3 of the User Guide.
For further information about the Crime Survey for England and Wales (CSEW) and police recorded cri
crimestatistics@ons.gov.uk
or write to: ONS Centre for Crime and Justice, Office for National Statistics, Room 2200, Segensworth R
crimestatistics@ons.gov.uk
email: crimestatistics@ons.gov.uk
Table of contents
Worksheet number
Notes
Table 1
Table 2
Table 3a
Table 3b
Table 3c
Table 3d
Table 4
Table 5
Table 6
Table 7
Table 8
Table 9
Table 10
Table 11
Table 12
Table 13
Table 14
Table 15
Table 19
Table 16
Table 17
Table 18
Worksheet title
Notes
Number of incidents of fraud and percentage of people aged 16 and over who were victims of fraud onc
(prevalence risks), England and Wales, year ending March 2017 to year ending March 2023
Number of incidents of computer misuse and percentage of people aged 16 and over who were victims
misuse once or more (prevalence risks), England and Wales, year ending March 2017 to year ending M
Number of fraud and computer misuse offences recorded by Action Fraud and referred to the National F
Bureau (NFIB), with percentage change, England and Wales, year ending March 2013 to year ending M
Number of fraud offences recorded by Cifas and referred to the National Fraud Intelligence Bureau (NF
percentage change, England and Wales, year ending March 2013 to year ending March 2023
Number of fraud offences recorded by UK Finance and referred to the National Fraud Intelligence Bure
percentage change, England and Wales, year ending March 2013 to year ending March 2023
Number of fraud and computer misuse offences referred to the National Fraud Intelligence Bureau (NFI
percentage change, England and Wales, year ending March 2013 to year ending March 2023
Number of fraud incidents on all payment types, UK Finance CAMIS database, with percentage change
year ending March 2011 to year ending March 2023
Number of fraud and computer misuse offences referred to the National Fraud Intelligence Bureau (NFI
Fraud, by police force area, England and Wales (excluding Devon and Cornwall), year ending March 20
ending March 2023 (Experimental Statistics)
Proportion of victims aged 16 and over who were victimised more than once, England and Wales, year
2017 to year ending March 2023
Proportion of people aged 16 and over who were victims of fraud, by personal characteristics, England
ending March 2023
Proportion of people aged 16 and over who were victims of fraud, by household and area characteristic
Wales, year ending March 2023
Proportion of people aged 16 and over who were victims of computer misuse, by personal characteristic
Wales, year ending March 2023
Proportion of people aged 16 and over who were victims of computer misuse, by household and area c
England and Wales, year ending March 2023
Fraud and computer misuse by loss (of money or property) - number and rate of incidents and number
victims aged 16 and over, England and Wales, year ending March 2023
Percentage of fraud and computer misuse incidents reported to the police or Action Fraud, England and
ending March 2017 to year ending March 2023
Reasons for not reporting incidents of fraud and computer misuse to the police or Action Fraud, Englan
ending March 2019 to year ending March 2023
Security measures taken to prevent unauthorised access to bank, building society or credit card accoun
aged 16 and over, England and Wales, year ending March 2018 to year ending March 2023
Security measures taken to keep safe online, people aged 16 and over, England and Wales, year endin
year ending March 2023
Rating and awareness of the National Crime Agency and the local police in tackling cyber crime, Englan
year ending March 2019 to year ending March 2023
Worksheet title
Proportion of people aged 16 and over who received a message that may have been phishing and the p
who replied to or clicked on a link in the message, by personal characteristics
Proportion of people aged 16 and over who received a message that may have been phishing and the p
who replied to or clicked on a link in the message, by household and area characteristics
Source
UK Finance
Source
Worksheet link
Notes
Table 1
Table 2
Table 3a
Table 3b
Table 3c
Table 3d
Table 4
Table 5
Table 6
Table 7
Table 8
Table 9
Table 10
Table 11
Table 12
Table 13
Table 14
Table 15
Table 19
Worksheet link
Table 16
Table 17
Table 18
Notes for Fraud and computer misuse tables
Note number
Note number
5
6
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
2
3
4
5
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Note number
4
Notes for Tables 11, 12, 13, 14 and 15
Note number
1
3
4
5
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
Note number
3
4
5
ud and computer misuse tables
Note text
New victimisation questions on fraud and computer misuse were incorporated into the CSEW from Octo
were asked of half the survey sample. From October 2017 onwards the questions are being asked of a
In March 2018 the new CSEW estimates on fraud and computer misuse were assessed by the Office fo
for Statistics and were awarded National Statistics status.
CSEW estimates for the year ending March 2023 have been temporarily suspended of their National St
interpreting these estimates because of the impact of lower response rates, and reduced interviewer nu
Chapter 5 of the User guide to crime statistics for England and Wales contains more information about
Chapter 8 of the User guide to crime statistics for England and Wales contains further information on st
Note text
More information on the National Fraud Intelligence Bureau can be found on the Action Fraud website.
Action Fraud and NFIB collate data for the UK as a whole, the figures presented here for England and W
information is available on where offences take place (which is often hard to define). For a small propor
is unknown, these are also included in the total for England and Wales figures. Offences referred to the
any information on the location of the victim. UK Finance figures are derived for England and Wales usi
distribution of offences referred by Cifas. Section 5.4 of the User guide to crime statistics for England an
Revisions have been made to previous data, therefore figures will not match previous tables that have b
Section 5.4 of the User guide to crime statistics for England and Wales provides an explanation and exa
Following the implementation of a new IT system in November 2022, Devon and Cornwall Police have b
Action Fraud data from Devon and Cornwall Police have been excluded from the year ending March 20
match other published tables.
A PSP is a payment service provider (for example Paypal, World Pay) that is not a bank, dealing in elec
using PSPs are recorded under 'Online shopping and auctions'.
TSB reported a large number of 'Cheque, plastic card and online bank accounts (not PSP)' offences in
increase recorded by Action Fraud in this type of fraud in the year ending March 2019.
Frauds within the telecoms sector that are reported to Cifas are subject to a lot of fluctuation due to the
members on a case-by-case basis, i.e. they use a batch reporting system whereby they submit multiple
over a period of time.
The increase in fraudulent applications for grants from charities or lottery fund organisations recorded b
attributed to one specific organisation that was targeted by a fraud ring resulting in a large number of of
The large increase in 'other advance fee' frauds recorded by Action Fraud from the year ending March 2
reports recorded in the summer months of 2016 following a scam where fraudsters contacted victims cl
(HMRC) and tricked them into paying bogus debts and taxes using iTunes gift cards.
'Other advance fee' includes frauds that cannot be classified under any of the other advance fee payme
clairvoyant or psychic scams, impersonation of officials, racing tipster scams, work from home and busi
scams.
