Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Isal Asatidz Individual Performance Evaluation Tools
Isal Asatidz Individual Performance Evaluation Tools
Isal Asatidz Individual Performance Evaluation Tools
The Quality Assurance Division evaluates the performance of the Asatidz or the ISAL Teachers to ensure that
qualified and competent individuals are retained or renewed.
This evaluation maintains the quality of education and ensures that learners receive proper guidance and
instruction. It also provides an opportunity for constructive feedback and identify areas for improvement,
holds Asatidz/ISAL Teacher accountable for their performance and ensure that they are meeting the
expectations set by the MBHTE - DGME.
pg. 2
26. Can explain and articulate ISAL
Subjects and Program.
27. Serves willingly beyond teaching work
by participating in extracurricular
activities when needed
28. Does task as request by superiors
29. Encourage praying and wearing of
Hijab inside and outside the
classrooms.
30. Encourage learners to always help one
another and respect elders.
Sub-Total (total /5 = )
VI. ASSESSMENT AND LEARNERS’
DEVELOPMENT
31. Designs and utilizes appropriate
assessment strategies and tools for
lesson taught.
32. Learners are oriented on the learners’
objectives and how their development
will be evaluated.
33. Keep record of formative and
summative tests.
34. Assessment results are explained to
the learners, leading to their
realization if the areas of
improvement.
35. Learners can keep track of their
progress in their learnings
Sub-Total (total /5 = )
Grand Total ( Total / 35 = )
LEGEND
Outstanding (3.51) All observation question/tasks completely answered/accomplished; supported by
what were observed and analyzed.
Very Satisfactory One (1) to two (2) observation questions/tasks not done/accomplished; supported
(2.51-3.50) by what were observed and analyzed.
Satisfactory (1.51- Three (3) observation questions/tasks not done/accomplished; somewhat
2.50) supported by what were observed and analyzed
Needs (1 – 1.50) Four (4) or more observation questions tasks not done/ accomplished; rarely
Improvement supported by what were observed and
analyzed.
Summary of Results
No. Outstanding Very Satisfactory Needs
PERFORMANCE INDICATORS Satisfactory Improvement
I CONTENT KNOWLEDGE AND PEDAGOGY
II SELF MANAGEMENT
III CLASSROOM MANAGEMENT
pg. 3
IV DIVERSITY OF LEARNERS
V ISLAMIC/SERVICE ORIENTATION
VI ASSESSMENT AND LEARNERS’
DEVELOPMENT
Grand Total
Rating
This certifies that the monitoring and evaluation results have been discussed with me. I understand
that my signature does not necessarily indicate agreement, but acknowledge receipt of the report, and
that I may respond to all issues contained in this evaluation. Written response must be submitted to the
undersigned supervisor/Division Head within 10 working days of date noted below.
pg. 4