Professional Documents
Culture Documents
George Srzednicki (Editor) - Chaleeda Borompichaichartkul (Editor) - Konjac Glucomannan-Production, Processing, and Functional Applications-CRC Press (2020)
George Srzednicki (Editor) - Chaleeda Borompichaichartkul (Editor) - Konjac Glucomannan-Production, Processing, and Functional Applications-CRC Press (2020)
George Srzednicki (Editor) - Chaleeda Borompichaichartkul (Editor) - Konjac Glucomannan-Production, Processing, and Functional Applications-CRC Press (2020)
Konjac Glucomannan
Production, Processing,
and Functional Applications
Edited by
George Srzednicki
Chaleeda Borompichaichartkul
CRC Press
Taylor & Francis Group
6000 Broken Sound Parkway NW, Suite 300
Boca Raton, FL 33487-2742
This book contains information obtained from authentic and highly regarded sources. Reasonable efforts have been made
to publish reliable data and information, but the author and publisher cannot assume responsibility for the validity of all
materials or the consequences of their use. The authors and publishers have attempted to trace the copyright holders of all
material reproduced in this publication and apologize to copyright holders if permission to publish in this form has not been
obtained. If any copyright material has not been acknowledged please write and let us know so we may rectify in any future
reprint.
Except as permitted under U.S. Copyright Law, no part of this book may be reprinted, reproduced, transmitted, or utilized in any
form by any electronic, mechanical, or other means, now known or hereafter invented, including photocopying, microfilming,
and recording, or in any information storage or retrieval system, without written permission from the publishers.
For permission to photocopy or use material electronically from this work, please access www.copyright.com (http://
www.copyright.com/) or contact the Copyright Clearance Center, Inc. (CCC), 222 Rosewood Drive, Danvers, MA 01923,
978-750-8400. CCC is a not-for-profit organization that provides licenses and registration for a variety of users. For organiza-
tions that have been granted a photocopy license by the CCC, a separate system of payment has been arranged.
Trademark Notice: Product or corporate names may be trademarks or registered trademarks, and are used only for identi-
fication and explanation without intent to infringe.
His thousands of herbarium specimens collected during his field trips in Thailand, Laos,
Cambodia and Myanmar are spread across herbaria in the world, many in the Chiang Mai
University herbarium where he held office as curator and from where he roamed the tropical
forests. His knowledge of plant ecology in those forests was phenomenal. As a mutual
acquaintance, Martin van den Bult (pers. Comm.), joined him in a number of field trips and told
me how the high standards of working Max held, which often led to outcries after seeing lesser
qualitative work, using such terms as “moron” and “cretin” but always in good spirit (because
Max liked to drink a strong local “schnapps”, which he called “Mekong”). His relationship
with several Thai botanists was brittle, to say the least but in the long run, many of them
and an equally high number of students gained profuse knowledge in the field of botany.
I deeply cherish my giant pile of faxes and emails from Max in all their good
and sometimes evil spirit. A unique person suddenly left us when Max died
on 12 May 2015 of a massive heart attack during forest work. I imagine that
dying during field work could have been something he would wish for.
Wilbert Hetterscheid
One of the last photographs of Max during his field survey in Rayong Province.
Preface...............................................................................................................................................ix
Editors...............................................................................................................................................xi
Contributors.................................................................................................................................. xiii
1. Introduction..............................................................................................................................1
Chaleeda Borompichaichartkul and George Srzednicki
Index.............................................................................................................................................. 279
Preface
There are about 200 species of genus Amorphophallus in the Araceae family. Except for
about 25 species native to Africa, most of them originate from southern, south-eastern and
eastern Asia, northern Australia, or Pacific islands. The underground tubers of several of
the Asian species are rich in glucomannan, which is a water-soluble polysaccharide that
is considered as a dietary fibre. As such, it resists human digestive enzymes and absorp-
tion in the small intestine. Hence, it is used as food or food additives (e.g., thickener or
emulsifier), food supplements for weight management, and also in the pharmaceutical
and cosmetic industries. Given these properties, it is an important economic raw material.
The natural sources of glucomannan besides Amorphophallus include tubers of orchids of
genus Orchis, hemicellulose present in the wood of conifers, and some bacterial and yeast
cell walls. However, the by far most important commercial source of glucomannan are vari-
ous species of the genus Amorphophallus. One of the main species producing glucomannan
is Amorphophallus konjac, from which the common name of this crop ‘konjac’ originates.
The generic name of this compound is ‘konjac glucomannan’, generally designated by the
acronym KGM. China had owned and utilized abundant glucomannan resources as early
as 2000 years ago, but until the mid-1980s, the konjac production was limited to plants
growing in the wild or planted in gardens in front of the houses. After 1985, with the
advancement of science and technology and the development of foreign trade, responding
to the increasing konjac flour demand in the international market, people began to recog-
nize the potential value of konjac-derived products, and the development and utilization
of konjac resources took rapidly off. After nearly 30 years of relentless efforts by konjac
researchers, growers, and processors in the konjac industry, China has formed a complete
konjac supply chain, and its industrial scale continues to expand. In 2009, konjac flour
production from China exceeded that of Japan’s which until then was the number one
producer in the world.
Japan was the first country to form a complete konjac supply chain. About 1500 years
ago, konjac was introduced to Japan from China by Buddhist monks. Although its cultiva-
tion and utilization took place later than in China, the konjac industry focusing mainly on
the production of jelly-like cake called konnyaku, started in Japan earlier than in China.
In Japan, konjac has been traded as a commodity on the market since the fourteenth
century. The konjac cultivation evolved from a natural perennial growth to the annual
cultivation after the seventeenth century. Since then, konjac has been considered as a
food source of national importance, and its cultivation and processing became encour-
aged since the nineteenth century. Konjac became one of the main ingredients in Japanese
healthy traditional meals in the 1960s. The konjac plantation areas ranked first in the world
by the 1970s. By the 1990s, the output of fresh harvested tubers reached 100,000 tonnes and
12,000 tonnes of konjac flour was produced.
Although the centre of origin and the production areas of several glucomannan producing
species are in Southeast Asian countries, the utilization of konjac is mainly driven by the
demand of Chinese and Japanese markets. In the past, it was mainly used to make k onjac
cake by harvesting the subterranean tubers, called ‘corms’, in their natural habitat, sun
drying them after slicing, and then exporting them to the Chinese market. In the last decade,
because of the increased investment in processing equipment from China and Japan, the
konjac cultivation and mechanical drying of chips has increased in Southeast Asia.
ix
x Preface
Konjac is a very particular plant. It has originated in the lower layers of tropical forests
in Asia, and thus has the characteristics of plants growing in warm and moist environ-
ments, half shade and does not support neither dryness nor dampness. Underground
tubers are particularly susceptible to bacterial soft rot disease (Erwinia carotovora) infection
that causes devastating damage. Konjac requires special processing equipment because
the underground tubers have a high moisture content and konjac glucomannan is very
prone to browning.
The high glucomannan content of konjac underground tubers has attracted wide attention
by the international community. The United States opened its market in 1997, giving the
konjac flour the status of ‘generally recognised as safe’. The EU recognized konjac flour as a
food additive in the EU in 1998 and 2003. This development stimulated the research on the
konjac applications in the European Union. Subsequently, there is a growing demand for
konjac glucomannan in the global market.
The konjac industry has gradually developed thanks to the continuous scientific and
industrial research in China and Japan for nearly 30 years. Although the potential benefits
of konjac glucomannan for the health of people in modern society are considerable, the
popularity of konjac is still below that of most of the other major crops. Therefore, in order
to fill this gap, it is necessary to summarize and update the information on the current
status of konjac field production, the processing industry, and applications in food and
other industries.
The authors of this book are researchers and experts who have been engaged in the research
and development of the konjac industry for many years. This book includes the results of
laboratory, field, and industrial research in the konjac producing and consuming countries.
It includes the latest information on the biology of the Amorphophallus species producing
glucomannan, agronomy, raw materials processing equipment, the applications in food
and other industries, and the related processing technology. It describes the most advanced
cultivation and processing technologies of the konjac industry in various countries. It is
expected that the information covered by this book will be useful as a reference for the sci-
entists and konjac industry practitioners. However, because of our limited ability to obtain
all the relevant data, especially from the industrial sources, we would like to apologize if
there are still gaps in the information provided.
xi
Contributors
xiii
xiv Contributors
1
2 Konjac Glucomannan
In the sixth century AD, konjac was introduced into Japan and Korea, initially, as a
medicinal plant. Later on, konjac became popular as a vegetarian foodstuff. For culinary
use, konjac flour is pounded with lime and water into a gelatinous grey cake, a key ingredi-
ent in Japanese noodles (shirataki) and cuisines, such as sukiyaki and gyudon (Chua et al.
2010). More recently, under the influence of the konjac industry in Japan and China after
World War II, the production of glucomannan flour expanded to Southeast Asia, particu-
larly, Thailand and Indonesia (Impaprasert et al. 2014; Yanuriati et al. 2017). The current
world konjac flour production is in excess of 25,000 tons (Parry 2010). The largest producers
of konjac flour are China and Japan, these two countries account for approximately 60%
and 28% of global production, respectively (Liu 2004).
In spite of the wide use of KGM as a foodstuff and in traditional medicine in the Orient,
its consumption in the West is relatively limited. This is due to the fact that knowledge
about the properties and potential applications of KGM and its derivatives is still rather
limited compared to other well-established polysaccharides, such as cellulose, starch, and
chitosan. However, since the United States Food and Drug Administration listed konjac
flour as generally recognised as safe (GRAS) (FDA 1997), shortly followed thereafter by
recognition as a food additive in the European Union (EU 1998; Parry 2010; EFSA 2017),
KGM became increasingly used in emulsifier and stabilizer products for the food, drinks,
cosmetic, and pharmaceutical industries. Therefore, the aim of this book is to provide an
overview of the botanical background of the glucomannan producing Amorphophallus spe-
cies, the biosynthesis of glucomannan, field production, processing techniques, status of
KGM processing industry in the main producing countries, application of KGM-derived
products, and the current research leading to the development of new products. It is
expected that this book will be a useful reference for researchers, members of the industry
including growers and processors, and also all potential users of products derived from
this multifunctional natural polymer.
References
Behera, S. S., & Ray, R. C. (2016). Konjac glucomannan, a promising polysaccharide of Amorphophallus
konjac K. Koch in health care. International Journal of Biological Macromolecules, 92, 942–956.
Chorvatovičová, D., Machová, E., Šandula, J., & Kogan, G. (1999). Protective effect of the yeast
glucomannan against cyclophosphamide-induced mutagenicity. Mutation Research/Genetic
Toxicology and Environmental Mutagenesis, 444(1), 117–122.
Chua, M., Baldwin, T. C., Hocking, T. J., & Chan, K. (2010). Traditional uses and potential health
benefits of Amorphophallus konjac K. Koch ex N.E.Br. Journal of Ethnopharmacology, 128, 268–278.
Elbein, A. D. (1969). Biosynthesis of a cell wall glucomannan in mung bean seedlings. Journal of
Biological Chemistry, 244(6), 1608–1616.
EFSA [European Food Safety Authority]. (2017). Re-evaluation of konjac gum (E 425 i) and konjac
glucomannan (E 425 ii) as food additives. EFSA Journal, 15(6), 1–43.
EU. (1998). Directive 98/72/EC published 4th Nov 1998 modifying European Parliament and Council
Directive 95/2/EC of 20 February 1995 on food additives other than colours and sweeteners.
FDA. (1997). GRAS title 21 CFR 170.30
Impaprasert, R., Borompichaichartkul, C., & Srzednicki, G. (2014). A new drying approach to enhance
quality of konjac glucomannan extracted from Amorphophallus muelleri. Drying Technology: An
International Journal, 32(7), 851–860.
Introduction 3
JECFA (Joint FAO/WHO Expert Committee on Food Additives). (2006). Konjac flour. Combined
Compendium of Food Additive Specifications: All Specifications Monographs from the 1st to the 65th
Meeting (1956–2005). Rome, Italy: Food and agriculture organization of the United Nations.
Liu, P. Y. (2004). Konjac. Beijing, China: China Agricultural Press (in Chinese).
Merck Index. (2006). Konjac Gum and Konjac Glucomannan. 14th ed., Merck & Co., Whitehouse Station,
NJ.
Parry, J. (2010). Konjac glucomannan. In: Imeson, A. (ed.) Food Stabilisers, Thickeners and Gelling
Agents. Singapore: Blackwell Publishing, pp. 198–215.
Tokoh, C., Takabe, K., Sugiyama, J., & Fujita, M. (2002). CP/MAS 13C NMR and electron diffraction
study of bacterial cellulose structure affected by cell wall polysaccharides. Cellulose, 9(3–4),
351–360.
Yanuriati, A., Marseno, D. W., Rochmadi, R., & Harmayani. E. (2017). Characteristics of glucoman-
nan isolated from fresh tuber of Porang (Amorphophallus muelleri Blume). Carbohydrate Polymers,
156, 56–63.
2
Botanical Background to Amorphophallus
CONTENTS
2.1 Evolutionary and Genetic Aspects.......................................................................................6
2.2 Taxonomy.................................................................................................................................9
2.2.1 Amorphophallus: Genus Description..................................................................... 11
2.3 Glucomannan-Producing Species...................................................................................... 14
2.3.1 Amorphophallus albus Liu & Wei............................................................................ 14
2.3.2 Amorphophallus amygdaloides Hett. & Sizemore.................................................. 16
2.3.3 Amorphophallus asterostigmatus Bogner & Hett................................................... 19
2.3.4 Amorphophallus bulbifer (Roxb.) Blume..................................................................22
2.3.5 Amorphophallus coaetaneus S. Y. Liu & S. J. Wei................................................... 25
2.3.6 Amorphophallus corrugatus N. E. Br....................................................................... 28
2.3.7 Amorphophallus dunnii Tutch.................................................................................. 31
2.3.8 Amorphophallus kachinensis Engl. & Gehrm......................................................... 33
2.3.9 Amorphophallus kiusianus (Makino) Makino........................................................ 36
2.3.10 Amorphophallus konjac K. Koch.............................................................................. 38
2.3.11 Amorphophallus krausei Engl................................................................................... 40
2.3.12 Amorphophallus macrorhizus Craib.........................................................................43
2.3.13 Amorphophallus muelleri Bl. Blume (‘mulleri’)...................................................... 46
2.3.14 Amorphophallus paeoniifolius (Dennst.).................................................................. 50
2.3.15 Amorphophallus pygmaeus Hett..............................................................................54
2.3.16 Amorphophallus tenuistylis Hett.............................................................................. 56
2.3.17 Amorphophallus thaiensis (S. Y. Hu) Hett............................................................... 59
2.3.18 Amorphophallus tonkinensis Engler & Gehrmann................................................ 62
2.3.19 Amorphophallus variabilis Blume............................................................................64
2.3.20 Amorphophallus xiei H. Li & Z. L. Dao.................................................................. 67
2.3.21 Amorphophallus yuloensis H. Li.............................................................................. 70
2.3.22 Amorphophallus yunnanensis Engl.......................................................................... 72
2.4 Growth Cycles.......................................................................................................................77
2.5 Glucomannan Content in Various Amorphophallus Species............................................77
2.6 Hybrids...................................................................................................................................80
2.6.1 Hybridization in Amorphophallus..........................................................................80
Acknowledgements....................................................................................................................... 85
Appendix 2.I Successful Amorphophallus Hybridizations........................................................ 85
Appendix 2.II Failed Amorphophallus Hybridizations.............................................................. 87
References........................................................................................................................................ 94
5
6 Konjac Glucomannan
FIGURE 2.1
Schematic representation of the morphology of Amorphophallus sp. (Adapted from Liu, P.Y., Konjac, China
Agriculture Press, Beijing, China, 2004; Chua, M., An investigation of the biology and chemistry of the Chinese
medicinal plant, Amorphophallus konjac, PhD thesis, University of Wolverhampton, Wolverhampton, UK, 2011.)
Botanical Background to Amorphophallus 7
0.50 pg/C (Chauhan and Brandham, 1985). Currently, a number of DNA techniques are
helping to determine the genetic relationships and evolution in this genus become more
clear through molecular phylogenetic analyses. A number of molecular markers have
been employed to determine relationships and to assess genetic variation in the genus.
The first study on the phylogeny of Amorphophallus – based on molecular markers by Grob
et al. (2002) – includes 46 Amorphophallus and Pseudodracontium species using chloroplast
matK and the trnL intron. The phylogeny showed that this genus can be divided into five
major clades according to their morphology. However, this study concluded that the rela-
tionship among phylogenetic clades remains unresolved and branches connecting these
clades are poorly supported. Later on, Grob et al. (2004) introduced a utility of FLint2
as a tool for phylogeny reconstruction in Amorphophallus. The FLint2 phylogeny was
shown to be largely congruent with chloroplast regions (rbcL, matK, and trnL). However,
there remained some limitations with unresolved issues of polytomies and lack of abil-
ity to provide enough non-conflicting informative characters to produce highly infor-
mative phylogeny. Subsequently, Sedayu et al. (2010) studied 69 Amorphophallus species
by combining gene-study data of trnL, rbcL in chloroplast and LEAFY (LFY) in nucleus.
The phylogeny showed major clades reflecting the biogeographical distribution and some
morphological synapomorphies. Five morphological characters showed relevant congru-
ence with the molecular phylogenetic results and lead to the following evolutionary state-
ments: (i) a non-sessile stigma may have evolved from a sessile one with several reversals;
(ii) pollen release through the rupturing of the connective evolved from pollen open-
ing by opening pores; (iii) unequally shaped main segments of the lamina evolved from
equally shaped segments three times in the Asian clades; (iv) simultaneous existence
of leaf (leaves) and inflorescence(s) evolved from alternating cycles of leaf and inflores-
cence; and (v) blue, purple, green, white and yellow fruits evolved from red/orange fruits.
However, this study on species-level relationships was based on a limited sample size
(30% of all species) with some under-represented clades and most of the relationships
remained with a high level of conflicting findings in the informative characters in the
tree. Claudel et al. (2017) enlarged the sampling to 157 species (70%), using nuclear (ITS1)
and plastid (rbcL and matK) regions. The combined phylogenetic trees (Figure 2.2) iden-
tified four main clades. The African clade (AFR-subgenus Afrophallus) contains all and
only African species and its unique seasonal cycle of both flowering, fruiting and leafing
in one and the same season. The Southeast Asian clade (SEA-subgenus Amorphophallus)
contains a majority of species from all over Southeast Asia (Indonesia, Philippines, east-
ern Malaysia), India, Indonesia to the Philippines and Australia (A. galbra). This group
is divided into (i) Paeoniifolius-Manta clade (12 species) that exhibits most of the red-
leafed seedlings and lack of offset development on the tuber; (ii) Pulchellus clade and (iii)
Pusillus clade with their monophyly being strongly supported by non-molecular charac-
ters such as their unique fruiting behaviour. The continental Asia I clade (CA-I-subgenus
Metandrium) includes species distributed in Asia with morphological support for part
of the clade by the sterile organs between the female and male zone. The continental
Asia II clade (CA-II-subgenus Scutandrium) includes mainly species from the Asian main-
land (India, southern China, Myanmar, Thailand and Indochina). This clade supports
the inclusion of the former genus Pseudodracontium in Amorphophallus (Hetterscheid and
Claudel, 2012).
In addition, genetic variation within the same species is interesting to study based
on different molecular markers; such as (a) microsatellite markers in A. paeoniifolius
(Santosa et al., 2007), A. konjac (Pan et al., 2012), A. bulbifer and A. konjac (Zheng et al.,
2013) and A. paeoniifolius (Santosa et al., 2017); (b) random amplified polymorphic
8
FIGURE 2.2
Combined phylogenetic tree of Amorphophallus with nuclear (ITS1) and plastid (rbcL and matK) region. (From Claudel, C. et al., Bot. J. Linn. Soc., 184, 32–45, 2017.)
Konjac Glucomannan
Botanical Background to Amorphophallus 9
DNA (RAPD) markers in A. konjac (Wenbing et al., 2001), A. titanium (Poerba and
Yuzammi, 2008) and A. muelleri (Poerba and Martanti, 2008); and (c) amplified frag-
ment length polymorphism (AFLP) markers in A. paeoniifolius (Sugiyama et al., 2006)
and A. konjac (Pan et al., 2015).
Meanwhile, other markers were studied in relation to phylogenetic evolution, like
biochemical markers to identify the chemical composition of inflorescence odours of
Amorphophallus (80 species) by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) (Kite
and Hetterscheid, 2017). When combined with the already described phylogenetic tree
(Claudel et al., 2017), the results showed that dimethyl oligosulphides were the dominant
odour compounds in Asian species. Fruity odours (1-phenylethanol derivatives) were the
dominant odour compounds in Metandrium clade, while anise odours (2-phenylethanol
derivative 4-methoxyphenethyl alcohol) are unique in Scutandrium clade. This study also
found that odour co-evolved with inflorescence colour, like rotting meat odours with
darker inflorescences. The evolution of some odour types is likely influenced by ecological
factors, the pressure of pollinator resources, etc.
Nevertheless, the present understanding of genetic relationships and evolution among
Amorphophallus species provides only baseline information. There are still some conflicts
in infrageneric classification and evolution based on complex morphological features and
additional factors such as plant distribution.
2.2 Taxonomy
The generic name Amorphophallus was proposed by Blume in 1825 (Bataafsche Courant,
nom. nud.) based on his encounter with A. paeoniifolius and later validated by him in
Decaisne (1834). The name is conserved against Thomsonia Wallich (1830) and Pythion
Martius (1831).
Schott (in Schott and Endlicher, 1832) was the first to present a classification of a num-
ber of Amorphophallus species, until then treated under Arum L., using the generic names
Candarum Reich. (nom. illeg.) and Pythonium Schott (nom. illeg.). Both names were pub-
lished superfluously.
Blume (1837) presented the first suprageneric and infrageneric classification of
Amorphophallus, treating it as part of the tribe Thomsonieae Bl. and dividing it into three
sections (Candarum (Reich.) Bl. (nom. illeg.), Adenophallus Bl. and Leiophallus Bl.).
Schott (1856) reduced Amorphophallus to the contents of Blume’s sect. Candarum.
Species of Blume’s other sections were transferred to Schott’s new genera Brachyspatha
Schott and Conophallus Schott. Schott also proposed the new genus Plesmonium. In sub-
sequent years (1857, 1858a, 1858b, 1860) Schott proposed several new genera, con-
taining species now accommodated in Amorphophallus, viz. Corynophallus, Hansalia,
Hydrosme, Rhaphiophallus and Synantherias. These genera were included in the tribe
Pythonieae Schott (1856, nom. illeg.) together with Pythonium, Anchomanes Schott and
Allopythion Schott and in 1860 Schott divided them over subtribes Amorphophallinae
Schott (Allopythion, Pythonium, Plesmonium, Rhaphiophallus, Synantherias, Brachyspatha,
Conophallus and Amorphophallus) and Hydrosminae Schott (Corynophallus, Hydrosme,
Hansalia and Anchomanes).
Hooker (1875) proposed the genus Proteinophallus to include A. rivieri Carr. (= A. konjac
K. Koch).
10 Konjac Glucomannan
Pseudodracontium as part of Amorphophallus and this step has been effected by Hetterscheid
and Claudel (2012).
At the level of tribe Thomsonieae, Bogner et al. (1985) proposed to remove Anchomanes
and Pseudohydrosme to another tribe (Nephthytideae Engl.) but leaving Thomsonieae in subf.
Lasioideae. Grayum (1984, 1990) was the first to treat the tribe Thomsonieae as part of sub-
fam. Aroideae but its position in it remained unclear. Bogner and Nicolson (1991) followed
Grayum but also refrained from further clarifying its position. Hetterscheid (1994) summa-
rized and added an extra argument for the tribe’s relation to subf. Aroideae and suggested
a sister-group relation to Arisaema Mart., based on preliminary cladistic analyses. More
recent analysis (molecular and morphological) indicates that Thomsoniae is a basal taxon
of a larger clade including genera of tribe Caladieae Schott (Cabrera et al., 2008; Cusimano
et al., 2011).
Molecular phylogenetic studies of Amorphophallus in its entirety (Grob et al., 2002, 2004;
Sedayu et al., 2010; Claudel et al., 2017) have all proven the monophyly of Amorphophallus in
the widest sense, including all satellite genera mentioned above by diverse authors, except
those transferred to other tribes than Thomsonieae. In Claudel et al. (2017) a first attempt is
presented at an infrageneric classification but only to the level of subgenera. The subgen-
era proposed are Amorphophallus (autonymic), Scutandrium Hett. & Claudel, Metandrium
Stapf and Afrophallus Hett. & Claudel. Further division of the genus at lower categorical
levels is hampered by low levels of statistical confidence at crucial nodes in the phylogeny.
A large body of literature exists introducing new species of Amorphophallus, as well
as floristic treatments (Thailand, China, Indochina, Africa, India, Java, Madagascar,
Taiwan) and partial taxonomic revisions (e.g., sect. Rhaphiophallus, sect. Conophallus, genus
Pseudodracontium). None of these three taxa were corroborated by the molecular results of
Claudel et al. (2017).
In most species only one leaf develops per cycle. In a few clades of miniature species
(e.g., A. pulchellus Hett. & Schuit.) or species from the former genus Pseudodracontium (now
a clade in Amorphophallus, see Hetterscheid and Claudel, 2012; e.g., A. lacourii Linden &
Andre), more than one leaf may develop per cycle. Occasionally species develop more
leaves prior to a tuber split. This is often seen in A. paeoniifolius (Dennst.) Nicholson, for
example. And sometimes individual plants may develop more leaves when cultivated in
very rich soils or when considerable fertilizer is used (e.g., A. muelleri Blume).
The petiole (leaf stalk) may be smooth, or more rarely covered with velvety hairs (e.g.,
A. macrorhizus Craib), or variously set with smaller or larger warts (e.g., most forms of
A. paeoniifolius). The warts may be grouped around differently coloured spots and then
often imitate lichen (Claudel et al., 2019). The petiole may be of one colour (e.g., green,
purplish, brown) but more often it is variously ornamented with lines and/or spots of very
variable sizes and colour. Even within species, the colour pattern may vary considerably.
Quite often spots seem to imitate lichen and/or algae (Claudel et al., 2019) and may there-
fore imitate woodiness of the petiole. This may be a means to escape herbivory. In combi-
nation with the typical shape of the lamina (see below), the whole leaf thus often seems to
imitate young tropical sapling trees. The lower third part of the petiole often has a differ-
ent pattern of colours than the upper part.
The leaf blade is orientated perpendicular to the petiole. It is always dissected into
few or many smaller leaflets, superposed on a generally three-parted main division.
These three main divisions are in most species appr. of equal size and complexity but
in some groups, the anterior main segment may be less strongly developed than the
two lateral ones (e.g., A. lacourii), creating sometimes a pedate-like appearance, espe-
cially when the anterior segment carries one or few leaflets. Each main segment is
divided into higher order segments (the lamina is said to be ‘decompound’) and these
carry one, few or many leaflets. The diameter of the entire lamina may be as small as
ca. 10 cm (e.g., A. myosuroides Hett. & A. Galloway) or reach the enormous size of ca.
7 meters (A. titanum; pers. obs. Hetterscheid). The leaflets are shaped variously depend-
ing on the species (e.g., linear, lanceolate, narrowly to broadly elliptical or oval), their
surface usually being smooth but occasionally velvety hairy (e.g., A. atroviridis Hett.).
The colour of the upper surface is usually a shade of green. It may be a solid very-deep
velvety green (e.g., A. pendulus Bogner & Mayo), or occasionally variegated (e.g., spotted
as in A. lacourii, or striped along the midrib as in forms of A. pseudoharmandii Hett. &
Claudel), or feathered as in forms of A. taurostigma Ittenbach, Hett. & Bogner. Leaflets
of young sapling leaves of a few species may be purplish before turning green in older
plants (e.g., A. muelleri). In developing leaves all leaf segments and leaflets are pointed
upwards and the leaflets have their margins independently rolled inwards (involute
vernation). This character combination is the main genus-defining morphological trait
and underscores the monophyly of the genus. In several species groups, bulbils may
develop on branching points of the leaf lamina, which will produce new plants after
the leaf has died down (e.g., A. bulbifer (Roxb.) Blume, A. coaetaneus, A. muelleri, A. xiei
H. Li & Z.L. Dao, A. yuloensis H. Li).
The inflorescence of Amorphophallus species usually grows solitary from the tuber after
a period of dormancy except in a few species where it develops after leaves have devel-
oped (e.g., A. coaetaneus) or when the leaf is dying down (e.g., A. tuberculatus Hett. & V.D.
Nguyen). Occasionally more than one inflorescence develops alongside the leaves (e.g.,
A. pulchellus). Peduncle length varies between ca. 1 cm (e.g., A. terrestris) to 3–4 meters
in A. gigas Teijsm. & Binnend. and A. decus-silvae Backer & Alderw. In most cases the
peduncle is longer than the spathe, pushing the inflorescence well above soil surface
Botanical Background to Amorphophallus 13
but some species develop a short peduncle and the inflorescence is sessile on the soil
surface, or almost so (e.g., A. paeoniifolius, A. yuloensis). Very few species show consider-
able variation in peduncle length (e.g., A. bulbifer). The surface and colour patterns of
the peduncle generally resemble those of the petiole but are often less prominent and/
or paler. In most species with sessile inflorescences, the peduncle may elongate strongly
after fertilization, pushing the (brightly coloured) fruits well in sight of potential dis-
tributers, notably birds. In one clade of small species, the long peduncle bows back to
the soil after fertilization and pushes the (dull coloured) fruits on the soil surface (e.g.,
A. pulchellus). In another clade of small species, the short peduncle does not (or hardly)
elongates at all after fertilization, leaving the (dull coloured) fruits close to soil surface
(e.g., A. terrestris Hett. & C. Claudel).
The flowering part of the inflorescence in Araceae is usually a pseudo-flower, consisting
of a variously shaped bract, called the spathe, situated at the base of an equally variable
axis with reduced flowers and often sterile organs, like (syn-)staminodes and pistillodes.
The axis is called the spadix. In Amorphophallus the variation in shape, colour and size of
spathe+spadix is bewildering. Size varies from very small, some 3–4 cm high in A. pusillus
Hett. & Serebryanyi, to the massive construct of A. titanum, which may reach up to 3 meters
in height!
The spathe in Amorphophallus is erect, at least the basal part of it. The basal part often
envelopes the lower part of the spadix and is usually closed with overlapping sides, form-
ing a vase-like or urn-like structure (e.g., A. muelleri). In two species the lateral sides are
not overlapping but fused, viz. A. elliottii Hook. f. and A. pusillus. In several species this
enveloping part is short or almost absent, exposing the base of the spathe (e.g., A. thaiensis
(S.Y. Hu) Hett.). The spathe base may be separated from the upper part (the limb) by a
constriction (e.g., A. kiusianus (Makino) Makino) or not (e.g., A. thaiensis). The outside of the
spathe base may be of one colour (often off-white, green or purple) or variously spotted.
The surface of the inside of the spathe base may be smooth but is more often verrucate,
with smaller or larger warts (e.g., A. paeoniifolius) or set with papillae, which are usually
hair-like, either short or long (e.g., A. angolensis (Welw. Ex Schott) N. E. Brown). The spathe
limb may be almost absent or more or less erect or horizontal and may be more or less flat
or convex. Its outer side may be of one colour (usually off-white, green or purple) or vari-
ously spotted and/or striped, the inside may be as the outside or paler and less complexly
patterned.
The spadix in Amorphophallus is differentiated in at least two different zones but most
often in three or even in four. The lower zone carries the female flowers, each flower
reduced to consist of only a pistil. Between the pistils sometimes hair-like staminodes
appear (e.g., A. cirrifer Stapf). Above the pistillate zone, usually a staminate zone follows
with strongly reduced male flowers, each flower consisting of 1–5 (or an indeterminate
number of) stamens. Occasionally hair-like staminodes are found between the functional
staminate flowers or within them (e.g., A. lanuginosus Hett.). Between the pistillate and
staminate zones, a sterile zone may exist, either devoid of any floral structure, or more
often set with staminodes (e.g., A. amygdaloides Hett. & Sizemore). Occasionally the neuter
flowers may turn out to be derived from pistils but this has not been unequivocally estab-
lished (e.g., A. longiconnectivus Bogner). Above the staminate zone, usually another sterile
part exists, called the appendix. The appendix consists of sterile stamen-derived tissue
and as such may be considered to be a single big synstaminodium. It may be smooth, or
variously set with staminodial (sub-) structures. In only one case, the appendix is truly
absent (A. margaritifer (Roxb.) Kunth). And in only one case the appendix is believed to be
secondarily entirely fertile (carrying functional stamens; e.g., A. coudercii (Bogner) Bogner).
14 Konjac Glucomannan
The appendix is usually erect but may be bent horizontally (e.g., A. cirrifer Stapf) or may be
pendulous (e.g., A. pendulus Bogner & Mayo).
The pistils consist of an ovary, a style (but sometimes hardly differentiated) and a stigma.
The ovary is usually globose or depressed-globose and consists of 1–4 locules, each car-
rying 1 ovule. The style may be near-absent, short or very long, to at least 4 times the
height of the ovary. The stigma may be globose, depressed globose or disciform, lobed or
entire and very small to quite large, its diameter far outreaching the diameter of the style.
The stigma surface may be smooth or variously verrucate.
The fruits of Amorphophallus are usually fleshy, juicy berries, closely congested in a cylin-
dric infructescence. More rarely the infructescence is hemispheric or subglobose. The fruits
are globose or elliptic. The skin of the mature fruits is usually smooth and glossy but occa-
sionally verrucate and dull coloured (e.g., A. terrestris). The colour of most species is red to
orange but all species of one clade of the subgenus Metandrium have bright blue to purple
fruits (e.g., A. amygdaloides), whereas another group in this subgenus has mature fruits that
are yellow (e.g., A. atroviridis) or white (e.g., A. pygmaeus Hett.). Fruit size in Amorphophallus
varies from ca. 0.8 mm to 4–5 cm (in A. titanum). Fruits contain, dependent on the species,
1–4 seeds. Seed set usually requires cross-pollination but some species develop seeds apo-
mictically (e.g., A. bulbifer, A. kiusianus, A. muelleri and A. xiei.)
FIGURE 2.3
Amorphophallus albus: tuber with offsets. (Courtesy of W.L.A. Hetterscheid.)
FIGURE 2.4
Amorphophallus albus: petiole detail. (Courtesy of C. Claudel.)
FIGURE 2.5
Amorphophallus albus: inflorescence. (Courtesy of C. Claudel.)
16 Konjac Glucomannan
FIGURE 2.6
Amorphophallus albus: pistillate, sterile and staminate zones. (Courtesy of W.L.A. Hetterscheid.)
FIGURE 2.7
Amorphophallus albus: fruiting. (Courtesy of C. Claudel.)
The single leaf has a petiole of up to 80 cm long and is ca. 2.5 cm in diam. Its surface is smooth,
mid to pale green with many circular or elliptic paler spots. The leaf blade is up to ca. 120 cm
across. The individual leaflets are elliptic-lanceolate, up to 18 by 6 cm, with an acuminate tip
and the upper surface is mid-green. The inflorescence appears solitary and never with a leaf.
The peduncle is up to 50 cm long and otherwise as the petiole. The spathe is elliptic, 21–24 cm
long and up to 20 cm in diam., strongly concave, hooded, top acute, the base only shortly con-
volute. The pouter surface of the spathe is pale green with whitish green spots, the inner sur-
face is uniformly whitish green but for a very small pinkish zone at the base. The inside of the
base is smooth. The spadix is shorter than the spathe, ca. 15 cm long, stipitate (meaning with a
short naked zone below the pistillate zone). The pistillate flower zone is cylindrical, 2 by 2 cm
with the pistils crowded. The ovary is depressed, mostly quadrangular in outline, 2 by 2.5 mm,
with a truncate top, whitish green, bilocular; the style is 1 mm long; the stigma is hemispheri-
cal, elliptic in outline, 2–3 mm in diam., shallowly or more distinctly bi- or trilobed. Above
the pistillate zone is a sterile zone with staminodes that is 1–1.5 cm long; the staminodes are
cushion-shaped, angular, creamy white. The staminate zone is cylindrical, 3–4 cm long, with
crowded staminate flowers. The stamens are creamy white. The appendix is fusiform-conical,
7–8 cm long and 2.7–3 cm in diam., sometimes laterally compressed, base constricted, apex
subacute, surface smooth, creamy white. Fruits glossy bright blue (Figures 2.8 through 2.13).
FIGURE 2.8
Amorphophallus amygdaloides: tuber with offsets. (Courtesy of W.L.A. Hetterscheid.)
FIGURE 2.9
Amorphophallus amygdaloides: petiole detail. (Courtesy of W.L.A. Hetterscheid.)
18 Konjac Glucomannan
FIGURE 2.10
Amorphophallus amygdaloides: inflorescence. (Courtesy of W.L.A. Hetterscheid.)
FIGURE 2.11
Amorphophallus amygdaloides: spadix exposed. (Courtesy of W.L.A. Hetterscheid.)
FIGURE 2.12
Amorphophallus amygdaloides: sterile and staminate zones. (Courtesy of W.L.A. Hetterscheid.)
Botanical Background to Amorphophallus 19
FIGURE 2.13
Amorphophallus amygdaloides: fruiting. (Courtesy of W.L.A. Hetterscheid.)
FIGURE 2.14
Amorphophallus asterostigmatus: tuber with offsets. (Courtesy of W.L.A. Hetterscheid.)
FIGURE 2.15
Amorphophallus asterostigmatus: petiole detail. (Courtesy of W.L.A. Hetterscheid.)
Botanical Background to Amorphophallus 21
FIGURE 2.16
Amorphophallus asterostigmatus: inflorescence. (Courtesy of W.L.A. Hetterscheid.)
FIGURE 2.17
Amorphophallus asterostigmatus: spadix exposed. (Courtesy of W.L.A. Hetterscheid.)
FIGURE 2.18
Amorphophallus asterostigmatus: pistillate and staminate zones. (Courtesy of W.L.A. Hetterscheid.)
22 Konjac Glucomannan
FIGURE 2.19
Amorphophallus bulbifer: tuber. (Courtesy of W.L.A. Hetterscheid.)
FIGURE 2.20
Amorphophallus bulbifer: leaf with bulbil. (Courtesy of C. Claudel.)
FIGURE 2.21
Amorphophallus bulbifer: inflorescence. (Courtesy of W.L.A. Hetterscheid.)
24 Konjac Glucomannan
FIGURE 2.22
Amorphophallus bulbifer: spadix exposed. (Courtesy of W.L.A. Hetterscheid.)
FIGURE 2.23
Amorphophallus bulbifer: pistillate and staminate zones. (Courtesy of W.L.A. Hetterscheid.)
FIGURE 2.24
Amorphophallus bulbifer: maturing fruits. (Courtesy of W.L.A. Hetterscheid.)
Botanical Background to Amorphophallus 25
Distribution: India (widespread, see Jaleel et al., 2012), Bangladesh, (Myanmar, acc.
to Jaleel et al., 2012 but no specimens mentioned).
FIGURE 2.25
Amorphophallus coaetaneus: tuber chain. (Courtesy of W.L.A. Hetterscheid.)
FIGURE 2.26
Amorphophallus coaetaneus: leaf. (Courtesy of C. Claudel.)
FIGURE 2.27
Amorphophallus coaetaneus: inflorescence. (Courtesy of W.L.A. Hetterscheid.)
Botanical Background to Amorphophallus 27
FIGURE 2.28
Amorphophallus coaetaneus: pistillate and staminate zones. (Courtesy of W.L.A. Hetterscheid.)
FIGURE 2.29
Amorphophallus coaetaneus: pistillate zone. (Courtesy of W.L.A. Hetterscheid)
FIGURE 2.30
Amorphophallus coaetaneus: fruiting. (Courtesy of R. McHatton.)
28 Konjac Glucomannan
Distribution: South China: Guangxi (Guiping, Rongshui) & Yunnan; eastern and
north Vietnam.
Ecology: in moist forested valleys, along water, in thickets; 300–900 m altitude.
NOT E: A most unique species being the only one in the genus with a ‘rhizome’ of
chained tubers. The species is well-nested within the blue-fruited clade of subg.
Metandrium and the primitive-looking tuber chain may therefore well be an evolution-
ary novelty instead of a primitive character, which it looks like at first glance in the
light of the prevailing mode of tuber development in Amorphophallus (see Section 2.5).
The evergreen character of the species is shared with three other rhizomatous species
(A. verticillatus, A. hayi, A. rhizomatosus Hett., although all may be leafless when kept
dry [obs. in cultivation]).
FIGURE 2.31
Amorphophallus corrugatus: leaf. (Courtesy of W.L.A. Hetterscheid.)
FIGURE 2.32
Amorphophallus corrugatus: petiole detail. (Courtesy of C. Claudel.)
FIGURE 2.33
Amorphophallus corrugatus: inflorescence. (Courtesy of C. Claudel.)
30 Konjac Glucomannan
FIGURE 2.34
Amorphophallus corrugatus: spadix exposed. (Courtesy of C. Claudel.)
FIGURE 2.35
Amorphophallus corrugatus: pistillate and part of staminate zone. (Courtesy of C. Claudel.)
NO T E : Although this species bears great resemblance to A. yunnanensis and its allies, it
differs remarkably in developing orange-red fruits (instead of blue) and having long, rhi-
zomatous offsets (instead of short, subglobose ones). Also its phylogenetic position is very
different, being a member of subg. Scutandrium, whereas the yunnanensis-alliance is part
of subg. Metandrium (Claudel et al., 2017). A clear case of convergent evolution, possibly
Botanical Background to Amorphophallus 31
FIGURE 2.36
Amorphophallus dunnii: tuber with offsets. (Courtesy of W.L.A. Hetterscheid.)
32 Konjac Glucomannan
FIGURE 2.37
Amorphophallus dunnii: petiole detail. (Courtesy of W.L.A. Hetterscheid.)
FIGURE 2.38
Amorphophallus dunnii: inflorescence. (Courtesy of W.L.A. Hetterscheid.)
Botanical Background to Amorphophallus 33
FIGURE 2.39
Amorphophallus dunnii: spadix exposed. (Courtesy of W.L.A. Hetterscheid.)
FIGURE 2.40
Amorphophallus dunnii: pistillate and part of staminate zone. (Courtesy of W.L.A. Hetterscheid.)
The blue berries and the ovate, concave spathe clearly group this species with
NO T E :
A. yunnanensis and allies in the blue-fruited clade of subg. Metandrium.
with dark green to reddish brown spots. The leaf blade is up to 100 cm across, with
elliptic leaflets of up to 15 cm long. Inflorescence solitary, peduncle up to 120 cm long,
surface as petiole. Spathe broadly elliptic-ovate, strongly concave, overarching the spa-
dix, up to ca. 30 cm long, basal part shortly convolute, outside green or greenish brown
with green spots or purplish red stripes and spots, inside dirty pale whitish-greenish or
with broad, longitudinal purplish stripes, or the reversed pattern, with a purplish back-
ground and several narrow, longitudinal whitish stripes, apex purple, base inside dirty
whitish green or pale purplish, with scattered shallow, tiny warts. Spadix, much shorter
than spathe, up to 18 cm long, stipitate. Pistillate zone slightly obconic or cylindric, up
to 5 cm long, pistils crowded or more loosely arranged. The ovaries are blackish purple,
globose or subpyriform, ca. 1.5 mm in diam., 1-loculed, the style is strongly curved and
dark purple; the stigma is very small, shallowly hemispheric or flattened, sometimes
more or less bilabiate. The staminate zone is obconic, occasionally fusiform, base often
constricted, to ca. 6 cm long, stamens congested and white or pale purple. The appen-
dix emits an unpleasant, rancid smell, is stipitate or occasionally sessile, dirty white or
with a narrow basal purplish margin above the stipe, ovoid or conic, occasionally nearly
globose, to ca. 7 cm long, sometimes with a few short longitudinal furrows at the base
but more often with a few deep, longitudinal grooves all over the length or with a few
shallow folds, or upwards more or less wrinkled, brain-like, glabrous or rarely shallowly
verrucate, base constricted, apex truncate, rounded, or rarely acute. Fruits orange red
(Figures 2.41 through 2.44).
FIGURE 2.41
Amorphophallus kachinensis: petiole detail. (Courtesy of C. Claudel.)
Botanical Background to Amorphophallus 35
FIGURE 2.42
Amorphophallus kachinensis: inflorescence. (Courtesy of C. Claudel.)
FIGURE 2.43
Amorphophallus kachinensis: spadix exposed. (Courtesy of C. Claudel.)
FIGURE 2.44
Amorphophallus kachinensis: pistillate and part of staminate zone. (Courtesy of C. Claudel.)
36 Konjac Glucomannan
Distribution: China: Yunnan (south and west); Laos; Myanmar, Kachin State; N. Thailand.
Ecology: in dense climax forests, on limestone rocks; 1,000–1,500 m altitude; flower-
ing March to May.
FIGURE 2.45
Amorphophallus kiusianus: leaf. (Courtesy of C. Claudel.)
Botanical Background to Amorphophallus 37
FIGURE 2.46
Amorphophallus kiusianus: petiole detail. (Courtesy of C. Claudel.)
FIGURE 2.47
Amorphophallus kiusianus: inflorescence. (Courtesy of C. Claudel.)
FIGURE 2.48
Amorphophallus kiusianus: pistillate and part of staminate zone. (Courtesy of C. Claudel.)
38 Konjac Glucomannan
FIGURE 2.49
Amorphophallus kiusianus: fruits maturing from lilac to blue. (Courtesy of C. Claudel.)
NO T E :The blue fruits indicate that A. kiusianus is part of subg. Metandrium. Its phyloge-
netic position within the blue-fruited clade remains unresolved (Claudel et al., 2017).
The style is purplish, 1–5 mm long. The stigma is dirty yellowish brown; 2-, 3- or 4-lobed.
The staminate zone is cylindric, slightly fusiform, or slightly obconic, 2–12 cm long, staminate
flowers congested. The appendix narrowly fusiform-conic, 10–ca. 100 cm long, often laterally
compressed and with irregular, shallow longitudinal furrows, 10–85 × 1.5–6 cm, acute, dark
purplish brown or paler, densely rugulose, base often with several diamond-shaped, and flat-
tened staminodes. Fruits are orange-red (Figures 2.50 through 2.53).
FIGURE 2.50
Amorphophallus konjac: tuber with offsets. (Courtesy of W.L.A. Hetterscheid.)
FIGURE 2.51
Amorphophallus konjac: leaf. (Courtesy of C. Claudel.)
FIGURE 2.52
Amorphophallus konjac: inflorescence. (Courtesy of C. Claudel.)
40 Konjac Glucomannan
FIGURE 2.53
Amorphophallus konjac: pistillate and staminate zones. (Courtesy of W.L.A. Hetterscheid.)
NOT E: It is unclear to date, which parts of the data above (morphology, distribution,
ecology) can be attributed to a ‘natural’ profile of the species, because it is unclear which
occurrences outside cultivated fields are assignable to naturally occurring individuals or
weedy escapees from cultivation. Amorphophallus konjac is one of the economically most
important species of the genus (the others being A. paeoniifolius and A. muelleri) and has
been domesticated many centuries ago. Philipp von Siebold brought plants from Japan,
which he named Arisaema konjac, the source of the present-day accepted species epithet
as established by Karl Koch. It is highly surprising to the author that to his knowledge no
known officially registered named cultivars are distinguished in this crop. Two names
are available for clones recognized in circles of ornamental plant lovers, viz. ‘Leo Song’,
a robust clone with very pale petiole and peduncle with only few and small darker spots
and ‘Nightstick’, a stunted clone with very dark petiole almost without spots and often
deformed inflorescences. In the light of the goal of this book, it may be suggested here
that it is high and about time that the Konnyaku-crop is described in terms of proper
cultivars, securing the possibility of choosing the most useful cultivars for particular
cultivation circumstances by farmers and for best choice of resources by glucomannan
producers.