Action Fraud reported several increases in the subcategories of 'Financial Investment fraud' in the year
driven by legislative changes, for example, the cold calling ban, which have resulted in fraudsters divers
transfer funds in the belief that they are making an investment. The increase was also driven by an incr
Action Fraud reported a large increase in NFIB2E 'other financial investment' in the year ending March
cryptocurrency and 'Forex' investments. The increase is also part driven by an increase in reports of 'm
'Other financial investment' fraud includes frauds that cannot be classified under any of the other financ
seminar.
'Non-investment fraud' has been renamed as 'Consumer and retail fraud' to reflect the corresponding na
from April 2017.
'Other consumer and retail fraud' includes frauds that cannot be classified under any of the other consu
could be a person agreeing to buy a laptop advertised in the paper and during the exchange they are d
laptop case contains a telephone directory instead of a laptop.
Recording of these fraud offences by Action Fraud commenced from 1 January 2012.
Recording of these fraud offences by Action Fraud commenced from 14 February 2013.
Recording of these fraud offences by Action Fraud commenced from 1 July 2012.
'Other regulatory' fraud includes regulators fraud (such as Land Registry, Insider Dealing at the stock ex
covered elsewhere. An example would be the Land Registry receives a fraudulent application to change
The increase in hacking (extortion) figures in March 2019 is driven primarily by the mass extortion camp
that summer. These campaigns included hoax bomb threats to schools, hoax Wannacry and DDoS cam
Figures may be an underestimate as Cifas' fraud cases are recorded on their database after member b
therefore be a delay in reporting of Covid-19 related frauds. Additionally, Cifas report that some membe
practices in response to Covid-19 which may have had an impact on fraud reporting levels during the p
Both sets of industry data from Cifas and UK Finance relate only to fraud affecting those organisations t
networks. While membership of Cifas and UK Finance has remained fairly stable over the last few year
members join or previous members withdraw, which could impact on overall figures for fraud reported.
Cifas reports that the increase in 'Business trading fraud' is mainly due to a rise in merchant acquiring.
Cifas reports a significant rise in the year ending March 2023 in false applications where false informati
there has been a failure to give an account of the grant.
The UK Finance figures and NFIB totals presented are supplemented by provisional data provided by U
the data collection process impacting a small percentage of the records supplied by UK Finance. The N
referrals from this period are processed, at which point the need for provisional data will be removed.
Fraud offences referred to the NFIB by industry bodies cover only a subset of fraud types, and in respec
Plastic Card and Online Bank Accounts (not PSP) only.
The large increase in UK Finance figures for the year ending March 2022 was a result of increase in rep
engagement from UK Finance to their members, as well as the reports coming in from new members of
the last calendar year. There was also a data submission issue from one of UK Finance’s member firms
duplicated throughout February 2022. The National Fraud Intelligence Bureau’s (NFIB) IT Supplier have
system, but the process for this back out is currently in negotiation. Until the duplicates have been remo
figure in terms of the number of reports received from UK Finance for February 2022. Therefore, the UK
may be an underestimate.
As a result of inconsistencies in the data collection process impacting a small percentage of the records
ending March 2023 are provisional and will be updated in future publications. The NFIB and UK Financ
period are processed, at which point the need for provisional data will be removed.
UK Finance is always working with member firms to improve the volume of actionable intelligence that c
National Fraud Intelligence Bureau (NFIB), the increases seen in 2022 and 2023 is a positive reflection
that the Fraud Reports published by UK Finance should be used to understand the full level of fraud im
4, 5 and 6
Note text
All offences are classed under HOCR as NFIB5A, cheque, plastic card and online bank accounts (non P
UK Finance's breakdowns.
The total number of offences here is including all offences that are also included in the FISS dataset.
Counterfeit card fraud has been getting more difficult since the introduction of Chip and PIN technology
Remote purchase fraud includes telephone, internet and mail order fraud.
Account takeover has been renamed to Card ID theft to more accurately reflect the data captured in this
fraud and account takeover. Figures presented in this table continue to be comparable with previously p
The increase in card ID theft is thought to be a result of the increased amount of personal information fr
banks controls, such as social media.
The downward trend of cheque fraud is likely to have been driven by the continued fall in the use of che
of lockdown restrictions.
UK Finance identified an issue with its Authorised Push Payment dataset so data prior to 2020 have be
from January 2020 onwards.
These data are published as Experimental Statistics, which are in the testing phase and not yet fully de
users and stakeholders in their development, and as a means to build in quality at an early stage.
Action Fraud and National Fraud Intelligence Bureau (NFIB) collate data for the UK as a whole. The figu
based on victims' address information. This is in contrast with traditional crimes which are based on wh
fraud is often hard to define). Section 5.4 of the User Guide to crime statistics for England and Wales co
More information on the National Fraud Intelligence Bureau can be found on the Action Fraud website.
The total for England and Wales includes the number of offences where the victim's police force area is
Rates for London include 'City of London'.
Following the implementation of a new IT system in November 2022, Devon and Cornwall Police have b
2022 to March 2023. Their data have been excluded from this table for the purpose of comparison.
Offences where the victim's police force area is unknown relate to cases where it has not been possible
example, due to missing address information, or where the offence occurred outside the UK.
New victimisation questions on fraud and computer misuse were incorporated into the CSEW from Octo
were asked of half the survey sample. From October 2017 onwards the questions are being asked of a
In March 2018 the new CSEW estimates on fraud and computer misuse were assessed by the Office fo
for Statistics and were awarded National Statistics status.
CSEW estimates for the year ending March 2023 have been temporarily suspended of their National St
interpreting these estimates because of the impact of lower response rates, and reduced interviewer nu
Chapter 5 of the User guide to crime statistics for England and Wales contains more information about
A small change to the weighting procedure made in 2019 has been incorporated from the year ending M
of this change will only have a negligible impact on the estimates in this table and therefore not all histo
weights, except where direct comparisons have been made since January 2019. The years ending Mar
using the new weighting procedure.
Chapter 8 of the User guide to crime statistics for England and Wales contains further information on st
New victimisation questions on fraud and computer misuse were incorporated into the CSEW from Octo
the questions were asked of half the survey sample. From October 2017 onwards the questions are bei
Two different breakdowns are provided for fraud. One relates to the type of fraud, the other relates to w
For the purposes of this analysis, 'All other fraud' refers to advance fee fraud and other fraud combined
'Cyber' represents cases where the internet or any type of online activity was related to any aspect of th
'Non-cyber' represents offences which did not involve the internet or any online activity.
