Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 15

Large Optical Kerr Nonlinearity in Titanium

Carbide MXene-VS2 Hybrid

Vinod Kumar,† Aditya Sharma,‡ Pratap Mane,¶ Brahmananda Chakraborty,§,∥

Chandra S. Rout,⊥ and K. V. Adarsh∗,†

†Department of Physics, Indian Institute of Science Education and Research, Bhopal


462066, India
‡Centre for Nano and Material Sciences, Jain (Deemed-to-be University), Jain Global
Campus, Kanakapura Road, Bangalore 562112, India
¶Seismology Division, Bhabha Atomic Research Centre, Trombay, Mumbai 400085, India
§High Pressure and Synchrotron Radiation Physics Division, Bhabha Atomic Research
Centre, Trombay, Mumbai 400085, India
∥Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai 400085, India
⊥Centre for Nano and Material Science, Jain University, Jain global campus, Jakkasandra,
Ramanagaram, Bangalore 562112 India

E-mail: adarsh@iiserb.ac.in

Abstract
Nonlinear optical responses or Kerr nonlinearity of materials are of significant importance
in developing modern photonic and optoelectronic devices. Optical Kerr nonlinearity induced
by strong optical excitation in hybrid material can offer a larger amplitude, potentially helpful
in optical switching/limiting, all-optical signal processing, and quantum information. Here, we
demonstrate a remarkable, manifold increase in the magnitude of the third-order nonlinear optical
response (Kerr nonlinearity) of the donor-acceptor Ti3 C2 Tx (MXene)-VS2 hybrid in the strong
coupling regime compared to control systems in the femtosecond domain. Interestingly, we ob-
served a transition from reverse saturable absorption to saturable absorption and a change from
self-focusing to self-defocusing in the nonlinear optical behavior when moving from the MXene-
VS2 hybrid to control systems. Our four-level rate-equation model encapsulates the underlying
physics governing the unprecedented ultrafast nonlinear optical response observed in hybrid. The
enhanced Kerr nonlinearity of the hybrid is ascribed to charge transfer between MXene and VS2 .
Besides, First-principles calculations and the Bader charge study unveil strong electronic coupling
within the hybrid system, where the transfer of electrons from MXene to VS2 corroborated through
measurements of the steady-state and time-resolved photoluminescence. Finally, benefitting from
the high third-order nonlinear response, we present a propitious application of MXene-VS2 hybrid

1
as an ultrafast optical limiter based on liquid cells for optoelectronic sensors with an onset thresh-
old of 0.6 mJ cm−2 and differential limiting transmittance of 0.46.

KEYWORDS: MXene-VS2 hybrid, charge transfer, saturable absorption, reverse saturable ab-
sorption, self-focusing, self-defocusing, optical limiter

INTRODUCTION stituent systems. Besides, several other hybrids


also showed an improved nonlinear optical response,
Nonlinear optics has emerged as an extensive area of such as MoSe2 /GO, 20 hybrids of gold nanoparticles
research in modern science since the innovation of the with CdSe/WS2 and Ge2 4Se7 6, 21–23 Graphene/MoS2
laser in the 1960s. The nonlinear optical interaction heterostructure 24 and inorganic-organic halide per-
of light with the material itself guides several fasci- ovskites, 25 etc. However, the majority of these hy-
nating scientific phenomena, such as optical switch- brids display nonlinear response in the picosecond and
ing and limiting, 1,2 harmonic generation in optically nanosecond pulse regimes with slow transfer rates. So,
active materials, 3 optical parametric oscillation, 4 op- finding appropriate donor-acceptor materials that can
tical data storage, 5 and quantum information pro- operate in femtosecond pulse regimes with fast charge
cessing. 6 In addition, the nonlinear optical implica- transfer rates is a fundamental task.
tions also guide many worthwhile functional appli-
cations, such as super-continuum generation through To address this emerging challenge, we pro-
photonic crystal, 7 frequency combs generation in op- pose the hybrid of Ti3 C2 Tx (MXene) and VS2 ,
tical cavities, 8 laser-based gas sensing, 9 molecular fin- one of the transition metal dichalcogenides (TMDs).
gerprinting, 10 and telecommunications through opti- Meanwhile, MXenes represent a category of ma-
cal fibres. 11 However, despite extensive endeavor and terials consisting of metal carbides and metal ni-
several years of progress in this arena, third-order trides characterized by their two-dimensional (2D)
nonlinear optics for photonic devices have yet to be layered structure. 26 The standard formula for MX-
understood fully due to the deficiency of materials ene is Mn+1 Xn Tx (n = 1, 2, 3). Where M stands for
with extremely large nonlinear responses. It is al- an early transition metal, X denotes either nitrogen or
ways desirable to have materials with large third- carbon, and Tx is attributed to surface terminations
order optical response (Kerr-nonlinearity) at low op- such as -F, -OH, or -O. MXenes are generally pro-
tical power, inherently fast response time, and an duced by selectively etching the intermediate A layers
extended dynamic range to develop next-generation from a MAX phase (where A belongs to group IIIA
optical devices. 12,13 The Kerr-nonlinearity is repre- or IVA elements). This process involves using fluorine
sented as changes in the imaginary and real parts of etchants, such as lithium fluoride (LiF) or hydrofluo-
the nonlinear susceptibility and embodies nonlinear ric acid (HF). 27 On the other hand, among the TMDs,
absorption and refraction, respectively. The former a highly abundant and low-cost VS2 bids an excellent
resembles intensity-dependent changes in material ab- prospect to develop as a better-performance nonlinear
sorption, and the latter corresponds to the variation in optical material for photonics owing to its substantial
the phase of propagating waves within the material, surface area featuring extremely active sites at the
which can lead to either positive nonlinearity (self- edges, along with remarkable mechanical strength of
focusing) or negative nonlinearity (self-defocusing) of unique 2D layered structure. 28,29 Individually, MX-
the optical field. 14 Hence, the quest for materials with enes and VS2 have device-beneficial nonlinear optical
large Kerr nonlinearity is one of the main goals of properties with lower magnitudes. 30,31 Incorporating
nonlinear optics. However, traditional materials of- VS2 with MXene thus could be an effective strategy to
ten exhibit weak nonlinear optical responses, even improve the Kerr nonlinearity or device performance
in intense optical fields. Therefore, such constraints further. Recent studies demonstrated efficient charge
call for alternative approaches to enhance the nonlin- transfer in MXene-VS2 hybrid, highlighting their use-
ear responses of prevailing materials. One promising fulness in energy storage devices. 29 So far, active con-
strategy is to acquire large ultrafast Kerr nonlinear- trol of optical Kerr nonlinearity mediated by charge
ity through photoinduced charge transfer of a donor- transfer remains largely unexplored. In this article,
acceptor pair hybrid at the nanoscale interface. Also, we illustrate an unprecedented or manifold increase in
recent studies ascertained that the interactions on a the magnitude of the absorptive and refractive parts
nanoscopic scale at interfaces can significantly mod- of the ultrafast third-order nonlinear optical response
ify the optoelectronic and chemical characteristics of of the MXene-VS2 hybrid at 800 nm excitation wave-
a hybrid system. 15–17 For instance, we have recently length compared to control systems in the femtosec-
reported the enhanced nonlinear optical response in ond regime. For example, we demonstrate a large
VSe2 -rGO 18 and SWCNT-VSe2 nanohybrid, 19 which reverse saturable absorption (RSA) coefficient (β) of
are approximately 10 times larger than their con- (150 ± 16) × 10−3 cm GW−1 and the nonlinear refrac-

