Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Litchi Paper 2020
Litchi Paper 2020
Litchi Paper 2020
net/publication/344753259
CITATIONS READS
0 160
5 authors, including:
Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:
Higher Education Quality Enhancement Project (HEQEP), UGCB, Ministry of Education, Bangladesh. View project
All content following this page was uploaded by Shormin Choudhury on 21 October 2020.
Reference to this paper should be made as follows: Akter, M.S., Sarkar, M.R.,
Choudhury, S., Islam, N. and Uddain, J. (2020) ‘Effect of postharvest
treatments on shelf life and quality of litchi stored at ambient temperature’,
Int. J. Postharvest Technology and Innovation, Vol. 7, No. 4, pp.319–334.
1 Introduction
Litchi (Litchi chinenesis Sonn.) is subtropical evergreen fruit crop with high commercial
value and liked due to its enriched taste whitish flesh and attractive red skin colour at full
maturity (Holcroft and Mitcham, 1996). Physiochemical composition of litchi comprises
of 77.83% water, 6.74%–20.64% sugar, 0.8%–0.9% protein, 0.3% fat, mineral specially
calcium, phosphorus and iron 0.7% and vitamin C 40.2–90 mg/l00 g of fruits (Bose
et al., 2001). In Bangladesh, the litchi is mainly concentrated in the Northern and
Eastern region (Molla et al., 2010). Litchi is an important sub-tropical fruit and it
deteriorates rapidly within 24 hours after harvested and stored at ambient temperature
(Dinesh et al., 2014). Ambient temperature is the surrounding temperature, and it is
normally taken as atmospheric temperature. Under ambient condition, litchi fruits have a
very short postharvest life as in 1–2 days after harvesting the red colour of the pericarp
turns to brown, devaluing commercial acceptability and economic return (Kumar et al.,
2013). The fruit is highly perishable in nature and only lasts at ambient temperature
(26 ± 2°C) for 2–3 days because of microbial and physiological spoilage. The losses after
harvest are therefore estimated to be 20%–30% of the litchi harvested and can be up to
50% even before consumption (Kore and Chakraborty, 2014). Moreover, 37.10%
postharvest loss is estimated in Bangladesh (Molla et al., 2010).
The main postharvest issue of litchi was pericarp browning, which decreases
dramatically the commercial value of the fruit (Snowdon, 1990; Kore and Chakraborty,
2014). The postharvest browning problem of litchi has been solved by various methods,
such as heat treatment, wax coating, ethylene-bromide fumigation, acid dip and the use of
fungicides. Low temperature storage at 1°C–5°C decreases the disease but has a minor
role to play in reducing pericarp browning (Jiang et al., 2003). In addition, when removed
from cold storage, the fruit deteriorate rapidly. Long-term storage (unrelated to loss of
water and browning) of litchi is also associated with a loss of aroma that results in the
consistency of edible aril (Jiang and Li, 2003). Coating is also a useful technique for
optimising fruit preservation (Ghosh et al., 1998).
Nevertheless, such methods cannot be successful in maintaining the pericarp’s red
colour for a longer period of time. Ice and oxalic acid treatment and the use of fungicides
Effect of postharvest treatments on shelf life and quality of litchi 321
have therefore also been tested in order to solve the problem of litchi brewing after
harvest and extended shelf-life. Hydro-cooling of litchi delayed pericarp browning and
improved overall fruit quality after storage (Ketsa and Leelawatana, 1991). After
hydro-cooling was hypothesised to include pericarp browning, litchi fruits are at a greater
level of hydration (Olesen et al., 2003).
Browning and loss of water can be prevented by packaging with high fruit moisture,
but this increases the risk of rot (Neog and Saikia, 2010). Furthermore, litchis available
on the fresh market were sold without packaging in bunches of 50 and 100, thus many
litchis of bunches fall and customers rarely get the actual number. A good packaging will
solve this problem as well as improve the marketability. Furthermore, good packing is
helpful to protect the fruit from pathogens, moisture loss, extreme temperature, crushing
and bruising of the product. Packaging has been reported to affect the quality of the fruits
after harvest (Santos et al., 2002). Tefera et al. (2005) studied packaged fruit and was of
the opinion that the pH, low titrateable acids and greater overall content of sugar were of
benefit to physiologically reduced loss of weight than unpacked mango fruits.
