Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Unit 2 Negotiable Instrument Act, 1881
Unit 2 Negotiable Instrument Act, 1881
Unit 2 Negotiable Instrument Act, 1881
INTRODUCTION
The Negotiable Instrument Act came into force on the first day of March 1882. It deals
with Bills of Exchange, Promissory Note and Cheque.
DEFINITION
The term Negotiable instrument can be defined as a written promise or order to pay money
which may be transferred from one hand to another as a substitute of money.
P a g e 2 | 18
UNIT 2 THE NEGOTIABLE INSTRUMENTS ACT, 1881
1. Consideration
2. Date
3. Time of acceptance
4. Time of transfer
5. Order of endorsement
6. Stamp
7. Holder in due course
8. Fact of dishonor
1. Promissory Note
2. Bill of Exchange
3. Cheque
Note: The Negotiable Instruments Act speaks of only above 3 instruments, but it does not
mean that there cannot be any other negotiable instruments than these three.
1. PROMISSORY NOTE:
Section 4 of the act defines Promissory Note as follows:
“A Promissory Note is an instrument in writing containing an unconditional undertaking
signed by the maker to pay a certain sum of money only to, or to the order of a certain person,
or to the bearer of the instrument”.
DRB & BCP BBA COLLEGE, ASST PROF Dr. HIRAL MEHTA
P a g e 3 | 18
UNIT 2 THE NEGOTIABLE INSTRUMENTS ACT, 1881
Example:
1. Maker: It is a person who makes the promissory note and promises to pay the money
stated therein.
2. Payee: It is a person to whom the amount of promissory note is payable.
Three months after date, I promise to pay B or order the sum of rupees five
hundred for value received.
To B
Bombay. Stamp
Sd/ - A
P a g e 4 | 18
UNIT 2 THE NEGOTIABLE INSTRUMENTS ACT, 1881
P a g e 5 | 18
UNIT 2 THE NEGOTIABLE INSTRUMENTS ACT, 1881
2. BILL OF EXCHANGE:
Section 5 of the Negotiable instrument act defines bill of exchange as follows:
Generally, a bill of exchange is drawn by the creditor, who directs his debtor to pay the
money to the person specified in the instrument.
Example: A wrote and signed an instrument ordering B to pay Rs.500 to C. This is a bill
of exchange. In this instrument B has been ordered to pay Rs.500 to C.
• Like promissory note a bill of exchange cannot be made payable to the bearer on
demand, because The Reserve Bank of India Act prohibits the issue of such bill of
exchange.
Example: On demand pay to the bearer the sum of Rs.500 for value received.
• A bill of exchange payable on demand in which the name of the payee is mentioned is
valid.
Example: On demand pay to A or order the sum of Rs.500 for value received.
• The bill of exchange being an order upon the drawee to pay the money, is not binding
on him unless he accepts to pay the money due on the bill of exchange.
• A bill of exchange becomes dishonored by non-acceptance.
P a g e 6 | 18
UNIT 2 THE NEGOTIABLE INSTRUMENTS ACT, 1881
• The acceptance of the BOE is given by the rawer in writing only. The acceptance can be
either by writing the word accepted or signing the BOE or by simply putting a signature.
To B
Delhi. Sd/ - A
1. It must be in Writing.
2. It must be signed by the drawer.
3. It must contain an express order to pay.
4. The order to pay must be unconditional.
5. It must contain an order to pay in terms of money only.
6. It must contain an order to pay a definite amount of money.
7. It must contain certain parties.
8. Intention to make a bill of exchange and its delivery.
9. Other formalities include stamp, date, time, place, consideration etc.
DRB & BCP BBA COLLEGE, ASST PROF Dr. HIRAL MEHTA
P a g e 7 | 18
UNIT 2 THE NEGOTIABLE INSTRUMENTS ACT, 1881
DRB & BCP BBA COLLEGE, ASST PROF Dr. HIRAL MEHTA
P a g e 8 | 18
UNIT 2 THE NEGOTIABLE INSTRUMENTS ACT, 1881
10. Same person In this case the maker and A drawer and the payee
the payee cannot be the may be the same person,
same person, because a because the drawee can be
promise to self is not a ordered to pay the money
promissory note. to the drawer himself.
