Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Nu Nanofluid
Nu Nanofluid
To cite this article: Bock Choon Pak & Young I. Cho (1998): HYDRODYNAMIC AND HEAT TRANSFER STUDY OF DISPERSED FLUIDS
WITH SUBMICRON METALLIC OXIDE PARTICLES, Experimental Heat Transfer: A Journal of Thermal Energy Generation, Transport,
Storage, and Conversion, 11:2, 151-170
This article may be used for research, teaching, and private study purposes. Any substantial or systematic
reproduction, redistribution, reselling, loan, sub-licensing, systematic supply, or distribution in any form to
anyone is expressly forbidden.
The publisher does not give any warranty express or implied or make any representation that the contents
will be complete or accurate or up to date. The accuracy of any instructions, formulae, and drug doses should
be independently verified with primary sources. The publisher shall not be liable for any loss, actions, claims,
proceedings, demand, or costs or damages whatsoever or howsoever caused arising directly or indirectly in
connection with or arising out of the use of this material.
HYDRODYNAMIC AND HEAT TRANSFER
STUDY OF DISPERSED FLUIDS WITH
SUBMICRON METALLIC OXIDE PARTICLES
Young I. Cho
Downloaded by [University of Arizona] at 23:49 19 January 2013
a
Turbulent friction and heat transfer behaviors of disp.rs.d fluids .e., ultrafin. metallic
oxide particles suspended in water) in a circular pipe were investigated experimentally.
Viscosity measurements were also conducted using a Brookfield rotating viscometer. Two
different metallic oxide particles, y-alumina CAl,O,) and titanium dioxide (TiO,). with
mean diameters of 13 and 27 nm, respectively, were used as suspended particles. The
Reynolds and Prandtl numbers varied in the ranges 10'_10 5 and 6.5-12.3, respectively.
The viscosiJies of the dispersedfluids wiJh ,..Al,O, and TiO, particles at a 10% volume
concentration were approximately 200 and 3 times greater than thai of water, respectively.
These viscosity results were significantly larger than the predictions from the classical theory
of suspension rheology. Darcy friction factors for the dispersed fluids of the volume
concentration ranging from J% to 3% coincided well with KLJys' correlation for turbulent
flow of a single-phase fluid. The Nusselt number of the dispersedfluids for fully developed
turbulent flow increased with increasing volume concemmtion as weU as the Reynolds
number. However. it wasfound that the convective heat transfer coefficientof the dispersed
fluid at a volume concentration of 3% was 12% smaller than tluu of pure water when
compared under the condition of constant average velocity. Therefore, better selection of
particles having higher thermal conductivity and larger size is recommended in order
to utilize dispersed fluids as a working medium to enhance heat transfer performance. A
new correlation for the turbulent connective heat transfer for dilute dispersed fluids
with submicron metallic oxide particles is given by the following equation: Nu =
0.021 ReO.s Pr O.5•
Responding to the need for more efficient heat transfer systems, researchers
and engineers have introduced various heat transfer enhancement techniques since
the mid-1950s. The exponential increase in the number of research articles devoted
NOMENCLATURE
c specific heat, kJ Ikg K 1] viscosity, mPa . s
D inside tube diameter, m <\> concentration, %
f Darcy friction factor
"
k
convective heat transfer coefficient,
W/m'K
thermal conductivity. W 1m K
Subscripts
b bulk
Nu Nusselt number f fluid
Pr Prandtl number m mass
q" heat flux, W 1m' p particle
x axial distance from an inlet of heat r relative
transfer lest section, m v volume
p density, kg/m' w water
Downloaded by [University of Arizona] at 23:49 19 January 2013
10 this subject thus far manifests the importance of heat transfer enhancement
technology. Among the many articles, several recent review articles [1-3] and
handbook chapters [4, 5], covering a variety of methods for augmenting heat
transfer, are available in the literature.
