Professional Documents
Culture Documents
BS 1
BS 1
Table of Contents
SECTION A..................................................................................................................3
SECTION B...................................................................................................................6
1. CEMEX...............................................................................................................6
2. JetBlue.................................................................................................................9
REFERENCE..............................................................................................................14
SECTION A
Organizations do not combine their activities with social activities, instead, they
remain interdependent with each other. Porter and Kramer came up with a framework
in 2006 to elaborate this more clearly. They categorised social issues into 3 types of
impacts, which companies might address to create the share value with their
shareholders and stakeholders.
Generic Social Impacts are issues that play a vital role in society, however, they do
not bring long-term competitiveness or benefits to company and its value chain
activities. They are not significantly affected by company’s operations as well.
Value Chain Impacts have great effects on company’s daily activities, and vice
versa. These issues are divided into two types: Positive impact and Negative impact.
In this case of JetBlue, each impact will be analysed using Porter and Kramer’s CSV
(Creating Share Value) model to see whether the company should continue its funding
or divert the funds to other social initiatives.
C. The earthquakes in Turkey brought a lot of damage to its people, therefore a lot
of organizations from countries all over the world have raised fund and donated
to Turkey. JetBlue is not an exception, and the company has raised $100,000 to
for firefighters in this country, making a great contribution to Turkey’s society.
The contribution significantly supports Turkey’s serious environmental and life
conditions, hence being categorised as Generic Social Impact.
D. Environmental issue has always needed the attention from individuals as well
as organizations all over the world. JetBlue is aware of that, and is now
carrying out research with professionals in other countries to create more
sustainable biofuels. By using this better newly developed energy, carbon
dioxide emissions will be reduced, and in the long run, the engines of JetBlue
aeroplanes will also be benefited, since the biofuels contain much less toxicity
than normal fuels. Since this activity contributes greatly to air pollution
reduction (generic social issue), as well as provides a better source of energy
for JetBlue’s aeroplanes, which belong to value chain activities, it is
categorised as Positive Value Chain Impact in Porter and Kramer’s CSV
framework.
From the above analysis, the issues can be categorised into a CSV impacts table as
below:
CSR, as the name speaks for itself, is about businesses being aware of the
responsibility and take it into action. However, if companies just focus on performing
what they have to do without creating any value, sustainability is not created, hence
the importance of putting CSR initiatives into CSV context. According to Kramer
(2011), CSR is about duty while CSV is about generating value. The Social
Dimension of Competitive Context should be invested in the most, while Value Chain
Social Impacts can be of low or high priority based on how they benefit the company.
If they are positive value chain impacts then the company should continue to invest in
them, but if they are negative then company should mitigate harms out of value chain
activities, and fix the problems immediately. For the Generic Social Impact, they are
all very meaningful funding activities, and they can help JetBlue build a reputation
and image of an eco-friendly organization that works to contribute to the environment,
as well as influencing others to do the same. There is no doubt that JetBlue should
continue investing in creating sustainable biofuels and funding collaborations to give
students opportunities to learn from the company, since they are of positive Value
Chain Impacts and Social Dimension of Competitive Context. For the negative Value
Chain Impact (CO2 emission), JetBlue should fix the problems by continue applying
Nextgen Navigation equipment. In conclusion, JetBlue should keep funding these
activities since they bring a lot of intangible benefits to the company.
SECTION B
1. CEMEX
According to the resource-based view (RBV), a company's ability to maintain a
competitive edge depends on its access to valuable, rare, inimitable, and non-
replaceable resources (Barney, 1991). The capacity of businesses to produce or
acquire these resources has an impact on their effectiveness and competitiveness
against rivals.
Since core competencies are the tools and talents that make up a company's
competitive advantages, they are the foundation for competitiveness. Srivastava in
2005 revealed that core competencies are the foundation for all competitive
advantages. Core competency is a pretty new concept that was established in 1990 by
Prahalad and Hamel. They claimed that in order for a company activity to become a
core competency, it must meet three qualities: valuable, rare, and inimitable.
Applying the theory into the case of CEMEX, a VRIO test is necessary to identify
whether the company’s activities meet the requirements to become core competencies.
The majority of CEMEX shops used to be tiny, ineffective, and little known. Due to
the enormous volume of bagged cement CEMEX sold, the company needed to
concentrate on controlling its dealers. Construrama, a network for independent
merchants, was therefore developed by CEMEX. Because Construrama was able to
establish a sizable market share, provide CEMEX national and regional commercial
opportunities, and also supply a wide variety of goods, it was able to deliver
Sustainable Competitive Advantage. Thanks to Construrama, brand recognition rate
was more than 90% throughout Mexico, making it valuable, uncommon, and very
challenging to copy. The launch of CEMEXNET is another action that generated
sustainable competitive advantage. Since the Mexican phone system was so unstable
and insufficient, CEMEX made the decision to invest in its own satellite
communications system. Since all activities were transparent thanks to CEMEXNET,
the firm was able to respond quickly to changes in demand and unforeseen problems.
Since CEMEX was the only corporation capable of creating its own communication
system, the activity was utterly unique and non-substitutable.
The CEMEX culture and cement delivery are two permanent competitive advantages.
One CEMEX, or CEMEX culture, was a more progressive and data-driven culture that
placed a higher priority on satisfying customer demands and strengthening ties with
distributors and users. Not many businesses can create a culture like this, but others,
especially new entrants, have little trouble copying it. The delivery of cement is in the
same predicament. Smaller builders would purchase CEMEX cement in bags from
construction materials wholesalers and retail establishments. CEMEX cement was
distributed in bulk to ready mix firms. Although the concept of selling cement in bags
was initially quite original, competitors in the business were able to imitate it since it
was a simple move to copy.
