Professional Documents
Culture Documents
IFAC State of Play Sustainability Assurance Disclosure
IFAC State of Play Sustainability Assurance Disclosure
FEBRUARY 2023
FOREWORD
This marks our third annual benchmarking study of global • Stand-alone sustainability reports remain a popular format with financial statement audits—all based on rigorous and
practice in sustainability disclosure and its assurance. The for disclosure (especially in Canada, U.S., and jurisdictions widely accepted professional, quality management, and ethical
momentum behind enhancing corporate reporting with in Asia). But there are jurisdiction-specific trends toward standards. In fact, 70% of the time, companies that obtained
environmental, social, and governance (ESG) or sustainability reporting in annual reports and integrated reports, which sustainability assurance from a professional accountant engaged
information continues—demonstrated by our findings provide more connectivity between ESG and financial their statutory auditor to also review their ESG disclosures.
that 95% of large companies report on ESG and 64% of information and support integrated decision making within • However, in seven jurisdictions, non-accountancy service
companies now obtain assurance/verification over some of companies. providers performed a majority of assurance engagements,
the information they provided in 2021 (increasing from • While most reporting focuses on multi-stakeholder and albeit narrower in scope—focused on greenhouse gas or
91% and 51%, respectively, in 2019). societal matters, using or referencing the TCFD Framework other environmental metrics.
The need for a harmonized, global system for reporting decision- and SASB Standards has grown dramatically since 2019, As the ISSB, IAASB, IESBA collectively work to ensure
useful information is clearer than ever before given 86% of albeit unevenly around the world. their standards support high-quality sustainability
the companies reviewed employed multiple standards and • The rate of assurance has increased significantly from 2019 disclosure and assurance, the accountancy profession
frameworks to prepare and present sustainability information. to 2021, but most engagements remain narrowly focused must demonstrate to stakeholders why our profession is
We continue to believe this practice neither supports consistent, on greenhouse gas metrics. Little more than half (53%) of best placed to deliver assurance. We hope that this study
comparable, and reliable information, nor provides a foundation engagements encompassed a range of ESG disclosures. continues to serve as a foundation for evidenced-based
for globally consistent, high-quality sustainability assurance. conversations amongst policy makers, regulators, preparers,
• The International Auditing and Assurance Standards Board’s
New in this report, we examine the extent to which companies (IAASB) International Standard on Assurance Engagements and all users of sustainability information.
provide forward-looking information on climate: emissions 3000 (Revised) remained the most widely used assurance
reduction targets and plans for achieving them. While nearly standard. Kevin Dancey Susan S. Coffey
two-thirds of companies disclosed targets, they lag the rate Chief Executive CPA, CGMA, Chief Executive
at which companies report their historic greenhouse gas Assurance enhances trust and confidence in ESG information Officer, IFAC Officer – Public Accounting
emissions (97%). and the systems and controls used to collect and report AICPA & CIMA
data. It also supports informed capital allocation decisions.
Other key highlights in this report demonstrate important global We believe professional accountants are best positioned to
trends, as well as continuing jurisdictional differences. conduct engagements that connect sustainability assurance
2
MAPPING GLOBAL REPORTING AND ASSURANCE PRACTICES
For the third consecutive year, our analysis indicates
KEY FINDINGS: 2019 | 2020 | 2021
that while the frequency of reporting ESG information
3
MAPPING GLOBAL REPORTING AND ASSURANCE PRACTICES - 2021
UNITED KINGDOM GERMANY TURKEY
99.0 81.8 36.4 99.0 73.7 95.9 88.0 52.3 69.0
ITALY
100 94.0 100
CHINA's mainland
93.0 36.6 50.0
SOUTH KOREA
CANADA
92.0 100 8.1
98.0 61.2 61.3
FRANCE JAPAN
UNITED STATES
100 98.0 98.0 99.0 68.7 46.6
99.0 81.8 15.3
SPAIN HONG KONG S.A.R.