2
tion (n2 ) of (94 ± 9) × 10−6 cm2 GW−1 , these findings methods, and the details are presented in description
are at least one order of magnitude greater than those S1 in the Supporting Information.
observed in the control systems. This strongly en- High magnification field emission scanning elec-
hanced Kerr nonlinearity in the hybrid is ascribed to tron microscopy (FESEM) measurements investigated
the charge transfer phenomenon between MXene and the morphological description of MXene, VS2 , and
VS2 . Notably, we have observed a transition from MXene-VS2 hybrid. Figure 2a offers an understand-
RSA to saturable absorption (SA) in the imaginary ing of the uniform layered, sheet-like morphology of
part and a change from self-focusing to self-defocusing VS2 from a particular angle, indicating layer-by-layer
in the real part of nonlinear optical behavior when growth in the range of 0.2 to 0.5 µm in size. No-
moving from hybrid to control systems. Our four-level tably, the gaps observed between the layers indicate
rate-equation model effectively encapsulates the un- the presence of substantial ion transport sites. Fig-
derlying physics responsible for the unprecedented ul- ure 2b displays the FESEM image of MXene flakes
trafast nonlinear optical response observed in the hy- showing uniformly etched layers, indicating substan-
brid system. First-principles calculations and Bader tial active sites to hold ions. Figure 2c illustrates
charge study unveiled a strong electronic coupling in how the MXene-VS2 hybrid exhibits the crumbling
the hybrid where electrons are transferred from MX- of VS2 into small sheets that assemble on or in be-
ene to VS2 . Further, this charge transfer is corrobo- tween the MXene flakes to inhibit restacking in con-
rated through the measurements of steady-state and trast to the control VS2 sheets. The Powder X-ray
time-resolved photoluminescence (PL) with a trans- diffraction (PXRD) pattern of the hybrid and con-
fer rate of (7.3 ± 0.5) × 108 s−1 . By utilizing the trols are displayed in Figure S1. The PXRD pat-
strong RSA of our hybrid system, we have success- tern of the MXene exhibits a distinct peak at 8.83◦
fully fabricated a high-performance ultrafast optical correlates with the (002) plane. The observed shift
limiter based on liquid cells with imperative charac- of this diffraction peak towards lower angles signifies
teristic device parameters, including an onset thresh- the successful etching of the Al layer from Ti3 AlC2
old of 0.6 mJ cm−2 and a minimal limiting differential (MAX). 29,30 Moreover, the PXRD pattern of VS2
transmittance of 0.46. These device performance pa- in Figure S1 illustrates the hexagonal structure with
rameters surpass several benchmark optical limiters the P 3m1 space group. The distinctive peaks at
observed in the femtosecond domain. 15.2, 35.8, 45.4, 57.3, 58.2, and 69.4◦ resemble (001),
(101), (102), (110), (103), and (201) lattice planes, re-
spectively, which completely match with the JCPDS
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION card no. 01-89-1640. 32 Additionally, the PXRD pat-
Figure 1 displays the schematic of the synthesis tern of the MXene-VS2 hybrid depicts the dominant
procedure of control VS2 sheets and strongly cou- characteristic (002) peak of MXene. Notably, this
pled Ti3 C2 Tx (MXene)-VS2 hybrid by hydrothermal peak has shifted towards the lower angle from 8.9◦ to

Figure 1: Schematic showing the details of sample preparation of control VS2 sheets and Ti3 C2 Tx
(MXene)-VS2 hybrids by hydrothermal method.

3
Figure 2: High magnification FESEM images of (a) etched Ti3 C2 Tx (MXene) flakes (b) VS2 sheets (c)
MXene-VS2 hybrid (d) FT-IR spectrum of VS2 , MXene, and MXene-VS2 hybrid.

6.7◦ , owing to the widening of the interlayer spacing at 153 cm−1 might ascribed to the existence of oxy-
due to the deposition of VS2 sheets either between or gen species in MXene. The less prominent peaks at
on top of the MXene flakes, effectively inhibiting the 201, 277, 406, 510, and 623 cm−1 indicate the forma-
tendency for restacking. Nevertheless, the exposure tion of MXene. The energy-gap modes of the in-plane
of a wide peak near 27.9◦ in the MXene-VS2 hybrid Ti−OH and Ti−O surface functional groups existing
because of the expanded interlayer spacing of con- in the MXene 35 are ascribed to the peak at 406 cm−1 .
trol VS2 . 33 Figure 2d displays the FT-IR spectrum Figure 3a (middle panel) displays the Raman spec-
of control VS2 , MXene, and MXene-VS2 hybrid. The trum of control VS2 , showing the characteristic peaks
V4+ oxidation state is corroborated by S−V−S and at 140, 189, 282, 405, 690, and 990 cm−1 . The charac-
V=S peaks at 674 and 976 cm−1 in control VS2 , re- teristic peaks at 282 and 405 cm−1 are ascribed to the
spectively. The lack of prominent peaks of functional in-plane E12g and out-of-plane A1g vibration modes,
groups sustains the purity of MXene. 34 Additionally, respectively, emerging from S atoms connected to V
the C−F bond in MXene exhibits a modest character- atoms. 36 Figure 3a (bottom panel) shows the Raman
istic stretched band vibration at a wavelength of 1232 spectrum of the MXene-VS2 hybrid, where the char-
cm−1 , further supporting its low fluorine concentra- acteristic peaks of both control materials are clearly
tion. 34 Due to the presence of MXene in the hybrid, discernible within the hybrid. Strikingly, we find that
there is a change in bending vibrations from control the characteristic peak at 510 cm−1 in MXene is red-
VS2 to hybrids, from 674 to 520 cm−1 for the S−V−S shifted to 525 cm−1 in the hybrid, indicating a strong
band and from 976 to 988 cm−1 for the V=S band. electronic coupling of VS2 with MXene. Figure 3b
As a result, the S−V−S and V=S bands have widened presents the UV-Vis (200-800 nm) optical absorption
in hybrids, indicating that MXene functional groups spectra of MXene, VS2 , and MXene-VS2 hybrid. As
have attached to the doubly bridged (S2− ) doubly shown, MXene absorbs a broad spectrum from 200
bonded (S2− ) species. 32 to 800 nm with a characteristic absorption peak near
200 nm, which is consistent with previous reports. 31
Figure 3a (top panel) shows the Raman spectrum
Moreover, VS2 displays an absorption onset at 500
of the MXene having characteristics peaks at 153,
nm with two distinct peaks at 262 and 350 nm in the
201, 277, 406, 510, and 623 cm−1 . The intense peak

