11/1/23, 4:45 PM Osteopathic Manipulative Treatment: HVLA Procedure - Cervical Vertebrae - StatPearls - NCBI Bookshelf

NCBI Bookshelf. A service of the National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health.

StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2023 Jan-.

Osteopathic Manipulative Treatment: HVLA Procedure - Cervical

Vertebrae
Bader Elder; Kevin Tishkowski.

Author Information and Affiliations

Last Update: October 3, 2022.

Continuing Education Activity

The osteopathic manipulative principles for high-velocity low amplitude (HVLA) cervical spine
therapy, including the indications for treatment, treatment techniques, and the expectations of
resolution of symptoms. HVLA cervical manipulation techniques can provide another outlet for
patients with cervical neck dysfunction in addition to traditional medical routes. This activity will
review the candidacy evaluation of the patient's cervical pathology as well as provide the
significance of communication between the physician and the patient for optimal outcomes of
cervical spine HVLA.

Objectives:

Outline the steps of the HVLA procedure as an alternate pathway of treatment for patients
with cervical biomechanical joint dysfunction.

Summarize the proper procedural methods of HVLA cervical osteopathic manipulative

treatment (OMT) for physicians.

Outline the indications for HVLA of the cervical spine.

Access free multiple choice questions on this topic.

Introduction
Since the founding of osteopathy by Andrew Taylor Still, M.D., D.O. in 1874, a fundamental
principle of osteopathic medicine has been the treatment of somatic dysfunction by using
osteopathic manipulative treatment (OMT).[1] Somatic dysfunction is an impaired function of
integral components of the somatic system (the body framework). It can include the
musculoskeletal, nervous, vascular, and lymphatic systems and combinations of these systems in
affected areas of dysfunction.[1][2]

High-velocity low amplitude (HVLA) OMT is one type of technique utilized by various
practitioners that can be used to restore health to the somatic system. Specifically, HVLA
therapy is a technique used in manual medicine that employs a rapid, therapeutic force of brief
duration that travels a short distance within the anatomic range of motion of a joint. The force
engages a restrictive barrier to elicit a release of the restriction. HVLA treatment is frequently
associated with an audible and palpable "release" in the form of a "pop" accepted to represent
cavitation of a spinal intervertebral joint and its subsequent release.

The cervical (neck) region is an area between the cranium and the thorax consisting of vascular,
musculoskeletal, and neural pathways. It is a common area of injury and somatic dysfunction,

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK565847/ 1/11
11/1/23, 4:45 PM Osteopathic Manipulative Treatment: HVLA Procedure - Cervical Vertebrae - StatPearls - NCBI Bookshelf

resulting in pain and loss of mobility. Understanding the diagnostic approach and the treatment
of cervical spinal somatic dysfunction is a cornerstone of manual medicine.

Dysfunction may occur at one or many anatomical locations: the atlantooccipital joint, the
atlantoaxial joint, the paraspinal musculature, or any of the cervical vertebral joints. Collectively,
manual (osteopathic) treatment may include various myofascial release techniques, muscle
energy techniques, strain-counter strain techniques, and high-velocity low amplitude (HVLA)
techniques. HVLA is used to relieve movement restrictions by applying a quick, therapeutic
force of rapid duration that travels a short distance within the range of motion of a joint. HVLA
therapy aims to restore a more "normal" range of motion within a joint and alleviate pain.

Neck dysfunction is associated with significant health costs and disability, typically due to work-
related injuries and improper ergonomic practices.[3] Symptoms involved in cervical
musculoskeletal joint dysfunction include neck pain, stiffness, loss of neck mobility, arm pain,
tingling in the upper extremities, weakness, dizziness, and headache.

