Amkor 8D Assessment Sheet

8D Report

SCAR# Supplier/site P3 Assessed by

Customer ATP Problem Date

Not complied Partially complied Fully complied Available Assessed

Discipline Attribute Weighed score Weight
(0%) (50%) (100%) point point

The internal tracking identification of the report is identified - 2 2

0.1
Amkor SCAR # or Customer CAR #
100 100

Clear information such material description, SCAR issued

date, SCAR resp date, supplier lot#, MFG date, defect ratio, 0.5 0.5
0.2
defect mode, defect sample received date, etc related
100 100
information
D0 - General Information

Failure mode experienced and defined by customer is 0.5 0.5

0.3
identified
100 100

5%

The traceable information such as device name, product 0.5 0.5

0.4
description, manufacturing lot# and date code is available
100 100

Size of the problem experienced by customer is defined such 0.5 0.5

0.5
as quantity/rate and frequency
100 100

The time related information such as problem received date 1 1

0.6
and response date is identified, and within due date
100 100

Not complied Partially complied Fully complied Available Assessed

Discipline Attribute Weighed score Weight
(0%) (50%) (100%) point point

1.1 All related members are formed and cross-functional 100 1 100 1

The team leader is identified and The members formed 1 1

1.2 100 100
D1 - Team Approach

include working and management level together

The team leader is senior, manager level, and enough 1 1

1.3
capability to lead team members to solve the problem
100 100 5%

The members formed have the skills or experience for 1 1

1.4
problem solving technique
100 100

The members formed include 3rd parties as needed such as 1 1

1.5
equipment/material supplier or customer
100 100

Not complied Partially complied Fully complied Available Assessed

Discipline Attribute Weighed score Weight
(0%) (50%) (100%) point point

The problem is throughly defined by using thought process 1 1

2.1
such as 5W2H
100 100

Failure mode historical data is included to be aware of same 0.5 0.5

2.2
or similar occurrence
100 100

The question of "What's wrong with what?" is clearly 0.25 0.25

2.3
answered
100 100

The detection point of problem is clearly identified such as 0.75 0.75

2.4
Incoming stage, Electrical test, Board mount or Field
100 100
D2 - Problem Description

The magnitude of problem is defined from initiation through

2.5 end point of use including shipped amount of products to 100 0.5 100 0.5 5%
customer

The timeline in which the problem as witnessed at the 0.25 0.25

2.6
customer is listed
100 100

Failure mode historical data is included to be aware of same 0.5 0.5

2.7
or similar occurrence
100 100

Failure mode description, such as customer observed 0.25 0.25

2.8
measurements versus expectation/specification is listed
100 100

The visual media such as drawing or pictures is well used to 1 1

2.9
describe the problem clearly and accurately
100 100

Not complied Partially complied Fully complied Available Assessed

Discipline Attribute Weighed score Weight
(0%) (50%) (100%) point point

Problem is communicated immediately through all partieis 1.5 1.5

3.1
related using effective communication media
100 100

The affected process or manufacturing line including raw

3.2 material supplier site are identified and reviewed if Shut Down 100 1.25 100 1.25
is needed.
- Containment Action

10%
 The affected materials are identified to put them on hold and 1.5 1.5
D3 - Containment Action 3.3
Containmnet Action in place
100 100

The immediate actions to prevent any escaping to customer

3.4 are identified such as Re-screen or Tighten monitoring along 100 1.5 100 1.5
with effective methodology
10%
The tighten monitoring is implemented until Permanent
Corrective Action is in place. The sample plan for tighthen 1.5 1.5
3.5
monitoring is statistically significant to capture the potential
100 100
defects

The process assessment,reliability assessment or 1 1

3.6
commonality study are planned or executed
100 100

The tighten monitoring is implemented until Permanent 1 1

3.7
Corrective Action is in place
100 100

The data of Re-screen or Tighten monitoring is provided and 0.75 0

3.8
validated
100 0

9.25

Not complied Partially complied Fully complied Available Assessed

Discipline Attribute Weighed score Weight
(0%) (50%) (100%) point point

Failure Analysis is comprehensively performed from external

through internal examination using suitable analytical tools 1.75 0
4.1
and methodologies without any missing items(internal
100 0
examination is done when needed)

Failure Analysis Report is tabulated, visualized and logical to

4.2 understand the findings clearly so as to draw the conclusion 100 1.75 0 0
objectively

Process traceability is performed to identify the variables via 1.75 1.75

4.3
4M or 5W2H, and analyzed by using Commonality Study
100 100

Various analytical tools are used to identify the potential root

4.4 cause such as Fishbone Diagram, Cause and Effect Analysis, 100 1.75 100 1.75
Fault Tree Diagram or Is/Is-Not

