PAPERS

1. Adedeji, Y. M. D., Aluko, O. O. & Ogunsote, O. O. (2010). Sustainable

Landscaping and Green Housing in Tropical Climates: A Case Study of Akure,
Nigeria. Proceedings of the International Conference on Man, Technological
Advancement and Sustainable Environment held at the Federal University of
Technology, Akure, 25 -27 October 2010. Akure, School of Environmental
Technology, Federal University of Technology, Akure.
2. Johnston, D. & Gibson, S. (2010). Toward a Zero Energy Home: A Complete
Guide to Energy Self-Sufficiency at Home. The Taunton Press, Inc.
Newtown, CT, USA.
3. Kwok, A. G. & Grondzik, W. T. (2011). The Green Studio Handbook:
Environmental Strategies for Schematic Design. Second Edition. Elsevier,
Burlington, MA, USA; Oxford, UK.
4. Maclay, W. & Maclay Architects (2014). The New Net Zero: Leading Edge
Design and Construction of Homes and Buildings for a Renewable Energy
Future. Chelsea Green Publishing, VT, USA.
5. Ogunsote, O. O., Prucnal-Ogunsote, B. (2017). Sustainable Design of Climate
Sensitive University Buildings in Nigeria. Proceedings of the 2nd
International Conference of Environmental Studies, January 17-19, Moshood
Abiola Polytechnic, Abeokuta. Pp 20-54.
6. Prucnal-Ogunsote, B., Ogunsote, O. O., Ude, O. A. & Ogunsote, B. V. (2011).
Towards the Establishment of a Green Building Council and the Development
of a Green Building Rating System for Nigeria. Proceedings of the 2011
Architects Colloquium, June 28 – 30, Musa Yar’adua Centre, Abuja.
Organized by the Architects Registration Council of Nigeria (ARCON).
7. Prucnal-Ogunsote, B., Okwoli, F. J. P. & Ude, O. A. (2010). Progress and
Prospects of Promoting Sustainable Architecture through Education in
Nigeria. The Architects Registration Council of Nigeria (ARCON) 3rd
Architects Colloquium. Theme: Architecture and the National Development
Agenda III. 19 – 21 April 2010, Abuja.
8. SB05Tokyo Student Session (2005). Sustainable Building Design Book.
Available from: http://www.uop.edu.jo/download/research/members/
[Architecture_Ebook]_Sustainable_Building_Design_Book.pdf.

GREEN HOUSING IN TROPICAL CLIMATES

Green building (also known as green construction or sustainable building) is the practice of
creating structures and using processes that are environmentally responsible and resource-
efficient throughout a building's life-cycle (Bauer et al, 2009). Starting from siting to design,
construction, operation, maintenance, renovation, and deconstruction, this practice expands
and complements the classical building design concerns of economy, utility, durability, and
comfort (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 2009b).
Green building brings together a vast array of practices and techniques to reduce and ultimately
eliminate the impacts of new buildings on the environment and human health. It often
emphasizes taking advantage of renewable resources e.g., using sunlight through passive solar,
active solar and voltaic techniques and using plants and trees for reduction of rainwater run-
off. Many other techniques, such as using packed gravel or permeable concrete instead of
conventional concrete or asphalt to enhance replenishment of ground water, are used as well.
While the practices, or technologies, employed in green building are constantly evolving and
may differ from region to region, there are fundamental principles that persist from which the
method is derived: siting and structure design efficiency, energy efficiency, water efficiency,
materials efficiency, indoor environmental quality enhancement, operations and maintenance
optimisation and toxic waste reduction (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 2009a). The
essence of green building is an optimization of one or more of these principles. Also, with the
proper synergistic design, individual green building technologies may work together to produce
a greater cumulative effect.
Although new technologies are constantly being developed to complement current practices in
creating greener structures, the common objective is that green buildings are designed to reduce
the overall impact of the built environment on human health and the natural environment by:
a. Efficiently using energy, water and other resources;
b. Protecting occupants’ health and improving employees’ productivity and
c. Reducing waste, pollution and other environmental degradation.
Green housing is fundamentally the basis of green living and green building. This means that
the lifestyle of the homeowner, design and functionality of the house influence the degree of
green housing anticipated. There are a wide variety of options to be chosen from in order to
“green” a building. These includes reducing energy use and converting to alternative energy
solutions, reducing water use, choosing an environmentally friendly location for houses,
designing homes with green building materials and increasing recycling.