High-velocity low amplitude (HVLA) osteopathic manipulative treatment (OMT) of the cervical
spine is a passive, direct therapy that provides a high-velocity, low amplitude manually applied
force to treat motion loss in a somatic dysfunction.[4] Passive treatment implies that the patient
stays inactive throughout this therapy and does not attempt to assist the physician in executing
cervical HVLA treatment. This therapy provides direct engagement into the restrictive barrier of
the cervical spine. The treatment goal is to forcefully stretch a contracted musculoskeletal
system, producing an aggressive response of afferent nerve impulses from the muscle spindles to
the central nervous system. The central nervous system will then send a reflex of inhibitory
responses to the muscle spindle, relaxing the muscle.[5][3]

HVLA therapy of the cervical spine should be performed only by practitioners who have been
educated with this technique and have demonstrated practical and cognitive skills. Like any
other procedure, education, along with pre-procedural screening for contraindications and a
detailed review of the risks and benefits, is imperative before HVLA treatment. Informed consent
to medical treatment is fundamental in both ethics and law. Patients have the right to receive
advice and ask questions about HVLA treatments so that they can make well-founded decisions.
[6]

Anatomy and Physiology

The cervical spine has 7 vertically stacked bones called vertebrae, labeled C1 (cervical 1)
through C7 (cervical 7). C1 (called the atlas) connects the top of the cervical spine to the base of
the skull, and C7 connects to the upper thoracic spine at about shoulder level. These uniquely
shaped bones (the spinal column) protect the spinal cord, a cylindrical bundle of nerve fibers and
associated nerve roots enclosed within the cervical vertebrae and connect the body to the brain.

The upper cervical spine is unique. The atlas (C1) and axis (C2), functioning together, are
primarily responsible for spinal rotation, flexion (bend forward), and extension (bend backward)
and are the most mobile part of the entire spine. Roughly 50% of flexion and extension and 50%
of rotation of the neck occurs in the area of C1 and C2.

The remainder of the cervical vertebrae (C3-C7) are smaller compared to the thoracic and lumbar
vertebrae. The vertebral bodies are round with a hollow center that continues from C1 and C2
and houses the spinal cord as it travels distally from the brainstem. The cervical intervertebral
discs are "shock-absorbing pads" between each level starting below C2 (axis). The discs are

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK565847/ 2/11
11/1/23, 4:45 PM Osteopathic Manipulative Treatment: HVLA Procedure - Cervical Vertebrae - StatPearls - NCBI Bookshelf

strong yet flexible tissues composed of fibrocartilage. In the middle of each disc is a nucleus
pulposus, a gel-like material surrounded by a strong protective outer layer called the annulus
fibrosus.

At each vertebral level of the spinal column, the discs function to hold the vertebrae together and
absorb shock to the spine. The presence of the discs also creates spaces (called foramen) between
each bony vertebrae that allow nerves to exit from the spinal cord. Spinal nerve roots are
bundles of nerve fibers that exit (or enter) the spinal cord, in pairs from each side of the spinal
cord, and travel through the foramen to send and receive nerve impulses from the body. Each
cervical nerve innervates or provides sensation and motor function to both sides of a
corresponding part of the upper body. Muscles, tendons, and ligaments help support the cervical
spinal column by limiting excessive movement in all directions.

Common disc disorders include degenerative disc disease and disc herniations ("ruptured disc")
that can cause adjacent spinal nerve irritation. This can happen when a disc flattens or becomes
deformed, as the space for a spinal nerve passing through the foramen is compromised. Nerve
compression may cause pain that may radiate throughout the neck and into the head, back, and
arms.

Cervical spinal stenosis is a narrowing of the hollow center of the spinal canal and can lead to
compression of the spinal cord and impingement of the nerve roots exiting the spinal cord.

Cervical trauma may affect the cervical spinal column by causing injury to bones, nerves,
muscles, tendons, and ligaments. Trauma can disrupt nerve communication between the brain
and various somatic and visceral systems, sometimes resulting in weakness, paralysis, and loss of
sensation.

Cervical strain is typically the result of a stretch injury to the muscles and ligaments of the
cervical spine. Oftentimes, it is the result of trauma from sports-related injuries, falls, or motor
vehicle accidents. Prolonged improper positioning (poor workplace ergonomics) can cause
postural deviations, which may eventually result in neck pain even in younger patient
populations.[7]

To be an adequate cervical HVLA OMT provider, the provider must have adequate background
knowledge in cervical spine and neck anatomy.[8] It should be noted that all cervical vertebrae
except C1 and C2 are composed of two portions: The body (an anteriorly situated central mass of
bone) and a vertebral arch arising posteriorly off the body. The vertebral arch consists of the
pedicles that connect the body to the articular processes and the lamina that connects the articular
processes to the spinous process on the most posterior aspect of each vertebra. The paired
articular processes on each vertebra articulate with an adjacent articular process of a contiguous
vertebra to form zygapophyseal joints, allowing motion between the vertebrae in X, Y, and Z
planes.

