Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Ot 25013 - 32 RF - Oac
Ot 25013 - 32 RF - Oac
By
MART, Bhubaneswar
July 2005
First of all we would like to thank MART for providing us an opportunity to learn a lot within
a short span besides fulfilling our Organizational Traineeship Segment (OTS). We are
grateful to MART team members, Mr. A. Chandak, Mr. K.P. Mishra and Mr. C.K Mishra for
the guidance and support provided to us in completing the Segment. It was indeed a
wonderful experience to work with them.
We are deeply indebted to the guidance provided by our Faculty Guide, Prof. K.V. Raju for
providing his valuable advices and insights on the topic whenever needed. We also thank
Prof. Jayant Negi, the OTS co-coordinator for the opportunity provided.
We are grateful to the WORLP CBT, PIA and LST members who helped us in selecting the
right villages and provided us the logistics to commute through the villages.
Last, but not the least, we would like to extend our sincere gratitude to the secretaries of
watersheds and the villagers who helped us in conducting the survey successfully. Without
their cooperation and support this project could not have been completed.
ii
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
I. Title: Collective marketing of Agri-produce and Non-timber forest produce
II. Organization: MART, Bhubaneswar
III. Reporting Officer: Mr. Ashwini Chandak
IV. Faculty Guide: Prof. K.V. Raju
V. Students’ Name: Diptiranjan Sahoo(25013) and Prabhakar Singh(25032)
Objectives:
1. To build up an understanding on two farm-produces, namely Cotton and arhar.
2. To propose a marketing strategy for both the produces in order to achieve better profit
realization at the community level.
Scope:
1. Understanding the product characteristics and the cost involved in the pre-production,
production and post production phase per unit area.
2. Identifying the existing the existing trading channel and value addition perspective at
different levels.
3. Identifying the existing indigenous technical knowledge and exploring low cost
technical intervention as profit enhancement strategy
4. Understanding the socio-economic characteristics of the rural community and their
inclination towards marketing of the produce through collective action.
Methodology:
Focused group discussion and interview through semi-structured questionnaire and
discussion through formal interaction were the methods adopted to collect the data
from the farmers, kutchias etc from twenty villages of four blocks of the Bolangir and
Nuapada districts. Besides the primary data effort was made to collect the secondary data
from different Government and Non-Government sources through institution profiles.
Major findings:
Cotton as a cash crop is grown in uplands by all type of farmers; land leasing is also
practised in case of small and marginal farmers. Farmers remain in clutches of kutchias
by taking inputs at an interest rate of 50% per six months and end up in selling their
produce at a differential price of Rs.80-250 than the prevailing mandi price. Kutchias
cheat farmers not only in price but also in weighing the produce and in giving the money
to farmers 1-2 months latter in a phased manner. In case of arhar though most of the
farmers cultivate in only half to one acre of upland as a mixed crop with paddy ,still some
marketable and marketed surplus exists due to simultaneous selling just after harvesting
to fulfil the monetary need of the family. Due to the pulse eating habit of the people here,
some portion of the produce is returned back just after reaching the next higher level
market. And rest portion is consumed in the town market. Value addition is restricted to
grading the good quality (rounded, red in colour and not infested) of seeds than the
inflated and infested produce.
Conclusion and recommendations:
In case of cotton as the cost of cultivation is high due to injudicious spraying of
pesticides, hence IRM based IPM practice should be encouraged through different
meeting by Agriculture officers, video shows and through folk daces. Awareness should
be generated for quality perception by differentiating different plucking according to
staple length. Collective marketing by farmers’ association is a prudential step by linking
them to the mandi and to different ginning mills. In case arhar processing through low
cost machine by existing SHGs and subsequent selling in the nearby hostels, hotels and
village shops is seen as a viable business. Monetary and technical support from both
Government and NGOs is critical to this kind of collective marketing effort.
iii
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1
1. INTRODUCTION
1.1 Objective 1
1.2 Scope 1
1.3 Research design 2
iv
3.3 Collective Marketing of Arhar 31
3.3.1 Need for collective marketing 31
3.3.2 Gaps in Collective Marketing effort of arhar 32
3.3.3 Intervention plan 32
v
LIST OF TABLES
LIST OF GRAPHS
vi
Graph 2: Trend of Productivity of Cotton in Bolangir 5
Graph 3: Block wise area of Production in Nuapada 5
Graph 4: Trend of Production of cotton in Bolangir 6
Graph 5: Trend of Production of cotton in Nuapada 6
Graph 6: Utilization of Land in cotton 7
Graph 7: Leasing of Land in cotton 7
Graph 8: Sources of cotton seeds 8
Graph 9: Dependency of farmers on fertilizers and pesticides for cotton 8
Graph 10: Reasons for selling of cotton to kutchia by farmers in Nuapada 12
Graph 11: Reasons for selling of cotton to kutchia by farmers in Bolangir 12
Graph 12: Time gap between selling and money realization in cotton in Nuapada 13
Graph13: Time gap between selling and money realization in cotton in Bolangir 13
Graph 14: Duration of storage of cotton before selling 13
Graph 15: Land holding pattern of arhar 22
Graph 16: Problems in arhar production 24
vii