KEMENTERIAN AGAMA

INSTITUT AGAMA ISLAM NEGERI PALANGKA RAYA

JURUSAN PENDIDIKAN BAHASA
PRODI TADRIS BAHASA INGGRIS
SEMESTER GANJIL TA 2023/ 2024
Alamat Jl. G. Obos Komplek Islamic Centre Telp. (0536) 3239447/3226356 Fax 3222105 . Palangka Raya
Kalimantan Tengah 73112

MID TEST

Course : STATISTICS Semester/Class : 5A/B

Credit : 2 SKS Time : 100 minutes
Instructor : Sabarun, M. Pd. Room : MIPA 3.1

Instruction
The research investigates the effect of writing strategy on writing performance amongst Islamic
University Students across different senior high school background. The design applied a posttest quasi-
experiment using a 3 × 2 analysis of variance with participant’s types of writing strategy (x1): Digital
Graphic Organizers (DGOs) versus Paper- based Graphic Organizers (DGOs) versus Non Graphic
Organizers (NGOs) and senior high school background/HSB (x2): split evenly between SMA versus MA
as between-participants factors. The RQs are: Does school background give effect on learners’ writing
performance? Do types of writing strategy give effect on learners’ writing performance? Is there any
interaction effect between between types of writing strategy and high school background (HSB) on
writing performance. The score is as follows:
Groups HSB Writing Score
1.0 1.0 83.0
1.0 2.0 83.0
1.0 1.0 70.0
2.0 2.0 80.0
3.0 1.0 54.0
3.0 1.0 61.0
3.0 1.0 52.0
2.0 2.0 82.0
2.0 2.0 83.0
2.0 2.0 81.0
2.0 1.0 65.0
1.0 1.0 62.0
1.0 1.0 54.0
1.0 1.0 70.0
1.0 1.0 65.0
2.0 2.0 92.0
2.0 2.0 80.0
2.0 2.0 80.0
3.0 2.0 60.0
2.0 1.0 73.0
1.0 1.0 76.0
2.0 1.0 63.0
3.0 1.0 51.0
2.0 1.0 62.0
1.0 1.0 81.0
2.0 2.0 75.0
3.0 1.0 45.0
1.0 2.0 94.0
1.0 1.0 70.0
1.0 1.0 61.0
1.0 2.0 83.0
1.0 1.0 70.0
2.0 2.0 80.0
3.0 1.0 54.0
3.0 1.0 61.0
3.0 1.0 52.0
2.0 2.0 82.0
2.0 2.0 83.0
2.0 2.0 81.0
2.0 1.0 65.0
1.0 1.0 83.0
2.0 2.0 80.0
3.0 2.0 50.0
2.0 2.0 62.0
3.0 1.0 43.0
3.0 2.0 62.0
3.0 2.0 46.0
3.0 2.0 43.0
3.0 2.0 53.0
1.0 2.0 90.0
2.0 2.0 84.0
1.0 2.0 95.0
3.0 2.0 61.0
2.0 1.0 82.0
2.0 1.0 62.0
2.0 1.0 80.0
3.0 1.0 50.0
2.0 1.0 72.0
1.0 1.0 82.0
3.0 1.0 52.0
3.0 2.0 45.0
3.0 2.0 53.0
1.0 2.0 87.0
2.0 2.0 82.0
3.0 2.0 60.0
1.0 2.0 90.0
1.0 1.0 80.0
2.0 2.0 85.0
1.0 2.0 82.0
1.0 2.0 83.0
1.0 1.0 70.0
2.0 2.0 80.0
3.0 1.0 54.0
3.0 1.0 61.0
3.0 1.0 52.0
2.0 2.0 82.0
2.0 2.0 83.0
2.0 2.0 81.0
2.0 1.0 65.0
1.0 1.0 62.0
1.0 1.0 54.0
1.0 1.0 70.0
1.0 1.0 65.0
2.0 2.0 92.0
1.0 2.0 94.0
1.0 1.0 70.0
1.0 1.0 61.0
1.0 1.0 83.0
2.0 2.0 80.0
3.0 2.0 50.0
2.0 2.0 62.0
3.0 1.0 43.0
3.0 2.0 62.0
3.0 2.0 46.0
3.0 2.0 43.0
3.0 2.0 53.0
1.0 2.0 90.0
2.0 2.0 84.0
1.0 2.0 95.0
3.0 2.0 61.0
2.0 1.0 82.0
2.0 1.0 62.0
2.0 1.0 80.0
3.0 1.0 50.0
2.0 1.0 72.0
1.0 1.0 82.0
3.0 1.0 52.0
3.0 2.0 45.0
3.0 2.0 53.0
1.0 2.0 87.0
2.0 2.0 82.0
3.0 2.0 60.0
1.0 2.0 90.0
1.0 1.0 80.0
2.0 2.0 85.0
1.0 2.0 82.0
1.0 2.0 83.0
1.0 1.0 70.0
2.0 2.0 80.0
3.0 2.0 53.0
1.0 2.0 87.0
2.0 2.0 82.0
3.0 2.0 60.0
1.0 2.0 90.0
1.0 1.0 80.0
2.0 2.0 85.0
1.0 2.0 82.0
1.0 2.0 83.0
1.0 1.0 70.0
2.0 2.0 80.0
3.0 1.0 54.0
3.0 1.0 61.0
3.0 1.0 52.0
2.0 2.0 82.0
2.0 2.0 83.0
2.0 2.0 81.0
2.0 1.0 65.0
1.0 1.0 62.0
1.0 1.0 54.0
1.0 1.0 70.0
1.0 1.0 65.0
2.0 2.0 92.0
1.0 2.0 94.0
1.0 1.0 70.0
1.0 1.0 61.0
1.0 1.0 83.0
2.0 2.0 80.0
3.0 2.0 50.0
2.0 2.0 62.0
3.0 1.0 43.0
3.0 2.0 62.0
3.0 2.0 46.0
3.0 2.0 43.0
3.0 2.0 53.0
1.0 2.0 90.0
2.0 2.0 84.0
1.0 2.0 95.0
3.0 2.0 61.0
2.0 1.0 82.0
2.0 1.0 62.0
2.0 1.0 80.0
3.0 1.0 50.0
2.0 1.0 72.0
2.0 1.0 62.0
1.0 1.0 81.0
2.0 2.0 75.0
3.0 1.0 45.0
1.0 2.0 94.0
1.0 1.0 70.0
1.0 1.0 61.0
1.0 1.0 83.0
2.0 2.0 80.0
3.0 2.0 50.0
2.0 2.0 62.0