MEXICO 98.0 93.9 98.0 100 52.0 34.5
86.0 46.5 85.0
SINGAPORE
100 38.0 56.5
ESG Reporting INDONESIA
Companies
100 32.0 50.0
BRAZIL
0% 100% 92.0 71.7 75.8 INDIA
Rate of ESG SAUDI ARABIA 100 49.0 47.1
Assurance ARGENTINA SOUTH AFRICA
76.0 13.2 71.4
64.0 25.0 89.0 96.0 62.5 46.9 AUSTRALIA
0% 100% 98.0 69.4 94.3
Assurance Provided
by Audit Firms or
Affiliated Firms
4
0% 100%
SCOPE OF REPORTING 2020 2021
AND ASSURANCE
REPORTING ASSURANCE
5
REPORTING
6
SUMMARY CHANGES: REPORTING
METHOD OF REPORTING. The use of stand-alone sustainability reports has declined globally over the 2019-2021
reporting periods, with Canada, China's mainland, Hong Kong S.A.R., South Korea and the U.S. being notable exceptions.
Elsewhere ESG reporting in integrated reports (Brazil, France, Japan, India, Turkey, Singapore) and annual reports (Germany,
Spain, Saudi Arabia, Indonesia, and Singapore) has increased. (See page 8 for more information.)
increasing from
The use of / reference to Global Reporting Initiative (GRI)
Standards and the UN Sustainable Development Goals
(SDGs) remained high (comparing 2020 to 2021) among 72% to
74% (GRI)
the companies that reported on ESG. increasing from
76% to
79% (SDGs)
7
CHANGES IN WHERE
COMPANIES 2019 57% 18% 16% 9%
BRAZIL MEXICO FRANCE ITALY SAUDI TURKEY AUSTRALIA HONG KONG INDONESIA SINGAPORE
ARABIA S.A.R.
ARGENTINA CANADA USA GERMANY SPAIN SOUTH UNITED CHINA’S INDIA JAPAN SOUTH
AFRICA KINGDOM MAINLAND KOREA
8
STANDARDS SASB Standards – Jurisdictional reference or use of SASB Standards during 2021
AND 100% AMERICAS EUROPEAN UNION OTHER EMEA ASIA-PACIFIC
FRAMEWORKS
50% 49% 49% AVERAGE RATE OF REPORTING
38%
Usage of SASB Standards and the TCFD
Framework has increased significantly 15%
between 2019 and 2021—albeit not to the
0%
same extent across all jurisdictions.
2019 2020 2021 BRAZIL MEXICO FRANCE ITALY SAUDI TURKEY AUSTRALIA HONG KONG INDONESIA SINGAPORE
ARABIA S.A.R.
Companies in the Americas and Europe have ARGENTINA CANADA USA GERMANY SPAIN SOUTH UNITED CHINA’S INDIA JAPAN SOUTH
steadily adopted while companies in the Middle AFRICA KINGDOM MAINLAND KOREA
East, and parts of Asia have lagged. TCFD Framework – Jurisdictional reference or use of TCFD Framework during 2021
100% AMERICAS EUROPEAN UNION OTHER EMEA ASIA-PACIFIC
63%
63% AVERAGE RATE OF REPORTING
50% 48%
24%
0%
The percentage of ESG reporting framework/standard is 2019 2020 2021 BRAZIL MEXICO FRANCE ITALY SAUDI TURKEY AUSTRALIA HONG KONG INDONESIA SINGAPORE
ARABIA S.A.R.
calculated as the number of reports that disclose the use
of a specific framework/standard vs. the total number of ARGENTINA CANADA USA GERMANY SPAIN SOUTH UNITED CHINA’S INDIA JAPAN SOUTH
reports that include ESG information (1283). AFRICA KINGDOM MAINLAND KOREA
9
STANDARDS GRI Standards – Jurisdictional reference or use of GRI Standards during 2021
AND 100% AMERICAS EUROPEAN UNION OTHER EMEA ASIA-PACIFIC
50%
2019 2020 2021 BRAZIL MEXICO FRANCE ITALY SAUDI TURKEY AUSTRALIA HONG KONG INDONESIA SINGAPORE
Multiple Standards ARABIA S.A.R.
