Professional Documents
Culture Documents
PropSpeaker 1motion 2
PropSpeaker 1motion 2
Ladies and Gentlemen and the honourable judges, Istand before you as
the first speaker from house Proposition, for the motion- This house
believes that the world bank group must adopt a one country one vote
system. As the first speaker, I will be introducing the motion and
presenting my arguments on the motion.
The second speaker will refute and add arguments to support the case
and the third speaker will sum up our team’s case and refute.
Let’s begin by defining the key terms. The World Bank promotes
long-term economic development and poverty reduction by providing
technical and financial support to help countries implement reforms or
projects, such as building schools, providing water and electricity,
fighting disease, and protecting the environment. It currently works on a
weighted voting system where financial contributions heavily influence
decision making. The adoption of a one country one vote system would
significantly change the dynamics within the World Bank group and offer
multiple advantages to the developing nations. Developing countries
contribute to the World Bank's research and development activities
through their participation in the Bank's think tank, the World Bank
Institute. The World Bank Institute conducts research on a wide range of
development topics, and its findings are used to inform the Bank's
policies and lending decisions.
We will commence with our stance: Today, the side proposition clearly
stands out as we propose an affirmative action to sustain international
diplomacy and build a foundation for international organisations on a fair,
and democratic process. Secondly, we believe that equality is one of the
core founding principles of international organisations, irrespective of
their developmental status. Lastly, an inevitable fact in our world is the
circular flow of an economy. Everything is interconnected, and hence
each country influences the decision of another.
With this i present the first argument put forth by the house proposition,
‘One country one vote system will help to reduce corruption and
patronage’ If the power is taken away from financially strong
representatives and given to each country this will reduce the risk of
corruption as decisions will be made on the basis of the basic necessity
of each country rather than economic priorities. As in greed of money
many unfair practices can be undertaken by individuals. We have seen
multiple cases justifying this statement perfectly. Countries would now be
able to voice out their decisions more accurately and transparently to the
organisation after the collectivisation of votes.
Since there will now be fewer representatives to vote it will be more
convenient for the organisation to carefully examine each country and
ensure no unethical practices occur. It would make it more difficult for a
small number of countries to control the World Bank and use it for their
own benefit.
It would make it more difficult for the World Bank to be used for
patronage, as the Bank would be more accountable to all of its
members.
Thank you everyone for your time, I sincerely urge you all to vote for this
motion and help build a prosperous future.