Core competencies allow company to better understand how to allocate its resources.
By identifying core competencies, CEMEX was able to use its resources better to
create competitive advantages. As evaluated in the VRIO test above, it can be seen
that core competencies of CEMEX provided the company with Sustainable and
Temporary Competitive Advantages. As a result, competitive advantages can be the
products of company’s core competencies.
2. JetBlue
To analyse JetBlue’s value provided for customers, Porter’s Value chain analysis
(1985) will be used.
Supportive Activities
Primary Activities
There would be less delays since JFK airport has stronger infrastructure and a larger
capacity than other New York airports. Since it was far away and mostly used for
foreign flights, JetBlue's choice to make this airport its home base surprised many of
its industry rivals. 80% of JetBlue's flights could operate during non-peak hours,
according to CEO David Neeleman, therefore turnarounds time was shorter and delays
were cut down. The company established "red-eye" flights, which flew overnight and
arrived in the morning, to target underserved areas. JetBlue was able to utilize its
planes at the highest rate in the market thanks to its selections of routes and airports,
which improved customer satisfaction.
Trade-offs are the actions a brand decides not to do because they would conflict with
its vision and key values. According to Michael Porter, without trade-offs, there
would be no option and no need for strategy. JetBlue’s key value is to bring
“humanity on air”, and the company chose to operate a low-cost airline, making it a
trade-off option for first class/premium service. This trade-off choice brought values
to JetBlue, making it much more competitive than other rivals in the industry. This
also means that premium service like private lounge, larger seats and spaces were not
provided, so that the company can maintain the value it had offered, as well as
offering an egalitarian airline. Another trade-off choice JetBlue made is to charge a
fee for first baggage, that way the firm can influence the sense of loyalty and pride
that customers have for JetBlue.
d. Second order fit
Customer No baggage
bill of rights transfer Single aircraft
Flying
type A320s
point to
“True blue” and brand
point
reward system new aircrafts
Extra
legroom Bring humanity High aircraft
back to air utilization
travel
Very low
Unlimited ticket prices
Free wifi
snacks
on flights
JetBlue’s objectives are “Bringing humanity back to air travel”, “High aircraft
utilization”, “Limited but differentiated service”, “Productive Workforce” and “very
low ticket prices”. These goals are supported by specific actions and methods. The
activity map shows how activities and themes reinforce each other. For instance, the
themes of “bringing humanity back on air” and “limited but differentiated service” are
tailored with value chain activities like free wifi on flights, extra leg room, unlimited
snacks. It can be seen that low prices on tickets and high aircraft usage also strengthen
each other, where a single type of aircraft (A320s) was used, with no baggage transfer
and no transit helped reduce the cost for passengers. These activities are proof that
JetBlue’s value chain activities are well tailored.
The introduction of Mint Concept is to target the premium air travel segment.
Although the revenue per flight of JetBlue was higher than that of other low cost
carriers like Virgin America, not having a premium class caused the total revenue per
flight to be more than 10% lower. This led to a “significant unit revenue
disadvantage’. Since the initial core value of JetBlue was to avoid distributing seats
class, a lot of crew members as well as customers saw Mint concept as a betrayal to
JetBlue’s egalitarian service. There was obviously a threat to JetBlue’s reputation.
Nevertheless, CEO Robin Hayes still chose to operate Mint, because the company’s
operation capacity was developed so greatly that revenue needed to be increased.
Introducing premium service would not be enough to deal with the problems, so
Hayes and his team decided to keep an eye on what they could expect to boost
revenue and make changes, while still being able to reduce costs. Those changes
included introduction of first bag fee, charges for more leg room. Despite being a
threat to the egalitarian approach that JetBlue used to maintain, Mint concept was a
success, as it boosted annual revenues by $450m, while reducing capital cost by
around $1bn.
The new Mint Concept still satisfied customers in terms of great flight experience,
however, with initial value proposition targeted the economy segment and no class
distribution, it did not maintain JetBlue’s ‘egalitarian’ approach. In spite all that,
operating Mint helped the company gained more revenue to match current capacity.
REFERENCE
Creating Shared Value: Doing well by doing good! (2015a). Available at:
https://drmarkcamilleri.com/2015/05/11/creating-shared-value-doing-well-by-doing-
good/ (Accessed: May 3, 2023).
Dfitzgerald (2022a) “CSR vs. CSV – What’s the difference?,” FSG [Preprint].
Available at: https://www.fsg.org/blog/csr-vs-csv-whats-difference/ (Accessed: May
3, 2023).
Next Generation Air Transportation System (NextGen) (no date a). Available at:
https://www.faa.gov/nextgen (Accessed: May 4, 2023).
Service Industry Value Chain Analysis | EdrawMax Online (no date a). Available at:
https://www.edrawmax.com/article/service-industry-value-chain-analysis.html
(Accessed: May 4, 2023).
University of the West of England (2014c) JetBlue Case 1: Room at the Back -
“Bringing Humanity back to the air.” Available at:
https://www.studocu.com/ec/document/universidad-ute/e-business/jet-blue-case-
study-part-1/18498933 (Accessed: May 4, 2023).
University of the West of England (2016a) JetBlue Case 2: Mint in a Cocktail of
Change? Available at: https://www.studocu.com/en-gb/document/university-of-the-
west-of-england/strategic-management-accounting-economics-and-finance/jet-blue-
case-study-2-v2/6803147 (Accessed: May 4, 2023).
University of the West of England (no date a) CEMEX Case Study 2: The Next
Evolution. Available at: https://www.studocu.com/en-gb/document/university-of-the-
west-of-england/strategic-and-operational-management/cemex-case-study-
2/11583389 (Accessed: May 5, 2023).