Professional Documents
Culture Documents
BMI CH 2 A and B 1
BMI CH 2 A and B 1
BMI CH 2 A and B 1
A. BUSINESS ETHICS
Ethics (morality) and Law are interrelated. Both ethics and the law aim to guide human actions.
They govern actions of individuals around the world on a daily basis. They often work hand-in-hand to
ensure that citizens act in a certain manner, and likewise coordinate efforts to protect the health, safety
and welfare of the public.
Morality basically is held to include principles and norms concerning how a person should and
should not behave. This can be an outcome of a personal, social, culture (organizational or geographic in
origin) or religious views. Law on the other hand is an outcome of legal systems hence one can express
that one is better than another without others arguing. To sum, Ethics (Morality) comes from religion or
personal or cultural secular origins, laws come from officials of the government voting or decreeing them.
Practical intuition would tell us that violating ethical or moral rules affords one shame, on the other
hand, violating legal rules affords one fines or jail. The law, unlike morality, has the enforcement power
of the state behind it. Those who act immorally may earn hate or disrespect of others (few or many), but
those who act illegally may earn hate or disrespect of the state or the universe in general.
Below is a figure expressing Business Ethics and Law of the Land originating from basic public
opinion or what others commonly regard as what is right or wrong.
Key Points:
The law is an expression of the ethical beliefs of our society.
Law and ethics are not the same thing.
Therefore, an action might be unethical, yet not necessarily illegal.
Similarly, an illegal act does not necessarily mean it is immoral.
Business ethics covers all areas encompassed by business transactions. The ethical conduct
of businesspersons may be measured against how the following are adhered to:
Improvement in the ethical conduct of business and those involved in it may be through any of the
following ways:
Ethics training—either through formal classroom instruction or through actual hands-on
experience and observation. When carefully designed and administered, it makes a positive
contribution to the company.
Ethical advocate—a person who is knowledgeable about business ethics, employed by the
company and acts as the company’s conscience.
Ethical codes—otherwise known as “codes of ethics”, are documents that specify practices that
are unethical and which the company expressly forbids (kickbacks, payoffs, receiving gifts,
falsification of records). These are formal documents that provide clear direction to management
and employees in the performance of their duties.
Whistleblowing—when the employee resorts to
reporting the perceived unethical practice to outsiders
such as press, government agencies or public interest
groups.
B. SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY
Example: If the company produces products that do not harm or pollute the environment, it is meeting its
social obligation. However, if the same organization uses fully recycled paper in packaging its
products, organizes yearly tree-planting activities for its employees, and supports
campaigns and advocates against illegal logging and pollution, then it is socially responsive.
CSR enhances a company’s image. Companies should always observe good and responsible
practices to maintain a positive image among the public.
The following are some of the often-quoted definitions of Social Responsibility or its
equivalent as defined by various authors/authorities:
“A business system that enables the production and distribution of wealth for the
betterment of stakeholders through the implementation and integration of ethical systems and
sustainable management practices” (Frederick, 2006)
“the responsibility of enterprises for their impacts on society; and the consequences for
the integration of social, environmental, ethical, human rights, and as well consumer concerns
into business operations and core strategy, in close collaboration with stakeholders” (European
Commission, 2011).
“An integrative management concept, which establishes responsible behavior within a
company, its objectives, values and competencies, and the interests of stakeholders” (Meffert &
Münstermann, 2005)
“The understanding and managing a company’s wider influences on society for the benefit
of the company and society as a whole” (Marsden and Andriof, 1998)
“Triple Bottom Line or People, Planet, Profit refers to a situation where companies
harmonize their efforts in order to be economically viable, environmentally sound and socially
responsible” (Elkington, 1997)
“CSR is a concept whereby companies integrate social and environmental concerns in
their business operations and in their interactions with their stakeholders on a voluntary basis.”
EU-Communication” (July, 2002)
This figure (Pyramid of Corporate Social Responsibility) reflects the types of social
responsibility in four levels. This type of graphical presentation implies that every organization
pass through 1st level (base, foundation) or described as the Economic responsibility first before it
proceeds to the next level.
The pyramid of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) is used to refer the famous model
of Carroll, A.B., one of the distinguishing scholars in the literature. Building on his previous study
in 1979, Carroll (1991) developed a model of CSR that encompasses the entire range of business
responsibilities as economic, legal, ethical, and philanthropic dimensions. Carroll depicts his
model as a pyramid, in which types of CSR involvement are represented systematically at four
levels. This is a framework that explains how and why organizations should take social
responsibility. The pyramid was developed by Archie Carroll and highlights the four most
important types of responsibility of organizations.
CSR refers to a business’s behavior, that it’s economically profitable, complies with the
law, is ethical, and is socially supportive. Profitability and compliance with the law are the most
important conditions for corporate social responsibility and when discussing the company’s ethics,
and the level to which it supports the society it’s part of with money, time, and talent.
In 1991, he expanded on this definition using a pyramid. The goal of the pyramid was to
illustrate the building-block character of the four-part framework. This geometric shape was
chosen because it’s both simple and timeless. The pyramid’s base is profit. The economic
responsibility was placed at the pyramid’s foundation, since it’s a fundamental requirement to
survive in business. As with a building’s foundation that keeps the entire structure up, durable
profitability helps to support the expectations of society, shareholders, and other stakeholders. This
foundation is necessary for a company to meet all laws and regulations, as well as the demands of
shareholders. To sum, before a company can and should then take its philanthropic responsibility
or discretionary responsibility, it must also meet its ethical responsibilities.
All companies should strive to incorporate elements of social responsibility in their operations.
Economic responsibility—the company should produce goods and services with reasonable prices. The
goods and services should also satisfy the needs of its customers, stakeholders, and other members of
society even as they ensure sustainability and growth.
Legal responsibility—the organization should comply with local and international laws that apply to its
business operations.
Ethical responsibilities—include establishing norms, standards, mores, and practices that reflect fairness
to the consumers, employees, shareholders, and the community.
Philanthropic responsibilities—include the initiation of voluntary activities such as establishing corporate
programs, donating to charitable institutions, and other similar charitable causes.
COSTS
Even if socially responsible actions have benefits, they are not derived without costs. These
are the following:
a) the money spent in direct support of social projects
b) reduction of competitive power (funds for competitive purposes are used to finance social projects)
c) the private provision of social services and programs may, later on, be also regulated by the
government
If the company has already decided on becoming socially responsible, it can do so by adapting a systematic
approach. The approaches are expressed in four basic social responsibility strategies:
Reaction strategy—the company allows a condition or potential problems to go unresolved until the public finds
out about it. When a problem is brought before the company, the firm reacts by denying responsibility, then attempts
to resolve the problem, deal with its consequences, then continue doing business to minimize the negative impact.
Defense strategy—the company tries to minimize or avoid additional obligations. Among the tactics used are legal
maneuvering and seeking the support of groups that prefer the company’s way of doing business.
Accommodation strategy—when a business assumes responsibility for its actions. This is done when special
interest groups are taking the side of the opposition, or when the business perceives that if it does not react, a law
will be passed by Congress to ensure compliance. This means that the company is forced to accept its economic,
legal, and ethical responsibilities.
Proactive strategy—the firm goes beyond what is legally and ethically required. This is undertaken through
sponsorship of cultural shows offered free to the public, scholarship to financially handicapped but deserving
students, providing financial support to the upkeep of endangered animal species, and many other similar concerns.