061 064 East Kingston - Design Calculations

EAST KINGSTON
NH ROUTE 107A
OVER
PAN AM RAILWAY AND A RESIDENTIAL
DRIVE
REHABILITATION OF:
BRIDGE NO. 061 / 064
DESIGN
CALCULATIONS
PREPARED BY:
53 Regional Drive
Concord, NH 03301
(603) 225-2978
PREPARED FOR:
7 HAZEN DRIVE
CONCORD, NH 03301
PROJECT NO. 17960.08

BRIDGE DESIGN CALCULATIONS
NH ROUTE 107A OVER PAN AM RAILWAY
AND A RESIDENTIAL DRIVE
EAST KINGSTON, NH
BRIDGE NO. 061/064
TABLE OF CONTENTS
FORM 4 ............................................................................................................................ 1
BRIDGE GEOMETRY ........................................................................................................ 3
VERTICAL & HORIZONTAL CURVE DATA ............................................................. 5
COGO CALCULATIONS .......................................................................................... 8
CAMBER AND DECK ELEVATION CALCULATIONS ................................................. 15
ABUTMENT PEDESTAL ELEVATIONS ..................................................................... 37
BLOCKING DISTANCE CALCULATIONS ................................................................. 39
BACKWALL AND STUB WALL ELEVATION CALCULATIONS ................................. 41
BEAM DEPTH AND PIER PEDESTAL CALCULATIONS ............................................ 45
GIRDER DESIGN & FORM 4 CALCULATIONS ................................................................. 51
DECK DESIGN .................................................................................................................. 226
LINK SLAB DESIGN ......................................................................................................... 252
ULTRA-HIGH PERFORMANCE CONCRETE REINFORCEMENT DEVELOPMENT

LENGTH CALCULATIONS ................................................................................................ 264
FIXED BEARING DESIGN ................................................................................................. 271
EXPANSION BEARING DESIGN ........................................................................................ 279
DIAPHRAGM DESIGN ....................................................................................................... 294
BEARING STIFFENER DESIGN ......................................................................................... 306
CONSTRUCTABILITY VERIFICATION .............................................................................. 312

FORM 4
1 of 325
Form 4
N.H. D.O.T. TOWN: EAST KINGSTON
BRIDGE CAPACITY SUMMARY BRIDGE NUMBER: 061/064
DESIGN LOAD: HL-93 DESIGN METHOD: LRFD RATED BY: SIW DATE: 8/3/2016
RATING METHOD: LRFR (HS20) PLAN FILE: 131-2-1 CHECK BY: RLJ DATE: 9/9/2016
ROUTE: NH ROUTE 107A OVER: PAN AM RAILWAY AND RESIDENTIAL DR.
LONGITUDINAL REQUIRED CAPACITY (HS Tons) AVAILABLE CAPACITY (HS Tons)

RATED EFFECTIVE CURRENT CERTIFIED VEHICLES MULTIPLE LANES LOADED SINGLE LANES LOADED
MEMBER SPAN LEGAL SINGLE MULTIPLE
INVENTORY OPERATING POSTING INVENTORY OPERATING POSTING
LENGTH LOADS UNIT UNIT
CONCRETE DECK 1'-0" HS 14.0 HS 15.4 HS 15.4 HS 42.7 HS 55.3 HS 52.1 HS 42.7 HS 55.3 HS 52.1
STEEL GIRDERS
All Spans
Interior Girder 39'-4"
Shear HS 19.6 HS 23.5 HS 21.5 HS 87.1 HS 112.8 HS 106.3 HS 87.1 HS 112.9 HS 106.4
Positive Moment HS 21.5 HS 26.6 HS 23.9 HS 63.8 HS 82.9 HS 78.1 HS 78.9 HS 102.5 HS 96.6
Exterior Girder 39'-4"

Rating Method English Tons Metric Tons

RECOMMENDED POSTING: NA (Op.) 63. LRFR 64. (Op.) 99.5 90.3
(Inv.) 65. LRFR 66. (Inv.) 76.8 69.6
2 of 325
BRIDGE GEOMETRY
3 of 325
CALCULATION COVER PAGE
PROJECT: MJ JOB NO.:

East Kingston (NH RT. 107A over PAN AM Railway and Residential Drive) 17960.08
CLIENT: CLIENT JOB NO.:
New Hampshire Department of Transportation 26942
SUBJECT/ TITLE: FEDERAL JOB NO.:
Geometry Calculations for COGO, Camber Tables, Deck Elevations, Blocking Distance, X-A003 (411)
Abutment Pedestal Elev., Top of Backwall Elev., and Top of Stub Wall Elev.
ORIGINATOR’S CHECKER’S
REV. CALCULATION ITEMS
SIGNATURE / DATE SIGNATURE / DATE
NO.
COGO, Camber Tables, Deck
0 9/19/2016 Elevations, Blocking Distance, and
9/20/2016 Abutment Pedestal Elev.
Top of Backwall and Top of Stub
0 9/19/2016 9/20/2016 Wall Elevations
CALCULATION OBJECTIVE:
To determine the COGO, camber tables, deck elevations, blocking distance, abutment pedestal elevations, top of backwall
elevations, and top of stub wall elevations for the East Kingston bridge.
CALCULATION METHODOLOGY/ LIST of ASSUMPTIONS:
 The concept for the vertical geometry of the bridge was that the existing vertical geometry over the exterior beams
would be held on the new bridge and the interior beams would step with the cross slope.
 The existing beams were all located in the same position vertically (not stepped with the cross slope) and the deck
thickness varied to form the cross slope.
 The existing cross slope of 1% will be revised to a cross slope of 2%.
 Angle points at the centerline of the road at each end of the bridge are required to tie in the new bridge cross slope
with the existing approach roadway.
 Calculations were completed for camber at each beam. Since the camber requirements were very similar for all
beams (differed by no more than 1/8”), only one camber table was provided on the plans for all spans and all beams.
This camber table was based on the exterior beam because the exterior beam had the largest camber requirements,
and it would be better if the other beams came in slightly over cambered rather than under cambered.
 Deck elevations were provided for every beam at every span because the vertical curve and cross slope makes the
elevations different at each beam.
 The haunch thickness (blocking distance) was specified so as to minimize the amount of additional dead load
applied to the existing steel bents (which are to remain). For this reason, the camber tolerance was set at ¼” (as
opposed to the ¾” specified by the NHDOT Bridge Design Manual).
 The existing abutment seats are being replaced due to poor condition. The replacement abutment seats are stepped
per PBU. Differences in elevation between the beams in a PBU at the seat will be taken up in the load plate on the
bearings.
REFERENCES / DESIGN FILES:
REFERENCE TITLE: LOCATION: REASON FOR REFERENCE:
NHDOT Bridge Design Manual https://www.nh.gov/dot/org/projectdevelopment/bridge
State design standards
V1.0, 2000. design/documents/webbrmanual.pdf
v.2.0, 2015. design/manual.htm
M:\17960.08 East Kingston
COGO Microstation file with COGO points
26942\Design\Geometry\COGO
EXCEL file with all calculations for camber,
East Kingston Bridge_Vertical M:\17960.08 East Kingston
pedestals, deck elevations, and COGO
Geometry - 3Span 26942\Design\Geometry\COGO
information.
M:\17960.08 East Kingston EXCEL file with calculations for the backwall
East Kingston Misc Elevations
26942\Design\Geometry\Elevations elevations and stub wall elevations.
PAGE 1 OF 1
4 of 325
VERTICAL AND HORIZONTAL CURVE DATA
5 of 325
Project Name: East Kingston
Description:
Horizontal Alignment Name: NH Route 107A
Description:
Style: proposed
Vertical Alignment Name: NH Route 107A
Description:
Style: proposed
STATION ELEVATION
Element: Linear
POB 102+50.0000 148.8768
PVC 102+90.9900 149.7187
Tangent Grade: 2.0540
Tangent Length: 40.9900
Non-collinear
Element: Parabola
PVC 102+90.9900 149.7187
PVI 103+52.6150 150.4330
PVT 104+14.2400 148.8800
VHIGH 103+29.8187 149.9437
Length: 123.2500
Stopping Sight Distance: 354.9437
Entrance Grade: 1.1591
Exit Grade: -2.5200
r = ( g2 - g1 ) / L: -2.9851
K = l / ( g2 - g1 ): 33.5000
Middle Ordinate: -0.5668
Non-collinear
Element: Linear
PVT 104+14.2400 148.8800
POE 104+50.0000 147.7147
Tangent Grade: -3.2587
6 of 325
Project Name: East Kingston
Description:
Horizontal Alignment Name: NH Route 107A
Description:
Style: proposed
STATION NORTHING EASTING
Element: Linear
POB ( ) 100+00.0000 150837.4551 1157058.3082
PC ( ) 100+68.5235 150888.9892 1157013.1451
Tangent Direction: N 41^13'49.6422" W
Element: Circular
PC ( ) 100+68.5235 150888.9892 1157013.1451
PI ( ) 101+10.9655 150920.9083 1156985.1720
CC ( ) 149999.2186 1155997.8578
PT ( ) 101+53.3795 150951.0072 1156955.2493
Radius: 1350.0000
Delta: 3^36'05.0310" Left
Degree of Curvature(Arc): 4^14'38.8745"
Length: 84.8559
Tangent: 42.4419
Chord: 84.8420
Middle Ordinate: 0.6667
External: 0.6670
Radial Direction: N 48^46'10.3578" E
Chord Direction: N 43^01'52.1577" W
Radial Direction: N 45^10'05.3268" E
Element: Linear
PT ( ) 101+53.3795 150951.0072 1156955.2493
POE ( ) 108+00.0000 151409.5768 1156499.3633
7 of 325
COGO CALCULATIONS
8 of 325
100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 1101
1102 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 1201
1202 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130
200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 2101
2102 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 2201
2202 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230
300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 3101
3102 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 3201
3202 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330
400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 4101
4102 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 4201
4202 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430
10 20
30
40 50
60
70 80
500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 5101
5102 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 5201
5202 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530
600 601 602 603 604 605 606 607 608 609 6101
6102 611 612 613 614 615 616 617 618 619 6201
6202 621 622 623 624 625 626 627 628 629 630
700 701 702 703 704 705 706 707 708 709 7101
7102 711 712 713 714 715 716 717 718 719 7201
7202 721 722 723 724 725 726 727 728 729 730
800 801 802 803 804 805 806 807 808 809 8101
8102 811 812 813 814 815 816 817 818 819 8201
8202 821 822 823 824 825 826 827 828 829 830
9 of 325
McFARLAND-JOHNSON JOB EAST KINGSTON 26942
53 Regional Drive SHEET NO.
Concord, New Hampshire CALC. BY SIW DATE 07/20/16
(603) 225-2978 CHECKED BY JAL DATE 09/20/16
MJ PROJ. NO 17960.08
Vertical Curve Data
Alignment
Is the bridge on a vertical curve? Yes
Station Elev
PVI-1 102+90.9900 149.7187 Distance BL to PGL 0.00 ft
PVI-2 103+52.6150 150.4330 Length of curve 123.250 ft
PVI-3 104+14.2400 148.8800
PVC 102+90.9900 149.7187 Grade 1 1.1591 %

PVI-2 103+52.6150 150.4330 Grade 2 -2.5201 %
PVT 104+14.2400 148.8800 Rate of change -2.9851
Cross Section
Breakpoint Station Station Breakpoint

Rate Offset (ft) Rate Left Right Rate Offset (ft) Rate
‐2.00 16.08 ‐2.00 102+90.00 102+90.00 ‐2.00 16.08 ‐2.00
‐2.00 16.08 ‐2.00 104+15.00 104+15.00 ‐2.00 16.08 ‐2.00
Is this a divided highway

with 2 PGLs? no
10 of 325
Concord, New Hampshire CALCULATED BY SIW DATE 07/20/16
Offset off Elevation at Elevation at

Point No. Station
PGL Baseline Offset
10 102+92.91 0.00 149.7404135 149.7404135
20 103+32.16 0.00 149.9429177 149.9429177
30 103+32.56 0.00 149.9426177 149.9426177
40 103+32.95 0.00 149.9422708 149.9422708
50 103+72.29 0.00 149.6745629 149.6745629
60 103+72.68 0.00 149.669522 149.669522
70 103+73.08 0.00 149.6644343 149.6644343
80 104+12.33 0.00 148.9276506 148.9276506
100 102+92.91 -14.00 149.7404135 149.4604135
101 102+96.84 -14.00 149.7813585 149.5013585
102 103+00.76 -14.00 149.8177047 149.5377047
103 103+04.69 -14.00 149.8494521 149.5694521
104 103+08.61 -14.00 149.8766008 149.5966008
105 103+12.54 -14.00 149.8991506 149.6191506
106 103+16.46 -14.00 149.917102 149.637102
107 103+20.39 -14.00 149.9304542 149.6504542
108 103+24.31 -14.00 149.9392075 149.6592075
109 103+28.24 -14.00 149.943362 149.663362
111 103+36.89 -14.00 149.9362828 149.6562828
112 103+40.82 -14.00 149.9256761 149.6456761
113 103+44.75 -14.00 149.9104514 149.6304514
114 103+48.69 -14.00 149.8906078 149.6106078
115 103+52.62 -14.00 149.8661464 149.5861464
116 103+56.55 -14.00 149.8370668 149.5570668
117 103+60.49 -14.00 149.8033679 149.5233679
118 103+64.42 -14.00 149.7650516 149.4850516
119 103+68.35 -14.00 149.7221159 149.4421159
121 103+77.00 -14.00 149.6114506 149.3314506
122 103+80.93 -14.00 149.553868 149.273868
123 103+84.85 -14.00 149.4916866 149.2116866
124 103+88.78 -14.00 149.4249064 149.1449064
125 103+92.70 -14.00 149.3535275 149.0735275
126 103+96.63 -14.00 149.2775497 148.9975497
127 104+00.55 -14.00 149.1969731 148.9169731
128 104+04.48 -14.00 149.1117978 148.8317978
129 104+08.40 -14.00 149.0220236 148.7420236
130 104+12.33 -14.00 148.9276506 148.6476506
200 102+92.91 -10.00 149.7404135 149.5404135
201 102+96.84 -10.00 149.7813585 149.5813585
202 103+00.76 -10.00 149.8177047 149.6177047
203 103+04.69 -10.00 149.8494521 149.6494521
204 103+08.61 -10.00 149.8766008 149.6766008
205 103+12.54 -10.00 149.8991511 149.6991511
206 103+16.46 -10.00 149.917102 149.717102
207 103+20.39 -10.00 149.9304542 149.7304542
208 103+24.31 -10.00 149.9392075 149.7392075
209 103+28.24 -10.00 149.943362 149.743362
211 103+36.89 -10.00 149.9362828 149.7362828
212 103+40.82 -10.00 149.9256761 149.7256761
213 103+44.75 -10.00 149.9104514 149.7104514
214 103+48.69 -10.00 149.8906078 149.6906078
215 103+52.62 -10.00 149.8661464 149.6661464
216 103+56.55 -10.00 149.8370668 149.6370668
217 103+60.49 -10.00 149.8033679 149.6033679
218 103+64.42 -10.00 149.7650516 149.5650516
219 103+68.35 -10.00 149.7221159 149.5221159
221 103+77.00 -10.00 149.6114506 149.4114506
222 103+80.93 -10.00 149.553868 149.353868
223 103+84.85 -10.00 149.4916866 149.2916866
224 103+88.78 -10.00 149.4249064 149.2249064
225 103+92.70 -10.00 149.3535275 149.1535275
226 103+96.63 -10.00 149.2775497 149.0775497
227 104+00.55 -10.00 149.1969731 148.9969731
228 104+04.48 -10.00 149.1117978 148.9117978
229 104+08.40 -10.00 149.0220236 148.8220236
230 104+12.33 -10.00 148.9276506 148.7276506
300 102+92.91 -6.00 149.7404135 149.6204135
301 102+96.84 -6.00 149.7813585 149.6613585
302 103+00.76 -6.00 149.8177047 149.6977047
303 103+04.69 -6.00 149.8494521 149.7294521
11 of 325

Point No. Station
PGL Baseline Offset
304 103+08.61 -6.00 149.8766008 149.7566008
305 103+12.54 -6.00 149.8991506 149.7791506
306 103+16.46 -6.00 149.917102 149.797102
307 103+20.39 -6.00 149.9304542 149.8104542
308 103+24.31 -6.00 149.9392075 149.8192075
309 103+28.24 -6.00 149.943362 149.823362
311 103+36.89 -6.00 149.9362828 149.8162828
312 103+40.82 -6.00 149.9256761 149.8056761
313 103+44.75 -6.00 149.9104514 149.7904514
314 103+48.69 -6.00 149.8906078 149.7706078
315 103+52.62 -6.00 149.8661464 149.7461464
316 103+56.55 -6.00 149.8370668 149.7170668
317 103+60.49 -6.00 149.8033679 149.6833679
318 103+64.42 -6.00 149.7650516 149.6450516
319 103+68.35 -6.00 149.7221159 149.6021159
321 103+77.00 -6.00 149.6114506 149.4914506
322 103+80.93 -6.00 149.553868 149.433868
323 103+84.85 -6.00 149.4916866 149.3716866
324 103+88.78 -6.00 149.4249064 149.3049064
325 103+92.70 -6.00 149.3535275 149.2335275
326 103+96.63 -6.00 149.2775497 149.1575497
327 104+00.55 -6.00 149.1969731 149.0769731
328 104+04.48 -6.00 149.1117978 148.9917978
329 104+08.40 -6.00 149.0220236 148.9020236
330 104+12.33 -6.00 148.9276506 148.8076506
400 102+92.91 -2.00 149.7404135 149.7004135
401 102+96.84 -2.00 149.7813585 149.7413585
402 103+00.76 -2.00 149.8177047 149.7777047
403 103+04.69 -2.00 149.8494521 149.8094521
404 103+08.61 -2.00 149.8766008 149.8366008
405 103+12.54 -2.00 149.8991506 149.8591506
406 103+16.46 -2.00 149.917102 149.877102
407 103+20.39 -2.00 149.9304542 149.8904542
408 103+24.31 -2.00 149.9392075 149.8992075
409 103+28.24 -2.00 149.943362 149.903362
411 103+36.89 -2.00 149.9362828 149.8962828
412 103+40.82 -2.00 149.9256761 149.8856761
413 103+44.75 -2.00 149.9104514 149.8704514
414 103+48.69 -2.00 149.8906078 149.8506078
415 103+52.62 -2.00 149.8661464 149.8261464
416 103+56.55 -2.00 149.8370668 149.7970668
417 103+60.49 -2.00 149.8033679 149.7633679
418 103+64.42 -2.00 149.7650516 149.7250516
419 103+68.35 -2.00 149.7221159 149.6821159
421 103+77.00 -2.00 149.6114506 149.5714506
422 103+80.93 -2.00 149.553868 149.513868
423 103+84.85 -2.00 149.4916866 149.4516866
424 103+88.78 -2.00 149.4249064 149.3849064
425 103+92.70 -2.00 149.3535275 149.3135275
426 103+96.63 -2.00 149.2775497 149.2375497
427 104+00.55 -2.00 149.1969731 149.1569731
428 104+04.48 -2.00 149.1117978 149.0717978
429 104+08.40 -2.00 149.0220236 148.9820236
430 104+12.33 -2.00 148.9276506 148.8876506
500 102+92.91 2.00 149.7404135 149.7004135
501 102+96.84 2.00 149.7813585 149.7413585
502 103+00.76 2.00 149.8177047 149.7777047
503 103+04.69 2.00 149.8494521 149.8094521
504 103+08.61 2.00 149.8766008 149.8366008
505 103+12.54 2.00 149.8991506 149.8591506
506 103+16.46 2.00 149.917102 149.877102
507 103+20.39 2.00 149.9304542 149.8904542
508 103+24.31 2.00 149.9392075 149.8992075
509 103+28.24 2.00 149.943362 149.903362
511 103+36.89 2.00 149.9362828 149.8962828
512 103+40.82 2.00 149.9256761 149.8856761
513 103+44.75 2.00 149.9104514 149.8704514
514 103+48.69 2.00 149.8906078 149.8506078
515 103+52.62 2.00 149.8661464 149.8261464
516 103+56.55 2.00 149.8370668 149.7970668
12 of 325

Point No. Station
PGL Baseline Offset
517 103+60.49 2.00 149.8033679 149.7633679
518 103+64.42 2.00 149.7650516 149.7250516
519 103+68.35 2.00 149.7221159 149.6821159
521 103+77.00 2.00 149.6114506 149.5714506
522 103+80.93 2.00 149.553868 149.513868
523 103+84.85 2.00 149.4916866 149.4516866
524 103+88.78 2.00 149.4249064 149.3849064
525 103+92.70 2.00 149.3535275 149.3135275
526 103+96.63 2.00 149.2775497 149.2375497
527 104+00.55 2.00 149.1969731 149.1569731
528 104+04.48 2.00 149.1117978 149.0717978
529 104+08.40 2.00 149.0220236 148.9820236
530 104+12.33 2.00 148.9276506 148.8876506
600 102+92.91 6.00 149.7404135 149.6204135
601 102+96.84 6.00 149.7813585 149.6613585
602 103+00.76 6.00 149.8177047 149.6977047
603 103+04.69 6.00 149.8494521 149.7294521
604 103+08.61 6.00 149.8766008 149.7566008
605 103+12.54 6.00 149.8991506 149.7791506
606 103+16.46 6.00 149.917102 149.797102
607 103+20.39 6.00 149.9304542 149.8104542
608 103+24.31 6.00 149.9392075 149.8192075
609 103+28.24 6.00 149.943362 149.823362
611 103+36.89 6.00 149.9362828 149.8162828
612 103+40.82 6.00 149.9256761 149.8056761
613 103+44.75 6.00 149.9104514 149.7904514
614 103+48.69 6.00 149.8906078 149.7706078
615 103+52.62 6.00 149.8661464 149.7461464
616 103+56.55 6.00 149.8370668 149.7170668
617 103+60.49 6.00 149.8033679 149.6833679
618 103+64.42 6.00 149.7650516 149.6450516
619 103+68.35 6.00 149.7221159 149.6021159
621 103+77.00 6.00 149.6114506 149.4914506
622 103+80.93 6.00 149.553868 149.433868
623 103+84.85 6.00 149.4916866 149.3716866
624 103+88.78 6.00 149.4249064 149.3049064
625 103+92.70 6.00 149.3535275 149.2335275
626 103+96.63 6.00 149.2775497 149.1575497
627 104+00.55 6.00 149.1969731 149.0769731
628 104+04.48 6.00 149.1117978 148.9917978
629 104+08.40 6.00 149.0220236 148.9020236
630 104+12.33 6.00 148.9276506 148.8076506
700 102+92.91 10.00 149.7404135 149.5404135
701 102+96.84 10.00 149.7813585 149.5813585
702 103+00.76 10.00 149.8177047 149.6177047
703 103+04.69 10.00 149.8494521 149.6494521
704 103+08.61 10.00 149.8766008 149.6766008
705 103+12.54 10.00 149.8991506 149.6991506
706 103+16.46 10.00 149.917102 149.717102
707 103+20.39 10.00 149.9304542 149.7304542
708 103+24.31 10.00 149.9392075 149.7392075
709 103+28.24 10.00 149.943362 149.743362
711 103+36.89 10.00 149.9362828 149.7362828
712 103+40.82 10.00 149.9256761 149.7256761
713 103+44.75 10.00 149.9104514 149.7104514
714 103+48.69 10.00 149.8906078 149.6906078
715 103+52.62 10.00 149.8661464 149.6661464
716 103+56.55 10.00 149.8370668 149.6370668
717 103+60.49 10.00 149.8033679 149.6033679
718 103+64.42 10.00 149.7650516 149.5650516
719 103+68.35 10.00 149.7221159 149.5221159
721 103+77.00 10.00 149.6114506 149.4114506
722 103+80.93 10.00 149.553868 149.353868
723 103+84.85 10.00 149.4916866 149.2916866
724 103+88.78 10.00 149.4249064 149.2249064
725 103+92.70 10.00 149.3535275 149.1535275
726 103+96.63 10.00 149.2775497 149.0775497
727 104+00.55 10.00 149.1969731 148.9969731
728 104+04.48 10.00 149.1117978 148.9117978
729 104+08.40 10.00 149.0220236 148.8220236
13 of 325

Point No. Station
PGL Baseline Offset
730 104+12.33 10.00 148.9276506 148.7276506
800 102+92.91 14.00 149.7404135 149.4604135
801 102+96.84 14.00 149.7813585 149.5013585
802 103+00.76 14.00 149.8177047 149.5377047
803 103+04.69 14.00 149.8494521 149.5694521
804 103+08.61 14.00 149.8766008 149.5966008
805 103+12.54 14.00 149.8991506 149.6191506
806 103+16.46 14.00 149.917102 149.637102
807 103+20.39 14.00 149.9304542 149.6504542
808 103+24.31 14.00 149.9392075 149.6592075
809 103+28.24 14.00 149.943362 149.663362
811 103+36.89 14.00 149.9362828 149.6562828
812 103+40.82 14.00 149.9256761 149.6456761
813 103+44.75 14.00 149.9104514 149.6304514
814 103+48.69 14.00 149.8906078 149.6106078
815 103+52.62 14.00 149.8661464 149.5861464
816 103+56.55 14.00 149.8370668 149.5570668
817 103+60.49 14.00 149.8033679 149.5233679
818 103+64.42 14.00 149.7650516 149.4850516
819 103+68.35 14.00 149.7221159 149.4421159
821 103+77.00 14.00 149.6114506 149.3314506
822 103+80.93 14.00 149.553868 149.273868
823 103+84.85 14.00 149.4916866 149.2116866
824 103+88.78 14.00 149.4249064 149.1449064
825 103+92.70 14.00 149.3535275 149.0735275
826 103+96.63 14.00 149.2775497 148.9975497
827 104+00.55 14.00 149.1969731 148.9169731
828 104+04.48 14.00 149.1117978 148.8317978
829 104+08.40 14.00 149.0220236 148.7420236
830 104+12.33 14.00 148.9276506 148.6476506
1101 103+32.16 -14.00 149.9429177 149.6629177
2101 103+32.16 -10.00 149.9429177 149.7429177
3101 103+32.16 -6.00 149.9429177 149.8229177
4101 103+32.16 -2.00 149.9429177 149.9029177
5101 103+32.16 2.00 149.9429177 149.9029177
6101 103+32.16 6.00 149.9429177 149.8229177
7101 103+32.16 10.00 149.9429177 149.7429177
8101 103+32.16 14.00 149.9429177 149.6629177
1102 103+32.95 -14.00 149.9422708 149.6622708
2102 103+32.95 -10.00 149.9422708 149.7422708
3102 103+32.95 -6.00 149.9422708 149.8222708
4102 103+32.95 -2.00 149.9422708 149.9022708
5102 103+32.95 2.00 149.9422708 149.9022708
6102 103+32.95 6.00 149.9422708 149.8222708
7102 103+32.95 10.00 149.9422708 149.7422708
8102 103+32.95 14.00 149.9422708 149.6622708
1201 103+72.29 -14.00 149.6745629 149.3945629
2201 103+72.29 -10.00 149.6745629 149.4745629
3201 103+72.29 -6.00 149.6745629 149.5545629
4201 103+72.29 -2.00 149.6745629 149.6345629
5201 103+72.29 2.00 149.6745629 149.6345629
6201 103+72.29 6.00 149.6745629 149.5545629
7201 103+72.29 10.00 149.6745629 149.4745629
8201 103+72.29 14.00 149.6745629 149.3945629
1202 103+73.08 -14.00 149.6644343 149.3844343
2202 103+73.08 -10.00 149.6644343 149.4644343
3202 103+73.08 -6.00 149.6644343 149.5444343
4202 103+73.08 -2.00 149.6644343 149.6244343
5202 103+73.08 2.00 149.6644343 149.6244343
6202 103+73.08 6.00 149.6644343 149.5444343
7202 103+73.08 10.00 149.6644343 149.4644343
8202 103+73.08 14.00 149.6644343 149.3844343
14 of 325
CAMBER AND DECK ELEVATION CALCULATIONS
15 of 325
McFARLAND-JOHNSON PROJECT East Kingston 26942
53 Regional Drive BRIDGE 061 / 064 JOB NO. 17960.08
Concord, New Hampshire 03301 MADE BY SIW DATE Jul-16 CHECKED BY JAL DATE Sep-16
(603) 225-2978 REVISED BY DATE CHECKED BY DATE
COGO POINT NUMBERS-SPAN 1

GIRDER ABUT. A 0.10 L 0.20 L 0.30 L 0.40 L 0.50 L 0.60 L 0.70 L 0.80 L 0.90 L PIER
1 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 1101
2 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 2101
3 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 3101
4 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 4101
5 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 5101
6 600 601 602 603 604 605 606 607 608 609 6101
7 700 701 702 703 704 705 706 707 708 709 7101
8 800 801 802 803 804 805 806 807 808 809 8101
FINISHED GRADE ELEVATIONS-SPAN 1

GIRDER ABUT. A 0.10 L 0.20 L 0.30 L 0.40 L 0.50 L 0.60 L 0.70 L 0.80 L 0.90 L PIER
1 149.46 149.50 149.54 149.57 149.60 149.62 149.64 149.65 149.66 149.66 149.66
2 149.54 149.58 149.62 149.65 149.68 149.70 149.72 149.73 149.74 149.74 149.74
3 149.62 149.66 149.70 149.73 149.76 149.78 149.80 149.81 149.82 149.82 149.82
4 149.70 149.74 149.78 149.81 149.84 149.86 149.88 149.89 149.90 149.90 149.90
5 149.70 149.74 149.78 149.81 149.84 149.86 149.88 149.89 149.90 149.90 149.90
6 149.62 149.66 149.70 149.73 149.76 149.78 149.80 149.81 149.82 149.82 149.82
7 149.54 149.58 149.62 149.65 149.68 149.70 149.72 149.73 149.74 149.74 149.74
8 149.46 149.50 149.54 149.57 149.60 149.62 149.64 149.65 149.66 149.66 149.66
Wearing Surface = 0.000 in

Membrane = 0.000 in
Deck = 8.500 in
Vertical Constant = 8.500 in
ELEVATIONS AT BOTTOM OF CONCRETE DECK SLAB-SPAN 1 (FEET)

CL BRG. CL BRG.
GIRDER 0.10 L 0.20 L 0.30 L 0.40 L 0.50 L 0.60 L 0.70 L 0.80 L 0.90 L
ABUT. A PIER 1
1 148.75 148.81 148.86 148.90 148.94 148.96 148.98 148.98 148.98 148.97 148.95
2 148.83 148.89 148.94 148.98 149.01 149.04 149.05 149.06 149.06 149.05 149.03
3 148.91 148.97 149.01 149.05 149.09 149.11 149.13 149.13 149.13 149.13 149.11
4 148.99 149.05 149.09 149.13 149.17 149.19 149.21 149.21 149.21 149.21 149.19
5 148.99 149.05 149.09 149.13 149.17 149.19 149.21 149.21 149.21 149.21 149.19
6 148.91 148.97 149.02 149.06 149.10 149.12 149.14 149.14 149.14 149.13 149.11
7 148.83 148.89 148.94 148.98 149.01 149.04 149.05 149.06 149.06 149.05 149.03
8 148.75 148.81 148.85 148.89 148.93 148.95 148.97 148.97 148.97 148.97 148.95
East Kingston Bridge_Vertical Geometry - 3Span~ Deck Elevations (Span 1)
16 of 325
VERTICAL ORDINATES - GIRDER G1 - SPAN 1

POINT ON GIRDER 0.00 L 0.10 L 0.20 L 0.30 L 0.40 L 0.50 L 0.60 L 0.70 L 0.80 L 0.90 L 1.00 L
COGO point ID 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 1101
T/Grade elev. (profile) 149.46 149.50 149.54 149.57 149.60 149.62 149.64 149.65 149.66 149.66 149.66
T/Grade elev. (chord) 149.46 149.48 149.50 149.52 149.54 149.56 149.58 149.60 149.62 149.64 149.66
Vertical ordinates (in) 0.00 0.25 0.44 0.58 0.66 0.69 0.66 0.58 0.44 0.25 0.00

COGO point ID 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 2101

COGO point ID 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 3101

COGO point ID 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 4101

COGO point ID 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 5101
17 of 325

COGO point ID 600 601 602 603 604 605 606 607 608 609 6101

COGO point ID 700 701 702 703 704 705 706 707 708 709 7101

COGO point ID 800 801 802 803 804 805 806 807 808 809 8101
18 of 325
DEAD LOAD DEFLECTIONS - GIRDER G1 - SPAN 1 (inches)

CL BRG. CL BRG.
POINT ON GIRDER 0.10 L 0.20 L 0.30 L 0.40 L 0.50 L 0.60 L 0.70 L 0.80 L 0.90 L
ABUT. A PIER 1
STEEL DL 0.00 0.03 0.05 0.07 0.08 0.09 0.08 0.07 0.05 0.03 0.00
CONCRETE SLAB 0.00 0.18 0.35 0.47 0.56 0.58 0.56 0.47 0.35 0.18 0.00
SUPERIMPOSED DL 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.21 0.40 0.55 0.65 0.68 0.65 0.55 0.40 0.21 0.00

CL BRG. CL BRG.
ABUT. A PIER 1
STEEL DL 0.00 0.03 0.05 0.07 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.07 0.05 0.03 0.00
CONCRETE SLAB 0.00 0.17 0.33 0.45 0.53 0.56 0.53 0.45 0.33 0.17 0.00
SUPERIMPOSED DL 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.21 0.39 0.53 0.63 0.66 0.63 0.53 0.39 0.21 0.00

CL BRG. CL BRG.
ABUT. A PIER 1
STEEL DL 0.00 0.03 0.05 0.07 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.07 0.05 0.03 0.00
CONCRETE SLAB 0.00 0.15 0.28 0.38 0.44 0.47 0.44 0.38 0.28 0.15 0.00
SUPERIMPOSED DL 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.18 0.34 0.46 0.54 0.57 0.54 0.46 0.34 0.18 0.00

CL BRG. CL BRG.
ABUT. A PIER 1
STEEL DL 0.00 0.03 0.05 0.07 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.07 0.05 0.03 0.00
CONCRETE SLAB 0.00 0.15 0.28 0.38 0.44 0.47 0.44 0.38 0.28 0.15 0.00
SUPERIMPOSED DL 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.17 0.33 0.45 0.53 0.56 0.53 0.45 0.33 0.17 0.00

CL BRG. CL BRG.
ABUT. A PIER 1
STEEL DL 0.00 0.03 0.05 0.07 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.07 0.05 0.03 0.00
CONCRETE SLAB 0.00 0.15 0.28 0.38 0.44 0.47 0.44 0.38 0.28 0.15 0.00
SUPERIMPOSED DL 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.17 0.33 0.45 0.53 0.56 0.53 0.45 0.33 0.17 0.00
19 of 325

CL BRG. CL BRG.
ABUT. A PIER 1
STEEL DL 0.00 0.03 0.05 0.07 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.07 0.05 0.03 0.00
CONCRETE SLAB 0.00 0.15 0.28 0.38 0.44 0.47 0.44 0.38 0.28 0.15 0.00
SUPERIMPOSED DL 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.18 0.34 0.46 0.54 0.57 0.54 0.46 0.34 0.18 0.00

CL BRG. CL BRG.
ABUT. A PIER 1
STEEL DL 0.00 0.03 0.05 0.07 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.07 0.05 0.03 0.00
CONCRETE SLAB 0.00 0.17 0.33 0.45 0.53 0.56 0.53 0.45 0.33 0.17 0.00
SUPERIMPOSED DL 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.21 0.39 0.53 0.63 0.66 0.63 0.53 0.39 0.21 0.00

CL BRG. CL BRG.
ABUT. A PIER 1
STEEL DL 0.00 0.03 0.05 0.07 0.08 0.09 0.08 0.07 0.05 0.03 0.00
CONCRETE SLAB 0.00 0.18 0.35 0.47 0.56 0.58 0.56 0.47 0.35 0.18 0.00
SUPERIMPOSED DL 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.21 0.40 0.55 0.65 0.68 0.65 0.55 0.40 0.21 0.00
20 of 325
CAMBER TABLE - ALL GIRDERS- ALL SPANS (INCHES)
ALL GIRDERS CL BRG. 0.10 L 0.20 L 0.30 L 0.40 L 0.50 L 0.60 L 0.70 L 0.80 L 0.90 L CL BRG.
STEEL DL 0.00 0.03 0.05 0.07 0.08 0.09 0.08 0.07 0.05 0.03 0.00
CONCRETE SLAB 0.00 0.18 0.35 0.47 0.56 0.58 0.56 0.47 0.35 0.18 0.00
SUPERIMPOSED DL 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.00
VERTICAL ORDINATE 0.00 0.25 0.44 0.58 0.66 0.69 0.66 0.58 0.44 0.25 0.00
TOTAL CAMBER 0.00 0.46 0.85 1.13 1.31 1.37 1.31 1.13 0.85 0.46 0.00
CAMBER TABLE - GIRDER G2 - SPAN 1 (INCHES)

CL BRG. CL BRG.
GIRDER 2 0.10 L 0.20 L 0.30 L 0.40 L 0.50 L 0.60 L 0.70 L 0.80 L 0.90 L
ABUT. A PIER 1
STEEL DL 0.00 0.03 0.05 0.07 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.07 0.05 0.03 0.00
CONCRETE SLAB 0.00 0.17 0.33 0.45 0.53 0.56 0.53 0.45 0.33 0.17 0.00
SUPERIMPOSED DL 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.00
TOTAL CAMBER 0.00 0.45 0.83 1.11 1.29 1.35 1.29 1.11 0.83 0.45 0.00

CL BRG. CL BRG.
ABUT. A PIER 1
STEEL DL 0.00 0.03 0.05 0.07 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.07 0.05 0.03 0.00
CONCRETE SLAB 0.00 0.15 0.28 0.38 0.44 0.47 0.44 0.38 0.28 0.15 0.00
SUPERIMPOSED DL 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.00
TOTAL CAMBER 0.00 0.43 0.78 1.04 1.20 1.26 1.20 1.04 0.78 0.43 0.00

CL BRG. CL BRG.
ABUT. A PIER 1
STEEL DL 0.00 0.03 0.05 0.07 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.07 0.05 0.03 0.00
CONCRETE SLAB 0.00 0.15 0.28 0.38 0.44 0.47 0.44 0.38 0.28 0.15 0.00
SUPERIMPOSED DL 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
TOTAL CAMBER 0.00 0.42 0.77 1.03 1.19 1.25 1.19 1.03 0.77 0.42 0.00
21 of 325

CL BRG. CL BRG.
ABUT. A PIER 1
STEEL DL 0.00 0.03 0.05 0.07 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.07 0.05 0.03 0.00
CONCRETE SLAB 0.00 0.15 0.28 0.38 0.44 0.47 0.44 0.38 0.28 0.15 0.00
SUPERIMPOSED DL 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
TOTAL CAMBER 0.00 0.42 0.77 1.03 1.19 1.25 1.19 1.03 0.77 0.42 0.00

CL BRG. CL BRG.
ABUT. A PIER 1
STEEL DL 0.00 0.03 0.05 0.07 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.07 0.05 0.03 0.00
CONCRETE SLAB 0.00 0.15 0.28 0.38 0.44 0.47 0.44 0.38 0.28 0.15 0.00
SUPERIMPOSED DL 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.00
TOTAL CAMBER 0.00 0.43 0.78 1.04 1.20 1.26 1.20 1.04 0.78 0.43 0.00

CL BRG. CL BRG.
ABUT. A PIER 1
STEEL DL 0.00 0.03 0.05 0.07 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.07 0.05 0.03 0.00
CONCRETE SLAB 0.00 0.17 0.33 0.45 0.53 0.56 0.53 0.45 0.33 0.17 0.00
SUPERIMPOSED DL 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.00
TOTAL CAMBER 0.00 0.45 0.83 1.11 1.29 1.35 1.29 1.11 0.83 0.45 0.00

CL BRG. CL BRG.
ABUT. A PIER 1
STEEL DL 0.00 0.03 0.05 0.07 0.08 0.09 0.08 0.07 0.05 0.03 0.00
CONCRETE SLAB 0.00 0.18 0.35 0.47 0.56 0.58 0.56 0.47 0.35 0.18 0.00
SUPERIMPOSED DL 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.00
TOTAL CAMBER 0.00 0.46 0.85 1.13 1.31 1.37 1.31 1.13 0.85 0.46 0.00
22 of 325

GIRDER PIER 1.10 L 1.20 L 1.30 L 1.40 L 1.50 L 1.60 L 1.70 L 1.80 L 1.90 L PIER
1 1102 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 1201
2 2102 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 2201
3 3102 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 3201
4 4102 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 4201
5 5102 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 5201
6 6102 611 612 613 614 615 616 617 618 619 6201
7 7102 711 712 713 714 715 716 717 718 719 7201
8 8102 811 812 813 814 815 816 817 818 819 8201

GIRDER PIER 1.10 L 1.20 L 1.30 L 1.40 L 1.50 L 1.60 L 1.70 L 1.80 L 1.90 L PIER
1 149.66 149.66 149.65 149.63 149.61 149.59 149.56 149.52 149.49 149.44 149.39
2 149.74 149.74 149.73 149.71 149.69 149.67 149.64 149.60 149.57 149.52 149.47
3 149.82 149.82 149.81 149.79 149.77 149.75 149.72 149.68 149.65 149.60 149.55
4 149.90 149.90 149.89 149.87 149.85 149.83 149.80 149.76 149.73 149.68 149.63
5 149.90 149.90 149.89 149.87 149.85 149.83 149.80 149.76 149.73 149.68 149.63
6 149.82 149.82 149.81 149.79 149.77 149.75 149.72 149.68 149.65 149.60 149.55
7 149.74 149.74 149.73 149.71 149.69 149.67 149.64 149.60 149.57 149.52 149.47
8 149.66 149.66 149.65 149.63 149.61 149.59 149.56 149.52 149.49 149.44 149.39

Membrane = 0.000 in
Deck = 8.500 in

CL BRG. CL BRG.
PIER 1 PIER 2
1 148.95 148.96 148.97 148.96 148.95 148.93 148.90 148.86 148.81 148.75 148.69
2 149.03 149.04 149.05 149.04 149.03 149.00 148.97 148.93 148.88 148.83 148.77
3 149.11 149.12 149.12 149.11 149.10 149.08 149.05 149.01 148.96 148.91 148.85
4 149.19 149.20 149.20 149.19 149.18 149.16 149.13 149.09 149.04 148.99 148.93
5 149.19 149.20 149.20 149.19 149.18 149.16 149.13 149.09 149.04 148.99 148.93
6 149.11 149.12 149.13 149.12 149.11 149.09 149.06 149.02 148.97 148.91 148.85
7 149.03 149.04 149.05 149.04 149.03 149.00 148.97 148.93 148.88 148.83 148.77
8 148.95 148.96 148.96 148.95 148.94 148.92 148.89 148.85 148.80 148.75 148.69
23 of 325

COGO point ID 1102 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 1201

COGO point ID 2102 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 2201

COGO point ID 3102 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 3201

COGO point ID 4102 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 4201

COGO point ID 5102 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 5201
24 of 325

COGO point ID 6102 611 612 613 614 615 616 617 618 619 6201

COGO point ID 7102 711 712 713 714 715 716 717 718 719 7201

COGO point ID 8102 811 812 813 814 815 816 817 818 819 8201
25 of 325

CL BRG. CL BRG.
PIER 1 PIER 2
STEEL DL 0.00 0.03 0.05 0.07 0.08 0.09 0.08 0.07 0.05 0.03 0.00
CONCRETE SLAB 0.00 0.18 0.35 0.47 0.56 0.58 0.56 0.47 0.35 0.18 0.00
SUPERIMPOSED DL 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.21 0.40 0.55 0.65 0.68 0.65 0.55 0.40 0.21 0.00

CL BRG. CL BRG.
PIER 1 PIER 2
STEEL DL 0.00 0.03 0.05 0.07 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.07 0.05 0.03 0.00
CONCRETE SLAB 0.00 0.17 0.33 0.45 0.53 0.56 0.53 0.45 0.33 0.17 0.00
SUPERIMPOSED DL 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.21 0.39 0.53 0.63 0.66 0.63 0.53 0.39 0.21 0.00

CL BRG. CL BRG.
PIER 1 PIER 2
STEEL DL 0.00 0.03 0.05 0.07 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.07 0.05 0.03 0.00
CONCRETE SLAB 0.00 0.15 0.28 0.38 0.44 0.47 0.44 0.38 0.28 0.15 0.00
SUPERIMPOSED DL 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.18 0.34 0.46 0.54 0.57 0.54 0.46 0.34 0.18 0.00

CL BRG. CL BRG.
PIER 1 PIER
STEEL DL 0.00 0.03 0.05 0.07 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.07 0.05 0.03 0.00
CONCRETE SLAB 0.00 0.15 0.28 0.38 0.44 0.47 0.44 0.38 0.28 0.15 0.00
SUPERIMPOSED DL 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.17 0.33 0.45 0.53 0.56 0.53 0.45 0.33 0.17 0.00

CL BRG. CL BRG.
PIER 1 PIER 2
STEEL DL 0.00 0.03 0.05 0.07 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.07 0.05 0.03 0.00
CONCRETE SLAB 0.00 0.15 0.28 0.38 0.44 0.47 0.44 0.38 0.28 0.15 0.00
SUPERIMPOSED DL 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.17 0.33 0.45 0.53 0.56 0.53 0.45 0.33 0.17 0.00
26 of 325

CL BRG. CL BRG.
PIER 1 PIER 2
STEEL DL 0.00 0.03 0.05 0.07 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.07 0.05 0.03 0.00
CONCRETE SLAB 0.00 0.15 0.28 0.38 0.44 0.47 0.44 0.38 0.28 0.15 0.00
SUPERIMPOSED DL 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.18 0.34 0.46 0.54 0.57 0.54 0.46 0.34 0.18 0.00

CL BRG. CL BRG.
PIER 1 PIER 2
STEEL DL 0.00 0.03 0.05 0.07 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.07 0.05 0.03 0.00
CONCRETE SLAB 0.00 0.17 0.33 0.45 0.53 0.56 0.53 0.45 0.33 0.17 0.00
SUPERIMPOSED DL 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.21 0.39 0.53 0.63 0.66 0.63 0.53 0.39 0.21 0.00

CL BRG. CL BRG.
PIER 1 PIER 2
STEEL DL 0.00 0.03 0.05 0.07 0.08 0.09 0.08 0.07 0.05 0.03 0.00
CONCRETE SLAB 0.00 0.18 0.35 0.47 0.56 0.58 0.56 0.47 0.35 0.18 0.00
SUPERIMPOSED DL 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.21 0.40 0.55 0.65 0.68 0.65 0.55 0.40 0.21 0.00
27 of 325

CL BRG. CL BRG.
PIER 1 PIER 2
STEEL DL 0.00 0.03 0.05 0.07 0.08 0.09 0.08 0.07 0.05 0.03 0.00
CONCRETE SLAB 0.00 0.18 0.35 0.47 0.56 0.58 0.56 0.47 0.35 0.18 0.00
SUPERIMPOSED DL 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.00
TOTAL CAMBER 0.00 0.46 0.85 1.14 1.31 1.37 1.31 1.14 0.85 0.46 0.00

CL BRG. CL BRG.
PIER 1 PIER 2
STEEL DL 0.00 0.03 0.05 0.07 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.07 0.05 0.03 0.00
CONCRETE SLAB 0.00 0.17 0.33 0.45 0.53 0.56 0.53 0.45 0.33 0.17 0.00
SUPERIMPOSED DL 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.00
TOTAL CAMBER 0.00 0.46 0.83 1.12 1.29 1.35 1.29 1.12 0.83 0.46 0.00

CL BRG. CL BRG.
PIER 1 PIER 2
STEEL DL 0.00 0.03 0.05 0.07 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.07 0.05 0.03 0.00
CONCRETE SLAB 0.00 0.15 0.28 0.38 0.44 0.47 0.44 0.38 0.28 0.15 0.00
SUPERIMPOSED DL 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.00
TOTAL CAMBER 0.00 0.43 0.78 1.04 1.20 1.26 1.20 1.04 0.78 0.43 0.00

CL BRG. CL BRG.
PIER 1 PIER 2
STEEL DL 0.00 0.03 0.05 0.07 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.07 0.05 0.03 0.00
CONCRETE SLAB 0.00 0.15 0.28 0.38 0.44 0.47 0.44 0.38 0.28 0.15 0.00
SUPERIMPOSED DL 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
TOTAL CAMBER 0.00 0.42 0.77 1.03 1.20 1.25 1.20 1.03 0.77 0.42 0.00
28 of 325

CL BRG. CL BRG.
PIER 1 PIER 2
STEEL DL 0.00 0.03 0.05 0.07 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.07 0.05 0.03 0.00
CONCRETE SLAB 0.00 0.15 0.28 0.38 0.44 0.47 0.44 0.38 0.28 0.15 0.00
SUPERIMPOSED DL 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
TOTAL CAMBER 0.00 0.42 0.77 1.03 1.20 1.25 1.20 1.03 0.77 0.42 0.00

CL BRG. CL BRG.
PIER 1 PIER 2
STEEL DL 0.00 0.03 0.05 0.07 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.07 0.05 0.03 0.00
CONCRETE SLAB 0.00 0.15 0.28 0.38 0.44 0.47 0.44 0.38 0.28 0.15 0.00
SUPERIMPOSED DL 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.00
TOTAL CAMBER 0.00 0.43 0.78 1.04 1.20 1.26 1.20 1.04 0.78 0.43 0.00

CL BRG. CL BRG.
PIER 1 PIER 2
STEEL DL 0.00 0.03 0.05 0.07 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.07 0.05 0.03 0.00
CONCRETE SLAB 0.00 0.17 0.33 0.45 0.53 0.56 0.53 0.45 0.33 0.17 0.00
SUPERIMPOSED DL 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.00
TOTAL CAMBER 0.00 0.46 0.83 1.12 1.29 1.35 1.29 1.12 0.83 0.46 0.00

CL BRG. CL BRG.
PIER 1 PIER 2
STEEL DL 0.00 0.03 0.05 0.07 0.08 0.09 0.08 0.07 0.05 0.03 0.00
CONCRETE SLAB 0.00 0.18 0.35 0.47 0.56 0.58 0.56 0.47 0.35 0.18 0.00
SUPERIMPOSED DL 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.00
TOTAL CAMBER 0.00 0.46 0.85 1.14 1.31 1.37 1.31 1.14 0.85 0.46 0.00
29 of 325

GIRDER PIER 2.10 L 2.20 L 2.30 L 2.40 L 2.50 L 2.60 L 2.70 L 2.80 L 2.90 L ABUT
1 1202 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130
2 2202 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230
3 3202 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330
4 4202 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430
5 5202 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530
6 6202 621 622 623 624 625 626 627 628 629 630
7 7202 721 722 723 724 725 726 727 728 729 730
8 8202 821 822 823 824 825 826 827 828 829 830

GIRDER PIER 2.10 L 2.20 L 2.30 L 2.40 L 2.50 L 2.60 L 2.70 L 2.80 L 2.90 L ABUT
1 149.38 149.33 149.27 149.21 149.14 149.07 149.00 148.92 148.83 148.74 148.65
2 149.46 149.41 149.35 149.29 149.22 149.15 149.08 149.00 148.91 148.82 148.73
3 149.54 149.49 149.43 149.37 149.30 149.23 149.16 149.08 148.99 148.90 148.81
4 149.62 149.57 149.51 149.45 149.38 149.31 149.24 149.16 149.07 148.98 148.89
5 149.62 149.57 149.51 149.45 149.38 149.31 149.24 149.16 149.07 148.98 148.89
6 149.54 149.49 149.43 149.37 149.30 149.23 149.16 149.08 148.99 148.90 148.81
7 149.46 149.41 149.35 149.29 149.22 149.15 149.08 149.00 148.91 148.82 148.73
8 149.38 149.33 149.27 149.21 149.14 149.07 149.00 148.92 148.83 148.74 148.65

Membrane = 0.000 in
Deck = 8.500 in

CL BRG. CL BRG.
PIER 2 ABUT. B
1 148.68 148.64 148.59 148.54 148.48 148.41 148.34 148.25 148.15 148.05 147.94
2 148.76 148.72 148.67 148.62 148.56 148.49 148.41 148.33 148.23 148.13 148.02
3 148.84 148.80 148.75 148.70 148.63 148.56 148.49 148.40 148.31 148.21 148.10
4 148.92 148.88 148.83 148.77 148.71 148.64 148.57 148.48 148.39 148.29 148.18
5 148.92 148.88 148.83 148.77 148.71 148.64 148.57 148.48 148.39 148.29 148.18
6 148.84 148.80 148.75 148.70 148.64 148.57 148.50 148.41 148.31 148.21 148.10
7 148.76 148.72 148.67 148.62 148.56 148.49 148.41 148.33 148.23 148.13 148.02
8 148.68 148.64 148.59 148.54 148.47 148.40 148.33 148.24 148.15 148.05 147.94
30 of 325

COGO point ID 1202 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130

COGO point ID 2202 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230

COGO point ID 3202 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330

COGO point ID 4202 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430

COGO point ID 5202 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530
31 of 325

COGO point ID 6202 621 622 623 624 625 626 627 628 629 630

COGO point ID 7202 721 722 723 724 725 726 727 728 729 730

COGO point ID 8202 821 822 823 824 825 826 827 828 829 830
32 of 325

CL BRG. CL BRG.
PIER 2 ABUT. B
STEEL DL 0.00 0.03 0.05 0.07 0.08 0.09 0.08 0.07 0.05 0.03 0.00
CONCRETE SLAB 0.00 0.18 0.35 0.47 0.56 0.58 0.56 0.47 0.35 0.18 0.00
SUPERIMPOSED DL 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.21 0.40 0.55 0.65 0.68 0.65 0.55 0.40 0.21 0.00

CL BRG. CL BRG.
PIER 2 ABUT. B
STEEL DL 0.00 0.03 0.05 0.07 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.07 0.05 0.03 0.00
CONCRETE SLAB 0.00 0.17 0.33 0.45 0.53 0.56 0.53 0.45 0.33 0.17 0.00
SUPERIMPOSED DL 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.21 0.39 0.53 0.63 0.66 0.63 0.53 0.39 0.21 0.00

CL BRG. CL BRG.
PIER 2 ABUT. B
STEEL DL 0.00 0.03 0.05 0.07 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.07 0.05 0.03 0.00
CONCRETE SLAB 0.00 0.15 0.28 0.38 0.44 0.47 0.44 0.38 0.28 0.15 0.00
SUPERIMPOSED DL 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.18 0.34 0.46 0.54 0.57 0.54 0.46 0.34 0.18 0.00

CL BRG. CL BRG.
PIER 2 ABUT. B
STEEL DL 0.00 0.03 0.05 0.07 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.07 0.05 0.03 0.00
CONCRETE SLAB 0.00 0.15 0.28 0.38 0.44 0.47 0.44 0.38 0.28 0.15 0.00
SUPERIMPOSED DL 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.17 0.33 0.45 0.53 0.56 0.53 0.45 0.33 0.17 0.00

CL BRG. CL BRG.
PIER 2 ABUT. B
STEEL DL 0.00 0.03 0.05 0.07 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.07 0.05 0.03 0.00
CONCRETE SLAB 0.00 0.15 0.28 0.38 0.44 0.47 0.44 0.38 0.28 0.15 0.00
SUPERIMPOSED DL 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.17 0.33 0.45 0.53 0.56 0.53 0.45 0.33 0.17 0.00
33 of 325

CL BRG. CL BRG.
PIER 2 ABUT. B
STEEL DL 0.00 0.03 0.05 0.07 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.07 0.05 0.03 0.00
CONCRETE SLAB 0.00 0.15 0.28 0.38 0.44 0.47 0.44 0.38 0.28 0.15 0.00
SUPERIMPOSED DL 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.18 0.34 0.46 0.54 0.57 0.54 0.46 0.34 0.18 0.00

CL BRG. CL BRG.
PIER 2 ABUT. B
STEEL DL 0.00 0.03 0.05 0.07 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.07 0.05 0.03 0.00
CONCRETE SLAB 0.00 0.17 0.33 0.45 0.53 0.56 0.53 0.45 0.33 0.17 0.00
SUPERIMPOSED DL 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.21 0.39 0.53 0.63 0.66 0.63 0.53 0.39 0.21 0.00

CL BRG. CL BRG.
PIER 2 ABUT. B
STEEL DL 0.00 0.03 0.05 0.07 0.08 0.09 0.08 0.07 0.05 0.03 0.00
CONCRETE SLAB 0.00 0.18 0.35 0.47 0.56 0.58 0.56 0.47 0.35 0.18 0.00
SUPERIMPOSED DL 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.21 0.40 0.55 0.65 0.68 0.65 0.55 0.40 0.21 0.00
34 of 325

CL BRG. CL BRG.
PIER 2 ABUT. B
STEEL DL 0.00 0.03 0.05 0.07 0.08 0.09 0.08 0.07 0.05 0.03 0.00
CONCRETE SLAB 0.00 0.18 0.35 0.47 0.56 0.58 0.56 0.47 0.35 0.18 0.00
SUPERIMPOSED DL 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.00
TOTAL CAMBER 0.00 0.46 0.85 1.13 1.31 1.37 1.31 1.13 0.85 0.46 0.00

CL BRG. CL BRG.
PIER 2 ABUT. B
STEEL DL 0.00 0.03 0.05 0.07 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.07 0.05 0.03 0.00
CONCRETE SLAB 0.00 0.17 0.33 0.45 0.53 0.56 0.53 0.45 0.33 0.17 0.00
SUPERIMPOSED DL 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.00
TOTAL CAMBER 0.00 0.45 0.83 1.11 1.29 1.35 1.29 1.11 0.83 0.45 0.00

CL BRG. CL BRG.
PIER 2 ABUT. B
STEEL DL 0.00 0.03 0.05 0.07 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.07 0.05 0.03 0.00
CONCRETE SLAB 0.00 0.15 0.28 0.38 0.44 0.47 0.44 0.38 0.28 0.15 0.00
SUPERIMPOSED DL 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.00
TOTAL CAMBER 0.00 0.43 0.78 1.04 1.20 1.26 1.20 1.04 0.78 0.43 0.00

CL BRG. CL BRG.
PIER 2 ABUT. B
STEEL DL 0.00 0.03 0.05 0.07 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.07 0.05 0.03 0.00
CONCRETE SLAB 0.00 0.15 0.28 0.38 0.44 0.47 0.44 0.38 0.28 0.15 0.00
SUPERIMPOSED DL 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
TOTAL CAMBER 0.00 0.42 0.77 1.03 1.19 1.25 1.19 1.03 0.77 0.42 0.00
35 of 325

CL BRG. CL BRG.
PIER 2 ABUT. B
STEEL DL 0.00 0.03 0.05 0.07 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.07 0.05 0.03 0.00
CONCRETE SLAB 0.00 0.15 0.28 0.38 0.44 0.47 0.44 0.38 0.28 0.15 0.00
SUPERIMPOSED DL 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
TOTAL CAMBER 0.00 0.42 0.77 1.03 1.19 1.25 1.19 1.03 0.77 0.42 0.00

CL BRG. CL BRG.
PIER 2 ABUT. B
STEEL DL 0.00 0.03 0.05 0.07 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.07 0.05 0.03 0.00
CONCRETE SLAB 0.00 0.15 0.28 0.38 0.44 0.47 0.44 0.38 0.28 0.15 0.00
SUPERIMPOSED DL 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.00
TOTAL CAMBER 0.00 0.43 0.78 1.04 1.20 1.26 1.20 1.04 0.78 0.43 0.00

CL BRG. CL BRG.
PIER 2 ABUT. B
STEEL DL 0.00 0.03 0.05 0.07 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.07 0.05 0.03 0.00
CONCRETE SLAB 0.00 0.17 0.33 0.45 0.53 0.56 0.53 0.45 0.33 0.17 0.00
SUPERIMPOSED DL 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.00
TOTAL CAMBER 0.00 0.45 0.83 1.11 1.29 1.35 1.29 1.11 0.83 0.45 0.00

CL BRG. CL BRG.
PIER 2 ABUT. B
STEEL DL 0.00 0.03 0.05 0.07 0.08 0.09 0.08 0.07 0.05 0.03 0.00
CONCRETE SLAB 0.00 0.18 0.35 0.47 0.56 0.58 0.56 0.47 0.35 0.18 0.00
SUPERIMPOSED DL 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.00
TOTAL CAMBER 0.00 0.46 0.85 1.13 1.31 1.37 1.31 1.13 0.85 0.46 0.00
36 of 325
ABUTMENT PEDESTAL ELEVATIONS
37 of 325
Concord, New Hampshire 03301 CALCULATED BY SIW DATE 07/20/16
ABUTMENT PEDESTAL ELEVATIONS
ABUTMENT A
Unit G1 G2 G3 G4 G5 G6 G7 G8
COGO Point Number 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800
Finished Grade Elev. ft 149.46 149.54 149.62 149.70 149.70 149.62 149.54 149.46
Wearing Surface in 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Waterproof Membrane in 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Concrete Deck Slab in 8.50 8.50 8.50 8.50 8.50 8.50 8.50 8.50
Haunch Thickness in 1.12 1.12 1.12 1.12 1.12 1.12 1.12 1.12
Girder Depth @ Brg. in 21.50 21.50 21.50 21.50 21.50 21.50 21.50 21.50
Bearing Assembly @ CL in 4.06 5.06 4.06 5.06 5.06 4.06 5.06 4.06
in
Total Change of Depth: -35.18 in -36.18 in -35.18 in -36.18 in -36.18 in -35.18 in -36.18 in -35.18 in
TOP OF PEDESTAL ELEVS: 146.53 146.53 146.69 146.69 146.69 146.69 146.53 146.53
ABUTMENT B
in
TOP OF PEDESTAL ELEVS: 145.71 145.71 145.87 145.87 145.87 145.87 145.71 145.71
Abut Pedestal Elev East Kingston Bridge_Vertical Geometry - 3Span
38 of 325
BLOCKING DISTANCE CALCULATIONS
39 of 325
Purpose & Methodology
The New Hampshire Department of Transportation (NHDOT) outlines the preferred method
for calcuating the blocking distance for steel girder bridges (Section 650.4.2). The minimum
haunch is 1.0 inch plus the camber tolerance (NHDOT Plate 630.4e), the cross slope
across the top flange of the girder, and the variations in the thickness of the top flange
(including splice plates).
Input Information
Minimum Haunch Thickness = 0.75 in At Midspan (NHDOT 650.4.2)

Camber Tolerance = 0.25 in Different than (NHDOT PL 630.4e) due to
Aesthetic Camber = 0.00 in weight concerns to existing piers
Top Flange Thickness 1 (thinnest) = 0.75 in At Midspan
Top Flange Thickness 2 (thickest) = 0.75 in
TF Splice Plate Thickness = 0.00 in
Top Flange Haunch Width = 9.00 in
Cross Slope 1 = 2.00 %
Notes:
Due to concerns of putting more dead load to the existing piers than necessary, the camber
tolerance for the beams on this project were revised from 3/4" (per NHDOT PL 630.4e) to
1/4". Also the minimum haunch thickness will be allowed to go as low as 3/4".
If a 3/4" camber tolerance and minimum haunch thickness of 1" were held the haunches
could come in a total of 3/4" thicker than required for each beam (@ 8 beams per span)
which would add additional dead load to the existing piers.
Blocking Distance Calculations (Inches) Allowable Tolerance for Cabmer

( Beyond Spans shown in NHDOT Plate 630.4e)
ABUTMENTS Span Camber
Minimum Haunch = 0.75 (ft) (in)
Camber Tolerance = 0.25 10 0.250
Aesthetic Camber = 0.00 20 0.500
∆ TF + Splice Plate = 0.00 30 0.750
Cross Slope = 0.09 40 0.750
50 0.750
Blocking Distance = 1.09 inches 60 0.750
USE = 1.125 inches
Page 1 of 1
40 of 325
BACKWALL AND STUB WALL ELEVATION CALCULATIONS
41 of 325
North Bound Bridge Profile Vertical Geometry:
Reference File: NH Route 107A Vertical.pdf
Reference File Location: M:\17960.08 East Kingston 26942\Design\Geometry\Highway Data
Profile Segment 1 Profile Segment 2 Profile Segment 3

Segment Type: Vertical Tangent Segment Type: Vertical Curve Segment Type: Vertical Tangent
Station Elevation Station Elevation Station Elevation
PVT 102+50.00 148.8768 PVC 102+90.99 149.7187 PVT 104+14.24 148.88
PVC 102+90.99 149.7187 PVI 103+52.62 150.433 PVC 104+50.00 147.7147
-- PVT/PVCC 104+14.24 148.88 --
Length 40.99 Length 123.25 Length 35.76
G1 2.054% G1 1.159% G1 -3.259%
G2 2.054% G2 -2.520% G2 -3.259%
Station FG Elev.
Bridge CL Bearing @ Abut 1 = 102+92.91 149.7404
Bridge CL Bearing @ Abut 2 = 104+12.33 148.9276
Length from Start to End Bridge = 119.42
Bridge Roadway Cross-Section Geometry:

Reference File: 16148DeckSect.dgn
Reference File Location: M:\17732.01 NHDOT Lebanon Hartford\Draw\Drawings\Plans
3rd 2nd 2nd 3rd

Station Left X- Station Left 1st Breakpoint Station Left PGL Station PGL Station Station Right 1st Breakpoint Station Right Station Right
Breakpoint Breakpoint Breakpoint Breakpoint
Slope 3 X-Slope 2 Offset (ft) X-Slope 1 Left Right X-Slope 1 Offset (ft) X-Slope 2 X-Slope 3
Offset (ft) Offset (ft) Offset (ft) Offset (ft)
16.08 -2.00% 102+50.00 102+50.00 -2.00% 16.08
16.08 -2.00% 104+50.00 104+50.00 -2.00% 16.08
42 of 325
Top of Backwall Elevations
Depth of Deck End Haunch: 11.375 in (Including Bearing strips bonded to the Deck end Haunch)
CL brg. To FF of BackwalL: 8.000 in
Abutment A Backwall
Right or Change in
PGL Left of Offset from Break Point Break Point Elev due to Final
Backwall POI Station Elevation PGL PGL (ft) X-Slope 1 1 Offset (ft) X-Slope 2 2 Offset (ft) X-Slope 3 Cross Slope Elevation
Middle 102+92.24 149.73 N/A 0.00 0.00% 0.00 0.00% 0.00 0.00% 0.000 148.79
Left Edge (looking sta. ahead) 102+92.24 149.73 Left 16.08 -2.00% 16.08 0.00% 0.00 0.00% -0.322 148.46
Right Edge (looking sta. ahead) 102+92.24 149.73 Right 16.08 -2.00% 16.08 0.00% 0.00 0.00% -0.322 148.46
Abutment B Backwall
Right or Change in
PGL Left of Offset from Break Point Break Point Elev due to Final
Backwall POI Station Elevation PGL PGL (ft) X-Slope 1 1 Offset (ft) X-Slope 2 2 Offset (ft) X-Slope 3 Cross Slope Elevation
Middle 104+13.00 148.91 N/A 0.00 0.00% 0.00 0.00% 0.00 0.00% 0.000 147.96
Left Edge (looking sta. ahead) 104+13.00 148.91 Left 16.08 -2.00% 16.08 0.00% 0.00 0.00% -0.322 147.64
Right Edge (looking sta. ahead) 104+13.00 148.91 Right 16.08 -2.00% 16.08 0.00% 0.00 0.00% -0.322 147.64
43 of 325
Top of Stubwall Elevations
Depth of Plug Joint: 2.500 in
CL brg. To BF Stubwall: 35.000 in
CL brg. To FF Stubwall: 24.500 in
Abutment A Backwall
Right or Change in
PGL Left of Offset from Break Point 1 Break Point Elev due to Final
Backwall POI Station Elevation PGL PGL (ft) X-Slope 1 Offset (ft) X-Slope 2 2 Offset (ft) X-Slope 3 Cross Slope Elevation
FF Middle 102+90.87 149.72 N/A 0.00 0.00% 0.00 0.00% 0.00 0.00% 0.000 149.51
FF Left Edge (looking sta. ahead) 102+90.87 149.72 Left 14.08 -2.00% 16.08 0.00% 0.00 0.00% -0.282 149.23
FF Right Edge (looking sta. ahead) 102+90.87 149.72 Right 14.08 -2.00% 16.08 0.00% 0.00 0.00% -0.282 149.23
BF Middle 102+89.99 149.70 N/A 1.00 0.00% 0.00 0.00% 0.00 0.00% 0.000 149.49
BF Left Edge (looking sta. ahead) 102+89.99 149.70 Left 14.08 -2.00% 16.08 0.00% 0.00 0.00% -0.282 149.21
BF Right Edge (looking sta. ahead) 102+89.99 149.70 Right 14.08 -2.00% 16.08 0.00% 0.00 0.00% -0.282 149.21
Abutment B Backwall
Right or Change in
PGL Left of Offset from Break Point 1 Break Point Elev due to Final
Backwall POI Station Elevation PGL PGL (ft) X-Slope 1 Offset (ft) X-Slope 2 2 Offset (ft) X-Slope 3 Cross Slope Elevation
FF Middle 104+14.37 148.88 N/A 0.00 0.00% 0.00 0.00% 0.00 0.00% 0.000 148.67
FF Left Edge (looking sta. ahead) 104+14.37 148.88 Left 14.08 -2.00% 16.08 0.00% 0.00 0.00% -0.282 148.39
FF Right Edge (looking sta. ahead) 104+14.37 148.88 Right 14.08 -2.00% 16.08 0.00% 0.00 0.00% -0.282 148.39
BF Middle 104+15.25 148.85 N/A 0.00 0.00% 0.00 0.00% 0.00 0.00% 0.000 148.64
BF Left Edge (looking sta. ahead) 104+15.25 148.85 Left 14.08 -2.00% 16.08 0.00% 0.00 0.00% -0.282 148.36
BF Right Edge (looking sta. ahead) 104+15.25 148.85 Right 14.08 -2.00% 16.08 0.00% 0.00 0.00% -0.282 148.36
44 of 325
BEAM DEPTH AND PIER
PEDESTAL CALCULATIONS
45 of 325

CLIENT: STATE JOB NO.:
Beam Depth Determination X-A003 (411)
ORIGINATOR’S CHECKER’S QA REVIEWER’S

REV.
SIGNATURE / DATE SIGNATURE / DATE SIGNATURE / DATE
NO.
0 9/13/2016 9/20/2016
To determine the proposed beam depth based on the existing pier cap elevation, proposed bearing depth, proposed
profile, and proposed deck section.

