III.

SIGNIFICANCE OF THE STUDY

This study aims to plan and design a livelihood center for the Municipality of Itogon which uses

organic architecture on the overall planning and design process and incorporate design principles and

planning strategies that will be beneficial for the following related aspects:

ARCHITECTURAL SIGNIFICANCE

This study will promote the concept of aesthetic harmony through architectural practices

in which organic architecture often emphasizes the beauty of natural forms and materials. By

integrating these elements into the design of a livelihood center, it can create visually appealing

spaces that inspire and uplift the people who utilize them. Aesthetically pleasing environments

have been shown to have a positive impact on mood, creativity, and overall well-being.

SOCIAL SIGNIFICANCE

This study will help to improve the community engagement wherein a livelihood center

designed with organic architecture can become a focal point for community engagement and

interaction. The unique and aesthetically pleasing design can attract people, serving as a gathering

space for various activities, events, workshops, and exhibitions. Such a center can provide

opportunities for networking, collaboration, and community building, fostering social

connections and a sense of belonging among individuals with shared interests or goals, and

encourages the sharing of knowledge and skills among individuals within the community.

ENVIRONMENTAL SIGNIFICANCE

This study will positively impact the environment through integration with the

environment wherein an organic architecture livelihood center would harmoniously blend with its

natural surroundings, considering the site's topography, vegetation, and existing ecosystem. The

building's design and materials would complement and enhance the natural landscape rather than

dominate or disrupt it. This integration fosters a sense of connection and sustainability.

HEALTH AND SAFETY SIGNIFICANCE

This study will prioritize human health and well-being through the overall planning and

design process and promotes a healthy living environment. It emphasizes the use of natural light,

ventilation, and non-toxic materials, which can enhance the quality of indoor spaces. A livelihood
 center designed with organic architecture principles can provide a healthier and more inspiring

environment for people to work and engage in livelihood activities.

ECONOMIC SIGNIFICANCE

This study will be beneficial for the people of the municipality of Itogon wherein an

organic architecture-based livelihood center can create new economic opportunities for the locale.

It can serve as a hub for promoting livelihood activities, providing training and capacity-building

programs, and facilitating market access for local farmers and producers. By supporting organic

and sustainable practices, the center can attract eco-conscious consumers, tourists, and

businesses, thereby boosting the local economy and creating jobs.

SIGNIFICANCE TO THE RESEARCHER

The study will be significant to the researcher to have a balance understanding with

current situation of our environment. The study of a livelihood center with organic architecture

provides researchers with an ideal setting to study sustainability, well-being, community

engagement, and long-term performance. It offers an opportunity to explore the relationship

between humans, the built environment, and nature, contributing to the development of more

environmentally conscious and socially beneficial architectural practices.

SIGNIFICANCE TO THE LOCALE OF THE STUDY

Through this study, the livelihood center can have significant positive impacts on the

locale, promoting sustainable development, community engagement, economic opportunities,

cultural preservation, and enhancing health and well-being. It creates a harmonious and

environmentally friendly space that fosters a sense of pride, participation, and prosperity within

the local community.

IV. SCOPE AND LIMITATIONS

This study is primarily focused on designing a livelihood center, which is a facility that

provides resources, training, and support for individuals or communities to develop sustainable

livelihoods by means of Organic Architecture as its concept. The scope includes understanding

the needs of the target community, identifying appropriate programs and services, and designing a

space that facilitates their implementation. Furthermore, this study will not cover all aspects of
 the community's livelihood activities, but rather prioritize those that can be integrated into the

center's design effectively. The researcher aims to identify and analyze the principles and

characteristics of Organic Architecture in designing a livelihood center and its relevance to

sustainable community development. Furthermore, this study will not provide a comprehensive

analysis of all organic architectural principles, but rather focus on key elements relevant to the

design of the livelihood center. This study would take place in the Municipality of Itogon,

province of Benguet, which has a lot area of 79,815 sqm.

Moreover, the researcher will focus on the investigation of case studies and related

literatures of existing livelihood centers and organic architectural elements for comparative

analysis and inspiration. The study is limited to site planning, space planning, form

conceptualization, functional conceptualization and derivation of its design and concept with the

proper application of the National Building Code of the Philippines, Accessibility Law, and

related bylaws. It does not cover structural, electrical, plumbing, sanitary, and cost estimates

unless required as supporting data. While the thesis focuses on creating a livelihood center, the

researcher has not considered the inclusion of the examination of its economic viability. Factors

such as market demand, financial feasibility, and long-term sustainability of the center's economic

activities may require additional studies beyond the scope of the thesis.

Scope:

1. Design and construction of a livelihood center with a focus on organic

architecture principles.
2. Exploration of sustainable and eco-friendly design strategies and materials for
the center.
3. Integration of organic architectural elements to promote a harmonious
relationship between the built environment and nature.
4. Incorporation of spaces and facilities that support various livelihood activities,
such as workshops, training rooms, exhibition spaces, and community gathering
areas.
5. Analysis of the social, economic, and environmental benefits of organic
architecture in the context of a livelihood center.
6. Evaluation of the center's potential to enhance the quality of life and well-being
of the community it serves.
7. Consideration of the center's adaptability to different contexts and potential for
replication in other locations.
 8. Examination of the feasibility and cost-effectiveness of implementing organic
architecture principles in the construction and operation of the livelihood center.
9. Investigation of case studies and best practices of existing livelihood centers with
organic architectural elements for comparative analysis and inspiration.