7, 8, 9 and 10
Note text
See Section 7 of the User guide to crime statistics for definitions of personal, household and area chara
CSEW estimates for the year ending March 2023 have been temporarily suspended of their National St
interpreting these estimates because of the impact of lower response rates, and reduced interviewer nu
The definition of disability used is consistent with the core definition of disability under the Equality Act 2
they have a long-standing illness, disability or impairment which causes difficulty with day-to-day activiti
The terminology used to label this data has been changed to 'sexual orientation' from 'sexual identity' to
Act 2010). Sexual Orientation is an umbrella concept which encompasses sexual identity, attraction and
principle is based on a substantial body of research and is designed to capture self-perceived Sexual Id
questions on either sexual identity, attraction or behaviour. The measurement of Sexual Identity was ide
Sexual Orientation most closely related to experiences of disadvantage and discrimination. The questio
of sexual behaviour or attraction where a series of more detailed questions and answer categories migh
11, 12, 13, 14 and 15
Note text
CSEW estimates for the year ending March 2023 have been temporarily suspended of their National St
interpreting these estimates because of the impact of lower response rates, and reduced interviewer nu
Chapter 5 of the User guide to crime statistics for England and Wales contains more information about
Loss through computer viruses is mainly associated with additional charges or costs incurred as a resu
are less likely to be fully reimbursed.
Incidents that were reported to the police (and/or Action Fraud for fraud and computer misuse offences)
know about in another way, e.g. police arrived at the scene.
New victimisation questions on fraud and computer misuse were incorporated into the CSEW from Octo
the questions were asked of half the survey sample. From October 2017 onwards the questions are bei
In March 2018 the new CSEW estimates on fraud and computer misuse were assessed by the Office fo
for Statistics and were awarded National Statistics status.
From April 2017, the question wording changed from 'Did the police come to know about the matter?' to
Chapter 8 of the User guide to crime statistics for England and Wales contains further information on st
For the purposes of this analysis, 'All other fraud' refers to advance fee fraud and other fraud combined
'Cyber' represents cases where the internet or any type of online activity was related to any aspect of th
'Non-cyber' represents offences which did not involve the internet or any online activity.
Following changes to the CSEW questionnaire, questions on the reasons for not reporting fraud and co
onwards are not comparable with those in earlier years. Hence, only estimates from the year ending Ma
Percentages sum to more than 100 as more than one response is possible.
The question on measures taken to prevent unauthorised access to bank, building society or credit acc
CSEW sample.
The questions on measures taken to keep safe online are only asked of one quarter of the CSEW samp
last year.
Answer option was not separately available in the year ending March 2017 (denoted by "[x]").
Answer option was not available in the year ending March 2017 (denoted by "[x]").
Answer option is not available in the year ending March 2018 onwards (denoted by "[x]").
From the year ending March 2018 onwards, unweighted bases may be slightly different for some answe
being split across two questions.
Note text
CSEW estimates for the year ending March 2023 have been temporarily suspended of their National St
interpreting these estimates because of the impact of lower response rates, and reduced interviewer nu
Chapter 8 of the User guide to crime statistics for England and Wales contains further information on st
The question on awareness of the National Crime Agency was not asked in the year ending March 202
Percentages sum to more than 100 as more than one response is possible.
This question was not asked in the year ending March 2019 (denoted by "[x]").
Useful links
Useful links
Useful links
Temporary suspension of National Statistics status for estimates from the Crime Survey for England an
Useful links
Temporary suspension of National Statistics status for estimates from the Crime Survey for England an
Temporary suspension of National Statistics status for estimates from the Crime Survey for England an
England and Wales, year ending March 2017 to year ending March 2023 [note 1, 2, 3]
Source: Crime Survey for England and Wales (CSEW) from the Office for National Statistics
Due to the suspension of the CSEW, data are not available between the year ending March 2020 and the year ending March 2023.
This worksheet contains one table. Some cells refer to notes which can be found on the Notes worksheet.
Link to Notes worksheet
Some shorthand is used in this table. [s] Indicates that the change is statistically significant at the 5% level.
Link to Table of contents
Fraud - Percentage of people aged 16 and over, victims 6.0 6.0 6.8
Bank and credit account fraud 4.3 4.2 4.6
Consumer and retail fraud 1.5 1.7 2.0
Advance fee fraud 0.1 0.1 0.1
Other fraud 0.2 0.1 0.3
Unweighted base - number of people aged 16 and over 17,171 25,725 34,163
of fraud once or more (prevalence risks)
g March 2023.
England and Wales, year ending March 2017 to year ending March 2023 [note 1, 2, 3]
Source: Crime Survey for England and Wales (CSEW) from the Office for National Statistics
Due to the suspension of the CSEW, data are not available between the year ending March 2020 and the year ending March 2023.
This worksheet contains one table. Some cells refer to notes which can be found on the Notes worksheet.
Link to Notes worksheet
Some shorthand is used in this table. [s] Indicates that the change is statistically significant at the 5% level.
Link to Table of contents
Computer misuse - Percentage of people aged 16 and over, victims 2.9 2.2 1.8
Computer virus 1.9 1.3 0.8
Unauthorised access to personal information (including hacking) 1.1 0.9 1.0
Unweighted base - number of people aged 16 and over 17,171 25,725 34,163
re victims of computer misuse once or more (prevalence risks)
March 2023.
England and Wales, year ending March 2013 to year ending March 2023
Source: Action Fraud, National Fraud Intelligence Bureau (NFIB)
This worksheet contains one table. Some cells refer to notes which can be found on the Notes workshe
Link to Notes worksheet
NFIB data are not designated as National Statistics.
Some shorthand is used in this table. [u] Indicates the percentage change is not reported because the b
Link to Table of contents
Insurance fraud
Insurance related fraud
Insurance broker fraud
Corporate fraud
Corporate employee fraud
Corporate procurement fraud
False accounting
Bankruptcy and insolvency
Passport application fraud
Department of Work and Pensions (DWP) fraud
Fraudulent applications for grants from government funded organisations [note 19]
HM Revenue and Customs (HMRC) fraud
Other regulatory fraud [note 20]
Fraud by failing to disclose information
Fraud by abuse of position
DVLA Driving Licence Application Fraud
Computer viruses/malware
Denial of service attack
Denial of service attack (extortion)
Hacking - server
Hacking - personal
Hacking - social media and email
Hacking - PBX/dial through
Hacking (extortion) [note 23]
he Notes worksheet.