The tuber is globose, sometimes slightly subcylindrical, with a deep central depression,
up to 25 cm in diam., seasonally producing several rhizomatous offsets. Leaf solitary, the
petiole up to ca. 200 cm long, pale green or mauve, at the base often pale pink or with a
reddish brown or reddish hue, with many, smaller and larger, elliptic, partly or almost
entirely confluent, to narrowly elliptic, blackish green or paler green or rarely reddish
brown spots and several small, white dots, the intensity of colours and the extension of
the pattern variable. The leaf blade is up to 160 cm across, with lanceolate leaflets of up to
48 cm length, plain mid green. The inflorescence appears solitary, with a long peduncle of
up to 100 cm and coloured as the petiole. The spathe is erect, boat-shaped, up to 40 cm long,
base short convolute. The spathe exterior is pale green, towards the base slightly darker;
the interior is pale yellowish green, with the base sometimes maroonish, and covered with
numerous small, slightly elongate or irregularly ridge-shaped, warts. The spadix is ses-
sile and nearly as long as spathe to distinctly shorter or slightly longer, up to 35 cm long.
The pistillate zone is cylindrical or slightly obconical, up to 5 cm long with pistils flowers
congested. The ovaries are globose or slightly depressed, 1.5–2 mm in diam., pale green,
occasionally pale magenta-purple near style base; style cylindrical, 1–2 mm long, green or
magenta-purple; stigma globose or subglobose, pale yellowish white, yellow or brownish,
ca. 1 mm, entire or with a shallow central depression or shallowly 2- or 3-lobed. Between
the pistillate and staminate zone is a sterile zone (rarely absent) of 0.5–2 cm long, densely
(or rarely distantly) set with staminodes which are ovate or diamond-shaped in cross-
section, rarely subglobose, ivory-white or creamy orange, occasionally flushed with pale
purple. Staminate zone up to 13 cm long, cylindrical-fusiform or slightly obconical, some-
times slightly laterally compressed, flowers congested. Staminate flowers ivory-white, the
lowermost flowers greatly enlarged and with reduced thecae, grading to the staminodes.
The appendix is short to elongate fusiform or fusiform-conical, up to 17 cm long, some-
times slightly laterally compressed, sometimes with a small stipe-like part, smooth, top
rounded or more or less acute, base occasionally stipe-like, sometimes with a few rounded
staminodes or staminodial remnants at the base, separated by small grooves, yellowish
white or pale green. Fruits are bright red (Figures 2.54 through 2.58).
FIGURE 2.54
Amorphophallus krausei: tuber with offsets. (Courtesy of W.L.A. Hetterscheid.)
42 Konjac Glucomannan
FIGURE 2.55
Amorphophallus krausei: inflorescence. (Courtesy of W.L.A. Hetterscheid.)
FIGURE 2.56
Amorphophallus krausei: spadix exposed. (Courtesy of W.L.A. Hetterscheid.)
FIGURE 2.57
Amorphophallus krausei: pistillate, sterile and staminate zones. (Courtesy of W.L.A. Hetterscheid.)
Botanical Background to Amorphophallus 43
FIGURE 2.58
Amorphophallus krausei: fruiting. (Courtesy of C. Claudel.)
NO T E : The development of a sterile zone between pistillate and staminate zones with
gibbous staminodes has evolved several times independently in Amorphophallus (and in
Araceae as a whole) and as such is an unreliable character for suggesting evolutionary rela-
tionships. Of the species treated in this book A. krausei (subg. Scutandrium), A. albus (subg.
Scutandrium) and A. amygdaloides (subg. Metandrium) develop the aforementioned type of
sterile zone. The phylogenetic position of A. krausei relative to the other closest species in
subg. Scutandrium remains unresolved to date (Claudel et al., 2017).
green with or without a purplish margin and sometimes with indistinct small whitish
spots all over and the basal part is green or dirty maroon, chequered with pale green or
entirely pale maroon, the latter colour sometimes extending over nearly the entire spathe.
The inside of the basal parts has the veins impressed, groove-like, in between with very
tiny, punctiform warts. The spadix is sessile or very shortly stipitate, slightly to distinctly
longer than spathe and up to 30 cm long. The pistillate zone cylindrical or slightly conical,
up to 5 cm long, pistils congested, rarely a small naked zone at the apex or a small zone
with flask-shaped pistillodes. The ovaries are depressed, prismatic or diamond-shaped, up
to 3 mm in diam., entirely bright pale green or with a blackish purple apex; style absent or
very short; the stigma is 2-, 3- or 4-lobed, oval in outline, 1 by 1–1.75 mm, greyish or pale
yellowish brown. The staminate zone is fusiform-conical, up to 12 cm long, staminate
flowers congested. The appendix is elongate fusiform, subulate, sometimes very feeble,
5–21 cm long, often compressed and slightly sinuous, the base often with several, scat-
tered, flexuous, ca. 1–3 mm long, thin, purple-brown hairs, otherwise smooth, dirty (yel-
lowish) green, blackish brown or lead-grey, the base often white and sometimes more or
less stipe-like. Fruits are bright red (Figures 2.59 through 2.63).
FIGURE 2.59
Amorphophallus macrorhizus: tuber. (Courtesy of W.L.A. Hetterscheid.)
FIGURE 2.60
Amorphophallus macrorhizus: leaf. (Courtesy of W.L.A. Hetterscheid.)
Botanical Background to Amorphophallus 45
FIGURE 2.61
Amorphophallus macrorhizus: petiole detail. (Courtesy of W.L.A. Hetterscheid.)
FIGURE 2.62
Amorphophallus macrorhizus: inflorescence. (Courtesy of W.L.A. Hetterscheid.)
FIGURE 2.63
Amorphophallus macrorhizus: spadix exposed. (Courtesy of W.L.A. Hetterscheid.)
46 Konjac Glucomannan
Distribution: Thailand: Mae Hong Son, Chiang Mai, Chiang Rai, Lampang, Tak,
Udon Thani.
Ecology: dry deciduous dipterocarp-oak forests, on shale or granite in very hard soil;
300–1500 m altitude.
with two or three, dirty pale yellow. The staminate zone is cylindrical, obconical or
fusiform, up to 9 cm long, in large specimens usually laterally compressed, flowers
congested. The appendix is narrowly or very broadly fusiform-conical, 3–22 cm long,
laterally compressed to various degrees, surface pitted with numerous small, puncti-
form depressions and with or without some irregular, larger shallow depressions, base
with staminodes intermediate between stamens and the appendix-wall, pale pinkish,
yellowish or pale brownish. Fruits are red (Figures 2.64 through 2.71).
FIGURE 2.64
Amorphophallus muelleri: old leaf with bulbils. (Courtesy of W.L.A. Hetterscheid.)
FIGURE 2.65
Amorphophallus muelleri: petiole detail. (Courtesy of C. Claudel.)
48 Konjac Glucomannan
FIGURE 2.66
Amorphophallus muelleri: flowering plant from Thailand, Kanchanaburi. (Courtesy of Yamazaki.)
FIGURE 2.67
Amorphophallus muelleri: inflorescence. (Courtesy of C. Claudel.)
FIGURE 2.68
Amorphophallus muelleri: spathe view of inner surface. (Courtesy of C. Claudel.)
Botanical Background to Amorphophallus 49
FIGURE 2.69
Amorphophallus muelleri: spadix exposed. (Courtesy of C. Claudel.)
FIGURE 2.70
Amorphophallus muelleri: pistillate zone. (Courtesy of C. Claudel.)
FIGURE 2.71
Amorphophallus muelleri: fruiting. (Courtesy of C. Claudel.)
50 Konjac Glucomannan
Distribution: Thailand: Chiang Mai, Tak, Kanchanaburi; India: Andaman & Nicobar
Islands; Myanmar; Indonesia: Sumatra, Java, southern Borneo, Flores, Timor.
Ecology: ruderal and open secondary seasonal forests.
NO T E : The correct application of the name A. muelleri has been chaotic since Engler (1879)
created a mixture of true A. muelleri and probably a west Javan species (A. annulifer Hett.)
and perpetuated this in his Lasioideae treatment in 1911. Several authors duplicated this
in flora’s, etc., so when Prain discovered a plant of A. muelleri on Great Coco Island, he
considered it a different species than the one from Java and named it A. oncophyllus (based
on the bulbils on the leaves). Van Hasselt’s drawing of the original plant (used by Blume
to create A. muelleri), leaves no doubt about it being the same species as meant by Prain.
Jaleel et al. (2012) decided to ignore this and accepted that the name A. oncophyllus repre-
sents a different species and even restricted its occurrence to the Andaman Islands, there-
fore claiming it to be an Indian endemic. This is impossible in the light of the fact that
Prain’s type specimen of the name of this species is from Great Coco Island, belonging to
Myanmar. Specimens of A. muelleri from eastern Thailand often enough show characters
that are similar to plants from the Andamans and the (taxonomically irrelevant) difference
that remains basically is the darker reddish-brownish colour of the spathe of the latter
specimens. Jaleel et al. (2012) also uphold the species A. carnosus, based on a specimen that
only differs from the other muelleri on the Andamans by having a somewhat aberrantly
long attenuated appendix. This is also found, be it lesser pronounced, in specimens from
Thailand. Also the type of A. carnosus does not show this character, nor is it mentioned in
the protologue, so their plant is just a singly occurring, aberrated A. muelleri.
dark maroon, base within densely warty with the warts variable, mostly conical, fleshy.
The spadix is sessile, shorter or longer than spathe, up to ca. 70 cm long. The pistillate zone
is cylindric, 3–25 cm long with the pistils congested or slightly distant. The staminate zone
is cylindric or strongly obconic and roofed against the expanded base of the appendix, up
to 15 cm long with the staminate flowers congested. The appendix very variable, inflated,
1.5–ca. 30 cm long, 1.2–30 cm in diam. (slightly above the base), globose, depressed glo-
bose, oval or triangular conic (pyramidal), smooth or with various folds and/or irregular
shallow depressions, base often with flattened, staminodial structures, top obtuse or acut-
ish, surface minutely granulate, glossy dark maroon, rarely pinkish or yellow, giving off
a stench of rotting meat. The ovaries are depressed, circular in cross-section, 3–5 mm in
diam., 2- or 3-locular, entirely pale green or largely maroon with a whitish base. The style
is long and slender, up to 20 mm long, maroon. The stigma is large, oval or triangular in
cross-section, 4–7 mm in diam., often strongly laterally compressed, shallowly or deeply
2- or 3-lobed, pale or deep yellow. The staminate flowers are off-white. Fruits are bright red
(Figures 2.72 through 2.79).
FIGURE 2.72
Amorphophallus paeoniifolius: tuber. (Courtesy of W.L.A. Hetterscheid.)
FIGURE 2.73
Amorphophallus paeoniifolius: leaf. (Courtesy of unknown.)
52 Konjac Glucomannan
FIGURE 2.74
Amorphophallus paeoniifolius: petioles appearing from same tuber. (Courtesy of W.L.A. Hetterscheid.)
FIGURE 2.75
Amorphophallus paeoniifolius: petiole detail. (Courtesy of C. Claudel.)
FIGURE 2.76
Amorphophallus paeoniifolius: inflorescence. (Courtesy of W.L.A. Hetterscheid.)
Botanical Background to Amorphophallus 53
FIGURE 2.77
Amorphophallus paeoniifolius: spadix exposed. (Courtesy of W.L.A. Hetterscheid.)
FIGURE 2.78
Amorphophallus paeoniifolius: pistillate zone. (Courtesy of W.L.A. Hetterscheid.)
FIGURE 2.79
Amorphophallus paeoniifolius: fruiting. (Courtesy of unknown.)
54 Konjac Glucomannan
NO T E : Amorphophallus paeoniifolius has been widely cultivated throughout Asia. The spe-
cies seems to become weedy quite easily after escaping from cultivation. It is therefore
certain that parts of the descriptive, geographical and ecological data relate to characters
and data that deal with weedy escapes from cultivation and are not part of the natural
‘evolutionary’ make-up of this species. Suresh et al. (1983) have attempted to separate the
wild (as A. paeoniifolius var. paeoniifolius) and cultivated (as A. paeoniifolius var. campanula-
tus) aspect taxonomically and thus used the concept of ‘taxon’ as used for wild plants for
domesticated plants and consequentially using infraspecific Linnean epithets to express
their ideas. It is however clear that, at least in the Malesian area, there is no straightforward
distinction in morphology between cultivated and wild aspects of this species, provided it
is at all possible to make the distinction in the first place without thorough ethnobotanical
studies. Local taxonomic solutions may be looked for to distinguish the cultivated aspect
in terms of cultivars, for which no existing taxon names are necessary and warranted
other than folk names or accurately established cultivar epithets. A useful study of wild
and weedy aspects of this species should be based on concepts in use for domesticated
plants and described in the nomenclatural code for cultivated plants (Brickell et al., 2016)
and not the nomenclature code for algae, fungi and plants.
FIGURE 2.80
Amorphophallus pygmaeus: tuber. (Courtesy of W.L.A. Hetterscheid.)
FIGURE 2.81
Amorphophallus pygmaeus: leaf. (Courtesy of W.L.A. Hetterscheid.)
FIGURE 2.82
Amorphophallus pygmaeus: inflorescence. (Courtesy of W.L.A. Hetterscheid.)
56 Konjac Glucomannan
FIGURE 2.83
Amorphophallus pygmaeus: spadix exposed. (Courtesy of W.L.A. Hetterscheid.)
FIGURE 2.84
Amorphophallus pygmaeus: pistillate and staminate zones. (Courtesy of W.L.A. Hetterscheid.)
elongate-elliptic, pale to dark green spots, blackish green at the base, or largely dirty
pale grey with elongate-elliptic, dark olive-green spots, often confluent, and some sim-
ilar small dots near the base, or almost entirely dark olive-green with numerous small,
greyish punctate spots. The leaf lamina is up to 100 cm across, with the leaflets elliptic,
elongate-elliptic or lanceolate, up to 12 cm long. The inflorescence is solitary with the
peduncle up to 100 cm long, greyish to pale grey with elongate, often confluent, olive-
green or dark brown spots and scattered small whitish dots. The spathe is erect, elliptic-
lanceolate to elongate-triangular, up to 40 cm long, base convolute and separated from
the limb by a shallow constriction, apex acute, margin strongly sinuous, sometimes
spirally twisting along the midrib, exterior appearance as petiole but limb flushed
maroon, interior base pale to dark maroon, limb dark maroon, or dirty green with
purple-brown flushes, darker near the margin, or dirty pale grey with orbicular, dark
green spots around the midrib and the remainder dark purple, base within densely
clothed with short and long, more or less fleshy, elongate, hair-like warts, sometimes
with a few irregular branches. The spadix is sessile or stipitate, shorter to distinctly
longer than spathe, 7–50 cm long. The pistillate zone cylindrical, flowers slightly or dis-
tinctly distant, up to 6.5 cm long, with or without a very short naked zone at the apex.
The ovaries are depressed, oval in outline, up to 4 mm in diam., more or less bright
pale green; style slender, dark brown or pale purple; stigma obconical, 1.5–2 mm in
diam., entire or shallowly, or distinctly 2- or 3-lobed, off-white or pale yellow. A short
sterile zone between pistillate and staminate zone may be present and then with dark
purple brown, angulate, flattened staminodes. The staminate zone is cylindrical or
slightly conical, up to 11 cm long, flowers congested. The staminate flowers are off-
white or purplish and the ones at the base of the zone are often enlarged. The appendix
is narrowly elongate, acute, in smaller inflorescences even mouse-t ail-like, up to 32 cm
long., lower part sometimes warty, otherwise smooth, brownish grey. Fruits are orange
red (Figures 2.85 through 2.89).
FIGURE 2.85
Amorphophallus tenuistylis: tuber. (Courtesy of W.L.A. Hetterscheid.)
58 Konjac Glucomannan
FIGURE 2.86
Amorphophallus tenuistylis: inflorescence. (Courtesy of W.L.A. Hetterscheid.)
FIGURE 2.87
Amorphophallus tenuistylis: spadix exposed. (Courtesy of W.L.A. Hetterscheid.)
FIGURE 2.88
Amorphophallus tenuistylis: pistillate zone. (Courtesy of W.L.A. Hetterscheid.)
Botanical Background to Amorphophallus 59
FIGURE 2.89
Amorphophallus tenuistylis: fruiting. (Courtesy of W.L.A. Hetterscheid.)
Ecology: Open mixed bamboo & deciduous forest, on limestone; ca. 200 m altitude.
The ovaries are obliquely depressed, 2–4 mm in diam., bright pale green or maroon,
unilocular; the style is 2–3 mm long, straight or curved towards the spadix, bright pale
green or maroon; the stigma is strongly depressed, bilabiate with an elongate central
depression, dirty pale yellowish. The staminate zone is cylindrical, up to 2.5 cm long,
top slightly laterally compressed, flowers congested; staminate white. The appendix is
ovoid to shortly conical, 2–6.5 cm long, not or slightly laterally compressed, with or
without one or two broad, longitudinally elongate depressions, top broadly obtuse, sur-
face smooth, dirty white, with or without a pale purple flush. Fruits are glossy bright
blue (Figures 2.90 through 2.94).
FIGURE 2.90
Amorphophallus thaiensis: tuber with offsets. (Courtesy of W.L.A. Hetterscheid.)
FIGURE 2.91
Amorphophallus thaiensis: inflorescence. (Courtesy of W.L.A. Hetterscheid.)
Botanical Background to Amorphophallus 61
FIGURE 2.92
Amorphophallus thaiensis: spadix exposed. (Courtesy of W.L.A. Hetterscheid.)
FIGURE 2.93
Amorphophallus thaiensis: pistillate zone. (Courtesy of W.L.A. Hetterscheid.)
FIGURE 2.94
Amorphophallus thaiensis: fruiting. (Courtesy of W.L.A. Hetterscheid.)
62 Konjac Glucomannan
NO T E :With its blue fruits, A. thaiensis is yet another member of the blue-fruited clade of
subg. Metandrium. It mostly resembles A. yunnanensis but differs in the much smaller, later-
ally compressed, bilabiate stigma and the much higher number of annual offsets.
FIGURE 2.95
Amorphophallus tonkinensis: leaf. (Courtesy of M. Sizemore.)
Botanical Background to Amorphophallus 63
FIGURE 2.96
Amorphophallus tonkinensis: petiole. (Courtesy of M. Sizemore.)
FIGURE 2.97
Amorphophallus tonkinensis: inflorescence. (Courtesy of W.L.A. Hetterscheid.)
FIGURE 2.98
Amorphophallus tonkinensis: spadix exposed. (Courtesy of W.L.A. Hetterscheid.)
64 Konjac Glucomannan
FIGURE 2.99
Amorphophallus variabilis: tuber with offsets. (Courtesy of W.L.A. Hetterscheid.)
Botanical Background to Amorphophallus 65
FIGURE 2.100
Amorphophallus variabilis: petiole detail. (Courtesy of C. Claudel.)
FIGURE 2.101
Amorphophallus variabilis: inflorescence. (Courtesy of W.L.A. Hetterscheid.)
FIGURE 2.102
Amorphophallus variabilis: spathe and spadix side view. (Courtesy of W.L.A. Hetterscheid.)
66 Konjac Glucomannan
FIGURE 2.103
Amorphophallus variabilis: pistillate and staminate zones. (Courtesy of W.L.A. Hetterscheid.)
FIGURE 2.104
Amorphophallus variabilis: fruiting. (Courtesy of C. Claudel.)
Japan, where it was used to prepare Konnyaku-flour. Tubers were also bought by Chinese
tradesmen. In the US, in the late thirties, an interest grew in Ilesmannane-flour, prepared
from Amorphophallus-tubers. Amorphophallus variabilis has repeatedly been reported from
outside Java (e.g., Philippines, Thailand, India, Sri Lanka, Malaysia) but these records are
all based on misidentifications.
FIGURE 2.105
Amorphophallus xiei: leaf. (Courtesy of C. Claudel.)
68 Konjac Glucomannan
FIGURE 2.106
Amorphophallus xiei: lamina with bulbils. (Courtesy of unknown.)
FIGURE 2.107
Amorphophallus xiei: petiole detail. (Courtesy of C. Claudel.)
FIGURE 2.108
Amorphophallus xiei: inflorescence. (Courtesy of H. Li.)
Botanical Background to Amorphophallus 69
FIGURE 2.109
Amorphophallus xiei: inflorescence. (Courtesy of Y.J. Tao.)
FIGURE 2.110
Amorphophallus xiei: pistillate and staminate zones. (Courtesy of A. Galloway.)
FIGURE 2.111
Amorphophallus xiei: fruiting. (Courtesy of H. Li.)
70 Konjac Glucomannan
NO T E : For comments by the author of the species status of A. xiei, see Li & Hetterscheid,
2010. Amorphophallus xiei shows a mixture in morphological characters of both of its closest
relatives, A. bulbifer and A. muelleri. In terms of molecular phylogenetic relationships, it is
just a bit closer to A. bulbifer (Claudel et al., 2017). These three species form a very interest-
ing triad of apomictic species, with probably all there a triploid genome (established for
A. bulbifer and A. muelleri).
FIGURE 2.112
Amorphophallus yuloensis: tuber. (Courtesy of W.L.A. Hetterscheid.)
Botanical Background to Amorphophallus 71
FIGURE 2.113
Amorphophallus yuloensis: leaf bulbil. (Courtesy of W.L.A. Hetterscheid.)
FIGURE 2.114
Amorphophallus yuloensis: inflorescence. (Courtesy of W.L.A. Hetterscheid.)
FIGURE 2.115
Amorphophallus yuloensis: spadix exposed. (Courtesy of W.L.A. Hetterscheid.)
72 Konjac Glucomannan
FIGURE 2.116
Amorphophallus yuloensis: pistillate zone. (Courtesy of W.L.A. Hetterscheid.)
FIGURE 2.117
Amorphophallus yuloensis: fruiting. (Courtesy of C. Claudel.)
A rather small species but a clear member of the blue-fruited clade in subg.
NO T E :
Metandrium. Its more detailed phylogenetic position is unclear.
FIGURE 2.118
Amorphophallus yunnanensis: tuber. (Courtesy of W.L.A. Hetterscheid.)
74 Konjac Glucomannan
FIGURE 2.119
Amorphophallus yunnanensis: petiole detail. (Courtesy of W.L.A. Hetterscheid.)
FIGURE 2.120
Amorphophallus yunnanensis: petiole detail. (Courtesy of C. Claudel.)
Botanical Background to Amorphophallus 75
FIGURE 2.121
Amorphophallus yunnanensis: inflorescence. (Courtesy of W.L.A. Hetterscheid.)
FIGURE 2.122
Amorphophallus yunnanensis: inflorescence, lateral view. (Courtesy of W.L.A. Hetterscheid.)
76 Konjac Glucomannan
FIGURE 2.123
Amorphophallus yunnanensis: spadix exposed. (Courtesy of W.L.A. Hetterscheid.)
FIGURE 2.124
Amorphophallus yunnanensis: pistillate zone. (Courtesy of W.L.A. Hetterscheid.)
FIGURE 2.125
Amorphophallus yunnanensis: fruits maturing to blue. (Courtesy of C. Claudel.)
Botanical Background to Amorphophallus 77
Distribution: Thailand: Mae Hong Son, Chiang Mai, Lamphun, Tak, Phitsanulok,
Khon Kaen, Chaiyaphum (Phu Khieo); China: Guangxi, Guizhou, Yunnan; Laos;
northern Vietnam.
Ecology: in shaded places in primary evergreen or mixed evergreen/deciduous for-
ests, on metamorphic bedrock, in rich soils, or secondary forests, thickets, forest
margins; 100–3,300 m altitude.
In addition, there are species that contain small amounts of alkaloids and toxic sub-
stances such as oxalic acid in fresh tubers. Since it is difficult to remove those undesir-
able substances during processing, such species have no commercial value for the food
industry. However, some of these species contain considerable amounts of konjac gluco-
mannan (KGM). This polymer is composed of D-glucose and D-mannose connected by
β-1,4 glycosidic bonds in a molecular ratio of 1:1.6 to 4.2 (Chen et al., 2005). KGM can have
high viscosity at low concentration and can therefore be used as a raw material in many
industries (Sheng and Teng, 2008). Amorphophallus is the main plant genus used for com-
mercial production of glucomannan. The glucomannan content in tubers of some species
is approximately 60% of their dry weight (Diao et al., 2014). This is why the glucomannan
content is an important quality indicator.
The size of the tubers increases during the growing season and it may reach up to three
times its former weight per season (Zhao, 2010). An approximately three-year-old tuber is
suitable for KGM flour production. Most of the species with high glucomannan content are
grown in plantations in China and Japan. They are also grown in Southeast Asia but at a
smaller scale (Zhou et al., 2004).
The species with high KGM content are as follows:
Amorphophallus konjac K. Koch: an important crop cultivated in Japan and China for
the KGM flour production industry. It is a diploid species (2n = 26). The tuber con-
sists of 49%–60% (w/w) water soluble KGM (Li et al., 2005).
A. albus is a native Chinese species and mainly cultivated as crop in Yunnan, south-
west China (Long, 1998). It is diploid (2n = 26). The tubers of this species contain
around 59.3% KGM (w/w) (Liu, 2004).
A. bulbifer is a triploid (2n = 39) with that produces nucellar, clonal seedlings without
pollination. This species tolerates a wide range of temperatures and grows well
between 15°C and 30°C. A. bulbifer has been successfully introduced and is cul-
tivated in Yunnan, China. The KGM content in this species is between 48%–52%
which is lower than A. konjac and A. muelleri (Zhang et al., 2009, 2010; Zhao, 2010).
It was used as a model for the glucomanan biosynthesis pathway (Diao et al., 2014)
and for a complete chloroplast genome study (Hu et al., 2008).
A. muelleri is also triploid (3n) with 39 chromosomes and is an important wild and
cultivated species in Thailand and Indonesia (Java). It has a high KGM content
(72%–78%) (Zhang et al., 2010; Zhao, 2010). There is a study that reported about a
relationships between phylogeny and glucomanan content of Amorphophallus spp.
collected in Thailand (Mekkerdchoo et al., 2016). The highest KGM content was
found in A. muelleri (60.16%–68.93%) followed by A. krausei, A. kachinensis, A. bulbifer,
A. xiei and A. corrugatus respectively. Moreover, the study retrieved two monophy-
letic clades using DNA sequencing with high KGM content species (Figure 2.126).
The RAPD analysis generated specific bands identifying species belonging only to
the high and medium glucomamnan content clades. It can be used as a screening
tool for economic Amorphophallus species. Moreover, these species can also be stud-
ied for complete chloroplast genome construction (Hu et al., 2008) and ceramidase
production from sphingolipid metabolic pathway (Zhong et al., 2018).
The glucomannan content can be affected by various factors such as location, soil, weather,
age of tuber and processing (Fang and Wu, 2004; Zhang and Liu, 2006; Zhang et al., 2005).
Liu (2004) found that the KGM content of A. konjac grown in different areas varied slightly
Botanical Background to Amorphophallus 79
FIGURE 2.126
Phylogenetic tree of Amorphophallus spp. in Thailand and glucomannan content. (From Mekkerdchoo, O. et al.,
Phytotaxa, 282, 81–106, 2016.)
80 Konjac Glucomannan
(ranging from 58.8% to 52.1%). However, the results of these studies also indicated that the
individual species is the main factor determining the KGM content and the quality of the
KGM flour and that the growing conditions are a secondary factor that can be optimized
to maximize the KGM yield.
2.6 Hybrids
2.6.1 Hybridization in Amorphophallus
During the phylogenetic investigations of the genus Amorphophallus on a larger scale
(Claudel et al., 2017), a negligible but intriguing phenomenon constantly reproduced in
most analyses: four species of the subg. Scutandrium Hett. & Claudel paired in an unex-
pected combination. The first two species, A. konjac K. Koch and A. maxwellii Hett., are tall
and large. The plants easily exceed one meter height and are characterized by an equally
large inflorescence, both with a dark maroon spathe (Hetterscheid and Ittenbach, 1996).
In contrast, the other two species which are ‘morphologically very similar’ (Hetterscheid
and Ittenbach, 1996) are distinctly smaller and the inflorescences bear light-coloured
spathes. The spathe is whitish to pale green outside and faintly maroonish inside in the
case of A. krausei Engl; and greenish outside and whitish inside in the case of A. albus
P. Y. Liu & J. F. Chen. Based on the morphological similarity between the two species pairs,
A. konjac was expected to be closely related to A. maxwellii and A. albus was expected to
pair with A. krausei. Instead, A. konjac paired with A. albus and A. maxwellii with A. krausei.
This result was too intriguing to be ignored and, as a consequence different accessions of
A. albus and A. konjac were sequenced in order to validate or disprove the result. However,
it persisted and the question arose if hybridization events possibly influenced the result.
It first seemed unlikely, however, taking into consideration that several Amorphophallus
species, (i.e., A. paeoniifolius (Dennst.) Nicolson, A. albus and A. konjac) have a long breed-
ing history in Asia (Hetterscheid and Ittenbach, 1996; Zheng et al., 2013; Liu et al., 2015) it
did not seem impossible. Moreover, Zhang et al. (1998) reported the successful hybridiza-
tion of several Amorphophallus species, amongst others hybridization between A. albus and
A. konjac. It therefore seemed suddenly not only possible but even likely that these species
might have been hybridized in the past.
Thus, the first author (Claudel et al., 2017) decided to reproduce the cross between the
aforementioned species in order to investigate the placement of the progeny within the
phylogenetic analysis. This was the starting point of further attempts to cross as many dif-
ferent Amorphophallus species as possible and to explore the limits of hybridization within
the genus. Thanks to Mr. John Tan, an avid plantsman from Singapore, the author received
the necessary support to raise many hundred plants of hybrid origin. Moreover, several
Amorphophallus enthusiasts around the world, from Australia to Indonesia, from the US
to Europe joined the informal project and started to hybridize species and consequently
reported the outcome. The overall aim of the project was to create new hybrids of orna-
mental value, with desirable traits, such as increased hardiness and robustness and/or
decreased odour properties (Claudel and Galloway, 2012). Therefore, the limits of hybrid-
ization within the genus had to be explored in order to improve or to combine specific
traits from different species and to increase the overall vigour.
Although the ornamental value was in the foreground instead of crop traits, such as
tuber growth or glucomannan content, a short comment should be made concerning
Botanical Background to Amorphophallus 81
species with agricultural importance. These essentially include six species from three
different subgenera, namely A. albus and A. konjac, A. paeoniifolius and A. bulbifer Blume,
A. muelleri Blume and A. xiei H. Li & Z. L. Dao.
Amorphophallus albus and A. konjac belong to the subgenus Scutandrium and both have
2n = 26 chromosomes which is considered to be the basic chromosome number in the
genus (Shete et al., 2015). As previously mentioned these two species are compatible and
the hybrids show signs of hybrid vigour (Claudel et al., 2013). Moreover, the resulting
F1-generation is fertile and the hybrids can either be crossed one with each other or back-
crossed with one of the parents (personal observation). This opens up endless opportuni-
ties for breeding programs of suitable crop plants. Overcoming the poor disease resistance
of A. konjac (Zheng et al., 2013) could be a possible outcome. Moreover, the study from
Zheng et al. (2013) concerning A. konjac revealed that the genetic ‘variation between wild
and cultivar genotypes’ is very small. Yin et al. (2019) come to the same conclusion concern-
ing the genetic variation within A. albus. In other words, it seems that the Amorphophallus
species have a long history of cultivation but not necessarily a long breeding history.
Amorphophallus paeoniifolius from the subgenus Amorphophallus is the species with
the widest distribution, possibly due to their use as starchy crop plant (Hetterscheid &
Ittenbach, 1996). It belongs to a small clade (Claudel et al., 2017) together with A. prainii Hook
f. and a few other species which are characterized by 2n = 28 chromosomes (Chauhan &
Brandham, 1985). Although widely planted, the aberrant chromosome number limits the
potential in terms of hybridization as only few species can be used as crossing partners.
Even more limited in this context are the three species A. bulbifer, A. muelleri and A. xiei
from the subgenus Metandrium Stapf. The chromosome number for A. xiei has not been
investigated; however, A. xiei is so similar to A. bulbifer that its species identity has been
questioned by Li and Hetterscheid (2010). Amorphophallus bulbifer and A. muelleri are trip-
loids characterized by the chromosome number 2n = 39 (Ramachandran, 1977; Chauhan
and Brandham, 1985; Patil, 1995; Shete et al., 2015) and it has been discussed if the chromo-
some number in these two species is based on allotriploidy or autoploidy (Chauhan and
Brandham, 1985; Patil, 1995; Shete et al., 2015). Both species seemingly exclusively rely on
the formation of epiphyllar bulbils and apomictic seed formation for propagation (more
precisely: agamospermy). This is underlined by the investigation of Patil (1995) who states
that the: ‘autopolyploid nature in A. bulbifer (2n = 39) is supported by the lowest pollen fer-
tility 5.69% and apomictic seed formation...’ Thus, these species seemingly cannot be used
for generative propagation, neither for hybridization nor for selections based on breeding.
However, Kuruvilla et al. (1989) reported 2n = 26 for A. bulbifer. Possibly some popula-
tions from A. bulbifer and A. muelleri are true diploids which could be used for breeding
experiments. This finding would fit with the concept that apomixis in plants is facultative
(Savidan, 2000), in other words that if sexual reproduction has not been observed, than the
observation has just not been rigorous enough. Moreover, although the pollen fertility is
very low (Patil, 1995) the pollen nevertheless is fertile. These points deserve closer atten-
tion as these species are of economic value (Zhao et al., 2009, 2010; Zhang et al., 2010) and
breeding programs could give rise to new high-performance cultivars. It is noteworthy to
add that Tjio (1948) reports 2n = 39 for A. rivieri Dur., a synonym of A. konjac. Either the
plant was not correctly identified and was in fact a specimen of A. bulbifer or A. muelleri, or
further triploid specimens occur within other species.
However, at the starting point the focus was set on the ornamental value and the fea-
sibility of a cross. As a result, nearly 250 crosses worldwide were performed, of which
47 were successful and yielded viable seeds (Claudel and Galloway, 2012; Claudel
et al., 2013; Claudel and Mangelsdorff, 2014). Some outstanding specimens from a few
82 Konjac Glucomannan
crosses were named and subsequently released, namely: Amorphophallus ‘Kiat Tan’
(A. lewallei Malaisse & Bamps x A. maximus (Engl.)), Amorphophallus ‘Mary Sizemore’
and Amorphophallus ‘Meister Eckhardt’ (both A. albus x A. konjac), Amorphophallus ‘Heine’
(A. lewallei x A. richardsiae Ittenb.), Amorphophallus ‘Blue Nightspot’ (A. glaucophyllus Hett. &
Serebr. x A. lacourii Linden & Andre) and Amorphophallus ‘Majda’ (A. pulchellus Hett. &
Schuit. x A. myosuroides Hett. & A. Galloway) (Claudel, 2019; Galloway, 2019). Besides
exhibiting good growing properties and beautiful foliage or inflorescences it was required
that these could not be mistaken for the true species. These cultivars represent a trial bal-
loon and will demonstrate if Amorphophallus cultivars of hybrid origin will find their niche
and spread in collections.
The perhaps most amazing cross was performed by Ralph Mangelsdorff in 2002
(Claudel et al., 2012). It involved two very different crossing partners in terms of absolute
size. The seed parent was A. variabilis Bl. which usually hardly exceeds 1.20 meter height
(Hetterscheid and Ittenbach, 1996) and has a long peduncled but otherwise rather small
and inconspicuous inflorescence. The pollen parent however was A. titanum (Becc.) Becc.
ex Arcangeli, the most striking species of the genus with leaves up to six meters high and
sessile, very large inflorescences exceeding 3 meter height (McPherson and Hetterscheid,
2011). Only a few seeds fully developed (Claudel et al., 2012) and only one seedling reached
flowering stage. The plant displayed perfectly intermediate character traits and was very
showy at that. It was named Amorphophallus ‘John Tan’ (Claudel et al., 2012) in honour of
Mr. Tan and represents therefore the first named Amorphophallus cultivar of hybrid origin.
Moreover, used as pollen parent, it also is the ‘father’ of the first Amorphophallus hybrid
involving three Amorphophallus species (Claudel et al., 2012).
Since 2014 the interest in hybridization amongst enthusiasts seemingly declined.
Considering that one cross can yield a few to a few hundred seeds and that it takes,
species-dependant, three to seven years to raise the hybrids until maturity, it becomes
apparent that it is a task which requires time, space and efforts, especially if larger species
are involved. Moreover, it requires close observation of the plants, as Amorphophallus spe-
cies, like all aroids are protogynous (Boyce and Wong, 2012) which in most cases imply a
short time frame for successful pollination. As a general rule, the ‘female phase’, the phase
characterized by receptive stigmas, starts and ends on day one of anthesis, whereas the
‘male phase’, characterized by pollen release, occurs on day two. That said, the female
phase does not necessarily last the whole day but can end after a period of six hours only
(personal observation). In contrast to that, some species are characterized by an extended
female phase which lasts up to five days (personal observation) such as for example
A. antsingyensis Bogner, Hett. & Ittenb., A. gigas Teijsm. & Binnend., A. henryi N. E. Br.,
A. konjac, A. lambii Mayo & Widjaja, A. natolii Hett. et al. and A. variabilis. Either way, the
pollen needs to be applied to the stigmas when these are receptive which is often indicated
by a sticky fluid on the stigma surface. Applying pollen either requires a plant which flow-
ered in the preceding days and serves as pollen donator or stored pollen, dried and frozen
or refrigerated (Claudel & Galloway, 2012).
Fresh pollen is naturally the best choice and is ideally applied on the day of release as
it is assumed to be short-lived and to deteriorate within a few days at room temperature
(Harrington, 1970; Zhang et al., 1998; Barabé et al., 2008). However, it can be gently dried
using silica gel (Claudel and Galloway, 2012) and either be refrigerated at 4°C–8°C or frozen
at −20°C or comparable temperatures. As stated in Claudel et al. (2013) and Claudel and
Mangelsdorff (2014), eight out of 25 successful crosses were performed using frozen pollen;
in one case the pollen had been stored for more than two years. Moreover, in the new series
of crosses (see Appendix 2.I) 16 out of 37 successful crosses have been performed using
Botanical Background to Amorphophallus 83
have weaker growing and flowering properties than their corresponding parents (Leimu
and Fischer, 2010; Barmentlo et al., 2018). This is due to biochemical and/or physiological
incompatibilities between the crossing partners. The crossing partners are genetically too
distant and the selective advantage of adapted gene complexes of the involved species
is disrupted through hybridization (Wikipedia, 2019). One of the markers, indicating the
limitation of hybridization in Amorphophallus is albinism (Claudel et al., 2013). Albinism
in the progeny of a given Amorphophallus cross can be displayed at two levels. One is the
number of seedlings affected and the second is the degree of albinism that a single seed-
ling expresses. In the best case only a few seedlings show slight signs of chlorophyll-free
leaf tissue which may eventually slowly turn green after the leaf unfolds. In the worst case
all the seedlings are completely devoid of chlorophyll and will die as soon as the stored
nutrients are consumed.
This raises the question how closely related two crossing partners need to be if ‘optimal
outcrossing distance’ (Schierup and Christiansen, 1996) or hybrid vigour is the goal or
on the opposite, how distantly related they can possibly be if not improvement but pure
survival at any cost is the aim. Unfortunately there is no specific answer to this question.
It must be taken into consideration that effects based on inbreeding depression, outbreed-
ing depression or heterosis play a role even between different populations of a given single
species (Leimu and Fischer, 2010; Barmentlo et al., 2018). Predicting which effect might
dominate would require a precise knowledge about the genetics of each crossing partner.
Besides this limitation it must be also taken into consideration that the presented hybrid-
ization attempts are arbitrary, mainly for two reasons. Firstly, the involved species are
selected based on traits judged desirable by the hybridizers. Second, the opportunities to
hybridize depend on the cultivated species.
However, some concluding observations can be made. Out of nearly 500 hybridization
attempts a total of 84 yielded viable seeds, especially crosses between closely related species
are often successful. As insignificant as this might seem, it demonstrates that Amorphophallus
species hybridize readily which suggests that interspecific hybridization barriers are not pro-
nounced in many species. This could be accounted for by adaptive radiation. Amorphophallus
is a comparatively young genus (Nauheimer et al., 2012) within the Araceae. However, with
an estimated 219 species (Boyce and Croat, 2011) it exhibits a high species diversity growing
in the (sub)tropical zones of the palaeotropics, outranking all other aroid genera in mor-
phological diversity (Hetterscheid and Ittenbach,1996; Claudel et al., 2017). For example, the
genus encompasses an exceptionally high diversity in berry colour, ranging from white,
green, and yellow, orange, red to blue and purple. This is a characteristic trait indicating seed
dispersal through birds (Claudel et al., 2017) which might have played a major role in the
wide distribution of the genus. Last but not least, many closely related species have similar
or even identical nuclear and plastid sequences (Claudel et al., 2017). Although speculative,
all facts combined – high species and morphological diversity acquired in a short period
of time, palaeotropical distribution pattern, birds as dispersal vector and finally, similar
genetic sequences – suggest adaptive radiation.
Additionally, six out of the 37 successful crosses involve three different species and
one cross even involves four species (see Appendix 2.II). The latter consists of a hybrid
between two Malagasy species as pollen acceptor (A. taurostigma x A. ankarana) crossed
with a hybrid between two African species as pollen donor (A. lewallei x A. impressus).
Nine of the successful crosses even involve species from different subgenera. For example
A. variabilis crossed with A. maximus involves A. variabilis, a species from South East Asia
from the subgenus Amorphophallus and A. maximus an African species from the subgenus
Afrophallus Hett. & Claudel.
Botanical Background to Amorphophallus 85
Simply put, the boundaries of hybridization within Amorphophallus are not yet
reached, there is still a lot of potential to be uncovered and many questions remain to
be answered.
Acknowledgements
The author of Section 2.6 Hybrids, C. Claudel, wants to express his gratitude towards
Mr. John Tan from Singapore who made the hybrid possible from the beginning to the
end. Furthermore, the author wants to thank Steve Jackson, Alan Galloway and Bjoern
Malkmus-Hussein for joining the journey.
(Continued)
88 Konjac Glucomannan
(Continued)
Botanical Background to Amorphophallus 89
References
Anil, S. R., Beevy, S. S. & Siril, E. A. 2013. Karyosystematic studies in Amorphophallus Blume ex decne.
J. Root Crops, 39(2), 39–50.
Barabé, D., Lavallée, K. & Gibernau, M. 2008. Pollen viability and germination in some neotropical
aroids. Botany, 86, 98–102.
Barmentlo, S. H., Meirmans, P. G., Luijten, S. H., Triest, L. & Oostermeijer, J. G. 2018. Outbreeding
depression and breeding system evolution in small, remnant populations of Primula vulgaris:
Consequences for genetic rescue. Conserv. Genet., 19(3), 545–554.
Bentham, G. & Hooker, J. D. 1883. Genera Plantarum, Vol. 3, Part 2. London, UK: Reeve & Co.
Blume, C. L. 1834. Amorphophallus: In J. Decaisne, Description d’un herbier de l’ile de Timor. Nouv.
Ann. Mus. Hist. Nat. III, 3, 333–501.
Blume, C. L. 1837. Amorphophallus. Rumphia, 1, 138–149.
Bogner, J. & Nicolson, D. H. 1991. A revised classification of the Araceae with dichotomous keys.
Willdenowia, 21, 35–50.
Bogner, J. & Hetterscheid, W. L. A. 1992. Notes on the genus Amorphophallus (Araceae). 1. Three new
species from tropical Asia. Blumea, 36, 467–475.
Bogner, J., Mayo, S. J. & Sivadasan, M. 1985. New and changing concepts in Amorphophallus. Aroideana,
8(1), 15–25.
Boyce, P. C. & Croat, T. B. 2011 (onwards). The Überlist of Araceae, Totals for Published and Estimated
Number of Species in Aroid Genera. http://www.aroid.org/genera/180211uberlist.pdf, last
accessed on 28 May 2019.
Boyce, P. C. & Wong, S. Y. 2012. The Araceae of Malesia I: Introduction. Malay. Nat. J., 64, 33–67.
Boyce, P. C., Sookchaloem, D., Hetterscheid, W. L., Gusman, G., Jacobsen, N., Idei, T. & Van Du, N.
2012. Flora of Thailand, Vol. 11, Part 2: Araceae, Acoraceae. Bangkok, Thailand: Forest Herbarium,
National Park, Wildlife and Plant Conservation Department, 325 p.
Brandham, P. E. 1983. Evolution in a stable chromosome system, in: Brandham, P. E. & Bennett, M.
D. (eds.), Kew Chromosome Conference II. London, UK, pp. 251–260.
Brickell, C. D., Alexander, C., Cubey, J. J., David, J. C., Hoffman, M. H. A., Leslie, A. C., Malécot, V. &
Xiaobai, J. 2016. International Code of Nomenclature for Cultivated Plants, Vol. 10, pp. 1–184, ed. 9,
ISHS, Leuven, Belgium: Scripta Horticulturae.
Brown, N. E. 1882. Four new genera of Aroideae. J. Bot. New Ser., 11, 193–197.
Brown, N. E. 1901. Aroideae, in: Thiselton-Dyer, W.T. (ed.), Flora of Tropical Africa, Vol. 8. London, UK:
Lovel Reeve & Co.
Cabrera, L. I., Salazar, G. A., Chase, M. W., Mayo, S. J., Bogner, J. & Dávila, P. 2008. Phylogenetic
relationships of aroids and duckweeds (Araceae) inferred from coding and noncoding plastid
DNA. Am. J. Bot., 95(9), 1153–1165.
Chauhan, K. P. S. & Brandham, P. E. 1985. Chromosome and DNA variation in Amorphophallus
(Araceae). Kew Bull., 40(4), 745–758.
Botanical Background to Amorphophallus 95
Chen, L. –G., Liu, Z. –L. & Zhuo, R.–X. 2005. Synthesis and properties of degradable hydrogels of
konjac glucomannan grafted acylic acid for colon-specific drug delivery. Polymer, 46, 6274–6281.
Chua, M. 2011. An investigation of the biology and chemistry of the Chinese medicinal plant,
Amorphophallus konjac. PhD thesis, University of Wolverhampton, Wolverhampton, UK.
Claudel, C., Buerki, S., Chatrou, L. W., Antonelli, A., Alvarez, N. & Hetterscheid, W. 2017. Large-scale
phylogenetic analysis of Amorphophallus (Araceae) derived from nuclear and plastid sequences
reveals new subgeneric delineation. Bot. J. Linn. Soc., 184(1), 32–45.
Claudel, C. & Galloway, A. 2012. Hybridization of Amorphophallus: State of the art. Aroideana., 35,
103–108.
Claudel, C., Galloway, A. & Mangelsdorff, R. 2013. Hybridization of Amorphophallus: State of affairs.
Aroideana., 36, 114–122.
Claudel, C. & Mangelsdorff, R. 2014. Hybridization of Amorphophallus: State of the Unions. Aroideana,
37, 72–79.
Claudel, C., Mangelsdorff, R. & Hetterscheid, W. L. A. 2012. The first successful hybrid of
Amorphophallus titanum. Aroideana, 35, 81–85.
Claudel, C., Lev-Yadun, S., Hetterscheid, W. L. A. & Schultz, M. 2019. Lichen and cyanobacteria
mimicry in huge tree-size Amorphophallus petioles results in their masquerade as inedible tree
trunks. Bot. J. Linn. Soc., 190, 192–214.