The transverse processes are small bony projections off the right and left sides of each vertebra.
The two transverse processes of each vertebra function as the site of attachment for muscles. The
transverse foramen (foramen transversarium) of the cervical vertebrae is a hole or opening in the
transverse process of a cervical vertebra for the passage of the vertebral artery and vein and the
sympathetic nerve plexus. The paired vertebral arteries (one on each side) are of particular
importance because they provide blood to the brain and spinal cord, and they can be damaged
during traumatic events involving the transverse processes.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK565847/ 3/11
11/1/23, 4:45 PM Osteopathic Manipulative Treatment: HVLA Procedure - Cervical Vertebrae - StatPearls - NCBI Bookshelf

The spinous process is a projection of bone off the posterior aspect of a vertebra. It arises from
the neural arch at the junction of two laminae and provides attachment for muscles concerned
especially with flexion, extension, and stability of the spine.

Efficient and careful palpation of the cervical vertebral elements, particularly the spinous
processes and the transverse processes, is essential to establish an accurate diagnosis of cervical
somatic dysfunction. Likewise, the same knowledge base is required to provide cervical HVLA
OMT for the patient in the safest way possible.

Indications
Many manual medicine practitioners use high-velocity low amplitude (HVLA) thrust techniques
to treat spinal somatic dysfunction. A common indication for the use of HVLA OMT is "joint
fixation," described as a condition where any two bones in a joint either become misaligned or
fixated (stuck). HVLA therapy used in the cervical region may be effective in resolving the neck,
shoulder, and head pain.[9]

The use of HVLA therapy of the cervical spine is indicated to treat motion loss with associated
somatic dysfunction. It is hypothesized that fibrous adhesions develop in zygapophyseal joints
during periods of relative immobility, restricting motion within the joint. HVLA therapy is
thought to improve symptoms consistent with musculoskeletal joint restriction due to cavitation
and adhesions of the zygapophyseal joints. HVLA is typically used for patients with local or
radiating neck pain in non-acute phases. To that extent, it is also used to treat patients with
cervicogenic headaches. Studies suggest that mobilization or manipulation of the cervical spine
may be beneficial for individuals experiencing cervicogenic headaches.[10]

Contraindications
There are two types of contraindications in the cervical HVLA OMT, absolute and relative.
Absolute contraindications include patients with a medical history of osteoporosis, active
osteomyelitis, fractures in the cervical area, severe rheumatoid arthritis, and bone metastasis in
the cervical region. Also included are patients with Down syndrome as HVLA therapy can lead
to rupture of the transverse ligament of the dens process since this population may have
increased laxity of the transverse ligament at baseline.[11]

Absolute Contraindications: [12] [13]

Acute fractures

Acute soft tissue injury

Acute myelopathy

Ankylosing spondylitis

Anticoagulant therapy

Chiari malformation

Connective tissue disease

Dislocation

Down syndrome

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK565847/ 4/11
11/1/23, 4:45 PM Osteopathic Manipulative Treatment: HVLA Procedure - Cervical Vertebrae - StatPearls - NCBI Bookshelf

Infection

Instability

Ligament rupture

Osteoporosis

Patient refusal

Recent surgery

Rheumatoid arthritis

Surgical or pathologic fusion of a joint

Tumor/bony malignancy

Vertebral artery abnormalities

Vascular disease

Relative Contraindications: [13]

Acute herniated nucleus pulposis

Acute whiplash

Any symptom aggravated by movement of the neck

Blurred vision

Diplopia

Dizziness/vertigo

Drop attacks

Dysarthria

Dysphagia

Facial/oral paresthesia

Hypermobility syndromes

Nausea

Previous diagnosis of vertebrobasilar insufficiency

Tinnitus

Visual disturbances

Worsening of symptoms with manipulations

Since a large number of the reported cases of serious adverse outcomes involved in cervical
HVLA OMT and "thrust" techniques involve vertebrobasilar accidents (VBA) and strokes,
caution should be used when treating patients with suspected artery disease or vascular
anomalies.[14][15][16]

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK565847/ 5/11
11/1/23, 4:45 PM Osteopathic Manipulative Treatment: HVLA Procedure - Cervical Vertebrae - StatPearls - NCBI Bookshelf

Personnel
The technique requires a practitioner with training in OMT or hands-on spinal manipulation
techniques. To have successful HVLA therapy outcomes, the patient must consent, be
cooperative, and be relaxed and healthy enough to be placed in the proper positioning for
treatment.

