The Role of Professional Skepticism in Evaluating Audit Evidence

You might also like

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 7

The Role of Professional

Skepticism in Evaluating
Audit Evidence
Audit and Assurance
Audit is a procedure of closely monitoring the accounting information
provided in a company's financial statements

Assurance is a process for independently ensuring the accuracy of an


audit

Assurance Engagement

An engagement in which a practitioner expresses a conclusion designed to


enhance the degree of confidence of the intended users other than the
responsible party about the outcome of the evaluation or measurement of
a subject matter against criteria
Professional skepticism
Professional skepticism is a mindset that involves
questioning and challenging the information
presented, seeking to identify inconsistencies, biases,
and potential misrepresentations in the data
Why is Professional
Skepticism Important?

Minimizing audit riskg


It Reduces the risk of overlooking or misinterpreting evidence
that could potentially have a significant impact on the audit
opinion
Enhancing audit quality
It is essential for ensuring that auditors exercise a critical and
questioning mindset while gathering and evaluating audit Meeting stakeholder expectations
evidence. This helps to improve the quality of audit work and
increases the reliability By demonstrating a questioning mindset and thoroughly
examining audit evidence, auditors can provide stakeholders
with the assurance they need to make informed decisions
Identifying material misstatementsnce about the financial health of the organization.
Enables auditors to identify material misstatements in
financial statements, such as errors, fraud, or intentional Complying with auditing standards
misrepresentations
By adhering to this principle, auditors can ensure compliance
with auditing standards and maintain their professional
credibility.
Professional Skepticism
It is essential when evaluating audit evidence.
Auditors need to carefully evaluate the evidence
they are presented with and use their judgment to
determine whether it is sufficient and reliable.

Recognizing individual
Auditor and group
notices anachievements
unusually high
percentag of accounts receivable
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing
thatProinare
elit. past
pulvinar enim due, they
eget ante may
scelerisque,
ullamcorper ultrices dui malesuada. Pellentesque at
question
purus thelacinia.
at felis luctus accuracy
Donec in augueofmi. Nulla
the
accounts
a magna euismod, receivable balance
finibus augue and
vitae, efficitur
Etiam condimentum odio odio, non ornare magna
ex.

investigate
feugiat further.
vitae. Maecenas eget ornare sapien. Lorem
ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit.
Aenean molestie diam eu augue ornare lobortis.

Organizing company-
wide gatherings
Auditor observes a pattern of
unusually
Lorem ipsum dolor large
sit amet,journal
consectetur entries,
adipiscing
elit. Proin pulvinar enim eget ante scelerisque,
they may
ullamcorper question
ultrices the reason
dui malesuada. Pellentesque for
at
purus at felis luctus lacinia. Donec in augue mi. Nulla
the
a magnaentries
euismod,and request
finibus additional
augue vitae, efficitur ex.
documentation
Etiam condimentum odio toodio,
support them.
non ornare magna
feugiat vitae. Maecenas eget ornare sapien. Lorem
ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit.
Aenean molestie diam eu augue ornare lobortis.
Factors that affect Professional Skepticism

Time constraints may limit the amount of


testing an auditor can perform, which can
affect their ability to identify potential
errors or fraud

If an auditor has a long-standing relationship


with a client, they may be less likely to
question the client's assertions or may be
influenced by their preconceived notions
about the client's integrity
Thank You
For Your Attention

You might also like