 The top of pier cap elevation was not shot during surveying; therefore, the top of pier cap was determined
through a combination of survey shots on the top of concrete footing, survey shots of the top of concrete curb,
and field measurements.
 The top of pier cap elevation was determined by field measuring the top of pier cap down to the top of
concrete footing which had survey elevations.
 The top of pier cap elevation was also measured by using the top of concrete curb elevation shot by survey and
measuring down the depth of the concrete deck and curb and then the distance from the bottom of concrete
deck to the top of pier cap.
 Overall these two methods compared fairly well on each pier (+/- 1/8”); however, between piers the required
beam depth differed by about ¼”. This discrepancy could be due to a number of reasons including the 1990
rehab where the cap was replaced, settlement of a pier’s spread footing, or even a numerical error either in the
survey or the field measurements.
 There is evidence of covering up vertical alignment issues in the field as the curb reveal varies along the length
of the bridge

East Kingston Bridge Vertical M:\17960.08 East Kingston
Geometry File
Geometry - 3Span 26942\Design\Geometry\COGO
M:\17960.08 East Kingston 26942\Design\Bearing
Fixed Bearing - MATHCAD Bearing design including sole plate design
Design\Fixed Bearings
CONCLUSIONS:
 The proposed beam depth will be based on Pier 1, which requires a shallower beam than Pier 2 by a ¼”. The
calculated ¼” discrepancy will be accounted for by making the sole plates at Pier 2 a ¼” thicker. The sole
plates will be modified instead of the masonry plates so as to keep the masonry plates the same on both piers
(the sole plates are already different between piers). Therefore, the proposed total beam depth will be 21.5”.
 The contractor will be required to survey all pier beam seat elevations prior to fabrication of structural steel.
The engineer shall be notified if contractor measurements differ from field measurements by more than ¼”.
PAGE 1 OF 1
46 of 325
1'-4" õ
SURVEY EL. 150.28
2'0‚ "õ
EL. 146.923 FT. PER FOOTING
EL. 146.926 FT. PER CURB
13'-1"õ
* FIELD MEASUREMENT
SURVEY EL. 133.84
PIER 1 SEAT ELEVATION SKETCH
47 of 325
õ
1'-4"
SURVEY EL. 149.98
2'0„ "õ
EL. 146.634 FT. PER FOOTING
EL. 146.636 FT. PER CURB
13'-1‚ "õ
* FIELD MEASUREMENT
SURVEY EL. 133.53
PIER 2 SEAT ELEVATION SKETCH
48 of 325
PIER 1 PEDESTAL ELEVATIONS
Top of Concrete Footing Elevations: 133.8474 ft

133.8398 ft
133.8317 ft
133.8392 ft
Avg: 133.8395 ft
Field Measured Distance to Top of Cap: 13.08333 ft

Existing Seat Elvation: 146.9229 ft
Bearing Line 1
in
PEDESTAL ELEVATIONS: 146.92 147.00 147.08 147.16 147.16 147.08 147.00 146.92
SHIM NEEDED: 0.00 0.08 0.16 0.24 0.24 0.16 0.08 0.00
Bearing Line 2
in
SHIM NEEDED: 0.00 0.08 0.16 0.24 0.24 0.16 0.08 0.00
USE A 21.5" TOTAL DEPTH BEAM
Pier 1 Pedestal Elev East Kingston Bridge_Vertical Geometry - 3Span
49 of 325
PIER 2 PEDESTAL ELEVATIONS
Top of Concrete Footing Elevations: 133.5118 ft

133.517 ft
133.5421 ft
133.5373 ft
Avg: 133.5271 ft
Field Measured Distance to Top of Cap: 13.10417 ft

Existing Seat Elvation: 146.6312 ft
Bearing Line 1
SHIM NEEDED: 0.00 0.08 0.16 0.24 0.24 0.16 0.08 0.00
Bearing Line 2
SHIM NEEDED: 0.00 0.08 0.16 0.24 0.24 0.16 0.08 0.00
USE A 21.5" TOTAL DEPTH BEAM
Pier 2 Pedestal Elev East Kingston Bridge_Vertical Geometry - 3Span
50 of 325
GIRDER DESIGN & FORM 4
CALCULATIONS
51 of 325
New Hampshire Department of Transportation Girder Design Calculations
Client Job No. 26942 Bridge No. 061/064
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
CALCULATION COVER PAGE ................................................................................. GD1
GIRDER ELEVATION................................................................................................. GD2
FRAMING PLAN ......................................................................................................... GD3
MATHCAD INPUT WORKSHEET FOR MERLIN DASH .......................................... GD5
MERLIN DASH OUTPUT FOR CONTROLLING INTERIOR GIRDER................... GD16
MERLIN DASH OUTPUT FOR EXTERIOR GIRDER ............................................. GD85
FORM 4 ................................................................................................................... GD155
FORM 4 CALCULATIONS ..................................................................................... GD156
INTERIOR GIRDER RATING OUTPUT ................................................................. GD158
EXTERIOR GIRDER RATING OUTPUT ............................................................... GD166
November 2015
52 of 325

Girder Design X-A003 (411)

REV.
NO.
0 9/6/2016
To design the steel plate girders that will be used in the Prefabricated Bridge Units (PBU)
The steel plate girders were design using the Merlin Dash software. Input for the Merlin Dash software was generated
in MATHCAD.
The geometry of the girders was driven by the existing pier geometry (steel bent piers to remain), and minimum plate
size requirements. NHDOT’s minimum flange width is 12” (NHDOT BDM v1.0 630.2.2). Through discussions with
the State and Casco Bay it was determined that the minimum flange plate width requirement could be relaxed to a
width of 9”. The minimum flange plate thickness and web plate thickness of ¾” and ½” respectively was held. Through
discussions with Casco Bay it was determined that the minimum plate girder depth that could be fabricated without
special equipment was 16”. Plate girders were desirable on this project due to the presence of a vertical curve on the
bridge and the necessity to camber the girders.
The design of the superstructure was based on adding no additional load to the existing steel bent piers. Therefore, the
same girder layout as existing was used and a different beam spacing was not explored. The existing beam spacing also
allowed for the use of PBU’s on this accelerated bridge construction project.

AASHTO LRFD, 7th edition w/ 2015 Design guidelines supplemental to State
http://lrfdus.digital.transportation.org/LRFD.aspx
and 2016 interims Standards.
East Kingston Plate Girder M:\17960.08 East Kingston 26942\Design\Proposed
Input file for Merlin Dash runs.
(MATHCAD) Steel Design
M:\17960.08 East Kingston 26942\Design\Proposed This folder contains design and rating runs for
Merlin Dash Files
Steel Design\Merlin Dash Files both interior and exterior beams
CONCLUSIONS:
The controlling girder for design was the first interior girder on each side of the bridge. The rating factors are very high
for this design (Inventory rating around 2.5) because the beam is design based on existing geometry, and minimum
plate sizes. The beam was optimized as best it could be to meet the geometric constraints of the existing substructure.
PAGE 1 OF 1
GD1
53 of 325
À BRG ABUTMENT A (EXP) À PIER 1 À PIER 2
À BRG (FIXED) À BRG (FIXED) À BRG (FIXED)
39'-3" (SPAN 1 & 3) 39'-4" (SPAN 2)
2'-3"
5•
TO END OF GIRDER (TYP)
4" (TYP)
SHEAR STUD SPACING õ 28 SPACES @ 12" = 28'-0" õõ õõõ 24 SPACES @ 12" = 24'-0" õõõ
(27 STUDS PER ROW X 2 ROWS = 54 STUDS) (23 STUDS PER ROW X 2 ROWS = 46 STUDS)
Á 9"xƒ" Á 9"xƒ"
WEB Á 20"x•" WEB Á 20"x•"

Š
4"x•" (TYP)
Š
BEARING STIFFENER
(TYP)
6'-0" Á 9"xƒ" 6'-0" 6'-0" Á 9"xƒ" 6'-0"
PAINT LIMIT PAINT LIMIT (TYP)
40'-•" (SPAN 1 & 3) 40'-0" (SPAN 2)
* 8 SPACES @ 6" = 4'-0"

(9 STUDS PER ROW X 2 ROWS = 18 STUDS)
** 12 EQUAL SPACES = 5'-4" GIRDER ELEVATION

NOT TO SCALE
**õ 12 EQUAL SPACES = 5'-9"

GD2
54 of 325
À BRG ABUTMENT A (EXP) À PIER 1 À PIER 2 À BRG ABUTMENT B (EXP)
39'-7ƒ" (SPAN 1)
40'-1•" (SPAN 2) 39'-7ƒ" (SPAN 3)
À BRG (FIXED) À BRG (FIXED) À BRG (FIXED) À BRG (FIXED)
DIAPHRAGM SPACING 2 SPACES @ 19'-7•" = 39'-3" 2 SPACES @ 19'-8" = 39'-4" 2 SPACES @ 19'-7•" = 39'-3"
9•" 9•"
4ƒ" (TYP)
BEARING 4ƒ" (TYP) DRIP BAR

STIFFENERS (TYP)
(TYP)
G1
DIAPHRAGM (TYP)
G2
7 SPACES @ 4'-0" = 28'-0"

G3
2'-0"
STA 102+92.91 À GIRDER (TYP)
STA 103+32.56 STA 103+72.68 STA 104+12.33
G4
103+00 104+00
G5
CONNECTION
PLATE (TYP)
90°00'00"
G6 (TYP)
G7
G8
FRAMING PLAN
SCALE: ‰" = 1'-0"
GD3
55 of 325
DESIGN OUTPUT
GD4
56 of 325
East Kingston, N.H. MJ Project No.: 17960.08
NH 107A over B&M R.R. Sheet: _1_ of: _11_
NHDOT Bridge No. 061/064 Calc By: SIW Date: 7/15/16
53 Regional Drive Proposed Beam Design Chck By: RLJ Date: 9/9/16
Concord, NH 03301
Purpose:
This worksheet is used for computing various inputs including girder loads, geometry, and distribution factors for
conducting a Merlin DASH line girder analysis for FINAL girder design.
Bridge Geometry:
Bridge Length: Lbridge  119ft  5in  119.417 ft
Bridge is three simple spans of
comparable length. Use longest span
Span Length: Lspan  39ft  4in  39.333 ft
length.
Bridge Width (out to out): Wbridge  32ft  2in  32.167 ft
Brush Curb Dimensions: Wcurb  2ft Hbc  7in
Travel Width (curb to curb): Wtravel  Wbridge  2Wcurb  28.167 ft
Number of Beams: Nb  8
Bridge Support Skew: Skew  0deg
Beam Spacing: Sbeam  4ft
Structural Deck Thickness: tdeck  8.25in
Sacrificial Wearing Surface Thickness: tsws  0.5in
Haunch Width: Whaunch  9in
Minimum Haunch Thickness: thaunch.min  1in
Roadway Cross Slope: XS rw  2.00%
 Wbridge  2   Wcurb
Design Lanes: Lanesdesign  floor 2
 12ft 
Average Daily Traffic (2037): ADT  3000 NHDOT Bureau of Traffic
Percent Trucks (Estimated): %truck  5.9% NHDOT Bureau of Traffic
Average Daily Truck Traffic (2032): ADTT  Ceil ADT %truck 10  180
Fraction of Trucks in a Single Lane: ρ  0.85 AASHTO Table 3.6.1.4.2-1, For 2 lanes
Single Lane Average Daily Truck Traffic: ADTTSL  ADTT ρ  153
Steel Load Detail Factors:

Interior Members: SLDFInt  1.10
Exterior Members: SLDFExt  1.05
East Kingston Plate Girder.xmcd 1 of 11 GD5

57 of 325
Concord, NH 03301
Material Properties: (NHDOT BDM Table 4.3.2-1

γconc  150pcf γconc.Ec  145pcf & LRFD Table 3.5.1-1)
Concrete Unit Weight:
Steel Unit Weight: γsteel  490pcf (NHDOT BDM Table 4.3.2-1)
Pavement Unit Weight: γpvmt  140pcf (NHDOT BDM Table 4.3.2-1)
Concrete Strength: f'c  4ksi
Steel Yield Strength: fy  50ksi
0.33
 f'c 
Concrete Elastic Modulus (ksi): Econc  2500    ksi  3950 ksi (LRFD Eq. C5.4.2.4-1)
 ksi 
Beam Elastic Modulus (ksi): Es  29000ksi
(LRFD 6.4.1)
Modular Ratio:
 Es 
η  Round 1  7 (LRFD C6.10.1.1.1b)
 Econc 
Loads on Bridge:
Steel Bridge Rail Unit Weight: γrail  0.067klf  0.067  klf (NHDOT BDM Table 4.3.2-2, T2 Rail
with snow screen)
Section Properties of Beams:
Web Thickness: tw  0.5in
Web Height: d w  20in
Top Flange Thickness: ttf  0.75in
Top Flange Width: b tf  9in
Bottom Flange Thickness: tbf  0.75in
Bottom Flange Width: b bf  9in
Depth of Section: d  d w  ttf  tbf  21.5 in
2
As  tw d w  ttf  b tf  tbf  b bf  23.5 in
Area of Section:
3
wsteel  As γsteel  0.08 klf tw d w 4
Iweb   333.333  in
12
Section Properties
A y Ay Ay^2 I
Web 10.00 10.75 108 1156 333
Bot Flange 6.75 0.375 3 1 0.32
Top Flange 6.75 21.13 143 3012 0.32
2 3 4 4
Atotal  Atotal1 in Aytotal  Aytotal1 in Ay2 total  Ay2 total1 in Itotal  Itotal1 in
2 3 4 4
Atotal  23.50  in Aytotal  252.625  in Ay2 total  4169 in Itotal  334  in
4 Aytotal
Iz  Itotal  Ay2 total  4502.833 in y NCDL   10.75  in
Atotal
2 4
INCDL  Iz  Atotal y NCDL  1787.115 in
1 3 4 1 3 4
Iyc   b tf  ttf  45.563 in Iyt   b bf  tbf  45.563 in
12 12
58 of 325
Concord, NH 03301
Bridge Layout and Geometry Notes:

1. Substructure and girder layout based on roadway geometry and existing substructure geometry.
2. Diaphragm and cross frame layout are as noted below.
3. Add other notes as applicable.
Lspan
Diaphragm & Crossframe Layout: MinNumspaces   1.573 Numspaces  ceil MinNumspaces  2
25ft
Lspan
Spacing: Diaspacing  Diaspacing  19.667 ft
Numspaces
Wbridge   Nb  1   Sbeam
Overhang Width: Overhang   2.083 ft
2
Steel Beam Depth: d  21.5 in (Recall)
Check Beam Depth: Checkbeam.depth  if  d  0.033  Lspan "OK" "NO GOOD" 

(LRFD Table 2.5.2.6.3-1)
0.033  Lspan  15.576 in
Checkbeam.depth  "OK"
Minimum Structure Depth: depthstruct  d  tdeck  29.75  in
Check Total Structure Depth: Checktotal.depth  if  depthstruct  0.040  Lspan "OK" "NO GOOD" 
0.040  Lspan  18.88  in Checktotal.depth  "OK"
AASHTO Plate Girder Geometry Checks:
Web Proportion
 dw 
Checkweb_1  if   150 "OK" "NO GOOD"  Checkweb_1  "OK"
(AASHTO 6.10.2.1.2-1):
 tw 
dw
 40
tw
Top Flange Proportion:

 btf 
Checktop_flng_1  if   12 "OK" "NO GOOD" 
AASHTO 6.10.2.2-1:
 2 ttf 
b tf
6 Checktop_flng_1  "OK"
2  ttf
 dw 
Checktop_flng_2  if  b tf  "OK" "NO GOOD" 
AASHTO 6.10.2.2-2:  6 
dw
 3.333  in Checktop_flng_2  "OK"
6
AASHTO 6.10.2.2-3: Checktop_flng_3  if  ttf  1.1 tw "OK" "NO GOOD" 
1.1 tw  0.55 in Checktop_flng_3  "OK"

59 of 325
Concord, NH 03301
AASHTO 6.10.2.2-4:
 Iyc 
Checktop_flng_4  if  0.1   10 "OK" "NO GOOD" 
 Iyt 
Iyc
1 Checktop_flng_4  "OK"
Iyt
Bottom Flange Proportion:
 bbf 
CheckBot_flng_1  if   12 "OK" "NO GOOD" 
AASHTO 6.10.2.2-1:
 2 tbf 
b bf
6 CheckBot_flng_1  "OK"
2  tbf
 dw 
CheckBot_flng_2  if  b bf  "OK" "NO GOOD" 
AASHTO 6.10.2.2-2:  6 
dw CheckBot_flng_2  "OK"
 3.333  in
6
AASHTO 6.10.2.2-3: CheckBot_flng_3  if  tbf  1.1 tw "OK" "NO GOOD" 
CheckBot_flng_3  "OK"
1.1 tw  0.55 in
AASHTO 6.10.2.2-4:
 Iyc 
CheckBot_flng_4  if  0.1   10 "OK" "NO GOOD" 
 Iyt 
Iyc
1 CheckBot_flng_4  "OK"
Iyt

60 of 325
Concord, NH 03301
LOAD CALCULATIONS
ηi  1.0 NHDOT table 4.2.2-1
Importance Factor:
Calculate Slab Load due to Deck & Haunch Buildup, (DC1):
DLslab  Sbeam  tdeck  tsws  γconc DLslab  0.437  klf
  Whaunch 
2
DLhaunch   thaunch.min Whaunch   XSrw    γconc DLhaunch  0.01 klf
  2 
DLdeck.int  DLslab  DLhaunch DLdeck.int  0.448  klf
 DLdeck.int 
DLdeck.ext      tdeck  tsws  thaunch.min  ttf    Overhang  2in  γconc DLdeck.ext  0.475  klf
 2 
Calculate Noncomposite Dead Load (DC1):
 Since the brush curb is precast on the exterior PBU, assume that the dead load is evenly distributed
between the two beams in the PBU.
Brush Curb Dead Load: DC1 bc  γconc Hbc Wcurb DC1 bc  0.175  klf
Total SDL on Exterior Girder:

 DC1bc
DC1 ext  DC1 ext  0.087  klf
2
Total SDL on Int Girders: DC1 int  DC1 ext DC1 int  0.087  klf
Calculate Superimposed Dead Loads (DC2):
 DC2 loads will be distributed evenly to first three girders for the bridge railing. See NHDOT BDM 4.3.2.
Total SDL on Exterior Girder:

 γrail
DC2 ext  DC2 ext  0.022  klf
3
Total SDL on Int Girders: DC2 int  DC2 ext DC2 int  0.022  klf

61 of 325
Concord, NH 03301
CALCULATE DISTRIBUTION FACTORS TO CHECK MERLIN DASH: ALL DF's are # of axles, not wheels
Check Ranges of Applicability for the AASHTO Approximate Formulas (LRFD Table 4.6.2.2.2b-1):
 Haunch thickness ignored per NHDOT BDM in section property and moment capacity calculations.
tdeck
Distance between COGs (in): eg   d  y NCDL   14.875 in (Beam ytop + 1/2 Slab)
2
Kg  η INCDL   Atotal  eg   48908  in

2 4 (LRFD Eq.
Approximate Composite Beam Stiffness:
4.6.2.2.1-1)
Range of Applicability checks for AASHTO Tables 4.6.2.2.2b-1 and 4.6.2.2.3a-1:
4 4
Approximate Composite CheckKg  "OKAY" if 10000in  Kg  7000000  in
CheckKg  "OKAY"
Beam Stiffness:
"NO GOOD" otherwise
Beam Spacing: CheckS  "OKAY" if 3.50ft  Sbeam  16.0ft

CheckS  "OKAY"
"NO GOOD" otherwise
Slab Thickness: Checkts  "OKAY" if 4.50in  t deck  12.0in

Checkts  "OKAY"
"NO GOOD" otherwise
Span Length: CheckL  "OKAY" if 20ft  min Lspan  max Lspan  240ft
CheckL  "OKAY"
"NO GOOD" otherwise
Number of Beams: CheckNb  "OKAY" if Nb  4
CheckNb  "OKAY"
"NO GOOD" otherwise
Skewed Support Correction Factors for LL Distribution
c1  0 if Skew  30deg
Moment Correction Factor for
  Sbeam  
Skewed Supports: 0.25 0.5
(LRFD Table 4.6.2.2.2e-1) 0.25  Kg 
  otherwise c1  0
  Lspan tdeck3   Lspan  
   
Skew Angle used for Correction θ  ( 60deg) if Skew  60deg

Factor:
Skew otherwise
1.5
Moment Skew Correction Factor: MCF  1  c1 tan( θ) MCF  1.00
Shear Correction Factor for Skewed Supports at Obtuse Corners: (LRFD Table 4.6.2.2.3c-1)
 0.3 
  Lspan tdeck3  
VCF  1  0.20  tan( Skew) if 0deg  Skew  60deg VCF  1.000
 Kg 
   
"NOT APPLICABLE" otherwise

62 of 325
Concord, NH 03301
Interior Girder Live Load Distribution Factors

 Does not Include Skew factors. These will be applied later.
Moment (single lane) (LRFD Table 4.6.2.2.2b-1):
0.4 0.3 0.1

 Sbeam   Sbeam   Kg 
g int.mo.1.lane  0.06        0.318
 14ft   Lspan   Lspan tdeck3 
 
Moment (two or more lanes) (LRFD Table 4.6.2.2.2b-1):
 Sbeam  0.6  Sbeam  0.2  0.1

 Kg 
g int.mo.2.lane  0.075         0.393
 9.5ft   Lspan   L  t 3  
  span deck  
Shear (single lane) (LRFD Table 4.6.2.2.3a-1):
Sbeam
g int.shr.1.lane  0.36   0.52
25ft
Shear (two or more lanes) (LRFD Table 4.6.2.2.3a-1):

2.0
 Sbeam   Sbeam 
g int.shr.2.lane  0.2      0.52
 12ft   35ft 
Exterior Girder Live Load Distribution Factors

 Distribution factors for exterior girders are specified in LRFD Table 4.6.2.2.2d-1 and 4.6.2.2.3b-1.
 In addition, since diaphragms are provided, distribution factors for moment and shear shall not be taken less
than those computed according to the provisions of Article 4.6.2.2.2d assuming the entire cross section
deflects and rotates as a rigid cross section (pile cap analogy).
Moment (single lane) (LRFD Table 4.6.2.2.2d-1):

 The lever rule is specified for the single lane condition.
Distance from exterior beam
d e  Overhang   Wcurb  0.083 ft
to face of barrier, (de ):
Multiple Presence Factor: MPF1  1.2 LRFD Table 3.6.1.1.2-1
Sbeam  de  2ft
g ext.mo.1.lane  MPF1  0.313
Lever Rule: 2Sbeam

63 of 325
Concord, NH 03301
Moment (two or more lanes) (LRFD Table 4.6.2.2.2d-1):

applicabilityext.1  "OK" if 1 ft  d e  5.5ft
applicabilityext.1  "OK"
"No Good" otherwise
de
emo.2lane  0.77   0.779
9.1ft
End Spans
g ext.mo.2.lane  g int.mo.2.lane emo.2lane  0.306
Int. Spans
Shear (single lane) (LRFD Table 4.6.2.2.3b-1):
 The lever rule is specified for the single lane condition.
Multiple Presence Factor: MPF1  1.2
Lever Rule:
Sbeam  de  2 ft
g ext.shr.1.lane  MPF1  0.313
2Sbeam
Shear (two or more lanes) (LRFD Table 4.6.2.2.3b-1):
applicabilityext.2  "OK" if 1 ft  d e  5.5ft

applicabilityext.2  "OK"
"No Good" otherwise
de
eshr.2.lane  0.6   0.608
10ft
g ext.shr.2.lane  g int.shr.2.lane eshr.2.lane  0.316
Additional Check for Rigid Supported Girders:
Rigid Superstructure Distribution - Single Lane Loaded:

Multiple Presence Factor: MPF1  1.2 (Recall)
Number of Load Lanes: NL1  1
Distance from C.G. of bridge to exterior girder:

 Nb  1   Sbeam
Xext   14 ft
2
Sum of squared distances of horiz.
x sq_tot  2  .5Sbeam   1.5Sbeam   2.5Sbeam   672 ft
2 2 2 2
distance of each girder's distance
from the C.G. of the group:   3.5 S  2 
 beam 
Sum of distances between each loaded  6ft   9.083 ft

lane and the C.G. of the girder group:
eext.1  Xext  d e  2ft    eext.1  9.083 ft
 2
 NL1 Xext  eext.1
Distribution Factor: Rext1  MPF1    Rext1  0.377
 Nb x sq_tot 

64 of 325
Concord, NH 03301
Rigid Superstructure Distribution - Two Lanes Loaded:

Multiple Presence Factor: MPF2  1.0 LRFD Table 3.6.1.1.2-1
Number of Load Lanes: NL2  2
Sum of distances between each loaded

eext.2  eext.1  12ft  NL2  1   eext.1 eext.2  6.167 ft
lane and the C.G. of the girder group:
 NL2 Xext  eext.2
Distribution Factor: Rext2  MPF2    Rext2  0.378
 Nb x sq_tot 
Governing Distribution Factors

Interior Girder (STRENGTH):
Moment: DF M.int  max g int.mo.1.lane g int.mo.2.lane DF M.int  0.393
In-Span Shear: DF V.int  max g int.shr.1.lane g int.shr.2.lane DF V.int  0.520
End Reaction: DF V.end.int  DFV.int VCF DF V.end.int  0.520

Interior Girder (FATIGUE):
g int.mo.1.lane
Moment: DF M.int.FAT  DF M.int.FAT  0.265
MPF1
g int.shr.1.lane
In-Span Shear: DF V.int.FAT  DF V.int.FAT  0.433
MPF1
End Reaction: DF V.end.int.FAT  DFV.int.FAT VCF DF V.end.int.FAT  0.433
Exterior Girder (STRENGTH):

Moment: DF M.ext  max g ext.mo.1.lane g ext.mo.2.lane Rext1 Rext2
DF M.ext  0.378
In-Span Shear: DF V.ext  max g ext.shr.1.lane g ext.shr.2.lane Rext1 Rext2 DF V.ext  0.378
End Reaction: DF V.end.ext  DFV.ext VCF

DF V.end.ext  0.378
End Span Exterior Girder (FATIGUE)
max g ext.mo.1.lane Rext1
Moment: DF M.ext.FAT  DF M.ext.FAT  0.314
MPF1
max g ext.shr.1.lane Rext1
In-Span Shear: DF V.ext.FAT  DF V.ext.FAT  0.314
MPF1
End Reaction: DF V.end.ext.FAT  DF V.ext.FAT VCF DF V.end.ext.FAT  0.314

65 of 325
Concord, NH 03301
Live Load Deflection

 Allowable live load deflection taken as L/1000 in accordance with the NHDOT memorandum dated October 1,
2004, and utilizes HS25 loading (maximum of the design truck or lane load plus moment rider).
 The live load deflection computed by Merlin DASH is taken as the larger of (in accordance with AASHTO LRFD
Section 3.6.1.3.2):
a) That resulting from the design truck (same as HS20 truck) alone or
b) That resulting from 25% of the design truck combined with the design lane load.
 The deflection produced by the HS25 design truck will be scaled from the HL-93 deflection assuming the first
case (a) governs. If the second case governs, then the check is conservative.
Max. Interior Girder Truck Deflection: Δint_HL93truck  0.231in

DASH Table 1.2.8.2
Max. Exterior Girder Truck Deflection: Δext_HL93truck  0.231in
Max. Interior Girder Lane Deflection: Δint_HL93lane  0.051in
DASH Table 1.2.8.2
Max. Exterior Girder Lane Deflection: Δext_HL93lane  0.051in
25% Truck With lane Interior Beam: Δint.tr.lane  0.25 Δint_HL93truck  Δint_HL93lane  0.109  in
25% Truck With lane Interior Beam: Δext.tr.lane  0.25 Δext_HL93truck  Δext_HL93lane  0.109  in
2-Lane Deflection Distribution Factor: DF defl  0.250 (Merlin Dash - 2 lanes) DASH Table 1.2.8.2
 Lanesdesign 
DF DEFL_CALCULATED  round  1  3  0.25 Calculated Deflection Distribution Factor
 Nb 
Check Calculated vs Merlin Dash Deflection:
checkdefl  "OK" if DFdefl = DF DEFL_CALCULATED

"NG" otherwise checkdefl  "OK"
 25  max Δ
Maximum HS25 Live Load Deflection: ΔLLmax    int_HL93truck Δext_HL93truck Δint.tr.lane Δext.tr.lane
 20 
ΔLLmax  0.289  in (scaled from HS20 to HS25 effect)
Lspan
NHDOT Allowable Live Load Deflection: ΔLL_allow  ΔLL_allow  0.472  in
1000
checkΔLL  "OKAY" if ΔLLmax  ΔLL_allow

checkΔLL  "OKAY"
"NO GOOD" otherwise

66 of 325
Concord, NH 03301
Shear Stud Layout:

 The interior girder controls the shear stud layout; therefore, the values below will be reported from Merlin
Dash for the interior girder.
 Since the ADTTsl is less than 960, the Fatigue check for the shear studs needs to satisfy the Fatigue II
limit state (Finite Life)
Number of Studs per Transverse Section: Ntrans  2
Between point of maximum moment and zero

Required Number of Studs By Strength: Nstr  38 moment (half the beam length). Merlin Table
1.2.22.24A)
Stud Spacing @ beam end for Fatigue: SFat.cont.end  11in Merlin Table 1.2.22.24.2, Round to Nearest Inch
Length of Stud spacing at beam end: LFat.end  4ft Merlin Table 1.2.22.24.2
Stud Spacing Beyond Beam End: SFat.cont.mid  12in Merlin Table 1.2.22.24.2, controlling spacing
Specified Stud Spacing @ Provide tighter spacing than required to help tie
Send  6in
beam End back it the debonded region of deck
Lenght of Stud Spacing @ Labut.end  4ft

abutment end:
Length of Stud Spacing LLS.end  6ft

@ link slab end:
Specified Sud Spacing Smax  12in

Between end zones:
Number of Studs Provided   Labut.end  0.4Lspan  Labut.end 

Nstud.abut  CeilNtrans    1   1  42
between Abutment and point
of Maximum Moment:
  Send  Smax  
Note Maximum Moment occurs @ 40% the span length per Melin Dash Table 1.2.5.3
Check strength requirements for

Checkabut  if  Nstud.abut  Nstr "OK" "No Good"   "OK"
Abutment end:
Number of Studs Provided   LLS.end   0.4Lspan  LLS.end 

Nstud.LS  CeilNtrans    1   1  46
between Link Slab and point
of Maximum Moment:
  Send  Smax  
Check strength requirements for

CheckLS  if  Nstud.LS  Nstr "OK" "No Good"   "OK"
Abutment end:

67 of 325
INTERIOR GIRDER DESIGN OUTPUT
GD16
GD15
68 of 325
East Kingston Int Beam
1
**************************************
* *
* BRIDGE ENGINEERING SOFTWARE CENTER *
* DEPARTMENT OF CIVIL ENGINEERING *
* UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND *
* *
**************************************
COPYRIGHT NOTICE AND DISCLAIMER

‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
1. NOTICE : COPYRIGHT 1985‐2013 THE UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND,

BRIDGE ENGINEERING SOFTWARE CENTER.
2. DISCLAIMER : THE SOFTWARE IS A PROPRIETARY PRODUCT OF

THE UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND, BRIDGE ENGINEERING
SOFTWARE CENTER AND ONLY CONDITIONALLY ISSUED.
POSSESSION, ACCESS AND USE IS PROHIBITED
EXCEPT AS EXPRESSLY AUTHORIZED BY THE UNIVERSITY
OF MARYLAND, BRIDGE ENGINEERING SOFTWARE CENTER.
3. WARRANTY AND LIMITATION OF LIABILITY :
(A) UMD REPRESENTS THAT TO THE BEST OF ITS KNOWLEDGE, THE

LICENSED MATERIALS DO NOT INFRINGE ANY COPYRIGHT, TRADE
SECRET OR PATENT.
(B) THE SELECTION OF APPROPRIATE SOFTWARE, THE COLLECTION

AND STORAGE OF DATA, AND THE INTERPRETATION OF OUTPUT
ARE LICENSEE'S RESPONSIBILITY, AND NOT UMD'S RESPONSIBILITY.
THE LICENSED MATERIALS ARE ONLY TO BE USED AS A TOOL
AND NOT AS A SUBSTITUTE FOR LICENSEE'S PROFESSIONAL
JUDGMENT.
(C) THE LICENSED MATERIALS WERE FORMERLY OWNED AND DEVELOPED

WITH THE ASSISTANCE OF THE STATE HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION
OF THE MARYLAND DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION ("MDOT").
THE LICENSED MATERIALS ARE MADE AVAILABLE ON AN "AS IS"
BASIS. EXCEPT AS EXPRESSLY SET FORTH IN THIS AGREEMENT,
BOTH UMD AND MDOT DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL PROMISES,
REPRESENTATIONS AND WARRANTIES BOTH EXPRESS AND IMPLIED
WITH RESPECT TO THE LICENSED MATERIALS AND ANY SUPPORT
SERVICES PROVIDED HEREUNDER, INCLUDING THEIR CONDITION,
CONFORMITY TO ANY REPRESENTATION OR DESCRIPTION, THE
Page 1
GD17
69 of 325
EXISTENCE OF ANY LATENT OR PATENT DEFECTS THEREIN,
AND THEIR MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR
USE OR PURPOSE.
(D) THE CUMULATIVE LIABILITY OF UMD TO LICENSEE FOR ALL

CLAIMS, DEMANDS OR ACTIONS ARISING OUT OF OR RELATING
TO THE LICENSED MATERIALS AND THIS AGREEMENT, SHALL
NOT EXCEED THE TOTAL AMOUNT OF ALL LICENSE FEES PAID
TO UMD HEREUNDER DURING THE TWELVE (12) MONTHS
IMMEDIATELY PRECEDING SUCH CLAIM, DEMAND OR ACTION.
THIS LIMITATION OF LIABILITY IS INTENDED TO APPLY
WITHOUT REGARD TO WHICH OTHER PROVISIONS OF THIS
AGREEMENT HAVE BEEN BREACHED OR HAVE PROVEN INEFFECTIVE.
(E) WITHOUT LIMITING THE FOREGOING, IN NO EVENT SHALL UMD

BE LIABLE FOR ANY BUSINESS EXPENSE, MACHINE DOWN TIME,
LOSS OF PROFITS, ANY INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL, EXEMPLARY OR
CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES, OR ANY CLAIMS OR DEMANDS BROUGHT
AGAINST LICENSEE OR LICENSEE'S CUSTOMERS, EVEN IF
UMD HAS BEEN ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH CLAIMS
OR DEMANDS. THIS LIMITATION UPON DAMAGES AND CLAIMS IS
INTENDED TO APPLY WITHOUT REGARD TO WHICH OTHER
PROVISIONS OF THIS AGREEMENT HAVE BEEN BREACHED OR
HAVE PROVEN INEFFECTIVE.
1
BRIDGE ENGINEERING SOFTWARE & TECHNOLOGY CENTER MERLIN V 10.6
DEPARTMENT OF CIVIL & ENVIRON. ENGINEERING COMPOSITE
UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND LRF ‐‐ 2012
INPUT
FILE NAME = L:\Employees\SWhite\East Kingston\Proposed Beam Design\PAGE 1
Beam\Design\East
TABLE 0.0.1.1 PROJECT DATA

************
DESCRIPTION DATE
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ ‐‐‐‐
9/8/2016
CONTRACT NUMBER STR NO STR UNIT DES CHK SPECS. USED

‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ ‐‐‐‐‐‐ ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ ‐BY‐ ‐BY‐ ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
17960.08 061 / 064 SIW RLJ LRFD
Page 2
GD18
70 of 325
TABLE 0.0.1.2 GENERAL PROGRAM OPTIONS

***********************
OUTPUT SPAN CONSTRUCTION ANALYSIS CODE PROGRAM

LEVEL INTERVAL ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ FLOW
(0,1) (MAX=20) 1= COMPOSITE CODE YEAR UNIT DESIGN CONTROL
2= NONCOMP. ID TYPE OPTION
‐‐‐‐‐‐ ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
1 10 1 AASHTO 2012 0 2 2
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
* output level : 0 = basic output

1 = detailed output
* span interval : maximum = 20

default = 10
* structural type : 1 = composite (default)

2 = noncomposite
3 = reinforced concrete
4 = prestressed concrete
* type of unit : 0 = English (default)

1 = Metric
2 = Metric input English output
3 = English input Metric output
* design option : 0 = WSD (default)

1 = LFD
2 = LRFD
* program flow : 0 = DL analysis only

1 = DL + LL analysis
2 = code check
3 = rating
4 = design
5 = design + code check
6 = design + recycle + code check
7 = DL stage only
8 = DL stage + LL
* EFFECTIVE FLANGE WITH OPTION = 0

0 ‐ DEFAULT (2008)
1 ‐ "PRIOR TO 2007" WIDTH IS USED
1
Page 3
GD19
71 of 325
BRIDGE ENGINEERING SOFTWARE & TECHNOLOGY CENTER
MERLIN V 10.6
INPUT
Beam\Design\East
TABLE 0.0.3.1 STRUCTURAL DETAILS

******************
BEAM WIDTH EDGE OF COMPOSITE STEEL

RIGHT R. EDGE OF
POSITION BETWEEN OVERHANG SLAB TO HAUNCH PERCENTAGE LOAD
OVERHANG SLAB TO
NUMBER ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ CURBS OR WIDTH CURB ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ AT NEG MOM DETAIL
WIDTH CURB
OF 1=INT. BARRIER ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ DEPTH WIDTH. REGION FACTOR
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
GIRDERS 2,3=EXT. (ft) (ft) (ft) (in) (in) (%) >= 1.0
(ft) (ft)
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
8 1 28.17 2.08 2.00 0.75 9.00 100.00 1.10

0.00 0.00
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
* WIDTH BETWEEN CURBS OR BARRIERS (ROAD WIDTH) is used for the
determination of traffic lanes
* The section properties with composite percentage at negative

moment region is calculated by using the linear interpolation
between the noncomposite section (N=Inf.) and 100% composite for the
analysis at negative moment region.
* DETAIL FACTOR is used for the steel dead load only
* EXT=2 for the same left and right exterior overhang information or
only left exterior overhang information
* EXT=3 for the right exterior overhang information
Page 4
GD20
72 of 325
TABLE 0.0.3.2 SPAN LENGTHS ‐‐‐ in feet

************************
SPAN‐1 SPAN‐2 SPAN‐3 SPAN‐4 SPAN‐5 SPAN‐6 SPAN‐7 SPAN‐8 SPAN‐9 SPAN‐10
‐‐‐‐‐‐,‐‐‐‐‐‐,‐‐‐‐‐‐,‐‐‐‐‐‐,‐‐‐‐‐‐,‐‐‐‐‐‐,‐‐‐‐‐‐,‐‐‐‐‐‐,‐‐‐‐‐‐,‐‐‐‐‐‐,
39.33 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
TABLE 0.0.3.4 BEAM SPACING ‐‐‐ in feet

************************
‐‐‐‐‐‐,‐‐‐‐‐‐,‐‐‐‐‐‐,‐‐‐‐‐‐,‐‐‐‐‐‐,‐‐‐‐‐‐,‐‐‐‐‐‐,‐‐‐‐‐‐,‐‐‐‐‐‐,‐‐‐‐‐‐,
4.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
1
INPUT
Beam\Design\East
TABLE 0.0.4.1 DEFINITION OF SECTIONS

**********************
ROLLED SECTIONS WITH

STANDARD SECTN PLATE GIRDER COVER PLATES OR REINFORCED
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ PLATE GIRDERS ... (in) CONCRETE SECTION
SECTION NOMINAL WEIGHT WEB WEB ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ DEPTH ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ DEPTH THICK. TOP PLATE BOT. PLATE AREA Ix
NO. ID. (in) (lb/ft) (in) WIDTH THICK. WIDTH THICK. (in**2) (in**4)
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
1 PG 20.0 0.5000 9.00 0.7500 9.00 0.7500
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
NOTE: [1] maximum allowable section number is 70
Page 5
GD21
73 of 325
[2] For design option (flow 4, 5 or 6) this card need not be input
1
INPUT
Beam\Design\East
TABLE 0.0.5.1 DEFINITION OF MEMBERS

*********************
MEMBER MEMB END MEMBER DESCRIPTN PARAMETERS FOR YIELD STRESS

NUMBER SECT ID ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ NONPRISMATIC MEMB (KSI)
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ LNGTH ‐‐>TYPE<‐‐ ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
(IN ORDER) LEFT RIGHT (ft) 0=PRISMAT S(0) S(1) WEB TOP BOT
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
1 1 1 39.33 50. 50. 50.
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
NOTE: [1] maximum allowable member number is 70.
[2] For design process (flow 4, 5 or 6) this card need not

be input
[3] For hybrid section, yield stress defined here will override
DATA TYPE 13012 for code checking
1
INPUT
Beam\Design\East
TABLE 0.0.6.1 AASHTO LIVE LOADING ‐ LOAD TYPE (A)

************************************
AASHTO LOADING TANDEM LIVE LOAD AASHTO ROAD TYPE SIDEWALK

Page 6
GD22
74 of 325
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ 1,2,3 OR 4‐‐‐‐‐‐ ‐‐‐LIVE LOAD‐‐‐
HL ‐ 93 1=YES : 0=NO ADTT ADTTSL (k/ft)
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
HL‐93 0 1 180 153 0.00
HL‐93 VEHICLE X FACTOR OF 0.00
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
NOTE: * Road types 1, 2, 3 and 4 are used for fatigue check.
* Road type 1 is Rural Interstate. 2 is Urban Interstate.

3 is Other Rural. 4 is Other Urban.
truck on the bridge distributed to the girders as designated
in AASHTO LRFD Art.4.6.2.2 for one traffic lane loading.
For Fatigue, Fraction of Truck, p, is based on the Road Types.
Ref. AASHTO LRFD Table C3.6.1.4.2.1.
* Default road type = 1
* Sidewalk live loading is assumed taken by exterior girder only
* HL‐93 is for both truck(s) + lane and tandem(s) + lane loading,

as per 3.6.1.3.1.
* ADTT used in this calculation is 180

1
INPUT
Beam\Design\East
TABLE 0.0.10.1 SLAB LOAD DEFINITION

********************
SLAB MODULAR RATIO SLAB LOAD DATA

LOAD IDENTIFICATION DESIGN DEPTH POUR ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ DAY N1=3n N2=n INTENSITY POSITION
LOAD POUR DESCRIPTION INITIAL FINAL FROM TO
NO NO (in) (in) N1 N2 (k/ft) (ft) (ft)
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
Page 7
GD23
75 of 325
1 0 8.2 0 21.0 7.0 0.45 0.00 39.33
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
AASHTO Art.10.38.1.3 or LRFD Art.6.10.1.1.1b
The ratio of the moduli of elasticity of steel (29000 ksi) to those

of normal weight concrete (W=145 pcf) of various design strength shall
be as follows:
fc' = unit ultimate compressive strength of concrete as determined

by cylinder tests at the age of 28 days in pounds per square inch.
n = ratio of modulus of elasticity of steel to that of concrete.

1
MERLIN V 10.6
INPUT
Beam\Design\East
TABLE 0.0.11.1 DEFINITION OF UNIFORM AND CONCENTRATED LOADS

********************************************
LOAD IDENTIFICATION UNIFROM LOAD DATA CONCENTRATED LOAD DATA

‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
LOAD DESCRIPTION INTENSITY POSITION INTENSITY DISTANCE
NO. TYPE FROM TO FROM L SUPT
(k/ft) (ft) (Kips) (ft)
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
1 2 Brush Curb 0.087 0.00 39.33 0.00 0.00
2 1 SDL 0.022 0.00 39.33 0.00 0.00
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
NOTE: LOAD TYPE, 0 = (Default) Loads for noncomposite construction or
Superimposed Loads for composite construction
(In LRFD, it is for DW load)
1 = Superimposed Loads (In LRFD, it is for DC2 load)
Page 8
GD24
76 of 325
2 = Noncomposite Loads,(In LRFD, it is for DC1 load)
where N = modulus ratio = Es/Ec
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐

1
INPUT
Beam\Design\East
TABLE 0.0.12.3 SHEAR CONNECTOR AND SLAB REINFORCEMENT DATA

*******************************************
SHEAR CONNECTOR Qn VALUE Zr VALUE SLAB REINFORCEMENT CONCRETE

‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
CONNECTOR AASHTO ART. AASHTO ART. REBAR BAR AREA DIST. COMP. COMP.
NO. DIA.IN NEGAT. 6.10.10.4 6.10.10.2 YIELD PER FOOT FROM STRENG. ALLOW
PER M. REGION ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ (kip / per STRESS OF SLAB TOP AT 28 ‐ABLE
TRAN. 0=NO (kip / per connector) Fy ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ ‐‐‐‐‐ DAYS ‐‐‐‐‐
SEC (in) 1=YES connect.) Truck Lane (ksi) (in**2) (in) (ksi) (ksi)
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
2 0.875 0 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.00 4.00 0.00
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
NOTE: Qr = nominal resistance of the shear connector
= (phi)sc x Qn
... see AASHTO LRFD Eqs.6.10.10.4.1‐1,4.3‐1 or 4.3‐2
Zr = shear fatigue resistance of an individual shear connector

... see AASHTO LRFD Eqs.6.10.10.2‐1 & ‐2
fc' = unit ultimate compressive strength of concrete as

determined by cylinder test at the age of 28 days
= 4 ksi (default)
Page 9
GD25
77 of 325
fc = allowable compressive strength of concrete

= 0.85fc' (default)
* default number of shear connector per trans. section = 3
* If the shear connectors and slab reinforcements are supplied

in the negative moment region, the contribution
of rebar on the section properties in the negative moment
region (for N = 3n & N = n) will be considered.
* If Zr left blank, Road type input in Data 06012 and

7/8"‐diameter studs are assumed
* default rebar yield stress = 60 ksi

1
INPUT
Beam\Design\East
TABLE 0.0.13.1 YIELD STRESS (Fy) AND LATERAL BRACING DATA (lb)
***********************************************
L O C A T I O N YIELD SPACING
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ STRESS OF LATERAL BRACING
DISTANCE DISTANCE ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
FROM TO Fy Fy (WEB) Lb
(ft) (ft) (ksi) (ksi) (ft)
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
0.00 19.67 50.0 50.0 19.67
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
NOTE: [1] default Fy = 36 ksi
[2] default spacing of lateral bracing = 25 feet
Please refer to AASHTO LRFD Art. 6.7.4 for requirement.
[3] The spacing of lateral bracing is also assumed to

be the diaphragm spacing which is used for the
Page 10
GD26
78 of 325
calculation of wind effect (code check only).
1
ANALYSIS
Beam\Design\East
TABLE 1.2.1.1=PROGRAM ASSUMPTIONS

*******************
NO. D E S C R I P T I O N S
‐‐‐‐‐ ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
1 Small deflection theory
2 Material is elastic
3 Beam length is much greater than lateral dimensions
4 Torsional effects are neglected
5 Shear deformations are neglected
6 Two kinematic degree‐of‐freedom are assumed 'at each

joint (vertical deflection and bending rotation)
7 Concentrated joint loads
8 Uniform member loads
9 Transformed sections are used for composite sections

.... see AASHTO Art.10.38.1.4 or LRFD Art.6.10.1.1.1b
10 Sections symmetrical about vertical, principal axis
11 Unshored construction
12 Hinged bridge ends
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
F A C T O R S U S E D B Y L R F D
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
13 GAMMA for Load DC maximum = 1.25
Page 11
GD27
79 of 325
14 GAMMA for Load DC minimum = 0.90
15 GAMMA for Load DW minimum = 1.50
17 GAMMA for LL Load Strength I = 1.75
18 GAMMA for LL Load Strength II = 1.35
19 GAMMA for LL Load Service I = 1.00
20 GAMMA for LL Load Service II = 1.30
21 GAMMA for LL Load Fatigue = 0.75
22 ETA for Service Limit State = 1.00
23 ETA for Strength Limit State = 1.00
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
1
ANALYSIS
Beam\Design\East
TABLE 1.2.2.1=LOADING INFORMATION

*******************
AVERAGE DEAD LOAD INTENSITIES

*****************************
SPAN SLAB + STEEL = TOTAL

NO. (K/FT) (K/FT) (K/FT)
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
1 0.448 0.0880 0.5360
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
Page 12
GD28
80 of 325
SUPERIMPOSED DEAD LOADS
***********************
LOAD INTENSITY DIST DIST

FROM TO
(K or K/Ft) (Ft) (Ft)
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
1 DC2 0.022 0.000 39.333
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
1
ANALYSIS
Beam\Design\East
TABLE 1.1.3.1=BRIDGE SUPERSTRUCTURE QUANTITIES

********************************
C O N C R E T E D E C K S T E E L SUPERSTRUCTURE
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ TOTAL WEIGHT
V O L U M E TOTAL TOTAL ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
UNIT WEIGHT ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ WEIGHT WEIGHT (kip)
(pcf) (ft**3) (yard**3) (kip) (kip)
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
150.00 869.8 32.2 130.5 27.7 158.15
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
NOTE: [1] Concrete unit weight assumed to be 150. lb/ft**3
[2] Superimposed dead load not included
[3] Dead load detail factor for steel beam = 1.10 is included.
TABLE 1.1.3.1A=BRIDGE SPACING AND EFFECTIVE WIDTH

**********************************
SPAN SPACING EFF. WIDTH

Page 13
GD29
81 of 325
NO. (ft) (in)
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
1 4.00 48.00
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
1
ANALYSIS
Beam\Design\East
TABLE 1.1.3.2=DISTRIBUTION OF LRFD LIVE LOADS

********************************
SPAN AASHTO DUMP MAXIMUM SPECIAL

NO. LOADING TRUCK TRUCK TRUCK
(A) (D) (M) (G,C)
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
1 0.393 0.393 0.393 0.393 FOR STRENGTH POSITIVE MOMENT

0.520 FOR STRENGTH POSITIVE SHEAR
1 0.265 FOR FATIGUE POSITIVE MOMENT
0.433 FOR FATIGUE POSITIVE SHEAR
1
ANALYSIS
Beam\Design\East
TABLE 1.2.4.1=NONCOMPOSITE SECTION PROPERTIES FOR N=INFINITY

**********************************************
MOMENT OF WEB LOCATION OF N.A. ELASTIC SECTION MODULUS

SP IN D FROM INERTIA DEPTH FROM BOT OF STEEL ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
NO NO L SUPT ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ STEEL
(ft) Ix D Y(BS) BOT. TOP.
(in**4) (in) (in) (in**3)
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
Page 14
GD30
82 of 325
1 0 0.00 1787.1 20.0 10.75 166.2 166.2

1 1 3.93 1787.1 20.0 10.75 166.2 166.2
1 2 7.87 1787.1 20.0 10.75 166.2 166.2
1 3 11.80 1787.1 20.0 10.75 166.2 166.2
1 4 15.73 1787.1 20.0 10.75 166.2 166.2
1 5 19.67 1787.1 20.0 10.75 166.2 166.2
1 6 23.60 1787.1 20.0 10.75 166.2 166.2
1 7 27.53 1787.1 20.0 10.75 166.2 166.2
1 8 31.47 1787.1 20.0 10.75 166.2 166.2
1 9 35.40 1787.1 20.0 10.75 166.2 166.2
1 10 39.33 1787.1 20.0 10.75 166.2 166.2
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
NOTE: For rolled section, the 5th column is the depth d (inch)
1
ANALYSIS
Beam\Design\East
TABLE 1.2.4.2=COMPOSITE SECTION PROPERTIES FOR N = 21.00

******************************************
MOMENT OF Q/Ix ELASTIC SECTION MODULUS,(in**3)

SP IN D FROM INERTIA ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
NO NO L SUPT ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Q=1ST. MOMENT STEEL CONCRETE(SLAB)
(ft) Ix OF INERTIA ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
(in**4) (1/in) BOT. TOP. TOP.
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
1 0 0.00 4209.0 0.037261 242.3 1019.7 340.0

1 1 3.93 4209.0 0.037261 242.3 1019.7 340.0
1 2 7.87 4209.0 0.037261 242.3 1019.7 340.0
1 3 11.80 4209.0 0.037261 242.3 1019.7 340.0
1 4 15.73 4209.0 0.037261 242.3 1019.7 340.0
1 5 19.67 4209.0 0.037261 242.3 1019.7 340.0
1 6 23.60 4209.0 0.037261 242.3 1019.7 340.0
1 7 27.53 4209.0 0.037261 242.3 1019.7 340.0
1 8 31.47 4209.0 0.037261 242.3 1019.7 340.0
1 9 35.40 4209.0 0.037261 242.3 1019.7 340.0
1 10 39.33 4209.0 0.037261 242.3 1019.7 340.0
Page 15
GD31
83 of 325
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
1
ANALYSIS
Beam\Design\East

******************************************

(ft) Ix OF INERTIA ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
1 0 0.00 5781.7 0.042693 272.0 24027.1 681.0

1 1 3.93 5781.7 0.042693 272.0 24027.1 681.0
1 2 7.87 5781.7 0.042693 272.0 24027.1 681.0
1 3 11.80 5781.7 0.042693 272.0 24027.1 681.0
1 4 15.73 5781.7 0.042693 272.0 24027.1 681.0
1 5 19.67 5781.7 0.042693 272.0 24027.1 681.0
1 6 23.60 5781.7 0.042693 272.0 24027.1 681.0
1 7 27.53 5781.7 0.042693 272.0 24027.1 681.0
1 8 31.47 5781.7 0.042693 272.0 24027.1 681.0
1 9 35.40 5781.7 0.042693 272.0 24027.1 681.0
1 10 39.33 5781.7 0.042693 272.0 24027.1 681.0
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
Please read NOTE on the following page
1
ANALYSIS
Beam\Design\East
NOTE [1] If the section modulus for the top flange indicates
overflows (***), the neutral axis may be very closed to
Page 16
GD32
84 of 325
the top of the top flange.
[2] The section properties shown in this table are used

for the calculation of stresses.
[3] AASHTO Art.10.38.1.6 or LRFD Art.6.10.1.1 ‐‐‐

Composite sections in simple spans and
the positive moment regions of continuous
spans should preferably be proportioned so that the
neutral axis lies below the top surface of the steel
beam. Concrete 'on the tension side of the neutral axis
shall not be considered in calculating resulting moments.
In the negative moment regions of continuous spans, only
the slab reinforcement can be considered to act
compositely with the steel beams in calculating resisting
moments. Mechanical anchorages shall be provided in the
composite regions to develop stresses on the plane
joining the concrete and the steel. Concrete on the
tension side of the neutral axis may be considered in
computing moments of inertia for deflections and for
determining stiffness factors used in calculating moments
and shears
[4] AASHTO LRFD 6.6.1.2.1 & C6.10.10.1.2 ‐‐‐ Q/I value shall be
using short‐term composite section for positeve & negative flxure.
1
ANALYSIS
Beam\Design\East
TABLE 1.2.5.1=NONCOMPOSITE DEAD LOAD MOMENTS FOR N=INFINITY (UNFACTORED)

*********************************************
DEAD LOAD TOTAL (k‐ft)

SP IN D FROM ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ CONCENTRATED UNIFORM ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
NO NO L SUPT BEAM SLAB LOADS LOADS NONCOMPOSITE
(ft) (k‐ft) (k‐ft) (k‐ft) (k‐ft) DEAD LOAD
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
1 0 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

1 1 3.93 6.1 31.2 0.0 6.1 43.4
1 2 7.87 10.9 55.4 0.0 10.8 77.1
1 3 11.80 14.3 72.8 0.0 14.1 101.2
1 4 15.73 16.3 83.2 0.0 16.2 115.7
Page 17
GD33
85 of 325
1 5 19.67 17.0 86.6 0.0 16.8 120.5
1 6 23.60 16.3 83.2 0.0 16.2 115.7
1 7 27.53 14.3 72.8 0.0 14.1 101.2
1 8 31.47 10.9 55.4 0.0 10.8 77.1
1 9 35.40 6.1 31.2 0.0 6.1 43.4
1 10 39.33 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
1
ANALYSIS
Beam\Design\East
TABLE 1.2.5.2=COMPOSITE DEAD LOAD MOMENTS FOR N = 21.00 (UNFACTORED)

*****************************************
UNIFORM OTHER TOTAL (k‐ft)

SP IN D FROM SUPERIMPOSED CONCENTRATED UNIFORM ‐‐
NO NO L SUPT DEAD LOAD LOADS LOADS COMPOSITE
(ft) (k‐ft) (k‐ft) DEAD LOAD
DW DC2 DW DC2
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
1 0 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

1 1 3.93 0.0 1.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.5
1 2 7.87 0.0 2.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.7
1 3 11.80 0.0 3.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.6
1 4 15.73 0.0 4.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 4.1
1 5 19.67 0.0 4.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 4.3
1 6 23.60 0.0 4.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 4.1
1 7 27.53 0.0 3.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.6
1 8 31.47 0.0 2.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.7
1 9 35.40 0.0 1.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.5
1 10 39.33 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
1
ANALYSIS
Page 18
GD34
86 of 325
Beam\Design\East
TABLE 1.2.5.3=COMPOSITE LIVE LOAD MOMENTS FOR N = 7.00 (UNFACTORED)

*****************************************
SIDEWALK (MAXIMUM) LL+I ,(k‐ft), LOAD TYPE= HL ‐93

SP IN D FROM ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
NO NO L SUPT POSITIVE NEGATIVE MAXIMUM GOVERN. MAXIMUM GOVERN.
(ft) (k‐ft) (k‐ft) POSITIVE LOAD TYPE NEGATIVE LOAD TYPE
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
1 0 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0 HL‐93 0.0 HL‐93

1 1 3.93 0.0 0.0 115.7 HL‐93 0.0 HL‐93
1 2 7.87 0.0 0.0 197.8 HL‐93 0.0 HL‐93
1 3 11.80 0.0 0.0 247.0 HL‐93 0.0 HL‐93
1 4 15.73 0.0 0.0 273.3 HL‐93 0.0 HL‐93
1 5 19.67 0.0 0.0 272.5 HL‐93 0.0 HL‐93
1 6 23.60 0.0 0.0 273.3 HL‐93 0.0 HL‐93
1 7 27.53 0.0 0.0 247.0 HL‐93 0.0 HL‐93
1 8 31.47 0.0 0.0 197.8 HL‐93 0.0 HL‐93
1 9 35.40 0.0 0.0 115.7 HL‐93 0.0 HL‐93
1 10 39.33 0.0 0.0 0.0 HL‐93 0.0 HL‐93
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
1
ANALYSIS
Beam\Design\East
TABLE 1.2.5.3A=FATIGUE LIVE LOAD MOMENT RANGE FOR N = 7.0 (k‐ft) (UNFACTORED)
**************************************************
SP IN D FROM TRUCK ONLY

