WSDOT Foundation and Fill Settlement Case Histories: Tony M. Allen WA-RD 884.1 August 2018

WSDOT Foundation and Fill
Settlement Case Histories
WA-RD 884.1 Tony M. Allen August 2018
WSDOT Research Report

Office of Research & Library Services
18-09-0418
Research Report
WA-RD 884.1
WSDOT Foundation and Fill Settlement Case Histories
by
Tony M. Allen, P.E.
Washington State Department of Transportation
HQ Geotechnical Office
Olympia, Washington
Prepared for
The State of Washington

Department of Transportation
Roger Millar, Secretary
And in cooperation with

U.S. Department of Transportation
Federal Highway Administration
August 2018
1. REPORT NO. 2. GOVERNMENT ACCESSION NO. 3. RECIPIENT'S CATALOG NO.
WA-RD 884.1
4. TITLE AND SUBTITLE 5. REPORT DATE
WSDOT FOUNDATION AND FILL SETTLEMENT August 2018

CASE HISTORIES
6. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION CODE
7. AUTHOR(S) 8. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION REPORT NO.
Tony M. Allen
9. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME AND ADDRESS 10. WORK UNIT NO.

11. CONTRACT OR GRANT NO.
State Materials Laboratory
1655 South Second Avenue
Tumwater, WA 98512-6951
12. SPONSORING AGENCY NAME AND ADDRESS 13. TYPE OF REPORT AND PERIOD COVERED
Research Office
Final Research Report
Transportation Building, MS 47372
14. SPONSORING AGENCY CODE
Olympia, Washington 98504-7372
Project Manager: Mustafa Mohamedali, 360-705-6307
15. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES
This study was conducted in cooperation with the U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal
Highway Administration.
16. ABSTRACT:
Estimation of settlement below foundations and embankment fills is a routine geotechnical design
requirement. A couple of settlement estimation methods are typically used for this purpose nationally and at
WSDOT. These include the Hough and Schmertmann methods. This report provides a summary of these
methods, and an assessment of their accuracy through comparison of predicted and measured settlement
values. Based on long-term experience, it is usually assumed that settlement estimates are not reliable enough
to predict settlements of less than 0.5 inch. The available data appear to support this in that the scatter in the
measured settlement is greater than the settlement prediction for settlements of less than 0.5 inch.
The scope of this research is limited to sandy WSDOT sites where settlement was measured (i.e.,
settlement in clay is not included). Measured settlements ranged from 0.5 inch to 40 inches.
Overall, the Hough Method provided a more accurate prediction than did the Schmertmann Method.
17. KEY WORDS 18. DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT
Settlement, foundations, embankments No restrictions. This document is available to the public

through the National Technical Information Service,
Springfield, VA 22616
19. SECURITY CLASSIF. (of this report) 20. SECURITY CLASSIF. (of this page) 22. PRICE
21. NO. OF PAGES
None None 178
iii
DISCLAIMER
The contents of this report reflect the views of the author, who is responsible for
the facts and the accuracy of the data presented herein. The contents do not necessarily
reflect the official views or policies of the Washington State Department of Transportation,
Federal Highway Administration, or U.S. Department of Transportation. This report does
not constitute a standard, specification or regulation.
4
TABLE OF CONTENTS
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ................................................................................................ 9
THE PROBLEM ............................................................................................................... 10
BACKGROUND FOR AND SUMMARY OF MOST COMMONLY USED
SETTLEMENT PREDICTION METHODS .................................................................... 11
Prediction of Stress Increase as a Function of Depth ................................................................ 11
The Hough Method ................................................................................................................... 15
The Schmertmann Method ........................................................................................................ 18
OBJECTIVE AND SCOPE OF THIS REPORT .............................................................. 23
CASE HISTORY DESCRIPTIONS ................................................................................. 24
SR395, BNSF Railroad Tunnel ................................................................................................. 24
SR522, University of Washington – Bothell/Cascadia Community College South Campus
Access Walls ............................................................................................................................. 30
I-5/SR432 Talley Way Interchange ........................................................................................... 34
CASE HISTORY SETTLEMENT PREDICTIONS ........................................................ 41
Access Walls ............................................................................................................................. 44
CASE HISTORY SETTLEMENT MEASUREMENTS.................................................. 50
Access Walls ............................................................................................................................. 51
CASE HISTORY DATA ANALYSES ............................................................................ 55
SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS ............................................................................... 61
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ................................................................................................ 62
REFERENCES ................................................................................................................. 63
5
FIGURES
Figure 1. Influence factors for vertical stress under a very long embankment (after
Osterberg 1957 as reported in Holtz and Kovacs, 1981). ................................................. 12
Figure 2. Influence values for vertical stress under the corners of a triangular load of
limited length (after NAVFAC, 1971 as reported in Holtz and Kovacs, 1981). .............. 13
Figure 3. Boussinesq Vertical Stress Contours for Continuous and Square Footings
Modified after Sowers (1979). .......................................................................................... 14
Figure 4. 2V:1H method to estimate vertical stress increase as a function of depth below
ground (after Holtz and Kovacs, 1981)............................................................................. 15
Figure 5. Bearing Capacity Index versus Corrected SPT (Hough, 1959, as modified in
Samtani and Nowatzki, 2006) ........................................................................................... 17
Figure 6—(a) Simplified vertical strain influence factor distributions, (b) Explanation of
pressure terms in equation for Izp (Samtani and Notatzki, 2006, after Schmertmann, et
al., 1978). .......................................................................................................................... 21
Figure 7. SR395 BNSF Railroad tunnel vicinity map. .................................................... 25
Figure 8. Cross-section of spread footing supported arch tunnel. ................................... 26
Figure 9. Close-up of spread footing that supports arch tunnel. ....................................... 26
Figure 10. Overview showing arch and fill under construction....................................... 27
Figure 11. Plan view of tunnel showing boring locations. .............................................. 28
Figure 12. Geologic profile along tunnel showing subsurface conditions....................... 29
Figure 13. SR522, University of Washington – Bothell/Cascadia Community College
South Campus Access Walls vicinity map. ...................................................................... 31
Figure 14. Plan View of Sites No. 7 and No. 8. ................................................................ 32
Figure 15. Subsurface Profile for Sites No.7 and No.8. ................................................... 33
Figure 16. I-5/SR432 Talley Way Interchange vicinity map. .......................................... 35
Figure 17. P-line Bridge Pre-load between Abutments (Sites No.10 and No.11). ........... 35
Figure 18. Typical Section of Pre-load for the P-Line Bridge at Sites No.10 and No.11
(width of structure was assumed to be 40 ft). ................................................................... 36
Figure 19. Plan View of Site No. 9, Section 15+00, on the P-Line with Boring Locations.
........................................................................................................................................... 36
Figure 20. Plan View of Sites No.10 and No.11, the P-Line Bridge Pre-Load Area with
Boring Locations. .............................................................................................................. 37
Figure 21. Plan View of Sites No.12 and No.13, Embankment between Stations 19+87
and 23+83 on the R-Line with Boring Locations. ............................................................ 37
6
Figure 22. Site No.9, P-Line Cross-Section at Station 15+00 (The location of
site/settlement plate No.9 was not underlain by stone columns). ..................................... 38
Figure 23. Profile of P-Line Bridge for Sites/Settlement Plates No.10 and No.11. ......... 39
Figure 24. Typical Embankment Cross-Section for Sites/Settlement Plates No.12 and
No.13 (R-Line Stations 19+87 and 23+83). ..................................................................... 40
Figure 25. Installation Details for Settlement Plates at Site No’s 7 and 8........................ 52
Figure 26. Settlement Plate Detail. ................................................................................... 54
Figure 27. Predicted and measured settlement values for the Hough Method, comparing
the WSDOT case history data to the rest of the data presented in Samtani and Allen
(2018)................................................................................................................................ 55
Figure 28. Predicted and measured settlement values for the Schmertmann Method,
comparing the WSDOT case history data to the rest of the data presented in Samtani and
Allen (2018). ..................................................................................................................... 56
Figure 29. Bias versus predicted settlement for the Hough Method................................ 57
Figure 30. Bias versus predicted settlement for the Schmertmann Method. ................... 57
Figure 31. Measured settlement and Schmertmann Method settlement predictions using
both CPT and SPT data for the WSDOT case histories.................................................... 58
Figure 32. Cumulative Distribution Functions (CDFs) of Hough Method prediction bias
values for the WSDOT case histories, using (a) bias plotted on a lognormal axis, and (b)
ln(bias) plotted on a normal axis....................................................................................... 60
Figure 33. Cumulative Distribution Functions (CDFs) of Schmertmann Method
prediction bias values for the WSDOT case histories, using (a) bias plotted on a
lognormal axis, and (b) ln(bias) plotted on a normal axis. ............................................... 60
TABLES
Table 1: Correlations between Elastic Soil Modulus and SPT N160 or static Cone qc
values for the Schmertmann Method (Schmertmann 1970, and Samtani and Nowatzki
2006). ................................................................................................................................ 22
Table 2. Summary of example Hough analysis (analyzed near mid-point of tunnel
length) for BNSF Railroad tunnel, based on Test Hole RR-5-04 (Site No. 4). ................ 42
Table 3. Summary of example Schmertmann analysis (analyzed near mid-point of tunnel
length) for BNSF Railroad tunnel, based on Test Hole RR-5-04 (Site No. 4). ................ 43
Table 4. Summary of Estimated Settlements using Schmertmann Method for the BNSF
Railroad tunnel.................................................................................................................. 44
7
Table 5. Summary of Hough analysis at Site #7, based on Test Hole H-32-02. ............. 44
Table 6. Hough settlement predictions at settlement plate at Site No’s 7 and 8.............. 45
Table 7. Schmertmann analysis at Site No. 7, based on Test Hole H-32-02. .................. 45
Table 8. Summary of Estimated Settlements using Schmertmann Method for SR 522
UWB CCC Campus S. Access.......................................................................................... 45
Table 9. Summary of example Hough analysis (site No’s 10 and 11), based on Test Hole
H-23-08. ............................................................................................................................ 47
Table 10. Hough Method Settlement predictions at site No’s 9 through No.13.............. 48
Table 11. Summary of example Schmertmann analysis for I-5/SR432 Talley Way
Interchange R-Line Station 20+00 based on CPT 10-08 (Site No.12). ............................ 48
Table 12. Summary of Estimated Settlements using Schmertmann Method for............. 49
I-5/SR432 Talley Way Interchange. ................................................................................. 49
Table 13. Final settlement measurements and corresponding predictions for SR395
BNSF Railroad Tunnel. .................................................................................................... 50
Table 14. Settlement measurements of settlement and corresponding predictions at
settlement plates at sites No’s 7 and 8. ............................................................................. 51
Table 15. Settlement measurements and corresponding predictions at settlement plates
No’s 9 through 13. ............................................................................................................ 54
Table 16. Summary statistics for each settlement case history, for both the Hough and
Schmertmann methods, based on SPT blow counts. ........................................................ 59
Table 17. Summary statistics for the case where CPT data are available as the basis for
estimating settlement using the Schmertmann Method. ................................................... 59
8
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Summarized in this report are comparisons between measured and predicted

settlements obtained from three project sites in the State of Washington (13 individual
measurements and predictions), two sites in western Washington and one site in eastern
Washington. The eastern Washington case is a cut-and-cover tunnel in which the tunnel
footing settlement was measured; however, the surrounding fill was the driver regarding
the settlement measured there. The two western Washington cases represent bridge
abutment fill settlement, though two of the measurement locations included an MSE wall.
These measurements and predictions are used to determine the accuracy of two
settlement estimation methods, the Hough Method and the Schmertmann Method, in
Washington soils. The database of measurements reported here are not comprehensive,
but do represent some typical cases.
Based on these data, both methods appear to be reliable, though in general,
settlement estimates were conservative. The Hough Method was more consistent than
the Schmertmann Method when SPT data are used, but on average was conservative by
an approximate factor of 1.5 for the sites investigated. The Schmertmann Method
predictions using CPT data were the most accurate, but that data set is extremely limited,
so all that can be said at this point is that the Schmertmann Method has the potential to
provide the most accurate results when CPT data are available.
9
THE PROBLEM
Estimation of settlement due to structure loads and beneath embankments is a

common geotechnical design requirement. For structures, this settlement has a direct
impact on the loads induced in a structure, affecting the structural design of the structure.
For embankments, settlement can affect pavement design, impacts to adjacent structures,
differential settlement between the bridge abutment and the approach fill, down drag
loads on structure foundations, and the need to add fill to reestablish the embankment
grade.
Settlement estimation methods typically used (e.g., Hough 1959) were developed
decades ago, were based on limited data, and were not specifically developed for
Washington soils. Settlement data collected for WSDOT projects can be used to assess
the accuracy of these existing methods for soils commonly encountered in the state of
Washington.
10
BACKGROUND FOR AND SUMMARY OF MOST COMMONLY
USED SETTLEMENT PREDICTION METHODS
Two empirical settlement prediction methods have been commonly used for
WSDOT projects to estimate “elastic” (i.e., not time dependent, but immediate)
settlement in cohesionless soils: the Hough Method, and the Schmertmann Method,
though the Schmertmann Method does have an empirical coefficient that can be used to
simulate potential time dependency. Of these two methods, the Hough Method has been
the most often used for WSDOT projects. Settlement of cohesionless soils usually occurs
rapidly, essentially as soon as the foundation is loaded. Hence, this type of settlement is
often characterized as elastic.
Note that it may be necessary to use more than one settlement estimation
approach for layered profiles consisting of a combination of cohesive soil, cohesionless
soil and/or rock. For example, for a cohesive soil layer, the settlement should be
estimated using consolidation theory in combination with undisturbed soil samples tested
using a laboratory consolidation test. For the cohesionless soil layers, the settlement
estimation methods described in this report should be used. An appropriate settlement
estimation procedure for each layer within the zone of influence of induced stress beneath
the footing or embankment should be used.
Settlement prediction requires knowledge of:
 The applied stress increase due to the structure footing or embankment,
 The rate at which the stress increase dissipates with depth below the structure
footing or embankment, and
 The compression characteristics of the soil layers (e.g., as estimated using the
Hough or Schmertmann methods).
Prediction of Stress Increase as a Function of Depth

To estimate settlement, the stress increase at various depths below the applied
load (i.e., due to the foundation or embankment load) must be estimated. Typically the
estimation of stress increase as a function of depth is accomplished with linear elastic
half-space methods such as by Boussinesq (1885) or Westegaard (1938). While most
11
soils are not elastic materials, the theory of elasticity is the most widely used
methodology to estimate the stress distribution in a soil deposit from a surface load.
The equations for the theory of elasticity have been incorporated into design
charts and tables for typical loading scenarios, such as below a foundation or an
embankment. Almost all foundation engineering textbooks include these charts. For
convenience, charts to evaluate embankment loading are included as figures 1 and 2.
Figure 1. Influence factors for vertical stress under a very long embankment (after
Osterberg 1957 as reported in Holtz and Kovacs, 1981).
12
0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.6 1.0 2 3 4 5 6 8 10
0.25
I Values of n
,~ i.,.,,
0.25
- l:r- / -- ---
~
l .....
-· .-
y l 1- .• ~
>---+-
1g. I,.,
>---
qol
I
(.Lx
L H/ V V
~5 - Lo--
0.20
>---
>--- Or-:B--j Q ,j 3_
.. r==
-- 0.20
>--- z m = Liz
11
V ·" "
n = B/ z J J /'
,___
a, f )II II V V
2
>---
a,= I X q 0 '/ I
1,
' I / ... 1:~

/
-- - L-- ~
._._,_
0.15 0.15
L 1~· , lJ /
1
I/
.~ J1/
l
jj
'i '
I
1, 1.0
:, ) 'I I fl ,/" ' /

.,.
_ .. --·
0.8 '-- -- --- l-1-,.
1a, 0.10 0.10

h1 ~·/ I II . /
0
C
a,
:,
'E
~ I '1
~j'il/1
/1,"
v,
.,.v
-0.6
/, ;: / V / }" 0.4
1,-- '- - ' -·-
~ L
0.05
1t1 ,•'/ / I/ 0.05
'~· I/
1_ .... ,... -""
~~
/,
V Beneath corner, 0
~~,I /.:
~.;V,i / ,~ 1 , /
I/
..- ..
., V
_... -- -0.2
.... ... _,_

0.08 --
~ L.-- _l---"' ....
Values of n
Beneath corner, Q I
•~
........
1.0~
...0.1
-- 0.5
-- ......
,___
.o- ,___._
0.08
0.06
/
/
.,/' ...:,;::.;,,
.... :::: ... ::;, .. / - ...... dl.£
O] ...::':'rll- ' -
I-'<:
--- -- -
~----
0.06
/ '.> ...-~ ... ...-