4
Figure 3: Raman spectrum of (a) MXene (top), VS2 (middle) and MXene-VS2 hybrid (bottom) (b)
Ground state optical absorption spectrum of MXene, VS2 and MXene-VS2 hybrid. (c) PL spectra
of MXene and MXene-VS2 hybrid. The PL intensity experiences a significant reduction and exhibits
a redshift of 13 nm in the hybrid compared to MXene, suggesting the occurrence of efficient charge
transfer between MXene and VS2 .

UV-Vis region. The absorption spectrum of the hy- It has been shown that charge transfer interac-
brid can be examined as a combination of signals from tions at the interfaces significantly change the opto-
each control system; the intensity of the characteris- electronic and chemical characteristics of the hybrid.
tic absorption signal significantly weakened and red- For instance, when the VSe2 is hybridized with the re-
shifted in the MXene-VS2 hybrid compared to con- duced graphene oxide (rGO) 18 and single-wall carbon
trol VS2 (see Figure S2), signifying strong coupling nanotube (SWCNT), 19 an amazing enhancement in
between MXene and VS2 . Further, we provide the the nonlinear optical response is produced. Similarly,
results of the photoluminescence (PL) measurements large improvements in third-order nonlinearity have
of the MXene and MXene-VS2 hybrid shown in Fig- also been noted in hybrids such as MoSe2 /graphene
ure 3c to explore the charge transfer process between oxide 20 , AuNP/Ge24 Se76 , 23 Graphene/MoS2 , 24 and
MXene and VS2 . The MXene shows high photolumi- Graphene/WX2 (X = S, Se, and Te) 38 systems.
nescence with a broad peak centered at 480 nm under Therefore, the charge transfer process in MXene-VS2
360 nm excitation. Strikingly, the PL intensity experi- hybrid could be expected to play a crucial role in en-
ences a substantial reduction and a noticeable redshift hancing the ultrafast third-order nonlinear optical re-
by 13 nm in the hybrid compared to MXene, indicat- sponse. To investigate the third-order nonlinear op-
ing close integration and interaction between the MX- tical response, we have employed the open and close
ene and VS2 , suggesting an efficient charge transfer. aperture Z-scan method with a 120-femtosecond laser
Because the electronic wavefunctions of MXene and pulse at 800 nm excitation. All the samples have been
VS2 overlap, the potential barrier is made sufficiently diluted in distilled water, having a linear transmit-
low to allow for charge transfer during photoexcita- tance of 60%.
tion. The red shifting and quenching of the PL peak
The open aperture Z-scan symmetric transmission
are caused by the changing density of states brought
results of the MXene-VS2 hybrid and controls are dis-
about by mixing electronic states at the interface. 37
played in Figure 4a at a peak intensity of 90 GW

5
Figure 4: The normalized transmittance measured as a function of position under 800 nm excitations
with a moderate peak intensity of 90 GW cm−2 . (a) Open aperture (c) Close aperture Z-scan results
of MXene, VS2 , and MXene-VS2 . (b) Schematic diagram of a four-level model for the charge transfer
mechanism. (d) Variation of the Imaginary, and (e) Real part of the nonlinear susceptibility with the
input intensity. (f) The decay lifetimes of MXene and hybrid were determined through time-resolved
PL spectroscopy.

cm−2 . Under this moderate peak intensity, the Z-scan 4b. Our model’s phenomenology comprises a signif-
peak-shape result of the hybrid possesses a very large icant optical transition in MXene, a significant opti-
RSA, which contrasts sharply with the SA of the con- cal transition in VS2 , and the charge transfer process
trol systems due to charge transfer. The observed SA from the photo-excited state in MXene to the ground
behaviour of MXene can be explained by considering state in VS2 . Upon photoexcitation, donor MXene ex-
a plasmon-induced augmentation in the ground state periences single photon absorption and transfers the
absorption at 800 nm. In MXenes, oscillations of the excited electrons to the V0 state of the acceptor VS2 .
free carrier are more advantageous at higher wave- From V0 , it absorbs additional photons and drives to
lengths >1130 nm, 39 and the depletion of the ground the excited state Vn ; such a charge transfer process
state population is more prominent at 800 nm, leading results in the RSA (detail in description S7). The
to an increase in nonlinear transmittance at higher in- measured open aperture Z-scan experimental data are
tensity and results in SA 39 (absorption progress is dis- fitted with nonlinear light propagation equations 19,20
played in Figure S6a). The SA response exhibited by (see description S3), and extracted RSA coefficient
the control VS2 can be explained through the modu- (β) and saturation intensity (Is ) are tabulated in Ta-
lation of its band structure induced by the presence of ble 2. It is evident from this observation that the
atomic deficiencies involving either vanadium (V) or β of (150 ± 16)× 10−3 cm GW−1 for the hybrid
sulphur (S) elements and the coexistence of both semi- is 30 times and approximately 19 times higher than
conducting and metallic states within the layered two- the corresponding value for MXene and VS2 , respec-
dimensional (2D) materials 40,41 (see description S6). tively. Our intensity-dependent Z-scan measurements
As well, in both cases, the peak intensity is inadequate and σES display a monotonic rise with peak intensity,
to produce the excited state absorption cross-section adding to the experimental support for the RSA of
(σES ) surpassing the ground state absorption cross- the hybrid (see Table 1 and Figure S4c). Addition-
section (σGS ) (see Table 1), which supports the SA ally, it reinforces the idea that charge transfer occurs
of control systems. 18,19,42 Conversely, the giant un- within the MXene-VS2 hybrid.
precedented RSA of hybrid is ascribed to the charge The sign and value of the nonlinear refractive in-
transfer from MXene to VS2 . To explain the RSA dex (n2 ) have been estimated using the closed aper-
phenomenon in the MXene-VS2 hybrid, we have de- ture Z-scan technique by putting an aperture before
signed a minimal four-level model depicted in Figure the detector so that transmission decreases to 1/3 of