100%
ARGENTINA CANADA USA GERMANY SPAIN SOUTH UNITED CHINA’S INDIA JAPAN SOUTH
AFRICA KINGDOM MAINLAND KOREA
86% SDG Goals – Jurisdictional reference or use of SDG Goals during 2021
80%
100% AMERICAS EUROPEAN UNION OTHER EMEA ASIA-PACIFIC
68%
76% 79%
79% AVERAGE RATE OF REPORTING
50%
62%
50%
0% 0%
2019 2020 2021 2019 2020 2021 BRAZIL MEXICO FRANCE ITALY SAUDI TURKEY AUSTRALIA HONG KONG INDONESIA SINGAPORE
ARABIA S.A.R.
ARGENTINA CANADA USA GERMANY SPAIN SOUTH UNITED CHINA’S INDIA JAPAN SOUTH
AFRICA KINGDOM MAINLAND KOREA
10
FORWARD-LOOKING
DISCLOSURE
11
SETTING AND
GETTING TO CLIMATE 67% of companies reviewed in 2021 disclosed emissions reduction targets
REDUCTION GOALS
100%
Carbon neutral or net zero?
Scope 3 disclosures vary. Companies may include all GHG target that reaches carbon neutrality
27% Net Zero
15 categories from the GHG Protocol standards, only or net zero emission in operations.
Scopes 1 + 2
material categories, or only select categories of Scope 27% (i.e., Scope 1 + 2)
3 emissions. A detailed analysis of Scope 3 emissions
was not included in this analysis. GHG target that reaches carbon neutrality
22% Net Zero
16%
or net zero emission in the value chain.
Scopes 1, 2 + 3
GETTING TO NET ZERO
BENCHMARKING EMISSIONS TARGETS AND TRANSITION PLANS
0% (i.e., Scope 1, 2 + 3)
A Global Review of Corporate Disclosures
12
SETTING NET ZERO
49% of companies reviewed in 2021 set a net zero emissions reduction target
REDUCTION TARGETS
Scopes 1, 2 + 3 Scopes 1 + 2 Other Target No Target
There is little regional variance in setting
100% AMERICAS EUROPEAN UNION OTHER EMEA ASIA-PACIFIC
emissions reduction goals other than a
slightly higher rate, 58%, of net zero 58%
targets - either Scopes 1 + 2 or EU
Scopes 1, 2 + 3 - in the European Union.
BRAZIL MEXICO FRANCE ITALY SAUDI TURKEY AUSTRALIA HONG KONG INDONESIA SINGAPORE
ARABIA S.A.R.
ARGENTINA CANADA USA GERMANY SPAIN SOUTH UNITED CHINA’S INDIA JAPAN SOUTH
AFRICA KINGDOM MAINLAND KOREA
13
CREATING EMISSIONS
REDUCTION PLANS
Transition Plan No Transition Plan
100%
87% of companies reviewed in 2021 with
AMERICAS EUROPEAN UNION OTHER EMEA ASIA-PACIFIC
0%
BRAZIL MEXICO FRANCE ITALY SAUDI TURKEY AUSTRALIA HONG KONG INDONESIA SINGAPORE
ARABIA S.A.R.
ARGENTINA CANADA USA GERMANY SPAIN SOUTH UNITED CHINA’S INDIA JAPAN SOUTH
AFRICA KINGDOM MAINLAND KOREA
14
ASSURANCE
15
SUMMARY CHANGES: ASSURANCE
ASSURED ESG INFORMATION.
The percentage of companies that obtained assurance on
some of their ESG reporting increased from:
51% to
58% to
64%
in 2019 in 2020 in 2021
The six jurisdictions with the largest 3-year increases are Hong Kong S.A.R., Italy, Japan, Singapore, Turkey, and the United Kingdom,
while Hong Kong S.A.R., Japan, and the U.K. posted the largest single-year increases in 2021.