0.04 ~-0 0.04
Ln,2 '
~ :% ~:: ...-:,-
.
-c;:.! -,'-5.0
0.02
0
--
-·--
-
~~~
--- ---
/
.,;-
;;:,:: '-"" ... 0-1
10,.0 •
0.02
0
0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.6 1.0 2 3 4 5 6 8
Value of m
Figure 2. Influence values for vertical stress under the corners of a triangular load
of limited length (after NAVFAC, 1971 as reported in Holtz and Kovacs, 1981).
The distribution of vertical stress increase below circular or square foundations,

and long rectangular footings (i.e., where L > 5B), may be estimated using Figure 3.
13
38 2s s llllllkss ]JI lks 2s 38 48
B
/
/ ~~~--
02q
'/I ' r---o4q{
0 4q
0
11 I \
['\_
' B
~
\)<::,''{' ' ~ '
2B ,.< -,,,• ' 'I '
' ~
I
.. o 1q
o osq'
'A I \
'
'
'I 28
<:::,.:,,,O..o ' I
'
/ " ,I
38 '
'' ' 0.2q;-
/
-
~ I o64qo
,, '
"
38
I ' , I !
48
-- ··1 / !.
,,
48
I
58
' ' 0.02q ,_,
5B
:\ ' ''
\ I, /
'
\
' 0 1q ..... /
'
t::: ~0.01 qo c- ,
,_ ,'
88 ' 0 08q, ,:::'. , 88
,
\ ,
98 98
,
. '
108
-- 0 D05q 0- - I
' I OB
'- I
0.06q 0
'
118 I
4B 3B 2B B 0 0 B 2B 38 48
Infinitely Long Foundation Square Foundation
(a) (bl
Figure 3. Boussinesq Vertical Stress Contours for Continuous and Square Footings
Modified after Sowers (1979).
A more simplified approach that is sometimes used to estimate stress distribution

at depth is the 2V:1H (vertical to horizontal) method. This empirical approach is based
on the assumption that the area the load acts over increases geometrically with depth as
depicted in Figure 4. Since the same vertical load is spread over a much larger area at
depth, the unit stress decreases.
14
Stress a0 = _P_
8 X 1
t
I a0 8 X 1
z
_l ......______,_____. _ (8 + z) X 1
1--z12-j-8---j-+-z/2~1
(a) Strip footing.
Stress on this plane, a0 = :L
t z
· /
/
/
/
/
/
I
)-
-------f
/ x"'
/ :v
/
/
/
-----8 + z - - - - - ao8L
Stress on this plane at depth z, az = - - - -
(8 + z)(L + z)
(b) Rectangular footing
Figure 4. 2V:1H method to estimate vertical stress increase as a function of depth

below ground (after Holtz and Kovacs, 1981).
The Hough Method uses the methods described above to estimate the stress
increase at various depths below the applied load. The Schmertmann Method, however,
uses its own approach developed from finite element modeling and greatly reduced scale
laboratory experiments to estimate the stress and strain increase at various depths below
the applied load (Schmertmann et al., 1978). Since the Schmertmann Method stress
increase as a function of depth was originally developed for rigid footings, it may not be
as applicable to embankment settlement.
The Hough Method

Estimation of settlement on cohesionless soils using the Hough Method is determined
using Eqs. 1 and 2. Standard Penetration Test (SPT) blow counts are corrected as
15
specified in the AASHTO LRFD Bridge Design Specifications (AASHTO 2017), Article
10.4.6.2.4, for depth, i.e. overburden stress, and hammer efficiency, before correlating the
SPT blow counts to the bearing capacity index, C′.
n
Se   H i (1)
i 1
in which:
1    v 
H i  H c log  o  (2)
C  o 
where:
n = number of soil layers within zone of stress influence of the footing
Hi = elastic settlement of layer i (ft)
HC = initial height of layer i (ft)
C′ = bearing capacity index from Figure 5 (dim)
′o = initial vertical effective stress at the midpoint of layer i (ksf)
v = increase in vertical stress at the midpoint of layer i (ksf)
Figure 5 provides the empirical correlation between the Hough bearing capacity
index C’ and the corrected SPT blow counts, N160.
16
300 , , 1 , • f I I I . 1 , I •.I I I • II I I 1
i I I I I 1 , I Ii I : ' 1 l I I I i. I r J I I I I l I I • • • i , / I I :
• 1 , , : I t I I ! 1 I I I I I I '1 I I I I f I I I I .al'Jl'--1--1-
l l--'
ll~•-f
.............
' -'-+-
'+-..._.'_.._
, ....
' +-'-'t-
' ,-i'Hf--''-+- '.-t-''-''-+-+I C
' +- . I I I .... ,. If' I l Q ..'1-'1--11--1-
l-1- '''-1
l ...
r----'
~ '--.-'--+-'--- -''-+---
111,
'' - ' -''' -lh- 'l- '-l._t --'-+-11 -,:,;
., 1 , , 11 1
1 ~
J
!I
I : i µj
: 1 .:S: I I
~ •',-..,
y1 1'',-i,-"-
'' .._
., _,-,r--1
'
>--~,·~--+-----+--'- -'-,-.'-+- I I~-,+-',-.,..' ~ / , 1 I
' +-' i • ff" I I C;j f I ' :
1-'--~>-+- I -+--1-'-+-+ (/j I
· ~ - -+---<''-'"-+~.,. ' I O ~ _J -1 T I • I
250
I ! ' ' I I : : ~ ," ; : : 1 0 l_t] § ~ I I : ~·
1 - -- - 1 - - -- 1-.i.....
• c.......;...,1-.~'' -+-l-i-'-!' .2 ' ' t:t:J . ' I-!. ~ ''~ .
i-- - - - f - - - --i--''-J..1._._ ' ..c'-+-
• !--'- + ' +-~' "t;j , I I I 1-' (.; I , I I ~ '
i - - - - - f - --, ---1-"-
l -l-
l -'--
, ' -f-''--'-
l -,'-i-'-f-'- t2) I J I I ~ ~ 0 .I I : ~
f-- - - - + - -- -,t-L..1--'1-J'-l-'- i' -+-'-HI E:. !I I I , -.;;;;;:-
Y' I -.,;: I ; , 1 G::, •
. ~======~~======~=!::j,:::::~~=~='-,'-+-<
1-- - - - f - - - - ''--!--f'-t-
~j~:.-t:
',-1-++.._
l . I
f::
I I
!I
I I
•
i
'
,
I
!
I
Clj
~~ V
~
(b
•~ I
•I
t
;
I
I
I
I
l '_.....l
' .~~ 'i,
Y 0
·>f-- -,- -f
~ -111'+--'-l---1
(.J i - - ~-'-f--,--,'- '--!-'-+-
l -' !f -f-'-,..-
1-/;-f- ..p I I I .§'"., ~ b, I i • ~ , / •
t: ;s t
, 1 1 1 · - II ' t 1 ~ 1 .,.._0 • , ~... ., • 1 • ,
)( 200 t------+----+....__:-.:'.:'.::'.:~::
•
,I _;; § I I I
-:::~ I >-.
r/JV I
:::- '1:,V "
:\.: , I
' & ,,,-
fZ,T
'--'',
-+....___.--i
.
w I------+-.-~- ,+ -,,-~--1-r-' , ,-t-
, ~ C/) r ~ " , I I I II
C
z : I : ; : :
I I
; : : : : : ·~
I u .. :-..~'O ~ ~ . , I: ~<l,·"ov~
~~I
.,. :
~ .• : : ; I I I I : I •
~==~~:=~=!:;::~·=~=~:::::~ ,;,::,, :~~1!=~,, 1~,jf -t-r • 'qf ~ ,~
~
•=-',t- V • • 1 , I j ! 1
' ,, ,·.:::,:: ~ 0., . Ill'· ~
~:!•:.:::,: ;1:t::,::;:,:::;,:t::::·:~,;1::;,~!~;:t1~"'r'.::1:::
}_ ·...~ (J<l, : • ' O(b o/ I I I ! I i ' ,\ ~
(.J 1-'c...J...
' --I-"-
' '-'-.l... I t---' : ·~'1-'--'-.
-+- , ,
,. -'-4-J.' _
. ,
'-1,...-1-- cy ,_, • I
lb' I I f I
V . ;, :
I
j
1
I . C,<::,'\V
, ,
I
,
ct 150 1 - - - -+ -, - - - t - - -..... , -l--4 ,--1--¥-,-""- , +--.,
..... ~~ 'f ' I t ~"' ,,.... I
0.. l----'--f-'--'--, ---1- - -

, - , -,-,1-,-,+ -,- - ,t-,-,+-,--1,-+,~ • , ,0 .
.-~
;._ ~ I I I : ~Q,'b.. •, I l I
< ! I I i , 1 ,I i :
-b,.,I- ,:--',-J_,Lf-t l ,r I I I ,(>o _. ,. I i I
.,_.,,
r.1 ~-
l -;-- '--f--,:....,:...1--1-_.,-+-
, '-1-,-#-"-.l....l.
; T • t ' ~ ! I I I
(.J
C,
z
' '
I
•
•
1 I I
I
..
'
I
I
I I
I
'
i
I
1,
l
•I ,
ll
I f
. ,.
,.
I I
,
!
I ..i
.r '
l
I
I
I
:
_.,,
'
: i
i I
,
;
I
I
I
I
' I
I
' II I
! • '
r , I I ..i I 1 1 'I I I
' ! I
cc
I I
I
I
I
I
I I \
I
' ,., :
• i I ' ' I I
'
I
'
•
I
I
I
'
I
'
.. .,.,.
j l ., • !
'I 'F ' ! I J I
~ 100 'J '
I
'
• : I
I
I I
I
!
l
f
~
l r
_,
I
t
' ' f
I I I I
I
I
I
I
:
I ' : .'
al . ' ; • Y I t ..,. , I ' I I ' '
I O ' V / V • Lr ' : ' . , I
II
I
11 1
IJ
I / y,,,, , ·.. ,.
i I
I/ / / /.
I
I lfJ' o
I T • I
I
:
I
,,- , t
I
I
•
I
'
~
l J !
I I I
' I I
! ; I
' I I
'
' I
.. I
I I
' '
I
1 "..///- ~ · I ' J J I I ' '
I I I
+ /-,// II __.. I , I I I I • I r '
50 . ' /,,,, -- '
' .'
~
I I
I
.
I I I '
'I '• '' I
! 1
' I
'I I
! I
'
I .......... I I I I
'I I
1 t
I
I _,
!
I l I
'
'
I
I
I
' I
I
•
! I
I
I I
I I
•
I
I
I
'
I '
. I
I
I '
• I I '
I
I
' ' ' I ' I
I I i I ' I : I I i I I I I I I ' I I I
0
! • i ' l I t i I
'
I
I
I I
.'
I
' .'
I I I I
I
I f I
1 f
I
I
I
!
i I
'
I
' '
I
I
I
I
0 20 40 60 80 100
CORRECTED SPT N-VALUE, N1 60
Figure 5. Bearing Capacity Index versus Corrected SPT (Hough, 1959, as modified
in Samtani and Nowatzki, 2006)
The Hough Method was developed for normally consolidated cohesionless soils. The
“Inorganic Silt” curve should generally not be applied to soils that exhibit plasticity. The
settlement characteristics of cohesive soils that exhibit plasticity should be investigated
using undisturbed samples and laboratory consolidation tests.
17
The Hough Method has several advantages over other methods used to estimate
settlement in cohesionless soil deposits, including express consideration of soil layering
and the zone of stress influence beneath a footing of finite size.
The subsurface soil profile should be subdivided into layers based on stratigraphy to a
depth of about three times the footing width. The maximum layer thickness should be
about 10 ft.
While Hough (1959) did not specifically state that the SPT N values should be
corrected for hammer energy in addition to overburden pressure, due to the vintage of the
original work, hammers that typically have an efficiency of approximately 60 percent
were in general used to develop the empirical correlations contained in the method. If
using SPT hammers with efficiencies that differ significantly from this 60 percent value,
the N values should also be corrected for hammer energy, in effect requiring that N160 be
used (Samtani and Nowatzki, 2006).
Studies conducted by Gifford et al. (1987) and Samtani and Nowatzki (2006)
indicate that Hough’s procedure is more conservative, but has less prediction variability,
than the Schmertmann Method. However, this difference is mostly taken into account
through the load factor, SE, since it has been calibrated using reliability theory (Kulicki,
et al., 2015; Samtani and Kulicki, 2018; and Samtani and Allen, 2018).
The Schmertmann Method

The Schmertmann Method was originally developed for rigid footings in sand using
CPT data (Schmertmann 1970; Schmertmann et al. 1978), and has also been adapted for
use with SPT data in Samtani and Nowatzki (2006). This method was originally
developed for use with the static cone bearing resistance qc, in which qc was correlated to
the soil modulus, E, and E is used directly in this method. The original formulation by
Schmertmann (1970) for this correlation assumed E was in units of tsf (i.e., E (in tsf) =
2qc (in tsf or kg/cm2). The correlation in Table 1 predicts E in ksi. Correlations between
E and the SPT N value are also available and provided in Table 1.
Equations 3 through 6 are used to estimate spread footing immediate, or elastic,
settlement, Si, on cohesionless soils by this method (Samtani and Nowatzki 2006).
18
n
S i  C1 C 2 p  J i (3)
i 1
in which:
 Iz  (4)
J i  H c  
 144 XE 
p 
C1  1  0.5  o   0.5 (5)
 p 
 
 t 
C 2  1  0.2 log 10   (6)
 0.1 
 
where:
Ji = elastic spring stiffness of layer i (ft/ksf)
HC = height of compressible soil layer i (ft)
Iz = strain influence factor from Figure 6. The dimension Bf represents the least lateral
dimension of the footing after correction for eccentricities, i.e. use least lateral
effective footing dimension. The strain influence factor is a function of depth and
is obtained from the strain influence diagram. The strain influence diagram is
constructed for the axisymmetric case (Lf/Bf = 1) and the plane strain case (Lf/Bf ≥
10) as shown in Figure 6a. The strain influence diagram for intermediate
conditions should be determined by simple linear interpolation.
n = number of soil layers within the zone of strain influence (strain influence
diagram).
∆p = net uniform applied stress (load intensity) at the foundation depth (see Figure 6b)
(ksf).
E = elastic modulus of layer i based on guidance provided in Table 1 (ksi).
X = a factor used to determine the value of elastic modulus. If the value of elastic
modulus is based on correlations with N160-values or qc from Table 1, then values
of X are as follows:
X = 1.25 for axisymmetric case (Lf/Bf = 1)
X = 1.75 for plane strain case (Lf/Bf ≥ 10)
Use interpolation for footings with values of Lf/Bf between 1 and 10.
19
If the value of elastic modulus is based on other sources, such as in-situ testing
(e.g., pressuremeter), use X = 1.0.
C1 = correction factor to incorporate the effect of strain relief due to embedment
po = effective in-situ overburden stress at the foundation depth - pressure as shown in
Figure 6b (ksf)
p = net uniform applied stress (load intensity) at the foundation depth as shown in
Figure 6b (ksf).
C2 = correction factor to incorporate time-dependent (creep) increase in settlement for
time t after construction
t = time t from completion of construction to date under consideration for evaluation
of C2 (yrs)
The C2 parameter is not used to estimate time-dependent consolidation

settlements. Where consolidation settlement can occur within the depth of the strain
distribution diagram, the magnitude of the consolidation settlement should be estimated
from consolidation tests conducted on undisturbed samples (see AASHTO LRFD Bridge
Design Specifications Article 10.6.2.4.3) and added to the immediate settlement of other
layers within the strain distribution diagram where consolidation settlement may not
occur.
The variables in the equation for Ji (Equation 4) require specific units for Hc (ft)
and E (provided in Table 1) is in ksi. This results in the units for Ji being ft/ksf.
Furthermore, in Equation 3 and 5, units of po and p must be ksf.
For C2 correction factor the time duration, t, in Eq. 6 is set to 0.1 years to evaluate
the settlement immediately after construction, i.e., C2 = 1. If long-term creep
deformation of the soil is suspected then an appropriate time duration, t, should be used
in the computation of C2. Creep deformation is not the same as consolidation settlement.
This factor can have an important influence on the reported settlement since it is included
in Eq. 3 as a multiplier. For example, the C2 factor for time durations of 0.1 yrs, 1 yr, 10
yrs and 50 yrs are 1.0, 1.2, 1.4 and 1.54, respectively. In cohesionless soils and
unsaturated fine-grained silts with low plasticity, time durations of 0.1 yr and 1 yr,
respectively, are generally appropriate and sufficient for cases of static loads.
20
(a)
(b)
Figure 6—(a) Simplified vertical strain influence factor distributions, (b)
Explanation of pressure terms in equation for Izp (Samtani and Notatzki, 2006,
after Schmertmann, et al., 1978).
21
Table 1: Correlations between Elastic Soil Modulus and SPT N160 or static Cone qc
values for the Schmertmann Method (Schmertmann 1970, and Samtani and
Nowatzki 2006).
Correlation between E and SPT N160 Value

Soil Type E (ksi)
Silts, sandy silts, slightly cohesive mixtures 0.056 N160
Clean fine to medium sands and slightly silty sands 0.097 N160
Coarse sands and sands with little gravel 0.139 N160
Sandy gravel and gravels 0.167 N160
Correlation between E and qc (static cone resistance, in tsf or
kg/cm2)
Soil Type E (ksi)
Sandy soils 0.028qc
22
OBJECTIVE AND SCOPE OF THIS REPORT
The objective of this report is to summarize several WSDOT case histories in

which settlement was measured and compare those measured settlements to the predicted
settlement using both the Hough and Schmertmann methods. The data from these case
histories can then be used to begin developing a database of predicted and estimated
settlements to refine WSDOT design practice. The scope of this report is limited to cases
in which the native soils are generally cohesionless in nature (i.e., silts, sands, and
gravels). While some of the case histories have included foundation elements, in those
cases, new fill was adjacent to or even surrounding the foundation elements such that the
total load applied to the foundation soil is strongly influenced by the fill load.
23
CASE HISTORY DESCRIPTIONS
Case histories addressed in this report are as follows:
 SR395, Francis Avenue to US2 Structures, BNSF Railroad Overcrossing Tunnel

 SR522, University of Washington – Bothell/Cascadia Community College South
Campus Access Walls
 I-5, I-5/SR432 Talley Way Interchange
SR395, BNSF Railroad Tunnel

This project involved construction of a spread footing supported (arch) tunnel to
allow the proposed State Route (SR) 395 alignment/fill to pass over the existing
Burlington Northern Santa Fe (BNSF) Railroad at the north end of Spokane, Washington.
The project location is shown in Figure 7. The arch had a clear span (i.e., interior width)
of approximately 51 feet at the base, and the footings were designed for a service limit
state bearing stress of approximately 7 kips per square foot to keep the footing stress
approximately the same as the added overburden stress due to the fill located beside the
tunnel. A cross-section of the tunnel is provided in Figure 8, and a tunnel footing detail is
provided in Figure 9. The proposed embankment over the existing BNSF tracks varied
from 50 to 58 feet in total height. Figure 10 shows the tunnel and fill under construction.
Due to the large amount of fill over and around the tunnel, the fill footprint is what
controlled the stress increase with depth below the tunnel.
The subsurface conditions consisted of loose to dense sands above granitic
bedrock at depths of 45 to 110 feet. The layout of the tunnel and the soil boring locations
are shown in Figure 11. A longitudinal soil profile along the tunnel is provided in Figure
12.
Settlement predictions and measurements for this case history were conducted at
eight locations along the tunnel alignment. The settlement estimates and measurements
near the ends of the tunnel were treated as outliers for this study due to the extreme
changes in fill/tunnel geometry that happen there. Therefore, only data at test holes RR-
2-04 through RR-7-04 are used, corresponding to Site No’s 1 through 6, respectively.
24
Figure 7. SR395 BNSF Railroad tunnel vicinity map.
25
Figure 8. Cross-section of spread footing supported arch tunnel.
Figure 9. Close-up of spread footing that supports arch tunnel.
26
Figure 10. Overview showing arch and fill under construction.
27
Figure 11. Plan view of tunnel showing boring locations.
28
2020 2020
912+00 913+00 914+00 915+00 916+00 917+00 918+00 919+00 920+00 921+00 922+00 923+00 924+00 925-+00 926+00
2000
_________ -------- ~
_,-
2000
1980 1980
1960 1960
1940 1940
? ? -
1920 0 1920
?
•
1900 1900
:~ 5;
•· ,;:
..~ &,
1880 1880
}1 5;
•:f~6)
::i e,
·:;.( 15
860 1860
'? !' 5;
?
1840 ® 1840
1820 1820
G) Loose to medium dense poorly graded SAND (Dune Sand)

®
TEST H0t£ lE(if.N{) ® Medium dense to very dense well graded SAND with silt and gravel (Flood Deposits)
,I04 I TEST HO!.E NUMBER
/~5
26 t, RT.
f-C$f' rKJi.L SIAT"KJN
TECST ,,01.£ OFFSECT
@ Decomposed GRANITE
~ ZJ srAN{)AR() PEN TRON r " TEST
R/5/04
(BUM'S PER FOOT)
WATE'.R I.Ev'ECL .. DArEC
@ GRANITE .,00 XL-2201 ~.R. 395 C~>. 3208 I It C IT - - - -
UNDISTURBED SAJ,,IPL.£
@ BASALT Francis Avenue to US-2
Structures, BNSF Tunnel
\\'ASHING TON ST ATE CAlE 112.005
TRANS~ORT ATION COMMISSION
0
- - ROCK OUIALIT'I' DESJGJIATION JH X SCiLE ·=)I)' VLR 1,
DiYA .l"\lE~ r OF THAt!SPCRT mt 1' tSIJ' IDR.l.
MA TER A.LS BRANCH Sk::H _ J_ CF _ 4
Cf1AVI~ BY _
Figure 12. Geologic profile along tunnel showing subsurface conditions.
29
SR522, University of Washington – Bothell/Cascadia Community College
South Campus Access Walls
This project involved construction of a number of transportation and associated
infrastructure improvements intended to provide improved access to the University of
Washington Bothell/Cascadia Community College campus from SR522 in Bothell,
Washington. The project location is shown in Figure 13.
One of the project infrastructure improvements consisted of widening the
SR522/28N Bridge and constructing geosynthetic approach walls (Walls 9 and 10) to
accommodate this widening. The walls are located on the north side of the proposed
widening, and they both were designed to match to the curtain walls of the bridge
widening. Wall 9 is on the west abutment, and Wall 10 is on the east abutment. The
general plan locations of the walls along with a subsurface profile are provided in figures
14 and 15, respectively. The walls were generally 7 to 8 feet tall in the areas monitored,
and approximately 175 ft long. At the settlement plate locations, the soil was
characterized as very loose to medium dense interbedded silt, organic silt, clayey sand,
silty sand, and poorly-graded sand for the upper 10 ft to 20 ft (recent alluvium). Below
that, it transitioned to a very dense silty sand and gravel (glacial till). Groundwater at this
site was generally encountered within the upper 10 feet to 20 feet of the deposit. Due to
near surface organic soils, the top 3 ft of soils at Wall 9 were over-excavated and
replaced with compacted gravel borrow. Both walls were surcharged by over-building
the wall by 5 feet in height, which was removed after the majority of the settlement
occurred.
Settlements were predicted and measured at one location for each wall. These
two locations are designated as Site No’s 7 (i.e., Wall 9) and 8 (i.e., Wall 10).
30
..
w
>
....:r0
5
Q
NE 195TH ST 4
BEGIN PROJECT ~
MP 10.18. ----~ END PROJECT ,s.o
SR 522 MP 24,0 . (<)-
N£ 190TH ST
SR 40!5
\ ~
I
"' I-
f.
I
I
I
' "-'
..J
'
Figure 13. SR522, University of Washington – Bothell/Cascadia Community College

South Campus Access Walls vicinity map.
31
CITY OF B 0THELL
1 1
S.R 522 BK ,OF .PAV'T $EAT TO B:K. OF PA.VT SEAT

.«=ASLJReD ALONG R-C UNI=
4'~ "·C-URTAIN WAll (TYP.) / fRJjFFIC BARRIER
_,..,.-• X - ·- X ~- ~
/ ,.- EXJST. cu .·s&RAi ·eA ·
- x - - i[}E~ =a2---.-~,.......-3------'i~ I (ffi BE RE'MOVEDJ
- RfiTAJNING WAU 9 / ~-- RETAJ'NING WAU. 10
··.~
TO JCT. I~ r;i15 ~
0.,5 MILES
PB STA 12+8!1'. 78 . X
n l-+-~.J...-...,,,~ ------,~ r-J-1"
CONC. BARRJER TYPE 2

fOONT. OFF BRJOOE B'Y OTHERS
~
I
Figure 14. Plan View of Sites No. 7 and No. 8.
32
Approximate Location of
Settlement Plate at Site No. 8
Approximate Location of
Settlement Plate at Site No. 7
Figure 15. Subsurface Profile for Sites No.7 and No.8.
33
I-5/SR432 Talley Way Interchange
This project involved construction of a number of transportation and associated
infrastructure improvements intended to provide improved access from I-5 to SR432 and
Longview, Washington. The project location is shown in Figure 16. Deep soft soils at
the project location created geotechnical design complications due to settlement and
liquefaction effects such as lateral spreading and liquefaction induced settlement that had
to be addressed during design and monitored during construction. Liquefaction problems
were addressed in the vicinity of the structures through the use of stone columns.
Settlements were predicted and monitored at 16 sites across the project area,
including both areas where stone columns were installed to mitigate liquefaction
problems and areas where fill and wall settlement due to the static loads was expected.
These sites were located along fill walls, embankments and bridge approaches. There
were only five of the 16 settlement plates that were not installed in stone column
improved areas, and these five settlement plates were used in this study. The locations of
these five settlement plates were used to monitor settlement under fill embankments, a
geosynthetic wall, and under a pre-load embankment between bridge abutments during
the construction of the I-5/SR 432 Talley Way Interchange. These five individual sites
are designated as Site No’s 9 to 13.
The new embankments typically ranged from 20 ft to 30 ft in height. The
geosynthetic wall was approximately 17 feet tall at the settlement plate location, and the
pre-load embankment was typically 20 feet tall. A photograph of the pre-load
embankment during construction is presented in Figure 17, and its cross-section is
presented in Figure 18. The subsurface conditions consisted of up to 100 feet of very
loose to medium dense sandy silt (alluvium), underlain by very dense sand, silt, or
bedrock. Plan views of the approximate settlement plate locations including boring
locations are provided in figures 19 through 21. Typical sections with soil profile data
are provided in figures 22 through 24.
34
Figure 16. I-5/SR432 Talley Way Interchange vicinity map.
Figure 17. P-line Bridge Pre-load between Abutments (Sites No.10 and No.11).
35
Figure 18. Typical Section of Pre-load for the P-Line Bridge at Sites No.10 and
No.11 (width of structure was assumed to be 40 ft).
Figure 19. Plan View of Site No. 9, Section 15+00, on the P-Line with Boring
Locations.
36
Figure 20. Plan View of Sites No.10 and No.11, the P-Line Bridge Pre-Load Area
with Boring Locations.
Figure 21. Plan View of Sites No.12 and No.13, Embankment between Stations
19+87 and 23+83 on the R-Line with Boring Locations.
37
Approximate location
of settlement plate
Figure 22. Site No.9, P-Line Cross-Section at Station 15+00 (The location of site/settlement plate No.9 was not underlain by stone columns).
38
17,00 17+50 18,00 18+50 19+00 19+50
Approximate Location of Plate at Site #1 O

- - - Approximate Location of Plate at Site #11
Preload
30
20
10 -----¥-1
0
-10 -1
-20 ·2
50
-30
50
UNIT 2
UNIT 2 UNIT 2
-40
70
-50
80
-60
90
-70 ?
3127/2008 UNIT 2 UNIT 2
100
-80 ?----- --?--------'7 ?
110
-90
120
-100 STQNE COi LiMNS -100
• 10% Replacement Ratio 130
-110 • 20% Replacement Ratio -110
• 30% Replacement Ratio
-120 100 200 -120
:p,a_ _ _ _ 7 _ _ _ _ __.TS..,F -------?-
?---------?-------~ ?----- UNIT 2
-130 """"'-""' -------?- -130
..... HOLi ..._
11- ~CU.Slllll10III
UNIT 2 UNIT 2
---------?-------
-111. HII..IOFFIEI'
· 140 ?----------?--------'7
UNIT 3 UNIT 3
-150
TEsr HUIE LffE#D
H·/-04 T~ff' l«Mi MAd/6.lf
Talley Way Interchanges
1,0,55 TEST" HO&.£ srATIO#
p Line Ramp (New Structure)
J
26 ft. Rf. TEST HOI.E OFFSET
-160
u sr-r"'..,,:f"1:ff"/!5$f,'' r1sr Unit 1 - Fill: Generally consists of very loose to dense sand and gravel w ith varying amounts of silt.
R£.F' srNtONtD /at!~/IIOMl!T~"
ltvl'U&ILJ
r~sr Unit 2 - This unit generally consists of very soft to hard elastic silt and lean clay with varying amounts
8 / 5/ 04 '5/.. WATER 1.EYEL • DAT£ of sand and organic matter, and very loose to medium dense silt and sand. DA TE 812008
UND/ff~D~ Unit 3 - Bedrock: This unit generally consisls of soft to moderately strong sandstone and siltstone SCALE 1=30' VERT.
SOIL,'ROCI( 6TRATA As
unde~ain by strong to very strong basalt. WASHINGTON STATE
DEFINED 0# UJC
1=30' HORIZ.
f.
/!IO#fHIIO
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
......
»IDICAT•s CIDRE SAMPIL TAKEN
DATUM SHEET __ OF _ _
L!__ RO:K OUAU1Y D£SIONATl0# I# ,t GEOTECHNICAL DIVISION
DRAWN BY
Figure 23. Profile of P-Line Bridge for Sites/Settlement Plates No.10 and No.11.
39
-100 -1!0 -60 -20 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 260 280
R. L ine
'Ii'.
Approximate Location of Plate
45 45
40 40
35 35
30
25
CPT-10-0B- - -
H-38-08
115+36.54
_____ J60.37ftRt
--- --- --- ------------- ------------ 30
25
20
15
----------0- -.-- UNIT 1
; ..... , , H-39-09 .,.. ......... , ........... 20
15
' > - - - - -s,1372·009,¥. ______ .,..--
10 10
10 ~ ~
5 4 s
0 3 0
20 5
6
-5 3 -S
-10 3 -10
30 4
-15 -15
4
-20 -20
40 4
-25 -2S
-30 -30
50 3
-35 UNIT 2 -3S
2
-40 -40
60 2
-45 -45
4
-SO -SO
70 4
-55 -55
-60 -60
-65
BO g
-65
28
-70 -70
90 .75
-75
7
r
-80 -60
100 6
-65 -1!5
8
-90 -90
-95
110 4
.95
6
-100 -100
120 4
-105 -105
.£, -,. . _. . .
7
-110 -110
130 17
-115 -115
-120
TfS1 /GE - ~ 0 100 200 33
-120
H-1-98 T£sr' HOU MJII/IIE/f
llJt55 rESr H(JU $TAT/OIi
TSF 43
-125 -125
2& fl.RI. TEsr HDLE. OFFSET
?--------?------- ? ------7---- ? ? ?
-130 -130
,au,,s /1£/f J:O(Jr)
.135 -135
,,.,,_,
REF ST#IDNfD l"'EIICTRDIICTCl'f TEST
-140
UIIDISTUIIJIJED SN/AL UNIT 3 ;!!!! REF -140
REF
-145 ff,15' '1lir£1t ~ • DATC -145
?- ?IIIDICATCS !IOIUff/DClt !URATA IJETWEE#
-150 TEST HDLE.S Miff IIOr BE. COltrl#UOUS -150
-155
"'=°""= #ID/CATES IIITICr to:lt
-155
B INOCNCS CIJlf£ SJtlllltE TNt£fl
-160 /fDCll OIMU1Y DESlfillllllTIOII
-165 JOB XL-2963 S.R. 5/432

-170 TEST #G.E lEt1£IID
-175
H~/-04
/10-55
2J, ff.Rf,
sr-
T~.,. NOLE. IIICll#Klt
T•ff HOIL STATIO#
l-5/SR432 to Talley Way Interchange
J
TIEST MJll a,,-SET
-180
ZJ --•-re• r•sr
(a.DWS ~ " ,oQTJ
Unit 1 - Fill: Generally consists of very loooe to dense Nnd and gravel with varying amoonlo of silt
-185 RE.F STANDA#t0 ,_,..._.,
~~lt0"1CJ'~lt 'f'ES'r
Unit2 -Alluvium; Thia unit.generally consists ohofttc very stiff'elutic silt and clay with varying
8/5/(}4'5i/. WArlER UVIEL • DIVE amounts of sand and organic matter, 11nd very looee to medium denN silt and sand.
UNaSrUNOED.-.E Unit 3 • Bedroc:I<: llli1 unit gen0!1llly conoil19 of 1ol\ to moderaloly strong aandotone and 1iltatDne DATE 9/2008
1/lYn:fB"or=:.~ unde~aln by strong ID wry strong baaall
SCALE 1=30' VERT .
WASHINGTON STATE
l!_ HIOICATIES ~ ~ TMIEN
lfOCI( autllUT"Y t:ZS#MIATIO# Ill JI'

• DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 1=30' HORIZ.
SHEE T _ Of _ _
GEOTECHNICAL DIVISION
DRAWN BY
Figure 24. Typical Embankment Cross-Section for Sites/Settlement Plates No.12 and No.13 (R-Line Stations 19+87 and 23+83).
40
CASE HISTORY SETTLEMENT PREDICTIONS

Settlements were predicted and monitored at six sites along the locations of the
spread footings for the tunnel structure. For design of the structure, settlements were
estimated using the Hough Method. The combined footing/fill applied stress ranged from
650 psf near the ends of the tunnel to 9,000 psf near the mid-point of the tunnel length
where the fill depth was deepest. The footing was essentially considered to be infinitely
long to determine the distribution of stress with depth below the footing/fill. The soil was
characterized as a clean uniform sand for much of the deposit, with layers of well graded
silty sand and gravel and well graded fine to medium sand. The sand was loose to
medium dense in the upper 35 to 40 ft of the deposit, and was medium dense to dense
below that. Ground water at this site was deep and was not a factor in the design.
Settlement at a given point along the tunnel was estimated using the depth of fill and
footing stress at that location to calculate the stress increase, as the depth of fill over the
tunnel was variable due to the fill side slopes and due to the extreme skew of the tunnel
relative to the fill centerline – Figure 10 provides an illustration of the fill depth that was
to be placed over the tunnel.
Table 2 provides a summary of one of the Hough Method settlement calculations.
This example calculation was conducted near the halfway point along the tunnel’s length.
The input parameters used for the Hough analysis as well as the calculated values are
summarized in this table and are based on Test Hole RR-5-04 (i.e., Site No. 4). All of the
predicted settlements along the tunnel profile, using the Hough Method, are provided in
Figure 25.
Settlement of this tunnel was also estimated by others using the Schmertmann
Method (Naresh Samtani, personal communication, 1-27-2018). Table 3 provides a
summary of Schmertmann Method settlement calculations at the same location (Test
Hole RR-5-04) where the Hough Method calculations were performed in Table 2. The
input parameters used for the Schmertmann analysis as well as the calculated values are
41
summarized in this table. The soil modulus E was obtained through correlation to SPT N
values (see Table 1). All of the predicted settlements along the tunnel profile, using the
Schmertmann Method, are provided in Table 4.
Table 2. Summary of example Hough analysis (analyzed near mid-point of tunnel

length) for BNSF Railroad tunnel, based on Test Hole RR-5-04 (Site No. 4).
Depth
SPT N Soil Effective Stress
Below SPT N' Material Hough Cumm.
Field sat N'/N Stress I Change
Footing Corrected Type C' Settle. (in)
(bpf) (pcf) (psf) (psf)
(ft)
0 (N/A) 125 2.00 14 1 70 125 0.000 0.00 0.00

4 7 1.76 12 1 66 625 0.993 6580 0.85
9 7 1.12 8 1 55 1250 0.992 6576 1.77
14 8 0.96 8 1 54 1875 0.991 65690 2.55
19 9 0.88 8 1 55 2500 0.990 6562 3.20
24 13 0.82 11 1 61 3125 0.988 6554 3.73
29 12 0.77 9 1 58 3750 0.987 6544 4.19
34 8 0.73 6 4 36 4375 0.986 6534 4.69
39 22 0.66 15 2 64 5000 0.984 6523 5.19
44 50 0.60 30 2 102 5625 0.982 6512 5.43
49 37 0.60 22 2 82 6250 0.980 6500 5.64
54 24 0.60 14 2 64 6875 0.978 6487 5.90
59 10 0.60 6 4 36 7500 0.976 6474 6.23
64 24 0.60 14 2 64 8125 0.974 6460 6.58
74 43 0.60 26 2 91 9375 0.970 6432 6.95
80 50 0.60 30 2 102 10130 0.967 6414 7.12
85 41 0.60 25 2 88 10750 0.965 6398 7.25
90 19 0.60 11 2 57 11380 0.963 6382 7.42
95 23 0.60 14 2 62 12000 0.960 6366 7.61
100 38 0.60 23 2 83 12500 0.958 6350 7.76
105 19 0.60 11 2 57 12810 0.955 6333 7.92
107 12880 0.955 6330 7.95
42
Table 3. Summary of example Schmertmann analysis (analyzed near mid-point of
tunnel length) for BNSF Railroad tunnel, based on Test Hole RR-5-04 (Site No. 4).
Layer Raw Corrected
Layer Z Mid- Layer Midpoint N- N-Val. Z(Iz/E) Settle.
No. (ft) Depth Depth Below Df USCS Value N160 Iz E (ksf) (ft/ksf) S (ft)
1 4.6 2.3 2.3 -- 11.0 11.0 0.201 269 0.00343 0.0227
2 5 7.1 7.1 SP 7.0 13.0 0.202 318 0.00318 0.0211
3 5 12.1 12.1 SP 7.0 10.8 0.204 265 0.00385 0.0255
4 5 17.1 17.1 SP 8.0 10.9 0.206 267 0.00384 0.0255
5 5 22.1 22.1 SP 9.0 11.1 0.207 273 0.00380 0.0252
6 5 27.1 27.1 SP 13.0 14.8 0.209 362 0.00288 0.0191
7 5 32.1 32.1 SP 12.0 12.7 0.210 310 0.00339 0.0226
8 5 37.1 37.1 SM 8.0 7.9 0.212 138 0.00767 0.0509
9 5 42.1 42.1 SW 22.0 20.4 0.214 714 0.00150 0.0099
10 5 47.1 47.1 SW 50.0 43.7 0.215 1530 0.00070 0.0047
11 5 52.1 52.1 SW-SM 37.0 30.6 0.217 750 0.00145 0.0096
12 5 57.1 57.1 SP 24.0 18.8 0.218 462 0.00237 0.0157
13 5 62.1 62.1 SM 10.0 7.5 0.220 131 0.00843 0.0559
14 10 69.6 69.6 SP 24.0 17.1 0.222 418 0.00533 0.0353
15 5 77.1 77.1 GW 43.0 27.8 0.225 1168 0.00096 0.0064
16 5 82.1 82.1 SP 50.0 30.9 0.226 757 0.00150 0.0099
17 5 87.1 87.1 SP 41.0 24.2 0.228 594 0.00192 0.0127
18 5 92.1 92.1 SM 19.0 10.7 0.230 188 0.00611 0.0405
19 5 97.1 97.0 GW 23.0 12.5 0.231 523 0.00221 0.0147
20 5 102.1 102.1 GW 38.0 19.7 0.233 827 0.00141 0.0093
21 5 107.1 107.1 GW 19.0 9.6 0.235 1000000 0.00000 0.00001
22 100 159.6 159.6 GW 55.0 27.3 0.252 1000000 0.00003 0.00017
23 100 259.6 259.6 GW 100.0 100 0.284 1000000 0.00003 0.00019
24 100 359.6 359.6 GW 100.0 100 0.316 1000000 0.00003 0.00021
25 100 459.6 459.6 GW 100.0 100 0.348 1000000 0.00003 0.00023
26 100 559.6 559.6 GW 100.0 100 0.381 1000000 0.00004 0.00025
27 100 659.6 659.6 GW 100.0 100 0.413 1000000 0.00004 0.00027
28 100 759.6 759.6 GW 100.0 100 0.445 1000000 0.00004 0.00030
29 100 859.6 859.6 GW 100.0 100 0.477 1000000 0.00005 0.00032
30 100 959.6 959.6 GW 100.0 100 0.510 1000000 0.00005 0.00034
31 100 1059.6 1059.6 GW 100.0 100 0.513 1000000 0.00005 0.00034
32 100 1159.6 1159.6 GW 100.0 100 0.495 1000000 0.00005 0.00033
33 100 1259.6 1259.6 GW 100.0 100 0.478 1000000 0.00005 0.00032
34 100 1359.6 1359.6 GW 100.0 100 0.461 1000000 0.00005 0.00031
35 100 1459.6 1459.6 GW 100.0 100 0.443 1000000 0.00004 0.00029
36 100 1559.6 1559.6 GW 100.0 100 0.426 1000000 0.00004 0.00028
37 100 1659.6 1659.6 GW 100.0 100 0.408 1000000 0.00004 0.00027
38 100 1759.6 1759.6 GW 100.0 100 0.391 1000000 0.00004 0.00026
39 100 1859.6 1859.6 GW 100.0 100 0.373 1000000 0.00004 0.00025
40 100 1959.6 1959.6 GW 100.0 100 0.356 1000000 0.00004 0.00024
= 0.442
Calculate C1 1.000
Calculate C2 1.000
Immediate Settlement (Start to end of construction) 0.442 ft 5.31 inches
Creep (Long-Term) Settlement (During Design Life) 0.000 ft 0.00 inches
Total Settlement (Start of Const. to end of design life) 0.442 ft 5.31 inches
43
Table 4. Summary of Estimated Settlements using Schmertmann Method for the
BNSF Railroad tunnel.
Test Hole Number Settlement (inches)
RR-2-04 (Site No. 1) 1.26
RR-3-04 (Site No. 2) 3.50
RR-4-04 (Site No. 3) 5.04
RR-5-04 (Site No. 4) 5.31
RR-6-04 (Site No. 5) 2.98
RR-7-04 (Site No. 6) 2.28

Settlements were predicted and monitored at each of the two geosynthetic
approach walls (Walls 9 and 10, corresponding to Site No’s 7 and 8). For design of the
walls, settlements were estimated using the Hough Method. The applied design stress
was approximately 1,625 psf at the settlement plates. The wall footings were essentially
considered to be infinitely long, and Figure 1 was used to determine the distribution of
stress with depth below the footing/fill.
Table 5 provides a summary of one of the Hough Method settlement calculations,
and Table 6 summarizes the predicted settlements for both wall locations. The example
calculation was conducted for the Wall 9 settlement plate at Site #7. The input
parameters used for the Hough analysis as well as the calculated values summarized in
Table 5 are based on Test Hole H-32-02. A detailed summary of the Schmertmann
Method settlement estimate for Site No. 7 provided by others (Naresh Samtani, personal
communication, 1-27-2018) is shown in Table 7, and Table 8 summarizes the predicted
settlements for both wall locations.
Table 5. Summary of Hough analysis at Site #7, based on Test Hole H-32-02.
Depth SPT
Effective Stress Cumm.
Below N γsat SPT N' Material Hough
N'/N Stress I Change Settlement
Wall Field (pcf) Corrected Type C'
(psf) (psf) (in.)
(ft) (bpf)
1.5 35 130 1.78 83 2 300 195 1 1625 0.12
6.4 14 90 1.36 25 6 49 694 0.83 1349 0.90
13.1 64 90 1.15 98 6 158 1301 0.56 910 1.01
18.3 64 130 1.03 88 4 140 1833 0.43 699 1.05
22.5 50 67.6 0.97 64 4 235 2229 0.36 585 1.08
27.5 50 130 0.90 59 4 97 2723 0.3 488 1.13
44
Table 6. Hough settlement predictions at settlement plate at Site No’s 7 and 8.
Site # Settlement Prediction (in)
H-32-02 (Site 7) 1.1
H-31-02 (Site 8) 0.8
Table 7. Schmertmann analysis at Site No. 7, based on Test Hole H-32-02.