6
Table 1: The calculated σGS and σES for MXene, VS2 , and MXene-VS2 hybrid under 800 nm excitation.

Sample Intensity σGS σES


GW cm−2 (10−20 cm2 ) (10−20 cm2 )
MXene 30 1.5 ± 0.4 0.7 ± 0.2
90 2.2 ± 0.5 1.1 ± 0.3
150 3.5 ± 0.7 1.6 ± 0.5
VS2 30 1.0 ± 0.2 0.5 ± 0.1
90 1.6 ± 0.4 0.9 ± 0.3
150 2.4 ± 0.6 1.5 ± 0.6
MXene-VS2 30 2.5 ± 0.8 6.2 ± 1.0
90 3.8 ± 1.0 8.6 ± 1.5
150 5.4 ± 1.6 15.0 ± 3.0

the incident intensity of the laser beam. 19 Figure 4c The optical nonlinear susceptibility of the materials
depicts the close aperture Z-scan result of the hy- is expressed as
brid and control systems at a pump intensity of 90
(3) (3)
GW cm−2 . The nonlinear refraction traces for Con- χ(3) = χR + ιχI (1)
trol MXene and VS2 display an initial peak in prefo-
(3) (3)
cal transmittance followed by a subsequent valley in Imaginary parts (χI ) and Real (χR ) of optical non-
post-focal transmittance, constituting the character- linear susceptibility (χ(3) ) are associated with the β
istic Z-scan signature of a negative refractive index and n2 respectively, which are expressed as 46
or self-defocusing nature of the material. 18,43 These
negative nonlinear refractive index for MXene and (3) c2 n20 m
χI (esu) = 2
β( ) (2)
VS2 can be ascribed to bound carriers induced by 240π ω W
nonresonant excitation since the thermal effects are (3) cn20 m2
negligible in femtosecond excitation. 43 Conversely, we χR (esu) = n 2 ( ) (3)
120π 2 W
observe a crossover, i.e., an initial valley in prefo-
cal transmittance followed by a subsequent peak in where c stands for the speed of light, n0 represents
post-focal transmittance, constituting the character- the linear refractive index, and ω is the frequency of
istic Z-scan signature of a positive refractive index or laser radiation. In our case, n0 = 1.34. 47 The cal-
self-focusing nature of the material. 19,44 This positive culated imaginary part and real part value of third-
nonlinear refractive index for the hybrid can be cred- order susceptibility at 90 GW cm−2 are tabulated in
ited to the effects induced by free carriers, given that Table 2. Figure 4d,e depicts a monotonic increase in
the intense incident intensity is sufficient to generate the imaginary and real parts of the optical nonlinear
these free carriers. 43–45 Additionally, the estimated n2 susceptibility as the peak intensity increases, respec-
values using equation S4 43 within the description S3 tively (Table S3), which also supports the notion of
are listed in Table 2. We found that the n2 value of effective charge transfer occurring at the interface of
(94 ± 9)×10−6 cm2 GW−1 for the hybrid is an order the MXene-VS2 hybrid.
of magnitude higher than the control systems, partic- At this juncture, it is crucial to prove that the
ularly approximately 12 times (8 ± 0.7)× 10−6 cm2 observed unprecedented large RSA is a direct result
GW−1 for MXene and 19 times of (5 ± 0.4) × 10−6 brought on by the charge transfer process between the
cm2 GW−1 for VS2 . Furthermore, the increased dis- donor MXene and acceptor VS2 . To achieve this, we
parity between the peak and valley in the Z-scan trace have established a crucial criterion for the occurrence
suggests higher n2 values for the MXene-VS2 hybrid. of RSA is that the value of σES must surpass that of
the value σGS . It is important to note that failure to

Table 2: Third order nonlinear parameters: RSA coefficient (β), saturation intensity (Is ), refractive
index (n2 ) along with imaginary and real parts of third-order susceptibility at 800 nm.

Sample β Isat n2 IMχ(3) Reχ(3)


(10 cm GW−1 )
−3
(10 GW cm−2 )
2
(10 cm2 GW−1 )
−6
(10−15 esu) (10−13 esu)
MXene −(5.0 ± 0.6) 68 ± 6 −(8.0 ± 0.7) 9.1 ± 2.0 3.6 ± 1.8
VS2 −(8.0 ± 0.5) 58 ± 3 −(5.0 ± 0.4) 14.6 ± 5.0 2.3 ± 1.4
MXene-VS2 150 ± 16 6.0 ± 0.5 94 ± 9 274 ± 38 42.8 ± 6.0

7
Figure 5: Optimized structure of (001) plane (a) VS2 (b) MXene-VS2 hybrid, Yellow, Red, Cyan,
and Violet indicate S, V, C and Ti atoms, respectively. (c) TDOS for VS2 and MXene-VS2 hybrid
(d) PDOS for S 3p orbital of VS2 and MXene-VS2 hybrid (e) PDOS for Ti 3d orbital of MXene and
MXene-VS2 hybrid. (f) The charge density picture illustrates the difference in charge between MXene
and hybrid with an isovalue of 0.07e. The yellow region represents VS2 gaining charge, while the blue
region represents MXene losing charge.

meet this criterion will result in the material exhibit- To realize the charge-transfer mechanism theoret-
ing SA instead. 19,42 We satisfied the condition σES > ically, we performed first-principles DFT simulations
σGS by enabling the charge transfer from MXene to using VASP. 49–51 Details of the calculations are pre-
VS2 in the MXene-VS2 hybrid, apparent from the cal- sented in the method section. For the MXene-VS2
culated data tabulated in Table 1. In this way, we can hybrid, we have taken the monolayer corresponding
acquire RSA in substances only exhibiting SA. For in- to the MAX phase plane (002) of MXene. The opti-
stance, VS2 displays SA that can be made composite mized structure of the VS2 and hybrid (001) plane is
with electron-donating MXene to yield RSA. These presented in Figure 5a,b, respectively. The MXene-
findings certify the unprecedented nonlinear optical VS2 hybrid consists of two monolayers, one with VS2
response exhibited by the MXene-VS2 hybrid results supercell of dimension 3×3 under periodic boundary
from the phenomenon of charge transfer. conditions, below which the MXene layer of dimen-
We conducted time-resolved PL spectroscopy to sion 3×3 with interlayer separation of 3.5Å was po-
further understand the charge transfer process. Fig- sitioned. To understand the net effect of hybridiza-
ure 4f presents the time-resolved PL spectra of MXene tion qualitatively between MXene and VS2 , we have
and MXene-VS2 hybrid under 298 nm excitation. The presented the total density of states (TDOS) for the
decay kinetics were well fitted, exploiting an exponen- VS2 (001) layer and the MXene-VS2 hybrid displayed
tial decay model, 48 and the corresponding parameters in Figure 5c. This shows an enhancement of states
were tabulated in Table S4. Compared to the aver- over the entire range of the valence band due to the
age PL lifetime (τave ) of the control MXene at (4.58 addition of MXene to VS2 . For visualization of or-
± 0.05) ns, the PL lifetime declined to (1.06 ± 0.01) bital interaction and charge contribution that hap-
ns for the MXene-VS2 hybrid. The notably shorter pened after hybridization, we have plotted the par-
average PL lifetime observed in the MXene-VS2 hy- tial density of states (PDOS) for S 3p orbital of
brid in comparison to the control MXene suggested VS2 and Ti 3d orbital of MXene as shown in Fig-
an efficient charge transfer between MXene and VS2 , ure 5d,f, respectively. For the S 3p orbital of VS2 ,
similarly noted in other hybrid materials. 18,19,48 The states are sharply enhanced below the Fermi level af-
charge transfer rate and efficiency were calculated to ter hybridization. While for Ti 3d orbital, there is
be 7.3 ×108 s−1 and 77 % using the expressions kET = an overall decrease of states for the MXene-VS2 hy-
1 1 τM Xene−V S2 brid. To comprehend it in a quantitative manner, we
τM Xene−V S - τM Xene and efET = 1 - τM Xene , re-
2 have calculated the charge transfer using Bader charge
spectively. 48

