RMIT

Classifi
cation:
Peer Evaluation Truste
d

Course title: Principle of Play 2

Assignment Name: Expanded Study

1. Individual Evaluation: Nguyen

Write the names of the other group members in the blank boxes below
Tran Anh
Thi
Nguyen Nguyen
Quang Minh Nhat Huy

Yourself

Level of 3 3 3 3
enthusiasm/participation
Suggesting ideas 2 2 2 2

Understanding what was 3 3 3 3

required
Helping the group to 3 3 3 3
function well as a team
Performing tasks 3 3 3 3
efficiently

For each criterion, marks are awarded as follows:

3 for “better than most of the group in this respect”
2 for “about average for this group in this respect”
1 for “not as good as most of the group in this respect”
0 for “no help at all in this respect”
-1 for “a hindrance to the group in this respect”

2. Overall Evaluation:
Please give a mark of 10 to the group member(s) who you believed made the greatest overall
contribution to the group (other than yourself). Please rate the contribution of each other member of
your group on a scale of 0 to 10, where 0 means they made no contribution and 5 means they made half
the contribution of the group’s leading contributor. You are not required to rate your own contribution.

Group members’ names Overall Contribution (out of 10)

1 Nguyen Tran Anh Thi 10
2 Nguyen Quang Minh 10
3 Nguyen Nhat Huy 10
4
5
 RMIT
Classifi
cation:
Truste
Please provide your group experience in general. Feel free to express your honest
d
feelings, experience, problems faced, gained knowledge, how you overcame the issues, etc.
It is important that your explanations are factual, legible, and professional.

We’ve been working as a group since the beginning of time so there’s nothing to say.

This evaluation is a formal component of your assessment for group work.

Full Name: Nguyen Khoi Nguyen
Student ID: s3884511
Date: 8th December 2023
I hereby certify that I have provided an honest assessment of the contribution of my teammates to our
team’s productivity. My team maintenance scores are not based on any ‘in or out-of-class’ agreements
among my teammates and myself to distribute points in a particular way (i.e., a way that does not
consider the quality or quantity of individual efforts).