Groups:
1. Digital Graphic Organizers (DGOs)
2. Paper- based Graphic Organizers (DGOs)
3. Non Graphic Organizers (NGOs)
High School Background (HSB)
1. SMA
2. MA
Writing score

Instructions:
1. Formulate the research objective.
2. Determine the variables of the study
3. Find the normality and homogeneity test
4. Use SPSS program using a two way ANOVA test to find the mean difference amongst the
variables.
 5. Demonstrate step by step the procedure of conducting a two way ANOVA to answer the
research question using SPSS program
6. Use descriptive statistics and ANOVA table to present the data
7. Complete the summary table
The Two Way Analysis of Variance on interaction effect between types of writing strategy and HSB on
learners’ writing performance.
Source variable df Sums of Mean F P Significa Conclusi interpretati
squares square valu valu nce test on on
e e
Main effect Types of 0.050
(A) writing
strategy
Main effect HSB 0.050
(B)
Interaction Types of 0.050
effect (AB) writing
strategy and
HSB
Error
Total

8. Interpret the result of analysis.

9. Give a report on the analysis result
 RESULT DATA
Tests of Normality

Kolmogorov-Smirnova Shapiro-Wilk

HSB Statistic df Sig. Statistic df Sig.

WritingScore SMA .12 81 .00 .95 81 .00

MA .28 93 .00 .87 93 .00

Between-Subjects Factors

Value Label N

Groups 1 Digital Graphic

62
Organizers

2 Paper- based
Graphic 61
Organizers

3 Non Graphic
51
Organizers

HSB 1 SMA 81

2 MA 93

Levene's Test of Equality of Error Variancesa

Dependent Variable:WritingScore

F df1 df2 Sig.

