Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Dr. Arvind Mulimani & Sangam
Dr. Arvind Mulimani & Sangam
Dr. Arvind Mulimani & Sangam
OF MAHARASHTRA
Dr. Aravind Mulimani1and Dr. Sangmeshwar Dharashive2
1
Professor & Head, Department of Geography, Karnatak University, Dharwad Karnataka State.
2
Department of Geography, Mahatma Basweshwar Mahavidyalaya, Latur (MH)
Abstract
Geographers are paying much attention to study the hierarchy not only to study the functional
based settlement order but also proposed the planning strategy for further development of the
settlement and play its role to achieve the rural development. Therefore, for the last four decades
more emphasis is given on quantitative studies on central place theory. Berry and Garrison (1958)
are the first to attempt a quantitative explanation of central place theory. The Hierarchy classes of
central places are arranged into an orderly manner based on the functions performing on the
geographical space is the main consideration in this paper. Parbhani is being the study area
extends between 180 45’North to 20001’ North latitudes and 760 13’East to 77026’ East Longitudes
with an area of 6511 sq.km. and fallowed by 1836086 population (2011). It has 838 of settlements
with 08 urban centers. The main objectives of the study is to understand the spatial distribution of
central palceses and to proposed to the spatial planning strategy to the lower order centre are to be
encouraged by providing the necessary functions with its identity in the study area. The nearest
neighbor method has been employed and the centrality method has been employed to determine
the hierarchy based on the functional weightages and accordingly the analysis has been made.
Thespatial planning strategy is an outcome of the investigation undertaken is another dimension
of rural development.
Key Words: Spatial distribution, hierarchy and spatial planning strategy.
I. INTRODUCTION
Central places are not only important to perform their functional activities on a geographical
space but also determine the level of development either in rural or regional development. The
process of development is depends upon the selected parameters based on the resources available in
the given region. The spatial development is the main consideration by the geographers and
accordingly many studies have been carried out. The spacing between two settlements are not
constant but it is varies from settlements and their size, the central palceses are also not an
acceptations of this. The population threshold of each central places also spacing between the central
places itself. The main mechanism of the central places are performing their functions and changing
its order. Lower order central place can be a higher order and higher order central place can be lower
order and apart for further.
The distribution of central places is to be studied in terms of the frequency of their
occurrence, their physical spacing and regularity in their locational pattern. On isotropic surface
central places, following distribution of other rural settlements should have a regular pattern with
uniform spacing. In the real world, however, isotropic surface is rarely found. The topography of the
area is rarely uniform and resources are not uniformly distributed. As a result, the distribution of
population and settlements becomes uneven.
Dran = is the expected mean distance for a similar number of points distributed in the same area.
1
Dran = Whereas,N = is the number of market centres in the study region.
N
2 A
places of varying sizes. While due to undulating topography, lack of transportation, Jintur, Sailu and
Palam tahsils include few number of central place i, e. 23.
As far the study area is concern, it presents a visible contrast in the density pattern and
spacing of central places, the Rn values at tahsil level are also calculated. In such situation different
Rn values for different tahsil are obtained in order to find out the association of the central places
with each other Rn value for the study region has been calculated. And its result has been shown in
the Table No. 1.1 and position of various tahsils has been marked on the Rn value scale (Fig.No.1.2).
Table No. 1.1: Parbhani District: Nearest Neighbor Statistics of Central Places
Tahsil Dobs km. Dran km. ‘Rn’ Values
Parbhani 5.13 4.04 1.26
Gangakhed 5.59 4.45 1.25
Palam 9.54 4.83 1.97
Sonpeth 6.15 4.37 1.40
Purna 6.53 4.77 1.36
Pathri 4.75 4.59 1.03
Manwat 5.40 4.93 1.09
Sailu 6.70 6.13 1.09
Jintur 6.41 4.57 1.40
Total 6.243 4.74 1.317
Source: - Compiled by the Researchers.
PARBHANI DISTRICT
'Rn' Value Scale of Central Place
1.8750
1.7500
1.6250
GANGAKHED PARBHANI
1.1250
MANWAT/SAILU
PATHARI 1.0000 Random
Distributional Patteren
0.8750
T A H S I L
0.7500
0.6250
0.3750
0.2500
0.1250
0.0000
Fig. No.4.13
The analysis reveals that the central places are of regular pattern random manner where the
degree of regularness is 1.317. Most of the central places in the study region are in the regular pattern
random manner, having the range 1.00 to 1.50. The central places Parbhani, Gangakhed, Sonpeth,
Purna, Pathri, Sailu and Jintur tahsil are in the regular pattern random manner. The central places in
Palam tahsil are having Rn value above regular uniform pattern. But the central places in Palam
tahsil are near to regular pattern.
IV. CONCLUSIONS
The spacing of central places is uneven because of lack of transportation facilities for the
movements of people and goods are also unevenly distributed. The northern hilly part of the region
has inadequate facilities which prevent the farmer’s range of marketing their production, whereas
central eastern and western part of the region has adequate facilities of transport and developed
agriculture which is directly responsible for developing more central places to achieve spatial
development.
BIBLIOGRAPHY
[1] Clark, P. J. and Evans. (1958): ‘Distance to the nearest neighbor as a measure of a spatial relationship in population’,
Ecology, pp. 445-450.
[2] Lokhande, T. N. and Pawar, C.T. (1934) : ‘Periodicity and Distributional Pattern of Market Centers in Kolhapur
District, Maharashtra Journal of the Shivaji University, Vol. 36, pp. 65-72.
[3] The Encyclopedic District Gazetteers of India, (1998) : Western Zone vol. 7, Gyan Publication, New Delhi, pp. 515-
520.
[4] Socio-Economic Review and Statistical Abstracts of Parbhani District, (2003-04 to 2009-10).