57%
(IAASB) International Standard on Assurance Engagements
assurance reports from 818 companies) (ISAE) 3000 (Revised) remained the most widely used
were conducted by audit firms in 2021
standard for ESG assurance engagements:
63%
95% of firms* (or their affiliates) used ISAE 3000 (Revised), while
assurance reports from 645 companies)
non-IAASB standards were most commonly used by the other
were conducted by audit firms in 2019
services providers (i.e., only 38% used ISAE 3000) during 2021.
* Including national assurance standards—such as the AICPA's attestation standards—that are at least as robust as ISAE 3000 (Revised),
Firms applied ISAE 3000 (Revised), or corresponding national standards, 99% in 2021.
16
RATE OF
ASSURANCE BY
2019 2020 2021
JURISDICTION
100% AMERICAS EUROPEAN UNION OTHER EMEA ASIA-PACIFIC
The percentage of assurance is based on the number 50% 58% 2020 AVERAGE
of companies that obtained assurance over reported 51% 2019 AVERAGE
ESG information (818) vs. the total number of
companies that reported ESG information (1,283).
If a company obtained more than one assurance
report (i.e., there were multiple metrics or information
individually verified), that company is only counted
once. Reviews, verification statements, and other
similar items were not counted as assurance reports. 0%
BRAZIL MEXICO FRANCE ITALY RUSSIA SOUTH UNITED CHINA’S INDIA JAPAN SOUTH
AFRICA KINGDOM MAINLAND KOREA
ARGENTINA CANADA USA GERMANY SPAIN SAUDI TURKEY AUSTRALIA HONG KONG INDONESIA SINGAPORE
ARABIA S.A.R.
17
TYPE OF FIRM
On average, 57% of assurance in 2021 was performed by audit firms
PROVIDING ASSURANCE
Audit Firm* Other Service Provider
BY JURISDICTION
100% AMERICAS EUROPEAN UNION OTHER EMEA ASIA-PACIFIC
Japan 16%
18
LOCATION AND LEVEL
OF ASSURANCE LEVEL OF ASSURANCE - 2021 Limited Moderate Reasonable Other
20
STATUTORY
AUDITORS VS.
2020 Same Firm 2021 Same Firm 2020 Different Firm 2021 Different Firm
ESG ASSURANCE
100%
PROVIDERS
AMERICAS EUROPEAN UNION OTHER EMEA ASIA-PACIFIC
0%
BRAZIL MEXICO FRANCE ITALY RUSSIA SOUTH UNITED CHINA’S INDIA JAPAN SOUTH
AFRICA KINGDOM MAINLAND KOREA
ARGENTINA CANADA USA GERMANY SPAIN SAUDI TURKEY AUSTRALIA HONG KONG INDONESIA SINGAPORE
ARABIA S.A.R.
Statutory audit firm data was only collected for 2020 and 2021.
21
DAYS BETWEEN
STATUTORY 120 AMERICAS EUROPEAN UNION OTHER EMEA ASIA-PACIFIC
2020 2021
AUDIT AND ESG
ASSURANCE
The global gap between when statutory audit
reports are issued and sustainability assurance
reports are issued decreased to — 51 days in
2021 from 54 days in 2020. 60
Average 2021 BRAZIL MEXICO FRANCE ITALY RUSSIA SOUTH UNITED CHINA’S INDIA JAPAN SOUTH
AFRICA KINGDOM MAINLAND KOREA
Average 2020
ARGENTINA CANADA USA GERMANY SPAIN SAUDI TURKEY AUSTRALIA HONG KONG INDONESIA SINGAPORE
Some jurisdictions may have different deadline requirements for statutory ARABIA S.A.R.
reporting versus voluntary disclosures, which can impact the time between
the date of the statutory audit report and ESG assurance report(s).