NO NO L SUPT ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
(ft) POS NEG RANGE
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
1 0 0.00 0. 0. 0.
1 1 3.93 40. 0. 40.
1 2 7.87 64. 0. 64.
1 3 11.80 90. 0. 90.
1 4 15.73 101. 0. 101.
1 5 19.67 103. 0. 103.
1 6 23.60 101. 0. 101.
Page 19
GD35
87 of 325
1 7 27.53 90. 0. 90.
1 8 31.47 64. 0. 64.
1 9 35.40 40. 0. 40.
1 10 39.33 0. 0. 0.
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
1
ANALYSIS
Beam\Design\East
TABLE 1.2.5.4=MOMENT SUMMARY FOR COMPOSITE CONSTRUCTION (UNFACTORED)

*****************************************
DEAD LOAD LL+I:N= 7.0 LOAD TYPE= HL ‐ 93 TOTAL MAXIMUM

‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
SP IN D FROM NON COMP. COMP. MAXIMUM GOVERN MAXIMUM GOVERN POSITIVE NEGATIVE
NO NO L SUPT N=Infin. N=21.0 POSITIVE LOAD NEGATIVE LOAD ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
(ft) (k‐ft) (k‐ft) (k‐ft) TYPE (k‐ft) TYPE (k‐ft) (k‐ft)
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
1 0 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0 HL‐93 0.0 HL‐93 0.0 0.0

1 1 3.93 43.4 1.5 115.7 HL‐93 0.0 HL‐93 160.6 44.9
1 2 7.87 77.1 2.7 197.8 HL‐93 0.0 HL‐93 277.6 79.8
1 3 11.80 101.2 3.6 247.0 HL‐93 0.0 HL‐93 351.8 104.8
1 4 15.73 115.7 4.1 273.3 HL‐93 0.0 HL‐93 393.0 119.7
1 5 19.67 120.5 4.3 272.5 HL‐93 0.0 HL‐93 397.2 124.7
1 6 23.60 115.7 4.1 273.3 HL‐93 0.0 HL‐93 393.0 119.7
1 7 27.53 101.2 3.6 247.0 HL‐93 0.0 HL‐93 351.8 104.8
1 8 31.47 77.1 2.7 197.8 HL‐93 0.0 HL‐93 277.6 79.8
1 9 35.40 43.4 1.5 115.7 HL‐93 0.0 HL‐93 160.6 44.9
1 10 39.33 0.0 0.0 0.0 HL‐93 0.0 HL‐93 0.0 0.0
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
1
ANALYSIS
Beam\Design\East
Page 20
GD36
88 of 325
TABLE 1.2.5.5=MOMENT SUMMARY FOR COMPOSITE CONSTRUCTION (LRFD)

*****************************************
SP IN D FROM SERVICE I SERVICE II STRENGTH I STRENGTH II STRENGTH IV FATIGUE

NO NO L SUPT RANGE
(ft) (k‐ft) (k‐ft) (k‐ft) (k‐ft) (k‐ft) (k‐ft)
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
1 0 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

1 1 3.93 160.6 195.3 258.5 212.3 67.4 29.8
1 2 7.87 277.6 337.0 445.9 366.8 119.7 48.1
1 3 11.80 351.8 425.9 563.3 464.5 157.2 67.8
1 4 15.73 393.0 475.0 627.9 518.6 179.6 76.0
1 5 19.67 397.2 478.9 632.7 523.7 187.1 77.0
1 6 23.60 393.0 475.0 627.9 518.6 179.6 76.0
1 7 27.53 351.8 425.9 563.3 464.5 157.2 67.8
1 8 31.47 277.6 337.0 445.9 366.8 119.7 48.1
1 9 35.40 160.6 195.3 258.5 212.3 67.4 29.8
1 10 39.33 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
1
MERLIN V 10.6
DEPARTMENT OF CIVIL & ENVIRON. ENGINEERINGCOMPOSITE
ANALYSIS
Beam\Design\East
TABLE 1.2.6.1=NONCOMPOSITE DEAD LOAD SHEAR FOR N=INFINITY (UNFACTORED)

*******************************************
STEEL CONC. CONCENT. OTHER UNIFORM TOTAL NONCOMPOSITE

SPAN IN DIST FROM BEAM SLAB LOAD LOAD DEAD LOAD
NO. NO LEFT SUPT ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
(ft) (kip) (kip) (kip) (kip) (kip)
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
1 0 0.00 1.7 8.8 0.0 1.7 12.3

1 1 3.93 1.4 7.0 0.0 1.4 9.8
1 2 7.87 1.0 5.3 0.0 1.0 7.4
1 3 11.80 0.7 3.5 0.0 0.7 4.9
Page 21
GD37
89 of 325
1 4 15.73 0.3 1.8 0.0 0.3 2.5
1 5 19.67 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
1 6 23.60 ‐0.3 ‐1.8 0.0 ‐0.3 ‐2.5
1 7 27.53 ‐0.7 ‐3.5 0.0 ‐0.7 ‐4.9
1 8 31.47 ‐1.0 ‐5.3 0.0 ‐1.0 ‐7.4
1 9 35.40 ‐1.4 ‐7.0 0.0 ‐1.4 ‐9.8
1 10 39.33 ‐1.7 ‐8.8 0.0 ‐1.7 ‐12.3
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
1
MERLIN V 10.6
ANALYSIS
Beam\Design\East
TABLE 1.2.6.2=NONCOMPOSITE AND COMPOSITE DEAD LOAD SHEAR SUMMARY (UNFACTORED)

**************************************************
COMPOSITE (k) TOTAL TOTAL

SP IN D FROM ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ DEAD LOADS
NO NO L SUPT UNIFORM CONCENTRATED COMPOSITE NONCOMPOSITE ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
(ft) LOADS LOADS (k) (k)
DW DC2 DW DC2
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
1 0 0.00 0.0 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.4 12.3 12.7

1 1 3.93 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.3 9.8 10.1
1 2 7.87 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.3 7.4 7.6
1 3 11.80 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.2 4.9 5.1
1 4 15.73 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 2.5 2.5
1 5 19.67 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
1 6 23.60 0.0 ‐0.1 0.0 0.0 ‐0.1 ‐2.5 ‐2.5
1 7 27.53 0.0 ‐0.2 0.0 0.0 ‐0.2 ‐4.9 ‐5.1
1 8 31.47 0.0 ‐0.3 0.0 0.0 ‐0.3 ‐7.4 ‐7.6
1 9 35.40 0.0 ‐0.3 0.0 0.0 ‐0.3 ‐9.8 ‐10.1
1 10 39.33 0.0 ‐0.4 0.0 0.0 ‐0.4 ‐12.3 ‐12.7
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
1
Page 22
GD38
90 of 325
ANALYSIS
Beam\Design\East
TABLE 1.2.6.3=LIVE LOAD SHEAR FOR N = 7.0 (UNFACTORED)

****************************
SIDEWALK (MAXIMUM) LL+I ,(kips), LOAD TYPE= HL ‐93

SP IN D FROM ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
(ft) (kips) (kips) POSITIVE LOAD TYPE NEGATIVE LOAD TYPE
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
1 0 0.00 0.0 0.0 44.5 HL‐93 0.0 HL‐93

1 1 3.93 0.0 0.0 38.3 HL‐93 ‐2.3 HL‐93
1 2 7.87 0.0 0.0 32.2 HL‐93 ‐4.7 HL‐93
1 3 11.80 0.0 0.0 26.3 HL‐93 ‐7.2 HL‐93
1 4 15.73 0.0 0.0 21.0 HL‐93 ‐10.9 HL‐93
1 5 19.67 0.0 0.0 15.9 HL‐93 ‐15.9 HL‐93
1 6 23.60 0.0 0.0 10.9 HL‐93 ‐21.0 HL‐93
1 7 27.53 0.0 0.0 7.2 HL‐93 ‐26.3 HL‐93
1 8 31.47 0.0 0.0 4.7 HL‐93 ‐32.2 HL‐93
1 9 35.40 0.0 0.0 2.3 HL‐93 ‐38.3 HL‐93
1 10 39.33 0.0 0.0 0.0 HL‐93 ‐44.5 HL‐93
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
1
ANALYSIS
Beam\Design\East
TABLE 1.2.6.3A=LIVE LOAD SHEAR RANGE FOR N = 7.0 (kips) (UNFACTORED)

*****************************************

NO NO L SUPT ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
(ft) POS NEG RANGE
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
1 0 0.00 20. 0. 20.
1 1 3.93 17. ‐2. 18.
1 2 7.87 13. ‐3. 17.
1 3 11.80 13. ‐5. 17.
1 4 15.73 11. ‐7. 17.
Page 23
GD39
91 of 325
1 5 19.67 9. ‐9. 17.
1 6 23.60 7. ‐11. 17.
1 7 27.53 5. ‐13. 17.
1 8 31.47 3. ‐13. 17.
1 9 35.40 2. ‐17. 18.
1 10 39.33 0. ‐20. 20.
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
1
ANALYSIS
Beam\Design\East
TABLE 1.2.6.3B=MINIMUM WELD SIZE

*****************
TOP FLANGE BOTTOM FLANGE

‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
SP IN D FROM Vr Q/I SHEAR WELD Q/I SHEAR WELD
NO NO L SUPT [1] [2] FLOW SIZE FLOW SIZE
(ft) (Kip) (1/in) [3] (in) (1/in) (in)
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
1 0 0.00 19.7 .41183E‐01 0.41 0.2500*.23594E‐01 0.23 0.2500*
1 1 3.93 18.1 .41183E‐01 0.37 0.2500*.23594E‐01 0.21 0.2500*
1 2 7.87 16.5 .41183E‐01 0.34 0.2500*.23594E‐01 0.19 0.2500*
1 3 11.80 17.3 .41183E‐01 0.36 0.2500*.23594E‐01 0.20 0.2500*
1 4 15.73 17.1 .41183E‐01 0.35 0.2500*.23594E‐01 0.20 0.2500*
1 5 19.67 17.1 .41183E‐01 0.35 0.2500*.23594E‐01 0.20 0.2500*
1 6 23.60 17.1 .41183E‐01 0.35 0.2500*.23594E‐01 0.20 0.2500*
1 7 27.53 17.3 .41183E‐01 0.36 0.2500*.23594E‐01 0.20 0.2500*
1 8 31.47 16.5 .41183E‐01 0.34 0.2500*.23594E‐01 0.19 0.2500*
1 9 35.40 18.1 .41183E‐01 0.37 0.2500*.23594E‐01 0.21 0.2500*
1 10 39.33 19.7 .41183E‐01 0.41 0.2500*.23594E‐01 0.23 0.2500*
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
NOTE: [1] Vr = range of shear due to live loads and impact
[2] For non‐composite construction:
Q/I = (At * Dt) / Inc ‐‐ top flange

Inc = moment of inertia of non‐composite section
At = area of top flange
Dt = distance between the center of top flange and neutral axis
Page 24
GD40
92 of 325
Q/I = (Ab * Db) / Inc ‐‐ bottom flange
Ab = area of bottom flange
Db = distance between the center of bottom flange and neutral axis
For composite construction:
Q/I = (Q/Ic) + (At * Dt) / Ic ‐‐ top flange

Q = statical moment about the neutral axis of the
composite section of the transformed compressive
concrete area or the area of reinforcement embedded
in the concrete for negative moment
Ic = moment of inertia for composite section
Q/I = (Ab * Db) / Ic ‐‐ bottom flange
[3] shear flow = (Vr * Q) / (2 * I)
* ‐‐ minimum weld size governs

1
ANALYSIS
Beam\Design\East
TABLE 1.2.6.3C=WELD DESIGN BY SHEAR FORCE

**************************
SHEAR FLOW ALLOWABLE SHEAR FLOW

SP IN D FROM ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ MIN SIZE ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
NO NO L SUPT St [1] Sb [2] Sg [3] WELD Vw [4] Vc [5] Vg [6] FL
(ft) (kip/in) (kip/in) (kip/in) (in) (kip/in) (kip/in) (kip/in) AG
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
1 0 0.00 3.83 2.45 3.83 0.2500 11.88 14.50 11.88
1 1 3.93 3.26 2.07 3.26 0.2500 11.88 14.50 11.88
1 2 7.87 2.70 1.70 2.70 0.2500 11.88 14.50 11.88
1 3 11.80 2.15 1.33 2.15 0.2500 11.88 14.50 11.88
1 4 15.73 1.64 0.99 1.64 0.2500 11.88 14.50 11.88
1 5 19.67 1.14 0.66 1.14 0.2500 11.88 14.50 11.88
1 6 23.60 1.64 0.99 1.64 0.2500 11.88 14.50 11.88
1 7 27.53 2.15 1.33 2.15 0.2500 11.88 14.50 11.88
1 8 31.47 2.70 1.70 2.70 0.2500 11.88 14.50 11.88
1 9 35.40 3.26 2.07 3.26 0.2500 11.88 14.50 11.88
1 10 39.33 3.83 2.45 3.83 0.2500 11.88 14.50 11.88
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
NOTE: [1] St = top flange shear flow
Page 25
GD41
93 of 325
= VQ/I
where : V = shear force
Q = statical moment of the area about neutral axis
I = moment of inertia
[2] Sb = bottom flange shear flow
[3] Sg = govern. shear flow (max. of St and Sb)
[4] Vw = allowable shear flow for min. size weld

= 0.6 * (phi)e2 * Fexx * 0.707 * min. weld size * 2
where: (Phi)e2 = weld resistance factor (0.8)
Fexx = class. strength of the weld metal (70 ksi)
[5] Vc = allowable shear flow on the connected material

= (Phi)v * (0.58 * Ag * Fy)
where: (Phi)v = resistance factor for shear (1.0)
Ag = gross area of the connection element
Fy = min. yield strength of connection element
[6] Vg = govern. allow. shear flow (min. of Vw and Vc)
If [6] is less than [3], then the flag ** will show up.
1
ANALYSIS
Beam\Design\East
TABLE 1.2.6.4=SHEAR SUMMARY FOR COMPOSITE CONSTRUCTION (UNFACTORED)

****************************************
TOTAL TOTAL L+I , LOAD TYPE = HL ‐ 93

SP IN D FROM ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ MAX. SHEAR
NO NO L SUPT DEAD LOADS POSITIVE GOVERN. NEGATIVE GOVERN. (kips)
(ft) (k) (k) LOAD TYPE (k) LOAD TYPE POS. NEG.
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
1 0 0.00 12.7 44.5 HL‐93 0.0 HL‐93 57.2 12.7

1 1 3.93 10.1 38.3 HL‐93 ‐2.3 HL‐93 48.5 7.9
1 2 7.87 7.6 32.2 HL‐93 ‐4.7 HL‐93 39.8 2.9
1 3 11.80 5.1 26.3 HL‐93 ‐7.2 HL‐93 31.4 ‐2.2
1 4 15.73 2.5 21.0 HL‐93 ‐10.9 HL‐93 23.6 ‐8.3
1 5 19.67 0.0 15.9 HL‐93 ‐15.9 HL‐93 15.9 ‐15.9
1 6 23.60 ‐2.5 10.9 HL‐93 ‐21.0 HL‐93 8.3 ‐23.6
Page 26
GD42
94 of 325
1 7 27.53 ‐5.1 7.2 HL‐93 ‐26.3 HL‐93 2.2 ‐31.4
1 8 31.47 ‐7.6 4.7 HL‐93 ‐32.2 HL‐93 ‐2.9 ‐39.8
1 9 35.40 ‐10.1 2.3 HL‐93 ‐38.3 HL‐93 ‐7.9 ‐48.5
1 10 39.33 ‐12.7 0.0 HL‐93 ‐44.5 HL‐93 ‐12.7 ‐57.2
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
1
ANALYSIS
Beam\Design\East
TABLE 1.2.6.5=SHEAR SUMMARY FOR COMPOSITE CONSTRUCTION (LRFD)

****************************************

NO NO L SUPT RANGE
(ft) (kips) (kips) (kips) (kips) (kips) (kips)
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
1 0 0.00 57.2 70.6 93.8 76.0 19.0 14.8

1 1 3.93 48.5 59.9 79.7 64.4 15.2 13.6
1 2 7.87 39.8 49.5 65.9 53.0 11.4 12.4
1 3 11.80 31.4 39.3 52.4 41.9 7.6 13.0
1 4 15.73 23.6 29.9 40.0 31.6 3.8 12.8
1 5 19.67 ‐15.9 ‐20.7 ‐27.8 ‐21.4 0.0 12.8
1 6 23.60 ‐23.6 ‐29.9 ‐40.0 ‐31.6 ‐3.8 12.8
1 7 27.53 ‐31.4 ‐39.3 ‐52.4 ‐41.9 ‐7.6 13.0
1 8 31.47 ‐39.8 ‐49.5 ‐65.9 ‐53.0 ‐11.4 12.4
1 9 35.40 ‐48.5 ‐59.9 ‐79.7 ‐64.4 ‐15.2 13.6
1 10 39.33 ‐57.2 ‐70.6 ‐93.8 ‐76.0 ‐19.0 14.8
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
1
ANALYSIS
Beam\Design\East
Page 27
GD43
95 of 325
TABLE 1.2.7.1=LIVE LOAD REACTIONS (UNFACTORED)
*******************
M I N I M U M M A X I M U M
SUPT ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
NO. LL IMPACT LL+I GOVERN. LL IMPACT LL+I GOVERN.
(kip) FACTOR (kip) LOAD TYPE (kip) FACTOR (kip) LOAD TYPE
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
1 0.00 1.300 0.00 HL‐93 35.11 1.268 44.53 HL‐93
2 0.00 1.268 0.00 HL‐93 35.11 1.268 44.53 HL‐93
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
NOTE: [1] "‐" indicates Uplift. For the provision of Uplift.
[2] For the application of impact factor on the supports,
please refer to AASHTO LRFD Art. 3.6.2.
No impact on lane load. The impact shown is the Reaction due to
(truck load*IM+lane load) divided by the Reaction w/o IM
1
MERLIN V 10.6
ANALYSIS
Beam\Design\East
TABLE 1.2.7.2=SUMMARY OF REACTIONS (UNFACTORED)

********************
TOTAL LL+I ,(K), LOAD TYPE = HL ‐ 93 TOTAL DL+LL+I (L R F D)

SUPT ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
NO. DEAD LOADS MINIMUM GOVERN. MAXIMUM GOVERN. MINIMUM MAXIMUM
(K) LOAD TYPE LOAD TYPE
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
1 12.68 0.00 HL‐93 44.53 HL‐93 ST1 11.42 93.79

ST2 11.42 75.98
ST4 19.03 19.03
SE1 12.68 57.22
SE2 12.68 70.58
2 12.68 0.00 HL‐93 44.53 HL‐93 ST1 11.42 93.79

ST2 11.42 75.98
ST4 19.03 19.03
SE1 12.68 57.22
Page 28
GD44
96 of 325
SE2 12.68 70.58
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
NOTE: [1] " ‐ " Indicates Uplift
ST1 = STRENGTH I; ST2 = STRENGTH II; SE1 = SERVICE I;SE2 = SERVICE II.
1
ANALYSIS
Beam\Design\East
TABLE 1.2.8.1=COMP AND NONCOMP DL DEFL FOR INFINITY AND N = 21.0 (UNFACTORED)
**************************************************
NONCOMPOSITE DL COMPOSITE DL T O T A L
SP IN D FROM ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
NO NO L SUPT BEAM SLAB CONCENTRATED UNIFORM NONCOMPOSITE+COMPOSITE = DL
(ft) (in) (in) (in) (in) (in) (in) (in)
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
1 0 0.00 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

1 1 3.93 ‐0.0287 ‐0.1461 0.0000 ‐0.0030 ‐0.2032 ‐0.0030 ‐0.2063
1 2 7.87 ‐0.0543 ‐0.2765 0.0000 ‐0.0058 ‐0.3845 ‐0.0058 ‐0.3902
1 3 11.80 ‐0.0743 ‐0.3785 0.0000 ‐0.0079 ‐0.5264 ‐0.0079 ‐0.5342
1 4 15.73 ‐0.0870 ‐0.4433 0.0000 ‐0.0092 ‐0.6165 ‐0.0092 ‐0.6257
1 5 19.67 ‐0.0914 ‐0.4655 0.0000 ‐0.0097 ‐0.6473 ‐0.0097 ‐0.6570
1 6 23.60 ‐0.0870 ‐0.4433 0.0000 ‐0.0092 ‐0.6165 ‐0.0092 ‐0.6257
1 7 27.53 ‐0.0743 ‐0.3785 0.0000 ‐0.0079 ‐0.5264 ‐0.0079 ‐0.5342
1 8 31.47 ‐0.0543 ‐0.2765 0.0000 ‐0.0058 ‐0.3845 ‐0.0058 ‐0.3902
1 9 35.40 ‐0.0287 ‐0.1461 0.0000 ‐0.0030 ‐0.2032 ‐0.0030 ‐0.2063
1 10 39.33 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
NOTE: " ‐ " Indicates downward deflections
NOTE: The total noncomposite DL deflection is the sum of the deflections

due to beam, slab, arbitrary DL uniform load and arbitrary DL
concentrated load.
NOTE: Due to space limit only beam deflections and slab deflections are
printed out.
1
Page 29
GD45
97 of 325
ANALYSIS
Beam\Design\East
TABLE 1.2.8.1A=CAMBER INFORMATION (UNFACTORED)

******************
NONCOMPOSITE DEAD LOADS COMPOSITE DL T O T A L

SP IN D FROM ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐(in)‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ ‐‐‐‐‐‐(in)‐‐‐‐‐‐ ‐‐‐‐‐‐(in)‐‐‐‐‐‐
NO NO L SUPT STEEL CAMBER SLAB CAMBER DEFL. CAMBER DEFL. CAMBER
(ft) DEFL. SIZE DEFL. SIZE SIZE SIZE
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
1 0 0.0 0.000 ‐‐ 0.000 ‐‐ 0.000 ‐‐ 0.000 ‐‐
1 1 3.9 ‐0.029 0 1/16 ‐0.175 0 3/16 ‐0.003 0 1/16 ‐0.206 0 1/ 4
1 2 7.9 ‐0.054 0 1/16 ‐0.330 0 3/ 8 ‐0.006 0 1/16 ‐0.390 0 7/16
1 3 11.8 ‐0.074 0 1/ 8 ‐0.452 0 1/ 2 ‐0.008 0 1/16 ‐0.534 0 9/16
1 4 15.7 ‐0.087 0 1/ 8 ‐0.529 0 9/16 ‐0.009 0 1/16 ‐0.626 0 11/16
1 5 19.7 ‐0.091 0 1/ 8 ‐0.556 0 9/16 ‐0.010 0 1/16 ‐0.657 0 11/16
1 6 23.6 ‐0.087 0 1/ 8 ‐0.529 0 9/16 ‐0.009 0 1/16 ‐0.626 0 11/16
1 7 27.5 ‐0.074 0 1/ 8 ‐0.452 0 1/ 2 ‐0.008 0 1/16 ‐0.534 0 9/16
1 8 31.5 ‐0.054 0 1/16 ‐0.330 0 3/ 8 ‐0.006 0 1/16 ‐0.390 0 7/16
1 9 35.4 ‐0.029 0 1/16 ‐0.175 0 3/16 ‐0.003 0 1/16 ‐0.206 0 1/ 4
1 10 39.3 0.000 ‐‐ 0.000 ‐‐ 0.000 ‐‐ 0.000 ‐‐
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
NOTE: for camber, please refer to AASHTO Art.10.14 or LRFD Art. 6.7.2
1
ANALYSIS
Beam\Design\East
TABLE 1.2.8.2=MAXIMUM LIVE LOAD DEFLECTION FOR COMPOSITE CONSTRUCTION

*******************************************************
(UNFACTORED)
NUMBER OF LANE LL + I.
D FROM ‐‐‐‐‐AND‐‐‐‐‐‐ DEFLECTION GOVERN. 1/800 OF SPAN L ROTATION
SPAN L SUPT DIST. FACTOR ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ LOAD ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
NO. (ft) FOR LL DEFL. (inch) TYPE AASHTO 2.5.2.6.2 [5] Rad.
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
Page 30
GD46
98 of 325
1 19.67 2 0.250 ‐0.231 MAX HL‐93 0.59 0.00475
0.033 MIN
‐0.051 MAX LANE
0.033 MIN LANE
3 0.375 ‐0.346 MAX HL‐93 0.59 0.00475

0.050 MIN
‐0.077 MAX LANE
0.050 MIN LANE
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
NOTE: [1] " ‐ " indicates downward deflection
[2] The distribution factor for LL+I deflection is defined as
DF = (NL/Ng) ..... AASHTO LRFD Art. 2.5.2.6
where NL= no. of traffic lanes

Ng= no. of girders
[3] This table is based upon the optional criteria specified

in AASHTO LRFD Art. 3.6.1.3.2
[4] The number of traffic lanes is determined according to

AASHTO LRFD Art.3.6.1.1.1.
The 1st line is for the most probable number of lanes
and the 2nd line is for the next probable number of lanes.
[5] Max rotations at left (1st line) & right (2nd line)
supports of the span without averaging, factor and impact
[6] If ADTT is between 100 and 1000, multi‐presence

factor of 0.95 is applied. If ADTT is below 100, factor
is 0.9 (AASHTO LRFD C3.6.1.1.2).
1
ANALYSIS
Beam\Design\East
TABLE 1.2.9.1=NONCOMPOSITE DEAD LOAD STRESSES FOR N=INFINITY (UNFACTORED)

**********************************************
STEEL DEAD LOAD OTHER DEAD LOAD TOTAL DEAD LOAD

SP IN D FROM ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
Page 31
GD47
99 of 325
NO NO L SUPT STEEL BEAM STEEL BEAM STEEL BEAM
TOP BOT TOP BOT TOP BOT
(ft) (ksi) (ksi) (ksi)
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
1 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

1 1 3.93 ‐0.44 0.44 ‐2.69 2.69 ‐3.13 3.13
1 2 7.87 ‐0.79 0.79 ‐4.78 4.78 ‐5.57 5.57
1 3 11.80 ‐1.03 1.03 ‐6.27 6.27 ‐7.30 7.30
1 4 15.73 ‐1.18 1.18 ‐7.17 7.17 ‐8.35 8.35
1 5 19.67 ‐1.23 1.23 ‐7.47 7.47 ‐8.70 8.70
1 6 23.60 ‐1.18 1.18 ‐7.17 7.17 ‐8.35 8.35
1 7 27.53 ‐1.03 1.03 ‐6.27 6.27 ‐7.30 7.30
1 8 31.47 ‐0.79 0.79 ‐4.78 4.78 ‐5.57 5.57
1 9 35.40 ‐0.44 0.44 ‐2.69 2.69 ‐3.13 3.13
1 10 39.33 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
1
ANALYSIS
Beam\Design\East
TABLE 1.2.9.2=COMPOSITE DL STRESS FOR N = 21.0 AND TOTAL DL STRESSES

******************************************************
(UNFACTORED)
SUPERIMPOSED DEAD LOAD,(ksi) TOTAL DEAD LOAD,(ksi)

SP IN D FROM ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
NO NO L SUPT CONCRETE STEEL BEAM CONCRETE STEEL BEAM
(ft) ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
TOP TOP BOT TOP TOP BOT
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
1 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

1 1 3.93 0.00 ‐0.02 0.08 0.00 ‐3.15 3.21
1 2 7.87 0.00 ‐0.03 0.13 0.00 ‐5.60 5.70
1 3 11.80 ‐0.01 ‐0.04 0.18 ‐0.01 ‐7.35 7.48
1 4 15.73 ‐0.01 ‐0.05 0.20 ‐0.01 ‐8.40 8.55
1 5 19.67 ‐0.01 ‐0.05 0.21 ‐0.01 ‐8.75 8.91
1 6 23.60 ‐0.01 ‐0.05 0.20 ‐0.01 ‐8.40 8.55
1 7 27.53 ‐0.01 ‐0.04 0.18 ‐0.01 ‐7.35 7.48
1 8 31.47 0.00 ‐0.03 0.13 0.00 ‐5.60 5.70
Page 32
GD48
100 of 325
1 9 35.40 0.00 ‐0.02 0.08 0.00 ‐3.15 3.21
1 10 39.33 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
1
ANALYSIS
Beam\Design\East
TABLE 1.2.9.3=LIVE LOAD STRESSES FOR N = 7.0 (UNFACTORED)

*******************************
MAXIMUM POSITIVE,(ksi) MAXIMUM NEGATIVE,(ksi)

‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
SP IN D FROM CONCR. STEEL CONCR. STEEL
NO NO L SUPT ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
(ft) TOP TOP BOT TOP TOP BOT
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
1 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

1 1 3.93 ‐0.29 ‐0.06 5.10 0.00 0.00 0.00
1 2 7.87 ‐0.50 ‐0.10 8.73 0.00 0.00 0.00
1 3 11.80 ‐0.62 ‐0.12 10.90 0.00 0.00 0.00
1 4 15.73 ‐0.69 ‐0.14 12.06 0.00 0.00 0.00
1 5 19.67 ‐0.69 ‐0.14 12.02 0.00 0.00 0.00
1 6 23.60 ‐0.69 ‐0.14 12.06 0.00 0.00 0.00
1 7 27.53 ‐0.62 ‐0.12 10.90 0.00 0.00 0.00
1 8 31.47 ‐0.50 ‐0.10 8.73 0.00 0.00 0.00
1 9 35.40 ‐0.29 ‐0.06 5.10 0.00 0.00 0.00
1 10 39.33 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
1
ANALYSIS
Beam\Design\East
TABLE 1.2.9.3A=FATIGUE LIVE LOAD STRESS RANGE FOR N = 7.0 (ksi) (UNFACTORED)
*************************************************
Page 33
GD49
101 of 325
SP IN D FROM TOP OF TOP FLANGE GOVERNING BOT OF BOT FLANGE GOVERNING

NO NO L SUPT ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ STRESS LOAD ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ STRESS LOAD
(ft) TRUCK ONLY RANGE TP TYPE TRUCK ONLY RANGE TP TYPE
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
1 0 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0 T HL 0.0 0.0 0.0 T HL

1 1 3.93 0.0 0.0 0.0 C HL 1.8 0.0 1.8 T HL
1 2 7.87 0.0 0.0 0.0 C HL 2.8 0.0 2.8 T HL
1 3 11.80 0.0 0.0 0.0 C HL 4.0 0.0 4.0 T HL
1 4 15.73 0.1 0.0 0.1 C HL 4.5 0.0 4.5 T HL
1 5 19.67 0.1 0.0 0.1 C HL 4.5 0.0 4.5 T HL
1 6 23.60 0.1 0.0 0.1 C HL 4.5 0.0 4.5 T HL
1 7 27.53 0.0 0.0 0.0 C HL 4.0 0.0 4.0 T HL
1 8 31.47 0.0 0.0 0.0 C HL 2.8 0.0 2.8 T HL
1 9 35.40 0.0 0.0 0.0 C HL 1.8 0.0 1.8 T HL
1 10 39.33 0.0 0.0 0.0 T HL 0.0 0.0 0.0 T HL
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
NOTE: LOAD TYPE: HL = Fatigue Truck or Tandem

STRESS TYPE: R = Reversal, C = Compression, and T = Tension
1
ANALYSIS
Beam\Design\East
TABLE 1.2.9.5A=SERVICE I TOTAL (DC+DW+LL+I) STRESS SUMMARY

*******************************************
YIELD TOTAL POSITIVE ,(ksi) TOTAL NEGATIVE ,(ksi)

STRESS ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
SP IN D FROM ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ CONCR. STEEL BEAM CONCR. STEEL BEAM
NO NO L SUPT Fy (ksi) TOP ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ TOP ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
(ft) TOP BOT TOP BOT TOP BOT
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
1 0 0.00 50. 50. 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

1 1 3.93 50. 50. ‐0.29 ‐3.21 8.31 0.00 ‐3.15 3.21
1 2 7.87 50. 50. ‐0.50 ‐5.70 14.43 0.00 ‐5.60 5.70
1 3 11.80 50. 50. ‐0.63 ‐7.47 18.38 ‐0.01 ‐7.35 7.48
Page 34
GD50
102 of 325
1 4 15.73 50. 50. ‐0.69 ‐8.53 20.61 ‐0.01 ‐8.40 8.55
1 5 19.67 50. 50. ‐0.69 ‐8.88 20.93 ‐0.01 ‐8.75 8.91
1 6 23.60 50. 50. ‐0.69 ‐8.53 20.61 ‐0.01 ‐8.40 8.55
1 7 27.53 50. 50. ‐0.63 ‐7.47 18.38 ‐0.01 ‐7.35 7.48
1 8 31.47 50. 50. ‐0.50 ‐5.70 14.43 0.00 ‐5.60 5.70
1 9 35.40 50. 50. ‐0.29 ‐3.21 8.31 0.00 ‐3.15 3.21
1 10 39.33 50. 50. 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
1
ANALYSIS
Beam\Design\East
TABLE 1.2.9.5B=SERVICE II TOTAL (DC+DW+1.3(LL+I)) STRESS SUMMARY

*************************************************

STRESS ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
1 0 0.00 50. 50. 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

1 1 3.93 50. 50. ‐0.38 ‐3.22 9.84 0.00 ‐3.15 3.21
1 2 7.87 50. 50. ‐0.65 ‐5.73 17.05 0.00 ‐5.60 5.70
1 3 11.80 50. 50. ‐0.81 ‐7.51 21.65 ‐0.01 ‐7.35 7.48
1 4 15.73 50. 50. ‐0.90 ‐8.57 24.23 ‐0.01 ‐8.40 8.55
1 5 19.67 50. 50. ‐0.90 ‐8.92 24.54 ‐0.01 ‐8.75 8.91
1 6 23.60 50. 50. ‐0.90 ‐8.57 24.23 ‐0.01 ‐8.40 8.55
1 7 27.53 50. 50. ‐0.81 ‐7.51 21.65 ‐0.01 ‐7.35 7.48
1 8 31.47 50. 50. ‐0.65 ‐5.73 17.05 0.00 ‐5.60 5.70
1 9 35.40 50. 50. ‐0.38 ‐3.22 9.84 0.00 ‐3.15 3.21
1 10 39.33 50. 50. 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
1
ANALYSIS
Beam\Design\East
Page 35
GD51
103 of 325
TABLE 1.2.9.5C=STRENGTH I TOTAL (1.25DC+1.50DW+1.75(LL+I)) STRESS SUMMARY

**********************************************************

STRESS ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
1 0 0.00 50. 50. 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

1 1 3.93 50. 50. ‐0.51 ‐4.04 12.94 0.00 ‐3.94 4.01
1 2 7.87 50. 50. ‐0.88 ‐7.17 22.40 ‐0.01 ‐7.00 7.13
1 3 11.80 50. 50. ‐1.10 ‐9.40 28.43 ‐0.01 ‐9.18 9.35
1 4 15.73 50. 50. ‐1.21 ‐10.73 31.79 ‐0.01 ‐10.50 10.69
1 5 19.67 50. 50. ‐1.21 ‐11.17 32.17 ‐0.01 ‐10.93 11.13
1 6 23.60 50. 50. ‐1.21 ‐10.73 31.79 ‐0.01 ‐10.50 10.69
1 7 27.53 50. 50. ‐1.10 ‐9.40 28.43 ‐0.01 ‐9.18 9.35
1 8 31.47 50. 50. ‐0.88 ‐7.17 22.40 ‐0.01 ‐7.00 7.13
1 9 35.40 50. 50. ‐0.51 ‐4.04 12.94 0.00 ‐3.94 4.01
1 10 39.33 50. 50. 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
1
ANALYSIS
Beam\Design\East
TABLE 1.2.9.5D=STRENGTH I TOTAL (0.90DC+0.65DW+1.75(LL+I)) STRESS SUMMARY

**********************************************************

STRESS ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
1 0 0.00 50. 50. 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

1 1 3.93 50. 50. ‐0.51 ‐2.93 11.82 0.00 ‐2.83 2.89
1 2 7.87 50. 50. ‐0.88 ‐5.21 20.40 0.00 ‐5.04 5.13
1 3 11.80 50. 50. ‐1.09 ‐6.83 25.81 ‐0.01 ‐6.61 6.73
1 4 15.73 50. 50. ‐1.21 ‐7.80 28.80 ‐0.01 ‐7.56 7.70
1 5 19.67 50. 50. ‐1.21 ‐8.11 29.06 ‐0.01 ‐7.87 8.02
Page 36
GD52
104 of 325
1 6 23.60 50. 50. ‐1.21 ‐7.80 28.80 ‐0.01 ‐7.56 7.70
1 7 27.53 50. 50. ‐1.09 ‐6.83 25.81 ‐0.01 ‐6.61 6.73
1 8 31.47 50. 50. ‐0.88 ‐5.21 20.40 0.00 ‐5.04 5.13
1 9 35.40 50. 50. ‐0.51 ‐2.93 11.82 0.00 ‐2.83 2.89
1 10 39.33 50. 50. 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
1
ANALYSIS
Beam\Design\East
TABLE 1.2.9.5E=STRENGTH II TOTAL (1.25DC+1.50DW+1.35(LL+I)) STRESS SUMMARY

***********************************************************

STRESS ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
1 0 0.00 50. 50. 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

1 1 3.93 50. 50. ‐0.40 ‐4.01 10.90 0.00 ‐3.94 4.01
1 2 7.87 50. 50. ‐0.68 ‐7.13 18.91 ‐0.01 ‐7.00 7.13
1 3 11.80 50. 50. ‐0.85 ‐9.35 24.07 ‐0.01 ‐9.18 9.35
1 4 15.73 50. 50. ‐0.94 ‐10.68 26.97 ‐0.01 ‐10.50 10.69
1 5 19.67 50. 50. ‐0.93 ‐11.12 27.36 ‐0.01 ‐10.93 11.13
1 6 23.60 50. 50. ‐0.94 ‐10.68 26.97 ‐0.01 ‐10.50 10.69
1 7 27.53 50. 50. ‐0.85 ‐9.35 24.07 ‐0.01 ‐9.18 9.35
1 8 31.47 50. 50. ‐0.68 ‐7.13 18.91 ‐0.01 ‐7.00 7.13
1 9 35.40 50. 50. ‐0.40 ‐4.01 10.90 0.00 ‐3.94 4.01
1 10 39.33 50. 50. 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
1
ANALYSIS
Beam\Design\East
TABLE 1.2.9.5F=STRENGTH II TOTAL (0.90DC+0.65DW+1.35(LL+I)) STRESS SUMMARY

***********************************************************
Page 37
GD53
105 of 325

STRESS ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
1 0 0.00 50. 50. 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

1 1 3.93 50. 50. ‐0.40 ‐2.91 9.78 0.00 ‐2.83 2.89
1 2 7.87 50. 50. ‐0.68 ‐5.17 16.91 0.00 ‐5.04 5.13
1 3 11.80 50. 50. ‐0.84 ‐6.78 21.45 ‐0.01 ‐6.61 6.73
1 4 15.73 50. 50. ‐0.93 ‐7.74 23.97 ‐0.01 ‐7.56 7.70
1 5 19.67 50. 50. ‐0.93 ‐8.06 24.25 ‐0.01 ‐7.87 8.02
1 6 23.60 50. 50. ‐0.93 ‐7.74 23.97 ‐0.01 ‐7.56 7.70
1 7 27.53 50. 50. ‐0.84 ‐6.78 21.45 ‐0.01 ‐6.61 6.73
1 8 31.47 50. 50. ‐0.68 ‐5.17 16.91 0.00 ‐5.04 5.13
1 9 35.40 50. 50. ‐0.40 ‐2.91 9.78 0.00 ‐2.83 2.89
1 10 39.33 50. 50. 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
1
CODE CHECK
Beam\Design\East
TABLE 1.2.22.3=MEMBER LENGTH AND SECTION GEOMETRY

**********************************
COVER PLATE ‐‐ (in)

MEMBER TOP FLANGE WEB BOT FLANGE ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ STEEL ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ TOP BOT
NO LENGTH TYPE WIDTH THICK DEPTH THICK WIDTH THICK ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
(ft) (in) (in) (in) WIDTH THICK WIDTH THICK
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
1 39.33 PG 9.0 0.7500 20.0 0.5000 9.0 0.7500
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
NOTE: PG = plate Girder ,W = standard W‐section with/without cover plates
1
Page 38
GD54
106 of 325
CODE CHECK
Beam\Design\East
TABLE 1.2.22.4=DEPTH RATIOS

************
** [1] = Span length (ft) = 39.3

LIMITATION
MEMBER SLAB GIRDER [2]=OVERALL D. [2]/(12*[1]) 1/25
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ THICK. DEPTH ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ <=> ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ STATUS
NO LENGTH ‐‐‐‐‐‐ ‐‐‐‐‐‐ [3]= GIRDER D. [3]/(12*[1]) 1/30
(ft) (in) (in) (in)
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
1 39.33 8.25 21.50 [2]= 29.75 0.06303 > 0.04000 OK
[3]= 21.50 0.04555 > 0.03333 OK
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
NOTE : [1] ‐‐ Span length or Average of two adjacent span lengths
[2] ‐‐ AASHTO LRFD TABLE 2.5.2.6.3‐1
* For composite girders, the minimum overall depth

of girder (concrete slab plus haunch & girder) preferably should not
be less than 0.040*Length of span (or 0.032*L if continuous spans).
and the depth of steel girder alone preferably should not be
less than 0.033*Length of span (or 0.027*L if continuous)
[3] ‐‐ same as NOTE [2]
** ‐‐ cover plates not taken into account
** ‐‐ these criteria are related to the structural stability

during construction and the limitation for the live load
deflection.
1
BRIDGE ENGINEERING SOFTWARE & TECHNOLOGY CENTERMERLIN V 10.6
CODE CHECK
Beam\Design\East
TABLE 1.2.22.5 =DEPTH/THICKNESS RATIOS (N = n)

******************************
Page 39
GD55
107 of 325
SP IN D FROM
Lo Co Web Web
NO NO L SUPT
ng mp depth thick D/tw 2Dcp/tw 2Dc/tw Cat
[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6]
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
1 0 0.00 0 1 20.00 0.500 40.0 150.0 0.00 90.55 0

1 1 3.93 0 1 20.00 0.500 40.0 150.0 0.00 90.55 0
1 2 7.87 0 1 20.00 0.500 40.0 150.0 0.00 90.55 0
1 3 11.80 0 1 20.00 0.500 40.0 150.0 0.00 90.55 0
1 4 15.73 0 1 20.00 0.500 40.0 150.0 0.00 90.55 0
1 5 19.67 0 1 20.00 0.500 40.0 150.0 0.00 90.55 0
1 6 23.60 0 1 20.00 0.500 40.0 150.0 0.00 90.55 0
1 7 27.53 0 1 20.00 0.500 40.0 150.0 0.00 90.55 0
1 8 31.47 0 1 20.00 0.500 40.0 150.0 0.00 90.55 0
1 9 35.40 0 1 20.00 0.500 40.0 150.0 0.00 90.55 0
1 10 39.33 0 1 20.00 0.500 40.0 150.0 0.00 90.55 0
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
NOTE:
[1] 0 ‐ No long. stiffeners
1 ‐ long. stiffeners
[2] D/tw limit (Eq. 6.10.2.1‐1 or Eq. 6.10.2.1.2‐1)
[3] For composite sections in positive flexure, use Article D6.3.2
to calculate Dcp and 2*Dcp/tw
Note: If the plastic N.A. is not in the web, Dcp = 0
[4] 2Dcp/tw limit: 3.76*SQRT(E/Fyc) (Eq.6.10.6.2.2‐1)
[5] Use Article D6.3.1 to calculate Dc and 2.*Dc/tw
[6] 2Dc/tw limit: 5.7*SQRT(E/Fyc) (Eq.6.10.6.2.3‐1)
Web Category
0 = compact section
2 = non‐compact section
3 = slender section
1
CODE CHECK
Beam\Design\East
TABLE 1.2.22.5A=DEPTH/THICKNESS RATIOS (N = inf.)

*********************************
SP IN D FROM Lo Co Web Web

Page 40
GD56
108 of 325
NO NO L SUPT
ng mp depth thick 2Dc/tw Category
[1] [2] [3]
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
1 0 0.00 0 1 20.00 0.500 40.00 137.27 2

1 1 3.93 0 1 20.00 0.500 40.00 137.27 2
1 2 7.87 0 1 20.00 0.500 40.00 137.27 2
1 3 11.80 0 1 20.00 0.500 40.00 137.27 2
1 4 15.73 0 1 20.00 0.500 40.00 137.27 2
1 5 19.67 0 1 20.00 0.500 40.00 137.27 2
1 6 23.60 0 1 20.00 0.500 40.00 137.27 2
1 7 27.53 0 1 20.00 0.500 40.00 137.27 2
1 8 31.47 0 1 20.00 0.500 40.00 137.27 2
1 9 35.40 0 1 20.00 0.500 40.00 137.27 2
1 10 39.33 0 1 20.00 0.500 40.00 137.27 2
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
NOTE:
[2] For non‐composite sections, calculate Dc and 2*Dc/tw
Web Category
0 = compact section
3 = slender section
1
CODE CHECK
Beam\Design\East
TABLE 1.2.22.6=FLANGE PROPORTIONS CHECK

************************
SP NO D FROM
NO NO L SUPT bf/2tf [1] bf [2] tf [3] Iyc/Iyt FLAG
(ft) (in) (in) (in) (in)
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
1 0 0.00 6.00 12. 9.0 3.3 0.750 0.550

6.00 12. 9.0 3.3 0.750 0.550 1.00 0
1 1 3.93 6.00 12. 9.0 3.3 0.750 0.550
Page 41
GD57
109 of 325
6.00 12. 9.0 3.3 0.750 0.550 1.00 0
1 2 7.87 6.00 12. 9.0 3.3 0.750 0.550
6.00 12. 9.0 3.3 0.750 0.550 1.00 0
1 3 11.80 6.00 12. 9.0 3.3 0.750 0.550
6.00 12. 9.0 3.3 0.750 0.550 1.00 0
1 4 15.73 6.00 12. 9.0 3.3 0.750 0.550
6.00 12. 9.0 3.3 0.750 0.550 1.00 0
1 5 19.67 6.00 12. 9.0 3.3 0.750 0.550
6.00 12. 9.0 3.3 0.750 0.550 1.00 0
1 6 23.60 6.00 12. 9.0 3.3 0.750 0.550
6.00 12. 9.0 3.3 0.750 0.550 1.00 0
1 7 27.53 6.00 12. 9.0 3.3 0.750 0.550
6.00 12. 9.0 3.3 0.750 0.550 1.00 0
1 8 31.47 6.00 12. 9.0 3.3 0.750 0.550
6.00 12. 9.0 3.3 0.750 0.550 1.00 0
1 9 35.40 6.00 12. 9.0 3.3 0.750 0.550
6.00 12. 9.0 3.3 0.750 0.550 1.00 0
1 10 39.33 6.00 12. 9.0 3.3 0.750 0.550
6.00 12. 9.0 3.3 0.750 0.550 1.00 0
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
NOTE: [1] = 12. (Eq. 6.10.2.2‐1)

[2] = D/6 (Eq. 6.10.2.2‐2)
[3] = 1.1tw (Eq. 6.10.2.2‐3)
For each nodal point, the 1st line checked criteria for top
flange and the 2nd line checked criteria for bottom flange
1
MERLIN V 10.6
DEPARTMENT OF CIVIL & ENVIRON. ENGINEERING
COMPOSITE
CODE CHECK
Beam\Design\East
TABLE 1.2.22.7.0=CB VALUES FOR LATERAL BRACING

*****************************
DIST. FROM
LATERAL LEFT SUPT
BRACING ‐‐‐‐(FT)‐‐‐‐ fo f2 fmid f1
NO FROM TO (ksi) (ksi) (ksi) (ksi) Cb
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
1 0.0 25.0 0.000 0.000 11.236 22.471 1.000

0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 1.000
Page 42
GD58
110 of 325
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
Note: The 1st line is for DL case and the 2nd line is for LL case
f0, f2, fmid, f1, and Cb are defined in Art. 6.10.8.2.3
If the flange transition is beyond 20% X unbraced length

from the smaller end and the ratio of the smaller
and larger lateral moment of inertia of the flange
is smaller than 50%, then Cb=1.0.
1
CODE CHECK
Beam\Design\East
TABLE 1.2.22.7A=FLB AND LTB CATEGORIES

**********************
SP IN D FROM Co ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ FLB ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ LTB ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐

NO NO L SUPT mp LMDAf LMDApf LMDArf Lb Lp Lr GOV
(ft) CAT (ft) (ft) (ft) CAT CAT
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
1 0 0.00 1 6.00 9.15 16.12 0 25.00 4.67 17.53 3 3

1 1 3.93 1 6.00 9.15 16.12 0 25.00 4.67 17.53 3 3
1 2 7.87 1 6.00 9.15 16.12 0 25.00 4.67 17.53 3 3
1 3 11.80 1 6.00 9.15 16.12 0 25.00 4.67 17.53 3 3
1 4 15.73 1 6.00 9.15 16.12 0 25.00 4.67 17.53 3 3
1 5 19.67 1 6.00 9.15 16.12 0 25.00 4.67 17.53 3 3
1 6 23.60 1 6.00 9.15 16.12 0 25.00 4.67 17.53 3 3
1 7 27.53 1 6.00 9.15 16.12 0 25.00 4.67 17.53 3 3
1 8 31.47 1 6.00 9.15 16.12 0 25.00 4.67 17.53 3 3
1 9 35.40 1 6.00 9.15 16.12 0 25.00 4.67 17.53 3 3
1 10 39.33 1 6.00 9.15 16.12 0 25.00 4.67 17.53 3 3
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
NOTE: LMDAf = slenderness ratio for the comp. flange

= bfc / 2tfc (Eq. 6.10.8.2.2‐3)
LMDApf = limiting slenderness ratio for a compact flange
= 0.38*SQRT(E/Fyc) (Eq. 6.10.8.2.2‐4)
LMDArf = limiting slenderness ration for a non‐compct flange
= 0.56*SQRT(E/Fyr) (Eq. 6.10.8.2.2‐5)
Lb = unbraced length
Lp = limiting unbraced length to achieve the nominal flexural
Page 43
GD59
111 of 325
of RbRhFyc under uniform bending
= 1.0rt*SQRT(E/Fyc) (Eq. 6.10.8.2.3‐4)
Lr = limiting unbraced length to achieve the onset of
nominal yielding in either flange under uniform
bending with consideration of comp. flange
residual stress effects
= pi * rt * SQRT(E/Fyr) (Eq. 6.10.8.2.3‐5)
In negative moment region, the fist line is for non‐composite sections

and the second line is for composite sections
Flange Category
0 = compact section
3 = slender section
1
CODE CHECK
Beam\Design\East
TABLE 1.2.22.7B=FLB AND LTB RESISTANCE

**********************
SP IN D FROM Co FLB LTB GOV

NO NO L SUPT mp Rh Rb Cb Fnc Fnc Fnc
(ft) (Ksi) (Ksi) (Ksi)
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
1 0 0.00 1 1.000 1.000 1.00 50.00 17.22 17.22

1 1 3.93 1 1.000 1.000 1.00 50.00 17.22 17.22
1 2 7.87 1 1.000 1.000 1.00 50.00 17.22 17.22
1 3 11.80 1 1.000 1.000 1.00 50.00 17.22 17.22
1 4 15.73 1 1.000 1.000 1.00 50.00 17.22 17.22
1 5 19.67 1 1.000 1.000 1.00 50.00 17.22 17.22
1 6 23.60 1 1.000 1.000 1.00 50.00 17.22 17.22
1 7 27.53 1 1.000 1.000 1.00 50.00 17.22 17.22
1 8 31.47 1 1.000 1.000 1.00 50.00 17.22 17.22
1 9 35.40 1 1.000 1.000 1.00 50.00 17.22 17.22
1 10 39.33 1 1.000 1.000 1.00 50.00 17.22 17.22
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
Note: In the positive moment region, the result is for DL case

Page 44
GD60
112 of 325
In the negative moment region, the 1st line is for DL case
and the 2nd line is for LL case
1
CODE CHECK
Beam\Design\East
TABLE 1.2.22.7C=INFORMATION FOR DUCTILITY CHECK

******************************
SP IN D FROM Co
NO NO L SUPT mp Dp 0.42Dt
(ft) (in) (in)
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
1 0 0.00 1 7.20 12.49

1 1 3.93 1 7.20 12.49
1 2 7.87 1 7.20 12.49
1 3 11.80 1 7.20 12.49
1 4 15.73 1 7.20 12.49
1 5 19.67 1 7.20 12.49
1 6 23.60 1 7.20 12.49
1 7 27.53 1 7.20 12.49
1 8 31.47 1 7.20 12.49
1 9 35.40 1 7.20 12.49
1 10 39.33 1 7.20 12.49
1
INPUT
Beam\Design\East
TABLE 1.2.22.9=SUMMARY OF STRENGTH CATEGORY OF CROSS SECTION

*********************************************
S T R E N G T H C A T E G O R Y, Category
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
SP IN D FROM Section Noncomposite Composite Non‐ Comp.
NO NO L SUPT Region Web Flange Web Flange Comp.
(ft) [1] [2] [3] [4]
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
Page 45
GD61
113 of 325
1 0 0.00 1 0 3 0 3 0
1 1 3.93 1 0 3 0 3 0
1 2 7.87 1 0 3 0 3 0
1 3 11.80 1 0 3 0 3 0
1 4 15.73 1 0 3 0 3 0
1 5 19.67 1 0 3 0 3 0
1 6 23.60 1 0 3 0 3 0
1 7 27.53 1 0 3 0 3 0
1 8 31.47 1 0 3 0 3 0
1 9 35.40 1 0 3 0 3 0
1 10 39.33 1 0 3 0 3 0
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
1
CODE CHECK
Beam\Design\East
NOTE: [1] For non‐conposite sections, check Eq.6.10.6.2.3‐1

[2] For non‐composite FLB/LTB, use Article 6.10.8.2 to
decide section category
[3] For composite sections in positive flexure, use
Article 6.10.6.2.2 to decide section category
For composite sections in negative flexure, use
Eq. 6.10.6.2.3‐1
[4] For composite FLB or LTB, use Article 6.10.8.2 to compute
section category
* Strength Category of Cross Section
0 = compact section
3 = slender section
FOR N = INF. : Category No. is the maximum of [1] and [2]

FOR N = n : Category No. is [3] for composite sections
in positive flexure
Category No. is the maximum of [3] and [4] for
composite sections in negative flexure
Page 46
GD62
114 of 325
Non‐compact for Fy of the flanges > 70 ksi (483 MPa)

1
CODE CHECK
Beam\Design\East
TABLE 1.2.22.10=CONSTRUCTIBILITY CHECK (STRENGTH IV)

*********************************
SP IN D FROM fl 0.6Fyt fbu [1] fbu+fl [2] fbu+1/3fl [3] FLAG

(ft) (ksi) (ksi) (ksi) (ksi) (ksi) (ksi) (ksi) (ksi)
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
1 0 0.00 0.0 30.0 0.0 50.0 0.0 50.0 0.0 17.2 0

0.0 ‐ 0.0 ‐ 0.0 50.0 ‐ ‐ 0
1 1 3.93 0.0 30.0 4.7 50.0 4.7 50.0 4.7 17.2 0
0.0 ‐ 4.7 ‐ 4.7 50.0 ‐ ‐ 0
1 2 7.87 0.0 30.0 8.3 50.0 8.3 50.0 8.3 17.2 0
0.0 ‐ 8.3 ‐ 8.3 50.0 ‐ ‐ 0
1 3 11.80 0.0 30.0 11.0 50.0 11.0 50.0 11.0 17.2 0
0.0 ‐ 11.0 ‐ 11.0 50.0 ‐ ‐ 0
1 4 15.73 0.0 30.0 12.5 50.0 12.5 50.0 12.5 17.2 0
0.0 ‐ 12.5 ‐ 12.5 50.0 ‐ ‐ 0
1 5 19.67 0.0 30.0 13.0 50.0 13.0 50.0 13.0 17.2 0
0.0 ‐ 13.0 ‐ 13.0 50.0 ‐ ‐ 0
1 6 23.60 0.0 30.0 12.5 50.0 12.5 50.0 12.5 17.2 0
0.0 ‐ 12.5 ‐ 12.5 50.0 ‐ ‐ 0
1 7 27.53 0.0 30.0 11.0 50.0 11.0 50.0 11.0 17.2 0
0.0 ‐ 11.0 ‐ 11.0 50.0 ‐ ‐ 0
1 8 31.47 0.0 30.0 8.3 50.0 8.3 50.0 8.3 17.2 0
0.0 ‐ 8.3 ‐ 8.3 50.0 ‐ ‐ 0
1 9 35.40 0.0 30.0 4.7 50.0 4.7 50.0 4.7 17.2 0
0.0 ‐ 4.7 ‐ 4.7 50.0 ‐ ‐ 0
1 10 39.33 0.0 30.0 0.0 50.0 0.0 50.0 0.0 17.2 0
0.0 ‐ 0.0 ‐ 0.0 50.0 ‐ ‐ 0
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
NOTE: [1] = (PHI)f * Fcrw (Eq. 6.10.3.2.1‐3)

[2] = (PHI)f * Rh * Fyc (Eq. 6.10.3.2.1‐1) or
= (PHI)f * Rh * Fyt (Eq. 6.10.3.2.2‐1)
[3] = (PHI)f * Fnc (Eq. 6.10.3.2.1‐2)
Page 47
GD63
115 of 325
"‐" is N.A.
Under FLAG Column, 0 = OK; 1= NG
The values of fbu and fl shall be determined based on

factored loads, and shall be taken as positive in
sign in all resistance equations (Art. 6.10.1.6)
The value of fbu is the actual stress in this table,

the users can use the maximum value within the
unbraced length to do their own check
1
CODE CHECK
Beam\Design\East
TABLE 1.2.22.10A=RATIO OF APPLIED STRESS AND THE CAPACITY

****************************************
SP IN D FROM fl/ fbu/ fbu+fl/ fbu+1/3fl/ MAX.

0.6Fyt [1] [2] [3] RAT. GOVN.
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
1 0 0.00 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 1

0.000 0.000 3
1 1 3.93 0.000 0.094 0.094 0.273 0.273 4
0.094 0.094 3
1 2 7.87 0.000 0.167 0.167 0.485 0.485 4
0.167 0.167 3
1 3 11.80 0.000 0.219 0.219 0.636 0.636 4
0.219 0.219 3
1 4 15.73 0.000 0.250 0.250 0.727 0.727 4
0.250 0.250 3
1 5 19.67 0.000 0.261 0.261 0.758 0.758 4
0.261 0.261 3
1 6 23.60 0.000 0.250 0.250 0.727 0.727 4
0.250 0.250 3
1 7 27.53 0.000 0.219 0.219 0.636 0.636 4
0.219 0.219 3
1 8 31.47 0.000 0.167 0.167 0.485 0.485 4
0.167 0.167 3
1 9 35.40 0.000 0.094 0.094 0.273 0.273 4
0.094 0.094 3
Page 48
GD64
116 of 325
1 10 39.33 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 1
0.000 0.000 3
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
NOTE: [1] = (PHI)f * Fcrw (Eq. 6.10.3.2.1‐3)

[2] = (PHI)f * Rh * Fyc (Eq. 6.10.3.2.1‐1) or
= (PHI)f * Rh * Fyt (Eq. 6.10.3.2.2‐1)
[3] = (PHI)f * Fnc (Eq. 6.10.3.2.1‐2)
The governing number is listed as below.

1 = fl / 0.6Fyt
2 = fbu / [1]
3 = fbu + fl / [2]
4 = (fbu + 1/3fl) / [3]
1
CODE CHECK
Beam\Design\East
TABLE 1.2.22.14=STRENGTH LIMIT STATE CHECK

**************************
SP IN D FROM ID Mu+1/3flSxt [1] fbu [2] fl [3] fbu+ [4] FLAG

NO NO L SUPT 1/3fl MCTD
(ft) (k‐ft) (k‐ft) (ksi) (ksi) (ksi) (ksi) (ksi) (ksi)
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
1 0 0.00 0 0.0 1358.0 ‐ ‐ 0.0 30.0 ‐ ‐ 0‐‐0

1 1 3.93 0 258.5 1358.0 ‐ ‐ 0.0 30.0 ‐ ‐ 0‐‐0
1 2 7.87 0 445.9 1358.0 ‐ ‐ 0.0 30.0 ‐ ‐ 0‐‐0
1 3 11.80 0 563.3 1358.0 ‐ ‐ 0.0 30.0 ‐ ‐ 0‐‐0
1 4 15.73 0 627.9 1358.0 ‐ ‐ 0.0 30.0 ‐ ‐ 0‐‐0
1 5 19.67 0 632.7 1358.0 ‐ ‐ 0.0 30.0 ‐ ‐ 0‐‐0
1 6 23.60 0 627.9 1358.0 ‐ ‐ 0.0 30.0 ‐ ‐ 0‐‐0
1 7 27.53 0 563.3 1358.0 ‐ ‐ 0.0 30.0 ‐ ‐ 0‐‐0
1 8 31.47 0 445.9 1358.0 ‐ ‐ 0.0 30.0 ‐ ‐ 0‐‐0
1 9 35.40 0 258.5 1358.0 ‐ ‐ 0.0 30.0 ‐ ‐ 0‐‐0
1 10 39.33 0 0.0 1358.0 ‐ ‐ 0.0 30.0 ‐ ‐ 0‐‐0
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
Page 49
GD65
117 of 325
NOTE: Top flange is assumed to be continuously braced for composite bridges.
[1] = (PHI)f * Mn (Eq. 6.10.7.1.1‐1)
[2] = (PHI)f * Fnc for comp. flange of composite
sections in positive flexure (Eq. 6.10.7.2.1‐1)
= (PHI)f * Rh * Fyt for tension flange of composite sections in
negative flexure and non‐composite sections (Eq. 6.10.8.1.3‐1)
[3] = 0.6*Fyt for composite sections in positive flexure
or tension flange for composite sections in
negative flexure and non‐composite sections (Eq. 6.10.1.6‐1)
= 0.6*Fyc for comp. flange of composite sections in
[4] = (PHI)f * Fnt for non‐compact tension flange
of composite sections in positive flexure (Eq. 6.10.8.1.2‐1)
= (PHI)f * Fnc for comp. flange of composite sections
in negative flexure and non‐composite sections (Eq. 6.10.8.1.1‐1)
"‐" is N.A.