Generally, enhancement techniques can be categorized as passive and active
methods, depending on whether or not an external power is required [3]. The
passive schemes, requiring no direct application of external power, include the use
of extended surfaces, swirl flow devices, and additives for liquids and gases. On the
other hand, the active methods consist of the vibration of the heated surface and
fluid, the injection or suction of fluid, etc. The application of the passive methods
in a liquid flow system includes the use of solid particles, gas bubbles, and
phase-change materials in carrier flow.
Ahuja [6, 7] performed experiments on the augmentation of heat transport in
the laminar flow of polystyrene suspensions. His experiments were based on the
overall heat transfer measurements in a shell-and-tube heat exchanger, employing
the Graetz entrance flow conditions. The results showed remarkable enhancements
of the Nusselt number and heat exchanger effectiveness when polystyrene spheres
were added to a single-phase liquid. Sohn and Chen [8, 9] reported the effective
thermal conductivity of a dispersed two-phase mixture in a low-velocity and
Couette flow condition. When the particle Peclet number was sufficiently high, the
thermal conductivity increased with increasing shear rate.
Recently, a new technique utilizing phase-change particles was introduced to
increase the convective heat transfer coefficient in a turbulent pipe flow in district
cooling and thermal control systems [10-13]. In particular, Choi et al. [13] used
tetradecane (i.e., phase-change materials, 0.4 mm in diameter when frozen) and
successfully demonstrated that the turbulent heat transfer could be significantly
enhanced in a circular pipe flow. A small amount of a surfactant (less than 300
ppm) could maintain the dispersion of solidifying tetradecane particles in a carrier
fluid, thus allowing the mixture slurry to be pumped without clogging the piping
system.
Masuda et al. [14] investigated the possibility of controlling thermophysical
properties of fluids by dispersing metallic oxide particles whose thermophysical
DISPERSED FLUIDS WITH SUBMICRON METALLIC OXIDE PARTICLES 153
properties were significantly different from those of carrier fluids. They demon-
strated that the effective thermal conductivity of the mixtures of liquid and
submicron metallic oxide particles (such as y-Al20 3 and Ti0 2 ) increased consider-
ably from the value of the liquid. They showed that the increases in the thermal
conductivity were approximately 32% and 11%, respectively, for y-Al 2 0 3 and Ti0 2
particles in water at a volume concentration of 4.3%. Hence, the dispersed fluids
might be used as a fluid medium for convective heat transfer enhancement as long
as the increase in the pressure drop due to the addition of the particles is not
significantly large.
To verify this concept in practical heat transfer problems, the fluid dynamics
and heat transfer characteristics of these dispersed fluids should be clearly under-
stood. The objective of the present study is to investigate the hydrodynamic and
Downloaded by [University of Arizona] at 23:49 19 January 2013
Chiller
Collecting
Reservoir
Mono Pump
Digital Weighing balance
Figure I. Schematic diagram of the experimental setup for pressure drop and heat transfer.
154 B. C. PAK AND Y. I. CHO
entrance of the heat transfer test section. The remaining parts of the flow loop,
except for the hydrodynamic entry and heat transfer test section, were constructed
from a welded, stainless steel tube with an outer diameter of 2.52 cm.
Fourteen thermocouples (Tvtype) and two pressure taps were mounted along
the heat transfer test section for temperature and pressure drop measurements,
respectively. Specifically, at two different locations, eight additional thermocouples
were installed circumferentially to check circumferential temperature variations
during tests. The thermocouples were cemented with a high-thermal-conductivity
epoxy to the outside surface of the heat transfer test tube. The thermocouples were
calibrated by the freezing and boiling points of distilled water before they were
attached to the test section. The pressure drop measurements were performed with
a Validyne DPI03-18 pressure transducer. Prior to the experiments, the pressure
Downloaded by [University of Arizona] at 23:49 19 January 2013
Mean Thermal
Submicron diameter Density Specific surface conductivity Specific heat
particles (nrn)" (kgyrrr') area (m'/g)b (W/m K) (kJ/kg K)'
alumina has a very high surface area, a property that makes it useful as a support
Downloaded by [University of Arizona] at 23:49 19 January 2013
for catalysts and as a dehydrating agent. Titanium is the ninth most abundant
element in the earth's crust and is well known for its unusual resistance to
corrosion under ordinary conditions. Titanium dioxide (Ti0 2 ) , also an amphoteric
substance, is the most important titanium compound; it is a bright white substance
used as a pigment in paint, paper, and many other products.
