Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Types of Stylistics PDF Semantics Linguistics
Types of Stylistics PDF Semantics Linguistics
Types of Stylistics PDF Semantics Linguistics
Document Information
TYPES of stylistic STUDIES and the CHARACTERIZATI…
Original Description:
Download now
Date uploaded
THE TYPES OF STYLISTIC STUDIES AND THE CHARACTERIZATION OF INDIVIDUAL
JunAN
STYLE: 19,OUTLINE
2015 OF PROBLEMS
Original Title
types of stylistics.docx
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
Available Formats
DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
Facebook
Twitter
TYPES OF STYLISTICS
Diri I. TEILANYO &Priscilla O. EFE-OBUE
1. General Stylistics or Stylistics:
T!is is s"#lis"ics $i%%' (r)* "!%+r)a' ,)"i), )( "!% li,is"ic s"'#)( all "#/%s )( li,is"ic %$%,"s (r)*'i((%r%," ')*ai,s )( li(%.
I" is s%' asac)$%r "%r* ()r "!% a,al#sis )( ,),-li"%rar# $ari%"i%s )( la,a%0 )rr%is"%rs12al%s 3456. H%,c%0 ),% ca,,'%r"a7% a s"#lis"ic
s"'# Is this content
)( ar%lii)ss%r*),0 inappropriate?
a s/)r" Reporta /)li"ical
c)**%,"ar#0 a l%al')c*%,"0 this Document
s/%%c!0 a+si,%ss c),$%rsa"i),0 %"c.
2. Literary Stylistics:
T!is is "!% "#/% )( a,al#sis "!a"()cs%s ), li"%rar# "%8"s. I, "!%+r)a's%,s%0 sc! a s"'# *a# +% li,is"ic)r ,),-li,is"ic0 +" i,
"!% *)r%s/%ciali9%' s%,s%0 i" is %ss%,"iall#li,is"ic. T) *a7% "!is li,is"ic)ri%,"a"i), cl%ar%r0 "!% "%r*s
li,is"ics"#lis"ics
)r
li,)s"#lis"ics
ar%s)*%"i*%s %*/l)#%' ") '%,)"% "!%li,is"ic a,al#sis )r i,"%r/r%"a"i), )( li"%rar# %$%,"s. O"!%r "#/%s )( s"#lis"ics +%l) ar% lar%l#
s+"#/%s)( "!isli,is"ic li"%rar# s"#lis"ics.
3. Textualist Stylistics(Textlinguistics):
T!is is "!% "#/% )( s"#lis"ics !ic!%,a%' i, a, %*/"# "%c!,)l)#;)( a "%8". I" *%r%l# i'%,"i(i%s "!% rali,is"ic /a""%r,s )( a 1li"%rar#6
"%8"sc!as "!% /!),)l)ical0 ra**a"ical0l%8ical a,' s%*a,"ic /a""%r,si"!)"a""%*/"i, ") r%la"% "!%s% /a""%r,s") "!% *%ssa% i, "!% "%8".
T!isa//r)ac!as /)/lar a" "!% %arl# s"a%s )( "!% %$)l"i), )( s"#lis"ics as a'isci/li,%!%r% li,is"s $i%%' li"%rar# "%8"s*%r%l# as
li,is"ic %$%,"s a,' (%l"li"%rar# i,"%r/r%"a"i),0 i,$)l$i,"!%*a"ic c),c%r,s )r ar"is"icsi,i(ica,c%0%r% ,)" )( c),c%r, ") "!%*
asli,is"s0 %s/%ciall# as "!%# i,$)l$%'a,,'%rs"a,'i, )( "!% ar"is"<si,"%,"i), !ic! as !ar'l# s+=%c" ")"!%)+=%c"i$% $%ri(ia+ili"#
%*/!asi9%' +#"!% sci%,"i(ic clai* )( *)'%r,li,is"ics.