M = Moment; C = Comp. Flange; T = Tension Flange
D = Ductility
For negative moment region or non‐compact sections in

positive moment region, the 1st line is for top
flange and the 2nd line is for bottom flange
The values of fbu, Mu and fl shall be determined based on


1
CODE CHECK
Beam\Design\East
TABLE 1.2.22.14A=RATIO OF APPLIED STRESS/MOMENT AND THE CAPACITY

***********************************************
SP IN D FROM ID Mu+1/3flSxt/ fbu/ fl/ fbu+1/3fl/ MAX.

[1] [2] [3] [4] RAT. GOVN.
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
Page 50
GD66
118 of 325
1 0 0.00 0 0.000 0.000 1
1 1 3.93 0 0.190 0.190 1
1 2 7.87 0 0.328 0.328 1
1 3 11.80 0 0.415 0.415 1
1 4 15.73 0 0.462 0.462 1
1 5 19.67 0 0.466 0.466 1
1 6 23.60 0 0.462 0.462 1
1 7 27.53 0 0.415 0.415 1
1 8 31.47 0 0.328 0.328 1
1 9 35.40 0 0.190 0.190 1
1 10 39.33 0 0.000 0.000 1
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
NOTE: [1] = (PHI)f * Mn (Eq. 6.10.7.1.1‐1)


1 = (Mu+1/3flSxt) / [1]
2 = fbu / [2]
3 = fl / [3]
4 = (fbu + 1/3fl) / [4]
1
CODE CHECK
Beam\Design\East
TABLE 1.2.22.15=UNSTIFFENED SECTION SHEAR CAPACITY

**********************************
SP IN D FROM Fy k Art.6.10.9.2 C Vp SHEAR CAPACITY

Page 51
GD67
119 of 325
NO NO L SUPT ‐‐‐‐‐ ‐‐‐‐‐ ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ D/tw ‐‐‐‐‐ ‐‐‐‐‐ ‐‐‐‐‐ ‐Eq.6.10.9.2‐‐
(ft) (ksi) [1] [2] [3] [4] (ksi) Vn = C x Vp
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
1 0 0.00 50.0 5.0 60.3 75.4 40.0 1.000 290.0 290.0

1 1 3.93 50.0 5.0 60.3 75.4 40.0 1.000 290.0 290.0
1 2 7.87 50.0 5.0 60.3 75.4 40.0 1.000 290.0 290.0
1 3 11.80 50.0 5.0 60.3 75.4 40.0 1.000 290.0 290.0
1 4 15.73 50.0 5.0 60.3 75.4 40.0 1.000 290.0 290.0
1 5 19.67 50.0 5.0 60.3 75.4 40.0 1.000 290.0 290.0
1 6 23.60 50.0 5.0 60.3 75.4 40.0 1.000 290.0 290.0
1 7 27.53 50.0 5.0 60.3 75.4 40.0 1.000 290.0 290.0
1 8 31.47 50.0 5.0 60.3 75.4 40.0 1.000 290.0 290.0
1 9 35.40 50.0 5.0 60.3 75.4 40.0 1.000 290.0 290.0
1 10 39.33 50.0 5.0 60.3 75.4 40.0 1.000 290.0 290.0
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
1
CODE CHECK
Beam\Design\East
NOTE: [1] k= buckling coefficient = 5+5/((d0/D)**2)

= 5 for unstiffened beams and girders
= 5 for stiffened girders when (d0/D) > 3, or
(d0/D) > (260/(D/tw))**2
[2] = 1.12 * sqrt(Ek / Fyw)
[3] = 1.40 * sqrt(Ek / Fyw)
[4] C = ratio of nominal shear resistance and plastic shear force, Vp
For D/tw < [2], C = 1.0
For [2] <= D/tw <= [3], C = 1.12 * sqrt(Ek / Fyw) / (D/tw)
..... AASHTO LRFD Eq.6.10.9.3.2‐6
For D/tw > [3], C = 1.57 * (Ek / Fyw) / (D/tw)^2

..... AASHTO LRFD Eq.6.10.9.3.2‐7
Page 52
GD68
120 of 325
** AASHTO LRFD Art.6.10.9.1 ‐‐‐ For interior web panels considered
stiffened
if (d0/D) < 3 without long. stiffener, or
if (d0/D) > 3 with both transv. and long. stiffeners.
For handling requirement, (d0/D) > (260/(D/tw))**2
Vu = CVp
where D = clear, unsupported distance between flange components
d0 = distance between transverse stiffeners
** This Article (6.10.9.2) indicates that a designer cannot

count on post‐buckling shear resistance from tension‐
field action for an unstiffened girder.
1
CODE CHECK
Beam\Design\East
TABLE 1.2.22.16=SUMMARY OF WEB STRENGTH CATEGORY

********************************
S T R E N G T H C A T E G O R Y; SEE NOTE
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
SP IN D FROM WEB STABILITY LFD/LRFD UNSTIFFENED OVERALL
NO NO L SUPT UNSTIFFENED,[1] MAX. SHEAR <=> SHEAR CAPA‐ CATEGORY WEB
(ft) ‐‐‐‐ D/tw ‐‐‐‐‐ (kip) CITY, [2]
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
1 0 0.00 0 93.8 < 290.0 0 0

1 1 3.93 0 79.7 < 290.0 0 0
1 2 7.87 0 65.9 < 290.0 0 0
1 3 11.80 0 52.4 < 290.0 0 0
1 4 15.73 0 40.0 < 290.0 0 0
1 5 19.67 0 27.8 < 290.0 0 0
1 6 23.60 0 40.0 < 290.0 0 0
1 7 27.53 0 52.4 < 290.0 0 0
1 8 31.47 0 65.9 < 290.0 0 0
1 9 35.40 0 79.7 < 290.0 0 0
1 10 39.33 0 93.8 < 290.0 0 0
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
Page 53
GD69
121 of 325
1
CODE CHECK
Beam\Design\East
NOTE [1]: WEB STABILITY, D/tw ratio ..... buckling consideration
For compact section (composite sections in positive flexure)
w/o long. stiff.
D/tw <= 150 (Eq. 6.10.2.1.1‐1)
w / long. stiff.
D/tw <= 300 (Eq. 6.10.2.1.2‐1)
2Dcp/tw .LE. 3.76*sqrt(E/Fyc) ......... AASHTO Eq.6.10.6.2.2‐1
For compact or non‐compact sections specified in Art. 6.10.8
(composite sections in negative flexure and

non‐composite sections)
2Dc/tw .LE. 5.7*SQRT(E/Fyc) ........... AASHTO Eq.6.10.6.2.3‐1
[2]: SHEAR CAPACITY ... web crippling control
Vn = CVp .......... AASHTO Eq.6.10.9.2‐1
Vn = VpRc1 ......... AASHTO Eq.6.10.9.3.2‐2
Rc1 = C+[0.87(1‐C)]/sqrt(1+(d0/D)**2) for 2Dtw/(bfctfc+bfttft) <=2.5
Vn = VpRc2 ......... AASHTO Eq.6.10.9.3.2‐8
Rc2 = C+[0.87(1‐C)]/[sqrt(1+(d0/D)**2)+(d0/D)] for 2Dtw/(bfctfc+bfttft) > 2.5
Vp = 0.58*Fy*D*tw ...... AASHTO Eq.6.10.9.3.2‐2
* For the detailed description of shear capacity,

please refer to AASHTO Art.6.10.9.2 and .3
Page 54
GD70
122 of 325
* STRENGTH CATEGORY; 0 = compact section
2 = braced non‐compact section
3 = slender section
1
CODE CHECK
Beam\Design\East
TABLE 1.2.22.17=TRANSVERSE STIFFENER SPACING

****************************
YIELD LFD/LRFD UNSTIFFENED REQUIREMENT OF MAX. ALLOWABLE

SP IN D FROM STRESS MAXIMUM SHEAR ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ TRANS. STIFFENERS
NO NO L SUPT Fy SHEAR CAPACITY TRANS. STIFFENERS SPACING
(ft) (ksi) (k) (k) 1=YES , 0=NO (ft‐in)
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
1 0 0.00 50. 93.79 290.00 0

1 1 3.93 50. 79.72 290.00 0
1 2 7.87 50. 65.88 290.00 0
1 3 11.80 50. 52.39 290.00 0
1 4 15.73 50. 39.98 290.00 0
1 5 19.67 50. 27.80 290.00 0
1 6 23.60 50. 39.98 290.00 0
1 7 27.53 50. 52.39 290.00 0
1 8 31.47 50. 65.88 290.00 0
1 9 35.40 50. 79.72 290.00 0
1 10 39.33 50. 93.79 290.00 0
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
1
CODE CHECK
Beam\Design\East
TABLE 1.2.22.20B=SPECIAL SHEAR REQUIREMENTS FOR WEBS

***********************************
SHEAR
SP IN D FROM ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ FACTORED UNF. PERM +
NO NO L SUPT DL FATIGUE PERM. V* <=> Vcr <=> FAC FATIG V**
Page 55
GD71
123 of 325
(ft) (k) (k) (k) (k) (k)
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
1 0 0.00 12.25 19.72 15.31 < 290.00 > 41.83

1 1 3.93 9.80 16.53 12.25 < 290.00 > 34.60
1 2 7.87 7.35 13.34 9.19 < 290.00 > 27.37
1 3 11.80 4.90 12.53 6.13 < 290.00 > 23.69
1 4 15.73 2.45 10.53 3.06 < 290.00 > 18.25
1 5 19.67 0.00 8.54 0.00 < 290.00 > 12.81
1 6 23.60 2.45 10.53 3.06 < 290.00 > 18.25
1 7 27.53 4.90 12.53 6.13 < 290.00 > 23.69
1 8 31.47 7.35 13.34 9.19 < 290.00 > 27.37
1 9 35.40 9.80 16.53 12.25 < 290.00 > 34.60
1 10 39.33 12.25 19.72 15.31 < 290.00 > 41.83
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
NOTE: This table checks Art. 6.10.3.3 and Art. 6.10.5.3.
Vcr is the shear‐buckling resistance determined from Eq. 6.10.9.3.3‐1.
* f*(DL)
If default, load factor f=1.25 is used.
** (DL)+f*FATIGUE LOAD
If default, Fatigue I load factor f=1.5 is used.
1
MERLIN V 10.6
CODE CHECK
Beam\Design\East
TABLE 1.2.22.21=SERVICE LIMIT STATE CHECK

*************************
SP IN D FROM TOP FLANGE BOT. FLANGE

COMP. FLG
ff ff+fl/2
[1] RATIO1 ff+fl/2 [2] RATIO2
fc fcrw FLAG
NO NO L SUPT [3] TBC
(ft) (ksi) (ksi) (ksi) (ksi) (ksi) (ksi) (ksi)
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
1 0 0.00 0.0 ‐ 47.5 0.000 0.0 47.5 0.000 ‐ ‐ 00‐

1 1 3.93 3.2 ‐ 47.5 0.068 9.8 47.5 0.207 ‐ ‐ 00‐
1 2 7.87 5.7 ‐ 47.5 0.121 17.0 47.5 0.359 ‐ ‐ 00‐
1 3 11.80 7.5 ‐ 47.5 0.158 21.7 47.5 0.456 ‐ ‐ 00‐
1 4 15.73 8.6 ‐ 47.5 0.180 24.2 47.5 0.510 ‐ ‐ 00‐
1 5 19.67 8.9 ‐ 47.5 0.188 24.5 47.5 0.517 ‐ ‐ 00‐
1 6 23.60 8.6 ‐ 47.5 0.180 24.2 47.5 0.510 ‐ ‐ 00‐
1 7 27.53 7.5 ‐ 47.5 0.158 21.7 47.5 0.456 ‐ ‐ 00‐
Page 56
GD72
124 of 325
1 8 31.47 5.7 ‐ 47.5 0.121 17.0 47.5 0.359 ‐ ‐ 00‐
1 9 35.40 3.2 ‐ 47.5 0.068 9.8 47.5 0.207 ‐ ‐ 00‐
1 10 39.33 0.0 ‐ 47.5 0.000 0.0 47.5 0.000 ‐ ‐ 00‐
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
1
CODE CHECK
Beam\Design\East
NOTE: [1] = 0.95RhFyf for composite sections (Eq. 6.10.4.2.2‐1)

= 0.80RhFyf for non‐composite sections (Eq. 6.10.4.2.2‐3)
[2] = 0.95RhFyf for composite sections (Eq. 6.10.4.2.2‐2)
[3] = 0.9Ek / (D/tw)^2 (Eq. 6.10.1.9.1‐1)
but not to exceed the smaller of RhFyc and Fyw/0.7
k = bending‐buckling coefficient
= 9 / (Dc/D)^2 (Eq. 6.10.1.9.1‐2)
where:
Dc = depth of the web in compression in the elastic
range. For composite sections, Dc shall be
determined as specified in Article D6.3.1
"‐" is N.A.
Flag check ‐ 0 = OK; 1 = NG

T = Top Flange; B = Bottom Flange; C = Comp. Flange
The values of fl shall be determined based on

RATIO1 = ff / [1] or (ff + fl/2) / [1] (top flange)

RATIO2 = (ff + fl/2 ) / [2] (bot. flange)
1
CODE CHECK
Beam\Design\East
TABLE 1.2.22.23.1=FATIGUE I STRESS RANGE FOR INFINITE LIFE (FACTORED)

****************************************
Page 57
GD73
125 of 325
(1) Main (Longitudinal) Load Carrying Members
(2) Road Type = I ‐‐‐ Rural Interstate

‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
TOP OF TOP FLANGE BOTTOM OF BOTTOM FLANGE

‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
SP IN D FROM GOVERN. STRESS ACCEPTABLE GOVERN. STRESS ACCEPTABLE
NO NO L SUPT LOADING RANGE STRESS LOADING RANGE STRESS
(ft) (ksi) CATEGORY (ksi) CATEGORY
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
1 0 0.00 TR 0.0 A B B^C^C D E E^ TR 0.0 A B B^C^C D E E^

1 1 3.93 TR 0.0 A B B^C^C D E E^ TR 2.6 A B B^C^C D E
1 3 11.80 TR ‐0.1 A B B^C^C D E E^ TR 6.0 A B B^C^C D
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
NOTE: Negative sign means live load stresses all in compression or the permanent
load compressive stress more than twice the max. live load tensile stress.
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
NOTE: TR = Truck loading; LRFD Fatigue I Limit State with 1.5 load factor.
Design for Infinite Life
NOTE: ITEM ; INT = Span interval point

SCG = Section‐change point
POC = Dead load point of contraflexure
I:P = Point where INT coincides with POC

I:C = Point where INT coincides with SCG
S:P = Point where SCG coincides with POC
1
CODE CHECK
Page 58
GD74
126 of 325
Beam\Design\East
TABLE 1.2.22.23.2=FATIGUE II STRESS RANGE FOR FINITE LIFE (FACTORED)

***************************************

‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐

‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐

‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
NOTE: TR = Truck loading; LRFD Fatigue II Limit State with 0.75 load factor.
Design for Finite Life w/ ADTT Single Lane= 153 & No. of Cycles= 8376750
* If ADTT Single Lane greater than or equal to 960, refer to Fatigue I Table.


1
Page 59
GD75
127 of 325
CODE CHECK
Beam\Design\East
TABLE 1.2.22.24.1=SHEAR CONNECTOR (FATIGUE CRITERIA) FATIGUE I (FACTORED)

********************************************
AASHTO E6.10.10.1.2 AASHTO LRFD Eqn. SHEAR CONN. MAX. ALLOW.

SP IN D FROM ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ 6.10.10.2‐1 PER TRANS. SHEAR CONN.
NO NO L SUPT Vf Q/I Vsr ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ SECTION ‐‐‐PITCH‐‐‐‐
(ft) [1] [2] [3] [4],Zr <‐‐Input [5], input (in),[6]
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
1 0 0.00 29.6 .42693E‐01 1.3 TR 4.21 2 6.67

1 1 3.93 27.2 .42693E‐01 1.2 TR 4.21 2 7.26
1 2 7.87 24.8 .42693E‐01 1.1 TR 4.21 2 7.96
1 3 11.80 26.0 .42693E‐01 1.1 TR 4.21 2 7.60
1 4 15.73 25.6 .42693E‐01 1.1 TR 4.21 2 7.70
1 5 19.67 25.6 .42693E‐01 1.1 TR 4.21 2 7.70
1 6 23.60 25.6 .42693E‐01 1.1 TR 4.21 2 7.70
1 7 27.53 26.0 .42693E‐01 1.1 TR 4.21 2 7.60
1 8 31.47 24.8 .42693E‐01 1.1 TR 4.21 2 7.96
1 9 35.40 27.2 .42693E‐01 1.2 TR 4.21 2 7.26
1 10 39.33 29.6 .42693E‐01 1.3 TR 4.21 2 6.67
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
1
CODE CHECK
Beam\Design\East
NOTE: [1] Vf = range of shear due to live loads and impact in Kips; at any
section, the range of shear shall be taken as the difference
in the minimum and maximum shear envelopes (excluding dead
loads); AASHTO LRFD Eqn.6.10.10.1.2‐2
[2] Q/I : Q= statical moment about the neutral axis of the composite
Page 60
GD76
128 of 325
section of the transformed compressive concrete area or
the area of reinforcement embedded in the concrete for
negative moment, in cubic inches; AASHTO LRFD
Eqn.6.10.10.1.2‐3
I= moment of inertia of the transformed composite girder in

positive moment regions or the moment of inertia provided
by the steel beam including or excluding the area of
reinforcement embedded in the concrete in negative moment
regions, in inches to the fourth power.
[3] Vsr = range of horizontal shear, in Kips per inches, at the junction
of the slab and girder at the point in the span under
consideration.
= SQRT(Vfat^2 + Ffat^2) (Eq. 6.10.10.1.2‐2)
Vfat = Vf*Q/I (Eq. 6.10.10.1.2‐3)
Ffat = radial fatigue shear range per unit length
= Ffat2 = Frc/w for skews exceeding 20 degrees
Frc = 25.0 kips for both exterior and interior girders
w = the effective length of the deck
= 48 inches except at end supports where w is taken
as 24 inches
[4] Zr = allowable range of horizontal shear, in Kips, on an individual

connector, AASHTO LRFD Eqn.6.10.10.2‐1 for Fatigue I
[5] No. of shear connectors per transverse section. This value is from
input data type 12032.
[6] Maximum allowable pitch = 24 inches, AASHTO LRFD ART. 6.10.10.1.2
** The connector spacing shown here is calculated based upon

AASHTO Fatigue Combinations I where ADTT Single Lane= 153
*** If ADTT Single Lane is less than 960, use Fatigue II Table.
1
CODE CHECK
Beam\Design\East
TABLE 1.2.22.24.2=SHEAR CONNECTOR (FATIGUE CRITERIA) FATIGUE II (FACTORED)

*********************************************

Page 61
GD77
129 of 325
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
1 0 0.00 14.8 .42693E‐01 0.6 TR 3.73 2 11.81

1 1 3.93 13.6 .42693E‐01 0.6 TR 3.73 2 12.85
1 2 7.87 12.4 .42693E‐01 0.5 TR 3.73 2 14.09
1 3 11.80 13.0 .42693E‐01 0.6 TR 3.73 2 13.45
1 4 15.73 12.8 .42693E‐01 0.5 TR 3.73 2 13.63
1 5 19.67 12.8 .42693E‐01 0.5 TR 3.73 2 13.63
1 6 23.60 12.8 .42693E‐01 0.5 TR 3.73 2 13.63
1 7 27.53 13.0 .42693E‐01 0.6 TR 3.73 2 13.45
1 8 31.47 12.4 .42693E‐01 0.5 TR 3.73 2 14.09
1 9 35.40 13.6 .42693E‐01 0.6 TR 3.73 2 12.85
1 10 39.33 14.8 .42693E‐01 0.6 TR 3.73 2 11.81
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
1
CODE CHECK
Beam\Design\East
Eqn.6.10.10.1.2‐3

Page 62
GD78
130 of 325
consideration.
= SQRT(Vfat^2 + Ffat^2) (Eq. 6.10.10.1.2‐2)
Vfat = Vf*Q/I (Eq. 6.10.10.1.2‐3)
as 24 inches

connector, AASHTO LRFD Eqn.6.10.10.2‐2 for Fatigue II
* Default ALPHA value based on 7/8" diameter and input road type

AASHTO Fatigue Combination II. For II, see AASHTO 6.10.10.1.2
where ADTT Single Lane= 153 & No. of Cycles= 8376750
*** If ADTT Single Lane greater than or equal to 960, refer
to Fatigue I Table.
1
CODE CHECK
Beam\Design\East
TABLE 1.2.22.24A=SHEAR CONNECTOR (STRENGTH LIMIT STATE)

**************************************
MOMENT
REGION P2p,1n P1p P2n NO OF SHEAR SEE NOTE STATUS
SP IN D FROM ‐‐‐‐‐‐ ‐‐‐‐‐ ‐‐‐‐‐ ‐‐‐‐‐‐ CONNECTOR ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
NO NO L SUPT 1=POS. (k) (k) (k) N(PER ZONE) <=> N1 N2 BLANK=OK
(ft) 0=NEG. LRFD 6.10.10.4.2 FATIG. CRI. CHECK=**
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
1 5 19.67 1 1175.0 1346.4 44 > 38

1 10 39.33 1 1175.0 1346.4 44 > 38
Page 63
GD79
131 of 325
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
Please read NOTE on the Following Page
1
CODE CHECK
Beam\Design\East
Strength Limit State (Article 6.10.10.4)
[1] The number of shear connectors provided between the

section of maximum positive moment and each adjacent
point of 0.0 moment, or between each adjacent point
of 0.0 moment and centerline of an interior support
shall be checked to ensure that adequate connectors
are provided for Strength Limit State.
[2] The number of shear connectors required equal or exceed

the number given by the formula :
N1 (N2) = P / Qr ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ (Eq. 6.10.10.4.1‐2)

Where
N1 = Number of connectors between points of maximum
positive moment and each adjacent point of 0.0 moment
N2 = number of connectors between each adjacent point of
0.0 moment and the centerline of an interior support
P = total nominal horizontal shear force
Qr = factored shear resistance of one shear connector
= (Phi)sc Qn ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ (Eq. 6.10.10.4.1‐1)
Qn = nominal shear resistance
(Phi)sc = resistance factor for shear connectors
[3] The total horizontal shear force between the point of

maximum positive moment and each adjacent point of 0.0 moment
shall be the lesser either:
P1p = 0.85 f'c bs ts ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ (Eq. 6.10.10.4.2‐2)

or
P2p,1n = Fyw D tw + Fyt bft tft + Fyc bfc tfc (Eq. 6.10.10.4.2‐3,7)
Where
f'c = specified 28‐day compressive strength of the concrete
bs = effective width of the slab
Page 64
GD80
132 of 325
bfc = width of compression flange
bft = width of tension flange
ts = slab thickness
Fyw = specified minimum yield strength of the web
Fyt = specified minimum yield strength of the tension flange
Fyc = specified minimum yield strength of the compression flange
D = web depth
tft = thickness of tension flange
tfc = thickness of compression flange
tw = web thickness
[4] For continuous‐span composite sections, the total horizontal

shear force between each adjacent point of 0.0 moment
and the centerline of an interior support shall be taken as:
P2n = 0.45 f'c bs ts‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ (Eq. 6.10.10.4.2‐8)

Where
bs = effective width of the concrete deck
ts = thickness of a concrete deck
[5] If ADTT Single Lane is greater than 960, the pitch from Fatigue I will be
used.
If ADTT Single Lane is less than 960, the pitch should use Fatigue II.
1
CODE CHECK
Beam\Design\East
TABLE 1.2.22.24B=RECOMMENDED SHEAR CONNECTOR REQUIRED PITCH

******************************************
SPAN CURRENT SPAN REQUIRED

NO. FROM TO PITCH
(ft) (ft) (in)
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
1 0.000 19.667 11.000
1 19.667 39.333 11.000
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
1
Page 65
GD81
133 of 325
CODE CHECK
Beam\Design\East
TABLE 1.2.22.24C=TENSION‐COMPRESSION‐REVERSAL AREAS

**********************************
SPAN CURRENT SPAN T

NO. FROM TO C
(ft) (ft) R
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
1 0.0 39.3 C
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
NOTE: T: TENSION AREA, C: COMPRESSION AREA,

R: REVERSAL AREA BASED ON TOTAL TOP FLANGE
STRESSES
1
CODE CHECK
Beam\Design\East
TABLE 1.2.22.29=SPLICE DESIGN AT SECTION CHANGE POINTS

**************************************
Assumption: 1. Plate design is based on the average of the calculated design

stress and the allowable stress at the point of the splice
but no less than 75% of the allowable stress.
2. Web splice is proportioned for shear, moment due to eccentricity
of the shear and the portion of the flexural
moment resisted by the web. Min. shear of 1.5V or average.
3. The bolt design is based on the capacity. Designer should check
the need of staggering to satisfy the requirement of net areas.
1
CODE CHECK
Page 66
GD82
134 of 325
Beam\Design\East
TABLE 1.2.22.30=BEARING STIFFENERS

******************
SUP. NO. MAT'L. SIZE WELDING

(INCH or mm)
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
1 2 A709 GR. 50 4.00 X 0.4375 X 20.0 5/16
2 2 A709 GR. 50 4.00 X 0.4375 X 20.0 5/16
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
Please see LRFD Art. 6.10.11.2

1
MERLIN V 10.6
CODE CHECK
Beam\Design\East
TABLE 1.2.30.1=CODE CHECK STATUS SUMMARY

*************************
STATUS TABLE NO.

‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
OK 1.2.8.2=MAXIMUM LIVE LOAD DEFLECTION FOR COMPOSITE CONSTRUCTION
OK 1.2.22.4=DEPTH RATIOS
OK 1.2.22.10=CONSTRUCTIBILITY CHECK
OK 1.2.22.14=STRENGTH LIMIT STATE CHECK
OK 1.2.22.17=TRANSVERSE STIFFENER SPACING
OK 1.2.22.21=SERVICE LIMIT STATE CHECK
MORE TABLES TO BE INSPECTED ...
1.2.22.23A=FATIGUE STRESS RANGE FOR TRUCK (UNFACTORED)

Page 67
GD83
135 of 325
1.2.22.24=SHEAR CONNECTOR (FATIGUE CRITERIA) (UNFACTORED)
1.2.22.24A=SHEAR CONNECTOR (ULTIMATE STRENGTH CRITERIA)
1.2.22.29=SPLICE DESIGN AT SECTION CHANGE POINTS
Page 68
GD84
136 of 325
EXTERIOR GIRDER DESIGN OUTPUT
GD85
GD84
137 of 325
East Kingston Ext Beam
1
**************************************
* *
* BRIDGE ENGINEERING SOFTWARE CENTER *
* DEPARTMENT OF CIVIL ENGINEERING *
* UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND *
* *
**************************************
COPYRIGHT NOTICE AND DISCLAIMER

‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
1. NOTICE : COPYRIGHT 1985‐2013 THE UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND,

BRIDGE ENGINEERING SOFTWARE CENTER.
2. DISCLAIMER : THE SOFTWARE IS A PROPRIETARY PRODUCT OF

THE UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND, BRIDGE ENGINEERING
SOFTWARE CENTER AND ONLY CONDITIONALLY ISSUED.
POSSESSION, ACCESS AND USE IS PROHIBITED
EXCEPT AS EXPRESSLY AUTHORIZED BY THE UNIVERSITY
OF MARYLAND, BRIDGE ENGINEERING SOFTWARE CENTER.
3. WARRANTY AND LIMITATION OF LIABILITY :
(A) UMD REPRESENTS THAT TO THE BEST OF ITS KNOWLEDGE, THE

LICENSED MATERIALS DO NOT INFRINGE ANY COPYRIGHT, TRADE
SECRET OR PATENT.
(B) THE SELECTION OF APPROPRIATE SOFTWARE, THE COLLECTION

AND STORAGE OF DATA, AND THE INTERPRETATION OF OUTPUT
ARE LICENSEE'S RESPONSIBILITY, AND NOT UMD'S RESPONSIBILITY.
THE LICENSED MATERIALS ARE ONLY TO BE USED AS A TOOL
AND NOT AS A SUBSTITUTE FOR LICENSEE'S PROFESSIONAL
JUDGMENT.
(C) THE LICENSED MATERIALS WERE FORMERLY OWNED AND DEVELOPED

WITH THE ASSISTANCE OF THE STATE HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION
OF THE MARYLAND DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION ("MDOT").
THE LICENSED MATERIALS ARE MADE AVAILABLE ON AN "AS IS"
BASIS. EXCEPT AS EXPRESSLY SET FORTH IN THIS AGREEMENT,
BOTH UMD AND MDOT DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL PROMISES,
REPRESENTATIONS AND WARRANTIES BOTH EXPRESS AND IMPLIED
WITH RESPECT TO THE LICENSED MATERIALS AND ANY SUPPORT
SERVICES PROVIDED HEREUNDER, INCLUDING THEIR CONDITION,
CONFORMITY TO ANY REPRESENTATION OR DESCRIPTION, THE
Page 1
GD86
138 of 325
EXISTENCE OF ANY LATENT OR PATENT DEFECTS THEREIN,
AND THEIR MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR
USE OR PURPOSE.
(D) THE CUMULATIVE LIABILITY OF UMD TO LICENSEE FOR ALL

CLAIMS, DEMANDS OR ACTIONS ARISING OUT OF OR RELATING
TO THE LICENSED MATERIALS AND THIS AGREEMENT, SHALL
NOT EXCEED THE TOTAL AMOUNT OF ALL LICENSE FEES PAID
TO UMD HEREUNDER DURING THE TWELVE (12) MONTHS
IMMEDIATELY PRECEDING SUCH CLAIM, DEMAND OR ACTION.
THIS LIMITATION OF LIABILITY IS INTENDED TO APPLY
WITHOUT REGARD TO WHICH OTHER PROVISIONS OF THIS
AGREEMENT HAVE BEEN BREACHED OR HAVE PROVEN INEFFECTIVE.
(E) WITHOUT LIMITING THE FOREGOING, IN NO EVENT SHALL UMD

BE LIABLE FOR ANY BUSINESS EXPENSE, MACHINE DOWN TIME,
LOSS OF PROFITS, ANY INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL, EXEMPLARY OR
CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES, OR ANY CLAIMS OR DEMANDS BROUGHT
AGAINST LICENSEE OR LICENSEE'S CUSTOMERS, EVEN IF
UMD HAS BEEN ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH CLAIMS
OR DEMANDS. THIS LIMITATION UPON DAMAGES AND CLAIMS IS
INTENDED TO APPLY WITHOUT REGARD TO WHICH OTHER
PROVISIONS OF THIS AGREEMENT HAVE BEEN BREACHED OR
HAVE PROVEN INEFFECTIVE.
1
INPUT
Beam\Design\East
TABLE 0.0.1.1 PROJECT DATA

************
DESCRIPTION DATE
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ ‐‐‐‐
9/8/2016
CONTRACT NUMBER STR NO STR UNIT DES CHK SPECS. USED

‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ ‐‐‐‐‐‐ ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ ‐BY‐ ‐BY‐ ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
17960.08 061 / 064 SIW RLJ LRFD
Page 2
GD87
139 of 325
TABLE 0.0.1.2 GENERAL PROGRAM OPTIONS

***********************
OUTPUT SPAN CONSTRUCTION ANALYSIS CODE PROGRAM

LEVEL INTERVAL ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ FLOW
(0,1) (MAX=20) 1= COMPOSITE CODE YEAR UNIT DESIGN CONTROL
2= NONCOMP. ID TYPE OPTION
‐‐‐‐‐‐ ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
1 10 1 AASHTO 2012 0 2 2
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
* output level : 0 = basic output

1 = detailed output
* span interval : maximum = 20

default = 10
* structural type : 1 = composite (default)

2 = noncomposite
3 = reinforced concrete
4 = prestressed concrete
* type of unit : 0 = English (default)

1 = Metric
2 = Metric input English output
3 = English input Metric output
* design option : 0 = WSD (default)

1 = LFD
2 = LRFD
* program flow : 0 = DL analysis only

1 = DL + LL analysis
2 = code check
3 = rating
4 = design
5 = design + code check
6 = design + recycle + code check
7 = DL stage only
8 = DL stage + LL
* EFFECTIVE FLANGE WITH OPTION = 0

0 ‐ DEFAULT (2008)
1 ‐ "PRIOR TO 2007" WIDTH IS USED
1
Page 3
GD88
140 of 325
MERLIN V 10.6
INPUT
Beam\Design\East
TABLE 0.0.3.1 STRUCTURAL DETAILS

******************
BEAM WIDTH EDGE OF COMPOSITE STEEL

RIGHT R. EDGE OF
POSITION BETWEEN OVERHANG SLAB TO HAUNCH PERCENTAGE LOAD
OVERHANG SLAB TO
NUMBER ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ CURBS OR WIDTH CURB ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ AT NEG MOM DETAIL
WIDTH CURB
OF 1=INT. BARRIER ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ DEPTH WIDTH. REGION FACTOR
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
GIRDERS 2,3=EXT. (ft) (ft) (ft) (in) (in) (%) >= 1.0
(ft) (ft)
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
8 2 28.17 2.08 2.00 0.75 9.00 100.00 1.05

0.00 0.00
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
* WIDTH BETWEEN CURBS OR BARRIERS (ROAD WIDTH) is used for the
determination of traffic lanes
* The section properties with composite percentage at negative

moment region is calculated by using the linear interpolation
between the noncomposite section (N=Inf.) and 100% composite for the
analysis at negative moment region.
* DETAIL FACTOR is used for the steel dead load only
* EXT=2 for the same left and right exterior overhang information or
only left exterior overhang information
* EXT=3 for the right exterior overhang information
Page 4
GD89
141 of 325
TABLE 0.0.3.2 SPAN LENGTHS ‐‐‐ in feet

************************
‐‐‐‐‐‐,‐‐‐‐‐‐,‐‐‐‐‐‐,‐‐‐‐‐‐,‐‐‐‐‐‐,‐‐‐‐‐‐,‐‐‐‐‐‐,‐‐‐‐‐‐,‐‐‐‐‐‐,‐‐‐‐‐‐,
39.33 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
TABLE 0.0.3.4 BEAM SPACING ‐‐‐ in feet

************************
‐‐‐‐‐‐,‐‐‐‐‐‐,‐‐‐‐‐‐,‐‐‐‐‐‐,‐‐‐‐‐‐,‐‐‐‐‐‐,‐‐‐‐‐‐,‐‐‐‐‐‐,‐‐‐‐‐‐,‐‐‐‐‐‐,
4.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
1
INPUT
Beam\Design\East
TABLE 0.0.4.1 DEFINITION OF SECTIONS

**********************
ROLLED SECTIONS WITH

STANDARD SECTN PLATE GIRDER COVER PLATES OR REINFORCED
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ PLATE GIRDERS ... (in) CONCRETE SECTION
SECTION NOMINAL WEIGHT WEB WEB ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ DEPTH ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ DEPTH THICK. TOP PLATE BOT. PLATE AREA Ix
NO. ID. (in) (lb/ft) (in) WIDTH THICK. WIDTH THICK. (in**2) (in**4)
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
1 PG 20.0 0.5000 9.00 0.7500 9.00 0.7500
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
NOTE: [1] maximum allowable section number is 70
Page 5
GD90
142 of 325
[2] For design option (flow 4, 5 or 6) this card need not be input
1
INPUT
Beam\Design\East
TABLE 0.0.5.1 DEFINITION OF MEMBERS

*********************
MEMBER MEMB END MEMBER DESCRIPTN PARAMETERS FOR YIELD STRESS

NUMBER SECT ID ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ NONPRISMATIC MEMB (KSI)
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ LNGTH ‐‐>TYPE<‐‐ ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
(IN ORDER) LEFT RIGHT (ft) 0=PRISMAT S(0) S(1) WEB TOP BOT
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
1 1 1 39.33 50. 50. 50.
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
NOTE: [1] maximum allowable member number is 70.
[2] For design process (flow 4, 5 or 6) this card need not

be input
[3] For hybrid section, yield stress defined here will override
DATA TYPE 13012 for code checking
1
INPUT
Beam\Design\East
TABLE 0.0.6.1 AASHTO LIVE LOADING ‐ LOAD TYPE (A)

************************************
AASHTO LOADING TANDEM LIVE LOAD AASHTO ROAD TYPE SIDEWALK

Page 6
GD91
143 of 325
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ 1,2,3 OR 4‐‐‐‐‐‐ ‐‐‐LIVE LOAD‐‐‐
HL ‐ 93 1=YES : 0=NO ADTT ADTTSL (k/ft)
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
HL‐93 0 1 180 153 0.00
HL‐93 VEHICLE X FACTOR OF 0.00
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
NOTE: * Road types 1, 2, 3 and 4 are used for fatigue check.
* Road type 1 is Rural Interstate. 2 is Urban Interstate.

3 is Other Rural. 4 is Other Urban.
truck on the bridge distributed to the girders as designated
in AASHTO LRFD Art.4.6.2.2 for one traffic lane loading.
For Fatigue, Fraction of Truck, p, is based on the Road Types.
Ref. AASHTO LRFD Table C3.6.1.4.2.1.
* Default road type = 1
* Sidewalk live loading is assumed taken by exterior girder only
* HL‐93 is for both truck(s) + lane and tandem(s) + lane loading,

as per 3.6.1.3.1.
* ADTT used in this calculation is 180

1
INPUT
Beam\Design\East
TABLE 0.0.10.1 SLAB LOAD DEFINITION

********************
SLAB MODULAR RATIO SLAB LOAD DATA

LOAD IDENTIFICATION DESIGN DEPTH POUR ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ DAY N1=3n N2=n INTENSITY POSITION
LOAD POUR DESCRIPTION INITIAL FINAL FROM TO
NO NO (in) (in) N1 N2 (k/ft) (ft) (ft)
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
Page 7
GD92
144 of 325
1 0 8.2 0 21.0 7.0 0.47 0.00 39.33
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
AASHTO Art.10.38.1.3 or LRFD Art.6.10.1.1.1b
The ratio of the moduli of elasticity of steel (29000 ksi) to those

of normal weight concrete (W=145 pcf) of various design strength shall
be as follows:
fc' = unit ultimate compressive strength of concrete as determined

by cylinder tests at the age of 28 days in pounds per square inch.
n = ratio of modulus of elasticity of steel to that of concrete.

1
MERLIN V 10.6
INPUT
Beam\Design\East
TABLE 0.0.11.1 DEFINITION OF UNIFORM AND CONCENTRATED LOADS

********************************************
LOAD IDENTIFICATION UNIFROM LOAD DATA CONCENTRATED LOAD DATA

‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
LOAD DESCRIPTION INTENSITY POSITION INTENSITY DISTANCE
NO. TYPE FROM TO FROM L SUPT
(k/ft) (ft) (Kips) (ft)
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
1 2 Brush Curb 0.087 0.00 39.33 0.00 0.00
2 1 SDL 0.022 0.00 39.33 0.00 0.00
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
Page 8
GD93
145 of 325
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐

1
INPUT
Beam\Design\East
TABLE 0.0.12.3 SHEAR CONNECTOR AND SLAB REINFORCEMENT DATA

*******************************************
SHEAR CONNECTOR Qn VALUE Zr VALUE SLAB REINFORCEMENT CONCRETE

‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
CONNECTOR AASHTO ART. AASHTO ART. REBAR BAR AREA DIST. COMP. COMP.
NO. DIA.IN NEGAT. 6.10.10.4 6.10.10.2 YIELD PER FOOT FROM STRENG. ALLOW
PER M. REGION ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ (kip / per STRESS OF SLAB TOP AT 28 ‐ABLE
TRAN. 0=NO (kip / per connector) Fy ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ ‐‐‐‐‐ DAYS ‐‐‐‐‐
SEC (in) 1=YES connect.) Truck Lane (ksi) (in**2) (in) (ksi) (ksi)
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
2 0.875 0 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.00 4.00 0.00
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
NOTE: Qr = nominal resistance of the shear connector
= (phi)sc x Qn
... see AASHTO LRFD Eqs.6.10.10.4.1‐1,4.3‐1 or 4.3‐2
Zr = shear fatigue resistance of an individual shear connector

... see AASHTO LRFD Eqs.6.10.10.2‐1 & ‐2
fc' = unit ultimate compressive strength of concrete as

determined by cylinder test at the age of 28 days
= 4 ksi (default)
Page 9
GD94
146 of 325
fc = allowable compressive strength of concrete

= 0.85fc' (default)
* default number of shear connector per trans. section = 3
* If the shear connectors and slab reinforcements are supplied

in the negative moment region, the contribution
of rebar on the section properties in the negative moment
region (for N = 3n & N = n) will be considered.
* If Zr left blank, Road type input in Data 06012 and

7/8"‐diameter studs are assumed
* default rebar yield stress = 60 ksi

1
INPUT
Beam\Design\East
TABLE 0.0.13.1 YIELD STRESS (Fy) AND LATERAL BRACING DATA (lb)
***********************************************
L O C A T I O N YIELD SPACING
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ STRESS OF LATERAL BRACING
DISTANCE DISTANCE ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
FROM TO Fy Fy (WEB) Lb
(ft) (ft) (ksi) (ksi) (ft)
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
0.00 19.67 50.0 50.0 19.67
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
NOTE: [1] default Fy = 36 ksi
[2] default spacing of lateral bracing = 25 feet
Please refer to AASHTO LRFD Art. 6.7.4 for requirement.
[3] The spacing of lateral bracing is also assumed to

be the diaphragm spacing which is used for the
Page 10
GD95
147 of 325
calculation of wind effect (code check only).
1
ANALYSIS
Beam\Design\East
TABLE 1.2.1.1=PROGRAM ASSUMPTIONS

*******************
NO. D E S C R I P T I O N S
‐‐‐‐‐ ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
1 Small deflection theory
2 Material is elastic
3 Beam length is much greater than lateral dimensions
4 Torsional effects are neglected
5 Shear deformations are neglected
6 Two kinematic degree‐of‐freedom are assumed 'at each

joint (vertical deflection and bending rotation)
7 Concentrated joint loads
8 Uniform member loads
9 Transformed sections are used for composite sections

.... see AASHTO Art.10.38.1.4 or LRFD Art.6.10.1.1.1b
10 Sections symmetrical about vertical, principal axis
11 Unshored construction
12 Hinged bridge ends
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
F A C T O R S U S E D B Y L R F D
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
13 GAMMA for Load DC maximum = 1.25
Page 11
GD96
148 of 325
14 GAMMA for Load DC minimum = 0.90
17 GAMMA for LL Load Strength I = 1.75
18 GAMMA for LL Load Strength II = 1.35
19 GAMMA for LL Load Service I = 1.00
20 GAMMA for LL Load Service II = 1.30
21 GAMMA for LL Load Fatigue = 0.75
22 ETA for Service Limit State = 1.00
23 ETA for Strength Limit State = 1.00
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
1
ANALYSIS
Beam\Design\East
TABLE 1.2.2.1=LOADING INFORMATION

*******************
AVERAGE DEAD LOAD INTENSITIES

*****************************
SPAN SLAB + STEEL = TOTAL

NO. (K/FT) (K/FT) (K/FT)
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
1 0.475 0.0840 0.5590
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
Page 12
GD97
149 of 325
SUPERIMPOSED DEAD LOADS
***********************
LOAD INTENSITY DIST DIST

FROM TO
(K or K/Ft) (Ft) (Ft)
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
1 DC2 0.022 0.000 39.333
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
1
ANALYSIS
Beam\Design\East
TABLE 1.1.3.1=BRIDGE SUPERSTRUCTURE QUANTITIES

********************************
C O N C R E T E D E C K S T E E L SUPERSTRUCTURE
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ TOTAL WEIGHT
V O L U M E TOTAL TOTAL ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
UNIT WEIGHT ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ WEIGHT WEIGHT (kip)
(pcf) (ft**3) (yard**3) (kip) (kip)
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
150.00 869.8 32.2 130.5 26.4 156.89
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
NOTE: [1] Concrete unit weight assumed to be 150. lb/ft**3
[2] Superimposed dead load not included
[3] Dead load detail factor for steel beam = 1.05 is included.
TABLE 1.1.3.1A=BRIDGE SPACING AND EFFECTIVE WIDTH

**********************************
SPAN SPACING EFF. WIDTH

Page 13
GD98
150 of 325
NO. (ft) (in)
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
1 4.00 48.00
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
1
ANALYSIS
Beam\Design\East
TABLE 1.1.3.2=DISTRIBUTION OF LRFD LIVE LOADS

********************************
SPAN AASHTO DUMP MAXIMUM SPECIAL

NO. LOADING TRUCK TRUCK TRUCK
(A) (D) (M) (G,C)
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
1 0.378 0.378 0.378 0.378 FOR STRENGTH POSITIVE MOMENT

0.378 FOR STRENGTH POSITIVE SHEAR
1 0.314 FOR FATIGUE POSITIVE MOMENT
0.314 FOR FATIGUE POSITIVE SHEAR
1
ANALYSIS
Beam\Design\East
TABLE 1.2.4.1=NONCOMPOSITE SECTION PROPERTIES FOR N=INFINITY

**********************************************
MOMENT OF WEB LOCATION OF N.A. ELASTIC SECTION MODULUS

SP IN D FROM INERTIA DEPTH FROM BOT OF STEEL ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
NO NO L SUPT ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ STEEL
(ft) Ix D Y(BS) BOT. TOP.
(in**4) (in) (in) (in**3)
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
Page 14
GD99
151 of 325
1 0 0.00 1787.1 20.0 10.75 166.2 166.2

1 1 3.93 1787.1 20.0 10.75 166.2 166.2
1 2 7.87 1787.1 20.0 10.75 166.2 166.2
1 3 11.80 1787.1 20.0 10.75 166.2 166.2
1 4 15.73 1787.1 20.0 10.75 166.2 166.2
1 5 19.67 1787.1 20.0 10.75 166.2 166.2
1 6 23.60 1787.1 20.0 10.75 166.2 166.2
1 7 27.53 1787.1 20.0 10.75 166.2 166.2
1 8 31.47 1787.1 20.0 10.75 166.2 166.2
1 9 35.40 1787.1 20.0 10.75 166.2 166.2
1 10 39.33 1787.1 20.0 10.75 166.2 166.2
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
NOTE: For rolled section, the 5th column is the depth d (inch)
1
ANALYSIS
Beam\Design\East

******************************************

(ft) Ix OF INERTIA ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
1 0 0.00 4209.0 0.037261 242.3 1019.7 340.0

1 1 3.93 4209.0 0.037261 242.3 1019.7 340.0
1 2 7.87 4209.0 0.037261 242.3 1019.7 340.0
1 3 11.80 4209.0 0.037261 242.3 1019.7 340.0
1 4 15.73 4209.0 0.037261 242.3 1019.7 340.0
1 5 19.67 4209.0 0.037261 242.3 1019.7 340.0
1 6 23.60 4209.0 0.037261 242.3 1019.7 340.0
1 7 27.53 4209.0 0.037261 242.3 1019.7 340.0
1 8 31.47 4209.0 0.037261 242.3 1019.7 340.0
1 9 35.40 4209.0 0.037261 242.3 1019.7 340.0
1 10 39.33 4209.0 0.037261 242.3 1019.7 340.0
Page 15
GD100
152 of 325
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
1
ANALYSIS
Beam\Design\East

******************************************

(ft) Ix OF INERTIA ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
1 0 0.00 5781.7 0.042693 272.0 24027.1 681.0

1 1 3.93 5781.7 0.042693 272.0 24027.1 681.0
1 2 7.87 5781.7 0.042693 272.0 24027.1 681.0
1 3 11.80 5781.7 0.042693 272.0 24027.1 681.0
1 4 15.73 5781.7 0.042693 272.0 24027.1 681.0
1 5 19.67 5781.7 0.042693 272.0 24027.1 681.0
1 6 23.60 5781.7 0.042693 272.0 24027.1 681.0
1 7 27.53 5781.7 0.042693 272.0 24027.1 681.0
1 8 31.47 5781.7 0.042693 272.0 24027.1 681.0
1 9 35.40 5781.7 0.042693 272.0 24027.1 681.0
1 10 39.33 5781.7 0.042693 272.0 24027.1 681.0
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
1
ANALYSIS
Beam\Design\East
NOTE [1] If the section modulus for the top flange indicates
overflows (***), the neutral axis may be very closed to
Page 16
GD101
153 of 325
the top of the top flange.
[2] The section properties shown in this table are used

for the calculation of stresses.
[3] AASHTO Art.10.38.1.6 or LRFD Art.6.10.1.1 ‐‐‐

Composite sections in simple spans and
the positive moment regions of continuous
spans should preferably be proportioned so that the
neutral axis lies below the top surface of the steel
beam. Concrete 'on the tension side of the neutral axis
shall not be considered in calculating resulting moments.
In the negative moment regions of continuous spans, only
the slab reinforcement can be considered to act
compositely with the steel beams in calculating resisting
moments. Mechanical anchorages shall be provided in the
composite regions to develop stresses on the plane
joining the concrete and the steel. Concrete on the
tension side of the neutral axis may be considered in
computing moments of inertia for deflections and for
determining stiffness factors used in calculating moments
and shears
[4] AASHTO LRFD 6.6.1.2.1 & C6.10.10.1.2 ‐‐‐ Q/I value shall be
using short‐term composite section for positeve & negative flxure.
1
ANALYSIS
Beam\Design\East
TABLE 1.2.5.1=NONCOMPOSITE DEAD LOAD MOMENTS FOR N=INFINITY (UNFACTORED)

*********************************************
DEAD LOAD TOTAL (k‐ft)

SP IN D FROM ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ CONCENTRATED UNIFORM ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
NO NO L SUPT BEAM SLAB LOADS LOADS NONCOMPOSITE
(ft) (k‐ft) (k‐ft) (k‐ft) (k‐ft) DEAD LOAD
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
1 0 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

1 1 3.93 5.8 33.1 0.0 6.1 45.0
1 2 7.87 10.4 58.8 0.0 10.8 79.9
1 3 11.80 13.6 77.2 0.0 14.1 104.9
1 4 15.73 15.6 88.2 0.0 16.2 119.9
Page 17
GD102
154 of 325
1 5 19.67 16.2 91.9 0.0 16.8 124.9
1 6 23.60 15.6 88.2 0.0 16.2 119.9
1 7 27.53 13.6 77.2 0.0 14.1 104.9
1 8 31.47 10.4 58.8 0.0 10.8 79.9
1 9 35.40 5.8 33.1 0.0 6.1 45.0
1 10 39.33 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
1
ANALYSIS
Beam\Design\East
TABLE 1.2.5.2=COMPOSITE DEAD LOAD MOMENTS FOR N = 21.00 (UNFACTORED)

*****************************************
UNIFORM OTHER TOTAL (k‐ft)

SP IN D FROM SUPERIMPOSED CONCENTRATED UNIFORM ‐‐
NO NO L SUPT DEAD LOAD LOADS LOADS COMPOSITE
(ft) (k‐ft) (k‐ft) DEAD LOAD
DW DC2 DW DC2
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
1 0 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

1 1 3.93 0.0 1.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.5
1 2 7.87 0.0 2.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.7
1 3 11.80 0.0 3.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.6
1 4 15.73 0.0 4.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 4.1
1 5 19.67 0.0 4.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 4.3
1 6 23.60 0.0 4.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 4.1
1 7 27.53 0.0 3.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.6
1 8 31.47 0.0 2.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.7
1 9 35.40 0.0 1.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.5
1 10 39.33 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
1
ANALYSIS
Page 18
GD103
155 of 325
Beam\Design\East
TABLE 1.2.5.3=COMPOSITE LIVE LOAD MOMENTS FOR N = 7.00 (UNFACTORED)

*****************************************
SIDEWALK (MAXIMUM) LL+I ,(k‐ft), LOAD TYPE= HL ‐93

SP IN D FROM ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
(ft) (k‐ft) (k‐ft) POSITIVE LOAD TYPE NEGATIVE LOAD TYPE
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
1 0 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0 HL‐93 0.0 HL‐93

1 1 3.93 0.0 0.0 111.3 HL‐93 0.0 HL‐93
1 2 7.87 0.0 0.0 190.4 HL‐93 0.0 HL‐93
1 3 11.80 0.0 0.0 237.8 HL‐93 0.0 HL‐93
1 4 15.73 0.0 0.0 263.1 HL‐93 0.0 HL‐93
1 5 19.67 0.0 0.0 262.3 HL‐93 0.0 HL‐93
1 6 23.60 0.0 0.0 263.1 HL‐93 0.0 HL‐93
1 7 27.53 0.0 0.0 237.8 HL‐93 0.0 HL‐93
1 8 31.47 0.0 0.0 190.4 HL‐93 0.0 HL‐93
1 9 35.40 0.0 0.0 111.3 HL‐93 0.0 HL‐93
1 10 39.33 0.0 0.0 0.0 HL‐93 0.0 HL‐93
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
1
ANALYSIS
Beam\Design\East
TABLE 1.2.5.3A=FATIGUE LIVE LOAD MOMENT RANGE FOR N = 7.0 (k‐ft) (UNFACTORED)
**************************************************

NO NO L SUPT ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
(ft) POS NEG RANGE
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
1 0 0.00 0. 0. 0.
1 1 3.93 47. 0. 47.
1 2 7.87 76. 0. 76.
1 3 11.80 107. 0. 107.
1 4 15.73 120. 0. 120.
1 5 19.67 122. 0. 122.
1 6 23.60 120. 0. 120.
Page 19
GD104
156 of 325
1 7 27.53 107. 0. 107.
1 8 31.47 76. 0. 76.
1 9 35.40 47. 0. 47.
1 10 39.33 0. 0. 0.
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
1
ANALYSIS
Beam\Design\East
TABLE 1.2.5.4=MOMENT SUMMARY FOR COMPOSITE CONSTRUCTION (UNFACTORED)

*****************************************
DEAD LOAD LL+I:N= 7.0 LOAD TYPE= HL ‐ 93 TOTAL MAXIMUM

‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
SP IN D FROM NON COMP. COMP. MAXIMUM GOVERN MAXIMUM GOVERN POSITIVE NEGATIVE
NO NO L SUPT N=Infin. N=21.0 POSITIVE LOAD NEGATIVE LOAD ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
(ft) (k‐ft) (k‐ft) (k‐ft) TYPE (k‐ft) TYPE (k‐ft) (k‐ft)
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
1 0 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0 HL‐93 0.0 HL‐93 0.0 0.0

1 1 3.93 45.0 1.5 111.3 HL‐93 0.0 HL‐93 157.8 46.5
1 2 7.87 79.9 2.7 190.4 HL‐93 0.0 HL‐93 273.1 82.7
1 3 11.80 104.9 3.6 237.8 HL‐93 0.0 HL‐93 346.3 108.5
1 4 15.73 119.9 4.1 263.1 HL‐93 0.0 HL‐93 387.1 124.0
1 5 19.67 124.9 4.3 262.3 HL‐93 0.0 HL‐93 391.4 129.2
1 6 23.60 119.9 4.1 263.1 HL‐93 0.0 HL‐93 387.1 124.0
1 7 27.53 104.9 3.6 237.8 HL‐93 0.0 HL‐93 346.3 108.5
1 8 31.47 79.9 2.7 190.4 HL‐93 0.0 HL‐93 273.1 82.7
1 9 35.40 45.0 1.5 111.3 HL‐93 0.0 HL‐93 157.8 46.5
1 10 39.33 0.0 0.0 0.0 HL‐93 0.0 HL‐93 0.0 0.0
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
1
ANALYSIS
Beam\Design\East
Page 20
GD105
157 of 325
TABLE 1.2.5.5=MOMENT SUMMARY FOR COMPOSITE CONSTRUCTION (LRFD)

*****************************************

NO NO L SUPT RANGE
(ft) (k‐ft) (k‐ft) (k‐ft) (k‐ft) (k‐ft) (k‐ft)
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
1 0 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

1 1 3.93 157.8 191.2 253.0 208.4 69.8 35.4
1 2 7.87 273.1 330.2 436.5 360.4 124.0 57.1
1 3 11.80 346.3 417.6 551.8 456.6 162.8 80.4
1 4 15.73 387.1 466.0 615.3 510.1 186.0 90.2
1 5 19.67 391.4 470.1 620.4 515.5 193.8 91.4
1 6 23.60 387.1 466.0 615.3 510.1 186.0 90.2
1 7 27.53 346.3 417.6 551.8 456.6 162.8 80.4
1 8 31.47 273.1 330.2 436.5 360.4 124.0 57.1
1 9 35.40 157.8 191.2 253.0 208.4 69.8 35.4
1 10 39.33 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
1
MERLIN V 10.6
ANALYSIS
Beam\Design\East
TABLE 1.2.6.1=NONCOMPOSITE DEAD LOAD SHEAR FOR N=INFINITY (UNFACTORED)

*******************************************
STEEL CONC. CONCENT. OTHER UNIFORM TOTAL NONCOMPOSITE

SPAN IN DIST FROM BEAM SLAB LOAD LOAD DEAD LOAD
NO. NO LEFT SUPT ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
(ft) (kip) (kip) (kip) (kip) (kip)
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
1 0 0.00 1.7 9.3 0.0 1.7 12.7

1 1 3.93 1.3 7.5 0.0 1.4 10.2
1 2 7.87 1.0 5.6 0.0 1.0 7.6
1 3 11.80 0.7 3.7 0.0 0.7 5.1
Page 21
GD106
158 of 325
1 4 15.73 0.3 1.9 0.0 0.3 2.5
1 5 19.67 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
1 6 23.60 ‐0.3 ‐1.9 0.0 ‐0.3 ‐2.5
1 7 27.53 ‐0.7 ‐3.7 0.0 ‐0.7 ‐5.1
1 8 31.47 ‐1.0 ‐5.6 0.0 ‐1.0 ‐7.6
1 9 35.40 ‐1.3 ‐7.5 0.0 ‐1.4 ‐10.2
1 10 39.33 ‐1.7 ‐9.3 0.0 ‐1.7 ‐12.7
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
1
MERLIN V 10.6
ANALYSIS
Beam\Design\East
TABLE 1.2.6.2=NONCOMPOSITE AND COMPOSITE DEAD LOAD SHEAR SUMMARY (UNFACTORED)

**************************************************
COMPOSITE (k) TOTAL TOTAL

SP IN D FROM ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ DEAD LOADS
NO NO L SUPT UNIFORM CONCENTRATED COMPOSITE NONCOMPOSITE ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
(ft) LOADS LOADS (k) (k)
DW DC2 DW DC2
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
1 0 0.00 0.0 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.4 12.7 13.1

1 1 3.93 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.3 10.2 10.5
1 2 7.87 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.3 7.6 7.9
1 3 11.80 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.2 5.1 5.3
1 4 15.73 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 2.5 2.6
1 5 19.67 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
1 6 23.60 0.0 ‐0.1 0.0 0.0 ‐0.1 ‐2.5 ‐2.6
1 7 27.53 0.0 ‐0.2 0.0 0.0 ‐0.2 ‐5.1 ‐5.3
1 8 31.47 0.0 ‐0.3 0.0 0.0 ‐0.3 ‐7.6 ‐7.9
1 9 35.40 0.0 ‐0.3 0.0 0.0 ‐0.3 ‐10.2 ‐10.5
1 10 39.33 0.0 ‐0.4 0.0 0.0 ‐0.4 ‐12.7 ‐13.1
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
1
Page 22
GD107
159 of 325
ANALYSIS
Beam\Design\East
TABLE 1.2.6.3=LIVE LOAD SHEAR FOR N = 7.0 (UNFACTORED)

****************************
SIDEWALK (MAXIMUM) LL+I ,(kips), LOAD TYPE= HL ‐93

SP IN D FROM ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
(ft) (kips) (kips) POSITIVE LOAD TYPE NEGATIVE LOAD TYPE
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
1 0 0.00 0.0 0.0 32.4 HL‐93 0.0 HL‐93

1 1 3.93 0.0 0.0 27.9 HL‐93 ‐1.7 HL‐93
1 2 7.87 0.0 0.0 23.4 HL‐93 ‐3.4 HL‐93
1 3 11.80 0.0 0.0 19.1 HL‐93 ‐5.3 HL‐93
1 4 15.73 0.0 0.0 15.3 HL‐93 ‐7.9 HL‐93
1 5 19.67 0.0 0.0 11.6 HL‐93 ‐11.6 HL‐93
1 6 23.60 0.0 0.0 7.9 HL‐93 ‐15.3 HL‐93
1 7 27.53 0.0 0.0 5.3 HL‐93 ‐19.1 HL‐93
1 8 31.47 0.0 0.0 3.4 HL‐93 ‐23.4 HL‐93
1 9 35.40 0.0 0.0 1.7 HL‐93 ‐27.9 HL‐93
1 10 39.33 0.0 0.0 0.0 HL‐93 ‐32.4 HL‐93
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
1
ANALYSIS
Beam\Design\East
TABLE 1.2.6.3A=LIVE LOAD SHEAR RANGE FOR N = 7.0 (kips) (UNFACTORED)

*****************************************

NO NO L SUPT ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
(ft) POS NEG RANGE
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
1 0 0.00 14. 0. 14.
1 1 3.93 12. ‐1. 13.
1 2 7.87 10. ‐2. 12.
1 3 11.80 9. ‐3. 13.
1 4 15.73 8. ‐5. 12.
Page 23
GD108
160 of 325
1 5 19.67 6. ‐6. 12.
1 6 23.60 5. ‐8. 12.
1 7 27.53 3. ‐9. 13.
1 8 31.47 2. ‐10. 12.
1 9 35.40 1. ‐12. 13.
1 10 39.33 0. ‐14. 14.
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
1
ANALYSIS
Beam\Design\East
TABLE 1.2.6.3B=MINIMUM WELD SIZE

*****************
TOP FLANGE BOTTOM FLANGE

‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
SP IN D FROM Vr Q/I SHEAR WELD Q/I SHEAR WELD
NO NO L SUPT [1] [2] FLOW SIZE FLOW SIZE
(ft) (Kip) (1/in) [3] (in) (1/in) (in)
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
1 0 0.00 14.3 .41183E‐01 0.29 0.2500*.23594E‐01 0.17 0.2500*
1 1 3.93 13.1 .41183E‐01 0.27 0.2500*.23594E‐01 0.16 0.2500*
1 2 7.87 12.0 .41183E‐01 0.25 0.2500*.23594E‐01 0.14 0.2500*
1 3 11.80 12.5 .41183E‐01 0.26 0.2500*.23594E‐01 0.15 0.2500*
1 4 15.73 12.4 .41183E‐01 0.26 0.2500*.23594E‐01 0.15 0.2500*
1 5 19.67 12.4 .41183E‐01 0.26 0.2500*.23594E‐01 0.15 0.2500*
1 6 23.60 12.4 .41183E‐01 0.26 0.2500*.23594E‐01 0.15 0.2500*
1 7 27.53 12.5 .41183E‐01 0.26 0.2500*.23594E‐01 0.15 0.2500*
1 8 31.47 12.0 .41183E‐01 0.25 0.2500*.23594E‐01 0.14 0.2500*
1 9 35.40 13.1 .41183E‐01 0.27 0.2500*.23594E‐01 0.16 0.2500*
1 10 39.33 14.3 .41183E‐01 0.29 0.2500*.23594E‐01 0.17 0.2500*
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
NOTE: [1] Vr = range of shear due to live loads and impact
[2] For non‐composite construction:
Q/I = (At * Dt) / Inc ‐‐ top flange

Inc = moment of inertia of non‐composite section
At = area of top flange
Dt = distance between the center of top flange and neutral axis
Page 24
GD109
161 of 325
Q/I = (Ab * Db) / Inc ‐‐ bottom flange
Ab = area of bottom flange
Db = distance between the center of bottom flange and neutral axis
For composite construction:
Q/I = (Q/Ic) + (At * Dt) / Ic ‐‐ top flange

Q = statical moment about the neutral axis of the
composite section of the transformed compressive
concrete area or the area of reinforcement embedded
in the concrete for negative moment
Ic = moment of inertia for composite section
Q/I = (Ab * Db) / Ic ‐‐ bottom flange
[3] shear flow = (Vr * Q) / (2 * I)
* ‐‐ minimum weld size governs

1
ANALYSIS
Beam\Design\East
TABLE 1.2.6.3C=WELD DESIGN BY SHEAR FORCE

**************************
SHEAR FLOW ALLOWABLE SHEAR FLOW

SP IN D FROM ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ MIN SIZE ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
NO NO L SUPT St [1] Sb [2] Sg [3] WELD Vw [4] Vc [5] Vg [6] FL
(ft) (kip/in) (kip/in) (kip/in) (in) (kip/in) (kip/in) (kip/in) AG
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
1 0 0.00 2.98 1.97 2.98 0.2500 11.88 14.50 11.88
1 1 3.93 2.52 1.66 2.52 0.2500 11.88 14.50 11.88
1 2 7.87 2.08 1.35 2.08 0.2500 11.88 14.50 11.88
1 3 11.80 1.64 1.05 1.64 0.2500 11.88 14.50 11.88
1 4 15.73 1.23 0.76 1.23 0.2500 11.88 14.50 11.88
1 5 19.67 0.83 0.48 0.83 0.2500 11.88 14.50 11.88
1 6 23.60 1.23 0.76 1.23 0.2500 11.88 14.50 11.88
1 7 27.53 1.64 1.05 1.64 0.2500 11.88 14.50 11.88
1 8 31.47 2.08 1.35 2.08 0.2500 11.88 14.50 11.88
1 9 35.40 2.52 1.66 2.52 0.2500 11.88 14.50 11.88
1 10 39.33 2.98 1.97 2.98 0.2500 11.88 14.50 11.88
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
NOTE: [1] St = top flange shear flow
Page 25
GD110
162 of 325
= VQ/I
where : V = shear force
Q = statical moment of the area about neutral axis
I = moment of inertia
[2] Sb = bottom flange shear flow
[3] Sg = govern. shear flow (max. of St and Sb)
[4] Vw = allowable shear flow for min. size weld

= 0.6 * (phi)e2 * Fexx * 0.707 * min. weld size * 2
where: (Phi)e2 = weld resistance factor (0.8)
Fexx = class. strength of the weld metal (70 ksi)
[5] Vc = allowable shear flow on the connected material