Distilled water was used for the suspending liquid medium. The mean
diameters of y-A1 2 0 3 and Ti0 2 particles were 13 and 27 nm, respectively. The
other physical properties of the particles are shown in Table 1, and micropho-
tographs observed with a magnification of 120,00 are shown in Figure 2. Both types
of particles have irregular, grainlike shapes with an aspect ratio of approximately 1.
Since the density difference between metallic oxide particles and water is so
great, a method to prevent the settling of the metallic oxide particles in water was
imperative. Two kinds of techniques could be applied [14]: one was to use the
electrostatic repulsion forces between particle surfaces, and the other was to use
surfactants. Since the latter method was found to cause significant changes in the
thermophysical properties of dispersed fluids [14], the former technique was used
in the present study. The principle and preparation procedure of dispersed fluids
are summarized briefly below.
When the submicro metallic oxide particle comes into contact with water, a
hydroxyl radical ( - OH) is formed at the surface of the metallic oxide particle. The
overall behavior of the particle-water interaction depends on whether the water is
acidic or alkalic. For example, the particle surface in acidic water (i.e., having
excess hydrogen ions) has a positive charge, since a hydrogen ion from the acidic
water is combined with a hydroxyl radical at the surface of the metallic particle. On
Downloaded by [University of Arizona] at 23:49 19 January 2013
the other hand, the surface of a metallic oxide particle in an alkalic water (i.e.,
having excess hydroxyl radicals) has a negative charge, since a hydrogen ion is
removed from the hydroxyl radical at the particle surface. Equations (1) and (2)
show these two reactions in acidic and alkalic water in general, respectively:
(2)
approximately 2 h, the dispersed fluid was allowed to settle for 5-6 days. Any
possible sedimentation was checked carefully by visual observation and by measur-
ing the densities of collected samples from the middle and bottom of a reservoir.
The authors could not find any evidence of irreversible settling due to density
difference at the above-mentioned pH values (i.e., pH = 3 for y-A1 z0 3 and
pH = 10 for TiO z particles).
The viscosities of the dispersed fluids were measured over a wide range of
shear rate by a Brookfield rotating viscometer with cone-and-plate geometry. The
fundamental principle and overall procedure for measuring viscosity using a
cone-and-plate rotating viscometer can be found elsewhere [17). In order to
examine the effect of the volume concentration on the non-Newtonian behavior of
the viscosity of dispersed fluids, the volume concentration was varied from 1% to
Downloaded by [University of Arizona] at 23:49 19 January 2013
10%. The density of the mixture was measured by using hydrometers. The effective
thermal conductivities of dispersed fluids reported by Masuda et al. [14) were used
in the data reduction of the present study.
(3)
where Pp and Pw are the densities of metallic oxide particles and water, respec-
tively, and <lJu and <lJm are the volume and mass concentrations (%) of the
dispersed fluid, respectively. Once the volume concentration is determined, the
density of the dispersed liquid could be determined from
(4)
1160
0 y·AI,o, (calculated)
• y·AI,o, (experiment) ~
1120 D TiO, (calculated)
~
E
en
• TiO, (experiment)
~ ~ 0.6%
a.
1080 II
.?;o
'iii D
0
c:
'" •
1040 !l
•
Downloaded by [University of Arizona] at 23:49 19 January 2013
1000
0 2 3 4 5
concentration of the test fluids. Prior to measuring the viscosities of the test fluids,
calibration runs for the viscometer were conducted with distilled water and a
standard viscosity fluid (4.3 mPa s at 298 K) supplied by the manufacturer of the
Brookfield viscometer. All the experiments were carried out at a constant tempera-
ture of 298 K. Figure 4 shows the viscosity results for water and a standard viscosity
sample, of which the average deviation was approximately 2% for all of the
calibration runs.