Claudel, Cyrille. Amorphophallus hybrids, cultivars, 25 May 2019. https://www.amorphophallus-
network.org/
Cusimano, N, Bogner, J., Mayo, S. J., Boyce, P. C., Wong, S. Y., Hesse, M., Hetterscheid, W. L. A.,
Keating, R. C. & French, J. C. 2011. Relationships within the Araceae: Comparisons of morpho-
logical patterns with molecular phylogenies. Am. J. Bot., 98, 654–668.
Diao, Y., Yang, C., Yan, M., Zheng, X., Jin, S., Wang, Y. & Hu, Z. 2014. De novo transcriptome and
small RNA analyses of two Amorphophallus species. PloS One, 9(4), e95428.
Engler, A. 1876. Vergleichende Untersuchungen über die morphologischen Verhältnisse der Araceae.
1 Theil: Natürliches System der Araceae. Nov. Act. Ksl. Leop.-Carol.-Deutschen Akad. Naturf.,
39(3), 135–155.
Engler, A. 1879. Araceae, in: de Candolle, A. & de Candolle, C. (eds.), Monographiae Phanerogamarum,
Vol. 2, pp. 1–681. Paris, France: Sumptibus G. Masson.
Engler, A. 1881. Beiträge zur Kenntnis der Araceae, I. Bot. Jahrb. Syst., 1, 179–190.
Engler, A. 1893. Araceae africanae. Bot. Jahrb. Syst., 26, 447–466.
Engler, A. (ed.). 1911. Araceae-Lasioideae, in: Das Pflanzenreich, IV, 23C (Heft 48). Leipzig, Germany:
Wilhelm Engelmann.
Fang, W. & Wu, P. 2004. Variations of Konjac glucomannan (KGM) from Amorphophallus konjac and
its refined powder in China. Food Hydrocoll., 18, 167–170.
Galloway, A. 2019. Amorphophallus hybrids, 25 May 2019. https://alangallowaybotanicals.com/
Gholave, A. R., Pawar, K. D., Yadav, S. R., Bapat, V. A. & Jadhav, J. P. 2016. Reconstruction of molecular
phylogeny of closely related Amorphophallus species of India using plastid DNA marker and
fingerprinting approaches. Physiol. Mol. Biol. Pla., 23(1), 155–167. doi: 10.1007/s12298-016-0400-0.
Grayum, M. H. 1984. Palynology and phylogeny of the Araceae. Ph.D. dissertation University of
Massachusetts. Amherst, MA.
Grayum, M. H. 1990. Evolution and phylogeny of the Araceae. Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard., 77, 628–697.
Grob, G. B. J., Gravendeel, B., Eurlings, M. C. M. & Hetterscheid, W. L. A. 2002. Phylogeny of the
Tribe Thomsonieae (Araceae) based on chloroplast matK and trnL intron sequences. Syst. Bot.,
27(3), 453–467.
Grob, G. B. J., Gravendeel, B. & Eurlings, M. C. M. 2004. Potential phylogenetic utility of the
nuclear Floricaula/Leafy second intron: Comparison with three chloroplast DNA regions in
Amorphophallus (Araceae). Mol. Phylogenet. Evol., 30, 13–23.
Harrington, J. F. 1970. Seed and pollen storage for conservation of plant gene resources, in: Frankel,
O. H. & Bennett, E. (eds.), Genetic Resources in Plants: Their Exploration and Conservation, pp. 501–
521. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
Hawkes, A. D. 1951. Studies in Araceae I. Loydia, 14, 98–100.
96 Konjac Glucomannan
Hetterscheid, W. L. A. & van der Ham, R. W. J. M. 2001. Notes on the genus Amorphophallus (Araceae):
11 New and obsolete species from East Malaysia and continental Southeast Asia. Blumea, 46(2),
253–282.
Hetterscheid, W. L. A. & Ittenbach, S. 1996. Everything you always wanted to know about
Amorphophallus, but were afraid to stick your nose into. Aroideana, 19, 7–131.
Hetterscheid, W. L. A, Wistuba, A., Amoroso, V., Medecilo, M. & Claudel, C. 2012. Amorphophallus
natolii (Araceae), a new species from limestone on Palawan, Philippines. Bot. Stud., 53, 415–420.
Hetterscheid, W. L. A. & Claudel, C. 2012. The end of Pseudodracontium. Aroideana, 35, 40–46.
Hetterscheid, W. L. A. 1992(1994). Preliminary taxonomy and morphology of Amorphophallus Blume
ex Decaisne (Araceae), in: Serebryanyi, M. M. (ed.), Proceedings of the Moscow Aroid Conference,
pp. 35–48. Moscow, Russia.
Hetterscheid, W. L. A. 2012. Amorphophallus in: Boyce, P. C., Sookchaloem, D., Hetterscheid, W. L. A.,
Gusman, G., Jacobsen, N., Idei, T. & Nguyen, V.D. (eds.), Araceae. Flora of Thailand Vol. 11, no. 2.
Bangkok, Thailand: The Forest Herbarium.
Hooker, J. D. 1875. Proteinophallus rivieri. Bot. Mag., 101, t. 6195.
Hooker, J. D. 1894. Amorphophallus elliottii. Bot. Mag., 55, t. 7394.
Hu, J., Gao, X., Liu, J., Xie, C. & Li, J. 2008. Plant regeneration from petiole callus of Amorphophallus
albus and analysis of somaclonal variation of regenerated plants by RAPD and ISSR markers.
Bot. Stud., 49, 189–197.
Jaleel, V. A., Sivadasan, M., Ahmed, H., Alfarhan, A. H., Thomas, J. & Alatar, A. A. 2012. A taxonomic
revision of Amorphophallus Blume ex Decne. sect. Conophallus (Schott) Engl. (Araceae) in India.
Bangladesh J. Plant Taxon., 19(2), 135–153.
Kite, G. & Hetterscheid, W. L. A. 1997. Inflorescence odours of Amorphophallus and Pseudodracontium
(Araceae). Phytochemistry, 46(1), 71–75.
Kite, G. C. & Hetterscheid, W. L. 2017. Phylogenetic trends in the evolution of inflorescence odours
in Amorphophallus. Phytochemistry, 142, 126–142.
Krause, K. 1924. Eine neue Sektion der Gattung Amorphophallus Bl. Notizbl. Bot. Gart. Mus. Berl.-
Dahlem, 9, 37–38.
Kumar, C. S. & Jaleel, V. A. 2009. Amorphophallus bognerianus (Araceae), a new species from India.
Aroideana, 32, 136–141.
Kuntze, O. 1891. Revisio Generum Plantarum, Part 2. A. Felix, Leipzig, Germany.
Kuruvilla, K. M., Dutt, B. & Roy, R. P. 1989. Karyomorphological investigations on Aroids of North-
eastern Hills. J. Cytol. Genet., 24, 13–22.
Leimu, R. & Fischer, M. 2010. Between‐population outbreeding affects plant defence. PLoS ONE, 5,
e12614.
Li, H. & Hetterscheid, W. L. A. 2010. Amorphophallus, in: Wu, Z., Raven, P. H. & Deyuan, H. (eds.),
Flora of China, Vol. 23. Beijing, China: MBG Press and Science Press, pp. 23–33.
Li, J. J., Pei, G. L., Pang, H. X., Bilderbeck, A., Chen, S. S. & Tao, S. H. 2006. A new method for
RAPD primers selection based on primer bias in nucleotide sequence data. J. Biotechnol., 126,
415–442.
Liu, Y., Li, H., Jarvis, D. & Long, C. 2015. Aroid crops in China. Aroideana., 38E, 116–129.
Liu, P. Y. & Chen, J. F. 1984. Amorphophallus albus. J. Southwest. Agric. Coll. (Chongqing), 67(1), 1984.
Liu, P. Y. 2004. Konjac. Beijing, China: China Agriculture Press.
Liu, S. Y. & Wei, S. J. 1986. Amorphophallus coaetaneus. Guihaia, 6, 183.
Long, C. 1998. Ethnobotany of Amorphophallus of China, in: Current Advances in Araceae Studies:
Proceedings of the Sixth International Aroid Conference, Suppl, Vol. 10, pp. 89–92. Beijing, China:
Acta Botanica Yunnanica.
McPherson, S. & Hetterscheid, W. L. A. 2011. Amorphophallus in the wild and in cultivation.
Plantsman., 10, 90–97.
Mekkerdchoo, O., Borompichaichartkul, C., Perrigo, Allison, Srzednicki, G., Prakitchaiwattana, C. &
Antonelli, A. 2016. Tracing the evolution and economic potential of konjac glucomannan in
Amorphophallus species (Araceae) using molecular phylogeny and RAPD markers. Phytotaxa,
282(2), 81–106.
Botanical Background to Amorphophallus 97
Nakai, T. 1948. Amorphophallus selebicus: A new giant Amorphophallus from Celebes, with some
remarks on the bulb of Amorphophallus titanum, and photographs of Amorphophallus selebicus,
A. titanum, and A. decus silvae. Bull. Tokyo Sci. Mus., 22, 1–4.
Nauheimer, L., Metzler, D. & Renner, S. S. 2012. Global history of the ancient monocot family Araceae
inferred with models accounting for past continental positions and previous ranges based on
fossils. The New Phytologist., 195, 938–950.
Nicolson, D. H, Bogner, J., Mayo, S. & Sivadasan, M. 1984. Proposal to amend 723 Amorphophallus,
add Thomsonia, nom. rej. prop. (Araceae). Taxon, 33, 740.
Nicolson, D. H. 1977. (429) Proposal to change the typification of 723 Amorphophallus, nom. cons.
(Araceae). Taxon, 26(2, 3), 337–338.
Pan, C., Gichira, A. W. & Chen, J. M. 2015. Genetic variation in wild populations of the tuber crop
Amorphophallus konjac (Araceae) in central China as revealed by AFLP markers. Genet. Mol.
Res., 14(4), 18753–18763.
Pan, C., You, Y., Diao, Y., Hu, Z. & Chen, J. 2012. Isolation and characterization of microsatellite loci
for the herbaceous tuber crop, Amorphophallus konjac (Araceae). Genet. Mol. Res., 11(4), 4617–4621.
Patil, K. S. 1995. Cytotaxonomical & Genetical studies in Araceae from Western Ghats of Maharashtra.
Ph.D. Thesis. Department of Botany, Shivaji University, Kolhapur, India.
Petersen, G. 1989. Cytology and systematics of Araceae. Nordic J. Bot., 9(2), 119–166.
Poerba, Y. S. & Martanti, D. 2008. Genetic variability of Amorphophallus muelleri Blume in Java based
on random amplified polymorphic DNA. Biodiversitas, 9(4), 245–249.
Poerba, Y. S. & Yuzammi, D. 2008. Estimation of genetic variation of Amorphophallus titanium Becc.
based on random amplified polymorphic DNA. Biodiversitas, 9(2), 103–107.
Prain, D. 1893. On the flora of Narcondam and Barren Island. J. Asiat. Soc. Bengal, 62(2), 39–86.
Ramachandran, K. 1977. Karyological studies on four South Indian species of Amorphophallus.
Cytologia., 42, 645–652.
Santosa, E., Lian, C. L., Pisooksantivatana, Y. & Sugiyama, N. 2007. Isolation and characterization
of polymorphic microsatellite markers in Amorphophallus paeoniifolius (Dennst.) Nicolson,
Araceae. Mol. Ecol. Notes, 7(5), 814–817.
Santosa, E., Lian, C. L., Sugiyama, N., Misra, R. S., Boonkorkaew, P. & Thanomchit, K. 2017. Population
structure of elephant foot yams (Amorphophallus paeoniifolius (Dennst.) Nicolson) in Asia. PloS
One, 12(6), e0180000.
Savidan, Y. H. 2000. Apomixis: Genetics and breeding. Plant Breed. Rev., 18, 13–86. doi:10.1002/
9780470650158.ch2.
Schierup, M. H. & Christiansen, F. B. 1996. Inbreeding depression and outbreeding depression in
plants. Heredity., 77(5), 461–468. https://doi.org/10.1038/hdy.1996.172.
Schott, H. W. 1832. Araceae, in: Schott, H.W. & Endlicher, S. (eds.), Meletemata Botanica, pp. 16–22.
Vienna, Austria: C. Gerold.
Schott, H. W. 1856. Synopsis Aroidearum. Vienna, Austria: Mechitarists’ Press.
Schott, H. W. 1857. Aroideen-Skizzen. Oesterr. Bot. Wochenbl., 7, 261–263.
Schott, H. W. 1858a. Genera Aroidearum Exposita. Vienna, Austria: Hölzel.
Schott, H. W. 1858b. Aroideen-Skizzen. Oesterr. Bot. Zeitschr., 8, 317–318.
Schott, H. W. 1860. Prodromus Systematis Aroidearum. Vienna, Austria: Mechitarists’ Press.
Sedayu, A., Eurlings, M. C. M., Gravendeel, B. & Hetterscheid, W. L. A. 2010. Morphological charac-
ter evolution of Amorphophallus (Araceae) based on a combined phylogenetic analysis of trnL,
rbcL and LEAFY second intron sequences. Bot. Stud., 51, 473–490.
Sheng, D. X. & Teng, J. X. 2008. Analysis of current situation and future trend of konjac industry
demand. China Agricult. Inf., 7, 39–40.
Shete, C. C., Wadkar, S. S., Gaikwad, N. B. & Patil, K. S. 2015. Cytological studies in some members of
Amorphophallus from Western Ghats of Maharashtra. J. Cytol. Genet., 16(1–2), 17–24.
Shull, G. H. 1948. What Is Heterosis? Genetics, 33(5), 439–446.
Sivadasan, M. 1989. Amorphophallus smithsonianus (Araceae), a new species from India, and a note on
A. sect. Synantherias. Willdenowia, 18, 435–440.
Stapf, O. 1924. Amorphophallus cirrifer. Bot. Mag., 149, t. 9000.
98 Konjac Glucomannan
Sugiyama, N., Santosa, E., Lee, O. N., Hikosaka, S. & Nakata, M. 2006. Classification of elephant foot
yam (Amorphophallus paeoniifolius) cultivars in Java using AFLP markers. Jap. J. Trop. Agricu.,
50(4), 215–218.
Suresh, C. R., Sivadasan, M. & Manilal, K.S. 1983. A commentary on Rheede’s Aroids. Taxon, 32(1),
126–132.
Tjio, J. H. 1948. The somatic chromosomes of some tropical plants. Hereditas., 34, 135–114.
Ulrich, S., Hesse, M., Weber, M. & Halbritter, H. 2017. Amorphophallus: New insights into pol-
len morphology and the chemical nature of the pollen wall. Grana, 56(1), 1–36. doi:
10.1080/00173134.2015.1133699.
van der Ham, R., Grob, G., Hetterscheid, W. L. A., Star, W. & Van Heuven, B. J. 2005. Notes on the
genus Amorphophallus (Araceae) – 13: Evolution of pollen ornamentation and ultrastructure in
Amorphophallus and Pseudodracontium. Grana, 44, 252–265. doi: 10.1080/00173130500424417.
van der Ham, R., Hetterscheid, W. L. A. & Van Heuven, B. J. 1998. Notes on the genus Amorphophallus –
8: Pollen morphology of Amorphophallus and Pseudodracontium. Rev. Paleobot. Palynol., 103,
95–142. doi:10.1016/S0034-6667(98)00042-6.
Wakabayashi, S. 1955. On the Chromosome of Amorphophallus konjac. Chromosome, 25(26), 881–885.
Wenbing, C., Chunlin, L. & Jianfu, Z. 2001. Study on genetic diversity of RAPD markers in
Amorphophallus. J. Agric. Biotechnol., 4, 024.
Wikipedia contributors. 2019. “Outbreeding depression” Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia; 7 May 2019,
14:22 UTC. <https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Outbreeding_depression&oldid=89
5953627> [accessed 28 May 2019].
Yin, S., Yan, Y., You, L., Chen, Q., Zhou, Y., Chen, K., Li, R., Yang, Z., Man, L. & Gao, Y. (2019). Newly
developed genomic SSRs reveal genetic diversity in wild and cultivated Amorphophallus albus
germplasms. Plant Mol. Biol. Rep., 37(4), 365–375.
Ying, S.-S. 1991. Miscellaneous notes on The Flora of Taiwan (14). 174: Some correct names of genus
Amorphophallus in Taiwan (Araceae). Mem. Coll. Agric. Nat. Taiw. Univ., 31(1), 31.
Zhang, D. H., Wang, Q. P. & He, Z. G. 2010. Amorphophallus muelleri: A new promising star from low
yield crop to quality high yield crop. Res. Develop. Market, 2, 013.
Zhang, D. H., Wang, Q. P., Duan, Z. B. & Mi, K. X. 2009. Mechanism of relay multi-seedling release of
Amorphophallus bulbifer and its application in Southeast Asia. Res. Develop. Market., 25, 682–684.
Zhang, D., Wang, Q. & Srzednicki, G. 2010. Mechanism of staggered multiple seedling production
from Amorphophallus bulbifer and Amorphophallus muelleri and its application to cultivation in
Southeast Asia. Trop. Agricu. Develop., 54(3), 84–90.
Zhang, S. & Liu, Y. 2006. Small Konjac could be a Big Industry in China New Countryside. Jianshi, China:
Hubei Press.
Zhang, S.-L., Liu, P.-Y., Sun, Y.-M. 1998. Artificial adjustment of flower period and hybridizing tech-
niques of Amorphophallus konjac. Acta Bot. Yunnanica, X, 62–66.
Zhang, Y. Q., Xie, B. J. & Gan, X. 2005. Advance in the applications of konjac glucomannan and its
derivatives. Carbohyd. Polym., 60, 27–31.
Zhao, J. 2010. Integrated production of purified konjac flour, King Mongkut’s University of
Technology Thonburi (PhD thesis). Bangkok, Thailand.
Zhao, J., Zhang, D., Srzednicki, G. Kanlayanarat, S. & Borompichaichartkul, C. 2009. Asexual repro-
duction of Amorphophallus bulbifer by low-cost artificial-induction technique. Acta Hortic.
(ISHS), 837, 351–358.
Zhao, J., Zhang, D., Zhao J., Srzednicki, G., Borompichaichartkul, C. & Kanlayanarat, S. 2010.
Morphological and growth characteristics of Amorphophallus muelleri Blume: A commercially
important konjac species. Acta Hortic. (ISHS), 875, 501–508.
Zheng, X., Cheng, P., Ying, D., Yongning, Y., Chaozhu, Y. & Zhongli, H. 2013. Development of mic-
rosatellite markers by transcriptome sequencing in two species of Amorphophallus (Araceae).
BMC Genom., 14, 490. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-14-490.
Botanical Background to Amorphophallus 99
Zheng, X., Pan, C., Diao, Y., You, Y., Yang, C. & Hu, Z. 2013. Development of microsatellite markers by
transcriptome sequencing in two species of Amorphophallus (Araceae). BMC Genom., 14(1), 490.
Zhong, L., Liu, E., Yang, C., Diao, Y., Harijati, N., Liu, J. & Jin, S. 2018. Gene cloning of a neutral
ceramidase from the sphingolipid metabolic pathway based on transcriptome analysis of
Amorphophallus muelleri. PloS One, 13(3), e0194863.
Zhou, Y., Yan, S., Lu, H. X. & Hu G. X. 2004. The cause and control method of konjac soft rot disease.
China Plant Protect., 24, 17–20
3
Biosynthesis and Decomposition
of Konjac Glucomannan
CONTENTS
3.1 Konjac Glucomannan in the Plant Tissue....................................................................... 102
3.1.1 Characteristics of Konjac Glucomannan Particles............................................. 102
3.1.2 The Formation Process of Konjac Glucomannan............................................... 102
3.2 Biosynthesis of Konjac Glucomannan............................................................................. 102
3.2.1 The Main Carbohydrates in Konjac..................................................................... 102
3.2.2 The Composition of Soluble Glycosides in the Konjac Corm........................... 104
3.2.3 Role of Enzymes...................................................................................................... 105
3.2.4 Biosynthesis Pathway of Konjac Glucomannan................................................. 107
3.3 Enzymatic Degradation of Konjac Glucomannan......................................................... 110
3.4 Regulation of Konjac Glucomannan Synthesis.............................................................. 110
Acknowledgements..................................................................................................................... 112
References...................................................................................................................................... 112
101
102 Konjac Glucomannan
Further studies by Mayeda et al. (1911, 1915) confirmed that konjac non-starch polysac-
charide hydrolysate contained glucose in addition to glucomannan, and the ratio of man-
nose to glucose was 2:1.
Goto (1922) named the polysaccharide glucomannan and analyzed the composition of
the carbohydrates in konjac plants. He found that the konjac leaf tissue contained glucose,
fructose, starch, and glucomannan, but no mannose. Glycans accumulated in the leaves,
petioles, and corms, with contents of 19%, 19%, and 40%, respectively.
In view of the above contradictions, Da Yu Hu Nan (1930) performed a detailed experi-
ment and obtained the following results:
1. No free mannose was found in the leaves, petioles, or corms. The presence of glu-
cose, fructose, sucrose, and starch was detected. The content of sucrose and starch
was high. The glucomannan was only found in the corms. This indicated that the
glucomannan in corm is not from free mannan, but it is actually converted from
the accumulated starch in leaves and transferred to the corm to form glucoman-
nan. In addition, there were no significant differences between the results at any
time of the growing season.
2. The starch produced by leaf photosynthesis was converted to sucrose and trans-
ferred to the corms. This can be explained by a higher concentration of sucrose
than other free sugars (glucose and fructose). The concentration of sucrose in dif-
ferent organs is as follows: leaf > petiole > corm. This implies that sucrose can be
transported from the leaves to the corms.
3. The transformed form of glucomannan in the corm was also sucrose. The inter-
conversion of glucomannan and sucrose is a fact that had been established in plant
physiology.
Murata (1972) used Dowex anion exchange resin column chromatography to analyze the
dynamic changes of carbohydrates during the growth of konjac and summarized the
results of the experiments as follows:
1. Sucrose, fructose, and glucose could be detected in any organ, such as seed corm,
growing corms, petioles, and leaf blades. The sucrose content was the highest in
seed corms, growing corms, and leaf blades, and mannose could only be detected
in sprouting seed corms (see Table 3.1).
2. The starch content in the growing corm was maintained at around 0.5% through-
out the growth period (on a fresh weight basis). The content of mannose was lower
in the early stage of growth of the new corm, and gradually increased with the
progressing growth.
Further on, the author systematically analysed the soluble sugars, starch, and glucoman-
nan content of the various organs of konjac (Murata 1975). The results were basically con-
sistent with those reported previously (Murata 1972). With regard to the changes in the
konjac carbohydrates, the following mechanisms are proposed:
1. Leaf photosynthesis products are transported to the corm tissue in the form of
sucrose, and then, in some cells, sucrose is converted to starch; and in other cells,
sucrose is converted to glucomannan.
104 Konjac Glucomannan
TABLE 3.1
Changes in Soluble Sugar Content During Konjac Growth (mg/g wet basis)
Growing Total
Organ Days (d) Sucrose Mannose Fructose Glucose Sugars
2. Both the starch and the glucomannan can be synthesized in the leaves, but the
content is low, and it is a temporary polysaccharide. The monosaccharides syn-
thesized by photosynthesis in leaves during the daytime can be converted into
polysaccharides, such as starch or glucomannan. Starch and glucomannan are
decomposed into monosaccharides at night-time, while sucrose is synthesized to
facilitate transport.
3. Sucrose, glucose, and fructose are present in both leaves and corms. Glucose and
fructose in the leaves are direct products from photosynthesis, and sucrose is syn-
thesized therefrom. Some of the sucrose in the corm is transported to the leaves,
and then decomposed to form glucose and fructose.
The molecular mass of this enzyme is around 62,000 Daltons, it is the most stable
at pH 7.5, and the highest enzyme activity is detected at pH 6.5–7.0. The enzymatic
reaction has an equilibrium constant of 8.5, an activation energy of 46.6 kJ/mol, and
high thermal stability, and Mg2+ and 2-D-glucose-1,6-diphosphate are required as
auxiliary factors. Co2+ or Ni2+ may partially replace Mg2+ for this, while Ca2+ and
Zn2+ are metal inhibitors. Moreover, other enzymes also are found in the konjac
corm tissue (Murata 1976), such as phosphoglucose isomerase that converts man-
nose 6-phosphate and glucose-6-phosphate to each other. Moreover, phosphoglu-
comutase, which catalyzes the conversion of glucose-6-phosphate and glucose
1-phosphate, has also been detected in the konjac corm.
Biosynthesis and Decomposition of Konjac Glucomannan 107
FIGURE 3.1
Schematic diagram of glucomannan and starch biosynthesis based on enzyme analysis. AGP: ADP-glucose
pyrophosphorylase; CSLA: cellulose synthase-like A; CSLD: cellulose synthase-like D; GMPP: GDP-mannose
pyrophosphorylase; HXK: hexokinase; INV: invertase; PGI: phosphoglucose isomerase; PGM: phosphogluco-
mutase; PMI: phosphomannose isomerase; PMM: phosphomannose mutase; SBE: starch branching enzyme; SS:
starch synthase; SuS: Sucrose synthase; UGP: UDP-glucose pyrophosphorylase. (Modified from Zhang, X.G.,
Biosynthesis of konjac glucomannan, in: Konjac Biology, ed. P. Y. Liu, pp. 84–91, China Agriculture Press, Beijing,
China, 2004; Diao, Y. et al., PloS One, 9, e95428, 2014.)
FIGURE 3.2
Suggested glucomannan and starch synthesis pathway based on EST database in A. konjac corm. (Modified from Gille, S. et al., Planta, 234, 515–526, 2011; Diao, Y. et al.,
PloS One, 9, e95428, 2014.)
109
110 Konjac Glucomannan
There are various studies claiming that CSLA proteins exhibit mannan synthase a ctivity.
The CSLA protein can transfer mannosyl residues from GDP-mannose to produce a homo-
mannan backbone (Sawake et al. 2015). CSLA2, CSLA3, and CSLA9 are responsible for the
synthesis of the glucomannan in Arabidopsis stems, and CSLA7 synthesizes the glucoman-
nan in embryos, according to Goubet et al. (2009). CSLA2 is also involved in the biosyn-
thesis of the mucilage glucomannan in the structure of the Arabidopsis seed (Yu et al. 2014).
Arumingtyas and Fatinah (2015) designed a primer from the CSLA gene to detect its influ-
ence on the glucomannan content of A. muelleri from Java Island, Indonesia. However, this
relationship could not be found.
FIGURE 3.3
Antisense gene expression inhibition process. (Modified from Zhang, X.G., Biosynthesis of konjac g
lucomannan,
in: Konjac Biology, ed. P. Y. Liu, pp. 84–91, China Agriculture Press, Beijing, China, 2004.)
112 Konjac Glucomannan
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to acknowledge the assistance of Dr. Pilanee Vaithanomsat,
Enzyme Technology and Waste Management Research Unit, Kasetsart Agricultural and
Agro-Industrial Product Improvement Institute (KAPI), Kasetsart University Bangkok, for
the critical review of this chapter.
References
Arumingtyas, E. L., & Fatinah, A. A. (2015). Sequence variation of CSLA gene responsible for the
synthesis of glucomannan in porang (Amorphophallus muelleri Blume) collected from Java,
Indonesia. Journal of Life Sciences and Technologies, 3(1), 7–10.
Da Yu Hu Nan. (1930). Journal of Botany, 44, 432–439. [cited in Liu, P. Y. (2004). Konjac. China Agriculture
Press, Beijing, China (in Chinese)].
Diao, Y., Yang, C., Yan, M., Zheng, X., Jin, S., Wang, Y., & Hu, Z. (2014). De novo transcriptome and
small RNA analyses of two Amorphophallus species. PloS One, 9(4), e95428.
Geigenberger, P., & Stitt, M. (1993). Sucrose synthase catalyses a readily reversible reaction in vivo in
developing potato tubers and other plant tissues. Planta, 189, 329–339.
Gille, S., Cheng, K., Skinner, M. E., Liepman, A. H., Wilkerson, C. G., & Pauly, M. (2011). Deep sequenc-
ing of voodoo lily (Amorphophallus konjac): An approach to identify relevant genes involved in
the synthesis of the hemicellulose glucomannan. Planta, 234(3), 515–526.
Goto, K. (1922). The nature of the carbohydrates in the leaf, stem and tuber of Amorphophallus konjaku
and their variations in amount under different conditions. Journal of Biochemistry, 1, 201–211.
Goubet, F., Barton, C. J., Mortimer, J. C., Yu, X. L., Zhang, Z. N., Miles, G. P., Richens, J., Liepman,
A. H., Seffen, K., & Dupree, P. (2009). Cell wall glucomannan in Arabidopsis is synthesised by
CSLA glycosyltransferases, and influences the progression of embryogenesis. Plant Journal, 60,
527–538.
Heller, J. S., & Villemez, C. L. (1972). Interaction of soluble glucosyl- and mannosyl-transferase
enzyme activities in the synthesis of a glucomannan. Biochemical Journal, 129(3), 645–655.
Hinman, M. B., & Villemez, C. L. (1975). Glucomannan biosynthesis catalysed by Pisum sativum
enzyme. Plant Physiology, 56(5), 608–612.
Kato, K., Yamaguchi, Y., Mutoh, K., & Ueno, Y. (1976). Structural analysis of lily glucomannan.
Agricultural and Biological Chemistry, 40(7), 1393–1398.
Biosynthesis and Decomposition of Konjac Glucomannan 113
Li, B., Xia, J., Wang, Y., & Xie, B. J. (2005). Grain-size effect on the structure and anti-obesity activity
of konjac flour. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 53, 7404–7407.
Liepman, A. H., Wilkerson, C. G., & Keegstra, K. (2005). Expression of cellulose synthase-like (Csl)
genes in insect cells reveals that CslA family members encode mannan synthases. Proceedings
of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 102, 2221–2226.
Liu, P. Y. (2004). Konjac. China Agriculture Press, Beijing, China (in Chinese).
Mayeda, M. (1911). Mitteil, Med. Gesellsch, Tokyo. 25,518–524.
Mayeda, M. (1915). Mitteil. Med, Gesellsch, Tokyo. 29, 57–65.
Mayeda, M. (1920). Tokyo Igakukai Zasshi, 34, 586.
Murata, T. (1976). Purification and some properties of phosphomannomutase from corms of
Amorphophallus konjac C. Koch Plant & Cell Physiology, 17(6), 1099–1109.
Murata, T. (1972). Studies on konjak mannan biosynthesis. Nippon Nôgeikagaku Kaishi, 46(1), 1–7.
Murata, T. (1975). Composition of soluble nucleotides in growing corms of Amorphophallus konjac C.
Agricultural and Biological Chemistry, 39, 1401–1406.
Ohtsuki, T. (1930). Dobutsugaku Zasshi, 42, 379–412.
Parry, J. M. (2009). Konjac glucomannan. In: Food Stabilisers, Thickeners and Gelling Agents, ed.
A. Imeson, pp. 198–217, Wiley-Blackwell, Chichester, UK.
Reiter, W. D. (2008). Biochemical genetics of nucleotide sugar interconversion reactions. Current
Opinion in Plant Biology, 11, 236–243.
Ruo Lin Zhong Dao. (1957). Journal of Plant Research, 32, 337–347. [cited in Liu, P. Y. (2004). Konjac.
China Agriculture Press, Beijing, China (in Chinese)].
Sawake, S., Tajima, N., Mortimer, J. C., Lao, J., Ishikawa, T., Yu, X., & Tsumuraya, Y. (2015). KONJAC1
and 2 are key factors for GDP-mannose generation and affect l-ascorbic acid and glucomannan
biosynthesis in Arabidopsis. The Plant Cell, 27(12), 3397–3409.
Sugiyama, N., Shimahara, H., Andoh, T., & Takemoto, M. (1973). Konjac-mannanase from the tubers
of Amorphophallus konjac C. Koch. Agricultural and Biological Chemistry, 37(1), 9–17.
Takigami, S., Takiguchi, T., & Phillips G. O. (1997). Microscopical studies of the tissue structure of
konjac tubers. Food Hydrocolloid, 11, 479–484.
Tsuji, C. (1895). Kon’nyaku kōjō. College of Agriculture, Tokyo Imperial University, 2, 103–110.
Yu, L., Shi, D., Li, J., Kong, Y., Yu, Y., Chai, G., & Zhou, G. (2014). Cellulose synthase-like A2, a gluco-
mannan synthase, is involved in maintaining adherent mucilage structure in Arabidopsis seed.
Plant Physiology, 164(4), 1842–1856.
Zhang, X. G. (2004). Biosynthesis of konjac glucomannan. In: Konjac Biology, ed. P. Y. Liu, pp. 84–91,
China Agriculture Press, Beijing, China.
Zhao, J., Zhang, D., Srzednicki, G., Kanlayanarat, S., & Borompichaichartkul, C. (2010). Development
of a low-cost two-stage technique for production of low-sulphur purified konjac flour.
International Food Research Journal, 17, 1113–1124.
4
Field Production of Konjac
CONTENTS
4.1 Cultivation........................................................................................................................... 116
4.1.1 Variety Improvement of Konjac............................................................................ 116
4.1.1.1 Current Konjac Varieties Cannot Meet Production Needs................ 116
4.1.1.2 Objectives of Variety Improvement....................................................... 117
4.1.1.3 Basis of Variety Improvement................................................................ 117
4.1.2 Cultivated Species and Varieties.......................................................................... 120
4.1.2.1 Cultivated Species and Varieties in China........................................... 121
4.1.2.2 Cultivated Species and Varieties in Japan............................................ 125
4.1.2.3 Cultivated Species and Varieties in Other Countries and Regions...... 129
4.1.3 Elite Breeding of Konjac......................................................................................... 130
4.1.3.1 Establishment of Elite Variety Breeding Grounds for Konjac........... 130
4.1.3.2 Principles of Elite Breeding System for Konjac.................................... 131
4.1.3.3 Use of Sterilized Konjac Seed Material................................................. 132
4.1.3.4 Local Production and Commercialization of Elite Varieties............. 132
4.1.4 Ecological Adaptability of Konjac........................................................................ 133
4.1.4.1 Influence of Temperature on Growth and Development of Konjac..... 133
4.1.4.2 Influence of Light on Growth and Development of Konjac............... 134
4.1.4.3 Influence of Moisture Conditions on Growth and Development
of Konjac.................................................................................................... 135
4.1.4.4 Mineral Nutrition..................................................................................... 136
4.1.4.5 Soil.............................................................................................................. 137
4.1.4.6 Other Conditions...................................................................................... 137
4.1.5 Hazards for Konjac Cultivation............................................................................ 138
4.1.5.1 Diseases..................................................................................................... 138
4.1.5.2 Insect Attacks on Konjac......................................................................... 140
4.1.5.3 Meteorological Hazards.......................................................................... 140
4.1.5.4 Drought Damage...................................................................................... 141
4.1.5.5 Waterlogging Damage............................................................................. 141
4.1.5.6 Damages Caused by Wind and Hail..................................................... 141
4.1.6 Cultivation Techniques.......................................................................................... 142
4.1.6.1 Selection of Areas and Plots for Cultivation........................................ 142
4.1.6.2 Cultivation Pattern and Cropping System........................................... 144
4.1.6.3 Reproduction Methods............................................................................ 146
4.1.6.4 Seed Konjac Selection and Treatment Before Planting....................... 147
4.1.6.5 Plot Preparations...................................................................................... 148
115
116 Konjac Glucomannan
4.1 Cultivation
4.1.1 Variety Improvement of Konjac
According to the evolutionary process of various Amorphophallus species, the konjac is a
plant with a long history. Although the konjac has been cultivated and consumed for a
very long time in a number of regions in China, Japan, and Southeast Asia, the plant is still
grown under semi-wild conditions in many producing areas. The crop is cultivated from
unimproved original genetic material in most regions and cannot meet the demand for
industrial-scale production.
1. To breed varieties with strong resistance to soft rot and southern blight.
2. To breed varieties with corms characterized by high dry matter weight.
3. To breed varieties with relatively shorter dormancy period and longer period from
leaf expansion to the maturity stage.
4. To breed varieties with strong adaptability to light and temperature and high pho-
tosynthetic efficiency.
5. To breed varieties with the appropriate ratio of the number of buds to corm.
For species with few buds, such as the Amorphophallus corrugatus N. E. Brown (syn.
A. tianyangense P. Y. Liu & S. L. Zhang), the varieties with more buds should be
bred, and for species like the A. albus with too many buds, the varieties with more
developed corm and less buds should be bred.
6. For species producing glucomannan, the varieties with high glucomannan content
(KGM), high viscosity, and white colour should be bred. For species producing
mainly starch, the varieties with a high starch content and suitability for particu-
lar applications should be bred.
4.1.1.3.3.2 Mutant Breeding The asexually reproduced crops show differences in charac-
teristics caused by mutations. A suitable variation is obtained by artificial selection and
multiplied by asexual reproduction. This has been an important way of tuber crops breed-
ing. The physical and chemical methods are the most common means of mutant breeding.
In mutation breeding by irradiation, the selection of the appropriate irradiation dose is the
condition of successful mutation. If the dose is too small, it is insufficient to cause variation
or the variation is not significant. If the dose is too high, the variant cells may have reduced
vitality and even die; and even if such cells survive, inferior mutations will be caused and
cover up other mutations. When the konjac corm is planted after the irradiation treatment,
it gradually shrivels and disappears at the early stage of the growth. The new corm and
its buds can be regarded as the M2 generation. Whether the superior mutations are con-
solidated by the M3 generation can be observed and recorded. A new variety or strain can
be bred by asexual reproduction. The meristem of the konjac is at the end where the ter-
minal bud is located, i.e., the upper end of the corm. The lower end, however, is the stor-
age tissue. The mutation treatment usually must be centred on the terminal bud of the
corm. After the mutation treatment, the plants and new corms grown in the same year
can be observed to see if the variation has occurred and first assess whether it is a favour-
able variation. However, since the konjac corm is very crisp and tender and the radiation
may cause injury by infection through diseases or become fruitless after the injury, large
corms cannot be used as the material for the mutation treatment; instead, corms with low
water content and a single corm weight of no more than 50 g should be used. Therefore, the
corms grown in the same year are insufficient to represent the content of the KGM. Such
corms should be cultivated for another year until they reach the size of the commercially
grown konjac. The effects of irradiation on the content of the KGM can be explained cor-
rectly by the analysis conducted at this time (Huang Xunduan 2002). The common chemi-
cal mutagens include gibberellin and colchicine. It has been reported that on the basis of
the liquid culture of the konjac, polyploids are obtained by inducing the meristem of the
A. konjac with colchicine, in order to conduct the test on the polyploid breed of the konjac
(Hu Nan 2011).
120 Konjac Glucomannan
4.1.1.3.3.3 Crossbreeding The difficulties in the crossbreeding of the konjac are mainly
reflected in the following aspects:
1. Few materials to choose from: only a few varieties, such as the A. albus, A. konjac,
A. muelleri, A. yunnanensis, and A. krausei, can be used as the materials for cross-
breeding, and these varieties account for a small proportion of the genetic
resources of the konjac in the world. Therefore, the genetic background is narrow
for breeding materials.
2. Difficulties in hybridization technique: there are such problems as difficult flower
induction, different flowering periods, and self-incompatibility. It takes 3–4 years
from seed to blossom of the konjac, the flowering ages of different varieties are
different, completely different flowering periods of the same konjac plant can be
caused due to the difference in environmental conditions, in addition, the changes
in the temperature and humidity in the environment not only affect the konjac
blooms, but also have great impacts on anther dehiscence, no pollen spread, and
stigma activity. The konjac is a plant with the same inflorescence of the pistil and
stamen and different flowers. The pistil matures 1–2 days earlier than the stamen
in the same inflorescence, and the suitable time of the pistil for fertilization is gen-
erally as short as 1 day. If the odour is released from the appendage, it indicates
that the pistil is mature. The effective pollination period of the konjac is from the
time of the pollen spread to the maturity of the stamen and is about 1–2 days.
When the pollen is spread by the stamen, the pistil stigma of the same plant has
lost its pollination and fertilization vitality. Therefore, a certain group is needed
for cross-pollination to ensure that the pistil and stamen mature at the same time
during the intraspecific hybridization of the konjac. The flowering periods of dif-
ferent varieties of the konjac are very different and may be at any time during
March–September, which is also a major obstacle to the interspecific crossbreeding
of the konjac. The manipulation of the temperature and humidity and the induc-
tion by exogenous hormones has provided preliminary solutions to the problems
in the crossbreeding of the konjac, such as induced flowering, control of flowering
period, cross-incompatibility, and pollen preservation (Zhang Shenglin 1995).
4.1.1.3.3.4 Breeding Using Biotechnological Techniques In the last 20 years, the application of
biotechnology in a variety of improvements has made significant progress and has been
applied in field production. However, there are few reports on the applications of biotech-
nology in breeding of the konjac. The establishment and perfection of tissue culture for
the konjac laid the foundation of biotechnological breeding for overcoming the incom-
patibility of sexual hybridization by cell fusion. Zhang Xingguo et al. (1992) explored the
cell fusion of the konjac and completed the process from the protoplast isolation of the
petiole cells to the somatic cell hybridization of the embryogenic cell and fusion cell; and
the plant regeneration rate is up to 62%. The genetic engineering breeding of the konjac is
still at a basic research stage. The current reports are mainly on the research of a disease-
resistant gene, heat-resistant gene, high-yielding gene, KGM synthesis, storage gene, and
anti-browning gene (Bai 2016).
KGM. Meanwhile, since the corm contains a toxic alkaloid, the starch type konjac had
not been valued and developed by mankind in the long history of frequent food short-
ages. Although the KGM type konjac has high-quality soluble dietary fibres, traditional
processing just makes it into konjac gel food by adding alkali to satisfy hunger in famine
years or act as an off-season specialty. From the perspective of agronomy, the konjac is still
a very basic crop so far; Japan was the first country to carry out the selection and breeding
of the konjac; and China has so far successively bred several varieties in recent years, but
many producing areas in Southeast Asia have not yet reached the cultivation stage and
still harvest it mainly in the wild.
4.1.2.1.1 A. albus
The A. albus (P. Y. Liu & J. F. Chen) was discovered and named by Liu Peiying and Chen
Jinfeng from Southwest University in 1984. This species is naturally distributed in the
Jinsha River valley, and the main area suitable for this variety is the downstream sec-
tion of the river valley at the border between southern Sichuan Province and northern
Yunnan Province. This species produces a small plant, with a green three-lobed leaf, that
grows up obliquely and has fewer split leaves than the A. konjac. The corm is oblate with
a sunken neck, brown epidermis, white interior, and developed offset tubers. There is a
sterile neuter between inflorescences. According to the system identification, the A. albus
is an endemic species of China. Its content of KGM can be up to 60%. The molecular weight
of the KGM is also greater than that of the KGM in the corm of the A. konjac. The A. albus
is a KGM type konjac with the best processing quality (Liu & Chen 1984). The browning
during the processing of the A. albus is slight. The konjac flour produced from its corm is
white in colour and has a much better viscosity, transparency, and other quality attributes
than the flour from the A. konjac.
The A. albus can adapt to an environment with low altitude, high temperature, low
humidity, and strong sunlight. Its active accumulated temperature is 4863.1°C and effec-
tive accumulated temperature is 1658.1°C. After years of natural selection and domestica-
tion, the suitable stable variations occurred in different cultivation areas, forming local
germplasm with different colours and spots and also significantly different yield and
content of the KGM. The ‘green type’ with pure green petioles, ‘spotted type’ with peti-
oles with brownish green spots, and ‘yellow type’ with petioles with a ground colour of
yellowish-brown are superior strains of the A. albus. The A. albus has a good quality of
the KGM and strong resistance to soft rot and southern blight. However, the single plant/
unit area yield is low; the offset tubers account for a too large proportion of the weight
122 Konjac Glucomannan
of the underground harvested part; and can be more than 50% in particularly fertile soil.
Therefore, the blind introduction of the A. albus is not advocated. Meanwhile, seed mate-
rial selection and breeding should be rigorously carried out on the A. albus in order to
maintain its merits, such as good resistance to diseases, high reproduction coefficient, and
high quality, in order to offset its demerit of a low yield.
4.1.2.1.2 A. konjac
A. konjac (K. Koch) is distributed in all producing areas in China and is the most impor-
tant cultivated species. The A. konjac has good adaptability, a wide range of suitable areas,
and can adapt to all mountainous areas suitable for the konjac in China. The A. konjac
can also grow well in areas specialized in producing the A. albus, especially in areas
with a northern latitude, high altitude, low temperature, weak sunlight, and high humid-
ity. From germination to senescence, the A. konjac needs an active accumulated tempera-
ture of 4278°C (above 10°C) and an effective accumulated temperature of 1089.3°C (above
15°C). Characteristics of the A. konjac are: nearly circular corm, reddish-brown epider-
mis, black brown small spots, and large size; bright pink terminal bud of the corm and
inverted ‘V’-shaped leaf bud with a length of only about 1 cm; and an inverted ‘U’-shaped
flower bud with a length of more than 1.5 cm and up to 10 cm before spring planting.
The flower bud can be easily recognized for early treatment. The A. konjac has obvious
apical dominance. The offset tubers are concentrated on the middle-upper part of the
corm. The 2-year-old plants have strong growth vigour and a plant height of 1–1.5 m.
The ground colour of the petiole is related to age. The morphologic characteristics of 2- to
3-year-old plants are stable; the petiole is green or light green in the ground colour; and
it has connected olive-drab spots with small white dots, covering the petiole. The spathe
is funnel-shaped, with a coiled base. The surface of the spathe is pale green and has dark
green spots. The interior is deep purple-red. The inflorescence is one time longer than
the spathe. The pistillate inflorescence is cylinder-shaped; and the appendage is sword-
shaped, purple-red, and hollow. The filaments are united with a four-chamber anther
and spherical pollen; the stigma is trifid or bifid with papillary protuberance. The fruit
chamber is oval and first is green and then turns orange when it matures. The flowering
period is April–May, and the fruiting period is June–August. The A. konjac can adapt to
the environmental conditions of high altitude, low temperature, and insufficient sunlight.
In recent years, the in-depth innovation of genetic resources and variety improvement of
the A. konjac have been carried out in various regions. Several varieties of the A. konjac
have been successively bred:
4.1.2.1.2.1 ‘Wanyuan A. konjac’ In the late 1980s, on the basis of the collection of the
genetic resources of konjac in China, the former Southwest Agricultural University (now
Southwest University) in Chongqing optimized 15 strains of the cultivated specimens of
the A. konjac from various regions. After systematic breeding and 4 years of variety com-
parison tests and regional tests, a new variety was approved by the Sichuan Crop Varieties
Examination and Approval Committee as ‘Wanyuan A. konjac’ in 1993. The variety is
characterized by a strong growth vigour, good resistance to stress, and high yield. It was
not only the first approved performing variety of the A. konjac in China, but also became
the dominant variety in the Daba Mountain area (Liu Peiying et al. 2007).
propagation, variety comparison tests, regional tests, and production tests. In 2001, tissue
culture, rapid propagation, and repeated selection were conducted on the mutated selected
individual plants; then, after systematic breeding of individual plants, the strains with
tall plants, dark green leaves, petioles with a ground colour of green and black spots, and
nearly circular corm were selected for a multiyear variety test. This variety was approved
by the Chongqing Crop Varieties Examination and Approval Committee in 2008 (Niu Yi
et al. 2010).
