Ashlee L.

Baguio HIST 101 (MWF) 12:30-1:30 PM

Reflection of the Rizal’s Retraction

When I think about the contentious matter of Jose Rizal's retraction note, I

find that I am strongly inclined to believe the claim that he did not sign it

voluntarily. The historical backdrop of his incarceration and probable death

provides crucial evidence in favor of this viewpoint. The Spanish government put a

lot of pressure on Rizal because they considered him as a danger to their authority.

Rizal was well-known for his intellectual prowess and unwavering beliefs. Given

the circumstances surrounding his execution, it is possible that the retraction note

was forced as a calculated attempt to lessen Rizal's impact on the revolutionary

cause in the Philippines. A further degree of doubt is added by the fact that Rizal

signed the retraction shortly before his execution, casting doubt on the veracity of

his agreement. Rafael Palma and Austin Coates’ critical analysis builds up the

skeptical filter of the supposed “signed” retraction, from the Spanish friars not

immediately handing over the marriage certificate of Jose Rizal and Josephine

Bracken and his retraction letter. Moreover, not given a proper religious Catholic

bade of farewell is questionable! Overall, I strong believe Rizal's life was devoted

to enlightenment, education, and the quest of justice; therefore, it is improbable

that he would willingly change his mind, particularly in light of the certainty of his

own death. In keeping with the values that shaped Rizal's life and legacy, the
Ashlee L. Baguio HIST 101 (MWF) 12:30-1:30 PM

retraction message thus seems more like the result of outside forces than of a

sincere change of heart.