8
Figure 6: (a) The schematic depicts the liquid cell-based optical limiter device with a 1 mm path length
containing MXene-VS2 in distilled water having linear transmission of approximately 60%. Lower-
intensity beams pass through the device in the linear zone (green). Whereas exceeding the threshold
(red region), the system serves as an optical limiter attenuating high-intensity beams. (b) Normalized
transmittance versus input intensity. (c) Output fluence versus input fluence.

partitioning. 52 The Bader charge study indicates that i) Onset Threshold (FON ), described as the input in-
in MXene-VS2 hybrid, VS2 has a gain of 6.9e charge tensity at the point where the normalized transmit-
from the MXene. So, this agrees with our qualitative tance begins to depart from linearity 18,42 (Figure 6b).

PDOS analysis, concluding that the charge transfer ii) Limiting Differential Transmittance (Tdif f ), mea-
mechanism follows the path from MXene to VS2 . For sured as the derivative of output intensity with respect
a more visual interpretation of the charge transfer, to input intensity at higher intensity 18,19 depicted in
we present the charge density picture illustrating the Figure 6c. An ideal case of optical limiter should pos-

difference in charge density between MXene-VS2 and sess a remarkably low FON and a minimal Tdif f . The

MXene in Figure 5f. The yellow region signifies the determined value of FON = 0.6 mJ cm−2 and Tdif f
charge-gaining VS2 , while the blue region represents of 0.6 was superior to numerous benchmark optical
the charge-losing MXene. limiters. We present a performance evaluation of our
The remarkable advancements in the Kerr nonlin- device with other optical limiters within their respec-
earity of hybrid material signify their promising po- tive wavelength region in Table 3. Notably, our de-
tential for use as an ideal optical limiter. To illustrate vice establishes a new standard for optical limiting in
this, we have fabricated an ultrafast optical limiter the femtosecond domain. An added advantage of our
based on the liquid cell with a path length of 1 mm, liquid-based optical limiters is their self-healing capa-
utilizing aqueous MXene-VS2 as its optical-limiting bility, allowing extensive dynamic ranges constrained
medium. Figure 6a presents a schematic of our de- solely by the extent of damage sustained by the cell
vice, which exhibits a linear transmittance of approx- windows.
imately 60%. We illustrated the capabilities of our op-
tical limiting device, employing two key parameters:

9

Table 3: Onset threshold (FON ) and differential transmittance (Tdif f ) are compared to those of various
benchmark optical limiters.

Systemsm Wavelength Linear T. FON Tdif f References
(nm) (mJ cm−2 )
MXene-VS2 800 60 0.6 0.46 Present Work
C60 532 63 65 - Ref 2
VSe2 -rGO 534 65 2.5 0.42 Ref 18
SWCNT-VSe2 800 70 4 0.54 Ref 19
SWCNT-VSe2 900 66 3 0.53 Ref 19
AuNP-rGO 532 70 50 0.3 Ref 42
ReS2 1064 90 700 0.64 Ref 53
SiO2 -Se 800 85 54 - Ref 54
CdS nanoparticles 532 70 300 0.56 Ref 55

CONCLUSIONS phology at a voltage of 30 kV. Perkin Elmer Instru-


ment used Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy
In summary, we have demonstrated unprecedented or
(FT-IR) to assess the IR scheme from 4000 to 500
manifold enhancement in the magnitude of the ab-
cm−1 . The Raman spectra were obtained utilizing a
sorptive and refractive parts of the ultrafast third-
high-resolution (∼ 1 cm−1 ) Horiba Lab RAM spec-
order nonlinear optical response (Kerr nonlinearity)
trometer with a 632.8 nm excitation wavelength from
in donor-acceptor Ti3 C2 Tx (MXene)-VS2 hybrid due
a He-Ne laser.
to synergistic charge transfer. We showed a transition
from RSA to SA in the imaginary part and a change
from self-focusing to self-defocusing nature in the real Z-scan Measurement.
part of nonlinear optical behavior when moving from The Kerr nonlinearity of the MXene-VS2 hybrid and
MXene-VS2 hybrid to control systems. Our four- control samples was studied via the open and close
level rate equation model encapsulates the underlying aperture Z-scan technique. The femtosecond excita-
physics behind the charge transfer. First-principles tion wavelength of 800 nm, 1kHz, and 120 fs pulses
calculations and Bader charge study revealed strong were used in the measurement. The experimental
electronic coupling in the MXene-VS2 hybrid where setup and detail are illustrated in description S3
electrons are transferred from MXene to VS2 , con- within the Supporting Information.
firmed through the measurement of steady-state and
time-resolved photoluminescence. Moreover, we have Computational Detail.
successfully fabricated an optical-limiting device ex-
hibiting crucial device parameters (FON = 0.6 mJ For first-principle density functional theory (DFT)

cm−2 and Tdif f = 0.46) comparable to numerous es- simulations, we employed the Vienna ab initio sim-
tablished benchmark optical limiters operating within ulation package (VASP). 49–51 Further, to consider
the femtosecond domain. Our findings offer new per- the ion-electron interaction, we have employed the
spectives on tuning Kerr nonlinear responses, poten- projector-augmented wave (PAW) method. 56 The
tially contributing to the advancement of all-optical generalized gradient approach (GGA) of the Perdew-
photonic devices designed for optical limiting and Burke-Ernzerhof (PBE) functional 57 was used to
switching. characterize the electron-electron exchange correla-
tion. The Grimme’s dispersion corrections for weak
Vander Waals interactions between MXene and VS2
EXPERIMENTAL METHODS have been applied using a dispersion scheme, DFT-
D2. 58 The plane wave basis was established with
Material characterizations.
an energy cutoff of 520 eV. The conjugate gradient
We employed Powder X-ray diffraction (PXRD) to approach was used for the structural optimizations,
analyze the crystalline structure of the control MX- with a convergence threshold of 10−5 eV and 0.01
ene, VS2 , and the MXene-VS2 hybrid. The measure- eV/Å for the forces and energy, respectively. The
ments were conducted using a Rigaku Ultima IV X- Monkhorst–Pack 59 K point grid size of 5×5×1 and
ray diffractometer with Cu Kα radiation (λ = 0.154 7×7×1 in the Brillouin zone were applied for struc-
nm) and Ni-filter. Field Emission Scanning Elec- tural optimization and electronic or optical properties
tron Microscopy (FESEM) from JEOL (model JSM- calculations, respectively. To avoid the periodic inter-
7100F) was utilized to characterize the surface mor- actions among the planes, we have introduced a suf-

