This document outlines the methodology for evaluating rural historic landscapes according to the National Park Service (NPS). It involves compiling primary and secondary data on the site's history and current conditions. Sites are then evaluated based on the National Register of Historic Places criteria of A) association with events or activities, B) association with important individuals, C) distinctive physical characteristics, and D) ability to provide historical information. The document analyzes a Malay house landscape in Malaysia based on these criteria and determines it is significant under criteria A for its association with land use and activities, and C for its distinctive vernacular design and form.
This document outlines the methodology for evaluating rural historic landscapes according to the National Park Service (NPS). It involves compiling primary and secondary data on the site's history and current conditions. Sites are then evaluated based on the National Register of Historic Places criteria of A) association with events or activities, B) association with important individuals, C) distinctive physical characteristics, and D) ability to provide historical information. The document analyzes a Malay house landscape in Malaysia based on these criteria and determines it is significant under criteria A for its association with land use and activities, and C for its distinctive vernacular design and form.
This document outlines the methodology for evaluating rural historic landscapes according to the National Park Service (NPS). It involves compiling primary and secondary data on the site's history and current conditions. Sites are then evaluated based on the National Register of Historic Places criteria of A) association with events or activities, B) association with important individuals, C) distinctive physical characteristics, and D) ability to provide historical information. The document analyzes a Malay house landscape in Malaysia based on these criteria and determines it is significant under criteria A for its association with land use and activities, and C for its distinctive vernacular design and form.
This document outlines the methodology for evaluating rural historic landscapes according to the National Park Service (NPS). It involves compiling primary and secondary data on the site's history and current conditions. Sites are then evaluated based on the National Register of Historic Places criteria of A) association with events or activities, B) association with important individuals, C) distinctive physical characteristics, and D) ability to provide historical information. The document analyzes a Malay house landscape in Malaysia based on these criteria and determines it is significant under criteria A for its association with land use and activities, and C for its distinctive vernacular design and form.
Step of process Definition of Rural Landscape b/ground discussions G/lines for Evaluating & Documenting Rural Historic Landscape by NPS
Secondary data: Primary Data:
Site Historic: review past Compile exstg conditions tru’ inventory /document of the site observation, site photos, DOCUMENT (SITE site study – struc. plan/ local topo map, interview use 12 of INVENTORY) plan, journal, historic landscape characteristics document, magazine etc)
Analysis & synthesis use NPS:
1. Defining significant –based on 4 National Criteria (NR) A, B, C & D A – associate event & historic B – associate w/important person EVALUATE C – distinctive physical charac. D – ability to provide past historic info METHODOLOGY National Register Criteria & Consideration 2. Assess historic integrity: National register a. Criteria consideration – location, Criteria Rural Landscape dtl, setting, material, w/manship, Yes No feeling & association A x B x C x EVALUATE D x b. Identify threat/problems to integrity Consideration Location x Detail x c. weight overall integrity Setting x (conclusion) Material x W/manship x Feeling x Association x Stewardship: -preservation TREATMENT -rehabilitation -support by -restoration drwg/sketches -reconstruction To evaluate rural landscape eligibility: 1. Defining significance
a) Significant elements are valued based on the following
criteria: - association w/events/actv. Ex: farming, irrigation, fishing, settlement, mining. - association w/important persons of success, talent, ingenuity etc. - distinctiveness phy. characteristics of dsgn, const & form. Ex. Vernacular bldg, transport system. - provides info its past ex archeology sites. Ex. abandoned roadways, reforested field, remnant stone walls. NR Criterion Criterion A: association w/ l/use & actv. The Malay house within Kg Kemasin in Bachok which opened in the 1970s still retains 4 original yards, namely the front yard, backyard & the side yard. Front yard has large compound & serves as the home decor areas & social actv. Side yard as food crops, medicines & bulky trees. The back yard is classified as a private area & has r/ships with residents' daily use. Even the surrounding of the house which originally a forest has changed into a rice fields but the distinctiveness Malay characteristics of 19th century still can see.
Criterion A established the great evidence/strong significance for the
establishment of a Malay landscape. Criterion B: association w/important persons in past
• The person associated with Pak Ali’s house of local
significance. • Criterion B no significance for the establishment of a Malay house landscape. Criterion C: distinctiveness phy. characteristics of dsgn, const & form.
• The house is a locally significant ex of vernacular built form
and can been seen tru’their original designation. These physical characteristics are important coz contribute among the sense of place as Malay house. The Malay built form element (wood material, thatched roof, raised on stilts etc) and surrounded by green areas.
• Criterion C holds great/quite significance of the Malay
landscape, Criterion D: provides info its past ex archeology sites
• Criterion D – no significance for the establishment of a
Malay landscape. Conclusion:
• The NR criteria is a foundation on which to make a
statement for the creation of a Malay landscape. The Pak Ali’s house of Kg Kemasin can be considered a Malay house landscape under criteria A & C with the criteria A providing the strongest evidence for the creation of a Malay landscape. Table National Register Criteria National register Criteria Malay Landscape Yes No A x B x C x D x