11. Writer Promissory note is written by It is written by the
a debtor who himself creditor, ordering the
promises to pay the money debtor to pay money.
to his creditor.
3. CHEQUE:
Cheque is therefore, such a bill of exchange which is drawn on a specified banker and not
expressed to be payable otherwise than on demand.
The cheque being a bill of exchange must possess all the requirements of bill of exchange
and should also meet the requirements of Section 6.
Banker: A banker is one, who in the ordinary course of business honor’s cheques drawn on
him by persons and receives money on current accounts”.
Parties to Cheque:
DRB & BCP BBA COLLEGE, ASST PROF Dr. HIRAL MEHTA
P a g e 9 | 18
UNIT 2 THE NEGOTIABLE INSTRUMENTS ACT, 1881
SPECIMEN OF CHEQUE:
• A cheque being a Bill of Exchange must have all the essential elements of Bill of
Exchange. In addition to these essential elements of Bill of Exchange, the cheque should
also satisfy the following two additional conditions.
1. It must be drawn on a specified banker. A cheque drawn on any person other than a
banker is not valid.
2. It must be payable on demand. A cheque is always payable on demand.
Note:
P a g e 10 | 18
UNIT 2 THE NEGOTIABLE INSTRUMENTS ACT, 1881
DRB & BCP BBA COLLEGE, ASST PROF Dr. HIRAL MEHTA
P a g e 11 | 18
UNIT 2 THE NEGOTIABLE INSTRUMENTS ACT, 1881
1. Parties It has three parties; 1) Drawer There are two parties – maker
(Bank Customer) 2) Drawee (Bank) (promisor) and payee (promise)
3) Payee (Holder)
4. Relation In case of cheque the drawer and A promissory note cannot be made
payee may be one and the same payable to the maker himself. The
person. In other words, the maker maker stands in the immediate
and the receiver may be the same relation to the payee.
person.
DRB & BCP BBA COLLEGE, ASST PROF Dr. HIRAL MEHTA
P a g e 12 | 18
UNIT 2 THE NEGOTIABLE INSTRUMENTS ACT, 1881
10. Liability In case of cheque, the liability of the The maker of the promissory note
drawer is secondary and is primarily and absolutely liable to
conditional. payee. In other words, the liability
of maker is primary and absolute.
11. Payment A cheque can only be drawn A note may be also drawn payable
payable on demand. on demand, or on the expiry of a
certain period after date.
HOLDER:
“The holder of a negotiable instrument means any person entitled in his own name to the
possession thereof and to receive or recover the amount, due thereon from parties thereto.”
(Section 8)
Before a person can claim to be a holder of a negotiable instrument two conditions are
necessary:
1. He should be entitled in his own name the possession of the instrument, and
2. He should have the right to recover the amount due thereon from the parties.
Every instrument initially belongs to the payee and he is entitled in his own name to its
possession and receive the amount due on it. The payee of a negotiable instrument can transfer
the same to any person in payment of his own debts. This transfer of the negotiable instrument
is known as Negotiation and it takes place in two ways:
DRB & BCP BBA COLLEGE, ASST PROF Dr. HIRAL MEHTA
P a g e 13 | 18
UNIT 2 THE NEGOTIABLE INSTRUMENTS ACT, 1881
“Holder in Due Course means, any person who for consideration became the possessor of a
promissory note, bill of exchange or cheque, if payable to bearer, or the payee or endorsee
thereof, if payable to order, before the amount mentioned in it became payable, and without
having sufficient cause to believe that defect existed in the title of the person from whom he
derived his title.” (Section 9)
A person becomes the holder in due course of the negotiable instrument if all the
following conditions are fulfilled:
1. He must be the holder of the negotiable instrument.
2. He must have obtained the instrument before its maturity.
3. He must have obtained the instrument for valuable consideration.
4. He must have obtained the instrument in good faith.
5. He must take the negotiable instrument which is complete and regular on the face.
Thus, a person cannot be said to be a holder in due course when:
1. He has obtained the instrument by gift or for an unlawful consideration or by illegal
methods.