Preparation
It is encouraged that all practitioners who wish to use cervical manipulation should undertake a
formal education program to decrease risks.[12] As with any therapy, awareness and knowledge
are important factors to weigh the benefits, manage the risks, and recognize early warning signs
of adverse events.[17]

Preparation should begin with a thorough history and complete head-to-toe assessment to
minimize the likelihood of complications arising from cervical manipulation. Patients should be
thoroughly screened for all potential contraindications and precautions, preferably through
screening methods focused on identifying patients who have contraindications to HVLA therapy
and may be at risk of adverse outcomes.[12][13]

Since HVLA therapy (OMT) is considered a procedure, proper consent should be obtained
before the initiation of treatment.[18] Providing information about HVLA and assessing the
patient's understanding of HVLA is an essential component of positive outcomes and patient
relaxation during the procedure. The practitioner's duty includes the safe and appropriate
performance of HVLA therapy and the provision of pertinent information and advice to enable
the patient to make an informed decision regarding their own treatment. Failure to inform the
patient of the potential risks and benefits and failure to obtain informed consent is a breach of
duty.

Preparation starts with localizing the correct region in which a cervical somatic
dysfunction exists. In order to establish this diagnosis, it is necessary to identify the specific
cervical spine level in which the segment is causing severe pain on palpation or a restriction of
motion. Once identified, the practitioner will engage that cervical level in both flexion and
extension. The provider will then test the patient's ability to rotate and side bend each segment to
the right and left. Once identifying the restricted barrier, for example, a C4 vertebra that is
flexed, rotated left side bent left, the physician would take the restricted barrier into the opposite
orientation. For this example, you would engage C4 extended rotated right and side bent right.

Patient positioning is ideal for optimal procedural outcomes. The patient should be supine, and
the operator (physician) should be at the head of the table. Patients need to be as relaxed as
possible through physical assessment. This is an essential component of treatment for patients to
have optimal results and prevent any adverse outcomes. The importance of establishing a
satisfactory patient-physician relationship and establishing a foundation of trust is imperative to
positive outcomes.

Technique or Treatment
A Step-by-step organized procedural pathway is paramount to having an ideal outcome for this
procedure. The first step in this procedure is diagnosing the patient's cervical somatic
dysfunction. Then ensuring that a patient is a candidate for HVLA therapy by verifying that there
are no existing contraindications.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK565847/ 6/11
11/1/23, 4:45 PM Osteopathic Manipulative Treatment: HVLA Procedure - Cervical Vertebrae - StatPearls - NCBI Bookshelf

Diagnosing cervical somatic dysfunction involves a careful manual examination of the

atlantooccipital joint with the patient in the supine position, comparing the depths of the occipital
sulci. The atlantoaxial joint is examined by flexing the patient's cervical spine, locking the
atlantooccipital joint and the C2-C7 joints. The range of motion of the atlantoaxial joint is then
evaluated by slowly rotating the cervical spine from right to left, noting any restricted movement
when comparing the rotation to each side. C2-C7 are also evaluated with the patient in the
supine position, with careful attention directed to the freedom of movement of each segment with
palpation to the right and left. With the cervical spine positioned in the neutral, flexed, and
extended positions, the practitioner should determine which segments are rotationally translated
(manually displaced) more easily from one side versus the contralateral side. A lack of equality
at any level of translation of an individual vertebra indicates restriction at that level.

HVLA techniques are most successful when the patient is relaxed. Myofascial techniques may be
instituted before HVLA therapy to relax muscle groups further. This is achieved by applying a
slow and gentle force to loosen hypertonic muscles. By delivering perpendicular and parallel
traction and stretching motions with the fingertips, the muscles and soft tissues will "release."

When the restricted barrier is identified (for example, C4 flexed rotated left, side bent left), the
practitioner will take the restricted barrier into the opposite orientation. In this example, the
practitioner would engage C4 in the extended, rotated right, and side bent right position.