10
ficient vacuum of 20Å along the z-axis perpendicular (4) Foster, M. A.; Turner, A. C.; Sharping, J. E.;
to the planar direction. Schmidt, B. S.; Lipson, M.; Gaeta, A. L. Broad-
Band Optical Parametric Gain on a Silicon Pho-
tonic Chip. Nat. 2006, 441 (7096), 960–963.
ASSOCIATED CONTENT
Supporting Information. Sample fabrication, Ma- (5) Riesen, N.; Badek, K.; Riesen, H. Data Stor-
terial characterizations, Conventional Z-scan mea- age in a Nanocrystalline Mixture Using Room
surement and theory, Open aperture fluence depen- Temperature Frequency-Selective and Multilevel
dent data, Closed aperture fluence dependent data, Spectral Hole-Burning. ACS Photonics 2021, 8
four-level rate equation, Fitting parameters for pho- (10), 3078–3084.
toluminescence decays
(6) Blais, A.; Girvin, S. M.; Oliver, W. D. Quantum
Information Processing and Quantum Optics
AUTHOR INFORMATION with Circuit Quantum Electrodynamics. Nat.
Phys. 2020, 16 (3), 247–256.
Corresponding authors:
K. V. Adarsh - Department of Physics, Indian In-
(7) Dudley, J. M.; Genty, G.; Coen, S. Supercontin-
stitute of Science Education and Research, Bhopal
uum Generation in Photonic Crystal Fiber. Rev.
462066 India.
Mod. Phys. 2006, 78 (4), 1135–1184.
Phone:+91-755-2691207
E-mail: adarsh@iiserb.ac.in (8) Del’Haye, P.; Schliesser, A.; Arcizet, O.; Wilken,
T.; Holzwarth, R.; Kippenberg, T. J. Opti-
Notes cal Frequency Comb Generation from a Mono-
The authors declare no competing financial interest. lithic Microresonator. Nat. 2007, 450 (7173),
1214–1217.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
(9) Thorpe, M. J.; Moll, K. D.; Jones, J. R.; Safdi,
The authors extend their sincere gratitude to the B.; Ye, J. Broadband Cavity Ringdown Spec-
Science and Engineering Research Board (project troscopy for Sensitive and Rapid Molecular De-
no. EMR/2016/002520 and CRG/2019/002808), fection. Science 2006, 311 (5767), 1595–1599.
DAE BRNS (sanction no. 37(3)/14/26/2016-
BRNS/37245), and the FIST Project for the Depart- (10) Diddams, S. A.; Hollberg, L.; Mbele, V. Molecu-
ment of Physics for their invaluable support. BC ac- lar Fingerprinting with the Resolved Modes of a
knowledges the BARC computer center supercomput- Femtosecond Laser Frequency Comb. Nat. 2007,
ing facility and thanks its staff for continuous help 445 (7128), 627–630.
and support. CSR acknowledges the financial support
provided by the SERB Core Research Grant (Grant (11) van Leent, T.; Bock, M.; Fertig, F.; Garthoff,
No. CRG/2022/000897) and the Department of Sci- R.; Eppelt, S.; Zhou, Y.; Malik, P.; Seubert, M.;
ence and Technology (DST/NM/NT/2019/205(G)), Bauer, T.; Rosenfeld, W.; Zhang, W.; Becher,
as well as the Minor Research Project Grant from C.; Weinfurter, H. Entangling Single Atoms over
Jain University (JU/MRP/CNMS/29/2023). 33 Km Telecom Fibre. Nat. 2022, 607 (7917),
69–73.

References (12) Kauranen, M.; Zayats, A. V. Nonlinear Plas-


monics. Nat. Photonics 2012, 6 (11), 737–748.
(1) Hui, D.; Alqattan, H.; Zhang, S.; Pervak, V.;
Chowdhury, E.; Hassan, M. T. Ultrafast Opti- (13) Abb, M.; Albella, P.; Aizpurua, J.; Muskens,
cal Switching and Data Encoding on Synthesized O. L. All-Optical Control of a Single Plasmonic
Light Fields. Sci. Adv. 2023, 9 (8), eadf1015. Nanoantenna - ITO Hybrid. Nano Lett. 2011,
11 (6), 2457–2463.
(2) Tutt, L. W.; Kost, A. Optical Limiting Perfor-
mance of C60 and C70 Solutions. Nat. 1992, 356 (14) Boyd, R. W. Nonlinear Optics 3rd. Ed. Aca-
(6366), 225–226. demic Press, 2008, 1–613.

(3) Fejer, M. M.; Jundt, D. H.; Byer, R. L.; Magel, (15) Caballero, B.; Garciá-Martı́n, A.; Cuevas, J. C.
G. A. Quasi-Phase-Matched Second Harmonic Hybrid Magnetoplasmonic Crystals Boost the
Generation: Tuning and Tolerances. IEEE J. Performance of Nanohole Arrays as Plasmonic
Quantum Electron. 1992, 28 (11), 2631–2654. Sensors. ACS Photonics 2016, 3 (2), 203–208.

