.

TEAM ESTHETIC
Guidelines
1 Score for each criterion is within 1 to 10. The highest score is 10.
2 No member can have exactly the same score correspondingly for all items with any other member of the team.
3 Every gray cell should be filled out.
4 ALL members should be able to fill out TIGS.
5 Make sure the black and white part in the right side remains blank, else, you have to repeat rating because there are students with the same score.
6 if only 5 members, leave the last 2 rows and last 2 columns for the 6th & 7th, empty.
7 Instead of rating per column on one part (horizontally), you are going to rate your classmate VERTICALLY based on your assigned column/color.
8 This is a new IGS format. If you have questions, please don't be afraid to ask.

TEAM MEMBERS Code PSA % Cont AA IG

(Write your complete names in alphabetical order)
Domagtoy, Geralden B.
Encallado, Jan Aaron O
Ferrater, Rasheed Jim G.
Futalan, Carlos Enrique
Gabriente, Razel James S.
Gella,Leza M.

WEEK # 6 NAME OF DELIVERABLES/ACTIVITIES

. .
Item Criteria Domagtoy, Geralden B.
1 Attendance of meetings 9 8 7 9.6 10
2 Quality of presentation for meetings 10 9 10 9.6 9
3 Active participation during discussions 10 9 8 9.6 9
4 Respect for team members' opinions 10 10 10 9.6 9
5 Ability to meet deadlines for work in progress & submissions 10 10 10 9.6 8
6 Contribution to project execution & achievement 10 9 7 9.6 10
7 Contribution to report writing 10 8 8 9.6 9
8 Leadership / initiative 9 8 7 9.6 8
9 Creative approach 10 8 10 9.6 9
10 Knowledge and understanding of project 10 8 10 9.6 9

Item Criteria Encallado, Jan Aaron O

1 Attendance of meetings 10 10 10 10 10
2 Quality of presentation for meetings 10 10 10 10 10
3 Active participation during discussions 10 10 10 10 9
4 Respect for team members' opinions 10 10 9 10 8
5 Ability to meet deadlines for work in progress & submissions 10 10 9 10 9
6 Contribution to project execution & achievement 10 10 10 10 9
7 Contribution to report writing 10 10 8 10 9
8 Leadership / initiative 10 9 10 10 9
9 Creative approach 10 10 8 10 8
10 Knowledge and understanding of project 10 10 8 10 9

Item Criteria Ferrater, Rasheed Jim G.

1 Attendance of meetings 10 10 10 9.5 9
2 Quality of presentation for meetings 10 8 9 9.5 9
3 Active participation during discussions 10 9 10 9.5 8
4 Respect for team members' opinions 10 10 10 9.5 10
5 Ability to meet deadlines for work in progress & submissions 10 8 9 9.5 8
6 Contribution to project execution & achievement 10 8 8 9.5 9
7 Contribution to report writing 10 10 9 9.5 9
8 Leadership / initiative 9 8 8 9.5 10
9 Creative approach 10 9 9 9.5 9
10 Knowledge and understanding of project 10 9 10 9.5 9

Item Criteria Futalan, Carlos Enrique

1 Attendance of meetings 10 10 6 9.8 10
2 Quality of presentation for meetings 10 9 7 9.8 9
3 Active participation during discussions 10 9 7 9.8 8
4 Respect for team members' opinions 10 10 10 9.8 9
5 Ability to meet deadlines for work in progress & submissions 10 10 8 9.8 10
6 Contribution to project execution & achievement 10 10 8 9.8 8
7 Contribution to report writing 10 10 9 9.8 8
8 Leadership / initiative 8 8 9 9.8 9
 9 Creative approach 10 8 7 9.8 10
10 Knowledge and understanding of project 10 9 9 9.8 9

Item Criteria Gabriente, Razel James S.

1 Attendance of meetings 10 8 9 9.7 8
2 Quality of presentation for meetings 10 9 10 9.7 9
3 Active participation during discussions 10 8 8 9.7 8
4 Respect for team members' opinions 10 10 10 9.7 10
5 Ability to meet deadlines for work in progress & submissions 10 10 8 9.7 10
6 Contribution to project execution & achievement 10 9 8 9.7 9
7 Contribution to report writing 10 8 8 9.7 9
8 Leadership / initiative 10 8 10 9.7 9
9 Creative approach 10 8 9 9.7 9
10 Knowledge and understanding of project 10 8 10 9.7 9

Item Criteria Gella,Leza M.