Layer
Layer Midpoint Raw Corrected
Layer Z Mid- Depth N- N-Val. Z(Iz/E) Settle
No. (ft) Depth Below Df USCS Value N160 Iz E (ksf) (ft/ksf) S (ft)
1 3 1.5 1.5 -- 35 35.0 0.288 858 0.00101 0.00166
2 7 6.5 6.5 CL 14 28.0 0.580 392 0.01036 0.01709
3 5 12.5 12.5 ML 64 100 0.450 1400 0.00161 0.00265
4 5 17.5 17.5 SM 50 75.5 0.305 1322 0.00115 0.00190
5 5 22.5 22.5 ML 50 69.1 0.160 968 0.00082 0.00136
6 5 27.5 27.5 ML 50 62.3 0.015 872 0.00008 0.00014
7 5 32.5 32.5 SM 50 59.4 0.000 1039 0.00000 0.00000
8 5 37.5 37.5 ML 50 54.7 0.000 766 0.00000 0.00000
9 5 42.5 42.5 SM 50 50.8 0.000 890 0.00000 0.00000
= 0.025
Calculate C1 1.000
Calculate C2 1.000
Calculate Total Settlement (Start of Const. to end of design life) 0.025 ft 0.31 inches
Table 8. Summary of Estimated Settlements using Schmertmann Method for SR

522 UWB CCC Campus S. Access.
Test Hole Location Settlement, inches
H-32-02 (Site 7) 0.31
H-31-02 (Site 8) 0.30

Settlements were predicted and monitored at sixteen sites across the project area.
These sites were along fill walls, embankments and bridge approaches. There were only
six of the settlement plates that were not installed in stone column improved areas, and
these six settlement plates were used in this study. For design of the wall and
embankments, settlements were estimated using the Hough Method. The applied stress
was approximately1,620 psf for site No.9, 2,700 psf for site No’s 10 and 11 and 4,400 psf
for site No’s 12 and 13. The wall footing at site No. 9 was essentially considered to be
45
infinitely long, and Figure 3 was used to determine the distribution of stress with depth
below the footing/fill. The embankments at site No’s 10 through 13 were essentially
considered to be infinitely long, and Figure 1 was used to determine the distribution of
stress with depth below the fill. The soil at the sites was generally characterized as loose
to very dense sand and gravel with varying amounts of silt (fill) for the upper 10 ft to
15ft. It transitioned to a very loose to medium dense sandy silt (alluvium) to depths of
100 ft to 150 ft, underlain by very dense sand, silt, or bedrock. Groundwater at this site
was generally encountered within the upper 10 feet of the deposit.
Table 9 provides a summary of one of the Hough Method settlement calculations.
This example calculation was conducted for the preload embankment on the P-Line for
settlement plates No.10 and No.11. The input parameters used for the Hough analysis as
well as the calculated values are summarized in this table and are based on Test Hole H-
23-08. Predicted settlements at each of the settlement plates, using the Hough Method,
are provided in Table 10.
Settlements for the Talley Way Interchange were also estimated by others using
the Schmertmann Method (Naresh Samtani, personal communication, 1-27-2018). Table
11 provides a summary of Schmertmann Method settlement calculations for Site No’s 10
and 11 as an example. The input parameters used for the Schmertmann analysis as well
as the calculated values are summarized in this table. All of the predicted settlements
using the Schmertmann Method for this case history are provided in Table 12.
Settlement analyses for Site No’s 10 through 13 were performed using CPT results since
the logs for test holes at these locations showed a SPT N-value of zero at some depths.
For such cases, it is not possible to obtain a reliable value of elastic modulus, since the
elastic modulus is a direct function of the N-value. In these cases, results from CPTs in
the vicinity of the test holes were utilized. When CPTs were used, the elastic modulus,
Es, was calculated using Es (tsf) = 3.5qc, where qc is the cone tip resistance. This is based
on the equation in Table 1 where E (ksi) = 0.028qc which qc is in tsf. For E in tsf, E =
2.0qc. Since the wall geometry can be considered to be plane-strain (i.e., its length is
much greater than its width), the elastic modulus is multiplied by X=1.75. Thus, E (tsf) =
(1.75)(2.0)qc = 3.5qc.
46
Table 9. Summary of example Hough analysis (site No’s 10 and 11), based on Test
Hole H-23-08.
SPT N Soil SPT N' Mater Effective Stress Cumm.
Depth Below Hough
Field γsat N'/N Cor- -ial Stress I Change Settlement
Embank. (ft) C'
(bpf) (pcf) rected No. (psf) (psf) (in)
2 5 120 2.00 10 2 54 115 1 2700 0.31
7 6 120 2.00 12 2 58 403 1.00 2691 1.41
12 23 120 1.64 38 2 125 691 0.98 2655 1.77
14 15* 120 1.48 22 2 80 806 0.97 2631 1.92
15 10* 100 1.43 15 5 43 844 0.97 2617 2.09
17 2 100 1.35 3 5 27 919 0.96 2586 2.56
24 1 100 1.16 1 5 25 1182 0.91 2452 4.28
29 3 100 1.07 3 5 27 1370 0.87 2341 5.32
32 0 100 1.04 0 5 23 1483 0.84 2273 5.92
37 3 100 1.00 3 5 27 1671 0.80 2159 6.80
42 0 100 0.97 0 5 23 1859 0.76 2047 7.62
51 3 100 0.92 3 5 27 2198 0.69 1860 8.86
57 0 100 0.89 0 5 23 2423 0.65 1746 9.58
64 0 100 0.86 0 5 23 2686 0.60 1624 10.36
67 1 100 0.85 1 5 24 2799 0.58 1576 10.65
74 0 100 0.82 0 5 23 3062 0.55 1472 11.29
77 0 100 0.81 0 5 23 3175 0.53 1430 11.54
84 5 100 0.79 4 5 28 3438 0.50 1341 12.03
87 9 100 0.79 7 5 32 3551 0.48 1305 12.19
94 3 100 0.77 2 5 26 3814 0.45 1228 12.56
97 5 100 0.76 4 5 28 3927 0.44 1198 12.71
102 6 100 0.75 5 5 29 4115 0.43 1150 12.94
109 6 100 0.73 4 5 29 4378 0.40 1088 13.24
112 6 100 0.72 4 5 29 4491 0.39 1063 13.35
119 4 100 0.69 3 5 27 4754 0.37 1010 13.62
122 6 100 0.68 4 5 28 4867 0.37 988 13.72
129 5 100 0.65 3 5 27 5130 0.35 941 13.95
132 0 100 0.65 0 5 23 5243 0.34 922 14.06
137 2 100 0.65 1 5 25 5431 0.33 892 14.22
141 8* 100 0.60 5 5 30 5582 0.32 869 14.33
142 10* 110 0.60 6 6 23 5629 0.32 864 14.37
144 13 110 0.60 8 6 26 5724 0.32 853 14.42
147 30 110 0.60 18 6 39 5867 0.31 837 14.49
152 30 140 0.60 18 1 81 6135 0.30 812 14.56
157 28 140 0.60 17 1 78 6523 0.29 789 14.60
162 101 140 0.60 61 1 337 6911 0.28 766 14.61
The asterisk in Table 9 indicates that the value was interpolated.
47
Table 10. Hough Method Settlement predictions at site No’s 9 through No.13.
Site/Settlement Plate No. Settlement Prediction (in)
9 (H-28-08) 3.1
10 (H-23-08) 14.6
11 (H-23-08) 14.6
12 (H-38-08) 30.0
13 (H-38-08) 24.1
Table 11. Summary of example Schmertmann analysis for I-5/SR432 Talley Way
Interchange R-Line Station 20+00 based on CPT 10-08 (Site No.12).
Layer
Layer Midpoint Raw Corrected
Layer Z Mid- Depth N- N-Val. Z(Iz/Es) Settle.
No. (ft) Depth Below Df USCS Value N160 Iz E (ksf) (ft/ksf) S (ft)
1 4.7 2.35 2.35 -- 35.0 35.0 0.209 140 0.00702 0.0310
2 5 7.2 7.20 GM 32.0 59.9 0.228 140 0.00813 0.0359
3 5 12.2 12.20 GM 24.0 37.5 0.247 140 0.00882 0.0390
4 5 17.2 17.20 GM 12.0 17.6 0.266 140 0.00950 0.0420
5 5 22.2 22.20 ML 2.0 2.8 0.285 245 0.00582 0.0257
6 5 27.2 27.20 ML 2.0 2.7 0.304 245 0.00621 0.0275
7 5 32.2 32.20 ML 3.0 3.9 0.324 245 0.00661 0.0292
8 5 37.2 37.20 ML 5.0 6.3 0.343 70 0.02449 0.1083
9 5 42.2 42.20 ML 2.0 2.4 0.362 70 0.02586 0.1143
10 5 47.2 47.20 ML 3.0 3.5 0.381 70 0.02723 0.1204
11 5 52.2 52.20 ML 2.0 2.3 0.400 70 0.02860 0.1264
12 5 57.2 57.20 ML 1.0 1.1 0.420 70 0.02998 0.1325
13 5 62.2 62.20 ML 1.0 1.1 0.439 70 0.03135 0.1386
14 5 67.2 67.20 ML 2.0 2.1 0.458 70 0.03272 0.1446
15 5 72.2 72.20 ML 3.0 3.1 0.477 70 0.03409 0.1507
16 5 77.2 77.20 ML 2.0 2.0 0.496 280 0.00887 0.0392
17 5 82.2 82.20 ML 3.0 3.0 0.516 280 0.00921 0.0407
18 5 87.2 87.20 ML 5.0 4.8 0.535 280 0.00955 0.0422
19 5 92.2 92.20 ML 11.0 10.4 0.554 280 0.00989 0.0437
20 5 97.2 97.20 ML 0.0 0.0 0.573 105 0.02730 0.1207
21 5 102.2 102.20 ML 4.0 3.6 0.580 105 0.02761 0.1220
22 5 107.2 107.20 ML 4.0 3.6 0.570 105 0.02714 0.1200
23 10 114.7 114.70 ML 4.0 3.5 0.555 105 0.05290 0.2338
24 5 122.2 122.20 ML 6.0 5.1 0.541 71 0.03818 0.1687
25 6 127.7 127.70 ML 5.0 4.1 0.530 58 0.05489 0.2426
26 4 132.7 132.70 ML 9.0 7.3 0.520 102 0.02040 0.0902
27 5 137.2 137.20 ML 13.0 10.4 0.512 145 0.01761 0.0778
28 5 142.2 142.20 ML 24.0 18.8 0.502 264 0.00952 0.0421
29 5 147.2 147.20 ML 27.0 20.8 0.492 291 0.00845 0.0373
30 5 152.2 152.20 ML 50.0 37.9 0.482 530 0.00455 0.0201
31 5 157.2 157.20 ML 50.0 37.2 0.473 521 0.00453 0.0200
32 5 162.2 162.20 SP 50.0 36.6 0.463 897 0.00258 0.0114
33 5 167.2 167.20 SP 50.0 36.0 0.453 882 0.00257 0.0114
34 5 172.2 172.20 SP 100.0 100.0 0.443 2450 0.00091 0.0040
35 5 177.2 177.20 SP 100.0 100.0 0.434 2450 0.00089 0.0039
48
36 5 182.2 182.20 SP 100.0 100.0 0.424 2450 0.00087 0.0038
37 5 187.2 187.20 SP 100.0 100.0 0.414 2450 0.00085 0.0037
38 5 192.2 192.20 SP 100.0 100.0 0.405 2450 0.00083 0.0037
39 5 197.2 197.20 SP 100.0 100.0 0.395 2450 0.00081 0.0036
40 5 202.2 202.20 SP 100.0 100.0 0.385 2450 0.00079 0.0035
= 2.78
Calculate C1 1.000
Calculate C2 1.000
Calculate Total Settlement (Start of Const to end of design life) 2.78 ft 33.3 inches
Table 12. Summary of Estimated Settlements using Schmertmann Method for

I-5/SR432 Talley Way Interchange.
Test Hole Location Settlement, inches
H-28-08 [Site No.9] 4.3
H-23-08 (CPT-5-08) [Site No.10] 11.3
H-23-08 (CPT-5-08) [Site No.11] 11.3
H-38-08 (CPT-10-08) [Site No.12] 33.3
H-38-08 (CPT-10-08) [Site No.13)] 22.3
49
CASE HISTORY SETTLEMENT MEASUREMENTS

Settlement was monitored using a survey method, using targets established on the
stem wall inside the tunnel. Settlement was monitored beginning with the placement of
the targets on the stem walls after it was constructed. Settlement of the ground due to
placement of the stem wall structure was assumed to be less than 0.5 inch. Settlement
monitoring targets were established on both sides of the tunnel. Final settlement
measurement results are provided in Table 13. Once the structure and fill were
completed, settlement was also completed (no long-term settlement). For comparison to
the predicted settlements along the length of the tunnel, the measured settlements were
the average of the two settlement monitoring points (i.e., east and west stem walls) at
each section of the tunnel, as shown in Table 13.
Table 13. Final settlement measurements and corresponding predictions for SR395
BNSF Railroad Tunnel.
Measured Average Schmertmann
Hough Method
1 Corresponding Site Settlement (in.) Measured Method
Station. Predicted
No. (Boring No.) West East Settlement Predicted
Settlement (in.)
Wall Wall (in.) Settlement (in.)
18+00 3.36 2.52 2.94
17+00 Site No. 1 (RR-2-04) 4.20 5.04 4.62 3.8 1.3
16+00 4.20 5.88 5.04
15+00 Site No. 2 (RR-3-04) 5.64 5.76 5.70 7.2 3.5
14+00 4.92 4.32 4.62
13+00 Site No. 3 (RR-4-04) 4.68 4.56 4.62 7.9 5.0
12+00 4.32 4.08 4.20
11+00 4.44 3.96
10+50* Site No. 4 (RR-5-04) 3.87 8.0 5.3
10+00 4.32 2.76
9+00 Site No. 5 (RR-6-04) 3.24 2.28 2.76 6.3 3.0
8+00 3.24 1.92 2.58
7+00 2.52 1.32 1.92
6+00 Site No. 6 (RR-7-04) 3.00 2.04 2.52 5.0 2.3
*Since there were no settlement monitoring points at this station, the settlement measurements at both
station 10+00 and station 11+00 were averaged together.
1
Tunnel begins at tunnel station 5+00 and ends at tunnel station 18+24. The roadway alignment stationing
increases in the opposite direction, however.
50
Settlement was monitored using a survey method. The method consisted of
survey of settlement plates. See Figure 25 for the contract settlement plate detail. The
settlement plates were placed a foot below the ground surface after clearing and grubbing
operations were completed. A steel pipe was welded to the base of the steel plate, and
steel riser pipe was used as the fill was placed. The pipe was wide enough for a survey
rod to be inserted down to the plate. The plates were surveyed at the beginning and
ending of each shift until the engineer allowed survey at longer intervals. Settlement was
monitored until the survey readings approached zero vertical displacement. Final
settlement measurement results, with their corresponding settlement predictions, are
provided in Table 14.
Table 14. Settlement measurements of settlement and corresponding predictions at

settlement plates at sites No’s 7 and 8.
Settlement Hough Method Schmertmann
Site No. Measurement Predicted Method Predicted
(in) Settlement (in.) Settlement (in.)
7 0.37 1.1 0.31
8 0.2 0.8 0.30
51
:Removable
CO\ref
•1.1p
Maintain 1-ft min.
but no more than 6-11
3-foot square steel plate

weld 5.fr,ch pipe 1/4-lnch minimum Ulickness
to sf!l81 plate
Sul'l/ey elevation
of steel plale
Per Special Pro,vi ons
§,
'C
UNIV RS ITY OF WASHINGTON~SOTfiEU. §

CASCAOIA CC CAMPUS SOUTH ACCESS
:::
t-----~.~., :,~==o~=i=--,,-:~:-,~"~1-::12:::ooe
= --i~
O JHIJllP~ IATICfl CQWWl!.11D tl
,Kf,1JH ut,\IT ~
MATERI ALS OAANCH
IR!lliSPCR TJlllK'
l1l•L£
''"'' - " _
i
'.T. S.:~. .:
tn,ll0IIN IJ'r
Figure 25. Installation Details for Settlement Plates at Site No’s 7 and 8.
52
Settlement was monitored using a survey method. The method consisted of
survey of settlement plates. See Figure 26 for the contract settlement plate detail. The
settlement plates were placed a foot below the ground surface after clearing and grubbing
operations were completed. A steel pipe was welded to the base of the steel plate, and
steel riser pipe was used as the fill was placed. The pipe was wide enough for a survey
rod to be inserted down to the plate. The plates were surveyed at the beginning and
ending of each shift until the engineer allowed survey at longer intervals. Final
settlement measurement results, with their corresponding settlement predictions, are
provided in Table 15. Settlement was monitored until the survey readings approached
zero vertical displacement.
53
Figure 26. Settlement Plate Detail.
Table 15. Settlement measurements and corresponding predictions at settlement

plates No’s 9 through 13.
Hough Method Schmertmann Method
Settlement
Site No. Predicted Settlement Predicted Settlement
Measurement (in.)
(in.) (in.)*
9 1.3 3.1 4.3
10 12.2 14.6 11.3
11 11.4 14.6 11.3
12 41.0 29.8 33.3
13 24.7 24.1 22.3
*Sites 10 through 13 are based on nearest CPT data.
54
CASE HISTORY DATA ANALYSES
Analyses were carried out to assess the ability of each settlement prediction
method to accurately predict the settlement that was measured in the case histories
presented in this report. This assessment of prediction accuracy is carried out using the
bias, which is defined as the measured/predicted value. Predicted values have been
generated using the Hough and Schmertmann methods.
Figure 27 shows measured and predicted values for settlement using the Hough
Method. Dark symbols represent the WSDOT case history data, whereas the white
symbols represent the data presented in Samtani and Allen (2018) except for the WSDOT
case histories. This figure shows that the WSDOT cases settlement estimates tend to be
conservative relative to the rest of the data presented in Samtani and Allen (2018) and
relative to the one-to-one correspondence line shown.
Figure 27. Predicted and measured settlement values for the Hough Method,
comparing the WSDOT case history data to the rest of the data presented in
Samtani and Allen (2018).
55
Similar to Figure 27, Figure 28 shows measured and predicted values for
settlement using the Schmertmann Method. While data scatter for the Schmertmann
Method appears to be greater than for the Hough Method predictions, the Schmertmann
Method appears to be a little less conservative than the Hough Method.
Figure 28. Predicted and measured settlement values for the Schmertmann
Method, comparing the WSDOT case history data to the rest of the data presented
in Samtani and Allen (2018).
Figures 29 and 30 show the same data, but instead prediction bias is shown on the
vertical axis. When the bias is less than 1.0, the prediction is conservative (i.e., less
settlement occurred than was predicted), and when the bias is greater than 1.0, the
prediction is unconservative. Based on these figures, both prediction methods are
conservative for settlements of approximately three-fourths inch or more. However, at a
settlement of approximately 0.5 inch or less (vertical dotted line in figures), data scatter
increases significantly. The increase in data scatter at 0.5 inch or less could not be
verified for the WSDOT data, due to lack of WSDOT settlement data less than 0.5 inch.
56
Figure 29. Bias versus predicted settlement for the Hough Method.
Figure 30. Bias versus predicted settlement for the Schmertmann Method.
57
Figure 31 shows the Schmertmann Method predictions for the WSDOT case
histories site using CPT and SPT data. While a direct comparison between the SPT and
CPT based settlement estimates was not possible, this figure shows that estimates using
both types of data track reasonably well on the one-to-one correspondence line.
Figure 31. Measured settlement and Schmertmann Method settlement predictions

using both CPT and SPT data for the WSDOT case histories.
Table 16 summarizes the mean and coefficient of variation (i.e., COV) for each
case history for both settlement prediction methods. Table 17 summarizes the mean and
COV for the case where CPT data are available for estimating settlement using the
Schmertmann Method. Based on these results, the Hough Method has less data scatter
than the Schmertmann Method when basing the settlement estimates based on SPT data.
There were not adequate data available to assess the potential accuracy of CPT based
Schmertmann Method estimates, though for the data that were available, the CPT based
estimates followed the one-to-one correspondence line fairly closely, indicating that if
CPT data are available, the Schmertmann Method has the potential to be the most
58
accurate prediction method. Considering that the Schmertmann Method was developed
with CPT data in mind, the potential for the Schmertmann Method to be the most
accurate alternative when CPT data are available was not unexpected.
Table 16. Summary statistics for each settlement case history, for both the Hough
and Schmertmann methods, based on SPT blow counts.
Hough Method *Schmertmann Method
Case History N N
Mean Bias COV Mean Bias COV
SR395, BNSF
6 0.60 26.5% 6 1.33 55.6%
Railroad Tunnel
SR522, U of W
2 0.29 20.8% 2 0.93 40.1%
Bothell Campus
I-5/SR432 Talley Way
5 0.89 39.1% 1 0.30 --
Interchange
All WSDOT Case
13 0.67 46.9% 9 1.13 61.7%
Histories
*Based on SPT data only.
Table 17. Summary statistics for the case where CPT data are available as the basis
for estimating settlement using the Schmertmann Method.
*Schmertmann Method
Case History N
Mean Bias COV
I-5/SR432 Talley Way Interchange 4 1.11 8.2%
*Based on CPT data only.
Figures 32 and 33 show the Cumulative Distribution Functions (CDFs) for both
the Hough and Schmertmann method predictions, respectively. Both bias and ln(bias)
plots are shown. These figures indicate that the data are generally lognormally
distributed. This is consistent with the larger data set gathered and analyzed by Samtani
and Allen (2018).
59
Figure 32. Cumulative Distribution Functions (CDFs) of Hough Method prediction
bias values for the WSDOT case histories, using (a) bias plotted on a lognormal axis,
and (b) ln(bias) plotted on a normal axis.
Figure 33. Cumulative Distribution Functions (CDFs) of Schmertmann Method

prediction bias values for the WSDOT case histories, using (a) bias plotted on a
lognormal axis, and (b) ln(bias) plotted on a normal axis.
60
SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS
Summarized in this report are comparisons between measured and predicted

settlements obtained from three project sites in the State of Washington (13 individual
measurements and predictions), two sites in western Washington and one site in eastern
Washington. The eastern Washington case is a cut-and-cover tunnel in which the tunnel
footing settlement was measured; however, the surrounding fill was the driver regarding
the settlement measured there. The two western Washington cases represent bridge
abutment fill settlement, though two of the measurement locations included an MSE wall.
These measurements and predictions are used to determine the accuracy of two
settlement estimation methods, the Hough Method and the Schmertmann Method, in
Washington soils. The database of measurements reported here are not comprehensive,
but do represent some typical cases.
Based on these data, both methods appear to be reliable, though in general,
settlement estimates were conservative. The Hough Method was more consistent than
the Schmertmann Method when SPT data are used, but on average was conservative by
an approximate factor of 1.5 for the sites investigated. The Schmertmann Method
predictions using CPT data were the most accurate, but that data set is extremely limited,
so all that can be said at this point is that the Schmertmann Method has the potential to
provide the most accurate results when CPT data are available.
61
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
The author wishes to acknowledge the support provided by two of my staff,

Andrew Fiske and Mark Frye, in the development of their case histories, including both
design and construction monitoring, that are contained in this report. The author also
wishes to acknowledge the assistance of Dr. Naresh Samtani of NCS GeoResources,
LLC, Tucson, AZ, who performed parallel settlement calculations using the
Schmertmann Method for all of the case histories presented in this report, as the original
case history designs utilized only the Hough Method. His help in supplying those
calculations is much appreciated.
62
REFERENCES
AASHTO, 2017. AASHTO LRFD Bridge Design Specifications. American Association of

State Highway and Transportation Officials, Eighth Edition, Washington, D.C.,
USA.
Boussinesq, J., 1885, “Application des Potentiels a L’Etude de L’Equilibre et due
Mouvement des Solides Elastiques,” Gauthier-Villars, Paris.
Gifford, D. G., J. R. Kraemer, J. R. Wheeler, and A. F. McKown. 1987. Spread Footings
for Highway Bridges, FHWA/RD-86/185. Federal Highway Administration, U.S.
Department of Transportation, Washington, DC, p. 229.
Holtz, R. D., and Kovacs, W. D., 1981, An Introduction to Geotechnical Engineering,
Prentice-Hall, Inc, Eaglewood Cliffs, New Jersey.
Hough, B. K. 1959. “Compressibility as the Basis for Soil Bearing Value,” Journal of the
Soil Mechanics and Foundations Division. American Society of Civil Engineers,
Weston, VA, Vol. 85, Part 2.
Kulicki, J., W. Wassef, D. Mertz, A. Nowak, N. Samtani, and H. Nassif. 2015. “Bridges
for Service Life Beyond 100 Years: Service Limit State Design.” SHRP 2 Report
S2-R19B-RW-1, SHRP2 Renewal Research, Transportation Research Board.
National Research Council, The National Academies, Washington, D.C.
NAVFAC, 1971, Design Manual: Soil Mechanics, Foundations, and Earth Structures,
DM-7. (note: included as Appendix A in US Department of Defense, 2005, Soil
Mechanics, Unified Facilities Criteria (UFC), UFC 3-220-10N).
Osterberg, J. 0., 1957, "Influence Values for Vertical Stresses in a Semi-Infinite Mass Due
to an Embankment Loading," Proc., Fourth Intern. Conf. on Soil Mech. and Found.
Engr., Vol. 1, pp. 393-394.
Samtani, N. C., and Nowatzki, E. A. 2006. Soils and Foundations, FHWA NHI-06-088
and FHWA NHI 06-089, Federal Highway Administration, U.S. Department of
Transportation, Washington, DC.
63
Samtani, N. C., Nowatzki, E. A., and Mertz, D.R. 2010. Selection of Spread Footings on
Soils to Support Highway Bridge Structures, FHWA-RC/TD-10-001, Federal
Highway Administration, Resource Center, Matteson, IL
Samtani, N. and J. Kulicki. 2018. Incorporation of Foundation Deformations in AASHTO
LRFD Bridge Design Process. Second Edition. SHRP2 Solutions. American
Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials. Washington, DC.
Samtani, N. and J. Kulicki. 2018. Incorporation of Foundation Movements in AASHTO
LRFD Bridge Design Process - Second Edition. FHWA-18-007. Federal Highway
Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation.
Samtani, N. and T. Allen. 2018. Implementation Report - Expanded Database for Service
Limit State Calibration of Immediate Settlement of Bridge Foundations on Soil.
FHWA-18-008. Federal Highway Administration, U.S. Department of
Transportation.
Schmertmann, J. H., 1970. "Static Cone to Compute Settlement over Sand," American
Society of Civil Engineers, Journal of the Geotechnical Engineering Division, Vol.
96 (No. SM3), 1011-1043.
Schmertmann, J. H., Hartman, J. P., and Brown, P. R. 1978. "Improved Strain Influence
Factor Diagrams." American Society of Civil Engineers, Journal of the
Geotechnical Engineering Division, 104 (No. GT8), 1131-1135.
Sowers, G. F. 1979. Introductory Soil Mechanics and Foundations: Geotechnical
Engineering. MacMillan Publishing Co., New York, NY, p. 621.
Westergaard, H., 1938, “A Problem of Elasticity Suggested by a Problem in Soil
Mechanics: A Soft Material Reinforced by Numerous Strong Horizontal Sheets,”
in Contribution to the Mechanics of Solids, Stephen Timoshenko 60th Anniversary

Volume, Macmillan, New York, New York, pp. 268-277.
64
APPENDIX A
SUBSURFACE DATA FOR SR395 BNSF TUNNEL PROJECT
A-1
0
0
~
c::;
v,I
~
~ Washington State
Test Boring Legend
.. .
Page 1 of 2
Sampler Symbols Soil Density Modifiers

Standard Penetration Test Gravel, Sand & Non-plastic Silt I Elastic Silts and Clay
Oversized Penetration Test

SPT I Density I SPT Consistency
Blows/ft I Blows/ft
Dames & Moore, California 0-4 Very Loose II 0-1 Very Soft
Shelby Tube 5-10 Loose I 2-4 Soft
11-24 Medium Dense 5-8 I Medium Stiff
Piston Sample 25-50 I Dense 11 9-15 Stiff
>50 I Very Dense I 16~30 Very Stiff
Washington Undisturbed 31-60 Hard
>60 Very Hard
Vane Shear Test
Core ' '\\Angularity of Gravel & Cobbles . .
Angular Coarse particles have sharp edges and relatively

Becker Hammer plane sides with unpolished ~urfaces.
Subangular Coarse grained particles are similar to angular
B Bag Sample but have rounded edges.
Subrounded Coarse grained particles have nearly plane sides
but have well rounded corners and edges.
Rounded Coarse grained particles have smoothly curved
sides and no edges.
Cement Surface Seal
Piezometer Pipe in
Granular Bentonite Seal
Moistur~ Modifi~rs ?/··
Absence of moisture; dust
Piezometer Pipe in Sand Dam but no visible water
Visible free water
Well Screen in Sand
Granular Bentonite Bottom Seal

Stratified Alternating layers of varying material or color at
Inclinometer Casing in least 6mm thick; note thickness and inclination.
Concrete Bentonite Grout Laminated Alternating layers of varying material or color less
·'' : . .· ·-:": .. • ;, . ... :
••: - . ·_-: ,... .· -~ . '·.·:· ... ,.,,·.:- '. .,_-. ,; ·_· than 6mm thick; note thickness and inclination.
·.-.,Jc3bora.toiyTesting;Cqdes > Fissured Breaks along definite planes of fracture with little
resistance to fracturing.
UU Unconsolidated Undrained Triaxial Slickensided Fracture planes appear polished or glossy,
somtimes striated.
CU Consolidated Undrained Triaxial
Blocky Cohesive soil that can be broken down into smaller
CD Consolidated Drained Triaxial angular lumps which resist further breakdown.
UC Unconfined Compression Test Disrupted Soil structure is broken and mixed. Infers that
material has moved substantially - landslide debris.
DS Direct Shear Test
Homogeneous Same color and appearance throughout.
CN Consolidation Test
GS Grain Size Distribution_
MC Moisture Content .. HCL Reaction_
SG Specific Gravity No HCL Reaction No visible reaction.
OR Organic Content Weak HCL "Reaction Some reaction with bubbles forming slowly.
DN Density Strong HCL Reaction Violent reaction with bubbles forming imediately.
.
AL Atterberg Limits
PT Point Load Compressive Test
Degree of Vesicularity of Pyrodastic Rocks >
SL Slake Test Slightly Vesicular 5 to 10 percent of total
DG Degradation . Moderately Vesicular 10 to 25 percent of total
LA LA Abrasion Highly Vesicular 25 to 50 percent of total

Scoriaceous Greater than 50 percent of total
v,I
~
~
Washington State ,
Department of Transportatiof
Test Boring Legend p aae 2 0 f 2
Grain Size
Fine Grained I < 1mm !
I
Few crystal boundaries/grains are distinguishable in the field or with hand lens. I
Medium Grained I 1mm to 5mm I Most crystal boundaries/grains are distinguishable with the aid of a hand lens.
Coarse Grained >5mm Most crystal boundaries/grains are distinguishable with the naked eye.
I I
·.
Weathered State·
Term I Description Grade
Fresh No visible sign of rock material weathering; perhaps slight discoloration in major I
I discontinuity surfaces. I
Slightly Discoloration indicates weathering of rock material and discontinuity surfaces. All the rock material II
Weathered may be discolored by weathering and may be somewhat weaker externally than its fresh condition.
Moderately Less than half of the rock material is decomposed and/or disintegrated to soil. Fresh or discolored
III
Weathered rock is present either as a continuous framework or as core stones.
I
Highly More than half of the rock material is decomposed and/or disintegrated to soil. Fresh or discolored
Weathered rock is present either as discontinuous framework or as core stone. IV
Completely All rock material is decomposed and/or disintegrated to soil. The original mass structure is
Weathered still largely intact. V
Residual All rock material is converted to soil. The mass structure and material fabric is destroyed. There is a
Soil large change in volume, but the soil has not been significantly transported. VI
Relative Rock Strength'

Grade Description Field Identification Uniaxial Compressive
Strength approx
R1 Very Specimen crumbles under sharp blow from point of geological hammer, 1 to 25 MP a
Weak and can be cut with a pocket knife.
R2 Moderately Shallow cuts or scrapes can be made in a specimen with a pocket knife. 25 to 50 MPa
Weak . Geological hammer point indents deeply with firm blow.
R3 I Moderately
Strong
Specimen cannot be scraped or cut with a pocket knife, shallow indentation
can be made under firm blows from a hammer.
50 to 100 MPa
R4 Strong Specimen breaks with one firm blow from the hammer end of a geological 100 to 200 MPa
hammer.
Very Specimen requires many blows of a geological hammer to break intact sample. Greater than 200 MPa
R5
Strong
1-···
•· ··· Discontinuities ..··. I
Spacing . Condition
Very Widely Greater than 3 m Excellent Very rough surfaces, no separation, hard discontinuity wall
Widely 1 m to 3 m Good Slightly rough surfaces, separation less than 1 mm, hard
Moderately 0.3 m to 1 m discontinuity wall.
Closely 50 mm to 300 mm Fair Slightly rough surfaces, separation greater than 1 mm,
soft discontinuity wall.
Very Closely Less than 50 mm
ROD(%)
Poor ISlickensided surfaces, or soft gouge less than 5 mm thick, or open
discontinuities 1 to 5 mm.
Very Poor ISoft gouge greater than 5 mm thick, or open discontinuities
100(length of core in pieces> 100mm)
Length of core run greater than 5 mm.
Fracture Frequency (FF) is the average number of fractures per 300 mm of core.
Does not include mechanical breaks caused by drilling or handling.
Washington State LOG OF TEST BORING
Department of Transportation Start Card S-23984
HOLE No. RR-1-04

Job No XL-2201 SR 395 Elevation 1953.4 ft (595.4 m)
Sheet_1_ of _5_
Project NSLAC-BNSF RR Over Crossing Tunnel Driller Kerry Cooper Lie# 2552
Site Address Vicinity of Market Street and Piper Road Inspector Cleo Andrews
Start July 13, 2004 Completion July 14, 2004 CME 45 w/ autohammer
Well I D # - - - - - - - - - ~ Equipment
Station LR 359+40.23 Offset 255.87' LT. Casing HQ 3" X 105.0' Method Wet Rotary
Northing 620162 Easting 2822883 Latitude _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ Longitude
County Spokane Subsection NE 1/4 of the SW 1/4 15_

Section _ _ Range 43EWM Township.2.6..__
Q)
Standard ci $ c
g I Q) SPT
Cl.
i:'.' z zci .!!l "':;: Q)
.:; ~ ii= Penetration Q) .0 en Description of Material E

Blows/6'' Q) "O
Cl.
Q)
$
0
ct Blows/ft C.
E
-
Cl.
E
Q)
.0
=i
"'
-'
Q)
I-
C
:;J
:;J
.p
en
0
Q)
:;;; (N) "' I-
0
E
10 20 30 40
"'
(J)
(J) ~
(9
I I I I
0.0' to 4.0' Poorly graded Sand with gravel as indicated
I I I I by drilling and wash return. 100% drilling fluid return.
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
-1
~~
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
3
2
, D-1 Poorly graded SAND, loose, brown, moist,
Homogeneous, HCI reaction not tested. Top surface
-
5- 3 gravel from RR access road. -

I I I I
(5) Length Recovered 1.5 ft, Length Retained 1.0 ft
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
•
-2 I I I I -
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
~3
o,
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
3
3
, D-2 GS
MC
SP, M.C. = 20%
Poorly graded SAND, loose, brown, moist,
-
10- 4 Homogeneous, HCI reaction not tested. -
l
o I I I I (7) Length Recovered 1.5 ft, Length Retained 1.0 ft
(')
_j
5
Cl)
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
•
--,
0..
(')
I I I I
_j I I I I
w
z I I I I
z
~ I I I I
-4 I I I I -
,,
(')
z I I I I
ui
Cl)
0
O'.'.
0
o, I I
I
I
I
I
I 4 D-3 Poorly graded SAND, loose, brown, moist,
O'.'. I I I I 3 Homogeneous, HCI reaction not tested.
~ I I I I 4
0 15- Length Recovered 1.5 ft, Length Retained 1.0 ft -
O'.'.
O'.'.
ll.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
(7) H
Cl)
z I I I I
~ -5 I I I I -
...J
I I I I
Cl)
z I I I I
I I I I
"'
0)
(")
I I I I
O'.
Cl) I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
~
l~ I I I 4 D-4 Poorly graded SAND, loose, olive gray, moist, Stratified,
...J
-6 I I I I 5 HCI reaction not tested. 0.4' of volcanic ash pinkish gray -
0
Cl) II I I I
~
20
Department of Transportation Start Card ~S~-2~3~9~8~4_ __
HOLE No. RR-1-04

Sheet_2_ of _5_
Project NSLAC-BNSF RR Over Crossing Tunnel Driller Kerrv Cooper Lie# 2552
Q)
g Standard a. ci .m c
I Q)
ii= Penetration
SPT 1-- zQ) z
>, ci
.0 $l "':;: Q)
E
f; ~ Blows/6" ci.
Q) U)
Description of Material -0
Q_ 15 "'
0 :::,
a.
Q) .m it Blows/ft E E :::,
_J Q)
1--
C
:::, .la
0
Q)
:;;; (N) ttl ttl 1-- 0 U)
E:
(f)
(f) ~
(9
10 20 30 40
.. I I I
5
1;
I I I (9)
lX in color from 20.1' to 20.5'.
Length Recovered 1.5 ft, Length Retained 1.0 ft
I I I
I I I
I I I
I I I
......
..... I I I
... I I I I
-7 I I I I -
.,,.
I I I I
I I I I
..
.... ~~ I I I
...
... I I I I
5
6
H D-5 Poorly graded SAND, medium dense, brown, moist,
Stratified, HCI reaction not tested. 1" layer of silt, olive
I I I I
25- .... I I I I 5 gray in color. -
... I I I I (11) H Length Recovered 1.5 ft, Length Retained 1.0 ft
I I I I
~a I I I I -
I I I I
....... I I I I
.. I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
~9
I
I
I~~
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
6
7
, D-6 Poorly graded SAND, medium dense, brown, moist,
Stratified, HCI reaction not tested, very little drilling fluid -
30- I I I I
6 loss. 1" layer of sandy silt. -
.... I I I (13) ~ Length Recovered 1.5 ft, Length Retained 1.0 ft
····· I I I
I
..... I I I I
.. I I I I
I I I I
....... I I I
I I I I
e-10 :::::: I I I I
-
I I I I
I I I I
I I I
I I I I
13 ~ D-7 Well graded SAND with gravel, with silty sand lens,
17 dense, dark brown, moist, Laminated, HCI reaction not
f--
0
(!)
35-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
22
(39) ~
tested.
-
...i
0 I I I I
~11 -
Cf)
...., I I I I
Cl.
(!)
I I I I
...i I I I I
w
z I I I I
z
~ I I I I
(!) I I I I
z I I I I
uj
Cf)
0 I I I I
I I I I >>~~ 34
~
0::
()
e-12 D-8 GS SW-SM, M.C. = 9% -
0:: I I I I 29 MC Well graded SAND with silt and gravel, subrounded, very
~
0
0::
0::
40- I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
32
(61) ~
dense, dark yellowish brown, moist, Homogeneous, HCI
reaction not tested, traces of oxidized stains and silt.
-
LL Length Recovered 1.0 ft, Length Retained 1.0 ft
Cf)
z I I I I
OJ
I I I
~ I I I
VI
_J
Cf)
z I I I
l!)
0)
I I I
-13 -
"' I I I
D'. ~"-'.,-
Cf) I I I
0 '! _ \ - I I I
N I
~
N I I/ I I I
~ '! _ \ - I I I : 8 D-9 GRANITE, olive gray, coarse grained, completely
_J
I I I I I 17 weathered, very weak rock.
0
Cf)
I //
I I I I
45
Department of Transportation Start Card --""S_,-2co3'°'9"'8_._4_ __
HOLE No. RR-1-04

Sheet_3_ of _5_
g Standard SPT ]
Q)
£ ii= Penetration Blows/6" Description of Material E

0 _g
Cl.
Q)
0
a: Blows/ft (N) rn
C
10 20 30 40
I I I I
20 Length Recovered 1.5 ft, Length Retained 1.3 ft
~- '- I l I I
(37)
e-14 I I // I I I I
, , I I I I
1 - - I I I I
I I 1/ I I I
~ __ '- I I I
I I // I I I I
, , I I I I
1 - - I I I I
I I 1/ I I I I
'-15 ~- '- I l I :I••\ 10 ~ D-10 GRANITE, olive gray, coarse grained, completely
I I // I I I 18
, , I I I weathered, very weak rock.
50- 1 - - I I I I 24 Length Recovered 1.5 ft, Length Retained 1.0 ft
1
1
I / I I I I (42 )
~ _'- I I I I
I I // I I I I
, , I I I I
1 - - I I I I
1
I I / I I I I
'-16 ~-'- I I I I
I I // I I I I
, , I I I I
I - I I I I
I ~ 1
/ I I I I >>••
~ GRANITE, yellowish orange, coarse grained, completely
~ _' - I I I I
14 D-11
weathered, very weak rock.
I I // I I I I 38
55- , , I I I I 40 Length Recovered 1.5 ft, Length Retained 1.3 ft
I - - I I I I (78)
'-17 I I 1/ I I I I
~ '- I I I I
I ~ // I I I I
, , I I I I
1 - - I I I I
1
I I / I I I I
~ _'- I I I I
I I // I I I I
