Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Assignment 1
Assignment 1
Assignment 1
NTW 806
George Matthee
U17380635
10 December 2021
Contents
1. Introduction ............................................................................................................ 2
Bibliography ............................................................................................................... 7
1
1. Introduction
In this assignment I will attempt to review the use of Old Testament/ Hebrew
literature in the Book of Jude, as well as the use of extracanonical sources. To
accomplish this, I will first make state the texts identified by DeSilva (2018) and then
review it one by one. In the second section of this assignment, I will focus on the
deeper questions as set out in the assignment requirements.
Before I continue too the first section, it is necessary to first analyse why the use of
Hebrew Scriptures are so prominent in the Book of Jude. According to Boring
(2012:448-449) the name and identity of a person in this social setting played a very
important role in decerning their authority. For this particular reason, the explanation
of the identity of Jude in the book itself comes to light. Boring (2012:449) continues
that Jude identified himself with his brother James, which was not particularly
common to identify oneself with a brother. After further consideration of the identity
of James i.e., the leader of the Jewish community, it becomes clear that Jude,
wanting to give his text authority under Jewish people, connected himself to his
brother James, rather than to his other brother Jesus. Lastly Boring (2012:449)
states that the above explanation might clarify the use of Hebrew scriptures
associated with the Jewish community in Jude.
DeSilva (2018:767) states that the Jude alongside 2 Peter are very conveniently
placed at the end of the New Testament and gets ‘in effect’ not much of attention.
Although this might be true, he continues to argue that Jude has much to teach the
Church throughout history, especially with what the authority of the Church concerns.
The Book of Jude’s central theme can be explained as a warning to the community
of the intruders among them (Hagner 2012:707). According to DeSilva (2018:771)
Jude considered the teachings of itinerant Christians among the congregations to be
against the Gospel. In the introduction to the letter the way Jude addresses the
recipients and the way he transitions into the body of the letter, it becomes clear of
his hasty intentions to communicate his very serious message (Boring 2012:449).
Jude disagreed with the fact that ‘false teachers’ taught a ‘cheep gospel’. This
means that they used the Gospel as ‘n pass to lead unethical and impure lives. The
intention of Jude becomes quite clear at this stage that he wanted to remind the
Jewish community of the certainty that they will face the judgement of God. Thus, he
2
paid much attention to Jewish scripture, taking the community back to their roots
(DeSilva 2018:773). Consequently, the intertextual analysis is a key aspect that
needs to be considered to illumine the understanding of Jude.
A direct quote of 1 Enoch 1:9 can be found in Jude 1:14-15. He quotes this section
as the words of God caring authority concerning than the judgement of God for
ungodliness is imminent. Following Genesis 6:1-4, Jude remembers the story of the
angels who left heaven to have sexual relations with humans on earth. Using 1
Enoch 6-36 he expands the drama. Furthermore, Jude recites the day of Judgment
as found in 1 Enoch in Jude 1:13 to communicate his theme stronger (DeSilva
2018:774).
Other texts used by Jude, includes a citation of Zechariah 3:2 (Jude 1:14-15),
Deuteronomy 34:5-6 (Jude 1:9), Numbers 14 and Genesis 19 (Jude 1:5 and 7) and
Ezekiel 34:1-10. Other than the Old Testament Scriptures, Jude uses texts from the
New Testament as well such as parts of the apostolic tradition found in Acts and
Timothy and from Revelation 2:14-15 (DeSilva 2018:774). In what follows a brief
exegesis of the intertextual content will be discussed.
3
text known to him and the community, containing a warning that this salvation
threatened by those who use the grace of God to license an ungodly lifestyle
(Rowland 2001:1285; Marshall 2003:662). Jude also uses 1 Enoch 14-16 to dictate
the effect this ungodly lifestyle will have on the salvation if they don’t turn away from
it. This is also the wrath of God those will face who justify adulterous lifestyle.
Echoes of this can be found in 1 Enoch 6-19 and Genesis 6:1-3 as well (Hagner
2012:709). He reminds the community of what happened to the angels who left their
heavenly positions to have relations with earthly beings. In verse 5, Jude pleads to
them to return to the ways God intended for them, or they will face the wrath of God,
following examples of people who once thought of themselves as fully informed.
Finally, Jude reminds the congregation that they have a taste of the heavenly gift in
the salvation of which they are on the verge of losing if they don’t stop thinking about
themselves as privileged (Rowland 2001:1285).