Nevertheless, there is little evidence of how best to reduce water loss and the
browning of pericarp and preserve fresh colours in the postharvest process and packaging
techniques with the extended marketable life of litchi fruits in Bangladesh. The objective
of this research was therefore to study the effect of several postharvest treatments and
simple colour retention packaging techniques, minimising pericarp brewing and
increasing the life span of litchi fruits.
3 Experimental materials
The experimental materials were matured fruits of litchi variety, namely, Bedana. Litchi
fruits were harvested at full red colour stage from the orchard of Mashimpur, Dinajpur,
Bangladesh in May 2017. Maturity of the fruit is indicated by the red colour and fruit size
more or less similar. Besides colour, the maturity of the fruit is indicated when tubercles
become somewhat flattened and the shells become smooth. Maturity was also judged by
the grower’s recommendation. The fruits were then processed after shipment in the
laboratory. Then, the fruits were subjected to different bio preservatives as treatment.
The study was carried out with three replications of completely randomised design
(CRD). There were six treatments and three replications in each treatment. The
postharvest treatments imposed were as follows:
322 M.S. Akter et al.
Treatments
T0 Control
T1 CaCl2 dips
T2 Oxalic acid + bavistin
T3 Hydro cooled
T4 Hydro cooled + oxalic acid + bavistin
T5 Hydro cooled + oxalic acid
T6 Wash with clean water
Thirty litchi fruits per treatments were weighted by sensitive balance. The weighted litchi
fruits were kept in ventilated polythene bag and without bag at room temperature.
5.2 CaCl2 dips fruits preserved without packaged and packaged with perforated
LDPE bag under ambient temperature (T1)
The selected fresh Litchi fruits dipped in CaCl2 for 10 minutes within 2 h of harvesting
and then air-dried. Then the fruits were divided into four parts, every part remain ten
fruits with three replications. One part remains with packaging at ambient condition, and
one part remains without packaging at ambient condition.
5.3 Oxalic acid and bavistin treated fruits preserved without packaged and
packaged with perforated LDPE bag under ambient temperature (T2)
The selected 120 fruits were dipped in oxalic acid solutions (2 mM oxalic acid + 0.05%
fungicide, Bavistin) for 10 min within 2 h of harvesting and then air-dried. Then the fruits
were divided into four parts each part contains 30 fruits (with replications). Then the
fruits were divided into four parts, every part remain ten fruits with three replications.
One part remains with packaging and one part remains without packaging at ambient
condition.
5.4 Ice treated fruits preserved without packaged and packaged with perforated
LDPE bag under ambient temperature (T3)
Hydro cooling of selected fruits was achieved by dipping the fruits in a water bath with
stainless steel at 0°C–1°C for 15 minutes until the core pulp temperature reached 5°C.
Effect of postharvest treatments on shelf life and quality of litchi 323
Using a thermometer, the core pulp temperature was controlled. Until packing, the hydro
chilled fruit was dried by air via an electric fan. Then the fruits were divided into four
parts, every part remain ten fruits with three replications. One part remains with
packaging at ambient condition and one part remains without packaging at ambient
condition.
5.5 Ice + oxalic acid + bavistin treated fruits preserved without packaged and
packaged with perforated LDPE bag under ambient temperature (T4)
The fruit was hydraulically cooled at 0°C–1°C during 15 minutes before core pulp
temperature reached 5°C. In the case of a fruit, the fruit was immersed in a bath of
stainless steel. Using a thermometer, the core pulp temperature was monitored. The fruit
was then dried air with a hydro-cooled fan then deeper into 2 mM oxalic acid with 0.05%
fungicide (bavistin) solution for 10 minutes and then air dried using an electric fan. Then
the fruits were divided into four parts, every part remain ten fruits with three replications.
One part remains with packaging at ambient condition and one part remains without
packaging at ambient condition.