4. Interpretative Stylistics:
T!is is "!% /rac"ic% %,a%' i, +#*)s" s"#lis"icia,s ,)a'a#s. I"i,$)l$%s "!% a,al#sis )( "!% li,is"ic'a"a i, a 1li"%rar#6 "%8"0
"!%,ra$%lli,)( "!% c),"%," )r ar"is"ic $al% )( "!%"%8" a,' "!% *arr#i, )( "!%s% ").As'%/ic"%' i, L%) S/i"9%r<s
/!il)l)icalcircl%0 "!% i,"%r/r%"a"i$% s"#lis"icia,r%la"%s li,is"ic '%scri/"i), ")li"%rar# a//r%cia"i), +# s%%7i,ar"is"ic(,c"i), a,' r%la"i, i"
") "!%li,is"ic %$i'%,c% )r (irs" s%%7i,"!%li,is"ic (%a"r%s i, "!% "%8" a,'r%la"i, i" ") "!% ar"is"ic *)"i$a"i),. T!%+%li%( is "!a" "!%
li,is"ic /a""%r,sar% c!)s%, '%li+%ra"%l# ") %8/r%ssc%r"ai, ar"is"ic )r li"%rar# )als a,'"!a" "!% ") ca, !ar'l# +% 'i$)rc%'.
!. These areas of study are ore or less clear"cut. Soe scholars clai that stylistic is a coparatively new
branch of linguistics, The ter stylistics really cae into existence not too long ago.
#. $. the ob%ect and the atter under study& 'ot only ay each of these linguistic units (sounds, words and
clauses) be charged with a certain stylistic eaning but the interaction of these eleents, as well as the structure
and the coposition of the whole text are stylistically pertinent (*+-/, 01212456/).
7. 8. The de9nition of style& :ierent scholars have de9ned style dierently at dierent ties. ;n $<== the
>cadeician ?.?. ?inogradov de9ned style as @socially deterined and functionally conditioned internally united
totality of the ways of using, selecting and cobining the eans of lingual intercourse in the sphere of one
national language or anotherA. ;n $<7$ Brof. ;.C. Dalperin oered his de9nition of style as @is a syste of co"
ordinated, interrelated and inter"conditioned language eans intended to ful9l a speci9c function of
counication and aiing at a de9nite eectA. >ccording to Brof. Screbnev @style is what dierentiates a group
of hoogeneous texts fro all other groupsE Style can be roughly de9ned as the peculiarity, the set of speci9c
features of text type or of a speci9c textA.
F. 3. the nuber of functional styles& The authors of handbooGs on dierent languages propose systes of
styles based on a broad subdivision of all styles into 8 classes H literary and colloIuial and their varieties. These
generally include fro three to 9ve functional styles.
<. DalperinJs syste of stylesK $. Lelles"lettres style (poetry, eotive prose, draa)& $. Bublicist (oratory and
speeches, essay, article)& 3. 'ewspaper (brief news ites, headlines, ads, editorial)& !. scienti9c prose& =. oMcial
docuents.
$8. Stylistics is that branch of linguistics, which studies the principles, and eect of choice and usage of
dierent language eleents in rendering thought and eotion under dierent conditions of counication.
Therefore it is concerned with such issues asK
$3. $. The aesthetic function of language& 8. expressive eans in language (ai to eect the reader or
listener)& 3. synonyous ways of rendering one and the sae idea (with the change of wording a change in
eaning taGes place inevitably)& !. eotional colouring in language& =. a syste of special devices called stylistic
devices& #. the splitting of the literary language into separate systes called style& 7. the interrelation between
language and thought& F. the individual anner of an author in aGing use of the language.
$!. ;tJs essential that we looG at the ob%ect of stylistic study in its totality concerning all the above" entioned
probles.
$=.
$F. >ccording to the type of stylistic research we can distinguish literary stylistics Pnd linguP"stlisti+s. Qh*
hPv* soe eeting points or linGs in that they have coon ob%ects of research. OonseIuently they have certain
areas of +ross"r*f*r*n+*. Loth study the coon ground ofK
$<. $. the literary language fro the point of view of its variability&
88. The points of dierence proceed fro the dierent points of analysis. Rhile lingua"stylistics studiesK
8!. 8. The linguistic nature of the expressive eans of the language, their systeatic character and their
functions .
literary stylistics& 8. linguistic st.& 3. Ooparative st.& !. :ecoding st.& =. unctional st.& #. Stylistic lexicology& 7.
Stylistic graar.
$%. &omparati'e stylistics
3$. Ooparative stlistics is connected with the contrastive study of ore than one language. ;t analyses the
stylistic resources not inherent in P separate language but at the crossroads of two languages, or two literPtur*s
and is obviously linGed to the theory of translation.