Standard sample
----~----;!r----~-;!r--1a~---8r-------
:>'" 0 pH= 3
t:. pH= 6
+ pH = 12
• ..... •
..c
0 <1>\1 = 1,00%
<1>\1= 3,00%
<I>, = 5,00%
• <1>\1= 7,00%
• <I>, =10.00%
~
.~
• ••
n
.. ..
'" 10' Cc n n
5 Cc
.. .... .. . .... .
0 00 0 0 00 0
10' 10' 10 3
Figure 5. Viscosity versus shear rate for the dispersed fluids with
y-Al,O, particles at different volume concentrations.
160 B. C. PAK AND Y. I. CHO
10'
0 <1>, = 0.99%
" 0
5.00%
<1>v= 3.16%
cf)v=
"'
oi
0..
.s
• <1>,
<1>, = 8.00%
• = 10.00%
I=' • •• • • •• •
~
'iii
8<Jl • •• • • •• •
5 0 00 0 0 00 0
0 00 0
10°
10' 10 2
10 3
10 3
0 Y - 19.2
Y = 115.2
" y = 384.0
0
2 4 6 8 10 12
where 71, is the relative viscosity and <l>v is the volume concentration (%) divided by
100. Of note is that Batchelor's equation covers the present volume concentration
range (i.e., 1-10%). The uncertainty in Batchelor's equation is in the determina-
tion of the constant coefficient of the third term on the right-hand side of Eq. (5).
In particular, the coefficient value reported varies from 5 to 15. Even if one uses
the maximum coefficient 15, it accounts for no more than a 40% increase in
viscosity over the continuous liquid phase. The significant increase in the viscosity
of the dispersed fluids observed in the present study may be attributed primarily to
the viscoelectric effect, which has to do with the fact that the effective particle
dimension is larger than its radius and equal to the Debye length [20]. Rutgers [21]
also pointed out that the sphere size should have a profound influence on viscosity;
i.e., a much larger relative viscosity would have been observed if the sphere
Downloaded by [University of Arizona] at 23:49 19 January 2013
diameter was smaller than 0.5 JLm. Furthermore, the irregular shape of the
particles with a rough surface may have resulted in the increase of a specific
surface area, thus increasing the viscosity of the dispersed fluid. Figure 7 also
shows that the relative viscosity increases with decreasing shear rate at a constant
volume concentration, especially in the case of the dispersed fluid with y-A1 20 3
particles. The results agree qualitatively with previous experimental investigations
[22, 23], which presented the relative viscosity for monodisperse lattices at zero and
infinite shear rates.
Figures Sa and Sb present the temperature-dependent behavior of viscosity
for the y-A1 2 0 3 and Ti0 2 dispersed fluids, respectively. For comparison, the
corresponding curves for distilled water are shown as solid lines in the figures. The
viscosities of the dispersed fluids decreased asymptotically with increasing tempera-
ture. The rate of decrease of the viscosity with respect to temperature became
greater as the volume concentration increased for the two dispersed fluids, but
more conspicuously for the y-A1 2 0 3 fluid. The data from the curve fittings for
temperature-dependent viscosity for each volume concentration were used for the
data reduction procedure in the subsequent pressure drop and heat transfer
experiments to take into account the temperature effect on viscosity.
Figure 9 shows the energy balance ratio, which was calculated by measuring
the bulk mean temperatures of water at the inlet and outlet of the test section, and
162 B. C. PAK AND Y. I. CHO
(a)
4
~ 0
6
8
II)
0
6
5 6
0 6
0
0
0
Downloaded by [University of Arizona] at 23:49 19 January 2013
0
10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80
Temperature (0C)
(b)
1.4
IJ
water + TiO, 0 <1>. = 0.99%
I 6 <1>. = 2.04%
~ 1.2 IJ
II)
6 IJ <1>.=3.16%
l1i
c, 0 6
- water
.s 1.0
IJ
""
~ 0.8
8
II)
5
0.6
0.4
10 20 30 40 50 60 70
Temperature (0C)
the voltage drop and current over the test section. The energy balance ratio was
within approximately ± 2% of unity. The uniform heat flux condition was ensured
by checking thermocouple readings at four circumferentially different points at two
axial locations (i.e., x/D = 105 and 210) along the test section. Several measure-
ments at different Reynolds numbers and heat inputs showed that the cirumferen-
tial temperature variations of the test tube were negligible.