3.39 5 17 .00

Tests the null hypothesis that the error variance of the

dependent variable is equal across groups.

a. Design: Intercept + Groups + HSB + Groups * HSB

The Two Way Analysis of Variance on interaction effect between types of writing strategy and HSB on
learners’ writing performance.
Source variable df Sums of Mean F P Significa Conclusion interpre
squares square valu valu nce test tation
e e
Main effect Types of 0.050 Significant Types of
(A) writing writing
strategy strategy
give
216.7
2 22503.49 11251.75
5
.00 effects
on
writing
perfoma
nce
Main effect HSB 0.050 Significant HSB give
(B) effects
on
1 3761.50 3761.5 72.46 .00
writing
perfoma
nce
Interaction Types of 0.050 Significant Types of
effect (AB) writing writing
strategy and strategy
HSB and HSB
give
2 1884.90 942.45 18.16 .00
effects
on
writing
perfoma
nce
Error
Total
 Tests of Between-Subjects Effects

Dependent Variable:WritingScore

Type III Sum of Partial Eta

Source Squares df Mean Square F Sig. Squared

Corrected Model 28207.02 5 5641.40 108.68 .00 .76

Intercept 775754.04 1 775754.04 1.494E .00 .98

Groups 22503.49 2 11251.75 216.75 .00 .72

HSB 3761.50 1 3761.5 72.46 .00 .30

Groups * HSB 1884.90 2 942.45 18.16 .00 .17

Error 8720.95 168 51.91

Total 889808.00 174

Corrected Total 36927.97 173

a. R Squared = ,764 (Adjusted R Squared = ,757)

REPORT.
The two-way ANOVA was conducted to determine the interaction effect between types of
writing strategy and HSB on learners’ writing performance.
Firstly, the main effect of Types of writing strategy was significant, F(2,174) = 216.75, p = 0.00,
partial eta squared = 0.71. Therefore, We reject the null hypothesis that there is no effect of
writing strategy on writing performance.
Secondly, the main effect of HSB was significant, F(1, 174) = 72.46, p = 0.00, partial eta-
squared = 0.30. Therefore, we reject the null hypothesis that there is no effect of HSB on the
writing perfomance.
Finally, the interaction effect between types of writing strategy and HSB on learners’ was
significant, F(2,174) = 18.16 p = 0,00, partial eta squared = 0.17. Consequently, we reject the
null hypothesis that the effect of writing strategy and HSB is the same.
Estimated Marginal Means

1. Groups

Dependent Variable:WritingScore

95% Confidence Interval

Groups Mean Std. Error Lower Bound Upper Bound

Digital Graphic Organizers 79.54 .94 77.69 81.40

Paper- based Graphic

75.33 .98 73.39 77.27
Organizers

Non Graphic Organizers 52.41 1.01 50.41 54.41

2. HSB

Dependent Variable:WritingScore

95% Confidence Interval

HSB Mean Std. Error Lower Bound Upper Bound

SMA 64.29 .83 62.64 65.92

MA 73.90 .77 72.40 75.42

3. Groups * HSB

Dependent Variable:WritingScore

95% Confidence Interval

Groups HSB Mean Std. Error Lower Bound Upper Bound

Digital Graphic Organizers SMA 70.63 1.17 68.32 72.94

MA 88.46 1.47 85.56 91.36

Paper- based Graphic SMA 70.40 1.61 67.22 73.58

Organizers MA 80.27 1.13 78.05 82.49

Non Graphic Organizers SMA 51.82 1.50 48.86 54.79

MA 53.00 1.36 50.31 55.69

 Multiple Comparisons

WritingScore
Tukey HSD

95% Confidence Inter

Mean Difference
(I) Groups (J) Groups (I-J) Std. Error Sig. Lower Bound Upper

Digital Graphic Organizers Paper- based Graphic

.4995 1.29933 .922 -2.5730
Organizers

Non Graphic Organizers 25.0617* 1.36203 .000 21.8409

Paper- based Graphic Digital Graphic Organizers -.4995 1.29933 .922 -3.5720
Organizers Non Graphic Organizers 24.5622* 1.36706 .000 21.3296

Non Graphic Organizers Digital Graphic Organizers -25.0617* 1.36203 .000 -28.2824 -

Paper- based Graphic

-24.5622* 1.36706 .000 -27.7948 -
Organizers

Based on observed means.

The error term is Mean Square(Error) = 51,910.

*. The mean difference is significant at the ,05 level.

Homogeneous

WritingScore

Tukey HSD

Subset

Groups N 1 2

Non Graphic Organizers 51 52.4706

Paper- based Graphic

61 77.0328
Organizers

Digital Graphic Organizers 62 77.5323

Sig. 1.000 .927

Means for groups in homogeneous subsets are displayed.

Based on observed means.
The error term is Mean Square(Error) = 51,910.