The patient is instructed to relax. If the patient does not adequately relax, the treatment will fail,
and the corrective thrust cannot be executed appropriately. The physician should instruct the
patient to take multiple deep breaths, further engaging the restrictive barrier in the exhalation
phase. The physician then will execute a short effective thrust to move the dysfunctional segment
through the restriction barrier. The ability to perform a successful adjustment with HVLA therapy
will, at times, elicit a "popping" sound. The restrictive barrier should be engaged entirely before
applying the thrust. Finally, after executing the HVLA technique, the practitioner should reassess
the range of motion and the somatic dysfunction treated. A successful result would lead to
approximately 70% or greater return in the restricted range of motion and/or relief of pain.

Patients will be discharged after thirty minutes of observation with instructions to hydrate
appropriately. The patient will follow up in one week for further evaluation and reassessment.

Complications
Although rare, the risk of catastrophic adverse effects has been associated with manual therapy
of the cervical spine. The most serious associated adverse events include cervical artery
dissection (CAD) and vertebrobasilar insufficiency (VBI), and artery spasm, all of which can
lead to stroke.[19] It is suggested that all practitioners perform a Vertebral Artery Test or
(Wallenberg test), a physical exam for vertebral artery insufficiency prior to any neck
manipulation. The Wallenberg test involves motion in the cervical spine in the position of
rotation, extension, and a combination of both. If the patient has vertebral artery insufficiency
symptoms during the test (lightheadedness, visual disturbance, or ocular nystagmus), it is
considered a positive result, and cervical manipulation should be avoided.[20]

Controversy surrounds the dependability of vertebral artery testing before manipulation, with
studies concluding that it is not possible to conclude the accuracy of pre-manipulative tests.
Studies may indicate that the pre-manipulative tests do not seem reliable as a screening
procedure.[21] Nevertheless, the possibility of vertebral artery disease must be entertained
before performing cervical manipulation.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK565847/ 7/11
11/1/23, 4:45 PM Osteopathic Manipulative Treatment: HVLA Procedure - Cervical Vertebrae - StatPearls - NCBI Bookshelf

Vertebral artery injury is a major complication, usually occurring when cervical HVLA is
performed with the neck in the extended position.[22] Vertebral artery dissections may occur due
to intimal damage resulting from over-stretching the artery during rotational maneuvers.
[23] Intimal injury can lead to bleeding into the wall of the artery, pseudoaneurysm formation,
thrombosis, and embolism.[24]

Additional complications of this procedure, mainly performed by providers without sufficient

experience, can include minor soreness or muscle pains. Overall, complications are rare, but the
chance of adverse events will increase with contraindications. Additional complications can
include fractures of cervical vertebrae, spinal cord injury, and other soft tissue injuries.[25] In
some cases, subjective pains may be made worse following an HVLA therapy. It is also
hypothesized that dural tears may infrequently occur following HVLA treatment, as well as
central retinal artery occlusions from patients with atherosclerotic disease of the carotid arteries
and spinal cord contusion (Brown-Sequard syndrome).[26][27][28]

Clinical Significance
High-velocity, low-amplitude technique (HVLA) is frequently used among various professions,
including physicians, chiropractors, physical therapists, and other manual medicine practitioners.
HVLA therapy is also referred to as the "thrust" technique since it directs a quick, short thrust
through a joint, typically in the spine.

The goal of HVLA OMT of the cervical spine is the resolution of symptoms (reduced pain,
increase range of motion). The frequently cited therapeutic mechanism of HVLA treatment
centers on the restoration of mobility of a joint and/or correcting a joint's malalignment.[29] With
this in mind, some believe that the therapeutic effect from HVLA therapy is the result of a
reduction of pain from some underlying painful biomechanical dysfunction (a corrective
treatment of a painful biomechanical lesion).[30]

Controversy exists since evidence suggests that treating the asymmetrical movement of a single
vertebral segment or multiple segments is unlikely to be a source of therapeutic effect and that
treating spinal segments only produces a "minor movement" that is already observed in the pre-
treatment segments.[29][31] In attempting to describe the mechanism of action of HVLA,
researchers propose that HVLA provides relief through a complex reflexive pathway involving
afferent and efferent neurons and their effects on local paraspinal regions. Furthermore, HVLA
may help decrease pain by triggering serotonin and noradrenaline release on a systemic level.[32]