11
(16) Makarov, S. V.; Milichko, V.; Ushakova, E. (24) Sun, X.; Zhang, B.; Li, Y.; Luo, X.; Li, G.;
V.; Omelyanovich, M.; Cerdan Pasaran, A.; Chen, Y.; Zhang, C.; He, J. Tunable Ultrafast
Haroldson, R.; Balachandran, B.; Wang, H.; Nonlinear Optical Properties of Graphene/MoS2
Hu, W.; Kivshar, Y. S.; Zakhidov, A. A. Mul- van Der Waals Heterostructures and Their Ap-
tifold Emission Enhancement in Nanoimprinted plication in Solid-State Bulk Lasers. ACS Nano
Hybrid Perovskite Metasurfaces. ACS Photonics 2018, 12 (11), 11376–11385.
2017, 4 (4), 728–735.
(25) Zhang, R.; Fan, J.; Zhang, X.; Yu, H.; Zhang,
(17) Ye, T.; Kocherga, M.; Sun, Y. Y.; Nesmelov, H.; Mai, Y.; Xu, T.; Wang, J.; Snaith, H. J. Non-
A.; Zhang, F.; Oh, W.; Huang, X. Y.; Li, linear Optical Response of Organic-Inorganic
J.; Beasock, D.; Jones, D. S.; Schmedake, T. Halide Perovskites. ACS Photonics 2016, 3 (3),
A.; Zhang, Y. II-VI Organic-Inorganic Hybrid 371–377.
Nanostructures with Greatly Enhanced Opto-
(26) Gogotsi, Y.; Huang, Q. MXenes: Two-
electronic Properties, Perfectly Ordered Struc-
Dimensional Building Blocks for Future Mate-
tures, and Shelf Stability of over 15 Years. ACS
rials and Devices. ACS Nano 2021, 15 (4),
Nano 2021, 15 (6), 10565–10576.
5775–5780.
(18) Kumar, V.; Afreen; KA, S. R.; Mane, P.; (27) Naguib, M.; Kurtoglu, M.; Presser, V.; Lu, J.;
Chakraborty, B.; Rout, C. S.; Adarsh, K. V. Niu, J.; Heon, M.; Hultman, L.; Gogotsi, Y.;
Enhancing the Ultrafast Third-Order Nonlin- Barsoum, M. W. Two-Dimensional Nanocrys-
ear Optical Response by Charge Transfer in tals Produced by Exfoliation of Ti3AlC2. Adv.
VSe2-Reduced Graphene Oxide Hybrid. J. Phys. Mater. 2011, 23 (37), 4248–4253.
Chem. C 2023, 127 (37), 18485-18493.
(28) Feng, J.; Sun, X.; Wu, C.; Peng, L.; Lin, C.; Hu,
(19) Kumar, V.; Mandal, D.; Sree Raj, K. A.; S.; Yang, J.; Xie, Y. Metallic Few-Layered VS2
Chakraborty, B.; Agarwal, A.; Rout, C. S.; Ultrathin Nanosheets: High Two-Dimensional
Adarsh, K. V. Single-Wall-Carbon-Nanotube- Conductivity for in-Plane Supercapacitors. J.
VSe2 Nanohybrid for Ultrafast Visible-To-Near- Am. Chem. Soc. 2011, 133 (44), 17832–17838.
Infrared Third-Order Nonlinear Optical Lim-
iters. Phys. Rev. Appl. 2023, 19 (4), 044081. (29) Sharma, A.; Mane, P.; Chakraborty, B.; Rout,
C. S. 1T-VS2/MXene Hybrid as a Superior
(20) Sharma, R.; Aneesh, J.; Yadav, R. K.; Sanda, Electrode Material for Asymmetric Supercapac-
S.; Barik, A. R.; Mishra, A. K.; Maji, T. K.; itors: Experimental and Theoretical Investiga-
Karmakar, D.; Adarsh, K. V. Strong Interlayer tions. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. 2021, 4 (12),
Coupling Mediated Giant Two-Photon Absorp- 14198–14209.
tion in MoS E2 /Graphene Oxide Heterostruc-
ture: Quenching of Exciton Bands. Phys. Rev. (30) Wang, Y.; Wang, Y.; Chen, K.; Qi, K.; Xue,
B 2016, 93 (15), 155433. T.; Zhang, H.; He, J.; Xiao, S. Niobium Car-
bide MXenes with Broad-Band Nonlinear Op-
(21) Sreeramulu, V.; Haldar, K. K.; Patra, A.; tical Response and Ultrafast Carrier Dynamics.
Narayana Rao, D. Nonlinear Optical Switching ACS Nano 2020, 14 (8), 10492–10502.
and Enhanced Nonlinear Optical Response of
(31) Nadafan, M.; Parishani, M.; Malekfar, R. Z-
Au-Cdse Heteronanostructures. J. Phys. Chem.
Scan Investigation to Evaluate the Third-Order
C 2014, 118 (51), 30333–30341.
Nonlinear Optical Properties of Cauliflower-like
VS2 Structures. J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 2021, 38
(22) Abhijith, T.; Edappadikkunnummal, S.; Suthar,
(5), 1586–1592.
R.; Thomas, S.; Karak, S. Au-WS2 Nanohybrids
with Enhanced Optical Nonlinearity for Optical (32) Fang, W.; Zhao, H.; Xie, Y.; Fang, J.; Xu,
Limiting Applications. ACS Appl. Nano Mater. J.; Chen, Z. Facile Hydrothermal Synthesis of
2022 6 (4), 2327-2335. VS2 /Graphene Nanocomposites with Superior
High-Rate Capability as Lithium-Ion Battery
(23) Kumar, V.; Sharma, R.; Bhatt, A.; Csarnovics, Cathodes. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2015,
I.; Nemec, P.; Jain, H.; Adarsh, K. V. Ultra- 7 (23), 13044–13052.
fast Third-Order Nonlinear Optical Response
of Charge Coupled Gold Nanoparticle-Ge24 Se76 (33) Shinde, P. V.; Mane, P.; Late, D. J.;
Heterostructure. J. Non-Crystalline Solids X Chakraborty, B.; Rout, C. S. Promising 2D/2D
2023, 19, 100196. MoTe2 /Ti3 C2 Tx Hybrid Materials for Boosted