Limitations:

1. The study will focus primarily on the conceptual and design aspects of the
livelihood center. Detailed engineering calculations and technical specifications
for the construction may be outside the scope of this thesis.
2. Implementation of the proposed livelihood center may not be covered in this
thesis, as it may require additional resources, approvals, and stakeholder
involvement beyond the research and design phase.
3. The study may not consider all possible challenges and constraints that could
arise during the construction and operation of the livelihood center.
4. The assessment of social, economic, and environmental benefits will be based on
theoretical analysis and case studies, rather than comprehensive empirical data.
5. The thesis may not provide an exhaustive examination of all organic architectural
principles, but rather focus on key elements relevant to the design of the
livelihood center.
6. The thesis may not cover all aspects of the community's livelihood activities, but
rather prioritize those that can be integrated into the center's design effectively.
7. The study may not delve deeply into the cultural and contextual factors that
influence the design decisions, as it may vary significantly from one location to
another.
8. The thesis may not explore the long-term sustainability and performance of the
livelihood center once it is operational, as it may require continuous monitoring
and evaluation beyond the scope of this research.
Scope:

1. Conceptualization of a livelihood center: The scope of the thesis would involve

designing a livelihood center with organic architecture principles. This would
include understanding the needs and requirements of the community, identifying
suitable functions and activities to be included in the center, and developing a
conceptual framework for the overall design.
2. Organic architecture principles: The thesis would explore the principles of organic
architecture and their application in the design of the livelihood center. This
would involve studying the works of renowned architects who have contributed
to this architectural style and analyzing how these principles can be adapted to
suit the specific context and purpose of the livelihood center.
3. Sustainable design and construction: The thesis would emphasize incorporating
sustainable design and construction practices in the development of the
livelihood center. This would involve exploring environmentally friendly materials,
energy-efficient systems, waste management strategies, and other sustainable
design considerations.
4. Integration of organic farming and sustainable livelihood practices: The livelihood
center would integrate organic farming and other sustainable livelihood
practices. The thesis would explore how these activities can be incorporated into
the design, ensuring proper allocation of spaces, facilities, and resources for
 activities such as farming, training workshops, market spaces, and community
interactions.

Limitations:

1. Site-specific constraints: The thesis may face limitations due to site-specific

constraints, such as available land area, topography, climate, and local building
regulations. These limitations may impact the feasibility and implementation of
certain design elements or ideas.
2. Cost considerations: The thesis should acknowledge that the implementation of
organic architecture and sustainable design features might involve additional
costs compared to conventional construction methods. Therefore, there may be
limitations in terms of budget and available resources for the realization of the
proposed design.
3. Expertise and knowledge: The thesis should acknowledge that designing a
livelihood center with organic architecture principles requires expertise and
knowledge in various domains, including architecture, agriculture, sustainable
design, and community development. The limitations may arise from the
researcher's own limitations in expertise or the availability of experts for
consultation.
4. Evaluation and post-occupancy analysis: Due to the nature of a thesis project,
there may be limitations in conducting a comprehensive evaluation and post-
occupancy analysis of the designed livelihood center. The long-term effectiveness
and impact of the organic architecture principles and sustainable practices
implemented in the center may not be fully explored or validated within the
scope of the thesis.
1. Organic Architecture: The thesis focuses on exploring the principles of organic
architecture and their application in the design of a livelihood center. This
includes studying the relationship between the built environment and nature, the
use of natural materials, and the integration of sustainable design practices.
2. Livelihood Center: The thesis specifically focuses on the design of a livelihood
center, which is a facility that provides resources, training, and support for
individuals or communities to develop sustainable livelihoods. The scope includes
understanding the needs of the target community, identifying appropriate
programs and services, and designing a space that facilitates their
implementation.
3. Sustainability: The thesis aims to incorporate sustainable design principles in the
livelihood center, considering factors such as energy efficiency, use of renewable
materials, water conservation, and waste management. The focus is on creating
an environmentally friendly and socially responsible facility that promotes
sustainable practices.
4. Community Engagement: The thesis explores the importance of community
participation and involvement in the design and operation of the livelihood
center. This includes engaging with the local community, understanding their
needs and aspirations, and incorporating their input in the design process.

Limitations:
1. Time and Resources: The thesis may be limited by the available time and
resources for research and design. It may not be possible to extensively study all
aspects of organic architecture or implement all desired sustainable design
features within the given timeframe and available resources.
2. Site Constraints: The thesis may be constrained by the specific site chosen for the
livelihood center. Factors such as land availability, site conditions, zoning
regulations, and local building codes may impose limitations on the design.
3. Technical Expertise: The thesis may require expertise in various fields, including
architecture, sustainability, and community development. The availability of such
expertise and the researcher's proficiency in these areas may influence the depth
and complexity of the thesis.
4. Generalizability: The findings and recommendations of the thesis may be specific
to the chosen case study and may not be directly applicable to other contexts or
regions. The scope of the thesis should be clearly defined to avoid making broad
claims or assumptions beyond the study's scope.
5. Implementation Challenges: While the thesis may propose an innovative and
sustainable design for the livelihood center, the actual implementation of the
design may face challenges such as budget constraints, political factors, or
resistance to change. These limitations should be acknowledged and addressed
in the thesis.