= (Phi)v * (0.58 * Ag * Fy)
where: (Phi)v = resistance factor for shear (1.0)
Ag = gross area of the connection element
Fy = min. yield strength of connection element
[6] Vg = govern. allow. shear flow (min. of Vw and Vc)
If [6] is less than [3], then the flag ** will show up.
1
ANALYSIS
Beam\Design\East
TABLE 1.2.6.4=SHEAR SUMMARY FOR COMPOSITE CONSTRUCTION (UNFACTORED)

****************************************
TOTAL TOTAL L+I , LOAD TYPE = HL ‐ 93

SP IN D FROM ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ MAX. SHEAR
NO NO L SUPT DEAD LOADS POSITIVE GOVERN. NEGATIVE GOVERN. (kips)
(ft) (k) (k) LOAD TYPE (k) LOAD TYPE POS. NEG.
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
1 0 0.00 13.1 32.4 HL‐93 0.0 HL‐93 45.5 13.1

1 1 3.93 10.5 27.9 HL‐93 ‐1.7 HL‐93 38.4 8.9
1 2 7.87 7.9 23.4 HL‐93 ‐3.4 HL‐93 31.3 4.5
1 3 11.80 5.3 19.1 HL‐93 ‐5.3 HL‐93 24.4 0.0
1 4 15.73 2.6 15.3 HL‐93 ‐7.9 HL‐93 17.9 ‐5.3
1 5 19.67 0.0 11.6 HL‐93 ‐11.6 HL‐93 11.6 ‐11.6
1 6 23.60 ‐2.6 7.9 HL‐93 ‐15.3 HL‐93 5.3 ‐17.9
Page 26
GD111
163 of 325
1 7 27.53 ‐5.3 5.3 HL‐93 ‐19.1 HL‐93 0.0 ‐24.4
1 8 31.47 ‐7.9 3.4 HL‐93 ‐23.4 HL‐93 ‐4.5 ‐31.3
1 9 35.40 ‐10.5 1.7 HL‐93 ‐27.9 HL‐93 ‐8.9 ‐38.4
1 10 39.33 ‐13.1 0.0 HL‐93 ‐32.4 HL‐93 ‐13.1 ‐45.5
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
1
ANALYSIS
Beam\Design\East
TABLE 1.2.6.5=SHEAR SUMMARY FOR COMPOSITE CONSTRUCTION (LRFD)

****************************************

NO NO L SUPT RANGE
(ft) (kips) (kips) (kips) (kips) (kips) (kips)
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
1 0 0.00 45.5 55.3 73.1 60.2 19.7 10.7

1 1 3.93 38.4 46.7 61.9 50.8 15.8 9.9
1 2 7.87 31.3 38.3 50.9 41.5 11.8 9.0
1 3 11.80 24.4 30.1 40.1 32.4 7.9 9.4
1 4 15.73 17.9 22.5 30.1 23.9 3.9 9.3
1 5 19.67 ‐11.6 ‐15.0 ‐20.2 ‐15.6 0.0 9.3
1 6 23.60 ‐17.9 ‐22.5 ‐30.1 ‐23.9 ‐3.9 9.3
1 7 27.53 ‐24.4 ‐30.1 ‐40.1 ‐32.4 ‐7.9 9.4
1 8 31.47 ‐31.3 ‐38.3 ‐50.9 ‐41.5 ‐11.8 9.0
1 9 35.40 ‐38.4 ‐46.7 ‐61.9 ‐50.8 ‐15.8 9.9
1 10 39.33 ‐45.5 ‐55.3 ‐73.1 ‐60.2 ‐19.7 10.7
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
1
ANALYSIS
Beam\Design\East
Page 27
GD112
164 of 325
TABLE 1.2.7.1=LIVE LOAD REACTIONS (UNFACTORED)
*******************
M I N I M U M M A X I M U M
SUPT ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
NO. LL IMPACT LL+I GOVERN. LL IMPACT LL+I GOVERN.
(kip) FACTOR (kip) LOAD TYPE (kip) FACTOR (kip) LOAD TYPE
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
1 0.00 1.300 0.00 HL‐93 25.54 1.268 32.40 HL‐93
2 0.00 1.268 0.00 HL‐93 25.54 1.268 32.40 HL‐93
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
NOTE: [1] "‐" indicates Uplift. For the provision of Uplift.
[2] For the application of impact factor on the supports,
please refer to AASHTO LRFD Art. 3.6.2.
No impact on lane load. The impact shown is the Reaction due to
(truck load*IM+lane load) divided by the Reaction w/o IM
1
MERLIN V 10.6
ANALYSIS
Beam\Design\East
TABLE 1.2.7.2=SUMMARY OF REACTIONS (UNFACTORED)

********************
TOTAL LL+I ,(K), LOAD TYPE = HL ‐ 93 TOTAL DL+LL+I (L R F D)

SUPT ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
NO. DEAD LOADS MINIMUM GOVERN. MAXIMUM GOVERN. MINIMUM MAXIMUM
(K) LOAD TYPE LOAD TYPE
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
1 13.14 0.00 HL‐93 32.40 HL‐93 ST1 11.82 73.11

ST2 11.82 60.15
ST4 19.70 19.70
SE1 13.14 45.53
SE2 13.14 55.25
2 13.14 0.00 HL‐93 32.40 HL‐93 ST1 11.82 73.11

ST2 11.82 60.15
ST4 19.70 19.70
SE1 13.14 45.53
Page 28
GD113
165 of 325
SE2 13.14 55.25
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
NOTE: [1] " ‐ " Indicates Uplift
ST1 = STRENGTH I; ST2 = STRENGTH II; SE1 = SERVICE I;SE2 = SERVICE II.
1
ANALYSIS
Beam\Design\East
TABLE 1.2.8.1=COMP AND NONCOMP DL DEFL FOR INFINITY AND N = 21.0 (UNFACTORED)
**************************************************
NONCOMPOSITE DL COMPOSITE DL T O T A L
SP IN D FROM ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
NO NO L SUPT BEAM SLAB CONCENTRATED UNIFORM NONCOMPOSITE+COMPOSITE = DL
(ft) (in) (in) (in) (in) (in) (in) (in)
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
1 0 0.00 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

1 1 3.93 ‐0.0274 ‐0.1549 0.0000 ‐0.0030 ‐0.2107 ‐0.0030 ‐0.2138
1 2 7.87 ‐0.0518 ‐0.2931 0.0000 ‐0.0058 ‐0.3987 ‐0.0058 ‐0.4044
1 3 11.80 ‐0.0709 ‐0.4013 0.0000 ‐0.0079 ‐0.5458 ‐0.0079 ‐0.5537
1 4 15.73 ‐0.0831 ‐0.4700 0.0000 ‐0.0092 ‐0.6392 ‐0.0092 ‐0.6485
1 5 19.67 ‐0.0872 ‐0.4936 0.0000 ‐0.0097 ‐0.6712 ‐0.0097 ‐0.6809
1 6 23.60 ‐0.0831 ‐0.4700 0.0000 ‐0.0092 ‐0.6392 ‐0.0092 ‐0.6485
1 7 27.53 ‐0.0709 ‐0.4013 0.0000 ‐0.0079 ‐0.5458 ‐0.0079 ‐0.5537
1 8 31.47 ‐0.0518 ‐0.2931 0.0000 ‐0.0058 ‐0.3987 ‐0.0058 ‐0.4044
1 9 35.40 ‐0.0274 ‐0.1549 0.0000 ‐0.0030 ‐0.2107 ‐0.0030 ‐0.2138
1 10 39.33 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
NOTE: " ‐ " Indicates downward deflections
NOTE: The total noncomposite DL deflection is the sum of the deflections

due to beam, slab, arbitrary DL uniform load and arbitrary DL
concentrated load.
NOTE: Due to space limit only beam deflections and slab deflections are
printed out.
1
Page 29
GD114
166 of 325
ANALYSIS
Beam\Design\East
TABLE 1.2.8.1A=CAMBER INFORMATION (UNFACTORED)

******************
NONCOMPOSITE DEAD LOADS COMPOSITE DL T O T A L

SP IN D FROM ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐(in)‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ ‐‐‐‐‐‐(in)‐‐‐‐‐‐ ‐‐‐‐‐‐(in)‐‐‐‐‐‐
NO NO L SUPT STEEL CAMBER SLAB CAMBER DEFL. CAMBER DEFL. CAMBER
(ft) DEFL. SIZE DEFL. SIZE SIZE SIZE
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
1 0 0.0 0.000 ‐‐ 0.000 ‐‐ 0.000 ‐‐ 0.000 ‐‐
1 1 3.9 ‐0.027 0 1/16 ‐0.183 0 3/16 ‐0.003 0 1/16 ‐0.214 0 1/ 4
1 2 7.9 ‐0.052 0 1/16 ‐0.347 0 3/ 8 ‐0.006 0 1/16 ‐0.404 0 7/16
1 3 11.8 ‐0.071 0 1/ 8 ‐0.475 0 1/ 2 ‐0.008 0 1/16 ‐0.554 0 9/16
1 4 15.7 ‐0.083 0 1/ 8 ‐0.556 0 9/16 ‐0.009 0 1/16 ‐0.648 0 11/16
1 5 19.7 ‐0.087 0 1/ 8 ‐0.584 0 5/ 8 ‐0.010 0 1/16 ‐0.681 0 11/16
1 6 23.6 ‐0.083 0 1/ 8 ‐0.556 0 9/16 ‐0.009 0 1/16 ‐0.648 0 11/16
1 7 27.5 ‐0.071 0 1/ 8 ‐0.475 0 1/ 2 ‐0.008 0 1/16 ‐0.554 0 9/16
1 8 31.5 ‐0.052 0 1/16 ‐0.347 0 3/ 8 ‐0.006 0 1/16 ‐0.404 0 7/16
1 9 35.4 ‐0.027 0 1/16 ‐0.183 0 3/16 ‐0.003 0 1/16 ‐0.214 0 1/ 4
1 10 39.3 0.000 ‐‐ 0.000 ‐‐ 0.000 ‐‐ 0.000 ‐‐
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
NOTE: for camber, please refer to AASHTO Art.10.14 or LRFD Art. 6.7.2
1
ANALYSIS
Beam\Design\East
TABLE 1.2.8.2=MAXIMUM LIVE LOAD DEFLECTION FOR COMPOSITE CONSTRUCTION

*******************************************************
(UNFACTORED)
NUMBER OF LANE LL + I.
D FROM ‐‐‐‐‐AND‐‐‐‐‐‐ DEFLECTION GOVERN. 1/800 OF SPAN L ROTATION
SPAN L SUPT DIST. FACTOR ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ LOAD ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
NO. (ft) FOR LL DEFL. (inch) TYPE AASHTO 2.5.2.6.2 [5] Rad.
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
Page 30
GD115
167 of 325
1 19.67 2 0.250 ‐0.231 MAX HL‐93 0.59 0.00475
0.033 MIN
‐0.051 MAX LANE
0.033 MIN LANE
3 0.375 ‐0.346 MAX HL‐93 0.59 0.00475

0.050 MIN
‐0.077 MAX LANE
0.050 MIN LANE
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
NOTE: [1] " ‐ " indicates downward deflection
[2] The distribution factor for LL+I deflection is defined as
DF = (NL/Ng) ..... AASHTO LRFD Art. 2.5.2.6
where NL= no. of traffic lanes

Ng= no. of girders
[3] This table is based upon the optional criteria specified

in AASHTO LRFD Art. 3.6.1.3.2
[4] The number of traffic lanes is determined according to

AASHTO LRFD Art.3.6.1.1.1.
The 1st line is for the most probable number of lanes
and the 2nd line is for the next probable number of lanes.
[5] Max rotations at left (1st line) & right (2nd line)
supports of the span without averaging, factor and impact
[6] If ADTT is between 100 and 1000, multi‐presence

factor of 0.95 is applied. If ADTT is below 100, factor
is 0.9 (AASHTO LRFD C3.6.1.1.2).
1
ANALYSIS
Beam\Design\East
TABLE 1.2.9.1=NONCOMPOSITE DEAD LOAD STRESSES FOR N=INFINITY (UNFACTORED)

**********************************************
STEEL DEAD LOAD OTHER DEAD LOAD TOTAL DEAD LOAD

SP IN D FROM ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
Page 31
GD116
168 of 325
NO NO L SUPT STEEL BEAM STEEL BEAM STEEL BEAM
TOP BOT TOP BOT TOP BOT
(ft) (ksi) (ksi) (ksi)
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
1 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

1 1 3.93 ‐0.42 0.42 ‐2.82 2.82 ‐3.25 3.25
1 2 7.87 ‐0.75 0.75 ‐5.02 5.02 ‐5.77 5.77
1 3 11.80 ‐0.98 0.98 ‐6.59 6.59 ‐7.57 7.57
1 4 15.73 ‐1.13 1.13 ‐7.53 7.53 ‐8.66 8.66
1 5 19.67 ‐1.17 1.17 ‐7.85 7.85 ‐9.02 9.02
1 6 23.60 ‐1.13 1.13 ‐7.53 7.53 ‐8.66 8.66
1 7 27.53 ‐0.98 0.98 ‐6.59 6.59 ‐7.57 7.57
1 8 31.47 ‐0.75 0.75 ‐5.02 5.02 ‐5.77 5.77
1 9 35.40 ‐0.42 0.42 ‐2.82 2.82 ‐3.25 3.25
1 10 39.33 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
1
ANALYSIS
Beam\Design\East
TABLE 1.2.9.2=COMPOSITE DL STRESS FOR N = 21.0 AND TOTAL DL STRESSES

******************************************************
(UNFACTORED)
SUPERIMPOSED DEAD LOAD,(ksi) TOTAL DEAD LOAD,(ksi)

SP IN D FROM ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
NO NO L SUPT CONCRETE STEEL BEAM CONCRETE STEEL BEAM
(ft) ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
TOP TOP BOT TOP TOP BOT
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
1 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

1 1 3.93 0.00 ‐0.02 0.08 0.00 ‐3.26 3.32
1 2 7.87 0.00 ‐0.03 0.13 0.00 ‐5.80 5.91
1 3 11.80 ‐0.01 ‐0.04 0.18 ‐0.01 ‐7.62 7.75
1 4 15.73 ‐0.01 ‐0.05 0.20 ‐0.01 ‐8.70 8.86
1 5 19.67 ‐0.01 ‐0.05 0.21 ‐0.01 ‐9.07 9.23
1 6 23.60 ‐0.01 ‐0.05 0.20 ‐0.01 ‐8.70 8.86
1 7 27.53 ‐0.01 ‐0.04 0.18 ‐0.01 ‐7.62 7.75
1 8 31.47 0.00 ‐0.03 0.13 0.00 ‐5.80 5.91
Page 32
GD117
169 of 325
1 9 35.40 0.00 ‐0.02 0.08 0.00 ‐3.26 3.32
1 10 39.33 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
1
ANALYSIS
Beam\Design\East
TABLE 1.2.9.3=LIVE LOAD STRESSES FOR N = 7.0 (UNFACTORED)

*******************************
MAXIMUM POSITIVE,(ksi) MAXIMUM NEGATIVE,(ksi)

‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
SP IN D FROM CONCR. STEEL CONCR. STEEL
NO NO L SUPT ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
(ft) TOP TOP BOT TOP TOP BOT
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
1 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

1 1 3.93 ‐0.28 ‐0.06 4.91 0.00 0.00 0.00
1 2 7.87 ‐0.48 ‐0.10 8.40 0.00 0.00 0.00
1 3 11.80 ‐0.60 ‐0.12 10.49 0.00 0.00 0.00
1 4 15.73 ‐0.66 ‐0.13 11.61 0.00 0.00 0.00
1 5 19.67 ‐0.66 ‐0.13 11.57 0.00 0.00 0.00
1 6 23.60 ‐0.66 ‐0.13 11.61 0.00 0.00 0.00
1 7 27.53 ‐0.60 ‐0.12 10.49 0.00 0.00 0.00
1 8 31.47 ‐0.48 ‐0.10 8.40 0.00 0.00 0.00
1 9 35.40 ‐0.28 ‐0.06 4.91 0.00 0.00 0.00
1 10 39.33 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
1
ANALYSIS
Beam\Design\East
TABLE 1.2.9.3A=FATIGUE LIVE LOAD STRESS RANGE FOR N = 7.0 (ksi) (UNFACTORED)
*************************************************
Page 33
GD118
170 of 325
SP IN D FROM TOP OF TOP FLANGE GOVERNING BOT OF BOT FLANGE GOVERNING

NO NO L SUPT ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ STRESS LOAD ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ STRESS LOAD
(ft) TRUCK ONLY RANGE TP TYPE TRUCK ONLY RANGE TP TYPE
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
1 0 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0 T HL 0.0 0.0 0.0 T HL

1 1 3.93 0.0 0.0 0.0 C HL 2.1 0.0 2.1 T HL
1 2 7.87 0.0 0.0 0.0 C HL 3.4 0.0 3.4 T HL
1 3 11.80 0.1 0.0 0.1 C HL 4.7 0.0 4.7 T HL
1 4 15.73 0.1 0.0 0.1 C HL 5.3 0.0 5.3 T HL
1 5 19.67 0.1 0.0 0.1 C HL 5.4 0.0 5.4 T HL
1 6 23.60 0.1 0.0 0.1 C HL 5.3 0.0 5.3 T HL
1 7 27.53 0.1 0.0 0.1 C HL 4.7 0.0 4.7 T HL
1 8 31.47 0.0 0.0 0.0 C HL 3.4 0.0 3.4 T HL
1 9 35.40 0.0 0.0 0.0 C HL 2.1 0.0 2.1 T HL
1 10 39.33 0.0 0.0 0.0 T HL 0.0 0.0 0.0 T HL
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
NOTE: LOAD TYPE: HL = Fatigue Truck or Tandem

STRESS TYPE: R = Reversal, C = Compression, and T = Tension
1
ANALYSIS
Beam\Design\East
TABLE 1.2.9.5A=SERVICE I TOTAL (DC+DW+LL+I) STRESS SUMMARY

*******************************************

STRESS ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
1 0 0.00 50. 50. 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

1 1 3.93 50. 50. ‐0.28 ‐3.32 8.23 0.00 ‐3.26 3.32
1 2 7.87 50. 50. ‐0.48 ‐5.90 14.31 0.00 ‐5.80 5.91
1 3 11.80 50. 50. ‐0.60 ‐7.74 18.24 ‐0.01 ‐7.62 7.75
Page 34
GD119
171 of 325
1 4 15.73 50. 50. ‐0.67 ‐8.84 20.47 ‐0.01 ‐8.70 8.86
1 5 19.67 50. 50. ‐0.67 ‐9.20 20.80 ‐0.01 ‐9.07 9.23
1 6 23.60 50. 50. ‐0.67 ‐8.84 20.47 ‐0.01 ‐8.70 8.86
1 7 27.53 50. 50. ‐0.60 ‐7.74 18.24 ‐0.01 ‐7.62 7.75
1 8 31.47 50. 50. ‐0.48 ‐5.90 14.31 0.00 ‐5.80 5.91
1 9 35.40 50. 50. ‐0.28 ‐3.32 8.23 0.00 ‐3.26 3.32
1 10 39.33 50. 50. 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
1
ANALYSIS
Beam\Design\East
TABLE 1.2.9.5B=SERVICE II TOTAL (DC+DW+1.3(LL+I)) STRESS SUMMARY

*************************************************

STRESS ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
1 0 0.00 50. 50. 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

1 1 3.93 50. 50. ‐0.37 ‐3.34 9.71 0.00 ‐3.26 3.32
1 2 7.87 50. 50. ‐0.63 ‐5.93 16.83 0.00 ‐5.80 5.91
1 3 11.80 50. 50. ‐0.78 ‐7.77 21.39 ‐0.01 ‐7.62 7.75
1 4 15.73 50. 50. ‐0.87 ‐8.88 23.95 ‐0.01 ‐8.70 8.86
1 5 19.67 50. 50. ‐0.87 ‐9.24 24.27 ‐0.01 ‐9.07 9.23
1 6 23.60 50. 50. ‐0.87 ‐8.88 23.95 ‐0.01 ‐8.70 8.86
1 7 27.53 50. 50. ‐0.78 ‐7.77 21.39 ‐0.01 ‐7.62 7.75
1 8 31.47 50. 50. ‐0.63 ‐5.93 16.83 0.00 ‐5.80 5.91
1 9 35.40 50. 50. ‐0.37 ‐3.34 9.71 0.00 ‐3.26 3.32
1 10 39.33 50. 50. 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
1
ANALYSIS
Beam\Design\East
Page 35
GD120
172 of 325
TABLE 1.2.9.5C=STRENGTH I TOTAL (1.25DC+1.50DW+1.75(LL+I)) STRESS SUMMARY

**********************************************************

STRESS ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
1 0 0.00 50. 50. 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

1 1 3.93 50. 50. ‐0.49 ‐4.18 12.75 0.00 ‐4.08 4.15
1 2 7.87 50. 50. ‐0.84 ‐7.42 22.08 ‐0.01 ‐7.25 7.38
1 3 11.80 50. 50. ‐1.06 ‐9.73 28.05 ‐0.01 ‐9.52 9.69
1 4 15.73 50. 50. ‐1.17 ‐11.11 31.39 ‐0.01 ‐10.88 11.07
1 5 19.67 50. 50. ‐1.16 ‐11.56 31.79 ‐0.01 ‐11.33 11.53
1 6 23.60 50. 50. ‐1.17 ‐11.11 31.39 ‐0.01 ‐10.88 11.07
1 7 27.53 50. 50. ‐1.06 ‐9.73 28.05 ‐0.01 ‐9.52 9.69
1 8 31.47 50. 50. ‐0.84 ‐7.42 22.08 ‐0.01 ‐7.25 7.38
1 9 35.40 50. 50. ‐0.49 ‐4.18 12.75 0.00 ‐4.08 4.15
1 10 39.33 50. 50. 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
1
ANALYSIS
Beam\Design\East
TABLE 1.2.9.5D=STRENGTH I TOTAL (0.90DC+0.65DW+1.75(LL+I)) STRESS SUMMARY

**********************************************************

STRESS ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
1 0 0.00 50. 50. 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

1 1 3.93 50. 50. ‐0.49 ‐3.04 11.59 0.00 ‐2.94 2.99
1 2 7.87 50. 50. ‐0.84 ‐5.39 20.02 0.00 ‐5.22 5.32
1 3 11.80 50. 50. ‐1.05 ‐7.06 25.34 ‐0.01 ‐6.85 6.98
1 4 15.73 50. 50. ‐1.17 ‐8.06 28.28 ‐0.01 ‐7.83 7.97
1 5 19.67 50. 50. ‐1.16 ‐8.39 28.56 ‐0.01 ‐8.16 8.31
Page 36
GD121
173 of 325
1 6 23.60 50. 50. ‐1.17 ‐8.06 28.28 ‐0.01 ‐7.83 7.97
1 7 27.53 50. 50. ‐1.05 ‐7.06 25.34 ‐0.01 ‐6.85 6.98
1 8 31.47 50. 50. ‐0.84 ‐5.39 20.02 0.00 ‐5.22 5.32
1 9 35.40 50. 50. ‐0.49 ‐3.04 11.59 0.00 ‐2.94 2.99
1 10 39.33 50. 50. 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
1
ANALYSIS
Beam\Design\East
TABLE 1.2.9.5E=STRENGTH II TOTAL (1.25DC+1.50DW+1.35(LL+I)) STRESS SUMMARY

***********************************************************

STRESS ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
1 0 0.00 50. 50. 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

1 1 3.93 50. 50. ‐0.38 ‐4.16 10.78 0.00 ‐4.08 4.15
1 2 7.87 50. 50. ‐0.65 ‐7.38 18.72 ‐0.01 ‐7.25 7.38
1 3 11.80 50. 50. ‐0.82 ‐9.68 23.85 ‐0.01 ‐9.52 9.69
1 4 15.73 50. 50. ‐0.90 ‐11.06 26.74 ‐0.01 ‐10.88 11.07
1 5 19.67 50. 50. ‐0.90 ‐11.51 27.16 ‐0.01 ‐11.33 11.53
1 6 23.60 50. 50. ‐0.90 ‐11.06 26.74 ‐0.01 ‐10.88 11.07
1 7 27.53 50. 50. ‐0.82 ‐9.68 23.85 ‐0.01 ‐9.52 9.69
1 8 31.47 50. 50. ‐0.65 ‐7.38 18.72 ‐0.01 ‐7.25 7.38
1 9 35.40 50. 50. ‐0.38 ‐4.16 10.78 0.00 ‐4.08 4.15
1 10 39.33 50. 50. 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
1
ANALYSIS
Beam\Design\East
TABLE 1.2.9.5F=STRENGTH II TOTAL (0.90DC+0.65DW+1.35(LL+I)) STRESS SUMMARY

***********************************************************
Page 37
GD122
174 of 325

STRESS ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
1 0 0.00 50. 50. 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

1 1 3.93 50. 50. ‐0.38 ‐3.01 9.62 0.00 ‐2.94 2.99
1 2 7.87 50. 50. ‐0.65 ‐5.35 16.66 0.00 ‐5.22 5.32
1 3 11.80 50. 50. ‐0.81 ‐7.02 21.14 ‐0.01 ‐6.85 6.98
1 4 15.73 50. 50. ‐0.90 ‐8.01 23.64 ‐0.01 ‐7.83 7.97
1 5 19.67 50. 50. ‐0.90 ‐8.34 23.93 ‐0.01 ‐8.16 8.31
1 6 23.60 50. 50. ‐0.90 ‐8.01 23.64 ‐0.01 ‐7.83 7.97
1 7 27.53 50. 50. ‐0.81 ‐7.02 21.14 ‐0.01 ‐6.85 6.98
1 8 31.47 50. 50. ‐0.65 ‐5.35 16.66 0.00 ‐5.22 5.32
1 9 35.40 50. 50. ‐0.38 ‐3.01 9.62 0.00 ‐2.94 2.99
1 10 39.33 50. 50. 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
1
CODE CHECK
Beam\Design\East
TABLE 1.2.22.3=MEMBER LENGTH AND SECTION GEOMETRY

**********************************
COVER PLATE ‐‐ (in)

MEMBER TOP FLANGE WEB BOT FLANGE ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ STEEL ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ TOP BOT
NO LENGTH TYPE WIDTH THICK DEPTH THICK WIDTH THICK ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
(ft) (in) (in) (in) WIDTH THICK WIDTH THICK
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
1 39.33 PG 9.0 0.7500 20.0 0.5000 9.0 0.7500
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
NOTE: PG = plate Girder ,W = standard W‐section with/without cover plates
1
Page 38
GD123
175 of 325
CODE CHECK
Beam\Design\East
TABLE 1.2.22.4=DEPTH RATIOS

************
** [1] = Span length (ft) = 39.3

LIMITATION
MEMBER SLAB GIRDER [2]=OVERALL D. [2]/(12*[1]) 1/25
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ THICK. DEPTH ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ <=> ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ STATUS
NO LENGTH ‐‐‐‐‐‐ ‐‐‐‐‐‐ [3]= GIRDER D. [3]/(12*[1]) 1/30
(ft) (in) (in) (in)
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
1 39.33 8.25 21.50 [2]= 29.75 0.06303 > 0.04000 OK
[3]= 21.50 0.04555 > 0.03333 OK
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
NOTE : [1] ‐‐ Span length or Average of two adjacent span lengths
[2] ‐‐ AASHTO LRFD TABLE 2.5.2.6.3‐1
* For composite girders, the minimum overall depth

of girder (concrete slab plus haunch & girder) preferably should not
be less than 0.040*Length of span (or 0.032*L if continuous spans).
and the depth of steel girder alone preferably should not be
less than 0.033*Length of span (or 0.027*L if continuous)
[3] ‐‐ same as NOTE [2]
** ‐‐ cover plates not taken into account
** ‐‐ these criteria are related to the structural stability

during construction and the limitation for the live load
deflection.
1
CODE CHECK
Beam\Design\East
TABLE 1.2.22.5 =DEPTH/THICKNESS RATIOS (N = n)

******************************
Page 39
GD124
176 of 325
SP IN D FROM
Lo Co Web Web
NO NO L SUPT
ng mp depth thick D/tw 2Dcp/tw 2Dc/tw Cat
[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6]
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
1 0 0.00 0 1 20.00 0.500 40.0 150.0 0.00 90.55 0

1 1 3.93 0 1 20.00 0.500 40.0 150.0 0.00 90.55 0
1 2 7.87 0 1 20.00 0.500 40.0 150.0 0.00 90.55 0
1 3 11.80 0 1 20.00 0.500 40.0 150.0 0.00 90.55 0
1 4 15.73 0 1 20.00 0.500 40.0 150.0 0.00 90.55 0
1 5 19.67 0 1 20.00 0.500 40.0 150.0 0.00 90.55 0
1 6 23.60 0 1 20.00 0.500 40.0 150.0 0.00 90.55 0
1 7 27.53 0 1 20.00 0.500 40.0 150.0 0.00 90.55 0
1 8 31.47 0 1 20.00 0.500 40.0 150.0 0.00 90.55 0
1 9 35.40 0 1 20.00 0.500 40.0 150.0 0.00 90.55 0
1 10 39.33 0 1 20.00 0.500 40.0 150.0 0.00 90.55 0
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
NOTE:
[2] D/tw limit (Eq. 6.10.2.1‐1 or Eq. 6.10.2.1.2‐1)
[3] For composite sections in positive flexure, use Article D6.3.2
to calculate Dcp and 2*Dcp/tw
Note: If the plastic N.A. is not in the web, Dcp = 0
[4] 2Dcp/tw limit: 3.76*SQRT(E/Fyc) (Eq.6.10.6.2.2‐1)
[5] Use Article D6.3.1 to calculate Dc and 2.*Dc/tw
Web Category
0 = compact section
3 = slender section
1
CODE CHECK
Beam\Design\East
TABLE 1.2.22.5A=DEPTH/THICKNESS RATIOS (N = inf.)

*********************************
SP IN D FROM Lo Co Web Web

Page 40
GD125
177 of 325
NO NO L SUPT
ng mp depth thick 2Dc/tw Category
[1] [2] [3]
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
1 0 0.00 0 1 20.00 0.500 40.00 137.27 2

1 1 3.93 0 1 20.00 0.500 40.00 137.27 2
1 2 7.87 0 1 20.00 0.500 40.00 137.27 2
1 3 11.80 0 1 20.00 0.500 40.00 137.27 2
1 4 15.73 0 1 20.00 0.500 40.00 137.27 2
1 5 19.67 0 1 20.00 0.500 40.00 137.27 2
1 6 23.60 0 1 20.00 0.500 40.00 137.27 2
1 7 27.53 0 1 20.00 0.500 40.00 137.27 2
1 8 31.47 0 1 20.00 0.500 40.00 137.27 2
1 9 35.40 0 1 20.00 0.500 40.00 137.27 2
1 10 39.33 0 1 20.00 0.500 40.00 137.27 2
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
NOTE:
[2] For non‐composite sections, calculate Dc and 2*Dc/tw
Web Category
0 = compact section
3 = slender section
1
CODE CHECK
Beam\Design\East
TABLE 1.2.22.6=FLANGE PROPORTIONS CHECK

************************
SP NO D FROM
NO NO L SUPT bf/2tf [1] bf [2] tf [3] Iyc/Iyt FLAG
(ft) (in) (in) (in) (in)
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
1 0 0.00 6.00 12. 9.0 3.3 0.750 0.550

6.00 12. 9.0 3.3 0.750 0.550 1.00 0
1 1 3.93 6.00 12. 9.0 3.3 0.750 0.550
Page 41
GD126
178 of 325
6.00 12. 9.0 3.3 0.750 0.550 1.00 0
1 2 7.87 6.00 12. 9.0 3.3 0.750 0.550
6.00 12. 9.0 3.3 0.750 0.550 1.00 0
1 3 11.80 6.00 12. 9.0 3.3 0.750 0.550
6.00 12. 9.0 3.3 0.750 0.550 1.00 0
1 4 15.73 6.00 12. 9.0 3.3 0.750 0.550
6.00 12. 9.0 3.3 0.750 0.550 1.00 0
1 5 19.67 6.00 12. 9.0 3.3 0.750 0.550
6.00 12. 9.0 3.3 0.750 0.550 1.00 0
1 6 23.60 6.00 12. 9.0 3.3 0.750 0.550
6.00 12. 9.0 3.3 0.750 0.550 1.00 0
1 7 27.53 6.00 12. 9.0 3.3 0.750 0.550
6.00 12. 9.0 3.3 0.750 0.550 1.00 0
1 8 31.47 6.00 12. 9.0 3.3 0.750 0.550
6.00 12. 9.0 3.3 0.750 0.550 1.00 0
1 9 35.40 6.00 12. 9.0 3.3 0.750 0.550
6.00 12. 9.0 3.3 0.750 0.550 1.00 0
1 10 39.33 6.00 12. 9.0 3.3 0.750 0.550
6.00 12. 9.0 3.3 0.750 0.550 1.00 0
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
NOTE: [1] = 12. (Eq. 6.10.2.2‐1)

[2] = D/6 (Eq. 6.10.2.2‐2)
[3] = 1.1tw (Eq. 6.10.2.2‐3)
1
MERLIN V 10.6
DEPARTMENT OF CIVIL & ENVIRON. ENGINEERING
COMPOSITE
CODE CHECK
Beam\Design\East
TABLE 1.2.22.7.0=CB VALUES FOR LATERAL BRACING

*****************************
DIST. FROM
LATERAL LEFT SUPT
BRACING ‐‐‐‐(FT)‐‐‐‐ fo f2 fmid f1
NO FROM TO (ksi) (ksi) (ksi) (ksi) Cb
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
1 0.0 25.0 0.000 0.000 11.651 23.301 1.000

0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 1.000
Page 42
GD127
179 of 325
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
Note: The 1st line is for DL case and the 2nd line is for LL case
f0, f2, fmid, f1, and Cb are defined in Art. 6.10.8.2.3
If the flange transition is beyond 20% X unbraced length

from the smaller end and the ratio of the smaller
and larger lateral moment of inertia of the flange
is smaller than 50%, then Cb=1.0.
1
CODE CHECK
Beam\Design\East
TABLE 1.2.22.7A=FLB AND LTB CATEGORIES

**********************
SP IN D FROM Co ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ FLB ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ LTB ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐

NO NO L SUPT mp LMDAf LMDApf LMDArf Lb Lp Lr GOV
(ft) CAT (ft) (ft) (ft) CAT CAT
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
1 0 0.00 1 6.00 9.15 16.12 0 25.00 4.67 17.53 3 3

1 1 3.93 1 6.00 9.15 16.12 0 25.00 4.67 17.53 3 3
1 2 7.87 1 6.00 9.15 16.12 0 25.00 4.67 17.53 3 3
1 3 11.80 1 6.00 9.15 16.12 0 25.00 4.67 17.53 3 3
1 4 15.73 1 6.00 9.15 16.12 0 25.00 4.67 17.53 3 3
1 5 19.67 1 6.00 9.15 16.12 0 25.00 4.67 17.53 3 3
1 6 23.60 1 6.00 9.15 16.12 0 25.00 4.67 17.53 3 3
1 7 27.53 1 6.00 9.15 16.12 0 25.00 4.67 17.53 3 3
1 8 31.47 1 6.00 9.15 16.12 0 25.00 4.67 17.53 3 3
1 9 35.40 1 6.00 9.15 16.12 0 25.00 4.67 17.53 3 3
1 10 39.33 1 6.00 9.15 16.12 0 25.00 4.67 17.53 3 3
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
NOTE: LMDAf = slenderness ratio for the comp. flange

= bfc / 2tfc (Eq. 6.10.8.2.2‐3)
LMDApf = limiting slenderness ratio for a compact flange
= 0.38*SQRT(E/Fyc) (Eq. 6.10.8.2.2‐4)
LMDArf = limiting slenderness ration for a non‐compct flange
= 0.56*SQRT(E/Fyr) (Eq. 6.10.8.2.2‐5)
Lb = unbraced length
Lp = limiting unbraced length to achieve the nominal flexural
Page 43
GD128
180 of 325
of RbRhFyc under uniform bending
= 1.0rt*SQRT(E/Fyc) (Eq. 6.10.8.2.3‐4)
Lr = limiting unbraced length to achieve the onset of
nominal yielding in either flange under uniform
bending with consideration of comp. flange
residual stress effects
= pi * rt * SQRT(E/Fyr) (Eq. 6.10.8.2.3‐5)
In negative moment region, the fist line is for non‐composite sections

and the second line is for composite sections
Flange Category
0 = compact section
3 = slender section
1
CODE CHECK
Beam\Design\East
TABLE 1.2.22.7B=FLB AND LTB RESISTANCE

**********************
SP IN D FROM Co FLB LTB GOV

NO NO L SUPT mp Rh Rb Cb Fnc Fnc Fnc
(ft) (Ksi) (Ksi) (Ksi)
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
1 0 0.00 1 1.000 1.000 1.00 50.00 17.22 17.22

1 1 3.93 1 1.000 1.000 1.00 50.00 17.22 17.22
1 2 7.87 1 1.000 1.000 1.00 50.00 17.22 17.22
1 3 11.80 1 1.000 1.000 1.00 50.00 17.22 17.22
1 4 15.73 1 1.000 1.000 1.00 50.00 17.22 17.22
1 5 19.67 1 1.000 1.000 1.00 50.00 17.22 17.22
1 6 23.60 1 1.000 1.000 1.00 50.00 17.22 17.22
1 7 27.53 1 1.000 1.000 1.00 50.00 17.22 17.22
1 8 31.47 1 1.000 1.000 1.00 50.00 17.22 17.22
1 9 35.40 1 1.000 1.000 1.00 50.00 17.22 17.22
1 10 39.33 1 1.000 1.000 1.00 50.00 17.22 17.22
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
Note: In the positive moment region, the result is for DL case

Page 44
GD129
181 of 325
In the negative moment region, the 1st line is for DL case
and the 2nd line is for LL case
1
CODE CHECK
Beam\Design\East
TABLE 1.2.22.7C=INFORMATION FOR DUCTILITY CHECK

******************************
SP IN D FROM Co
NO NO L SUPT mp Dp 0.42Dt
(ft) (in) (in)
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
1 0 0.00 1 7.20 12.49

1 1 3.93 1 7.20 12.49
1 2 7.87 1 7.20 12.49
1 3 11.80 1 7.20 12.49
1 4 15.73 1 7.20 12.49
1 5 19.67 1 7.20 12.49
1 6 23.60 1 7.20 12.49
1 7 27.53 1 7.20 12.49
1 8 31.47 1 7.20 12.49
1 9 35.40 1 7.20 12.49
1 10 39.33 1 7.20 12.49
1
INPUT
Beam\Design\East
TABLE 1.2.22.9=SUMMARY OF STRENGTH CATEGORY OF CROSS SECTION

*********************************************
S T R E N G T H C A T E G O R Y, Category
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
SP IN D FROM Section Noncomposite Composite Non‐ Comp.
NO NO L SUPT Region Web Flange Web Flange Comp.
(ft) [1] [2] [3] [4]
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
Page 45
GD130
182 of 325
1 0 0.00 1 0 3 0 3 0
1 1 3.93 1 0 3 0 3 0
1 2 7.87 1 0 3 0 3 0
1 3 11.80 1 0 3 0 3 0
1 4 15.73 1 0 3 0 3 0
1 5 19.67 1 0 3 0 3 0
1 6 23.60 1 0 3 0 3 0
1 7 27.53 1 0 3 0 3 0
1 8 31.47 1 0 3 0 3 0
1 9 35.40 1 0 3 0 3 0
1 10 39.33 1 0 3 0 3 0
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
1
CODE CHECK
Beam\Design\East
NOTE: [1] For non‐conposite sections, check Eq.6.10.6.2.3‐1

[2] For non‐composite FLB/LTB, use Article 6.10.8.2 to
decide section category
[3] For composite sections in positive flexure, use
Article 6.10.6.2.2 to decide section category
For composite sections in negative flexure, use
Eq. 6.10.6.2.3‐1
[4] For composite FLB or LTB, use Article 6.10.8.2 to compute
section category
* Strength Category of Cross Section
0 = compact section
3 = slender section
FOR N = INF. : Category No. is the maximum of [1] and [2]

FOR N = n : Category No. is [3] for composite sections
in positive flexure
Category No. is the maximum of [3] and [4] for
composite sections in negative flexure
Page 46
GD131
183 of 325
Non‐compact for Fy of the flanges > 70 ksi (483 MPa)

1
CODE CHECK
Beam\Design\East
TABLE 1.2.22.10=CONSTRUCTIBILITY CHECK (STRENGTH IV)

*********************************
SP IN D FROM fl 0.6Fyt fbu [1] fbu+fl [2] fbu+1/3fl [3] FLAG

(ft) (ksi) (ksi) (ksi) (ksi) (ksi) (ksi) (ksi) (ksi)
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
1 0 0.00 0.0 30.0 0.0 50.0 0.0 50.0 0.0 17.2 0

0.0 ‐ 0.0 ‐ 0.0 50.0 ‐ ‐ 0
1 1 3.93 0.0 30.0 4.9 50.0 4.9 50.0 4.9 17.2 0
0.0 ‐ 4.9 ‐ 4.9 50.0 ‐ ‐ 0
1 2 7.87 0.0 30.0 8.7 50.0 8.7 50.0 8.7 17.2 0
0.0 ‐ 8.7 ‐ 8.7 50.0 ‐ ‐ 0
1 3 11.80 0.0 30.0 11.4 50.0 11.4 50.0 11.4 17.2 0
0.0 ‐ 11.4 ‐ 11.4 50.0 ‐ ‐ 0
1 4 15.73 0.0 30.0 13.0 50.0 13.0 50.0 13.0 17.2 0
0.0 ‐ 13.0 ‐ 13.0 50.0 ‐ ‐ 0
1 5 19.67 0.0 30.0 13.5 50.0 13.5 50.0 13.5 17.2 0
0.0 ‐ 13.5 ‐ 13.5 50.0 ‐ ‐ 0
1 6 23.60 0.0 30.0 13.0 50.0 13.0 50.0 13.0 17.2 0
0.0 ‐ 13.0 ‐ 13.0 50.0 ‐ ‐ 0
1 7 27.53 0.0 30.0 11.4 50.0 11.4 50.0 11.4 17.2 0
0.0 ‐ 11.4 ‐ 11.4 50.0 ‐ ‐ 0
1 8 31.47 0.0 30.0 8.7 50.0 8.7 50.0 8.7 17.2 0
0.0 ‐ 8.7 ‐ 8.7 50.0 ‐ ‐ 0
1 9 35.40 0.0 30.0 4.9 50.0 4.9 50.0 4.9 17.2 0
0.0 ‐ 4.9 ‐ 4.9 50.0 ‐ ‐ 0
1 10 39.33 0.0 30.0 0.0 50.0 0.0 50.0 0.0 17.2 0
0.0 ‐ 0.0 ‐ 0.0 50.0 ‐ ‐ 0
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
NOTE: [1] = (PHI)f * Fcrw (Eq. 6.10.3.2.1‐3)

[2] = (PHI)f * Rh * Fyc (Eq. 6.10.3.2.1‐1) or
= (PHI)f * Rh * Fyt (Eq. 6.10.3.2.2‐1)
[3] = (PHI)f * Fnc (Eq. 6.10.3.2.1‐2)
Page 47
GD132
184 of 325
"‐" is N.A.
The values of fbu and fl shall be determined based on


1
CODE CHECK
Beam\Design\East
TABLE 1.2.22.10A=RATIO OF APPLIED STRESS AND THE CAPACITY

****************************************
SP IN D FROM fl/ fbu/ fbu+fl/ fbu+1/3fl/ MAX.

0.6Fyt [1] [2] [3] RAT. GOVN.
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
1 0 0.00 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 1

0.000 0.000 3
1 1 3.93 0.000 0.097 0.097 0.283 0.283 4
0.097 0.097 3
1 2 7.87 0.000 0.173 0.173 0.503 0.503 4
0.173 0.173 3
1 3 11.80 0.000 0.227 0.227 0.660 0.660 4
0.227 0.227 3
1 4 15.73 0.000 0.260 0.260 0.754 0.754 4
0.260 0.260 3
1 5 19.67 0.000 0.271 0.271 0.786 0.786 4
0.271 0.271 3
1 6 23.60 0.000 0.260 0.260 0.754 0.754 4
0.260 0.260 3
1 7 27.53 0.000 0.227 0.227 0.660 0.660 4
0.227 0.227 3
1 8 31.47 0.000 0.173 0.173 0.503 0.503 4
0.173 0.173 3
1 9 35.40 0.000 0.097 0.097 0.283 0.283 4
0.097 0.097 3
Page 48
GD133
185 of 325
1 10 39.33 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 1
0.000 0.000 3
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
NOTE: [1] = (PHI)f * Fcrw (Eq. 6.10.3.2.1‐3)

[2] = (PHI)f * Rh * Fyc (Eq. 6.10.3.2.1‐1) or
= (PHI)f * Rh * Fyt (Eq. 6.10.3.2.2‐1)
[3] = (PHI)f * Fnc (Eq. 6.10.3.2.1‐2)

1 = fl / 0.6Fyt
2 = fbu / [1]
3 = fbu + fl / [2]
4 = (fbu + 1/3fl) / [3]
1
CODE CHECK
Beam\Design\East
TABLE 1.2.22.14=STRENGTH LIMIT STATE CHECK

**************************
SP IN D FROM ID Mu+1/3flSxt [1] fbu [2] fl [3] fbu+ [4] FLAG

NO NO L SUPT 1/3fl MCTD
(ft) (k‐ft) (k‐ft) (ksi) (ksi) (ksi) (ksi) (ksi) (ksi)
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
1 0 0.00 0 0.0 1358.0 ‐ ‐ 0.0 30.0 ‐ ‐ 0‐‐0

1 1 3.93 0 253.0 1358.0 ‐ ‐ 0.0 30.0 ‐ ‐ 0‐‐0
1 2 7.87 0 436.5 1358.0 ‐ ‐ 0.0 30.0 ‐ ‐ 0‐‐0
1 3 11.80 0 551.8 1358.0 ‐ ‐ 0.0 30.0 ‐ ‐ 0‐‐0
1 4 15.73 0 615.3 1358.0 ‐ ‐ 0.0 30.0 ‐ ‐ 0‐‐0
1 5 19.67 0 620.4 1358.0 ‐ ‐ 0.0 30.0 ‐ ‐ 0‐‐0
1 6 23.60 0 615.3 1358.0 ‐ ‐ 0.0 30.0 ‐ ‐ 0‐‐0
1 7 27.53 0 551.8 1358.0 ‐ ‐ 0.0 30.0 ‐ ‐ 0‐‐0
1 8 31.47 0 436.5 1358.0 ‐ ‐ 0.0 30.0 ‐ ‐ 0‐‐0
1 9 35.40 0 253.0 1358.0 ‐ ‐ 0.0 30.0 ‐ ‐ 0‐‐0
1 10 39.33 0 0.0 1358.0 ‐ ‐ 0.0 30.0 ‐ ‐ 0‐‐0
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
Page 49
GD134
186 of 325
NOTE: Top flange is assumed to be continuously braced for composite bridges.
[1] = (PHI)f * Mn (Eq. 6.10.7.1.1‐1)
"‐" is N.A.

M = Moment; C = Comp. Flange; T = Tension Flange
D = Ductility
For negative moment region or non‐compact sections in

positive moment region, the 1st line is for top
flange and the 2nd line is for bottom flange
The values of fbu, Mu and fl shall be determined based on


1
CODE CHECK
Beam\Design\East
TABLE 1.2.22.14A=RATIO OF APPLIED STRESS/MOMENT AND THE CAPACITY

***********************************************
SP IN D FROM ID Mu+1/3flSxt/ fbu/ fl/ fbu+1/3fl/ MAX.

[1] [2] [3] [4] RAT. GOVN.
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
Page 50
GD135
187 of 325
1 0 0.00 0 0.000 0.000 1
1 1 3.93 0 0.186 0.186 1
1 2 7.87 0 0.321 0.321 1
1 3 11.80 0 0.406 0.406 1
1 4 15.73 0 0.453 0.453 1
1 5 19.67 0 0.457 0.457 1
1 6 23.60 0 0.453 0.453 1
1 7 27.53 0 0.406 0.406 1
1 8 31.47 0 0.321 0.321 1
1 9 35.40 0 0.186 0.186 1
1 10 39.33 0 0.000 0.000 1
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
NOTE: [1] = (PHI)f * Mn (Eq. 6.10.7.1.1‐1)


1 = (Mu+1/3flSxt) / [1]
2 = fbu / [2]
3 = fl / [3]
4 = (fbu + 1/3fl) / [4]
1
CODE CHECK
Beam\Design\East
TABLE 1.2.22.15=UNSTIFFENED SECTION SHEAR CAPACITY

**********************************
SP IN D FROM Fy k Art.6.10.9.2 C Vp SHEAR CAPACITY

Page 51
GD136
188 of 325
NO NO L SUPT ‐‐‐‐‐ ‐‐‐‐‐ ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ D/tw ‐‐‐‐‐ ‐‐‐‐‐ ‐‐‐‐‐ ‐Eq.6.10.9.2‐‐
(ft) (ksi) [1] [2] [3] [4] (ksi) Vn = C x Vp
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
1 0 0.00 50.0 5.0 60.3 75.4 40.0 1.000 290.0 290.0

1 1 3.93 50.0 5.0 60.3 75.4 40.0 1.000 290.0 290.0
1 2 7.87 50.0 5.0 60.3 75.4 40.0 1.000 290.0 290.0
1 3 11.80 50.0 5.0 60.3 75.4 40.0 1.000 290.0 290.0
1 4 15.73 50.0 5.0 60.3 75.4 40.0 1.000 290.0 290.0
1 5 19.67 50.0 5.0 60.3 75.4 40.0 1.000 290.0 290.0
1 6 23.60 50.0 5.0 60.3 75.4 40.0 1.000 290.0 290.0
1 7 27.53 50.0 5.0 60.3 75.4 40.0 1.000 290.0 290.0
1 8 31.47 50.0 5.0 60.3 75.4 40.0 1.000 290.0 290.0
1 9 35.40 50.0 5.0 60.3 75.4 40.0 1.000 290.0 290.0
1 10 39.33 50.0 5.0 60.3 75.4 40.0 1.000 290.0 290.0
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
1
CODE CHECK
Beam\Design\East
NOTE: [1] k= buckling coefficient = 5+5/((d0/D)**2)

= 5 for unstiffened beams and girders
= 5 for stiffened girders when (d0/D) > 3, or
(d0/D) > (260/(D/tw))**2
[2] = 1.12 * sqrt(Ek / Fyw)
[3] = 1.40 * sqrt(Ek / Fyw)
[4] C = ratio of nominal shear resistance and plastic shear force, Vp
For D/tw < [2], C = 1.0
For [2] <= D/tw <= [3], C = 1.12 * sqrt(Ek / Fyw) / (D/tw)
..... AASHTO LRFD Eq.6.10.9.3.2‐6
For D/tw > [3], C = 1.57 * (Ek / Fyw) / (D/tw)^2

..... AASHTO LRFD Eq.6.10.9.3.2‐7
Page 52
GD137
189 of 325
** AASHTO LRFD Art.6.10.9.1 ‐‐‐ For interior web panels considered
stiffened
if (d0/D) < 3 without long. stiffener, or
if (d0/D) > 3 with both transv. and long. stiffeners.
For handling requirement, (d0/D) > (260/(D/tw))**2
Vu = CVp
where D = clear, unsupported distance between flange components
d0 = distance between transverse stiffeners
** This Article (6.10.9.2) indicates that a designer cannot

count on post‐buckling shear resistance from tension‐
field action for an unstiffened girder.
1
CODE CHECK
Beam\Design\East
TABLE 1.2.22.16=SUMMARY OF WEB STRENGTH CATEGORY

********************************
S T R E N G T H C A T E G O R Y; SEE NOTE
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
SP IN D FROM WEB STABILITY LFD/LRFD UNSTIFFENED OVERALL
NO NO L SUPT UNSTIFFENED,[1] MAX. SHEAR <=> SHEAR CAPA‐ CATEGORY WEB
(ft) ‐‐‐‐ D/tw ‐‐‐‐‐ (kip) CITY, [2]
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
1 0 0.00 0 73.1 < 290.0 0 0

1 1 3.93 0 61.9 < 290.0 0 0
1 2 7.87 0 50.9 < 290.0 0 0
1 3 11.80 0 40.1 < 290.0 0 0
1 4 15.73 0 30.1 < 290.0 0 0
1 5 19.67 0 20.2 < 290.0 0 0
1 6 23.60 0 30.1 < 290.0 0 0
1 7 27.53 0 40.1 < 290.0 0 0
1 8 31.47 0 50.9 < 290.0 0 0
1 9 35.40 0 61.9 < 290.0 0 0
1 10 39.33 0 73.1 < 290.0 0 0
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
Page 53
GD138
190 of 325
1
CODE CHECK
Beam\Design\East
NOTE [1]: WEB STABILITY, D/tw ratio ..... buckling consideration
For compact section (composite sections in positive flexure)
w/o long. stiff.
D/tw <= 150 (Eq. 6.10.2.1.1‐1)
w / long. stiff.
D/tw <= 300 (Eq. 6.10.2.1.2‐1)
2Dcp/tw .LE. 3.76*sqrt(E/Fyc) ......... AASHTO Eq.6.10.6.2.2‐1
For compact or non‐compact sections specified in Art. 6.10.8
(composite sections in negative flexure and

non‐composite sections)
2Dc/tw .LE. 5.7*SQRT(E/Fyc) ........... AASHTO Eq.6.10.6.2.3‐1
[2]: SHEAR CAPACITY ... web crippling control
Vn = CVp .......... AASHTO Eq.6.10.9.2‐1
Vn = VpRc1 ......... AASHTO Eq.6.10.9.3.2‐2
Rc1 = C+[0.87(1‐C)]/sqrt(1+(d0/D)**2) for 2Dtw/(bfctfc+bfttft) <=2.5
Vn = VpRc2 ......... AASHTO Eq.6.10.9.3.2‐8
Rc2 = C+[0.87(1‐C)]/[sqrt(1+(d0/D)**2)+(d0/D)] for 2Dtw/(bfctfc+bfttft) > 2.5
Vp = 0.58*Fy*D*tw ...... AASHTO Eq.6.10.9.3.2‐2
* For the detailed description of shear capacity,

please refer to AASHTO Art.6.10.9.2 and .3
Page 54
GD139
191 of 325
* STRENGTH CATEGORY; 0 = compact section
2 = braced non‐compact section
3 = slender section
1
CODE CHECK
Beam\Design\East
TABLE 1.2.22.17=TRANSVERSE STIFFENER SPACING

****************************
YIELD LFD/LRFD UNSTIFFENED REQUIREMENT OF MAX. ALLOWABLE

SP IN D FROM STRESS MAXIMUM SHEAR ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ TRANS. STIFFENERS
NO NO L SUPT Fy SHEAR CAPACITY TRANS. STIFFENERS SPACING
(ft) (ksi) (k) (k) 1=YES , 0=NO (ft‐in)
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
1 0 0.00 50. 73.11 290.00 0

1 1 3.93 50. 61.90 290.00 0
1 2 7.87 50. 50.86 290.00 0
1 3 11.80 50. 40.07 290.00 0
1 4 15.73 50. 30.06 290.00 0
1 5 19.67 50. 20.22 290.00 0
1 6 23.60 50. 30.06 290.00 0
1 7 27.53 50. 40.07 290.00 0
1 8 31.47 50. 50.86 290.00 0
1 9 35.40 50. 61.90 290.00 0
1 10 39.33 50. 73.11 290.00 0
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
1
CODE CHECK
Beam\Design\East
TABLE 1.2.22.20B=SPECIAL SHEAR REQUIREMENTS FOR WEBS

***********************************
SHEAR
SP IN D FROM ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ FACTORED UNF. PERM +
NO NO L SUPT DL FATIGUE PERM. V* <=> Vcr <=> FAC FATIG V**
Page 55
GD140
192 of 325
(ft) (k) (k) (k) (k) (k)
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
1 0 0.00 12.70 14.30 15.88 < 290.00 > 34.16

1 1 3.93 10.16 11.99 12.70 < 290.00 > 28.15
1 2 7.87 7.62 9.68 9.53 < 290.00 > 22.14
1 3 11.80 5.08 9.08 6.35 < 290.00 > 18.71
1 4 15.73 2.54 7.64 3.18 < 290.00 > 14.00
1 5 19.67 0.00 6.19 0.00 < 290.00 > 9.29
1 6 23.60 2.54 7.64 3.18 < 290.00 > 14.00
1 7 27.53 5.08 9.08 6.35 < 290.00 > 18.71
1 8 31.47 7.62 9.68 9.53 < 290.00 > 22.14
1 9 35.40 10.16 11.99 12.70 < 290.00 > 28.15
1 10 39.33 12.70 14.30 15.88 < 290.00 > 34.16
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
NOTE: This table checks Art. 6.10.3.3 and Art. 6.10.5.3.
Vcr is the shear‐buckling resistance determined from Eq. 6.10.9.3.3‐1.
* f*(DL)
If default, load factor f=1.25 is used.
** (DL)+f*FATIGUE LOAD
If default, Fatigue I load factor f=1.5 is used.
1
MERLIN V 10.6
CODE CHECK
Beam\Design\East
TABLE 1.2.22.21=SERVICE LIMIT STATE CHECK

*************************
SP IN D FROM TOP FLANGE BOT. FLANGE

COMP. FLG
ff ff+fl/2
[1] RATIO1 ff+fl/2 [2] RATIO2
fc fcrw FLAG
NO NO L SUPT [3] TBC
(ft) (ksi) (ksi) (ksi) (ksi) (ksi) (ksi) (ksi)
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
1 0 0.00 0.0 ‐ 47.5 0.000 0.0 47.5 0.000 ‐ ‐ 00‐

1 1 3.93 3.3 ‐ 47.5 0.070 9.7 47.5 0.204 ‐ ‐ 00‐
1 2 7.87 5.9 ‐ 47.5 0.125 16.8 47.5 0.354 ‐ ‐ 00‐
1 3 11.80 7.8 ‐ 47.5 0.164 21.4 47.5 0.450 ‐ ‐ 00‐
1 4 15.73 8.9 ‐ 47.5 0.187 23.9 47.5 0.504 ‐ ‐ 00‐
1 5 19.67 9.2 ‐ 47.5 0.194 24.3 47.5 0.511 ‐ ‐ 00‐
1 6 23.60 8.9 ‐ 47.5 0.187 23.9 47.5 0.504 ‐ ‐ 00‐
1 7 27.53 7.8 ‐ 47.5 0.164 21.4 47.5 0.450 ‐ ‐ 00‐
Page 56
GD141
193 of 325
1 8 31.47 5.9 ‐ 47.5 0.125 16.8 47.5 0.354 ‐ ‐ 00‐
1 9 35.40 3.3 ‐ 47.5 0.070 9.7 47.5 0.204 ‐ ‐ 00‐
1 10 39.33 0.0 ‐ 47.5 0.000 0.0 47.5 0.000 ‐ ‐ 00‐
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
1
CODE CHECK
Beam\Design\East
NOTE: [1] = 0.95RhFyf for composite sections (Eq. 6.10.4.2.2‐1)

[2] = 0.95RhFyf for composite sections (Eq. 6.10.4.2.2‐2)
[3] = 0.9Ek / (D/tw)^2 (Eq. 6.10.1.9.1‐1)
but not to exceed the smaller of RhFyc and Fyw/0.7
k = bending‐buckling coefficient
= 9 / (Dc/D)^2 (Eq. 6.10.1.9.1‐2)
where:
Dc = depth of the web in compression in the elastic
range. For composite sections, Dc shall be
determined as specified in Article D6.3.1
"‐" is N.A.
Flag check ‐ 0 = OK; 1 = NG

T = Top Flange; B = Bottom Flange; C = Comp. Flange
The values of fl shall be determined based on

RATIO1 = ff / [1] or (ff + fl/2) / [1] (top flange)

RATIO2 = (ff + fl/2 ) / [2] (bot. flange)
1
CODE CHECK
Beam\Design\East
TABLE 1.2.22.23.1=FATIGUE I STRESS RANGE FOR INFINITE LIFE (FACTORED)

****************************************
Page 57
GD142
194 of 325

‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐

‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐

1 3 11.80 TR ‐0.1 A B B^C^C D E E^ TR 7.1 A B B^C^C
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
NOTE: TR = Truck loading; LRFD Fatigue I Limit State with 1.5 load factor.
Design for Infinite Life


1
CODE CHECK
Page 58
GD143
195 of 325
Beam\Design\East
TABLE 1.2.22.23.2=FATIGUE II STRESS RANGE FOR FINITE LIFE (FACTORED)

***************************************

‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐

‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐

‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
NOTE: TR = Truck loading; LRFD Fatigue II Limit State with 0.75 load factor.
Design for Finite Life w/ ADTT Single Lane= 153 & No. of Cycles= 8376750
* If ADTT Single Lane greater than or equal to 960, refer to Fatigue I Table.


