Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Federal Civil Procedure Overview
Federal Civil Procedure Overview
CIVIL PROCEDURE
OVERVIEW
I. IN BRIEF
To determine where to file a case, a plaintiff must find a court that has power over the defen-
dants (“personal jurisdiction”) and power over the type of case (“subject matter jurisdiction”),
and the location (“venue”) must be proper. The plaintiff drafts a complaint (sometimes called a
“petition”) that will inform the defendant of the plaintiff’s claims; the plaintiff files the complaint
with the court. Once filed, the plaintiff must provide the defendant with timely notice the
complaint has been filed (“service of process”), using a method authorized by law. After the
defendant is served with process, the defendant may challenge the merits of the case or
defects in the complaint or petition by filing an answer and/or various motions (e.g., a motion
to dismiss). The defendant may also file a claim against the plaintiff. Thereafter, the parties
disclose to each other the evidence each may have (“discovery”). If a party discovers that his
opposing party may not be able to prove a claim or defense at trial, he may ask the court to
dismiss the case for lack of evidence (“motion for summary judgment”). If the plaintiff’s case
survives to this point, it is tried before a jury (if requested) or a judge. In certain circumstances,
the case may be withdrawn from the jury, or the jury’s verdict may be set aside, or the case
may be appealed.
b. Quasi in rem type II—court attaches property to bring defendant into forum on
unrelated claim; defendant must have minimum contacts with forum
3) Conducts systematic and continuous business in the state such that the
defendant is “essentially at home” therein;
4) Consents to jurisdiction; or
a. Defendant must have such minimum contacts with the forum such that the
exercise of personal jurisdiction over him is fair and reasonable
1) Interpleader exception
d. Questions of citizenship
1) Individuals—domicile
f. Supplemental jurisdiction
4) Cross-claims—supplemental jurisdiction
b. Aggregation
2) One plaintiff may not aggregate separate claims against several defendants
d. Counterclaims
3. Erie doctrine and law applied in diversity cases—state substantive law, federal proce-
dural law
CIVIL PROCEDURE OVERVIEW 5.
3. Supplemental jurisdiction
a. Pendent claims—federal court has discretion to hear state law claim if it arises
from a common nucleus of operative fact as the federal claim such that the
claims should be tried together
IV. VENUE
B. General Rules
1. Venue proper in federal district where any defendant resides (if all defendants reside
in same state), where a substantial part of events or omissions occurred, or where a
substantial part of property situated
2. Fallback provisions—if no district satisfies above, venue proper where any defendant
is subject to court’s personal jurisdiction
D. Transfer
1. Original venue proper—transfer for convenience to venue where case might have been
brought or to venue to which parties consent
2. Original venue improper—transfer to venue where case could have been brought to
correct error
V. REMOVAL JURISDICTION
Defendant can remove an action that could have been brought originally in federal court
A. Requirements
1. Original jurisdiction
a. Diversity jurisdiction
3) Case cannot be removed based solely on diversity more than one year
after case was filed unless defendant can show plaintiff acted in bad faith
to prevent removal
b. If later pleading, motion, etc., is filed that shows case is now removable, period
begins to run on service of that pleading, motion, etc.
2. Threatened state criminal proceedings—to prevent clear and imminent harm that
cannot be remedied with a criminal appeal
B. Service of Process
1. Personal service, abode service, service on agent; also state rules and waiver of
8. CIVIL PROCEDURE OVERVIEW
3. Immunity from process for parties, witnesses, attorneys in another action, or fraud or
deceit
D. Pleadings
1. Complaint—notice of plaintiff’s claim
2. Pre-answer motions
a. Motion to dismiss for (i) lack of subject matter jurisdiction; (ii) lack of personal
jurisdiction; (iii) improper venue (transfer probably); (iv) insufficient process or
service of process; (v) failure to state a claim; and (vi) failure to join a party
c. Motion to strike
4. Special pleading for, e.g., fraud, mistake, special damages; must be more detail
b. If party is charged, relates back if, within period for service of process, new
party (i) received notice of the action such that party will not be prejudiced;
and (ii) knew or should have known that, but for plaintiff’s mistake concerning
identity, new party would have been made a party originally
7. Rule 11
E. Joinder
1. Compulsory joinder
d. If a., b., or c. is true, and absentee’s presence will not destroy subject matter
jurisdiction or venue, and the court can obtain personal jurisdiction over
absentee, he must be joined
3. Joinder of claims
a. Class actions
10. CIVIL PROCEDURE OVERVIEW
1) Requirements
d. Interpleader
4. Intervention
6. Cross-claims—co-partners may sue each other for claims arising out of same trans-
action or occurrence
A. Disclosure Requirements
1. Types of disclosure required without discovery request
12. CIVIL PROCEDURE OVERVIEW
b. Experts
2. Oral depositions
a. Sanctions
b. Sanctions
4. Failure to admit
a. Pay expenses for proving matter unless generally some good reason for not
admitting
b. Sanctions
E. Pretrial Conferences
1. Rule 26(f) conference of parties—planning for discovery
IX. TRIAL
B. Trial
1. Jury trial problems
c. Standard—evidence is such that a reasonable jury would not have a legally suffi-
cient basis to find for the party on that issue
7. Motion for new trial—some error occurred at trial (e.g., juror misconduct)
a. If made with renewed motion for judgment as a matter of law, and renewed
motion is granted, judge must rule hypothetically on new trial motion
8. Party waives “sufficiency of the evidence” argument on appeal if he fails to move for
a renewed motion for judgment as a matter of law or for a new trial
a. Clerical mistakes
b. Final decision on merits may sometimes be valid despite lack of subject matter
jurisdiction
5. Supreme Court has jurisdiction to hear federal appellate cases (certiorari or certifi-
cation) and state supreme court cases (by certiorari) where federal issue
2. Issue preclusion (collateral estoppel)—a judgment binds parties (or their privies) in
subsequent actions between them as to issues actually litigated and essential to
judgment in first action
2. Mutuality rules
a. Traditionally, if a nonparty was not bound by a judgment, he could not use issue
preclusion against one who was bound by the judgment
b. Some states (and federal courts) have relaxed mutuality rule when issue preclu-
sion is used defensively
c. Some states (and federal courts) employ a four-part test to determine if issue
preclusion can be used offensively—if all of the following are answered affirma-
tively, issue preclusion can be used offensively
3) Did the party against whom the judgment is to be used have a fair opportu-
nity to be heard?