5.6 Ice + oxalic acid treated fruits preserved without packaged and packaged
with perforated LDPE bag under ambient temperature (T5)
Hydro-cooling of selected fruits was achieved by dipping the fruits in a water bath with
stainless steel at 0°C–1°C for 15 minutes until the core pulp temperature reached 5°C.
Temperature of the core pulp was tracked with a thermometer. The hydro-cooled fruit
was then air-dried with an electric ventilator then dipped into 2 mM oxalic acid solution
for 10 minutes and then air dried using an electric fan. Then the fruits were divided into
four parts, every part remain ten fruits with three replications. One part remains without
packaging at ambient condition and one part remains with packaging at ambient
condition.
The selected 120 fruits were washed with clean water for 15 min, then the hydro washed
fruits were air dried using an electric fan prior using postharvest treatments.
6 Observations
During postharvest storage period the experimental litchi were observed daily. Physical
observations (disease incidence, weight loss, firmness and pericarp browning) were
recorded on 6, 12, 18 and 24 days interval during storage. For estimating chemical
analysis, i.e., total soluble solids (TSS), titrable acidity (TA), ascorbic acid and pH and
shelf life of samples were drawn on 24 days of storage.
324 M.S. Akter et al.
The fruits were examined daily for the appearance of rot. The incidence of fruit rot was
recorded after one day. The first count was made at the 6 days after storage. Incidence of
diseases means percentage of disease-infected fruit. This is calculated by measuring the
percentage of infected fruit at each treatment replication. The diseased fruits have been
symptomatically described.
The prevalence of the disease was computed as follows:
Shelf life of litchi fruits as influenced by different postharvest storage treatments and
packaging system with different temperature management was calculated by counting the
days required to browning 25% as to retaining, maximum marketing and eating qualities.
where
WL weight loss of litchi
Effect of postharvest treatments on shelf life and quality of litchi 325
9 Statistical analyses
Figure 1 Effect of postharvest treatments on shelf life of litchi fruits at 24 days after storage
(see online version for colours)
Notes: T0: control, T1: CaCl2 dips T2: oxalic acid + bavistin dips, T3: ice dips, T4: ice
+ oxalic acid + bavistin dips, T5: ice + oxalic acid dips, T6: clean water dips.
Figure 2 Effect of postharvest treatments on disease incidence (%) of litchi fruits at different
days after storage (see online version for colours)
Notes: T0: control, T1: CaCl2 dips T2: oxalic acid + bavistin dips, T3: ice dips, T4: ice
+ oxalic acid + bavistin dips, T5: ice + oxalic acid dips, T6: clean water dips.
Figure 3 Effect of post-harvest treatments on pericarp browning (%) of litchi fruits at different
days after storage (see online version for colours)
Notes: T0: control, T1: CaCl2 dips T2: oxalic acid + bavistin dips, T3: ice dips,
T4: ice + oxalic acid + bavistin dips, T5: ice + oxalic acid dips,
T6: clean water dips.
Figure 4 Pericarp browning and disease incidence showing maximum in (T0P0: control with no
packaged) and minimum in (T4P1: Ice + Oxalic acid + Bavistin dips with perforated
LDPE bag) treatment (see online version for colours)
st
st
T0P0: 1 day T P : 12 day
0 0
st th th th
T4P1:1 day T P :12 day T4P1:18 day T4P1:24 day
4 1
Furthermore, LDPE packaging had a great influence on total weight loss of litchi fruits
compared to no packaging using various postharvest treatments. The lowest weight loss
was found 0.5%, 1.6%, 2.9% and 4.7% at 6th, 12th, 18th and 24th days after storage
respectively treated by hydro cooled Litchi fruits with 2 mM oxalic acid with 0.05%
fungicide (bavistin) solution in LDPE packaging condition (T4). The highest weight loss
was found 6.8%, 13.9%, 14.70% and 16.1% at 6th, 12th, 18th and 24th days after storage
respectively treated by hydro cooled litchi fruits with 2 mM oxalic acid with 0.05%
fungicide (bavistin) solution in LDPE packaging condition (T4). Thus, the LDPE bag
Effect of postharvest treatments on shelf life and quality of litchi 329
contributed to cause lower moisture loss. The lower moisture loss influenced the lower
weight loss of litchi fruit that was confirmed by Molla et al. (2017).
