Researc Implication

h s of the
Title of Study
Autho Problem Methodolo Principal Recommendati
Resear (Conclusio
r s or gy Findings ons
ch ns)
Objectiv
es
How Erikss In this The This This study The researcher
does on et study, the researchers association examines suggests that
political al. associatio , measured looked the teachers
discussi (2022) n the different relationship construct
on between association among between instructional tools
frequen self- between liberals and political and procedures
cy reported self- among discussion that are
impact discussio reported conservativ frequency appropriate for
political n discussion es. Having and the the students'
moral frequency frequency more opinions of academic
opinions and the and the frequent liberals and demands by first
? The probabilit probability discussions conservative analyzing the
moral y of of holding is s. The learners' level of
argume holding the more associated results show success.
nt the more liberal with a that frequent
theory liberal opinion on higher discussions
of opinion moral probability have a
opinion on moral issues, of holding liberalizing
dynamic issues using data more liberal effect on
s were from the opinions liberals'
measured General among opinions, but
, using Social liberals, little
data from Survey (81 while there systematic
the issues, n = is little effect on
General 4,395) and association conservative
Social the between s' opinions.
Survey American discussion However,
(81 National frequency the moral
issues, n Election and argument
= 4,395) Studies (27 opinions theory
and the issues, n = among suggests
American 17,653). conservativ that frequent
National es. These discussions
Election findings contribute to
Studies can be a common
(27 explained trajectory of
issues, n by the opinion
= moral change
17,653). argument towards
Is there theory, liberalism
any which is an among both
systemati account of liberals and
c the long- conservative
difference term s. This
in liberalizatio theory has
opinions n of public been
between opinion on supported
those moral by previous
who issues as analyses of
discuss an outcome General
frequently of repeated Social
and those discussions Survey data.
who do . The
not? theory
assumes
that
conservativ
e opinions
justified by
specific
arguments
have a
disadvanta
ge
compared
to opinions
justified by
arguments
accepted
by all. The
study found
that the
more
frequently
moral
opinions
are
discussed,
the
stronger
the effect
on opinions
with a
bigger
argument
advantage.