Apr 2012 to Apr 2013 to Apr 2014 to Apr 2015 to Apr 2016 to
Mar 2013 Mar 2014 Mar 2015 Mar 2016 Mar 2017
Apr 2021 to
Apr 2017 to Apr 2018 to Apr 2019 to Apr 2020 to
Mar 2022
Mar 2018 Mar 2019 Mar 2020 Mar 2021
[note 5]
252 176 88 48 52
9 11 11 10 7
17 20 13 5 8
17 32 111 109 69
111 65 28 150 123
139 98 143 250 67
539 530 303 239 200
785 536 126 102 171
2,964 2,597 2,842 2,867 3,151
111 61 67 34 35
30,171 -5.6
23,502 -3.1
3,283 -6.8
24 [u]
3,249 -18.9
113 -12.4
146 -1.4
621 8.9
127 10.4
494 8.6
444 16.5
516 -7.0
493 -7.7
23 [u]
45,452 -5.9
996 -46.5
608 -42.5
190 -18.8
7,583 -6.8
2,385 4.6
213 -33.0
5,098 5.1
26,025 -5.0
2,354 8.4
20,048 -11.8
3,883 -33.3
3,084 0.9
0 [u]
178 111.9
12,903 -6.3
107,476 -12.2
62,421 -13.3
1,870 -25.9
5,013 -5.3
22,671 -4.2
6,461 -43.9
7,196 52.5
1,844 -32.0
1,121 16.8
951 18.7
170 6.9
380 -7.3
5 [u]
132 -2.9
243 -9.7
76 46.2
1 [u]
21 [u]
59 -14.5
92 -25.2
30 [u]
248 24.0
146 -14.6
3,320 5.4
33 [u]
82,890 -27.9
293,291 -15.6
4,333 -30.6
77 -26.0
32 [u]
199 -29.2
5,054 2.6
13,433 -4.2
84 -16.0
2,812 14.1
26,024 -7.7
319,315 -15.0
Table 3b: Number of fraud offences recorded by Cifas and referred to the National Fraud
England and Wales, year ending March 2013 to year ending March 2023
Source: Cifas, National Fraud Intelligence Bureau (NFIB)
This worksheet contains one table. Some cells refer to notes which can be found on the Notes workshe
Link to Notes worksheet
NFIB data are not designated as National Statistics.
Some shorthand is used in this table. [x] indicates the data are not available. [u] Indicates the percentag
Link to Table of contents
Insurance fraud
Insurance related fraud
Insurance broker fraud
he Notes worksheet.
ates the percentage change is not reported because the base number of offences is fewer than 50.
Apr 2012 to Mar Apr 2013 to Mar Apr 2014 to Mar Apr 2015 to Mar Apr 2016 to Mar
2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
59 85 131 76 81
27 29 43 315 77
[x] [x] [x] [x] [x]
27 29 43 315 77
104 84 94 102 42
49 57 44 28 84
[x] [x] [x] [x] [x]
49 57 44 28 84
304,922 11.6
207,216 1.5
96,007 41.4
1,699 33.7
[x] [x]
[x] [x]
896 [u]
20,528 -11.8
20,528 -11.8
[x] [x]
44,731 16.0
263 213.1
[x] [x]
263 213.1
371,340 10.8
Table 3c: Number of fraud offences recorded by UK Finance and referred to the National
England and Wales, year ending March 2013 to year ending March 2023
Source: UK Finance, National Fraud Intelligence Bureau (NFIB)
This worksheet contains one table. Some cells refer to notes which can be found on the Notes workshe
Link to Notes worksheet
NFIB data are not designated as National Statistics.
Some shorthand is used in this table. [x] indicates the data are not available.
Link to Table of contents
he Notes worksheet.
Apr 2012 to Apr 2013 to Apr 2014 to Apr 2015 to Apr 2016 to
Mar 2013 Mar 2014 Mar 2015 Mar 2016 Mar 17
Apr 2021 to
Apr 2017 to Apr 2018 to Apr 2019 to Apr 2020 to
Mar 2022
Mar 2018 Mar 2019 Mar 2020 Mar 2021
[note 31]
460,537 56.9
460,537 56.9
[x] [x]
[x] [x]
[x] [x]
[x] [x]
460,537 56.9
Table 3d: Number of fraud and computer misuse offences referred to the National Fraud
England and Wales, year ending March 2013 to year ending March 2023
Source: National Fraud Intelligence Bureau (NFIB)
This worksheet contains one table. Some cells refer to notes which can be found on the Notes workshe
Link to Notes worksheet
NFIB data are not designated as National Statistics.
Some shorthand is used in this table. [u] Indicates the percentage change is not reported because the b
Link to Table of contents
Insurance fraud
Insurance related fraud
Insurance broker fraud
Corporate fraud
Corporate employee fraud
Corporate procurement fraud
False accounting
Bankruptcy and insolvency
Passport application fraud
Department of Work and Pensions (DWP) fraud
Fraudulent applications for grants from government funded organisations [note 19]
HM Revenue and Customs (HMRC) fraud
Other regulatory fraud [note 20]
Fraud by failing to disclose information
Fraud by abuse of position
DVLA Driving Licence Application Fraud
Computer viruses/malware
Denial of service attack
Denial of service attack (extortion)
Hacking - server
Hacking - personal
Hacking - social media and email
Hacking - PBX/dial through
Hacking (extortion) [note 23]
e Notes worksheet.
Apr 2012 to Apr 2013 to Apr 2014 to Apr 2015 to Apr 2016 to
Mar 2013 Mar 2014 Mar 2015 Mar 2016 Mar 2017
Apr 2021 to
Apr 2017 to Apr 2018 to Apr 2019 to Apr 2020 to
Mar 2022
Mar 2018 Mar 2019 Mar 2020 Mar 2021
[note 5, 31]
252 176 88 48 52
9 11 11 10 7
17 20 13 5 8
17 32 111 109 69
111 65 28 150 123
139 98 143 250 67
539 530 303 239 200
785 536 126 102 171
2,964 2,597 2,842 2,867 3,151
111 61 67 34 35
795,630 32.9
691,255 32.5
99,290 39.0
1,723 32.8
3,249 -18.9
113 -12.4
1,042 448.4
21,149 -11.3
20,655 -11.7
494 8.6
45,175 16.0
779 21.9
493 -7.7
286 172.4
45,452 -5.9
996 -46.5
608 -42.5
190 -18.8
7,583 -6.8
2,385 4.6
213 -33.0
5,098 5.1
26,025 -5.0
2,354 8.4
20,048 -11.8
3,883 -33.3
3,084 0.9
0 [u]
178 111.9
12,903 -6.3
107,476 -12.2
62,421 -13.3
1,870 -25.9
5,013 -5.3
22,671 -4.2
6,461 -43.9
7,196 52.5
1,844 -32.0
1,121 16.8
951 18.7
170 6.9
380 -7.3
5 [u]
132 -2.9
243 -9.7
76 46.2
1 [u]
21 [u]
59 -14.5
92 -25.2
30 [u]
248 24.0
146 -14.6
3,320 5.4
33 [u]
82,890 -27.9
1,125,168 15.3
4,333 -30.6
77 -26.0
32 [u]
199 -29.2
5,054 2.6
13,433 -4.2
84 -16.0
2,812 14.1
26,024 -7.7
1,151,192 14.6
Table 4: Number of fraud incidents on all payment types, UK Finance CAMIS database, with percentage change [note 1, 2]
United Kingdom, year ending March 2011 to year ending March 2023
Source: UK Finance
This worksheet contains one table. Some cells refer to notes which can be found on the Notes worksheet.