12
Hydrogen Evolution Reaction. ACS Appl. En- (43) Kalanoor, B. S.; Gouda, L.; Gottesman, R.;
ergy Mater. 2021, 4 (10), 11886–11897. Tirosh, S.; Haltzi, E.; Zaban, A.; Tischler,
Y. R. Third-Order Optical Nonlinearities in
(34) Feng, A.; Hou, T.; Jia, Z.; Zhang, Y.; Zhang, Organometallic Methylammonium Lead Iodide
F.; Wu, G. Preparation and Characterization Perovskite Thin Films. ACS Photonics 2016, 3
of Epoxy Resin Filled with Ti3 C2 Tx MXene (3), 361–370.
Nanosheets with Excellent Electric Conductiv-
ity. Nanomater. 2020, 10 (1), 162. (44) Mandal, D.; Adarsh, K. V.; Nemec, P.; Mondal,
A.; Halenkovic, T.; Yadav, R. K.; Aswin, J. R.;
(35) Lim, G. P.; Soon, C. F.; Morsin, M.; Ahmad, Bera, S. K. Intensity Mediated Change in the
M. K.; Nayan, N.; Tee, K. S. Synthesis, Charac- Sign of Ultrafast Third-Order Nonlinear Optical
terization and Antifungal Property of Ti3 C2 Tx Response in As2 S2 Thin Films. Opt. Lett. 2018,
MXene Nanosheets. Ceram. Int. 2020, 46 (12), 43 (19), 4787–4790.
20306–20312.
(45) Mandal, D.; Adarsh, K. V.; Karmakar, R.; Shri-
(36) Masikhwa, T. M.; Barzegar, F.; Dangbegnon, vastava, M. Defect-Mediated Carrier Dynamics
J. K.; Bello, A.; Madito, M. J.; Momodu, D.; and Third-Order Nonlinear Optical Response of
Manyala, N. Asymmetric Supercapacitor Based WS2 Quantum Dots. Opt. Lett. 2022, 47 (19),
on VS2 Nanosheets and Activated Carbon Ma- 5196–5199.
terials. RSC Adv. 2016, 6 (45), 38990–39000.
(46) Mushtaq, A.; Pradhan, B.; Kushavah, D.;
(37) Ashcroft, N. W.; Mermin, N. D.; Smoluchowski, Zhang, Y.; Wolf, M.; Schrenker, N.; Fron,
R. Solid State Physics. Phys. Today 1977, 30 E.; Bals, S.; Hofkens, J.; Debroye, E.; Pal,
(1), 61–65. S. K. Third-Order Nonlinear Optical Proper-
(38) He, C.; Zhao, Q.; Huang, Y.; Zhu, L.; Zhang, S.; ties and Saturation of Two-Photon Absorption
Bai, J.; Xu, X. Nonlinear Optical Response in in Lead-Free Double Perovskite Nanocrystals
Graphene/WX2 (X = S, Se, and Te) van Der under Femtosecond Excitation. ACS Photonics
Waals Heterostructures. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2021, 8 (11), 3365–3374.
2019, 10 (9), 2090–2100. (47) Daimon, M.; Masumura, A. Measurement of the
(39) Dong, Y.; Chertopalov, S.; Maleski, K.; Ana- Refractive Index of Distilled Water from the
sori, B.; Hu, L.; Bhattacharya, S.; Rao, A. M.; Near-Infrared Region to the Ultraviolet Region.
Gogotsi, Y.; Mochalin, V. N.; Podila, R.; Dong, Appl. Opt. 2007, 46 (18), 3811–3820.
Mx. Y.; Hu, L.; Bhattacharya, S.; Rao, A. M.; (48) Muduli, S.; Pandey, P.; Devatha, G.; Babar,
Podila, R.; Chertopalov, S.; Mochalin, V. N.; R.; Thripuranthaka, M.; Kothari, D. C.; Kabir,
Maleski, K.; Anasori, B.; Gogotsi Materials Sci- M.; Pillai, P. P.; Ogale, S. Photolumines-
ence, Y.; Drexel Nanomaterials, A. Saturable cence Quenching in Self-Assembled CsPbBr3
Absorption in 2D Ti3 C2 MXene Thin Films for Quantum Dots on Few-Layer Black Phosphorus
Passive Photonic Diodes. Adv. Mater. 2018, 30 Sheets. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2018, 57 (26),
(10), 1705714. 7682–7686.
(40) Li, Y.; Dong, N.; Zhang, S.; Zhang, X.; Feng, (49) Kresse, G.; Joubert, D. From Ultrasoft Pseu-
Y.; Wang, K.; Zhang, L.; Wang, J. Giant Two- dopotentials to the Projector Augmented-Wave
Photon Absorption in Monolayer MoS2 . Laser Method. Phys. Rev. B 1999, 59 (3), 1758.
Photon. Rev. 2015, 9 (4), 427–434.
(50) Kresse, G.; Furthmüller, J. Efficiency of Ab-
(41) Wang, S.; Yu, H.; Zhang, H.; Wang, A.; Zhao, Initio Total Energy Calculations for Metals and
M.; Chen, Y.; Mei, L.; Wang Wang, J. S.; Yu, H.; Semiconductors Using a Plane-Wave Basis Set.
Zhang, H.; Wang, J.; Wang, A.; Zhao, M.; Chen, Comput. Mater. Sci. 1996, 6 (1), 15-50.
Y.; Mei, L. Broadband Few-Layer MoS2 Sat-
urable Absorbers. Adv. Mater. 2014, 26 (21), (51) Kresse, G.; Furthmüller, J. Efficient Iterative
3538–3544. Schemes for Ab Initio Total-Energy Calculations
Using a Plane-Wave Basis Set. Phys. Rev. B
(42) Yadav, R. K.; Aneesh, J.; Sharma, R.; Abhiram- 1996, 54 (16), 11169.
nath, P.; Maji, T. K.; Omar, G. J.; Mishra, A.
K.; Karmakar, D.; Adarsh, K. V. Designing Hy- (52) Tang, W.; Sanville, E.; Henkelman, G. A Grid-
brids of Graphene Oxide and Gold Nanoparti- Based Bader Analysis Algorithm without Lat-
cles for Nonlinear Optical Response. Phys. Rev. tice Bias. J. Phys. Condens. Matter 2009, 21
Appl. 2018, 9 (4), 044043. (8), 084204.

13
(53) Mandal, D.; Shrivastava, M.; Sharma, S.; Poo-
nia, A. K.; Marik, S.; Singh, R. P.; Adarsh, K.
V. Band Edge Carrier-Induced Sign Reversal of
an Ultrafast Nonlinear Optical Response in Few-
Layer ReS2 Nanoflakes. ACS Appl. Nano Mater.
2022, 5 (4), 5479–5486.

(54) Ann Mary, K. A.; Unnikrishnan, N. V.; Philip,


R. Cubic to Amorphous Transformation of Se in
Silica with Improved Ultrafast Optical Nonlin-
earity. RSC Adv. 2015, 5 (18), 14034–14041.

(55) Feng, M.; Sun, R.; Zhan, H.; Chen, Y. Decora-


tion of Carbon Nanotubes with CdS Nanopar-
ticles by Polythiophene Interlinking for Optical
Limiting Enhancement. Carbon 2010, 48 (4),
1177–1185.

(56) Blöchl, P. E. Projector Augmented-Wave


Method. Phys. Rev. B 1994, 50 (24), 17953.

(57) Perdew, J. P.; Burke, K.; Ernzerhof, M. Gen-


eralized Gradient Approximation Made Simple.
Phys. Rev. Lett. 1996, 77 (18), 3865.

(58) Grimme, S. Semiempirical GGA-Type Density


Functional Constructed with a Long-Range Dis-
persion Correction. J. Comput. Chem. 2006, 27
(15), 1787–1799.

(59) Monkhorst, H. J.; Pack, J. D. Special Points for


Brillouin-Zone Integrations. Phys. Rev. B 1976,
13 (12), 5188.

14
TABLE OF CONTENTS GRAPHICS

15

You might also like