1
Page 59
GD144
196 of 325
CODE CHECK
Beam\Design\East
TABLE 1.2.22.24.1=SHEAR CONNECTOR (FATIGUE CRITERIA) FATIGUE I (FACTORED)

********************************************

‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
1 0 0.00 21.5 .42693E‐01 0.9 TR 4.21 2 9.20

1 1 3.93 19.7 .42693E‐01 0.8 TR 4.21 2 10.01
1 2 7.87 18.0 .42693E‐01 0.8 TR 4.21 2 10.97
1 3 11.80 18.8 .42693E‐01 0.8 TR 4.21 2 10.48
1 4 15.73 18.6 .42693E‐01 0.8 TR 4.21 2 10.62
1 5 19.67 18.6 .42693E‐01 0.8 TR 4.21 2 10.62
1 6 23.60 18.6 .42693E‐01 0.8 TR 4.21 2 10.62
1 7 27.53 18.8 .42693E‐01 0.8 TR 4.21 2 10.48
1 8 31.47 18.0 .42693E‐01 0.8 TR 4.21 2 10.97
1 9 35.40 19.7 .42693E‐01 0.8 TR 4.21 2 10.01
1 10 39.33 21.5 .42693E‐01 0.9 TR 4.21 2 9.20
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
1
CODE CHECK
Beam\Design\East
Page 60
GD145
197 of 325
Eqn.6.10.10.1.2‐3

consideration.
= SQRT(Vfat^2 + Ffat^2) (Eq. 6.10.10.1.2‐2)
Vfat = Vf*Q/I (Eq. 6.10.10.1.2‐3)
as 24 inches

connector, AASHTO LRFD Eqn.6.10.10.2‐1 for Fatigue I

AASHTO Fatigue Combinations I where ADTT Single Lane= 153
*** If ADTT Single Lane is less than 960, use Fatigue II Table.
1
CODE CHECK
Beam\Design\East
TABLE 1.2.22.24.2=SHEAR CONNECTOR (FATIGUE CRITERIA) FATIGUE II (FACTORED)

*********************************************

Page 61
GD146
198 of 325
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
1 0 0.00 10.7 .42693E‐01 0.5 TR 3.73 2 16.28

1 1 3.93 9.9 .42693E‐01 0.4 TR 3.73 2 17.72
1 2 7.87 9.0 .42693E‐01 0.4 TR 3.73 2 19.43
1 3 11.80 9.4 .42693E‐01 0.4 TR 3.73 2 18.55
1 4 15.73 9.3 .42693E‐01 0.4 TR 3.73 2 18.80
1 5 19.67 9.3 .42693E‐01 0.4 TR 3.73 2 18.80
1 6 23.60 9.3 .42693E‐01 0.4 TR 3.73 2 18.80
1 7 27.53 9.4 .42693E‐01 0.4 TR 3.73 2 18.55
1 8 31.47 9.0 .42693E‐01 0.4 TR 3.73 2 19.43
1 9 35.40 9.9 .42693E‐01 0.4 TR 3.73 2 17.72
1 10 39.33 10.7 .42693E‐01 0.5 TR 3.73 2 16.28
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
1
CODE CHECK
Beam\Design\East
Eqn.6.10.10.1.2‐3

Page 62
GD147
199 of 325
consideration.
= SQRT(Vfat^2 + Ffat^2) (Eq. 6.10.10.1.2‐2)
Vfat = Vf*Q/I (Eq. 6.10.10.1.2‐3)
as 24 inches

connector, AASHTO LRFD Eqn.6.10.10.2‐2 for Fatigue II
* Default ALPHA value based on 7/8" diameter and input road type

AASHTO Fatigue Combination II. For II, see AASHTO 6.10.10.1.2
where ADTT Single Lane= 153 & No. of Cycles= 8376750
*** If ADTT Single Lane greater than or equal to 960, refer
to Fatigue I Table.
1
CODE CHECK
Beam\Design\East
TABLE 1.2.22.24A=SHEAR CONNECTOR (STRENGTH LIMIT STATE)

**************************************
MOMENT
REGION P2p,1n P1p P2n NO OF SHEAR SEE NOTE STATUS
SP IN D FROM ‐‐‐‐‐‐ ‐‐‐‐‐ ‐‐‐‐‐ ‐‐‐‐‐‐ CONNECTOR ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
NO NO L SUPT 1=POS. (k) (k) (k) N(PER ZONE) <=> N1 N2 BLANK=OK
(ft) 0=NEG. LRFD 6.10.10.4.2 FATIG. CRI. CHECK=**
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
1 5 19.67 1 1175.0 1346.4 30 < 38 **

1 10 39.33 1 1175.0 1346.4 30 < 38 **
Page 63
GD148
200 of 325
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
Please read NOTE on the Following Page
1
CODE CHECK
Beam\Design\East
Strength Limit State (Article 6.10.10.4)
[1] The number of shear connectors provided between the

section of maximum positive moment and each adjacent
point of 0.0 moment, or between each adjacent point
of 0.0 moment and centerline of an interior support
shall be checked to ensure that adequate connectors
are provided for Strength Limit State.
[2] The number of shear connectors required equal or exceed

the number given by the formula :
N1 (N2) = P / Qr ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ (Eq. 6.10.10.4.1‐2)

Where
N1 = Number of connectors between points of maximum
positive moment and each adjacent point of 0.0 moment
N2 = number of connectors between each adjacent point of
0.0 moment and the centerline of an interior support
P = total nominal horizontal shear force
Qr = factored shear resistance of one shear connector
= (Phi)sc Qn ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ (Eq. 6.10.10.4.1‐1)
Qn = nominal shear resistance
(Phi)sc = resistance factor for shear connectors
[3] The total horizontal shear force between the point of

maximum positive moment and each adjacent point of 0.0 moment
shall be the lesser either:
P1p = 0.85 f'c bs ts ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ (Eq. 6.10.10.4.2‐2)

or
P2p,1n = Fyw D tw + Fyt bft tft + Fyc bfc tfc (Eq. 6.10.10.4.2‐3,7)
Where
f'c = specified 28‐day compressive strength of the concrete
bs = effective width of the slab
Page 64
GD149
201 of 325
bfc = width of compression flange
bft = width of tension flange
ts = slab thickness
Fyw = specified minimum yield strength of the web
Fyt = specified minimum yield strength of the tension flange
Fyc = specified minimum yield strength of the compression flange
D = web depth
tft = thickness of tension flange
tfc = thickness of compression flange
tw = web thickness
[4] For continuous‐span composite sections, the total horizontal

shear force between each adjacent point of 0.0 moment
and the centerline of an interior support shall be taken as:
P2n = 0.45 f'c bs ts‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ (Eq. 6.10.10.4.2‐8)

Where
bs = effective width of the concrete deck
ts = thickness of a concrete deck
[5] If ADTT Single Lane is greater than 960, the pitch from Fatigue I will be
used.
If ADTT Single Lane is less than 960, the pitch should use Fatigue II.
1
CODE CHECK
Beam\Design\East
TABLE 1.2.22.24B=RECOMMENDED SHEAR CONNECTOR REQUIRED PITCH

******************************************
SPAN CURRENT SPAN REQUIRED

NO. FROM TO PITCH
(ft) (ft) (in)
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
1 0.000 19.667 12.000
1 19.667 39.333 12.000
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
1
Page 65
GD150
202 of 325
CODE CHECK
Beam\Design\East
TABLE 1.2.22.24C=TENSION‐COMPRESSION‐REVERSAL AREAS

**********************************
SPAN CURRENT SPAN T

NO. FROM TO C
(ft) (ft) R
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
1 0.0 39.3 C
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
NOTE: T: TENSION AREA, C: COMPRESSION AREA,

R: REVERSAL AREA BASED ON TOTAL TOP FLANGE
STRESSES
1
CODE CHECK
Beam\Design\East
TABLE 1.2.22.29=SPLICE DESIGN AT SECTION CHANGE POINTS

**************************************
Assumption: 1. Plate design is based on the average of the calculated design

stress and the allowable stress at the point of the splice
but no less than 75% of the allowable stress.
2. Web splice is proportioned for shear, moment due to eccentricity
of the shear and the portion of the flexural
moment resisted by the web. Min. shear of 1.5V or average.
3. The bolt design is based on the capacity. Designer should check
the need of staggering to satisfy the requirement of net areas.
1
CODE CHECK
Page 66
GD151
203 of 325
Beam\Design\East
TABLE 1.2.22.30=BEARING STIFFENERS

******************
SUP. NO. MAT'L. SIZE WELDING

(INCH or mm)
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
1 2 A709 GR. 50 4.00 X 0.4375 X 20.0 5/16
2 2 A709 GR. 50 4.00 X 0.4375 X 20.0 5/16
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
Please see LRFD Art. 6.10.11.2

1
MERLIN V 10.6
CODE CHECK
Beam\Design\East
TABLE 1.2.30.1=CODE CHECK STATUS SUMMARY

*************************
STATUS TABLE NO.

‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
OK 1.2.8.2=MAXIMUM LIVE LOAD DEFLECTION FOR COMPOSITE CONSTRUCTION
OK 1.2.22.4=DEPTH RATIOS
OK 1.2.22.10=CONSTRUCTIBILITY CHECK
OK 1.2.22.14=STRENGTH LIMIT STATE CHECK
OK 1.2.22.17=TRANSVERSE STIFFENER SPACING
OK 1.2.22.21=SERVICE LIMIT STATE CHECK
MORE TABLES TO BE INSPECTED ...
1.2.22.23A=FATIGUE STRESS RANGE FOR TRUCK (UNFACTORED)

Page 67
GD152
204 of 325
1.2.22.24=SHEAR CONNECTOR (FATIGUE CRITERIA) (UNFACTORED)
1.2.22.24A=SHEAR CONNECTOR (ULTIMATE STRENGTH CRITERIA)
1.2.22.29=SPLICE DESIGN AT SECTION CHANGE POINTS
Page 68
GD153
205 of 325
RATING OUTPUT
GD154
GD153
206 of 325
Form 4
N.H. D.O.T. TOWN: EAST KINGSTON
BRIDGE CAPACITY SUMMARY BRIDGE NUMBER: 061/064
DESIGN LOAD: HL-93 DESIGN METHOD: LRFD RATED BY: SIW DATE: 8/3/2016
RATING METHOD: LRFR (HS20) PLAN FILE: 131-2-1 CHECK BY: RLJ DATE: 9/9/2016
ROUTE: NH ROUTE 107A OVER: PAN AM RAILWAY AND RESIDENTIAL DR.
LONGITUDINAL REQUIRED CAPACITY (HS Tons) AVAILABLE CAPACITY (HS Tons)

RATED EFFECTIVE CURRENT CERTIFIED VEHICLES MULTIPLE LANES LOADED SINGLE LANES LOADED
MEMBER SPAN LEGAL SINGLE MULTIPLE
INVENTORY OPERATING POSTING INVENTORY OPERATING POSTING
LENGTH LOADS UNIT UNIT
CONCRETE DECK 1'-0" HS 14.0 HS 15.4 HS 15.4 HS 42.7 HS 55.3 HS 52.1 HS 42.7 HS 55.3 HS 52.1
STEEL GIRDERS
All Spans
Interior Girder 39'-4"
Exterior Girder 39'-4"

Rating Method English Tons Metric Tons

RECOMMENDED POSTING: NA (Op.) 63. LRFR 64. (Op.) 99.5 90.3
(Inv.) 65. LRFR 66. (Inv.) 76.8 69.6
GD155
207 of 325
East Kingston, NH MJ Project No.: 17960.08
NH RT 107A over PAN AM Railway and Residential Dr. Calc By: SIW Date: 8/3/2016
Deck Rating Calculations Chck By: RLJ Date: 9/9/2016
Deck Rating
Equivalent HS Load
Moment Shear
HS 20 Equivalent of HL93 Table Span 1.00 20.4 20.4 Index
Span 1.00 20.4 20.4 1
HS 20 Equivalent of HL93 Table Span 2.00 20.4 20.6
See NHDOT HS20 Equivalents of HL93 table
Positive Moment
Reference the deck design template. Note that total dead load is already factored.
Total Dead Load Moment 0.266 k-ft/ft Note that the DC1 from the deck design should be calculated assuming simply
Total Live Load Moment 4.68 k-ft/ft support beam theory due to the use of the PBUs.
Positive Moment Capacity 17.39 k-ft/ft
LL Factor Inv. 1.75 See current edition of MBE

LL Factor Opp. 1.35
Inventory Rating 2.090842491 42.65

Operating Rating 2.710351377 55.29
Negative Moment
Total Dead Load Moment 0.266 k-ft/ft Reference the deck design template.
Total Live Load Moment 2.22 k-ft/ft
Negative Moment Capacity 13.2 k-ft/ft

LL Factor Opp. 1.35

Overhang
Total Dead Load Moment 0.54 k-ft/ft

Total Live Load Moment 0.000001 k-ft/ft For strength 1 case truck is inboard of the exterior beam. Therefore the overhang
Moment Capacity 30.13 k-ft/ft sees no live load effect (small effect shown to get equations to work).

LL Factor Opp. 1.35

Controlling RF HS
Inventory: 2.09 42.65
Operating: 2.71 55.29
GD156
208 of 325
NH RT 107A over PAN AM Railway and Residential Dr. Calc By: SIW Date: 8/3/2016
Girder Rating Calculations Chck By: RLJ Date: 9/9/2016
ALL SPANS
RESULTS FROM BEAM RUNS

SHEAR MOMENT
Inventory Operating Inventory Operating
Interior Girder (Positive Moment) 3.52 4.56 2.52 3.27 Strength

2.47 3.21 Serviceability
Exterior Girder (Positive Moment) 4.83 6.26 2.61 3.38 Strength

See Merlin Dash Tables 1.2.33.3A, 1.2.32.1, and 1.2.32.2 for the shear, service moment, and strength moment
ratings respectively.
Equivalent HS Load
Moment Shear
HS 20 Equivalent of HL93 Table Span 39.00 25.9 24.7 Index
Span 39.33 25.8334 24.7333 39
HS 20 Equivalent of HL93 Table Span 40.00 25.7 24.8
See NHDOT HS20 Equivalents of HL93 table
DISTRIBUTION FACTORS
SHEAR MOMENT
Single Lane Mult Lanes Single Lane Mult Lanes


NOTE:
- Single lane distribution factors taken from fatigue values in Merlin Dash Table 1.1.3.2 then multiplied by 1.2.
- Since the single lane distribtuion factors control for the exterior beams, the multiple lane values will be pull from
the Mathcad input template.
MULTIPLE LANES - AVAILABLE CAPACITY (HS TONS)

SHEAR MOMENT


CONTROLLING INTERIOR 87.06 112.78 63.81 82.93

CONTROLLING EXTERIOR 119.46 154.83 65.62 85.51
SINGLE LANE - AVAILABLE CAPACITY (HS TONS)

SHEAR MOMENT


CONTROLLING INTERIOR 87.13 112.87 78.86 102.48

CONTROLLING EXTERIOR 119.84 155.32 65.83 85.78
GD157
209 of 325
INTERIOR GIRDER RATING OUTPUT
GD158
GD157
210 of 325
UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND LRF -- 2012
RATING
FILE NAME = L:\Employees\SWhite\East Kingston\Proposed Beam Design\PAGE 80 Beam\Rating\East
TABLE 1.2.32.1=RATING; MAXIMUM STRENGTH FOR MOMENT

***********************************
UNFACTORED UNFACTORED L+I

DEAD LOAD -------------- OPERAT. INVENT. C
SP IN D FROM MOMENT MOMENT MAX. MOMENT RATING LIVE RATING A
NO NO L SUPT CAP. --------------- FACTOR LOAD FACTOR T
(ft) (k-ft) D1; k-ft D2 POS. NEG. [3] TYPE
or STRESS ksi MAX. STRESS
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1 0 0.00 1358.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 9.99 HL-93 9.99 0

1 1 3.93 1358.0 43.4 1.5 115.7 0.0 8.34 HL-93 6.43 0
1 2 7.87 1358.0 77.1 2.7 197.8 0.0 4.71 HL-93 3.63 0
1 3 11.80 1358.0 101.2 3.6 247.0 0.0 3.68 HL-93 2.84 0
1 4 15.73 1358.0 115.7 4.1 273.3 0.0 3.28 HL-93 2.53 0
1 5 19.67 1358.0 120.5 4.3 272.5 0.0 3.27 HL-93 2.52 0
1 6 23.60 1358.0 115.7 4.1 273.3 0.0 3.28 HL-93 2.53 0
1 7 27.53 1358.0 101.2 3.6 247.0 0.0 3.68 HL-93 2.84 0
1 8 31.47 1358.0 77.1 2.7 197.8 0.0 4.71 HL-93 3.63 0
1 9 35.40 1358.0 43.4 1.5 115.7 0.0 8.34 HL-93 6.43 0
1 10 39.33 1358.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 9.99 HL-93 9.99 0
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Please read NOTES on the following page
GD159
GD158
211 of 325
RATING
NOTE [1]: GENERAL LOAD-RATING PROCEDURES ARE IN AASHTO LRFR 6.4
---> BASED ON LRFD , STRENGTH LIMIT STATE CRITERIA
[2]: AASHTO LRFR 6.4.2 LOAD-RATING EQUATION
[3]: RATING FACTOR 9.99 INDICATES THAT THE CURRENT

SECTION IS NOT GOVERNING AT ALL.
RATING FACTOR 0.0 INDICATES THAT EITHER ALLOWABLE STRESS

IS TOO LOW OR DEAD LOAD STRESS IS TOO HIGH
[4]: LRFD SECTION IS RATED BY

RF=(Mu-DRI1*(GDC*D1+GDW*D2)))/DRI1*GLLST1*(L+I)
FOR NON COMPACT SECTIONS, RATING FORMULA IS MODIFIED TO
RF=(Mu-DRI1*(GDC*D1*S2/S0+GDW*D2*S2/S1)))/DRI1*GLLST1*(L+I)
WHERE S0,S1 & S2 ARE SECTION MODULUS OF D1,D2 & L
STRESS CATEGORY SHOWN ON THE LAST COL. (0=COMPACT)
DRI: Factor related to Ductility, Redundancy and
operational Importance
Maximum for Strength and Minimum for Other Limit State
(AASHTO LRFD Art. 1.3.2.1)
[5]: FOR CONTINUOUS BEAM WITH COMPACT SECTIONS,

THE STRESSES ARE CALCULATED AFTER REDISTRIBUTION
GD160
GD159
212 of 325
RATING
TABLE 1.2.32.2=RATING; SERVICEABILITY STRENGTH

*******************************
UNFACTORED UNFACTORED L+I STRESS

0.95Fy DEAD LOAD ----------------------- OPERAT. INVENT.
SP IN D FROM OR ---STRESS--- MAX. POS. MAX. NEG. RATING LIVE RATING
NO NO L SUPT 0.80Fy STEEL ---STEEL--- --- STEEL--- FACTOR LOAD FACTOR
(ft) (ksi) TOP;ksi;BOT TOP;ksi;BOT TOP;ksi;BOT [3] TYPE
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1 0 0.00 47.5 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 9.99 HL-93 7.68
1 1 3.93 47.5 -3.15 3.21 -0.06 5.10 0.00 0.00 8.68 HL-93 6.68
1 2 7.87 47.5 -5.60 5.70 -0.10 8.73 0.00 0.00 4.79 HL-93 3.68
1 3 11.80 47.5 -7.35 7.48 -0.12 10.90 0.00 0.00 3.67 HL-93 2.82
1 4 15.73 47.5 -8.40 8.55 -0.14 12.06 0.00 0.00 3.23 HL-93 2.48
1 5 19.67 47.5 -8.75 8.91 -0.14 12.02 0.00 0.00 3.21 HL-93 2.47
1 6 23.60 47.5 -8.40 8.55 -0.14 12.06 0.00 0.00 3.23 HL-93 2.48
1 7 27.53 47.5 -7.35 7.48 -0.12 10.90 0.00 0.00 3.67 HL-93 2.82
1 8 31.47 47.5 -5.60 5.70 -0.10 8.73 0.00 0.00 4.79 HL-93 3.68
1 9 35.40 47.5 -3.15 3.21 -0.06 5.10 0.00 0.00 8.68 HL-93 6.68
1 10 39.33 47.5 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 9.99 HL-93 7.68
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
GD161
GD160
213 of 325
RATING
NOTE [1]: AASHTO 5.5.2.2 OPERATING RATING OF SECTIONS GOVERNED BY

SERVICEABILITY LOAD-STRENGTH RELATIONSHIP, PP.37
---> BASED ON LRFD, SERVICE II LIMIT STATE CRITERIA
[2]: AASHTO 5.5.2.2A; SERVICEABILITY STRENGTH.GE. [D+RF(L+I)]



GD162
GD161
214 of 325
RATING
TABLE 1.2.32.3A=BRIDGE MOMENT RATING INFORMATION FOR AASHTO TRUCK

*************************************************
SPAN CRITICAL LOCATION GOVERNING GOVERNING

------------- ------------------ RATING OPERATING INVENTORY LIVE LOAD
NO. LENGTH D FROM L SUPT CRITERION RATING RATING TYPE
(ft) (ft)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
1 39.33 19.67 STRENGTH L.S. 3.27 2.52 HL-93

1 39.33 19.67 SERVICEBILITY 3.21 2.47 HL-93
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
NOTE: Control Rating Factor for Current Bridge:
SERVICEBILITY
Operating= 3.210
Inventory= 2.469
GD163
GD162
215 of 325
RATING
TABLE 1.2.33.1=RATING; MAXIMUM STRENGTH FOR SHEAR

**********************************

DEAD LOAD -------------- OPERAT. INVENT.
SP IN D FROM SHEAR SHEAR MAX. SHEAR RATING LIVE RATING
NO NO L SUPT CAP. --------------- FACTOR LOAD FACTOR
(ft) (kips) D1; kips D2 POS. NEG. [3] TYPE
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1 0 0.00 290.0 12.3 0.4 44.5 0.0 4.56 HL-93 3.52

1 1 3.93 290.0 9.8 0.3 38.3 -2.3 5.36 HL-93 4.14
1 2 7.87 290.0 7.4 0.3 32.2 -4.7 6.45 HL-93 4.98
1 3 11.80 290.0 4.9 0.2 26.3 -7.2 7.98 HL-93 6.16
1 4 15.73 290.0 2.5 0.1 21.0 -10.9 9.99 HL-93 7.79
1 5 19.67 290.0 0.0 0.0 15.9 -15.9 9.99 HL-93 9.99
1 6 23.60 290.0 -2.5 -0.1 10.9 -21.0 9.99 HL-93 7.79
1 7 27.53 290.0 -4.9 -0.2 7.2 -26.3 7.98 HL-93 6.16
1 8 31.47 290.0 -7.4 -0.3 4.7 -32.2 6.45 HL-93 4.98
1 9 35.40 290.0 -9.8 -0.3 2.3 -38.3 5.36 HL-93 4.14
1 10 39.33 290.0 -12.3 -0.4 0.0 -44.5 4.56 HL-93 3.52
GD164
GD163
216 of 325
RATING
TABLE 1.2.33.3A=BRIDGE SHEAR RATING INFORMATION FOR AASHTO TRUCK

************************************************

(ft) (ft)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
1 39.33 39.33 STRENGTH L.S. 4.56 3.52 HL-93
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
STRENGTH L.S.
Operating= 4.560
Inventory= 3.518
GD165
GD164
217 of 325
EXTERIOR GIRDER RATING OUTPUT
GD166
GD165
218 of 325
RATING
TABLE 1.2.32.1=RATING; MAXIMUM STRENGTH FOR MOMENT

***********************************

DEAD LOAD -------------- OPERAT. INVENT. C
SP IN D FROM MOMENT MOMENT MAX. MOMENT RATING LIVE RATING A
NO NO L SUPT CAP. --------------- FACTOR LOAD FACTOR T
(ft) (k-ft) D1; k-ft D2 POS. NEG. [3] TYPE
or STRESS ksi MAX. STRESS
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1 0 0.00 1358.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 9.99 HL-93 9.99 0

1 1 3.93 1358.0 45.0 1.5 111.3 0.0 8.65 HL-93 6.67 0
1 2 7.87 1358.0 79.9 2.7 190.4 0.0 4.88 HL-93 3.77 0
1 3 11.80 1358.0 104.9 3.6 237.8 0.0 3.81 HL-93 2.94 0
1 4 15.73 1358.0 119.9 4.1 263.1 0.0 3.39 HL-93 2.61 0
1 5 19.67 1358.0 124.9 4.3 262.3 0.0 3.38 HL-93 2.61 0
1 6 23.60 1358.0 119.9 4.1 263.1 0.0 3.39 HL-93 2.61 0
1 7 27.53 1358.0 104.9 3.6 237.8 0.0 3.81 HL-93 2.94 0
1 8 31.47 1358.0 79.9 2.7 190.4 0.0 4.88 HL-93 3.77 0
1 9 35.40 1358.0 45.0 1.5 111.3 0.0 8.65 HL-93 6.67 0
1 10 39.33 1358.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 9.99 HL-93 9.99 0
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
GD167
GD166
219 of 325
RATING
NOTE [1]: GENERAL LOAD-RATING PROCEDURES ARE IN AASHTO LRFR 6.4
---> BASED ON LRFD , STRENGTH LIMIT STATE CRITERIA
[2]: AASHTO LRFR 6.4.2 LOAD-RATING EQUATION


[4]: LRFD SECTION IS RATED BY

RF=(Mu-DRI1*(GDC*D1+GDW*D2)))/DRI1*GLLST1*(L+I)
FOR NON COMPACT SECTIONS, RATING FORMULA IS MODIFIED TO
RF=(Mu-DRI1*(GDC*D1*S2/S0+GDW*D2*S2/S1)))/DRI1*GLLST1*(L+I)
WHERE S0,S1 & S2 ARE SECTION MODULUS OF D1,D2 & L
STRESS CATEGORY SHOWN ON THE LAST COL. (0=COMPACT)
DRI: Factor related to Ductility, Redundancy and
operational Importance
Maximum for Strength and Minimum for Other Limit State
(AASHTO LRFD Art. 1.3.2.1)

GD168
GD167
220 of 325
RATING
TABLE 1.2.32.2=RATING; SERVICEABILITY STRENGTH

*******************************
UNFACTORED UNFACTORED L+I STRESS

0.95Fy DEAD LOAD ----------------------- OPERAT. INVENT.
SP IN D FROM OR ---STRESS--- MAX. POS. MAX. NEG. RATING LIVE RATING
NO NO L SUPT 0.80Fy STEEL ---STEEL--- --- STEEL--- FACTOR LOAD FACTOR
(ft) (ksi) TOP;ksi;BOT TOP;ksi;BOT TOP;ksi;BOT [3] TYPE
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1 0 0.00 47.5 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 9.99 HL-93 7.68
1 1 3.93 47.5 -3.26 3.32 -0.06 4.91 0.00 0.00 8.99 HL-93 6.92
1 2 7.87 47.5 -5.80 5.91 -0.10 8.40 0.00 0.00 4.95 HL-93 3.81
1 3 11.80 47.5 -7.62 7.75 -0.12 10.49 0.00 0.00 3.79 HL-93 2.91
1 4 15.73 47.5 -8.70 8.86 -0.13 11.61 0.00 0.00 3.33 HL-93 2.56
1 5 19.67 47.5 -9.07 9.23 -0.13 11.57 0.00 0.00 3.31 HL-93 2.54
1 6 23.60 47.5 -8.70 8.86 -0.13 11.61 0.00 0.00 3.33 HL-93 2.56
1 7 27.53 47.5 -7.62 7.75 -0.12 10.49 0.00 0.00 3.79 HL-93 2.91
1 8 31.47 47.5 -5.80 5.91 -0.10 8.40 0.00 0.00 4.95 HL-93 3.81
1 9 35.40 47.5 -3.26 3.32 -0.06 4.91 0.00 0.00 8.99 HL-93 6.92
1 10 39.33 47.5 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 9.99 HL-93 7.68
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
GD169
GD168
221 of 325
RATING
NOTE [1]: AASHTO 5.5.2.2 OPERATING RATING OF SECTIONS GOVERNED BY

SERVICEABILITY LOAD-STRENGTH RELATIONSHIP, PP.37
---> BASED ON LRFD, SERVICE II LIMIT STATE CRITERIA
[2]: AASHTO 5.5.2.2A; SERVICEABILITY STRENGTH.GE. [D+RF(L+I)]



GD170
GD169
222 of 325
RATING
TABLE 1.2.32.3A=BRIDGE MOMENT RATING INFORMATION FOR AASHTO TRUCK

*************************************************

(ft) (ft)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
1 39.33 19.67 STRENGTH L.S. 3.38 2.61 HL-93

1 39.33 19.67 SERVICEBILITY 3.31 2.54 HL-93
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
SERVICEBILITY
Operating= 3.307
Inventory= 2.544
GD171
GD170
223 of 325
RATING
TABLE 1.2.33.1=RATING; MAXIMUM STRENGTH FOR SHEAR

**********************************

DEAD LOAD -------------- OPERAT. INVENT.
SP IN D FROM SHEAR SHEAR MAX. SHEAR RATING LIVE RATING
NO NO L SUPT CAP. --------------- FACTOR LOAD FACTOR
(ft) (kips) D1; kips D2 POS. NEG. [3] TYPE
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1 0 0.00 290.0 12.7 0.4 32.4 0.0 6.26 HL-93 4.83

1 1 3.93 290.0 10.2 0.3 27.9 -1.7 7.36 HL-93 5.68
1 2 7.87 290.0 7.6 0.3 23.4 -3.4 8.86 HL-93 6.83
1 3 11.80 290.0 5.1 0.2 19.1 -5.3 9.99 HL-93 8.46
1 4 15.73 290.0 2.5 0.1 15.3 -7.9 9.99 HL-93 9.99
1 5 19.67 290.0 0.0 0.0 11.6 -11.6 9.99 HL-93 9.99
1 6 23.60 290.0 -2.5 -0.1 7.9 -15.3 9.99 HL-93 9.99
1 7 27.53 290.0 -5.1 -0.2 5.3 -19.1 9.99 HL-93 8.46
1 8 31.47 290.0 -7.6 -0.3 3.4 -23.4 8.86 HL-93 6.83
1 9 35.40 290.0 -10.2 -0.3 1.7 -27.9 7.36 HL-93 5.68
1 10 39.33 290.0 -12.7 -0.4 0.0 -32.4 6.26 HL-93 4.83
GD172
GD171
224 of 325
RATING
TABLE 1.2.33.3A=BRIDGE SHEAR RATING INFORMATION FOR AASHTO TRUCK

************************************************

(ft) (ft)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
1 39.33 39.33 STRENGTH L.S. 6.26 4.83 HL-93
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
STRENGTH L.S.
Operating= 6.256
Inventory= 4.826
GD173
GD172
225 of 325
DECK DESIGN
226 of 325

Design Deck Thickness Calculations X-A003 (411)

REV.
NO.
0 9/20/2016 9/21/2016
To determine the maximum deck thickness that can be used on the proposed PBUs.
Due to the reuse of the existing steel bents, it is desirable not to increase the applied dead load to the piers. The following
calculations compare the existing superstructure to the proposed superstructure to determine what the maximum proposed
deck thickness can be without increasing the applied dead load to the pier.

Deck Thickness Determination M:\17960.08 East Kingston
Deck thickness calculations
(Mathcad) 26942\Design\Superstructure Weight - Deck Thickness
CONCLUSIONS:
The proposed deck thickness is 8 ½” after the initial deck grinding.
PAGE 1 OF 1
227 of 325
New Hampshire Department of Transportation MJ Project No.: 17960.08
East Kingston Sheet: 1 of 3
Bridge No. 061/064 Calc by: SIW Date: 6/1/2016
53 Regional Drive NH 107A over B&M R.R. Chck by: JAL Date: 9/13/2016 .
Concord, NH 03301 Structural Deck Thickness
PURPOSE
This worksheet is used to determine the structural deck thickness required to not increase the dead load applied
to the existing steel bent piers
BRIDGE PARAMETERS
Span Length: Lspan  40 ft  1.5in  40.125 ft Controlling Span from Original Plan Set
Number of Spans: Nspan  3 Existing Plans Framing Plan
Bridge Width: wbridge  32ft  2in Existing Plans Bridge Typical Section
Number of Girders: Nb  8 Existing Plans Framing Plan
Girder Spacing: Spa  4ft Existing Plans Framing Plan
Roadway Cross Slope: XS rw  2.00% Proposed Cross Slope
Minimum Haunch: thaunch.min  1in
Existing Curb: wcurb.ex  25in tcurb.ex  10in
Proposed Curb: wcurb.prop  24in tcurb.prop  7.25in
UNIT WEIGHTS:
Steel unit weight γsteel  490  pcf NHDOT BDM V2.0 Table 4.3.2-1
γconc  150pcf NHDOT BDM V2.0 Table 4.3.2-1
Concrete deck unit weight:
Wearing surface unit weight: γws  140pcf NHDOT BDM V2.0 Table 4.3.2-1
GIRDER PROPERTIES & DETAILS

 The steel beam shape used on this bridge is a rolled shape, 24 WF 74. This is a historic shape and its
properties were taken from the historic shape tables provided by AISC.
24 WF 74:
Web Height: d w  22.546in
Top Flange Width: b tf  8.975in
Bottom Flange Width: b bf  8.975in
Depth of Section: d  d w  ttf  tbf  23.87  in
2
Area of Section: As  21.77in
Steel Weight: ωexist  74plf
Deck Thickness Determination.xmcd 1 of 3
228 of 325
Existing Deck System Weight:
Average Existing Deck Thickness: tslab.ex  mean( 6in 7.5in)  6.75 in

tex.ws  2in
Wearing Surface Thickness:
Weight per square foot of deck: wex.deck  wbridge  tslab.ex γconc  wbridge  tex.ws γws  ttf  b tf  Nb γconc  3415.106 plf
Equivalent Existing Deck wex.deck

tdeck.ex.eq   8.494  in
Thickness: wbridge  γconc
Proposed Deck System:

 btf 
Haunch Thickness: thaunch    XSrw  thaunch.min  1.09 in
 2 
Weight of Haunch: Whaunch  Nb thaunch b tf  γconc  81.504 plf
Whaunch
Equivalent Deck Thickness: thaunch.eq   0.203  in
wbridge  γconc
Weight of New Beam per ωnew  Nb [ 2 ( 9in)  ( 0.75in)  ( 20in)  ( 0.5in) ]  γsteel  639.722  plf
Foot:
Weight Increase for new

Wst.add   ωnew  Nb ωexist  47.722 plf
beam:
Wst.add
Equivalent Deck Thickness: tst.eq   0.119  in
wbridge  γconc
Change in Curb Weight: WCH.curb  2  wcurb.prop tcurb.prop    wcurb.ex tcurb.ex  γconc  158.333  plf
WCH.curb
Equivalent Deck Thickness: tcurb.eq   0.394  in negative because the proposed curb
wbridge  γconc is lighter than the existing curb
Minimum Sacrificial
tsws.min  0.25in Only 0.25" of sacrificial surface remains after the
Wearing Surface
initial deck grind
Thickness:
Maximum Allowable Deck tdeck.max  tdeck.ex.eq  thaunch.eq  tst.eq  tcurb.eq  tsws.min  8.316  in
Thickness:
229 of 325
Summary: Existing Deck and Wearing

Surface Thickness: 8.49 in.
Equivalent Haunch Thickness:
0.20 in.
Equivalent Additional Steel
Thickness: 0.12 in.
Sacrificial Deck Thickness:
0.25 in.
Maximum Allowable Structural negative because new curb
Deck Thickness: ‐0.39 in. is lighter than existing
Maximum Allowable Structural
Deck Thickness: 8.32 in.
The NHDOT was ok with using an 8.5" deck which includes a sacrificial wearing surface of 0.25" after
the initial deck grinding since this will result in only a slight (less than 5%) increase in dead weight to
the existing steel pier bents (July 18, 2016 meeting between B. Landry, B. Juliano, J. Lund, and S.
White).
230 of 325

PBU Concrete Deck Design X-A003 (411)

REV.
NO.
0 9/12/2016 9/14/2016
To design the concrete deck included as part of the PBU
This design calc. package uses Mathcad templates to design the reinforced concrete deck included in the PBU’s. This
calc. package does not include calculations for the longitudinal closure pour or the link slab.
As part of the link slab calculations, it was determined that #5’s @ 6” are required for the top longitudinal
reinforcement in the PBU’s (see the Link Slab calc. package). Also as part of the link slab detailing the longitudinal
reinforcement will be located above the transverse reinforcement.
The initial cast thickness of the PBU concrete deck will be 8 ¾”. After the initial diamond grinding the concrete deck
thickness will be 8 ½”. This thickness includes a ¼” for future grinding for resurfacing. This means that the structural
deck thickness for design will be 8 ¼”. The design clear cover will be 2 ½” from the top bars (plans will show 2 ¾”
because the in place deck thickness will be 8 ½”) and 1 ¼” from the bottom bars.

Deck Design (MATHCAD) M:\17960.08 East Kingston 26942\Design\Deck Design Used to design the concrete deck.
Deck Overhang Design

M:\17960.08 East Kingston 26942\Design\Deck Design Used to design the deck overhang
(MATHCAD)
CONCLUSIONS:
Top Longitudinal Bars: #5’s @ 6”
Top Transverse Bars: #5’s @ 6”
Bottom Longitudinal Bars: #4’s @ 6”
Bottom Transverse Bars: #5’s @ 6”
PAGE 1 OF 1
231 of 325
À CLOSURE POUR
** 7 - #5E @ 6"± = 3'-0"± 8'-1"

CENTERED ABOUT À BRIDGE RAIL POST
7'-9‚" 3ƒ"
2'-0" 5'-9‚"
#5E @ 12" **
BRUSH CURB (LEVEL)
(TIE TO RAIL POST
ANCHORAGE ASSEMBLIES) 3 - #5E
(DO NOT WELD) #5E @ 6" (TOP)
(SPACE AS SHOWN)
#5E @ 6"
* PRIOR TO INITIAL ‚"
DIAMOND GRINDING
8ƒ" DECK *
CLR *
#4E @ 6" (BOT)
REVEAL
7"
9• "
3"
2% EXPOSED
AGGREGATE
FINISH
CLR
#5E @ 6"
8„ " (MIN)
BUNDLE WITH #5 @ 6" 6•"
1‚ "
VARIES
(TOP TRANSVERSE) (TYP)

2" LEVEL
2'-1" 4'-0" 2'-0"
À GIRDER
À GIRDER
EXTERIOR PREFABRICATED BRIDGE UNIT (PBU)
À CLOSURE POUR À CLOSURE POUR
8'-0"
3ƒ" 7'-4•" 3ƒ"
* PRIOR TO INITIAL ‚"

#5E @ 6" #5E @ 6" (TOP)
#4E @ 6" (BOT) DIAMOND GRINDING
8ƒ" DECK *
3" CLR *
EXPOSED
2%
AGGREGATE
FINISH (TYP)
1‚ " CLR
6•"
(TYP)
2'-0" 4'-0" 2'-0"
À GIRDER
À GIRDER
INTERIOR PREFABRICATED BRIDGE UNIT (PBU)
232 of 325
East Kingston, NH Project No.: 17960.08 _
Bridge No. 061/064 Sheet: 1 _ of: 8_
NH RT 107A over PAN AM R.R Calc By: SIW Date:7/20/2016
53 Regional Drive Deck Design Chck By: WRB Date: 09/12/2016
Concord, NH 03301
MATERIAL PROPERTIES Code Reference:

Concrete Unit Weight: γconcrete  150pcf NHDOT BDM V2.0 Table 4.3.2-1
Concrete 28-day Compressive Strength: f'c  4.0ksi NHDOT BDM v1.0 Section 650.3.1
0.33
 f'c 
Concrete Modulus of Elasticity: Econc  2500    ksi  3950.207 ksi AASHTO C5.4.2.4
 ksi 
Reinforcing Yield Strength: Fy  60ksi NHDOT BDM v1.0 Section 650.3.2
Reinforcing Modulus of Elasticity: Es  29000ksi AASHTO 5.4.3.2
CROSS SECTION GEOMETRY

Design deck thickness: d deck  8.25 in
(design on a per foot basis)
Design strip width: b w  1ft
Girder spacing: Sbeam  4ft
Out to Out of Bridge: Wbridge  32ft  2in  32.167 ft
Overhang Width: Woverhang  2ft  1in  2.083 ft
Number of girders: Nb  8
Wearing surface thickness: tws  0.25 in See NHDOT Bare Deck Meeting Minutes
Roadway cross slope: XS rw  2.00%
Minimum haunch thickness: thaunch.min  1in
Girder top flange dimensions: b tf  9in ttf  0.75in
Girder web dimensions: tw  0.5in d w  20in
Girder bottom flange dimensions: b bf  9in tbf  0.75in
Brush curb dimensions: Wcurb  2ft tcurb  7in
Effective Slab Span: Seff  Sbeam  tw  3.958 ft (face-face of web, LRFD 9.7.2.3)
LOAD AND RESISTANCE FACTORS

Strength I Limit State Load Factors (LRFD Tables 3.4.1-1 & 3.4.1-2):
Components & Attachments: γpDC.strength1  1.25
Wearing Surface (Maximum): γpDW.strength1  1.50
Live Load: γLL.strength1  1.75
Service I Limit State Load Factors (LRFD Table 3.4.1-1):

Dead Loads: γpDL.service1  1.0
Live Load: γLL.service1  1.0
Service II Limit State Load Factors (LRFD Table 3.4.1-1):

Dead Loads: γpDL.service2  1.0
Live Load: γLL.service2  1.3
Deck Design.xmcd 1 of 8
233 of 325
Concord, NH 03301
Extreme Event II Limit State Load Factors:

Components & Attachments: γpDC.ext2  1.0 LRFD Section A13.4.1
Wearing Surface (Maximum): γpDW.ext2  1.0 LRFD Section A13.4.1
Vehicular Collision: γCT.ext2  1.0 LRFD Table 3.4.1-1
LRFD Limit State Resistance Factors (LRFD 5.5.4.2):

Strength I: ϕb  0.90 (for tension-controlled section) LRFD Section 5.5.4.2
ϕv  0.90
Extreme Event II: ϕext  1.00 LRFD Section 1.3.2.1

Service I: ϕserv  1.00 LRFD Section 1.3.2.1
BRIDGE DECK REINFORCEMENT

See NHDOT Bare Deck
Concrete cover (bottom of deck and/or bottom overhang): coverbot  1.25 in
Meeting Minutes, and
Concrete cover (top of deck): covertop  2.50 in 7/18/2016 meeting with Bob
Landry. There will be 2.5" of
cover after the initial grinding.
Top Longitudinal Reinforcement
Top Reinforcing Size & Spacing: Sizelong.top  5 bar space.long.top  6in
Bar Diameter: bar diam.long.top  Diameterrebar  Sizelong.top bar diam.long.top  0.625  in
Ab.long.top  Arearebar  Sizelong.top

2
Bar Area: Ab.long.top  0.31 in
 bw 
As.long.top   Ab.long.top  
2
Area of Steel Provided per foot:  As.long.top  0.62 in
 barspace.long.top 
234 of 325
Concord, NH 03301
Bottom Longitudinal Reinforcement

Bot Reinforcing Size & Spacing: Sizelong.bot  4 bar space.long.bot  6in
Bar Diameter: bar diam.long.bot  Diameterrebar  Sizelong.bot bar diam.long.bot  0.5 in
Ab.long.bot  Arearebar  Sizelong.bot

2
Bar Area: Ab.long.bot  0.2 in
 bw 
Area of Steel Provided per foot: As.long.bot   Ab.long.bot    2
As.long.bot  0.4 in
 barspace.long.bot 
Bottom Transverse Reinforcement (#5 @ 6"):
Bottom Reinforcing Size & Spacing: Sizebot  5 bar space.bot  6in
Reinforcing Bar Area: Ab.pos  Arearebar  Sizebot 2

Ab.pos  0.31 in
Bar Diameter: bar diam.pos  Diameterrebar  Sizebot
bar diam.pos  0.625  in
1  ft
Area of Steel Provided: As.pos.bot  Ab.pos  2
barspace.bot As.pos.bot  0.62 in
 bardiam.pos 
Reinforcement Effective Depth: d s.bot  d deck  coverbot    d s.bot  6.687  in
 2 
Top Transverse Reinforcement (#5 @ 6"):
Top Reinforcing Size & Spacing: Sizetop  5 bar space.top  6in
Ab.neg  Arearebar  Sizetop

2
Reinforcing Bar Area: Ab.neg  0.31 in
Bar Diameter: bar diam.neg  Diameterrebar  Sizetop bar diam.neg  0.625  in
Area of Steel Provided per foot:

 bw 
As.neg.top  Ab.neg   2
As.neg.top  0.62 in
 barspace.top 
 bardiam.neg 
Reinforcement Effective Depth: d eff.top  d deck  covertop     bardiam.long.top d eff.top  4.812  in
 2 
INTERIOR DECK SPAN DESIGN

Load Effects
Components & Attachments (DC)
Slab Self-weight: DLslab   d deck  tws  γconcrete  1ft  0.106  klf
Design span length: Sbeam  4 ft
2 (Use simple span ignoring segment
Deck DL moments: M DC.pos  0.125  DLslab Sbeam  0.213  kip ft
overhanging steel beams on PBU)
M DC.neg  0.5 DLslab  0.5Sbeam  0.213  kip  ft (Use AISC equation for uniform load
2
on overhang)
235 of 325
Concord, NH 03301
Live Load
 AASHTO LRFD Table A4-1 is used to determine approximate maximum LL effects for design of the deck.
Multiple presence factors and impact have already been taken into account in calculating the numbers in the
table.
b tf
Design Section for Negative locds   2.25 in from CL beam LRFD Section 4.6.2.1.6
Moment: 4
Maximum Positive Moment: M LL.pos  4.68 kip ft LRFD Table A4-1
Maximum Negative Moment

M LL.neg  2.22 kip  ft LRFD Table A4-1, interpolated value from
at Design Section:
between 0" and 3" from Crit. section
Factored Design Moments - Strength I
Total Positive Moment: M u.pos.strength1  γpDC.strength1  M DC.pos  γLL.strength1 M LL.pos
M u.pos.strength1  8.46 ft kip

Total Negative Moment: M u.neg.strength1  γpDC.strength1 M DC.neg  γLL.strength1 M LL.neg
M u.neg.strength1  4.15 ft kip

Design Moments - Service I
Total Positive Moment: M pos.service1  γpDL.service1 M DC.pos  γLL.service1 M LL.pos
M pos.service1  4.89 ft kip

Total Negative Moment: M neg.service1  γpDL.service1  M DC.neg  γLL.service1 M LL.neg
M neg.service1  2.43 ft kip
Flexural Design (Transverse Direction) - Positive Moment (Bottom Steel)

Flexural Strength- Strength I Load Case
As.pos.bot  Fy
Whitney stress block depth: abot   0.912  in
0.85 f'c b w
Whitney stress block coefficient: β1  0.85
abot
Depth to neutral axis: cpos   1.073  in LRFD Section 5.7.2.2
β1
Reinforcing depth: d s.bot  6.687  in
 Using strain compatibility and similar triangles, the reinforcing strain exceeds 0.005 (i.e. tension-controlled
section) at ultimate capacity when c/d is less than or equal 0.375.
236 of 325
Concord, NH 03301
cpos
Check if tension-controlled: checkεs  "TENSION-CONTROLLED, ϕ = 0.90" if  0.375
d s.bot
"TRANSITION ZONE, MANUALLY COMPUTE ϕ" otherwise
checkεs  "TENSION-CONTROLLED, ϕ = 0.90"
Applied Positive Moment: M u.pos.strength1  8.46 kip  ft
Resistance Factor: ϕstr  0.90 LRFD Section 5.5.4.2
 abot 
Positive Moment Strength: ϕMn.bot  ϕstr As.pos.bot  Fy  d s.bot    17.39  ft kip
 2 
Check Positive Moment checkbot.moment  if  ϕMn.bot  M u.pos.strength1 "OK" "NO GOOD Mu EXCEEDS ϕMn" 
Capacity (LRFD 5.7.3.2.1):
checkbot.moment  "OK"
Minimum Reinforcement Requirements (LRFD Section 5.7.3.3.2):

2
b w d deck 3
Non-Composite Section Modulus: Snc  Snc  136.125  in
6
3
Composite Section Modulus: Sc  Snc Sc  136.125  in
Modulus of Rupture: fr  0.24 f'c ksi fr  0.48 ksi LRFD Section 5.4.2.6
Compressive Stress at Extreme Fiber
fcpe  0ksi (Non-prestressed)
due to Effective Prestress Forces Only:
Total unfactored DL Moment on
M dnc.pos  M DC.pos M dnc.pos  0.21 ft kip
Non-Composite Section:
Flexural Cracking Variability Factor: γ1  1.6 (Not segmental precast)
Prestress Variability Factor: γ2  1.0
Reinforcing Strength Ratio Factor: γ3  0.67 (ASTM A615 Grade 60)
  Sc 
Cracking Moment: M cr  γ3  γ1 fr  γ2 fcpe  Sc  M dnc.pos   1 LRFD EQ. 5.7.3.3.2-1
  Snc 
M cr  5.8 ft kip
Minimum Flexural Moment
M design.min  min M cr 1.33M u.pos.strength1 M design.min  5.8 ft kip
to be Resisted:
Check Reinforcement Provided: checkmin.reinf.bot  if  ϕMn.bot  M design.min "OK" "NG"  checkmin.reinf.bot  "OK"
237 of 325
Concord, NH 03301
Distribution of Reinforcing (Crack Control) (LRFD Section 5.7.3.4) - Service I Load Case
Deck thickness: d deck  8.25 in
bar diam.pos
Distance to Reinforcement Centroid: d c.bot  coverbot   1.563  in
2
Modular Ratio:
 Es 
n  Round 1  7
 Econc 
As.pos.bot
Reinforcement Ratio: ρpos   0.008
b w d s.bot
Service Load Parameters: k pos  ρpos n 2  2 ρpos n  ρpos n  0.279

k pos
jpos  1   0.907
3
M pos.service1
fss   15.6 ksi
Reinforcing Tensile Stress: jpos  d s.bot As.pos.bot
d c.bot
Flexural Strain Ratio: βs  1   1.334
0.7  d deck  d c.bot
Exposure Factor: γe  0.75 (Assume Class 2 Exposure)
700  γe
Maximum Spacing: smax.bot   in  2  d c.bot  22.09  in
fss LRFD EQ. 5.7.3.4-1
βs
ksi
Check Spacing Against Maximum: checkspace  if  smax.bot  bar space.bot "OK" "NG"  checkspace  "OK"
Flexural Design (Transverse Direction) - Negative Moment (Top Steel)

Flexural Strength - Strength I Load Case
As.neg.top Fy
Rectangular stress block depth: atop  atop  0.912  in
0.85 f'c b w
atop
Depth to neutral axis: cneg  cneg  1.073  in
β1
Resistance factor:
  d eff.top  
ϕf.str  min0.75  0.15  1 0.90 LRFD Eq. 5.5.4.2.1-2
  cneg  
ϕf.str  0.90
Applied Negative Moment: M u.neg.strength1  4.151  kip ft
 atop 
Negative Moment Strength: ϕMn.top  ϕf.str As.neg.top Fy  d eff.top   ϕMn.top  12.15 ft kip
 2 
238 of 325
Concord, NH 03301
Check Negative Flexural Moment Capacity (LRFD 5.7.3.2.1):

checktop.moment  if  ϕMn.top  M u.neg.strength1 "OK" "NO GOOD Mu EXCEEDS ϕMn" 
checktop.moment  "OK"
3
Non-Composite Section Modulus: Snc  136.125  in
3
Composite Section Modulus: Sc  136.125  in
Modulus of Rupture: fr  0.48 ksi LRFD Section 5.4.2.6

fcpe  0 (Non-prestressed)
M dnc.neg  M DC.neg M dnc.neg  0.21 ft kip
  Sc 
Cracking Moment: M cr.top  γ3  γ1 fr  γ2 fcpe  Sc  M dnc.neg   1 LRFD EQ. 5.7.3.3.2-1
  Snc 
M cr.top  5.8 ft kip
M design.min.top  min M cr 1.33 M u.neg.strength1  M design.min.top  5.5 ft kip
to be Resisted:
Check Reinforcement Provided: checkmin.reinf.top  if  ϕMn.top  M design.min "OK" "NG"  checkmin.reinf.bot  "OK"
Check Cracking Control and Distribution of Reinforcing (LRFD Section 5.7.3.4) - Service I Load Case
Deck thickness: d deck  8.25 in
bar diam.neg
Distance to Reinforcement Centroid: d c.top  covertop   bar diam.neg  3.438  in
2
Modular Ratio:
n7
As.neg.top
Reinforcement Ratio: ρ  ρ  0.011
b w d eff.top
2
Service load parameters: k neg  ( ρ n )  ( 2  ρ n )  ρ n k neg  0.32
k neg
jneg  1  jneg  0.893
3
M neg.service1
fss.neg  fss.neg  10.95  ksi
Reinforcing Tensile Stress: jneg  d eff.top As.neg.top
d c.top
Flexural Strain Ratio: βs.neg  1  βs  1.334
0.7  d deck  d c.top
239 of 325
Concord, NH 03301
Exposure Factor: γe  0.75
700  γe
Maximum Spacing: smax.neg   in  2  d c.top smax.neg  29.1 in LRFD Eq. 5.7.3.4-1
fss.neg
βs
ksi
Check Spacing Against Maximum: checkspace.neg  if  barspace.top  smax.neg "OK" "NG"  checkspace.neg  "OK"
Design Longitudinal Reinforcement

Temperature and Shrinkage Requirements (LRFD Section 5.10.8)
Width of bridge deck: Wdeck  Wbridge  2  2 in Wdeck  31.833 ft
kip
1.30  Wdeck  d deck
Min. Temperature and in 2
As.TS.req   0.087  in LRFD Eq. 5.10.8-1
Shrinkage Reinforcement: 2  d deck  Wdeck  Fy
As.long  max min As.TS.req 0.60in

2 2 2
 0.11in  As.long  0.11 in (per ft) LRFD Eq. 5.10.8-2
Check Temperature & Shrinkage Requirement

Top Long'l Steel Check CheckTS.top  if  As.long.top  As.long "OK" "NO GOOD"  CheckTS.top  "OK"
Bot Long'l Steel Check CheckTS.bot  if  As.long.bot  As.long "OK" "NO GOOD"  CheckTS.bot  "OK"
Longitudinal Distribution Reinforcement Requirements in Bottom of Slab (LRFD Section 9.7.3.2)

M u.pos.strength1 2
Area of Transverse As.req.bot  As.req.bot  0.271  in
Steel Required:  abot 
Fy  d s.bot  
 2 
Minimum Distribution As.req.bot  ft  2

Amin.long.bot   min 67 220   Amin.long.bot  0.182  in
Steel Required: 100 Seff 

Check Distribution Steel Requirement
Bot Long'l Steel Check CheckDis.bot  if  As.long.bot  Amin.long.bot "OK" "NG"  CheckDis.bot  "OK"
240 of 325
East Kingston, NH Project No.: 17960.08
Bridge No. 061/064 Sheet: _1_ of: _11_
NH RT 107A over PAN AM R.R. Calc By: SIW Date: 08/23/16
53 Regional Drive Deck Overhang Design Chck By: WRB Date: _09/12/16
Concord, NH 03301
(603) 225-2978
BRIDGE PARAMETERS
Deck slab thickness: ts  8.25 in
Remaining integral wearing surface
Wearing surface thickness: tws  0.25in
after initial grinding
Deck cross slope: XS deck  2%
Girder spacing: Sbeam  4ft
wOH  2ft  1in  2.083 ft

Deck overhang:
coverbot  1.25 in NHDOT Bare Deck Meeting Minutes
Clear cover, bottom of slab:
Clear cover, top of slab: covertop  2.5 in Take off the sacrificial surface
Minimum Haunch thickness: thaunch  1.00 in
b fc  9  in
Top (compression) flange width:
Compression (top) Flange Thickness: tfc  0.75in
Web thickness: tw  0.5 in
Tributary slab design width: b w  12 in
Brush curb width: wcurb  2ft
Brush curb height: tcurb  7in
Bottom rail height (above road) H1  9  in NHDOT STD Detail T2 Bridge Rail
Top Rail Height (above road): H2  19 in NHDOT STD Detail T2 Bridge Rail
Design Load Height (above road): He  32in AASHTO T. A13.2-1
wOH.rail   8 
Distance between edge of 13 
slab, center of rail:   in  8.813  in NHDOT STD Detail T2 Bridge Rail
 16 
DESIGN PARAMETERS
γconc  150  pcf NHDOT Table 4.3.2-1
Concrete unit weight:
Concrete 28-day fc  4ksi

compressive strength:
Reinforcing steel fy  60ksi
yield strength:
Steel modulus of elasticity: Es  29000  ksi AASHTO 5.4.3.2
M:\17960.08 East Kingston 26942\Design\Deck Design\Deck Overhang Design.xmcd Page 1 of 11
241 of 325
Concord, NH 03301
(603) 225-2978
0.33
Concrete modulus  fc 
Ec  2500    ksi  3950 ksi AASHTO 5.4.2.4
of elasticity:  ksi 
Modular ratio:
 Es 
n  Round 1  7
 Ec 
Bridge rail dead load: ωrail  55plf NHDOT BDM V2.0 Table 4.3.2-2,
T2 Bridge Rail
LOAD FACTORS
Ductility Load Modifier ηD  1.00 AASHTO 1.3.3
Redundancy Load Modifier ηR  1.00 AASHTO 1.3.4

Operational Importance
ηI  1.00 AASHTO 1.3.5
Load Modifier:
Maximum Load Modifier: ηi.max  ηD ηR ηI  0.95  1.00 AASHTO 1.3.2.1
1
ηi.min   1.00  1.00 AASHTO 1.3.2.1
Minimum Load Modifier: ηD ηR ηI
Service:
Strength I: Extreme Event 2:
γp.EE2.DC.max  ηi.max 1.0  1 γpDL.service  1.0
γp.STR1.DC.min  ηi.min 0.90  0.90
γLL.service  1.0
γp.EE2.DW.max  ηi.max 1.0  1.00
γp.STR1.DC.max  ηi.max 1.25
γEE2.LL  ηi.max 0.50  0.50
γp.STRI.DW.min  ηi.min 0.65  0.65
γEE2.CV  ηi.max 1.00  1.00
γp.STR1.DW.max  ηi.max 1.50  1.50
γSTR1.LL  ηi.max 1.75  1.75
STRENGTH LIMIT STATE RESISTANCE FACTORS AASHTO 5.5.4.2

Shear and torsion: ϕv  0.90
Flexure: ϕf  0.9 tension controlled, mild reinforcing steel
Extreme Event II: ϕext  1.00 LRFD Section 1.3.2.1
DESIGN LOADS
Component Dead Loads (DC)
Bridge Rail: DCrail  ωrail  0.055  klf
Overhang width from b fc

wOH.crit  wOH   22.75  in AASHTO 4.6.2.1.6
Critical Section: 4
Design Slab Thickness
t1  ts  0.75 thaunch  9  in Remove a quarter in from
at Exterior Girder CL:
Haunch thickness for
Design Slab Thickness construction tolerance
t2  ts  0.75 thaunch  9  in
at Critical Section:
242 of 325
Concord, NH 03301
(603) 225-2978
Design Slab Thickness at

t3  ts  0.75 thaunch  tfc  9.75 in
Edge of Girder Flange:
Overhang self-weight: DCslab   wOH.crit t3  0.25 tfc b fc  γconc  0.229  klf
Rail curb: DCcurb  tcurb wcurb γconc  0.175  klf
Wearing Surface Loads (DW)
Width of wearing surface

wWS  wOH.crit  wcurb  1.25 in
tributary to overhang:
Wearing Surface DW  if  wWS  0 tws γconc wWS 0klf   0  klf
Dead Load Moments @ Critical Section

 wOH.crit  kip ft
Slab Overhang: M slabOH  DCslab   M slabOH  0.217 
 2  ft
 wcurb  kip  ft
Brush Curb: M curb  DCcurb  wOH.crit   M curb  0.157 
 2  ft
kip ft
Bridge Rail: M rail  DCrail  wOH.crit  wOH.rail M rail  0.064 
ft
Wearing Surface M pave  DW

 wOH.crit  wcurb kip  ft
M pave  0 
2 ft
Top Transverse Reinforcement (#5 @ 6"):
Bar Diameter: bar diam  Diameterrebar  Sizetop bar diam  0.625  in
Ab.neg  Arearebar  Sizetop

2
Bar Area: Ab.neg  0.31 in

 bw 
As.neg.top  Ab.neg   2
As.neg.top  0.62 in
 barspace.top 
 bardiam 
Top Reinforcement Effective Depth: d eff.top  ts  covertop     bardiam d eff.top  4.812  in
 2 
243 of 325
Concord, NH 03301
(603) 225-2978
Additional Overhang Transverse Reinforcement (#5 @ 6"):
Top Reinforcing Size & Spacing: Sizetop.add  5 bar space.top.add  6in
Overhang Reinforcing Spacing: bar space.OH  barspace.top bar space.OH  6  in
Ab.add  Arearebar  Sizetop.add

2
Bar Area: Ab.add  0.31 in
2
Bundled Bar Steel Area: Ab.OH  Ab.neg  Ab.add Ab.OH  0.62 in

 Ab.OH  2
As.neg.OH   bar   bw As.neg.OH  1.24 in
 space.top 
4  As.neg.OH AASHTO
Equivalent bundled bar diameter: bar diam.OH.eq  bar diam.OH.eq  1.257  in
π 5.11.2.3
Vehicle Collision (CV) - Load Case 1A Transverse and Longitudinal Force
Transverse Force: Ft  54.0kip Force Distribution Length: Lt  3.5ft AASHTO Table A13.2-1
Longitudinal Force: Fl  18.0kip Force Distribution Length: Ll  3.5ft AASHTO Table A13.2-1
AASHTO Table A13.2-1
Design Load Height (above road): He  32.0in Recall
Case 1a Design Moment: M CT1a  Ft  He  tws  tcurb  0.5 t2 M CT1a  196.9  kip  ft
Moment Design Case 1B - Concentrated Force from Post (Extreme Event II Load Case) (LRFD A13.4.3.1)
3
Post Plastic Section Modulus: Zx  18.9 in AISC Manual (W6x25)
Post yield strength: Fy.post  50ksi ASTM A572 Gr. 50
Flexural Capacity of Post: M post  Zx Fy.post M post  78.75 ft kip
Width of base plate: Wb  14.0in
Distance from back of
d b  10in  1.8125in d b  8.188  in NHDOT STD Detail T2 Bridge Rail
plate to front row of bolts:
244 of 325
Concord, NH 03301
(603) 225-2978
 The maximum moment to be applied to the deck overhang is limited to that corresponding to the plastic
capacity of the post in the event of a crash. Therefore, use the lesser of the static moment from rail impact
and the plastic moment of the post.
 The AASHTO Equations for the moment distribution of the rail posts do not account for the presence of a
brush curb; therefore assume that the moment is transferred through the brush curb at a 45 degree angle
further distributing the moment by two times the thickness of the curb.
Governing moment at base of post: M post.gov  min M CT1a M post M post.gov  78.75  kip  ft
Distance X: X   wOH.crit  7.625in  2in X  17.125 in
Slab Width at critical section: Slabwidth  2  X  Wb  48.25  in Slabwidth  4.02 ft

Min. Post Spacing: Lp  7.5 ft Estimated
Design Slab Width: b  min Slabwidth Lp b  4.02 ft
Moment at the point where M post.gov kip ft

M d1  M d1  26.1 LRFD Eq. A13.4.3.1-1
post is attached to the deck: Wb  d b  2  tcurb ft
Moment Design Case 2 - Vertical Vehicle Collision Forces (Extreme Event II Load Case)
 Distribute railing and or post loads to the slab per Figure A13.4.3.1-1, assuming the loading distributes at a 45
degree angle from the point of application.
 Rail post is not mounted directly on top of deck, however, neglect the distribution of force effects vertically
through the brush curb.
Vertical Collision Force on Rail: Fv  18.0kip

LRFD Table
Force Distribution Length: Lv  18.00ft A13.2-1 (TL-4)
NOTE: Distribution width is limited to the post spacing per

AASHTO A13.4.3.1.
Punching Shear Force:

Fv Lp LRFD Eq.
Pv   7.5 kip
Lv A13.4.3.1-3
Overhang Moment:
Pv X LRFD Eq. A13.4.3.1-4
M d2 
b
kip ft
M d2  2.66
ft
Moment Design Case 3 - Strength 1 Limit State (Strength I Load Case):

 In accordance with AASHTO LRFD section 3.6.1.3, the wheel load is placed 1'-0" from the face of curb.
Dynamic load allowance: IMdynamic  33% LRFD 3.6.2.1
Design Truck Wheel Load: Pwheel  0.5 32kip Pwheel  16 kip LRFD 3.6.1.2.2
Multiple presence factor: m1  1.20 (1 Design Lane Loaded) LRFD Table 3.6.1.1.2-1
245 of 325
Concord, NH 03301
(603) 225-2978
Wheel offset from critical section:

Brush curb side - Xwheel  wOH.crit  wcurb  1ft Xwheel  1.1 ft
A negative distance indicates that a wheel placed 1'-0" from the face of the brush curb is inboard of
the critical section and does not produce any moment at the critical section.
Equivalent strip width for LL on an overhang: wstrip.OH  45in  10.0in 

 Xwheel 
 LRFD Table 4.6.2.1.3-1
 ft 
wstrip.OH  34 in
 Pwheel  
LL Moment: M LL3   w    1  IMdynamic  m1 Xwheel if Xwheel  0ft M LL3  0  kip 
ft
 strip.OH   ft
0ft otherwise
Factored Overhang Design Moments
For the Extreme Event II Load Cases (Design Cases 1 and 2)

kip ft
Maximum Vehicular Collision Moment: M CT  max M d1 M d2 M CT  26.11 
ft
Factored Moment: M EE2  γp.EE2.DC.max  M slabOH  M rail  M curb  γp.EE2.DW.max M pave   b w
 γ 
 EE2.CV MCT 
M EE2  26.55  kip ft
For the Strength I Load Case (Design Case 3)
Factored Moment: M STR1  γp.STR1.DC.max  M slabOH  M rail  M curb   b w
 γ  M STR1  0.55 kip  ft
 STR1.LL MLL3  γp.STR1.DW.max Mpave 
Controlling Factored Moment
kip  ft
M u.OH  max M EE2 M STR1 M u.OH  26.55 ft
ft
 Design Case 1b controls, therefore, thrust on the overhang must be considered when assessing flexure.
 Since the moment for Design Case 3 will not govern by inspection.
 AASHTO LRFD Section A13.4.3 says to compute Pp as the shear force on the post corresponding to Mpost
set at a distance of Ybar above the deck surface. Since it is impossible to predict how the rail impact force
distributes to the individual rails, assume Y bar = He  32 in
M post
Shear in post during impact: Pp  Pp  29.5 kip (see variable definitions)
He
Pp
Thrust per foot of deck at critical section: Td  Td  9.79 klf LRFD Eq. A13.4.3.1-2
Wb  d b  2  tcurb
246 of 325
Concord, NH 03301
(603) 225-2978
Factored Overhang Moment Resistance