, , I I I I
-18 1 - I I I I >>O
~
-
1
1 16 D-12 GRANITE, yellowish orange, coarse grained, completely
I / I I I I 28 weathered, very weak rock.
60-
~ '- I I I I 45 Length Recovered 1.5 ft, Length Retained 1.0 ft
l
o I ~ // I I I I (68)
C9 , , I I I I 07/15/2004
...I
I - I I I I
i5
(/)
....,
I ~ 1/ I I I I
0..
C9
~- '- I I I I
...I
w
I I // I I I I
z -19 , , I I I I
z I - I I I I
~
C9 I ~ 1
/ I I I I
z ~- '- I I I I
ui
(/)
0 I I // I I I I
, , I I I I
~
!l'.'.
0 14 D-13 GRANITE, yellowish orange, coarse grained, completely
!l'.'.
1 - - I I I I 50/6 weathered, very weak rock.
~ I I 1/ I I I I
0 65- (50) Length Recovered 1.0 ft, Length Retained 1.0 ft
!l'.'. ~ '- I I I I
!l'.'.
lL
~20 I ~ // I I I I -
(/)
z , , I I I I
ro 1 - - I I I I
~
...I
I I 1/ I I I I
(/)
z ~ '- I I I I
U)
0)
I ~ // I I I I
(')
, , I I I I
!l'.'.
(/)
1 - - I I I I
1
I I / I I I I
~21 ~- '- I I I I ,~
1
1 // I I I I 36 ~ D-14 GRANITE, yellowish orange, coarse grained, completely
...1 , , I I I I 35 weathered, very weak rock .
i5
(/)~ 70_1__ __ L._:_::c_
1 - I I _
- L___..1___...L_ I
__L_ I
_J__ __L_ _ __1_,___ _J__ ___1__ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _.J____L_ _--"
HOLE No. RR-1-04

Sheet _4_ of _5_
Q)
g Standard a. d c
,G
Q)
ii= Penetration
SPT
?:' ! ~ Q)
E
a.
Q)
2
CL Blows/ft
Blows/6"
{N)
"*-E 0.
E
~::i Description of Material _g
en
0 ro
(f)
ro
(f)
t:. C
10 20 30 40
I I I
50/4 Length Recovered 1.3 ft, Length Retained 1.3 ft
~ '- I I I I
(50)
1
~ 1/ I I I I
, , I I I I
1 - I I I I
~
1
1
/ I I I I
~22 ~ __ ' - 1 I \ I
\ I // I I I I
, , I I I I
1 - - I I I I
1
\ I / I I I I
~ __ '- I I I !
\ I // I I I I
50/6
~ D-15 GRANITE, brownish orange, coarse grained, completely
, , I I I I weathered, very weak rock.
75- 1 - - I I I I (50) Length Recovered 1.0 ft, Length Retained 1.0 ft
1
~23 \ I / I I I I
~- '- I I I I
\ I // I I I I
, , I I I I
1 - I I I I
~
1 1
/ I I I I
~ '- I I I I
1
~ 1/ I I I I
, , I I I I
~24 1 - - I I I I
1
\ I / I I I I
~-- '- I I 1 I
•• 28 r,' D-16 GRANITE, reddish brown, coarse grained, completely
\ I // I I I I
50/4 1.6. weathered, very weak rock.
80- (50) Length Recovered 0.8 ft, Length Retained 0.8 ft
, , I I I I
1 - - I I I I
\ I
1/ I I I I
~ __ '- I I I !
1 I I I I
1 1/
~25 , , I I I I
1 - I I I I
~
1
1
/ I I I I
~ '- I I I I
1
~ 1/ I I I I
, , I I I I
\
1
-
I
1
-
/
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
>>~~ 60/5
IX D-17 GRANITE, dark brown, coarse grained, completely
~ _' - I I I I (BO) weathered, very weak rock.
85- Length Recovered 0.4 ft, Length Retained 0.4 ft
l
o ~25 \ I // I I I I
(9 , , I I I I
_J
6
1 - - I I I I
en \ I
1/ I I I I
-,
0..
(9
~-- '- 1 I I I
_J \ I // I I I I
w
z , , I I I I
z 1 - - I I I I
F'. \ I
1/ I I I I
(9
z ~-- '- I I I l
cii ~27
en \ I // I I I I
0
Q'.
0
Q'.
,
1
,
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
>>~~ 75/6 II: D-18 GRANITE, yellowish orange, coarse grained, completely
~ (75) weathered, very weak rock.
1
~ 1
/ I I I I
0 90- Length Recovered 0.5 ft, Length Retained 0.5 ft
Q'. ~-- '- I I l I
Q'.
u. \ I // I I I I
en , , I I I I
z(0 1 - - I I I I
:;l
_J
\ I
1
/ I I I I
'-28
en
z ~ __ '- I I I !
U)
Ol
\ I // I I I I
<') , , I I I I
Q'.
en 1 - I I I I
~
1
1
/ I I I I
~ __ '- I I I \ O
1
1/ I I I I 22 r,'
GRANITE, yellowish orange, coarse grained, completely
D-19
I.A.
1
_J
6 , , I I I I 50/4 weathered, very weak rock.

en 95 _J___ ___L~1_:c_:__---'--_ _L__l_-1I_ _L__l_-1I_ _L___ _- ' - - - - - L - - - ' - - - - - _ _ _ L _ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ~ ~ - - ~
Department of Transportation Start Card _S~-_2_3_98_4_ __
HOLE No. RR-1-04

Sheet _5_ of _5_
Project NSLAC-BNSF RR Over Crossing Tunnel Driller Kerrv Cooper Uc# 2552
~,:
Q)
g I Standard 0. ci ~
c
I- zQ) z
Q) SPT >, ci Q)
$ E
£ ~ ii= Penetration Blows/6" Q) 0.. ~
.0
cu 1/)
Description of Material "O ::,
0. $ 2 0. _J Q)
I-
C .p
Q) Q) 0.. Blows/ft (N) E E => ::,
0 1/)
0 ::;; cu I-
cu (f) ..!::
(f)
~
ci
10 20 30 40
-29 I I I I -
'! _ - \
I I I I
I
I // I I I I
I I I I
I
'1_ \
-
I I I I
I //
I I I I
'1_ \ - I I I I
I I
I // I I I
' I I I I
~·
\ -
!_
-30 I I I I I -
I //
I I I I
'1_ \
- I I I I
100-
I
'
I
\
// I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
28
50/6
,~M I D-20 GRANITE, yellowish orange, coarse grained, completely
weathered, very weak rock.
Lenqth Recovered 1.0 ft Lenqth Retained 1.0 ft r-
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I -
-31
I I I I
I I I I End of test hole boring at 100 ft below ground elevation.
I I I I This is a summary Log of Test Boring. Soil/Rock
I I I I descriptions are derived from visual field identifications
I I I I and laboratory test data.
I I I I
I I I I
(Water table in hole before bailing is 7.0', bailed hole to
I I I I
78.0' after 15 minute delay water table stayed at 78.0',
I I I I ~-
105--32 I I pulled 5.0' of casing after 30 minutes stabilized at 59.4',
I I
I I I I hole left open over night water table remained the same.
I I I I Ended and abandoned test boring at 100.0' below ground
I I I I elevation.
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
-33 -
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
110- f-
l
o I I I I
(9 I I I I
_j
i5 I I I I
en I I I I
--, -
(L -34 I I I I
(9
_j I I I I
w
z I I I I
z
I I I I
i:?
(9 I I I I
z I I I I
en
en
0 I I I I
C!'.
0
I I I I
C!'. I I I I
~ -35 I I I I -
0 115- ~
C!'. I I I I
C!'.
u. I I I I
en I I I I
za:,
I I I I
~
.J
I I I I
en I I I I
z
.,.,- I I I I
0)
(')
I I I I
O'. -
en -36 I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
.J I I I I
i5 I I I I
en - 120
Department of Transportation Start Card ---'R'--'-_,,6=5=90=2~-
HOLE No. RR-2-04

Job No XL-2201 SR 395 Elevation 1942.3 ft (592.0 m}
Sheet _1_ of _5_
Project NSLAC-BNSF RR Over Crossing Tunnel Driller Joe Judd Lie# 2454
Site Address Market St. & Piper Rd. Inspector Dave Nelson
start July 14, 2004 Completion July 15, 2004 A_H_N_-6_6_8_ _ _ _ __

Well lD# _ _ Equipment CME 850 w/ auto hammer
Station LR 361 +54.19 Offset 231.65' LT. Casing 6" x 40' & 4" x 98' Method Wet Rotary
Northing 62037 4 Easting 2822920 Latitude _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ Longitude _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __
County Spokane Subsection NE 1/4 of SW 1/4 1_5_

Section _ _ Range 43 EWM Township .2Q_
0)
g I Standard
SPT
Cl.
>-
ci
z zci c0)
.!'! I- J!l
£ ~ ""0 Penetration
Blows/6" 0)
0)
- 0)
.0
ro V)
Description of Material
E
:::,
Cl.
0)
0
20) a: Blows/ft
{N)
0.
E
ro
Cl.
E :::,
ro I-
.0 ...J
0)
I- .p
V)
~ (f) ~
C:
(f)
10 20 30 40
5
2 D-1 Poorly graded SAND, loose, brown, dry, Homogeneous,
4 HCI reaction not tested.
4 Length Recovered 1.0 ft
(8)
2
N
U1
<D
0
N
'¢
Q
0
[::'
~ 3
I-
10
0 2 D-2 GS SP-SM, M.C. = 16%
(.')
_j
4 MC Poorly graded SAND with silt, loose, brown, dry,
6
(/)
6 Homogeneous, HCI reaction not tested.
-, {10) Length Recovered 1.0 ft
0..
(.')
_j
w
z
z
F
(.') 4
z
ui
(/)
0
0::
u
0::
g!
0 15
0:: 3 D-3 Poorly graded SAND, loose, brown, moist,
0::
LL. 5 Homogeneous, HCI reaction not tested.
(/)
z 5 Length Recovered 1.0 ft
m
0 5 (10)
<{
...J
(/)
z
0.0
en
(')
a:
(/)
0
;
N
...J
6 6
(/)
20
Department of Transportation Start Card _R~-_.,6...,,5_.,_90.,,.2"----
HOLE No. RR-2-04

Sheet_2_ of _5_
Project NSLAC-BNSF RR Over Crossing Tunnel Driller Joe Judd Uc# 2454
Q)
Standard d $
g SPT
Q.
~ ~ ~ ~
C
Q)
Penetration .D. .!!l E
£
Q.
Q) Blows/ft
Blows/6"
(N)
*-E C.
E
i:, Cll
__J ~
"' Description of Material 'O
C
:,
0
:,
.p
"'
0 ro
(f)
ro
Cf)
t:.. (9
C
20 30 40
4 D-4 Poorly graded SAND, loose, brown, moist,
(11)
25
4 D-5 Poorly graded SAND, with silt, medium dense, brown,
9 moist, Homogeneous, HCI reaction not tested.
8 (20)
9
30
17 D-6 GS SW-SM, M.C. = 13%
22 MC Well graded SAND with silt and gravel, dense, brown,
(47) Length Recovered 1.0 ft
N
10
"'
uj
0
N
:;:
'2
0
~
N
I
35
D 18 D-7 Well graded SAND with silt, dense, brown, wet,
(9
_j 20 Homogeneous, HCI reaction not tested.
6
Cf) 11 27 Length Recovered 1.0 ft
--, (47)
11.
(9
_j
w
z
z
~
(9
z
ui
Cf)
0
Cl'.
0
Cl'.
12
~
0 40
Cl'. 13 D-8 Well graded SAND with gravel, dense, brown, wet,
Cl'.
u. 15 Homogeneous, HCI reaction not tested.
Cf)
z(!l 15 Length Recovered 1.0 ft
(30)
~
...J
Cf)
z
u,·
0)
13
~
Cf)
0
N
N
..
~
...J
6
Cf) 45_L_ __L~~L___1--4l~_l___ _[__ _J__ __[__ _____l_L___ _J__ ___J__ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __c____~·-·CL_-'-C'---'-'"
Department of Transportation Start Card ~R~-6~5~9=0=2_ __
HOLE No. RR-2-04

Sheet _3_ of _5_
c
g
£;
Q)
ii=
0
Standard
Penetration
SPT
Blows/6"
.0
"'
$l
Vi Description of Material
1
"O
Q)
E
:,
0.
Q) it Blows/ft ...J ~ C
:, .lo
Vi
0 (N) 0
C
(9
10 20 30 40
I I
I
I
3 H D-9 GS =
ML, M.C. 23%, Pl 21=
I I I
5 MC Sandy SILT, medium dense, brown, moist,
-14 8 AL Homogeneous, HCI reaction not tested. Layer of gravel
I I I
I I I (13) from 42' to 43'.
I I I Length Recovered 1.5 ft
I I I
I I I
~II I
'! _ , - I I I
\ I // I I I
~15
, , I I I
1 _ - I I I
\ I // I I I
50- '! _ , - 1•
I
I
I
I
I
2 ~ I D-10 GRANITE, yellowish brown, coarse grained, completely
\ I // 4 weathered, very weak rock.
, , I I I
I I I 7 Length Recovered 1.5 ft
\ I
1 _
1
-
/ I I I
(11) H
'! _ , - I I I
~16 \ I // I I I
, , I I I
1 _ - I I I
\ I 1/ I I I
'! _ , - I I I
\ I // I I I
, , I I I
1_ - I I I
55- \ I //
' ,
I
I I
I
I
2 ~ I D-11 GRANITE, yellowish brown, coarse grained, completely
~11 1 6 weathered, very weak rock.
1 ~ 1~ I I I 13 Length Recovered 1.5 ft
, , I I I (19)
1_ - I I I 07/15/2004
\ I 1/ I I
'! _ , - I I I
\ I // I I I
N , , I I I
"'
<D
0
1 _ - I I I
N \ I 1/ I I I I
-18 '1 _ , - I I I I
\ I // I I I I
, , I I I I
f-
0
60-
1 _ - I I I I •• 9 , ' D-12 GRANITE, yellowish brown, coarse grained, completely
(!) \ I // I I I I 20 weathered, very weak rock.
...J
0 '1 _ , - I I I I 30 Length Recovered 1.5 ft
rJ)
..., \ I // I I I I (50)
0.. I I I I
~ '-
(!)
...J I I I I
\ ~ I/
w
z -19 I I I I
z
~ ' , I I I I
1
(!) 1 ~ 1~ I I I I
z , , I I I I
1ii
rJ)
0
1 _ - I I I I
er::
u \ I // I I I I
er:: ' , I I I I
~
0
er::
65- \I~ I~ : : : : »~• 15
~' D-13 GRANITE, reddish brown, coarse grained, completely
~
er::
lL -20 ~ __ '- I I I 1 36 weathered, very weak rock. - '
rJ)
z \ I // I I I I 70 Length Recovered 1.0 ft
al
' , I I I I (106) ~I
~
...J \I~ I~ I I I I
rJ)
z , , I I I I
1 _ - I I I I
"'
(J)
(')
1
1 1/ I I I I
er::
rJ) ' , I I I I
\ I ~ I~ I I I I
~21 , , I I I I _,'
5<! I - I I I I :::t:=::
6 1
~ 1/ I I I I , ·~
rJJ ~ 70__,__ __,__'---'-'-'----'--_
l _,.l_ _l'--_.LI~
~:,..__ __i_____1__ __L__ ___i__ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ___1_ _1_<,:,_,t::~~
Department of Transportation Start Card __,R._.-_,,6=5=9=02=----
HOLE No. RR-2-04

Sheet _4_ of _5_
g Standard SPT c
Q)
Penetration .0 .l!l E
,E
a.
Q) Blows/ft
Blows/6" "' ~"'
....J
Description of Material ::,
.p
0 (N) "'C
10 20 30 40
'1 _ \ - D-14 GRANITE, reddish brown, coarse grained, completely
I 100
I weathered, very weak rock.
\ I //
I
';_ \ -
I
\ I //
I
22 'I \
- I
\ ~ // I
'I \
I
-
I
\ ~ //
I
'I \
- I
\ ~ // I
'; _ \ - I
75 I >> 30 D-15
\ I // GRANITE, reddish brown, coarse grained, completely
23 I weathered, very weak rock.
';_ - \ I
100
\ I // I
';_ \ - I
I
\ I //
I
';_ \ - I
\ I // I
'1 _ \ - I
24 I
\ I //
I
';_ \ - I
\ I // I
80 I
'I \
-
33 GRANITE, yellowish brown, coarse grained, completely
I
\ ~ //
I
50 weathered, very weak rock.
';_ \ - I
\ I // I
25 '1 _ \ - I
I
\ I //
I
';_ \ - I
\ I // I
'1 _ \ - I
I
\ I //
I
';_ \ - I
85
f--
0 26 \ I // I 30 D-17 GRANITE, yellowish brown, coarse grained, completely
(!)
'I \
I 50 weathered, very weak rock.
..J -
I
0
(/) \ ~ //
I
--,
Cl..
(!)
'I \
- I
..J
w
\ ~ // I
z 'I I
z \
-
F'. I
\ ~ //
I
(!)
z
1ii
';_ \ - I
27
(/)
0 \ I // I
0::
(.) ';_ \ - I
0:: I
~ \ I //
I
0 90 'I
0::
\
- I 50 D-18 GRANITE, yellowish brown, coarse grained, completely
0::
LL \ ~ // I (50) weathered, very weak rock.
(/)
z 'I - \
I Length Recovered 0.4 ft
!ll -
I
~ \ I //
I
...J
(/)
z
28 'I \
- I
lO
0)
\ ~ // I
(")
'; _ I
ti: \
-
(/) I
\ I //
I
';_ \
- I
\ I // I
...J
' \
I
0
(/) 95_J__ ____L.:_/.::c-_-_L_ __l__ _j__ __J_ _ L___....____j___L_ _L___J___ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ L_ _L_J-L__LJ
Department of Transportation Start Card _,_.Rec-6"-'5,_.,9._,,0_,,.2_ __
HOLE No. RR-2-04

Sheet _5_ of _5_
g Standard ~ d -- c
~ ~ ~
Q) SPT Q)
ii= Penetration .n $l E
£ Blows/6" Cll V, Description of Material
0. 0. ~
0 ::,
Cl.
0:: Blows/ft __J ~ .;,
Q)
(N) E E ::, V,
0 ro ro t:, Ee
(/) (/)
10 20 30 40
~29
'! _ \ - I
I I
I
I
I
I
I
50 J.l: D-19 GRANITE, yellowish brown, coarse grained, completely
(50) weathered, very weak rock.
\ I // I I I I
I I I I Length Recovered 0.4 ft
'! _ \
-
I I I I
\ I //
I I I I
'I I I I I
:
\
-
\ // I I I I
I I I I
I I I I 100 D-20 No Recovery

~30
I I I I (100)
I I I I
100- I I I I descriptions are derived from visual field identifications
I I I I
I I I I Bailed Hole to 60.3 with recharge to 56.2
~31
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I WATER LEVEL READINGS
I I I I DATE DEPTH
I I I I 8/17/04 56.1
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
105-~32
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
N I I I I
"'
(D ~33 I I I I
0
N I I I I
st
'2 I I I I
0
£:' I I I I
N
I I I I
110-
f-
0
I I I I
0 I I I I
...J
6 I I I I
(/)
--,
I I I I
!l. -34 I I I I
0
...J I I I I
w
z I I I I
z
F' I I I I
0 I I I I
z I I I I
uj
(/)
0 I I I I
Cl'.
0
I I I I
Cl'. I I I I
~ 115- C - 35 I I I I
0
Cl'. I I I I
Cl'.
u.. I I I I
(/)
z I I I I
"' I I I I
~
...J
I I I I
(/)
z I I I I
"'
CJ)
I I I I
(')
(!'.
I I I I
(/) e-35 I I I I -
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
...J I I I I
6
(/) 12o_J__ __ L_ _L___ l
_l___ _ __il_ _lL___ _l___l_ _l____ __ L _ _ . L __ __,____ ___,____ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _~-~-~
HOLE No. RR-3-04

Shee t_1_ of 5
Start July 14, 2004 Completion July 15, 2004 CME 45 w/ autohammer
Well I D # - - - - - - - - - - Equipment
Station LR 363+23.5 Offset 119.49' LT. Casing HQ 3" ID x 115.0' Method Wet Rotary
Northing 620536 Easting 2823042 Latitude _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ Longitude
County Spokane Subsection NE 1/4 of the SW 1/4 15 _

Section _ _ Range 43EWM Township 26._
g Standard "' d 2 c
I "'
o= Penetration
SPT
0.
1-- z z
>, d
.0 ,,,
.l'J "'5' "'E
£
D.
~
2(1)
0
ct Blows/ft
"' -"'0.
Blows/6" ci. "'
.0 "'
...J (1)
1--
Description of Material "O
C
::,
::,
,,,
.p
(1)
0 (N) E E ::i 0
:;:; "' 1-- -C
"'
(/)
(/) ~
ci
10 20 30 40
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
~1 I I -
I I
I I I I
~~ I I I I 2 0-1 Poorly graded SAND, loose, brown, moist,
I I I I
3 Homogeneous, HCI reaction not tested. Top surface
I I I I -
5- 4 crushed rock from from RR access road. 0.0' to 4.0'
I I I I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
(7)
• Poorly graded Sand with some gravel as indicated by
drilling and wash return. 100% drilling fluid return.
~2 I I I I -
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
(')
U) I I I I
co
0 I I I I
N I I I I
01 I I I
1--
0
(9
10-
~3
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
3
4
4
(8)
'I 0-2 Poorly graded SAND, loose, brown, moist,
Homogeneous, HCI reaction not tested.
_-
_J
0 I I I I
U)
-, I I I I
tl.
(9
I I I I
_J I I I I
w
z I I I I
z
i=! I I I I
(9 -4 I I I I -
z I I I I
Cl)
U)
I I I I
~'
0
er: 01 I I I 0-3 GS
0 4 SP, M.C. = 20%
er: I I I I. 4 MC Poorly graded SAND, loose, brown, moist,
~ I I I I -
0 15- 4 Homogeneous, HCI reaction not tested, very little drilling
er:
er:
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
(8) ~I fluid loss.
LL. Length Recovered 1.5 ft, Length Retained 1.0 ft
U)
z I I I I
(0
-5 I I I I -
~
_J
I I I I
U)
z I I I I
U)
en
I I I I
(')
I I I I
er.
U) I I I
I I I
I I I
~~
_J
0
U)
20
-6
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
3
5
I 0-4 Poorly graded SAND, loose, brown, moist,
Homogeneous, HCI reaction not tested. -
Department of Transportation Start Card --"'S_,-2'-"3'-"9""8_._4_ __
HOLE No. RR-3-04

Sheet _2_ of _5_
g Q)
Standard
SPT C
Q)
E ii= Penetration
Blows/6" Description of Material
E
::,
0
0.
Q) 0:: Blows/ft
(N)
.j,
U)
0 C
10 20 30 40
I I I
I I I
(10)
I I I
I I I
I I I
I I I
I I I
I I I
-7 I I I
I I I
I I I
~ I I I
I I I I
5 H D-5 Poorly graded SAND, with 1" layer of sandy silt, loose,
I I I I 5 brown, moist, Stratified, HCI reaction not tested.
25- I I I I 5 Length Recovered 1.5 ft, Length Retained 1.0 ft
I I I I (10) H
I I I I
'---8 I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I
I I I
I I I I
'---9
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
10
12
~ I D-6 GS ML, M.C. = 50%
MC SILT and sand, medium dense, olive gray, moist,
I I I I
30- 10 Homogeneous, HCI reaction not tested, (material is
I I I I
I I I I (22) H Volcanic Ash very fine grained).
I I I I Length Recovered 1.0 ft, Length Retained 1.0 ft
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
~10 I I I I -
I I I I
I I I
I I I
I I I 12 D-7 Well graded SAND with silt and gravel, with sandy silt
I I I I 15 lens, subrounded, dense, dark brown, moist, Laminated,
I I I I
35- 16 HCI reaction not tested.
f-- I I I I
0 (31) Length Recovered 1.0 ft, Length Retained 1.0 ft
(!) I I I
...J
6 I I I I -
(/) -11
-,
I I I I
n.
(!)
I I I I
...J I I I I
w
z I I I I
z
~
I I I I
(!) I I I I
z I I I I
en
(/)
0 I I I I
n::
u I I I I >>~~ 20 D-8 Well graded SAND with silt, with sandy silt lens,
~12 -
n:: I I I I 20 subrounded, very dense, grayish brown, moist,
~ I I I I 38
0 40- Laminated, HCI reaction not tested.
n:: I I I I (58) Length Recovered 1.0 ft, Length Retained 1.0 ft
n:: I I I I
'-'
(/)
z I I I I
ro I I I I
~
...J
I I I I
(/)
z I I I
"'
0,
I I I I
~13 I I I I
"'n::
(/) I I I I
0 I I I I
N
N I I I
I I I I 13 ~ D-9 GS SW-SM, M.C. = 14%
...1 I I I I 14 MC Well graded SAND with silt, dense, grayish brown, moist,
0
(/)~ ,•,•''
45__L_ __L._.,j_-"--'-o_L___ I
_L___ I I
_L___J___L__ I
__L_ __J__ __ _ , _ . _ __ _ L_ ___J__ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _~ ~ - - -
HOLE No. RR-3-04

Job No XL-2201 SR 395 Elevation 1951.1 ft(594.7 m)
Sheet~3~ of ~5~
Q)
g g Standard Q_ () c
SPT I- zQ) z
>, ()
£Q_ </)
Q)
ii= Penetration Blows/6" ci
Q)
.0
ro
.l!l
</)
"*:;:
'O
Q)
E
::,
.m 2 a. ~ ...J
Q) C
.lo
Blows/ft E E ::i I- ::,
.
Q) Q) a_ </)
0 :;a {N) ro I- 0
ro (f) ~ (9 E
(f)
10 20 30 40
.. I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-14 I I I I -
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I
I I I
I I I I
I +1 I I
'
-15 10 D-10 Well graded SAND with silt and gravel, medium dense, -
I I I I
I I I 9 dark yellowish brown, moist, Stratified, HCI reaction not
I
50- 9 tested. -
.. I I I
(18)
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
• Length Recovered 1.5 ft, Length Retained 1.0 ft
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
-16 ~~-0.
I I I I -
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
... I I +1 I
I I I I
7
13
H D-11 Poorly graded SAND with gravel, with 0.3' of sandy Silt,
dense, dark yellowish brown, moist, Stratified, HCI
.... I I I I
55- 13 reaction not tested, traces of mica. -
I I I I
-17 ...
..
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
•• -
I I I I
~~e-:-:: I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
..... I I I
I I I
I I
~~
I
-18 .... I I I -
......
......
... .... I I I
9
9
H D-12 Silty SAND, with horizontal fine grained sand lenses,
medium dense, olive gray, moist, Laminated, HCI
.... ... I I I I 10
60- reaction not tested, lenses are brown in color, traces of C-
l
o I I I I
(19)
(')
...J
6
en
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
•• mica.
...,
a.
(')
I I I I
...J I I I I
w -
z -19 . ....._ .. I I I I
z
~
(')
~o·o
.. I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
z I I I I
uj
en I I I
0
Cl'.
0
Cl'.
I
I
I
I I
I
I
12
18
H D-13 Well graded SAND with silt and gravel, with 0.3' of poorly
graded sand with some coarser grains, dense, dark
~ I I I I 12
0 65- yellowish brown, moist, Stratified, HCI reaction not tested, ~
Cl'.
Cl'.
-20
': : I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
(30) H very little drilling fluid loss.
-
Ll.
en Length Recovered 1.5 ft, Length Retained 1.0 ft
z I I I
co
I I I I
~ I I I I
...J
en
z .. .. I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
"'
0)
(')
Q'.
I I I I
en I I I I
I I I I
-21 I I I I 'SJ__
>>O
~
I I I I 27 D-14 GS 07/15/2004
I I I I SW-SM, M.C. = 11 %
..
...J
6 25 MC
nr:arlPrl !':/\Nn ,,vith c:ilt :anrl <:11hrrninrlPrl dPC\/
en - 70 I I I I \Moll
- Nr~Hol
Department of Transportation Start Card _S_-_2_3_98_4_ __
HOLE No. RR-3-04

Job No XL-2201 SR 395 Elevation 1951.1 ft {594. 7 m)
Sheet _4_ of _5_
g I a,
;;:
Standard SPT
a,
0.
>,
I-
d
z zd
a,
- .n ~
2
"5'
ca,
£ ~ Penetration a, E
"' I-"'a,
Blows/6" Description of Material -0
ci 0.. ~
0 ::,
0.
a,
0
2a, a: Blows/ft (N) E E ::i
....J C
::,
0
-la
"'
.o=
~
en"' en
"' I-
~ (j
10 20 30 40
.. I I I I
30
..1. dense, dark yellowish brown, moist, Homogeneous, HCI
(55) reaction not tested, Note switched over to HQ core barrel
I I I I
I I I I at 71.5' refusal with HQ advancer. Changed to dark gray
I I I I - in color at 71.5', changed back to yellowish orange in
I I I I C-15 color at 73.0'
-22 I I I I Length Recovered 1.5 ft, Length Retained 1.0 ft -
I I I
I I I I
I I I I Well graded SAND with gravel, with (3) 1", 2" and 4"
I I I I long pieces of basalt rock, dense, brown, moist,
I I I I Stratified, HCI reaction not tested, traces of mica.
~~
I I I
75- I I I f--
18 D-16 Well graded SAND with silt and gravel, with one thin lens
-23 I I I 23 of sandy silt, brownish orange in color, dense, grayish
-
.... . . I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
17
(30)
brown, moist, Laminated, HCI reaction not tested.
C-17
I I I I Well graded SAND with gravel, with 0.6' of elastic silt,
I I I I dense, brown, moist, Stratified, HCI reaction not tested.
I I I I
I I I I
.... I I I I
-24 I I I I -
~";--'- I I I I
-__:___:__
-
I I I I
------:-- ~ I I
80- ~ - f--
-·- I I
lt
-__:__- _.:_ 8 D-18 GS CL, M.C. = 18%, Pl= 15
I I
- -
. . I I I I
10 MC Sandy lean CLAY, with gravel, very stiff, dark brown,
- - 17 AL moist, Stratified, HCI reaction not tested.
-·- I I I I (27)
-- . -- Length Recovered 1.5 ft, Length Retained 1.0 ft
- - I I I I C-19
-25 --==;-=,= I I I I -
'1_ \
- I I I I GRANITE, yellowish orange, coarse grained, completely
I
//
I I I I weathered, very weak rock, HCI Reaction not tested.
I
'1_ \ - I I I I
I
I // I I I I
'1_ \ - I I I I
I I I I I
I //
I I I I f--
l
85- '1_ \ - I I I I
>>O :z
o -26 75/3 D-20 GRANITE, yellowish orange, coarse grained, completely -
I
(9
_j
I // I I I I (75) C-21 weathered, very weak rock, HCI reaction not tested.
6 '1_ \ - I I I I ROD Discontinuities are very widely spaced and in very poor
Cl)
--, I I I I I 0 condition.
I //
0.. I I I I FF Length Recovered 0.2 ft, Length Retained 0.2 ft
(9
_j '1_ \ - I I . I I 26
w I
z I // I I I I
z
~ '1_ \ - I I I I GRANITE, yellowish orange, coarse grained, completely
(9 I
//
I I I I weathered, very weak rock, HCI reaction not tested.
z I
I I I I
en f--27 Discontinuities are very widely spaced and in very poor -
Cl)
0
'1_ \ - I I I I
I condition. Percent Recovered 82.0%
(l'.'.
0 I // I I I I
(l'.'.
'1_ \ - I I I I
!!; I I I I I >>~ ~
0
(l'.'.
(l'.'.
90-
'1_
I
\
//
-
I I I I 60/4" : D-22 GRANITE, grayish brown, coarse grained, completely
f--
u. I I I I (60) C-23 weathered, very weak rock, HCI reaction not tested.
I
Cl)
z I // I I I I ROD Length Recovered 0.3 ft, Length Retained 0.3 ft
co
'I _ \ - I I I I 0 GRANITE , yellowish brown, coarse grained, highly
~ I I I I I FF weathered, very weak rock, HCI reaction not tested.
...I
f--28 I // -
Cl)
z I I I I 26 Discontinuities are very widely spaced and in very poor
'1_ \ - I I I I
"'
0) I
I I I I
condition. Percent Recovered 82.0%
~ I //
Cl)
'1_ \ - I I I I
I
//
I I I I
I
I I I I
'1_ \
- I I I I
I
...I
I // I I I I
6 I I I I
Cl)
- 95 ' \
~~
Department of Transportation Start Card _S~-~2=3~98~4~~
HOLE No. RR-3-04

Sheet~5~ of ~5~
Q)
g Standard ci 2 c
I Q) SPT
Q.
>,
I- z
z
ci
.J!J "'3: Q)
,S
Q.
VJ
2
-=0 Penetration Blows/6" Q)
Q.
-
Q)
Q.
Q)
.0
.0
ro
_J
VJ
Q) Description of Material -0
C
E
::,
.le,
Q) Q) 0:: Blows/ft (N) E E ::, I- ::,
0 VJ
0 ro I-
~ ro
(J)
(J) ~
(9 -'=
10 20 30 40
-29 -
60/4 ,ii D-24 GRANITE, grayish brown, coarse grained, completely
'1_ \
- I I I I (60) C-25 weathered, very weak rock, HCI reaction not tested.
\
I // I I I I
I I I I Discontinuities are very widely spaced and in very poor
'1_ \ - I I I I condition.
\
I //
'1_ \ - I I I I No Recovery
\
I // I I I I
'1_ \ - I I I I
-30 \ I I I I -
//
I I I I I
'1_ \
- I I I I
\
I // I I I I
'1_ \ - I I I I
100-
\ I I I I >>~ ~ 75/4 :: D-26 GRANITE, yellowish orange, coarse grained, completely
-
//
I I I I I (75) C-27 weathered, very weak rock.
'1_ \ - I I I I ROD Length Recovered 0.3 ft, Length Retained 0.3 ft
\
I // I I I I 0
I I I I
-31 '1_ \ - I I I I
FF -
\
// 26 GRANITE, yellowish gray, coarse grained, highly
I I I I I weathered, very weak rock, HCI reaction not tested.
'1_ \ - I I I I
Discontinuities are very widely spaced and in very poor
\
I // I I I I
condition. (Note water table in casing before bailing hole
I I I I
'1_ \ - I I I I is 7.0', bailed hole to 88.0' bailer lost in hole. Over night
\
I //
I I I I reading is 68.9'., Percent Recovered 1.7%
'1_ \ - I I I I
\
// I I I I
105- -32 I
I I I I
--
'1_ \ - I I I I
\
//
I I I I I
'1_ \
- I I I I
\ I I I
I // I
I I I I
'1_ \ - I I I I
\
I // I
I I I
'1_ \ - I I I I
-
-33 \
I I I I
I //
I I I I
'1_ \
-
I I I I
\
I //
I I I I
110-
'
I
\
- I I I I
f--
0
I I I I
t') I I I I
..J End of test hole boring at 11 Oft below ground elevation .
0 I I I I
(f)
...., I I I I
0.. -34 I I I I This is a summary Log of Test Boring. Soil/Rock -
t')
..J I I I I descriptions are derived from visual field identifications
w and laboratory test data.
z I I I I
z
~
I I I I
t') I I I I
z I I I I
ui
(f)
0 I I I I
0::
(.) I I I I
0:: I I I I
~ -35 I I I I -
0 115- I-
0:: I I I I
0::
u. I I I I
(f)
z I I I I
a)
I I I I
~
__J
I I I I
(f)
z I I I I
.,;
m
I I I I
<')
I I I I
O'.
(f) -36 I I I I -
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
__J
I I I I
0
(f) I I I I
~
120
Department of Transportation Start Card _R_-_6_5_90_2_ __
HOLE No. RR-4-04

Sheet _1_ of _6_
Start July 13, 2004 Completion July 14, 2004 Well lD# __
A_H_N_-6_6_9_ _ _ _ __ Equipment CME 850 w/ auto hammer
Station LR 365+39.08 Offset 116.61' LT. Casing 6" X 15.0 & 4" x 135 Method Wet Rotary
Northing 620750 Easting 2823058 Latitude _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ Longitude _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __
County Spokane Subsection NE 1/4 of SW 1/4 1_5_

Section __ Range 43 EWM Township_2Q__
Q)
g I Standard a. d c
1-- zQ) z
Q) SPT >- d Q)
[i: Penetration .n .J!l E
£; ~ ro
a.
Q) .l!l e
0... Blows/ft
Blows/6" Q) - a. .n
a. E ::i
Q)
...J
V)
Q)
1--
Description of Material ::,
-t;
0
Q)
{N) E ro 1--
ro C
2:
en en ~
10 20 30 40
5
2 D-1 Poorly graded SAND, loose, brown, dry, Homogeneous,
(6)
2
0,
0
N
oi
lO
g
:,:
3
r 10
0 2 D-2 Poorly graded SAND, loose, brown, moist,
(!)
_j
0 3 Length Recovered 1.0 ft
(/)
-, (6)
a..
(!)
_j
w
z
z
f:'.
(!) 4
z
1ii
(/)
0
0::
u
0::
w
> 15
0
0:: 2 D-3 Poorly graded SAND, loose, brown, moist,
0::
lL 3 Homogeneous, HCI reaction not tested.
(/)
z 4 Length Recovered 1.0 ft
co
0 5 (7)
<(
....I
(/)
z
lO
0)
(')
Cl'.
(/)
0
N
N
~
....I
0
(/)
6 ..
20
Department of Transportation Start Card ~R~-6~5~9~0=2_ __
HOLE No. RR-4-04

Sheet _2_ of _6_
g Q)
Standard
SPT c
Q)
,6
a.
-=e Penetration
E
:,
.p
Q) 0.. Blows/ft en
0 (N) C
~10 20 30 40
I I
3 D-4 GS SP, M.C. = 19%
I I I I
I I I I
4 MC Poorly graded SAND, loose, brown, moist,
I I I I 4 Homogeneous, HCI reaction not tested.
I I I I (8) Length Recovered 1.0 ft
I I I I .
I I I
I I I
~7 I I I -•
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
~
25-
I'~ I I I 3 D-5 Poorly graded SAND, medium dense, brown, moist, t=
: : : : 6 Stratified, HCI reaction not tested, silt stratified. t=
I 1 1 1 6 Length Recovered 1.0 ft _ ,-
I I I I <12) -
I I I I t=
I I I I
I I I I t=
I I I I t=
I I I I
I I I I t=
I I I I
I ! I I _ t=
30-
I I I I ~ t=
I '• I I I 5 I D-6 Poorly graded SAND, medium dense, brown, moist,
: : : : 7 Homogeneous, HCI reaction not tested. t:
1 1 1 1
7 I Length Recovered 1.0 ft t=:
14
I I I I < )
I I I t=
I I I I
~10
I I l ! t=
I I I I :=
I I I I
I I I I =
I I I I
! I I l =
35- I I I ~ :::::
l I I I 5 , D-7 Well graded SAND with silt and gravel, dense, brown,
o
(.!)
I I I I 13 wet, Homogeneous, HCI reaction not tested. =
=
...J
0
(/) ~11 : : : : 17 Length Recovered 1.0 ft
-,
Cl.
(.!)
I I I I
3
< o) • t=
...J I I I I _
w
z
z I I I I =
~ I I I I
(.!) ! I l I t=
z
u5 I I I I :::::
(/)
0 I I I
0::
u I I I I _ t=::
~12
0:: I I I I t=
~ I I I I
0 40-
0:: I I I I 7 ' D-8 GS SP-SM, M.C. = 13%
0::
u.. I I I 9 MC Poorly graded SAND with silt and gravel, medium dense, t=::
: •:i= ·
(/)
za) I I I I 10 brown, wet, Homogeneous, HCI reaction not tested.
~
I I I I (17) I Length Recovered 1.0 ft ,: <=
...J I I I I ·.t··
(/)
z I I I ·.·~
UJ I I I I • 'f...-
0)
<') 1-13 1 I I I _ ••• ~
ci:
(/) ! I I l O ot:::
0
N
I I I I :<t: o o
N I I I : ~
~
0 0
I ! j I 0 °0 t= 0 0
6 I I I I ·.·:=
(/)L 45_L_ _____L~..a..Ll__J_
I _ _J_I_ _IL__ _L__l_~
... - - _ _ J _ L _ __ _L_ ___L_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ J____L·_._.•..bf..-cd_.'--J
Department of Transportation Start Card _R'---'-'-6"'5"'9""02,c_____
HOLE No. RR-4-04

Sheet _3_ of _6_
g Q)
Standard
SPT
c
Q)
,G ii=
0
Penetration
E
C.
Q) a: Blows/ft i:
0 (N) "'
.!::
10 20 30 40
I I
I I I I
18
' D-9 Well graded SAND with silt and gravel, dense, grey, wet, rYYY'
26 Homogeneous, HCI reaction not tested. -Y Y X X
I I I I y y y
'-14
w
22 Length Recovered 0.2 ft y y Xy
I I I I
I I I I {48) I
I I I I -y y Xy
I I I I
I I I I Y'xYr
y y y
I I I I
I I I I Wt'
I I I 1Y1}
I I I I _-Y1xY
'-15
'- w
I I I I y y y
I I I I 1-Y j y -y
50- I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
12 ~ I D-10 GS SW-SM, M.C. = 12%
16 MC Well graded SAND with silt and gravel, dense, brown, -y y -y l
I I I I X y y
I I I I
I I I I
(37) H Length Recovered 1.0 ft
IY Y 1 l
~
I I I I XXX
I I I I Y Y 1 1
'-16 I I I I XXX
IY Y Y 1
I I I Y 1 X
I I I IY Y Y 1
I I I I XXX
IY Y Y 1
I I I I 1 XX
IY Y Y ,
I I I I 1 XX
I I I I IY Y 1 i
55-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
12 H D-11 Well graded SAND with silt and gravel, dense, brown,
'-- 1XX
IY Y Y i
14 moist, Homogeneous, HCI reaction not tested. XX X
'--17 I I I I l Y1 1
12 Length Recovered 1.0 ft XXX
I I I I
I I I I
{26) H IY Y 1 Y
X1 X
I I I I IY Y Y 1
I I I X1 X
x Y1 Y
I I I I XXX
I I I I 1 Y 1 Y
I I I I XXX
1111
I I I I XX X
~18 I I I I 1 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - + _yyyy
Y XX
I I I I y y y y
I~~ I I I 1 X X
60-
I I I I
~ r r Y Y
f-
0 5
~' D-12
GS ML, M.C. = 27% -y y y
Cl I I I I 5 MC Sandy SILT, medium dense, brown, wet, Homogeneous, y y y y
....I -y y y
0 I I I I 8 HCI reaction not tested. y y y y
en I I I I
-,
a.
Cl
I I I I
{13) Length Recovered 1.0 ft YN;
y -y-y
....I I I I I X XY Y
w
I I I I - y y-y
w
z ~19
z
F I I I I
Cl I I I I
z I I I I
ui
en I I I I X XYY
0 y -y -y
O'.'.
u I I I I y y y y
O'.'.
~
0 65-
I
I ,
I I
I
I
I ._
N1Y
-y-y-y
O'.'. I I I 7 ~' D-13 Well graded SAND with silt, medium dense, brown, wet, y y y y
~
O'.'.
u.. ~20 I I I 9 Homogeneous, HCI reaction not tested.
en I I I 10
z Length Recovered 1.0 ft
ca
~
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
(19) H
....I
en I I I I X X X
z
U)
(J)
I I I I
(')
I I I I
O'.'.
en I I I I
I I I I
'-- 21 I I I I
I I I I
....I I I I I
0 70__1__ __l"_,'c".c'oL.J.,J__ _j__l_..1_l--4,..~I_ _L.....I_J___ __L__1__ _L....._ _J___ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ___L_-1...L.L_JL.i.J
en
Department of Transportation Start Card __._.R'---'-6=5=9=02=---
HOLE No. RR-4-04

Sheet _4_ of _6_
§: (J)
Standard
SPT c (J)
£ ii= Penetration
Blows/6"
E
a. 0 Description of Material _g
(J) [L Blows/ft VI
(N)
0 .s
10 20 30 40
1 1 1 1
5 I D-14 Silty SAND, dense, brown, wet, Stratified, HCI reaction tfil
11 not tested, stratified with well graded sand, traces of ~
1 1 1 1
1
I
1
I
1
I
1
I
15
(26)
I mica.
Length Recovered 1.0 ft
~1; Y
Y1
I I I I
~22 I I I I TYY
I I I I IY1Y1
I I I I TYX
I I I I 111}-
I I I I Y YY Y
I I I I TTY
I I I I "Jy-N
I I I I X XY Y
75-
~23
I
:
I
I
~~ : : 12
12
' D-15 GS
MC
SM, M.C. = 17%
Silty SAND, medium dense, brown, wet, Homogeneous,
- l@
- x x y y
1 : : : 12 I HCI reaction not tested, traces of mica. x\\\

1 1 1 1 (24) Length Recovered 1.0 ft y Ty
I I I I JyH
1
1
I I I X///
I I I 'fxxx
I I I I yyy
I I I I ~
~24 I I I I X X X X
I I I I YYY
I I 1 1 'fxxx
y y y
80- I I, I I .__ ~
I I ~ I I 12 ~I D-16 Silty SAND with gravel, dense, brown, wet,
I I I I 12 Homogeneous, HCI reaction not tested, traces of mica. Xy1//
: : 1 : 13 , I Length Recovered 1.0 ft ::<<Y:
I I I I ~~ ~ 111
~25 1 I I I _IX//y)
1 I I I IX X X X
I I I I YlY
I I I I X/T\X
I I I XXy X
I I I I YT T
I I I I \\\X
I I I I X X X X
f-
0
(!)
_,
85-
~25
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
1
I
I
1
•
~
35
50
I D-17 Silty SAND, very dense, yellowish brown, moist,
Homogeneous, HCI reaction not tested, traces of mica.
~
-
yyy
Trxx
1///
y y y
0 I I 1 1 (50) Length Recovered 0.5 ft 1 xx x

Cl)
..., I I I I yyy
a..
(!)
I I I I T r x1
_, y y y
w I I I I Y 1 x1
z I I I I yyy
z I I I I Y r X1
~ Xy y
(!)
z
I I I I T r x1
ui ~27 I I I I XYY
Cl)
0
a:
I I I I \ i/
1
u I I I I i)'. X X 1
a: I I I I 1/ //--x
~ I I I I >>•~ ~ y y y
90-
0
a:
a:
I I I I 70 [I D-18 Silty SAND, very dense, yellowish brown, moist, x x x 'f
u_ I I I I (70) Homogeneous, HCI reaction not tested, traces of mica. IXY / x1 x
Cl)
z I I I I Length Recovered O.4 ft Y Y Y
OJ
1 I I I 1xy1 x x
~
_, 1 I I I
71
x XX X
Cl) <-- 28
z I I I I Y 1 Y
"'
a,
I I I I IX/,//
<')
a: I I I I IX X1 X
Cl) I I I I YT Y
0 ~ '- I I I I \\\X
N
N
1
~ 1/ I I I I X X y X
_, '1 ,
- -
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
\
///x
yyy
0
Cl) 95__L_ ___J_\__:_I_1/__J__ _Ll_ __1i_ ___JI_ _Ll__.,._-,~~~~-___J_l___ _.L_ __J__ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _J___LLJ.Y_,__,_,Y
.,, ........ Washington State
LOG OF TEST BORING
1949.5 ft (594.2 m)
Start Card
HOLE No.
R-65902
RR-4-04
Job No XL-2201 SR 395 Elevation
Sheet_5_ of _6_
Q)
Standard d 2 c
g I Q)
ii= Penetration
SPT
C.
1-- zQ) z
>, d
.0 .l!l
en
"':;:: Q)
E
,S ~ Blows/6" ci.
Q)
Description of Material cl
C.
Q) 2Q) e
a.. Blows/ft t~ "'
....I
Q)
1--
C
::,
::,
.p
en
0 (N) E ro 1-- 0
:::a .E
10 20 30 40
"'
Cf)
Cf)~ (9
29 100 D-19 GRANITE, yellowish brown, coarse grained, completely

I
',_ \
-
(100) C-20 weathered, very weak rock, HCI reaction not tested.
I //
RQD Length Recovered 0.3 ft
I
',_ \ - 100 GRANITE, light olive grey, coarse grained, highly
I // FF weathered, very weak rock, HCI reaction not tested.
',_ \ - 0 Discontinuities are closely spaced and in fair condition.
I
//
Percent Recovered 100.0%
I
,_
' \
-
30 I
I //
',_ \ -
I
I //
100 ', _ \ -
I
//
RQD C-21 GRANITE, light olive grey, coarse grained, highly
I
90 weathered, very weak rock, HCI reaction not tested.
',_ \
FF Discontinuities are moderately spaced and in fair
I
//
I 0 condition. Percent Recovered 100.0%
31
I
',_ \
-
I //
', _ \ -
I
I //
',_ \ -
I
I //
', _ \ -
I
I //
105 32
', _ \ - RQD C-22 GRANITE, bluish-grey, coarse grained, moderately
I
//
90 weathered, moderately strong rock, HCI reaction not
I
FF tested. Discontinuities are moderately spaced and in fair
',_ \ - condition. Percent Recovered 100.0%
I
I //
', _ \ -
I
I //
33 I
',_ \
-
0 //
I
N
m
',_ \
-
I
"',;:
Q I //
110
',_ \ -
I
I-
0 I // RQD C-23 GRANITE, bluish-grey, coarse grained, slightly
(.!)
_j ',_ \ - 50 weathered, moderately strong rock, HCI reaction not
6
(J)
I
//
FF tested. Discontinuities are moderately spaced and in fair
I
-, 2 condition. Percent Recovered 100.0%
0..
(.!)
34 ', _ \ -
_j I
I //
w
z
z
::,
', _ \ -
I- I
I //
(.!)
z ',_ \ -
cii
(J) I
0 I //
O'.
(.)
O'.
',_ \
-
w I
35 I //
>
0 115
O'. ',_ \ - RQD C-24 GRANITE, bluish-grey, medium grained, slightly
O'. I
LL I // 98 weathered, strong rock, HCI reaction not tested.
(J)
z ',_ \ - FF Discontinuities are moderately spaced and in good
[O
condition. Percent Recovered 100.0%
~
I
I //
__J
(J)
z ', _ \
-
I
"'
0)
<')
I //
O'.
(J) 36
',_ \ -
I
I //
0
',_ \ -
;
N
I
I //
__J
6
(J)
',_ \
120
Department of Transportation Start Card R-65902
HOLE No. RR-4-04

Sheet _6_ of _6_
Q)
g Standard a. 6 $ c
I Q)
ii= Penetration
SPT >,
f- z z6
Q) .0 .!!l "';:: Q)
E
,S ~ Blows/6" Q)
Description of Material 'O
a.
Q) J!l
0
a: Blows/ft C. ni
E :o "'
_J
(/)
Q)
f-
C
:,
:,
.p
0
Q)
(N) E 0 (/)
2 "' f- .E
10 20 30 40
"'
ff) ff) - (9
~
I I I
",_ \ - ROD C-25 GRANITE, bluish-grey, medium grained, slightly
I I I I
I 95 weathered, strong rock, HCI reaction not tested.
I // I I I I
I FF Discontinuities are moderately spaced and in good
I I I
", _ \ - I I Y
m
-37 I I I I 1 condition. Percent Recovered 100.0%
I
I //
I I I I
",_ \ - I I I I