The aecuracy of the pressure measurements was checked by measuring the
pressure drop along the test section with water. The Darcy friction factors were
calculated and compared with those of Blasius [24] and Kays [25]. Figure lOa shows
the Darcy friction coefficients obtained from the present study. The deviation of
the measured Darcy friction coefficients from the predicted values with both
DISPERSED FLUIDS WITH SUBMICRON METALLIC OXIDE PARTICLES 163
1.10
1.05
ci o ~
a:i 1.00
uj o o
0.95
Downloaded by [University of Arizona] at 23:49 19 January 2013
0.90
0 2 4 6 6 10
Blasius' and Kays' correlations was less than 2% over the range of the Reynolds
number.
The accuracy of the temperature measurements was also tested by comparing
the measured Nusselt numbers at the fully developed region of the test section to
the predicted values from the Dittus-Boelter [26] and Notter-Rouse equations [27].
As depicted in Figure lOb, excellent agreement was observed for water between
the present results and these well-established correlations. The convective heat
transfer coefficient and the corresponding Nusselt number are usually calculated
using the following equations:
q"
h= (8)
Tw - Tb
hD
Nu=- (9)
kf
where hand Nu are the heat transfer coefficient and the Nusselt number,
respectively, and D and k , are the inside tube diameter and thermal conductivity
of the fluid, respectively. More detailed information on the data reduction proce-
dure can be found elsewhere [28].
The difference between inlet and outlet temperatures, as well as between wall
and bulk temperatures, should be small in order to minimize the effect of
temperature-dependent viscosity on the overall heat transfer coefficient. The
164 B. C. PAK AND Y. I. CHO
o Present Study
Blasius
Kays
Downloaded by [University of Arizona] at 23:49 19 January 2013
Reynolds number, Re
(b)
103
0 Present study
::J
z --- Dittus and Boelter
- Notter and Rouse
t;;
D
E
::J
C 10 2
""gj
Q)
::J
Z
10' 3
10 10' 10'
Reynolds number. Re
Figure 10. (a) Comparison of Darcy friction factors obtained with
distilled water in the present study with the well-known correlations (i.e.,
Blasius [24] and Kays [25]). (b) Comparison of the Nusselt numbers
obtained with distilled water in the present study with those calculated
from Dittus and Boelter [26Jand Notter and Rouse [27].
maximum temperature difference between the inlet and outlet was less than lOoe,
and the inlet temperature of the fluid was kept at 200 e for all runs. The local
Reynolds and Prandtl numbers were calculated with the thermophysical properties
based on local mean bulk temperature. The Nusselt number in the thermally fully
developed region was determined by averaging local Nusselt numbers over the heat
transfer test section. As shown in Figure lOb, the measured Nusselt numbers for
water are between the two values predicted by the well-established correlations
[26, 27].
It is essential in multi phase phenomena to define clearly the nondimensional
parameters such as Reynolds number and Prandtl number. Table 2 shows repre-
sentative values of effective thermal conductivity and specific heat for dispersed
fluids at 300 K. It is of note that the specific heat of dispersed fluids was calculated
DISPERSED FLUIDS WITH SUBMICRON METALLIC OXIDE PARTICLES 165
Table 2. Representative data for effective thermal conductivity and specific heat of dispersed fluids
with submicron metallic oxide particles at 300 K [14]
a Calculated with the effective thermal conductivity for each volume concentration.
using the following equation based on the volume fraction, since there were no
data available in the literature.
(10)
The Prandtl number of dispersed fluids was determined with these values by the
usual definition.
Figure 11 and 12 present the Darcy friction factors and heat transfer
coefficients as a function of the Reynolds number for the dilute dispersion fluids
with submicron y-Al Z0 3 and TiO z particles, respectively. The dispersed fluids of
dilute concentrations (i.e., less than 3% volume concentration) were used in
pressure drop and heat transfer measurements from a practical point of view.