The mountainous areas with an altitude of 600–1,400 m in Sichuan, Chongqing, Yunnan,
and Guizhou are suitable for planting ‘Yumo 1’. This variety has a strong growth vigour
and green trisected leaves. The split leaves are pinnately divided or bipinnatifid. The small
split leaves are oblong and sharp pointed. The stalk has a ground colour of dark green
with black massive stripes. The corm is nearly circular and has a yellowish-brown epider-
mis. The interior tissues of the corm are white. The offset tubers naturally separate from
the parent upon maturity and shrivel into a garlic head-like shape. It takes about 130 days
from the emergence to maturity and senescence. The variety has a strong growth vigour
and stout plants. The yield per mu (1 ha = 15 mu) is 2,100 kg; the dry matter content in the
fresh konjac is 21.5%–22.2%; and the content of the KGM is 59.8%–60.2% dry basis. This vari-
ety is of high quality. The incidence of soft rot and southern blight is lower than in native
varieties of the A. konjac in Chongqing.
4.1.2.1.2.3 ‘Qingjiang A. konjac’ ‘Qingjiang A. konjac’ came from the systematic breed-
ing of the local genetic resources of the konjac in the Wuling mountainous area by the
Enshi Prefecture Academy of Agricultural Sciences and was approved by the Hubei Crop
Varieties Examination and Approval Committee. The seedling of this variety has a strong
growth vigour, uniform emergence, and palmately compound leaves with green or dark
green small split leaves; the petioles are stout with stripes; the corm is spherical with
brown epidermis; the bulbil is tip shaped and pink; and the interior is white. The whole
growth period of this variety is about 125 days. It is resistant to southern blight and soft
rot; its yield per mu is about 2,000 kg; the dry matter content in the fresh konjac is around
17.4%; and the content of the KGM is 51.4% dry basis. This variety is suitable for planting at
an altitude of 900 ~ 1,400 m in southwest China and is the dominant variety in the devel-
opment of the konjac industry in Enshi Prefecture and the Wuling mountainous area (Liu
Jinlong et al. 2010).
4.1.2.1.2.4 ‘Yunyu 1’ ‘Yunyu 1’ was bred from the high-quality genetic resource groups
of the Lijiang A. konjac in high attitude areas by the Yunnan Academy of Agricultural
Sciences and was registered with the Yunnan Provincial Horticultural Plant Variety
Registration Office in 2009. For this variety, it takes about 180 days from the emergence to
maturity and senescence. It is a medium-late maturing variety; the emergence is uniform;
and the seedling has a strong growth vigour. The leaves are green and trisected. The split
leaves are pinnately divided or bipinnatifid, or pinnately divided after dichotomous
branching. The small split leaves are oblong with gradually sharp points; the whole leaf is
large in area; and the plant is stout. The petiole is light green in the ground colour and has
greenish-brown spots, as the plant grows, the ground colour darkens to dark green and
the greenish-brown spots connect into one, making the whole petiole greenish-brown.
The corm of ‘Yunyu 1’ is oblate with few offset tubers; the hilar scar is smooth without
protuberance; and the interior tissue of the corm is white. The dry matter content in the
fresh konjac is 17.5%–20.3% and the content of the KGM 61.8% dry basis. This variety is of
high quality. The average yield is 37,500 kg/ha; the disease resistance is superior to most
124 Konjac Glucomannan
cultivated varieties; and the incidence of soft rot and southern blight is lower than that of
the control variety. This variety is suitable for planting in the Yunnan-Guizhou plateau
areas with an altitude of 1,500–2,300 m (Li Yongjun et al. 2010).
4.1.2.1.2.5 ‘Qinmo 1’ ‘Qinmo 1’ was bred from the genetic resources of the A. konjac in
Qin-Ba Mountain areas by the Shaanxi Ankang Qin-Ba Konjac R & D Center. In 2002,
some naturally mutated individual plants with a compact plant architecture and strong
tolerance of shade were discovered among the cultivated plants of the A. konjac in Langao
County, Shaanxi Province. The corms were selected as parent material for propagation
and screening to select strains with uniform growth, strong resistance to diseases, few
offset tubers, regular corm, and high expansion coefficient. Then, after years of propaga-
tion, multipoint regional tests, and production tests, this variety was named as ‘Qinmo 1’
within the scheme of identification of nonmajor crop varieties in the Shaanxi Province (Li
Chuan et al. 2010).
The whole growth period of this variety is 160 days; the leaves are green or dark green
and trisected; the split leaves are pinnately divided or bipinnatifid, or pinnately divided
after dichotomous branching; the small split leaves are ovate triangular with gradually
sharp points; the plant architecture is compact with an included angle of 151.20° between
the bifurcation and the petiole; the petiole is dark brown with a few light pink flaky spots;
the corm is nearly circular and has a drab epidermis; and the interior tissues of the corm is
milk white. ‘Qinmo 1’ has a strong tolerance of shade and is suitable for underwood plant-
ing; the average field yield is 1,987 kg/mu; and the dry matter content in the fresh konjac is
21.21% and the content of the dry basis KGM is 57.77%. This variety is suitable for planting
in the Qin-Ba Mountain areas with an altitude of 700–1,200 m.
4.1.2.1.2.6 ‘Chumohua 1’ ‘Chumohua 1’ is a new variety of the A. konjac bred from the
local resources of the A. konjac by the Yunnan Province Chuxiong Prefecture Agricultural
Sciences Research and Promotion Institute and is characterized by a high yield, strong
resistance to diseases, and good processing quality. It was registered by the identification
of the Yunnan Seed Control Station. ‘Chumohua 1’ has a stable performance in agronomic
terms in different regions and a strong adaptability. It is superior to main local varieties
in terms of disease resistance, unit area yield, and the expansion coefficient of the corm
(Zhang Yan et al. 2013).
4.1.2.1.3 A. muelleri
A. muelleri refers to the konjac varieties that can grow bulbils on the leaf (similarly to
A. bulbifer). The A. muelleri has tall plants and strong heat resistance and is mainly dis-
tributed in the tropical rain forest in Southeast Asia and in southern Yunnan, China. The
A. muelleri has particularly rich morphological characteristics with significant differences
in petiole colour and stripes. The corm of the A. muelleri is usually oblate without offset
tuber. The A. albus and A. konjac grow fibrous roots at the shoulder of the corm only, but
the corm of the A. muelleri is covered with fibrous roots. The developed root system may be
the important reason for the tall plant, strong growth vigour, and rapid expansion of the
corm of the A. muelleri. The corm section is pink, yellow, or light yellow. The content of
the KGM in the corm is comparable to that in the A. albus and A. konjac. After flowering,
the A. muelleri can produce seed by ‘parthenogenesis’, which is one of the reasons why the
A. muelleri has attracted much attention. In recent years, influenced by market demand,
China has gradually imported the bulbils and seeds of the A. muelleri from Southeast
Asian countries for cultivation tests. At present, the approved or registered varieties of the
Field Production of Konjac 125
A. muelleri include ‘Mile 1’, ‘Mile 2’, ‘Mile 3’, and ‘A. muelleri’. Currently, the cultivated area
of the A. muelleri in Yunnan and Sichuan is about 10,000 mu. The successful introduction
and cultivation have greatly improved farmers’ enthusiasm for planting.
climate or cultivation conditions. The whole leaf is large in area and light green; the peti-
ole is scattered with small stripes; the corm is slightly flattened; the epidermis has a dark
colour and many grooves; the bud eye is deep; the main bud is red; and the lateral corms
are very few and are longish corms with many stripes on the epidermis. This variety is
characterized by early maturity and large corm. The fine granules’ proportion in the flour
and the viscosity are high. It is of high quality, but has a weak resistance to leaf spot dis-
ease, root rot, and is prone to zinc and magnesium deficiency. Low temperature may eas-
ily cause yellowing, while high temperature causes sunscald. It is vulnerable to diseases
and natural calamities. Therefore, it is a variety that is the most difficult to plant. It is only
suitable for planting on mountain slopes without a sharp rise of temperature in the mid-
summer and with short sunshine duration.
variety is late-maturing, it can grow and develop even in late autumn and thus allows
the corm to fully expand. Therefore, it is suitable for planting at a low altitude. However,
the plants cannot fully grow and develop on hilly land with early frost, as it leads to a
low yield and quality and poor storage performance of the corm. In order to prevent rot
disease, the best choice for planting this variety are areas with few natural hazards, such
as hail or a typhoon.
is characterized by a horizontal ‘T’-shaped plant architecture and a blade longer than the
petiole. The split leaves are of broadleaf type and large in number. The leaf colour is the
lightest among the existing varieties in Japan. The petiole has a light red ground colour,
with small protuberances, and many small white spots on the surface. The stripes are
medium in size and are distributed continuously, but lighter in colour than the variety
from China. The old corm is slightly oblate and rounder than the variety from China.
The young corm is irregular in shape and looks like the specimens from China. The epi-
dermis is brown; the bud eye is deep; and the main bud is deep red. The lateral corms
grow on young corm. A few lateral corms can be spherical, but generally have an elon-
gated shape. Like the variety from China, the epidermis is smooth and light in colour;
and the separation from the konjac flour during processing is poor. The storage loss is
huge; thus, postharvest operations must be conducted immediately after harvesting
to preserve the corm quality. This variety has more lateral corms than the native vari-
ety; the single weight is high; and the propagation rate is good. The variety has a high
expansion of the corm and high yield. The proportion of coarse particles in the konjac
flour is low and, thus, the ratio of fine/coarse particles is high, which is superior to
the native variety. The flour is characterized by high viscosity. Like the native variety
and Haruna-kuro, this variety is a mid-maturation variety, but its germination and leaf
expansion are early. Its resistance to sunscald and deficiency of elements is stronger
than that of the native variety, but weaker than that of the variety from China. Its resis-
tance to yellowing and low temperature damage is strong, but the resistance to soft rot
is weak; the resistance to leaf blight is strong; and that to root rot is between the native
variety and the variety from China. It can be planted in the medium and high hilly areas
with an altitude of 300–600 m. For planting in the mountainous areas with an altitude
of around 600 m, the plastic film mulching can ensure safety. It should not be planted
in the plots prone to sunscald at low altitudes, high temperatures, and strong sunlight.
It is suitable for planting in the east mountain areas of Kanto (Honshu Island). Since its
corm has good expansion and many lateral corms, 2-year-old corms should be used for
cultivation (Yamaga Ichiro 1970).
4.1.2.3.2 India
Some 13 varieties of the konjac are growing in India, but only starch type, the A. paeoniifo-
lius, is cultivated and consumed at a large scale. The main cultivated variety is the Kavvor.
The other variety is the A. paeoniifolius var. hortensis Backer. According to Anil et al. (2011),
the specimens of 12 varieties of the A. paeoniifolius collected in Tamil Nadu showed high
variation: the yield of a single corm 100–3,000 g and the starch content 14%–36%. The
A. paeoniifolius is consumed in India as a vegetable with the corm washed, sliced, and cooked.
the promulgation of national or industrial standards for the elite konjac varieties, the cre-
ation of brands for the high-quality konjac varieties, and the standardization of produc-
tion, packaging, and transportation of the elite varieties. Positioning the production of the
seed material near the plantations will facilitate the commercialization of the elite konjac
varieties and reduce the cost of the seed material.
obvious growth advantage: had long, thick petioles and a significantly higher seedling
index than the control or the konjac plants under other films. They also had the high-
est chlorophyll content and photosynthetic rate, a higher corm yield, and KGM content.
Moreover, the soluble protein content and the starch content in the konjac corms grow-
ing under the red film were significantly lower than of those covered with other films
(Li Nanlin 2014).
There also is a difference in the photosynthetic performance between different
Amorphophallus species. Compared with the A. albus, the A. konjac has a higher net photo-
synthetic efficiency during the same growth period. The A. muelleri, A. dunnii, and A. paeo-
niifolius have a higher resistance to high light intensity. Also, the level of required shade
density varies with the environment, higher shade densities (60%–90%) should be adopted
in areas with high temperatures and long and strong exposure to sunlight; and the shade
densities of 40%–60% should be adopted in areas with short exposure and weak sunlight;
no shade treatment is needed in areas with poor light. For instance, in mountain areas
where the konjac is in the shade of mountain chains and numerous trees, temperatures
are low and humidity high, shading can be generally avoided. The higher the latitude or
altitude, the lower shade density that is needed (Kobayashi 1964).
In conclusion, the intercropping of the konjac with corn or other long-stalk crops, plant-
ing under sparse forest, or the large-area planting under economic fruit trees can make
the light intensity and light quality suitable for the konjac and improve the plant growth
and konjac yield.
Organic fertilizer cannot only increase the content of organic matter in soil, improve soil
structure, and increase soil permeability, but also provide a lot of mineral nutrients. Under
certain fertility conditions, the amount of organic fertilizer applied is closely correlated to
the konjac yield.
According to the growth characteristics of the konjac plants, the fertilization principle
is ‘focusing on the application of base fertilizer and applying topdressing timely’. Good
understanding of the nutritional needs of the crop and the timely application of fertilizers
are the important guarantees for improving the konjac yield and quality.
4.1.4.5 Soil
The konjac corm grows in the ground and, thus, has high requirements for soil condi-
tions. Light sandy loam soil with a deep soil layer, loose texture, rich organic matter, and
good ventilation and drainage is the most suitable bed for the growth of the konjac. Loose,
thick, and fertile soil is an important guarantee for the development of the root system
and corm expansion of the konjac. Sticky and heavy soil with poor drainage, permeability,
and easy hardening is unsuitable for the growth of the konjac. The konjac planted in such
soil not only is low in yield, easy to become infected by diseases, but also has corms in
irregular shape and coarse epidermis that are bad for the konjac corm processing. A too
shallow soil layer is unsuitable for the growth and expansion of the konjac corm (Cui Ming
et al. 2006).
Most konjac varieties are suitable for growing in the slightly acidic soil with a pH value
of about 6.5 and can also be planted in neutral and slightly alkaline soil, but too acidic or
alkaline soil is unsuitable for the growth of the konjac; and there are serious diseases in
acidic soil. Compared with the A. konjac, the A. albus prefers slightly alkaline soil. That is to
say, the yield is relatively higher when the pH value is 7.0–7.5 and is greatly reduced when
the pH value is below 6.0 or greater than 8.0.
Physical and chemical conditions of the woodland or vegetable garden soil in front and
behind the house are suitable for the expansion and growth of the konjac corms. When
the konjac cultivation is transferred to the field, the planting bed should be improved
accordingly by increasing soil layer thickness, improving soil structure, adding farmyard
manure to increase the organic matter in the soil, retain water, and adjust the pH value of
the soil to promote the reproduction of beneficial microorganisms in the soil.
crops should preferably include long-stalk species to avoid competing for photosynthetic
resources, such as light and CO2, thus the planting density of long-stalk crops should also
be appropriate. Suitable inter-row spacing in sparse forests, tree plantations economic
seeking benefits (e.g., rubber or coffee fruit trees) can also be selected for planting the
konjac, but special attention should be paid to the density of such forests to ensure the
necessary light for the konjac growth (Liu Wenlu et al. 2009).
4.1.5.1.1.1 Pathogens The pathogenic bacteria causing the soft rot in the konjac have been
identified as the carrot pathogenic varieties of carrot soft rot, such as, Erwinia aroideae,
Erwinia carotovora subsp. Atroseptica, and Erwinia carotovora subsp. carotovora. In the konjac
cultivation, there is a difference between the varieties that these pathogens infect and also
the degree of pathogenicity among the pathogenic bacteria (Huang Junbin et al. 1999).
4.1.5.1.1.2 Suitable Conditions for Infection Studies have shown that soft rot may occur
between 10°C and 40°C, and it is most common between 22°C and 35°C and is rare below
10°C and above 40°C. The optimum propagation temperature for the konjac soft rot patho-
gen is 25°C–35°C. The pathogen can grow at a pH value of 5.3–9.2, but it grows best at neu-
tral pH. The incidence of the konjac soft rot is the highest at a relative humidity between
90% and 95%. At a given temperature, the higher the humidity, the more serious the dis-
ease. Therefore, the epidemic outbreak of soft rot may easily be caused during a period
of heavy rainfall and high temperatures after the konjac planting, causing wounds in the
epidermis or lack of oxygen (Cui Ming & Li Chuan 2009).
4.1.5.1.1.3 Primary Source of Infection Soft rot bacteria are heterotrophic and need sub-
stances containing carbohydrates that are easy to oxidize as food. They degrade pectate
molecules that bind plant cells together, causing the plant structure to eventually fall apart.
Field Production of Konjac 139
The bacteria can live for up to 40 months in soil rich in compost and organic matter, tak-
ing advantage of abundant carbon sources. When the konjac plants are injured by insects’
gnawing and farm operation, the wounds open an intrusion portal for soft rot pathogen.
Since the konjac corm contains more than 80% water and is crisp and tender, it is easy to
be injured and then be infected with bacteria in the soil. Seed corms carrying bacteria are
the most dangerous primary source of infection. It has been reported that seed corms,
compost, soil, diseased plants, weed roots, insects, and other carriers may be the primary
sources of infection by soft rot bacteria. Any part of the konjac plants can be infected with
soft rot bacteria via wounds (Wang Jian et al. 2009).
4.1.5.1.1.4 Infection and Symptoms After invading the plant, the soft rot bacteria usually
reproduce in the parenchymatous tissue. They first absorb nutrients from the wound part
or intercellular space, and then they destroy cell walls and middle lamella, making the
intracellular water and other inclusions flow into the intercellular space, thus causing his-
tolysis, collapse, and lodging of the plant, until the whole plant shows distinctive signs of
soft rot. Therefore, the seed konjac should be strictly controlled during the konjac planting
to avoid injury or infection of the corm seeds. If the konjac corm is injured and infected
during harvesting, the bacteria may hide in corm tissues and carry over soft rot during
storage and dormancy periods, causing corm rot (He Feng et al. 2011).
4.1.5.1.1.5 Transmission The pathogen overwinters in the soil, diseased plant remains,
and weed roots. During the konjac growing season, it gets attached to the leaflet or the pet-
iole through the soil in the course of farm operations, wind, or rain, and then it invades the
plant to cause disease. When the aboveground part becomes diseased, the diseased plants
become the centre of the secondary source of infection; and the pathogen is transmitted to
adjacent plants via the wind and rain. Meanwhile, the bacteria carried by the underground
corm are also transmitted to adjacent injured corms or plants through the soil.
4.1.5.1.2.1 Pathogens The konjac southern blight is a fungal disease. The pathogenic
fungus is Sclerotium rolfsii Sacc that endangers the konjac from generation to generation.
The hypha is first white, then turns yellowish-brown, always forms rhizomorphs (special
morphological adaptation root-like structures), and can even tightly pack into a sclero-
tium. The sclerotium is spherical, first white, then dark brown, with a diameter of 1–2 mm
or larger. The sclerotium is highly adaptable to environmental changes and can survive
10 years indoors and 5–6 years in the field. Hyphae rarely produce basidiosomes under
natural circumstances.
The growth temperature is 13°C–38°C; the optimum temperature is 30°C–33°C; and the
optimal pH value is 5.9. If the pH value reaches 8.0, the hyphae cannot grow and the scle-
rotium cannot germinate. The bacteria are highly saprophytic (Ma Qiong et al. 2006).
4.1.5.1.2.2 Symptoms It often invades the plant from the petiole close to the ground by the
hyphae and causes disease. Light pink moist spots are generated at the part invaded by the
hyphae, and then expand around the petiole; later, the tips of the leaflet on the same side of
such spots begin to turn yellow; and the soft rot side of the part of the petiole close to the
140 Konjac Glucomannan
ground lodges. White silky hyphae are formed at the part close to the ground, the nearby
ground surface, and the shallow soil layer where the disease develops rapidly, and spreads
to surrounding plants or the ground. Such hyphae get together to form a white sclerotium
with the part close to the ground of the petiole as the centre; and the sclerotium then turns
yellow and dark brown. When the ground surface is dry, since the sclerotium in the deep
soil layer germinates and invades, colour fading and the withering of leaves are observed
before seeing the hyphae or sclerotium. If the petiole is pulled out, hyphae reproduction
can be seen at its base. The disease spots expanding along the petiole invade the corm via
the petiole base and cause rot of the corm or offset tubers. The plants with the early onset
of disease have poor expansion of the corm. If the disease is serious, the yield is signifi-
cantly reduced due to the invasion of the corm. The infected corms are of poor quality, and
thus, can never be used as konjac seed (Yan Kai et al. 2015).
4.1.5.1.2.3 Infection and Transmission The sclerotium and hyphae of southern blight bacte-
ria in the konjac survive the winter in soil, on the corm, in diseased plants and compost, on
fallen leaves and weeds, and in crop rhizosphere. These parts become primary sources of
infection. Most of the sclerotium exists in the 3–7 cm topsoil layer. The sclerotium can also
be found in compost. The southern blight bacteria are saprophytic in the soil, and the new
hyphae germinated from the sclerotium in the following spring can directly invade the
host, generally via a wound. Hyphae can be transmitted through the soil and cause infec-
tion, can be transmitted to healthy plants by contact with the diseased plants, or transmit-
ted over a long distance by bacteria carried by the konjac seed. The bacterium is a soil-borne
disease with a wide range of hosts in nearly 100 families and 500 species of plants, but
Cucurbitaceae, Cruciferae, Leguminosae, and grasses are generally not infected. The dis-
ease is more likely to occur in continuously cropped land or the land with a previous crop
that is a host crop. The disease is serious in the case of unsterilized corms, low-lying land,
acidic soil, loose sandy soil, too much nitrogen fertilizer, and high air humidity, otherwise
the disease is minor (Cui Ming et al. 1999).
even if the plant can expand the leaf normally, it may subsequently still easily be infected
with soil-borne diseases. If the seed corms are then dug out, it can be seen that they are rot-
ten. High temperature damages mainly occur in July and August; minor damages cause
physical discomfort; while serious damages cause sunscald of leaves. Particularly high
temperatures and strong sunlight cause a temperature rise of leaves; and the leaves turn
white green with a subsequent browning and withering. High temperatures cause the
accumulated temperature requirements of the konjac to be met quickly, causing the early
ending of growth cycle, lodging, and severe drop in yield. In addition, high temperatures
are often accompanied with a high humidity that can easily cause the outbreak of such
destructive diseases as the konjac soft rot.
period of the corm is over. Wind damages are a serious threat for the konjac plantations in
Japan. In the case of hail in the period of emergence of the konjac, the bud is damaged. As
a result, the leaf and the bud cannot expand fully and the yield and quality drop seriously.
If the konjac is damaged after leaf expansion and has large wounds, there is a risk of infec-
tion by soft rot or other soil-borne diseases.
Plateau), mountainous areas around the Sichuan Basin, Nanling Mountains (including
Western Hubei and western Hunan parts of the Wuling Mountains, Luoxiao Mountains,
and Wuyi Mountains), and the mountainous areas to the south of the Nanling Mountains
are warm and humid and are the most suitable for planting the konjac; the Qin-Ba
Mountain areas to the north of the main ridge of the Daba Mountain area, and to the west
and northwest of the Hubei Province are suitable for planting the konjac.
When selecting specific planting bases, the konjac should be planted in areas where
the mean monthly temperature in May–October is higher than 15°C, the mean maximum
temperature in July–August does not exceed 32°C, the total rainfall is above 200 mm, the
relative humidity is between 80% and 85%, and there is natural or artificial shading. In the
growing period of the konjac in May–October, areas with a longer period of a daily tem-
perature of around 25°C are more conducive to the growth and development of the konjac,
the yield is higher and the risk of disease is small (Zhang Zhongliang et al. 1998).
Since the konjac has strict requirements for environmental conditions, its suitable areas
are obviously and comprehensively related to the altitude. Except for a few low-altitude
areas with an adjustment of the ecological and environmental conditions by forest and
water, most of the suitable areas for the konjac in China are in the higher-altitude moun-
tain or hilly areas. The altitude should be selected according to the latitude, mountains,
rivers, topography, landform, vegetation, and climate in the area, taking advantage of the
three-dimensional climate in 500–2,500 m mountainous areas. According to years of prac-
tical experience, the upper altitude limit for rice cultivation in the area where the konjac is
to be planted generally is the lower altitude limit for the growth of the konjac. For instance,
the suitable altitude of the south foothill in the Qin-Ba Mountain areas is about 1,000 m,
but the konjac should be developed at an altitude of about 800 m on the north foothill; the
areas in the Yunnan-Guizhou Plateau with an altitude of about 2,000 m are suitable for the
konjac development. In areas where the environmental conditions of the konjac, especially
temperature, can be met, the altitude should be properly selected. For example, the konjac
can be cultivated at an altitude of nearly 1,000 m in the Jinsha River Basin, mountain areas
around the Sichuan Basin, and the northwest Hubei mountains, but diseases are signifi-
cantly reduced by selecting the altitude of 1,200–1,500 m.
4.1.6.1.3 Soil
For the optimum growth of the konjac, a fertile soil with a top layer of more than 30 cm,
rich in organic matter, well drained, but with good water and nutrients retention, and
144 Konjac Glucomannan
neutral pH should be selected. Loam or sandy clay loam is preferred. A sandy soil with
poor water retention and too heavy clay soil with poor drainage and aeration are unsuit-
able for planting the konjac. The soil with inadequate organic matter and lacking granular
structure, having insufficient water retention, poor drainage, and inadequate nutrient con-
tent and ventilation should be avoided. In such soil, the konjac plants do not grow vigor-
ously and may easily be infected with diseases. On the basis of the selection of soil, the
appropriate amount of fertilizer should be applied to improve the soil fertility. The way of
improving the uptake of fertilizer and improving the soil structure is through the applica-
tion of soil amendments (improving the permeability and water retention characteristics
of the soil) and tillage. In addition, a large amount of high-quality thoroughly decomposed
and pathogen-free compost may be applied. The ideal soil for planting the konjac has strict
requirements with regard to physical and chemical characteristics (GPAIA 1991), as shown
in Table 4.1.
TABLE 4.1
Physical and Chemical Characteristics of Soil Suitable for Konjac Cultivation
Characteristic
Type Characteristic Value Remarks
The natural growth method can be adopted in areas that are the most suitable for the
growth of the konjac, have an annual mean temperature of 13°C–18°C without intense heat
and intense sunshine in summer and without frost in winter, with a thick fertile topsoil
layer, high organic matter content, and shading provided by deciduous trees. Generally,
no tillage is required. Only an appropriate amount of organic fertilizer is supplemented to
ensure the high quality of the corm; corms of 3-year-old plants are harvested according to
the thickness of the petiole, with 1- to 2-year-old corm left in the soil for further growth.
Selected harvesting is conducted in successive years without tillage.
4.1.6.2.1.2 Field Cultivation Corms, lateral corms, and offset tubers of the konjac are
planted in the field according to the type of planting material and age. After harvesting
all corms, the 2- to 3-year-old corms are sold for processing. The 1- to 2-year-old small
corms, offset tubers, and lateral corms are used as seed material after storage in winter
for further cultivation. The injuries of corms may be caused during drying, storage, and
transportation of seed konjac and inadequate field management. The disease incidence is
much higher than when practicing the natural growth method. Moreover, the decrease
of corm quality and yield may be caused by improper application of pesticides and fertil-
izers. Between the two cultivation patterns, the natural growth method is very consistent
with the biological characteristics of the konjac and produces a high yield and quality.
However, with the development of production and the expansion of the cultivation area,
the production pattern has gradually turned to field cultivation. After years of experience
in field cultivation practice, relatively efficient cultivation methods have been developed.
For example, some areas in the Yunnan Province, China, adopt 2-year natural cultivation.
This means that in a suitable natural environment that is suitable for the growth of the
konjac, small seed corms are planted in the first year. After appropriate fertilization, cul-
tivation in deep furrows and high mounds is carried out without harvesting in autumn.
In the winter, the plants are properly covered with soil or with green manure to protect
them from frost. In the spring, after applying fertilizer, the dry green manure is laid on
the plant bed. The harvesting is conducted in autumn including large size corms for pro-
cessing, commercial seed corms (the second-generation seed), and lateral corms (the first-
generation seed). In Langao County (Ankang, Shaanxi Province) and other regions, the
konjac is planted under sparse woodland that has been converted from farmland to forest
to restore the conditions similar to the natural growth method (Zhang Yang 2017).
the konjac with more shade. Thus, the risk of high temperatures caused by strong
sunlight will be reduced. The key to successful intercropping is to control the
degree of shading. With moderate plant density and shade, the konjac and the
other crops can both benefit. When applying appropriate intercropping, the corm
yield per unit area is much higher than in monoculture. The shade density of
40%–60% is appropriate and can both inhibit diseases and stimulate photosynthe-
sis, resulting in a higher yield.
2. Crop selection and distribution of intercropping: The shade plant selected for inter-
cropping should be higher than the konjac. The height of 2- to 3-year-old A. konjac
generally is 1 m, and that of the A. albus is 60 cm. Therefore, the best intercrop-
ping crops are young deciduous trees and long-stalk crops. Among suitable trees
are: Eucommia ulmoides, Paulownia sp., deciduous fruit trees, mulberry, Camellia sp.,
and Ricinus communis. The examples of crops are: sorghum, corn, amaranth, jute,
and sunflower. Thus, trees and long-stalk crops can obtain more sunlight as an
upper layer and the konjac can be properly shaded as a lower layer. The konjac
generally emerges in mid-to-late May and gets mature and decays in late October
or early November. After September, the temperature and illumination gradually
decrease, thus, the shade should be decreased by removing the lower leaves of the
sorghum, corn, sunflower, and other crops at the later stage of growth to increase
the sunlight for the konjac.
reproduction to increase the reproduction rate and are usually cut with a thin knife from
the terminal bud downwards into 4 ~ 6 pieces, each weighing about 100 g. The terminal
bud must be cut to destroy its apical dominance and promote the lateral leaf buds on the
cuttings to germinate as leaves. Attention should be paid to the air drying and healing of
the cutting wound to prevent infection; an appropriate temperature and humidity should
be maintained during the storage of cuts. If corms are cut right before spring planting, the
budding period will be delayed, affecting the yield. Therefore, corms should be cut before
storage.
They are mainly applied by spraying or soaking. The abovementioned agents are usually
applied separately and diluted according to the instructions of the manufacturers. If soak-
ing sterilization is adopted, the soaking time should be 20–30 minutes. The seed konjac
usually needs to be dried after spraying and soaking sterilization to ensure that the agent
is fully attached on the surface of the seed material.
4.1.6.6 Planting
4.1.6.6.1 Planting Time
The konjac is generally planted after the termination of the physiological dormancy period
of the corm and when the mean temperature rises to 12°C–14°C and the minimum tem-
perature is about 10°C. The konjac is generally planted in mid-to-late March in a warmer
climate, in April, in areas at higher altitude and northern latitude in China, and in early
May, in northern areas in Japan. The conventional planting period in Korea is around April
20; and the yield can be increased if the planting is advanced to April 5 and covered with
mulch (Lee 1992). In low mountainous areas where there is a warm winter without frost in
southern China, seeding planting in winter can be carried out immediately after the har-
vest in November–December; big corms are harvested and small ones left; and small corms
and offset tubers are evenly buried in the soil for natural germination in the next spring.
4.1.6.7.4 Fertilizing
In China, the first application of fertilizer after emergence is usually in early June to pro-
mote the growth of the aboveground parts of the konjac. The second application is in
early July to promote the growth of the underground parts. The corm begins to expand
quickly in mid-to-late July and absorbs a large amount of nutrients in August–September,
but the extensive application of nitrogen fertilizer in the middle and later periods causes
the excessive growth of the aboveground part and is unfavourable to the accumulation of
active components in the corm.
4.1.6.7.5.1 Physical Methods Diseases can be prevented and controlled by grading of the
seed konjac, crop rotation, intercropping, timely removal and burying the affected plants,
and other cultural disease control techniques. Infested plants should be removed manu-
ally as soon as possible. Also, steam treatment of the top layer and deep ploughing in the
winter are other ways of physical control of diseases and pests.
4.1.6.7.5.2 Chemical Control The results of the tests on the effectiveness of commonly used
agents on southern blight and soft rot showed that thiophanate methyl, mancozeb, and
150 Konjac Glucomannan
metalaxyl provide the best control of southern blight, while carbendazim, anti-toxic alum,
and streptomycin provide the best control of soft rot (Cui Ming et al. 2001). The Bordeaux
mixture is generally used for disease prevention in Japan. Planned spraying is carried out
monthly from the early stage of leaf expansion; which is especially effective in prevent-
ing disease in leaves that tends to develop disease after a typhoon. In recent years, there
have been reports of successful control of the konjac diseases by biological pesticides (Cui
Pengfei 2016).
The larva of sweet potato noctuid moths, Sphingidae, and Clanis bilineata may be cap-
tured manually and may be sprayed with a diluted phoxim oil concentrate or decis, a
broad spectrum pyrethroid insecticide, when the pest attack is serious. In terms of the
methods to control grub or mole cricket, in addition to avoiding the use of undecayed
manure or compost, the thoroughly decomposed organic manure and light may be used
to kill adults. If larvae damage is found, a diluted phoxim oil concentrate may be used for
root treatment.
4.1.6.8 Harvesting
In China, after the end of September, the corm gradually enters the dormancy period,
leaves tend to stop growing and gradually turn yellow and reach the senescence stage.
The maturity and senescence stage of leaves takes about 10 days and commercial size
corms may be harvested from this time. Harvesting should be conducted on sunny days
and corm injury should be avoided during harvesting.
4.1.6.9.1.2 Curing Before Storage The effects of the konjac storage are closely correlated to
the temperature, humidity, ventilation status, and other environmental conditions during
Field Production of Konjac 151
the storage, with proper field management, timely harvesting, and proper pre-treatment
before the storage as the preconditions for safe storage. The injury of seed konjac is the
most important reason for the rot during storage and after planting; therefore, special
attention should be paid to avoiding the injury of seed konjac from harvesting. The corm
that is just harvested, especially that is harvested prematurely and is large in size, has high
water content, tender epidermis, and crisp meat, and may easily have external wounds and
internal cracks, causing the invasion of soft rot bacteria and rot. Therefore, curing of the
corms should be carried out (Holcroft 2018). The objective of curing is to remove the water
on the surface of the corm to obtain the epidermis suberization and to heal the wound.
Curing begins with sun drying in the field for a day on sunny days after harvesting. After
that, all dirt should be removed and corms spread out in a ventilated place sheltered from
the rain and air dried at 15°C–20°C. The degree and duration of air drying are determined
by the degree of weight loss of the corm. Generally, a 15% loss in weight is required. Two-
year-old corm should be dried for 15–20 days. For offset tubers, the curing objective can be
achieved after 5–10 days of air drying.
4.1.6.9.1.3 Conditions for Safe Storage In order to prevent the formation of ‘aged buds’ and
the occurrence of freeze injury, the storage temperature must be maintained at 8°C–10°C.
At the late stage of seed konjac storage, the temperature may vary between 12°C and 20°C
to promote the germination of the terminal bud. The relative air humidity suitable for
the konjac storage is 80% and should not exceed 90% or fall below 60%. If the relative air
humidity is below 60% for a long time, corms may shrivel easily. The high range of rela-
tive humidity of the air should be maintained in order to reduce the natural loss of corm
moisture, but condensation should be avoided in order to avoid the risk of rot that would
cause considerable loss. This risk is considerable if storage occurs at a high temperature
(30°C–32°C) and high humidity (above 90%), when soft rot spreads easily. Since the corm
still continues to metabolize by breaking down nutrients and releasing heat and water in
the storage period, the temperature and humidity of the storage environment increases,
but the excessive increase in temperature and humidity is unfavourable to the storage.
The simplest method to adjust the temperature and humidity is ventilation. Since the
outdoor temperature is low, ventilation can decrease the temperature and humidity (Liu
Peiying & Wang Yulan 1990).
4.1.6.9.2.2 Simple Indoor Tempering Storage A layer of dry river sand is spread on the floor,
then a layer of seed corms is placed. The corms are again covered with dry river sand and
3–4 layers are formed. The top layer and the four sides are covered with dry straw for
insulation. A layer of dry rice husk, wheat glumes, leaf litter, or straw may be spread on a
ventilated dry floor; then a layer of seed corms is placed; and the two steps are repeated
3–4 times. In a few areas, a cellar may be created on a rocky hillside when seed corms
152 Konjac Glucomannan
are placed. They are sterilized with formalin, potassium permanganate, and other agents.
During the dormancy period, the cellar door should be tightly closed, but with vent holes
above the cellar door. Once the temperature rises in the spring, the cellar door may be
opened in the morning for ventilation and closed at night. During storage, the konjac
should be inspected and rotten coms removed promptly.
4.1.6.9.2.3 Outdoor Piled Storage In areas where there is no risk of frost injuries, a dry
place with high terrain, loose soil, good drainage, and exposure to the sun may be selected.
Sorghum stalks are spread on the ground, then a layer of corms is placed, next, loose dry
soil is scattered, and after that, another layer of corms is placed. Such steps are repeated
several times. The top is covered with loose dry soil and sealed with a plastic sheet for pro-
tection against rain. The film should be opened on sunny days for ventilation and closed
on rainy days to prevent the entrance of rainwater. The ventilation should be increased
after arrival of warm days in the spring.
4.1.6.9.2.4 Open Field Protection for Overwintering In regions with frozen ground in the
winter, after the decay of the aboveground parts of the plants on the plots reserved for
seed corms, the holes left after the decay of petioles are filled with soil. Then the soil on the
planting bed surface is covered with mulch (straw, leaves) or a plastic film. In some areas,
leguminous green manure crops can be sown around October on the planting bed of the
konjac in order to use them as mulch for overwintering.
the government to develop Kesatuan Pengelola Hutan (as well literally translated to Forest
Management Unit and abbreviated KPH), which are aimed to regulate the commercial for-
est managed by the private sector (Hartojo 2018: personal communication).
The predominant trees in the lower land part of the agroforestry are teakwood (Tectonia
grandis Linn. f.), while in the higher land part they are mahogany (Swietenia mahagoni King)
and sono keling (Dalbergia latifolia Roxb.), with the variant of sonobrit and sono sungu. Some
of the trees are 50 years old or older, but others are renewed trees substituting the previous
trees that have already been harvested during logging.
Farmers learned that the konjac plants growing under sono trees provide a better yield
compared to those growing under teakwood and mahogany. In the KPH Saradan, the area
of the forest is divided into a teakwood area, mahogany area, sono area, and mixed trees
area. The size of the forest area under mixed trees is the largest, followed by teakwood,
sono, and mahogany, which is the smallest in size.
1. Sustainability of the forest trees which produce high commercial value wood pro-
tected by the government with strict regulations in logging.
2. Sustainability of the forest to maintain the green environment and to avoid green-
house effects.
3. Sustainability of the forest environment with the community dwelling in its sur-
roundings to avoid illegal logging and social conflicts.
4. Sustainability of the prosperity of the community in the forest surroundings.
When the community surrounding the forest becomes konjac farmers, they assist the KPH
in maintaining the forest and the high value wood producing trees because without the
shade of the trees, the konjac growth will fail. At the same time, the community has good
income and is leveraged above the poverty line.
The KPH with the farmers’ community in the villages surrounding the KPH forest
formed an organization called Lembaga Masyarakat Desa Hutan(Forest Village Community
Institution) or Masyarakat Pengelola Sumberdaya Desa Hutan (Forest Village Resources
Management Community). The community institutions elect the leader whose functions
are: (1) coordinating the harvesting time, and formulating and making decisions on the
market price of the produce, which are crucial in the system and (2) liaising between the
community institutions and the KPH. When the system is established, and all parties –
individual farmers and the KPH – reach a win–win solution, both the community institu-
tions and the KPH prefer not to change the leader and feel safe to be coordinated by the
same person for a long time.
This sustainability has been proven in many years of konjac growing under the agro-
forestry system at KPH Saradan, as well as from it to other KPHs at Central and East
Java Provinces. The production area has been increasing from 315 ha at KPH Saradan
in 1998 (Purwadaria 2001) to 1,655.3 ha at Saradan, Jember, Nganjuk, Padangan, Madiun,
Bojonegoro, and Mojokerto in Central and East Java Province (Hidayat et al. 2013). At KPH
Saradan alone, the statistics showed that from 315 ha in 1998, the konjac area has grown to
a 750-ha harvest area in 2017.
154 Konjac Glucomannan
FIGURE 4.1
A. muelleri growing under trees in KPH Saradan (Central Java).
Field Production of Konjac 155
plants will be remaining in place and will grow again in October and eventually will die
in April, one month before the harvest in the following year.
4.2.2.3 Replanting
To maintain the sustainability of the porang production, farmers need to do replanting to
substitute the plants they harvest. There are three ways of replanting: the most common is
by using the plant bulbils since the plants growing from bulbils will lead to the production
of ready-to-harvest tubers in 2 years, while the other alternatives are by using the plant
tubers, and the plant seeds that commonly need 3 years’ time for reaching the mature
stage that is suitable for harvest. Farmers believe that the rate of plant growth from bulbil
replanting is 100%, while from good seeds is 94%. Replanting by using tubers is avoided
by farmers for the reasons that tubers are the end product for sale, while bulbils are abun-
dant. The other advantage of replanting by bulbils is that the replanting is much simpler
than replanting by seeds.
However, harvest might leave some small tubers accidentally removed from the soil
along with the targeted big ones. Tubers with the size range of 4–10 cm diameter will
be replanted by the farmers. Tubers with 10 cm diameter are commonly divided into
four pieces and then each piece will be planted separately.
FIGURE 4.2
Bulbils of A. muelleri.
156 Konjac Glucomannan
The number of bulbils produced can be estimated from the number of the konjac planted
per ha, which is around 30,000 plants. The harvest ranges from 10,000 to 15,000 plants per
ha, and the bulbils are collected from the harvested mature plants. This means that the
production of bulbils is 500,000–750,000 per ha per year. Bulbils are sold on the market at
the price of IDR 40,000–50,000 (USD 3–3.5)/kg, and 1 kg of bulbils contains 80–100 pieces.
References
Anil, Shirly Raichal, E. A. Siril, S. Suhara Beevy. (2011). Morphological Variability in 17 Wild Elephant
Foot Yam (Amorphophallus paeoniifolius) Collections from Southwest India. Genetic Resources
and Crop Evolution, 58(8): 1263–1273.
Bai Liwei. (2016). Identification of Heat Resistance and Cloning and Preliminary Analysis of HSP
Gene of Konjac. Dissertation of Southwest University, Chongqing, China.
Chen Dunqiao, Yang Qinglin. (2000). Comprehensive Techniques for Disease Prevention and High
Yield Cultivation of Konjac. Development of Mountainous Areas, 11(09): 29–30.
Cui Ming, Li Chuan. (2009). Progress in Study on Occurrence Rules and Control Techniques of Soft
Rot. China Plant Protection, 13(6): 185–187.
Field Production of Konjac 157
Cui Ming, Zhao Xingxi, Du Dajun, Liu Lieping. (2006). Study on Influence of NPK Fertilizer on
Konjac Yield. Soil and Water Conservation in China, 13(6): 185–187.
Cui Ming, Zhao Xingxi, Qiu Yunguo, Xie Lihua. (2001). Study on Chemical Control Test on Soft Rot
and Southern Blight of Konjac. Shaanxi Journal of Agricultural Sciences, (11): 18–21.
Cui Ming, Zhao Xingxi, Xie Lihua. (1999). Elementary Report on Experimental Study on Infection
Pattern of Konjac Southern Blight. Hubei Plant Protection, (3): 26–27.
Cui Pengfei, Zhang Liqiong, Liu Lin. (2016). Study on Control of Soft Rot of Konjac by Biocontrol
Bacteria. Shaanxi Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 62(08): 34–37.
Dai Qingtang, Yang Yongbo, Yang Chaozhu, Teng Jianxun, Zhao Qinghua, Xiang Qiaolong. (2011).
New progress in Elite Breeding System by Tissue Culture for Konjac. Amino Acids & Biotic
Resources, 33(4): 34–37.
GPAIA [Gunma Prefecture Agricultural Improvement Association]. (1991). Latest Book of Konjac.
Japan Chimae-shi, Yamagishi Printing Office, pp. 30–40.
Gu Tao. (2017). Influence of Externally Applied Chlorine on Growth and Development of Konjac.
Dissertation of Southwest University, Chongqing, China.
Hayashi Nobuo. (1988). The Seed Corm Transmission of Konnyaku’s (A. konjac) Soft Rot Caused by
Erwinia carotovora subsp. carotovora. Gunma Journal of Agricultural Research, (5): 25–34.
He Feng, Yang Ying, Zhang Wei, Ji Jiaxing, Yu Longjiang. (2011). Study on Pathogenic Conditions
and Infection Routes for Konjac Soft Rot Bacteria. Hubei Agricultural Sciences, 50(1): 81–83.
Hidayat, Ramdan, Felicitas Deru Dewanti, Hartojo. (2013). Tanaman Porang, Karakter, Manfaat,
dan Budidaya (Konjac Plants, Characters, Usage, and Cultivation). Graha Ilmu, Yogyakarta,
Indonesia.
Holcroft, Deirdre. (2018). Curing and Storage of Tropical Roots, Tubers and Corms to Reduce
Postharvest Losses. PEF White Paper No. 18-02. The Postharvest Education Foundation (PEF).
La Pine, Oregon.
Hu Nan. (2011). Study on Shallow Liquid Tissue Culture and Polyploid Induction of konjac.
Dissertation of Southwest University, Chongqing, China.
Huang Junbin, Qiu Rensheng, Zhao Chunsen. (1999). Preliminary Study on Identification of Konjac
Soft Rot Pathogen and Its Biological Characteristics. Journal of Huazhong Agricultural University,
18(5): 413–415.
Huang Xunduan. (2002). Mutagenic Effects of 60 Co γ Ray Irradiation of Konjac Germination Corm
and Its Impacts on Genetic Improvement. Master’s Thesis of Anhui Agricultural University,
Hefei, China.
Japan Konjac News Agency. (2001). Konjac News. Tokyo. 2067, 2001-05-15(4).
Kobayashi, K. (1964). Shading Cultivation of Konjac. Agriculture and Horticulture, 39(8): 31–33.
Lee, M.D. (1992). The effects of seed corm processing and cultural methods on corm yield of
A. konjac. Korean Journal of Crop Sciences, 37(2): 117–122.
Li Chuan, Cui Ming, Wang Xianan, Zhao Xingxi, Li Zengyi, Liu Lieping. (2010). A New Variety of
Amorphophallus: ‘Qinmo 1’. China Vegetables, 37(3): 30.
Li Heng. (1979). Flora of China Vol. 13, 2. Science Press, Beijing, China, pp. 84–97.
Li Nanlin. (2014). Influence of Different Light Quality on Growth and Yield of Konjac. Dissertation
of Southwest University, Chongqing, China.
Li Yongjun, Wang Ling, Chen Jianhua, Ma Jiqiong, Yin Guifang, Jiang Deyou, Xu Yun. (2010). A New
Variety of Amorphophallus: ‘Yunyu 1’. China Vegetables, 37(2): 339–340.
Liu Jinlong, Li Weiqun, Lv Shian, Sheng Dexian, Li Qiuwen. (2004). A New Variety of Amorphophallus:
‘Qingjiang A. konjac’. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 31(06): 839.
Liu Peiying, Chen Jinfeng. (1984). A New Species of Amorphophallus. Journal of Southwest Agricultural
University, 6(1): 34–36.
Liu Peiying, Sun Yuanming, Zhang Shenglin, Su Chenggang, Zhang Xingguo, Liu Chaogui. (2007).
‘Wanyuan A. konjac’. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 3(34): 900.
Liu Peiying, Wang Yulan. (1990). Physiological Study on Storage of Konjac, Proceedings of the 60th
Anniversary and Second Annual Conference of the Chinese Society of Horticulture, II, Vegetables.
International Academic Publishers, Bradenton, FL, pp. 29–32.
158 Konjac Glucomannan
Liu Peiying, Zhang Dapeng, Zhao Lei. (1985). Studies on Karyotype and Protein of Two Konjac
Species. Journal of Southwest Agricultural University, 4: 39–43.
Liu Peiying, Zhang Shenglin. (2000). Disease Prevention and High Yield Cultivation of Konjac.
Development of Mountainous Areas, 11(09): 27–28.