ADVANTAGES AND BENEFITS OF GREEN HOUSING

Green building practices aim to reduce the environmental impact of new buildings. Buildings
account for a large amount of land use, energy and water consumption, and alteration of the
environment. Considering the statistics, reducing the amount of natural resources buildings
consume and the amount of pollution given off is seen as crucial for future sustainability (U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency, 2009b). Benefits derivable from green housing can be
categorized into two. These are environmental benefits and economic benefits. The
environmental benefits include improving air and water quality; protecting the biodiversity and
the ecosystem of our planet and conserving natural resources such as natural gas and fossil
fuels (Greg et al., 2003). Economic benefits include lower energy consumption with energy
saving electrical appliances, lightning bulbs, home designs and locations; and through green
energy solutions such as solar panels and wind turbines which generate electricity
independently from utility companies. Additionally, green housing increases the value of a
home.
Green buildings can be used to achieve the following:
Improvement of Indoor Air Quality
Improvement of Indoor Air Quality (IAQ) seeks to reduce volatile organic compounds (VOC)
and other air impurities such as microbial contaminants. Choosing construction materials and
interior finish products with zero or low emissions will improve IAQ because many building
materials emit toxic gases. These gases can have a detrimental impact on occupants' health and
productivity as well (Lee & Guerin, 2009).

Increase in Energy Efficiency

Green buildings often include measures to reduce energy use. To increase the efficiency of the
building envelope, (the barrier between conditioned and unconditioned space), they may use
high-efficiency windows insulation in walls, ceilings, and floors. Another strategy, passive
solar building design, is often implemented in low-energy homes. Personal temperature and
airflow control over the HVAC system coupled with a properly designed building envelope
will aid in increasing a building's thermal quality. Designers orient windows and walls and
place awnings, porches, and trees (Simpson, 2002) to shade windows and roofs during the wet
season while maximizing solar gain in the dry season. In addition, effective window placement
(day lighting) can provide more natural light and lessen the need for electric lighting during
the day. Solar water heating further reduces energy loads. Creating a high performance
luminous environment through the careful integration of natural and artificial light sources will
improve the lighting quality of a structure (National Institute of Building Sciences, 2010)

Waste Reduction
Green architecture also seeks to reduce waste of energy, water and materials used during
construction. During the construction phase, one goal should be to reduce the amount of
material going to landfills. Well-designed buildings also help reduce the amount of waste
generated by the occupants as well, by providing on-site solutions such as compost bins to
reduce matter going to landfills. To reduce the impact on wells or water treatment plants,
several options exist. Waste water from sources such as dishwashing or washing machines,
can be used for subsurface irrigation, or if treated, for non-potable purposes, for example, to
flush toilets and wash cars.

WORLD GBC
The World Green Building Council (WGBC) was formally incorporated in 2002 with its
headquarters in Toronto, Canada. Its primary role is to formalize international
communications, help industry leaders’ access emerging markets, and provide an
international voice for green building initiatives (UK Green Building Council, 2007).

THE COMMON CARBON METRIC

The World Green Building Council’s strategy to promote the global reduction of carbon
emissions is to enforce the Common Carbon Metric. This is a protocol for measuring energy
use and reporting greenhouse gas emissions from building operations. The Common Carbon
Metric will enable the grading the energy usage for all buildings irrespective of geographic
location or function. Using the Common Carbon Metric will aid member countries in
reducing carbon footprint and meeting the Carbon Emissions Commitments (Bldgsim, 2011;
UNEP SBCI, 2011).
The Common Carbon Metric will enable the realisation of cost-effective carbon mitigation
potential of buildings, which accounted for around 40% of the world’s energy use and 33% of
global greenhouse gas emissions (German Sustainable Building Council, 2009). It is piloted
by the leading green building rating tools, and made available to all those who are dedicated
to promoting the understanding and development of a green, low-carbon and sustainable built
environment. The metric is recognised by the UNEP Sustainable Building and Climate
Initiative.
5. Rating Systems for Green Architecture and Sustainable Design around the World

The Building Research Establishment Environmental Assessment Method (BREEAM)

BREEAM is a voluntary measurement rating for green buildings that was established in the
UK by the Building Research Establishment (BRE). Since its inception it has grown in scope
and geographically, being exported in various guises across the globe. It sets the standard for
best practice in sustainable design and has become the de facto measure used to describe a
building's environmental performance. BREEAM addresses wide-ranging environmental and
sustainability issues and enables developers and designers to prove the environmental
credentials of their buildings to planners and clients. It:
 uses a straightforward scoring system that is transparent, easy to understand and
supported by evidence-based research,
 has a positive influence on the design, construction and management of buildings,
 sets and maintains a robust technical standard with rigorous quality assurance and
certification (Building Research Establishment Ltd., 2010 & Wikipedia, 2010b).

The Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED)

This is a green building rating system developed by the United States Green Building Council,
USGBC. It provides a suite of standards for the environmentally sustainable design,
construction and operation of buildings and neighbourhoods. The hallmark of LEED is that it
is an open and transparent process where the technical criteria proposed by the LEED
committees are publicly reviewed for approval by the more than 10,000 membership
organizations that currently constitute the USGBC (United States Green Building Council,
2010). Individuals recognized for their knowledge of the LEED rating system are permitted to
use the LEED Accredited Professional (AP) acronym after their name, indicating they have
passed the accreditation exam given by the Green Building Certification Institute - a third-party
organization that handles accreditation for the USGBC (Green Building Council Australia -
GBCA, 2010 & Wikipedia, 2010c).