-- ~
10·2 3
10 10' 10'
Reynolds number, Re
(a)
10'
SZ
1:
~
s:
C
Q)
'0
IE
Q) 10'
8 =
y-AI,o,(l\>, 1.34%)
~
~ =
y-AI,o,(l\>, 2.78%)
III
c: no, (l\>, 0.99%)
=
~ no, (l\>, 2.04%)
=
ro
Q)
0 no, (l\>, 3.16%)
=
Downloaded by [University of Arizona] at 23:49 19 January 2013
J: Dittus-Boelter
10 3
10' 10'
Reynolds number, Re
(b)
10 3
:>
z
G;
.c
E
:>
c: 0 =
y-AI,O,(l\>, 1.34%)
1z
:>
..•
.
=
y-AI,O,(l\>, 2.78%)
no, (l\>, 0.99%)
=
no, (l\>, 2.04%)
=
0 =
TiO, (l\>, 3.16%)
Dittus-Boelter
10'
10' 10'
Reynolds number, Re
Figure 12. (a) Heat transfer coefficient versus Reynolds number. (b)
Corresponding Nusselt number versus Reynolds number for dispersed
fluids with both y-A1,03 and TiO, particles. Solid lines represent the
data for a single-phase fluid.
Kays' correlation for the turbulent flow of a single-phase fluid is also shown
as a solid line in Figure 11 to facilitate comparison. As shown in the figure, the
friction coefficients for dispersed fluids coincide well with Kays' prediction regard-
less of the volume concentration, implying that pumping power can be estimated
with a well-known correlation when the volume concentration in water is less than
or close to 3%.
The deviation from the predicted values by Kays' correlation was within 3%
over the range of Reynolds numbers. The effect of particle size on the friction
DISPERSED FLUIDS WITH SUBMICRON METALLIC OXIDE PARTICLES 167
factor was not seen with the two different particle sizes (i.e., 13 and 27 nrn) as long
as the volume concentration was less than 3%.
Ahuja [6] reported that the Darcy friction factor for polystyrene suspensions
of 50 ILm in diameter at 20% volume concentration was approximately 7.5% less
(i.e., f = 59 IRe) than the corresponding value calculated from the fully developed
laminar flow correlation (i.e., f = 64/Re), an observation that can be attributed to
the so-called e-phenomenon [29]. However, the present results did not show such a
decrease in the friction factor, which may be attributed to the fact that the particle
size in the present study was much smaller than that used by Ahuja, the volume
concentration was low, and the flow in the present study was turbulent.
Figures 12a and 12b present turbulent heat transfer coefficients and the
. corresponding Nusselt numbers for dilute dispersed fluids. The Dittus-Boelter
Downloaded by [University of Arizona] at 23:49 19 January 2013
correlation for a single-phase fluid (i.e., zero concentration) is also shown as a solid
line for comparison. As shown in the figure, the convective heat transfer coefficient
increased with increasing Reynolds number and volume concentration. For a fixed
Reynolds number, the enhancement in the convective heat transfer coefficient due
to the addition of submicron y-A1 20 3 particles was approximately 45% at the
volume concentration of 1.34%, and approximately 75% at the concentration of
2.78%. The heat transfer enhancement for the Ti0 2 dispersed fluids was less than
that for the y-A1 20 3 fluids at the same concentration. When one compares the
percentage increase in the heat transfer coefficient and that in the effective
thermal conductivity of dispersed fluids (i.e., see Figure 12a and Table 2), the
former is substantially greater than the latter. The authors attribute this to
enhanced mixing caused by submicron particles near the walls.
Figure 13 shows a plot of Nusselt numbers versus Reynolds numbers. From
this plot, the authors have obtained a new correlation, the solid line in Figure 13,
10'
+ water (<I>, = 0 %)
0 y-AIP, (<I>, = 1.34%)
• y-AIP, (<I>, = 2.78%)
l>. TiO, (<I>, = 0.99%)
:t-Q.