I I I I I
I // X X X X
I y y
x«
",_ - \
I I I I
I I I I I
I //
I I I I
",_ \ I y y
- I I I I X X XX
I I I
I // I I XYI
~33 I I I I - XX X X
125- ",_ \ - I I I I ~ f-
Xy y
I ROD C-26 GRANITE, bluish-grey, medium grained, fresh, strong
I //
I I I I 98 rock, HCI reaction not tested. Discontinuities are
Af'H
",_ \ - I I I I 1. J.. X X
Xy y
I FF moderately spaced and in excellent condition. Percent
I // I I I I l X X X
0 Recovered 100.0% XX X
I I I I
",_ \ - I I I I 1. 1. X X
I
I //
XXX
I I I I y X J.. 1.
", _ \ - I I I I XXX
-39 I X 1. J.. 1.
I // I I I I XXX
I I I I Y X X X
",_ \ - I I I I XXX
I
I //
X 1. X J..
I I I I X XX
",_ \ - I I I I X J.. J.. X
XXX
I
I // I I I I Y l X J..
130- I I I I
~ f-
XXX
", _ \ - I I I I
ROD C-27 GRANITE, bluish-grey, medium grained, fresh, strong X 1. X X
I 98 rock, HCI reaction not tested. Discontinuities are XXX
I //
I I I I FF moderately spaced and in excellent condition. Percent X J.. J.. X
-40 ", _ \ - I I I I _ XI X
I
0 Recovered 100.0% X J.. X J..
I // I I I I X XX
I I I I J.. J.. X J..
", _ \ - I I I I XXX
I
I
",_ \ -
//
I I I
I
I lfR
I I I
I
I // I I I I HH
X J.. X X
I I I I XX X
",_ \ -
t
o
(.')
135-
-41
I
"I
I
\
//
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-M
__j End of test hole boring at 135 ft below ground elevation.
5 I I I I
Cl)
-, descriptions are derived from visual field identifications
c..
(.')
I I I I
__j I I I I and laboratory test data.
w
z I I I I
z
~ -42 I I I I Bailed hole to 130 with no recharge -
(.') I I I I
z I I I I
iii
Cl)
0 I I I I WATER LEVEL READINGS
5 I I I I DATE DEPTH
O'. I I I I 8/17/04 dry
~ I I I I -
0 140-
O'. I I I I
O'.
u. I I I I
Cl)
z -43 I I I I -
co I I I I
~
...J
I I I I
Cl)
z I I I I
'1)
O>
I I I I
"' I I I I
O'.
Cl) I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
~44
I I I I -
...J I I I I
5
Cl) I I I I
145
Department of Transportation Start Card _S~-~2=3~98~4~-
HOLE No. RR-5-04

Sheet _1_ of _5_
Site Address Vicinity of Market Street and Piper Road Inspector Cleo andrews
Start July 15, 2004 Completion July 16, 2004 Well I D # - - - - - - - - - - Equipment CME 45 w/ autohammer
Station LR 367+04.82 Offset 18.89' LT. Casing HQ 3" ID x 115.0' Method Wet Rotary
County Spokane Subsection NE 1/4 of the SW 1/4 Section __1_5_ Range 43 EWM Township 29__
Ql
Standard d $ cQl
g I Ql SPT
Q.
>,
I- z zd ro
:;:
2<J)
£
Q.
~
2
-=
0
Penetration Blows/6" Ql
C.
Ql
-
Q.
Ql
.0
.0
ro
_J Ql Description of Material "O
C
E
~
Ql Ql ct Blows/ft (N) E E
ro I-
::i I- ::,
0
<J)
0 ro
~
Cf) Cf) - (9 -C
10 20 30 40
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
-1 I I I I -
I I I I
~·1 I I I
I I I I
3
3
H D-1 Poorly graded SAND, loose, brown, moist,
Homogeneous, HCI reaction not tested. Top surface
I I I I
5- 4 gravel from access road. 0.0' to 4.0' Poorly graded sand ~
I I I I
I I I I (7) H with some gravel as indicated by drilling and wash return.
I I I I 100% drilling fluid return.
-2 I I I I -
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
"'"' I I I I
0
0
N
sf
'2
0
~
N
-3
I
I
~·1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
3
4
,, D-2 Poorly graded SAND, loose, brown, moist,
Homogeneous, HCI reaction not tested, very little drilling
~-
10- 3 fluid loss.
I I I I
t
o
(9
__j
I I I I
(7) H Length Recovered 1.5 ft, Length Retained 1.0 ft
i5 I I I I
Cl)
-,
I I I I
a..
(9
I I I I
__j I I I I
w
z I I I I
z
F I I I I
(9 -4 I I I I -
z I I I I
OJ
Cl)
0 I I I I
~•1 I I I
0::
0
0:: I I I I
3
4
H D-3 Poorly graded SAND, with silt lens, loose, brown, moist,
Laminated, HCI reaction not tested.
~ I I I I
0 15- 4 Length Recovered 1.0 ft, Length Retained 1.0 ft -
0::
0::
LL.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
(8) H
Cl)
z I I I I
0)
-5 I I I I -
~
-'
I I I I
Cl)
z I I I I
I I I I
"'"'Q'.
0)
I I I I
Cf) I I I I
I I I I
I
~~
I I
~
I I I 3 D-4 GS SP, M.C. = 18%
-'
-6 I I I I 4 MC Poorly graded SAND, loose, brown, moist, -
i5
Cf) ~
20 l I I I
Department of Transportation Start Card ~S_-2_3_9_8_4~~
HOLE No. RR-5-04

Sheet~2~ of ~5~
Q)
g Standard cj ~
2ro c
I
Q.
SPT I- zQ) z
>, cj Q)
Q)
ii= Penetration ..0 .l!l 5 E
f; ~ Blows/6" a.
Q) ro "' Description of Material 'O :,
Q.
2Q)
0 a.~ ...J
Q) C .p
Q) ct Blows/ft E E ::i I- :,
-'"'=
(N) ro I- 0
0 :::, ro CJ)~
0
CJ)
10 20 30 40
,,
..
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
5
(9)
.x Homogeneous, HCI reaction not tested.
·····
.. .... \ I I I
... i1 I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
-7 I I I I -
I I I I
I I I I
lo I I I
I I I I 6
7
H D-5 Poorly graded SAND, with silt lens, medium dense,
brown, moist, Laminated, HCI reaction not tested.
I I I I
25- I I I I 7 Length Recovered 1.5 ft, Length Retained 1.0 ft -
I I I I (13) H
I I I I
f-8 I I I I -
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
.. I
I I I
I I I I
.. I I I I
.... 1~ ~ I I I
f-9 I I I I
5
5
H D-6 Poorly graded SAND, medium dense, brown, moist,
Homogeneous, HCI reaction not tested. -
I I I I
30- 7 Length Recovered 1.5 ft, Length Retained 1.0 ft -
I I I I
(12)
..
...
I
i
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
••
I I I
~-;-;--:-;: I I I
I I I I
e-10 I I I I -
(0
I I I I
"'0 I I I I
0 ......
N I I I I
~ I I I I
"Q ...... 3 H D-7 GS SM, M.C. = 19%
0
£:! I I I I 4 MC Silty SAND, loose, brown, moist, Stratified, HCI reaction
N
... .... I I I 4 -
35- not tested.
l
o ... .... I I I I (8) Length Recovered 1.5 ft, Length Retained 1.0 ft
(!)
_J
i5
(f) e-11
,.. ....
....
... .... ....
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
•• -
--,
n. ····· I I I I
(!)
_J .. I I I I
w
z . ...,_ .. I I I I
z t-'-'-'
~ I I I I
(!) I I I I
z I I I
ui
(f)
0
Cl'.
0
Cl'.
e-12
. . ..
.. I
I
I
:.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
9
9
H D-8 Well graded SAND with silt and gravel, medium dense,
brown, wet, Homogeneous, HCI reaction not tested.
-
ig I I I I
0 40- 13 Length Recovered 1.0 ft, Length Retained 1.0 ft f-
Cl'.
Cl'.
I
I
I
I
I I
I
(22) ~I
LL
(f)
z<l) I I I I
I I I I
~
_J
I I I I
(f)
z I I I I
.,; I I I
0)
-13 -
"' I I I I
ci:
(f)
..
.... ..
I I I I
0
N
N
.. I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
~
~
_J
i5
(f)
45
..
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I I
28
50/4
I D-9 Well graded SAND with silt and gravel, with silt lens,
subrounded, very dense, dark yellowish brown, moist,
Department of Transportation Start Card ~S~-2=3~9=8-"4_ __
HOLE No. RR-5-04

Sheet _3_ of _5_
<D
g Standard
SPT
n.
~
d
z
-
d
c<D
£ Penetration
Blows/6" ~ ~
Q)
.0
ro
.l!l
"' Description of Material
E
:,
Cl.
<D Blows/ft a. E -g _j ~ .p
<Fl
0 {N) E ro f-- C
~ en _..
10 20 30 40
(50) Laminated, HCI reaction not tested.
I I I
I I I Length Recovered 0.5 ft, Length Retained 0.5 ft
-14
I I I
I I I
I I I
I I I
I I I
I I
I I I
I I I
I I I
~15
I I I 19 ~ I D-10 GS SW-SM, M.C. = 10%
I I I 20 MC Well graded SAND with silt and gravel, subrounded,
50- I I I 17 dense, grayish brown, moist, Laminated, HCI reaction not '
I I I (37) H tested. Sand lens brownish orange in color.
I I I
I I
I I
I I I
~16
I I I
I I I
I I I
I I I
I I I
I I I
22 H D-11 Poorly graded SAND, with gravel, medium dense, grayish
14 brown, moist, Stratified, HCI reaction not tested,
I I I
55- 10 laminated with silty sand lens, brownish orange in color. '-
I I I
I I (24) H Length Recovered 1.5 ft, Length Retained 1.0 ft
~17 I I I
I I I
I I I
I I I
I I I
I I I
I I I
I I I
I I I
-18 I I I 12 , ' D-12 Silty SAND, with 0.3' of well graded sand with small
I I I I 6 gravel, loose, olive gray, moist, Stratified, HCI reaction
I I I I 4
60- not tested, change is from 64.0' to 64.3', traces of mica. -
l
o
(.')
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
{10) H Took moister can sample MC-12a from same depth,
__J
I I I I retained 0.3'.
i5
en I I I I Length Recovered 1.0 ft, Length Retained 1.0 ft
-,
CL
(.')
I I I I
__J I I I I
w
z ~19 I I I I
z
F'. I I I
(.') I I I I
z I I I I
uj
en I I I I
0
0::
0
I I I I 11 Poorly graded SAND, with 1" layer of silt, medium dense,
0:: I I I I ' D-13
13 dark brown, moist, Stratified, HCI reaction not tested,
~ I I I I 11
0 65- laminated with thin lenses of silty sand, traces of mica.
I I I I
0::
0::
LL
~20 I I I I
{24) I Length Recovered 1.5 ft, Length Retained 1.0 ft
-
en I I I I
z
O'.l
I I I I
~
__J
I I I I
en I I I
z
I I I
"'
(D
(')
I I I I
~
en I I I I
I I I I
'-21 I I I I
I I I I
--' I I I I
i5
en~ 70__J__ __ _ L _ ~ ~ " - - - _ _Il _ - _ LI __ _I _ J _I _ _ _ c _ _ _ c _ _ ~ - - _ _ J - " - - - _ J _ _ - - - - ' - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - L - - - ' - - - ~
HOLE No. RR-5-04

Sheet _4_ of _5_
Q)
g I Standard C. d c
Q) SPT ~ zQ) zd Q)
,S ~ ii= Penetration .0 ~Q) E

a. 2Q) e Blows/ft
Blows/6" Q)
0.
-
C.
Q)
.0
ro
...J
f-
Description of Material :::,
.le,
n..
~ ~
Q)
0 (N) E C"'
~ ro Cf)~
Cf)
10 20 30 40
22
0 0 0
?o? C)
0 0 0 13 0-14 Well graded GRAVEL with sand, with 0.2' of sandy silt,
75
?o? C)
18
25
subrounded, dense, grayish brown, moist, Stratified, HCI
reaction not tested, traces of decomposed granite, light
23 0 0 0 (43) gray in color, mica sand and brownish orange stain.
?o? C)
(Note refusal with HQ advancer at 76.5', switched over to
HQ coring at 75.5').
0 0 0 Length Recovered 1.2 ft, Length Retained 1.0 ft
?o? C)
C-15 Well graded SAND with gravel, yellowish orange in color,
very dense, gray, moist, Stratified, HCI reaction not
0 0 0
tested. 0.3' piece of Basalt.
Len th Recovered 1.0 ft Len th Retained 1.0 ft
24
80
43 0-16 Poorly graded SAND with silt, dense, yellowish orange,
32 moist, Stratified, HCI reaction not tested, with pieces of
50/2" basalt and granite gravel.
(50) C-17 Length Recovered 1.0 ft, Length Retained 1.0 ft
Well graded SAND with gravel, very dense, yellowish
25 orange, moist, Stratified, HCI reaction not tested. 0.3' of
basalt rock, gray in color,
(!) Length Recovered 1.0 ft, Length Retained 1.0 ft
"'
<D
0
N
:;:
'2
0
~
~
85
f-
0 26 15 0-18 Poorly graded SAND, dense, yellowish orange , moist,
(')
..J
19 Stratified, HCI reaction not tested. Pieces of basalt, gray
6
Cl)
22 in color.
...., (41) Length Recovered 1.5 ft, Length Retained 1.0 ft
a.. C-19
(')
..J
w
z
z
~
I
(')
z <ld I Silty SAND, medium dense, light gray, moist,
iii 27 .·f> I>.
Cl)
I Homogeneous, HCI reaction not tested.
0
0::
0 I Len th Recovered 0.3 ft Len th Retained 0.3 ft
0::
w
I
>
0 90
I
0:: I 11 0-20 Silty SAND, with Volcanic Ash, medium dense, yellowish
0::
LL
I 7 orange, moist, Stratified, HCI reaction not tested.
Cl)
z I 12 Changed to Basalt Rock at 92.0'.
ca I
() (19) Length Recovered 0.3 ft, Length Retained 0.3 ft
<t:
_J
I ROD C-21
Cl) 28
z I 60
I Basalt, gray, fine grained, slightly weathered, strong rock,
"'"'
(')
I
FF
HCI reaction not tested. Very little drilling fluid loss.
~
Cl) I Percent Recovered 71.0%
0 I
N
N I.
~ I
_J
I
6
Cl)
95
Department of Transportation Start Card _S~-2=3=9~8~4~~
HOLE No. RR-5-04

Sheet~5~ of ~5~
(I)
g I Standard 0. d $ c
SPT I- zQ) z
Q)
>, d ro Q)
<i= Penetration ..0 .l!l :,: E
f; ~ Blows/6" ci ro VJ
D- i
Q) "O
0. 2 ...J
Q) C
:::,
.p
Q) CL Blows/ft E E :::, I- :::,
VJ
(N)
0
"*
;;e ro ro
en en
I-
~
0
(9 -'=
,'
10 20.... 30 40
1---29 ..... I I I I
9 D-22 Silty SAND, with Volcanic Ash, medium dense, yellowish -
I I I I
10 orange, wet, Stratified, HCI reaction not tested.
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I (23) ~
I I I I ROD C-23 -
~ 38
~ I I I Basalt, dark gray, fine grained, fresh, strong rock, HCI
~
)-
I I I FF
)-
3 reaction not tested. Percent Recovered 71.0%
~)- ) - I I I I
1---30
)-
)-)-)-
I I I I -
)- )- I I I I
~~
- I I I I
I I I I
'>-<>->- I I I I
100- ~~- I I I I 9 D-24 Poorly graded SAND, with 1" layer of silty Sand, dense,
I I I I 10 grayish brown, moist, Stratified, HCI reaction not tested.
I I I I 28 Length Recovered 1.5 ft, Length Retained 1.0 ft
I I I I
(38)
1---31 I I I I -
ROD C-25
I I I I
I I I 0
)- ,_
'c----'-'
I I I I FF
)-
)-
)-
I I I I 26 Basalt, highly fractured, dark gray, fine grained, slightly
)-
)- )-
I I I I weathered, strong rock, HCI reaction not tested. Percent
;-,~ ~.
)-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Recovered 85.0%
I I I I
.... ... I I I ,_ _
105- 1---32 I I I
.... 1 D-26 Silty SAND, with pieces of basalt rock, medium dense,
I I I I 7 yellowish orange, moist, Stratified, HCI reaction not
- I I I I 12 tested.
I I I I (19) Length Recovered 1.5 ft, Length Retained 1.0 ft
... I I I ROD C-27
.. I I I I 0
.....
I I I I
I I I I
FF
~:
- 26
(0
I I I
"'
(0 -33 I I I I Basalt, highly fractured, gray, fine grained, slightly -
0
N I I I I weathered, strong rock, HCI reaction not tested. Percent
-
st
g .. I I I I ,Recovered 85.0% r
0
~
... , I I I I
....
N
I I I I
110- ....
I >>O 55/4
-
l
o I I I ! D-28 Silty SAND, very dense, orange, moist, Homogeneous,
Cl
--'
6
en
--,
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
(55) HCI reaction not tested.
Lenath Recovered 0.4 ft Lenath Retained 0.4 ft r
tl. -34 I I I I -
Cl
--' I I I I End of test hole boring at 110.4 ft below ground elevation.
w
z I I I I This is a summary Log of Test Boring. Soil/Rock
z
~
Cl I I I I and laboratory test data.
z I. I I I
cii
en I I I I Water table in casing before bailing is 12.8', pulled 5.0' of
0
Cl'.
0 I I I I casing bailed hole to 106.0', water table after 15 minutes
Cl'. I I I I is 106.2'. (Dry hole) Ended and abandoned test boring
~ -35 I I I I at 110.4' below ground elevation. 7/17/04. -
0 115- -
Cl'. I I I I
Cl'.
LL
I I I I
en I I I I
z
~--'
I I I I
I I I I
en I I I I
z
I I I I
I I I I
f-36 I I I I -
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
--' I I I I
6 I I I I
en 120
Department of Transportation Start Card ~S~-2=3~9~8~4_ __
HOLE No. RR-6-04

Sheet _1_ of _5_
start July 17, 2004 Completion July 18, 2004 Well ID# Equipment CME 850 w/ autohammer
Station LR 369+20.01 Offset 36.14' RT. Casing 4" X 100.0 Method Wet Rotary
Northing 621127 Easting 2823208 Latitude Longitude
County Spokane Subsection NE 1/4 of SW 1/4 Section 15 Range 43EWM Township _2g___
g I a,
Standard
SPT f-
a,
Cl.
>,
ci
z zci
- .n J!J
$
ro
;::
ca,
f; ~ ii= Penetration a, a,
ro VJ "O E
0 Blows/6" - a,
.n a, Description of Material C
::,
$ ci Cl.
Cl.
Ql
0
0) a:: Blows/ft
(N) E E ::,
ro f-
..J
f- ::,
a
.le,
VJ
~ ro (/) ~ (9 .E
(/)
10 20 30 40
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
~1 I I I I -
I I I I
1~ I I I
I I I I
4 ~ D-1 Poorly graded SAND, loose, brown, dry, Homogeneous,
I I
I
5-
I I I
6 Length Recovered 1.0 ft ~
I I I (11) ~
I I I
I I I I
-2 I I I I -
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
-3
~•1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
2
3
, D-2 Poorly graded SAND, loose, brown, dry, Homogeneous,
HCI reaction not tested.
-
10- 4 Length Recovered 1.0 ft ~
l I I I I
o
(9 I I I I
(7) ~
..J
6 I I I I
en I I I I
-,
!l.
(9
I I I I
..J
w
I I I I
z I I I I
z
~ I I I I
(9 -4 I I I I -
z I I I I
en
,'
en I I I I
0
ex:
u ~·1 I I I 2 D-3 GS SP, M.C. = 10%
ex: I I I I 3 MC Poorly graded SAND, loose, brown, dry, Homogeneous,
~ I I I I
0 15- 4 HCI reaction not tested. ~
ex:
ex:
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
(7) ~~ Length Recovered 1.0 ft
lL
en I I I I
z
[O
-5 I I I I -
~
...J
I I I
en I I I
z
I I I
"'"'c,:
(')
I I I I
en I I I I
0 I I I I
N
N
lo I I I
~
~
I I I I 3 D-4 Poorly graded SAND, medium dense, brown, dry,
...J
-6 I I I I 5 Homogeneous, HCI reaction not tested. -
6 I I I I
en ~
20
Department of Transportation Start Card _S=-~2c"'3=98"'-4.,______
HOLE No. RR-6-04

Sheet _2_ of _5_
g Q)
Standard
SPT cQ)
£i ii= Penetration
E
0.
Q)
0
0::: Blows/ft
_g
<J)
0 (N)
E
10 20 30 40
I I I I
(12)
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
-7 I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I ~~ I I I
5 D-5 Poorly graded SAND, medium dense, brown, dry,
I I I I
25- I I I I 7 Length Recovered 1.0 ft
I I I I (15)
I I I I
-8 I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I •• I I I 7 D-6 Poorly graded SAND, medium dense, brown, dry,
I I I I
I I I I
30- 7 Length Recovered 1.0 ft
I I I I
(14)
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
~10 I I I I
,._ I I I I
UJ
(0
0 I I I I
N I I I I
I I I 8 GS SP-SM, M.C. = 20%
I I I ~' D-7
8 MC Poorly graded SAND with silt, medium dense, brown, wet,
I I I I 11
35- Homogeneous, HCI reaction not tested.
l
o I I I I
(!) I I I I
...J
i5 I I I I
Cl) -11
-,
I I I I
!l..
(!)
I I I I
...J .... .. '"';" I I I I
w
z I I I I
z
F' I I I I
(!) .1 I I I
z I I I I
cij
Cl)
0 I I I
Cl'.
0
Cl'.
~12
I
I
I
I
u I
I
11 H D-8 GS SM, M.C. = 20%
13 MC Silty SAND, dense, brown, wet, Homogeneous, HCI
~ I I I
0 40- 17 reaction not tested.
Cl'. I I I I (30) Length Recovered 0.2 ft
Cl'.
u.. I I I I
Cl)
za:, I I I I
I I I I
~
...J
I I I I
Cl)
z I I I I
UJ
a,
I I I I
<') '--13 I I I I
Cl'.
Cl) I I I I
0 I I I I
N
N
'' I I ~ I I
I I I I 12 l,r D-9 Well graded SAND with silt and gravel, dense, brown,
...J
i5
Cl)
''
45__.l__ _l,,__°_,,.'.1.:.,L:.L__
I
_Jl_
I i' I 14
_j_l~__JLll~___t_l~_1__ ____i.a1111L_
IA. ___JL_____
wet, Homogeneous, HCI reaction not tested .
____l~----~-------------__[__----'------'
HOLE No. RR-6-04

Sheet_3_ of _5_
g a,
Standard SPT ca,
<i= Penetration .0 .El E
f; Blows/6" Description of Material
Q.
a,
0
ct Blows/ft
"' ~"'
....J
::,
.p
0 (N) "'
C
10 20 30 40
I
I
I
I
\
I
I
I
I
14
(28)
.x Length Recovered 0.8 ft
~14
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I +1
~15
I I I I 16 ~ D-10 GS SW-SM, M.C. = 12%
I I I I 18 MC Well graded SAND with silt, dense, brown, wet,
50- I I I I 18 Homogeneous, HCI reaction not tested.
I I I I (36) Length Recovered 1.0 ft
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
~15 I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I
I I •• I 12 ~ D-11 Well graded SAND with silt and gravel, dense, brown,
I I I
15 wet, Homogeneous, HCI reaction not tested.
I I I
I I I
(30)
I I I I
'-17 I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
'-18 I I ~~I I , D-12
10 Silty SAND with silt and gravel, dense, brown, wet,
I I I I 16
60- Length Recovered 1.0 ft
l I I I I
o
(.')
_J
6
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
(28)
•
(/)
..., I I I I
Cl.
(.')
I I I I
_J I I I
w
z -19 I I I
z
~
I I I
(.') I I I
z I I I I
1ii
(/)
0
I I I I
er: O
u I I I 10 ~ D-13 GS SM, M.C. = 16%
er: I I I I 13 MC Silty SAND, dense, brown, moist, Homogeneous, HCI
~ I I I I 18
0 65- reaction not tested.
er: I I I I (31) Length Recovered 1.0 ft
er: '-20 I I I I
u..
(/)
z I I I I
co I I I I
~
_J
I I I I
(/)
z I I I I
I I I I
"'
0,
"'oc I I I I
(/) I I I I
~ I I I I
~
-
; ~21 :I 1:11II ,\: 7 D-14 GS SM, M.C. = 16%
_Jo
(/) L _L_ _..._L_,LCL_.LL__ _j____-1._ - - 1_ __L\..__
1 1
_L____17___..,_____ _L__M_c_ _L___s_i_lty_S_A_N_D_,_d_e_ns_e_._b_ro_w_n_._w_e_t_,_s_tr_a_tif_ie_d_,_H_c_i_re_a_c_ti_o_n_ __L._ _.__~
70
HOLE No. RR-6-04

Sheet _4_ of _5_
g Q)
Standard
SPT c
Q)
ii= Penetration .c .l!l E
£ 0 Blows/6" ro "' Description of Material :,
0.
Q)
0
a: Blows/ft
(N)
...J ~ "t;
C
10 20 30 40
Uhl: i i i ii\ 19
(36)
!.I not tested, stratified w/ silt.
Length Recovered 1.0 ft
I I I
'! _ \ - I I I I
I I // I I I I
~22 '! _ \ - I I I I
I I //
I I I I
I I I I
'! _ \
- I I I I
I I // I I I I
' \ I I I I >>~• 18
1
~' D-15 GRANITE, reddish brown, coarse grained, completely
1 ~ 1~ I I I I
, , I I I I 28 weathered, very weak rock, Homogeneous, HCI reaction
75- 1 _ - I I I I 38 not tested.
-23 I I // I I I I (66) Length Recovered 1.0 ft -
'! _ , - I I I I
I I // I I I I
, , I I I I
I - - I I I I
I I // I I I I
',_ , - I I I I
I I // I I I I
, , I I I I
~24 ,_ - I I I I
I I
',_ , -
// I
I
I
I
I
I
I >>••
I
70
(70)
II D-16 GRANITE, reddish brown, coarse grained, completely
weathered, very weak rockHomogeneous, HCI reaction
I I // I I I I
80-
, , I I I I not tested.
1 _ - I I I I Length Recovered 0.5 ft
I I I I I
I
'! _ , -
//
I I I I RQD
- C-17 GRANITE, bluish-grey, medium grained, slightly
I I // I I I I 3 weathered, moderately strong rock, HCI reaction not
~25 , , I I I I FF tested. Discontinuities are widely spaced and in fair -
,_ - I I I I 4 condition. Percent Recovered 100.0%
I I // I I I I
.....
UJ
',_ , - I I I I
(!)
0 I I // I I I I
"'
st
, ,
1 _ -
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Q.
0
~
I I // I I I I
N
'! _ , - I I I I -
85-
1-- I I I I
0 ~25 I I // RQD C-18 GRANITE, bluish-grey, medium grained, slightly -
(!) , , I I I I 48 weathered, moderately strong rock, HCI reaction not
_J
i5
1 _ - I I I I FF tested. Discontinuities are moderately spaced and in fair
(/J
-,
I I // I I I I 2 condition .. Percent Recovered 100.0%
!l.
(!)
'1 , I I I I
_J
w 1 ~ 1~ I I I I
z , , I I I I
z 1 _ - I I I I
~
(!) I I // I I I I
z '! _ , - I I I I
ui
(/J
~27 -
0 I I // I I I I
n'.
0
, , I I I I
n'. I - I I I I
'!!0 90-
I ~ // I I I I
n'. '! _ , - I I I I RQD C-19 GRANITE, bluish-grey, medium grained, slightly
n'.
u.. I I // I I I I 94 weathered, strong rock, HCI reaction not tested.
(/J
z , , I I I I FF Discontinuities are moderately spaced and in good
m I I I I
I - 1 condition. Percent Recovered 100.0%
~
...J
I ~ // I I I I
'-28
(/J
z '! _ , - I I I I
U1
CJ)
I I // I I I I
"'n'. , , I I I I
(/J ,_ - I I I I
0 I I // I I I I
N
N 'I , - I I I I
I ~ // I I I I
...J
, , I I I I
6
(/J __1__ ___r__1_1~=.L_ _ .L_l_ _j_l_ ___jl_ _L__I_.L__ __.__.___ _L___ _.L__ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _----'---'-------'
95
Department of Transportation Start Card _S=---"-2,..,,3"'9.---8__,_4_ __
HOLE No. RR-6-04

Sheet _5_ of _5_
g Standard
SPT
c
Q)
Penetration .n
ro 2.,, E
£
D.
Q) Blows/ft
Blows/6"
(N)
...J ~
.s
VI
0 C
10 20 30 40
~29 I I I I
'I \
- I I I I
RQD C-20 GRANITE, bluish-grey, medium grained, slightly
52 weathered, strong rock, HCI reaction not tested.
\ ~ // I I I I
FF
I I I I Discontinuities are moderately spaced and in good
'
I
\ -
2 condition. Percent Recovered 100.0%
I I I I
\ ~ //
I I I I
'I \
- I I I I
\ ~ // I I I I
'1 _ \ - I I I I
~30 I I I I -
\ I //
I I I I
'! _ \ - I I I I
\ I // I I I I
' \
I I I I
100- I I I I
I I I I
~31
I I I I
I I I I Bailed hole to 70.0 and after 24 hours WT @ 75.0
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
105-~32
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
~33 I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
110-
l
o I I I I
(') I I I I
.J
6 I I I I
en I I I I
-, -
0.. ~34 I I I I
(')
.J I I I I
w
z I I I I
z
~ I I I I
(') I I I I
z I I I I
iii
en I I I I
0
Cl:'.
()
I I I I
Cl:'. I I I I
~ 115- - 35 I I I I
0
Cl:'. 'I I I I
Cl:'.
u. I I I I
en I I I I
z
"' I I I I
;;! I I I I
.J
en I I I I
z
U)
O>
I I I I
(<)
(l'.'.
I I I I
en -36 I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
.J I I I I
6
en~ 120_L_ _....L_ _l___ __LI_ __Ll_ ___.1_l_ __1l_ __1_ _____J~L__-__c__ __[__ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ , _ _ - - - ' - - - - - - - '
Department of Transportation Start Card _R_-6_5_9_02_ __
HOLE No. RR-7-04

Sheet_1_ of _4_
Start July 17, 2004 Completion July 17, 2004 Well lD# __
A_H_N_-6_7_0_ _ _ _ __ Equipment CME 45 w/ autohammer
Station LR 370+96.89 Offset 95.27' RT. Casing (HWT 4" ID x 12.0')(HQ 3" ID xrvlrull~ _W_e_tR_o_t_ar-"-y_ _ _ _ __
County Spokane Subsection NE 1/4 of the SW 1/4 Section __1_5_ Range 43 EWM Township 26._
0)
Standard d
g I 0) SPT
Q.
>,
I- z zd .l!l
C
0)
£ ~ ii= Penetration Blows/6"

0) .0
ro Description of Material E
20)
0 ~ Q. 0)
"'
0) :::,
Q.
0) n:: Blows/ft (N)
Q.
E E
ro
.0
:::,
....I
I- .le,
"'
0 :;:; ro
Cf)
Cf) !:::. C
10 20 30 40
4 D-1 Poorly graded SAND, loose, brown, moist,

5 Homogeneous, HCI reaction not tested. Top surface
5 5 crushed rock from RR access road. 0.0' to 4.0' Poorly
(10) graded Sand with gravel as indicated by drilling and wash
return. 100% drilling fluid return.
2
00
U)
(0
0
N
sf
,;::, 3 D-2 Poorly graded SAND, loose, brown, moist,
0
£:' 3 Homogeneous, HCI reaction not tested, very little drilling
N
3 4
I-
10 fluid loss.
0
(9
__j
i5
Cl)
,
Q.
(9
__j
w
z
z
:::,
I-
(9
z 4
en
Cl)
0
n'.
0 3 D-3 GS SP, M.C. = 21%
n'. MC
w 2 Poorly graded SAND, very loose, brown, moist,
> 2
0 15 Homogeneous, HCI reaction not tested.
n'. (4)
n'. Length Recovered 1.0 ft, Length Retained 1.0 ft
u..
Cl)
z
'°() 5
<(
....I
Cl)
z
.,;
0)
"'
[(
Cl)
0
N
N
,t 5 D-4 Poorly graded SAND, with silty sand lense of, loose,
....I
i5 6 5 brown, moist, Laminated,Fissured, HCI reaction not
Cl)
20
Department of Transportation Start Card ~R~-6~5~9~0_2~-
HOLE No. RR-7-04

Job No XL-2201 SR 395 Elevation 1948.8 ft (594.0 m}
Sheet _2_ of _4_
Project NSLAC-BNSF RR Over Crossing Tunnel Driller Kerry Cooper Uc# 2552
Q)
g I Q)
Standard
SPT
0.
>,
ci
z zci c
Q)
1-- $l
['! ii= Penetration Q) .n E
£ n. i "' 1--"'
Q)
0 Blows/6" Q) Description of Material :,
0. .Bl ci. _J .la
Q)
0
Q) ct Blows/ft
(N) E E :,
"'C
2: "' 1--
10 20 30 40
"'
(/)
(/) ~
4 tested.
5 D-5 Poorly graded SAND, medium dense, brown, moist,

6 Stratified, HCI reaction not tested, traces of root hairs,
25 9 very little drilling fluid loss. With 0.3' layer of silt (
(15) volcanic ash ), very fine grained, pinkish brown in color.
8
4 D-6 GS SM, M.C. = 21%

9 5 MC Silty SAND, loose, brown, moist, Homogeneous, HCI
30 4 reaction not tested.
OJ
10
..
"'0
0
N
'¢
Q
0
7 D-7 Well graded SAND with silt and gravel, with 1" layer of
£::I 13 silty sand, dense, grayish brown, moist, Stratified, HCI
~
1--
35 15 reaction not tested
0
(.')
_j
0
(I) 11
...,
D..
0
_j
w
z
z
::,
1--
0
z
en
(I)
0
0::
u 12
14 D-8 GS SW-SM, M.C. = 13%
0:: 20 MC Well graded SAND with silt, dense, brownish gray, moist,
~
0 40 20 Homogeneous, HCI reaction not tested
0:: (40) Length Recovered 1.5 ft, Length Retained 1.0 ft
0::
Li.
(I)
z
w
u
<(
...J
(I)
z
U)
'"
(<)
O'.
(I)
13
.. ..
0
N
N
~
.. .. >>
32 D-9 Well graded SAND with silt and gravel, very dense,
...J
0
(I)
45
.. 37 brownish gray, moist, Homogeneous, HCI reaction not
Department of Transportation Start Card _R~-~6~5~9=02~-
HOLE No. RR-7-04

Sheet _3_ of _4_
(I)
g a. ci ~
2 c
I (I)
ij:
Standard
Penetration
SPT I- z(I) z
>, ci
.D .!!l "':;: (I)
E
£i ~ Blows/6" (I) 0. ~ VJ
Description of Material 'Cl
a. $ e
n. Blows/ft ci. "'
...J
(I)
I-
C
::,
::,
.p
(I)
0
(I)
(N) E E ::i 0 VJ
2: "' f )I- E
10 20 30 40
Cf)"'
C ~ (9
.. I I I
38
.x
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
(75)
tested.
Length Recovered 1.5 ft, Length Retained 1.0 ft .. -- . .
-14 -
I I I I c=
I I I I
I I I I c=
I I I I c=
.. .. I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I t=
I I I I
I I I I c=
-15 .... .. I
I
I
I
I
I
I >>~•
I 26 ~ D-10 GS SW-SM, M.C. = 12% - -
35 MC Well graded SAND with silt, very dense, brownish gray, t=
I I I I
50- I I I I 38 moist, Homogeneous, HCI reaction not tested. -
I I I I (73) Length Recovered 1.5 ft, Length Retained 1.0 ft c=
I I I I t=
I I I I
.. I I I I .. - . .
~
I I I I
c=
....- .. ..
I I I I
-16 -
I I I I • c-- •
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I ..·-·
- ..
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I >>~~ 38 D-11
.. -- . .
Well graded SAND with silt and gravel, very dense,
I I I I t=
44 brownish gray, moist, Laminated, HCI reaction not tested,
I I I I -
55- 40 silty Sand lens, brownish orange in color. c=
I I I I
I I I I (84) Length Recovered 1.5 ft, Length Retained 1.0 ft
-17 I I I I - c=
I I I I
I I I I t=
I I I I 'SJ_ t=
I I I I 07/21/2004
I I I I t=
I I I I
I I I I t=
I I I I .. c= .:.,
~r
-18 I I I I >>~ ~ 70/4 % D-12 Well graded SAND, very dense, yellowish orange, moist, X1 Y
I I I I (70) Homogeneous, HCI reaction not tested, (Material consists 1. 1. X 1.
l
o
60- ~~;__
'1_ \ -
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I RQD
~
C-13
decomposed GRANITE). Note refusal at 60.3' with
advancer, switched over to HQ core Barrel.
HQ{~ X1 X
1. 1. X X
XX X
(!) I I I I 48 X l 1. 1.
_j \
// I I I I Lenoth Recovered 0.3 ft Lenoth Retained 0.3 ft XXX
0 I FF GRANITE, pinkish gray, medium grained, slightly X X X 1.
(f)
-, '1_ \ - I I I I 5
weathered, strong rock, HCI reaction not tested.
XXX
CL \
//
I I I I 1 l X 1.
(!)
_j
I
I I I I Discontinuities are closely spaced and in good condition. XXX
w '1_ \ - 1 x x X
z -19 I I I I Percent Recovered 100.0% - XXX
z \
Y x x X
F I // I I I I
XXX
(!)
z
'1_ \ - I I I I 1 x x X
U)
\
//
I I I I XXX
I 1 x x X
(f)
I I I I
0
0:: '1_ \ -
I I I I
XXX
u \ X 1. 1. X
0:: I // I I I I XXX
~ Xx x X
0 65- '1_ \ - I I I I f-- I- XX X
0::
\
I // I I I I RQD C-14 GRANITE, light gray, coarse grained, fresh, strong rock, X X 1. l
0::
-20 I I I I 98 HCI reaction not tested. Discontinuities are closely XXX
LL.
(f)
z
'1_ \
-
I I I I FF spaced and in good condition. Percent Recovered
XXXX
XXX
\
Ol
I // I I I I 1 100.0% XXXX
~
_J '1_ \ - I I I I XY X
X1 XX
(f)
z \
I //
I I I I X1 Y
II) I I I I XXXX
0)
(') '1_ \
-
I I I I
X1 1
XXXX
Cl'. \
Xy y
(f) I // I I I I
XXXX
'1_ \ - I I I I X1 X
-21 \
I //
I I I I ~
- l XXX
I I I I
_J '1 _ \
-
I I I I
0 \
// I I I I
(f) I
70
Department of Transportation Start Card _R,_,_,-6=5=9=02=---
HOLE No. RR-7-04

Sheet _4_ of _4_
g Q)
Standard
SPT C
Q)
,S ii= Penetration
E
:::,
0
D.
Q)
0
a: Blows/ft
{N)
.p
U)
C
10 20 30 40
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
~22 I I I I and laboratory test data.
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I Water table in casing before bailing hole is 12.5', bailed
I I I I hole to 62.4', after 15 minutes delay water table stabilized
I I I I at 54.7. Installed and bailed piezo. Ended test boring at
I I I I 69.0' below ground elevation.
I I I I
75- I I I I WATER LEVEL READINGS
~23 I I I I DEPTH
-
DATE
I I I I
8/17/2004 dry
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
'-24 I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
80- I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
~25 I I I I -
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
85-
f-
0 ~26 I I I I -
0 I I I I
...J
6 I I I I
Cf)
-, I I I I
11.
0
I I I I
...J I I I I
w
z I I I I
z
F I I I I
0 I I I I
z I I I I
~ ~27 -
0 I I I I
o:'.
0
I I I I
o:'. I I I I
~ I I I I
o 90-
o:'. I I I I
o:'.
lL
I I I I
Cf)
za:, I I I I
I I I I
~ I I I I
...J ~28
Cf)
z I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
-' I I I I
6
Cf)~ 95_j__ __L_ _L __ I
_[__ I
__L__ _ IL_ I
__j__ __L_ __ _ _ J _ L __ __j__ ___L_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _i . . _ _ L_ __
Department of Transportation Start Card _S.,,_--=2~3""98.,__4,_______
HOLE No. RR-8-04

Sheet _1_ of _5_
start July 16, 2004 Completion July 17, 2004 CME 850 w/ auto hammer
Well I D # - - - - - - - - - - Equipment
Station LR 372+93.92 Offset 103.86' RT. Casing 4"x110.5 Method Wet Rotary
County Spokane Subsection NE 1/4 of SW 1/4 Section _ _1_5_ Range 43 EWM Township 29._
g Q)
Standard
SPT c
Q)
ii= Penetration .0
ro
.l'l E
£
Cl.
Q)
0
ct Blows/ft
Blows/6"
(N)
_J ~
v, Description of Material
.s
<fl
0 C
10 20 30 40
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
•• I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
2
3
~ I D-1 Poorly graded SAND, loose, brown, dry, Homogeneous,
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I (6) H
I I I I
I I I I
~2 I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
0)
U) I I I I
(!)
0 I I I I
N I I I I
.;-
01 I I I GS SP, M.C. = 16%
"'
0
~
I I I I
3
3
~' D-2
MC Poorly graded SAND, loose, brown, dry, Homogeneous,
N
10- - 3 I I I I 4 HCI reaction not tested.
l
o I I I I
(.') I I I I
..J
6 I I I I
fl)
..., I I I I
a..
(.')
I I I I
..J I I I I
w
z I I I I
z
F I I I I
(.') -4 I I I I
z I I I I
ui
fl)
0 ~• I I I I
0::
t)
0::
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
2 ~ I D-3 Poorly graded SAND, loose, brown, dry, Homogeneous,
~ I I I I
0 15- 2 Length Recovered 1.0 ft
0:: I I I I (4)
0::
u. I I I I
fl)
z I I I I
<D
-5 I I I I
~
..J
I I I I
fl)
z I I I I
U)
0)
I I I I
"'a: I I I I
fl) I I I I
I I I I
.~ I I I I
I I I I 3 l'f'iD-4 Poorly graded SAND, loose, brown, dry, Homogeneous,
..J
6
fl)
~5 I
2o__J___ ___L_ _,__-"---'---l_---1I_
I I I 3 I~ HCI reaction not tested.
__Jlc_____J__l_-'-----_caa..,__ _,___ _c.L___ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _~ _ ~ - -
HOLE No. RR-8-04

Sheet~2~ of ~5~
Q)
Standard SPT cQ)
ii= Penetration .0 .l!l E
0 Blows/6" Description of Material ::,
~
"' V)
.p
ct Blows/ft (N)
...J
V)
C
10 20 30 40
I I I I
I I I I
3
(6)
.I. Length Recovered 1.0 ft
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I- 7 I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
OI I I I
I I I I
3 D-5 I GS ML, M.C. = 45%
I I I I 3 MC Sandy SILT, loose, brown, moist, Homogeneous, HCI
25- I I I I 3 reaction not tested.
I I I I (6) I Length Recovered 1.0 ft
I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
4 D-6H Poorly graded SAND, medium dense, brown, moist,
I I I I
I I I
I I I I (17) H
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
1--10 I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
~.
I I I I
I I '~ I 11 Well graded SAND with gravel, dense, brown, wet,
I I I ~' D-7
I I I I
1-- I I I I
0 (30)
(!) I I I I
...J
0 I I I I
Cf)
..., I I I I
a..
(!)
I I I I
...J I I I I
UJ
z I I I I
z
~ I I I I
(!) I I I I
z I I I I
Vi
Cf)
0 .. I I I I
5 I I ~~ I I 10 D-8H GS SW-SM, M.C. = 18% -
oc
~
0 40-
1--12
.. I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
11
15
MC Well graded SAND with silt, dense, brown, wet,
Homogeneous, HCI reaction not tested.
oc I I I I (26) Length Recovered 1.0 ft
oc I I I I
LL
Cf)
z I I I I
co I I I I
~
...J
I I I I
Cf)
z I I I I
'1)
a,
I I I I
(') 1--13 I I I I
ti:
Cf) I I I I
0 I I I I
N
N
I I ~~ I
I I I 9 D-9f'9 GS SW-SM, M.C. = 13%
...J
0
Cf)
<<: : I I I I 12 Ii. MC Well graded SAND with silt, dense, brown, wet,
45__j_~~_l__o_·__,·L,·c!.<·u_~__j_l~___-1l~__ull~___jl~___j~~___j......L _ _ _ _ ~ _ _ _ L ~ ~ _ _ _ L ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ _ _ J ' - - - - - - . . . _ L _ ~ _ _ _ . . . . . J
Department of Transportation Start Card _S"'-"-2"'3'-"9-"'8_,__4_ __
HOLE No. RR-8-04

Sheet_3_ of _5_
g Standard SPT
.El c
f;
0)
ii: Penetration .0 .l!l "'~ 0)
E
Cl.
0)
0
ct Blows/ft
Blows/6"
(N)
"'
...J ~
Vi Description of Material 'O
C
:,
0
.s
Vi
0 C
(9
10 20 30 40
I I II I
I I I I
I I I
'-14
I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I OI I
'-15
I I I I 12 D-10 Well graded SAND, dense, brown, wet, Homogeneous, -
I I I
50- I I I I 14 Length Recovered 1.0 ft
I I I I (28) I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
'-16 I I I I
I I I I
I I I
I I I I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
14 H D-11 Well graded SAND with gravel, dense, brown, wet,
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I (42) H
~17 -
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
"'"' I I I I
(!)
0 I I I I
N I I I I
~18 I I I I >>~~ 23
Well graded SAND with gravel, very dense, brown, wet,
I I I I , ' D-12
I I I I
I I I I
l
o
(') I I I I
(78) H
..J
6 I I I I
Cf)
-,
I I I I
fl_
(')
I I I I
I I I I
..J
w
z ~19
::_._;_:~ I I I I -
z 'I -
: : : :I;
~
\
-
I I I I
(') I I //
z
U)
Cf)
'
1 _
\
~ I I I
0 1
Cl:'.
u
1
1 / 1 1 1 1 15 GRANITE, reddish brown, coarse grained, completely
~' D-13
Cl:'. ~ _ '- I I I I 17 weathered, very weak rock.
~ I I // I I I I 24
0 65- Length Recovered 1.0 ft
, , I I I I
Cl:'.
Cl:'.
lL
~20 1 - - I I I I
(41) H
Cf) I I 1/ I I I I
z
OJ
~ _ '- I I I I
~
..J
I I // I I I I
Cf)
z , , I I I I
I - - I I I I
"'"' I I 1/ I I I I
"'
O'.
Cf)
~- '- I I I I
~ I I // I I I I
N ~ 21 , , I I I I, t
~ 1 -
1
1
- I I I I 12 ~ D-14 GRANITE, brown, coarse grained, completely weathered,
-' I / I I I I 18 very weak rock.
6
Cf)~ ' '
70-'-----"-~~L___ I
_L__ I
_J___ I
_ l __ I
_LL___J_ _ ___._L___ _ L_ ___,__ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _~ ~ - - -
Department of Transportation Start Card ~S~-2=3=9=8~4_ __
HOLE No. RR-8-04

Sheet _4_ of _5_
0) d
g 0)
ii=
Standard
Penetration
SPT i z ~ .0 .lB 1 ]i
E
£;
0.
0)
0
ct Blows/ft
Blows/6''
{N)
tE -*-E i:, ro
....J
"'
~
C
:,
0
:,
.),
V)
0 ro
(f)
co
(f)
C (9
C
10 20 30 40
~ '- I I I I (42)
1
~ 1/ I I I I
, , I I I I
1 - - I I I I
\ I 1/ I I I I
~22 ~ _'- I I I I
\ I // I I I I
, , I I I I
I - - I I I I
\ I 1/ I I I I
~- '- I I I I•~
10 D-15 GRANITE, brown, coarse grained, completely weathered,
\ I // I I I I
, , I I I I 15 very weak rock.
75- 1 - - I I I I 29 Length Recovered 1.0 ft
1 (44)
~23 \ I / I I I I
~ _'- I I I I
\ I // I I I I
, , I I I I
I - I I I I
~
1 1
/ I I I I
~ '- I I I I
1
~ 1/ I I I I
, , I I I I
~24 I - I I I I
~ 1/
1
~ _'-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I ••
I
18 J D-16 GRANITE, brown, coarse grained, completely weathered,
18 very weak rock.
\ I // I I I I
80- , , I I I I 30 Length Recovered 1.0 ft
1 - -
1/
I I I I {48) I
\ I I I I I
~ _'- I I I I
\ I // I I I I
~25 , , I I I I
\I~/~ : : : :
0)
U) ~ '- I I I I
(!)
0
1
~ 1/ I I I I
, , I I I I
"'
»~~
1
\ ~ /~ : : : : 11 ~' D-17 GRANITE, yellowish brown, coarse grained, completely
37 weathered, very weak rock.
'I ' - I I I I ~
85- Length Recovered 1.0 ft
f-
0 ~26
1
~ 1/ I I I 1 {7?)
(!) , , I I I 1
...J
0
1 - - I I I I
Cl) \ I
1/ I I I I
-,
<l.
(!) ~- '- I I I I
...J
w
\ I // I I I I
z , , I I I I
z 1 - - I I I I
F' \ I 1/ I I I I
(!)
z ~ '- I I I I
ci5 ~27
Cl)
0
1