Statutory audit information was only collected for 2020 and 2021.
22
JURISDICTION
PROFILES
23
ARGENTINA
DISCLOSURE ASSURANCE
Region: • Lowest rate of emissions reduction • One of two jurisdictions with a decreased
AMERICAS targets (14%) globally assurance rate (-6%) over three years
32 of 50
Sustainability Annual Integrated No Report
8 of 32
Assurance lag (days) 66 49
Reporting standards / frameworks Assurance standards
2020 100% 2020 100%
100% 100%
60% 87%
84%
78%
81% 37% 92%
89%
30 of 50 77% 11 of 30
73% 73%
69%
33%
31% 33%
26 of 50 8 of 26 22%
19%
17% 11%
15%
8%
0% 8% 0%
GRI SASB SDG TCFD Multiple ISAE 3000 ISAE 3410 AA1000 ISO 14064 Other
100% 68%
90%
86%
82%
84% 88%
50 of 50 80% 71% 34 of 50
76%
72%
70%
2019 2019
62%
50% 50%
54%
43%
100% 56% 43%
29%
50 of 50 28% 28 of 50
6% 6%
12% 11% 4% 3%
0% 0%
GRI SASB SDG TCFD Multiple ISAE 3000 ISAE 3410 AA1000 ISO 14064 Other
92% 67%
98%
96% 88%
93% 85% 91% 85%
88%
87%
82% 84%
46 of 50 31 of 46
64%
2019 50%
61% 52% 2019 50%
50%
90% 53%
45 of 50 24 of 45
18% 9%
6%
3% 3% 3% 10%
0% 0% 8% 8% 8%
GRI SASB SDG TCFD Multiple ISAE 3000 ISAE 3410 AA1000 ISO 14064 Other
49 of 50
Sustainability Annual Integrated No Report
30 of 49
Assurance lag (days) 98 94
Reporting standards / frameworks Assurance standards
2020 100% 2020 100%
92%
96% 58%
90%
82% 89%
85%
73% 81% 76%
48 of 50 79% 28 of 48
72% 71% 71%
47 of 50 21 of 47 19% 27%
15%
4%
0% 0%
GRI SASB SDG TCFD Multiple ISAE 3000 ISAE 3410 AA1000 ISO 14064 Other
93 of 100
Sustainability Annual Integrated No Report
34 of 93
Assurance lag (days) 39 17
Reporting standards / frameworks Assurance standards
2020 100% 2020 100%
32%
79 of 100 18% 22 of 79 27% 28%
21%
12%
11% 5% 5% 4% 3% 4% 9% 4% 3%
0% 0%
GRI SASB SDG TCFD Multiple ISAE 3000 ISAE 3410 AA1000 ISO 14064 Other
88%
82% 90%
50 of 50 49 of 50
64% 74%
62%
66%
64%
2019 50%
60% 60% 2019 50%
100% 96%
48%
42%
50 of 50 48 of 50
12% 2%
0% 0% 2% 2% 2%
GRI SASB SDG TCFD Multiple ISAE 3000 ISAE 3410 AA1000 ISO 14064 Other
94% 86%
81% 83% 70% 92% 93%
82% 80%
94 of 100 77% 66 of 94
73%
59% 66%
2019 50%
60% 2019 50%
42%
94% 44%
63%
32%
94 of 100 27% 59 of 94
5% 4% 5% 4% 3% 3% 1%
0% 9% 0% 1%
GRI SASB SDG TCFD Multiple ISAE 3000 ISAE 3410 AA1000 ISO 14064 Other
50 of 50
Sustainability Annual Integrated No Report
26 of 50
Assurance lag (days) 20 20
Reporting standards / frameworks Assurance standards
2020 100% 2020 100%
98% 86%
35% 85% 86%
86%
74%
49 of 50 68% 17 of 49
66% 73%
64%
2019 2019
62% 61%
50% 56% 57% 50%
100% 26%
26% 31%
33%
50 of 50 13 of 50
22% 23%
19%
15% 10% 15%
16% 7%
10% 3% 5% 5%
0% 8% 0%
GRI SASB SDG TCFD Multiple ISAE 3000 ISAE 3410 AA1000 ISO 14064 Other
100 of 100
Sustainability Annual Integrated No Report
49 of 100
Assurance lag (days) 109 95
Reporting standards / frameworks Assurance standards
2020 100% 2020 100%
98% 38%
47%
44%
39%
34%
29%
98 of 100 21% 37 of 98 22%
17% 27%
20%
4% 6% 13%
4%
9% 3% 3%
0% 7% 0% 7%
