Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Polypropylene Fibers in Concrete - tcm45-347135
Polypropylene Fibers in Concrete - tcm45-347135
W. R. MALISCH
n the past several years, an increasing number of contractors have placed concrete containing polypropylene fibers. Fiber manufacturers have promoted the material as a practical alternative to the use of welded wire fabric for control of shrinkage and t e m p e ra t u re cracking. They cite the ease with which fibers can be added to concrete and also state that adding fibers reduces shrinkage, inhibits shrinkage cracking, reduces permeability and improves impact and abrasion resistance. There is, howe ve r, conflicting data concerning the effects of polypropylene fibers on the properties of concrete. This article reviews some of the suggested applications for concrete reinforced with fibers and surveys recent studies concerning properties of the fiber- re i nforced concrete. We limited our survey to data obtained from tests on concretes containing either 1.5 or 1.6 pounds of collated fibrillated polypropylene fiber per cubic yard of concrete. These are dosage rates recommended by the two major polypropylene fiber manufact u re r s. Results of the testing are fragmentary because there have been a limited number of tests and test conditions investigated. Few of the studies involved field mixing of the concrete containing fibers.
trol shrinkage and temperature cracking. Goals for the engineer and contractor are to reduce the number of cracks and to keep ones that do form from opening up too wide. Adding polypropylene fibers to the concrete has been suggested as one way of achieving these goals. Other suggested applications for concrete containing polypropylene fibers include structures such as median barriers that are subjected to impact loads, placements where all materials must be nonmetallic and areas requiring materials that are resistant to alkalis and other chemicals.
5 4.9 412
2 2
3
2 2 112 2 2 3 4 1 214 2 2
2 2 3 4 4 8 8 9 10 10
* These specimens cured 3 days wet and 25 days dry before testing.
wont improve workability but will reduce strength and increase shrinkage. In some cases, such as for slipformed median barriers, use of a more cohesive concrete with a lower slump may actually be beneficial. Edges of the in-place concrete are less likely to crumble and fall away, and the barrier itself wont subside as much before setting occurs. One researcher (5) suggests that polypropylene fibers might act as dampers or energy absorbers during the concrete compaction process. He recommends periodic density checks on the compacted concrete to detect poor compaction that might cause increases in porosity and poor performance. Data from three studies (2, 3, 4) show that the fibers had little or no effect on unit weight of the concrete. Howe ve r, unit weight wasnt measured on the in-place concrete.
Drying shrinkage
There have been conflicting reports concerning the effect of polypropylene fibers on shrinkage that occurs after concrete has hardened. A pilot study reported in 1982 (7) indicated that polypropylene fibers reduced shrinkage of plain concrete specimens by about 75 percent. Howe ve r, more recent test results dont agree with these findings. One researcher (2) concluded that the total shrinkage for concrete containing polypropylene fibers is approximately equal to shrinkage of concrete without the fibers. Another researcher (4) found that fiber concrete shrinks less than plain concrete but that the difference in shrinkage is small. Shrinkage of 3000 psi concrete with fibers was 6.8 percent less than that of plain concrete, and shrinkage of 4500 psi concrete with fibers was 4.9 percent less than that of plain concrete. Different mix pro p o rt i o n s, specimen sizes, drying conditions and testing procedures were used by the researchers in the studies mentioned above. And conclusions were based upon testing of a limited number of specimens. A soon-to-be-published study (8), based on a larger number of tests, concludes that polypropylene fibers reduce plastic and drying shrinkage when added
* These specimens cured 3 days wet and 25 days dry before testing.
at the manufacturers recommended dosage rates. Concretes containing fibers consistently exhibited less shrinkage than plain concrete. But no conclusions were made regarding actual percentage differences found as a function of the amount or type of fiber used. The researcher stated that because of scatter in individual test data, shrinkage testing requires a large number of test specimens in order to interpret trends.
of Engineers method CRD-C 52) was modified by using a 20-pound load instead of a 10-pound load and an abrasion time of 6 minutes instead of 2 minutes. Polypropylene fibers significantly increased flexural fatigue resistance of plain concrete in one study (2). Specimens were subjected to repetitive loads at about 60 percent of the modulus of rupture. Concrete with fibers withstood over twice as many cycles as plain concrete.