Studies have suggested that osteopathic manipulative treatment, in general, is as efficacious as

intramuscular ketorolac in providing pain relief.[33] To that extent, it was concluded that OMT is
a reasonable alternative to parenteral nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory medications for patients
with acute neck pain. Nevertheless, there is a need for further osteopathic trials with specific
outcome measures related to the HVLA technique to define the therapeutic effect better and
define what combination therapies might best benefit the patient.[34]

Enhancing Healthcare Team Outcomes

The patient-physician relationship is built on trust, allowing a physician to provide an accepted
standard of care within the practitioner's scope of practice and training.[35][36][37] To that
extent, communication between the physician providing HVLA OMT and the patient is pivotal
for optimizing results. The physician's responsibility is to educate, provide adequate information
about the risks and benefits of treatment, and obtain informed consent before this procedure to

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK565847/ 8/11
11/1/23, 4:45 PM Osteopathic Manipulative Treatment: HVLA Procedure - Cervical Vertebrae - StatPearls - NCBI Bookshelf

alleviate anxiety. This allows maximal relaxation and comfort, which are essential to proper
performance. Successful communication in the patient-physician relationship ensures trust and
allows for shared decision making.

Collaboration amongst the interprofessional team to understand and interpret somatic

dysfunctions and understand HVLA therapy is paramount to guide further diagnostics,
therapeutics, and consultations for the patient's overall benefit. Collaboration with other members
of the health care team (other physicians, as well as physical therapists, occupational therapists,
social workers, acupuncturists, counselors, etc.) may ensure complementary healthcare
modalities, such as dietary changes, nutritional supplements, therapeutic exercises, and medicinal
regimes as part of the overall treatment plan.

Review Questions

Access free multiple choice questions on this topic.

Comment on this article.

References
1. Ingold CJ, Ratay S. StatPearls [Internet]. StatPearls Publishing; Treasure Island (FL): Feb 11,
2023. Osteopathic Manipulative Treatment: HVLA Procedure - Inhaled Ribs. [PubMed:
32965970]
2. Snider KT, Johnson JC, Snider EJ, Degenhardt BF. Increased incidence and severity of
somatic dysfunction in subjects with chronic low back pain. J Am Osteopath Assoc. 2008
Aug;108(8):372-8. [PMC free article: PMC2592088] [PubMed: 18723455]
3. Giacalone A, Febbi M, Magnifica F, Ruberti E. The Effect of High Velocity Low Amplitude
Cervical Manipulations on the Musculoskeletal System: Literature Review. Cureus. 2020 Apr
15;12(4):e7682. [PMC free article: PMC7228797] [PubMed: 32426194]
4. Dugailly PM, Sobczak S, Van Geyt B, Bonnechère B, Maroye L, Moiseev F, Rooze M,
Salvia P, Feipel V. Head-trunk kinematics during high-velocity-low-amplitude manipulation
of the cervical spine in asymptomatic subjects: helical axis computation and anatomic motion
modeling. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2015 Jul-Aug;38(6):416-24. [PubMed: 26215899]
5. Lyle MA, Nichols TR. Evaluating intermuscular Golgi tendon organ feedback with twitch
contractions. J Physiol. 2019 Sep;597(17):4627-4642. [PMC free article: PMC6717046]
[PubMed: 31228207]
6. Hall DE, Prochazka AV, Fink AS. Informed consent for clinical treatment. CMAJ. 2012 Mar
20;184(5):533-40. [PMC free article: PMC3307558] [PubMed: 22392947]
7. Gheysvandi E, Dianat I, Heidarimoghadam R, Tapak L, Karimi-Shahanjarini A, Rezapur-
Shahkolai F. Neck and shoulder pain among elementary school students: prevalence and its
risk factors. BMC Public Health. 2019 Oct 16;19(1):1299. [PMC free article: PMC6796365]
[PubMed: 31619204]
8. Wang X, Lindstroem R, Carstens NP, Graven-Nielsen T. Cervical spine reposition errors after
cervical flexion and extension. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2017 Mar 13;18(1):102. [PMC
free article: PMC5347814] [PubMed: 28288610]
9. Saavedra-Hernández M, Castro-Sánchez AM, Fernández-de-Las-Peñas C, Cleland JA,
Ortega-Santiago R, Arroyo-Morales M. Predictors for identifying patients with mechanical
neck pain who are likely to achieve short-term success with manipulative interventions
directed at the cervical and thoracic spine. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2011 Mar-
Apr;34(3):144-52. [PubMed: 21492749]
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK565847/ 9/11
11/1/23, 4:45 PM Osteopathic Manipulative Treatment: HVLA Procedure - Cervical Vertebrae - StatPearls - NCBI Bookshelf