~ 1/ I I I I
a: , , I I I I '
u 12 D-18 GRANITE, reddish brown, coarse grained, completely
a: I - - I I I I 19 weathered, very weak rock.
~ \ I
1/ I I I I
30
0 90- Length Recovered 1.0 ft
a: ~ '- I I I I (49)
a: 1
~ 1/ I I I I
LL
Cl)
z , , I I I I
[!l
I - - I I I I
~ \ I 1/ I I I I
...J ~28
Cl)
z ~ '- I I I I
U)
0)
1
~ 1/ I I I I
"'n'. , , I I I I
Cl)
1 - - I I I I
1
\ I / I I I I
'1 ' I I I I
I -I /-/ I I I I ~~"- 10 ~ D-19 GRANITE, reddish brown, coarse grained, completely
...J
0 , , I I I I 16 weathered, very weak rock .
Cl)
1 _:c-_-__,___J___1_.i1_---1I_ _L......l_
95__L_ ___L_:_ _l___ _ ~..,_-_J______ _ i_____ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ L_ _,___ ___,
Department of Transportation Start Card _S.,,._-__,,2=3=98,,_4.,____
HOLE No. RR-8-04

Sheet_5~ of _5~
Q) 6
g Standard
~ z ~
C
Q) SPT Q)
4= Penetration .c .l!l E
£
a.
Q)
a
a: Blows/ft
Blows/6''
(N)
tE 'E*- 25::i ro
....l ~
"' Description of Material ::,
.p
VI
0 ro ro t:, C
(J) (J)
10 20 30 40
~29 I I I I
'
!_
\
- I I I I
(45)
\ I // I I I I
'! _ \
I I I I
-
I I I I
\ I //
I I I I
'I \
- I I I I
\ ~ // I I I I
'I \
I I I I
-
I I I I
~30 \ ~ //
I I I I
'I \ I I I I >>i~
-
I 100 ~ D-20 Nb Recovery
\ ~ // I I I
I I I I (100) C-21 GRANITE, bluish-grey, coarse grained, slightly
100-
'I \
- I ROD weathered, moderately strong rock, HCI reaction not
I I I
\ ~ //
I I I I 0 tested. Discontinuities are moderately spaced and in
'I \
- I I I I FF C-22 poor condition, Percent Recovered 100.0%
\ ~ // I I I I 3 GRANITE, bluish-grey, medium grained, fresh, strong
'! _ I I I I ROD rock, HCI reaction not tested. Discontinuities are
~31 \
-
I I I I 98 moderately spaced and in excellent condition. Percent
\ I //
I I I I FF Recovered 100.0%
'1 _ \ - I I I I
\ I // I I I I
'! _ \ - I I I I
I I I I
\ I //
I I I I
'1 _ \ - I I I I
\ I // I I I I
105-~32
'I \
I I I I
-
I I I I
\ ~ //
I I I I ROD C-23 GRANITE, bluish-grey, medium grained, fresh, strong
'I \
- I I I I 98 rock, HCI reaction not tested. Discontinuities are
\ ~ // I I I I FF moderately spaced and in excellent condition. Percent
I I I I Recovered 100.0%
'! _ \ -
I I I I
\ I //
I I I I
'! _ \
- I I I I
~33
\ I // I I I I
'1 _ \ -
I I I I
I I I I
\ I ;/
I I I I
'! _ \ - I I I I
110-
1--
0
\ I // I I I I
(9
...J
6 I I I I
Cl)
--,
I I I I
a. ~34 I I I I
(9 End of test hole boring at 110.5 ft below ground elevation.
...J I I I I
w
z I I I I
z This is a summary Log of Test Boring. Soil/Rock
I I I I
~ descriptions are derived from visual field identifications
(9 I I I I
z and laboratory test data.
en I I I I
Cl)
0
I I I I
rt'.
0
I I I I
rt'. I I I I
~ 115- ~ 35 I I I I
0
rt'. I I I I
rt'.
u. I I I I
Cl)
z I I I I
co I I I I
~
...J
I I I I
Cl)
z I I I I
I I I I
"'
m
"' I I I I
O'.
Cl) -36 I I I I -
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
....J I I I I
6
Cl) 120-'---___L_--'-----'----1--"-l_-------1I_ _ _ _ _ J l ' - - - - - ' - - - - - L - - - - - L - - - ~ - - - ' - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ~ - ~ - -
Job No.
Hole No.
XL-2201
RR-1-04
Date
Sheet 1
July 29, 2004
of 1 Laboratory Summary 5........
r, Washington State
Project NSLAC-BNSF RR Over Crossing Tunnel
Depth Depth
(ft) (m)
Sample No. uses Color Description MC% LL PL Pl
• 9.0 2.74 D-2 SP POORLY GRADED SAND 20
III 39.0 11.89 D-8 SW-SM WELL-GRADED SAND with SILT and GRAVEL 9
US Sieve Opening In Inches US Sieve Numbers Hydrometer Analysis

I I
GRADATION FRACTIONS 3" 3/4" #4 #10 #40 #200
100 - ---......_
%Gravel %Sand %Fines Cc Cu
\ "1'
90 "
' [\
• 0.2 95.8 4.0 1.0 2.4
80
\ I\
III 38.9 56.0 5.1 1.6 17.7

70
"' ~1'
\
:E I\
Cl I\ ,
~
>,
60
\ I
Ill
ciiC: 50 I\
u::
c
Q)
e
40
I\ I\
\\
'I'-
GRADATION VALUES Q)
a..
30
D60 DSO D30 D20 D10

20
~ \
• 0.336 0.29 0.22 0.19 0.142

10
1'1'
1'1'1 r-.....
,~,
III 4.579 3.28 1.38 0.69 0.259 ""~
0 5 4 3 2 10 8 5 4 3 2 1 8 5 4 3 2 0.1 8 5 4 3 2 0.018 5 4 3 2 0.001
Grain Size In Millimeter

Sand
Gravel Silt and Clay
Coarse Medium Fine
Job No.
Hole No.
Project
XL-2201
RR-2-04
Date
Sheet 1
August 6, 2004
NSLAC-BNSF RR Over Crossing Tunnel

of 1 Laboratory Summary u
........
r, Washington State
Depth Depth
(ft) (m)
• 10.0 3.05 D-2 SP-SM POORLY GRADED SAND with SILT 16
lXl 30.0 9.14 D-6 SW-SM WELL-GRADED SAND with SILT and GRAVEL 13
... 45.0 13.72 D-9 ML SANDY SILT 23 49 28 21

I I
100
~r-r.
%Gravel %Sand %Fines Cc Cu 90
·~"
l's
\ \
\
• 0.0 93.7 6.3 1.0 4.3
80
I'\
f\
\
\ ~
lXl
...
20.2
0.0
72.6
46.0
7.1
54.0
1.5 16.5
:E
70 I\
'
I\
I\
I\
\
\ \
',
Cl
I\
~
>,
60
~
CJ \
m
c::
50
GRADATION VALUES
u:::
c
Q)
~
40 \\ I\
Q)
a..
30
/\
I\
I\ 1
D60 D50 D30 D20 D10 f\

I'\. \
20
~ la_
I'! 1'--
• 0.675 0.51 0.32 0.26 0.157
lXl 2.376
... 0.150
1.62 0.71 0.47 0.144
10
0 5 4 3 2 10 8 5 4 3 2 1 8 5 4 3 2
-
0.1 8 5 4 3 2 0.018 5 4 3 2 0.001

Sand I
Coarse Medium Fine
Job No.
Hole No.
Project
XL-2201
RR-3-04
Date
Sheet 1
August 6, 2004

of 1 Laboratory Summary ur,
~
Washington State
Depth Depth
(ft) (m)
III 29.0 8.84 D-6 ML SILT with SAND 50
... 44.0 13.41 D-9 SW-SM WELL-GRADED SAND with SILT 14
69.0 21.03 D-14 SW-SM WELL-GRADED SAND with SILT and GRAVEL 11
*
0 80.0 24.38 D-18 CL SANDY LEAN CLAY 18 34 19 15
GRADATION FRACTIONS
US Sieve Opening In Inches
I US Sieve Numbers
I Hydrometer Analysis
3" 3/4" #4 #10 #40 #200
100
'"' ~
-.......... -
r-., ~ rs
.... r---
•
%Gravel %Sand
0.0 96.4
%Fines
3.6
Cc
1.1
Cu
2.4
90
80
' ----
,..
'l's-
\
\ ,-....._
\
'~ '
III 0.0 16.2 83.8
70
"\ \\ ~~
... 6.1 88.5 5.4 1.3 7.6 :E
Cl \\
~
~
~
60
\ \ ~
18.7 72.6 8.8 1.4 19.3
* >,
co
0 11.1 36.5 52.4 ciiC: 50
u::
i::
~
Q) 40
\ \
!\
~
GRADATION VALUES Q)
a.
30
\
\
\
\
I\ \
•
D60
0.311
D50
0.27
D30
0.21
D20
0.18
D10
0.129
20
10
\
\, ""'" ~
' f".... ......
"
III ~:::
... 1.625 1.21 0.67 0.50 0.215

0 5 4 3 2 10 8 5 4 3 2 1 8 5 4 3 2 0.1 8 5 4 3 2 0.018 5 4 3 2 0.001

1.696 1.09 0.45 0.24 0.088
* Sand
0 0.183 Gravel Silt and Clay
Coarse Medium Fine
Job No.
Hole No.
Project
XL-2201
RR-4-04
Date
Sheet 1
August 6, 2004

of 1 Laboratory Summary vr,
~
Washington State
Depth Depth
(ft) (m)
III 40.0 12.19 D-8 SP-SM POORLY GRADED SAND with SILT and GRAVEL 13
.... 50.0 15.24 D-10 SW-SM WELL-GRADED SAND with SILT and GRAVEL 12
60.0 18.29 D-12 ML SANDY SILT 27

*
0 75.0 22.86 D-15 SM SILTY SAND 17
US Sieve Opening In Inches I US Sieve Numbers

GRADATION FRACTIONS
100
3"
- 3/4" #4 #10 #40 #200
•
%Gravel %Sand
0.0 96.6
%Fines
3.4
Cc
1.0
Cu
3.3
90
80
~ "', "' .....
'\
'\
i-..... ~
['\
\ "'"" \
\
"\ )...
I\ \ \
C
III 31.7 63.1 5.2 5.7 16.1
70
I\ '\ \
.... 15.5 77.1 7.4 1.5 15.8 :E
Cl
\ \ ~
0.1 45.9 54.0 I 60 \
*
0 8.2 79.1 12.6 m
>,
Ill
50
\
\
\ '\
\
C:
u::: \I\ [\
1::
Q) 40
\
[::: \
GRADATION VALUES Q)
Cl.
'\ \ '\
[\ I\.
30 \
\
~
D60 D50 D30 D20 D10 \ ['\
I\. ~
• 0.874 0.71 0.47 0.36 0.263
20
r-- -r--
H~
~~
~
10
III 4.119 3.47 2.46 2.07 0.256 • 1we-...:
~
.... 1.965 1.33 0.61 0.40 0.124

0 5 4 3 2 10 8 5 4 3 2 1 8 5 4 3 2 0.1 8 5 4 3 2 0.018 5 4 3 2 0.001

0.084
* Sand
0 0.955 0.64 0.26 0.15 Gravel Silt and Clay
Coarse Medium Fine
Job No.
Hole No.
XL-2201
RR-5-04
Date
Sheet 1
August 6, 2004
of 1 Laboratory Summary 5r,
..ia...
Washington State
Depth Depth
(ft) (m)
III 34.0 10.36 D-7 SM SILTY SAND 19
.... 49.0 14.94 D-10 SW-SM WELL-GRADED SAND with SILT and GRAVEL 10

I I
100
r--- -- a...., \
•
%Gravel %Sand
0.0 97.0
%Fines
3.0
Cc
0.8
Cu
3.2
90
80 ' ~
1-s,,
c\\
'-...
III
....
2.8
33.0
84.6
60.0
12.7
7.0 1.5 25.8 :E

Cl
70
\
"''
,~
\
~
\
60
>,
co
\
~ 50
\ ~\
C:
u:: \
C:
<I) 40
\ '\
~
~
GRADATION VALUES <I)
a.
30
\ \
\
'
D60 D50 D30 D20 D10 ' ',
20
.............. ,,
• 0.706 0.54 0.35 0.29 0.219
10
~ ....
III 0.635 0.43 0.20 0.11 "-._:
0
.... 3.685 2.56 0.89 0.49 0.143 5 4 3 2 10 8 5 4 3 2 1 8 5 4 3 2 0.1 8 5 4 3 2 0.018 5 4 3 2 0.001

Sand
Coarse Medium Fine
Job No.
Hole No.
XL-2201
RR-6-04
Date
Sheet 1
August 6, 2004
of 2 Laboratory Summary 5.......
r, Washington State
Depth Depth
(ft) (m)
III 34.0 10.36 D-7 SP-SM POORLY GRADED SAND with SILT 20
.A. 39.0 11.89 D-8 SM SILTY SAND 20
14.94 D-10 SW-SM WELL-GRADED SAND with SILT

* 49.0 12
0 64.0 19.51 D-13 SM SILTY SAND 16
GRADATION FRACTIONS
US Sieve Opening In Inches
I US Sieve Numbers
3" 3/4" #4 #10 #40 #200
100 -~ I::~r:- .... ,-......
r--
~
ti. ~ ~
I'"
" i\[\ r--,
• 0.1 94.9 5.0 0.8 3.4 \ I\

~\ f\ ' I' '\
80
\
I\\ l
I\\
III 7.9 83.6 8.5 0.9 11.9 '\
!)
70 \
... 3.5 53.2 43.3 :E
Ol
\~ 'I'\ \
'<ii \ l'l \
~ 60 '\ \ 'I'-
*
0
12.0
0.7
80.7
80.4
7.3
18.9
1.6 15.0 >-
al
~
C:
50
\ '\
'\
'\
[\
!\ \\ ~
u::
c
Cl)
~
40 \ I\
I\
GRADATION VALUES Cl)

a..
30
\
I\ \ \
D60 D50 D30 D20 D10
\
I'\ \~ ~
I\
20
• 0.650 0.48 0.32 0.27 0.190

10
"'\ ~
III 1.092 0.68 0.31 0.22 0.092 -.-=: 1--
... 0.376 0.12

0 5 4 3 2 10 8 5 4 3 2 1 8 5 4 3 2 0.1 8 5 4 3 2 0.018 5 4 3 2 0.001
1.970 1.36 0.64 0.44 0.131
* Sand
0 0.278 0.23 0.14 0.08 Gravel Silt and Clay
Coarse Medium Fine
Job No.
Hole No.
XL-2201
RR-6-04
Date
Sheet 2
August 6, 2004
of 2 Laboratory Summary 5r,
~
Washington State
Depth Depth
(ft) (m)
• 69.0 21.03 D-14 SM SILTY SAND 16

I I
100 --
-. ~
I'...
• 5.6 81.1 13.3

80
\ I
..... 70
\
..c:
I
0)
>,
60
\ \
co ~
aiC: 50 I\
u::: \
"E
Q) 40 \
~
GRADATION VALUES Q)
0. l
30
'\
D60 D50 D30 D20 D10
20
~ ..____
• 1.053 0.75 0.36 0.20
10
0 5 4 5 4 5 4 5 4 5 4
3 2 10 8 3 2 1 8 3 2 0.1 8 3 2 0.018 3 2 0.001

Sand
Coarse Medium Fine
Job No. XL-2201 Date August 6, 2004 .........
;a
Hole No.
Project
RR-7-04 Sheet 1
of 1 Laboratory Summary r, Washington State
Depth Depth
(ft) (m)
III 29.0 8.84 D-6 SM SILTY SAND 21
A 39.0 11.89 D-8 SW-SM WELL-GRADED SAND with SILT 13
49.0 14.94 D-10 SW-SM WELL-GRADED SAND with SILT 12

*
US Sieve Opening In Inches J US Sieve Numbers Hydrometer Analysis
I
100
~F:: f::;, -,_
-r-e
,r--
I'.. '
\ "' !~
• 0.0 97.9 2.1 0.7 3.0
80 '\ \ \ \
III 0.0 56.2 43.8 \\ \ iIJ
70
~ "\
\
A 12.6 82.0 5.4 1.2 9.8 :i=:
Cl
~ 60
* 7.0 86.1 7.0 1.6 11.9 >,
co
\ \ \ \
aiC: 50
\\ \ I\
u::
c
(I) 40 I
GRADATION VALUES ~
(I)
a. \ I\\I\
30
\'
D60 D50 D30 D20 010
20
\\
\I\. \
..
i\' \
• 0.780 0.62 0.39 0.32 0.264
10
' f:::::. ~ ..L
III 0.125 0.09 ~~

0
A 2.172 1.54 0.75 0.52 0.221 5 4 3 2 10 8 5 4 3 2 1 8 5 4 3 2 0.1 8 5 4 3 2 0.018 5 4 3 2 0.001

1.776 1.27 0.65 0.47 0.149
* Sand
Coarse Medium Fine
Job No.
Hole No.
Project
XL-2201
RR-8-04
Date
Sheet 1
August 6, 2004

of 1 Laboratory Summary ur,
..a... Washington State
Depth Depth
(ft) (m)
IX] 24.0 7.32 D-5 ML SANDY SILT 45
A 39.0 11.89 D-8 SW-SM WELL-GRADED SAND with SILT 18
44.0 13.41 D-9 SW-SM WELL-GRADED SAND with SILT 13

*
US Sieve Opening In Inches I US Sieve Numbers

100
. I'\
~
~r-
........ r--....._
%Gravel %Sand %Fines Cc Cu 90 I"'-" ~I',.
\
\ \ \ \
• 0.0 95.1 4.9 0.9 3.5
80
[\
\
\
\
\
'
IX] 0.0 31.7 68.3 \
70
~
A 5.1
10.6
88.5 6.4 1.6 8.7
7.8
1:
C)
~ 60
\\ \
* 84.3 5.0 1.1 >,
co
\\ \
cii
C:
u::
c
Q)
50
40
\\
GRADATION VALUES ~
Q)
a.
\ ~
\ \
30
I\
D60 D50 D30 D20 D10
20
\\ \
~-
'\ J ..........
• 0.601 0.45 0.31 0.26 0.170
10
[',. ......_
IX] ~ ~
0
A 1.394 1.06 0.61 0.46 0.160 5 4 3 2 10 8 5 4 3 2 1 8 5 4 3 2 0.1 8 5 4 3 2 0.018 5 4 3 2 0.001

2.053 1.47 0.75 0.54 0.263
* Sand
Coarse Medium Fine I
APPENDIX B
SUBSURFACE DATA FOR SR522 CAMPUS ACCESS PROJECT
B-1
.......
~
" " Department of Transportation Startcard S-15283
HOLE No. H-31-02

Job No XL-2311 SR 522 Elevation -'2=-=7-'-.6"--"'ft_ _ __
Sheet _1_ of _3_
Project SR 522 UWB CCC Campus S. Access. Drilfer Harvey Lie# T2599
Site A d d r e s s - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Inspector Hanning
start May 22, 2002 Completion May 23, 2002 Well I D # - - - - - - - - - - Equipment CME 850 w/ autohammer
Station R-C 612+49 Offset 17.5ft Lt. HoleDia HQ Method Wet Rotary
(inches)-------------
Northing 607316.14 Easting 1635190.93 Col!ected b ~ - - - - - - - - - Datum-------------
County King Subsection SE/NE Section 8 Range 5 EWM TO'Mlship 26 N
..
••
g BIOWS/6" (I)
.;;,
Field SPT (NJ z0 -;
a. 2
g <:: ., (NJ ~ z
1=
(I)
.,.,0 ij: Moisture Content ., £l.,
J::> E
:G
.,a. i
e
0..
~ RQD
and/or
RQD
2Q.
.,E
*-
E .2l:, ~
I-
V,
Description of Material -0
C
=>
0
2
ti
0
w ~ t:. 0 £
40 60 80
FF Cl)
~20
......
······
......
~, I I I
4 D-1 Silty SAND with gravel and organics throughout, medium
······
...... I I I 7 dense, olive brown, moist, homogeneous. no HCI
······
......
...... I I 8 reaction
······
...... I I (15J Length Recovered 0.5 ft. Length Retained 0.5 ft
......
...... I I
······
......
..... I I
......
. . ..,
,
I I
-25.0 ...... ,
I I
······
......
...... I I
......
........
,, .. I I -
.,.,.,
...... I I
~-:-
• I
J
I
I
>>o 1
1 ~ D-2 GS
MC
ML, MC=117%
Sandy ORGANIC SILT. very soft, dark brown, moist,
5- 3 stratified, no HCI reaction -
(4J ~ Length Recovered 1.5 ft, Length Retained 1.5 ft
J
I
-
>--20.0
~
S-3 05/23/2002
10-
I
--
...
... - ;
~
.... :- 1 0-4 GS SP-SM, MC-=39%
...
... I I 2 MC Poorly graded SAND with silt and organics, very loose,
...
...
...
... I 1 dark gray, wet, stratified, no HCI reaction
...
... I (3) Length Recovered 1.5 ft, Length Retained 1.5 ft
-15.0 ...
... I
...
... I -
...
... I
...
... ..
... I r
...
".
I I S-5 Sandy ORGANIC SILT, very soft, dark gray brown, wet.
...
".
I I
15-
...
".
...
".
...
...
" .
...
...
I
I
I
I
stratified, no HCI reaction
-
...
" .
...
...
...
...
'".
:• '•
I
I
2
1
D-6 GS
MC
SP-SM, MC=45%
Poorly graded SAND with silt and wood chunks, very
-
...
'"' I 2 loose, dark gray brown. wet, stratified, no HCI reaction
-10.0
...
.'"' I (3) length Recovered 1.5 ft. Length Retained 1.5 ft
....
"'
I
...
"'
.... I
...
"'
I
... I
.,;:.:.+ ~ ~
20
1::1::i::I: !•
I
I
I
I
I I
0
5
! D-7 GS
MC
ML, MC=57%, Pl=11
rt SILT with sand, very soft, dark gray, wet, stratified, no
f -
~
~ Washington State · LOG OF TEST BORING
.,,,,,,, Department of Transportation Start Card S-15283
HOLE No. H-31-02

Job No XL-2311 SR 522 Elevation _2=-7c.c..6"-'-'ft_ _ __
Sheet_2_ of _3_
· t SR 522 UWB CCC Campus S Access
p roiec Dn·11er Harvev L"IC# T2599
••
g V
g
.,=
C
..,0.,
V
i,=
Field SPT (N)
Moisture Content
Blows/6"
(N)
a.
~ z ci
z
0
., j1"'
.D
!;;:
,:,
e
V
E
and/or Description of Material
aV e ~ "*- V
,:,
~ C 2
E .,
....J
~ ...E :::,
> D. RQD ::, ti
0 ~
w
ROD
FF Cf)
Cf) !::. e
(!)
£
20 40 60 80
......
......
...... I I I I
······
······
······
······
I
I
I
I
12
(17)
IJ AL \ HCI reaction.
Length Recovered 1.5 ft, Length Retained 1.5 ft I
......
······ I 1. SM, MC=26%
......
······
...... I I Silty SAND. medium dense, moist to wet, stratified, no
······
......
... , .. I I HCL reaction .
······
...... I I Legth Recovered 1.5 ft, Length Retained 1.5 ft
~s ......
······ I I
......
······ I I -
······
······ I I
······
......
······ I I
......
······
......
······
......
······
......
• •
I
I
I
I 60/6"
(60/6")
J: D-8 GS
MC
SM. MC=11%
Silty SAND, very dense. dark greenish gray, moist,
25- .. ,., .
...... stratified, strong HCI reaction
......
..,.,.,
..
······
, , ,
I
I Length Recovered 0.5 ft, Length Retained 0.5 ft
'--
······ I
······
.,,,., I -
.......
, . .,
......
~
I
······
......
······ I
......
······ I
~o ......
······ I I
......
······
...... J
······
······ J
······
······
~,:_·if-!
• 17
26
D-9 SILT with sand and some gravel, very dense. dark
greenish gray, moist, stratified, no HCI reaction -
30- 26 Length Recovered 1.5 ft, Length Retained 1.5 ft L-
(52)
~-5
-
35-
······
......
······
......
......
······
······
• l
I
•
I
I
16
32
50
D-10 GS
MC
AL
SM, MC=12%
Silty SAND, trace gravel, very dense, dark greenish gray,
moist, stratified, no HCI reaction '--
......
······ I I (82)
······
······ I I L~ngth Recovered 1.5 ft, Length Retained 1.5 ft
······
.... ,.
...... I J I
.... , .
...... I I -
....
......
,. I
I I I
......
······ I
......
······
'---10 ······
......
······ I
I
······
······
······
······
······
......
······
······
...
······
•
~
,.,
······
. ,,,.,
28 D-11 No Recovery -
.,.,.,
······ 50/5" Coarse GRAVEL indicated from drilling action.
.._
40- ······
,, .... (50/5')
······
......
......
......
......
······
......
······
......
.......
......
······
·······
······
······
······
0--.15 ······
······
······
......
-
' ~~·•••,
······
......
······
......
i.o
I
I
I
I I I
+
I
I
80/6"
(80/6")
~ D-12 Silty GRAVEL with sand, subrounded, very dense, dark
greenish gray, moist, homogeneous. no HCI reaction
L...
45
HOLE No. H-31-02

Job No XL-2311 SR 522 Elevation _2=-7c..c·.=..6...c.ft'------
Sheet _3_ of _3_
Project SR 522 UWB CCC Campus S. Access. Driller Harvev Lie# T2599
g g • Field SPT (N) Blows/6"

11)
Q. 0 - :;;
e
f
4)
0
C
0
+>
"'>
2
w
4)
""a..e •
~
Moisture Content
RQD
(N)
and/or
ROD
FF
~ za, z0
iE 1§
"' (/)"'~
Cl)
~
.0
"'
~
J!l
(I}
4)
~
.i
~
,:;,
C
::,
e
C)
~
4)
E
2
't;
20 40 60 80
1-: • ! I I I I
I I I I
• IO I I I I -
a· a I I I I
•••
i.l~n
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
a· a I I I I
••••
--20 I I I I
I I I I
10 I I I I
a·• •a•
50-
I
I
I
I
r
I
I
I
I •
I
I
I
..
(70/3")
- --·,v Silly GRAVEL with sand, subrounded, very dense, dark
\~reenish gray, moist, homogeneous, no HCI reaction
f-
-
End of test hole boring at 49.2 ft below ground elevation.
Bailed boring after drilling, water level stabilized at a

depth of 9 ft.
'--25 This is a summary Log of Test Boring. Soil/Rock

-
descriptions are derived from visual field identifications
and laboratory test data.
I
55- >-
I
>--30
I
-
60-
-
-
>--35
65- - -
--40
I
-
I
I I I l
~
70
.4alit.
~ Washington State LOG OF TEST BORING
.,,,,,, Department of Transportation Start Card S-15283
HOLE No. H-32-02

Job No XL-2311 SR 522 ......" "'0_ft~----
Elevation _26
Sheet~1~ of ~3~
Project SR 522 UWB CCC Campus S. Access. Driller Joe Judd Lie# 2454
Site A d d r e s s - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Inspector Dave Nelson
start April 29, 2002 Completion April 30, 2002 Well ID# Equipment CME 45 w/ auto hammer
Station R-C 611+52 Offset 17.6ft Lt. Hole Dia HQx45.0 Method Wet Rotary
(inches)
Northing 607254.24 Easling 1635116.91 COiiected Datum
County King Subsection SE-NE Section a Range 5EWM Township 26 N
••
BIOWS/6" ._
g € Field SPT (N) 8. 0 .l!l E
...e ~ z 6
(I)
C: S> (N} z <I>
~
()J
.c .Q Moisture Content .c ti E
a. m and/or 1i
()J
! -8 (I)
...J {!!.
Description of Material "O
C
:::,
~
~
(I) Q. :J
1 RQD ROD E E (I) "' e
0
w
(I)
(/) t:. 0
E.
20 40 60 80
FF (/)
X I I I I
X I I I I
-25.0 X I I I I
X I I I I
X I I I
X I I I
X I I I
.,
X I I I
X I I I
X I .. I -
I I
•
X
X I 2 D-1 GS MH, MC=46%, Pl=23
X I 6 MC Elastic SILT, orange mottling, stiff, blue gray, moist.
X I
5- X J
8
(14}
Al homogeneous, no HCI reaction -
X Length Recovered 1.0 ft
X
-20.0 X
X -
X
X
,
X
X
X
X
X
S-2 ORGANIC SILT, dark brown, wet, stratified, no HCI
X
X reaction.
10- X Length Recovered 1.5 ft -
-15.0
i-;-----!:-
• I+
I
I
32
31
D-3 GS
MC
ML, MC=14%
Sandy SILT with gravel, very hard, gray, moist,
I 33 homogeneous, no HCI reaction
I (64) ~ Length Recovered 1.0 ft
I
I
I -
I
.......
7-:.-:-:~
,.,,,
.......
,,, ..
......
.,., ..
• • I
I
I
50/6
(50/6") ~ D-4 GS
MC
SM, MC=10%
Silty SAND with gravel, very dense, gray, moist,
15-
.,., ..
······ homogeneous, no HCI reaction -
.,., ..
······ Length Recovered 0.5 ft
.,., ..
······
-10.0 .,., ..
······ ~
......
., ....
05/30/2002 -
., ....
······
., ....
······
......
. ,., ..
., ....
······
......
. ,., ..
.,., ..
······
.,., ..
······
......
~:....:.,;-:.
• • 50/6
(50/6")
= D-5 GS
MC
ML, MC=13%
Sandy SILT, very dense, gray, moist, homogeneous, no -
- 20
I I I I
.......
~ Washington State
. , , , , Department of Transportation
LOG OF TEST BORING
Start Card S-15283
HOLE No. H-32-02

Job No XL-2311 SR 522 Elevation ...c2=:6:..:..0:::....:..:ft_ _ __
Sheet _2_ of _3_
Project SR 522 UWB CCC Campus S Access D(ller Joe Judd Lie# 2454
'
••
g Blows/6" ~
€ C (I)
Field SPT (NJ
Moisture Content
(N) ~
0
z z0
~
J!l
!;;: i::
Q)
-5
0.
~
0
~
""e and/or
t ! i "'
.Q
...J
V,
i!
Description of Material ,:,
C:
E
:::,
~ E ::, ~
QI ll. RQD ::,
E
0 _gi
w
RQD FF (I)
(/)
8l t:.. e
c:J
E.
20 40 60 80
I I I I
I I HCI reaction
I I Length Recovered 0.5 ft
-5 I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I -
I I
I I
I-:--.";"-:"":""".
.,.,.,
.,., ..
······
. . , ..
······
r
I
I
• r
J
50/6
(50/6")
tJ: D·6 SILT with sand and gravel, very dense, gray, moist,
homogeneous, no HCI reaction
25- ......
~
...... Length Recovered 0.5 ft

I ~
......
······
I
,., ...
······
......
..... I
'-0 ~
......
........
, ..
.......
,.,,.
, I
r
-
. ,., .. r J
······ I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
J
I
r
• r
r
I
50/3
(50/3")
lz 0.7 Silty SAND with gravel. very dense, gray, moist,
homogeneous, no HCI reaction -
30- Length Recovered 0.2 ft ~
I I
I I
'-.5 r I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I -
r I I
I
• 50/3
(50/3")
l:a: [).8 SILT. very dense, gray, moist, homogeneous, no HCI
reaction
35- Length Recovered 0.2 ft ~
--10 -
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
• 50/3
(50/3")
l:a: D-9 Silty SAND/ Sandy SILT with gravel, very dense, gray,
moist, homogeneous, no HCI reaction
-
40- I Length Recovered 0.2 ft '-
I
I
'--15 r
I
I
I
I
I -
I I
I I r
I I I
I I I I
I I I
~
45
I I
... ! I
Department of Transportation Start Card _S,,,.-:..,1c,;5~2~83><---
HOLE No. H-32-02

Job No XL-2311 SR 522 Elevation ...;2::.;6::..:·-=.0....:.ft=-------
Sheet~3~ of ~3~
Pro·ect
l SR 522 UWB CCC Campus S Access Drilter Joe Judd Lie# 2454
••
QJ
g € Field SPT (NJ Blows/6" C. 0 .Sl "l:

~ zQJ z
0
C
0
~
Moisture Content
(NJ .0
~ ~ QJ
E
5 ""
e and/or QJ
Description or Material
a. a.
QJ "O
~ j
~
Q QJ C:
.0
~ E 1-- :;,
QJ
0 QJ
0..
RQD RQD E ::,
e
w
20 40 60 80
FF "' "'
en Cl) t:. C!>
.E
······· vvrv
-
...., "' Silty SAND with gravel, very dense, gray, moist.
I J I
'--20
I
I
I
I
I
I
(50/3') homogeneous, no HCI reaction
Length Recovered 0.2 ft I -
I I End of test hole boring at 45.2 ft below ground elevation.

I I
I I This is a summary Log of Test Boring. Soil/Rock
I I
descriptions are derived from visual field identifications
I J
I I and laboratory test data.
I I -
I I
I I
50- I I '-
r I
'--25
t I
I
I
I
I
I -
I
I
I
I
I
55- '-
'--30 I -
I
I
-
60- -
CJ)
~
>--
--35
0
(!)
...,
g
-
65- '-
-
'--40
'
I
' I
I
~ I
...J
X
I
I
-
:5 I
5 r
<f)
- 70
I I I
APPENDIX C
SUBSURFACE DATA FOR SR5/SR432 TALLEY WAY I/C PROJECT
C-1
.......
:,= Washington State
. . , , , , Department of Transportation
Test Boring Legend Page 1 of 2
Sampler Symbols Soil Density Modifiers

Standard Penetration Test Gravel, Sand & Non-plastic Silt Elastic Silts and Clay
SPT SPT
Oversized Penetration Test Density Consistency
Blows/ft Blows/ft
Dames & Moore California 0-4 Very Loose 0-1 Very Soft
Shelby Tube 5-10 Loose 2-4 Soft
11-24 Medium Dense 5-8 Medium Stiff
Piston Sample 25-50 Dense 9-15 Stiff
>50 Very Dense 16-30 Very Stiff
Washington Undisturbed 31-60 Hard
(REF) Refusal
>60 Very Hard
OJ Vane Shear Test
Core Angularity of Gravel & Cobbles

Angular Coarse particles have sharp edges and relatively
Becker Hammer plane sides with unpolished surfaces.
Subangular Coarse grained particles are similar to angular
[3 Bag Sample but have rounded edges.
Coarse grained particles have nearly plane sides
Subrounded
but have well rounded corners and edges.
Well Symbols Rounded Coarse grained particles have smoothly curved
sides and no edges.
Cement Surface Seal
) ): Piezometer Pipe in Soil Moisture Modifiers

. Granular Bentonite Seal Ory Absence of moisture; dustv, drv to touch
Damo but no visible water
Moist
..
.. ..
Piezometer Pipe in Sand
Wet Visible free water
.. Well Screen in Sand
Soil Structure
~
Granular Bentonite Bottom Seal
Stratified Alternating layers of varying material or color at
Inclinometer Casing in least 6mm thick; note thickness and inclination.
Concrete Bentonite Grout Laminated Alternating layers of varying material or color less
than 6mm thick; note thickness and inclination.
Laboratory Testing Codes Fissured Breaks along definite planes of fracture with little
resistance to fracturing.
uu Unconsolidated Undrained Triaxial Slickensided Fracture planes appear polished or glossy,
somtimes striated.
cu Consolidated Undrained Triaxial
Blocky Cohesive soil that can be broken down into smaller
CD Consolidated Drained Triaxial angular lumps which resist further breakdown.
UC Unconfined Compression Test Disrupted Soil structure is broken and mixed. Infers that
material has moved substantially - landslide debris.
OS Direct Shear Test
Homogeneous Same color and appearance throughout.
CN Consolidation Test
GS Grain Size Distribution
MC Moisture Content
HCL Reaction
No HCL Reaction No visible reaction.
SG Specific Gravity
. Weak HCL Reaction Some reaction with bubbles forming slowly .
OR Organic Content
Strong HCL Reaction Violent reaction with bubbles forming immediately.
ON Density
AL Atterberg Limits
PT Point Load Compressive Test
Degree of Vesicularity of Pyroclastic Rocks
Slightly Vesicular 5 to 1O percent of total
SL Slake Test
. Moderately Vesicular 10 to 25 percent of total
DG Degradation
LA LA Abrasion Highly Vesicular 25 to 50 percent of total
HT Hydrometer Test Scoriaceous Greater than 50 percent of total
......
~ Washington State
..
, , Department of Transportation
Test Boring Legend
Paqe 2 o f 2
Grain Size
Fine Grained <1mm Few crystal boundaries/grains are distinguishable in the field or with hand lens.
Medium Grained 1mm to 5mm Most crystal boundaries/grains are distinguishable with the aid of a hand lens.
Coarse Grained >5mm Most crystal boundaries/grains are distinguishable with the naked eye.
Weathered State
Term Description Grade
Fresh No visible sign of rock material weathering; perhaps slight discoloration in major I
discontinuity surfaces.
Slightly Discoloration indicates weathering of rock material and discontinuity surfaces. All the rock material II
Weathered may be discolored by weathering and may be somewhat weaker externally than its fresh condition.
Moderately Less than half of the rock material is decomposed and/or disintegrated to soil. Fresh or discolored
rock is present either as a continuous framework or as core stones. III
Weathered
Highly More than half of the rock material is decomposed and/or disintegrated to soil. Fresh or discolored
Weathered rock is present either as discontinuous framework or as core stone. IV
Completely All rock material is decomposed and/or disintegrated to soil. The original mass structure is
Weathered still largely intact. V
Residual All rock material is converted to soil. The mass structure and material fabric is destroyed. There is a
Soil large change in volume, but the soil has not been significantly transported. VI
Relative Rock Strength

Grade Description Field Identification Uniaxial Compressive
Strength approx
R1 Very Specimen crumbles under sharp blow from point of geological hammer, 150-3500 psi
Weak and can be cut with a pocket knife.
R2 Moderately Shallow cuts or scrapes can be made in a specimen with a pocket knife. 3500-7500 psi
Weak Geological hammer point indents deeply with firm blow.
R3 Moderately Specimen cannot be scraped or cut with a pocket knife, shallow indentation 7500-15000 psi
Strong can be made under firm blows from a hammer.
R4 Strong Specimen breaks with one firm blow from the hammer end of a geological 15000-30000 psi
hammer.
Very Greater than 30000 psi
R5 Specimen requires many blows of a geological hammer to break intact sample.
Strong
Spacing Condition
Very Widely Greater than 3 m Excellent Very rough surfaces, no separation, hard discontinuity wall
Widely 1 m to 3 m Good Slightly rough surfaces, separation less than 1 mm, hard
Moderately 0.3 m to 1 m discontinuity wall.
Closely 50 mm to 300 mm Fair Slightly rough surfaces, separation greater than 1 mm,
soft discontinuity wall.
Very Closely Less than 50 mm
Poor Slickensided surfaces, or soft gouge less than 5 mm thick, or open
RQD (%) discontinuities 1 to 5 mm.
100(1ength of core in pieces> 100mm)
Very Poor Soft gouge greater than 5 mm thick, or open discontinuities
Length of core run greater than 5 mm.
Fracture Frequency (FF) is the average number of fractures per 300 mm of core.
Does not include mechanical breaks caused by drilling or handling.
......
~ Washington Stat&
. . , , , Department of Transportation
LOG OF TEST BORING
Start Card S-26387
HOLE No. H-10-06

Job No XL-2963 . SR 5 Elevalion _1"""8"-.0"-'-'ft_ _ __
Sheet_1_ of _2_
Project 1-5 / SR-432 Talley Way Interchange Driller Danny Henderson Lie#· 2742 T
Site Address Vic. SR-432 and 1-5 Inspector Brian Hilts
start May 11, 2006 completion May 11, 2006 Woll I D # · - - - - - - - - - - Equipment CME 850 w/ autohammer
Stallon AL 110+46.77 Offset 84.85ft Lt. Hole Dia 4"0Dx42' Method Wet Rotary
(Inches
Nol1hing 291252.00 Easting 1035869.00 Datum _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __

Collected b . ~ - - - - - - - - - -
County Cowlitz Subsection SW-NW Seclion 12 Range 2WVVM Township..I..N_
••
g Blows/6" .,
g C:
0
.,
~
Field SPT (N)
Moisture Content
(N) ~ ..
d
:z z6
s:,
I Description of Material
j e.,
E
i
0 ..
~ (L
~ RQD
and/or Q.
RQD ~
~2
!~
j
1--
<:
::,
e
::,
I
ui FF (I) C)
.. , , ... 20 40 60 00
...
.,," ....
....
....
I I I I
....
...,. ...... ...,
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
,
...
.... ~
...
,,.,
I I I
'Sl.
,,,, .. ... I 5/11/2006
,, .. ...
.... .. ...
... I I I I
,.,,
...
....,"'",," .., ... ...
I I I
,
, , "'
...
...
...
...
I I '
I I
,.
....
.... ,,,, " ' I I I I
~·
-15.0 ...... ,,,, .. ...
"' I I I I
.... "'
...
... I I I I 5/11/2006 -
I I I I
,,.,
... :::• I I I
~
.... ,,,
, .. . .. 2 0-1 GS SM, M.C. =29%
....
,,,, .. ...
,,,, .. ' "
' I I I I 2 MC SIiiy SAND with trace of brown organics, loose, very dark
, ... ... I I I I
5- .. ,,,, ...
,, .. ...
I. I l I 3 gray, wet,.stratified, HCI reaction not tested. ~
...
'f•• ...
... I I l I {5) Length Recovered 0.8 ft, Length Retained 0.8 ft
.. ., ...
.... ,
...
.....,,, ...
....
, ...
...
I
I
I
I
I
I
....
....
.... ,,,, ... ...
...
... I I I -
I { I
....
..... ...
,,,,,,,
... "'
I I I
,,,, .".
,,,.
,, .. ... ."
... I I I
i-10.0 ...,,,,.........
..... , ... I I I
.... ... ...
...
... I I I
,, .. ... I I l
,
....
.......
,
. ,,.
...
...
...., ....
...
...
• I
I
I
I
3
5
D-2 SIity SAND with gravel, loose, dark greenish gray, moist,
stratified, HCI reaction not tested.
....... ...
. ... I I 5 Length Recovered 0.8 ft, Length Retained 0.8 ft --
........ ...
10- ,
I I I
.... ...
,
.... ...
, (10) Note: The bottom .1 ft was brown in color, with some dark
...
, I I
.... ...
, .... ...
,
I brown organics and heir roots throughout.
,, ...
...,.,,
..,,,, ...
... I
,.,, ...
,. ... I
... ...
,,,.,
... ...... I .
,
.... ...
..... ...
I
,.,,
,
,
... ...
...
...
,....
-6.0 ,,
.....
... ... ,
-
....
....
.... ......
....
....
..
:: :•
...
...,, ...
...
...T·!--'f..!..
.....
,
,•
I
0
0
D-3 MC M.C. =68%
SILT, very loose, dark greenish gray, moist, stratified, HCI
15- I I
I
1
(1)
reaction not tested.
-
I I Note: From 14.9' to 15' was silly sand, with trace wood
I I debris. A moisture oan was obtained at the sample
I
I
I
I
S-4
'{Jepth. -
I I SILT, loose, darl< greenish gray, moist, homogeneous,
I I HCI reaction not tested.
-o.o I I I -
I I I
:~ I
I
I
I
'•
I
I
I I
I
I
I
I
1
1 ! D·S GS
MC
ML, M.C. = 45%, Pl= NA
Sandy SILT with a trace of dark brown organics, very -
20
..-...
=w.= Washington State
..,,,,, Department of Transportation
LOG OF TEST BORING
Start Card S-26387
HOLE No. H-10-06
Job No XL-2963 SR 5 Elevation _1--'8'"'".0"--'--ft_ _ __
Sheet_2_ of _2_
Project 1-5 / SR-432 Talley Way Interchange Driller Dannv Henderson Lie#~
g
,:::.
a
g
0
J
C: ~
""e
•
•
Ffeld SPT (N}
Moisture Content
Blows/6'' [
(N)
and/or
tE
d
~ z0, d
z .0
z" ..., ~
<O
.,
~
0,
~
3:
'O
C:
0,
S
~
&I
~
~ ROD
RQD
FF
0.
E
~ I;::.
C
:,
e j
20 40 60 80
"'
Cl> <!>
I I r I
AL loose, very dark gray, moist, homogeneous, HCI reaction
I I I I
2
(3}
~ not tested.
I I I
I I I
I I I
I I I
I I I
I I I
1-.5 I I I -
I I I
I I I
;
•• I
I
l
I
I
• I
I
I
2
1
D-6 MC M.C. =43%
SILTwith sand, very loose, dark gray, wet, stratified, HCI
.._
25- I I I 1 reaction not tested.
I I I (2) Length Recoverecj 1.2 ft, Length Retained 1.2 ft
I I I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I I I
.,.
I I I
I I I
~-10 I I I
~-. I I I
::::::::'....... .
. I I I
.......
l I 7 D·t GS SW-SM, M.C. = 27%
::::...
I I I 7 MC Welt graded SAND with silt and a trace of black and -
I I I
30- .1 I I
7 brown organics, medium dense, dark gray, wet, stratified, -
....
••• I
I
I
I
I
I
(14)
Length Recovered 1. 1 ft, Length Retained 1.1 ft
..
.. I I I
.
.!l.!l ....... I
I
I
I
I
I
J
I
I
--16
..::::.....
~··
I
I
I
I
I
I
l
I -
. ,: I I
. '' '• 1
:.. 1
1
D-8 GS
MC
Ml, M.C. = 43%, Pl= NA
SILT with sand, very loose, dark gray, wet,
35- 2 AL homogeneous, HCI reaction not tested. ~

Note: A moisture can was obtained at the sample depth.
-
I
I
I
--20 I I
>;.
)(
I
I
I
I
I
•II 0
1
0-9 MC M.C. =75%
Elastic SILT with sand, soft, very dark gray, moist.
-
40-
X I I 1 homogeneous, HCI reaction not tested. -
)( I I (2l Length Recovered 1.5 ft, Length Retained 1.5 ft
·····l·-- I I
·\Nots: A moisturo can was obtained at the sample depth. f
I I I
I I I
I I l End of test hole boring at 40.5 ft below ground elevation.
I I I This is a summary Log of Test Boring. Soll/Rock
I I I descriptions are derived from visual field Identifications -
I I I and laboratory test data.
--25 I I I
I I I
I I I Note: Tl1e water table after drilling was measured at 1 ft.
I I I After removing the casing, the hole stayed open to 25 ff,
I I I and the waler table was measured at 3 ft.
45 I I I I
··----...
=-= ~
Washington State
LOG OF TEST BORING
Start Card S-32519
HOLE No. H-23-08

Job No XL-2963 SR 5 Elevation _2=-4-'-''-=-6-'-ft'------
Sheet _1_ of _8_
Project 1-5/SR 432 Talley Way Interchange Driller Shepherd. Robert Lie# 2710
Site Address Vic SR432 and 1-5 Inspector Brian Hilts
start April 7. 2008 Completion April 7. 2008 Equipment CME 850 with Autohammer
Well I D # - - - - - - - - - - -
Station AL 114+86.90 Offset 120.51ft Lt. Hole Dia 6 Method Wet Rotary
(inches)--"'----------
Northing 291359.11 Easting 1036297.46 Collected by HQ Geotech Division Datum State Plane South
county Cowlitz Subsection SE1/4 of NW1/4 Section 12 Range 2WWM Township 7
••
g Blows/6" Cl)
g
.c
a.
C
0
"'>ro ~
Cl)
Field SPT (N)
Moisture Content
(N)
and/or
C.
Cl)
0
~ zCl) z
C. 0. ~
0
.c
ro I Description of Material *,:
-0
C
C:
Cl)
E
:::,
.• .
Cl) Q.
~ RQD RQD E E :::i
...I
I- :::,
e ti
.s
0 Cl)
ui FF
ro
(/)
8l I::. (!)
20 40 60 80
1•1•• I I I l
• ' , I
•• 0••' I
I
.
I
•••• •••'' I
I
• 0 I
•••• •••''
• 0
. I
I
I
-
-20.0 ••••• '•.•

It •
I
I
4
3
D-1 GS
MC
GP-GM. MC=25%
Poorly graded GRAVEL with silt and sand, angular, loose,
5-
••
••••• ••••
0 2
(5)
brown, wet, homogenous, HCI not tested.
Length Recovered:0.5 ft. Length Retained:0.5 ft.
-
••• • • •
0
I
-
••••• ••••• •
0
•••,••••• • 0
•• ' .
.•• .
• I
~
4 D-2 GP-GM, MC=25%
-15.0 0 3 Poorly graded GRAVEL with silt and sand, angular. loose.
- -
.• .
3 black, wet, homogenous, HCI not tested.
10- •
,lit''
I
(6) Length Recovered:0.6 ft. Length Retained:0.6 ft.
•• 0' Note: Fines washed out. At 9 ft we lost 100% water return
during drilling.
•
,' I
I
b
(!)
...J
•• lit'0'
6
••••••''.
tJ)
• I
--,
a. -
(!)
w
z
0
•
••••••••'
• I
0
~
(.)
:c
I-
;:: -10.0 ••1 0
14
9
D-3 GP-GM, MC=25%
Poorly graded GRAVEL with silt and sand, angular,
-
•••• •••' 14 medium dense, dark gray, wet, homogenous, HCI not
(.)
I 15-
(23) tested.
~
s
~
•1
•• •••'
0 Length Recovered:1.5 ft. Length Retained:1.5 ft.
Note: At 17 ft the soil became less dense demonstrated
~
~
tJ)
I
~·
' .,. l
by drilling.
-
••
20
-5.0
I I I I
0
1
! D-4 SILT with sand, very loose, dark gray, wet, stratified, HCI
not tested. -
HOLE No. H-23-08

Job No XL-2963 SR 5 Elevation ~24~·=6~ft~----
Sheet~2~ of ~8~
Project 1-5/SR 432 Talley Way Interchange Driller Sheoherd Robert Lie# 2710
'
••
g
*
Q)
Field SPT (N) Blows/6" a. ci 1:
g C Q) (N) ~ z zci ;;:
Q)
.c
a
0
15
ii=
e Moisture Content and/or Q)
Q)
i5. i5.
Q)
.0
.0
"'
..J i Description of Material "O
C
::,
E
::,
ti
~
a. RQD E I-
e
.
Q) ::,
a iii RQD E .s
[jj FF "' en"' I:::.
en (!)
20 40 60 80
I I I I
1 Length Recovered:1.4 ft. Length Retained:1.4 ft .
I (2) Note: The top 0. 6 ft consisted of silt with brown organics
and hair roots, and the bottom 0. 8 ft consisted of silt with
sand.
~
S-5 SILT, dark gray, homogenous.
-0
25- -
• • 0
0
D-6 GS
MC
ML, MC=69%, LL=42
SILT with a trace of organics and hair roots, very loose,
...
-
1 AL dark gray, moist, homogenous, HCI not tested. ...

I ...
I
I ...
I I
~
S-7 No Recovery
I I -
30-
--5
I
I
I
I
I -
-~ I ...
I 1 D-8 Sandy SILT, very loose, dark gray, moist, homogenous,
I 2 HCI not tested.
I 1 Length Recovered:0.5 ft. Length Retained:0.5 ft.
I (3)
I -
I
I I
I
>---10
}~ I '• I
I
0
0
D-9 GS
MC
ML, MC=46%, LL=38
SILT with sandy silt lenses and some organics, very
35-
I 0 AL loose, dark gray, wet, stratified, HCI not tested. >--
Note: At 34 ft we got our water return back.
-
--15
·• 2
1
D-10 Sandy SILT, very loose, dark gray, wet, homogenous,
HCI not tested.
-
I 40- 2 Length Recovered:0.5 ft. Length Retained:0.5 ft. f-
(3)
I
-
>---20
. 0
• 0
0
! D-11 GS
MC
ML, MC=52%, LL=35
SILT, very loose, dark gray, wet, homogenous, HCI not
- 45
I I I I