 Moment resistance need only be computed for the Extreme Event load case, since the Strength I moment is
insignificant.
 Only the top reinforcing is fully developed at the critical section to resist the tensile force from rail impact.
 bardiam 
Top reinforcement effective depth: d eff.OH  t2  covertop     bardiam d eff.OH  5.562  in
 2 
Compression force in concrete: C1  As.neg.OH fy  Td b w C1  64.6 kip
C1
Rectangular stress block depth: a  a  1.584  in
0.85 fc b w
Flexural resistance factor: ϕext  1.0 AASHTO LRFD Art. 1.3.2.1
  deff.OH a 
ϕMn.EE2  ϕext As.neg.OH fy  d eff.OH 
a (per FHWA
Flexural resistance:   Td b w  2   design example)
  2  2 
ϕMn.EE2  27.96  kip  ft
kip  ft
Factored Overhang Design Moment: M u.OH  26.55 ft
ft
Check flexural capacity
Check  if  ϕMn.EE2  M u.OH "OK" "NG"  Check  "OK"
including the effects of thrust:
Minimum Reinforcement (AASHTO LRFD Section 5.7.3.3.2)

2
b w t2 3
Non-Composite Section Modulus: Snc1  Snc1  162  in
6
3
Composite Section Modulus: Sc1  Snc1 Sc1  162  in
Modulus of Rupture: fr  0.24 fc ksi fr  0.48 ksi LRFD Section 5.4.2.6

M dnc   M slabOH  M curb  M rail  M pave  b w M dnc  0.44 ft kip
Prestress Variability Factor: γ2  1.0 (Non-applicable)
 Sc1 
Cracking Moment: M cr1  γ3  γ1 fr  γ2 fcpe  Sc1  M dnc   1 LRFD Eq. 5.7.3.3.2-1
 Snc1 
M cr1  6.9 ft kip
247 of 325
Concord, NH 03301
(603) 225-2978
Minimum Flexural Moment kip ft

M design.min1  min M cr1 1.33M u.OH M design.min1  6.9 ft
to be Resisted: ft
Check Reinf. Provided: checkmin.reinf_b  if  ϕMn.EE2  M design.min1 "OK" "NG"  checkmin.reinf_b  "OK"
Control of Cracking by Distribution of Reinforcement (AASHTO LRFD Section 5.7.3.4)
1. Crack control is a Service Limit State Check; therefore, service loads are used. Design Case 1 and Design
Case 2 are Extreme Event limit states and are not considered when checking crack control.
2. For Design Case 3, the wheel load is located outside of the critical section, so control of cracking is
considered to be adequate by inspection since only the dead loads generate flexure at the critical section.
Service Moment: M service.OH  γpDL.service  M slabOH  M rail  M curb  M pave  γLL.service M LL3  b w
M service.OH  0.44 ft kip
Deck thickness at critical section: t2  9  in

Effective depth to reinforcing: d eff.OH  5.562  in
bar diam
Distance to Reinforcement Centroid: d c.top  covertop   bardiam  3.438  in
2
Modular Ratio: n7
As.neg.OH
Reinforcement Ratio: ρo  ρo  0.019
b w d eff.OH
Service load parameters: k o   ρo n 2  2 ρo n  ρo n k o  0.396
ko
jo  1  jo  0.868
3
M service.OH
fss.OH  fss.OH  0.88 ksi
Reinforcing Tensile Stress: jo  d eff.OH As.neg.OH
d c.top
Flexural Strain Ratio: βs.OH  1  βs.OH  1.883
0.7  t2  d c.top
Exposure Factor: γe  0.75 (Conservatively assume class 2 exposure)
700  γe
Maximum Spacing: smax   in  2  d c.top smax  310.7  in LRFD Eq. 5.7.3.4-1
fss.OH
βs.OH
ksi
Check Spacing Against Maximum: checkspace.OH  if  barspace.top  smax "OK" "NG"  checkspace.OH  "OK"
248 of 325
Concord, NH 03301
(603) 225-2978
Factored Overhang Punching Shear (AASHTO LRFD Section A13.4.3.2)
 According to AASHTO LRFD Section CA13.4.3.2, concrete decks frequently fail in punching shear resulting
from the force in the compression flange of the post. The post is a W6x25.
Design Case 1 - Horizontal Collision Forces
2
Area of Post Compression Flange: Af  6.08in 0.455 in  2.766  in AISC SCM
Yield Strength of Post: Fy.post  50 ksi ASTM A572 Gr. 50
Factored Shear Force: Vflange  Af  Fy.post  138.3  kip LRFD Eq. A13.4.3.2-1
Design Case 2 - Vertical Collision Force

Vertical Load on Post: Pv  7.5 kip (Computed previously)
Governing Factored Punching Shear
Vu  γEE2.CV  max Vflange Pv Vu  138.3  kip
Factored Punching Shear Resistance (AASHTO LRFD Section A13.4.3.2)

 The governing punching shear resistance will be at the brush curb.
Width of Base Plate: Wb  14 in
Depth of slab at critical section: h  t3  tcurb h  16.75  in (includes brush curb thickness)
Distance from edge of slab to centroid of 0.455in

E  7.625in  E  7.85 in
compressive stress resultant in post: 2
Distance between centroids of tensile and Center to Center of Post

B  6.375in  0.455in B  5.92 in
compressive stress resultants in post: Flanges
Depth of base plate: d b  8.188  in (computed previously)
Ratio of the long side to the short side Wb

βc  βc  1.71 LRFD Eq. A13.4.3.2-6
of the concentrated reaction area: db
Design shear stress: v c  min0.0633   0.1265  0.1265  f  ksi

 β   c v c  0.253  ksi LRFD Eq. A13.4.3.2-4
  c  
B1  min B
B h
Check B/2+h/2<=B:  B1  5.92 in LRFD Eq. A13.4.3.2-5
2 2 
Nominal shear strength: Vn  v c Wb  h  2   E  B1  h Vn  247.0  kip LRFD Eq. A13.4.3.2-3
Resistance factor: ϕext  1.0 LRFD Section 1.3.2.1
Punching shear resistance: Vr  ϕext Vn Vr  247.0  kip LRFD Eq. A13.4.3.2-2
Check Punching Shear: checkps  if  Vu  Vr "OK" "NG"  checkps  "OK"

249 of 325
Concord, NH 03301
(603) 225-2978
Required Lap Length of Bundled Overhang Reinforcement (AASHTO LRFD Section 5.11.2.1.1)
Since bundled bars are specified, the following calculations also meet the requirements of LRFD Section 5.11.2.3.
fy
Basic Development Length: ldb.OH  2.4 bar diam  45 in LRFD Eq. 5.11.2.1.1-2
fc ksi
Reinforcement Location Factor: λrl  1.00 LRFD Section 5.11.2.1.2
Coating Factor:
λcf  1.50 if  covertop  3  bardiam.OH.eq LRFD Section 5.11.2.1.2
1.50 if  bar space.top  2bar diam.OH.eq  6  bardiam.OH.eq

1.20 otherwise
λcf  1.50
 bardiam.OH.eq barspace.OH 
Bar Clear Constant: cb  min covertop     3  in LRFD Section 5.11.2.1.3
 2 2 
Transverse Reinforcement Index: k tr  0.00 (conservatively taken as 0.00)
Reinforcement Confinement Factor: λrc  min max 0.4 

  bardiam.OH.eq  
 1  0.42 LRFD Eq. 5.11.2.1.3-2
  cb  k tr  
Excess Reinforcement Factor: λer  1.00 (conservatively taken as 1.00)
Modified Development Length: ld.OH  ldb.OH  λrl λcf  λrc λer  28.271 in LRFD Eq. 5.11.2.1.1-1
Reinforcement Capacity Without Additional Bars:

 Assume that the thrust force has been sufficiently dissipated through the deck to be ignored.
 bardiam 
Top reinforcement effective depth: d eff  t2  covertop     bardiam  5.562  in
 2 
Compression force in concrete: Ctrans.bar  As.neg.top fy  37.2 kip
Ctrans.bar
Rectangular stress block depth: atrans.bar   0.912  in
0.85 fc b w
Flexural resistance factor: ϕext  1.0 AASHTO LRFD Art. 1.3.2.1
  atrans.bar  (per FHWA

Flexural resistance ϕMn.EE.trans  ϕext As.neg.top fy  d eff  
  2  design example)
(single #5 @ 6"):
ϕMn.EE.trans  15.83  kip ft
250 of 325
Concord, NH 03301
(603) 225-2978
To determine the moment distribution between the first interior beam and the exterior beam conservatively assume
that the exterior bay behaves like a simple span with a concentrated moment at one end (maximum moment at
one support dissipating to zero at the other support).
M u.OH kip  ft
Moment Distribution from exterior M dist   6.638 
stem to first interior stem: Sbeam ft
Dcurb  Dcurb  0
Distance From Front Face of Curb:
Diff  0
while Diff  0.00001 kip  ft
Dcurb  Dcurb  0.00001ft
Ldist  2  Dcurb tan( 30deg)
 Mu.OH  Dcurb Mdist 

M cut     1ft
 Ldist 
Diff  M cut  ϕMn.EE.trans
Dcurb
Dcurb  1.066  ft
The 2in is for the inset of

Total Length of Required Bar: Lbar.req  Dcurb  wcurb  covertop  2in  2.691 ft the deck from the edge of
the curb
Minimum Bar Length: Lbar.add  Ceil Lbar.req  ld.OH 0.5ft  5.5 ft
Conservatively specify the additional #5 bar bundled with the main transverse #5 bar to have a length equal to the
width of the exterior PBU deck less 2.5in of clear cover on each end (length = 7' - 1").
251 of 325
LINK SLAB
252 of 325

Link Slab Design X-A003 (411)

REV.
NO.
0 9/14/2016 9/14/16
To design the link slab between spans 1&2 and spans 2&3.
This calc package uses a Mathcad template to design the Link Slab. The Mathcad template uses concepts from the PCI
Journal article titled “Behavior and Design of Link Slabs for Jointless Bridge Decks” to design the debonded portion of the
concrete deck included in the PBU. The UHPC closure pour that is included in the link slab was analyzed using concepts
from the Unofficial Link Slab Design template from NYSDOT.
The moment applied to the link slab is determined based on the beam end rotations assuming simple span action, and the
stiffness of the link slab. The stiffness of the link slab was based off of the concrete properties of the PBU concrete section
(both geometric and material properties). It is assumed that the UHPC closure pour in the link slab will have little effect on
the overall stiffness of the link slab (the UHPC section has a thinner section, but has a larger modulus of elasticity resulting in
a similar stiffness to the PBU concrete section). Because the applied moment is related to the stiffness of the link slab, it is too
conservative to assume uncracked section properties (especially since the link slab is intended to distribute cracking over its
length). The calculations ignore the sacrificial surface and assumes that half the clear cover to the top bar cracks for section
property calculations used in determining the applied moment. If full section properties are used to compute moment demand,
it was found that the link slab satisfied all code requirements except the crack control requirements of section 5.7.3.4 (bar
spacing needed to be 5” when the full section properties were used to compute the applied moment).
Since the link slab does not impact the structural integrity of the bridge directly, all code checks were conducted at the service
limit state.

“Behavior and Design of Link Slabs http://www.pci.org/uploadedFiles/Siteroot/Publications/
Link slab design guideline.
for Jointless Bridge Decks” PCI_Journal/1998/DOI_Articles/jl-98-may-june-7.pdf
NYSDOT Unofficial Link Slab
L:\PracticeAreas\Bridge\References\Bridges\Link Slabs UHPC closure pour analysis guideline.
Design Template
Link Slab Design
M:\17960.08 East Kingston 26942\Design\Link Slab Link Slab design template
(MATHCAD)
CONCLUSIONS:
The top longitudinal bars were made the upper most reinforcement layer to help with crack control. The top longitudinal bars
are #5 @ 6”.
PAGE 1 OF 1
253 of 325
2'-1•"
* THICKNESS AFTER INITIAL ‚" DIAMOND GRINDING
5 - #5D5E
58 - #5D8E
(EQUALLY SPACED) CONCRETE DECK PREFABRICATED BRIDGE
STAGGER BETWEEN #5E @ 6"
PROJECTING FROM PBUs 9•" UNIT - SUPERSTRUCTURE (F)
PROJECTION (ITEM 550.151) (TYP)
ULTRA HIGH
#5E @ 6" PERFORMANCE CONCRETE (F) #5E @ 6"
5‚ " *
(ITEM 520.00001)
1'-0"
(TYP)
1•" 2'-0" õõ 3"
(TYP) (TYP)
** 2 LAYERS OF COMPRESSED SYNTHETIC SHEET

EXPOSED AGGREGATE FINISH (TYP) WELDED PLATE GIRDER
GASKET. SEE PREFABRICATED BRIDGE UNIT AND
PREFABRICATED BRIDGE UNIT (PBU) (TYP)
CLOSED CELL EXPANSION MATERIAL SUPERSTRUCTURE NOTES (NOTE 23) ON
(USED FOR FORMING)(SUBSIDIARY SHEET 5.
TO ITEM 550.151)
LINK SLAB OVER PIER
2'-1•"
#5E @ 6"
1" (TYP) (TYP) (TYP)

(TYP)
õ
õ
(TYP)
1‚ "
8• "
5‚ "
#5E @ 6"
(TYP)
3"
1"
2•" CLR.
EXPOSED AGGREGATE #4E @ 6"
(TYP) CONCRETE DECK PREFABRICATED BRIDGE
FINISH (TYP) (TYP)
UNIT - SUPERSTRUCTURE (F)
(ITEM 550.151) (TYP)
LINK SLAB CLOSURE POUR DETAIL
254 of 325
NH RT 107A over PAN AM Railway Calc By: SIW Date: 08/18/16
53 Regional Drive Link Slab Design Chck By: WRB Date: _09/14/2016
Concord, NH 03301
(603) 225-2978
GEOMETRIC PARAMETERS
Deck slab thickness: ts  8.25 in
Assume the Sacrificial Wearing
Surface cracks
Link Slab Closure Pour Thickness: tUHPC  5in
Clear cover, top of slab: covertop  2.5 in Assuming the Sacrificial Surface
cracks
Clear cover, Bottom of slab: coverbot  1.25 in
The Design Width is equal to the

Design Width: b w  4ft
girder spacing
Span Length: Lspan  39ft  4in  39.333 ft
Send  1.5in
Space Between Beams:
Assume the Section
Deck Moment of Inertia: Ideck.PBU   1   b   t  0.5cover  3  1372 in4
  w s top Cracks through half the
 12  cover
IUHPC   1  b t 3 4
UHPC Closure Pour Moment of Inertia:   w UHPC  500  in
 
12
MATERIAL PARAMETERS
γconc  150  pcf NHDOT Table 4.3.2-1
Concrete unit weight:
PBU Concrete 28-day fc.PBU  4ksi

compressive strength:
fc.UHPC  21.7ksi FHWA-HRT-14-089
UHPC 28-day Compressive
Strength:
Reinforcing steel
fy  60ksi
yield strength:
Steel modulus of elasticity: Es  29000  ksi AASHTO 5.4.3.2
Limiting UHPC Strain: ε UHPC.lim  0.0035 Per NYSDOT recommendation to control

micro cracking
0.33
PBU Concrete modulus  fc.PBU 
Ec.PBU  2500    ksi  3950 ksi AASHTO 5.4.2.4
of elasticity:  ksi 
fc.UHPC
UHPC modulus of EUHPC  1550  ksi  7220.405 ksi FHWA -HRT-14-084
elasticity: ksi
fc.PBU
PBU Concrete Modulus of fr.PBU  0.24  ksi  0.48 ksi AASHTO 5.4.2.6
Rupture: ksi
M:\17960.08 East Kingston 26942\Design\Link Slab\Link Slab Design.xmcd Page 1 of 9
255 of 325
Concord, NH 03301
(603) 225-2978
UHPC Concrete Modulus of fr.UHPC  0.04 fc.UHPC  0.868  ksi FHWA -HRT-14-084
Rupture:
UHPC Tensile Strength (with
ft.UHPC  1.2ksi FHWA -HRT-14-084
multiple micro cracking)
LOAD FACTORS
 Since the link slab does not impact the structural integrity of the bridge, all checks will be completed at
the service limit state.
REINFORCEMENT:
Top Longitudinal Reinforcement in PBU (#5 @ 6"):

Bar Diameter: bar diam.top  Diameterrebar  Sizetop bar diam.top  0.625  in
Ab.top  Arearebar  Sizetop

2
Bar Area: Ab.top  0.31 in
Additional Top Longitudinal Reinforcement (Not Needed):

Top Reinforcing Size & Spacing: Sizetop.add  0 bar space.top.add  6in
Bar Diameter: bar diam.add  Diameterrebar  Sizetop.add bar diam.add  0  in
Ab.add  Arearebar  Sizetop.add

2
Bar Area: Ab.add  0  in
 bw   bw  2
Area of Steel Provided: As.top  Ab.add    Ab.top   As.top  2.48 in
 barspace.top.add   barspace.top 
Top Reinforcement Effective Depth: d eff.PBU  ts  covertop  0.5bardiam.top  5.437  in
d eff.UHPC  tUHPC  covertop  0.5bardiam.top  2.188  in

Top Reinforcement Effective Depth:
Bottom Longitudinal Reinforcement in PBU (#4 @ 6"):

Top Reinforcing Size & Spacing: Sizebot  4 bar space.bot  6in
Bar Diameter: bar diam.bot  Diameterrebar  Sizebot bar diam.bot  0.5 in
Ab.bot  Arearebar  Sizebot

2
Bar Area: Ab.bot  0.2 in
 bw  2
Area of Steel Provided: As.bot  Ab.bot   As.bot  1.6 in
 barspace.bot 
256 of 325
Concord, NH 03301
(603) 225-2978
TRANSFORMED SECTION PROPERTIES:

 Compute transformed section properties to get accurate moment resulting from simple beam end rotations.
 Assume the deck has cracked through half of the clear cover thickness (concept of link slab is cracking spread
out over link slab).
 0.5 bardiam.top   0.313  Top Layer

Depth to Reinforcing disttop      in Bot Layer
from top:  ts  0.5covertop  coverbot  bardiam.top  0.5bardiam.bot   4.875 
 Es 
Modular Ratio: n  Round 1  7
 Ec.PBU 
 As.top   17.36  2 Top Layer
Transformed Area of Reinforcement: Atrans  n     in Bot Layer
 As.bot   11.2 
Adeck  b w  ts  0.5covertop  336  in

2
Concrete Deck Area:
ts  0.5covertop
Centroid of Deck to top of Deck: d deck.top   3.5 in
2
Adeck ddeck.top   Atrans0 disttop0  Atrans1 disttop1

Geometric Neutral Axis from top: NA   3.39 in
Adeck  Atrans  Atrans
0 1
 3.078   in
Bar Distances From Neutral Axis: d NA  disttop  NA   
 1.485 
   
2 2 4
Reinforcement Contribution to Adsq  Atrans  d NA  Atrans  d NA  189.149  in
0 0 1 1
Transformed Section Properties:
4 Assuming deck is cracked

Transformed Moment of Inertia: Itrans  Ideck.PBU  Adsq  1561.149 in
to top reinforcement
Itrans 3
Transformed Section Modulus: Strans   460.454  in
NA
257 of 325
Concord, NH 03301
(603) 225-2978
END ROTATION:
Modulus of Elasticity: E  29000ksi See Beam Design

4
Moment of Inertia: I  5782in Merlin Dash Table 1.2.4.3
Number of beams: Nbeams  8 See Beam Design
Number of Lanes: Nlanes  2
From Diagram above: a( x )  x b ( x )  Lspan  x
b( x)   Lspan2  b ( x ) 2

Influence Rotation 1, θ1 : θ1( x ) 
  
6  Lspan E Nbeams I
a( x )  b ( x )   2 Lspan  b ( x ) 

Influence Rotation 2, θ2 : θ2( x ) 
6  Lspan E Nbeams I
Maximum Truck θtruck1  for i  0 0.01ft  Lspan  0.00119  rad

Rotation (truck
traveling left to right), xx1
θtruck1 : r  Nlanes   8kip θ1( i  28ft)  32kip  θ1( i  14ft)  
x   32kip θ ( i) 
 1 
max( r)
Maximum Truck θtruck2  for i  0 0.01ft  Lspan  0.001136 rad

Rotation (truck
traveling right to left), xx1
θtruck2 : r  Nlanes   8kip θ2( i  28ft)  32kip  θ2( i  14ft)  
x   32kip θ ( i) 
 2 
max( r)
258 of 325
Concord, NH 03301
(603) 225-2978
Nlanes  0.64klf   Lspan

3
Lane Load Rotation, θlane : θlane   0.00035  rad
24E Nbeams I
Total Rotation, θtotal: θtotal  θlane  max θtruck1 θtruck2   0.00154  rad
Factored θcalc  θtotal  0.00154  rad

Rotation:
Rotation From Merlin Dash θmerlin  0.00475 Does not contain a Distribution Factor
(table 1.2.8.2):
Factored Rotation From Nlanes
θmerlin.Fac  θmerlin  0.00119
Merlin: Nbeams
θDS  max θmerlin.Fac θcalc  0.00154

Design Rotation:
LINK SLAB ZONES

 See PCI document titled "Behavior and Design of Link Slabs for Jointless Bridge Decks"
Length of Debonded Zone per beam: Ldb  0.05 Lspan  1.967 ft
Length of Link Slab: LLS  Ceil 2  Ldb  Send 1.5in  4.125 ft
APPLIED MOMENT:
 Assume the beam end rotations are applied at the end of the Debonded Zone and the debonded zone
behaves as a simple supported beam. See the examples at the end of the PCI document titled
"Behavior and Design of Link Slabs for Jointless Bridge Decks"
 Assume that the Moment distribution is uniform through the Debonded Zone (ignoring the momentary
section change at the UHPC closure pour).
Stiffness Equation for Moment 2  Ec.PBU Itrans

M ( θ)   ( θ)
due to rotation: LLS
M a  M  θDS  31.922 kip ft

Applied Moment:
259 of 325
Concord, NH 03301
(603) 225-2978
MOMENT CAPACITY IN THE PBU DECK:

As.top fy
Whitney stress block depth: aPBU   0.912  in
0.85 fc.PBU b w
Whitney stress block coefficient: β1  0.85
aPBU
Depth to neutral axis: cPBU   1.073  in LRFD Section 5.7.2.2
β1
Reinforcing depth: d eff.PBU  5.437  in
Applied Negative Moment: M a  31.92  kip  ft
 aPBU 
Negative Moment Capacity: M n.PBU  As.top fy  d eff.PBU    61.77  ft kip
 2 
Check Negative Moment checkbot.moment  if  M n.PBU  M a "OK" "NO GOOD Mu EXCEEDS ϕMn" 
Capacity (LRFD 5.7.3.2.1):
checkbot.moment  "OK"
3
Non-Composite Section Modulus: Snc  Strans Snc  460.454  in
3
Composite Section Modulus: Sc  Strans Sc  460.454  in
Modulus of Rupture: fr.PBU  0.48 ksi

M dnc  0
Prestress Variability Factor: γ2  1.0
  Sc 
Cracking Moment: M cr  γ3  γ1 fr.PBU  γ2 fcpe  Sc  M dnc   1 LRFD EQ. 5.7.3.3.2-1
  Snc 
M cr  19.7 ft kip
M design.min  min M cr 1.33M a M design.min  19.7 ft kip
to be Resisted:
Check Reinforcement Provided: checkmin.reinf.bot  if  M n.PBU  M design.min "OK" "NG"  checkmin.reinf.bot  "OK"
260 of 325
Concord, NH 03301
(603) 225-2978
Control of Cracking by Distribution of Reinforcement (AASHTO LRFD Section 5.7.3.4)
Service Moment: M service.OH   M a  31.922 kip  ft
As.top
Reinforcement Ratio: ρo  ρo  0.01
b w d eff.PBU
bardiam.top
Distance to Reinforcement Centroid: d c  min covertop 2in   2.313  in
2
Service load parameters: k o   ρo n 2  2 ρo n  ρo n k o  0.304
ko
jo  1  jo  0.899
3
M service.OH
fss.OH  fss.OH  31.61  ksi
Reinforcing Tensile Stress: jo  d eff.PBU As.top
dc
Flexural Strain Ratio: βs  1  βs  1.556
0.7  ts  d c
Exposure Factor: γe  0.75 (Conservatively assume class 2 exposure)
 700  γe 
Maximum Spacing: smax  max  in  2  d c 5in smax  6.0 in LRFD Eq. 5.7.3.4-1
fss.OH
 βs 
 ksi 
Check Spacing Against Maximum: checkspace  if  bar space.top.add  smax "OK" "NG"  checkspace  "OK"
261 of 325
Concord, NH 03301
(603) 225-2978
MOMENT CAPACITY IN UHPC:

 Follow the guidelines set by the NYSDOT unofficial link slab design example
 limit the tensile strain in the UHPC to 0.0035 for crack control.
 The allowable compressive stress will be set at 14ksi
Strain Compatibility to cn  cn  0
determine Neutral axis
location: D0
while D  0.0001kip
cn  cn  .00001in
 c n
ε c  0.0035
 tUHPC  cn
  deff.UHPC  cn 
εs  εc   if cn  deff.UHPC
  cn 
  cn  d eff.UHPC 
εc  cn
 otherwise
  
fs  if Es  ε s  fy fy Es  ε s
Tt  As.top  fs  ft.UHPC  b w   tUHPC  cn
Ct  0.5 ε c EUHPC b w cn
D  C t  Tt
cn
cn  1.294  in
262 of 325
Concord, NH 03301
(603) 225-2978
Strains and Stresses @ Tensile Limit in UHPC
 cn 
Compressive Strain in UHPC: ε c  0.0035    0.00122
 tUHPC  cn 
UHPC Compressive Stress: σc  EUHPC ε c  8.826  ksi
 tUHPC  cn 
UHPC Tensile Strain: ε t  ε c    0.0035
 cn 
  deff.UHPC  cn 
ε s  εc   if cn  deff.UHPC  0.00084
Steel Strain: cn
  
  cn  d eff.UHPC 
εc  cn
 otherwise
  
σs  ε s Es  24.467 ksi
Steel Stress:
  tUHPC  cn 
Moment Capacity: M n.UHPC   As.top σs   deff.UHPC  cn  ft.UHPC bw  tUHPC  cn    
  2 
  2cn 
 0.5  σc  cn b w   
  3 
M n.UHPC  57.186 kip  ft
Applied Moment: M a  31.922 kip  ft
CheckUHCP  if  M a  M n.UHPC "OK" "NO GOOD"   "OK"

Check Moment:
263 of 325
ULTRA‐HIGH PERFORMANCE
CONCRETE REINFORCEMENT
DEVELOPMENT LENGTH
CALCULATIONS
264 of 325

UHPC Longitudinal Closure Pour and Reinforcement Development Length X-A003 (411)

REV.
NO.
0 9/13/2016 9/21/2016
To determine the width of the longitudinal closure pours and the development lengths for reinforcement placed in
UHPC (longitudinal closure pours between PBUs, Deck ends, and Link Slabs).
This calculation package determines the development and splice lengths for reinforcement in the UHPC longitudinal
closure pours, the link slab closure pours, and deck end closure pours based on the recommendations in the FHWA
publication titled: “Bond Behavior of Reinforcing Steel in Ultra-High Performance Concrete.”
The width of the longitudinal closure pour is set based on the development length of the transverse reinforcement in
UHPC and providing sufficient distance from the end of the bar to the adjacent PBU concrete surface for
constructability purposes.
REASON FOR
REFERENCE TITLE: LOCATION: REFERENCE:
NHDOT Bridge Design Manual V1.0, https://www.nh.gov/dot/org/projectdevelopment/bridgedesign/docum
2000. ents/webbrmanual.pdf
NHDOT Bridge Design Manual v.2.0, https://www.nh.gov/dot/org/projectdevelopment/bridgedesign/manua
2015. l.htm
Design guidelines
AASHTO LRFD, 7th edition w/ 2015
http://lrfdus.digital.transportation.org/LRFD.aspx supplemental to State
and 2016 interims
Standards.
Bond Behavior of Reinforcing Steel in Reference Document for
Ultra-High Performance Concrete L:\PracticeAreas\Bridge\References\Bridges\UHPC UHPC splice and Development
FHWA Pub No. FHWA-HRT-14-089 Length
UHPC Development Length M:\17960.08 East Kingston 26942\Design\UHPC Development
Design Template
(MATHCAD) Length
CONCLUSIONS:
 The width of the closure pour was governed by the bottom transverse reinforcement bars’ development length
(minimum of 6.25”). Use a bar projection of 6.5”. The minimum clearance from the end of the bar to the
adjacent concrete face is 1” for construction tolerance. Therefore, the width of the longitudinal closure pour
was set at 7.5” (rounded up to the nearest half inch).
 In order to meet the maximum spacing requirements in the link slab, the additional bar included in the link
slab should be alternated with the projecting bars from the PBU.
 The Z-shaped bar in the deck end regions will also be alternated with the bars projecting from the PBUs to
meet maximum spacing requirements.
PAGE 1 OF 1
265 of 325
STAGGER BETWEEN #4 @ 6" IN PBUs
2'-1•"
5 - #5D5E
58 - #5D8E
(EQUALLY SPACED) CONCRETE DECK PREFABRICATED BRIDGE
STAGGER BETWEEN #5E @ 6"
PROJECTING FROM PBUs 9•" UNIT - SUPERSTRUCTURE (F)
PROJECTION (ITEM 550.151) (TYP)
ULTRA HIGH
#5E @ 6" PERFORMANCE CONCRETE (F) #5E @ 6"
5‚ " *
(ITEM 520.00001)
1'-0"
(TYP)
1•" 2'-0" õõ 3"
(TYP) (TYP)
** 2 LAYERS OF COMPRESSED SYNTHETIC SHEET

EXPOSED AGGREGATE FINISH (TYP) WELDED PLATE GIRDER
GASKET. SEE PREFABRICATED BRIDGE UNIT AND
PREFABRICATED BRIDGE UNIT (PBU) (TYP)
CLOSED CELL EXPANSION MATERIAL SUPERSTRUCTURE NOTES (NOTE 23) ON
(USED FOR FORMING)(SUBSIDIARY SHEET 5.
TO ITEM 550.151)
LINK SLAB OVER PIER
2'-5•" CONCRETE DECK
ULTRA HIGH PERFORMANCE CONCRETE (F) PREFABRICATED BRIDGE
(ITEM 520.00001) UNIT - SUPERSTRUCTURE (F)
(ITEM 550.151) (TYP)
À BRG
EXPOSED AGGREGATE FINISH
(SEE PBU CLOSURE POUR SECTION,

9‚" 1'-6"
THIS SHEET, FOR JOINT LAYOUT)
PROJECTION
2ƒ " *
2• " *
6•" #5E @ 6"

CLR
2•" CLR
#4D4E @ 6"
LAP WITH #4D3E @ 12"
8 - #5D5E
1‚ "
(SPACE AS SHOWN)
CLR
#4E @ 6"
BEARING STRIP #5E @ 6"
#4D3E @ 6"
* THICKNESS AFTER COMPLETION OF ‚" STAGGER BETWEEN #5E @ 6" IN PBUs
DIAMOND GRINDING AND HAND GRINDING
DECK END HAUNCH
À CLOSURE POUR
ULTRA HIGH PERFORMANCE CONCRETE (F)
(ITEM 520.00001)
#5E @ 6"
CONCRETE DECK
PREFABRICATED BRIDGE
1• " õ
7•" 1" (TYP) UNIT - SUPERSTRUCTURE (F)

(TYP)
#5E @ 6"
(ITEM 550.151) (TYP)
(TYP)
1"
6•"
EXPOSED AGGREGATE (TYP) #4E @ 6"
FINISH (TYP)
* THICKNESS AFTER INITIAL 4 - #5D1E (END SPANS) OR

4 - #5D2E (CENTER SPAN)
‚" DIAMOND GRINDING
PBU CLOSURE POUR
266 of 325
NH RT 107A over PAN AM R.R. Calc By: SIW Date:7/22/2016
53 Regional Drive UHPC Development / Lap Lengths Chck By: JAL_ Date:_9/13/2016
Concord, NH 03301
Material Properties
Minimum UHPC Compressive f'c  14ksi Assume JS1000 UHPC
Strength (at opening to traffic):
Reinforcing Strength Fy  60ksi

Top Reinforcing Cover covertop  2.5in Conservatively use cover after future diamond
grinding has occurred.
Bottom Reinforcing Cover coverbot  1.25in
Lap Splice References

Reference FHWA Technical Briefs on the Bond Behavior of Reinforcing Steel in Ultra High Performance Concrete
FHWA Publication No. FHWA-HRT-14-089
Reinforcing Size & Spacing - Reference Deck Design Calculations
Top Longitudinal Reinforcement

Top Reinforcing Size & Spacing: Sizelong.top  5 bar space.long.top  6in
Bar Diameter: bar diam.long.top  Diameterrebar  Sizelong.top  0.625  in
Ab.long.top  Arearebar  Sizelong.top  0.31 in

2
Bar Area:
Bar Cover covertop.long  covertop  2.5 in
Top Transverse Reinforcement

Top Reinforcing Size & Spacing: Sizetrans.top  5 bar space.trans.top  6in
Bar Diameter: bar diam.trans.top  Diameterrebar  Sizetrans.top  0.625  in
Ab.trans.top  Arearebar  Sizetrans.top  0.31 in

2
Bar Area:
Bar Cover covertop.trans  covertop  bardiam.long.top  3.125  in
Bottom Transverse Reinforcement

Bottom Reinforcing Size & Spacing: Sizetrans.bot  5 bar space.trans.bot  6in
Bar Diameter: bar diam.trans.bot  Diameterrebar  Sizetrans.bot  0.625  in
Ab.trans.bot  Arearebar  Sizetrans.bot  0.31 in

2
Bar Area:
Bar Cover coverbot.trans  coverbot  1.25 in
Bottom Longitudinal Reinforcement

Bottom Reinforcing Size & Spacing: Sizelong.bot  4 bar space.long.bot  6in
Bar Diameter: bar diam.long.bot  Diameterrebar  Sizelong.bot  0.5 in
Ab.long.bot  Arearebar  Sizelong.bot  0.2 in

2
Bar Area:
Bar Cover coverbot.long  coverbot.trans  bardiam.trans.bot  1.875  in
UHPC Development Length.xmcd 1 of 4
267 of 325
Concord, NH 03301
COMPUTE REINFORCING DEVELOPMENT & LAP LENGTHS

-Reference FHWA Guidelines for determining the minimum lap and splice lengths for all deck reinforcing bars.
Top Transverse Bars
Min Top Transverse Bar

Development Length:
ld.trans.top  8 bardiam.trans.top if covertop.trans  3 bardiam.trans.top
10 bardiam.trans.top otherwise ld.trans.top  5  in
Min Top Transverse Bar

laptrans.top  0.75 ld.trans.top laptrans.top  3.75 in
Splice Length:
Calculate Minimum Bar

Clr spc.min.trans.top  2  bar diam.trans.top  bar diam.trans.top Clr spc.min.trans.top  1.875  in
Spacing per FHWA Guidelines
Calculate Maximum Bar

Clr spc.max.trans.top  laptrans.top  bardiam.trans.top Clr spc.max.trans.top  4.375  in
Top Transverse Bars Check - Assume Bars are Equally Staggered per Design Plans
barspace.trans.top  2bardiam.trans.top
Trans top.check.1  "OK" if  laptrans.top
2
Trans top.check.1  "OK"
"NG" otherwise
barspace.trans.top  bar diam.trans.top

Trans top.check.2  "OK" if  2  bar diam.trans.top
2 Trans top.check.2  "OK"
"NG" otherwise
Trans top.check.3  "OK" if f'c  13.5ksi

Trans top.check.3  "OK"
"NG" otherwise
Bottom Transverse Bars
Min Bottom Transverse Bar

Development Length:
ld.trans.bot  8 bardiam.trans.bot if coverbot.trans  3 bardiam.trans.bot
10 bardiam.trans.bot otherwise ld.trans.bot  6.25 in
Min Bottom Transverse Bar

laptrans.bot  0.75 ld.trans.bot
Splice Length:
laptrans.bot  4.688  in

Clr spc.min.trans.bot  2  bar diam.trans.bot  bar diam.trans.bot
Spacing per FHWA Guidelines Clr spc.min.trans.bot  1.875  in

Clr spc.max.trans.bot  laptrans.bot  bardiam.trans.bot
Spacing per FHWA Guidelines Clr spc.max.trans.bot  5.31 in
268 of 325
Concord, NH 03301
Bottom Transverse Bars Check - Assume Bars are Equally Staggered per Design Plans
barspace.trans.bot  2 bardiam.trans.bot
Trans bot.check.1  "OK" if  laptrans.bot Trans bot.check.1  "OK"
2
"NG" otherwise
barspace.trans.bot  2bardiam.trans.bot
Trans bot.check.2  "OK" if  2  bardiam.trans.bot Trans bot.check.2  "OK"
2
"NG" otherwise
Trans bot.check.3  "OK" if f'c  13.5ksi Trans bot.check.3  "OK"

"NG" otherwise
Top Longitudinal Bars

Min Top Longitudinal Bar
Development Length:
ld.long.top   8 bardiam.long.top if covertop.long  3 bardiam.long.top
 10 bardiam.long.top otherwise ld.long.top  5  in
Min Top Longitudinal Bar

laplong.top  0.75 ld.long.top
Splice Length: laplong.top  3.75 in

Clr spc.min.long.top  2  bar diam.long.top  bardiam.long.top Clr spc.min.long.top  1.875  in

Clr spc.max.long.top  laplong.top  bar diam.long.top Clr spc.max.long.top  4.375  in
Top Longitudinal Bars Check - (Alternate the additional bar in the link slab, as well as the Z-shaped bar in the deck
end, with the projecting bars to meet maximum spacing requirements)
barspace.long.top  2 bardiam.long.top
Long top.check.1  "OK" if  laplong.top Long top.check.1  "OK"
2
"NG" otherwise
barspace.long.top  2bardiam.long.top
Long top.check.2  "OK" if  2  bar diam.long.top Long top.check.2  "OK"
2
"NG" otherwise
Long top.check.3  "OK" if f'c  13.5ksi

Long top.check.3  "OK"
"NG" otherwise
269 of 325
Concord, NH 03301
Bottom Longitudinal Bars

Min Bottom Longitudinal Bar ld.long.bot   8 bardiam.long.bot if coverbot.long  3 bardiam.long.bot
Development Length:
 10 bardiam.long.bot otherwise ld.long.bot  4  in
Min Bottom Longitudinal Bar
Splice Length:
laplong.bot  0.75 ld.long.bot
laplong.bot  3  in

Clr spc.min.long.bot  2  bar diam.long.bot  bardiam.long.bot Clr spc.min.long.bot  1.5 in

Clr spc.max.long.bot  laplong.bot  bar diam.long.bot Clr spc.max.long.bot  3.5 in
Bottom Longitudinal Bars Check (Alternate the additional bar in the link slab, as well as the Z-shaped bar in
the deck end, with the projecting bars to meet maximum spacing requirements):
 barspace.long.bot  2bardiam.long.bot 
Long bot.check.1  "OK" if    laplong.bot Long bot.check.1  "OK"
 2 
"NG" otherwise
barspace.long.bot  2bardiam.long.bot
Long bot.check.2  "OK" if  2  bar diam.long.bot
2 Long bot.check.2  "OK"
"NG" otherwise
Long bot.check.3  "OK" if f'c  13.5ksi Long bot.check.3  "OK"

"NG" otherwise
270 of 325
FIXED BEARING DESIGN
271 of 325

Fixed Steel Shoe Bearing Design X-A003 (411)

REV.
NO.
0 8/22/2016 9/14/16
To design the fixed steel shoe bearings at both bearing lines on both piers.
The concept for the steel shoes came from the PennDOT Standard details for steel bearings. PennDOT uses their detail
for bridge spans up to 50ft. The detail consists of a flat steel sole plate with the corners rounded, on top of a steel base
plate.
The Pier reactions and beam end rotations were taken from the Merlin Dash Output (see Beam Design Calc Package).
The calc package includes plate size calculations and weld size calculations. The plates were sized for flexure which
occurs outside of the direct bearing area.
The sole plate thickness on Pier 2 was increased by ¼” due to the existing geometry of the steel pier caps. Therefore,
the max thickness of the sole plate should be 1 5/16” with a minimum thickness of 1 ¼”.
The bolt holes on the sole plate are oversized to allow for construction tolerance during erection of the beams. A plate
washer is welded on top of the sole plate to take up any excess play in the connection after erection of the PBUs. The
hole in the plate washer will be oversized by ¼” (provided 1/8” around bolt) to allow for end translation due to live
load rotation (to reduce risk of cracking in the concrete deck due to the presence of the link slab).

Expansion Bearing Design M:\17960.08 East Kingston 26942\Design\Bearing
Bearing Design File
(MATHCAD) Design\Expansion Bearings
http://www.dot.state.pa.us/public/Bureaus/BOPD/Bridg
PennDOT Standard Steel Bearing Concept details used to help build our detail.
e/2014/BC/bc755m.pdf
CONCLUSIONS:
The minimum sole plate thickness (not adjusted for profile grade) was found to be 1”.
The minimum base plate thickness was found to be ¾”.
A 5/16” weld will be used for connection of the sole plate to the steel girder and base plate to the pier cap.
PAGE 1 OF 1
272 of 325
1'-5‚"
6" ‡" Â ANCHOR …" x 2•" x 2•"

À PIER
3‡" 9•" 3‡" BOLT (TYP) PLATE WASHER W/
3" 3" 1„" Â HOLE (TYP)
BASE PLATE
3"
2"
10"
9"
9" BOTTOM FLANGE (TYP)

7"
7"
1'-6"
1'-8"
7"
7"
9"
10"
Š
2"
1"1•" 1"
3"
FACE OF PIER CAP
1†" Â OVERSIZE
HOLE À 1†" Â HOLES
À •" Â HOLES À •" Â HOLES

À BRG À BRG
À BASE PLATE
À SOLE PLATE
6" 1'-5‚"
SEE TABLE BELOW

1"
PIER 1 PIERS 1 & 2
SPAN 1 SPAN 2 EDGE GROUND TO

‚"+ RADIUS (TYP) EXISTING
Š
BEAM SEAT
BASE PLATE THICKNESS STEEL PLATE

‚" NEOPRENE
WASHER (TYP)
"
6" GIRDERS 1 & 8 ƒ"

1‚ "
1Š
GIRDERS 2 & 7 1ƒ"

EXISTING
À ‡" Â ANCHOR BOLT
GIRDERS 3 & 6 2ƒ" C12 CHANNEL
(TYP)
(TYP)
PIER 2
GIRDERS 4 & 5 3ƒ"
SPAN 2 SPAN 3 EDGE GROUND TO

‚"+ RADIUS (TYP) BASE PLATE
SOLE PLATE
273 of 325
McFARLAND-JOHNSON East Kingston, NH MJ Project No.: 17960.08
Bridge No. 061/064 Sheet: 1 of 5
53 Regional Drive
NH 107A over PAN AM Railway Calc By: SIW Date: 7/18/2016
Concord, NH 03301 Fixed Bearing Design Chck By: WRB Date: 7/19/2016
(603) 225-2978
BEARING DESIGN
Bearing Reactions:
Interior Beam: RDL.int  12.68kip RLL.int  44.53kip See Merlin Dash Table 1.2.7.2
Exterior Beam: RDL.ext  13.14kip RLL.ext  32.40kip
See Merlin Dash Table 1.2.7.2
Conservatively use the Interior Beam Bearing Reactions for all design calculations.
Controlling Bearing Loads: RDL  RDL.int  12.68  kip RLL  RLL.int  44.53  kip
Unfactored Reaction (Service I): Rser  RDL  RLL  57.21  kip
Factored Reaction (Strength I): Rstr  1.25 RDL  1.75 RLL  93.778 kip AASHTO Table 3.4.1-1
Bearing Geometry:
Sole Plate Length: Lsole  6in
NSBA tolerances for bolt dictate the length
Sole Plate Width: Wsole  18in of the plate.
Base Plate Width: Wbase  20in NSBA tolerances for bolt dictate the length
of the plate.
Base Plate Length: Lbase  17.25in
Space Between Beam Ends: Sends  1.5in
Bearing Material Properties:

fy  50ksi
Steel Yield Stress:
ϕstr  1.00 AASHTO 6.5.4.2 for Flexure
Flexure Resistance Factor:
FR  ϕstr fy  50 ksi
Factored Steel Resistance:
Es  29000ksi
Modulus of Elasticity:
SOLE PLATE DESIGN - FIXED BEARING WITH BASE PLATE
Check Sole Plate thickness for Bending :

 The plate thickness will be checked for bending over the length of plate that extends beyond the bottom flange of
the girder and which is in contact with the base plate.
Rstr
Pressure At Top of Base Plate: ft   0.868  ksi
Wsole Lsole
Free end of sole plate subjected to bending: lb  0.5  Wsole  b bf   4.5 in
M:\17960.08 East Kingston 26942\Design\Bearing Design\Fixed Bearings\ Page 1 of 5

Fixed Bearing.xmcd
274 of 325
53 Regional Drive
(603) 225-2978
2
3  ft lb
Minimum Sole Plate Thickness for Bending: tb1_min  tb1_min  1  in
FR
Specified Sole Plate Thickness: tsole.spec  Round tb1_min 0.125in  1  in
Determine Slope due to Profile:

Vertical Curve Length: Lvc  123.25ft
Elevation at PVC: EPVC  149.7187ft
Initial Roadway Grade: g 1  1.1591%
Exit Roadway Grade: g 2  2.52%
Station @ PVC: Sta PVC  10290.9900ft
 g2  g1 x2
Function for Elevation Along Curve: E( x )  EPVC  g 1 ( x ) 
2  Lvc
Sta CL_Pier1  10332.5567ft

Station @ CL of Pier 1:
Sta CL_Pier2  10372.6817ft
Station @ CL of Pier 2:
Elevation @ CL of Pier 1: Epier1  E StaCL_Pier1  StaPVC  149.9426 ft
Elevation @ CL of Pier 2: Epier2  E StaCL_Pier2  StaPVC  149.67 ft
Epier1.1ft  E StaCL_Pier1  1ft  StaPVC  149.942 ft

Elevation 1ft from Pier 1 CL:
Epier2.1ft  E StaCL_Pier2  1ft  StaPVC  149.657 ft
Elevation 1ft from Pier 2 CL:
Epier1.1ft  Epier1
Pier 1 Instantaneous Grade: g inst.pier1   0.097  %
1ft
Epier2.1ft  Epier2
g inst.pier2   1.294  %
Pier 2 Instantaneous Grade: 1ft
tsp.max.pier1  Round tsole.spec  g inst.pier1  Lsole  in  1  in

1
Calculate Maximum Sole Plate Thickness Pier 1:  32 
tsp.max.pier2  Round tsole.spec  g inst.pier2  Lsole  in  1.063  in

1
Calculate Maximum Sole Plate Thickness Pier 1:  32 
Bevelpier1  "YES" if g inst.pier1  1%

Determine if a Beveled Sole Plate is Required @ Pier 1:
"NO" otherwise
Bevelpier1  "NO"

Fixed Bearing.xmcd
275 of 325
53 Regional Drive
(603) 225-2978
Bevelpier2  "YES" if g inst.pier2  1%

Determine if a Beveled Sole Plate is Required @ Pier 2:
"NO" otherwise
Bevelpier2  "YES"
Determine Sole Plate Thickness tsp.brg  mean tsole.spec tsp.max.pier2  1.031  in Centerline of Bearing
at Centerline of Bearing: Occurs at the Midpoint of
the Sole Plate Length.
Sole Plate Bevel Dimensions Table for Plans:
Maximum CL Bearing Minimum
Bearing Thickness Thickness Thickness
Location (in) (in) (in) *Note that 0.25" was added to
Pier 1 1.000 1.000 1.000 the thickness provided in this
Pier 2 1.063 1.031 1.000 table for pier 2 due to the
existing pier seat geometry
Design Sole Plate Connection:
 Connection will be designed for the braking forces applied to each fixed bearing. Analyze on a per span basis assuming
each span to be independent.
 Also assume that beam end rotations will want to displace the bearing due to the introductin of the link slab. To evaluate
the welds, assume that the weld must be able to handle the frictional resistance provided from steel sliding on steel.
 Assume braking force to be uniformly distributed to all fixed bearings.
 Dead loads do not generate any rotation because of sole plate beveling.
Applied Braking Forces:
BRAKING FORCE (BR) (AASHTO 3.6.4)
 By inspection, the HS20 design vehicle will control over the tandem axle loading.
 Multiple presence factors from Article 3.6.1.1 apply. All lanes are conservatively loaded assuming the same
direction of travel.
 Per Section 3.6.4, braking force is taken as the maximum of the following:
Number of Beams: Nbeams  8
Length of Span: Lspan  40.125ft
Number of Lanes: Nlanes  2
Multiple Presence Factor for two Lanes Loaded: M p  1.00 AASHTO Table 3.6.1.1.2-1
1) 25% of the axle weights of the design vehicle:

BR1  25% ( 32kip  32kip  8kip) BR1  18.0 kip
2) 5% of the lane loading plus design vehicle weight:

BR2  5%0.640klf   3Lspan  72kip BR2  7.45 kip
Controlling braking force per lane: BRmax  max BR1 BR2  18.0 kip

Fixed Bearing.xmcd
276 of 325
53 Regional Drive
(603) 225-2978
Minimum number of fixed bearings per

Number of Fixed Bearings: Nfixed  8 span (end spans control)
Nlanes  M p BRmax
Braking Force Per Fixed Bearing: FBR   4.5 kip
Nfixed
BEARING FRICTIONAL FORCE:
Assumed Coefficient of friction Assumed based on table 6.13.2.8-2 for a class B

between Base Plate and Sole μ  0.50 surface.
Plate:
Total factored Vertical Load: Rstr  93.778 kip Conservative to Factored vertical load.
Frictional Resistance of Bearing: Fbrg  μ Rstr  46.889 kip
Total Force of Weld: FTOT  FBR  Fbrg  51.389 kip
Check Weld:
Input Weld Size: tweld  0.3125in (See AASHTO 6.13.3.4 for limits on weld size)
Resistance Factor: θe2  0.80 (AASHTO 6.5.4.2)
Weld Metal Strength: Fexx  70ksi
Resistance Provided By Weld: Rweld  0.6θe2 Fexx  33.6 ksi AASHTO 6.13.3.2.4b.
Minimum effective length of weld: Lmin  max 4  tweld 1.5 in Lmin  1.5 in (AASHTO 6.13.3.5)
Conservatively only consider welds

Welds Along Length of Sole Lweld  2Lsole  12 in along sole plate
Plate:
2
Effective Throat: TEff_weld   tweld  0.221  in (45 45 90 triangle)
2
Resisting Force: Fres.weld  Rweld Lweld TEff_weld  89.095 kip
Adequacy of Weld: Checkweld.long  if  Fres.weld  FTOT "OK" "NO GOOD"   "OK"

Fixed Bearing.xmcd
277 of 325
53 Regional Drive
(603) 225-2978
BASE PLATE
 Assume that a non-uniform pressure distribution develops below the base plate if the sole plate rotates to be on
edge.
 Only consider half of the base plate width.
0.5Lbase
CL of Base plate (per bearing line): Cbase   4.313  in
2
CL of Sole plt relative to the back of the The sole plate is set 1" in
Base plt: Csole  0.5Sends  1in  0.5Lsole  4.75 in from the end of the beam
CL if Sole Plate rotates: Csole.rot  Csole  0.5Lsole  7.75 in
Eccentricity: Ecc  Csole.rot  Cbase  3.437  in
Eccentricity Limit for stress 0.5 Lbase

distribution: LEcc   1.438  in
6
Unsupported Edge Length: Lunsup  0.5Lbase  Csole.rot  0.875  in
Since Eccentricity is outside the middle 1/6 of the plate length theoretically uplift would occur on the back edge of the
plate; however this will not physically happen since the Base plate is continuous across both bearing lines. Since the
unsupported length is so small conservatively analyze the free end using the max stress.
2  Rstr
Maximum Edge Stress: σmax   3.572  ksi AASHTO 11.6.3.2-4
 0.5Lbase 
3Wbase   Ecc
 2 
2
3  σmax Lunsup
Minimum Base Plate Thickness for Bending: tplt.min   0.405  in
FR
NSBA minimum
Specified Base Plate Thickness: tmas.spec  max Ceil tplt.min 0.125in 0.75in  0.75 in plate size of 3/4"

Fixed Bearing.xmcd
278 of 325
EXPANSION BEARING DESIGN
279 of 325

Elastomeric Bearing Design X-A003 (411)

REV.
NO.
0 8/11/2016 9/14/16
To design the elastomeric expansion bearings that will be used at both abutments.
The elastomeric bearings at both Abutments A and B were designed using Method B as described in AASTO LRFD
Bridge Design Specifications, 7th Edition.
The abutment reactions and beam end rotations were taken from the Merlin Dash Output (see Beam Design Calc
Package).
All elastomeric bearings will be rectangular and include a sole which will be bolted to a load plate that is vulcanized to
the elastomeric bearing. Bolting to a load plate allows the sole plates to be shop welded to the girder ends and will help
with the accelerated construction schedule. Also, since the beam seats are stepped for each PBU (not per beam) the load
plate thickness can be varied between beams in a PBU to make up the difference in seat elevation required to meet the
desired cross slope.

Expansion Bearing Design M:\17960.08 East Kingston 26942\Design\Bearing
Bearing Design File
(MATHCAD) Design\Expansion Bearings
CONCLUSIONS:
An elastomeric bearing with a total depth of 2½” was required to meet the expansion demands of the bridge geometry.
The minimum sole plate thickness is ¾” and is bolted to a load plate with a minimum thickness of ¾” (maximum 1¾”).
PAGE 1 OF 1
280 of 325
À BEARING ABUTMENT
Ž" (ABUT A) 10"

B)
A)
‡" (ABUT B)
(ABUT
(ABUT
(SEE NOTE 1) 0.125" BONDED

‚" COVER
MIN (TYP) INTERNAL STEEL

3 INTERNAL
*
PLATE (TYP)
1"
‡ "
LAYERS
ƒ "
2• "
5" 5"
‚" COVER •" INTERNAL LAYER
* EDGE CLOSEST
LAYER (TYP) OF ELASTOMER (TYP)
TO BACKWALL
10"
STEEL REINFORCED ELASTOMERIC BEARING PAD

BEVELED SOLE PLATE
1'-4"
SOLE PLATE & LOAD PLATE
À BEARING
9" BOT FLANGE
À GIRDER &
BEARING PAD
BRG STIFFENER
BRG STIFFENER
À ƒ" Â A325 BOLT (TYP)
1•"
(TYP)
BEVELED SOLE PLATE
2• " *
BEVELED SOLE PLATE LOAD PLATE
•"
LOAD PLATE BEAM SEAT
1" BEAM SEAT
(TYP)
4" 5"
(TYP) (TYP)
8" ELASTOMERIC 3" 5" 8" x 10" ELASTOMERIC BEARING
BEARING PAD (TYP) (TYP)
10" SOLE PLATE

10" ELASTOMERIC
AND LOAD PLATE * ƒ" (GIRDERS 1, 3, 6, & 8)
BEARING PAD
1ƒ" (GIRDERS 2, 4, 5, & 7)
281 of 325
53 Regional Drive
Concord, NH 03301 Bearing Design Chck By: WRB Date: 6/13/2016
(603) 225-2978
STEEL REINFORCED ELASTOMERIC BEARING DESIGN
Note: These calculations apply for rectangular, reinforced elastomeric bearing pads. This worksheet was setup to
follow Method B 14.7.5 of the AASHTO LRFD Bridge Design Specifications, Seventh Edition 2014 with
2016 interims and 2000 NHDOT Bridge Design Manual, Section 640
Material:
Per LRFD AASHTO one can specify a shear modulus when using Method B
Shore "A" Hardness = 60 Specify G= 130 with 15% +- variance.
Shear Modulus, Min: Gmin  0.85 130 psi (LRFD 14.7.5.2, Gmin = 80 psi)
Shear Modulus, Max: Gmax  1.15 130 psi  149.5  psi (LRFD 14.7.5.2, Gmax = 175 psi)
Creep Deflection factor: CD  0.35 (LRFD Table 14.7.6.2-1)
Steel Reinforcement Yield: fy  50ksi (NHDOT 640.3.3)
Concrete Compressive Strength: f'c  4ksi
Load Factors:
Dead Load Service I Factor: γDL  1.0 (DW & DC)
Live Load Service I Factor: γLL  1.0
Unfactored Bearing Loads: (Merlin Dash Output)
Dead Load Reaction, Max: RDL  12.68kip (MD Tbl 1.2.7.2, Int. Girder)
Live Load Reaction: RLL  44.53kip (MD Tbl 1.2.7.1, Int. Girder)
Live Load Rotation w/o Impact: θll  0.00511rad (MD table 1.2.8.2 )
Impact Factor: IM  1.268 Merlin Table 1.2.7.1, Compensates for
inclusion of Lane Load
Live Load Rotation w/ Impact: θLL  θll  IM  0.0065 rad
Camber Rotation: θCM  0.00rad (0 = Beveled sole plate)
Thermal Rotation: θTH  0.00rad
Uncertaintly Tolerance: θCT_B  0.005rad Construction tolerance included for the bearing pad. LRFD 14.4.2.1
Construction Tolerance: θCT_C  0.005rad To account for imperfections in concrete below the bearing pad per
NHDOT Memo from R. Landry 12/12/2001
 
22ft 0.25in 
Abutment Tip Rotation: θCT_D    0.00458 NHDOT BM 640.4.1, 0.25in. per 10ft of height
10ft  10ft 
Static Rotation: θst  θCM  θTH  θCT_B  θCT_C  θCT_D θst  0.015  rad
Cyclic Rotation: θcy  θLL γLL θcy  0.006  rad
Thermal Loading: NHDOT BDM 4.3.7A
Maximum Expansion Temperature: TMaxDesign  105deg NHDOT BDM 4.3.7A

Minimum Contraction Temperature: TMinDesign  20deg NHDOT BDM 4.3.7A
Length of Span(s) For Expansion: LSPAN  60ft Both Piers are fixed so the bridge expands
from the center.
M:\17960.08 East Kingston 26942\Design\Bearing Design\Expansion Bearings\ Page 1 of 12

Expansion Bearing Design.xmcd
282 of 325
53 Regional Drive
(603) 225-2978
Thermal Coefficent of Steel: ε STEEL  6.5 10 6  inindeg (AASHTO 6.4.1 and 5.4.2.2)
Design Thermal Movement Range: ΔT  ε STEEL  TMaxDesign  TMinDesign   LSPAN  (LRFD Eq. 3.12.2.3-1)
ΔT  0.59 in
Maximum Horizontal Displacement: ΔO  0.65ΔT ΔO  0.38 in (LRFD 14.7.5.3.2)
Static Shear Deformation: Δst  ΔO Δst  0.38 in Displacement caused by thermal movement
Cyclic Shear Deformation: Δcy  0.00in
Bearing Pad Dimensions:

Bearing Pad Length, L Lpad  8in
Bearing Pad Width, W: Wpad  10in
2
Plan Area: Apad  Lpad Wpad Apad  80 in
Thickness of Steel Reinforcement h s  0.125in (NHDOT 640.2.1, AASHTO 14.7.5.3.5)

(0.0625" min):
Thickness of Internal Elastomeric Layers: h ri  0.50in (NHDOT 640.2.1, Min 0.50")
Total Number of Internal Layers: Ni  3
Thickness of Each Top & Bottom Cover Layer: h c  0.25in
Total Thickness of Elastomer (ERT): h rt  h ri Ni  2  h c h rt  2  in
Total Thickness of Pad: h total  h rt   Ni  1   h s h total  2.5 in
Lpad Wpad
Shape Factor of Internal Layers: Si  Si  4.44 (LRFD Eq. 14.7.5.1-1)
2  h ri  Lpad  Wpad
Number of Internal Layers for Design: n ri  Ni if h c  0.5h ri (AASHTO 14.7.5.3.3

Definition for variable "n")
 Ni  2 0.5 if h c  0.5h ri
n ri  4
Shear due to Thermal Movement
Service Catagory I Factor for Uniform Temperature: γTU  1.20 (LRFD Table 3.4.1-1)
Deformation Due to Shear: ΔS  γTU ΔO ΔS  0.46 in
2  ΔS  0.913  in
Check Shear Deformation:
Check4  "OK" if h rt  2  ΔS Check4  "OK" (LRFD EQ. Eq. 14.7.5.3.2-1)
"NG" otherwise
Compressive Stress due to Axial Loads:
RDL γDL
Dead Load (Static): σDL  σDL  159  psi
Apad

283 of 325
53 Regional Drive
(603) 225-2978
RLL γLL
Live Load (Cyclic): σLL  σLL  557  psi
Apad
Shear Strain Values:
Shear Strain from Axial Load Coefficient: Da  1.4 (LRFD Eq. 14.7.5.3.3-4)
Shear Strain from Rotation Coefficient: Dr  0.5 (LRFD Eq. 14.7.5.3.3-7)
σDL
Axial Load, Static: γa_st  Da γa_st  0.452 (LRFD Eq. 14.7.5.3.3-3)
Gmin  Si
Check Static Shear Strain Limit: Checka_st  "OK" if γa_st  3.00 (LRFD Eq. 14.7.5.3.3-2)
"NG" otherwise
Checka_st  "OK"
σLL
Axial Load, Cyclic: γa_cy  Da γa_cy  1.587 (LRFD Eq. 14.7.5.3.3-3)
Gmin  Si
2
 Lpad  θst
Rotation, Static: γr_st  Dr    γr_st  0.467 (LRFD Eq. 14.7.5.3.3-6)
 hri  n ri
2
 Lpad  θcy
Rotation, Cyclic: γr_cy  Dr    γr_cy  0.207 (LRFD Eq. 14.7.5.3.3-6)
 h ri  n ri
Δst
Shear Deformation, Static: γs_st  γs_st  0.19 (LRFD Eq. 14.7.5.3.3-10)
h rt
Δcy
Shear Deformation, Cyclic: γs_cy  γs_cy  0 (LRFD Eq. 14.7.5.3.3-10)
h rt
Combined Shear Strain for Compression, Rotation, and Shear:
Combined Equation: γcomb   γa_st  γr_st  γs_st   1.75 γa_cy  γr_cy  γs_cy (LRFD Eq. 14.7.5.3.3-1)
γcomb  4.248
Does Combined Equation Meet Specified Limit? Checkcomb  "YES" if γcomb  5.00
Checkcomb  "YES"
"NO" otherwise
Hydrostatic Stress for Bearings with Externally Bonded Steel Plates on Top and Bottom:
Peak Hydrostatic Stress Coefficient: Ba  1.60 (LRFD Eq. 14.7.5.3.3-16)
Total Compressive Stress: σs  σDL  1.75σLL σs  1133 psi (LRFD Eq. 14.7.5.3.3-1)
Total Rotation: θs  θst  1.75θcy θs  0.026  rad (LRFD Eq. 14.7.5.3.3-1)

σs
Total Compressive Strain: ε a  ε a  0.108 (LRFD Eq. 14.7.5.3.3-15)
2
3  Ba Gmin  Si
ε a n ri
Coefficient Alpha: α   α  3.753 (LRFD Eq. 14.7.5.3.3-14)
Si θs

284 of 325
53 Regional Drive
(603) 225-2978
 2 1  1.5 2
Coefficient C sub Alpha:
4
Cα    α  
3  3
 α 1  α    (LRFD Eq. 14.7.5.3.3-13)

Cα  138.499
3 θs
Maximum Hydrostatic Stress: σhyd  3  Gmax Si   Cα σhyd  35340.804  psi (LRFD Eq. 14.7.5.3.3-12)
n ri
Maximum Allowable Hydrostatic Stress: σhyd_allow  2.25 Gmax σhyd_allow  336.375  psi
Does Maximum Hydrostatic Stress Meet Specified Limit? Checkhyd  "YES" if σhyd  σhyd_allow
(LRFD Eq. 14.7.5.3.3-11)
"NO" otherwise
Checkhyd  "NO"
1
Does Coefficient Alpha exceed a value of one-third? Checkα  "YES" if α 
(LRFD 14.7.5.3.3) 3
"NO" otherwise
Checkα  "YES"
Since the value of the coefficient alpha is greater than the threshold value of one-third, the provisions of LRFD Article
14.7.5.3.3 (page 14-63) state the "hydrostatic stress is compressive, so Eq. 11 is satisfied automatically and no further
evaluation is necessary."
Load Transfer to Substructure Due to Deformation of Elastomeric Element
Recall These Values:
2
Apad  80 in h rt  2  in Gmax  149.5  psi Δst  0.38 in (LRFD 14.6.3.1-2)
Δst
Hbu  Gmax Apad Hbu  2.3 kip
h rt
Check Stability: (LRFD 14.7.5.3.4)
Recall: h total  2.5 in Si  4.444
Lpad  8  in Wpad  10 in
h rt  2  in Gmax  149.5  psi
Check 1 - Check for Orientation of Pad as Detailed
L1  Lpad  8  in W1  Wpad  10 in
 hrt 
1.92  
A1 
 L1 
(LRFD Eq. 14.7.5.3.4-2)
 L1  A1  0.298
 1  2.0 W 
 1
2.67 (LRFD Eq. 14.7.5.3.4-3)

B1  B1  0.345
Si  2.0   1 
L1 

 4.0 W1 

285 of 325
53 Regional Drive
(603) 225-2978
Check Stability, Based on A & B: Checks1  "OK" if 2A1  B1 (LRFD Eq. 14.7.5.3.4-1)
"NG (See Checks 2 & 3)" otherwise
Checks1  "NG (See Checks 2 & 3)"
Check 2 - Check for Orientation of Pad with Length and Width Interchanged (Ref AASHTO 14.7.5.3.4)
StabilityCheck1  if  Lpad  Wpad "Interchange L & W" "Check Not Needed" 
StabilityCheck1  "Check Not Needed"
L2  Wpad  10 in W2  Lpad  8  in
 hrt 
1.92  
A2 
 L2 
(LRFD Eq. 14.7.5.3.4-2)
 L2  A2  0.205
 1  2.0 W 
 2
2.67 (LRFD Eq. 14.7.5.3.4-3)

B2  B2  0.316
Si  2.0   1 
L2 

 4.0 W2 
Check Stability, Based on A & B: Checks2  "N/A" if Wpad  Lpad

"OK" if 2A2  B2
"NG" otherwise
Checks2  "N/A" (IF "NG" See Check 3 Below)
Stress Due to Total Load: σTL  σDL  σLL σTL  715  psi
Stress limit:
NOTE: Due to the flexibility of the piers (even though they contain fixed bearings) assume that the deck is not
fixed against horizontal translation.
Gmin  Si
σmax  σmax  1963.6 psi (LRFD Eq. 14.7.5.3.4-5)
2A1  B1
Check 3 - Stability, Based on Checks3  "OK" if σs  σmax

Stress:
"OK" if A1  B1  0
"NG" otherwise
Checks3  "OK" IF 14.7.5.3.4-5 "OK" THEN Eq. 14.7.5.3.4-1 & Check 2 "OK"
Reinforcement:
Recall These Values:
h ri  0.5 in h s  0.125  in σs  1133 psi σLL  557 psi fy  50 ksi (LRFD 14.7.5.3.5)
Thickness of Internal Elastomeric Layers: h max  h ri h max  0.5 in

286 of 325
53 Regional Drive
(603) 225-2978
Thickness of Reinforcement: h s  0.125  in

Check at Service Limit State:
 3 hmax σs
h s_allow_s  h s_allow_s  0.03 in (LRFD Eq. 14.7.5.3.5-1)
fy
Check7  "OK" if h s_allow_s  h s Check7  "OK"

"NG" otherwise
Allowable Fatigue Range: ΔFTH  24ksi (LRFD Table 6.6.1.2.5-3)

Constant Amplitude Fatigue Threshold
Check at Fatigue Limit State:
2 hmax σLL
h s_allow_f  h s_allow_f  0.02 in (LRFD Eq. 14.7.5.3.5-2)
ΔFTH
Check8  "OK" if h s_allow_f  h s Check8  "OK"

"NG" otherwise
Compressive Deflection:
σDL
Strain Due to Initial Dead Load Deflection: ε di  ε di  0.015 (LRFD Eq. C14.7.5.3.6-1)
2
4.8Gmin  Si
Initial Dead Load Deflection: δd  n ri ε di h ri δd  0.03 in (LRFD Eq. 14.7.5.3.6-2)
σLL
Strain Due to Instantaneous Live Load Defl. ε li  ε li  0.053 (LRFD Eq. C14.7.5.3.6-1)
2
4.8 Gmin  Si
Instantaneous Live Load Deflection: δL  n ri ε li  h ri δL  0.106  in (LRFD Eq. 14.7.5.3.6-1)
Is instantaneous live load deflection satisfactory? CheckLLdefl  "YES" if δL  0.125in CheckLLdefl  "YES"
(LRFD C14.7.5.3.6)
"NO" otherwise
Check Anchorage for Bearings without Bonded External Plates: (LRFD 14.7.5.4)
In bearings without externally bonded steel plates, a restraint system shall be used to secure the
bearing against horizontal movement if the following equation is not satisified.
θs / n ri >= 3εa / Si (LRFD 14.7.5.4-1)
θs  0.026  rad Si  4.444 n ri  4 ε a  0.108

Calculate: θs 3 εa
MoveDsgn   0.006 MoveAllow   0.073
n ri Si
Check if restraint system is required: CheckAnchorage  "RESTRAINT SYSTEM REQUIRED" if MoveDsgn  MoveAllow
"RESTRAINT SYSTEM NOT REQUIRED" otherwise
CheckAnchorage  "RESTRAINT SYSTEM NOT REQUIRED"

287 of 325
53 Regional Drive
(603) 225-2978
Check Anchorage for Bearings: (AASHTO C14.8.3.1, coefficient of friction - 0.2)
Recall Minimum Design DL: RDL  12.68  kip
Recall Load Transfer Due to Elastomeric Element: Hbu  2.3 kip
0.2 RDL  2.536  kip
checkanchor  if  0.2 RDL  Hbu "OK" "NG"  checkanchor  "OK"
NOTE: If bearing size or height become excessive in trying to satisify this requirement, add a Retainer Plate
Expand if Retainer Plate is Required
Check Bearing on Concrete (AASHTO 5.7.5):
2
A1.brg  Apad A2.brg  4ft 22in  1056 in
 A2.brg A2.brg 
mbrg  if   2  2  2 AASHTO 5.7.5-3
 A1.brg A1.brg 
Pn  0.85 f'c A1.brg mbrg  544  kip
ϕbrg  0.7
Pr  ϕbrg Pn  380.8  kip
Pu.I  1.25RDL  1.75 1.33RLL Pu.I  119.494  kip
checkbrg  if  Pr  Pu.I "OK" "NG"  checkbrg  "OK"
Skematic of Final Bearing Design:

288 of 325
53 Regional Drive
(603) 225-2978
SOLE PLATE DESIGN - EXPANSION BEARING W/O MASONRY PLATE
Purpose and Methodology:

These calculations are used to determine the size and thickness of the sole plates based on bearing sizes per AASHTO. In
addition, sole plate beveling requirements are checked and calculated as required per NHDOT BDM Section 640.2.
Recall Input Values:
Bearing Pad Dimensions:

Recall Pad Dimensions: Lpad  8  in (Parallel to the girder centerline)
Wpad  10 in (Perp to the girder centerline)
h total  2.5 in (Total thickness of Bearing Pad)
Recall Reactions: RDL  12.68  kip RLL  44.53  kip

AASHTO Table 3.4.1-1
Factored Reaction (Strength I): Ru  1.25RDL  1.75RLL  93.778 kip
Recall Yield Stress: fy  50 ksi

ϕstr  1.00 AASHTO 6.5.4.2 for Flexure
Flexure Resistance Factor:
Allowable Steel Stress: Fa  ϕstr fy  50 ksi
Determine Sole Plate Dimensions:
 The Sole Plate should extend 1" beyond the end of the bottom flange (AASHTO/NSBA Steel Bridge Bearing Design
and Detailing Guidelines Section 1.4.3).
 NHDOT Plate 640.2.c (Sole Plate Length = Min 1" Greater than the Bearing Length. 1/2" per side)
 NHDOT Plate 640.2.c (Sole Plate Width = Min 1" Greater than the larger of B.F. and Bearing widths . 1/2" per side)
 For FIXED Bearings, MIN Sole Plate Width = BF width + 2( 3" from CL anchor to edge BF + 3" from CL anchor to
edge Sole Plate)
Sole Plate Length:

Sole Plate Length: LSP  Lpad  2in LSP  10 in (Parallel to the girder centerline.)
Sole Plate Width:

Bottom Flange Width : b bf  9in
Min Sole Plate Width : WSP  max Wpad b bf   6in WSP  16 in (Perp to the girder centerline.)
Determine Minimum Sole Plate Thickness:
1. Minimum sole plate thickness = 3/4" if there is 1.5" of lateral separation between the sole plate/flange weld and
the elastomer (AASHTO/NSBA Steel Bridge Bearing Design and Detailing Guidelines Section 1.4.3).
2. Minimum sole plate thickness = 1.5" after beveling if the field weld is directly over the elastomer
(AASHTO/NSBA Steel Bridge Bearing Design and Detailing Guidelines Section 1.4.3).
3. The bearing should be detailed with at least 1.5" of steel between the elastomer and any field welds
(AASHTO/NSBA Steel Bridge Bearing Design and Detailing Guidelines Section 1.4.4).
4. Sole plate must be beveled if slope of beam bottom flange exceeds 1% due to roadway grade (NHDOT Bridge
Manual Sec. 640.4.4.6).