33. > coparatively new branch of stylistics is the decoding stylistics, which can be traced bacG to the worGs
of . ?. Shcherba, V. W. arin, X, Ciffaterre, C. YacGobson and other scholars of the Brague linguistic circle. W
serious contribution into this branch of stylistic study was also ade b Brof. ;.Z. >rnold. [ach act of speech has
the perforer, or sender of speech and the recipient. Qh* forer does the act of *n+1ding and the latter the act
of decoding the inforation.
3!. ;f we analyse the text fro the authors (encoding) point of view we should consider the epoch, the
historical situation, the personal political, social and aesthetic views of the author.
3=. Lut if we try to treat the sae text fro the readers angle of view we shall have to disregard this,
bacGground Gnowledge and get the axiu inforation fro the text itself (its vocabu$ary, +1\1sition,
s*nt*n+* arrangeent, *t+.) The first approach anifests the prevalence of the literary analysis. Qh* second is
based alost exclusively 1n the linguistic analysis. :ecoding stylistics is an attept to haroniously +1bine the
two eth1ds of stylistic research and *nPb* the scholar to interpret P worG of art with P iniu loss of its
purport and essage.
37. Special ention, should b* ade of functional stylistics which is P branch of lingua"stylistics that
investigates functional styles, that is specia$ sublanguPg*s or varieties 1f of the national language such as
scienti9c, colloIuial, business, publicist and so on.
3F. ]owever Pn types of stylistics P exist 1r spring into existence they will Pll consider the sae source
aterial for stylistic analysis sounds, words, phrases, sentences, paragraphs and texts. Thats why any Gind of
stylistic research, will b* based 1n the level"foring branches that includeK
!N. Stytystic exicology studies the seantic structure of the word and the interrelation (or interplay) of the
connotative and denotative eanings of the word, as well as the interrelation of the stylistic connotations 1f the
word and the context.
!$. Stylistic Phonetics (or Phonostylistics) is engaged in the study of style"f1ring phonetic features of
the text. ;t describes the \ros1dic f*Ptures of prose and poetry and variants of pronunciation in different types of
speech (colloIuial or oratory or recital (2*^_P6\1`P-6*).
!3. Stylistic orphology is interested in the stylistic potentials of specific graatical, fors Pnd categories,
such as the nuber of the noun, or the peculiar use of tense fors of the verb, etc.
!!. Stylistic Syntax is 1n* of the oldest branches of stylistic studies that grew 1ut 1f classical rhetoric. The
Pterial in Iu*sti1n lends itself readily to analysis and description. Stylistic syntax has to do with the expressive
order of words, types of syntactic linGs ( asyndeton, polysyndeton), 9gures of speech (antithesis, chiasus, etc.).
;t also deals with bigger units fro paragraph onwards.
!=.
!F. >s is obvious fro the naes of the branches or types of stylistic studies this science is very closely linGed
to the linguistic disciplines philology students are failiar withK phonetics, lexicology and graar due to the
+11n study source.
!<. Stylistics interacts with such theoretical discipline as semasiology. This is P branch of linguistics whose
area of study is P ost coplicated and enorous sphere that of eaning. The. ter seantics is also widely
used in linguistics in relation to verbal eanings. Seasiology in its turn is often related to the theory of signs in
general and deals with visual as well as verbal eanings.
=N. eaning is not attached to the level of the word only, or for that atter to 1n* level at all but correlPt*s
with all of the " orphees, words, phrases 1r texts. This is one of the ost challenging areas of r*s*Pr+h since
prP+ti+ally all stylistic effects are based 1n the interplay between different Ginds of *Pning 1n different levels.
SuMce it to say that their are nuerous types of linguistic eanings attached to linguistic units, such as
graatical, lexical,$ogical, denotative, connotative, eotive, evaluative, expressive and stylistic.
=$. -nomasiology (or onomatology) is the theory of naing dealing with the choice of words when naing
or assessing soe ob%ect or \h*n1*n1n. ;n stylistic analysis we often have to do with P transfer of noinal
eaning in P text (antonoasia, etaphor, etonyy, etc.)
=8. The theory of fun+tionPl styles investigates the structure of the national linguistic space " what constitutes
the literary language, the sublanguages and dialects entioned ore than 1n+* already.
=3. iterary stylistics will inevitably overlap with areas of literary studies su+h as the theory of iagery, literary
genres, the art of coposition, etc.
=!. :ecoding stylistics in any ways borders culture studies in the broad sense of that word including the
history of art, aesthetic trends and even inforation theory.
Cancel Anytime.
Download