.......
~ Washington State
. , , , , , Department of Transportation
LOG OF TEST BORING
Start Card S-32519
HOLE No. H-23-08

Job No XL-2963 SR 5 Elevation _2=.4.:.:.·=-6~ft'-----
Sheet _3_ of _8_
Project 1-5/SR 432 Talley Way Interchange .
Driller Sheoherd Robert Uc# 2710
••
g g
C Q)
Field SPT (N)
(N)
Q)
Blows/6" C. ci
~ z z
ci !;,; "E
~:::,
.c
15..
0
""ro
ii=
e Moisture Content and/or Q) .!!? Q)
i5. EC. .0
.0
ro
...J ii Description of Material "O
C
:::,
-iii
~ E ro :::, I-
Q)
Cl iii a.
RQD
RQD
FF ro (/) I::. e
(!)
.!:
ill (/)
20 40 60 80
I I
IX
I I
0 AL tested.
I I (0) Length Recovered:1.5 ft. Length Retained: 1.5 ft.
I I -
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I
I
I
I -
'
S-12 No Recovery
I
>--25
I >-
50- I
I
I ~
I S-13 Sandy SILT, dark gray, stratified.

I
I
I
p
-
I
~ I
I 0 D-14 SILT with sand, very loose, dark gray, moist,
I 1 homogenous, HCI not tested.
I 2 Length Recovered:1.2 ft. Length Retained: 1.2 ft.
I (3)
55-
--30
I
I -
-
I
. :• 0 D-15 SILT, very loose, dark gray, moist, homogenous, HCI not
-
--35 0 tested.
60- 0 Length Recovered: 1.5 ft. Length Retained:1.5 ft. t-
(0)
>--40
~ S-16
GS
MC
ML, MC=45%, LL=37
SILT, dark gray, homogenous.
65- AL >-
I
CN
-~· 1• ~
I 0 D-17 GS ML, MC=58%, LL=38
-
I I 0 MC SILT, very loose, dark gray, moist, homogenous, HCI not

I I 0 AL tested.
I I (0) Length Recovered: 1.5 ft. Length Retained: 1.5 ft.
I I I
I I
I I
·~ I I -
~
70
t--45
I
I
I
I
I
I
I I
0
0
J D-18 SILT with sand, very loose, dark gray, moist,
homogenous, HCI not tested.
y,,~
~ Washington State
Job No
XL-2963 SR 5
LOG OF TEST BORING
Elevation ....=.24-'-'''-"6"-'ft"'-----
Start Card
HOLE No.
S-32519
H-23-08
Sheet _4_ of _8_
· t I-5/SR 432 Talley Way Interchange
p roJec o n·11 er Sheoherd Robert Lie# 2710
'
••
~
g 0)
g
.c
C
0
0)
~
Field SPT (N}
Moisture Content
Blows/6" a.
(N}
and/or
i::-
0)
d
z zd
~ .0
.0
"'
.l!l
ti)
*
s
'O
C:
0)
E
15.
0)
~
a, a.
~ RQD
0.
E E
0)
::,
...J
~
C
::,
e i
"' CJ)"' t:.
0 RQD .!:
iii FF CJ) (!)
20 40 60 80
I I I I
Length Recovered:0.5 ft . Length Retained:0.5 ft.
1
(1)
.1
--50
'1 S-19
SILTwith sand, dark gray, homogenous.
~·
75-
-
I
. 0 D-20 SILT, very loose, dark gray, moist, homogenous, HCI not
0 tested.
(0)
--55
-~. 0
0
D-21 SILT with a 0.1 ft think lense of sandy silt, very loose,
dark gray, moist, stratified, HCI not tested.
-
so- 0 Length Recovered:0.7 ft. Length Retained:0.7 ft. -

(0)
I
I
I
I
I -
'
S-22 No Recovery
1--60
I-
85-
,__ -
• t 1
2
D-23 GS
MC
ML, MC=40%, Pl=NA
SILT, loose, dark gray, wet, homogenous, HCI not tested.
3 AL Length Recovered:1.2 ft. Length Retained:1.2 ft.
(5)
--65
• 2
4
D-24 SILT with sand, loose, dark gray, moist, homogenous,
HCI not tested.
I 90- 5 Length Recovered:0.5 ft. Length Retained:0.5 ft. I-
(9)
,
I
S-25 SILT with sand, dark gray, homogenous.

--70
I I I I
95
HOLE No. H-23-08

Job No XL-2963 SR 5 Elevation -=.24..:.;·c.:::6...:.ft.,__ _ __
Sheet _5_ of _8_
Project 1-5/SR 432 Talley Way Interchange o ri·11 er Sheoherd Robert Lie# 2710
'
••
g Q)
g
.s::
C:
0
Q)
~
Field SPT (N)
Moisture Content
Blows/6" a.
(N)
and/or
i=:
Q)
d
z zd
,[ i
.0
! Description of Material *s
'O
C:
Q)
E
, ~E
a. """'iv 'i5.. E ::, "'
...J C:
:J
Q)
0
a. l?jJ RQD
RQD E
"' t::,
en
e
iii FF en"' Cl
20 40 60 80
I I I I -
I I
. i. I .,..t11
I
I
2
2
I D-26 GS
MC
ML, MC=33%, Pl=NA
SILT, very loose, dark gray, wet, homogenous, HCI not
I 1 AL tested.
I (3) I Length Recovered:1.5 ft. Length Retained:1.5 ft.
--75
• 0
3
I D-27 SILT with sand and some wood debris, loose, dark gray,
moist, stratified, HCI not tested.
100- 2 Length Recovered:1.2 ft. Length Retained:1.2 ft. -
(5) I
I -
I
I
I
I
I
I
--80
• 0
3
D-28 SILT with sand, loose, dark gray, moist, homogenous,
HCI not tested.
105- 3 Length Recovered:0.4 ft. Length Retained:0.4 ft. --
(6)
'
S-29 SILT with sand, dark gray, homogenous.
1---85 I Note: The bottom of the she/by had wood debris.
110-
I .......
I
I
b
• ... I
3
3
D-30 GS
MC
ML, MC=33%, LL=31
SILT with sand, loose, dark gray, moist, homogenous, -
(9
...J
3 AL HCI not tested.
5 (6) Length Recovered:1.5 ft. Length Retained: 1.5 ft.
en
--, Note: The bottom 0.4 ft had grayish brown chunks of
a.
(9 siltstone.
w
z
•
0
(.)
:r: 1 D-31 SILT with sand and a trace organics, loose, dark gray,
~ moist, homogenous, HCI not tested.
(.)
I 115-
........90 3
3
(6)
Length Recovered:1.5 ft. Length Retained: 1.5 ft. - -
s~
;
~
,
enI
-

........95
I I I I
- 120
~
..,,,,, Department of Transportation Start Card S-32519
HOLE No. H-23-08

Job No XL-2963 SR 5 Elevation _2_4_._6_ft_ _ _ __
Sheet _6_ of _8_
'
••
g Q) 1i;
g Field SPT (N) Blows/6" a. d
d 1ii c
~ zQ) z
Q)
C Q) (N) 1/) ;;: E
,
.c
~a.
.s::: 0 Moisture Content and/or Q) 1i, Description of Material 'O :::l
0. """' a. E 0.. ~ "'
..J {E. C
tl
~
:::l
Q)
iii RQD E :::i
e .s
Cl
[ij
20
RQD
40 60 80
FF "' "'
Cl)
Cl) I::, (!)
I I I I
I
•• I
I
I
0
2
D-33 SILT, very loose, dark gray, moist, homogenous, HCI not
tested.
-
I (4)
I
I
I
I
--100
• I
I
I
1
3
D-34 Sandy SILT, loose, dark gray, moist, homogenous, HCI
not tested. -
125- I 3 Length Recovered:1.5 ft. Length Retained: 1.5 ft. f--
(6)
I
I I
--105
I ~ S~5
SILT with sand, dark gray, homogenous.
I ~
130-
I
I
• • 1
2
D-36 GS
MC
ML, MC=50%, LL=38
SILT with sand and some organics, loose, dark gray,
-
3 AL moist, homogenous, HCI not tested.

(5) Length Recovered: 1.5 ft. Length Retained:1.5 ft.
--110
, .. 0
0
D-37 SILT with sand with organics, very loose, dark gray,
moist, stratified, HCI not tested. -
135- 0 Length Recovered:1.5 ft. Length Retained: 1.5 ft. -
(0) Note: No blow count was obtained, the chain wrench
I broke and we dropped 120 ft of sample rods with 20 ft of
free fall to obtain a sample.
140-
--115
·• 0
0
2
D-38 SILT with sand and some organics, very loose, dark gray,
moist, homogenous, HCI not tested.
Length Recovered: 1.5 ft. Length Retained: 1.5 ft. -
I
I (2)
,
I
S-39 SILT with sand, dark gray, homogenous. -

--120
I I I I
~
145
~
=:,= Washington State
. - , , Department of Transportation
LOG OF TEST BORING
Start Card S-32519
HOLE No. H-23-08

Job No XL-2963 SR 5 Elevation -=24"".c.cc6~ft~----
Sheet _7_ of _8_
Project 1-5/SR 432 Talley Way Interchange Driller Sheoherd. Robert Lie# 2710
g •
+
Field SPT (N) Blows/6" :g_
(N) ~
I
,
Ql
'*-
C
,g ii:
e Moisture Content and/or Description of Material
I
w
a..
~ RQD
RQD
FF ~
E
::J
e
(!)
20 40 60 80
I I I I
I
• •I I
6
7
D-40 GS
MC
CL. MC=32%. Pl=16
Lean CLAY with sand and some organics. medium
I 6 AL dense. dark greenish gray. moist. homogenous. HCI not
(13) tested.
--;- --;
I- -
-·-
__
...-.-.
....- -
>---125
--;-_--;"
-·-
,_.....:..-....:..
1--
• 6
12
D-41 No Recovery
150- 18
1--
(30)
I--___:_-_:_
....--;-- -;
,- -
-·-
1-
___:_ -=-
-
_--;-_---;-
1--.-.
--
f--
,_.....,.._(:
>---130 ,..,.: .. • 5
10
D-42 GS
MC
SM. MC=34%. Pl=NA
Silty SAND. dense. dark gray. wet. homogenous. HCI not
-
155- t?:......
::::
......
20
(30)
AL tested.
Length Recovered: 1.3 ft. Length Retained: 1.3 ft.
-
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
...... -
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
~-135
.. ...
......
......
......
,,
• 6
15
D-43 GS
MC
SM. MC=28%
Silty SAND. dense. dark gray. wet. stratified. HCI not
160-
......
...... 13 tested. I-

-
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
.... ,.,. .... ..
......
......
.......
.... .... ..
,,,.,,
,.
.......
......
,.
......
...... >>•• - D-44
50/3" ... Silty SAND. very dense. dark gray. moist. homogenous.
......
......
--140 ......
...... (REF) HCI not tested.
165- ......
...... Length Recovered:0.3 ft. Length Retained:0.3 ft .
.....
...... ,, Note: At 161 ft the soil became more dense
.. ...
......,.
......
......
demonstrated by drilling.
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
.....
.....
......
,,
,,
......
......
......
.......
······
······
: : : :~ >>• • 50/3" :Z: D-45 SANDSTONE. very dense. dark gray. moist.
~ ~-145 : :) ·: (REF) homogenous. HCI not tested.
en~ _..L_ __J,!l:l..c
. .,_:,....:~:J....__,1._l_.,1l_ __.1l1...-_J...._1_.,L__ _-1.......1..._ _.,___ _...__ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ___,._ _.__ ___.
170
~
" " " " Department of Transportation Start Card S-32519
HOLE No. H-23-08

Job No XL-2963 SR 5 Elevation _2=-4-"'c.:::6....:.ft:,___ _ __
Sheet~8~ of ~8~
••
g
j
(l)
Field SPT (N) Blows/6" 0. d
g C (l) (N) d
~ z(l) z
.c 0 ii= Moisture Content and/or Description of Material
e
(l)
i
I C. ci C
0. :::,
(l) a.
~ RQD
RQD E E :::, e
Cl
FF ro ~ t::, (!)
iD tJ)
60 80
C-46 Length Recovered:0.3 ft. Length Retained:0.3 ft.
SANDSTONE CONGLOMERATE with interbedded
siltstone, medium grained, fresh, moderately weak rock,
Discontinuities are very widely spaced and in good
condition. Recovered:100% RQD:100 FF:O.
-150
175
C-47 SANDSTONE CONGLOMERATE with interbedded
siltstone, medium grained, fresh, moderately weak rock,
Discontinuities are very widely spaced and in good
condition. Recovered:100% RQD:100 FF:O.
-155
180
The implied accuracy of the borehole location

information displayed on this boring log is typically
sub-meter in (X,Y) when collected by the HQ Geotech
Division and sub-centimeter in {X,Y,Z) when collected by
the Region Survey Crew.
End of test hole boring at 180 ft below ground elevation.

-160 This is a summary Log of Test Boring.
185 Soil/Rock descriptions are derived from visual field
a,
identifications and laboratory test data.
~ Note: REF = SPT Refusal
co
1--
Cl
(!)
_j
15
(/)
-,
a..
(!)
u.i
z
0
(,)
:c
1--
~ -165
(,)
_1 190
~
5
~
...J
~
~
~
;,
"'3;
~
X
:5 -170
15
(/)
195
y,,
~
!!JI!! Washington State
Department of_ Transportation
Job No XL-2963 SR 5
LOG OF TEST BORING
Elevallon 15.0 ft
Start Card S-32703
HOLE No. H-24-08

Sheet_1_ or _7_
Project 1-5/SR 432 Talley Way Interchange Drlller Shepherd. Robert
Site Address Vic SR432 and 1-5 Inspector Brian HIits
start May 5, 2008 complettonMay 7, 2008 Well I D # - - - - - - - - - -

Equipment CME 850 with Autohammer
Station AL 113-1-55.10 Offset 115.25ft Lt. Hole Dia 6 Method Wet Rotary
{lnches---'~-------
Northing 291325.88 l:asling 1036167.74 Collected by HQ Gaolech Division Oalum State Plane South
County Cowlitz Subsection SE1/4 of NW1/4 Section 12 Range 2\/WI/M Township 7

·-
g • Field SPT (N) Blows/6" <ll () llJ
g ., Q.
d j
•
'lo
(N) ~ :z z ti .g
t., ,..
C
0
~ Moisture Content Q)
-:a Description of Material
i 0.
~
and/or .....
I
<ll C
E .g ::,
a !
[jJ
Q.
~ RQD RQD -~ ~t:.
1/) 0
e
FF
20 40 60 80
I I I I
I I I
I I I
I I I
I I I
. I I I
I I
I I
I I
I I -
I I
•• • I
I
4
2
D-1 GS
MC
ML, MC=36%
Sandy SILT, very loose. dark gray, wet, stratified, HCf not
s- -10.0 I
I
I
2
(4)
tested.
Length Recovered:0.9 ft. Length Retained:0.9 fl.
-
Note: The bottom 0.4 ft ofsample was sandy silt wilh
soma hairroots.
-
.
..... I
I
I
I
I
•1
l
I
1
1
D-2 GS
MC
ML, MC=74%, LL=48
SILT with sand, very loose, dark gray, moist, stratified,
-
10- .... 6.0 1 Al. HCI not tested. I-
I I I (2) Length Recovered:1.5 ft. Length Retained:1.5 ft.
I I I Note: The top 0.4 ft ofsample was silty sand, and the
I I l bottom 1.1 ft was silt with some wood debris and hair
I l
I roots throughout.
l
I
I
I -
I
I I
I I S-3 SILT, dark gray, homogenous.
I I
.. -
I 15- -o.o I I
I I
I I
' I I
I I 1 0-4 SILTwith some brown organics, ve(lf loose, dark gray, -
I I 1 moist, homogenous, HCI not tested.
I I 1 Length Recovered:1.2 ft. Length Retalned:1.2 ft.
I I (2)
I I I
I I
I I
•! +
! !
I
I
I
I
I
I
!
2
4
I 0-5 GS
MC
ML, MC=41%
Sandy SILT, loose, dark gray, moist, homogenous, HCI -
... 20
~
......
Washington State
LO~ OF TEST BORING
Start Card S-32703
HOLE No. H-24-08

Job No XL-2963 SR 5 Elevation _1.,__,5""'.0"""'ft"------
Sheet _2_ or _7_
Driller Sheoherd Robert Uc# 27'10
.....
••
g Field SPT (N) Blows/6"
Q)
0 ci
g C &l . (N} ~ z ::z
.a .'!I 1 ~E
Moisture Content Q)
t i5
0
'Q
e and/or Q)
"' ~ Description of Material ::,
0
«I
~ a.. l?dj RQD RQD
ti.
E '.g
8J I::.
-' C
:,
e ~
E.
w FF ~ <!>
20 40 60 80
I I
I I I 3
(7)
[J; not tested.
Length Recovered:1.1 ft. Length Retained:"1.1 ft.
I I I
I I I
I I l
I I I
I l I
I I I
I
1·
I
I
I
I
-
I I I
•• I I I
~
I I I 0 D-6 SILT with some brown and black organics, very loose,
25- --10
I
I
I
I I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
0
1
1
(1)
dark gray, moist. homogenous, HCI not tested.
-
I
I
I
J
I
I
I
I
-
I I I
1. I J
.,.
I I I
I I I
I I I
I I I
. /.. ; /, I I 3 D-7 GS SP-SM, MC=27%
I I I 7 MC Poorly graded SAND with silt, medium dense, dark gray, -
ao- --15 V: ..
,., ." I
I
I
I
I
I 7 wet, homogenous, HCI not tested. >-
....
'"
" I I I (14) Length Recovered:1.5 ft. Length Retained:1.5 ft.
... ' .
".
I I
.... ..
"
"' I f
... .
... .. ' I I I
...
'" ' '
... .'
I
... '
... .. '
I
...
...
... ..
'
'
I -
...
... .. . ' ~
...
." .
'
'
'
1:~
...
".
v· 0 0-8 SILT, very loose, dark gray, wet, homogenous, HCI not
35- 1--20
y· . 1
1
tested.
Length Recovered:1.5 ft. Length Retained:1.5 ft . -
(2)
-
I
l I
I I
I l
I I
I I
•• I
I '• 0
0
0-9 GS
MC
ML, MC=ll6%
SILT, very loose, dark gray, moist, homogenous, HCI not
-
I 40- --26 I
I
1
(1)
tested.
Length Recovered:1.5 ft. Length Retalned:1.5 ft.
-
<
I
I
I I -
I I.
I I I
·~ I
I
I
I
I
I 0
J 0-10 SILT, very loose, dark gray, moist, homogenous, HCI not
'- 45
I I I
I
I
I
0 tested.
~
" " Department of Transportation Start Card S-32703
HOLE. No. H-24-08

Job No XL-2963 SR 5 Elevation _1.,_,5:c:..O"--'-'ft_ _ __
Sheet __L. of _7_
· t I.5/SR 432 Talley Way Interchange
p(OJOC o rIIIer Sheoherd Robert Uc# 2710
'
••
.,a. 0 al
g Field SPT (N) B1ow6/6" d .,
1:
g
=
.,
a.
C
0
~
2
2
Moisture Content
(N)
andfor ., :z i:z
~
"IS. l ...
f;l
! Description of Material !
C
::,
E
:,
~
E :::,
~ e
..
a'; ll. RQD E £
RQD
~ ~t:.
0
iil FF (!)
20
I
40
I
60
T
80
T
1 Length Recovered:1.5 fl. Length Retalned:1.5 ft.
--
I I (1)
I I -
I l
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I
I
..~ I 0 D-11 SILT, very loose, dark gray, moist, homogenous, HCI not -
I
50--..35
I
I
I
0
1
{1)
tested.
Length Recovered: 1.5 ft. Length Retained:1.5 ft. -
I-
I
I
I
I
I -
I ....
I
I
I
I
I ~ S-12
SILT, dark gray, homogenovs.
55- ---40
I
I -
I -
·• 4
3
0-13 SILT, loose, dark gray, moist, homogenous, HCI not
tested.
2 Length Recover.ed:1.3 ft. Length Retained:1.3 ft.
I (5)
~ -
0 0-14 SILT, very loose, dark gray, moist, homogenous, HCI not
80--..45
0
1
{1)
tested.
-
I
I
I
I
I -
I
-~ 0 D-15 SILT, very loose, dark gray, moist, homogenous, HCI not
1 tested.
I 65- --50 1 Length Recovered:1.5 ft. Length Retained:1.5 ft. -
I (2}
I -
I
I
I I
I I
I I
I I I
I I I
~. I
I
I
I
I
~
-
~
'
I I I 0 0-16 GS ML, MC=47%, Pl=:7
... 70
I
I
I
I ! ! 0 MC SILT, very loose, dark gray, moist, homogenous, HCI not
~
.......Washington Stats
LOG OF TEST BORING
Start Card S-32703
HOLE No. H-24-08

Job No XL-2963 SR 5 Elevation _1""5""'.0:..:ft-=----
Sheet_4_ of _7_
Profect 1-5/SR 432 Talley Way Interchange .
Driller Sheoherd Robert Uc# 2710
.,
••
g
g
.J:: j
<I)
;;a
~
Field SPT (N)
Moisture Content
Blowis/6"
(NJ
and/or
iQ)
d
z zd
*-
c .8 5
.0
J Description of Material
j r:
Q)
E
0.
(I)
0 ~
i1i
0.
~ RQD ROD
FF l
rn
t3
::i
I::, t.:)
::,
2 j
20 40 60 80
I
I ' I 0
~ AL tested.
I I
- I I
I I
I I
I I -
I I
I I
I I
I I
•• I
I
I I
I
I
2
2 ~ D-17 SILT, loose, dark gray, moist, homogenous, HCI not
tested.
75- ..--.so I I 3 Length Recovered:1.5ft. Length Retained:1.5ft. >-
I I (6) -
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I -
• I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
0
~ 018 SILT with sand, toose, dark gray, moist, homogenous,
so- --65 I
!
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
4
3
{7)
HCI not tested.
Length Recovered:1.2 ft. Length Retained:1.2 ft. -
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
.. I I I I -
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
.1 I I I
I I 4 D-19 Poorly graded SAND, medium dense, dark gray, wet,
85- --70 vf
.....
,
.
, .... :
.... .
.,,.,,.,.,
....... ,
I
I
I
I
I
I
8
8
(16}
Length Recovered:0.8 ft. Length.Retained:0.8 ft. --
,. .......
.......
,.,..,,,
I
I
I
I
.......
.......
.....
,, ... ,., .
,, .. ,.
.....
I
I
I
·······
...,,,.,,
, ..
,,.,,..
..... ,
I
I
.......
... ,. ..
....... , I
,,,, ...
,,,, ... I
....... I
,,,, ...
······· -
,,,,.,. . I
...... .,, J..I
;:::;: 8 0-20 GS SP·SM MC=24%
i;,(:
... .. I
10
12
MC Poorly graded SAND with silt, medium dense, dark gfay,
wet, homogenous, HCI not tested. .....
80- --75
......... : I
I
...
... I
I
...
....
..
... I -
...
...
...
I
I
I
I
...
... I I
I
...
... :
...
...
...
I
I I
I
I
... I I I I
... I/·:t.i• I
... 95
l:X .
I
I I ! I
I I 0
3
J D-21 SILT with some wood debris, loose, dark gray, moist,
......
=-= Washington State
..,,,,, Department ofTransportation
LOG OF TEST BORING
Start card S,32703
HOLE No. H-24-08

Job No XL-2963 SR 5 Elevation _1~5~.0~ft~----
Sheet_5_ of _7_

Driller Shegherd Robert Lie# 2710
••
s Flelcl SPT (N) Blows/6'' ~ 0....,. al
?::
I i
~
s (N) Z
z0
i I
C Q)
Moisture Conlent .8 ~
i
C !Ii)
0..
~ RQD
and/or
ROD
FF
.91 0.
!jg
(/)
_, Description of Material
e
(!)
c;
::,
::,
~
E
20 40 60 so
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I I
I
I
I
I
i
I
I
I
2
(5)
• Length Recovered:1.3 ft. Length Retained:1.3 ft. -
I I I I
I I I
.I I I
I I I
I I I -
I I I
I I I
'
I I I S-22 SILT, dark gray, homogenous.
I I I f--
100- --85 I I
I I
• I
I
I
~
I I
0
3
D-23 GS
MC
ML, MC,.38%, LL:;33
SILTwith some brown organics, very loose, dark gray, -
I I 2 AL moist, homogenous, HCI not tested.
l I (5) Length Recovered: 1.5 ft. Length Retained: 1.5 ft.
I I
I I
I I
I
I
I I
I. I --
105- --90 I
I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I
I I
I -
. I
'
• I 1 D-24 SILT with some brown organics, very loose, dark gray,
110- --%
2
2
(4)
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
'0
I 0 D,26 SILT with a trace of brown organics, very loose, dark '
I 0 gray, moist, homogenous, HCI not tested. -
116- --100
I
I
I
0
(0)
I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I I
I I -
'· .. I
I
I
I
~
120
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I I
0
0
J D-26 SILT with a trace of seashells and brown organics, vary
loose, dark gray, moist, homogenous, HCI not tested.
......
.,,,,,, Department of Transportation
LOG OF TEST BORING
Start Card S-32703
HOLE No. H-24-08

Job No XL-2963 SR 5 Elevation _1.....,5"-.0'-ft'-'-------
Sheet_6_ of _7_
Project 1-.6/SR 432 Talley Way Interchange Driller · Sheoherd, Robert Lie/I 2710
• Field SPT (N) Blows/6" 21. o ~.

(N) ~Zz 0
~
• Moisture Content
and/or ! ! 11 j Ji Oescription of Material
~ RQD
RQD
FF
E~=>
~ CJ) c
.--
20
I
I
40 60
i
.
80
I
Length Recovered:1.5 ft. Length Retalned:1.5 ft.
I I I
I I I
I I I
I I I
I I I
I I I
I I I
I I I
I I I
• I I 0-27
I I
0 SILTwilh some brown organics, loose, dark gray, moist,
I I 3
4
-
125---110 I I
I I (7)
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I -
I
! '~28
I
• I SILT with some brown organics, very loose, dark gray,
I
130- ......115
I
I
I
I
(3) IA/
moist, homoganous, HCI not tested.
-
I
I
I
I
• 0
2
D-29 SILT with sand and some brown organics, loose, dark
gray, moist, homogenous, HCI not tested. -
135---120 3 Length Recovered:0.8 ft. Length Retafned:0.8 ft. -
(5)
I
I -
I
I
.: '• I : r'1 D-30
GS
MC
ML, MC=45%, Ll,.37
SILTwith sand and some organics, loose, dark gray,
I
140-0-.125 l"r..,.,.,.,
::::;;
I
I
(8) lAI AL moist, stratified, HCI not tested.
Length Recovered:1.5 ft. Length Retained: 1.5 ft.
<!>Note: The bottom 0.3 ft ofthe sample was dark
::::::
::::::
I
I greenish gray slit with fine sand, at 140.2 ft a son change -
twas observed.
:::::: I
;::::: I
:::::: I
:::::: I
:::::: I
:::::: I
\. .••
\ /:.: /. /. ~
I
4
8 j
I D-31 Silty SAND, medium dense, dark greenish gray, wet,
stratified, HCI not tested.
145...L--.l.:.:.:1:::~:.;..:.::l.:L..~-L-'-L-l__.llL-......11_ ___.__ __....__~~---'-~----·~------------....L-......L------'
~
....... Washington State
. , , , , , Department of Transportation
LOG OF TEST BORING
Start Card S-32703
HOLi:. No. H-24-08

Job No XL-2963 SR 5 Elevation _1"-'5'-".0"--"-ft_ _ __
Sheet_7_ of _7_
Project 1-5/SR 432 Talley Way Interchange Driller Shepherd. Robert lie#~
g • Fleld SPT (N) Blows/6" i. o ~0•

~ z z
+ Molsturo Content
(N)
and/or '1l l <l> Description of Material
~ ROD I ~
~ ~ ~
D
RQD FF
20 40 60 80
15 Length Recovered:1.1 ft. Length Retalned:1.1 ft.
I I (23) Note: A 0. 1 ft piece of sandstone was observed.
I I
I I
I I
I l
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
•• I
I
I
I
I
8
16
0-32 GS
MC
SM. MC=31%
Silly SANO, dense. dark greenish gray, moist, stratified,
150- -135 I I 20 HCl not tested,.
I .1 (38} Length Recovered:1.3 ft. Length Retained:1.3 ft.
I Note: The top 0.2 fl ofserriple was sandy silt, the middle
I o. 7 ft ofsample was silly sand stratified with (SP) send,
I and the bottom 0.4 ft ofsample was weathered
l sandstone with FeO stains throughout. At 153.5ft th&
I soil became denser demonstratod by drilling.
I
I
I
I
I >> 50/1" D-33 SANDSTONE, very dense, dark gray, moist.
I (REF) C-34 homogenous, HCI not tested.
I Length Recovered:0.1 ft. Length Retained:0.1 ft.
155 -140
SANDSTONE/SilTSTONE, fine grained, fresh,
moderately weak rock, Discontinuities are very closely
spaced and in fair condition. Recovered:97% RQD:31
FF:3
160 ·146
C-35 SANDSTONE , medium grained, fresh, moderately weak
rock, Discontinuities are closely spaced and In fair
condition. Recovered:100% ROD:52 FF:3.
Note: The sample was stratified with some siltstone, the
top 1 ft was fractured.
165 -150
I
I The Implied accuracy of the borehole location
I information displayed on this boring log is typically
I sub-meter In (X,Y) when collected by the HQ Geotech
I Division and sub-centimeter in {X,Y.Z) when collected by
I the Region Survey Crew.
I
I End of test hole boring at 165 ft below ground elevation.
I This Is a summary Log of Test Boring.
I Soil/Rock descriptions are detived from visual field
I identifications and laboratory test data.
I. Note: REF = SPT Refusal
I
1 7 0 - · ' - - - - ' - - - L - - L - - l l - - - l ' - - - - ' - - - - 1 - - - - ' - - - ' - - . L . . . - - ' - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ' - - . . . __ __,
~
. , , , , , Department ofTransportation StartCard S-32519
HOLE No. H-28-08

Job No XL-2963 SR 5 Eleval!on 24.5 ft ______
Sheet_1_ of _5_
Project 1-5/SR 432 Talley Way Interchange Dnller Haller. Robert Lie# 2779
Site Address Vic SR432 and 1-5 Inspector Cleo Andrews
start March 31, 2008 completion March 31, 2008 wen I D # - - - - - - - - - - Equipment CME 55 with Autohammer
Stal!on AL 110+72.76 Offset 52.34ft Lt. Hole Dia 4 Method Wet Rotary
(inches-'---------
county Cowlitz Subsection SE1/4 of NW1/4 Section 12 Range 2WtNM Township.L.._
g • Fleld SPT (N) Blows/6" & ~

g 0 d
~ : z
"!Q liE
:5 g .9,!
e + Moisture Content (N)
and/or i a.,, .0
_j
I Description of Material ~
a.
<I)
0 l
iii
0..
l?}J RQO
60 80
RQD
FF ! j~
C
e
(9
:,
i
20 40
I I -r -r Note: Silty SAND with gmvel as indicated by drilling end
I I l wash returns, brown.
I I I
I I I
I I I
I I I
I I I
I I I
I I
I I -
I I
-.20.0 • I
I
a 0-1 Silty SANO with gravel, medium dense, dark gray, moist,
homogenous, HCl not tested.
6-
I
I
I
7
8
(15)
I
I
I -
I
I
I
I
I
I
•• I
I
6 D-2 GS SM, MC-=27%
--
'-15.0 6 MG SIiiy SAND with gravel. medium dense, brown, moist,
10-
I 6 homogenous, HCI not tested.
I (12) Length Recovered:0.7 ft. Length Retalned:0.7 ft.
I Note: Bottom 0.25 ft ofsample was light gray.
I Approximately 60-70% ofdrill!ng fluid was lost starling at
- I
I 6.0 ft.
I
. I
I
I -
I
I
4i I 3 Silty SANO with gravel, medium dense, dark gray with
I 15-
-10.0 I
I
8
10
~,. FeO stains, moist, homogenous, HCI not tested.
Length Recovered:1 ft. Length Retained:1 ft. f,-
. I {18) Note: The bottom 0.3 fl of sampte was brown in color.

I
I
I -
I
I
I
I I
. I
I
-6.0 • 1•
! !
I
I
I I
3
2
! D·'\ GS
MC
SM, MC=26%
Silty SAND with gravel, loose, dark gray, wet, -
20
~
" " Department of Transportation Start Card S-32519
HOLE No. H-28-08
Job No XL-2963 SR 5 Elevation ""'2"""4.....5.....ft
_______
Sheet_L of _5_
Project 1-5/SR 432 Talley Way Interchange Driller Haller, Robert
• Field SPT (N) Slows/6"

+ Moisture Content
(NJ
and/or Description of Material
~ RQD
RQD
FF
:20 40 60 80
, .....
,,
i I
,,, ,
........ j i 3
Length Recovered:1 ft. Length Retained:1 ft.
.
''"'""
. ..' . I I I (5)
.. ...
" "'
,,.,,,,. I I I
,,,, ..
,., ,,
...... I I I
······ I
I
I
I
I
I
... , ..
..,,,,,.
,,,,. I I I
I l I -
... ,, ..
-o
.......
......
..... ,,,
.... ;/.
; : ;;.
I
I
I+
I
l
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
2
2
0-6 GS
MC
ML, MC=31 %, Pl:::NA
Sandy SILT with silt lenses and trace organics, very
25- V I I I 1 AL loose, dark gray, moist, laminated, HCI not tested. -
I I I (3) Length Recovered:1.5 ft. Length Retained:1.5 ft.
I I I
I I I -
I l I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I
I I I
I I I
I I I
--6
•• J
•I
I
I 0
1
0-6 GS
MC
ML, MC=60%, Pl=7
SILT with organic lenses and root hairs, very loose, dark -
30-
I
I
I
I 3
(4)
AL gray mottled with dark brown and green, moist,
laminated, HCI not tested.
-
I I Length Recovered: 1.5 ft. Length Retained: 1.5 ft.
I I
I
I
--10
•• 0 0-7 Sandy SILT with organic lenses, very loose, dark brown,
moist, laminated, HCI not tested.
(4)
! -
~
g
.J
g
~
ul
8i -.15 . ~(:
•I• J
4
6
0-8 GS
MC
SM. MC=31%
Silty SAND with wood debris and possible volcanlc ash,
-
01 40- I(::::;
......
I
I I
7 medium dense, gray, moist, stratified, HCI not tested. -
~ :::::: I I
;: :: :::: I I
~ :::::: I I
~ :::::: I I
I
:,
}/
::::::
II II -
.. :::::: I I
fZ .. .... I I
lll
~
~
~ -
--20
::::::
: : : :) •
: :t:,i. ·
I
I
1
I
1
I
1
I
I
I
1
1
45-'----"1;.;~.--'..l-...-L-.......IL...--IL----11---'--~---..L---...__
1 1 1
! D-9 Sandy SILT with organics and wood debris, very loose,
dark g!ay, moist, stratified, HCI not tested.
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ . . _ ~ - ~
~
=w= Washington State
. , , , Department of Transportation
LOG OF TEST BORING
Start Card S-32519
HOLE No. H-28-08

JobNo XL-2963 SR 5 Elevation --'2=-4=.6"-'-'ft_ _ __
Sheet_3_ or _5_
Driller Haller Robert Llc#~
••
g
I
0)
Fle!d SPT (N) Blows/6" Q. 0 c.,
g ~ (N) ?: z 6
z
s
aY
C
0
'i e Moisture Content and/or 0)
} i i
J:)
~ I- I Description of Material 'O

C
:,
E
$
~ RQD E :,
C 0)
iil
0..
RQD FF <II
tJ)
bl) t:. e
C,
"'
Ei
20 40 60 80
I
I
I
I
I I
I
I
I
I
' I
I
1
(2}
• Length Recovered:1.5 ft. Length Retained:1.5 ft.
-
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
--26
•• I
I
I
I 1
2
D-10 Sandy SILT with traces of organic material, very loose,
dark gray, moist. homogenous, HCI not tested.
-
I l
so-
.. I I 1
(3)
I I I
I I I
I I I
I I I
I I I
I I I
I I I -
I [ I
[ I
I
•
I
''. -~ I 0 0-11 GS Ml., MC=51%, LL=37
>--30 I I 1 MC SILT, very loose, dark gray, moist, homogenous, HCI not
55-
I I 1 AL tested. -
I I
(2} Length Recovered: 1.5 ft. Length Retained:1.5 ft.
I
I -
I
I
I
I
I
....
I
I I
I I
' I I 0 0-12 SILT with one organic lense (brown in color). very loose, -
--35 I
60-
I I
I
I
1
1
{2)
dark gray, moist, homogenous, HCI not tested.
I
I
I
i
·1
-
II
'
>--40
.
;/.'"
,. • : 5
8
D-13 Silty SAND, medium dense, dark gray, moist,
A . . . . . . . . ., , . ,.... -
/.:: :
, ... ...
:: Length Recovered:0.6 fl. Length Retained:0.6 ft. -
...... ...
65- 4
I
,
....
, ...
... (12)
-
....
.... ...
,, .. ...
.... ...
...
...
.. , ....
....
.... ...
..... ...
....... ...
, ..
I
I
,,,
....
....
.... ..
....,.
... I I
J ... ....
.... , I I
....
.... ...
... I
....
.... ... I
.... ...
....... I I
... I I -
- 70
..... 45
::::[;),;
:,,, ....
::~.:::
'I
I I
.1
I
I
I
I
I
7
9
! D-14 Poorly graded SAND, medium dense, darh gray, wet,
~
•
r, Washington State
LOG OF TEST BORING
Start Card S-32519
HOLE No. H-28-08

Job No Xl-2963 SR 5 Elevation 24.5 ft
Sheet_4_ of _5_
Project 1-5/SR 432 Talley Way Interchange Driller Haner. Robert Uc# 2779
g
~
g
...
5
~
.!!!
2
• Field SPT (N}
+ Moisture Content
Blows/6" ~· 0
(N}
and/or
~ z
!
(l)
a. i
zti
~ ! Description ofMaterial J2 C
~
E
i
(l)
0
iii
0..
!?a RQD RQD
FF
E ~ :,
~ c <.?
.s
20 40 60 80
I I
I'
I
Length Recovered:1 ft. Length Retalned:1 ft.
I l
10
(19)
.I
I I I
I I l
I I I
I I I
I I I -
I I I
I I I
I I I
I I I
I l I
--50 I I I
75-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
--
I I I
I I I
I I I
I I I
I I I
I I I
I f I
I
I
I
I
l -
--55 I I
I
so- I -
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
.
I
I
I
. .. -.
; ~
:::::·;, 7 0-15 GS SP-SM, MC=26%

--60 : : : ./. ;
85- V:. .. 9
12
MC Poorly graded SAND with silt, medium dense, dark gray,
wet, homogenous, HCI not tested.
ell
(21) Length Recovered:0.8 ft. Length Retalned:0.8 ft.
~ ... . .
...~
Q ;
"~ ~ ~ ~ ;
2
"uiz I -
0
Q
I
~
I
~
>--66 I
", 90- I I
I I
j I I
; ... . .
l
I
I
I
~ I I -
I I
I
'J.' • >
I
I
I
l
I
I
*3
X
... ;;
...
I
1.
I
I
g
"'~ 95
~-70 7, :::;
...
)' I
I
I I
I
I
I l
9
11
! D-16 Poorly graded SAND, dense, dark gray, wet,
~
..... Washington State
LOG OF TEST BORING
StartCard S-32519
HOLE No. H-28-08

Job No XL-2963 SR _5_ _ Elevation --'2=-4~.5:::...:.aft_ _ __
Sheet _5_ of _5_
Project 1-5/SR 432 Talle1 Way Interchange Driller HallerI Robert lie/I 2779
...41
••
g g
C: ~
Field SPT {N)
Moisture Content
Blows/G''
(N}
<l)
0
~ z zo <l)
- ,::,
.,, <ii
~
~
E
.c.
~
Q
f
<l)
£ ~ RQD
and/or
RQD
<l)
a 0.
E E :,
8l
.2!
t:.
~ ! Description of Material C
;;;;,
g
:,
ill
s;
iil FF "'
(/J C)
20 40 60 BO
---.-----
I
I
I
I I
14
I.I Length Recovered:1.5 ft. Length Retained:1.5 ft. -
(26)
.. I
I
I
I
I
.... I
I
.... I -
I
.... I
I
......75
.... I I-
100-
..
.... l
I
....
.. -
.... I
I I
I
I
I
~ 7 D-17 Poorly graded SAND, medium dense, dark gray, wet,
i-.so .. 11 homogenous, HCI not tested.
.. 11 Length Recovered:1 ft. Length Retained:1 ft. --
....
105-
122\
'
I I
I I
I I
I I
I
I
I
I -
I
I
t--85 I
110-
I
I
Information displayed on this boring log is typically
sub-meter In (X,Y) when collected by the HQ Geotech
-·
I
I Division and sub-centimeter In (X,Y,Z) when collected by
I the Region Survey Crew.)
I -
I
I
I
I
I
This is a summaJY Log of Test Boring.
>--90 Soil/Rock descriptions are derived from vfsual field
115-
Nole: REF = SPT Refusal --
I
I
I
I
I
t I
I -
I
I
I
.....95 I
I I I I
120
HOLE No. H-38-08

Job No XL-2963 SR 5 Elevation ~2~1~·~7~ft~----
Sheet _1_ of _7_
Site Address Vic SR432 and 1-5 Inspector Brian Hilts
start April 1. 2008 completion April 3. 2008 Equipment CME 55 with Autohammer
Well ID#
Station AL 115+36.54 Offset 260.37ft Rt. Hole Dia 6 Method Wet Rotary
(inches)
County Cowlitz Subsection SE1/4 of NW1/4 Section 12 Range 2WWM Township_?_ _
g
'5.
g
C
0
~
q::
•• Field SPT (N)
Moisture Content
Blows/6"
(N)
Ql
C.
Ql
d
?:: z zd
Ql .0 %l Description of Material I 1:
Ql
E
I
(U
e and/or 0. 0.
Ql
I ...J Ql C
.0 ::,
E I-
Ql
Cl
a. l?jJ RQD RQD E (U
::,
t:. e
en en
(U
[ij Cl
FF
20 40 60 80
20.0
• 7
14
D-1 Silty GRAVEL with sand. sub-angular, dense, grayish
brown, moist, homogenous, HCI not tested.
5 18 Length Recovered:0.4 ft. Length Retained:0.4 ft.
(32)
15.0
• 10
14
D-2 Silty GRAVEL with sand, sub-angular, medium dense,
grayish brown, wet, homogenous, HCI not tested.
10 10 Length Recovered:0.3 ft. Length Retained:0.3 ft.
(24)
<J>
~
o5
I-
0 10.0
(!)
....i
5(/)
..,
C.
(!)
u.i
z
•
0
(.)
I
I-
4 D-3 Silty GRAVEL with sand, sub-angular, medium dense,
~ 6 grayish green, moist, homogenous, HCI not tested.
'.:, 15 6 Length Recovered:0.8 ft. Length Retained:0.8 ft.
(12)
~
5
tu
...J
...J
~ 5.0
N
(')
;1'cf
1g
<)I
~ D-4 SILT with gravel, organic soil and peat, very loose, dark
0
:5 0 gray, moist, homogenous, HCI not tested.
5(/)
20
~
......Washington State
" " " Department of Transportation
LOG OF TEST BORING
Start Card S-32521
HOLE No. H-38-08

Job No XL-2963 SR 5 Elevation _2:::.1.:.o·..:_7..:.:ft:...-_ __
Sheet_2_ of _7_
· ct I-5/SR 432 Talley Way Interchange
p roJe ort·11 er Sheoherd Robert L"c#
I 2710
'
••
g g
Q)
Field SPT (N) Blows/6"
(N)
Q)
a. ci
?: z zci I,: 1:
Q)
~
C
0 ii= Moisture Content Q) .0 E
.c
e and/or Q)
i (U Description of Material 'O
15.
I a.
~ RQD
a. C.
E E ::,
...J
I-
C
::,
e i
.
Q)
Cl RQD FF (U
"'
(/) I::, Cl
..!:
iii (/)
20 40 60 80
I I I I
2 Length Recovered:0.8 ft. Length Retained:0.8 ft .
I I (2)
I I
I I
I I
1-0 I I
I I
I I
I -
I
I
-~ ... 0 D-5 GS SILT with some organic lenss, very loose, dark gray
0 MC mottled with greenish gray, moist, laminated, HCI not
25- 2
(2)
AL tested.
-
-
--5
~ S6
Sandy SILT with a trace of organics, dark gray,
homogenous. -
I-
30-
--10
·• 1
1
D-7 Sandy SILT with a trace of organics, very loose, dark
gray, moist, homogenous, HCI not tested.
(3)
-
•• 4
2
D-8 Sandy SILT, loose, dark gray, moist, homogenous, HCI
not tested.
35- 3 Length Recovered:1.1 ft. Length Retained:1.1 ft. 1--
(5)
I
I -
I
1--15 I
I
I
-, I
a. I
(!)
lU
z I
0
(.)
:c
f- ·• ~
I
I
I 2
1
D-9 GS
MC
ML, MC=39%, Pl=NA
-
~
(.)
?i
I 40- I
I
1
(2)
AL tested.
-
s I
I
G:i
...I I ~ S-10
GS MC=37%(POST TEST MC:)
~ 1--20 I MC
AL
ML, MC=42%, Pl=NA
SILT, dark gray, homogenous.
I
i
( /)
I CN
-
~
I
~
I
I
~
- 45
I
I
I
I I I
2
2
J D-11 GS
MC
ML, MC=44%, LL=34
Sandy SILT with organic lenss, very loose, dark gray,
:,= ......Washington State
LOG OF TEST BORING
Start Card S-32521
HOLE No. H-38-08

Job No XL-2963 SR 5 Elevation _2_1_._7_ft_ _ _ __
Sheet _3_ of _7_
Project 1-5/SR 432 Talley Way Interchange Driller Shepherd Robert Uc# 2710
'
••
g <I)
g
.c
0.
C
0
""a,
«I
<I)
ij:
e
Field SPT (N)
Moisture Content
Blows/6" a. ci
(N)
and/or
~ z<I) z
<I)
a. E :,
C.
ci
.8
.0
«I
...I *<I) Description of Material *
;;:
'O
C
:,
1:
<I)
E
i
~
a. RQD I-
<I)
0
[jj
RQD FF
E «I
«I (/) t:, e
C)
E
(/)
20 40 60 80
I I I I
wet, stratified, laminated, HCI not tested.
I I
1
(3) lX AL
I I -
I I
I I
--25 I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
-~ I
I
I
I 1 D-12 Sandy SILT, very loose, dark gray, moist, homogenous, -
I I 1 HCI not tested.
50- I 1 Length Recovered:1.5 ft. Length Retained:1.5 ft. -
I (2)
I
--30
.~
0 D-13 Sandy SILT with trace organics, very loose, dark gray,
0 moist, homogenous, HCI not tested.
55- 1 Length Recovered:1.5 ft. Length Retained: 1.5 ft. -
(1)
I -
I
--35
I
-·~ 0
0
D-14 Sandy SILT, very loose, dark gray, moist, homogenous,
HCI not tested.
-
(1)
b
(9 --40
_j
6 -
en
..., ....
a.
(9
ui
z
0
(,)
:r:
~
·• • 0
0
D-15 GS
MC
ML, MC=56%, LL=40
(,)
I 65- 2 AL tested. t--
;'.i: (2) Length Recovered: 1.5 ft. Length Retained: 1.5 ft.
s -
~ --45
,
en I
-
S-16 Sandy SILT, dark gray, homogenous.
- 70
I I I I
HOLE No. H-38-08

Job No XL-2963 SR 5 Elevation _2_1_._7_ft~----
Sheet _4_ of _7_
Project 1-5/SR 432 Talley Way Interchange Driller Sheoherd Robert Uc# 2710
'
••
g Field SPT (N)
Q)
Blows/6" a. d lii "E
g ~ z zd 1
,
Q)
C Q) (N) .l!l
Q) .c E
~
0 Moisture Content
.c
a ~
and/or Q)
a. a. -8 _, "'
(U Description of Material "O ::,
~
C
::,
1ii
~
a. E ::,
Q)
Cl ai
[j
RQD
RQD
FF
E
(U
(/)
(U
(/) !::, e
<!)
.E
20 40 60 80
I I I I
I I
•• I
I
I
+I
0
1 ~ ~17
GS
MC
ML, MC=55%, LL=38
--50 I 2 AL tested.
I -
I
I
I
I
•• I
I 0
0
D-18 SILT, very loose, dark gray, moist, homogenous, HCI not
tested.
I -
75- I 2 Length Recovered: 1.5 ft. Length Retained: 1.5 ft.
(2) -
--55
-
-~ • 1 D-19 GS ML, MC=59%, LL=37
I 1 MC SILT, very loose, dark gray, wet, homogenous, HCI not
I AL -
80- 2 tested.
I (3) Length Recovered:1 ft. Length Retained:1 ft.
I
I
--60
I
I -
I
I
• 2
3
D-20 SILT with sand, loose, dark gray, wet, homogenous, HCI
not tested.
(5) -
--65
-
• 2
5
D-21 SILT with sand, medium dense, dark gray, wet,
I 90- 6 Length Recovered:1 ft. Length Retained:1 ft. >--
(11)
I
--70 I -
I
I
,
I I
I
I
I
I S-22 SILT with trace fine sand, dark gray. homogenous.
I
- 95
I I I I
~
~11
~ Washington State
LOG OF TEST BORING
Start Card S-32521
HOLE No. H-38-08

Job No XL-2963 SR 5 Elevation -=2-"1.'-'-7-'ft.,___ _ __
Sheet _5_ of _7_
'
•l?d:l•
g Field SPT (N) Blows/6"
Q)
0. 0 lii 'E
g Q) (N) ~ z z0 1il
~
Q)
.,:;;
C
0 ii= Moisture Content and/or Q)
~i
.0
ro ]I Description of Material -0 E
,
:::,
'E. +>
ro e RQD
0.
E
...J
I-
C
::,
~
Q)
Cl
>
Q)
Q.
RQD E
ro ro t:.
::i
e .s
w FF Cl)
Cl) (!)
20 40 60 80
I I I I -
I
--75
"it
• I
I
I
0
0
D-23 GS
MC
ML, MC=48%, LL=28
SILT with sand, very loose, dark gray, wet, stratified, HCI
I 0 AL not tested.
I (0) Length Recovered:0.8 ft. Length Retained:0.8 ft.
I Note: The bottom 0.3 feet of sample was silt with a trace
I of brown organics.
I -
I
•• I
I 0
2
D-24 SILT with sand, very loose, dark gray, moist,
homogenous, HCI not tested, with a trace of brown
100- 2 organics. .......
c--80 -
•• I
0
2
D-25 SILT with some brown organics, very loose, dark gray,
105-
I 2
(4)
Length Recovered:1.5 ft. Length Retained:1.5 ft. --
--85
'
t-
110-
>--90
• • 0
2
I D-27 GS
MC
ML, MC=45%, LL=39
SILT with one gravel, very loose, dark gray, moist, -
I 2 AL homogenous, HCI not tested.
(4) I Length Recovered: 1.5 ft. Length Retained:1.5 ft.
I
',
,- -
I 115-
--95
I
-
• 0
3
I D-28 SILT, loose, dark gray, moist, homogenous, HCI not
tested, (moisture tin obtained).
I I I I
120
HOLE No. H-38-08

Job No XL-2963 SR 5 Elevation -=.2.:..:1.c:..7....:.ft.:..__ _ __
Sheet_6_ of _7_
Project 1-5/SR 432 Talley Way Interchange Driller Sheoherd Robert Uc# 2710
'
••
g g
C Q)
(N)
Q)
a. ()
()
~ zQ) z .c -11
!;; 1=
Q)
E
Moisture Content
~a.
