1. A simulation of a penny fabrication process showed that at times 20 and 22, jobs at station 2 would experience bottlenecks close to starvation, and at time 24 ongoing processes would remain busy while empty processes starved continuously.
2. Practical worst case (PWC) is defined as a production system operating under capacity but remaining economically viable, helping establish performance limits to prevent worse outcomes with high costs or disruptions.
3. A case study of a hal capacity process found the actual throughput was 63% of capacity, work-in-process was 12.3 times the critical level, and cycle time was 24.1 times the raw process time. Calculations determined the actual system performed worse than the defined
1. A simulation of a penny fabrication process showed that at times 20 and 22, jobs at station 2 would experience bottlenecks close to starvation, and at time 24 ongoing processes would remain busy while empty processes starved continuously.
2. Practical worst case (PWC) is defined as a production system operating under capacity but remaining economically viable, helping establish performance limits to prevent worse outcomes with high costs or disruptions.
3. A case study of a hal capacity process found the actual throughput was 63% of capacity, work-in-process was 12.3 times the critical level, and cycle time was 24.1 times the raw process time. Calculations determined the actual system performed worse than the defined
1. A simulation of a penny fabrication process showed that at times 20 and 22, jobs at station 2 would experience bottlenecks close to starvation, and at time 24 ongoing processes would remain busy while empty processes starved continuously.
2. Practical worst case (PWC) is defined as a production system operating under capacity but remaining economically viable, helping establish performance limits to prevent worse outcomes with high costs or disruptions.
3. A case study of a hal capacity process found the actual throughput was 63% of capacity, work-in-process was 12.3 times the critical level, and cycle time was 24.1 times the raw process time. Calculations determined the actual system performed worse than the defined
1. A simulation of a penny fabrication process showed that at times 20 and 22, jobs at station 2 would experience bottlenecks close to starvation, and at time 24 ongoing processes would remain busy while empty processes starved continuously.
2. Practical worst case (PWC) is defined as a production system operating under capacity but remaining economically viable, helping establish performance limits to prevent worse outcomes with high costs or disruptions.
3. A case study of a hal capacity process found the actual throughput was 63% of capacity, work-in-process was 12.3 times the critical level, and cycle time was 24.1 times the raw process time. Calculations determined the actual system performed worse than the defined
• At time =20 and 22, jobs at station 2 will enter the bottleneck right before starvation. • At time 24, all on-going processes will just stay busy, while other empty processes will starve continuously.
2. Define Practical Worse Case
• PWC is when a production system underperforms, producing products (lower than ideal throughput or higher than ideal cycle time), but it remains economically viable. These scenarios help establish an upper limit for a production system's performance, preventing it from reaching a worst-case scenario with excessive costs or disruptions.
3. Hal Capacity Case Study
Critical WIP: rbT0 = 114 x 33.9 = 3,869
Actual Values:
• CT = 34 days = 663 hours (19.5 hrs/day)
• WIP = 47,600 panels • TH = 71.8 panels/hour
Conclusions:
• TH is 63% of the capacity
• WIP 12.3 higher compare to critical WIP • CT is 24.1 time raw process time