Link to Notes worksheet
Fraud data from UK Finance are not designated as National Statistics.
Some shorthand is used in this table. [x] indicates that data are unavailable.
Link to Table of contents
UK Finance fraud (CAMIS) Apr 2010 to Apr 2011 to Apr 2012 to Apr 2013 to Apr 2014 to Apr 2015 to Apr 2016 to
payment types Mar 2011 Mar 2012 Mar 2013 Mar 2014 Mar 2015 Mar 2016 Mar 2017
Plastic Card Fraud 976,112 866,488 1,048,151 1,296,705 1,236,095 1,551,694 1,817,039
Lost and Stolen 105,494 104,144 116,992 141,549 129,133 166,860 246,503
Card not Received 7,150 8,477 8,841 9,350 9,464 11,225 11,192
Counterfeit Card [note 3] 89,807 79,796 105,749 96,744 95,773 94,118 103,132
Remote Purchase Fraud [note 4] 755,173 657,690 790,723 1,017,092 975,781 1,245,321 1,423,783
Card ID theft [note 5, 6] 18,488 16,381 25,846 31,970 25,944 34,170 32,429
Cheque Fraud [note 7] 12,289 16,372 14,180 9,759 7,318 5,382 2,763
Remote Banking Fraud [note 8, 9] 52,500 35,072 21,639 19,266 24,010 34,992 33,767
Authorised Push Payment [note 10] [x] [x] [x] [x] [x] [x] [x]
TOTAL (excluding Authorised Push Payment) 1,040,901 917,932 1,083,970 1,325,730 1,267,423 1,592,068 1,853,569
TOTAL (including Authorised Push Payment) [note 10] [x] [x] [x] [x] [x] [x] [x]
Apr 2022 to
Mar 2023
Apr 2017 to Apr 2018 to Apr 2019 to Apr 2020 to Apr 2021 to Apr 2022 to
compared with
Mar 2018 Mar 2019 Mar 2020 Mar 2021 Mar 2022 Mar 2023
previous year
% change
England and Wales (excluding Devon and Cornwall), year ending March 2022 and year ending M
Source: Action Fraud, National Fraud Intelligence Bureau (NFIB)
This worksheet contains one table. Some cells refer to notes which can be found on the Notes worksheet.
Link to Notes worksheet
NFIB data are not designated as National Statistics.
Some shorthand is used in this table. [u1] indicates that rate per 1,000 population data for City of London have
[x] indicates that data are unavailable. [z] is not applicable.
Link to Table of contents
E12000006 East
E23000026 Bedfordshire
E23000023 Cambridgeshire
E23000028 Essex
E23000027 Hertfordshire
E23000024 Norfolk
E23000025 Suffolk
W92000004 WALES
W15000004 Dyfed-Powys
W15000002 Gwent
W15000001 North Wales
W15000003 South Wales
ation data for City of London have been suppressed due to the small population size of the police force area.
375,489 319,315 6
330,246 279,865 5
10,718 9,526 4
2,258 2,066 4
2,606 2,418 4
5,854 5,042 3
36,433 35,461 5
6,019 5,464 5
2,157 2,046 4
14,335 14,848 5
7,195 6,888 4
6,727 6,215 4
27,320 25,439 5
4,835 4,221 5
4,167 4,073 5
6,260 5,880 4
12,058 11,265 5
27,244 24,017 5
4,928 4,631 4
5,944 5,007 4
4,464 3,768 5
4,507 4,110 5
7,401 6,501 6
30,761 27,460 5
5,577 5,212 5
3,097 2,803 5
6,474 5,818 4
15,613 13,627 5
35,786 32,004 5
4,345 3,989 6
5,112 4,562 5
10,113 9,140 5
7,963 6,710 6
4,629 4,218 5
3,624 3,385 4
86,308 59,449 7
20,591 1,351 [u1]
65,717 58,098 7
53,723 47,666 5
10,167 9,432 5
11,363 9,867 5
7,781 6,689 6
9,886 8,809 5
14,526 12,869 5
21,953 18,843 5
9,236 7,985 5
[x] [x] [x]
5,133 4,320 6
3,298 2,988 5
4,286 3,550 5
16,598 14,848 5
4,391 3,520 7
2,697 2,491 4
3,380 3,166 5
6,130 5,671 4
Apr 2022 to
Mar 2023
compared with
previous year
% change
-15.0
-15.3
-11.1
-8.5
-7.2
-13.9
-2.7
-9.2
-5.1
3.6
-4.3
-7.6
-6.9
-12.7
-2.3
-6.1
-6.6
-11.8
-6.0
-15.8
-15.6
-8.8
-12.2
-10.7
-6.5
-9.5
-10.1
-12.7
-10.6
-8.2
-10.8
-9.6
-15.7
-8.9
-6.6
-31.1
[u1]
-11.6
-11.3
-7.2
-13.2
-14.0
-10.9
-11.4
-14.2
-13.5
[x]
-15.8
-9.4
-17.2
-10.5
-19.8
-7.6
-6.3
-7.5
[z]
Table 6: Proportion of victims aged 16 and over who were victimised more than once
England and Wales, year ending March 2017 to year ending March 2023 [note 18, 19, 20]
Source: Crime Survey for England and Wales (CSEW) from the Office for National Statistics
Due to the suspension of the CSEW, data are not available between the year ending March 2020 and the year ending March 2023.
This worksheet contains one table. Unless otherwise stated, the units in this table are for percentage who were victims once or more. Some cells refer to notes which can be found on the Notes worksheet.