• TiO, (<I>, = 2.04%)
c TiO, (<I>, = 3.16%)
--
Z
::J
10'
10' 10'
Reynolds number. Re
single-phase fluids. Note that the maximum deviation in the curve-fitting was 4.8%,
and the ranges of the Reynolds and Prandtl numbers tested were 104-10 5 and
6.54-12.33, respectively.
However, one needs to examine the pumping penalty due to the increased
viscosity of dispersed fluids. The dispersed fluid of 2.78% with y-AJ Z0 3 particles
will be used as an example. The viscosity of the dispersed fluid is approximately 3
mPa s, i.e., 300% larger than that of single-phase water. Assuming that the flow
rate and thus average velocity are fixed, the Reynolds number of the dispersed
fluid becomes 36.2% of that of water, considering the change in density of the
dispersed fluid. As a result, the friction factor calculated by Blasius' correlation for
the dispersed fluid is 28% greater than that of water. Since the pressure drop is
directly proportional to the friction factor and density when the flow velocity
remains constant, the pumping penalty due to the use of 2.78% y-AJ Z0 3 particles
is estimated to be 31%. Similarly, when the corresponding heat transfer is com-
pared under the condition of constant average velocity, the convective heat transfer
coefficient of the dispersed fluid is found to be 12% smaller than that of pure
water, because the Reynolds number of the dispersed fluid is 36.2% of that of
water, and the heat transfer coefficient is proportional to Re.o.8 This result is
attributed primarily to the significant increase in viscosity due to the extremely
small size of the particles and the relatively small increase in the effective thermal
conductivity of the dispersed fluid. Therefore, it is concluded that in order to
utilize dispersed fluids as a working medium to enhance heat transfer performance,
better selection of particles, i.e., selecting particles that have higher thermal
conductivity and larger size, is a crucial point.
I. The viscosity for the dispersed fluids with y-AJ Z03 and TiO z particles
showed shear-thinning behavior at or above volume concentration of 3%
and 10%, respectively.
DISPERSED FLUIDS WITH SUBM/CRON METALLIC OXIDE PARTICLES /69
2. At the 10% volume concentration, the relative viscosity for the dispersed
fluid with y-A1 20) particles was approximately 200, while it was approxi-
mately 3 for dispersed fluids with Ti0 2 particles. These viscosity results
are significantly larger than the predictions from the classical theory of
suspension rheology. The submicron size of metallic particles in dispersed
fluids plays a significant role in the determination of viscosity.
3. The Darcy friction factors for dilute dispersion fluids used in the present
study coincided well with the values predicted from Kays' correlation for
turbulent flow of a single-phase fluid. Due to the increase in the viscosity
of dispersed fluids, there is an additional pumping penalty of approxi-
mately 30% at a volume concentration of 3%.
4. The Nusselt number for the dispersed fluids increased with increasing
Downloaded by [University of Arizona] at 23:49 19 January 2013
REFERENCES
1. A. E. Bergles, Survey and Evaluation of Techniques to Augment Convective Heat and
Mass Transfer, in U. Grigull and E. Hahne (eds.), Progress in Heat and Mass Transfer
vol. 1, pp. 331-424, Pergamon Press, New York, 1969.
2. W. Nakayama, Enhancement of Heat Transfer, Heat Transfer 1982, Proc. 7th Int. Heat
Transfer Conf., vol. 1, pp. 223-240, Hemisphere, Washington, DC, 1982.
3. A. E. Bergles, Some Perspectives on Enhanced Heat Transfer-Second-Generation
Heat Transfer Technology, Trans. ASME, J. Heat Transfer, vol. 110, pp. 1082-1096,
1988.
4. A. E. Bergles, Augmentation of Heat Transfer, in Heat Exchanges Design Handbook, vol.
2, pp. 2.5.11-1-12, Hemisphere, Washington, DC, 1983.
5. A. E. Bergles, Techniques to Augment Heat Transfer, in Handbook of Heat Transfer
Applications, pp. 3-1-80, McGraw-Hill, New York, 1985.
6. A. S. Ahuja, Augmentation of Heat Transport in Laminar Flow of Polystyrene Suspen-
sions. 1. Experiments and Results, J. Appl. Phys., vol. 46, no. 8, pp. 3408-3416, 1975.