Green Star
Green Star is a voluntary environmental rating system for buildings in Australia. It was
launched in 2003 by the Green Building Council of Australia.
The system considers a broad range of practices for reducing the environmental impact of
buildings and to showcase innovation in sustainable building practices, while also considering
occupant health and productivity and cost savings (Green Building Council Australia - GBCA,
2010 & Wikipedia, 2010d).

Haute Qualité Environnementale (HQE)

The Haute Qualité Environnementale (High Quality Environmental standard) is a standard for
green building in France, based on the principles of sustainable development first set out at the
1992 Earth Summit. The standard is controlled by the Paris based Association pour la Haute
Qualité Environnementale - ASSOHQE (Wikipedia, 2010e).

In Nigeria
The introduction of education on green architecture and the existing rating systems on an
international level will create a more informed approach towards designing buildings based on
the principles of sustainable architecture at a national level.
The Building Research Establishment Environmental Assessment Method (BREEAM)
BREEAM is a voluntary measurement rating for green buildings that sets the standard for best
practice in sustainable design and is used to describe a building's environmental performance.
It addresses wide-ranging environmental and sustainability issues and enables developers and
designers to prove the environmental credentials of their buildings to planners and clients. It
uses a straightforward scoring system, has a positive influence on the design, construction and
management of buildings, and sets and maintains a robust technical standard with rigorous
quality assurance and certification (Building Research Establishment Ltd., 2010 & Wikipedia,
2010). There are minimum levels of performance across 7 key issues:
 Energy efficiency/CO2
 Water efficiency
 Surface water management
 Site waste management
 Household waste management
 Use of materials
 Lifetime homes (applies to Code Level 6 only)

The procedure for assessment is described in a 300-page document (Building Research

Establishment, 2010b) and it may not be possible to go into details in such a short paper. Table
1 shows a simplification of this procedure. Each of the issues (C) is awarded a credit (E), from
which a percentage point score (F) is obtained by multiplying the credits awarded (E) by the
weighted value of each credit (B). The total percentage point score is then found by addition.
The total percentage point score is used to find the code level (star rating) of the building using
Table 2. A code level is awarded on the basis of achieving both a set of mandatory minimum
standards and a minimum overall score. For most of the issues within the code assessment,
developers and designers can choose standards to suit a given site and development. This offers
flexibility in achieving the standards.
 Table 1: Calculation of Star Rating of Buildings using BREEAM.
A B C D E F=BxE
Categories Weighted Issue Available Credits Percentage
(Category value credits awarded point
weighing of score
factor) each
credit
Energy and CO2 1.26 Dwelling emission rate (M) 15
emissions Building fabric 2
(36.4%) Internal lighting 2
Drying space 1
Energy labelled white goods 2
External lighting 2
Low or zero carbon (LZC) 2
technologies
Cycle storage 2
Home office 1
Water (9%) 1.5 Indoor water use (M) 5
External water use 1
Materials (7.2%) 0.3 Environmental impact of materials 15
(M)
Responsible sourcing of materials – 6
basic building elements
Responsible sourcing of materials – 3
finishing elements
Surface Water 0.55 Management of Surface Water 2
Run-off Runoff from developments
(2.2%) (M)
Flood risk 2
Waste (6.4%) 0.91 Storage of non-recyclable waste 4
and recyclable household
waste (M)
Construction waste management 2
(M)
Composting 1
Pollution (2.8%) 0.7 Global warming potential (GWP) of 1
insulants
NOX emissions 3
Health and Well- 1.17 Daylighting 3
being Sound insulation 4
(14%) Private space 1
Lifetime homes (M) 4
Management 1.11 Home user guide 3
(10%) Considerate constructors scheme 2
Construction site impacts 2
Security 2
Ecology (12%) 1.33 Ecological value of site 1
Ecological enhancement 1
Protection of ecological features 1
Change in ecological value of site 4
Building footprint 2
Total
Note: (M) denotes issues with mandatory elements. Source: Adapted from Building Research
Establishment (2010b).
Table 2: Relationship between Total percentage points score and Code Level (Star rating).
Total percentage points score
Code Levels Star rating Comparison with other standards
(equal to or greater than)
36 1 1-star Above regulatory standards
48 2 2-star Similar standard to BRE’s EcoHomes GOOD level
Broadly similar standard to BRE’s EcoHomes VERY GOOD
57 3 3-star
level
68 4 4-star Current exemplary performance
Exemplary performance with high standards of energy and
84 5 5-star
water efficiency
Aspirational standard based on zero carbon emissions for
90 6 6-star the dwelling and high performance across all
environmental categories
Source: Adapted from Building Research Establishment (2010b).