Link to Notes worksheet
Link to Table of contents
Apr 2022 to Mar 2023
Apr 2016 to Apr 2017 to Unweighted base - compared with
Apr 2018 to Apr 2019 to Apr 2022 to
Offence group [note 21] Mar 2017 Mar 2018 number of victims Apr 2019 to Mar 2020
Mar 2019 Mar 2020 Mar 2023
[note 22] [note 22] (Apr 2022 to Mar 2023) significance
[note 23]
FRAUD AND COMPUTER MISUSE [note 24] 18.6 14.0 14.9 13.7 13.5 2,267
Fraud [note 24, 25] 14.0 11.3 12.9 11.9 11.4 1,923
Bank and credit account fraud 14.7 10.7 11.8 11.5 11.7 1,147
Consumer and retail fraud 5.0 6.4 5.8 6.0 5.1 490
All other fraud [note 26] 12.4 10.2 7.9 9.1 8.2 338
Cyber [note 27] 13.1 8.6 9.8 10.2 7.8 850
Non-cyber [note 28] 11.1 10.2 11.6 10.8 11.3 1,114
Computer misuse [note 24] 18.6 11.3 8.9 11.4 12.7 396
Computer virus 18.8 8.4 8.7 10.1 12.4 81
Unauthorised access to personal information (including hacking) 8.7 13.7 7.6 9.9 11.8 318
Table 7: Proportion of people aged 16 and over who were victims of fraud, by personal ch
Personal characteristics
All people
Age
Age
Age
Age
Age
Age
Age
Men
Men
Men
Men
Men
Men
Men
Men
Women
Women
Women
Women
Women
Women
Women
Women
Ethnic group
Ethnic group
Ethnic group
Ethnic group
Ethnic group
Ethnic group
Ethnic group
Ethnic group
Ethnic group
Ethnic group
Ethnic group
Ethnic group
Ethnic group
Ethnic group
Ethnic group
Ethnic group
Ethnic group
Ethnic group
Ethnic group
Ethnic group
Ethnic group
Ethnic group
Ethnic group
Country of birth
Country of birth
Marital status
Marital status
Marital status
Marital status
Marital status
Marital status
Respondent's occupation
Respondent's occupation
Respondent's occupation
Respondent's occupation
Respondent's occupation
Respondent's occupation
Highest qualification
Highest qualification
Highest qualification
Highest qualification
Highest qualification
Disability [note 3]
Disability [note 3]
Religion
Religion
Religion
Religion
Religion
Religion
Religion
Religion
Gender identity
Gender identity
data are not reported because the unweighted base is fewer than 50.
16-24 5.3
25-34 6.6
35-44 6.7
45-54 7.4
55-64 6.7
65-74 5.8
75+ 4.4
Men 5.8
Women 6.7
White 6.3
English/Welsh/Scottish/Northern Irish/British 6.2
Irish 8.8
Gypsy or Irish Traveller [u]
Any other white background 7.3
Mixed/Multiple 9.9
White and Black Caribbean 6.7
White and Black African 8.1
White and Asian 12.7
Any other Mixed/Multiple ethnic background 11.5
Asian/Asian British 4.5
Indian 4.1
Pakistani 4.8
Bangladeshi 3.7
Chinese 4.2
Any other Asian background 5.7
Black/African/Caribbean/Black British 7.3
African 7.3
Caribbean 5.9
Any other Black/African/Caribbean background 13.0
Other ethnic group 7.5
Arab 4.6
Any other ethnic group 9.3
In employment 7.0
Unemployed 6.5
Economically inactive 4.9
Economically inactive: Student 2.7
Economically inactive: Looking after family/home 4.1
Economically inactive: Long-term/temporarily sick/ill 6.7
Economically inactive: Retired 5.1
Economically inactive: Other inactive 5.4
No religion 6.6
Christian 6.3
Buddhist 4.1
Hindu 2.7
Jewish 3.2
Muslim 4.9
Sikh 2.2
Other 10.4
Heterosexual/straight 6.4
Gay/Lesbian 8.0
Bisexual 9.4
Other 7.1
None 5.5
Less than once a week 6.5
Once a week or more often 8.7
None 7.3
1-3 times a month 7.0
4+ times a month 6.2
ore. Some cells refer to notes which can be found on the Notes worksheet.
30,822
1,638
4,156
4,835
4,663
5,412
5,229
4,889
14,600
818
1,910
2,170
2,223
2,665
2,548
2,266
16,222
820
2,246
2,665
2,440
2,747
2,681
2,623
26,892
24,785
268
11
1,828
426
119
76
111
120
2,157
917
498
153
206
383
947
626
267
54
324
114
210
25,781
4,949
13,884
2,871
7,355
768
2,626
3,134
17,234
337
13,163
570
1,004
1,460
9,631
498
11,811
7,009
9,131
1,454
910
503
13,790
4,847
4,984
1,450
5,565
23,940
6,747
12,422
15,858
154
524
116
1,205
193
184
25,696
431
523
129
25,283
132
13,582
8,129
8,991
17,649
8,972
4,175
11,992
1,011
145
Table 8: Proportion of people aged 16 and over who were victims of fraud, by household
All people
Structure of household
Structure of household
Structure of household
Tenure
Tenure
Tenure
Accommodation type
Accommodation type
Accommodation type
Accommodation type
Accommodation type
Accommodation type
Region
Region
Region
Region
Region
Region
Region
Region
Region
Region
er who were victims of fraud, by household and area characteristics [note 1, 2]
Owners 6.3
Social renters 6.1
Private renters 6.4
House 6.2
Detached 7.1
Semi-detached 6.0
Terraced 5.6
Flats/maisonettes 6.7
Other accommodation 8.0
High 5.0
Not high 6.4
more. Some cells refer to notes which can be found on the Notes worksheet.
30,822
1,269
5,733
23,820
2,252
5,249
4,734
3,471
2,990
6,279
490
20,642
4,571
5,296
26,165
8,401
9,640
8,124
4,446
80
4,274
1,059
1,320
3,660
3,660
6,860
2,107
5,813
23,948
6,874
2,044
28,736
5,268
17,279
5,805
372
1,641
457
1,645
3,588
2,493
3,102
3,565
3,429
3,108
4,368
3,054
2,470
Table 9: Proportion of people aged 16 and over who were victims of computer misuse, by
Personal characteristics
All people
Age
Age
Age
Age
Age
Age
Age
Men
Men
Men
Men
Men
Men
Men
Men
Women
Women
Women
Women
Women
Women
Women
Women
Ethnic group
Ethnic group
Ethnic group
Ethnic group
Ethnic group
Ethnic group
Ethnic group
Ethnic group
Ethnic group
Ethnic group
Ethnic group
Ethnic group
Ethnic group
Ethnic group
Ethnic group
Ethnic group
Ethnic group
Ethnic group
Ethnic group
Ethnic group
Ethnic group
Ethnic group
Ethnic group
Country of birth
Country of birth
Marital status
Marital status
Marital status
Marital status
Marital status
Marital status
Respondent's occupation
Respondent's occupation
Respondent's occupation
Respondent's occupation
Respondent's occupation
Respondent's occupation
Highest qualification
Highest qualification
Highest qualification
Highest qualification
Highest qualification
Disability [note 3]
Disability [note 3]
Religion
Religion
Religion
Religion
Religion
Religion
Religion
Religion
Gender identity
Gender identity
t data are not reported because the unweighted base is fewer than 50.