7. A. S. Ahuja, Thermal Design of a Heat Exchanger Employing Laminar Flowof Particle
Suspensions, Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer, vol. 25, no. 5, pp. 725-728, 1982.
8. C. W. Shon and M. M. Chen, Microconvective Thermal Conductivity in Disperse
Two-Phase Mixture as observed in a Laminar Flow, Trans. ASME, J. Heat Transfer, vol.
104, pp. 47-51, 1984.
9. C. W. Shon and M. M. Chen, Heat Transfer Enhancement in Laminar Slurry Pipe Flows
with Power Law Thermal Conductivity, Trans. ASME, J. Heat Transfer, vol. 106, pp.
539-542, 1984.
170 B. C. PAK AND Y. 1. CHD
ity and Viscosity of Liquid by Dispersing Ultra-fine Particles (Dispersion of 1'-Al Z03 ,
SiO z and TiO z Ultra-Fine Particles), Netsu Bussei (Japan), vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 227-233,
1993.
15. J. C. Bailar, T. Moeller, J. Kleinberg, C. Guss, M. E. Castellion, and C. Metz, Chemistry,
3d ed., pp. 397-398, Harcourt Bruce Jovanovich, New York, 1989.
16. The Thermophysical Properties Research Center (TPRC), Thermophysical Properties of
Mattcr-Specific Heat (Nonmetallic Solids), Vol. 5, Purdue University, 1970.
17. H. A. Barnes, J. F. Hutton, and K. Walters, An Introduction to Rheology, pp. 25-35,
Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1989.
18. M. Ippolito, Rheology of Dispersed Systems-Influence of NaCI on the Viscous Proper-
ties of Aqueous Bentonite Suspensions, in G. Astarita et al. (eds.), Rheology, Vol. 2:
Fluids, pp. 651-658, Plenum Press, New York, 1980.
19. G. K. Batchelor, The Effect of Brownian Motion on the Bulk Stress in a Suspension of
Spherical Particles, J. Fluid Mech., vol. 83, part 1, pp, 97-117,1977.
20. Ronald F. Probstein, Physiochemical Hydrodynamics, pp. 185-190, Butterworths, 1989.
21. I. R. Rutgers, Relative Viscosity and Concentration, Rheol. Acta, vol. 2, pp. 305-438,
1962.
22. I. M. Krieger, Rheology of Monodisperse Lattices, Adv. Colloid Interface Sci., vol. 3, pp.
111-136,1972.
23. C. G. de Kruif, E. M. F. van Ievsel, A. Vrij, and W. B. Russel, Hard Sphere Colloidal
Dispersions: Viscosity as a Function of Shear Rate and Volume Fraction, J. Chern.
Phys., vol. 83, pp. 4717-4725, 1985.
24. H. Schlichting, Boundary Layer Theory, 7th cd., pp. 596-600, McGraw-Hill, New York,
1979.
25. W. M. Kays and M. E. Crawford, Convective Heat and Mass Transfer, 3d ed., pp.
244-249, McGraw-Hili, New York, 1993.
26. F. W. Dittus and L. M. K. Boelter, Heat Transfer in Automobile Radiators of the
Tubular Type, Uniu. Calif. Publ. in Eng., vol. 11, pp. 443-461,1930.
27. R. H. Notter and M. W. Rouse, A Solution to the Turbulent Graetz Problem-III. Fully
Developed Region Heat Transfer Rates, Chern. Eng. Sci., vol. 27, pp. 2073-2093, 1972.
28. B. C. Pak, Y. I. Cho, and S. U. S. Choi, A Study of Turbulent Heat Transfer in a
Sudden-Expansion Pipe with Drag-Reducing Viscoelastic Fluid, Int. J. Heat Mass
Transfer, vol. 34, no. 4/5, pp. 1195-1208, 1991.
29. H. L. Goldsmith and S. G. Mason, in F. R. Eirich (ed.), Rheology: Theory and
Applications, vol. 4, chap. 2, Academic Press, New York, 1967.