10.5 Firmness
Due to its ability to retain more water and avoid evaporation and respiration loss,
hydro-cooled litchi did not lose over 1% humidity and added oxalic acid and bavistin
(Munbodh, 2015) firmness was highest in case of treatment ice + oxalic acid + bavistin
dips followed by ice + oxalic acid dips and ice dips at different days after storage.
Figure 5 Effect of postharvest treatments on physiological weight loss (%) of litchi fruits at
different days after storage (see online version for colours)
Notes: T0: control, T1: CaCl2 dips T2: oxalic acid + bavistin dips, T3: ice dips, T4: ice
+ oxalic acid + bavistin dips, T5: ice + oxalic acid dips, T6: clean water dips.
Figure 6 Effect of postharvest treatments on firmness (%) of litchi fruits at different days after
storage (see online version for colours)
Notes: T0: control, T1: CaCl2 dips T2: oxalic acid + bavistin dips, T3: ice dips, T4: ice
+ oxalic acid + bavistin dips, T5: ice + oxalic acid dips, T6: clean water dips.
The lowest percentage of firmness was recorded (0.90%, 0.70%, 0.00%, 0.00%, and
0.00% at 6th, 12th, 18th and 24th days after storage respectively) in all litchi fruits stored
in control and no bag. The highest percentage of firmness was recorded 1.29%, 1.17%,
1.12%, and 0.96% at 6th, 12th, 18th, and 24th days after storage respectively with LDPE
330 M.S. Akter et al.
packaging system and treated with ice + oxalic acid + bavistin dips. It is known that the
increasing firmness of the litchi fruit can result in lower moisture loss due to the LDPE
packaging technique. The lower moisture loss affected litchi’s higher firmness (Molla
et al., 2017).
Figure 7 Effect of postharvest treatments on pH of litchi fruits at 24 days after storage (see online
version for colours)
Notes: T0: control, T1: CaCl2 dips T2: oxalic acid + bavistin dips, T3: ice dips, T4: ice
+ oxalic acid + bavistin dips, T5: ice + oxalic acid dips, T6: clean water dips.
Figure 8 Effect of postharvest treatments on titrable acidity (%) of litchi fruits at 24 days after
storage (see online version for colours)
Notes: T0: control, T1: CaCl2 dips T2: oxalic acid + bavistin dips, T3: ice dips, T4: ice
+ oxalic acid + bavistin dips, T5: ice + oxalic acid dips, T6: clean water dips.
The lower TA value (0.26%) was found in the control (T0) with no package at 24 days
after storage of litchi fruits and in the same time the TA value was higher (0.29%) in
Effect of postharvest treatments on shelf life and quality of litchi 331
hydro cooled litchi fruits treated with 2 mM oxalic acid with 0.05% fungicide (bavistin)
solution (T4). The changes in TA are based on modifications which are known to
decrease the concentration of this acid during maturation (Medlicott et al., 1990). This
could be attributed to the higher breathing rate of the litchis cycle for the catabolic
process. Similar remarks have been published (Aguayo et al., 2010).
Figure 9 Effect of postharvest treatments on TSS (°Brix) of litchi fruits 24 days after storage
(see online version for colours)
Notes: T0: control, T1: CaCl2 dips T2: oxalic acid + bavistin dips, T3: ice dips, T4: ice
+ oxalic acid + bavistin dips, T5: ice + oxalic acid dips, T6: clean water dips.
Figure 10 Effect of postharvest treatments on vitamin C (mg/100 g) of Litchi fruits 24 days after
storage (see online version for colours)
Notes: T0: control, T1: CaCl2 dips T2: oxalic acid + bavistin dips, T3: ice dips, T4: ice
+ oxalic acid + bavistin dips, T5: ice + oxalic acid dips, T6: clean water dips.