16-24 1.4
25-34 1.3
35-44 1.4
45-54 1.5
55-64 1.3
65-74 1.3
75+ 0.8
Men 1.4
Women 1.2
White 1.3
English/Welsh/Scottish/Northern Irish/British 1.4
Irish 2.2
Gypsy or Irish Traveller [u]
Any other white background 1.1
Mixed/Multiple 2.2
White and Black Caribbean 1.3
White and Black African 0.0
White and Asian 2.5
Any other Mixed/Multiple ethnic background 4.1
Asian/Asian British 0.9
Indian 1.7
Pakistani 0.4
Bangladeshi 0.5
Chinese 0.7
Any other Asian background 0.2
Black/African/Caribbean/Black British 0.9
African 0.9
Caribbean 1.2
Any other Black/African/Caribbean background 0.0
Other ethnic group 2.0
Arab 0.0
Any other ethnic group 3.2
In employment 1.4
Unemployed 1.9
Economically inactive 1.1
Economically inactive: Student 1.4
Economically inactive: Looking after family/home 0.3
Economically inactive: Long-term/temporarily sick/ill 1.8
Economically inactive: Retired 1.0
Economically inactive: Other inactive 1.7
No religion 1.3
Christian 1.3
Buddhist 1.4
Hindu 1.3
Jewish 5.9
Muslim 0.6
Sikh 1.7
Other 3.4
Heterosexual/straight 1.3
Gay/Lesbian 1.3
Bisexual 2.5
Other 0.9
None 1.1
Less than once a week 1.5
Once a week or more often 1.8
None 1.7
1-3 times a month 0.9
4+ times a month 0.5
me cells refer to notes which can be found on the Notes worksheet.
0.2 1.1
0.2 1.2
0.2 1.2
0.2 1.2
0.3 1.2
0.3 1.0
0.3 1.0
0.2 0.7
0.3 1.2
0.1 1.1
0.2 1.5
0.1 1.2
0.4 1.3
0.4 1.0
0.4 1.2
0.2 0.5
0.2 1.0
0.2 1.3
0.1 0.9
0.3 1.2
0.2 1.1
0.3 1.1
0.1 0.8
0.1 0.8
0.2 1.1
0.3 1.1
0.0 2.2
[u] [u]
0.3 0.9
0.1 2.1
0.5 0.9
0.0 0.0
0.0 2.5
0.0 4.1
0.0 0.9
0.0 1.7
0.0 0.4
0.0 0.5
0.0 0.7
0.2 0.0
0.3 0.7
0.2 0.7
0.4 0.8
0.0 0.0
0.3 1.7
0.0 0.0
0.5 2.7
0.3 1.1
0.1 0.9
0.2 1.1
0.2 1.6
0.2 1.0
0.8 1.6
0.4 1.1
0.2 0.4
0.2 1.2
0.2 1.7
0.2 0.9
0.3 1.2
0.1 0.2
0.6 1.6
0.2 0.8
0.1 1.6
0.2 1.3
0.3 1.1
0.2 0.9
0.1 0.8
0.2 1.0
0.4 2.0
0.2 1.4
0.3 1.1
0.3 1.1
0.3 0.2
0.1 0.5
0.2 1.1
0.4 1.2
0.2 1.1
0.2 1.1
0.0 1.4
0.0 1.3
0.0 5.9
0.0 0.6
0.0 1.7
1.4 3.4
0.2 1.1
0.2 1.3
0.8 2.0
0.3 0.6
0.2 1.2
1.8 1.0
0.2 0.9
0.2 1.1
0.3 1.3
0.2 0.9
0.3 1.2
0.2 1.5
0.3 1.4
0.1 0.9
0.3 0.2
Unweighted base - number of people aged 16
and over
30,822
1,638
4,156
4,835
4,663
5,412
5,229
4,889
14,600
818
1,910
2,170
2,223
2,665
2,548
2,266
16,222
820
2,246
2,665
2,440
2,747
2,681
2,623
26,892
24,785
268
11
1,828
426
119
76
111
120
2,157
917
498
153
206
383
947
626
267
54
324
114
210
25,781
4,949
13,884
2,871
7,355
768
2,626
3,134
17,234
337
13,163
570
1,004
1,460
9,631
498
11,811
7,009
9,131
1,454
910
503
13,790
4,847
4,984
1,450
5,565
23,940
6,747
12,422
15,858
154
524
116
1,205
193
184
25,696
431
523
129
25,283
132
13,582
8,129
8,991
17,649
8,972
4,175
11,992
1,011
145
Table 10: Proportion of people aged 16 and over who were victims of computer misuse, b
All people
Structure of household
Structure of household
Structure of household
Tenure
Tenure
Tenure
Accommodation type
Accommodation type
Accommodation type
Accommodation type
Accommodation type
Accommodation type
Region
Region
Region
Region
Region
Region
Region
Region
Region
Region
ver who were victims of computer misuse, by household and area characteristics [note 1]
Owners 1.3
Social renters 1.2
Private renters 1.5
House 1.3
Detached 1.7
Semi-detached 1.2
Terraced 1.0
Flats/maisonettes 1.5
Other accommodation 0.0
High 0.9
Not high 1.3
0.2 1.1
0.2 1.3
0.3 1.1
0.2 1.1
0.4 1.2
0.4 1.0
0.1 1.1
0.2 0.9
0.4 0.9
0.3 1.6
0.0 0.6
0.2 1.0
0.2 1.0
0.2 1.3
0.2 1.1
0.3 1.3
0.2 1.1
0.2 0.9
0.2 1.3
0.0 0.0
0.4 0.9
0.1 1.0
0.1 1.0
0.0 1.1
0.0 1.1
0.3 1.1
0.3 1.0
0.2 1.3
0.2 1.1
0.3 1.2
0.1 0.8
0.2 1.1
0.2 1.3
0.2 1.1
0.3 1.1
0.1 0.3
0.0 0.7
0.5 1.8
0.3 0.9
0.2 0.5
0.2 1.2
0.3 1.1
0.2 0.9
0.2 1.3
0.1 1.0
0.3 1.7
0.3 1.2
0.1 0.8
Unweighted base - number of people aged
16 and over
30,822
1,269
5,733
23,820
2,252
5,249
4,734
3,471
2,990
6,279
490
20,642
4,571
5,296
26,165
8,401
9,640
8,124
4,446
80
4,274
1,059
1,320
3,660
3,660
6,860
2,107
5,813
23,948
6,874
2,044
28,736
5,268
17,279
5,805
372
1,641
457
1,645
3,588
2,493
3,102
3,565
3,429
3,108
4,368
3,054
2,470
Table 11: Fraud and computer misuse by loss (of money or property) - number and rate o
FRAUD [note 5]
With loss, no or only partial reimbursement
With loss, fully reimbursed
Without loss
COMPUTER MISUSE
Computer virus [note 6]
With loss, no or only partial reimbursement
With loss, fully reimbursed
Without loss
Unauthorised access to personal information (including hacking)
3,526 74
739 15
1,748 37
1,039 22
2,135 45
279 6
1,415 30
442 9
825 17
376 8
241 5
208 4
391 8
60 1
73 2
257 5
175 4
24 1
19 0
132 3
745 16
123 3
43 1
0 0
80 2
622 13
31,183
ber and percentage of victims aged 16 and over
2,992 6.3
641 1.3
1,507 3.1
920 1.9
1,782 3.7
212 0.4
1,204 2.5
392 0.8
779 1.6
359 0.7
228 0.5
195 0.4
364 0.8
55 0.1
69 0.1
241 0.5
150 0.3
22 0.0
14 0.0
114 0.2
623 1.3
108 0.2
38 0.1
0 0.0
70 0.1
522 1.1
31,183
Table 12: Percentage of fraud and computer misuse incidents reported to the police or Action Fraud
England and Wales, year ending March 2017 to year ending March 2023 [note 1, 7, 8, 9, 10]
Source: Crime Survey for England and Wales (CSEW) from the Office for National Statistics
Due to the suspension of the CSEW, data are not available between the year ending March 2020 and the year ending March 2023.