GRI SASB SDG TCFD Multiple ISAE 3000 ISAE 3410 AA1000 ISO 14064 Other
50 of 50
Sustainability Annual Integrated No Report
16 of 50
Assurance lag (days) 53 42
Reporting standards / frameworks Assurance standards
2020 100% 2020 100%
100% 78%
88% 88%
26% 89%
82% 80%
50 of 50 78% 13 of 50
73%
69%
67%
56%
2019 50% 2019 50%
54%
44%
31%
45 of 50 18% 9 of 45
16%
10%
10%
0% 0% 8%
GRI SASB SDG TCFD Multiple ISAE 3000 ISAE 3410 AA1000 ISO 14064 Other
50 of 50
Sustainability Annual Integrated No Report
47 of 50
Assurance lag (days) 2 1
Reporting standards / frameworks Assurance standards
2020 100% 98%
2020 100% 100%
100% 92% 92%
98% 90%
98% 97% 98%
94%
90%
49 of 50 76%
44 of 49
71%
66%
98% 43%
73%
49 of 50 29% 29% 38 of 49
16%
3%
0% 0% 2%
GRI SASB SDG TCFD Multiple ISAE 3000 ISAE 3410 AA1000 ISO 14064 Other
99 of 100
Sustainability Annual Integrated No Report
68 of 99
Assurance lag (days) 102 75
Reporting standards / frameworks Assurance standards
2020 100% 2020 100%
93%
99% 53%
87% 90%
93%
86%
84%
80% 82%
99 of 100 52 of 99 71%
76%
73%
62%
2019 2019
62% 61% 61%
50% 50% 48%
54%
44%
99% 38%
36%
47%
32%
99 of 100 25%
47 of 99 27%
6% 5% 5%
2% 4%
0% 0%
GRI SASB SDG TCFD Multiple ISAE 3000 ISAE 3410 AA1000 ISO 14064 Other
77%
88% 79% 85%
84% 51% 89%
95%
41 of 50 21 of 41
69%
67% 58%
2019 2019
63%
50% 50%
GRI SASB SDG TCFD Multiple ISAE 3000 ISAE 3410 AA1000 ISO 14064 Other
26 of 50 3 of 26
52% 42%
38%
8% 29% 33%
26 of 50 2 of 26
14%
11% 8%
15%
4%
0% 8% 0%
GRI SASB SDG TCFD Multiple ISAE 3000 ISAE 3410 AA1000 ISO 14064 Other
96% 25%
96%
98% 90%
87%
90%
88%
85%
81%
48 of 50 70% 12 of 48
73%
69%
GRI SASB SDG TCFD Multiple ISAE 3000 ISAE 3410 AA1000 ISO 14064 Other
96% 54%
90%
92%
88%
83%
73%
48 of 50 77% 26 of 48
73%
64%
2019 2019
60% 52% 62%
50% 50% 50%
53%
100% 54%
46%
34% 34%
40%
50 of 50 27 of 50
15% 16%
15%
12% 7% 12%
10%
0% 8% 0%
GRI SASB SDG TCFD Multiple ISAE 3000 ISAE 3410 AA1000 ISO 14064 Other
87%
91%
96%
98%
80%
46 of 50 45 of 46
74%
42%
92% 93% 40%
30%
46 of 50 43 of 46 20% 25% 17%
24%
18% 16%
7% 14%
4% 3% 10%
0% 0% 1%
GRI SASB SDG TCFD Multiple ISAE 3000 ISAE 3410 AA1000 ISO 14064 Other
98% 94%
88%
92%
85% 86%
86% 89%
93%
83%
73%
49 of 50 42 of 49
63%
96% 85%
49%
45%
38%
48 of 50 41 of 48
20%
10% 10%
4% 11% 5% 7%
10% 5% 5% 2%
2%
0% 0% 2%
GRI SASB SDG TCFD Multiple ISAE 3000 ISAE 3410 AA1000 ISO 14064 Other
48%
72% 33%
47% 47%
43%
34%
36 of 50 12 of 36 31%
29% 21%
25%
20% 10%
6% 5% 3%
0% 0% 8% 8%
GRI SASB SDG TCFD Multiple ISAE 3000 ISAE 3410 AA1000 ISO 14064 Other
2019 2019
62%
50% 58% 50%
43%
99% 55%
48%
44% 43%
40% 39%
37%
27%
99 of 100 54 of 99 23%
24%
21%
5% 5% 7% 6% 5%
4% 4%
0% 0%
GRI SASB SDG TCFD Multiple ISAE 3000 ISAE 3410 AA1000 ISO 14064 Other
99% 71%
48% 40% 47%
34%
31%
99 of 100 70 of 99
21% 14%
14% 13% 7% 7% 6%
2% 10% 11%
2% 2% 8% 3%
0% 0%
GRI SASB SDG TCFD Multiple ISAE 3000 ISAE 3410 AICPA AA1000 ISO 14064 Other
45
METHODOLOGY