289 of 325
53 Regional Drive
(603) 225-2978
Required Minimum Sole Plate Thickness:

b bf  Wpad
Horizontal offset from elastomer to weld: Offsetweld  Offsetweld  0.5 in
2
Since the sole plate will be bolted to a load plate

Minimum sole plate thickness: t1_min  0.75in that is on top of the bearing, clearances for
welding will not be an issue.
Check Sole Plate Thickness for Bending:

The plate thickness will be checked for bending over the length of plate that extends beyond the bottom flange of the
girder and which is in contact with the bearing pad.
Ru
Pressure At Top of Bearing Pad: ft  ft  0.6 ksi
WSP LSP
Free Edge subjected to Bending: lb  0.5  WSP  Wpad lb  3  in
2
3  ft lb
Minimum Sole Plate Thickness for Bending: tb1_min  tb1_min  0.56 in
Fa
Controlling Minimum Sole Plate Thickness: max t1_min tb1_min   0.75 in USE: tSP_min  0.75in
Determine Slope due to Profile:

Vertical Curve Length: Lvc  123.25ft
Elevation at PVC: EPVC  149.7187ft
Initial Roadway Grade: g 1  1.1591%
Exit Roadway Grade: g 2  2.52%
Station @ PVC: Sta PVC  10290.9900ft
 g2  g1 x2
Function for Elevation Along Curve: E( x )  EPVC  g 1 ( x ) 
2  Lvc
Sta CL_Abut1  10292.83ft

Station @ CL of Abut 1:
Sta CL_Abut2  10412.41ft
Station @ CL of Abut 2:
Elevation @ CL of Abut 1: EAbut1  E StaCL_Abut1  StaPVC  149.7395 ft
Elevation @ CL of Abut 2: EAbut2  E StaCL_Abut2  StaPVC  148.9257 ft
EAbut1.1ft  E Sta CL_Abut1  1ft  Sta PVC  149.75 ft

Elevation 1ft from Abut 1 CL:
EAbut2.1ft  E Sta CL_Abut2  1ft  Sta PVC  148.901 ft
Elevation 1ft from Abut 2 CL:

290 of 325
53 Regional Drive
(603) 225-2978
EAbut1.1ft  EAbut1
Abut 1 Instantaneous Grade: g inst.Abut1   1.089  %
1ft
EAbut2.1ft  EAbut2
g inst.Abut2   2.48 %
Abut 2 Instantaneous Grade: 1ft
tsp.max.abut1  Round tSP_min  g inst.Abut1  LSP 0.0625in  0.875  in

Calculate Maximum Sole Plate Thickness Abut 1:
tsp.max.abut2  Round tSP_min  g inst.Abut2  LSP 0.0625in  1  in
Calculate Maximum Sole Plate Thickness Abut 2:
Determine if a Beveled Sole Plate is Required Bevelabut1  "YES" if g inst.Abut1  1.00%

@ Abut 1:
"NO" otherwise
Bevelabut1  "YES"
Determine if a Beveled Sole Plate is Required Bevelabut2  "YES" if g inst.Abut2  1.00%

@ Abut 2:
"NO" otherwise
Bevelabut2  "YES"
Determine Sole Plate Thickness tsp.brg.abut1  mean tSP_min tsp.max.abut1  0.812  in Centerline of Bearing Occurs at
at Centerline of Bearing Abut 1: the Midpoint of the Sole Plate
Length.
Determine Sole Plate Thickness tsp.brg.abut2  mean tSP_min tsp.max.abut2  0.875  in Centerline of Bearing Occurs at
at Centerline of Bearing Abut 2: the Midpoint of the Sole Plate
Length.
Sole Plate Bevel Dimensions Table for Plans:
Maximum CL Bearing Minimum

Bearing Thickness Thickness Thickness
Location (in) (in) (in)
Abut 1 0.875 0.812 0.750
Abut 2 1.000 0.875 0.750

291 of 325
53 Regional Drive
(603) 225-2978
Connection of Bottom Flange to Sole Plate:
Recall horizontal thermal movement: Δst  0.38 in
Recall max. elastomer shear modulus: Gmax  149.5  psi
 Δst 
Horizontal bearing expan/contraction force: FΔT_horiz   h   Gmax  Lpad Wpad FΔT_horiz  1.82 kip
 total 
Design Horizontal Force: FH  Hbu  2.274  kip
Rubber to Slip Coefficient: Hs  20 % AASHTO C14.8.3.1
Fconn  max RDL Hs FH Fconn  2.5 kip
Input Weld Size: tweld  0.3125in (See AASHTO 6.13.3.4 for limits on weld size)
Resistance Factor: θe2  0.80 (AASHTO 6.5.4.2)
Weld Metal Strength: Fexx  70ksi
(AASHTO 6.13.2.4b-1)
Factored Resistance of Base Metal: Rr  0.6θe2 Fexx Rr  33.6 ksi
Minimum effective length of weld: Lmin  max 4  tweld 1.5 in Lmin  1.5 in (AASHTO 6.13.3.5)
Effective Throat: TEff_weld  0.707  tweld TEff_weld  0.221  in

2
Effective Weld Area: AEff_weld  Lmin  TEff_weld AEff_weld  0.331  in (AASHTO 6.13.3.3)
Min Resistance of Weld in Shear: Rs  Rr AEff_weld Rs  11.135 kip (AASHTO 6.13.2.4b)
Recall Fconn : Fconn  2.5 kip
Fconn
Length of Weld Required: LWreqd   0.342  in
Rr TEff_weld
Length of Weld Provided: LWProvided  2   LSP  1.0in  18 in
Check if weld size is acceptable: Checkweld  "WELD SIZE ACCEPTABLE" if LWProvided  LWreqd
"WELD SIZE NOT ACCEPTABLE" otherwise
Checkweld  "WELD SIZE ACCEPTABLE"

292 of 325
53 Regional Drive
(603) 225-2978
AASHTO Requirement for Minimum Seat Width:

 Refer to AASHTO section 4.7.4.4
Length Between Expansion Joints: Lexp  120ft
Height of Abutments: Habut  21.17ft Existing Height will be close to Rehab height
Skew Angle: Skew  0deg
Minimum Seat Length:


Nsup   8  0.02
Lexp
 0.08
Habut 
 2
  1  0.000125 Skew  in  12.094 in
 1ft 1ft 

293 of 325
DIAPHRAGM DESIGN
294 of 325

Diaphragm Design X-A003 (411)

REV.
NO.
0 9/18/2016 9/20/16
To design the steel diaphragms located in each PBU.
 The design of the diaphragms was not controlled by structural capacity. The diaphragm was detailed based upon
geometric limitations. The selected diaphragm needed to be at least 0.75 times the girder depth (FHWA 2.1.1). Also,
the diaphragm needed to be deep enough to fit sufficient bolts to connect it to the connection plates.
 The design was completed in the attached Mathcad template.

AISC, Steel Constructino Manual,
Office Copy Design Verifications
Thirteenth Edition
FHWA Steel Bridge Design
Handbook, “Bracing System L:\PracticeAreas\Bridge\References\Bridges\Cross
Reference for diaphragm design
Design.” Pub No. Frame Design
FHWA-HIF-16-002 Vol. 13
Diaphragm Design (Mathcad) M:\17960.08 East Kingston 26942\Design\Diaphragm Used to design the diaphragm
CONCLUSIONS:
The specified diaphragm is a 15x33.9 channel.
PAGE 1 OF 1
295 of 325
À GIRDER
À GIRDER
•"x4" BEARING STIFFENER 1•"

OR •"x4" CONNECTION PLATE
(TYP)
(TYP)
2• "
(TYP)
3"
2.00% SLOPE
= 9" (TYP)
3 SPA @ 3"
1"
(TYP)
2• "
C15x33.9
1•"
À ‡" Â A325 (TYP)
H.S. BOLTS (TYP)
DIAPHRAGM DETAIL
(TYP AT ALL LOCATIONS)
296 of 325
Bridge No. 061/064 Sheet: 1 of: _9_
53 Regional Drive Fixed Bearing Design Chck By: WRB Date: 9/18/16
Concord, NH 03301
Input Variables
Tributary Diaphragm Spacing: Diaspa  19 ft  7.5in  19.625 ft
Number of braces in Span: n  3
Bridge End Span Length: Lspan  39.25 ft
Girder Spacing: S beam  4 ft

PBU Width out 2 out: WPBU  7 ft  9.25in Exterior PBU Controls
Number of Bays: N bays  7
Support Skew Angle: skew  0 deg
Roadway Cross Slope: XSrdwy  2 %
Minimum Steel Yield Strength: F y  50ksi

(AASHTO M 270 Gr. 50W)
Minimum Steel Ultimate Strength: F u  70ksi
Steel Modulus of Elasticity: Es  29000  ksi
Web Depth: D web  20in (For wind force calculation)
tw  0.5in
(Merlin Dash table 1.2.22.7.0 gives values at
Cbb  1.0 each brace location. C.b = 1.0 conservative)
Moment modification factor:
Strength III Wind Force Load Factor γSTR.III.wind  1.40 AASHTO Table 3.4.1-1
Strength III Dead Load Components Factor γSTR.III.DC  1.25 AASHTO Table 3.4.1-1
Construction LL Factor: γcons.LL  1.5 AASHTO 3.4.2
(Merlin Dash Table 1.2.5.1

Maximum Factored DC1 Moment M DC  γSTR.III.DC 125 kip ft  156.25 kip ft Ext. Girder Controls.)
(Per Beam) :
NHDOT BDM V2.0 Table 4.2.3-2,
Construction Live Load: LL cons  20psf  ( 20ft)  WPBU  3.1 kip Construction LL and apply over a 20ft length
Temporary Form Work: DLcons  15psf  WPBU  116.563 plf NHDOT BDM V2.0 Table 4.2.3-2, Assume no
walkway is required
Screed Machine: Wscreed  7 kip NHDOT BDM V2.0 Table 4.2.3-2, Use Screed weight
since it is unknown what the contractor will use
  LL  W DLcons Lspan 
screed  Lspan
2 Mult. by 0.5 to
Approximate Construction cons
M LL  0.5γcons.LL     91.226 kip ft account for 2 beams
LL Moment:
 4 8  in PBU
Total Applied Moment During Cons.: M f  M DC  M LL  247.5  kip ft
Section properties:
Top Flange Thickness: topflg.t  0.75in
Top Flange Width: topflg.w  9 in
Bottom Flange Thickness bott flg.t  0.75in
Diaphragm Design.xmcd 1 of 9
297 of 325
Concord, NH 03301
Bottom Flange Width bott flg.w  9 in

Web Depth webdepth  Dweb  20 in
Section Depth (@ Max Moment) Girderdepth  topflg.t  bott flg.t  webdepth  21.5 in
Location of N.A. from bottom of steel from Merlin Dash Table 1.2.4.1 Y BS  10.75 in
Tension Flange:
3
topflg.t topflg.w 4
Moment of Inertia: Iyt   45.563 in (For out of plane bending)
12
Distance from Extreme Tension Fiber to Neutral Axis: yt  Y BS  10.75  in
Compression Flange:
3
bott flg.t bottflg.w 4
Moment of Inertia: Iyc   45.563 in (For out of plane bending)
12
Distance from Extreme Compression Fiber to Centroid: yc  Girderdepth  YBS  10.75  in
  yt   4
Effective moment of inertia: Ieff  minIyc     Iyt Iyc  Iyt  91 in FHWA section 2.3.1
  yc  
Distance between flange centroids:

 topflg.t  bottflg.t
h0  Girderdepth   20.8 in
2
Minimum Assumed Frame Height:
Distance from top/bottom of flange to D dia  2 in Assumed Value per NSBA
edge of Diaphragm: Guidelines
Maximum Diaphragm Height: hb.min  D web  2  D dia  16 in
Horizontal Diaphragm Member Section Properties (C15x33.9):

2
Cross Sectional Area: A s  10in
Member Depth: dmem  15in
Flange Width: bf  3.40in
tf  0.650 in
Flange Thickness:
4 4
Member Moments of Inertia: Ix  315  in Iy  8.07in
3 3
Member Section Modulus: S x  42in S y  3.09in
Radii of Gyration: rx  5.62in ry  0.901 in
3 3
Plastic Section Modulus: Zx  50.8in Zy  6.19in
4
Torsional Constant, J: J t  1.01in
6
Torsional Prop, Cw: Cw  358 in
Distance Between Flange Centroids: ho  14.4in
Web Thickness: tw.ch  0.4in
298 of 325
Concord, NH 03301
Torsional Bracing Design Requirements

Stiffness phi factor: ϕstiff  0.75 FHWA section 2.3.1
Required System Stiffness:
 2.4 L  M 2 
β T   
span f
 1677 in·kip FHWA equation 13 β T  1677 in·kip
 2
 ϕstiff  n Es Ieff  Cbb 
Add skew effect:

 No additional requirements for skew since the girders on this bridge are not skewed relative to their supports.
βT
β T_skew   1677 in·kip FHWA equation 19 β T_skew  1677 in·kip
2
( cos( skew) )
Required strength
2
0.005 Diaspa Lspan Mf
M br   30 in·kip FHWA equation 14 M br  29.733 in·kip
2
n Es Ieff  Cbb  h0
Add skew effect:
M br
M br_skew   30 in·kip FHWA equation 20 M br_skew  30 in·kip
cos( skew)
Torsional flange force
M br_skew force applied to top and bottom flanges in

F br   1.9 kip opposite directions (text below FHWA F br  1.9 kip
hb.min
equation 14 )
Determine Stiffness Provided By Diaphragm
Stiffness Provided:
6  Es Ix
β b   1141875  in·kip FHWA Figure8 β b  1141875  in·kip
Sbeam
Stiffness Check
Stiffnesscheck  "Ok" if βb  βT_skew

"No Good" otherwise
Stiffnesscheck  "Ok"
299 of 325
Concord, NH 03301
Calculate Axial Force from Wind Load (AASHTO 3.8.1.1)
Clear Height above Rail Road: ZRR  18.5ft
Deck and Beam Height: H sup  21.5in  8.5in  2.5 ft

Curb Reveal: H reveal  7 in
Rail Height: H rail  37in

Height above water: Z  ZRR  Hsup  Hreveal  Hrail  24.667 ft
Design Wind Speed: V D  130 mph AASHTO Figure 3.8.1.1.2-1
Gust Factor: G u  1.00 AASHTO Table 3.8.1.2.1-1
Drag Coefficient: CD  1.3 AASHTO Table 3.8.1.2.1-2, for superstructures
2
2.5 ln Z   6.87
   
Exposure Coefficient: K z 
  0.9834ft    0.645 AASHTO 3.8.1.2, Exposure B
345.6
Design Wind Pressure: 

P z  2.56 10
6
 ksf
2
2
 VD  Kz G u CD  0.036  ksf
mph
Calculate Wind Load, WS, Acting on Diaphragm
Diaphragm wind load is based on the full girder depth prior to deck placement. The result will be conservative for the final
condition since only wind load on the bottom half of the girder is applied to intermediate diaphragms for this condition.
Calculated wind load on exterior girder:  

WSdes  P z Girderdepth  0.065  klf
Unfactored Wind Force on an Intermediate Diaphragm: P wind  WSdes Diaspa P wind  1.3 kip
Factored Wind Force on an Intermediate Diaphragm:: P wind.str_III  γSTR.III.wind P wind P wind.str_III  1.78 kip
γSTR.III.wind WSdes Lspan Pier Diaphragms collect

Factored Wind Load @ Pier: P wind.pier   0.51 kip wind force from deck and
N bays transfer it to bearings
Calculate Maximum Axial Force

Total Wind Force: F max  Pwind.str_III  Pwind.pier  2.3 kip
300 of 325
Concord, NH 03301
INTERMEDIATE DIAPHRAGM DESIGN

*************************************************************************************
TRUSS MEMBER STRENGTH
1. The members are to be evaluated for combined axial load and flexure using the provisions of Chapter H in accordance
with AISC Specification Section E3.
2. The provisions of Section H1 will be used to check member strength.
Compression Strength (AISC SCM Chapter E)

Effective length factor: K cf  0.75 AASHTO LRFD Bridge Spec. Section 4.6.2.5
Maximum member length: Ldb  S beam  4 ft Conservatively use the Beam Spacing
Slenderness Ratio:
 
Kcf  Ldb
(Z axis governs with min. radius of gyration)
S R   40
min rx ry
Slenderness Check: Member_Slenderness  "OK" if SR  140

AASHTO Section 6.9.3,
"NO GOOD" otherwise For Secondary Members
Member_Slenderness  "OK"
bf
Angle Leg Element Slenderness:  5.2
tf
Non-Compact Element Es
λr.comp  0.45  10.837 AISC Table B4.1 (Case 5)
Slenderness Limit: Fy
bf
Element Classification: COMPRESSION_ELEMENT_CLASSIFICATION  "NON-COMPACT" if  λr.comp
(for uniform compression) tf
"SLENDER" otherwise
COMPRESSION_ELEMENT_CLASSIFICATION  "NON-COMPACT"
2
π  Es
Elastic Critical Buckling Stress: F e  F e  179.3  ksi AISC Eq. (E3-4)
2
SR
  F y  
 
  Fe   F  Es
Flexural Buckling Stress: F cr  0.658  y if SR  4.71 AISC Eq. (E3-2)
Fy
  0.877  Fe  otherwise AISC Eq. (E3-3)
F cr  44.5 ksi
301 of 325
Concord, NH 03301
Compression Safety Factor: ϕc  0.9 AISC Section E1
Design compressive strength: P c  ϕc F cr As P c  400.4  kip
Flexural Strength (AISC SCM Section F2)

1. The Channel Diaphragm resists the out of plane twisting of the Primary Beams.
2. Flexural strength is taken as the minimum computed for the limit states of a) yielding (plastic moment) and b) lateral
torsional buckling.
a) Yielding (Plastic Moment), AISC Section F2.1:
Plastic Moment Capacity: M p  Fy Zx  2540 kip in
b) Lateral-Torsional Buckling, AISC Section F2.2:
Moment gradient coefficient: Cb  1.0 (Uniform moment gradient along length)
Member Length: Ldb  4 ft
Es
AISC Lp Length: Lp  1.76ry  3.183 ft
Fy
Iy Cw
AISC Factor, Rts: rts   1.131  in
Sx
ho Iy
AISC Factor, c: cltb    1.081
2 Cw
2
Es Jt cltb  0.7 Fy Sx ho 
AISC Lr Length: Lr  1.95 rts    1 1  6.76     11.219 ft
0.7 Fy Sx ho  Es Jt cltb 
2 2
Cb π  Es  Ldb 
Jt cltb
Critical Lateral Torsional F cr.ltb   1  0.078     177.995  ksi
Buckling Stress: 2 Sx ho  rts 
 Ldb 
 
 rts 
   Ldb  Lp  
Nominal Moment Resistance: M n  
minCb Mp  Mp  0.7 F y S x     Mp if Lp  Ldb  Lr
   Lr  Lp  

min Fcr.ltb Sx Mp  if Ldb  Lr
Mp
M n  2540 kip in
302 of 325
Concord, NH 03301
Governing design flexural strength:

Flexure Safety Factor: ϕb  0.9 AISC Section F1
M c  ϕb Mn M c  2286.0 kip in
Check Adequacy for Maximum Compression, AISC Section H1.1
F max
Axial strength utilization:  0.006
Pc
 Fmax 8  Mbr_skew  Fmax

Combined_InteractionC      if  0.2 AISC Eq. (H1-1a)
 Pc 9  Mc  Pc
 Fmax  Mbr_skew 
   otherwise AISC Eq. (H1-1b) Combined_InteractionC  0.02
 2Pc  Mc 

Check_compression  if Combined_InteractionC  1.0 "OK" "No Good"  Check_compression  "OK"
303 of 325
Concord, NH 03301
CONNECTION DESIGN
*************************************************************************************
Check Bolted Connection Strength
Compute Maximum Factored Bolt Force (Outermost Bolt)
Number of vertical rows of bolts: mbolt  1
Vertical pitch: S bolt  3 in
Horizontal spacing of columns: gbolt  0 in one row of bolts
Number of bolts in one vertical row nbolt  4
Maximum Bolt Pitch for single line:  

S max  min 4 in  4  tw.ch 7 in  5.6 in Max. Spacing for Sealing,
AASHTO 6.13.2.6
Polar Moment of Inertia of Bolt Group:
nbolt  mbolt
 S bolt  nbolt  1  gbolt  mbolt  1
2 2 2 2 2
Ip  Ip  45.0 in AASHTO Eq. C6.13.6.1.4b-3
12
Strength III
Number of Bolts in Connection: N bolt  mbolt  n bolt N bolt  4
F max
Force from axial load: P a   0.574  kip (per bolt)
N bolt
Force @ outermost bolt due to moment:


M br_skew 1.5S bolt  Extreme bolt is 1.5 bolt
spacings from the center of
P m   2.973  kip
Ip the group
Maximum factored force on outermost bolts in connection: P bu_max  P a  P m  3.55 kip
Factored Shear Resistance (AASHTO LRFD Sections 6.13.2.2 & 6.13.2.7)

 Diaphragm connections are made with a minimum 7/8"dia. ASTM A325 high strength bolts
 Design is based on THREADS EXCLUDED FROM THE SHEAR PLANE.
Bolt Diameter: db  0.875 in
2
 db  2
Area of Bolt: A b  π   A b  0.601  in
2
Minimum Bolt Tensile Strength: F ub  120  ksi AASHTO LRFD 6.4.3.1
Number of shear planes: N s  1
Nominal Shear Resistance: Rsn  0.48 Ab Fub N s Rsn  34.6 kip AASHTO Eq. 6.13.2.7-1
Resistance Factor: ϕs  0.80 AASHTO LRFD Section 6.5.4.2
Factored Shear Resistance (per bolt): Rsr  ϕs Rsn Rsr  27.709 kip AASHTO Eq. 6.13.2.2-2
Check Bolt Shear Resistance: 

Check bolt_shear  if Rsr  Pbu_max "Bolt Shear OK" "Bolt Shear No Good!" 
Check bolt_shear  "Bolt Shear OK"
304 of 325
Concord, NH 03301
Factored Bearing Resistance (AASHTO LRFD Sections 6.13.2.2 & 6.13.2.9)

Minimum End Distance: D end  1.5in
15
Standard Hole Diameter: dhole  in AASHTO LRFD Table 6.13.2.4.2-1
16
Clear End Distance: Lc_end  D end  0.5 dhole Lc_end  1.031  in
Clear Distance between Holes: Lc_int  S bolt  dhole Lc_int  2.062  in
Governing plate thickness: 

tplate  min tw.ch 0.5in  tplate  0.4 in
Nominal Bearing Resistance:

Rbbn   2.4 db tplate Fu if Lc_int  2  db  Lc_end  2  db AASHTO Eqs. 6.13.2.9-1 & 2
1.2 Lc_end tplate F u otherwise (per bolt) Rbbn  34.65  kip
Resistance Factor: ϕbb  0.80 AASHTO LRFD 6.5.4.2
Factored Bearing Resistance: Rbbr  ϕbb Rbbn AASHTO Eq. 6.13.2.2-2 Rbbr  27.720 kip
Check Bearing Resistance: 

Check bear  if Rbbr  P bu_max " Bearing Resistance OK" "Bearing No Good!" 
Check bear  " Bearing Resistance OK"
Check Slip at Bolted Connections

1. The bolted connections at the diaphragm ends are designated slip-critical. Per AASHTO Article 6.13.2.1.1, slip is to be
checked for the Service II Load Combination.
2. Assume that if bolts do not slip under Strength III Load Combination they will not slip under Service II Load
Combination.
Force on Outermost Bolt
Force from axial load: P u.strIII  P bu_max (per bolt) P u.strIII  3.5 kip
Slip Resistance (AASHTO LRFD Sections 6.13.2.8)

Hole size factor: K h  1.0 AASHTO Table 6.13.2.8-2
Surface condition factor: K s  0.50 AASHTO Table 6.13.2.8-3 (Class B surface)
Number of slip planes: Ns  1
Min. required bolt tension: P t_bolt  39kip AASHTO Table 6.13.2.8-1
Nominal Slip Resistance: Rn_slip  K h K s Ns P t_bolt AASHTO Eq. 6.13.2.8-1 Rn_slip  19.5 kip
Resistance Factor: ϕser  1.0
Factored Slip Resistance: Rr_slip  ϕser Rn_slip AASHTO Eq. 6.13.2.2-1 Rr_slip  19.5 kip
Check Slip Resistance: 

Check  if Rr_slip  Pu.strIII " Slip Resistance OK" "Slip Resistance No Good!" 
Check  " Slip Resistance OK"
305 of 325
BEARING STIFFENER DESIGN
306 of 325

Bearing Stiffener Design X-A003 (411)

REV.
NO.
0 9/14/2016 9/16/16
To design the steel bearing stiffeners to be used at each bearing line on each girder.
 The bearing stiffeners will be the same at the abutments and the piers.
 The bearing stiffeners will also serve as a connection plate for the abutment and pier diaphragms (NHDOT
Plate 630.4a).
 Stiffener sizes are provided by Merlin Dash, but are verified through calculations performed in Mathcad. The
specified bearing stiffener is slightly more conservative than the stiffener size specified by Merlin Dash
(Merlin Dash Specifies 7/16” x 4”).

M:\17960.08 East Kingston 26942\Design\Bearing
Bearing Stiffener Design (Mathcad) Used to design the Bearing Stiffener
Stiffeners
CONCLUSIONS:
The specified bearing stiffener size is ½” x 4”.
PAGE 1 OF 1
307 of 325
À GIRDER
‚" ± „" 1"
‚ "
(TYP) (TYP)
(TYP)
±
• "
Š
(TYP)
Š
BEARING STIFFENER
(TYP)
1ƒ "
Á •" x 4" (TYP)
Š
(TYP)
Š
WELD (TYP)
Š Š
GTB GTB
Š Š
COPE AND WELD DETAIL
ABUTMENT & PIER BEARING STIFFENER
308 of 325
East Kingston, N.H. Project No.: 17960.08
NH 107A over Pan Am R.R. Sheet: _1_ of: _3_
53 Regional Drive Bearing Stiffener Design Chck By: WRB Date: 09/14/2016
Concord, NH 03301
DESIGN OF BEARING STIFFENERS
Input: Code Reference:

Steel Yield Strength: Fy  50ksi
Steel Modulus of Elasticity: Es  29000ksi
Girder Section Properties at Abutments:
Top Flange Width: b tf  9in
Web Depth: d w  20in
Maximum Reaction (Factored): Ru  93.79kip (Int. Girder Controls. See Merlin

Dash, Table 1.2.7.2)
Design Reaction: Rdesign  Ceil Ru 10 kip   100  kip
Number of Stiffeners at this Location: Nbs  2 (One on each side of web)
Resistance Factor for Bearing: ϕb  1.00 (AASHTO 6.5.4.2)
Resistance Factor for Compression: ϕc  0.90 (AASHTO 6.5.4.2)
Calculations:
b bf  tw
Flange Width Available for Bearing of Plate: Wbrg   4.25 in
2
Select Stiffener Plate Dimensions:
Max Plate Width: b bsMAX  0.5  b bf  tw  4.25 in
Use Plate Width: b bs  4.00in
Plate Thickness: tbs  0.5in (1/2" min. per BDM1 630.4.7-6)
Plate Depth: d bs  d w  20 in
Plate Coping Width: cwbs  1in See Plans
Plate Coping Depth: cdbs  1.75in See Plans
Projecting Width of Stiffener Plate (AASHTO 6.10.11.2.2):

This check is intended to prevent local buckling of the stiffener plate.
Es
Local Buckling Limit: λlb  0.48 tbs  5.78 in (AASHTO EQ. 6.10.11.2.2.-1)
Fy
Bearing Stiffener Design.xmcd 1 of 3
309 of 325
Concord, NH 03301
Check Projecting Width: Checkpw  "LOCAL BUCKLING DOES NOT OCCUR" if b bs  λlb
"LOCAL BUCKLING OCCURS" otherwise
Checkpw  "LOCAL BUCKLING DOES NOT OCCUR"
Bearing Resistance (AASHTO 6.10.11.2.3):

Width of Plate Bearing on Flange: b bs.effective   bbs  cwbs if bbs  Wbrg  3.000  in
 Wbrg  cwbs otherwise

2
Area of Steel: Abs  b bs tbs  2.000  in
2
Area of Direct Bearing: Apn  Nbs b bs.effective tbs  3.000  in
Nominal Bearing Resistance for Rsbn  1.4 Apn Fy  210.0  kip (AASHTO EQ. 6.10.11.2.3-2)
Fitted Ends of Stiffener:
Factored Bearing Resistance for Rsbr  ϕb Rsbn  210.0  kip (AASHTO EQ. 6.10.11.2.3-1)
Fitted Ends of Stiffener:
Recall Design Reaction: Rdesign  100  kip
Check Bearing Capcacity: Checkbrg.cap  "SUFFICIENT CAPACITY" if Rsbr  Rdesign

"INSUFFICIENT CAPACITY" otherwise
Checkbrg.cap  "SUFFICIENT CAPACITY"
Axial Resistance of Bearing Stiffener (AASHTO 6.10.11.2.4):

The provisions of Article 6.10.11.2.4a state that "The factored axial resistance shall be determined as specified
in Article 6.9.2.1 using the specified minimum yield strength of the stiffener plates. The radius of gyration shall
be computed about the mid-thickness of the web and the effective length shall be taken as 0.75D, where D is
the web depth." As per AASHTO Table 6.9.4.1.1-1, the potential buckling mode of bearing stiffeners is flexural
buckling. Therefore, use the applicable equation for calculation of elastic flexural buckling resistance.
Effective Section:
The provisions of Article 6.10.11.2.4b state that "for stiffeners welded to the web, a portion of the web shall be
included as part of the effective column section. For stiffeners consisting of two plates welded to the web, the
effective column section shall consist of the two stiffener elements, plus a centrally located strip of web
extending not more than 9t w on each side of the stiffeners."
Aes  2   9  tw  Abs  8.5 in

2 2
Effective Section Area:
tbs  2  bbs  tw 3   2 9  tw  tbs  tw3

Moment of Inertia: Is 
      25.677 in4
12
310 of 325
Concord, NH 03301
Is
Radius of Gyration: rs   1.738  in
Aes
Effective Length Factor: Ke  0.75 (Welded Connection) (AASHTO 6.10.11.2.4a)
Slender Element Reduction Q  1.00 (Bearing Stiffener) (AASHTO 6.9.4.1.1)

Factor:
2
π  Es
Elastic Flexural Buckling Pe   Aes  32663  kip (AASHTO EQ. 6.9.4.1.2-1)
Resistance: 2
 Ke d bs 
 r 
 s 
Equivalent Nominal Yield Po  Q Fy Aes  425  kip (AASHTO 6.9.4.1.1)
Resistance:
Pe
Elastic FB Resistance to RP   76.855
Yield Resistance Ratio: Po
  Po  
   
Nominal Compressive Pn  0.658    Po if RP  0.44  422.7  kip (AASHTO EQ. 6.9.4.1.1-1)
 Pe
Resistance:
0.877  Pe otherwise (AASHTO EQ. 6.9.4.1.1-2)
Factored Resistance of Pr  ϕc Pn  380  kip (AASHTO 6.9.2.1-1)

Components in Compression:
Check Compressive Checkcomp.cap  "SUFFICIENT CAPACITY" if Pr  Rdesign

Resistance:
"INSUFFICIENT CAPACITY" otherwise
Checkcomp.cap  "SUFFICIENT CAPACITY"
Specify a 0.5" x 4.0" stiffener plate at the bearing locations.
311 of 325
CONSTRUCTABILITY
VERIFICATION
312 of 325

Constructability for PBU Erection X-A003 (411)

REV.
NO.
0 9/20/2016 9/20/2016
To determine potential crane locations and sizes for erection of PBUs.
 The three crane placement options were as follows:

1. Crane placed behind abutment, all picks from one side.
2. Crane placed behind abutments, picks from both sides (could be one mobile crane that moves or two
crawler cranes). Picks could also occur from both sides in front of the existing abutments with similar
pick distances.
3. Crane placed below Abutment A on residential drive, but outside railroad easement.

E Kingston Erection Check & Pick M:\17960.08 East Kingston
Calc sheet for pick weights
Weights - Mathcad 26942\Design\Constructability
L:\PracticeAreas\Bridge\References\Bridges\Crane
Crane Manuals Crane catalogs for crane capacities
Catalogs
CONCLUSIONS:
Option 2 (picks behind each abutment) was deemed to be the most practical option. Erecting a crane on the residential drive
would be difficult due to limited space. It would also be difficult to keep the crane out of the Railroad right-of-way. Crane
availability could prove to be a challenge for contractors due to the size of crane required to complete all picks in one
location. Option 2 also allows the contractor the option to use a mobile crane (a mobile crane would not be able to get down
Troll Way, and a very large mobile crane would be required for a single pick location). Erection of a crawler crane would
have to be completed during the road closure and therefore could impact the contractors schedule for the 21 day closure. A
sufficiently sized mobile crane could be found in the Boston Area.
PAGE 1 OF 1
313 of 325
OPTION 1
2•
ry
sto
d
woo
wire
3'h
an
#17
52
elm
+50
+50
+50
121'-
0"
R.
R. EASEMENT
siren
pole
an
y
Wa
l
ol
Tr
an
RES
J
net
ID E
D RI
40
69 20
cc
e&he 282
281
N TI
VE
meter
pole
314 of 325
A
jb
OPTION 2
2•
ry
sto
d
woo
wire
3'h
an
#17
52
elm
82'-0"
+50
+50
+50
R.
R. EASEMENT
siren
pole
an
y
Wa
l
ol
Tr
an
RES
J
net
ID E
D RI
40
69 20
cc
e&he 282
281
N TI
VE
meter
pole
315 of 325
A
jb
OPTION 3
2•
ry
sto
d
woo
wire
3'h
an
#17
52
elm
1
0
7
'
-
0
+50
"
+50
R.
R. EASEMENT
siren
pole
an
y
Wa
l
ol
Tr
an
RES
J
net
ID E
D RI
40
69 20
cc
e&he 282
281
N TI
VE
meter
pole
316 of 325
A
jb
East Kingston, N.H. Project No. 17960.08
NH 107A over PAN AM R.R. Sheet : 1 of: 3
NHDOT Bridge No. 061/064 Calc. By: SIW Date: 9/19/2016
PBU Erection Chck By: JAL Date: 9/20/2016
53 Regional Drive
Concord, NH 03301
ERECTION PLAN DESIGN

Purpose & Methodology:
This calculation covers the layout of the steel erection for the East Kingston Bridge. The Calculations will look at the erection
of the prefabricated bridge units (PBUs). By inspection, controlling pick weight will be an exterior PBU.
Calculations:
Girder Length Length: Lgirder  40ft  0.5in  40.042 ft Conservatively use
maximum girder length
PBU Deck Length: LPBU.deck  39ft  1.25in  39.104 ft Conservatively include the
partial thickness @ link slab
Weight of Steel:
Density of Steel: ρsteel  490pcf
2
Web Area Areaweb  ( 0.50in)  20.0in  0.069 ft 20" x 0.50"
2
Flange Area (Top and Bottom): Areaflange  ( 0.75in)  9.0in  0.047 ft 9.0" x 0.75"
Weight of Girder Wgirder  ρsteel  Areaweb  2  Areaflange  79.97  plf

only 3 diaphragms and sole plates,
Assumed Detail Factor: fdetail  1.05 short span, therefore small
Unit Weight of Steel per PBU: Wsteel  2fdetail Wgirder  167.9  plf two girders per PBU
Weight of Concrete:
Unit Weight of Concrete (Normal Weight) γconc  150  pcf
2 Measured in CAD so the deck overhang would

Area of Deck Adeck  5.87ft be accurate
Width of Curb: Wcurb  2ft
Height of Curb: Hcurb  7in
2
Area of Curb Acurb  Wcurb Hcurb  1.167 ft
Unit Weight of Concrete per PBU: Wconc  γconc  Adeck  Acurb  1055.5 plf
Preliminary PBU Pick Weights
Weight of Exterior PBU: WPBU.ext  Lgirder  Wsteel  LPBU.deck Wconc  47.999 kip
Total Pick Weight for Exterior Prefabricated Bridge Units - with Deck and Curb
Preliminary Factor of Safety of 25% to estimate FS  1.25
crane picks:
Controlling Pick Weight: PPBU.max  FS   WPBU.ext PPBU.max  60.0 kip
M:\17960.08 East Kingston 26942\Design\Constructability\ Page 1 of 3
317 of 325
53 Regional Drive
Concord, NH 03301
Maximum Pick Distances

Pick distances will be based on two possible crane locations but three possible erection plans:
1. Crane placed behind abutment, all picks from one side
2. Crane placed behind abutments, but crane moves and picks from both sides. Cranes could also be located on both
sides of the railroad tracks (in a location similar to that shown in option 3) with similar pick distances.
3. Crane placed below Abutment A on the residential drive, but outside railroad easement.
Maximum Pick Distances:
Option 1: Distpick.1  121ft All distances are approximate, measured
from center of rotation. Assume that the
Option 2: Distpick.2  82ft support closest to the back face of the
abutment can be no closer than 5ft to the
Option 3: Distpick.3  105ft back face of the abutment.
It is recommended that the bridge erection use Option 2, two crane positions placed behind either abutment. Reasons for this
conclusion include:
 Placing the crane beneath the bridge on Troll Way may require the outriggers to extend into the train ROW (which should
be avoided) or leveling a platform due to the footprint being larger than roadway (also not ideal). Also erection of the
crane boom on Troll Way could be difficult given the limited space (Over head utilities and the steep grade of Troll Way
would make it difficult to walk the crane down with the main boom attached on 107A)
 The amount of time the crane will spend in the fouling zone (boom over railroad tracks) should be minimized. Attempting
to pick and place all PBUs from a single crane position would mean increased time in the fouling zone while placing Spans
2 and 3.
 It would require a larger crane to pick all PBUs from a single position (providing a contractor to limited availability for a
sufficiently sized crane).
 Option 2 allows the contractor the option of using a mobile crane or a crawler crane. Erection/dismantling of a crawler
crane would need to occur during the 21 day road closure. A mobile crane would have a smaller impact on contractor
scheduling during the road closure. The required mobile crane is large but sufficiently sized cranes exist in the Boston
area.
Possible Crane Options:
 interpolation used in crane load charts when the design load is in between radius increments.
Option 1:
Manitowoc 2250 Crawler Crane (300 ton):
Maximum Radius at Design Pick Weight: Pickradius.2250  124ft At Cranes Capacity for Pick
Option 2:
Link Belt 298hslt Crawler Crane (230 ton):

Maximum Radius at Design Pick Weight: Pickradius.999  92ft
LTM 1300-6.2 Mobile Crane (300 ton):

Maximum Radius at Design Pick Weight: Pickradius.LTM1300  87ft At Cranes Capacity for Pick
LTM 1350-6.1 Mobile Crane (350 ton)

Maximum Radius at Design Pick Weight: Pickradius.LTM1350  105ft Better suited for Pick
318 of 325
53 Regional Drive
Concord, NH 03301
Option 3:
Link Belt 348h5 Crawler Crane (300 ton):


Maximum Radius at Design Pick Weight: Pickradius.2250  124 ft
319 of 325
320 of 325
321 of 325
LINK BELT 298HSLT VXSHUVHGHV 3
0DLQ %RRP /RDG &KDUW

0DLQ %RRP /LIW &DSDFLW\ &KDUW ŕ 5RWDWLRQ $%&'( $ > OE NJ @ &RXQWHUZHLJKW
>$OO FDSDFLWLHV DUH OLVWHG LQ NLSV PW @
/RDG %RRP /HQJWK IW P /RDG

5DGLXV 5DGLXV
IW P IW P

7KLV PDWHULDO LV VXSSOLHG IRU UHIHUHQFH XVH RQO\ 2SHUDWRU PXVW UHIHU WR LQ FDE &UDQH 5DWLQJ 0DQXDO DQG 2SHUDWRU V 0DQXDO WR GHWHUPLQH DOORZDEOH
FUDQH OLIWLQJ FDSDFLWLHV DQG DVVHPEO\ DQG RSHUDWLQJ SURFHGXUHV
+6/ /LQN%HOW &UDQHV
322 of 325
MANITOWOC 999
Heavy-lift boom load charts

Liftcrane boom capacities - Series 3 Fixed Jib No. 134 on
Boom No. 82 or No. 22EL Heavy-Lift Boom
No. 82 or No. 22EL
99 609 kg (219,600 lb) Upperworks Counterweight 36 288 kg (80,000 lb) Carbody Counterweight
Boom 360° Rating kg (lb) x 1 000 Deduct from
Jib
m (ft) Capacity when
Length
Radius 21,3 27,4 33,5 39,6 45,7 51,8 57,9 64,0 70,1 76,2 82,3 88,4 ﬁxed jib is attached
m (ft)
(70) (90) (110) (130) (150) (170) (190) (210) (230) (250) (270) (290) kg (lb)
9,1 1 220
4,6 250,0* (30) (2,700)
(15) (551.0)*
12,2 1 590
5,0 219,9 (40) (3,500)
(17) (462.5)
15,2 1 950
6,0 183,0 180,7 (50) (4,300)
(20) (397.5) (396.4)
18,3 2 310
8,0 139,0 138,5 138,1 133,2 120,1 (60) (5,100)
(26) (309.3) (308.3) (307.5) (295.0) (265.5)
21,3 2 770
10,0 111,5 111,1 110,8 110,5 110,6 100,8 88,6 (70) (6,100)
(32) (252.2) (251.2) (250.5) (249.9) (248.9) (224.1) (196.8)
24,4 3 220
11,0 100,2 100,3 100,4 100,3 99,9 97,6 86,3 76,7 63,1 (80) (7,100)
(36) (221.8) (222.0) (222.1) (221.9) (221.0) (215.7) (190.5) (169.2) (139.3)
12,0 88,2 88,3 88,3 88,3 88,2 88,3 81,4 74,9 62,8 51,8 —
(40) (190.3) (190.4) (190.4) (190.4) (190.0) (189.7) (177.0) (164.5) (138.4) (114.1) (95.1)
14,0 70,9 70,9 70,9 70,9 70,6 70,5 70,3 67,9 62,1 51,2 42,6 35,3
(46) (156.1) (156.2) (156.1) (156.0) (155.5) (155.1) (154.6) (149.6) (137.1) (113.0) (94.1) (77.9)
15,0 64,4 64,4 64,4 64,3 64,1 63,9 63,6 63,6 60,7 50,9 42,3 35,0
(50) (139.0) (139.0) (138.9) (138.8) (138.3) (137.9) (137.3) (136.7) (132.5) (112.2) (93.3) (77.2)
18,0 50,1 50,1 50,0 49,9 49,6 49,5 49,1 48,9 48,6 48,2 41,5 34,3
(60) (108.2) (108.1) (108.0) (107.8) (107.2) (106.8) (106.1) (105.5) (104.7) (104.7) (91.4) (75.5)
24,0 33,6 33,6 33,5 33,2 33,0 32,6 32,3 31,9 31,9 31,5 31,3
(80) (72.6) (72.5) (72.3) (71.7) (71.2) (70.4) (69.8) (68.9) (68.9) (68.0) (67.2)
30,0 24,4 24,3 24,1 23,8 23,5 23,1 22,7 22,7 22,3 21,9
(100) (52.7) (52.5) (51.9) (51.4) (50.6) (49.9) (49.0) (48.9) (48.0) (47.2)
34,0 — 20,2 19,9 19,7 19,3 19,0 18,6 18,6 18,1 17,7
(110) (41.6) (45.6) (45.0) (44.4) (43.6) (42.9) (42.0) (42.0) (41.0) (40.2)
36,0 18,5 18,2 18,0 17,6 17,3 16,9 16,8 16,4 16,0
(120) (39.8) (39.2) (38.7) (37.9) (37.2) (36.3) (36.2) (35.3) (34.5)
40,0 — 15,3 15,1 14,8 14,4 14,0 14,0 13,5 13,2
(130) (30.9) (34.5) (34.0) (33.2) (32.4) (31.6) (31.5) (30.5) (29.7)
42,0 13,9 13,9 13,5 13,2 12,8 12,8 12,3 12,0
(140) (29.3) (29.9) (29.1) (28.4) (27.5) (27.4) (26.5) (25.6)
46,0 — 11,7 11,5 11,1 10,7 10,7 10,2 9,8
(150) (22.4) (26.4) (25.7) (24.9) (24.0) (24.0) (23.0) (22.1)
50,0 8,7 9,7 9,4 9,0 8,9 8,5 8,1
(160) (21.4) (22.6) (21.9) (21.0) (20.9) (20.0) (19.1)
52,0 8,5 8,6 8,2 8,2 7,8 7,4
(170) (19.1) (19.3) (18.4) (18.3) (17.4) (16.5)
58,0 5,8 6,1 6,2 5,8 5,4
(190) (13.0) (13.6) (13.9) (12.9) (12.1)
64,0 3,4 4,1 3,9 3,8
(210) (7.6) (9.1) (8.8) (8.5)
70,0 1,8 1,9 1,8
(230) (4.1) (4.2) (4.0)
*NOTE: Special equipment required.
Meets ANSI B30.5 Requirements - Capacities do not exceed 75% of static tipping load.
NOTICE: This capacity chart is for reference only and must not be used for lifting purposes.
Manitowoc 999 43
323 of 325

LINK BELT 348H5 VXSHUVHGHV /
/RDG &KDUW ([WHQGHG *DXJH

+HDY\ 'XW\ %RRP :LWK +HDY\ 'XW\ 7RS ([WHQGHG *DXJH ŕ 5RWDWLRQ
$%& $ > OE PW @ &WZW
>$OO FDSDFLWLHV DUH OLVWHG LQ NLSV PW @
%RRP /HQJWK IW P
/RDG /RDG
5DGLXV 5DGLXV

IW P IW P

7KLV PDWHULDO LV VXSSOLHG IRU UHIHUHQFH XVH RQO\ 2SHUDWRU PXVW UHIHU WR LQ FDE &UDQH 5DWLQJ 0DQXDO DQG 2SHUDWRU V 0DQXDO WR GHWHUPLQH DOORZDEOH
FUDQH OLIWLQJ FDSDFLWLHV DQG DVVHPEO\ DQG RSHUDWLQJ SURFHGXUHV
+</$% /LQN%HOW &UDQHV
324 of 325
MANITOWOC 2250
Heavy-lift boom load charts

Liftcrane boom capacities - 2250 Series 3 Fixed jib No. 132 on
Boom No. 44 with heavy lift top Boom No. 44
113 040 kg (249,200 lb) Crane counterweight 54 430 kg (120,000 lb) Carbody counterweight Deduct from
Jib
360° Rating kg (lb) x 1 000 capacity when
length
ﬁxed jib is attached
m (ft)
Boom 21,3 27,4 33,5 39,6 45,7 51,8 57,9 67,1 73,2 79,2 85,3 91,4 kg (lb)
m (ft) (70) (90) (110) (130) (150) (170) (190) (220) (240) (260) (280) (300) 12,2 2 900
Radius (40) (6,400)
5,5 272,1
(18) (600.0) 18,3 3 720
(60) (8,200)
7,0 239,3 223,4 169,8
(22) (541.5) (495.6) — 24,4 4 670
(80) (10,300)
8,0 210,8 210,4 166,2 158,8
(26) (469.1) (468.1) (367.0) (350.7) 30,5 5 810
(100) (12,800)
9,0 188,2 187,8 162,9 155,9 135,8 —
(30) (408.7) (407.7) (358.2) (343.0) (298.6) (284.1) 36,6 6 940
(120) (15,300)
11,0 154,1 154,2 153,8 150,9 130,7 124,9 108,2
(36) (340.9) (340.9) (339.8) (333.2) (288.3) (275.6) (238.8)
12,0 135,9 140,7 140,4 138,0 128,4 123,1 106,5 97,7 —
(40) (293.0) (304.2) (303.9) (298.3) (282.3) (270.7) (234.2) (214.8) (185.8)
14,0 109,0 113,0 112,8 112,6 110,9 107,4 103,1 90,8 80,9 73,8 64,4 55,9
(46) (239.8) (248.7) (248.3) (247.9) (244.2) (236.4) (227.2) (200.2) (178.4) (162.8) (142.0) (123.3)
15,0 98,6 102,5 102,3 102,2 101,9 99,1 96,1 87,5 78,3 71,5 63,4 55,6
(50) (212.6) (221.2) (220.8) (220.4) (219.6) (214.7) (207.8) (191.2) (171.3) (156.5) (138.6) (122.6)
18,0 74,7 79,8 79,5 79,4 78,9 78,8 77,7 74,4 70,5 64,4 58,5 53,0
(60) (160.4) (172.4) (171.8) (171.4) (170.5) (169.8) (168.3) (160.5) (153.9) (140.7) (129.1) (116.0)
22,0 — 59,4 60,7 60,4 60,0 59,7 59,2 58,4 56,5 55,4 55,0 48,4
(70) (110.2) (137.4) (139.5) (139.0) (138.1) (137.4) (136.4) (133.8) (129.5) (125.9) (125.0) (108.3)
24,0 51,6 54,0 53,8 53,3 53,0 52,5 51,9 50,9 50,1 48,9 46,4
(80) (110.7) (116.6) (116.1) (115.1) (114.5) (113.4) (112.0) (110.2) (108.3) (105.8) (101.7)
28,0 42,8 43,6 43,2 42,8 42,3 41,7 41,2 41,3 40,2 38,8
(90) (97.6) (99.0) (98.0) (97.3) (96.2) (94.8) (93.7) (93.6) (91.1) (88.0)
30,0 37,8 39,6 39,2 38,9 38,4 37,8 37,2 37,3 36,7 35,4
(100) (80.9) (85.6) (84.7) (84.0) (82.9) (81.5) (80.3) (80.5) (79.5) (76.6)
34,0 32,1 32,9 32,6 32,1 31,4 30,9 30,9 30,7 29,8
(110) (72.7) (74.1) (73.4) (72.3) (70.8) (69.6) (69.8) (69.2) (67.2)
36,0 28,7 29,9 30,0 29,5 28,8 28,3 28,4 28,1 27,5
(120) (61.1) (64.1) (64.7) (63.6) (62.1) (60.9) (61.1) (60.5) (59.4)
42,0 21,9 22,9 23,2 22,6 22,1 22,2 21,9 21,3
(140) (46.3) (49.1) (49.5) (48.8) (47.6) (47.8) (47.1) (45.4)
50,0 — 15,8 16,0 15,8 16,3 15,2 13,9
(160) (35.5) (37.1) (37.4) (37.0) (38.0) (35.8) (32.8)
56,0 11,8 11,7 12,2 11,2 9,8
(180) (27.8) (27.4) (28.6) (26.4) (23.3)
62,0 8,5 8,4 8,9 8,1 6,8
(200) (20.0) (19.7) (21.0) (19.0) (16.1)
68,0 5,6 6,2 5,5 4,3
(220) (13.3) (14.7) (13.0) (10.4)
72,0 4,7 4,0 3,0
(235) (10.8) (9.2) (7.0)
74,0 3,3 2,4
(245) (6.9) (5.0)
76,0 2,6 1,9
(255) (4.7) —
Meets ANSI B30.5 Requirements - Capacities do not exceed 75% of static tipping load.
NOTICE: This capacity chart is for reference only and must not be used for lifting purposes.
32
325 of 325

061 064 East Kingston - Design Calculations

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

061 064 East Kingston - Design Calculations

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

EAST KINGSTON

PROJECT NO. 17960.08

BRIDGE GEOMETRY ........................................................................................................ 3

VERTICAL & HORIZONTAL CURVE DATA ............................................................. 5

COGO CALCULATIONS .......................................................................................... 8

CAMBER AND DECK ELEVATION CALCULATIONS ................................................. 15

ABUTMENT PEDESTAL ELEVATIONS ..................................................................... 37

BLOCKING DISTANCE CALCULATIONS ................................................................. 39

BACKWALL AND STUB WALL ELEVATION CALCULATIONS ................................. 41

BEAM DEPTH AND PIER PEDESTAL CALCULATIONS ............................................ 45

GIRDER DESIGN & FORM 4 CALCULATIONS ................................................................. 51

DECK DESIGN .................................................................................................................. 226

LINK SLAB DESIGN ......................................................................................................... 252

ULTRA-HIGH PERFORMANCE CONCRETE REINFORCEMENT DEVELOPMENT

FIXED BEARING DESIGN ................................................................................................. 271

EXPANSION BEARING DESIGN ........................................................................................ 279

DIAPHRAGM DESIGN ....................................................................................................... 294

BEARING STIFFENER DESIGN ......................................................................................... 306

CONSTRUCTABILITY VERIFICATION .............................................................................. 312

BRIDGE CAPACITY SUMMARY BRIDGE NUMBER: 061/064

ROUTE: NH ROUTE 107A OVER: PAN AM RAILWAY AND RESIDENTIAL DR.

LONGITUDINAL REQUIRED CAPACITY (HS Tons) AVAILABLE CAPACITY (HS Tons)

Exterior Girder 39'-4"

Rating Method English Tons Metric Tons

(Inv.) 65. LRFR 66. (Inv.) 76.8 69.6

PROJECT: MJ JOB NO.:

Vertical Curve Data

PVC 102+90.9900 149.7187 Grade 1 1.1591 %

Breakpoint Station Station Breakpoint

Is this a divided highway

Offset off Elevation at Elevation at

Offset off Elevation at Elevation at

Offset off Elevation at Elevation at

Offset off Elevation at Elevation at

COGO POINT NUMBERS-SPAN 1

FINISHED GRADE ELEVATIONS-SPAN 1

Wearing Surface = 0.000 in

ELEVATIONS AT BOTTOM OF CONCRETE DECK SLAB-SPAN 1 (FEET)

East Kingston Bridge_Vertical Geometry - 3Span~ Deck Elevations (Span 1)

VERTICAL ORDINATES - GIRDER G1 - SPAN 1

VERTICAL ORDINATES - GIRDER G2 - SPAN 1

VERTICAL ORDINATES - GIRDER G3 - SPAN 1

VERTICAL ORDINATES - GIRDER G4 - SPAN 1

VERTICAL ORDINATES - GIRDER G5 - SPAN 1

East Kingston Bridge_Vertical Geometry - 3Span~ Deck Elevations (Span 1)

VERTICAL ORDINATES - GIRDER G6 - SPAN 1

VERTICAL ORDINATES - GIRDER G7 - SPAN 1

VERTICAL ORDINATES - GIRDER G8 - SPAN 1

East Kingston Bridge_Vertical Geometry - 3Span~ Deck Elevations (Span 1)

DEAD LOAD DEFLECTIONS - GIRDER G1 - SPAN 1 (inches)

DEAD LOAD DEFLECTIONS - GIRDER G2 - SPAN 1 (inches)

DEAD LOAD DEFLECTIONS - GIRDER G3 - SPAN 1 (inches)

DEAD LOAD DEFLECTIONS - GIRDER G4 - SPAN 1 (inches)

DEAD LOAD DEFLECTIONS - GIRDER G5 - SPAN 1 (inches)

East Kingston Bridge_Vertical Geometry - 3Span~ Deck Elevations (Span 1)

DEAD LOAD DEFLECTIONS - GIRDER G6 - SPAN 1 (inches)

DEAD LOAD DEFLECTIONS - GIRDER G7 - SPAN 1 (inches)

DEAD LOAD DEFLECTIONS - GIRDER G8 - SPAN 1 (inches)

East Kingston Bridge_Vertical Geometry - 3Span~ Deck Elevations (Span 1)

CAMBER TABLE - ALL GIRDERS- ALL SPANS (INCHES)

CAMBER TABLE - GIRDER G2 - SPAN 1 (INCHES)

CAMBER TABLE - GIRDER G3 - SPAN 1 (INCHES)

CAMBER TABLE - GIRDER G4 - SPAN 1 (INCHES)