This worksheet contains one table. Some cells refer to notes which can be found on the Notes worksheet.
Link to Notes worksheet
Some shorthand is used in this table. [s] Indicates that the change is statistically significant at the 5% level.
Link to Table of contents
FRAUD AND COMPUTER MISUSE 14.2 10.7 13.3 12.4 11.5 2,462
Bank and credit account fraud 16.1 11.2 12.0 11.2 9.5 1,200
Consumer and retail fraud 19.9 16.9 16.4 16.1 14.8 497
All other fraud [note 12] 44.0 34.1 45.1 38.1 24.4 345 [s]
England and Wales, year ending March 2019 to year ending March 2023 [note 1, 9, 15]
Source: Crime Survey for England and Wales (CSEW) from the Office for National Statistics
Due to the suspension of the CSEW, data are not available between the year ending March 2020 and the year ending March 2023.
This worksheet contains one table. Some cells refer to notes which can be found on the Notes worksheet.
Link to Notes worksheet
Some shorthand is used in this table. [s] Indicates that the change is statistically significant at the 5% level.
Link to Table of contents
Fraud: Fraud:
Apr 2018 to Apr 2019 to
Reasons for not reporting [note 16]
Mar 2019 Mar 2020
(%) (%)
England and Wales, year ending March 2018 to year ending March 2023 [note 1]
Source: Crime Survey for England and Wales (CSEW) from the Office for National Statistics
Due to the suspension of the CSEW, data are not available between the year ending March 2020 and t
This worksheet contains one table. Unless otherwise stated, the units in this table are percentages. Som
Link to Notes worksheet
Some shorthand is used in this table. [x] indicates that data are not available. [s] indicates there is a sta
Link to Table of contents
e Notes worksheet.
[s] [s]
[s] [s]
[s] [s]
[s] [s]
[s]
[s] [s]
[s] [s]
[s] [s]
[s] [s]
[s]
[s]
[s]
[s] [s]
[x] [x]
[x] [x]
[s] [s]
Table 15: Security measures taken to keep safe online, people aged 16 and over
England and Wales, year ending March 2017 to year ending March 2023 [note 1]
Source: Crime Survey for England and Wales (CSEW) from the Office for National Statistics
Due to the suspension of the CSEW, data are not available between the year ending March 2020 and t
This worksheet contains one table. Unless otherwise stated, the units in this table are percentages. Som
Link to Notes worksheet
Some shorthand is used in this table. [x] indicates that data are not available. [s] indicates there is a sta
Link to Table of contents
Apr 2016 to Apr 2017 to Apr 2018 to Apr 2019 to Apr 2022 to
Mar 2017 Mar 2018 Mar 2019 Mar 2020 Mar 2023
[s] [s]
[s] [s]
[x] [s]
[x] [s]
[s]
[s] [s]
[s] [s]
[s] [s]
[s] [s]
[x]
[s] [s]
[x] [s]
[s]
[s] [s]
[s] [s]
[x] [s]
[s] [s]
[x] [x]
[x] [x]
[s]
Table 16: Experiences with phishing messages
This table was not produced for this release as the data are currently
unavailable.
The latest data available are for the year ending March 2022; please refer
to the Nature of fraud and computer misuse in England and Wales:
Appendix tables.
data are currently
This table was not produced for this release as the data are currently
unavailable.
The latest data available are for the year ending March 2022; please refer
to the Nature of fraud and computer misuse in England and Wales:
Appendix tables.
sage that may have been phishing and the proportion of those who replied to or clicked on a link i
This table was not produced for this release as the data are currently
unavailable.
The latest data available are for the year ending March 2022; please refer
to the Nature of fraud and computer misuse in England and Wales:
Appendix tables.
sage that may have been phishing and the proportion of those who replied to or clicked on a link i
How good a job is the National Crime Agency doing at tackling cyber crime
How good a job is the National Crime Agency doing at tackling cyber crime
How good a job is the National Crime Agency doing at tackling cyber crime
How good a job is the National Crime Agency doing at tackling cyber crime
How good a job is the National Crime Agency doing at tackling cyber crime
How good a job is the National Crime Agency doing at tackling cyber crime
Awareness of local police doing things in relation to cyber crime [note 4] [note 5]
Awareness of local police doing things in relation to cyber crime [note 4] [note 5]
Awareness of local police doing things in relation to cyber crime [note 4] [note 5]
Awareness of local police doing things in relation to cyber crime [note 4] [note 5]
Awareness of local police doing things in relation to cyber crime [note 4] [note 5]
Awareness of local police doing things in relation to cyber crime [note 4] [note 5]
How good a job are the local police doing at tackling cyber crime [note 5]
How good a job are the local police doing at tackling cyber crime [note 5]
How good a job are the local police doing at tackling cyber crime [note 5]
How good a job are the local police doing at tackling cyber crime [note 5]
How good a job are the local police doing at tackling cyber crime [note 5]
How good a job are the local police doing at tackling cyber crime [note 5]
How good a job are the local police doing at tackling cyber crime [note 5]
Awareness or rating
Yes
No
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
Very poor
Don't know
Providing advice about how people can protect themselves from cyber crime and be secure online
Explaining/warning of the consequences of committing cyber crimes
Working with Action Fraud to investigate cyber crimes
Visiting victims of cyber crime
None of these
Don't know
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
Very poor
No knowledge of actions
Don't know
Apr 2022 to Mar 2023
Apr 2018 to Apr 2019 to Apr 2022 to compared with
Mar 2019 Mar 2020 Mar 2023 Apr 2019 to Mar 2020
significance [note 2]