4
2.3. Jude 1:14-16
According to Hagner (2012:709), Jude is one of the very few books in the New
Testament that quotes from 1 Enoch. Verses 14 and 15 captures one such quote.
Jude uses 1 Enoch 1:9 as a prophecy going back as far as Adam. In verse 15 Jude
warns the people that the judgment on an ungodly lifestyle is immanent, he backs up
his argument with a statement. Boring (2012:454) noticed that Jude missed an
opportunity in these verses to quote Jesus himself. According to Boring he could
have used the words of Jesus in Mark 13:5-6 and 21-23, but instead chooses to
quote Enoch.
I believe that it was the aim of the author to use intertextual resources to enhance
the hearers’ experience of the new text, both to support his authority and his
5
argument as well as using traditions known to the congregation(s) to warn them
about the intruders in their mitts. In so doing he tried to leed them in a way to glorify
the Gospel. If Jude did not use the other texts in support of his argument, I believe
that his effort to warn the congregation(s) would have been null-and-void. The first
hearers of this text were well acquainted with Jewish scriptures: Following the
argument from above that the author used his blood relation with the leader of the
Jewish community (James the Just) to establish authority, it was his aim to reach the
Christians of Jewish decedents, thus justifying his use of Jewish scriptures and
unpacking his argument or way of thought so that they may follow his warning.
At first the letter from Jude, might seem disorientating and chaotic, but after closer
analyses, it became clear that the author put many a thought in his argument.
Without the structure and the intertextual references, the opinion of the letter might
have stayed the same i.e., Chaotic. Keeping in mind that readers today, especially
the laymen, are not as acquainted with Jewish traditions as the intended
congregation(s) might have been, it becomes clear why the letter can be a bit
disorientating. Therefore, assuming that the first hearers would hear these words
and be reminded of other teachings they’ve heard and know extensively, it would
have made sense to them. As stated above the use of the intertextual citations
supports the argument of Jude. Without it, it would have been empty. It gives the first
hearers the opportunity to connect what Jude is trying to teach them, to teachings
the were well aware of. Making it a lot easier to believe.
Following this argument, I would state that the weight and the authority would be lost
if it wasn’t for the intertextual sources. Jude most probably knew it, that is why he
used it.
In using these sources, it is my opinion, that Jude did not try to be the first to notice
the false teachers, just so that he can be tapped on the back for his exemplary effort
to save the faith community. If you’ll allow me to explain my snarky remark: With
regards to news (sometimes gossip) in any community today, it is our aim as people
to be the first to tell everybody. This is supported by the famous three-word phrase:
“have you heard… [John cheated on his wife]” Nobody likes to be the person telling
yesterday’s news. According to me, Jude would definitely be the exception to this
rule in today’s standards. Jude had the aim to communicate to the faith community
6
that the things happening now, is something someone long gone in the history
predicted would happen. Hence the use of the prophecies to backup his argument.
He made sure to enlighten the community to what is happening in their mitts by
using what he might have believed as text predicting their circumstances.
I also believe that scholars have spent many hours researching the viability of
predictions and prophecies in biblical texts. So much so that many of them had come
up with very sound and logical explanations for all of it. Therefore, we look upon
these texts with different lenses, looking back at them with more than 20 centuries’
worth of research and publications. Following this argument, it is very important for
us, not to prepose our ideologies on the texts. We might have the ability to explain or
debate whether the intertextual references Jude made, had anything to do with the
situation he found himself in. But the fact of the matter is that he believed that the
prophecies pointed in the direction of his days and that he had the obligation to warn
his beloved brothers (and sister) in Christ of their imminent danger.
Therefore, I believe that the specific citations had an enormous impact on advancing
the rhetorical goals Jude set out to reach.
Bibliography
Bauckham, R. J., 1983. Jude, 2 Peter: Word Biblical Commentary, Vol 50. Waco,
Texas: Word Books.
De Silva, D. A., 2018. An Introduction to the New Testament: Contexts, methods &
ministry formation. 2nd ed. Downers Grove: IVP Acedemic.
Hagner, D. A., 2012. The new testament: A historical and Theological Introduction.
Grand Rapids: Baker Academic.
Marshall, I. H., 2003. New Testament Theology; Many witnesses, one Gospel.
Downers Grove: InterVarsity Press.
Rowland, C., 2001. Jude. In: J. Barton & J. Muddiman, eds. The Oxford Bible
Commentary. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 1284-1287.