Liu Peiying. (2004). Konjac. China Agriculture Press, Beijing, China, 02, pp. 182–183.
Liu Wenlu, Zhang Wenxue, Yu Binwu, Huang Zhimin, Hu Chengxuan. (2009). Efficient Cultivation
Mode of Konjac and Corn Intercropping. Journal of Changjiang Vegetables, 2(17): 27–28.
Lontoh, A. P., Santosa, E., Kurniawati, A., Sari, M. (2019). Yield Evaluation of Selected Clones
Apomictic Iles-Iles (Amorphophallus muelleri Blume) on Second Growing Period. Journal of
Agronomi Indonesia, 47(2): 171–179.
Ma Qiong, Qin Enhua, Li Youping. (2006). Isolation and Identification of Pathogens of Southern
Blight in Konjac. Journal of Anhui Agricultural Sciences, 24(1): 97–100.
Nikmah, I., A., Azrianingsih, R., & Wahyudi, D. (2016). Genetic Diversity of Porang Populations
(Amorphophallus muelleri Blume) in Central Java and West Java Based on LEAFY Second Intron
Marker. The Journal of Tropical Life Science, 6(1): 23–27.
Niu Yi, Zhang Daxue, Liu Haili, Wang Qijun, Liu Hongyan, Zhang Shenglin. (2010). A New Variety
of Amorphophallus: ‘Yumo 1’. China Vegetables, 37(3): 30.
Niu Yi. (2004). Study on Influence of Boron Nutrition on Growth and Development, Quality and
Yield of Konjac. Dissertation of Southwest University, Chongqing, China.
Purwadaria, H. K., Syarief, A. M., Buchari, M. A. Arifin, and Widyotomo, S. (2001). Pengembangan
Proses Fraksinasi Untuk Meningkatkan Mutu Tepung Iles-Iles Untuk Ekspor (Development
of fractionation process to improve the export quality of konjac corm flour). Integrated
Competitive Report VIII (RUT VIII) Phase 1. IPB-Ministry of Research and Technology – LIPI,
Jakarta, Indonesia.
Sun Yuanhang. (2006). Study on Genetic Resources of A. albus. Master’s Thesis of Southwest
University, Chongqing, China.
Sun Yuanming, Liu Peiying, Liu Chaogui, Sui Chenggang, Li Mingqi. (1995). Study on Dormancy
Characteristics of A. konjac Corm. Journal of Southwest Agricultural University, 39(02): 118–121
Tsuji Satoshi. (1990). Konjac Science. Translated by Gu Ming. Sichuan University Press, Chengdu,
P.R. China, pp. 66–68 (in Chinese).
Wakabayasi Shigemichi. (1957). Cultivation and Processing of Konjac. Industry Books, Tokyo, Japan,
pp. 30–50.
Wang Jian, Yue Chaoyin, Guo Zhenghong, Liu Haijun, Li Jinju. (2009). Pathogenic Mechanism and
Biological Control of Soft Rot in Konjac. Journal of Anhui Agricultural Sciences, 37(30): 14746–14748.
Watanabe Hiroshi. (1979). Konjac Cultivation. Nongshan Fishing Village Cultural Association,
Nongshan Fishing Village (in Japanese).
Xiang Changqing, Chen Yongbo, Teng Jianxun. (2011). Overview of Establishment of Breeding
Technology System for Konjac. Amino Acids & Biotic Resources, 33(4): 31–32.
Yamaga Ichiro. (1966). Haruna-kuro. Agricultural Technology, 21(7): 336–337.
Yamaga Ichiro. (1970). Akagiodama. Agricultural Technology, 25(7): 331–332.
Yan Kai, Huang Rongmao, Zhang Haiou. (2015). Symptoms and Characteristics of Konjac Southern
Blight and Screening of Chemical Controls. Agricultural Research and Application, 28(2): 71−73.
Yang Hongmin, Li Chenghou, Xiong Lvyun, et al. (1989). Growth and Development of Konjac and Its
Absorption of Nutrients, Tillage and Cultivation,. Journal of Southwest Agricultural University,
11(3): 62–62.
Yang Xiulian, Yang Jianping, Wu Xingchun, Cun Xiangqin. (2010). Influence of Low Temperature
and Ultraviolet Band on Germination and Growth of Seed Konjac. Seed, 29(9): 49–51.
Yuzammi, Kurniawan A., Asih, N. P. S., Erlinawati, I., Hetterscheid, W. (2017). The Amorphophallus
of Indonesia. Center for Plant Conservation-Botanic Gardens, Indonesian Institute of Sciences
(LIPI), Bogor, Indonesia, p. 176.
Zhang Shenglin, Liu Peiying, Sun Yuanming, Zhang Xingguo, Su Chenggang. (1998). Study on
Crossbreeding Technique for Amorphophallus. Journal of Southwest Agricultural University, 20(3):
119–122.
Field Production of Konjac 159
Rarisara Impaprasert, Zhao Jianrong, George Srzednicki, Yu Lei, and Tao Ruixuan
CONTENTS
5.1 Harvest and Delivery of Tubers to Processing Plants................................................... 161
5.1.1 Harvesting and Storage of Corms........................................................................ 161
5.1.2 Delivery to the Processing Plant........................................................................... 162
5.2 Primary Processing of Konjac Corms.............................................................................. 162
5.3 Browning Control............................................................................................................... 163
5.3.1 Browning Reaction................................................................................................. 163
5.3.2 Browning of Konjac Corms................................................................................... 164
5.3.3 Control of Enzymatic Browning Reaction.......................................................... 164
5.3.4 Browning Control of Konjac Corms..................................................................... 166
5.4 Drying and Storage of Dried Chips................................................................................. 167
References...................................................................................................................................... 169
161
162 Konjac Glucomannan
FIGURE 5.1
Flowchart of the primary postharvest operations.
Postharvest Technology of Konjac 163
FIGURE 5.2
Washing unit for konjac corms equipped with rotating brushes (George Srzednicki).
Cleaning and peeling can be done manually or mechanically in order to remove the top
buds, roots, and epidermis. However, the weak point is that the removed peel is about
1–2 cm. thick, which means about 3% of the KGM in the external cell layers is also dis-
carded. Should the sliced tubers be sun dried for more than 10 days, it will be more dif-
ficult to scrap the epidermis, and more layers of peripheral cells will have to be removed.
Therefore, the ‘non-scrapping washing method’ has been proposed for the wet pro-
cessing (described in Chapter 6). This method is based on the principle that the exter-
nal cell layers of the tuber don’t contain KGM, but are composed mostly of fibre tissue
(Li 2006). Once the corm tissue has been ground, some of the surface fibre is sieved into
waste liquid, and the rest is dehydrated and ground along with flour granules. During
drying, the surface fibre shrinks and, being much lighter than flour granules, it can be
easily separated from the granules in the air classification process. Hence, the quality
of the purified flour is not compromised, and all the KGM is recovered. The peels and
other residues left from cleaning and washing the fresh tubers can be used as fertiliser
for the nearby fields.
optimum conditions (Walker & Ferrar 1998). The phenolic compounds are oxidised to qui-
nones and changed to a brown substance. This reaction is called the enzymatic brown-
ing reaction. Meanwhile, the non-enzymatic-induced brown pigment formation, known
as the Maillard reaction, is caused by free amino groups, which are found in free amino
acids, peptides, or proteins and carbonyl groups, which are found in reducing sugars.
Food browning can be also due to the degradation of carbohydrates also called the cara-
melization reaction or the pyrolysis of sugar due to heat treatment above the melting point
of the sugar under alkaline or acidic conditions. Ascorbic acid, its oxidation products, and
oxidized lipids can also react via the Maillard reaction.
FIGURE 5.3
Polyphenol oxidase pathway. (Adapted from Corzo-Martínez, M. et al., Browning reactions, in Food Biochemistry
and Food Processing, 2nd edn., Simpson, B.K., Nollet, L.M.L., Toldrá, F., Benjakul, S., Paliyath, G. and Hui, Y.H.
(eds.), John Wiley & Sons, Iowa, IA, 2012.)
processing, exclusion of oxygen, and anti-browning agents, have been studied to inhibit poly-
phenol oxidase-related enzymatic browning (Loaiza-Velarde et al. 2003). However, a common
approach for preventing enzymatic browning is the use of anti-browning agents (Arslan &
Doğan 2005). Sulphur-containing agents are found to be successful inorganic salts to con-
trol browning in fruits and vegetables since 1986 (Son et al. 2001). Many compounds contain
sulphites, called sulphiting agents, including sulphur dioxide, sodium sulphite, sodium and
potassium bisulphites, and metabisulphites. Walker (1977) proposed that the primary role of
sulphiting agents is to react with the pigment precursors (o-quinone) to produce stable and
colourless diphenols before they can undergo further reaction to form pigments. Ferrer et al.
(1989) proposed that bisulphate inhibition was due to the reaction of sulphites with interme-
diate quinones, resulting in the formation of sulphoquinones, which irreversibly inhibited
polyphenol oxidase, causing complete inactivation. On the other hand, Madero and Finne
(1982) proposed that bisulphite exerted a competitive inhibitory effect on polyphenol oxi-
dase, by binding a sulfhydryl group at the active site of the enzyme. The destruction of the
disulphide bonds may cause the enzymes to denature or lose their shape because enzymes
must have a specific three-dimensional structure to catalyze their biochemical reactions
(Fu et al. 2007). They are currently applied for the inhibition of the browning in potatoes,
mushrooms, apples, and other fruits and vegetables. Sulphite concentrations necessary for
controlling enzymatic browning vary widely in accordance with the food material and the
time required for the inhibition of the browning reaction (Taylor et al. 1986). Although sul-
phite treatment levels in foods vary widely between applications, the residue levels should
not usually exceed several hundred parts per million (ppm) (Sapers 1993; Taylor et al. 1986).
Moreover, the Joint Expert Committee on Food Additives of the World Health Organization
and the Food and Agriculture Organization recommended an acceptable sulphite daily intake
of sulphur dioxide in foodstuffs as 0.7 mg/kg of body weight (Queiroz et al. 2008). In addi-
tion, these compounds have been restricted by the Food and Drug Administration due to
the possibility of their associated potential hazards to human health, especially in asthmatic
patients (Simon 1998). Thus, the Codex General Standard for Food Additives online database
limited the maximum level use of a sulphiting agent to 50 mg/kg for starches, 200 mg/kg for
flours, 500 mg/kg for dried vegetables (including mushrooms and fungi, roots and tubers,
pulses and legumes, and Aloe vera), seaweeds, and nuts and seeds, and 1000 mg/kg for dried
fruits (Codex Alimentarius 2019).
166 Konjac Glucomannan
Hence, several studies have been devoted to the non-sulphite anti-browning agents
(e.g., ascorbic acid, citric acid, and sodium chloride) in many fruits and vegetables. Natural
anti-browning agents were also tested. Honey (Chen et al. 2000; Gacche et al. 2009);
banana leaf extract either alone or in combination with ascorbic acid and 4-hexylresorcinol
(Kaur and Kapoor 2000); papaya latex extract (De Rigal et al. 2001); onion juice (Hosoda
and Iwahashi 2002); solutions containing citric acid, calcium chloride, and garlic
extract (Ihl et al. 2003); onion oil (Hosoda et al. 2003); onion extracts (Kim et al. 2005);
onion by-products, such as residues and surpluses (Roldan et al. 2008); rice bran extract
(Boonsiripiphat and Theerakulkait 2009); and chitosan (Martin-Diana et al. 2009) are some
examples of natural inhibitors of PPOs. Inorganic halides are also well known inhibitors of
polyphenol oxidases (Vámos-Vigyázó 1981). Janovitz-Klapp et al. (1990) found that sodium
fluoride was the most potent inhibitor of apple polyphenol oxidase, followed by sodium
chloride, sodium bromide, and sodium iodide. Sodium chloride and calcium chloride at
concentrations ranging between 2% and 4% (w/v) are the most commonly used in the food
industry for the inhibition of browning (Steiner & Rieth 1989). Polyphenol oxidase activity
was observed to decrease with increasing concentrations of sodium chloride for the peach
(Luh & Phithakpol 1972), eggplant, and avocado (Knapp 1965).
as vitamin C, and its derivatives have been widely used as an anti-browning agent for the
processing of fruits and vegetables. In addition, ascorbic acid also acts as an oxygen scav-
enger for the removal of molecular oxygen in polyphenol oxidase reactions. Polyphenol
oxidase inhibition by ascorbic acid has been attributed to the reduction of enzymatically
formed o-quinones to their precursor diphenols (Walker 1977). Ascorbic acid is, however,
irreversibly oxidised to dehydroascorbic acid during the reduction process, thus allowing
browning to occur when the reducing efficiency of ascorbic acid was depleted. When com-
pared with the sulphur-free compounds group, sodium chloride at 10,000 ppm, soaking
for 20 minutes, showed a clearly better ability to inhibit the browning reaction in dried
konjac slices when compared with sodium metabisulphite. Thus, soaking konjac slices in
sodium chloride solution before drying can be an alternative way to replace the use of
sulphiting agents.
FIGURE 5.4
Vibrating fluidised bed dryers (Zhao Jianrong).
168 Konjac Glucomannan
FIGURE 5.5
Belt dryer (George Srzednicki).
konjac flour produced by the dry process is often characterized by a low viscosity (Wu and
Zhang 1994). As a result, most of the product resulting from the traditional dry process-
ing can only be used as third grade flour. Such a product often cannot meet the Chinese
Professional Standard for Konjac Flour NY/T494-2002 (Ministry of Agriculture P. R. China
2002), especially with regard to product colour.
In order to obtain good physical and chemical properties of konjac flour, the processor
has to prevent it from browning, case hardening, and gelatinization (Huang 1994). During
processing, browning and case hardening would affect the colour of konjac chips, while
gelatinization would lead to the reduction of viscosity. At present, the traditionally dried
chips often have such defects: The sun-dried chips are often discoloured and have a low
viscosity. The mechanically dried chips may have acceptable colour, but often have exces-
sive sulphur content.
Postharvest Technology of Konjac 169
The konjac chips are generally packed in woven polyethylene bags and stored at or near
the drying plant. The processor may keep them in storage at an ambient temperature and
with scarce light for several months until they can be sold for further processing. It is
important that they be stored in a dry place to prevent moisture reuptake. If the plant has
the necessary equipment, the chips may be ground into powder which is called ‘common
konjac flour’, then sifted and separated from impurities. This product is called ‘common
konjac fine flour’. These products will also be packed in bags and kept in storage under
similar conditions as konjac chips.
References
Arslan, O., and Doğan, S. (2005). Inhibition of polyphenol oxidase obtained from various sources by
2,3-diaminopropionic acid. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 85: 1499–1504.
Boonsiripiphat, K., and Theerakulkait, C. (2009). Extraction of rice bran extract and some factors
affecting its inhibition of polyphenol oxidase activity and browning in potato. Preparative
Biochemistry and Biotechnology, 39(2): 147–158.
Chen, L., Mehta, A., Berenbaum, M., Zangerl, A. R., and Engeseth, N. J. (2000). Honeys from different
floral sources as inhibitors of enzymic browning in fruit and vegetables homogenates. Journal
of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 48(10): 4997–5000.
Chua, M., Baldwin, T. C., Hocking, T. J., and Chan, K. (2010). Traditional uses and potential health
benefits of Amorphophallus konjac K. Koch ex N.E.Br. Journal of Ethnopharmacology, 128(2):
268–278. doi: 10.1016/j.jep.2010.01.021
Chua, M., Chan, K., Hocking, T. J., Williams, P. A., Perry, C. J., and Baldwin, T. C. (2012). Methodologies
for the extraction and analysis of konjac glucomannan from corms of Amorphophallus konjac K.
Koch. Carbohydrate Polymers, 87(3): 2202–2210. doi: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2011.10.053
Codex Alimentarius. (2019). Maximum level uses of sulfites in food. Retrieved August 19, 2019, from
http://www.fao.org/gsfaonline/groups/details.html?id=161
Corzo-Martínez, M., Corzo, N., Villamiel, M., and Castillo, M. D. (2012). Browning reactions. In Food
Biochemistry and Food Processing, 2nd edn., Simpson, B.K., Nollet, L.M.L., Toldrá, F., Benjakul, S.,
Paliyath, G. and Hui, Y.H. (eds.), John Wiley & Sons, Iowa, IA.
De Rigal, D., Cerny, M., Richard‐Forget, F., and Varoquaux, P. (2001). Inhibition of endive (Cichorium
endivia L.) polyphenol oxidase by a Carica papaya latex preparation. International Journal of Food
Science & Technology, 36(69): 677–684.
Ferrer, O. J., Otwell, W. S., and Marshall, M. R. (1989). Effect of bisulfite on lobster shell phenoloxi-
dase. Journal of Food Science, 54: 478–480.
Fu, Y., Zhang, K., Wang, N., and Du, J. (2007). Effects of aqueous chlorine dioxide treatment on
polyphenol oxidases from Golden Delicious apple. LWT: Food Science and Technology, 40:
1362–1368.
Gacche, R. N., Shinde, B. T., Dhole, N. A., Pund, M. M., and Jadhav, A. D. (2009). Evaluation of the
floral honey for inhibition of polyphenol oxidase-mediated browning, antioxidant and anti-
bacterial activities. Journal of Food Biochemistry, 33(5): 693–709.
Hosoda, H., and Iwahashi, I. (2002). Inhibition of browning if apple slice and juice by onion juice.
Journal of the Japanese Society for Horticultural Science, 71(3): 452–454.
Hosoda, H., Ohmi, K., Sakaue, K., and Tanaka, K. (2003) Inhibitory effect of onion oil on browning
of shredded lettuce and its active components. Journal of the Japanese Society for Horticultural
Science, 72: 451–456.
Ihl, M., Aravena, L., Scheuermann, E., Uquiche, E., and Bifani, V. (2003). Effect of immersion solutions
on shelf life of minimally processed lettuce. LWT-Food Science and Technology, 36(6): 591–599.
170 Konjac Glucomannan
Impaprasert, R. (2013). Production of purified konjac flour from corms of Buk Nuea Sai Amorphophallus
muelleri. PhD Thesis, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand, 224 p.
Janovitz-Klapp, A. H., Richard, F. C., Goupy, P. M., and Nicolas, J. J. (1990). Inhibition studies on apple
polyphenol oxidase. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 38: 926–931.
Kaur, C., and Kapoor, H. C. (2000). Inhibition of enzymic browning in apples, potatoes and mush-
rooms. Journal of Scientific & Industrial Research, 59(5): 389–394.
Kim, M. J., Kim, C. Y., and Park, I. (2005). Prevention of enzymatic browning pear by onion extract.
Food Chemistry, 89: 181–184.
Knapp, F. W. (1965). Some characteristics of eggplant and avocado polyphenolases. Journal of Food
Science, 30: 930–936.
Li, J. (2006). Development of wet processing of purified konjac flour, Proceedings of the 5th National
Seminar on Konjac Production. Konjac Section, Chinese Society for Horticultural Sciences. 8–9
August 2006, Jianshi County, Hubei Province (in Chinese).
Liu, P. Y., Zhang, S. L., Zhu, G. H., Chen, Y., Ouyang, H. X., and Han, M. (2002). Professional standard
for the classification, requirements and test methods of konjac flour; Technical Report NY/T
494. Chinese Ministry of Agriculture, Sichuan, P.R. China.
Loaiza-Velarde, J. G., Mangrich, M. E., Campos-Vargas, R., and Saltveit, M. E. (2003). Heat shock
reduces browning of fresh-cut celery petioles. Postharvest Biology and Technology, 27: 305–311.
Luh, B. S., and Phithakpol, B. (1972). Characteristics of polyphenol oxidase related to browning in
cling peaches. Journal of Food Science, 37: 264–268.
Madero, C. F., and Finne, G. (1982). Properties of phenoloxidase isolated from gulf shrimp. Proceedings
of the Seventh Annual Tropical and Subtropical Fisheries Technological Conference of the Americas.
New Orleans, LA, pp. 328–339.
Manzocco, L., Calligaris, S., Mastrocola, D., Nicoli, M. C., and Lerici, C. R. (2001). Review of non-
enzymatic browning and antioxidant capacity in processed foods. Trends in Food Science and
Technology, 11(9–10): 340–346.
Martin-Diana, A. B., Rico, D., Barat, J. M., and Barry-Ryan, C. (2009). Orange juices enriched with
chitosan: Optimisation for extending the shelf-life. Innovative Food Science and Emerging
Technologies, 10(4): 590–600.
Mayer, A. M. (1987). Polyphenol oxidases in plants: Recent progress. Phytochemistry, 26(1): 11–20.
Ministry of Agriculture P. R. C. (2002). NY/Y 494—2002. China’s Agricultural Standard for Konjac.
Ministry of Agriculture of P.R. of China, Beijing, China (in Chinese).
Özoglu, H., and Bayindirli, A. (2002). Inhibition of enzymic browning in cloudy apple juice with
selected antibrowning agents. Food Control, 13: 213–211.
Queiroz, C., Lopes, M. L. M., Fialho, E., and Valente-Mesquita, V. L. (2008). Polyphenol oxidase:
Characteristics and mechanisms of browning control. Food Reviews International, 24(4): 361–375.
doi: 10.1080/87559120802089332.
Roldan, E., Sánchez-Moreno, C., de Ancos, B., and Cano, M. P. (2008). Characterisation of onion
(Allium cepa L.) by products as food ingredients with antioxidant and antibrowning proper-
ties. Food Chemistry, 108(3): 907–916.
Sapers, G. M. (1993). Browning of foods: Control by sulfites, antioxidants and other means. Food
Technology, 47(10): 75–84.
Shimizu, N., and Shimahara, H. (1973). U.S. Patent No. 3767424.
Simon, R. A. (1998). Update on sulfite sensitivity. Allergy, 53(46): 78–79.
Son, S. M., Moon, K. D., and Lee, C. Y. (2001). Inhibitory effects of various antibrowning agents on
apple slices. Food Chemistry, 73: 23–30.
Steiner, F., and Rieth, T. E. (1989). Preservative method and preserved fruit or vegetable, using
citric acid, sodium and calcium chloride containing preservative composition. U.S. Patent
no. 4,818,549.
Taylor, S. L., Higley, N. A., and Bush, R. K. (1986). Sulfites in foods: Uses, analytical methods, resi-
dues, fate, exposure assessment, metabolism, toxicity and hypersensitivity. Advanced Food
Research, 30: 1–76.
Postharvest Technology of Konjac 171
Vámos-Vigyázó, L. (1981). Polyphenol oxidase and peroxidase in fruits and vegetables. Critical
Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition, 15: 49–127.
Walker, J. R. L. (1977). Enzymatic browning in foods, its chemistry and control. Food Technology in
New Zealand, 12: 19–25.
Walker, J. R. L., and Ferrar, P. H. (1998). Diphenol oxidases, enzyme-catalysed browning and plant
disease resistance. Biotechnology and Genetic Engineering Reviews, 15: 457–498.
Wu, W., and Zhang, Z. (1994). The report of production engineering of konjac flour. Science and
Technology of Food Industry, 4: 25–28 (in Chinese).
Zhang, S., Zheng, L., and Zhong, G. (2007a). Browning mechanism and inhibition of Amorphophallus
konjac and Amorphophallus albus. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering,
2007(2). doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-6819.2007.2.040
Zhang, S., Zheng, L., and Zhong, G. (2007b). Studies on the activity and inhibition of polyphenol oxi-
dase in Amorphophallus konjac. Journal of Chinese Institute of Food Science and Technology, 4: 51−55.
Zhao, J., Zhang, D., Srzednicki, G., Kanlayanarat, S., and Borompichaichartkul, C. (2010).
Development of a low-cost two-stage technique for production. International Food Research
Journal, 17: 1113–1124.
6
Processing of Konjac Flour
CONTENTS
6.1 Principles of Konjac Processing........................................................................................ 173
6.2 Dry Processing.................................................................................................................... 175
6.2.1 Grinding and Sifting.............................................................................................. 175
6.3 Wet Processing.................................................................................................................... 177
6.4 Combined Wet and Dry Processing................................................................................. 178
6.4.1 Process Description of the Wet Processing Step................................................ 180
6.4.1.1 Determination of the Reaction Time..................................................... 180
6.4.1.2 Pre-Treatment in Anti-Swelling Solution............................................. 180
6.4.1.3 Pre-Treatment in Anti-Browning Solution........................................... 180
6.4.1.4 Crushing and Grinding.......................................................................... 181
6.4.1.5 Washing and Dehydration...................................................................... 181
6.4.1.6 Drying of Common Fine Flour.............................................................. 181
6.4.1.7 Recycling of Ethanol................................................................................ 182
6.4.2 Process Description of the Dry Processing Step................................................ 183
6.4.2.1 Grinding and Separation of Particles.................................................... 183
6.4.3 Packaging................................................................................................................. 183
6.5 Quality Control and Storage of Konjac Flour................................................................. 184
References...................................................................................................................................... 187
TABLE 6.1
Definitions of Different Types of Konjac Flour
Name of Processing Product
Product Raw Materials Processing Method Characteristics Characteristics
Common konjac Konjac chips (bar) Physical dry processing Starch removal Particle size: 90%
fine flour Konjac fresh tuber Food grade ethanol wet processing 0.125–0.335 mm
Common konjac Konjac chips (bar) Physical dry processing Starch removal Particle size: 90%
particulate flour Konjac fresh tuber Food grade ethanol wet processing ≤0.125 mm
Purified konjac Konjac fresh tuber Food grade ethanol wet processing Purify & extract Particle size: 90%
fine flour Konjac flour Food grade ethanol purification KGM 0.125–0.335 mm
KGM% ≥ 85%
Purified konjac Konjac fresh tuber Food grade ethanol wet processing Purify & extract Particle size: 90%
particulate flour Konjac flour Food grade ethanol purification KGM ≤0.125 mm
KGM% ≥ 85%
Standard for Konjac’ (Ministry of Agriculture P.R.C. 2002). Common konjac particulate
flour is a semi-finished product that through further processing may become a refined
product (Chong 1990). The processing of konjac tubers into flour is the key step in the uti-
lization of konjac. The quality of the final product determines its range of applications, i.e.,
pharmaceuticals, food, chemicals, textile, or oil industries (Matsuzaki 1992).
The focus of konjac processing is on the extraction of Konjac Glucomannan (KGM) from
corms (Chen and Sun 1989). The processing methods can be divided into three catego-
ries depending on whether and when liquid media are used in the process, as shown in
Figure 6.1 (Iwatani 1978; Wootton et al. 1993; Sun and Yang 1994).
FIGURE 6.1
Processing methods of KF. (Adapted from Iwatani, S.K., Powdered konjac product, J88065297, J55092667, 1978;
Wootton, A.N. et al., J. Sci. Food Agric., 61, 429–433, 1993; Sun, Y. and Yang, Y., The processing technology of
konjac flour, ZL94116535.3, 1994.)
Processing of Konjac Flour 175
FIGURE 6.2
Flowchart showing dry processing of konjac corms.
FIGURE 6.3
Grinder for konjac chips (George Srzednicki).
FIGURE 6.4
Sifter for separation of different fractions of konjac flour (George Srzednicki).
Processing of Konjac Flour 177
FIGURE 6.5
Flowchart of wet-processing using fresh corms as raw material.
178 Konjac Glucomannan
FIGURE 6.6
Flowchart of wet-processing using common KF as raw material.
FIGURE 6.7
Flowchart of the combined wet and dry process.
liquid medium, some soluble impurities (e.g., some oligosaccharides and alkaloids) of the
KGM idioblast are dissolved gradually. Then, during the solid-liquid separation, the starch
dust will be filtered through filter cloth with a certain aperture size and soluble impurities
will be removed in the waste solution. At this moment, the first processing stage, the wet-
processing, is finished. In the second stage, the dry processing, the surface impurities of
the KGM idioblast will be removed constantly through the impact and friction between the
KGM granules and machine, and then separated by sifting, as shown in Figure 6.7.
Figure 6.7 shows that the first step consists of immersing the crushed tubers (but without
epidermis or subepidermal tissue) into a series of organic and inorganic solutions at a specific
concentration at which the macromolecules can expand without dissolving and becoming
mushy. The macromolecules can be broken up gradually and efficiently by a disintegrator and
their components separated. This is the wet processing stage, during which, the KGM gran-
ules will be purified by removing alkaloids, tannins, starch, sulphur, and other impurities.
180 Konjac Glucomannan
The second step, the dry processing stage, consists of grinding and sifting the KF obtained
during the first step following the specifications of the application in which it will be used.
A further separation of starch from the surface of the KGM granules occurs at this stage.
In brief, the first step is to purify the rough KF by the wet process, whereas the second
step is to separate the KF obtained from the first step by the dry process. The KF produced
by this two-stage technique is of good quality like that produced directly by wet pro-
cessing, but the production cost is much lower. At a large industrial scale, this technique
requires high-speed and high-capacity processing equipment for crushing raw tubers,
grinding and sifting granular material, and drying and recycling ethanol (Huang 2000;
Ishii and Kasuga 1991).
in accordance with the food material and the time required for inhibition of the browning
reaction (Taylor et al. 1986). However, these compounds have been restricted by the Food
and Drug Administration (FDA) due to the possibility of associated potential hazards to
human health.
The two most commonly used drying methods in wet processing, hot-air (pneu-
matic dryer) and vacuum drying, have their respective advantages and disadvantages.
The advantages of hot air drying are high speed (a few seconds) and high efficiency.
The inlet air temperature in the hot-air method is 120°C–150°C. Hence, a short drying
time is sufficient, and the quality of purified flour is not affected. The disadvantages of the
hot-air drying method are that the ethanol gas is not easy to collect and leaves a linger-
ing ethanol smell. As for vacuum drying method, the advantages are that ethanol vapour
is easy to recycle. In contrast, both process speed and efficiency are low. The long drying
time makes the KF darker and its viscosity lower. Therefore, vacuum drying cannot be
applied as a single drying stage.
In the first stage, the particles of the KF can freely flow in the drying air, while the
water-ethanol solution is rapidly vaporizing. In the hot air, the particles of the fresh
KF are dispersed into granular powder and transported in the stream of hot air. Wet
particulate materials that are dispersed and suspended in hot air flowing at a high
speed are subjected to a high rate of heat and mass transfer between the wet materials
and hot air. In the process, water and ethanol evaporate, the particulate materials enter
a cyclone separator and are collected at the bottom of the machine, while the exhaust
gases are vented. Because the airspeed in the pneumatic dryer is 20 ~ 30 m/s, the con-
tact time of the gas-solid is very short (about two seconds), so the powder is not likely
to be overdried.
In the second stage, the particles of the fresh KF are constantly moving, following the
rotation of the drying chamber. The heat transfer occurs through the internal surface of
the drying chamber, which is in direct contact with the particulate materials. Water and
ethanol will evaporate and be exhausted by a vacuum pump. In this process, due to the
action of the vacuum and uniform heating, water and ethanol will be removed completely.
A condenser is used for ethanol recycling.
Thus, in order to get the optimum results (complete recycling of ethanol, disappearance
of ethanol smell, and high efficiency), a combination of hot-air and vacuum drying are
recommended. The hot air removes the moisture quickly, resulting in the KF with a final
moisture content of about 10% wet basis; the vacuum dryer slowly removes the ethanol
vapours and smell from the product.
FIGURE 6.8
Flowchart of ethanol recycling.
2. In the course of vacuum drying: the principle of ethanol recycle is the same as
mentioned above. A condenser is connected to the exit of the exhaust gas for water
and ethanol vapour liquefaction. This liquid will be collected and recycled like
that from the waste water.
6.4.3 Packaging
A double-layer packaging is normally applied for the KF. The inner layer is a polyethyl-
ene film, and the outer layer consists of a woven polyethylene bag, paper, or laminate.
The product is kept in a dry and damp-proof enclosure without being exposed to sun-
shine. The optimum temperature should be below 25°C, and the relative humidity below
65%. If it is stored separately from other goods, the shelf life should be up to two years.
184 Konjac Glucomannan
temperature; type IV isotherms, for hydrophilic solids with swelling properties in which
adsorption continues until the maximum hydration of sites; and type V isotherms, for
mesoporous materials, such as charcoal (Basu et al. 2006; Ozturk & Takhar 2018). There are
many studies about moisture sorption isotherm as follows:
Palich and Ruszkowska (2007) studied the hygroscopicity of food concentrates with
the example of pea soup. The sorption isotherms were determined with a static
method. Samples were stored in hygrostats at a temperature of 20°C ± 1°C, with
saturated saline solutions with a water activity from 0.07 to 0.98 for 30 and 90 days
for croutons and powder samples, respectively. The results from this research
indicated that the sorption isotherms of croutons are corresponding to type II,
while the sorption isotherms for pea soup concentrate powder were the indirect
type between II and III according to the Brunauer’s classification.
Ozturk and Takhar (2018) reviewed the water transport in starchy foods and the
changes occurring in the functional properties, such as moisture sorption, swell-
ing, gelatinization, and glass transition characteristics of starchy foods. Starchy
foods presented type II (sigmoidal shaped) isotherms, which indicated that they
underwent multilayer adsorption.
Kruangam and Intipunya (2013) studied the sorption isotherm and quality changes
during the storage of a powdered longan cube. The results indicated that the sorp-
tion isotherm of the sample was adsorption isotherm. The moisture content of
the sample increased as the relative humidity increased. It was also found that
the longan cube was sensitive to the adsorption of water from the environment.
There were significant quality changes during storage including colour, solubil-
ity, water activity, and moisture content. The samples became gel-like and had a
darker colour when stored in a high relative humidity condition. The researchers
suggested that the longan cube should be packed in a low moisture permeable
packaging and stored at a relative humidity of 32%–43%.
Moisture sorption isotherms were also successfully studied using a static gravimetric
method for nixtamalized amaranth flour (Valdez-Niebla et al. 1993); maize flour (Oyelade
et al. 2008); chestnut and wheat flours (Moreira et al. 2010); ahipa and cassava flours and
starches (Doporto et al. 2012); tef (Eragrostis tef) grain flours (Abebe & Ronda 2015); spray-
dried pure orange juice powder (Sormoli & Langrish 2014); spray-dried tamarind pulp
powder (Muzaffar & Kumar 2016); by-products from the rice industry (Torres & Seijo 2016);
cassava bagasse (Polachini et al. 2016); extruded snacks (Wani & Kumar 2016); raw and
extruded whole meal sorghum flours (Galdeano et al. 2018); and chickpea, lentil, and yel-
low pea flours (Xu et al. 2019). According to the Brunauer, Emmett, and Teller classifica-
tion, the isotherms for all systems are type II isotherms (a sigmoidal shape isotherm),
which is generally observed in complex foods containing proteins and polysaccharides.
This type of isotherm can be classified into three regions: the first one for the monolayer
moisture, which is strongly bounded into the product matrix; the second is almost lin-
ear, corresponding to the multilayered water; and the third region is related to the free
water available for chemical reactions. These isotherms are influenced by temperature.
The Guggenheim, Anderson, and de Boer model nicely fit and gave the best result for all
experimental isotherms.
The structures of food materials are very complex, so the prediction of equilibrium
moisture content is difficult and can cause higher variations (Zapata et al. 2014). Thus,
186 Konjac Glucomannan
the mathematical models are used to correlate with experimental data to obtain semi-
empirical sorption isotherms. There are several models for describing the sorption behav-
iour. The Brunauer, Emmett, and Teller model is good at explaining multilayer sorption,
while the Guggenheim, Anderson, and de Boer model is known for its versatility (Zapata
et al. 2014). The Smith model is known for its ability to describe the sorption isotherms of
biopolymers like cellulose and starch (Smith 1947). The Halsey model provides a good rep-
resentation of the sorption behaviour of foods containing starch like corn flour (Andrade
et al. 2011). The Henderson model has been used for cereal grains (Zapata et al. 2014).
Konjac flour is a type of powder product, which has a polysaccharide base with hygro-
scopic properties to absorb water from the surrounding environment. Konjac powder is
very useful for both food and non-food industries, causing the world market to demand
large quantities of the konjac powder. Therefore, konjac powder manufacturers need to
increase the production capacity and stock a large quantity of konjac powder in order to
respond to the growing market demand. However, storing large quantities of konjac pow-
der in inappropriate conditions may affect its physical and chemical properties. Therefore,
it is necessary to study the optimum conditions for the storage of konjac flour. However,
no scientific evidence has been found regarding the suitable conditions for the storage of
konjac flour. Thus, the study of related research is important as a guideline for studying
the suitable conditions for konjac flour storage.
From the analysis of moisture absorption of konjac powder using the static gravimetric
method, it was found that the moisture content affects the moisture absorption of konjac
powder. The moisture content of konjac powder tends to increase steadily as the relative
humidity of the environment increases. The moisture absorption curve of konjac powder
is type II and called sigmoid or S-shape, which is a normal food (see Figure 6.9).
From the results of the experiment, it was found that the temperature, relative humid-
ity, and storage time affected the amount of free water of the konjac powder. A higher
temperature and relative humidity along with longer storage time resulted in the increase
in the amount of free water in the konjac powder due to the ability of konjac powder to
FIGURE 6.9
The moisture absorption curve of konjac powder.
Processing of Konjac Flour 187
absorb moisture from the surrounding air. However, when analysing the amount of free
water in konjac powder under the same relative humidity at different temperatures, it was
found that the konjac powder stored at high temperatures contained a lesser amount of
free water than konjac powder stored at low temperatures. This may suggest that a higher
temperature caused free water in the konjac powder to evaporate.
References
Abebe, W., & Ronda, F. (2015). Flowability, moisture sorption and thermal properties of tef (Eragrostis
tef (Zucc.) Trotter) grain flours. Journal of Cereal Science, 63: 14–20.
Ai, Y. & Ai, Y. (2000). The research on production technology and equipment for konjac gum.
Mountain Research and Development, 9: 38–40.
Andrade, R. D., Lemus, M. R., & Perez, C. C. E. (2011). Models of sorption isotherms for Food: Uses
and limitations. Vitae. Revista De La Facultad De Quimica Farmaceutica, 18(3): 324–333.
Basu, S., Shivhare, U. S., & Mujumdar, A. S. (2006). Models for sorption isotherms for foods: A review.
Drying Technology, 24(8): 917–930.
Brunauer, S., Deming, L. S., Deming, W. S., & Teller, E. (1940). On the theory of van der Waals adsorp-
tion of gases. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 62: 1723–1732.
Chong, Z. (1990). Konjac Science, Sichuan University Press, Chengdu, China, pp. 1–23, 118,119,131–135
(in Chinese translated by Gu Mingyuan).
Damodaran, S., Parkin, K.L., & Fennema, O. R. (2008). Fennema’s Food Chemistry, 4th edition, CRC
Press.
Domian, E., & Lenart, A. (2000). Steam adsorption through powdered food. Żywność, Nauka,
Technologia, Jakość, 4: 25–35.
Doporto, M. C., Dini, C., Mugridge, A., Viña, S. Z., & García, M. A. (2012). Physicochemical, ther-
mal and sorption properties of nutritionally differentiated flours and starches. Journal of Food
Engineering, 113: 569–576.
Ertugay, M. F., & Certel, M. (2000). Moisture sorption isotherms of cereals at different temperatures.
Nahrung, 44(2): 107–109.
Galdeano, M. C., Tonon, R. V., Piler de Carvalho, C. W., Menezes, N. S., Nogueira, R. I., Leal-Junior,
W. F., & Minguita, A. P. S. (2018). Moisture sorption isotherms of raw and extruded whole
meal sorghum flours studied by the dynamic and salt slurry methods. Brazilian Journal of Food
Technology, 21: e2017207.
Huang Z. (2005). Techniques and Facilities for Processing Konjac. China’s Light Industry Publishing
House, Beijing, China, Vol. 7, pp. 22–23 (in Chinese).
Huang, Z. (1997). Konjac flour processing technology, Countryside Practical Engineering Technology, 3:
78–80, 23–24 (in Chinese).
Huang, Z. (2000). Recycling of ethanol in the wet processing of konjac flour, Countryside Development,
9: 11 (in Chinese).
Ishii F. K. S., & Kasuga S. Y. (1991). Glucomannan Powder Production for Applications in Food,
Patent JP4258261 (in Japanese).
Iwatani, S. K. (1978). Powdered konjac product. Patents J88065297, J55092667 (in Japanese).
Jay, M. J. (1998). Modern Food Microbiology. Aspen Publishers, Gaithersburg, MD.
Kruangam, S., & Intipunya, P. (2013). A study of sorption isotherm and quality changes during stor-
age of powdered longan cube. Food and Applied Bioscience Journal, 1(2): 102–111.
Liu, P. (2004). Konjac, China Agriculture Press, Beijing, China, pp. 25, 48, 298, 314 (in Chinese).
Matsuzaki, R. (1992). Producing konjac powder, Japanese Patent JP6181703.
Ministry of Agriculture P. R. C. (2002). NY/Y 494—2002. China’s Agricultural Standard for Konjac.
Ministry of Agriculture of P.R. of China, Beijing, China (in Chinese).
188 Konjac Glucomannan
Moreira, R., Chenlo, F., Torres, M. D., & Prieto, D. M. (2010). Water adsorption and desorption iso-
therms of chestnut and wheat flours. Industrial Crops and Products, 32: 252–257.
Muzaffar, K., & Kumar, P. (2016). Moisture sorption isotherms and storage study of spray dried
tamarind pulp powder. Powder Technology, 291: 322–327.
Oyelade, O. J., Tunde-Akintunde, T. Y., Igbeka, J. C., Oke, M. O., & Raji, O. Y. (2008). Modelling mois-
ture sorption isotherms for maize flour. Journal of Stored Products Research, 44: 179–185.
Ozturk, O. K., & Takhar, P. S. (2018). Water transport in starchy foods: Experimental and mathemati-
cal aspects. Trends in Food Science & Technology, 78: 11–24.
Palich, P., & Ruszkowska, M. (2007). Hygroscopicity of food concentrates on the example of pea
soup. Polish Journal of Food and Nutrition Sciences, 57(3): 107–110.
Polachini, T. C., Betiol, L. F. L., Lopes-Filho, J. F., & Telis-Romero, J. (2016). Water adsorption iso-
therms and thermodynamic properties of cassava bagasse. Thermochimica Acta, 632: 79–85.
Smith, S. E. (1947). The sorption of water vapor by high polymers. Journal of the American Chemical
Society, 69(3): 646–651.
Sormoli, M. E., & Langrish, T. A. G. (2014). Moisture sorption isotherms and net isosteric heat of
sorption for spray-dried pure orange juice powder. LWT – Food Science and Technology, 62(1):
875–882.
Sun, Y., & Yang, Y. (1994). The processing technology of konjac flour, Patent ZL94116535.3 (in Chinese).
Taylor, S. L., Higley, N. A., & Bush, R. K. (1986). Sulfites in foods: Uses, analytical methods, resi-
dues, fate, exposure assessment, metabolism, toxicity, and hypersensitivity, Advances in Food
Research, 30: 1–76.
Torres, M. D., & Seijo, J. (2016). Water sorption behavior of by-products from the rice industry.
Industrial Crops and Products, 86: 273–278.
Valdez-Niebla, J. A., Paredes-López, O., Vargas-López, J. M., & Hernández-López, D. (1993). Moisture
sorption isotherms and other physicochemical properties of nixtamalized amaranth flour.
Food Chemistry, 46: 19–23.
Wani, S. A., & Kumar, P. (2016). Moisture sorption isotherms and evaluation of quality changes in
extruded snacks during storage. LWT – Food Science and Technology, 74: 448–455.
Wootton, A. N., Luker‐Brown, M., Westcott, R. J., & Cheetham, P. S. (1993). The extraction of a glu-
comannan polysaccharide from konjac corms (elephant yam, Amorphophallus rivieri). Journal of
the Science of Food and Agriculture, 61(4): 429–433.
Xu, M., Jin, Z., Simsek, S., Hall, G., Rao, J., & Chen, B. (2019). Effect of germination on the chemical
composition, thermal, pasting, and moisture sorption properties of flours from chickpea, len-
til, and yellow pea. Food Chemistry, 295: 579–587.
Zapata, M. J. E., Quintero, C. O. A., & Porras, B. L. D. (2014). Sorption isotherms for oat flakes (Avena
sativa L.). Agronomía Colombiana, 32(1): 52–58.
Zhang, D. (1994). A technique of processing purified konjac flour, Patent Number: ZL94104525.0: 3-4
(in Chinese).
7
Physico-Chemical Properties of Konjac
Glucomannan
CONTENTS
7.1 Structure of Konjac Glucomannan................................................................................... 189
7.1.1 Legislation in Europe............................................................................................. 190
7.1.2 Structure................................................................................................................... 190
7.1.3 Gelation Mechanism of Konjac............................................................................. 191
7.2 Physical Properties of Konjac Glucomannan.................................................................. 193
7.2.1 Water Solubility and Water Absorption.............................................................. 193
7.2.2 Thickening Agent................................................................................................... 195
7.2.3 Thermally Stable Gels............................................................................................ 197
7.3 Gelling Properties with Other Polysaccharides............................................................. 199
7.3.1 Starch-Konjac Mixed Systems............................................................................... 199
7.3.2 Encapsulation and Complexation......................................................................... 202
7.4 Structural Properties in Presence of Water and Cryoprotective Properties.............. 203
References...................................................................................................................................... 205
7.1.2 Structure
The primary component in konjac flour from the Amorphophallus konjac species is kon-
jac glucomannan (KGM), a high molecular polysaccharide, see Figure 7.1. It is a slightly
branched polysaccharide having a molecular weight of 200,000–2,000,000 Daltons (actual
molecular weight of KGM depends on the processing method and storage time of the raw
material) (Yuan 2017).
The polysaccharide glucomannan consists of a linear arrangement of β-D-glucose (G) and
β-D-mannose (M) residues linked by 1–4 linkages. They occur in an approximate ratio of
5:8. The basic polymeric repeating unit has the following pattern: GGMMGMMMMMGGM.
Short side chains of 11–16 monosaccharides occur at intervals of approximately 50–60 units
of the main chain, attached by 1–3 linkages. Acetate groups at the C-6 position occur at every
9–19 units along the linear chain. The hydrolysis of the acetate groups favours the formation
of inter-chain hydrogen bonds, a feature which is partly responsible for the formation of gels
and its subsequent high water-absorption capacity and voluminous expansion (Dorthe 2005).
Dorthe studied, in 2005, 28 representative samples of the main species of the konjac
(Amorphophallus sp) in Asia. The flours were compared according to the konjac species and
the purification treatment. These studies have shown that regardless of the species, the
molecular structure and molar mass of the KGM raw flours are similar. The KGM struc-
ture varies only according to the flour purification process. The composition of raw flours
seems to be independent of the konjac species.
TABLE 7.1
European Union Specifications for Konjac Glucomannan
Criteria Specifications
FIGURE 7.1
Chemical structure of konjac glucomannan according. (From Zhang, C. et al., Carbohydr. Polym., 104, 175–181,
2014.)
A structural model of the konjac glucomannan (mannose:glucose ratio 1.8:1) has been
proposed based on X-ray data and stereo-chemical constraints. The unit cell dimensions
of the orthorhombic I222 space group are a = 9.01, b = 16.73, and c (fibre axis) = 10.40Å.
The structure crystallises in the mannan II polymorphic form in which the backbone
conformation of two-fold helices and the chains are oriented in an anti-parallel fashion
(Ogawa 1991).
As a gelling agent, the konjac glucomannan is quite unique in its ability to form ther-
moreversible and thermoirreversible gels under different and well controlled conditions.
The solutions of the native konjac mannan do not form a gel because the acetyl content pre-
vents the polysaccharide chains from approaching and interacting strongly. However, gels
are obtained when the solution is heated at a pH of 9–10. These gels will remain stable to
heat and under repeated heating up to 200°C. When exposed to a slight alkaline environ-
ment, the konjac solution forms thermoirreversible gels after cooling from the hot solution.