.s::: 0 'O
and/or Q) (/)
0. """'ai a a. ~ "'
..J {!!. C
:::,
i
~ RQD E E :::, e
.
Q)
Cl
iii
20
RQD
40 60 80
FF "' "' c
(/)
(/) Cl
.!:
I I I I
3 Length Recovered: 1.5 ft . Length Retained:1.5 ft.
I (6)
I
I
-
f---100
• 0
2
D-29 SILT with trace brown organics, loose, dark gray, moist,
homogenous, HCI not tested. -
125- 3 Length Recovered: 1.5 ft. Length Retained:1.5 ft. -
(5)
--105
~ S30 SILT, dark gray, homogenous.
130- -
--110
• 5
4
D-31 SILT with some brown organics, loose, dark gray, moist,
-
I (9)
I I
I I
I I
I
• ~ I 0 D-32 GS ML, MC=36%, Pl=NA
6 MC SILT with sand, medium dense, dark greenish gray, wet, -
135- 7 AL homogenous, HCI not tested. -
ti
(9 --115
....i
6
Cf)
-
I
• 9
11
D-33 Sandy SILT with gravel, medium dense, dark greenish
gray, wet, homogenous, HCI not tested.
I 140- 13 Length Recovered:1 ft. Length Retained:1 ft. -
(24)
-
--120
••,
- 145
I
I
I I I
8
10
! D-34 GS
MC
ML, MC=34%
Sandy SILT stratified with silty sand, dense, dark
-
HOLE No. H-38-08

Job No XL-2963 SR 5 Elevation -=.2..:..1.,_,_7-'ft.,___ _ __
Sheet_?_ of _7_
Project 1-5/SR 432 Talley Way Interchange o n·11 er Sheoherd Robert L'IC# 2710
'
••
g g
Q)
Field SPT (N) Blows/6" C.
(N) j=:'
Q)
d
z zd I,: 'E
Q)
..., ~tl
C
.c 0 ii= Moisture Content Q) .0 'O E
15. ""<U e and/or Q)
a. a. .0 Q) <U Description of Material C
::,
::,
~
a.
~ E
e
RQD ::,
Q)
iii RQD E <U .s
Cl
iii FF <U
If)
If) I::. (.9
20 40 60 80
I I I I
17
(27)
IX greenish gray, wet, stratified, HCI not tested.
Note: At 146 feet the soil became denser demonstrated
by drilling.
1--125
>>• • 50/3" [% D-35 Sandy SILT, very dense, dark gray, dry, homogenous,
(REF) HCI not tested.
150- Length Recovered:0.3 ft. Length Retained:0.3 ft. -
-
1-.130
• >>•~ 28
5014''
(REF)
! D-36 GS
MC
AL
ML, MC=20%, Pl=9
Sandy SILT, very dense, dark grayish brown, dry,
homogenous, HCI not tested. -
-
155-
--135
>>• • [%
l!f:
50/3" D-37 Poorly graded SAND, very dense, dark gray, moist,
(REF) homogenous, HCI not tested.
160- .
....... Length Recovered:0.3 ft. Length Retained:0.3 ft. I-
.......
.......
.......
....... -
.......
.. ....
.......
,.
.. ....
.......
,.
.. ....
1--140 .......
,.
.......
.......
....... I
.......
.......
.......
.......
.......
.......
.......
.......
.......
.......
.......
....... -
....... >>• ~
r,..,..,.11 i.. n.'>0
Poorly graded SAND, very dense, gray, moist.
I\Length Recovered:0.3 ft. Length Retained:0.3 ft. (
I 165-
(REF)

-
information displayed on this boring log is typically
sub-meter in (X,Y) when collected by the HQ Geotech
1--145 Division and sub-centimeter in (X,Y,Z) when collected by
the Region Survey Crew.
-
I
This is a summary Log of Test Boring.
Soil/Rock descriptions are derived from visual field
Note: REF = SPT Refusal
I I I I
170
HOLE No. H-40-08

Job No XL-2963 SR 5 Elevation --'2::.:3:::.!..,_7_,_ft,..___ _ __
Sheet _1_ of _7_
Project 1-5/SR 432 Talley Way Interchange Driller Haller. Robert Lie# 2779
Site Address Vic SR432 and 1-5 Inspector Cleo Andrews
Start April 9, 2008 Completion April 11 , 2008 Equipment CME 45 with Autohammer
Well I D # - - - - - - - - - - -
(inches----------
g • Field SPT (N) Blows/6" QJ

a. ci iii <:QJ
g ~ zQJ zci 1
.c
a.
C:
0
+'
QJ
~
+ Moisture Content
(N)
and/or
QJ
a. C. i "' f--~
.0
-'
C:
E
::,
QJ
"'iii a.
~ RQD RQD E E ::i
::,
e tl
Cl
ITi FF "'
en &'l t:. Cl
..!:
';"1 • ... 20
I
I
40
I
60
I
I
80
I
I
• 1 i. ' I I I
••••1 ••
I> UI>
0
•
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
•• ••
•1....
•
0
•
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
.
-
•.••• •••••
I I I
-20.0 0 I I
I I
.•
I
5-
•.••• ••0••• ..i 14 D-1 GS GP-GM, MC=18%
-
..•,
8 MC Poorly graded GRAVEL with silt and sand, sub-angular,
•• 0•• 5 medium dense, dark gray, moist, HCI not tested.
(13} Length Recovered:0.5 ft. Length Retained:0.5 ft.
• •
.•
-
~ Note: Gravel is slightly weathered. from 0.0 ft to 5.0 ft
•• 0•• Silty SAND with gravel was indicated by drilling and wash
returns .
•••• •0• ,0
-15.0 • •
• 1 i. .Y
•• 0••' 4/9/2008
••
10-
,..'. t
• 1 i.
.• •
•
0
'
I 13
13
8
D-2 GS
MC
GP-GM, MC=18%
Poorly graded GRAVEL with silt and sand, sub-angular,
medium dense, dark gray, moist, HCI not tested.
--
••... (21) Length Recovered:0.5 ft. Length Retained:0.5 ft.
•.••
I
•• 0
. •
• I
...
-10.0
•.••
•• 0
. •
• I
-
•• 0••
15- ...• •• •
• • -
•.••
I
5 0-3 GS GP-GM, MC=18%
•• 0•• 8 MC Poorly graded GRAVEL with silt and sand, sub-angular,
medium dense, dark green, moist, homogenous, HCI not
8
.• •
..
(16} tested. -
•• 0••
I
•
...••• ••• '
-5.0
•
•• • • '
0
•• 0
!,
20
......
' I I I I
-
~[)
.......
LOG OF TEST BORING
Start Card S-32521
HOLE No. H-40-08

Job No XL-2963 SR 5 Elevation -=2.:::.3:..:..7....:ftc.:..__ _ __
Sheet _2_ of _7_
Project 1-5/SR 432 Talley Way Interchange Driller Haller. Robert Lie# 2779
g
.s::
0.
g
C
0
~
Ql
ii=
e
Moisture Content
Blows/6" 2l. 0
(N)
and/or
~ z z0
i Ql
Ql
C. .0
.0
Ol
...J *
Ql Description of Material
~
Ql a. RQD E E ::, I-
iii RQD Ol
~ (/) I::.
0
jjj FF
lo. 20 40 60 80
I I I I
I--_:_-_.:.. 0 D-4 Lean CLAY with gravel and root hairs, soft, dark olive
.-.- I I 1 gray with traces of green oxidized stains, moist, stratified,
---;- --;-
1--
-·- I I
_.!...
,___ _.:..
I I
_--;-_--;- I I
-·-
.__:__.....:. I I
t---
I
,_._ I
-·-
1--.-. I
-o I
--·-
1----
I
•
._-;-
-.-. I
--
,___
25-
•
V
0 D-5 GS ML, MC=40%
1 MC Sandy SILT, very loose, dark gray, wet, homogenous,
2 HCI not tested.
(3) Length Recovered:1 ft. Length Retained:1 ft.
,-
--5
-
30- -
'
SH-6 SILT with decayed wood particles and root hairs, dark
gray.
Note: 0 PSI was required to push a 3-inch OD she/by
tube 2.0 ft.
I
• I
I
I
1
1
D-7 SILT with decayed wood particles, root hairs and other
organic material, very loose, dark gray, moist, stratified, -
HCI not tested. ,-
I 1
I I (2) Length Recovered:1.5 ft. Length Retained:1.5 ft.
f-.10 I
I
I
...
a,
35-
• •I
1
3
D-8 MC MC=35%
Sandy SILT with traces of organic material, loose, dark
f-
~ 3 gray, wet, stratified, HCI not tested. -

00 (6) Length Recovered: 1.5 ft. Length Retained: 1.5 ft.
I-
0
(!)
Note: Sample becomes wet when shaken by hand.
...I
5(/)
...,
a.
(!)
w
z
0 --15
I.)
::c:
I- -
~
I.)
40- -
'
I
SH-9 Sandy SILT with traces of organic material, dark gray.
~ Note: 0 to 25 PSI was required to push a 3-inch she/by
$
tube 2.0 ft.
1:i
...I
~
l;j
~
(/)
•• 1
1
D-10 Sandy SILT, very loose, dark gray, wet, homogenous.
HCI not tested. -
I
'.2 1 Length Recovered: 1.5 ft. Length Retained: 1.5 ft.
(")
(2) Note: Sample becomes wet when shaken by hand.
~
~ --20
...I
X -
..._,
:5
5(/) I I I
~
45
=.:=.......
Washington State
LOG OF TEST BORING
Start Card S-32521
HOLE No. H-40-08

Job No XL-2963 SR 5 Elevation ~2=3~.7~ft_ _ __
Sheet _3_ of _7_
Project l-5ISR 432 Talley Way Interchange .

Driller Haller Robert Uc# 2779
••
g g
Q)
(N)
Q)
C. 0
~ zQ) z0
I;;: "E
Q)
.c
a.
C
0
'iii
ii=
e Moisture Content and/or Q)
C. a. i
.0
<1l ]! Description of Material "O
C
E
:,
_J :,
ti
~
I-
Q)
a; a. RQD E E :, e ..s
en ~ t:..
0 ROD FF <1l <.!)
jjj
20 40 _ 60 80
I I .,.. I T
0 D-11 GS ML. MC=53%. Pl=NA
I I 0 MC SILT with 6 inches of organic material in top of sample.
I I 1 AL very loose. dark gray. wet. stratified. HCI not tested. -
I I Length Recovered: 1.5 ft. Length Retained: 1.5 ft.
(1)
I I
I Note: Sample becomes wet when shaken by hand.
I
I I
I I
I I
I I
--25 I I
I I -
I I
I I -
50- I I
~SH-12
Sandy SILT with organic material. dark gray.
I I Note: Sample becomes wet when shaken by hand. 0 to
I I 25 PSI was required to push a 3-inch she/by tube 2.0 ft.
I I
I I
• ~ I
I
I
I
I
I
0
0
D-13 MC MC=44%
Sandy SILT. very loose. dark gray. wet. homogenous. -
I I (1) Length Recovered: 1.5 ft. Length Retained: 1.5 ft.
--30 I I Note: Sample becomes wet when shaken by hand.
I I
I I
I I
55- •• I
I
I
I
0 D-14 Sandy SILT. very loose. dark gray. wet. homogenous.
-
I I
1 HCI not tested.
-
1
I I (2) Note: Sample becomes wet when shaken by hand.
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
--35 I I
I I -
I
60-
I ~
~ SH-15 Sandy SILT, , dark gray.

Note: Sample becomes wet when shaken by hand. 0 to
25 PSI was required to push a 3-inch Shelby tube 2.0 ft.
• •• • 0
1
D-16 GS
MC
ML, MC=48%, LL=32
SILT, very loose. dark gray, wet, homogenous, HCI not
-
1 AL tested.
--40 Note: Sample becomes wet when shaken by hand.
I 65-
·• 0
1
D-17 Sandy SILT with trace organic material, very loose, dark
gray, wet, homogenous, HCI not tested.
-
-
1 Length Recovered: 1.5 ft. Length Retained: 1.5 ft.
--45 -
I I I I
70
=-=
~
Washington State
LOG OF TEST BORING
Start Card S-32521
HOLE No. H-40-08

Job No XL-2963 SR 5 Elevation -=2::..:3::.:...?=-.:.:.ft_ _ __
Sheet _4_ of _7_
Project 1-5/SR 432 Talley Way Interchange on·11 er Haller Robert Lie# 2779
'
••
g g
tl)
(N)
tl)
C.
~
d
z zd I;;:: t:tl)
! E
C
.0
.c 0 ii: Moisture Content and/or
tl)
ro Description of Material "O
0. ~ e
tl)
C. a.
E ::::,
i ..J
C
::::,
::::,
1il
tl)
Cl a,
[ij
a.
~ RQD
RQD
FF
E
ro
Cl)
8l t:. e
(!)
.s
20 40 60 80
I I I I
SILT, dark gray.
I I ~SH1' Note: 0 to 25 PSI was required to push a 3-inch Shelby
I I tube 2.0 ft.
I I
I I
•• I
I
I
~ 0
1
D-19 MC MC=58%
-
1 tested.
(2) Length Recovered: 1.5 ft. Length Retained: 1.5 ft.
.......50 Note: Sample becomes wet when shaken by hand.
75- ... -~ --
'
1 D-20 SILT, very loose, dark gray, moist, stratified, HCI not
1 tested.
(2) Note: A pocket of light pink organic material was
observed in the middle of the sample.
I
I
I
I
-.55 I -
I
I
I -
80-
, SH-21 Sandy SILT, medium dark gray.
Note: Sample becomes wet when shaken by hand. 0 to
•• 2
2
D-22 Sandy SILT, very loose, medium dark gray, wet,
-

--60
I
I
• I ,_
'
85-
2 D-23 MC MC=41% -
I 2 Sandy SILT, very loose, medium dark gray, wet,
2 homogenous, HCI not tested.
b
C9
Note: Sample becomes wet when shaken by hand.
..J
6
Cl)
--,
a.
C9
w -
z
0 --65
(.)
::c
~
(.)
~
~
I 90-
• t 1
3
D-24 MC MC=40%
Sandy SILT, fine grained silt layers, light gray in color,
-
- I 4 loose, medium dark gray, wet, stratified, HCI not tested.

g I
I
Note: Sample becomes wet when shaken by hand. -
I
i
C l)
I
I
I
I
I
--70 I
- I
I
- 95
I I I I
......
~ Washington State
LOG OF TEST BORING
Start Card S-32521
HOLE No. H-40-08

Job No XL-2963 SR 5 Elevation -'2=3~.7~ft_ _ __
Sheet _5_ of _7_
Project 1-5/SR 432 Talley Way Interchange Driller Haller Robert Lie# 2779
'
•• I
g g Field SPT (N) Blows/6"
Cl)
0. 6 t:
C: Cl) (N) ?:: z z6Cl) .c $l
Cl)
E
~
.c: 0 Moisture Content (J) 'O
a. """'> and/or
iE a. i "'
...J
~
Description of Material C:
::,
::,
ti
~
a.. E ::,
Cl) RQD e
RQD
"' "' t:. .!:
0 Q)
[jj FF Cl)
Cl) Cl
20 40 60 80
I I T T
SILT, gray.
-
I ' SH-25 Note: Sample becomes wet when shaken by hand. 25to
I
,
I
I
• + 1
2
D-26 GS
MC
ML, MC=41 %, Pl=NA
SILT, loose, gray, wet, homogenous, HCI not tested.
5 AL Length Recovered:1.5 ft. Length Retained:1.5 ft.
(7) Note: Sample becomes wet when shaken by hand. -
--75
•
~
100-
/, 3 D-27 Silty SAND with peat fibers, organic material (brown) and
/.:: 6 silt lenss (light gray), medium dense, dark gray, wet,
1/. : : : : 6 stratified, HCI not tested.
......
...... (12) Length Recovered: 1.5 ft. Length Retained:1.5 ft.
......
...... -
......
...... I
......
...... I
......
...... I
......
......
......
......
......
...... I
......
...... I
--80
......
.. ... I
......
,.
......
.. ...
......
,. I
......
105- .... ,,.
::::i;.,.
: : ;;.
• ii' 4
4
~ D-28 MC MC=43%
SILT with organic material (brown) and tiny pieces of light
-
II· 4 pink shell light pink in color, loose, dark gray, moist,
(8) ~ stratified, HCI not tested.
-
--85
110-
I
I
I
'1 SH-29 SILT, dark gray.
Note: 0 to 25 PSI was required to push a 3-inch Shelby
tube 2.0 ft.
-
-
• 2
3
D-30 SILT, traces of tiny pieces of shell, loose, dark gray,
moist, homogenous, HCI not tested, traces of shell.
4 Length Recovered: 1.5 ft. Length Retained:1.5 ft.
(7) ~
--90
I 115-
'1 SH-31 Sandy SILT, dark gray.
Note: 0 to 25 PSI was required to push a 2-inch Shelby
tube 2.0 ft.
- -
I
• • I
I
3
3
D-32 MC MC=39%
Sandy SILT with traces of organic material, loose, dark
I 3 gray, moist, homogenous, HCI not tested. -
I (6) Length Recovered: 1.5 ft. Length Retained:1.5 ft.
--95 I
I
~
120
LL I i I I
HOLE No. H-40-08

Job No XL-2963 SR 5 Elevation _2_3_._?_ft_ _ _ __
Sheet _6_ of _7_
Project 1-5/SR 432 Talley Way Interchange Driller Haller Robert lie# 2779
'
•• I,:
g g Field SPT (N) Ql
Blows/6" a. c:i "l::
Ql (N) ~ zQl zc:i Ql
.c
C
0
~
Moisture Content and/or a. C. ~
Ql
.0
<11 tl Description of Material "O E
1:i.
Ql
""<11 a.
~ RQD E E ::, ..J Ql
I-
e
C
::,
i
0
~ 20
RQD
40 60 80
FF
<11 t:,
<11 (/)
(/) Cl
.!:
lo.
rr I I I I
1 D-33 very loose, No recovery.
1
1
(2) -
>--100
-
125- f-
SILT with organic material (brown), dark gray.

' SH-34 Note: 0 to 25 PSI was required to push a 2-inch Shelby
tube 2.0 ft.
• ,•
I
2
2
D-35 GS
MC
ML, MC=45%, LL=42
SILT with organic material (brown), loose, dark gray,
I 5 Al moist, stratified, HCI not tested. -
I (7) ~ Length Recovered:1.5 ft. Length Retained:1.5 ft.
--105 I
I
I
130-
• '• 2
4
~ D-36 MC MC=45%
SILT with decayed wood and other organic material
-
3 (brown to black), loose, dark gray, moist, stratified, HCI
(7) ~ not tested.
-
Note: Silty sand with organic material (green) was
observed at top of the sample.
--110
-
135-
SILT with trace organic material, dark greenish gray ,
-
' SH-37 traces of organic.
Note: O to 50 PSI was required to push a 2-inch Shelby
tube 2.0 ft.
l
•
o
(!)
•
A
..J
6 I 6 D-38 GS CH, MC=38%, Pl=27
(J)
..., I 8 MC Fat CLAY with sand and organic material (brown), very -
a.
I 8 Al stiff, dark greenish gray, moist, stratified, HCI not tested.
-- -
(!)
ui
z
--115
-- -
--- -
I (16) Length Recovered:1.5 ft. Length Retained:1.5 ft.
8:r: I
--- - I
I- - - I
;:: --- -
(.)
~
s
I 140- ~-/
;/::
--.;;:: '•• 3
8
D-39 MC MC=32%
Silty SAND with sandy silt lenss, organic material (brown)
7, ..... 16 and traces of small gravel, medium dense, dark greenish -
.... ...
~ ....
....
....
....
....
....
...
...
...
...
...
...
(24) gray, moist, stratified, HCI not tested.
Length Recovered:1.5 ft . Length Retained: 1.5 ft.
i ....
.... ...
...
(J) .... ...
.... ...
I
....
.... ...
...
....
.... ...
...
....
.... ...
...
--120 ....
.... ...
...
.... ...
.... ...
....
.... ...
... -
.... ...
.... ... I I I I
145
.......
~ Washington State
.,,,.,, Department of Transportation
LOG OF TEST BORING
Start Card S-32521
HOLE No. H-40-08

Job No XL-2963 SR 5 Elevation -'2=3'-'-.?'--'-'ft_ _ __
Sheet_?_ of _7_
Project 1-5/SR 432 Talley Way Interchange Driller Haller Robert Lie# 2779
'
g g • Field SPT (N) Blows/6"

Q)
C. ci
?:: z zci ! 1:
+
Q)
Q) (N) 3
.s::
Q.
C
0
""ai
<U ~
Moisture Content and/or Q)
ci
Q)
a. ~
.0
_,
<U 1 Description of Material 'O
C
E
i
~
E :, f- :J
Q) a. RQD E e
0 RQD FF <U ~ t:. (!)
.!:
iii en
20 40 60 80
I I I I , ,
I I I
50/5" 1.6 D-40 Silty SAND with gravel and traces of organic material,
(REF) very dense, dark gray, moist, homogenous, HCI not
I I I tested, gravel is slightly weathered.
I I I Length Recovered:0.4 ft. Length Retained:0.4 ft.
I I I
I I I Note: Started drilling harder at 144.0 ft.
I I I
I I I -
I I I
I I I
--125 I I I
I I I
I I I
150- ,.. I
I
I
I •1
I
18 D-41 GS SM, MC=24%, Pl=NA
-
I I I I 30 MC Silty SAND with gravel/SANDSTONE, very dense,
I I I I 43 AL medium dark gray, moist, homogenous, HCI not tested, -
I I I I 173\ Sandstone is highly weathered.
I I
I I \Length Recovered:1.5 ft. Length Retained:1.5 ft. !

I I The implied accuracy of the borehole location
I I information displayed on this boring log is typically
I I sub-meter in (X,Y) when collected by the HQ Geotech
I I Division and sub-centimeter in (X,Y,Z) when collected by
--130 I I the Region Survey Crew.")
I I End of test hole boring at 151.5 ft below ground elevation. -
I I This is a summary Log of Test Boring.
I I Soil/Rock descriptions are derived from visual field -
155- I identifications and laboratory test data.
I Note: REF = SPT Refusal
I
~-135
160- -
-
I
-,
a.
(!)
-
w
z
0 >---140
(.) -
i
(.)
I 165- -
?i:
5
1:i
:::l
~
N
~ -
"'I -
>---145
-
I I I I
~ 170
HOLE No. H-43-08

Job No XL-2963 SR 5 Elevation ~18~-~4~ft~----
Sheet _1_ of _6_
Project 1-5/SR 432 Talley Way Interchange Driller Henderson. Danny Lie# 2742
Site Address Vic SR432 and 1-5 Inspector Vince Johnson
Start March 8. 2008 completion March 8. 2008 Equipment CME 55 with Autohammer
Well I D # - - - - - - - - - -
(inches)--'---------
••
g Field SPT (N) Blows/6" 0.
(])
d t "E
g C (]) (N) ?': z zd 1 (])
.c
a
0
+'
ro
ii=
e Moisture Content (])
and/or a a .0
(]) (])
.0
ro
..J i Description of Material "O
C
::,
E
::,
tl
~
I-
(])
0 ~
a.
RQD RQD E E ::,
ro t:. e E
ro en
iii FF en C)
20 40 60 80
I I I I
5l.
3/13/2008
-
-15.0
•• 1
2
D-1 SILT with trace gravel and root hairs. very loose. brown to
dark gray. moist. stratified. HCI not tested.
(3)
-10.0
•• • 0 D-2 GS ML. M.C.=70%. LL-43. PL=NP
10-
...
1
1
(2) ~
MC
AL
SILT with trace organics. very loose. dark gray, moist,
--
ti
C!J
..J
6
Cf)
...
-,
a. -
C!J
lU
z '"-5.0
0
(.)
:r I SILT, dark gray to brown, stratified.
1-
'S-3
:l:
(.)
I 15- -
~
3:
~ • 2
2
D-4 Sandy SILT, very loose, gray, wet, stratified, HCI not
tested.
-
~
Cf)
(3)
I
-0.0
. .
• • 1
~
D-5 GS SM, M.C.=31%
- 20
IA I I I I
2 MC Silty SAND, loose, gray, wet, homogenous, HCI not -
HOLE No. H-43-08

Job No XL-2963 SR 5 Elevation ---'-1~8-~4~ft~----
Sheet _2_ of _6_

proJec on·11er Henderson Dannv Uc# 27 42
'
g
.c
15.
g
C
0
:;::,
ii=
(1)
e
Moisture Content
Blows/6"
(N)
and/or
(1)
a.
(1)
ci
~ z(1) z
a. a.
ci
i:,
.0
(U
...I
.l!l
~
(/)
!
3
'O
C
:,
1=
(1)
E
~
(1)
l a.
~ RQD
RQD E E e E
If) t:.
(U
0 (U
iD FF If) C)
20 40 60 80
......
...... I I I I
......
...... I I
4
l1 tested.
......
...... I I
......
......
......
...... I I
......
...... I I
......
...... I
......
...... I
......
...... I
......
...... -
......
...... I
• .,
--5 ......
...... I
......
...... I
......
.... ;i. 0 D-6 GS ML, M.C.=36%
::V· 2 MC SILT with sand, very fine sand, very loose, gray, wet,
25- v· 1 AL homogenous, HCI not tested. -
,-
-
--10
I
/: • •
. / I 1 D-7 GS SP-SM, M.C.=27%
. I 4 MC Poorly graded SAND with silt, loose, gray, wet, -
30- /:
...
...
.. 5 homogenous, HCI not tested. -
t- ...
... (9) Length Recovered:1 ft. Length Retained:1 ft.
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
... -
...
...
>--15 ...
...
...
... .,,.......
2 D-8 SILT with sand, very loose, gray, wet, stratified, HCI not
2 tested.
35- 1 Length Recovered: 1.2 ft. Length Retained: 1.2 ft. >-
(3) Note: The upper 0. 6 feet of sample was well graded sand,
and the bottom 0. 6 ft of the sample was silt.
-
--20
~
S-9 SILT, gray. -
~
I 40-
t-
~
• 0
1
D-10 GS
MC
ML, M.C.=47%, LL=35, PL=NP
SILT with sand, very fine sand, very loose, dark gray, wet,
t-
1 AL homogenous, HCI not tested.

I
-
1--25
••
~
45
I I I I
0
1
J D-11 SILT, very loose, dark gray, wet, homogenous, HCI not
tested.
~
....... Washington State
. . , , , , Department of Transportation
LOG OF TEST BORING
Start Card S-32521
HOLE No. H-43-08

Job No XL-2963 SR 5 Elevation _,_18::c:·c...:4....:.ft!..,__ _ __
Sheet _3_ of _6_
Project 1-5/SR 432 Talley Way Interchange Driller Henderson Danny Lie# 2742
'
••
g Field SPT (N) Blows/6" 0.
<1)
d iii 'E
g <1) (N) ~ z d z
1il
3:
<1)
C:
0 ii= Moisture Content <1) .0 J!l 'O E
.c (/)
and/or a. i Description of Material
<1)
a ""t1l> e a.
t1l
...J
~
C:
:::l
:::l
tl
~
<1) a. RQD E E :::i
e
0 <1)
[ij
RQD FF t1l
t1l
(/) t:. (!)
.s
(/)
20 40 60 80
I I I I
I
1
(2)
ll
I -
I
--30
-~ 0 D-12 SILT, very loose, dark gray, wet, homogenous, HCI not -
0 tested.
50- 2 Length Recovered:1.5 ft. Length Retained: 1.5 ft. t-
(2)
--35
•• 0 D-13 SILT, very loose, dark gray, wet, homogenous, HCI not
0 tested.
55- 1 Length Recovered:1.5 ft. Length Retained: 1.5 ft. t-
(1)
-
--40
-~ • 0
0
D-14 GS
MC
ML, M.C.=49%, LL=30, PL=NP
SILT with sand, very loose, dark gray, wet, homogenous,
,_
-
60- 2 AL HCI not tested.
I
-
,__45
I 65-
·• 0
0
2
D-15 SILT, very loose, dark gray, wet, homogenous, HCI not
tested.
Length Recovered: 1.5 ft. Length Retained:1.5 ft. -
(2)
-
>--50
::i
i5
(/)
- 70
• I I I I
0
0
I D-16 SILT, very loose, dark gray, wet, homogenous, HCI not
tested.
-
HOLE No. H-43-08

Job No XL-2963 SR 5 Elevation --'-'18:::.:·...:.4...:.ft,:___ _ __
Sheet _4_ of _6_

p roiec o n·11 er Henderson Dannv L'IC# 2742
'
••
g g Field SPT (N) Blows/6"
<I)
C. d 2 1:
~ z z
d
C <I) (N) .0 .l'l "',: <I)
E
iE Moisture Content
~
.<:. 0 <I) "O :,
and/or <I)
.2l Description of Material
15. ~ e i5. E :, "'
....I
~
C
:,
ti
<I)
Cl iii
[ij
a.
~ RQD
RQD
FF
E
en"' en"' t::.
e
(!)
£
20 40 60 80
I I I I
I
2
(2)
ll
I
I
I
I
I -
I
I
--55 I
I
• 2
2
D-17 SILT, loose, dark gray, wet, laminated, HCI not tested.
Length Recovered: 1.5 ft. Length Retained:1.5 ft.
75- 3 t-
(5) -
--60
•• 2 D-18 SILT, very loose, dark gray, wet, stratified, HCI not tested.
-
80-
3
1
(4)
-
-
• ..,
--65
1 D-19 GS ML, M.C.=37%, LL=NA, PL=NP

2 MC SILT, loose, gray, wet, stratified, HCI not tested.
85- 3 AL Length Recovered:1.5 ft. Length Retained:1.5 ft. I-
(5) -
>--70 -
• 8 D-20 SILT, dense, gray to greenish gray, moist, stratified, HCI
I 90-
9
20
(29)
not tested.
-
I
>--75
>>• •
~
A
50/6" D-21 SILT, (SILTSTONE), very dense, dark greenish gray,
X (REF) moist, stratified, HCI not tested, Actual blow count 80/6".
X I I I I
~
95
HOLE No. H-43-08

Job No XL-2963 SR 5 Elevation -'-18"-'.'-'4'-'ft"------
Sheet~5~ of ~6~
Project 1-5/SR 432 Talley Way Interchange o n·11 er Henderson Dannv L"c#
I 2742
'
•• I
g g Field SPT (N) Blows/6" a.
<I)
d
z zd "E
~
<I)
<I) (N)
E
*
C
.c 0 tE Moisture Content <I) .0 "O
e and/or <I) C. <I) t1l Description of Material ::,
li ""a,
t1l C. .0 ...I
~
C
::,
~
a.
~ RQD E ::,
<I)
0
[ij
RQD FF
E
t1l t1l
(/) I::, e
(!)
.s
(/)
20 40 60 80
X X X I I I I
X
X
X X
X X
I
X X X I
X
X
X X
X X
I
X X X I
X
X
X X
X X
I
X X X I
X
X
X
X
X
X I
X X X I
X X X
t--80 X X X I -
X X X I
X X X
>>l ~
X
X
X
X
X
X
50/6"
(REF)
t% D-22 SILT, (SILTSTONE), very dense, dark greenish gray,
moist, stratified, HCI not tested, Actual blow count 62/6".
100-
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X X X
X X X
X X X
X X X
X X X -
X X X
X X X
X X X
X X X
X X X
X X X
>--85 X X X
X X X
X X X
>>~ ~
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
50/6"
(REF)
% D-23 SILTSTONE, CHLORITE, very dense, black, moist,
homogenous, HCI not tested, Drlling fliud indicates soil
105-
X
X
X
X
X
X change at approx. 101' from greenish gray to dark brown. --
X X X Length Recovered:0.5 ft. Length Retained:0.5 ft.
X X X
X X X
X X X
X X X
X X X
X X X
X X X
X X X
X X X
X X X
X X X
--90
X
X
X
X
X
X
-
X X X
r:
X X X
X X X >>• i. 50/6" D-24 SILTSTONE, CHLORITE, very dense, black, moist,
X X X
X X X (REF) stratified, HCI not tested, Actual blow count 52/6".
X X X
110- X X X Length Recovered:0.5 ft. Length Retained:0.5 ft. t-
X X X I
X
X
X
X
X
X
I
X X X I
X X X I
X X X
I -
b X X X
(9
...J
X
X
X
X
X
X
I
6
Cl)
X X X I
--,
X
X
X
X
X
X
I
a.
(9 X X X I
X X X
w
z --95 X X X I
0 X X X I
{)
>>l i.
X X X
5014" ti D-25 SILTSTONE, very dense, dark gray, moist, stratified, HCI
i
{)
I 115-
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
(REF) not tested, Actual blow count 60/5".
Length Recovered:0.4 ft. Length Retained:0.4 ft. - -
X X X
~ X X X
s X
X
X
X
X
X
~
X X X
X X X
X X X
X X X
~
X X X
X X X
Cl) X X X
I X X X
X
X
X
X
X
X
-
--100 X X X
X X X
X X X >>i i. 50/4"
X
X
X
X
X
X
(REF)
ti 0-26 SILTSTONE, very dense, dark gray, moist, stratified, HCI
not tested, Actual blow count 100/5".
X X X
Iv V V I I I I
20
......
" " " ' ' Department of Transportation
LOG OF TEST BORING
Start Card S-32521
HOLE No. H-43-08

Job No XL-2963 SR 5 Elevation _.:_1.::.B-:..:4c.:ft.:.__ _ __
Sheet _6_ of _6_
p roiec o n·11 er Henderson Dannv Lie# 2742
'
g
.c
a
g
C:
0
""a;ro
QJ
~
Moisture Content
Blows/6"
(N)
and/or
QJ
C.
QJ
0
~ zQJ z
0
QJ
i5. i5. .c
.c
ro
...J
~ Description of Material
:;;
1u
3
-0
C:
::,
1::
QJ
E
::,
tl
a..
~ E ::,
QJ
0 RQD
RQD E
ro ro
(J) I::;,
e .!::
w FF (J) (!)
20 40 60 80
X X X I I I I
X
X
X
X
X
X
I I I I
X X X I I I I
X
X
X
X
X
X
I I I I -
X X X I I I I
X X X
X X X
I I I I
X X X I I I I
X X X I I I I
X X X
X X X I I I I
X X X I I I I
--105 X X X
X X X I I I I
X X X I >>• ~
I I I
X X X
X X X I I I I 50/6" "!'. D-27 SANDSTONE, very dense, dark gray, moist, stratified,
125-
I
I
\"'t:r) \~Cl not tested, Actual blow count 87/6".
Length Recovered:0.5 ft. Length Retained:0.5 ft. f- -
I
I The implied accuracy of the borehole location
I information displayed on this boring log is typically
I sub-meter in (X,Y) when collected by the HQ Geotech
I Division and sub-centimeter in (X,Y,Z) when collected by
I the Region Survey Crew.
I
I -
--110 I
I End of test hole boring at 124.5 ft below ground elevation.
This is a summary Log of Test Boring.
Soil/Rock descriptions are derived from visual field
identifications and laboratory test data. t-
130-
Note: REF = SPT Refusal
t--115
-
I-
135-
-
>--120
I-
I 140-
--125
-
I I I I
- 145
WSDOT Geotech.Division
Operator: Brian Hilts CPT Date/Time: 4/16/2008 8:15:01 AM
Sounding: CPT-5-08 Location: N291319.5001 E1036246.802
Elevation: Job Number: XL-2963
Tip Resistance Local Friction Friction Ratio Pore Pressure SPT N* Seismic Velocity
Qt TSF Fs TSF Fs/Qt (%) Pw PSI 60% Hammer (ft/s)
0 200 0 3 0 6 -50 200 0 40 0 1400
0
686.1548
1308.497
901.6404
20 585.7611
376.9685
495.0459
517.5853
534.941
500.2297
40 535.958
619.7507
664.3373
606.8569
520.3412
570.046
60 864.1076
Depth
(ft)
80
100
120
140
Maximum Depth = 138.29 feet Depth Step = 0.164 feet
*Soil behavior type and SPT based on data from UBC-1983

WSDOT Geotech.Division
Operator: Brian Hilts CPT Date/Time: 5/1/2008 1:30:08 PM
Sounding: CPT-10-08 Location: N291032.3104E1036434.908
Elevation: Job Number: XL-2963
Tip Resistance Local Friction Friction Ratio Pore Pressure SPT N* Soil Behavior Type*
Qt TSF Fs TSF Fs/Qt (%) Pw PSI 60% Hammer Zone: UBC-1983
0 250 0 5 0 10 0 180 0 60 0 12
0
20
40
60
Depth
(ft)
80
100
120
140
Maximum Depth = 122.54 feet Depth Step = 0.164 feet
1 sensitive fine grained 4 silty clay to clay 7 silty sand to sandy silt 10 gravelly sand to sand
2 organic material 5 clayey silt to silty clay 8 sand to silty sand 11 very stiff fine grained (*)
3 clay 6 sandy silt to clayey silt 9 sand 12 sand to clayey sand (*)
I-5/SR-432 Talley Way I/C A hub and stake marking hole location
*Soil behavior type and SPT based on data from UBC-1983
~
~ Washington State LOG OF CONE PENETROMETER TEST
. , , , , Department of Transportation Start Card S-32522
HOLENo. CPT-11-08
Job No XL-2963 SR 5 Elevation _4-'--'0'-.0,:_ft:.o....__
'-' __
Sheet _1_ of _3_
Project 1-5/SR 432 Talley Way Interchange Driller Brian Hilts Lie# 2249
Site Address Vic. Of 1-5 and SR-432 Inspector Brian Hilts
start May 1, 2008 completion May 1, 2008 Equipment CPT with Autohammer
Well ID#
Station AL 117+63.15 Offset 338.98ft Rt. Hole Dia 1.5 Method Wet Rotary
(inches)
County Cowlitz Subsection SE1/4 of NW1/4 Section 12 Range 2WWM Township_?_ _
C
Pore Pressure
.2- Seismic velocity
.c~
0..-a, rom Tip Resistance Friction Friction (PSI)
(feeUsec)
Inclination
~~
a,~ (tsf) (tsf) Ratio(%) ---static press ure (degrees)
jjj
110 165 220 0 1.25 2.50 3.75 5 0 2.5 5.0 7.5
D=
10 0 5
r is~ggtion&est 0 250 500 750 1000 12501 500 o 5 10 15
I I I I I I II I
I I I I I I I I I
I I II I I I I I
....L .. J... 1.... .1. .... l...J ... L.. .. J.. .. I....
111111 Ill
111111 Ill
111111 Ill
11111111111
· · ., · ·· · · ·· · ·· · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · ·· ....y .. ,.... 1.....,.... y .1 .,....,..... t....,.. +.. ··· ······ · ·····
II I I II I I I I I
I I I I I II I I I I
I I I I I I II I I I
11111111111
...TT "f "T"T"T "f ""l"'T... I T....
I I I I I I I I II I
l> I I I I I I I I II I
II I I II I I I I I
.... [ .... j .....1.... l,.... [.... 1.....,..... 1.....[ .... j .....1.....
11111111111
11111111111
11111111111
.... t....,.... 1.. ,.... .t ...,.... ,.... t t ...,.... 1.....
D I I I I I II I I I I
II I I II I I I I I
II I I II I I I I I
....J.... LJ... J...J .. ..l....l.... L..L.J.... l.. ... ... ........ ..
11111111111
11111111111
I II I I I II I I I
I II I I I II I I I
..... f · l· l l..,+ ... 1... , ... 1. ++.. +
I I I I I I I I I I I
D I I I I I I I I I I I
: I I I II I I I I I I
·.. .. : ............T'T T""l'"T 'T'T"T""f"'T I ........ .. ......... .
D I I I I I I I I I I I
..... l...J... J....J.... l....L..l.. .. L .L .L .J....
11111111111
11111111111
11111111111
I I I II I I I I I I
t+.. +·++ . t .. l..·+·+·+.. ·I ··· ··· · .. ...... ... ..
II I I II I I I I I
II I I II I I I I I
11111111111
11111111111
..T ..TT'T "T'T'T "T"l"T"T "
I I I I I II II I I
I I I I II I I I I I
11111111111
........
~ Washington State LOG OF CONE PEN ETROM ETER TEST
.,,,,,, Department of Transportation Start Card S-32522
HOLE No. CPT-11-08

Job No XL-2963 SR 5 Elevation _4.:..::0:..:..:.0:...;ftco....__ __
Sheet_2_ of _3_
Pore Pressure
Tip Resistance (PSI) Seismic velocity Inclination
Friction Friction
(tsf) (feet/sec) (degrees)
(tsf) Ratio(%)
110 165 220 0 1.25 2.50 3.75 5 0 2.5 5.0 7.5 250 500 750 1000 12501500 o 5 10 15
55
... .. LJ....I. ..I.... .L...J....1..1.... L.J...L ..
···+ !···+·+ ·+ ·+ ·! + tt- ·+ ·· ....... .
· r T·T·T·TT I TrT·· T···
I I I I I I I I I II
....1-... 1.....1.....1.....1.... j.....1... 1..... 1....1.....1......... .
····· t····1···· 1·· 1 ·t ···1····i-- ·1····· t ··1·-i-····
.....l...J.... .l.....l.... .l..... L..1... . 1. . ..1. .... L..I.....
····· f····l··· l···+ ·+ ·+ ·+ ·· I +·+ ·· I·····
···T ·Tr·T ·T ·T ··rT·T ·· T ·r ·· .....
.. .. .L .J...J.. ..1. .... L....J....L..1... ..L.. .. J....L ..
· · ·· t···+ ·+ ·+ ·+ I I ·· I·+ ·· + ·+ ·· · · · · · · · ·· ··
··rT.. T.TT rT·r · rT··T···
.. .. ,
I
I
... 1-... 1.... 1.....1.....1.. .. ).....1.....1.....1....1.... 1............ ... .···· ··
l I I I I I I I I I I I
! I I I I I I I I I I I
! I I I I I I I I I I I
:1 ····t ··· -i-··· 1····-i---·t--··1···· 1·····1···1····1···· 1
:1 I I I I I I I I I I I
:1 I I I I I I I I II I
130 -90 · · · · · · · .• ... ........ ...... . · · · · · · · · · · · · · · , .... · ..... ·· :1=r · .. ... .. l...J... ..I.... L.J.. .J....L.L..L...L...I
Washington State LOG OF CONE PENETROMETER TEST
HOLE No. CPT-11-08

Job No XL-2963 SR 5 Elevation __:.4.::.0=--=.O:..cft"-----
Sheet _3_ of _3_
C
.Q..- Pore Pressure
Seismic velocity
.c~
0.. Q) ~m Tip Resistance Friction Friction (PSI)
(feeUsec)
Inclination
~~ iv~ (tsf) (tsf) Ratio(%) ~--s talic pressure (degrees)
jjj D= fis~ggtio1'1~est 0 250 500 750 1000 12501500 O 15
-- -- 0 55
~-
110 165 220 0 1.25 2.50 3.75 5 0 2.5 5.0 7.5 10 0 5
,,.... I l l l l
5 10
:\
- -vv
: :1 I I I I I I
-,
0.
(!)
w
z
0
(.)
:r
I-
~
(.)
I
-
APPENDIX D
EXAMPLE HAND CALCULATION FOR SCHMERTMANN METHOD
(Source: Naresh Samtani, personal Communication 1‐27‐18)
D-1
Job:
~ ll~of.
kXt:im/,le., /-/a,y,,1 (..,<f41c.S: SNSFfR../?.. Ri<-S-o 4 Job#: --
Computed by: kl CS Date: I / '2,.6 / I g- Page: / of~3~-
Checked by: Date: Sheet: of
itrre 60.
F(Yffl l:iufl l'\e-srra1· Yn-/fu
4 At :.o -z. ~ iO. '2. o
. ,= r~r- .s + t,. I T.!=!. 1.•o.
-porJ
Ur,.f /f'(e,1dM {efktJ.. ") ;:;.. /ZS d':: (hl2r

f'ot;; Uoo P-1:)(0.Jz.. k.;t.f) ::: /;. '/<..i f
-n, i /e1,1,d! oJ,

I
~, b ; .sf.J:-
/)..ef · HI 1ri1rt1( t~ ev :!; 12. 1fir ~
VS .S fw c.oi' ~f ~ A.1.(oh :::--
8ft N-\/~e I f'&t.MJ ;;;_ 7

,v, ;;. l f). 8 ho-.d #"f";
l ~~hJ ~!~~/]' n
rt..e&Ji·P"f\ fo ?,,-f,,,' Nia J. 33 - -

f3 ::;. / f). i ) /'Ill f, .t. .# IA ,fu,
Job:
1-
computed by: rN rs.

JJ
.
I
t:::~'IV'ble tt(Jl.,,r.t/ Ca1w :8NS.rfl:t!-
n,01:
Date:
AA-S-t1?!,
I/z I,, /1 '5
Job#:_~----
Page: 2
of~3~-
Checked by: Date: Sheet: of
12 l..ff-
.re
a.-f- }) .,.. I oo "ff
l ::;,.o.Zolf
-Ji
f 4, Ii 16 /l!r
/Vi,o 10-% '
t/:,-. f I ne .c f-i.
tA i'w ~:i.e+.
) € 5 '.:a 14- c,.11:i
.::.:.::.. :.:. :~1.:.:°':. :. f-=e:.. ._1;-+1_a__t.__h_·c._;.p..+--....J--+----1..w.J...- 1P 10.,-:z.r-. -zJ
--
Job:
1-
~:/.-#'ff'
Computed by:
1
bl e ntwie''
u j
Nt,,
~-'
t....(,.'/C.:.:
Df,o[
13/./l~
Date:
N-,-5" -0~
t /z_(:, /1 K - I /,?(!ff
Job#:.----;;----~--
Page: B
of 3
Checked by: Date: ' ' Sheet: of
. /0.6.2 ·.2d-l /
C. ,.J
s(, -- c c2. 1, t,{J;)

1
;:I {·c?.) O-o" c,.&3 .It P) (o.oo 38?; fr

fe.!,F.
=- 0 · 6 255 fir l
n1:JA• ft4t.s- # /PL- 1t t:,/eo]
sw/1'1 oJJ. . ~ , .,_,,,.,""••'""w . t:-J o tofu , r1. .foo f.r;_/ s. .Hf.e,n-\~

,:::C(),4ti,~ :;:.S'.3/i ~
~m- wilr
• to-,,, 0 .,bpt ~ /!off;-
/< oct bll tm,,....n r ~~ ;1; I . Id [+
• Tl,, i r:,..,~ ::.. .• , ff ~ .: .n-, -fo no tJ it:J:

·-itAt ~ irl\ ·. Iq Lft/. 6 {+ {60..tL =-"bf' af 0Y1V1..) Rf: -r-04J
& {!-- ~w- ! . f-k ;;: ~
J(.).h,-,~ie
Tllt-"""""' ofr
"f ;'c:1-.ta
l
le. ~ oJ- f /rofn~k lnfffeNa!.J ;P.,:J .-.1 lo:J.s,

Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) Information:
This material can be made available in an alternate format by emailing the Office of Equal Opportunity at wsdotada@wsdot.
wa.gov or by calling toll free, 855-362-4ADA(4232). Persons who are deaf or hard of hearing may make a request by calling the
Washington State Relay at 711.
Title VI Statement to Public:

It is the Washington State Department of Transportation’s (WSDOT) policy to assure that no person shall, on the grounds of race,
color, national origin or sex, as provided by Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, be excluded from participation in, be denied
the benefits of, or be otherwise discriminated against under any of its federally funded programs and activities. Any person who
believes his/her Title VI protection has been violated, may file a complaint with WSDOT’s Office of Equal Opportunity (OEO). For
additional information regarding Title VI complaint procedures and/or information regarding our non-discrimination obligations,
please contact OEO’s Title VI Coordinator at (360) 705-7082.

WSDOT Foundation and Fill Settlement Case Histories: Tony M. Allen WA-RD 884.1 August 2018

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

You might also like

WSDOT Foundation and Fill Settlement Case Histories: Tony M. Allen WA-RD 884.1 August 2018

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Description:

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

WSDOT Foundation and Fill Settlement Case Histories: Tony M. Allen WA-RD 884.1 August 2018

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

WSDOT Foundation and Fill

Settlement Case Histories

WA-RD 884.1 Tony M. Allen August 2018

WSDOT Research Report

WSDOT Foundation and Fill Settlement Case Histories

The State of Washington

And in cooperation with

WSDOT FOUNDATION AND FILL SETTLEMENT August 2018

7. AUTHOR(S) 8. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION REPORT NO.

Washington State Department of Transportation

17. KEY WORDS 18. DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT

Settlement, foundations, embankments No restrictions. This document is available to the public

Summarized in this report are comparisons between measured and predicted

Estimation of settlement due to structure loads and beneath embankments is a

Prediction of Stress Increase as a Function of Depth

' I / ... 1:~

:, ) 'I I fl ,/" ' /

1a, 0.10 0.10

.... ... _,_

/ '.> ...-~ ... ...-

The distribution of vertical stress increase below circular or square foundations,

A more simplified approach that is sometimes used to estimate stress distribution

Stress on this plane, a0 = :L

(b) Rectangular footing

Figure 4. 2V:1H method to estimate vertical stress increase as a function of depth

The Hough Method

n = number of soil layers within zone of stress influence of the footing

Hi = elastic settlement of layer i (ft)

HC = initial height of layer i (ft)

C′ = bearing capacity index from Figure 5 (dim)

′o = initial vertical effective stress at the midpoint of layer i (ksf)

v = increase in vertical stress at the midpoint of layer i (ksf)

0.. l----'--f-'--'--, ---1- - -

CORRECTED SPT N-VALUE, N1 60

The Schmertmann Method

The C2 parameter is not used to estimate time-dependent consolidation

Correlation between E and SPT N160 Value

The objective of this report is to summarize several WSDOT case histories in

Case histories addressed in this report are as follows:

 SR395, Francis Avenue to US2 Structures, BNSF Railroad Overcrossing Tunnel

SR395, BNSF Railroad Tunnel

Figure 9. Close-up of spread footing that supports arch tunnel.

G) Loose to medium dense poorly graded SAND (Dune Sand)

Figure 12. Geologic profile along tunnel showing subsurface conditions.

Figure 13. SR522, University of Washington – Bothell/Cascadia Community College

S.R 522 BK ,OF .PAV'T $EAT TO B:K. OF PA.VT SEAT

4'~ "·C-URTAIN WAll (TYP.) / fRJjFFIC BARRIER

CONC. BARRJER TYPE 2

Figure 15. Subsurface Profile for Sites No.7 and No.8.

Approximate Location of Plate at Site #1 O

Approximate Location of Plate

-165 JOB XL-2963 S.R. 5/432

lfOCI( autllUT"Y t:ZS#MIATIO# Ill JI'

SR395, BNSF Railroad Tunnel

Table 2. Summary of example Hough analysis (analyzed near mid-point of tunnel

0 (N/A) 125 2.00 14 1 70 125 0.000 0.00 0.00

SR522, University of Washington – Bothell/Cascadia Community College