This study reviewed the largest companies in each jurisdiction by market DATA COLLECTION METHODOLOGY
capitalization as of approximately March 21, 2021, for fiscal years 2019 and 2020,
and March 21, 2022, for fiscal year 2021. Company jurisdiction was based on the Reports were located on a company’s website in one of four places:
location of the company’s headquarters. The largest 50 companies were reviewed
in 16 jurisdictions for fiscal years 2019 and 2020, and 15 jurisdictions for fiscal
1. Dedicated sustainability web page for stakeholders
year 2021. The largest 100 companies were reviewed in the six largest economies 2. Sustainability web page under “About the Company” section
(denoted with an asterisk). The jurisdictions that make up the G20, Spain, Hong
Kong S.A.R., and Singapore were selected to ensure the jurisdictions had at least 3. Annual reports or downloads section of investor relations web page
50 listed companies to review. Jurisdictions with 100 companies reviewed were
selected based on the largest nominal GDP as of March 21, 2021. 4. Sustainability section of investor relations web page
If a report could not be located a company’s website, the company name
Europe, Middle East, was searched with the term “2020 sustainability report.” If a report was still
Americas and Africa (EMEA) Asia-Pacific not located, the company was search in the GRI Database of sustainability
• Argentina • France • Australia reports. For Hong Kong Stock Exchange (HKEx) listed companies, the exchange
• Brazil • Germany* • China’s mainland*
website was used to collect reports if a report could not be found on a
company’s website. This only impacted companies located in China’s mainland
• Canada • Italy • Hong Kong S.A.R.
and Hong Kong S.A.R.
• Mexico • Russia • India*
• United States • Saudi Arabia • Indonesia
of America* • South Africa • Japan* Emissions reduction targets 1. Sustainability Report Emissions reduction targets and transition plans
Spain Singapore and transition plans were were not always located together. All locations
• • 2. Annual Report
• Turkey • South Korea collected as of fiscal year were reviewed for each company to ensure all
2021. Emissions reduction 3. Integrated Report targets or transition plans were observed. For
• United Kingdom*
targets and transition plans 4. Company Website targets and transition plans that were located
Russia was excluded for fiscal year 2021 due to issues accessing public company documents and websites. were usually located in one 5. TCFD Website on a website, date of publication was used to
Excluding Russia from prior results would have resulted in 52% of companies receiving assurance in 2019 of six places: ensure targets and transition plans related to
(instead of 51%) and 60% audit firm market share in 2020 (instead of 61%). The impact on other reported 6. Other climate report fiscal year 2021 or earlier.
information was deemed immaterial.