11 Conclusions
Packaging affected considerable weight loss, decay, colour ranking, overall acceptability
and marketability of litchi fruit. The treatment of ice, oxalic acid and bavistin had more
efficiently slowed the process of preservation of the fruit quality, while the control
sample had greater changes in composition, with maximum loss of quality when stored at
room temperature. It can therefore be assumed that the chemical treatment selected for
the current study after the harvest will improve the litchi’s shelf-life while maintaining
their nutrient quality.
References
Aguayo, E., Requejo-Jackman, C., Stanley, R. and Woolf, A. (2010) ‘Effects of calcium ascorbate
treatments and storage atmosphere on antioxidant activity and quality of fresh-cut apple
slices’, Postharvest Biology and Technology, Vol. 57, No. 1, pp.52–60.
Aklimuzzaman, M., Goswami, C., Howlader, J., Al kader, H. and Kamrul M. (2011) ‘Postharvest
storage behavior of litchi’, Journal of Horticulture, Forestry and Biotechnology, Vol. 15,
No. 3, pp.1–8.
Arah, I.K., Amaglo, H., Kumah, E.K. and Ofori, H. (2015) ‘Preharvest and postharvest factors
affecting the quality and shelf life of harvested tomatoes: a mini review’, International
Journal of Agronomy, Article ID 478041.
Boonsiri, A. (2010) Use of Polymeric Composite Packaging Film to Maintain Quality and Extend
Shelf Life of Thai Vegetables and Fruits: Postharvest Technology Center, Research and
Development Institute, Kampaengsaen, Kasetsart University, Thailand.
Bose, T.K., Mitra, S.K. and Sanyal, D. (2001) Fruits: Tropical and Subtropical, Vol. 1, No. 3,
Naya Udyog, Kolkata, India.
Dinesh, R., Sharma, P. and Kumar, S. (2014) ‘Effect of total soluble solid during storage of litchi
fruits under different temperatures’, Advances in Applied Science Research, Vol. 5, No. 2,
pp.117–121.
Ghosh, U., Bhattacharjee, A., Bose, P., Choudhuri, D. and Gangopadhyay, H. (1998)
‘Physicochemical changes of litchi in modified atmospheric storage’, Indian Journal of
Chemical Technology, Vol. 5, No. 6, pp.393–396.
Effect of postharvest treatments on shelf life and quality of litchi 333
Holcroft, D.M. and Mitcham, E.J. (1996) ‘Postharvest physiology and handling of litchi (Litchi
chinensis Sonn.)’, Postharvest Biology and Technology, Vol. 9, No. 3, pp.265–281.
Jiang, Y. and Li, Y. (2003) ‘Effects of low-temperature acclimation on browning of litchi fruit in
relation to shelf life’, The Journal of Horticultural Science and Biotechnology, Vol. 78, No. 4,
pp.437–440.
Jiang, Y., Yao, L., Lichter, A. and Li, J. (2003) ‘Postharvest biology and technology of litchi fruit’,
Journal of Food Agriculture and Environment, Vol. 1, No. 2, pp.76–81.
Ketsa, S. and Leelawatana, K. (1991) ‘Effect of precooling and polyethylene film liners in
corrugated boxes on quality of lychee fruits’, Frontier in Tropical Fruit Research, Vol. 321,
No. 1, pp.742–746.
Kore, V.T. and Chakraborty, I. (2014) ‘A review of non-chemical alternatives to SO2 fumigation to
prevent pericarp browning of litchi’, International Journal of Fruit Science, Vol. 14, No. 2,
pp.205-224.
Kumar, D., Mishra, D.S., Chakraborty, B. and Kumar, P. (2013) ‘Pericarp browning and quality
management of litchi fruit by antioxidants and salicylic acid during ambient storage’, Journal
of Food Science and Technology, Vol. 50, No. 4, pp.797–802.
Kurubar, A.R. (2007) Studies on Integrated Nutrient and Post Harvest Management of Fig (Ficus
carica L.), UAS Dharwad.
Medlicott, A., Sigrist, J. and Sy, O. (1990) ‘Ripening of mangos following low-temperature
storage’, Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science, Vol. 115, No. 3,
pp.430–434.