1 Attendance of meetings 10 10 10 9.9 10
2 Quality of presentation for meetings 10 10 10 9.9 9
3 Active participation during discussions 10 10 10 9.9 9
4 Respect for team members' opinions 10 10 10 9.9 9
5 Ability to meet deadlines for work in progress & submissions 10 10 10 9.9 9
6 Contribution to project execution & achievement 10 10 10 9.9 10
7 Contribution to report writing 10 10 9 9.9 9
8 Leadership / initiative 10 9 10 9.9 9
9 Creative approach 10 9 9 9.9 8
10 Knowledge and understanding of project 10 10 10 9.9 9

Item Criteria
1 Attendance of meetings
2 Quality of presentation for meetings
3 Active participation during discussions
4 Respect for team members' opinions
5 Ability to meet deadlines for work in progress & submissions
6 Contribution to project execution & achievement
7 Contribution to report writing
8 Leadership / initiative
9 Creative approach
10 Knowledge and understanding of project
 VIDEO GUIDE: CHERADEE SERIES

ts with the same score.

gned column/color.

ATTENTION:
SUM
REVIEW SCORES.
No member can have exactly
the same score for all items
with other members of the
team.

ES

OVERALL AVERAGE 9.19

en B. MAX MIN SUM AVERAGE
8 10 7 51.6 8.65
9 10 9 56.6 9.40
10 10 8 55.6 9.40
10 10 9 58.6 9.90
10 10 8 57.6 9.90
9 10 7 54.6 9.40
8 10 8 52.6 8.65
8 9.6 7 49.6 8.25
8 10 8 54.6 9.15
 8 10 8 54.6 9.15
OVERALL AVERAGE 9.83
ron O MAX MIN SUM AVERAGE
10 10 10 60 10.00
10 10 10 60 10.00
10 10 9 59 10.00
10 10 8 57 9.75
10 10 9 58 9.75
10 10 9 59 10.00
10 10 8 57 9.75
10 10 9 58 9.75
10 10 8 56 9.50
10 10 8 57 9.75
OVERALL AVERAGE 9.21
Jim G. MAX MIN SUM AVERAGE
9 10 9 57.5 9.63
8 10 8 53.5 8.88
9 10 8 55.5 9.38
10 10 9.5 59.5 10.00
7 10 7 51.5 8.63
10 10 8 54.5 9.13
8 10 8 55.5 9.38
8 10 8 52.5 8.63
8 10 8 54.5 9.13
8 10 8 55.5 9.38
OVERALL AVERAGE 9.36
nrique MAX MIN SUM AVERAGE
10 10 6 55.8 9.95
8 10 7 52.8 8.95
9 10 7 52.8 8.95
10 10 9 58.8 9.95
10 10 8 57.8 9.95
10 10 8 55.8 9.45
9 10 8 55.8 9.45
8 9.8 8 51.8 8.50
 9 10 7 53.8 9.20
9 10 9 55.8 9.20
OVERALL AVERAGE 9.21
mes S. MAX MIN SUM AVERAGE
10 10 8 54.7 9.18
8 10 8 55.7 9.43
9 10 8 52.7 8.68
10 10 9.7 59.7 10.00
10 10 8 57.7 9.93
8 10 8 53.7 8.93
8 10 8 52.7 8.68
8 10 8 54.7 9.18
8 10 8 53.7 8.93
8 10 8 54.7 9.18
OVERALL AVERAGE 9.86
. MAX MIN SUM AVERAGE
10 10 9.9 59.9 10.00
10 10 9 58.9 9.98
10 10 9 58.9 9.98
10 10 9 58.9 9.98
10 10 9 58.9 9.98
10 10 9.9 59.9 10.00
10 10 9 57.9 9.73
10 10 9 57.9 9.73
9 10 8 54.9 9.23
10 10 9 58.9 9.98
OVERALL AVERAGE
MAX MIN SUM AVERAGE
0 0 0 0.00
0 0 0 0.00
0 0 0 0.00
0 0 0 0.00
0 0 0 0.00
0 0 0 0.00
0 0 0 0.00
0 0 0 0.00
0 0 0 0.00
0 0 0 0.00
THESIS INDIVIDUAL GRADING SHEET (TIGS)
Basic Principle: IE Department believes in the value of meritocracy. Fairness is upheld to motivate students to do their best in contributing to excellent o
Description:
TIGS is the mechanism of IE Department to provide equity to each member's effort to produce the research and/or project.
This peer- and self-assessment tool is integrated in the computation of the per-chapter grade of each student as a multiplying factor to the corresponding

GENERAL GUIDELINES
1 Score for each criterion is within 1 to 10. The highest score is 10.
2 No member can have exactly the same score correspondingly for all items with any other member of the team.
3 Every gray cell should be filled out.
4 ALL members should be able to fill out TIGS.

DEFINITION OF TERMS
PSA Peer & Self Assessment
% Cont % Contribution = PSA / Max PSA
AA Adviser Assessment of Team Output
IG Individual Grade
contributing to excellent output.

actor to the corresponding team grade given by the Research Adviser.