The non-reversibility of the gel occurs from the removal of the acetate groups, and partial
structural crystallization occurs due to the formation of inter-chain hydrogen bonds.
The exact gelling mechanism requires additional investigations, but at least two impor-
tant factors are known. The first factor is the hydrogen bonds. In the presence of an alkaline
agent, the konjac glucomannan molecule irreversibly loses the acetyl groups of its molecule.
This deacetylation facilitates the establishment of hydrogen bonds between konjac glu-
comannan chains, resulting in the formation of a structured gel network (Alonso-Sande
Teijeiro-Osorio et al. 2009). The second factor is the establishment of hydrophobic interac-
tions between konjac glucomannan molecules (Figure 7.2) (Wang et al. 2015). The lowest
critical concentration of the konjac glucomannan required to form an alkaline gel is esti-
mated at 0.5% (Nishinari et al. 1992).
The gelation occurs after a period of induction. The induction period is defined as the sum
of the deacetylation step and the aggregation step. The speed of the induction period would
be related to the concentration of the hydroxyl ions. When the speed is fast, both steps seem
indistinguishable (Yoshimura and Nishinari 1999; Williams et al. 2000; Dorthe 2005).
A number of parameters affect the gelation mechanism and, consequently, the proper-
ties of the final structure of the gel: the degree of acetylation, the temperature, the con-
centration and the molecular weight of the konjac glucomannan, and the concentration of
basic elements. The specific influences of each parameter are described in Table 7.2.
Nishinari et al. (1992) showed that the gels formed by the addition of salts had a lower
texture compared to the alkaline gels. The amount of salts required for the gel formation
is much higher than the amount of alkaline compounds. The authors also report that the
alkaline agent is not required to form a gel if the concentration of the glucomannan konjac
is greater than 8%.
FIGURE 7.2
Mechanism of gelation of konjac glucomannan. (Alonso-Sande, M. et al., Eur. J. Pharm. Biopharm., 72, 453–462,
2009.)
Physico-Chemical Properties of Konjac Glucomannan 193
TABLE 7.2
Influence of Different Parameters on the Gelation Mechanism of Konjac Glucomannan
Evolution of the Parameters Helping the Formation of a Konjac
Glucomannan Gel Mechanism
FIGURE 7.3
Experimental adsorption isotherm of the KGM at 25°C. (From Xiao, M. et al., Carbohydr. Polym., 130, 1–8, 2015.)
The interpretation of the moisture adsorption isotherms, according to the GAB model,
showed that the mono-layer moisture content in the KGM was high (12.69 ± 0.57) and the
energy constant C was 4.14 (Xiao et al. 2015).
The value of solubility and water absorption for the KGM varied due to different experi-
mental conditions and biological variation in samples (Table 7.3).
This high water-sorption capacity of the KGM leads to high viscous properties.
TABLE 7.3
Variation of Solubility and Water Absorption Values for KGM Samples
Value of Solubility for Water Absorption
Samples KGM Value References
KGM (92.6% purity, 71 ± 0.02 g dry basis in 153.64 ± 4.70 g Tatirat et al. (2012)
Mw = 1.2 × 106 Da, sample water solution/g total water/g dry basis
solution = 0.5% (w/w)) dry basis
KGM 0.829 ± 0.00185 g dry basis Chen et al. (2011)
(Mw = 7.47 × 105 g mol−1, in water solution/g total
sample solution = 0.4% sample
(w/w))
KGM (sample 105.4 g/g Koroskenyi and
solution = 0.33% (w/w)) McCarthy (2001)
KGM (sample 100 g g−1 dry sample Liu et al. (2010)
solution = 0.33% (w/w))
KGM sample 0.380 ± 0.003 g dry 38.8 ± 0.32 g Xiao, Dai et al. (2015)
solution = 0.4% (w/w)). basis/100 mL water water/g dry basis
Physico-Chemical Properties of Konjac Glucomannan 195
FIGURE 7.4
The effect of shear rate on viscosity (η) of the KGM gum at different concentrations. (From Wang, C. et al., Phys.
Proc., 33, 25–30, 2012.)
TABLE 7.4
K and n Value of KGM Gum of Different Concentrations
Concentrations (% w/w) Viscosity Coefficient K/(mPa·s) Index n
In fact, the viscosity of a KGM solution increases exponentially according to the polymer
concentration: the viscosity of a KGM aqueous solution at 2% (w/w) is 12 times higher than
that of a solution of the KGM at 1% (w/w) (Takigami 2009).
However, Wang et al. (2008) studied the influence of the concentration of the KGM on the
viscosity of the KGM solutions. Their results showed that the KGM concentration of 0.2%
was the threshold to observe a change of viscosity.
The viscosity of the KGM solutions is also dependent on the stirring time: two hours of
stirring are required to reach the viscosity plateau (Takigami 2009).
Other authors studied the viscosity of 30% KGM solutions as a function of temperature
for various shear rates. Quite surprisingly, it was observed that the viscosity values did
not seem to depend on processing temperatures. So, according to the authors, the KGM
solutions (concentration of 10% to 30%) can be processed indifferently at temperatures
ranging from 50°C to 90°C and (Dave et al. 1998).
Physico-Chemical Properties of Konjac Glucomannan 197
FIGURE 7.5
Effect of shear rate on the viscosity of 1.00% KGM gum at different temperatures. (From Wang, C. et al., Phys.
Proc., 33, 25–30, 2012.)
TABLE 7.5
Relative Gel Strength Produced by Adding 10% Alkali Relative
to the Weight of Konjac in the Solution
Alkali Used % Relative Gel Strength Gel pH
exception of sodium hydroxide, the best results are obtained by adding 10% alkali relative
to the weight of the konjac in the sol (Table 7.5). The pH can be lowered to 9; however, more
heat is required at a lower pH. The selection of a specific base may be strongly influenced
by the formulation of the food and the desired label. After adding the base, the mixture
must not be agitated while the gel is forming (Thomas 1997).
The gel formation of the deacetylated KGM is also dependent on the ionic environment:
the effects of cations are less significant than those of anions on gelation.
The viscoelastic behaviour of the KGM gels were studied for various KGM concentra-
tions and at 25°C. At lower frequencies, the polymer solution showed liquid-like behaviour
(G” > G’) and at higher frequencies, solid-like behaviour (G’ > G”). This is due to that
fact that at lower frequencies, the polymer chains have enough time to disentangle and
at higher frequencies, i.e., at short time periods, the polymer chains cannot disentangle
and thus form a temporary network structure. The crossover frequency (the point where
G’ = G”) is shifting to a lower frequency with the increasing KGM concentration, which is
an indication of an enhancement of that temporary network (Almeida et al. 2018).
The elastic (G’) and viscous (G”) moduli were followed as a function of the tempera-
ture for various concentrations of the KGM solution. With the increasing concentration,
both moduli increased. At a low temperature, the elastic behaviour was dominant with
G’ > G”. When the temperature increased, G” > G’ showed the disentanglement of the
KGM chains. The gelation temperature or the gel–sol transition temperature is defined
as Theat (G’ = G”), and it shifted to higher temperatures as the concentration of the KGM
increased. Almeida et al. (2018) showed that the gel–sol transition temperature, Theat
(G’ = G”), increased linearly with the KGM concentration.
It was observed that the frequency dependence of the KGM solutions decreased as the
concentration increased, especially above 7%. The system then moved from a weak gel to a
relatively strong one (Dave et al. 1998).
Yin et al. (2008) studied the effect of different sodium salts (Na2SO4, NaCl, NaNO3,
NaSCN, and Na2CO3) on the gelation behaviour of the KGM. The influence of salts on the
gelation of the KGM was quite diversiform. Even in the absence of alkali, the salting-out
sodium sulphate was found to be capable of making the KGM form a thermally irrevers-
ible gel under neutral conditions upon heating, while sodium chloride, a weak salting-out
salt, sodium nitrate and sodium thiocyanate, salting-in salts, had no such role on the gela-
tion. Upon the addition of sodium sulphate, the behaviour of the KGM in water changed
Physico-Chemical Properties of Konjac Glucomannan 199
from a viscoelastic fluid at room temperature to an increasingly stiff gel at elevated tem-
peratures. The formation of the KGM gel in the presence of sodium sulphate alone may
imply a different gelation mechanism from that shown in the presence of sodium carbon-
ate via the deacetylation.
FIGURE 7.6
Gelatinization curves of corn starch-konjac systems. The viscosity of the 8% corn starch dispersion and disper-
sions containing 1%, 2%, and 3% KGM addition were obtained using a rheometer. The solid line corresponds to
the temperature profile. (Xu, Z. et al., J. Agric. Food Chem., 60, 658–664, 2012.)
(2005) investigated the effect of the konjac glucomannan (0.5%) on the gelatinization of
wheat starch by assaying the amount of solubilised amylose in the continuous phase by
spectrophotometric assay at a wavelength of 620 nm after staining with a solution of I2 KI.
The results show that little amylose has been solubilised. The results suggest that increas-
ing the viscosity of the continuous phase prevents the diffusion of the amylose out of the
starch granule, thereby decreasing the amount of amylose released.
The influence of adding 0.5% of the konjac glucomannan to the microscopic structure of
a rice starch gel (8%) was studied by Charoenrein et al. (2011). The matrices were coloured
with a solution of fluorescein isothiocyanate dextran, and then observed by confocal laser
scanning microscopy. In a rice matrix without the konjac glucomannan, the swollen starch
grains are close, facilitating their association (Figure 7.7a). The addition of 0.5% of the kon-
jac generates starch granules less inflated, equitably distributed, and therefore a less dense
network (Figure 7.7b).
A link can be made between these microscopic observations and dynamic rheologi-
cal measurements. Yoshimura and Nishinari (1997) studied the rheological properties of
mixed corn starch and konjac glucomannan suspensions (total concentration of 3.5% poly-
saccharide with ratios of corn starch/KGM of 10/0, 9/1, 8/2, 7/3, and 6/4). They showed
that the konjac glucomannan did not interact synergistically with corn starch to promote
the formation of an ordered structure. They obtained a composite gel where the KGM is
dispersed in the continuous phase. The rheological behaviour of the KGM-corn starch
mixtures is intermediate between a concentrated polymer solution and a weak gel.
Yoshimura and Nishinari (1996) studied the physical properties of mixed corn starch and
KGM gels (total polysaccharide concentration 15%, starch/KGM ratio 13.5/1.5) by dynamic
rheology and differential enthalpic analysis. The authors showed the effect of the KGM
on syneresis fluid. The water retention capacity of the KGM prevents the occurrence of
syneresis. The maize starch retrogradation is favoured by the KGM, which absorbs water
Physico-Chemical Properties of Konjac Glucomannan 201
FIGURE 7.7
Confocal electron scanning microscopy pictures of rice starch gel (8% m/m) in absence (a) and presence of 0.5%
of the konjac glucomannan (b) (scale = 20 μm). (Charoenrein, S. et al., Carbohydr. Polym., 83, 291–296, 2011.)
from the mixed gel during short-term storage (1–3 days). Beyond 7 days of storage, the ret-
rogradation of the maize starch is slowed down by the KGM. The KGM can interact with
amylose or amylopectin and prevent the formation of an ordered structure, thus delay-
ing the reorganization of amylopectin molecules. Similarly, Funami et al. (2005) observed
the retrogradation of a wheat starch-KGM mixed gel (0.5%) by differential scanning and
rheological analysis. They showed that due to the thickening properties of the KGM and
its water retention capacity, the amylose concentration in the continuous phase increases,
accelerating at ‘short-time’ the retrogradation, i.e., the amylose reorganization. On the
other hand, the KGM slows the retrogradation of starch ‘long-term’, i.e., the amylopectin
retrogradation. Xu et al. (2012) observed by differential enthalpic analysis that the KGM
delayed the retrogradation of the maize starch gels due to interactions between amylose
and the KGM.
Khanna and Tester (2006) also showed that the KGM inhibited amylopectin retrogra-
dation in starch after storage for 28 days at T < 5°C. The behaviour of the KGM is similar
to a physical barrier that prevents the association of the amylopectin chains. However,
depending on the botanical origin and the nature of the starch, the results vary. In fact,
the addition of 1% KGM almost completely inhibited the retrogradation of waxy maize
gels (0.4% amylose) and high amylose corn starch (63% amylose). In contrast, 10% of the
KGM was required to inhibit the retrogradation of corn starch gels. As for potato starch,
the retrogradation is gradually inhibited by the addition of the KGM, but to a lesser
extent.
Huang et al. (2007) studied the effect of increasing the amount of the KGM (0.1% to 0.4%)
on the rheological properties of the rice starch gels by the texture profile analysis method.
The results show no variation in the rheological parameters regardless of the concentra-
tion of the KGM. This result has been confirmed by Charoenrein et al. (2011). The authors
also showed that the addition of the KGM does not increase the firmness of the gels unlike
the addition of guar gum. This difference is due to the non-gelling property of the konjac
at low concentration or in the absence of alkaline substances.
202 Konjac Glucomannan
FIGURE 7.8
X-ray diffraction spectra of different starch-KGM-carvacrol mixes. (From Schwartz, J.M. et al., Food Hydrocoll.,
41, 71–78, 2014.) (1) Starch 5%, (2) starch 5% carvacrol 10%, (3) starch 5% KGM 0.2% carvacrol 10%, (4) starch 5%
KGM 0.6% carvacrol 10%, and (5) starch 5% KGM 1% carvacrol 10%.
References
Alloncle, M., J. Lefebvre, G. Llamas, and J. L. Doublier. (1989). A rheological characterization of cereal
starch-galactomannan mixtures. Cereal Chemistry 66: 90–93.
Almeida, N., L. Rakesh, et al. (2018). Viscoelastic properties of konjac glucomannan in the presence
of salts. Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry 131(3): 2547–2553.
Alonso-Sande, M., D. Teijeiro-Osorio, et al. (2009). Glucomannan, a promising polysaccharide for
biopharmaceutical purposes. The European Journal of Pharmaceutics and Biopharmaceutics 72(2):
453–462.
Arvisenet, G., P. Le Bail, A. Voilley, and N. Cayot. (2002). Influence of physicochemical interactions
between amylose and aroma compounds on the retention of aroma in food-like matrices.
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 50(24): 7088–7093.
Bahnassey, Y. A., and W. M. Breene. (1994). Rapid Visco-analyser (RVA) pasting profiles of wheat,
corn, waxy xorn, tapioca and amaranth starches (A. hypochondriacus and A. cruentus) in the
presence of konjac flour, gellan, guar, xanthan and locust bean gums. Starch 4: 134–141.
Charoenrein, S., O. Tatirat, et al. (2011). Effect of konjac glucomannan on syneresis, textural proper-
ties and the microstructure of frozen rice starch gels. Carbohydrate Polymers 83(1): 291–296.
Chen, J., J. Li, et al. (2011). Identification of molecular driving forces involved in the gelation of kon-
jac glucomannan: Effect of degree of deacetylation on hydrophobic association. Carbohydrate
Polymers 86(2): 865–871.
Chua, M., K. Chan, T. J. Hocking, P. J. Williams, C. J. Perry, and T. C. Baldwin. (2012). Methodologies
for the extraction and analysis of konjac glucomannan from corms of Amorphophallus konjac
K. Koch. Carbohydrate Polymers 87: 2202–2210.
Dave, V., M. Sheth, et al. (1998). Liquid crystalline, rheological and thermal properties of konjac glu-
comannan. Polymer 39(5): 1139–1148.
Dong-ying, X., S. Jia-rong, L. Zhengfu. (2008). J Guangxi Teachers Educ Univ (Nat Sci Edn) 1:
118–123.
Dorthe, S. (2005). Caractérisation de farines et de glucomannanes de konjac selon l’origine botanique
et le procédé de fabrication/purification: Composition des farines, structure moléculaire fine
des glucomannanes et propriétés rhéologiques. Thèse de doctorat en Chime moléculaire struc-
turale, Université Joseph Fourier-Grenoble 1.
Fang, W., and P. Wu. (2004). Variations of Konjac glucomannan from Amorphophallus konjac and its
refined powder in China. Food Hydrocolloids 18: 167–170.
Funami, T., Y. Kataoka, T. Omoto, Y. Goto, I. Asai, and K. Nishinari. (2005). Effects of non-ionic
polysaccharides on the gelatinization and retrogradation behavior of wheat starch. Food
Hydrocolloids 19: 1–3.
Huang, M., J. F. Kennedy, B. Li, X. Xu, and B. J. Xie. (2007). Characters of rice starch gel modified by
gellan, carrageenan, and glucomannan: A texture profile analysis study. Carbohydrate Polymers
69: 411–418.
Jacon, S. A., M. A. Rao, et al. (1993). The isolation and characterization of a water extract of konjac
flour gum. Carbohydrate Polymers 20(1): 35–41.
Jimenez-Colmenero, F., S. Cofrades, et al. (2013). Konjac gel for use as potential fat analogue for
healthier meat product development: Effect of chilled and frozen storage. Food Hydrocolloids
30(1): 351–357.
Kato, K., and K. Matsuda. (1969). Studies on chemical structure of konjacmannan. I. Isolation and
characterization of oligosaccharides from partial acid hydrolysate of mannan. Agricultural and
Biological Chemistry 42: 1446–1453.
Khanna, S., and R. F. Tester. (2006). Influence of purified konjac glucomannan on the gelatinization
and retrogradation properties of maize and potato starches. Food Hydrocolloids 20: 567–576.
Koroskenyi, B., and S. P. McCarthy. (2001). Synthesis of acetylated konjac glucomannan and effect of
degree of acetylation on water absorbency. Biomacromolecules 2(3): 824–826.
206 Konjac Glucomannan
Lafarge, C., L. Journaux, et al. (2017). Trapping of carvacrol by konjac glucomannan-potato starch gels:
Stability from macroscopic to microscopic scale, using image processing. Food Hydrocolloids 66:
216–226.
Lafarge, C., N. Cayot, C. Hory, L. Goncalves, C. Chassemont, and P. Le-Bail. (2014). Effect of kon-
jac glucomannan addition on aroma release in gels containing potato starch. Food Research
International 64: 412–419.
Li, B., J. Xia, et al. (2005). Grain-size effect on the structure and antiobesity activity of konjac flour.
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 53(19): 7404–7407.
Li, J., B. Li, et al. (2017). Ultrasonic degradation kinetics and rheological profiles of a food polysac-
charide (konjac glucomannan) in water. Food Hydrocolloids 70: 14–19.
Liu, F., X. Luo, et al. (2010). Adsorption of tannin from aqueous solution by deacetylated konjac glu-
comannan. Journal of Hazardous Materials 178(1): 844–850.
Luo, X. G., P. He, et al. (2013). The mechanism of sodium hydroxide solution promoting the gelation
of Konjac glucomannan (KGM). Food Hydrocolloids 30(1): 92–99.
Ni, X., F. Ke, et al. (2016). The control of ice crystal growth and effect on porous structure of konjac
glucomannan-based aerogels. International Journal of Biological Macromolecules 92: 1130–1135.
Nishinari, K., P. A. Williams, et al. (1992). Review of the physico-chemical characteristics and prop-
erties of konjac mannan. Food Hydrocolloids 6(2): 199–222.
Nussinovitch, A. (2004) Encapsulating liquid with hydrocolloid membrane stable from about K20 to
90°C without bursting. US Patent 6,680,184.
Official Journal of the European Union. (2012). Commission regulation (EU) No 231/2012 of 9 March
2012 laying down specifications for food additives listed in Annexes II and III to Regulation
(EC) No 1333/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council.
Ogawa, K., T. Yui, and T. Mizuno. (1991). X-ray diffraction study of glucomannans and their acetates.
Agricultural and Biological Chemistry 55(8): 2105–2111.
Ratcliffe, I., P. A. Williams, et al. (2005). Physicochemical characterization of konjac glucomannan.
Biomacromolecules 6(4): 1977–1986.
Schwartz, J. M., K. Le Bail, C. Garnier, G. Llamas, D. Queveau, B. Pontoire, G. Srzednicki, and
P. Le-Bail. (2014) Available water in konjac glucomannan – Starch mixtures: Influence on the
gelatinization, retrogradation and complexation properties of two starches. Food Hydrocolloids
41: 71–78.
Singh, S., G. Singh, et al. (2018). Mannans: An overview of properties and application in food prod-
ucts. International Journal of Biological Macromolecules 119: 79–95.
Takigami, S. (2009). 32 – Konjac mannan. Handbook of Hydrocolloids (2nd edn.). G. O. Phillips and
P. A. Williams (eds.), Woodhead Publishing, Cambridge, UK, pp. 889–901.
Tatirat, O., S. Charoenrein, et al. (2012). Physicochemical properties of extrusion-modified konjac
glucomannan. Carbohydrate Polymers 87(2): 1545–1551.
Thomas, W. R. (1997). Konjac gum. Thickening and Gelling Agents for Food. A. P. Imeson (ed.), Springer
US, Boston, MA, pp. 169–179.
Wang, C., M. Xu, et al. (2012). Study on rheological behavior of konjac glucomannan. Physics Procedia
33: 25–30.
Wang, Y., J. Liu, et al. (2015). Two natural glucomannan polymers, from Konjac and Bletilla, as bioac-
tive materials for pharmaceutical applications. Biotechnology Letters 37(1): 1–8.
Wang, Y.-L., Z. Li, et al. (2008). Rheology and influence factor of low-concentration Konjac gum solu-
tions. Journal of Central South University of Technology 15(1): 516–519.
Williams, M. A., T. J. Foster, D. R. Martin, I. T. Norton, M. Yoshimura, and K. Nishinari. (2000).
A molecular description of the gelation mechanism of konjac mannan. Biomacromolecules 1:
440–450.
Xiao, M., S. Dai, et al. (2015). Carboxymethyl modification of konjac glucomannan affects water bind-
ing properties. Carbohydrate Polymers 130: 1–8.
Xiong, G., W. Cheng, et al. (2009). Effects of konjac glucomannan on physicochemical properties of
myofibrillar protein and surimi gels from grass carp (Ctenopharyngodon idella). Food Chemistry
116(2): 413–418.
Physico-Chemical Properties of Konjac Glucomannan 207
Xu, Z., F. Zhong, Y. Li, C. F. Shoemaker, W. H. Yokoyama, and W. Xia. (2012). Effect of polysaccha-
rides on the gelatinization properties of cornstarch dispersions. Journal of Agricultural and Food
Chemistry 60: 658−664.
Yang, J., J. X. Xiao, and L. Z. Ding. (2009). An investigation into the application of konjac glucoman-
nan as a flavor encapsulant. European Food Research and Technology 229(3): 467–474.
Yuan, Y., X. Hong, R. Mu, J. Gong, L. Wang, R. Huang, J. Wu, Y. Ni, X. Wu, J. Pang. (2017). Structure and
properties of konjac glucomannan/galactoglucomannan nanofiber membrane. Macromolecular
Research 25(10): 963–970.
Yin, W. C., H. B. Zhang, et al. (2008). Effects of the lyotropic series salts on the gelation of konjac
glucomannan in aqueous solutions. Carbohydrate Polymers 74(1): 68–78.
Yoshimura, M., and K. Nishinari. (1999). Dynamic viscoelastic study on the gelation of konjac gluco-
mannan with different molecular weights. Food Hydrocolloids 13: 227–233.
Yoshimura, T., and K. Nishinari. (1996). Effects of konjac-glucomannan on the gelatinization and ret-
rogradation of corn starch as determined by rheology and differential scanning calorimetry.
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 44: 2970–2977.
Yoshimura, T., and K. Nishinari. (1997). Rheological studies on mixtures of corn starch and konjac
glucomannan. Carbohydrate Polymers 35: 71–79.
Zhang, C., J. D. Chen, et al. (2014). Konjac glucomannan, a promising polysaccharide for OCDDS.
Carbohydrate Polymers 104: 175–181.
Zhang, Y.-Q, B.-J. Xiea, and X. Gan. (2005). Advance in the applications of konjac glucomannan and
its derivatives. Carbohydrate Polymers 60: 27–31.
8
Advances in Drying Technology
CONTENTS
8.1 Advances in Drying Technology of Konjac Tubers....................................................... 209
8.2 Advances in Drying Technology of Konjac Flour.......................................................... 211
8.2.1 Multistage Drying.................................................................................................. 212
8.2.2 Centrifugal Technique Followed by Fluidized Bed Drying............................. 215
8.2.3 Microwave Vacuum Drying.................................................................................. 217
References...................................................................................................................................... 220
209
210 Konjac Glucomannan
FIGURE 8.1
Dry processing of konjac flour. (From Shimizu, N., and Shimahara, H., U.S. Patent No. 3767424, 1973.)
FIGURE 8.2
Schematic diagram of the experimental fluidised bed dryer used in the experiments.
Advances in Drying Technology 211
FIGURE 8.3
Drying curves of 10 mm cubes of konjac tubers at different drying temperatures in a fluidised bed dryer of
300 mm bed thickness.
made in Taiwan) was used to control the inlet air velocity. A digital thermometer with an
accuracy of ±0.1°C (Lutron TM-903, made in Taiwan) and type K thermocouple sensor was
used.
The konjac corms were cut into 10 mm cubes using a dicer (GZZT Model MH003 China).
The initial moisture content of the sample (265.49% dry basis, db) was dried down to the
equilibrium moisture content at about 5%–6% db. The drying temperatures of 50°C, 60°C,
and 70°C with the air velocity of 2.5 m/s and the bed depth of 300 mm were the conditions
in this study. Changes in the moisture content are shown in Figure 8.3. The drying time
until the moisture content reached the equilibrium moisture content was 230, 180, and
160 minutes at the drying temperatures of 50°C, 60°C, and 70°C, respectively.
FIGURE 8.4
Wet processing of konjac flour. (From Shimizu, N., and Shimahara, H., U.S. Patent No. 3767424, 1973.)
the grinding process. The water-miscible organic solvent may include methanol, ethanol,
propanol, acetone, and 5% of ethyl acetate-modified ethanol. N,N-dimethylformamide and
ethylene glycol dimethyl ether can also be used (Shimizu & Shimahara 1973).
The drying process for the wet extraction is important to turn the konjac slurry to pow-
der form. At this stage of drying, it is often called the secondary drying process. The com-
mon drying approach that is mostly practised, such as a hot air dryer, is inefficient and has
moderate to high energy consumption. Many researchers attempted to develop a better
drying process for drying the konjac flour for the secondary drying process of the konjac
flour. In the secondary drying process, finally, the moist konjac flour derived from the wet
extraction and purification step will undergo a drying process to become dried konjac
flour. At this stage, the improper handling of the drying process can significantly reduce
the quality of the konjac flour. The drying method, temperature, and time are the main
factors affecting the quality of the final product. Therefore, several researchers studied the
effects of drying the konjac with various degrees of success.
TABLE 8.1
Time When the Colour of Konjac Flour Changes from White to Yellowish During Hot Air Drying
Moisture Content of Konjac
Flour at Time t (min)
Time t for Colour Change of Temperature of Konjac
Drying Temp (°C) Konjac Flour (% db) Mt /Mia Flour at Time t (°C)
TABLE 8.2
Drying Conditions in Multistage Drying Process
No. Drying Temp (°C) Drying Time for Two Stage Drying (min) Total Drying Time* (min)
1 50 300 300
2 60 280 280
3 70 210 210
4 80 145 145
5 50 + 80 100 + 110 210
6 60 + 80 80 + 95 175
7 70 + 80 70 + 70 140
* Time to reduce moisture content to 8%–10% db, the moisture ratio (Mt/Mi) = 0.03.
reached about 40°C. After this period, the colour of the konjac flour changed only slightly
during drying process. Based on this observation, the multistage can be developed by
choosing a two-stage drying process.
The drying process can be divided into two periods including before and after the colour
change. The possible drying conditions are presented in Table 8.2.
The results in Figure 8.5 show that multistage drying leads to a considerable reduction
in viscosity, with the values differing significantly (p ≤ 0.05) from the values obtained
using the conventional hot air drying at a constant drying temperature. This seems to be
due to the changes in the air temperature during the multistage drying process. A high
temperature and unsuitable drying time can cause heat damage and adversely affect the
molecular structure of the KGM. The long chain KGM is likely to be damaged by heat.
This would result in the chain length reduction and the decrease in viscosity of its solu-
tion. In comparison, freeze drying can lead to a very high viscosity (15.35 Pas). This result
shows that the drying temperature has a large effect on the quality of the konjac flour.
However, there is a trend towards increased whiteness index value with increasing the
drying temperature. When comparing between drying methods, multistage drying, con-
ventional hot air drying at a constant drying temperature, and freeze drying, the results
show that multistage drying has significantly improved the whiteness index value of the
konjac flour, whereas the whiteness index value of the freeze dried sample was very low.
This seems to be due to the shorter drying time of multistage drying. The browning of
the KGM flour is caused by exposure to the hot air. As for the residual sulphur dioxide
214 Konjac Glucomannan
FIGURE 8.5
Effect of drying method and drying temperature on viscosity (a), whiteness index value (b), and sulphur diox-
ide residue content (c) of konjac flour from dried slices of A. muelleri after extraction and drying process. Letters
a, b, c on the bar graph indicate a statistically significant difference (p ≤0.05).
content, it was very low in this study and lower than the maximum limit in all samples.
In particular, the residual sulphur dioxide content in the multistage dried sample was
lower than in the conventional hot air and freeze dried samples, see results in Figure 8.5.
In addition, the maximum level of 1500 mg/kg (ppm) of sulphur dioxide is approved
by the Food and Drug Administration of Thailand for use in dried or preserved fruits
Advances in Drying Technology 215
and vegetables. However, the Japanese specifications and standards for foods and food
additives indicate the maximum limit of sulphur dioxide for use with the konjac flour as
900 mg/kg (Japan External Trade Organization 2011).
FIGURE 8.6
Schematic diagram of centrifugal moisture extractor consisting of (1) centrifugal bucket, (2) control box, (3)
motor, and (4) set power transmissions belt.
216 Konjac Glucomannan
FIGURE 8.7
Change in moisture content of konjac flour at different centrifugal forces.
The moisture reduction of the konjac flour is shown in Figure 8.7. The experimental
results from the centrifugation technique show that the centrifugal force did not affect
the moisture content of the konjac flour, in contrast to the centrifugation time that did
affect the moisture content of the konjac flour. The moisture content had rapidly decreased
within the first five minutes of centrifugation, and then remained constant. However, the
final moisture content was still high, and the material needed to be dried in a further step.
The fluidization technique is selected to be used for removing the remaining moisture
content in the konjac flour. This is possible due to the granular structure and high mois-
ture content of the sample, because this technique can remove moisture content rapidly.
The fluidised bed dryer (Figure 8.8) can rapidly reduce the moisture content, as every par-
ticle of the material is exposed to the drying air.
FIGURE 8.8
Schematic diagram of a fluidised bed dryer consisting of: (1) blower, (2) heater, (3) sieve, [120 mesh], (4) drying
chamber, and (5) sieve [120 mesh].
Advances in Drying Technology 217
FIGURE 8.9
Moisture content changes of konjac flour in fluidized bed at different temperatures.
TABLE 8.3
Viscosity of Konjac Flour After Drying
Drying temperature (°C) Drying time (min) Moisture content (%wet basis) Viscosity (cP)
Sun drying – 10.36 1212.39 ± 56.52d
100 3 9.43 1455.41 ± 100.40c
120 2.5 9.09 1918.71 ± 68.51a
140 2 9.78 1810.12 ± 108.83b
Means with the different letter within a column are significantly different (p ≤ 0.05) by DMRT.
The drying temperatures of 100°C, 120°C, and 140°C were applied for the fluidization
technique. The moisture content changes of the konjac flour during drying are presented in
Figure 8.9. The experimental results using the fluidised bed dryer showed that the drying
time of 2–3 minutes reduced the moisture content of the konjac flour to less than 10% wet basis.
The viscosity of the konjac flour was assessed. The results are shown in Table 8.3.
The drying temperature significantly affects the viscosity. The higher temperature reduces
the drying time.
However, the highest temperature might not be the best condition due to the viscosity
decrease.
the microwave heating, generate very rapid, low temperature drying (Yongsawatdigul &
Gunasekaran 1996; Zheng et al. 2013). Moreover, the absence of air during the drying may
inhibit oxidation, and therefore, the colour and nutrient contents of products can be largely
preserved (Nahimana & Zhang 2011; Cui et al. 2004; Kelen et al. 2006; McLoughlin et al.
2003; Sagar & Suresh 2010; Zielinska et al. 2013). Thus, a dried product with the qual-
ity equivalent to that of conventionally hot-air-dried materials can be obtained. Applying
the microwave energy under the vacuum combines the advantages of both vacuum dry-
ing and microwave drying, as far as improved energy efficiency and product quality are
concerned (Krokida & Maroulis 1999). However, most of the microwave-vacuum drying
studies focus on fruits and vegetables that need the ‘puffing’ characteristic to improve
the rehydration properties of the final product (Zhang et al. 2006). The quick microwave
energy absorption by the water molecules causes the rapid evaporation of the water from
the interior of the product towards the surface of the product, creating a flux of rapidly
escaping vapour, which helps in preventing the shrinkage and case hardening and induces
a more porous and puffing structure, thus improving the rehydration properties of the
dried materials. Markowski et al. (2009) found a higher rehydration ability for the samples
dried with microwaves under low pressure. Similar results are reported by Giri & Prasad
(2007a), who found that the rehydration properties are improved by drying at a lower
system pressure and higher microwave power, as indicated by the higher values of the
rehydration ratio. In particular, the microwave-vacuum drying techniques are reported to
be used successfully for the dehydration of many kinds of fruits and vegetables, such as
carrots (Cui et al. 2004, 2005; Nahimana & Zhang 2011), bananas (Maskan 2000; Mousa &
Farid 2002), wild cabbage (Yanyang et al. 2004), beetroot (Figiel 2010), garlic (Cui et al.
2003; Figiel 2006), mushrooms (Rodríguez et al. 2005; Giri & Prasad 2007a, 2007b), pota-
toes (Setiady et al. 2007; Song et al. 2007; Markowski et al. 2009; Song et al. 2009), mint
leaves (Therdthai & Zhou 2009), and green peas (Chauhan & Srivastava 2009; Zielinska
et al. 2013). These products possess excellent quality in terms of taste, aroma, texture, and
appearance. A number of researchers studied the effects of drying foodstuffs using this
technique with various degrees of success. The advantages of the microwave vacuum dry-
ing, especially in food and agricultural products are listed below (Kanlapong 2006):
• Efficiency: In most cases the energy couples into the solvent, not the substrate.
• Non-destructive: Drying can be done at low ambient temperatures; no need to
maintain high surface temperatures. This leads to lower thermal profiles.
• Reduction of migration: Solvents are often mobilised as a vapour, thereby are
not transporting other materials to the surface.
• Levelling effects: Coupling among wetter areas.
• Speed: Drying time can be shortened by 50% and more.
• Uniformity of drying: By a combination of more uniform thermal profiles and
levelling.
• Conveyor systems, less floor space, reduced handling: No need for batch process-
ing in most cases.
• Product improvement in some cases: Eliminates case hardening, internal stresses, etc.
in the microwave field can lead to high temperatures in some regions and cause product
degradation (Lu et al. 1999). However, various ways of averaging the microwave field to
improve uniformity have been achieved by such means as mechanical movement (Torringa
et al. 1996), pneumatic agitation such as in a fluidized bed dryer (Kudra 1989), or spouted
bed dryers (Feng & Tang 1998). Some of the limitations are specific sample size and shape
(Liamkaew 2006). For industrial applications, it is difficult to dry large sizes of food and
agricultural products in the flow process because of the microwave penetration and micro-
wave leakage. The shape and size of objects heated by the microwave irradiation have much
greater and completely different impacts on the temperature distribution than the classical
means of heating. The microwave energy is produced directly in the heated material, so the
interior of the object can be heated to a higher temperature than near the surface, especially
for solids, such as frozen meat with low thermal conductivity. A number of researchers stud-
ied the effects of drying foodstuffs using this technique with various degrees of success.
In the case of the konjac flour, studies have been conducted to compare the effects of dry-
ing by various methods, such as hot air drying, multistage hot air drying, freeze drying, and
microwave-vacuum drying and related conditions on various physical quality attributes.
Those were water activity, Hunter value, whiteness index, bulk density, particle density,
porosity, apparent viscosity, glucomannan content, sulphur dioxide residues, the structure
characterization of the glucomannan flour by using the Scanning Electron Microscope
(SEM), image analyzer, and Fourier Transform Infrared (FTIR). The results from that experi-
ment indicated that the drying method had an effect on several important properties of
the konjac flour. The microwave vacuum drying seems to affect significantly physical and
structural properties of the konjac flour. This drying method decreased the bulk density
and particle density and increased the porosity of dehydrated products compared to the
conventional hot air drying. Application of the microwave vacuum drying was beneficial in
terms of reducing the processing times required and increasing the viscosity of the konjac
glucomannan solution. The highest viscosity was found after using the microwave vacuum
drying at 1440 W for 7.5 minutes. The porosity of the konjac glucomannan particles and the
viscosity of the konjac glucomannan solution seem to be related. The changes in the viscos-
ity and porosity occur in the same direction and are related to the drying conditions. It can
be observed that increasing the microwave power tends to increase the evaporation rate,
creating a flux of rapidly escaping vapour, which leads to a higher porosity. As a result, an
increase in the porosity leads the konjac glucomannan particles to absorb more water and
swell. The volume change of the konjac glucomannan particles during the water absorption
may affect the viscosity of the konjac glucomannan solution. Therefore, the more porous
granules produce more viscous solution. Similar result of the swelling in biological material
has been studied in the pharmaceutical field by Ek et al. (1995) and Hedenus et al. (2000).
They found that the porous cellulose beads were considered as a three-dimensional skeletal
fibre system on which the liquid can be taken up, both, in the pores between fibres and in the
solid fibre matrix itself. Moreover, the authors found that the pore size in the cellulose beads
almost doubled when the beads were soaked with water. For this reason, the hot-air-dried
samples with low porosity will result in a less viscous liquid. The particle shape of the konjac
flour is also an important factor affecting the viscosity of the konjac glucomannan solution.
Figure 8.10a and b shows that the microwave vacuum dried konjac flour samples have
an irregular particle shape with a rough surface. In contrast, the hot-air-dried konjac flour
sample has an oval shape with a quite smooth surface. It seems that the cavities were gener-
ated inside the particles of the konjac flour during the microwave vacuum drying process.
During the microwave vacuum drying, the heat was generated and the water was evapo-
rated to the outside of the konjac granules. Thus, the konjac granules were ruptured and
220 Konjac Glucomannan
(a) (b)
FIGURE 8.10
Scanning electron micrographs of the konjac glucomannan granules after drying using a hot-air dryer at
(a) 50°C; and a microwave vacuum dryer at the power level of 1440 W (b) to the same final moisture content
5–6% db. The konjac glucomannan particle structure is shown at 350× magnification.
showed a rough shape. Hence, the ratio of the surface area to the volume of the granules
has increased and contributed to the increased viscosity of the konjac solution. In contrast,
a spherical shape possesses a minimum surface area to volume ratio resulting in reduced
cohesive forces and improved flow ability of the solution. The macrostructure observations
revealed the presence of the pores in the granules of the microwave vacuum dried kon-
jac glucomannan samples, whereas the hot-air-dried samples maintained a tightly packed
structure like in a commercial product. The colour degradation during the microwave vac-
uum drying was caused by a browning reaction. Although the microwave vacuum drying
resulted in the konjac glucomannan flour being slightly darker, the samples had a uniform
colour and no overheating or burnt spots were observed by the naked eye and no signifi-
cant difference was observed when the samples were used in the solution in food and other
applications. Given its advantages, the microwave vacuum drying has the potential for
adoption in the konjac flour industry. Using the microwave vacuum drying at a power level
of 1440 W for 7.5 minutes resulted in the best quality of the konjac flour within the range of
experimental conditions studied and provided a comparable result with the first grade of
common konjac flour in the industrial standard of China (Impaprasert et al. 2014).
References
Chauhan, A. K., & Srivastava, A. K. (2009). Optimizing Drying Conditions for Vacuum-Assisted
Microwave Drying of Green Peas (Pisum sativum L.). Drying Technology: An International Journal,
27(6), 761–769. doi:10.1080/07373930902828120.
Chua, M., Chan, K., Hocking, T. J., Williams, P. A., Perry. C. J., & Baldwin. C. (2012). Methodologies
for the Extraction and Analysis of Konjac Glucomannan from Corms of Amorphophallus konjac
K. Koch. Carbohydrate Polymers, 87, 2202–2210.
Cui, Z. W., Xu, S. Y., & Sun, D. W. (2003). Dehydration of Garlic Slices by Combined Microwave-
Vacuum and Air Drying. Drying Technology: An International Journal, 21(7), 1173–1184.
doi:10.1081/drt-120023174.
Advances in Drying Technology 221
Cui, Z. W., Xu, S. Y., & Sun, D. W. (2004). Effect of Microwave-Vacuum Drying on the Carotenoids
Retention of Carrot Slices and Chlorophyll Retention of Chinese Chive Leaves. Drying
Technology, 22(3), 563–575. doi:10.1081/drt-120030001
Cui, Z., Xu, S., Sun, D., & Chen, W. (2005). Temperature Changes during Microwave-Vacuum Drying
of Sliced Carrots. Drying Technology: An International Journal, 23(5), 1057–1074.
Ek, R., Lennholm, H., Davidson, R., Nystrom, C., & Ragnarsson, G. (1995). Pore Swelling in Beads
Made of Cellulose Fibers and Fiber Fragments. International Journal of Pharmaceutics, 122, 49–56.
Feng, H., & Tang, J. (1998). Microwave Finish Drying of Diced Apples in a Spouted Bed. Journal of
Food Science, 63(4), 679–683.
Figiel, A. (2006). Drying Kinetics and Drying Shrinkage of Garlic Subjected to Vacuum Microwave
Dehydration. Acta Agrophysica, 7(1), 49–58.
Figiel, A. (2010). Drying Kinetics and Quality of Beetroots Dehydrated by Combination of Convective
and Vacuum-Microwave Methods. Journal of Food Engineering, 98(4), 461–470. doi:10.1016/j.
jfoodeng.2010.01.029.
Giri, S. K., & Prasad, S. (2007a). Drying Kinetics and Rehydration Characteristics of Microwave-
Vacuum and Convective Hot-Air Dried Mushrooms. Journal of Food Engineering, 78(2), 512–521.
doi:10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2005.10.021.
Giri, S. K., & Prasad, S. (2007b). Optimization of Microwave-Vacuum Drying of Button Mushrooms
Using Response-Surface Methodology. Drying Technology: An International Journal, 25(5),
901–911. doi:10.1080/07373930701370407.
Hedenus, P., Stromme Mattsson, M., Niklasson, G. A., Camber, O., & Ek, R. (2000). Characterization
of Instantaneous Water Absorption Properties of Pharmaceutical Excipients. International
Journal of Pharmaceutics, 202, 141–149.
Impaprasert, R., Borompichaichartkul, C., & Srzednicki, G. (2014). A New Drying Approach to
Enhance Quality of Konjac Glucomannan Extracted from Amorphophallus muelleri. Drying
Technology, 32, 851–860.
Impaprasert, R., Borompichaichartkul, C., Srzednicki, G., Zhao, J., & Yu, L. (2013). Improving
Production of Purified Konjac Glucomannan from Amorphophallus muelleri by multistage dry-
ing. Acta Horticulturae, 1011, 155–162.
Japan External Trade Organization. (2011). Japanese Specifications and Standards for Foods and
Food Additives. Available from www.jetro.go.jp/en/ [Accessed 22 August 2012].
Kanlapong, A. (2006). Rapid Dehydration of Carrot Pulp by Using Microwave Vacuum Dryer.
(The Degree of Master of Engineering (Food Engineering)), King Mongkut’s University of
Technology Thonburi, Bangkok, Thailand.
Kelen, A., Ress, S., Nagy, T., Pallai, E., & Pintye-Hodi, K. (2006). Mapping of Temperature Distribution
in Pharmaceutical Microwave Vacuum Drying. Powder Technology, 162(2), 133–137.
Krokida, M. K., & Maroulis, Z. B. (1999). Effect of Microwave Drying on Some Quality Properties of
Dehydrated Products. Drying Technology, 17(3), 449–466. doi:10.1080/07373939908917545.
Krokida, M. K., Tsami, E., & Maroulis, Z. B. (1998). Kinetics on Color Changes During Drying of
Some Fruits and Vegetables. Drying Technology, 16(3–5), 667–685.
Kudra, T. (1989). Dielectric Drying of Particulate Materials in a Fluidized State. Drying Technology:
An International Journal, 7(1), 17–34.
Kudra, T., & Mujumdar, A. S. (2009). Hybrid Drying Technologies Advanced Drying Technologies, 2nd ed.
(pp. 462). New York: CRC Press, Taylor & Francis Group.
Liamkaew, R. (2006). Application of Microwave Vacuum on Drying Pumpkin Slices. (Master of
Engineering), King Mongkut’s University of Technology Thonburi, Bangkok, Thailand.
Lin, T. M., Durance, T. D., & Scaman, C. H. (1998). Characterization of Vacuum Microwave, Air and
Freeze Dried Carrot Slices. Food Research International, 31(2), 111–117.
Lu, L., Tang, J., & Pan, X. (1999). Temperature and Moisture Changes During Microwave Drying of
Sliced Food. Drying Technology: An International Journal, 17(3), 413–432.
Markowski, M., Bondaruk, J., & Błaszczak, W. (2009). Rehydration Behavior of Vacuum-
Microwave-Dried Potato Cubes. Drying Technology: An International Journal, 27(2), 296–305.
doi:10.1080/07373930802606600.
222 Konjac Glucomannan
Maskan, M. (2000). Microwave/Air and Microwave Finish Drying of Banana. Journal of Food
Engineering, 44(2), 71–78.
McLoughlin, C. M., McMinn, W. A. M., & Magee, T. R. A. (2003). Microwave-Vacuum Drying of
Pharmaceutical Powders. Drying Technology, 21(9), 1719–1733. doi:10.1081/drt-120025505
Montreepila, M. (2018). Drying of Konjac Corm Using Fluidization Technique. Doctoral disserta-
tion in Mechanical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Maha Sarakham Univerity, Maha
Sarakham, Thailand. 173 p.
Mousa, N., & Farid, M. (2002). Microwave Vacuum Drying of Banana Slices. Drying Technology: An
International Journal, 20(10), 2055–2066. doi:10.1081/drt-120015584.
Mullin, J. (1995). Microwave processing. In Gould G. W. (Ed.), New Methods of Food Preservation
(pp. 112–134). Glasgow, UK: Blackie Academic and Professional.
Nahimana, H., & Zhang, M. (2011). Shrinkage and Color Change During Microwave Vacuum Drying
of Carrot. Drying Technology, 29(7), 836–847.
Noanlumduan, W. (2013). Two-stage dehydration of konjac flour using centrifugal technique and
fluidized bed drying. Master’s thesis in Mechanical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering,
Maha Sarakham University, Maha Sarakham, Thailand, 96 p.
Rodríguez, R., Lombraña, J. I., Kamel, M., & de Elvira, C. (2005). Kinetic and Quality Study of
Mushroom Drying Under Microwave and Vacuum. Drying Technology: An International Journal,
23(9–11), 2197–2213. doi:10.1080/07373930500212685.
Sagar, V. R., and Suresh, K. P. (2010). Recent Advances in Drying and Dehydration of Fruits and
Vegetables: A Review. Journal of Food Science and Technology, 47(1), 15–26.
Setiady, D., Clary, C., Younce, F., & Rasco, B. A. (2007). Optimizing Drying Conditions for Microwave-
Vacuum (MIVAC®) Drying of Russet Potatoes (Solanum tuberosum). Drying Technology: An
International Journal, 25(9), 1483–1489. doi:10.1080/07373930701537187.