Miller, W., Spalding, D. and Hale, P. (1986) ‘Film wrapping mangos at advancing stages of
post-harvest ripening’, Tropical Science, Vol. 26, No. 1, pp.9–17.
Molla, M., Islam, M., Nasrin, T. and Bhuyan, M. (2010) ‘Survey on postharvest practices and
losses of litchi in selected areas of Bangladesh’, Bangladesh Journal of Agricultural Research,
Vol. 35, No. 3, pp.439–451.
Molla, M.M., Rahman, E., Khatun, A., Islam, F., Uddin, Z., Ullah, A., Saha, M.G. and
Miaruddin, M. (2017) ‘Colour retention and extension of shelf-life of litchi fruit in response to
storage and packaging technique’, American Journal of Food Technology, Vol. 12, No. 5,
pp.322–331.
Munbodh, R. (2015) ‘Effect of hydro cooling and packaging on the shelf life of cold
stored destalked litchis cultivar’, University of Mauritius Research Journal, Vol. 21, No. 1,
pp.420–437.
Neog, M. and Saikia, L. (2010) ‘Control of post-harvest pericarp browning of litchi (Litchi
chinensis Sonn)’, Journal of Food Science and Technology, Vol. 47, No. 1, pp.100–104.
Olesen, T., Mcconchie, C.A. and Wiltshire, N. (2003) Improved Post-harvest Handling of Lychee:
A Report for the Rural Industries Research and Development Corporation, RIRDC,
Queensland, Australia.
Rajwana, I.A., Malik, A.U., Khan, A.S., Saleem, B.A. and Malik, S.A. (2010) ‘A new mango
hybrid shows better shelf life and fruit quality’, Pakistan Journal of Botany, Vol. 42, No. 4,
pp.2503–2512.
Ranganna, S. (1979) Manual of Analysis of Food and Vegetable Products, Tata McGraw Hill,
New Delhi, India.
Rk, P., Akath, S., Yadav, D. and Mousumi, B. (2009) ‘Waxing, lining and polyethylene packaging
on the shelf-life and juice quality of passion fruit during storage’, Journal of Food Science and
Technology, Mysore, Vol. 46, No. 1, pp.70–74.
Santos, E., Santos, A., Silveira, I., Mendonça, R., Alves, R. and Silva, S. (2002) ‘Influence of
1-methylcyclopropene on postharvest conservation of exotic mango cultivars’, in VII
International Mango Symposium, Vol. 645, pp.565–572.
Snowdon, A.L. (1990) ‘A colour atlas of post-harvest diseases and disorders of fruits and
vegetables’, General Introduction and Fruits, Vol. 1, Wolfe Scientific Ltd, London, UK..
334 M.S. Akter et al.
Sonkar, R., Sarnaik, D., Dikshit, S., Saroj, P. and Huchche, A. (2008) ‘Post-harvest management of
citrus fruits: a review’, Journal of Food Science and Technology, Mysore, Vol. 45, No. 3,
pp.199–208.
Tee, E., Young, S., Ho, S. and Mizura, S.S. (1988) ‘Determination of vitamin C in fresh fruits and
vegetables using the dye-titration and microfluorometric methods’, Pertanika, Vol. 11, No. 1,
pp.39–44.
Tefera, A., Seyoum, T. and Weldetsadik, K. (2005) Effect of Disinfection, Packaging and
Evaporative Cooling Storage on Shelf Life of Mango (MangiferaIndica L.), MSc thesis,
HaramayaUnivesrity, Haramaya, Ethiopia.
Yadav, R.K. (2015) Performance of Physical and Chemical Treatments on Post-Harvest Quality of
Litchi Fruit cv. Muzaffarpur, Master thesis, Agriculture and Forestry University, Chitwan,
Nepal.
Yadav, R., Sanwal, S., Singh, P. and Buragohain, J. (2009) ‘Effect of pretreatments and packaging
of tomato in LDPE and PET films on the storage-life’, Journal of Food Science and
Technology (Mysore), Vol. 46, No. 2, pp.139–141.