10. Garcia JD, Arnold S, Tetley K, Voight K, Frank RA. Mobilization and Manipulation of the
Cervical Spine in Patients with Cervicogenic Headache: Any Scientific Evidence? Front
Neurol. 2016;7:40. [PMC free article: PMC4800981] [PubMed: 27047446]
11. Van Dyke DC, Gahagan CA. Down syndrome. Cervical spine abnormalities and problems.
Clin Pediatr (Phila). 1988 Sep;27(9):415-8. [PubMed: 2970908]
12. Refshauge KM, Parry S, Shirley D, Larsen D, Rivett DA, Boland R. Professional
responsibility in relation to cervical spine manipulation. Aust J Physiother. 2002;48(3):171-
9; discussion 180-5. [PubMed: 12217065]
13. Puentedura EJ, March J, Anders J, Perez A, Landers MR, Wallmann HW, Cleland JA.
Safety of cervical spine manipulation: are adverse events preventable and are manipulations
being performed appropriately? A review of 134 case reports. J Man Manip Ther. 2012
May;20(2):66-74. [PMC free article: PMC3360486] [PubMed: 23633885]
14. Assendelft WJ, Bouter LM, Knipschild PG. Complications of spinal manipulation: a
comprehensive review of the literature. J Fam Pract. 1996 May;42(5):475-80. [PubMed:
8642364]
15. Jones J, Jones C, Nugent K. Vertebral artery dissection after a chiropractor neck
manipulation. Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent). 2015 Jan;28(1):88-90. [PMC free article:
PMC4264725] [PubMed: 25552813]
16. Chen WL, Chern CH, Wu YL, Lee CH. Vertebral artery dissection and cerebellar infarction
following chiropractic manipulation. Emerg Med J. 2006 Jan;23(1):e1. [PMC free article:
PMC2564146] [PubMed: 16373786]
17. Rushton A, Rivett D, Carlesso L, Flynn T, Hing W, Kerry R. International framework for
examination of the cervical region for potential of Cervical Arterial Dysfunction prior to
Orthopaedic Manual Therapy intervention. Man Ther. 2014 Jun;19(3):222-8. [PubMed:
24378471]
18. Delany C. Cervical manipulation--how might informed consent be obtained before
treatment? J Law Med. 2002 Nov;10(2):174-86. [PubMed: 12497733]
19. Di Fabio RP. Manipulation of the cervical spine: risks and benefits. Phys Ther. 1999
Jan;79(1):50-65. [PubMed: 9920191]
20. Richter RR, Reinking MF. Evidence in practice. How does evidence on the diagnostic
accuracy of the vertebral artery test influence teaching of the test in a professional physical
therapist education program? Phys Ther. 2005 Jun;85(6):589-99. [PubMed: 15921479]
21. Hutting N, Verhagen AP, Vijverman V, Keesenberg MD, Dixon G, Scholten-Peeters GG.
Diagnostic accuracy of premanipulative vertebrobasilar insufficiency tests: a systematic
review. Man Ther. 2013 Jun;18(3):177-82. [PubMed: 23127991]
22. Hidalgo B, Hall T, Bossert J, Dugeny A, Cagnie B, Pitance L. The efficacy of manual
therapy and exercise for treating non-specific neck pain: A systematic review. J Back
Musculoskelet Rehabil. 2017 Nov 06;30(6):1149-1169. [PMC free article: PMC5814665]
[PubMed: 28826164]
23. Ernst E. Adverse effects of spinal manipulation: a systematic review. J R Soc Med. 2007
Jul;100(7):330-8. [PMC free article: PMC1905885] [PubMed: 17606755]
24. Nadgir RN, Loevner LA, Ahmed T, Moonis G, Chalela J, Slawek K, Imbesi S.
Simultaneous bilateral internal carotid and vertebral artery dissection following chiropractic
manipulation: case report and review of the literature. Neuroradiology. 2003
May;45(5):311-4. [PubMed: 12692699]
25. Chakraverty J, Curtis O, Hughes T, Hourihan M. Spinal cord injury following chiropractic
manipulation to the neck. Acta Radiol. 2011 Dec 01;52(10):1125-7. [PubMed: 22025741]
26.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK565847/ 10/11
11/1/23, 4:45 PM Osteopathic Manipulative Treatment: HVLA Procedure - Cervical Vertebrae - StatPearls - NCBI Bookshelf