Shimizu, N., & Shimahara, H. (1973). Method of selective separation of konjac flour from the tubers
of amorphophallus konjac. U.S. Patent No. 3767424.
Song, X., Zhang, M., & Mujumdar, A. S. (2007). Effect of Vacuum-Microwave Predrying on Quality
of Vacuum-Fried Potato Chips. Drying Technology: An International Journal, 25(12), 2021–2026.
doi:10.1080/07373930701728703.
Song, X., Zhang, M., Mujumdar, A. S., & Fan, L. (2009). Drying Characteristics and Kinetics of
Vacuum Microwave–Dried Potato Slices. Drying Technology: An International Journal, 27(9), 969–
974. doi:10.1080/07373930902902099.
Therdthai, N., & Zhou, W. (2009). Characterization of Microwave Vacuum Drying and Hot Air
Drying of Mint Leaves (Mentha cordifolia Opiz ex Fresen). Journal of Food Engineering, 91, 482–
489. doi:10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2008.09.031.
Torringa, H. M., Van, Dijk, E. J., & Bartels, P.V. (1996). Microwave Puffing of Vegetables: Modelling
and Measurements. Paper Presented at the Proceedings of the 31st Microwave Power Symposium,
Boston, MA.
Vadivambal, R., & Jayas, D. S. (2007). Changes in Quality of Microwave-Treated Agricultural
Products-A Review. Biosystems Engineering, 98(1), 1–16. doi:10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2007.06.006
Yanyang, X., Min, Z., Mujumdar, A. S., Le-qun, Z., & Jin-cai, S. (2004). Studies on Hot Air and
Microwave Vacuum Drying of Wild Cabbage. Drying Technology: An International Journal, 22(9),
2201–2209. doi:10.1081/LDRT-200034275.
Yongsawatdigul, J., & Gunasekaran, S. (1996). Microwave Vacuum Drying of Cranberries: Part I.
Energy use and efficiency. Journal of Food Processing and Preservation, 20(1), 121–143.
Zhang, M., Tang, J., Mujumdar, A. S., & Wang, S. (2006). Trends in Microwave-Related Drying of Fruits
and Vegetables. Trends in Food Science & Technology, 17(10), 524–534. doi:10.1016/j.tifs.2006.04.011.
Zheng, X., Wang, Y., Liu, C., Sun, J., Liu, B., Zhang, B., Lin, Z., Sun, Y., & Liu, H. (2013). Microwave
Energy Absorption Behavior of Foamed Berry Puree Under Microwave Drying Conditions.
Drying Technology, 31(7), 785–794.
Zielinska, M., Zapotoczny, P., Alves-Filho, O., Eikevik, T. M., & Blaszczak, W. (2013). A Multi-
stage Combined Heat Pump and Microwave Vacuum Drying of Green Peas. Journal of Food
Engineering, 115(3), 347–356. doi:10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2012.10.047.
9
Konjac Industry in Major Producing Countries
CONTENTS
9.1 Konjac Industry in China.................................................................................................. 224
9.1.1 Developments in the Field Production................................................................ 224
9.1.1.1 Planting Area............................................................................................ 224
9.1.1.2 Variety Breeding...................................................................................... 224
9.1.1.3 Disease Prevention................................................................................... 226
9.1.1.4 Planting Mode.......................................................................................... 226
9.1.1.5 Planting Standardization........................................................................ 227
9.1.1.6 Major Planting Areas............................................................................... 228
9.1.1.7 Development Guidelines for Planting Industry.................................. 228
9.1.2 Current Techniques in Processing Industry....................................................... 228
9.1.2.1 Developments in Drying Techniques................................................... 228
9.1.2.2 Standards for Sulphur Dioxide Content............................................... 229
9.1.2.3 Environmental Compliance Standards................................................. 229
9.1.2.4 Impact on China of the Emergence of Konjac Production in
Southeast Asia.......................................................................................... 229
9.1.3 Development of Konjac Derived Products.......................................................... 230
9.1.3.1 Konjac Glucomannan as a Gelling Agent in the Food Industry....... 230
9.1.3.2 Product Development in Food and Other Areas................................ 230
9.1.3.3 Synchronized Expansion of Domestic and International Markets...... 230
9.1.4 The Guiding Role of National Macro-Policy....................................................... 231
9.1.4.1 Impact of Agricultural Industrialization on the Konjac Industry
in China..................................................................................................... 231
9.1.4.2 Konjac Industry Links with the National Strategy of Poverty
Alleviation................................................................................................. 231
9.1.4.3 Promotion of Konjac Products by the Healthcare Industry............... 232
9.1.5 Coordination and Management of the Industrial Associations...................... 232
9.1.5.1 Cooperation Between Key Players in the Konjac Industry................ 232
9.1.5.2 Seminars and Conferences Conducted Recently on
Konjac-Related Themes........................................................................... 232
9.1.5.3 Publicizing Konjac Industry................................................................... 233
9.1.6 Scientific Research and International Exchanges..............................................234
9.1.6.1 Scientific and Technological Achievements.........................................234
9.1.6.2 Role of International Exchanges in Konjac Industry Development..... 237
9.1.7 Market Prices........................................................................................................... 237
223
224 Konjac Glucomannan
TABLE 9.1
Planting Area of Konjac from 2008 to 2017 (unit: 10,000 mu)
Year
Type 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
A. konjac 90 100 110 120 140 150 160 170 175 185
A. albus 12 14 15 20 30 35 40 45 50 50
Total area 102 114 125 140 170 185 200 215 225 235
University in Chongqing has published DUS Test Guide for New Plant Varieties: Konjac (dis-
tinctiveness, uniformity, and stability of certain agricultural and vegetable plants) and
established the criteria for the selection of the subsequent new plant varieties. As a result,
five new varieties of the A. konjac, one new hybrid variety, and three new varieties of the
yellow konjac were bred (see Table 9.2). The new varieties mentioned above showed great
resistance to water stress and disease and were gradually promoted and expanded in suit-
able areas.
TABLE 9.2
New Konjac Varieties Bred Between 2007 and 2017
Species/
No. Variety Name Year License No. Completed by Involved Scientists
8 Mi-le II 2014 2014015 Xishuangbanna Seed Management Jian Li, Ling Wang, Tao
Station, Biotechnology and Sun, Jun Wang, Jiqiong
Germplasm Resources Institute, Ma, Shibin Wu, Fan
Yunnan Academy of Agric. Sc., Gao, etc.
Xishuangbanna Dai Autonomous
Prefecture Institute of Agric. Sc.
9 Mi-le III 2014 2014016 Xishuangbanna Dai Autonomous Tao Sun, Ling Wang
Prefecture Institute of Agric. Sc., Yanping Chem, Jian Li,
Biotechnology and Germplasm Guifang Yin, Xiaoyun
Resources Institute, Yunnan Jiang, Jiqiong Ma
Academy of Agric. Sc.,
Xishuangbanna Seed Management
Station
TABLE 9.3
Standards for Konjac Planting Industry
Standard
No. Standard Name Standard No. Level Completed Company
1 Local standard for DB6109/T9.(1~5)–2013 Ankang City Qinba Konjac Research and
selenium-enriched konjac Standard Development Center
cultivation soil in Ankang Ankang Agriculture Technical
Center, Ankang College
2 Determination of main DB42/T 1003–2014 Hubei Academy of Yichang Agricultural
diseases of konjac and Province Science
technical specifications Standard Academy of Enshi Agricultural
for integrated control Science
3 Technical rules for healthy DB42/T 1181–2016 Province Economic Institute of Hubei
cultivation of alpine Standard Agricultural Science, Academy of
vegetable konjac Enshi Agricultural Science,
Academy of Yichang Agricultural
Science
4 Technical rules for konjac DB42/T 1002–2014 Province Academy of Yichang Agricultural
variety test Standard Science, Academy of Enshi
Agricultural Science, Agreements
on Konjac Industry in Hubei
5 Technical rules for DB42/T841–2012 Province Hubei Jianshi Nongtai Industry Co.,
cultivation of eco Standard Ltd., Academy of Enshi Agric. Sci.,
food – konjac Academy of Yichang Agric.l Sci.,
Administration for Jianshi Science
and Technology and Administration
for Jianshi Quality Control
6 Jinyang technical rules for DB513430/T22–2014 District Jinyang A. albus Office
cultivation of konjac Standard
7 Fuyuan konjac DG5303/T5.1~8–2013 Agriculture Fuyuan Konjac Research Institute
comprehensive standard Standard in
Qujing
8 Fuyuan specification for DG5303/T5.1–2013 Agriculture Fuyuan Konjac Research Institute
cultivation of A. konjac Standard in
(seed and food corm) Qujing
9 Technical rules for storage, Q/FYQ3–2012 Company Fuyuan Jindi Konjac Seed Industry
packaging, and Standard Co., Ltd.
transportation of konjac
seed corn
10 Fuyuan technical rules for Q/FYQ2–2012 Company Fuyuan Jindi Konjac Seed Industry
konjac seed corn Standard Co., Ltd.
propagation
11 Fuyuan A. konjac corm Q/FYQ1–2012 Company Fuyuan Jindi Konjac Seed Industry
(seed and food corm) Standard Co., Ltd.
12 Technical regulations for N75–2012 District Yongshan Konjac Office and
cultivation of pollution- Standard Research Center
free A. albus in Yongshan
228 Konjac Glucomannan
of the konjac slices supplied for further processing, but also improved their quality, espe-
cially colour. This could be achieved with the help of sulphur fumigation during the dry-
ing process.
They built factories to purchase and process fresh konjac in Southeast Asian countries,
such as Myanmar, Laos, Thailand, Indonesia, etc. In the past 10 years, the konjac process-
ing industry has grown rapidly in those countries. Southeast Asia became the third biggest
platform for konjac processing after China and Japan. The rise of the processing industry
in Southeast Asian countries had a marked impact on the konjac flour market in China.
On the one hand, it complements the Chinese domestic processed konjac food market, but
on the other hand, it will decrease the opportunities of exporting konjac food to Japan as
Japan will import refined konjac flour from Southeast Asian countries. Therefore, attention
should be paid to further improving the konjac processing industry in China.
export market did not rise concurrently. The profits were further reduced because of the
low exchange rate of the Japanese yen. On the one hand, the Chinese konjac product man-
ufacturers controlled costs by technological improvement, product innovation, and good
management, on the other hand, they paid more attention to the expansion of European,
American, Australian, and domestic markets in the crisis period. Currently, besides the
traditional exports of konjac shred to Japan, the export of konjac products, including konjac
shred and konjac pancake to Europe, America, and Australia have rapidly expanded, and
the products were well accepted. Based on the wide recognition of traditional konjac tofu
in the domestic market, people gradually understood the importance of the konjac func-
tional food rich in high-quality dietary fibre. As a result, the consumption of konjac shreds,
konjac snack foods, konjac dietary fibre granules, and other products is increasing.
9.1.4.2 Konjac Industry Links with the National Strategy of Poverty Alleviation
Since 2013, poverty alleviation has become a hot social issue. The Chinese government has
promulgated a series of relevant policies to target poverty alleviation. The government has
also devised a detailed work plan focusing on poverty alleviation, which promoted the
idea of ‘Targeted poverty alleviation’. The mountainous areas inhabited by the minorities
in central and western China are characterized by relatively poor natural conditions and
a large proportion of the population with scarce economic resources. The number of eco-
nomic crops suitable for these areas is rather limited. However, konjac can be planted and
successfully grown in these areas according to the local conditions. Therefore, Yunnan,
Sichuan, Shaanxi, Hubei, Chongqing, Guizhou, Hunan, and few other provinces have
devised a series of practical measures to develop the konjac industry and promote targeted
poverty alleviation. At the same time, the recent developments in the konjac industry in
various regions have opened new perspectives for profitable konjac production within the
scope of the targeted poverty alleviation policy.
232 Konjac Glucomannan
TABLE 9.4
Recent Technical Meetings Related to Konjac Industry in China
Date Venue Theme
such as a konjac photography exhibition and annual ‘King of konjac’ selection to publicise
the konjac industry. The association calls on all members to make full use of all media to
publicise the konjac industry. In the past 10 years, the konjac industry was frequently the
object of reports and was publicised by CCTV, local TV stations, and network platforms.
On this basis, the association changed the original internal periodical ‘China Konjac
Newsletter’ into ‘China Konjac’ in 2012. The periodicals were colour printed. In order to
promote the publicity of the konjac industry in China, some information platforms were
established in the periodicals, including hot spot focus, industry dynamics, konjac cul-
ture, etc. From the 17th to 19th of July 2014, the konjac association held the first East-West
Konjac Industry Summit Forum in cooperation with local authorities in Taijiang (Guizhou
Province). On the 21st of July 2015, the association held the summit forum of the Chinese
konjac dietary fibre industry in cooperation with the China Dietary Fibre Association
and Yizhi Konjac Biotechnology Co., Ltd. On the 8th of June 2016, during the Ankang
dragon boat festival, the International Konjac Economic and Trade Fair was held by the
konjac association in collaboration with the China Association for the Promotion of
International Cooperation in Agriculture and Ankang Municipal People’s Government.
On the 17th September 2017, the association in cooperation with the Chuxiong Science
and Technology Association of Yunnan Province held the annual meeting of the konjac
industrialization and development in Chuxiong, Yunnan Province. The konjac associa-
tion has cooperated with the China Konjac Industry Network (Konjac Garden) under the
China Wangku Group. On the 21–23 September 2017, the ‘Konjac Industry Development
Summit Forum in the Internet Age’ was held with the help of the 2017 China (Sichuan)
E-commerce Development Summit. In cooperation with local governments, represen-
tatives of enterprises, and other organizations or social groups, the association will
further expand the awareness about the konjac industry by organizing large-scale con-
ferences, forums, exhibitions, and other events and also through various electronic or
printed media.
1 Research and Application of Key Technologies in Southwest University Ministry of 2007 First Prize for Scientific and
Konjac Industry in China Education Technological Progress
2 Basic Biological Research on A. konjac Southwest University Chongqing 2008 Second Prize in Natural Science
3 Study on Cultivation Techniques of Konjac with Regard Ankang Plant Protection and Ankang County 2009 Second Prize for Scientific and
to Plant Health and High Yield Quarantine Station & Southwest Technological Progress
University
4 Study on Cultivation Techniques of Konjac with Regard Qinba Konjac Research and Shanxi Province 2010 Second Prize in Science and
to Plant Health and High Yield Development Center Technology
5 Experimental and Theoretical Studies on Fine Structure Huazhong Agricultural University Hubei Province 2012 Second Prize in Natural
of Konjac Glucomannan and Its Molecular Assembly Sciences
6 Research and Application of Key Technologies in Academy of Enshi Agricultural Hubei Province 2013 Second Prize for Scientific and
Breeding and Industrialization of A. konjac Varieties in Science Technological Progress
Konjac Industry in Major Producing Countries
Qingjiang
7 Research and Promotion of Under-forest Planting Ankang Plant Protection and Shanxi Province 2015 Second Prize for Promotion of
Model of Konjac Quarantine Station Agricultural Technology
Achievement
8 Research and Promotion of Under-forest Cultivation Ankang Plant Protection and Shanxi Province 2015 Second Prize for Promotion of
Techniques of konjac quarantine Station Agricultural Technology
Achievement
9 Micro-ecological Mechanism of Healthy Growth of Northwest A&F University Shanxi Province 2017 Second Prize in Science and
Konjac Under Forest and Remediation Technology of Technology
Actinomycetes under Continuous Cropping
Conditions
10 Research and Development of Konjac Dietary Fibre Yunnan Fuyuan Jintian Agricultural Yunnan Province 2007 Third Prize for Scientific and
Products Development Co., Ltd. Technological Progress
11 A Series of Building Coatings with Konjac as Film Huazhong Agricultural University Hubei Province 2007 Third Prize for Technological
Forming Agent Invention
12 Study on Comprehensive Control Technology of Konjac Huazhong Agricultural University Hubei Province 2008 Third Prize for Scientific and
Soft Rot Technological Progress
(Continued)
235
236
13 Research and Application of Integrated Prevention and Ankang Plant Protection and Society of 2009 Third Prize in Science and
Control Technology for Konjac Diseases quarantine Station Chinese Plant Technology
Protection
14 Technical Development of Konjac Dietary Fibre and Yunnan Fuyuan Jintian Agricultural Yunnan Province 2010 Third Prize for Scientific and
Glucomannan-oligosaccharide Capsule Industry Products Development Co., Ltd. Technological Progress
15 Prevention and Control of Konjac Soft Rot by Fuyuan Konjac Research Institute, Yunnan Province 2011 Third Prize for Scientific and
Biodiversity Yunnan Academy of Agricultural Technological Progress
Sciences
16 Integration and Popularization of Key Technologies for Yichang Academy of Agricultural Hubei Province 2013 Third Prize for Promotion of
Disease Resistance, High Yield, and High Quality of Sciences Scientific and Technological
A. konjac Achievements
Konjac Glucomannan
Konjac Industry in Major Producing Countries 237
TABLE 9.6
Price of Fresh Konjac and Dry Konjac Chips from 2007 to 2016
Year
Type 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
A. konjac fresh tubers (CNY/500 g) 1.1 1.3 1.5 2.0 2.2 2.2 2.1 1.8 1.3 2.2
A. konjac dry chips ten thousand CNY/tonne) 1.8 2.1 2.2 2.7 2.7 2.8 2.8 2.6 2.0 3.2
A. albus fresh tuber (CNY/500 g) 1.8 2.2 2.4 3.2 3.3 3.4 3.4 3.3 2.8 3.8
A. albus dry chips(ten thousand CNY/tonne) 2.0 2.3 2.5 3.5 3.6 3.8 3.8 4 3.5 4.2
238 Konjac Glucomannan
TABLE 9.7
Price of Konjac Flour from 2007 to 2017 (Unit: 10,000 CNY/Tonne)
Year
Type 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
A. konjac Flour 4.6 4.8 5.2 6.0 6.5 6.5 6.5 6.3 5.5 6.5 7.0
A. albus Flour 5.5 6.0 6.5 7.0 7.2 7.5 7.5 7.5 7.0 7.5 8.0
According to Tables 9.6 and 9.7, the price of the fresh tubers has doubled over the past
10 years. The price of konjac flour has increased more than 50%. Overall, the supply and
demand are both booming. In short, from 2007 to 2017 was a decade of rapid development
and growth of konjac industry. The development of the Chinese konjac industry was fruit-
ful in all respects. However, the konjac industry in China fully recognizes the bottlenecks
that still remain, hampering further development, and continue their further research and
development work to assure a healthy industry.
like typhoons and earthquakes also have some impacts. Besides, it is also hit by the com-
petition with the steadily growing Chinese A. konjac production. Since Gunma-ken is a
prefecture with a large population and many electors, and A. konjac is the key industry of its
economy, the Japanese government set up a 1124.1% tariff to restrict the import of Chinese
Amorphophallus konjac products (http://jp.mofcom.gov.cn), and provides a government sub-
sidy to maintain the cultivation of A. konjac. As a result, the total cultivation of A. konjac in
Japan stabilized at the level of 4,000 hectares. Although the konjac industry in Japan has
declined, there are many useful and worthwhile lessons to be learned from this country.
• Climate: annual mean temperature of 13°C and rainfall during growing period
(May–October) between 1,000 and 1,100 mm.
• Soil: well-drained soil with rather coarse texture.
• Topography: hillside with slope in south or southeast direction at inclination of
25°–35°. The orientation and slope are related to the sunshine hours and insolation
intensity. On southwards inclined slope, the amount of solar radiation is smaller
than on the northwards inclined slope in the summer and the opposite in the
winter.
• Biological and ecological factors: trees of different height with the taller ones on
the top of the hill and shorter ones providing shading for the plantation and con-
tributing to soil conservation.
The traditional cultivation pattern is called Jinenjo (see Figure 9.1). It is a cropping pattern
resembling most the natural environment of A. konjac. Cultural practices are simple and
primitive with only mulching with wild herbs, weeding, and spraying pesticides one or
two times a year.
Among the positive characteristics of Jinenjo are the possibilities of continuous crop-
ping, low incidence of diseases, and sustainability if appropriate cultural practices are
applied. However, the hilly topography is a serious obstacle to mechanization. In spite
of the advantages of Jinenjo, Japanese agriculture is increasingly adopting the Uedama
cultivation pattern that is practiced on lowlands and allows mechanization and a more
intensive management.
FIGURE 9.1
Schematic representation of a typical “Jinenjo” field in Japan. (Adapted from Kurihara, H., Jap. Agric. Res. Q,
13, 174–179, 1979; Chua, M., An investigation of the biology and chemistry of the Chinese medicinal plant,
Amorphophallus konjac, PhD thesis, University of Wolverhampton, Wolverhampton, UK, 2011.)
different breeding projects, the A. konjac production area is small. Consequently, the pro-
portion of mechanized cultivation is very low. The cooperatives are not popular. Most of
the sales are temporary.
pre-sowing treatment, such as grading and selection in order to avoid planting damaged and
diseased corms. Second, standardize the planting: the land preparation, planting date, soil
test and fertilizer requirements, row spacing, and planting depth should be standardized.
Third, pay attention to covering seed corms well with the soil immediately after planting.
During the emergence of seedlings, open up the soil crust above the tip or use a black plastic
film covering the seedling with an opening allowing the tip to emerge. Fourth, apply disease
prevention measures. In addition to soft rot prevention, Japanese A. konjac plantations also
need protection from leaf blight caused by typhoon damage.
it is difficult to stabilize. As a result, the Japanese konjac processing industry has begun
importing raw materials from China and other countries.
Since 1912, Japanese businessmen have processed Chinese konjac raw materials into
crude powder and shipped them to Japan for further processing into fine powders.
This phenomenon is gradually prevalent in the processing and procurement circles. It has
aroused strong opposition from domestic konjac growers in Japan who appealed to the
government to prevent the import of konjac raw materials on the grounds of protecting the
domestic konjac industry. Although the Japanese government has approved the increase
of tariffs to restrict the import of konjac, the import of konjac raw materials has not been
interrupted. Once the domestic raw materials are insufficient and expensive, the proces-
sors will use the strong demand of the consumer market as the backing to coerce the
government to allow the import of raw material. Therefore, the internal contradictions
among the Japanese konjac processing cooperatives, the planting cooperatives, and the
konjac product cooperatives have not been substantially resolved.
In 1963, the Japanese Konjac Association was established. As a consortium, its subordinates
have three synergistic combinations of planting, processing, and products. It played a guid-
ing role in pre-production coordination, mid-production management, and post-production
services. Due to the shrinkage of the Japanese konjac cultivation, the number of processing
enterprises of Japanese konjac has decreased from 180 in the middle of the last century to
less than 80 at present. Fresh konjac mainly comes from Gunma and Yamanashi prefectures.
Since 1984, the production of konjac flour in Japan has experienced several twists and turns,
reaching a peak of 10,800 tonnes in 1991, and has been declining since then. By 2016, the pro-
duction was only 5,577 tonnes, which means a reduction by nearly a half.
Japanese raw material processing of konjac consisted of converting fresh konjac into
coarse powder and fine powder, which was practiced for hundreds of years. Chinese enter-
prises were processing fresh konjac into coarse powder for some time. Drawing on the
experience of Japan, in the 1980s, China developed techniques to process konjac directly
into fine powder. As a result, China has become the world’s largest producer of konjac
flour. Nevertheless, there are still various characteristics of the Japanese konjac processing
industry worth considering when designing advanced processing techniques.
production includes different steps: from the mixing and gelatinization of fine powders to
the automatic production, and the whole process of product packaging. It takes 4–5 hours to
produce different forms of konjac products, such as stripes, sheets, noodles, and meatballs.
Manufacturing enterprises require high-quality products. All products from raw mate-
rials to finished products are subject to strict quality control procedures. Factory-produced
konjac products are exported to major domestic supermarkets in Japan through the distri-
bution channels, but are also sold in exclusive shops. The production in a family workshop
is also common in the Gunma Prefecture, the main production area of konjac in Japan.
Because of the private ownership of Japanese land, several generations inherited the fam-
ily business. In the konjac industry, the façade of the family house usually hosts a char-
acteristic konjac restaurant or konjac products stores for customers to taste or purchase.
The backyard accommodates the corresponding manufacturing facilities of the konjac
products. Given its years of experience, the Japanese konjac product industry can be emu-
lated in various respects by the counterparts in other konjac producing countries.
particularly in the Sukabumi Regency. This had been the major source of raw material for
the konjac noodle home industry in Jakarta.
A. muelleri has yellow orange colour corm and grows mostly in the East Java province
and has been so far the major source of raw material for the konjac industries of East Java.
After this, it has expanded to industries in West Java as well. This species has a higher vis-
cosity than A. variabilis. Since the late 1990s, the konjac industries in Indonesia used only
A. muelleri as a raw material for its higher viscosity characteristics.
through the size reduction from the volume surface diameter of 522–214 µm, and showed
an increase of the viscosity from 16,640 cps to 17,660 cps in the series of the four machines
(Purwadaria et al. 2001, 2002b).
The rotary cutting mill measuring 1,150 × 420 × 1,350 mm, powered by a 5 HP gasoline
engine as the motor, and fitted with an eccentric device to vibrate a sifter, was used to
separate starch. The capacity of the rotary mill was 65 kg dried konjac chips per hour.
The burr mill measuring 1,050 × 850 × 1,350 mm, was powered by a 5 HP gasoline
engine with 3,000 RPM motor, and had a static 70 mesh sifter. The capacity was 40 kg/h.
The conical ball mill, batch type, measuring 2,150 × 700 × 1,500 mm, and driven with
an electrical motor of 3 HP at 12 RPM. The mill was divided into three compartments.
The first and second compartment contained 25 steel balls of 60 mm diameter, and the
third compartment contained 25 steel balls of 30 mm diameter. The first compartment of
trapezoidal shape and 0.20 m length received the input material from the feeding hopper
and started the grinding. The second compartment of cylindrical shape and 0.40 m length
continued to grind the flour filling the spaces between the ball surfaces, which moved
around grinding the material. The third compartment of conical shape and 0.70 m length
finished the grinding process. The conical ball mill was also connected to a cyclone to
remove the separated starch and fibre. The capacity of the conical ball mill was 24 kg/h.
The screw mill was designed inside a horizontal tube installed on a table. It was measur-
ing at 1,250 × 520 × 1,160 mm and was driven by an electrical motor of 3 HP at 2,860 RPM.
Operating at the end of the series, the function of the screw mill was to refine the flour, and
thus it had a higher capacity than the three previous machines, namely, 665 kg/h.
A further study with a different ball mill operating at 78 RPM at a laboratory scale inves-
tigated the effects of the number and diameter of the balls and the length of milling time
(Wijanarko and Suwasito 2014). The milling process used a consecutive series of four dif-
ferent numbers and ball diameters: 21 balls of 5.4 cm, 40 balls of 4.45 cm, 78 balls of 3.5 cm,
and 245 balls of 2.4 cm. The milling time was 40, 60, 80, 100, and 120 minutes, each milling
time divided equally for the consecutive stages of different numbers and sizes of the balls.
The amount of konjac flour put into the ball mill was 1.5 kg at a ratio of 1:9 to the total
weight of the balls per one stage, namely, 13.5 kg. The results indicated that the longest
milling time had the lowest yield of 83.34% and the highest hydration capacity of 47.96%.
In the following study, Wijanarko et al. (2015) set the length of milling time to 1, 2, 3,
and 4 hours. They found that the four-hour milling time yielded the best quality of the
konjac flour that did not go through the 100 mesh sieve (70.35% glucomannan content with
16,680 cps viscosity).
In another a study, Mustafa and Wijanarko (2015) reported a higher viscosity of konjac
flour (25,410 cps) as the result of the longest milling time (L8), however, no unit of time
was provided, and the treatment was combined with an ethanol leaching process after the
konjac flour exited the ball mill. The total number of balls applied was 105 with the ratio of
4:2:1, respectively, of small-, medium-, and large-ball diameters. No specific size had been
mentioned.
and the leaching process applied two times. The slurry went through the burr mill and
the centrifuge to separate the konjac flour from the starch and fibre. The wet konjac corm
flour was dried at 70°C and processed once more in the burr mill. The results showed that
a 55% ethanol concentration with a ratio of 1/2 ethanol to the water-soaked konjac powder
resulted in the best yield among the treatments with a 67.2%–68% glucomannan content
and viscosity of 13,709 cp. The observation was done at the pilot-plant scale using the
machineries described above.
Faridah and Wijanarko (2013) optimized the leaching process using ethanol in the mac-
eration of the konjac tuber by the response surface method employing a central composite
design. Three variables were applied: leaching time, stirring speed of the homogenizer,
and the ratio of solvent as the result of extraction from the flour produced (v/w). The glu-
comannan and calcium oxalate content in the konjac flour were analyzed. The results
indicated that the response surface method predicted well the optimized condition of a
leaching time of 4 hours, 6 minutes, and 18 seconds, stirring speed of 443 RPM, and the
ratio of solvent over flour of 8.92 mL/g provided an estimate of 79.26% glucomannan and
0.07% calcium oxalate content compared to the experimental results of 79.19% and 0.08%,
respectively.
A further study (Wijanarko et al. 2014) concluded that ultrasound applied between
ethanol extractions in the following consecutive stages, 40% ethanol extraction – ultra-
sound – 60% ethanol extraction – ultrasound – 80% ethanol extraction, produced a better
quality of konjac flour. The glucomannan content, viscosity, calcium oxalate content, and
degree of whiteness obtained were at the following levels, respectively, 84.37% ± 1.79%,
13,750 ± 52.92 cps, 0.064% ± 0.004%, and 60.38 ± 0.675.
and ƙ-casein with a higher binding energy compared to no heating. The lactic acid played
an important role in increasing the binding energy in its intermediation for the interaction
between glucomannan and ƙ-casein.
Several experiments of adding konjac flour into various food products have been
conducted. As a result, the recommendation was made to add konjac flour into modi-
fied cassava flour, which substituted for wheat flour as the main raw material in mak-
ing fresh noodles to improve their quality. The addition of 4% konjac flour (w/w) and
35% water (w/w) into the fresh noodle formula provided a better quality of the noodle
with 2.13 minutes cooking time, 7.03% cooking losses, 0.14 N tensile strength, 201.58%
water absorption, 103.63% volume expansion, and 51.41° of brightness (Faridah and
Wijanarko 2014).
Konjac flour of 80 mesh size produced by the wet process using ethanol as the leaching
solution was added as a mixture of ingredients with tapioca and NaCl into a formula for
meatballs. The study concluded that an ingredient composition of 5% konjac flour, 27%
tapioca, and 6% NaCl provided the best meatball physical characteristics, with 15.03 N elas-
ticity, 74.4% water holding capacity, and surface cohesiveness with small number of cavi-
ties (Dewi and Wijanarko 2015).
The addition of konjac gel as a binding agent was studied in the process of making tra-
ditional rice crackers commonly called kerupuk puli. Cooked rice was blended with other
ingredients and konjac gel, moulded to a square form, sun dried, and fried in cooking oil.
The addition of 15 g konjac corm gel with a concentration of 1% konjac flour (1 g konjac
flour per 100 mL water) into 100 g cooked rice yielded the best rice cracker of 5.77% MC
with 144.68% expansion ability during frying (Dwijanti et al. 2015).
The use of konjac corm gel at 1% concentration as a binding agent was also investigated
in the production of chicken sausage (Prastini and Wijanarko 2015). The composition of
15 g konjac corm gel with 85 g chicken meat gave the favoured chicken sausage with 98.16%
yield, 7.83 N elasticity, and 60.40% water holding capacity.
The modified konjac flour was used as an ingredient in making a kefir drink from goat
milk. The physicochemical characteristics during the storage of the kefir drink with and
without konjac flour at 4°C were investigated and compared (Manab et al. 2017). The modifi-
cation process of the konjac flour was described as follows. Three grams of konjac flour were
added to 100 mL of 8% lactic acid solution (v/v), stirred with a magnetic stirrer for 15 minutes,
irradiated in a high power microwave for 10 minutes, and then centrifuged at 5,000 RPM for
10 minutes. The results suggested that the kefir drink with modified konjac flour was more
homogenous with a smaller particle size than the kefir drink with konjac flour.
A study had been carried out using the konjac flour from yellow corm to produce restruc-
tured meat (Wijanarko et al. 2018). The konjac flour – ƙ carrageenan mixed gels – were
added to red koji rice extract in the development of the restructured meat. The optimiza-
tion of the formula was obtained using the response surface method showing that 10.21%
of the konjac flour – ƙ carrageenan mixed gels – and 6.11% red koji rice extract produced the
best restructured meat with 43.83 ± 1.82 g hardness, 72.74 ± 0.002 water holding capacity,
and 69.34 ± 0.14° hue.
The utilization of konjac glucomannan-derived products is so far still explored by the
researchers at the R&D stage. No information could be obtained whether the R&D results
have been implemented in the food processing industries. However, the Porang Research
Centre has promoted some of food processing methods using konjac flour on national TV
broadcasts, Trans 7, which can be found in the following YouTube links: https://youtu.
be/C8nXVoo3cDE for sausage processing, and https://youtu.be/xaB7h1r7rSU for jelly pro-
cessing (personal communication Wijanarko 2019).
250 Konjac Glucomannan
1. The konjac which is used in starch flour industries, such as Arrowroot Starch, Buk
raw, A. saraburiensis
The konjac with tubers that can be used for making glucomannan flour apart from
A. muelleri, such as Buk Korat or Buk hu chang is A. koratensis and Buk Dang is
A. putii (in Saraburi Province) or A. linearis (in southwestern) or A. yunnanensis
(Northern). Note: A. yunnanensis is very similar in appearance to A. putii, but the
latter has a spadix subequalling the spathe and a different colour-pattern on the
petiole, peduncle, and spathe.
2. The konjac with leaf or young stem that are used for cooking, such as A. paeoniifo-
lius is mostly called elephant yam.
3. The konjac with young stem and flowers that are used for cooking, such as Buk
Teang is Arisaema petiolatum and Buk Sai Num Peung is A. elatus.
4. The konjac which is used most in the food industry for jelly manufacturing, such
as Buk Nuea Sai or Buk Khai (A. muelleri).
Buk Nuea Sai (Amorphophallus muelleri ) is a native species in Thailand, which is found in
the western and northern part of the country, such as the provinces of Kanchanaburi, Tak,
Chiang Mai, Chiang Rai, Phayao, and Mae Hong Son. This species has a high glucomannan
content (about 10% of fresh weight) and exhibits a high viscosity of its solution. Konjac glu-
comannan is in high demand from the food industries in Asian, American, and European
countries (>12,000 tonnes per year). However, Thailand can produce only about 42% of
the total demand (5,000 tonnes per year), which is not sufficient to meet the demand of
the market (Source: Kanchanaburi Agricultural Occupation Promotion and Development
Center, Highland Agricultural Extension, non-published, obtained by interview).
FIGURE 9.2
Price (Baht) of fresh konjac corm per kilogram, Tak province, Thailand. (From Interview with local farmers in
Tak Province [2016].)
processors. From 2011 to 2016, the price of the fresh konjac corms has increased by about
1 Baht (1 THB = 0.03 USD) per year (Figure 9.2).
The structure of midstream konjac industries in Thailand can be divided into two cat-
egories, namely: (1) dry processing of konjac chips and (2) dry processing of glucomannan
flour. The dry processing of konjac chips in Thailand involves 2–3 major entrepreneurs
and individual SMEs with low capital, which are located in the Tak and Mae Hong Son
provinces. Most of the konjac slices products from dry processing in Thailand are pro-
cessed for export to China. In addition, many Thai farmers who have been guaranteed
the purchase price have also received from Chinese entrepreneurs the technology for the
production of konjac slices by dry processing to export to China.
In Thailand, there are few konjac glucomannan flour (KGM) processing factories
because this process requires advanced technology to produce high quality KGM flour
that is meeting the standards required by downstream industries.
As for the status of downstream industries in Thailand, most of the KGM flour is used
in the food industry, which is converting it into delicatessen products, such as noodles,
jelly, vegan food, etc. Moreover, KGM flour can be used to improve food properties, such
as gel formation in jelly and jam products, to substitute for fat in processed meat products,
to improve the texture of food, and the incorporation of KGM in dietary supplements can
be used for weight loss in a capsule form. In the biotechnology industry, konjac glucoman-
nan is used in plant tissue culture and microbial cultures. However, KGM that is used
in various industries in Thailand is mainly imported from abroad, with China being the
major source.
The overview of konjac industries in Thailand shows that the upstream, midstream, and
downstream industries are facing serious constraints because the demand from abroad is
much higher than the supply. Buk Nuea Sai (A. muelleri) is a native species in Thailand,
which is known for its high glucomannan content. Therefore, the A. muelleri corms that are
collected in the forests in addition to those harvested in the fields are not sufficient for the
market. The Thai government is currently encouraging farmers to grow more konjac in the
fields and also in the forests under the agroforestry schemes. Moreover, there is a short-
age of midstream industries in Thailand. It is found that just the dry processing of konjac
slices or processing into crude konjac flour will result in low-purity KGM. There is a need
252 Konjac Glucomannan
FIGURE 9.3
Processing of konjac in Tak province, Thailand. (From Interview with local farmers in Tak Province [2016].)
for a further purification process to manufacture high-quality KGM flour. The processing
of konjac in the Tak province is shown in Figure 9.3.
In summary, it can be said that the demand for konjac flour in Thailand is rising rapidly,
but so far the supply is still low. Should, however, the upstream industry increase its out-
put of tubers by breeding high yielding cultivars, allowing plantations and agroforestry to
have enough supply, there would be a good growth potential for the midstream process-
ing industry. With a sufficient supply of raw materials, there would be higher outputs and
revenues enabling the modernization of the KGM manufacturing processes, leading to an
improvement of the quality of purified KGM. This, in turn, would benefit the downstream
sector, especially the food and pharmaceutical industry.
Acknowledgements
The authors of this chapter would like to acknowledge the valuable assistance of Dr Niu
Xinghe (COFCO Corp.), Dr Zhao Jianrong (Kunming University), and Miss Ma Jun (UNSW)
in translating the sections on the konjac industry in China and in Japan.
References
Boyce, P., D. Sookchaloem, W. L. A. Hetterscheid, G. Gusman, N. G. Jacobsen, T. Idei, and N. Van Du.
(2012). Amorphophallus. In “Flora of Thailand” (C. Phengklai, T. Santisuk, H. Pedersen, J. Parnell,
D. Middleton, M. Newman, D. A. Simpson, M. Tamura, P. C. Welzen, H. J. Esser, S. Hual and
M. Kato, eds.), pp. 130–186. Drachachon, Bangkok, Thailand.
Chua, M. (2011). An investigation of the biology and chemistry of the Chinese medicinal plant,
Amorphophallus konjac. PhD thesis, University of Wolverhampton, Wolverhampton, UK.
Dewi, N. R. K., and S. B. Wijanarko. (2015). Studi proporsi tepung porang: Tapioka dan penam
bahan NaCl terhadap karakteristik bakso sapi (Study on proportion of porang flour: Tapioca and
NaCl addition on physical characteristics of beef meatball). J Pangan dan Agroindustri 3: 855–864.
Konjac Industry in Major Producing Countries 253
Dwijanti E. R., S. B. Widjanarko, and I. Purwantiningrum. (2015). Pengaruh penambahan gel porang
(Amorphophallus muelleri Blume) pada pembuatan kerupuk puli (The effect of adding porang
gel (Amorphophallus muelleri Blume) on making puli crackers). J Pangan dan Agroindustri 3:
1521–1560.
Faridah, A., and S. B. Wijanarko. (2014). Penambahan tepung porang pada pembuatan mi den-
gan substitusi tepung MOCAF (Modified cassava flour) (Addition of porang flour in noodle
making with MOCAF (Modified cassava flour) substitution). J Teknol dan Industri Pangan 25:
98–105.
Faridah, A., and S. B. Wijanarko. (2013). Optimization of multilevel ethanol leaching process of
porang flour (Amorphophallus muelleri) using Response Surface Methodology. Int J Adv Sci Eng
Inform Technol 3: 74–80.
Kadprasert, K. (2004). Konjac and Utilization of Konjac in Thailand. Department of Agriculture Press,
Bangkok, Thailand.
Kanchanaburi Agricultural Occupation Promotion and Development Center (Highland Agri
cultural Extension). (2019). Non-published, by interview.
Kurihara, H. (1979). Trends and problems of konjac (Amorphophallus konjac) cultivation in Japan. Jap
Agric Res Q 13: 174–179.
Manab, A., H. Purnomo, S. B. Wijanarko, and L. E. Radiati. (2016). Molecular docking study on the
interaction of ƙ-casein with glucomannan. Int J Current Microbiol Appl Sci 5: 651–658.
Manab, A., H. Purnomo, S. B. Wijanarko, L. E. Radiati, and I. Thohari. (2017). Physicochemical prop-
erties of kefir drink using modified porang flour (Amorphophallus oncophyllus) during storage
period. Cur Res Nutr Food Sci 5: 288–299.
Mustafa, S., and S. B. Wijanarko. (2015). Pengecilan ukuran metode Ball Mill dan pemurnian kimia
terhadap kemurnian tepung porang (Amorphophallus muelleri Blume) (Size reduction Ball Mill
method and chemical purification of porang flour (Amorphophallus muelleri Blume)). J Pangan
dan Agroindustri 3: 560–570.
Prastini, A. I., and S. B. Wijanarko. (2015). Pembuatan sosis ayam menggunakan gel porang
(Amorphophallus muelleri Blume) sebagai bahan pengikat terhadap karakteristik sosis
(Production of chicken sausage using porang (Amorphophallus muelleri Blume) gel as a binder
on the characteristics of sausages). J Pangan dan Agroindustri 3: 1503–1511.
Purwadaria, H. K., A. Unadi, S. Widyotomo, and S. Triwahyudi. (2002a). Rancang bangun mesin
ekstraksi glukomanan dari umbi iles (Amorphophallus muelleri) (Engineering design of machin-
eries for glucomannan extraction from konjac corm (Amorphophallus muelleri)). R&D Report.
LPPM IPB and PAATP Ministry of Agriculture, Jakarta, Indonesia.
Purwadaria, H. K., A. M. Syarief, Buchari, M. A. Arifin, and S. Widyotomo. (2001). Pengembangan
proses fraksinasi untuk meningkatkan mutu tepung iles-iles untuk ekspor (Development
of fractionation process to improve the export quality of konjac corm flour). Integrated
Competitive Report VIII (RUT VIII) Phase 1. IPB-Ministry of Research and Technology – LIPI,
Jakarta, Indonesia.
Purwadaria, H. K., A. M. Syarief, S. Mulato, and S. Widyotomo. (2002b). Pengembangan proses
fraksinasi untuk meningkatkan mutu tepung iles-iles untuk ekspor (Development of frac-
tionation process to improve the export quality of konjac corm flour). Integrated Competitive
Report VIII (RUT VIII) Phase 2. IPB-Ministry of Research and Technology – LIPI, Jakarta,
Indonesia.
Purwadaria, H. K., Haryadi, A. Unadi, and S. Triwahyudi. (2000). Rekayasa alat pengering dan peng-
giling umbi iles-iles (Design of drying and milling machine for konjac corm). R&D Report.
LPPM IPB and PAATP Ministry of Agriculture, Jakarta, Indonesia.
Sukumalanand, T. (2005). Amorphophallus spp. in Thailand. Department of Agriculture Press,
Chiang Mai, Thailand.
Wijanarko, S. B., A. Nugroho, and T. Estiasih. (2011). Functional interaction components of protein
isolates and glucomannan in food bars by FTIR and SEM studies. African Journal of Food Science
5: 12–21.
254 Konjac Glucomannan
Wijanarko S. B., and T. S. Suwasito. (2014). Pengaruh lama penggilingan dengan metode Ball Mill
terhadap rendemen dan kemampuan hidrasi tepung porang (Amorphophallus muelleri Blume)
(The effect of grinding duration using Ball Mill on the yield and hydration capability of konjac
flour (Amorphophallus muelleri Blume)). J Pangan dan Agroindustri 2: 79–85.
Wijanarko, S. B., E. Widyastuti, and F. I. Rozaq. (2015). Pengaruh lama penggilingan tepung porang
(Amorphophallus muelleri Blume) dengan metode Ball Mill (cyclone separator) terhadap sifat
fisik dan kimia tepung porang (The effect of porang (Amorphophallus muelleri Blume) milling
time Ball Mill (cyclone separator) method on the physical and chemical properties of porang
flour). J Pangan dan Agroindustri 3: 867–877.
Wijanarko, S. B., A. Faridah, and A. Sutrisno. (2014). Optimization of ultrasound-assisted extraction
of konjac flour from Amorphophallus muelleri Blume. Res Gate https://www.researchgate.net/
publication/281764119.
Wijanarko, S. B., Q. Amalia, M. B. Hermanto, and A. Z. Mubarok. (2018). Evaluation of the effect of
yellow konjac flour – ƙ-carrageenan mixed gels and red koji rice extracts on the properties of
restructured meat using response surface methodology. J Food Sci Technol 55: 1781–1788.
10
Applications of Konjac Glucomannan
in Food and Medicine
CONTENTS
10.1 Relevant Physicochemical Properties of KGM............................................................. 255
10.2 Utilization of KGM in Foods........................................................................................... 256
10.3 Utilization of KGM in Medicine..................................................................................... 257
10.4 Advances in Application of KGM in Food and Medicine........................................... 258
10.4.1 KGM-Milk Protein Stabilization Mechanism.................................................. 259
References...................................................................................................................................... 263
255
256 Konjac Glucomannan
important factor that mainly affects the solubility of KGM in water is the degree of acety-
lation. The acetyl groups potentially inhibit the intermolecular hydrogen bonds, which
improve its solubility in water (Alonso-Sande et al. 2009).
Therefore, these characteristics of the thickening and gelling agents cause konjac flour to
be popular in noodles, tofu, jelly, snack, and chewy texture foods.
jelly drink (skim milk: strawberry juice, 55:45) produced the highest textural scores (hard-
ness 036 N., 0.81 N.mm of internal consistencies, and 8.97% of syneresis) and the highest
overall liking score. Therefore, konjac glucomannan produces better results in combina-
tion with carrageenan when trying to obtain a textural property that will be accepted by
consumers without interference in taste or appearance of the product.
The work of Impaprasert et al. (2017) studied the effects of alkalinity using limewater
versus calcium hydroxide and the gelling agent sodium alginate on the textural proper-
ties of konjac noodles. Drying and rehydration conditions were studied to evaluate the
optimum conditions for producing dried konjac noodles. By considering the springiness
and cohesiveness of the konjac noodles, their results indicated that using 3% konjac gluco-
mannan flour with limewater and an incubation time of 30 minutes were the most suitable
conditions. In addition, hot air drying at 80°C for 55 minutes and soaking in hot water for
9 minutes were the optimum drying and rehydration conditions.
The application of KGM in food is favoured by many food manufacturers since KGM
is tasteless, odourless, and colourless. The European Union permits the use of KGM as
food additive no. E-425 as a thickening agent, gelling agent, emulsifier, stabilizer, and film-
forming agent (Behera & Ray 2016). In the pharmaceutical industry, KGM can be used
for drug delivery, cellular therapy, prosthetic implants, cosmetics, and sound absorption
(Zhang et al. 2005).
KGM has attracted more attention as a dietary fibre due to its non-harmful and non-toxic
properties, good biocompatibility, functional properties, and health benefits (Behera &
Ray 2016). Since KGM shows the most positive effects, it is a potential fat replacer for use
in mozzarella cheese in terms of functional properties (Dai et al. 2018). Furthermore, Dai
et al. (2019) reported that KGM may be used as a fat replacer in manufacturing fat-reduced
mozzarella cheeses to improve functionality and pizza bake characteristics. The authors
studied the effects of KGM addition on functional and pizza bake properties of low-fat
and skimmed mozzarella cheese during refrigerated storage. KGM addition in low-fat and
skimmed mozzarella cheeses decreased the firmness, but did not affect the stickiness of
the cheese blocks. Free oil formation was not changed by KGM addition. The cheeses with
KGM addition showed more desirable pizza bake performance, as they exhibited more
complete shred melt and less scorching on the cheese surface than the cheeses without
KGM.
