Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Just War
Just War
Just War
Just War
The wars have been a favorite pastime for the humans since the dawn of their history;
nevertheless, uncaused violence has always been considered immoral and damnable. The
concept of just war is one of the attempts to morally justify the situation when one group of
human beings tries to kill as much members of the another group, as possible.
Michael Walzer, who wrote the article we are going to use in this essay, explored two
concepts of wars, which are “Preventive War” and “Humanitarian Intervention”. In his
opinion, "a preventive war is a war fought to maintain the balance, to stop what is thought to
be even distribution of power from shifting into a relation of dominance and inferiority ".
Thus one, of the criterion for defining just war, is that it's started for to keep the balance
If the state sees no other means of resolving the situation when its analytics
presuppose that the leaders of the opposing state will start a war sooner or later, than the
intervention into the territory of that country is justified. It is done for not to let the potential
aggressor to develop stronger military power. Thus we can state that one more criterion for
saying that the war is just, is that there were no means except for the military intervention to
Preventive wars are led for to preserve peace on the territory of the country which
starts them. It sounds paradoxical, but gives us one more criterion for defining a just war,
reasonable expectations of success) to acts "that shock the moral conscience of mankind."
After analyzing this statement we can deduce two more criterions. The first is that the war is
just when it is fought with a reasonable chance of success, the second is that the war can be
considered just only if it is began and led for to prevent something wrong, like slaughter of
2
the civilians, or the introduction of the dictatorship of some political force or a group of
people.
Considering all of the criterions we can define just war as a war that is begun for to
keep the balance between the states and restore peace. It should be fought with a reasonable
chance of success for to prevent something wrong that is happening or will happen. The just
war is begun when there are no other means of solving the problems. Thus we can conclude
that a just war is a war that satisfies the set of moral rules and principles set by the
international community.
In the next part of the essay we are going to analyze the Vietnam War using the
criterions we developed. Our goal is to define whether this conflict can be considered to be
just war or not. We will analyze whether the reasons and circumstances of the Vietnam War
1. Just war is the war started for to keep the balance between the states.
As you may remember, the economical, political, and human power of Vietnam has
always been considerably smaller than that of the United States. There was no threat that in
some years Vietnam will become strong enough for to attack the U.S forces. From this
viewpoint we can conclude that the war wasn't justified. But we shouldn't forget the main
reason of the U.S involvement in the Vietnam conflict, which was that the U.S officials were
Andrew A. Wiest in his book The Vietnam War 1956-1975 told about the Domino
Theory developed in the USA in the late fifties. It said that: "If South Vietnam falls to the
Communist, Laos, Cambodia, Thailand, Burma, India and Pakistan would also fall like
Thus the U.S interference into the Vietnam conflict can be justified by the fact that the
U.S leaders made an attempt to keep the balance between the communist and democratic
forces.
Before bringing the military forces into Vietnam U.S had participated in the
negotiations, but the military intervention happened before all of the options for the non-
violent resolution were exhausted. The U.S is the state whose political influence in the world
is enormous, its economical resources are also great, and thus it evidently had other means to
influence the situation in Vietnam. Unfortunately, the fear of communism was too great
among the U.S officials. They wanted to display the U.S power to the leaders of communist
and pro-communist states, at least so says Michael Lind, the author of the Vietnam: The
desire to scare the communists made the U.S officials start a war that is nowadays considered
the most disastrous and infamous of all the conflicts USA gad ever participated in. Thus we
can conclude that judging by this criterion we cannot say that the Vietnam conflict was a just
war.
The U.S troops were brought into Vietnam to help the pro-American government gain
and keep power. De jure the goal of the American soldiers was to put an end to the armed
conflict in Vietnam, but de facto the actions of the U.S military officials led to the
enhancement of the civil war in the country. The U.S soldiers did their best for to assist the
pro-American forces in Vietnam n gaining the political power, but the results of their actions
were just that most of the population of the country took the side of the communist
government. People, who populated Vietnam, begun to hate the pro-American government,
as it invited the foreign invaders on their territory. Thus the actions of the American
4
government led to the enhancement of civil war in Vietnam. Even if the U.S officials chased
the goal of the re-establishment of peace on the Vietnam territory, they didn't manage to
reach it, thus, according to this criterion the war in Vietnam cannot be called a just war.
4. The war can be considered just only if it is begun and led for to prevent something
wrong.
The goal of the American government in the Vietnam War was to prevent communist
from gaining power in the region where Vietnam is situated. According to the U.S views on
the political situation in the world, letting communists take power in the Vietnam may have
led to the Domino Effect we described earlier. For the U.S officials the war in Vietnam was
just, as they opposed the communist threat in the Asian region. But, according to the data
provided by A.J. Langguth in his book Our Vietnam: The War 1954-1975, most of the
political regime in their country. For them communism wasn't "wrong". Thus, the Vietnam
Soon after the armed conflict begun it became obvious that the U.S forces had little
chance of winning the battle in Vietnam, as the Vietnam partisans, guerilla used the tactics
that was almost impossible to oppose. Thus the war we discuss cannot be named a just war
After analyzing the Vietnam War using all of the criterions of the Just War we
educed, we can say that this war wasn't just, as it had little chances for success, it didn't
prevent anything wrong (at least the population of Vietnam didn't consider this thing to be
wrong), and it didn't manage to re-establish peace in this region. It was also that armed
Works Cited
3. Langguth, A. Our Vietnam: The War 1954-1975. Simon & Schuster, 2002