SUMMARY
Conclusions here are based primarily upon laboratory studies of concretes containing about 0.1 percent by volume of polypropylene fibers. This dosage corresponds with the manufacturers recommended dosages of 1.5 or 1.6 pounds of fiber per cubic yard of concrete. Data on concretes containing higher volume percentages of fiber we re nt reviewed. Evaluations of data giving conflicting results are complicated by the fact that many of the testing methods used by different investigators havent been standardized. This and the limited number of tests conducted in several of the studies make many of the conclusions tentative at best. Adding fibers reduces the slump of concrete. There appears to be less plastic shrinkage and less plastic shrinkage cracking when concrete contains polypropylene fibers. Drying shrinkage after hardening is reduced when fibers are added to concrete but the amount of the reduction is difficult to predict using current testing methods. Some increase in compressive and flexural strength is possible when fibers are added to concrete and an increase in fatigue resistance has been noted by one researcher. Results of two abrasion resistance studies are contradictory and there arent enough test results to permit drawing a conclusion. There is also insufficient data concerning impact resistance. If the effects of polypropylene fibers on concrete properties are to be conclusively demonstrated by laboratory tests, more data are needed. Field observations of inplace concrete are perhaps a better indicator of p e rf o rmance at this time than are the results of laboratory tests. Another article in this issue gives some examples of field performance.
References 1. Guirguis, B. E. and Potter, R. J., Polypropylene Fibres in Concrete, Technical Report TR/F90, Cement and Concrete Association of Australia, 1985
2. Aitcin, Pierre-Claude et al, The Use of Fibre Reinforced Concrete for Highway Rehabilitation, Etude #231, IGM85305-231, Industrial Materials Research Institute, National Research Council of Canada, 1985 3. Dahl, P. A., Plastic Shrinkage and Cracking Tendency of Mortar and Concrete Containing Fibermesh, FCB Cement and Concrete Research Institute, Norway, 1985 4. Litvin, A., Report to Wire Reinforcement Institute on Properties of Concrete Containing Polypropylene Fibers, Construction Technology Laboratories, Portland Cement Association, 1985 5. Hannant, D. J., Polypropylene Fibres in Concrete, Mortar, and Cement, Chapter 7 in Fibre Cements and Fibre Concretes, John Wiley & Sons, 1978, page 96 6. Kraai, P. P., Crack Control Methods: Welded Wire Fabric vs. CFP Fibers, for Fibermesh Company, 1985 7. Zollo, R. F., Collated Fibrillated Polypropylene Fibers in FRC, Fiber Reinforced Concrete: International Symposium, SP 81, American Concrete Institute, 1984, page 397
8. Zollo, R. F. et al, Plastic and Drying Shrinkage in Concrete Containing Collated Fibrillated Polypropylene Fibers, to be published in 1986 9. Hanna, A. N., Preliminary Evaluation of Forta Fibre Reinforced Concrete, performed for Forta Corporation by Construction Technology Laboratories, Portland Cement Association, 1981 10. Static Load Test of Fibermesh vs. Welded Wire Fabric, F.E.D. Report No. 5, Fibermesh Inc. (Tests performed by Wiss, Janney, Elstner Associates, Inc.), 1985 11. Concrete Shatter Resistance Under Compressive Loading of Fibermesh vs. Plain, F.E.D. Report No. 6, Fibermesh Inc. (Tests performed by Paul P. Kraai), 1985 12. Kraai, P. P Abrasion Testing of Fibermesh Concrete, ., for Fibermesh Company, 1984
PUBLICATION#C860363
Copyright 1986, The Aberdeen Group All rights reserved