Download as txt, pdf, or txt
Download as txt, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 2

What Is the Arithmetic Mean?

The arithmetic mean is the simplest and most widely used measure of a mean, or
average. It simply involves taking the sum of a group of numbers, then dividing
that sum by the count of the numbers used in the series. For example, take the
numbers 34, 44, 56, and 78. The sum is 212. The arithmetic mean is 212 divided by
four, or 53.

People also use several other types of means, such as the geometric mean and
harmonic mean, which comes into play in certain situations in finance and
investing. Another example is the trimmed mean, used when calculating economic data
such as the consumer price index (CPI) and personal consumption expenditures (PCE).

How the Arithmetic Mean Works


The arithmetic mean maintains its place in finance, as well. For example, mean
earnings estimates typically are an arithmetic mean. Say you want to know the
average earnings expectation of the 16 analysts covering a particular stock. Simply
add up all the estimates and divide by 16 to get the arithmetic mean.

The same is true if you want to calculate a stock’s average closing price during a
particular month. Say there are 23 trading days in the month. Simply take all the
prices, add them up, and divide by 23 to get the arithmetic mean.

The arithmetic mean is simple, and most people with even a little bit of finance
and math skill can calculate it. It’s also a useful measure of central tendency, as
it tends to provide useful results, even with large groupings of numbers.

Limitations of the Arithmetic Mean


The arithmetic mean isn't always ideal, especially when a single outlier can skew
the mean by a large amount. Let’s say you want to estimate the allowance of a group
of 10 kids. Nine of them get an allowance between $10 and $12 a week. The tenth kid
gets an allowance of $60. That one outlier is going to result in an arithmetic mean
of $16. This is not very representative of the group.

In this particular case, the median allowance of 10 might be a better measure.

The arithmetic mean also isn’t great when calculating the performance of investment
portfolios, especially when it involves compounding, or the reinvestment of
dividends and earnings. It is also generally not used to calculate present and
future cash flows, which analysts use in making their estimates. Doing so is almost
sure to lead to misleading numbers.

The arithmetic mean can be misleading when there are outliers or when looking at
historical returns. The geometric mean is most appropriate for series that exhibit
serial correlation. This is especially true for investment portfolios.
Arithmetic vs. Geometric Mean
For these applications, analysts tend to use the geometric mean, which is
calculated differently. The geometric mean is most appropriate for series that
exhibit serial correlation. This is especially true for investment portfolios.

Most returns in finance are correlated, including yields on bonds, stock returns,
and market risk premiums. The longer the time horizon, the more critical
compounding and the use of the geometric mean becomes. For volatile numbers, the
geometric average provides a far more accurate measurement of the true return by
taking into account year-over-year compounding.

The geometric mean takes the product of all numbers in the series and raises it to
the inverse of the length of the series. It’s more laborious by hand, but easy to
calculate in Microsoft Excel using the GEOMEAN function.
The geometric mean differs from the arithmetic average, or arithmetic mean, in how
it's calculated because it takes into account the compounding that occurs from
period to period. Because of this, investors usually consider the geometric mean a
more accurate measure of returns than the arithmetic mean.

Example of the Arithmetic vs. Geometric Mean


Let's say that a stock's returns over the last five years are 20%, 6%, -10%, -1%,
and 6%. The arithmetic mean would simply add those up and divide by five, giving a
4.2% per year average return.

The geometric mean would instead be calculated as (1.2 x 1.06 x 0.9 x 0.99 x
1.06)1/5 -1 = 3.74% per year average return. Note that the geometric mean, a more
accurate calculation in this case, will always be smaller than the arithmetic mean.

You might also like