2. He acquires the instrument after its maturity.
3. When the circumstances are such that a reasonable person would suspect that the title
of the transferor is defective.
The holder in due course enjoys certain rights or privileged position. He has the
following rights:
1. Instrument purged of all defects (Section 53): A holder in due course who gets the
instrument in good faith in the course of its currency is not only himself protected against all
defects of title of the person from whom he has received it, but also serves, as a channel to
protect all subsequent holders. A holder in due course can recover the amount of the instrument
from all previous parties although, as a matter of fact, no consideration was paid by some of
the previous parties to instrument or there was a defect of title in the party from whom he took
it. Once an instrument passes through the hands of a holder in due course, it is purged (clean)
of all defects. It is like a current coin. Whosoever takes it can recover the amount from all
parties previous to such holder.
Thus, the holder in due course gets a good title to the instrument though the title of the
transferor or any prior party to the instrument is defective. He can recover the full amount
DRB & BCP BBA COLLEGE, ASST PROF Dr. HIRAL MEHTA
P a g e 14 | 18
UNIT 2 THE NEGOTIABLE INSTRUMENTS ACT, 1881
DRB & BCP BBA COLLEGE, ASST PROF Dr. HIRAL MEHTA
P a g e 15 | 18
UNIT 2 THE NEGOTIABLE INSTRUMENTS ACT, 1881
9. Estoppel against denying original validity of instrument (Section 120): The plea of
original invalidity of the instrument cannot be put forth, against the holder in due course by the
drawer of a bill of exchange or cheque or by an acceptor for the honour of the drawer. But
where the instrument is void on the face of e.g. promissory note made payable to "bearer", even
the holder in due course cannot recover the money. Similarly, a minor cannot be prevented
from taking the defence of minority. Also, there is no liability if the signatures are forged.
10. Estoppel against denying capacity of the payee to endorse (Section 121): No maker of
promissory note and no acceptor of a bill of exchange payable to order shall, in a suit therein
by a holder in due course, be permitted to resist the claim of the holder in due course on the
plea that the payee had not the capacity to endorse the instrument on the date of the note as he
was a minor or insane or that he had no legal existence. In other words, the maker of a note or
an acceptor of a bill payable to order cannot deny the payee's capacity to endorse the same at
the date of the note or bill.
11. Estoppel against endorser to deny capacity of parties (Section 122): An endorser of the
bill by his endorsement guarantees that all previous endorsements are genuine and that all prior
parties had capacity to enter into valid contracts. Therefore, he on a suit thereon by the
subsequent holder cannot deny the signature or capacity to contract of any prior party to the
instrument.
DIFFERENCE BETWEEN HOLDER AND HOLDER IN DUE COURSE:
SRNO ASPECTS HOLDER HOLDER IN DUE
COURSE
1. Consideration He may become the He is one who obtains
possessor or payee of an possession for
instrument even without consideration.
consideration.
2. Maturity He may become the He must become the
possessor before or after possessor or payee of the
maturity. instrument before the
amount thereon becomes
payable.
3. Knowledge of He may have knowledge of He must have become the
defects defect in the title of the holder of the instrument in
person from whom he good faith and after
derived his title. exercising due care and
caution.
DRB & BCP BBA COLLEGE, ASST PROF Dr. HIRAL MEHTA
P a g e 16 | 18
UNIT 2 THE NEGOTIABLE INSTRUMENTS ACT, 1881
DRB & BCP BBA COLLEGE, ASST PROF Dr. HIRAL MEHTA
P a g e 17 | 18
UNIT 2 THE NEGOTIABLE INSTRUMENTS ACT, 1881
DRB & BCP BBA COLLEGE, ASST PROF Dr. HIRAL MEHTA
P a g e 18 | 18