Technical cause investigation and reasons for non-detection 1.75 1.75

4.5
are included through why why analysis
100 100
D4 - Root Cause Analysis

Escape cause investigation and reasons for non-detections 1.75 1.75

4.6
are included through why why analysis
100 100

20%

Systemic cause investigation and reasons for non- 1.75 1.75

4.7
conformance are included through why why analysis
100 100

Systemic cause investigation and reasons for non-detection 1.75 1.75

4.8
are included through why why analysis
100 100

Root causes possibly identified are verfied by running

4.9 engineering evaluation such as DOE or Simulation Study so 100 2 50 1
that same problem is replicated

Any analysis is avaialble to confirm the conclusion of root

4.10 cause identified is statistically significant, for example using 100 1.5 100 1.5
Hypothetical Analysis

Matric analytical tool such as 3 Level Analysis classified per

Process RC, Detection RC and System RC using Why-Why- 1.75 1.75
4.11
Why is performed logically based the findings from various
100 100
analysis methodologies

When defining the root cause, the variables to validate "On &
4.12 Off" are identified, which can prevent the problem as 100 2.75 100 2.75
Permanent Corrective Actions

17.5
 Not complied Partially complied Fully complied Available Assessed
Discipline Attribute Weighed score Weight
(0%) (50%) (100%) point point

Corrective actions listed align with and address

5.1 Conformance/occur, Detection/escape and System root 100 5 100 5
causes as defined already through 4.5 - 4.8 Why why analysis
D5 - Corrective & Preventive Action

Corrective actions have been verified through "On & Off" 4 4

5.2
validation during root cause analysis process already
100 100

Corrective actions in place already or planned are statistically

5.3 verified or estimated for Escape ratio or Reliability risk level- 100 4 100 4 25%
ppm or high/medium/low

5.4 Corrective actions designed are fool-proof solutions 100 4 50 2

Corrective actions is confirmed if PCN is required and 4 2

5.5
customer is properly notified of PCN in time
100 50

Dates and Responsible persons for completion of corrective 2 2

5.6
actions are defined and well trained
100 100

19

Not complied Partially complied Fully complied Available Assessed

Discipline Attribute Weighed score Weight
(0%) (50%) (100%) point point

The methodologies technically and/or statistically valid are

6.1 included such as monitor/inspection or test items and sample 100 3 100 3
plan

There is exactly improved report through evaluation and/or 1 1

6.2
process mointor
100 100
Action Effectiveness
D6 - Verification of

The responsible person and term are defined to perform

6.3 validation measureables along with suitable tracking of the 100 3 100 3
actions and training
15%
Validation measureables with the statistical significant level 3 3
6.4
are included using such as hypothetical analysis
100 100

The methodologies to confirm corrective action

6.5 implementation are defined along with the person responsible 100 3 100 3
and date

The proposed requests are included when validation

measureables are not applicable at in-house factories but 2 2
6.6
customer or 3rd parties, and communicated to get customer
100 100
agreement
15

Not complied Partially complied Fully complied Available Assessed

Discipline Attribute Weighed score Weight
(0%) (50%) (100%) point point

Actions including fool-proofing steps are included for other

7.1 potential similar product or process where the same concern 100 2.5 100 2.5
may exist
D7 - Prevent Recurrence

The practices and systems are standardized, and/or fan out to

7.2 other product, process, factories - BKM for what, where and 100 2.5 100 2.5
when

All relevant documents are updated and documented - FMEA, 10%

Control plan, Work instructions and any related specifications 2.5 2.5
7.3
along with document number, responsible person and
100 100
completion date

The changes driven by corrective actions are integrated into 2.5 2.5
7.4
the existing system, process and procedure, or newly initiated
100 100

10

Not complied Partially complied Fully complied Available Assessed

Discipline Attribute Weighed score Weight
(0%) (50%) (100%) point point

Team members all understand and agree with the contents of

8.1 the report, and the report is accepted at 8D asessment 100 1.25 100 1.25
process

The initial provider of the report is correctly defined as 1.25 1.25

D8 - Approval

8.2
representative of the problem in a Corporation-QRE Engineer
100 100

5%
The managers who are authorized to review and approve the
8.3 report are the representatives of each cross-functional 100 1.25 100 1.25
members

The final Reviewer & Approver is the Manager of correctly

8.4 defined representative of the problem in a Corporation-QRE 100 1.25 100 1.25
Manager

5
*Note: Fill up cell shaded in pink only

- Mark at only one column out of three which are "Not complied" or "Partially complied" or "Fully complied".

- Then, "Weighed score" is calculated automatically along with overall score & Pass/Fail decision at the bottom of Assessment Sheet. 91 Pass
- Pass score is "Min. 80%"

- If the situation or case is not appliable at any check item, the score is "100%".

2nd assessment
Pass/Fail

2nd assessment
Pass/Fail
 8D Assessment education Log sheet

Supplier
Date Material company name Place Educator Attendee Attendee job title Signature