Recently, a degraded product of KGM, depolymerized KGM, has attracted attention
because of its low viscosity, improved hydrophilic properties, and favourable physiologi-
cal functions. Depolymerized KGM has been widely studied for health benefits, such as
the effect of a prebiotic and other relevant factors. Potential applications of depolymer-
ized KGM in the fields of anti-oxidation and immune function are also considered (Jiang
et al. 2018)
TABLE 10.1
Application of KGM in Food and Medicine
Function
Thickening Agent/ Cholesterol
Product Gelling Agent Texture Fibre Weight Control Blocking
Noodles/pasta ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓
Meat ✓ ✓
Bread/biscuit ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓
Ice cream ✓
Jam/marmalade ✓
Drink (fruit juice) ✓ ✓
Sauce/gravy ✓ ✓
Cup jelly ✓ ✓
Pudding/mousse ✓ ✓
Capsule, pill, tablet, ✓ ✓ ✓
or liquid
Source: Tester, R. and Al-Ghazzewi, F., Food Hydrocoll., 68, 246–254, 2017.
formulations in the form of capsules, tablets, and beverages. Moreover, initial clinical
studies have established that introducing KGM to the diet can significantly contribute
in decreasing plasma cholesterol, enhancing carbohydrate metabolism, colonic ecology,
and bowel movements (Chua et al. 2010). As a food additive, KGM is authorized in
Europe as E-425. KGM is declared as ‘generally recognised as safe’ by the Food and Drug
Administration (FDA). It also presents excellent functional properties and is claimed as
a low-calorie ingredient due to its non-digestible fibre compound. Therefore, KGM has a
great potential to be developed as a functional food with various health benefits (Jiménez-
Colmenero et al. 2012). KGM is also reported as a largely used emulsifier and stabilizer in
food, drinks, and cosmetic products due to its gelling properties and particular rheologi-
cal properties (Behera & Ray 2017). Moreover, the suitability of KGM to be used for drug
delivery has also been thoroughly studied, especially with regard to controlled release
properties, bioadhesive properties, and cellular therapy (Zhang et al. 2014). Table 10.1 sum-
marizes the different applications of KGM in food and food supplements.
area, KGM is applied as a multipurpose edible film, which promotes the concept of the
probiotic edible film. As knowledge is growing, KGM can also be used in advanced tech-
nology, such as encapsulation, microencapsulation, and nanoencapsulation of bioactive
materials. Nussinovitch (2004) invented the hydrocolloid membrane with KGM in its for-
mulation. The thermally stable droplet was able to encapsulate a liquid containing at least
one enzyme, a cell, a biological agent, a pharmaceutical component, an immunological
agent, or the mixture of those compounds. This hydrocolloid membrane was able to hold
the liquid containing essential compounds without bursting at temperatures −20°C–90°C.
The concept of encapsulation was further observed at a micro scale. The aim of recent
research on KGM is to use it as a coating material in microencapsulation via the spray dry-
ing. Microencapsulation is a technique where small particles or droplets are surrounded
by a wall material or embedded in the homogeneous or heterogeneous matrix and provide
small capsules with many useful characteristics. In food technology, microencapsulation
can be used for liquid, solid, and gas droplets that are entrapped into thin films of a food
grade microencapsulating agent (Gharsallaoui et al. 2007). Konjac glucomannan is a poten-
tial agent to be used as wall material. The mechanism will be explained in Chapter 11.
FIGURE 10.1
Illustration of protein-stabilized emulsion with KGM. (Lu, W. et al., Food Hydrocoll., 81, 120–128, 2018.)
260 Konjac Glucomannan
1. Protein adsorption: The protein allows the formation of small droplets during the
emulsification process. The hydrophobic part of the protein is denatured at the oil-
water interface, which is followed by fixing on the surface of the oil in the emulsion
2. Polysaccharide stabilization (KGM): The hydrophobic part will interact with the
adsorbed protein by hydrophobic interaction, and the predominant hydrophilic
part will be oriented to the water phase, which generates an extended thickening
network, which induces a high viscosity at a low shear rate, which then enhances
the steric hindrance and force of friction between droplets and the continuous
phase, thus slowing down the droplet motion of the system.
FIGURE 10.2
Bioaccessibility of curcumin emulsion during storage. (From Hayuningtyas, A. et al., Effect of konjac gluco-
mannan concentration and oil-phase volume fraction on the stability of curcumin-loaded-oil-in-milk sys-
tem, Proceedings of the 21st Food Innovation Asia Conference 2019 (FIAC 2019), 13–15 June 2019, BITEC, Bangkok,
Thailand, 2019.)
modifying the droplet mobility within the continuous phase. The higher viscosity and
a chain-like structure that was observed in the emulsion with the presence of KGM can
interfere with the hydrolysis of the oil phase and the surface layer of protein by a steric
hindrance effect (Lu et al. 2018). Also, KGM is non-degradable in the small intestine, but
degradable by β-mannanase, an enzyme generated by colon bacteria (Zhang et al. 2014).
In fact, KGM is a promising candidate for the development of controlled bioactive delivery
systems in the upper part of the GIT to the colon part. This mechanism may explain why
emulsions with the presence of KGM in this study showed a lesser release of curcumin
from the emulsion droplet. The results indicate that introducing KGM to the water phase
of emulsions makes a controlled release of curcumin from emulsions feasible. This can be
proven by considering the concentration of curcumin in the micelle (Figure 10.3), which
suggests that the addition of a low concentration of KGM potentially controls the loss of
curcumin during emulsion formation and within the GIT. The concentration of curcumin
in the micelle represents the amount of curcumin that is ready to be absorbed in the final
curcumin emulsion after passing through the upper part of the GIT. The concentration
of curcumin in the micelle was higher in 0.1% KGM compared to 0.2% KGM and without
KGM. The result suggests that structuring water phase with KGM can protect the cur-
cumin within the droplet during formulation, as well as in the digestion process, and this
related to the higher loading capacity as described above. Findings in this study indicated
that structuring the water phase with a low concentration of KGM could make it possible
to develop a curcumin in the milk system containing MCT oil with the potential emulsion
stability and controlled release of curcumin from emulsion.
Moreover, the low bioaccessibility was also shown when increasing the oil volume frac-
tion from 20% to 30% (v/v). Ahmed et al. (2012) reported that the bioaccessibility of cur-
cumin increased with the increase of the lipid level due to the increase of the total amount
of mixed micelle that was available to solubilize the curcumin. The result in this study
262 Konjac Glucomannan
FIGURE 10.3
The concentration of curcumin in the micelle during storage after passing through the GIT. (From
Hayuningtyas, A. et al., Effect of konjac glucomannan concentration and oil-phase volume fraction on the sta-
bility of curcumin-loaded-oil-in-milk system, Proceedings of the 21st Food Innovation Asia Conference 2019 (FIAC
2019), 13–15 June 2019, BITEC, Bangkok, Thailand, 2019.)
may have been due to a higher lipid concentration since there was a considerable amount
of lipids, which were probably not digested. Therefore, some curcumin may not have
been released from the emulsion droplets. Hence, there are two possible physicochemi-
cal mechanisms that could describe the correlation between curcumin bioaccessibility and
oil concentration. First, bioaccessibility will increase with the increase of lipid concentra-
tion as more mixed micelle will be formed. Second, the bioaccessibility decreases with the
increase of lipid concentration due to a larger proportion of oil remaining non-hydrolysed,
resulting in some curcumin not being released from the emulsion droplet into the sur-
rounding mixed micelle. In this study, it was expected that the non-hydrolysed oil would
be further absorbed in the colon. Since the KGM was to be degraded by a colonic enzyme,
β-mannanase, the access to the oil would have been facilitated resulting in the release of
curcumin from the oil droplet. Jeppesen and Mortensen (1998) reported that there were
two reasons that can explain the MCT absorption in the colon. First, the MCT can possibly
be absorbed because it has the ability to dissolve in water. The absorption of water-soluble
fatty acid in colon would be related to the report that the colon can completely absorb C8:0
and almost all of C10:0 at a physiological pH. Second, MCT can be absorbed due to the
backward effect of the colon on fat absorption in the small intestine.
There is a considerable potential for KGM to be used for medicinal purposes, particu-
larly for treatment of non-communicable diseases. The physicochemical characteristics of
KGM allow development of novel foods and especially foods for consumers with spe-
cial needs that demand tailor-made formulations. In the future, health promoting foods,
thanks to their nutritional properties, will increasingly be consumed to protect humans
from disease. Thus, the new task for the KGM industry is to provide healthy functional
ingredients for functional food manufacture. This topic will be dealt with in Chapter 11.
Applications of Konjac Glucomannan in Food and Medicine 263
References
Ahmed, K., Li, Y., McClements, D. J., & Xiao, H. (2012). Nano emulsion-and emulsion-based delivery
systems for curcumin: Encapsulation and release properties. Food Chemistry, 132(2), 799–807.
Akesowan, A., & Choonhahirun, A. (2014). Optimization of konjac gel texture prepared with-κ-
carrageenan and sweeteners and their applications in orange jelly. Advance Journal of Food
Science and Technology, 6(8), 961–967.
Alonso-Sande, M., Teijeiro-Osorio, D. Remunan-Lopez, C., & Alonso, M. J. (2009). Glucomannan, a
promising polysaccharide for biopharmaceutical purposes. European Journal of Pharmaceutics
and Biopharmaceutics, 72(2), 453–462.
Behera, S. S., & Ray, R. C. (2016). Konjac glucomannan, a promising polysaccharide of Amorphophallus
konjac K. Koch in health care. International Journal of Biological Macromolecules, 92, 942–956.
Behera, S. S., & Ray, R. C. (2017). Nutritional and potential health benefits of konjac glucomannan, a
promising polysaccharide of elephant foot yam, Amorphophallus konjac K. Koch: A review. Food
Reviews International, 33(1), 22–43.
Bouyer, E., Mekhloufi, G., Rosilio, V., Grossiord, J. L., & Agnely, F. (2012). Proteins, polysaccharides,
and their complexes used as stabilizers for emulsions: Alternatives to synthetic surfactants in
the pharmaceutical field?. International Journal of Pharmaceutics, 436(1–2), 359–378.
Chua, M., Baldwin, T. C., Hocking, T. J., & Chan, K. (2010). Traditional uses and potential health
benefits of Amorphophallus konjac K. Koch ex NE Br. Journal of Ethnopharmacology, 128(2),
268–278.
Dai, S., Jiang, F., Corke, H., & Shah, N. P. (2018). Physicochemical and textural properties of mozzarella
cheese made with konjac glucomannan as a fat replacer. Food Research International, 107, 691–699.
Dai, S., Jiang, F., Shah, N. P., & Corke, H. (2019). Functional and pizza bake properties of mozzarella
cheese made with konjac glucomannan as a fat replacer. Food Hydrocolloids, 92, 125–134.
Dickinson, E. (2011). Mixed biopolymers at interfaces: Competitive adsorption and multilayer struc-
tures. Food Hydrocolloids, 25(8), 1966–1983.
European Union (2012). Regulation No 231/2012 laying down specifications for food additives listed
in Annexes II and III to Regulation (EC) No. 1333/2008 of the European Parliament and of the
Council, Official Journal of the European Union.
Food and Drug Administration (FDA). (2016). Curcumin-GRAS FDA Report. Retrieved from https://
www.fda.gov.
Gharsallaoui, A., Roudaut, G., Chambin, O., Voilley, A., & Saurel, R. (2007). Applications of spray-
drying in microencapsulation of food ingredients: An overview. Food Research International,
40(9), 1107–1121.
Hayuningtyas, A., Borompichaichartkul, C., & Suriyarak, S. (2019) Effect of konjac glucomannan
concentration and oil-phase volume fraction on the stability of curcumin-loaded-oil-in-milk
system, Proceedings of the 21st Food Innovation Asia Conference 2019 (FIAC 2019), 13–15 June 2019,
BITEC, Bangkok, Thailand.
Hu, Y., Liang, H., Xu, W., Wang Y., An, Y., Yan, X,. Ye, S., Huang, Q., Liu, J., & Li, B. (2016). Synergistic
effects of small amounts of konjac glucomannan on functional properties of egg white protein.
Food Hydrocolloids, 52, 213–220.
Impaprasert, R., Piyarat, S., Sophontanakij, N., Sakulnate, N., Paengkanya, S., Borompichaichartkul,
C., & Srzednicki, G. (2017). Rehydration and textural properties of dried konjac noodles: Effect
of alkaline and some gelling agents. Horticulturae, 3(1), 20.
Jeppesen, P. B., & Mortensen, P. B. (1998). The influence of a preserved colon on the absorption of
medium chain fat in patients with small bowel resection. Gut, 43(4), 478–483.
Jiang, M., Li, H., Shi, J. S., & Xu, Z. H. (2018). Depolymerized konjac glucomannan: Preparation and
application in health care. Journal of Zhejiang University-SCIENCE B, 19(7), 505–514.
Jiménez-Colmenero, F., Cofrades, S., Herrero, A. M., Fernández-Martín, F., Rodríguez-Salas, L., &
Ruiz-Capillas, C. (2012). Konjac gel fat analogue for use in meat products: Comparison with
pork fats. Food Hydrocolloids, 26(1), 63–72.
264 Konjac Glucomannan
Kohyama, K., Iida, H., & Nishinari, K. (1993). A mixed system composed of different molecular
weights konjac glucomannan and kappa carrageenan: Large deformation and dynamic visco-
elastic study. Food Hydrocolloids, 7(3), 213–226.
Lafarge, C., & Cayot, N. (2018). Potential use of mixed gels from konjac glucomannan and native
starch for encapsulation and delivery of aroma compounds: A review. Starch‐Stärke, 70(9–10),
1700159.
Lu, W., Zheng, B., & Miao, S. (2018). Improved emulsion stability and modified nutrient release by
structuring O/W emulsions using konjac glucomannan. Food Hydrocolloids, 81, 120–128.
Mao, L. Roos, Y. H., & Miao S. (2015). Effect of maltodextrins on the stability and release of volatile
compounds of oil-in-water emulsions subjected to freeze–thaw treatment. Food Hydrocolloids,
50, 219–227.
Niwa, T., Etoh, H., Shimizu, A., & Shimizu, Y. (2000). Cis-N-(p-coumaroyl) serotonin from konnyaku,
Amorphophallus konjac K. Koch. Bioscience, Biotechnology, and Biochemistry, 64(10), 2269–2271.
Nussinovitch, A. (2004). Encapsulating liquid with hydrocolloid membrane stable from about-
20°C to 90°C without bursting U.S. Patent No. 6,680,184. U.S. Patent and Trademark Office,
Washington, DC.
Official Journal of the European Union. (2012). Commission regulation (EU) No 231/2012 of 9 March
2012 laying down specifications for food additives listed in Annexes II and III to Regulation
(EC) No 1333/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council.
Parry, J. M. (2009). Konjac glucomannan. In: A. Imeson (ed.), Food Stabilisers, Thickeners and Gelling
Agents, pp. 198–217, Wiley-Blackwell, Chichester, UK.
Phoonphun, S. (2004). Effect of gelling agents on quality attributes of strawberry flavoured milk jelly
drink. A Master’s Report submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree
Master of Science, Department of Food Technology, Silpakorn University, 87 p.
Shah, B. R., Li, B., Wang, L., Liu, S., Li, Y., Wei, X., Weiping, J., & Zhenshun, L. (2015). Health benefits
of konjac glucomannan with special focus on diabetes. Bioactive Carbohydrates and Dietary Fibre,
5(2), 179–187.
Srisamatthakarn, P., Chanrittisen, T., & Manochai, P. (2005). Effect of konjac flour and carrageenan
on the quality of Makiang (Cleistocalyx nervosum var. paniala) jelly. In: The Proceedings of
the Conference of Thai Resources: Connection of all Things, October 2005 (pp. 20–22).
Tester, R., & Al-Ghazzewi, F. (2017). Glucomannans and nutrition. Food Hydrocolloids, 68, 246–254.
Wang, C., Xu, M., Lv, W. P., Qiu, P., Gong, Y. Y., & Li, D. S. (2012). Study on rheological behavior of
konjac glucomannan. Physics Procedia, 33, 25–30.
Wang, Y., Liu, J., Li, Q., Wang, Y., & Wang, C. (2015). Two natural glucomannan polymers, from
Konjac and Bletilla, as bioactive materials for pharmaceutical applications. Biotechnology
Letters, 37(1), 1–8.
Wu, C. Y., & Shen, D. Y. (2001). Konjak-glucomannan capsule for chronic stomach disease. Faming
Zhuanli Shenqing Gongkai Shuomingshu CN1280829A, 24.
Yoshimura, M., Takaya, T., & Nishinari, K. (1998). Rheological studies on mixtures of corn starch and
konjac-glucomannan. Carbohydrate Polymers, 35(1–2), 71–79.
Zhang, C., Chen, J. D., & Yang, F. Q. (2014). Konjac glucomannan, a promising polysaccharide for
OCDDS. Carbohydrate Polymers, 104, 175–181.
Zhang, Y. Q., Xie, B. J., & Gan, X. (2005). Advance in the applications of konjac glucomannan and its
derivatives. Carbohydrate Polymers, 60(1), 27–31.
11
New Trends in the Konjac Flour Industry
CONTENTS
11.1 Introduction....................................................................................................................... 265
11.2 Properties of Konjac Flour............................................................................................... 265
11.3 Konjac Flour as a Novel Coating Material for Encapsulation..................................... 267
11.4 Konjac Flour as Fibre Source........................................................................................... 272
References...................................................................................................................................... 273
11.1 Introduction
Konjac flour is well-known in many industries including the food, agro-industry, biotech-
nology, pharmaceutical, and chemical industry. This is due to the properties of konjac flour
that allow its applications in a wide range of industries. The main applications are: dietary
fibre, thickening agent, gelling agent, water absorption agent, high molecular weight poly-
mer, film-forming material, and stabiliser. In the manufacturing of a food product, konjac
flour can be used to modify its texture, alter its viscosity, make it more solid-like or gel-like,
vary its flexibility, change its organoleptic properties, such as mouth feel, softer, or harder,
and also make it not thin film (e.g., edible coating). Moreover, nowadays, a consumer is
looking for healthy food products which are green, clean or composed of natural ingredi-
ents, easy to prepare, and have a long shelf life. The growing demand among consumers
for healthy products makes researches and industries focus intensively on health benefits.
Therefore, the new trend of using konjac flour in the industry is no longer limited to physi-
cal characteristics or textural properties, but includes more functional properties either
through new inventions or innovations in processing and product development that lead
to health benefits. Hence, this chapter will provide information about the potential appli-
cations of konjac flour in the agro-industry, food, and biotechnology industries, especially
for health and functional products.
in the food, pharmaceutical, chemical, and biotechnology industries (Zhang et al. 2005).
The physicochemical properties of KGM are described in Chapter 7. Moreover, KGM has
desirable properties, such as good film-formation, high water solubility, edibility, and bio-
degradability (Tobin et al. 2012). It has a tendency to create a fine dense network upon
drying (Zhang et al. 2005).
KGM powder itself has different characteristics from other powders that are made from
plants. KGM powder is a polymer that is soluble in water. However, it needs a special
technique to dissolve the KGM powder. A crucial factor in the process of the solubilisa-
tion of KGM powder is the fact that it has to be stirred all the time until the KGM powder
is completely dissolved. Otherwise, should it not be stirred all the time, it would become
solid. Furthermore, the KGM powder solution also exhibits different characteristics than
the other polysaccharides:
• The stickiness and the expansion of the KGM powder enable the water absorption
• When it is used in a solution, the particles will absorb and expand into a high vis-
cosity solution pseudoplastic fluid. It can expand 27–40 times its usual size
• The higher the viscosity of the KGM powder, the higher the expansion rate will be
The ability to absorb water by KGM powder will depend on time and temperature.
If the temperature is rising, it will also directly affect the absorption process and
cause the viscosity of the solution to change rapidly. The study from Tye (1991) showed
that the temperature of 50°C is the most suitable for glucomannan expansion. Moreover,
the increase of the viscosity in glucomannan also affects its ability to expand. It can
be argued that the viscosity of konjac powder will depend on the composition of the
KGM as a raw material and the manufacturing process during the extraction of the KGM
powder. Moreover, the gel formation from the KGM powder produced when the solu-
tion is heated under alkaline conditions is an irreversible process. The alkaline solution
will produce a deacetylation reaction, when it reacts with the acetyl group in KGM. As
a result, a gel will be produced due to the formation of a network of hydrogen bonds.
The study also mentions that the lowest concentration of KGM required to form an alka-
line gel is estimated at 0.5%. The alkaline solution substances that are widely chosen
include potassium carbonate, calcium carbonate, and calcium hydroxide. Furthermore,
Tye (1991) explained that the KGM powder can also be used with gum or other powders.
For example, when it is used with kappa carrageenan, the gel itself can become ther-
moreversible. Using the KGM powder with other substances also leads to new types of
gels that can be used in various circumstances, e.g., the creation of a stabiliser gel. More
details on the gelling properties of KGM in combination with other polysaccharides can
be found in Chapter 7.
The properties described above are well-known characteristics of KGM that can be
applied in many areas depending on the product and purpose of use. So far, the main
health benefits of KGM are associated with its nutritional characteristic as a ‘dietary fibre’.
However, the growing trends towards innovation aimed at developing a healthy diet are
focused on a number of new applications. They involve KGM as a coating material form-
ing a viscous solution, gel, or film that is utilised to encapsulate the bioactive compounds
from plants or animals.
New Trends in the Konjac Flour Industry 267
TABLE 11.1
Utilisation of KGM and Other Wall Materials in Spray Drying Microencapsulation
Spray Drying Encapsulation
Core Material Wall Material Condition Efficiency (%) References
Sweet orange oil flavour KGM, gum arabic, Inlet temperature: 60–81 Yang et al. (2009)
and starch sodium 160°C
octenyl succinate
Kaffir lime oil (Anti- KGM and KGM+ Inlet temperature: 56.86 Adamiec et al.
microbial agent) gum arabic 160°C–200°C (2012)
Andrographolide KGM, KGM+ Inlet temperature: 10.82–46.63 Wattanaprasert
β-cyclodextrin, 170°C, outlet et al. (2017)
KGM+ temperature: 85°C
α-cyclodexrtin
Coffee extract KGM, maltodextrin Inlet temperature: N/A Sakawulan et al.
160°C–180°C (2017)
Probiotics KGM, maltodextrin, Inlet air 90 Yanprapasiri
trehalose temperature: 170°C et al. (2018)
268 Konjac Glucomannan
enzymatic reaction. The acid hydrolysis of the polysaccharides is the simplest method
to convert KGM to be KGM hydrolysate. However, the reaction is time consuming, and
the high acid content in the residue at the end of the reaction hinders its utilisation in
the food industry. For instance, Huang et al. (2010) used sulfuric acid (3.2 M) at 40°C for
7 days and observed the particle size (nanocrystal) after the hydrolysed KGM was dried
by a freeze dryer. Moreover, Wang et al. (2015) also employed 2.8 M sulfuric acid at
40°C for 7 days and investigated the size of the KGM microcrystal. Meanwhile, Tanaka
et al. (2013) used 1 M of sulfuric acid in a boiling water bath for 5 hours with gentle
stirring every 1 hour to get fully hydrolysed KGM solutions. On the other hand, the
specific work of the enzyme shows that enzymatic hydrolysis can be an excellent way
to get the targeted and controlled hydrolysis of polysaccharides. When compared to
acid hydrolysis, o ligosaccharides from the enzymatical hydrolysis of KGM should be
used, as the KGM hydrolysate stimulates the growth of lactobacilli and bifidobacteria
(Al‐Ghazzewi et al. 2007).
There is a study on using β-mannanase to hydrolyse the (1, 4)-β-D-mannopyranosyl
linkages of glucomannans under the condition of 50°C, pH 5.5 for 24 hours. The enzyme
hydrolyses more than 90% of polysaccharides into oligosaccharides and some monosac-
charides (He et al. 2001). Enzyme modification techniques can be used for the modification
of the viscosity of the KGM solution. A number of techniques were devised to decrease
the viscosity of the polysaccharide solution by enzyme hydrolysis, such as using man-
nanase in the processing of plant fibres. Enzymatic hydrolysis leads to the production of
the oligosaccharides in KGM solution, which is used as a raw material in the food industry
(Table 11.2) (Al-Ghazzewi and Tester 2012; Chen et al. 2013).
Moreover, for applications in the food industry, it is more appropriate to use food-grade
enzymes to hydrolyse the KGM than to use concentrated acid. The KGM structure consists
of four different β-D-(1→4) linkages, which are mannose to mannose, mannose to glucose,
glucose to mannose, and glucose to glucose. Therefore, the macromolecule backbone of
KGM is contained in D-mannopyranosyl residue and D-glucopyranosyl residue. The link-
ages in the KGM backbone can be hydrolysed by mannanase, endoglucanase or cellulose,
and pectinase. However, mannanase is the most common enzyme to depolymerise the
KGM due to its high productivity compared to other enzymes. The predominant mono-
mers of KGM are mannose and glucose at a ratio of 1.6:1, while mannanase breaks the
main chain of β-D-1,4-mannopyranosyl linkages. In consequence, mannanase has a higher
productivity than other enzymes for the same timeframe of hydrolysis. On the other
hand, endoglucanases belong to the cellulose-degrading enzymes and cut the linkage of
β-D-1,4-linkages in a cellulose chain. The key targets of a cellulose-degrading enzyme are
TABLE 11.2
Characteristics of the Enzyme Hydrolyses of Substrate Solution
Enzyme Target of Enzyme References
the linkages between glucose to mannose and glucose to glucose. Moreover, pectinase
is in the big group of enzymes that break the chain of glycosidic linkage, especially at 1,
4-α-galactosiduronic linkages. In addition, a report from Cescutti et al. (2002) stated that
the presence of few short side chains may contain galactose residues, which are the target
of pectinase enzyme.
Therefore, the most important limitation for using KGM as a coating material, the high
viscosity of KGM, needs to be reduced, and the best and safest way is to produce enzy-
matic hydrolysate. The development of coating material from KGM to encapsulate or pro-
tect bioactive compounds includes kaffir lime oil-anti-microbial compounds (Adamiec
et al. 2012), andrographolide (Wattanaprasert et al. 2017), coffee extracts (Sakawulan et al.
2017), and probiotics (Yanprapasiri et al. 2018). The condition of drying is also important,
but it often depends on the raw material or bioactive compounds. The range of inlet and
outlet air temperature needs to be tailored to the specific product. As for anti-oxidant
properties of some bioactive compounds from the plant extract, they can be degraded or
formed during the high temperature spray drying. Therefore, the optimisation process for
spray drying conditions as well as the ratio of mixture core to wall material are important
and should draw the attention of the researcher. KGM can be used in combination with
other coating materials to synergise the protective effect, for example, KGM and gum ara-
bic (Adamiec et al. 2012), KGM and maltodextrin (Wattanaprasert et al. 2017; Sakawulan
et al. 2017), and KGM, maltodextrin, and trehalose (Yanprapasiri et al. 2018). It would be
interesting to understand the interaction of KGM with other coating materials that would
decrease or enhance the stability of materials, as well as control release. In their study,
Hayuningtyas et al. (2019) found that to stabilise curcumin, which is dissolved in lipids in
the milk system, the addition of KGM (<1%) can make stabilisation possible for this mix-
ture up to 14 days without separation due to the structuring of the water phase with a low
concentration of KGM.
Besides using KGM as a coating material to make a powder or liquid product, there is
another approach that could be applicable for healthy food products corresponding to the
needs of the consumer. An example of such an application could be a functional edible
film that is light, environmentally friendly, safe, and is able to encapsulate and conve-
niently release the bioactive compounds.
KGM is a polysaccharide, which is popular as a raw material for edible films
(Table 11.3). It can form an edible film which is tough, stable, and transparent. In addi-
tion, when mixing other polymers with KGM, they may enhance its mechanical
properties (Mikkonen 2009; Zhang et al. 2005). Other polymers are pullulan, gellan,
polyacrylamide, gelatin (Xiao et al. 2001b), carboxymethyl cellulose (Xiao et al. 2001c,
2002), chitosan (Tripetch et al. 2016; Xiao et al. 2000a), sodium alginate (Xiao et al. 2000b,
2002), polyvinyl pyrrolidone (Xiao et al. 2001a), cellulose, as well as whey protein iso-
late (Leuangsukrerk et al. 2014), etc. Plasticisers, which are often used with KGM edible
film, are glycerol and sorbitol. However, without a plasticiser, KGM can form edible
film alone. The deacetylation of the KGM solution with alkaline solution also increases
the strength of the edible film.
Applications of konjac glucomannan edible film in entrapping bioactive compounds
to preserve or extend shelf life of perishable products include KGM film incorpo-
rated with galangal extract to be used with mangos (Rattananin 2011), KGM film
incorporated with basil oil to be used in leafy salads (Saeheng 2016), and KGM film
270 Konjac Glucomannan
TABLE 11.3
Example of KGM Use for Film Forming
Formulation
Polymers Plasticiser Bioactive Compounds References
FIGURE 11.1
The proposed mechanism of 5-ALA entrapment in KGM and chitosan film.
272 Konjac Glucomannan
The prebiotic activity score is an interesting in vitro method to analyse the prebiotic prop-
erty of the tested saccharide because the data can present the activity of a prebiotic by com-
paring the growth of a probiotic with an enteric mixture. Moreover, Harindhanavudhi
et al. (2019) found that KGM and KGMH have a positive prebiotic activity score with L. casei.
KGMH is a mixture of oligosaccharides produced from the enzymatic hydrolysis of KGM
powder. It can be used as an effective biopolymer coating agent for bioactive materials.
The study of Harindhanavudhi et al. (2019) aimed at studying the effect of KGMH from
15% to 25% (w/w) KGM concentrations on the prebiotic activity score and growth rate of
Lactobacillus casei-01 in goat milk before using it as a coating material for L. casei-01 via spray
drying in a goat milk system. The KGM was hydrolysed by a β-mannanase enzyme and
manno-oligosaccharides were the product of the hydrolysis. The target product from the
hydrolysis was manno-oligosaccharides with 4°–6° of p olymerisation. The results from the
thin-layer chromatography technique demonstrated that by increasing the concentration of
KGM from 15% to 25%(w/w), this increased the concentration of m anno-oligosaccharides,
as shown by the intensity of the spot. The average growth of L. casei-01 was enhanced by
3.71 log CFU/mL (±0.53) when using KGMH as the prebiotic in De Man Rogosa and Sharpe
(MRS) broth. When comparing in vitro prebiotic activity scores between KGMH and com-
mercial prebiotics (inulin and fructo-oligosaccharide), it was found that KGMH from 25%
KGM exhibited a 0.35 ± 0.01 score, which was higher than those of fructo-oligosaccharide
(0.12 ± 0.02) and inulin (−0.02 ± 0.00). Furthermore, KGMH from 25% KGM promoted
L. casei-01 growth in a goat milk system more than KGMH from KGM of 15% and 20%.
These results indicated that KGMH produced from β-mannanase hydrolysis of 25% KGM
could have a potential to be applied in a synbiotic system with L. casei-01. The outcome of
this study shows that KGM and KGMH provide a significant amount of functional proper-
ties to the human body.
Regardless of a direct function in body well-being, KGMH could also be a benefit in food
drying as a drying aid and bioactive encapsulant. Synbiotic is a system where a probiotic
and its prebiotic are present together. Considering KGM or KGMH as a prebiotic of L. casei,
the synbiotic system of L. casei can be built and used as a functional ingredient in food
products.
The new trends in the konjac flour industry are associated with the needs or demands of
consumers that require a healthy product. In addition, the manufacturing process of that
particular product should be green and have zero waste. KGM flour exhibits a number of
advantages to health by adding functional properties to a food product, besides its physi-
cal function in the food product formulation. The examples of the studies mentioned in
this chapter could provide the food manufacturers with information about new trends
in product development and indicate the way to use konjac flour to produce healthy and
functional food products.
References
Adamiec, J., Borompichaichartkul, C., Srzednicki, G., Panket, W., Piriyapunsakul, S., & Zhao, J.
(2012). Microencapsulation of kaffir lime oil and its functional properties. Drying Technology,
30(9), 914–920.
Al-Ghazzewi, F. H., Khanna, S., Tester, R. F., & Piggott, J. (2007). The potential use of hydrolysed
konjac glucomannan as a prebiotic. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 87(9), 1758–1766.
274 Konjac Glucomannan
Al-Ghazzewi, F. H., & Tester, R. F. (2012). Efficacy of cellulase and mannanase hydrolysates of konjac
glucomannan to promote the growth of lactic acid bacteria. Journal of the Science of Food and
Agriculture, 92(11), 2394–2396.
Baer, D. J., Rumpler, W. V., Miles, C. W., & Fahey Jr, G. C. (1997). Dietary fiber decreases the metabo-
lizable energy content and nutrient digestibility of mixed diets fed to humans. The Journal of
Nutrition, 127(4), 579–586.
Brown, L., Rosner, B., Willett, W. W., & Sacks, F. M. (1999). Cholesterol-lowering effects of dietary
fiber: A meta-analysis. The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 69(1), 30–42.
Cescutti, P., Campa, C., Delben, F., & Rizzo, R. (2002). Structure of the oligomers obtained by enzy-
matic hydrolysis of the glucomannan produced by the plant Amorphophallus konjac. Carbohydrate
Research, 337(24), 2505–2511.
Chen, H. L., Cheng, H. C., Wu, W. T., Liu, Y. J., & Liu, S. Y. (2008). Supplementation of konjac gluco-
mannan into a low-fiber Chinese diet promoted bowel movement and improved colonic ecol-
ogy in constipated adults: A placebo-controlled, diet-controlled trial. Journal of the American
College of Nutrition, 27(1), 102–108.
Chen, J., Liu, D., Shi, B., Wang, H., Cheng, Y., & Zhang, W. (2013). Optimization of hydrolysis condi-
tions for the production of glucomanno-oligosaccharides from konjac using β-mannanase by
response surface methodology. Carbohydrate Polymers, 93(1), 81–88.
Connolly, M. L., Lovegrove, J. A., & Tuohy, K. M. (2010). Konjac glucomannan hydrolysate benefi-
cially modulates bacterial composition and activity within the faecal microbiota. Journal of
Functional Foods, 2, 219–224.
Dikeman, C. L., & Fahey Jr, G. C. (2006). Viscosity as related to dietary fiber: A review. Critical Reviews
in Food Science and Nutrition, 46(8), 649–663.
Harindhanavudhi, S., Somboonna, N., & Borompichaichartkul, C. (2019). Prebiotic activity score of
konjac glucomannan hydrolysate for Lactobacillus casei-01 and an application of the hydroly-
sate in goat milk system. In: Proceedings of the 21st Food Innovation Asia Conference 2019 (FIAC
2019), 13–15 June, Bitec Bangna, Bangkok, Thailand.
Hayuningtyas, A., Borompichaichartkul, C., & Suriyarak, S. (2019). Effect of konjac glucoman-
nan concentration and oil-phase volume fraction on the stability of curcumin-loaded-oil-in-
milk system. In: Proceedings of the 21st Food Innovation Asia Conference 2019 (FIAC 2019), 13–15
June 2019, Bitec Bangna, Bangkok, Thailand.
He, Z., Zhang, J., & Huang, D. A. (2001). Kinetic correlation for konjac powder hydrolysis by
β-mannanase from Bacillus licheniformis. Biotechnology Letters, 23, 389–393.
Ho, K. S., Tan, C. Y. M., Daud, M. A. M., & Seow-Choen, F. (2012). Stopping or reducing dietary fiber
intake reduces constipation and its associated symptoms. World Journal of Gastroenterology,
18(33), 4593.
Huang, J., Gao, S., & Shen, X. (2010). Konjac glucomannan nanocrystals prepared by acid hydrolysis.
e-Polymers, 10(1), 11–18.
Jenkins, D. J., Jenkins, A. L., Wolever, T. M., Vuksan, V., Rao, A. V., Thompson, L. U., & Josse, R. G.
(1994). Low glycemic index: Lente carbohydrates and physiological effects of altered food
frequency. The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 59(3), 706S–709S.
Jenkins, D. J., Vuksan, V., Kendall, C. W., Wursch, P., Jeffcoat, R., Waring, S., & Wong, E. (1998).
Physiological effects of resistant starches on fecal bulk, short chain fatty acids, blood lipids and
glycemic index. Journal of the American College of Nutrition, 17(6), 609–616.
Jia, D., Fang, Y., & Yao, K. (2009). Water vapor barrier and mechanical properties of konjac
glucomannan-chitosan-soy protein isolate edible films. Food and Bioproducts Processing, 87, 7–10.
Kalyani Nair, K., Kharb, S., & Thompkinson, D. K. (2010). Inulin dietary fiber with functional and
health attributes—A review. Food Reviews International, 26(2), 189–203.
Keithley, J. K., & Swanson, B. (2005). Glucomannan and obesity: A critical review. Alternative Therapies
in Health and Medicine, 11(6), 30–35.
Leuangsukrerk, M., Phupoksakul, T., Tananuwong, K., Borompichaichartkul, C., & Janjarasskul, T.
(2014). Properties of konjac glucomannan–whey protein isolate blend films. LWT-Food Science
and Technology, 59(1), 94–100.
New Trends in the Konjac Flour Industry 275
Mikkonen, K. S. (2009). Mannans as film formers and emulsion stabilizers. PhD Diss. Department of
Applied Chemistry and Microbiology Department of Food Technology, University of Helsinki,
Helsinki, Finland.
Nakajima, N., Ishihara, K., & Matsuura, Y. (2002). Dietary-fiber-degrading enzymes from a human
intestinal Clostridium and their application to oligosaccharide production from nonstarchy poly-
saccharides using immobilized cells. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 59(2–3), 182–189.
Pruksarojanakul, P., Prakitchaiwattana, C., Settachaimongkon, S., & Borompichaichartkul, C.
(2017). Development of synbiotic edible film from konjac glucomannan. In: Proceedings of Food
Innovation Asia Conference, 15–17 June 2017, Bangkok, Thailand.
Rattananin, J. (2011). Production of edible film from konjac powder incorporated with Thai medi-
cal plants extracts for extending shelf life of mangoes cv. Nam Dok Mai # 4. Master thesis,
Department of Food Technology, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Rexová-Benková, L., Omelková, J., Veruovič, B., & Kubanek, V. (1983). Endopolygalacturonase immo-
bilized on a porous poly (2, 6-dimethyl-p-phenyleneoxide). Biotechnology Letters, 5(11), 737–742.
Saeheng, P., Eamsakulrat, P., Mekkerdchoo, O., & Borompichaichartkul, C. (2016). Production
of konjac glucomannan antimicrobial film for extending shelf life of fresh-cut vegetables.
Horticulturae, 3, 17.
Sakawulan, D., Borompichaichartkul, C., & Archer, R. (2017). Effect of konjac glucomannan
hydrolysate on retaining antioxidant property of microencapsulated Arabica instant coffee.
In: Proceedings of Food Innovation Asia Conference, pp. 561–596. 15–17 June 2017, Bangkok,
Thailand.
Silva, V. M., Vieira, G. S., & Hubinger, M. D. (2014). Influence of different combinations of wall
materials and homogenisation pressure on the microencapsulation of green coffee oil by spray
drying. Food Research International, 61, 132–143.
Slavin, J. L. (2005). Dietary fiber and body weight. Nutrition, 21(3), 411–418.
Tanaka, Y., Okamoto, K., Matsushima, A., Ota, T., Matsumoto, Y., & Akasaki, T. (2013). Microwave-
assisted acid hydrolysis of konjac products for determining the konjac powder content.
Analytical Sciences, 29(11), 1049–1053.
Tatirat, O., & Charoenrein, S. (2011). Physicochemical properties of konjac glucomannan extracted
from konjac flour by a simple centrifugation process. LWT-Food Science and Technology, 44(10),
2059–2063.
Tobin, J. T., Fitzsimons, S. M., Chaurin, V., Kelly, A. L., & Fenelon, M. A. (2012). Thermodynamic
incompatibility between denature whey protein and konjac glucomannan. Food Hydrocolloids,
27, 201–207.
Tripetch, P., Borompichaichartkul, C., Duangmal, K., & Srzednicki, G. (2016). Entrapment of
5-aminolevulinic acid under edible composite film of konjac glucomannan and chitosan.
Engineering in Life Sciences, 16, 386–395.
Tye, R. J. (1991). Konjac flour: Properties and applications. Food Technology, 45(3), 82–92.
Wang, S., Zhou, B., Wang, Y., & Li, B. (2015). Preparation and characterization of konjac glucoman-
nan microcrystals through acid hydrolysis. Food Research International, 67, 111–116.
Wattanaprasert, S., Borompichaichartkul, C., Vaithanomsat, P., & Srzednicki, G. (2017). Konjac glu-
comannan hydrolysate: A potential natural coating material for bioactive compounds in spray
drying encapsulation. Engineering in Life Sciences, 17(2), 145–152.
Xiao, C., Gao, S., & Zhang, L. (2000b). Blend films from konjac glucomannan and sodium alginate
solutions and their preservative effect. Journal of Applied Polymer Science, 77, 617–626.
Xiao, C., Gao, S., Wang, H., & Zhang, L. (2000a). Blend films from chitosan and konjac glucomannan
solutions. Journal of Applied Polymer Science, 76, 509–515.
Xiao, C., Liu, H., Lu, Y., & Zhang, L. (2001a). Characterization of poly(vinylpyrrolidone)–konjac glu-
comannan blend films. Journal of Applied Polymer Science, 81, 1049–1055.
Xiao, C., Lu, Y., Gao, S., & Zhang, L. (2001b). Characterization of konjac glucomannan-gelatin blend
films. Journal of Applied Polymer Science, 79, 1596–1602.
Xiao, C., Lu, Y., Liu, H., & Zhang, L. (2001c). Preparation and characterization of konjac glucomannan
and sodium carboxymethylcellulose blend films. Journal of Applied Polymer Science, 80, 26–31.
276 Konjac Glucomannan
Xiao, C., Weng, L., & Zhang, L. (2002). Improvement of physical properties of crosslinked alginate
and carboxymethyl konjac glucomannan blend films. Journal of Applied Polymer Science, 84,
2554–2560.
Xu, X., Li, B., Kennedy, J. F., Xie, B. J., & Huang, M. (2007). Characterization of konjac g
lucomannan–
gellan gum blend films and their suitability for release of nisin incorporated therein.
Carbohydrate Polymers, 70, 192–197.
Yang, J., Xiao, J. X., & Ding, L. Z. (2009). An investigation into the application of konjac glucomannan
as a flavor encapsulant. European Food Research and Technology, 229, 467–474.
Yanprapasiri, K., Lohsrithong, C., Setthachaimongkol, S., Mekkerdchoo, O., & Borompichaichartkul,
C. (2018). Probiotic encapsulation by spray drying using konjac glucomannan hydrolysate as
wall material and its application in ice cream (Conference Paper). Italian Journal of Food Science,
30(5), 36–40.
Zhang, Y. Q., Xie, B. J., & Gan, X. (2005). Advance in the applications of konjac glucomannan and its
derivatives. Carbohydrate Polymers, 60(1), 27–31.
12
Concluding Remarks
KGM is an attractive dietary fibre. It acts as a neutral hydrocolloid with significant health
functions. It has been part of the human diet in China and Japan for nearly 2000 years.
Initially, the main species was Amorphophallus konjac from which the common English
name ‘konjac’ is derived. Nowadays, it has wide applications in the food industry as a
gelling agent, stabilizer, and emulsifier, and is used for edible coatings for the preservation
of fruit and vegetables. Other uses are in the pharmaceutical industry for microencapsula-
tion of active compounds that are to be released ‘on demand’ for treatment of various dis-
eases. There are also applications in the body care and tissue culture field, just to mention
a few of them.
In spite of the many applications, not enough is known about the raw material, i.e., vari-
ous species of the genus Amorphophallus in industrial production, processing, and various
applications of KGM-derived products. There are various publications dedicated to konjac
in the major producing countries like China and Japan in the languages of these countries.
However, even though it is a part of various scientific papers on very specialized topics,
there are so far only a few publications in the English language.
In order to fill in this gap, this book covers a wide range of aspects related to the produc-
tion of KGM. The first of these is the botanical background of the genus Amorphophallus, its
ecology, physiology, and field production. The next major aspect is the postharvest, pro-
cessing, and physicochemical properties of KGM. This is followed by the description on
the latest developments in the drying technology that are the key in the improvement of
the quality of KGM. The next section includes reports on the status of the konjac industry
in the major producing countries. Another major section refers to the applications of KGM
in food and medicine. These areas are the focal point of the research in several countries,
among them China, Thailand, and Indonesia, the latter two increasing considerably their
production of KGM and developing their local manufacturing of the derived products.
Finally, there is a section on the latest trends in the industry that illustrate the application
of the results of the current research done by scientific institutions, and the industry also
doing its own R&D.
The authors of this book very much hope that their work will promote knowledge about
KGM, its source, and its multiple applications.
277
Index
Note: Page numbers in italic and bold refer to figures and tables, respectively.
279
280 Index
E G
elite breeding, 132 Galloway, A., 83
establishment, 132 gastrointestinal tract (GIT), 260, 262
local production/commercialization, 132–133 GDP (Guanosine diphosphate)-mannose, 105,
principles, 131–132 107–108
sterilized konjac seed material, 132 gelatinization, 199
Emoyu 1, 125 gelation mechanism, konjac, 191–192, 192, 193
encapsulation process, 202, 259 gelling agent, 191
novel coating material for, 267–271 generally recognised as safe (GRAS), 2
endotherms, 203 genetic resources
Engler, A., 10 collection and collation, 117
enthalpy, 203 innovative development, 118
environmental compliance standards, 229 GIT (gastrointestinal tract), 260, 262
environmental conditions, 138, 143 glucomannans, 1, 101–103, 180, 189, 272; see also
environmental protection, 243 konjac glucomannan (KGM)
enzymatic browning reaction, 164–166 in Amorphophallus species, 77–80
enzymatic degradation, 110 biosynthesis, 104–105, 107, 109
enzymes, 105–106, 111 in idioblast, 102
glucomannan and starch biosynthesis on, 108 molecules, 196
hydrolysis, 268, 268 producing species, 14–77
modification techniques, 268 and starch biosynthesis, 104, 108, 109
ethanol recycling, 182–183, 183 glucose, 104, 112
glucose-6-phosphate, 107
GRAS (generally recognised as safe), 2
F
Grayum, M. H., 11
Ferrer, O. J., 165 grinding/grinder
fertilizing, 149 konjac chips, 176
field cultivation, 145 mill, 181
field management, 149–150 separation, particles, 183
field production, developments sifting, 175, 176
breeding variety, 224–225, 225–226 techniques, 229
disease prevention, 226
planting areas, 224, 225, 228
H
planting industry, guidelines, 228
planting mode, 226 Halsey model, 186
planting standardization, 227, 227 Haruna-kuro (Nonglin 1), 127–129
film forming, KGM, 270 harvesting, 150
Finne, G., 165 hazards, konjac cultivation
5-ALA, 270 damages caused, wind/hail, 141–142
FLint2 phylogeny, 7 diseases, 138–140
fluidised bed dryer, 216 drought damage, 141
fluidization technique, 209, 210, 216 insect attacks, 140
food/medicine, KGM application, 258–262 low and high temperature, 140–141
food technology, 259 meteorological, 140–141
foreign materials, separation, 243 waterlogging damage, 141
formation process, 102 healthcare industry, 232
free water, 184 Henderson model, 186
282 Index