Republic of the Philippines

Department of Education
Division of Bacolod City
SUM-AG NATIONAL HIGH SCHOOL
SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL DEPARTMENT

LETTER OF REQUEST TO THE VALIDATORS

May , 2023

Dear Sir /Ma'am

Greetings!

We are Senior High School students from Grade 12 - Accountancy, Business, and Management
are currently conducting our research entitled __________________The general purpose of this study is
to ____________________________.
Specifically, this study aims to answer the following questions:

1.What are the demographic profiles of the respondents in terms of:

a. Name of business
b. Location
c. Monthly income
2. What are the marketing strategies of ukay-ukay sellers in terms of:
a. Product
b. Price
c. Place
d. Promotion
In connection with this, we have chosen you to be one of the validators, we are requesting for
your expertise to validate our questionnaire.

Very truly yours,

NAME OF LEADER
Group leader and Member
NAME OF VALIDATOR
Validator

Noted by:
JERLYN DENOYA
Research 2 Teacher
 Validation Instrument
TITLE: RESEARCH TITLE
Direction: Please your degree of agreement or disagreement in the statements provided below by putting a
check (/) based on your chosen answer.
Criteria 1 2 3 4 5 INTERPRETATION
1. The questionnaire is short enough
that the respondents respect it and it
would not drain much of his/her
precious time.
2. The questionnaire is interesting
and has a has a face appeal such that
the respondent will be induced to
accomplish it fully.
3. The questionnaire can obtain depth
to the response and avoid superficial
answers.
4. The items/questions and their
alternative response are neither to
suggestive nor too unstimulating.
5. The questionnaire can elicit
responses which are define but not
mechanically enforced.
6. The questionnaire is stated in such
a way which are defined but not
mechanically enforced.
7. Questions/items are formed in such
a manner that the suspicion by the
respondents to the hidden purposes in
the questionnaire is avoided.
8. The questionnaire is neither narrow
nor restrictive or limited in scope
philosophy.
9. The responses to the questionnaire
when taken as a whole could.
AVERAGE RATING

Mean Score Range Interpretation

5-Strongly Agree 4.21-5.00 --- Very Good
4-Agree 3.41-4.20 ---Good
3-Undecided 2.61-3.40 --- Average
2-Disagree 1.81-2.60 --- Poor
1-Strongly Disagree 1.00-1.80 --- Very Poor