Jeret JS. More complications of spinal manipulation. Stroke. 2001 Aug;32(8):1936-7. [PubMed:
11486132]
27. Jumper JM, Horton JC. Central retinal artery occlusion after manipulation of the neck by a
chiropractor. Am J Ophthalmol. 1996 Mar;121(3):321-2. [PubMed: 8597278]
28. Lipper MH, Goldstein JH, Do HM. Brown-Séquard syndrome of the cervical spinal cord
after chiropractic manipulation. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 1998 Aug;19(7):1349-52. [PMC
free article: PMC8332220] [PubMed: 9726481]
29. Hennenhoefer K, Schmidt D. Toward a Theory of the Mechanism of High-Velocity, Low-
Amplitude Technique: A Literature Review. J Am Osteopath Assoc. 2019 Oct
01;119(10):688-695. [PubMed: 31566696]
30. O'Neill S, Ødegaard-Olsen Ø, Søvde B. The effect of spinal manipulation on deep
experimental muscle pain in healthy volunteers. Chiropr Man Therap. 2015;23:25. [PMC
free article: PMC4561471] [PubMed: 26347808]
31. Ianuzzi A, Khalsa PS. Comparison of human lumbar facet joint capsule strains during
simulated high-velocity, low-amplitude spinal manipulation versus physiological motions.
Spine J. 2005 May-Jun;5(3):277-90. [PMC free article: PMC1315283] [PubMed:
15863084]
32. Skyba DA, Radhakrishnan R, Rohlwing JJ, Wright A, Sluka KA. Joint manipulation
reduces hyperalgesia by activation of monoamine receptors but not opioid or GABA
receptors in the spinal cord. Pain. 2003 Nov;106(1-2):159-68. [PMC free article:
PMC2732015] [PubMed: 14581123]
33. McReynolds TM, Sheridan BJ. Intramuscular ketorolac versus osteopathic manipulative
treatment in the management of acute neck pain in the emergency department: a
randomized clinical trial. J Am Osteopath Assoc. 2005 Feb;105(2):57-68. [PubMed:
15784928]
34. Zamora S, Seffinger MA. Cervical HVLA Used as Single Intervention Improves Motion
and Strength. J Am Osteopath Assoc. 2018 May 01;118(5):346-348. [PubMed: 29710358]
35. Honavar SG. Patient-physician relationship - Communication is the key. Indian J
Ophthalmol. 2018 Nov;66(11):1527-1528. [PMC free article: PMC6213668] [PubMed:
30355854]
36. Pellegrini CA. Trust: The Keystone of the Patient-Physician Relationship. J Am Coll Surg.
2017 Feb;224(2):95-102. [PubMed: 27773776]
37. Epstein RM, Franks P, Fiscella K, Shields CG, Meldrum SC, Kravitz RL, Duberstein PR.
Measuring patient-centered communication in patient-physician consultations: theoretical
and practical issues. Soc Sci Med. 2005 Oct;61(7):1516-28. [PubMed: 16005784]
Disclosure: Bader Elder declares no relevant financial relationships with ineligible companies.

Disclosure: Kevin Tishkowski declares no relevant financial relationships with ineligible companies.

Copyright © 2023, StatPearls Publishing LLC.

This book is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
(CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ ), which permits others to distribute the work,
provided that the article is not altered or used commercially. You are not required to obtain permission to distribute this article,
provided that you credit the author and journal.

Bookshelf ID: NBK565847 PMID: 33351406

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK565847/ 11/11