46
METHODOLOGY
REPORT Reports were classified into three REPORTING Reporting standards were collected from the “About this Report” section.
CLASSIFICATION groups: sustainability reports, annual STANDARDS Both reporting standards and reporting frameworks were captured due
reports, and integrated reports. to inconsistent disclosure regarding their use as standards or frameworks.
Sustainability reports were identified Next, any standards or frameworks indexed in the appendix were collected.
as those published for the sole or main Finally, a text search for the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI), Sustainability
purpose of informing stakeholders of Accounting Standards Board (SASB), United Nations Sustainable
environmental, social, or governance Development Guidelines (SDG), and Taskforce on Climate-related Financial
activities and performance. Annual Disclosures (TCFD) was used to find additional references within the body
reports were identified as those of the report. Standards and frameworks must have been used to report
published for the main purpose of primary information to stakeholders.
informing stakeholders of financial
performance. Annual reports were
only collected if they included sustainability or ESG reporting. Integrated
reports were identified as those published pursuant to the <IR> ASSURANCE
framework issued by the International Integrated Reporting Council.
A company was determined to have obtained assurance if an assurance
For companies that issued more than one report, a hierarchy was used to report that covered ESG data was found within a report, on the
determine which report to collect. If an integrated report was published, company’s website, or in the CDP database. Verification statements
the company was counted as reporting in an integrated report, regardless were not counted, nor were references to assurance where a specific
of any other publications. If a company published both an ESG report and assurance report was not available. If a report included more than one
published this ESG information within an annual report, the company was assurance report, each report was reviewed separately.
counted as reporting in an annual report.
47
Copyright © July 2023 by the International Federation of Accountants (IFAC) and the Association of International Certified Professional Accountants
(the Association). All rights reserved. Contact permissions@ifac.org or copyright@aicpa-cima.com for permission to reproduce, store or transmit, or to
make other similar uses of this document other than for personal use.
IFAC and IFAC INTERATIONAL FEDERATION OF ACCOUNTANTS Design are trademarks of the International Federation of Accountants registered in the
U.S. and other countries.
ASSOCIATION OF INTERNATIONAL CERTIFIED PROFESSIONAL ACCOUNTANTS and the Globe Design are trademarks of the Association of International
Certified Professional Accountants registered in the U.S., the E.U., the U.K. and other countries. AICPA and CIMA are trademarks of the American Institute IFAC
of CPAs and The Chartered Institute of Management Accountants, respectively, and are registered in the U.S., the E.U., the U.K. and other countries.
@IFAC
The information provided in this publication is general and may not apply in a specific situation. Legal advice should always be sought before taking any legal
action based on the information provided. Although the information provided is believed to be correct as of the publication date, be advised that this is a
International Federation of Accountants
developing area. IFAC, the Association, AICPA, and CIMA cannot accept responsibility for the consequences of its use for other purposes or other contexts.
The information and any opinions expressed in this material do not represent official pronouncements of or on behalf of the IFAC, AICPA, CIMA, or the
International Federation of Accountants
Association of International Certified Professional Accountants. This material is offered with the understanding that it does not constitute legal, accounting,
529 Fifth Avenue
or other professional services or advice. If legal advice or other expert assistance is required, the services of a competent professional should be sought.
New York, NY 10017
The information contained herein is provided to assist the reader in developing a general understanding of the topics discussed but no attempt has been made USA
to cover the subjects or issues exhaustively. While every attempt to verify the timeliness and accuracy of the information herein as of the date of issuance has T +1 212 286 9344
been made, no guarantee is or can be given regarding the applicability of the information found within to any given set of facts and circumstances. www.ifac.org