Professional Documents
Culture Documents
SP 2390 Stress
SP 2390 Stress
0
Petroleum Development Oman LLC Effective: Dec.-2021
Document ID SP-2390
Security Restricted
Version 1.0
Keywords: This document is the property of Petroleum Development Oman, LLC. Neither the whole nor any part of this
document may be disclosed to others or reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form by any means
(electronic, mechanical, reprographic recording or otherwise) without prior written consent of the owner.
i Document Authorisation
Authorised For Issue
ii Revision History
The following is a brief summary of the 4 most recent revisions to this document. Details of all revisions prior to
these are held on file by the issuing department.
Version 1.0 05 DEC 2021 Mahesh Manjakuppam Srinivasan UEMS1 & First Issue
K.Saravanan UEMS5
TABLE OF CONTENTS
i Document Authorisation ...................................................................................................................................... 3
ii Revision History .................................................................................................................................................. 4
iii Related Business Processes .............................................................................................................................. 5
iv Related Corporate Management Frame Work (CMF) Documents ..................................................................... 5
1.0 Scope ............................................................................................................................................................ 9
2.0 Reference Documents ................................................................................................................................... 9
2.1 PDO/Company specification ......................................................................................................................... 9
2.2 International Codes & Standards ................................................................................................................ 10
3.0 General Requirement .................................................................................................................................. 11
4.0 Pipe stress Analysis .................................................................................................................................... 12
5.0 Stress Critical Line List ................................................................................................................................ 12
6.0 Analysis software......................................................................................................................................... 13
6.1 Caesar II software ....................................................................................................................................... 13
6.2 Caesar II set up file ..................................................................................................................................... 13
6.3 Bourdon effect ............................................................................................................................................. 13
7.0 Allowable Stress .......................................................................................................................................... 14
8.0 Analysis input requirement .......................................................................................................................... 14
8.1 Stress Critical lines ...................................................................................................................................... 14
8.2 Non Critical lines.......................................................................................................................................... 14
8.3 Design Conditions ....................................................................................................................................... 14
8.3.1 Design Basis .............................................................................................................................. 14
8.3.2 Line list ....................................................................................................................................... 15
8.3.3 Pressure .................................................................................................................................... 15
8.3.4 Temperature .............................................................................................................................. 15
8.4 Installation Temperature.............................................................................................................................. 15
8.5 Expansion Stress Range ............................................................................................................................. 15
8.6 Stress Intensification Factor ........................................................................................................................ 15
8.7 Pressure Relief Valve Loads ....................................................................................................................... 16
8.8 Slug Load .................................................................................................................................................... 16
8.9 Fatigue & Cyclic Loads ................................................................................................................................ 17
8.10 Wind Load ................................................................................................................................................... 17
8.11 Seismic Load ............................................................................................................................................... 17
8.12 Surge ........................................................................................................................................................... 17
8.13 Soil Settlement ............................................................................................................................................ 17
8.14 Vessel Skirt growth ...................................................................................................................................... 17
8.15 External Displacement ................................................................................................................................ 18
8.16 Restraints .................................................................................................................................................... 18
8.17 Spring Hanger Supports .............................................................................................................................. 19
Page 6 Pipe Stress Analysis Printed 05/12/2021
The controlled version of this CMF Document resides online in Livelink®. Printed copies are UNCONTROLLED.
SP-2390 Version-1.0
Petroleum Development Oman LLC Effective: DEC -2021
1.0 SCOPE
This document defines the requirements of static and dynamic stress analysis for piping connected to
various types of processing equipment for the facilities designed according to ASME 31.3 process
piping code and also should be applied to B31.1 power piping and other utility facilties.
This document also defines the requirements of documentation of the piping stress analysis.
All piping systems shall be evaluated and analysed for adequate flexibility in accordance with this
document, applicable COMPANY specifications, International Codes and Standards referenced
herein. This document specifies the requirement for performing the pipe stress analysis.
Piping covered under equipment design codes is excluded from the scope of this specification.
This specification is intended for use in facilities related to oil and gas production, gas handling, oil
refining, chemical processing, gasification, distribution and supply. This specification may also be
applied in other similar facilities.
When this specifiation is applied, a Management of Change (MOC) process shall be implemented;
this is of particular importance when existing facilities are to be modified.
ASME B16.5 - Pipe Flanges and Flanged Fittings NPS 1/2 through
NPS 24 Metric/Inch Standard
API 610/ ISO 13709 - Centrifugal Pumps for General Refinery Service
The controlled version of this CMF Document resides online in Livelink®. Printed copies are UNCONTROLLED.
Revision: Version 1.0
Petroleum Development Oman LLC Effective: Dec.-2021
Note : The applicable DEM1 DEPs shall be referred for the SHALL (PS) compliance.
The controlled version of this CMF Document resides online in Livelink®. Printed copies are UNCONTROLLED.
Revision: Version 1.0
Petroleum Development Oman LLC Effective: Dec.-2021
And also should be rigid enough to withstand dynamic loads due to slug, surge , water hammering
etc. and to be free of any undesirable vibrations
The controlled version of this CMF Document resides online in Livelink®. Printed copies are UNCONTROLLED.
Revision: Version 1.0
Petroleum Development Oman LLC Effective: Dec.-2021
The approved program for the purpose of computer analysis is “CAESAR II” latest version
unless otherwise agreed mutually with the Company (Petroleum Development Oman LLC). All
computer runs shall include temperature, pressure, weight and insulation if any as a minimum.
In case the latest version of Caesar II has not included important changes made to the latest
design code ASME B 31.3. The design contractor shall include these changes in the
calculations.
Caesar default unit file (mm.fil) shall be used for the analysis or for deriving project specific unit
file.
The controlled version of this CMF Document resides online in Livelink®. Printed copies are UNCONTROLLED.
Revision: Version 1.0
Petroleum Development Oman LLC Effective: Dec.-2021
The Bourdon effect shall be considered only in the translation and shall be considered for 900
# & above.
All stress critical lines shall be analysed using the Caesar II software unless otherwise agreed
mutually with the Company.
The documentation shall be prepared and submitted in the form of stress analysis reports as per
section 14.0.
Lines which are not categorised as stress critical shall be verified by use of engineering experience
or approximate method, Non-critical piping systems shall be adequately flexible and wherever
possible, this should be achieved by the natural flexibility of the pipe-work configuration.
Documentation is not mandatory for these lines.
However, for any non-critical lines connected to equipment, ensure the loads on the equipments are
limited by using good engineering practice. It is consultant’s / contractor’s accountability to provide
the right pipe routing and adequate supports to meet the design and technical integrity.
For small bore piping, refer Appendix-F.
A)All critical piping systems identified through (5.0, Item i to iii) SHALL [PS] be checked
for stresses caused by the following:
- pressure (internal/external pressures);
- weight effects of piping components and fluids;
- equipment vibration;
- thermal expansion and contraction;
- external loadings such as:
i. wind loads;( if applicable)
ii. seismic loads;( If applicable)
iii. settlement;
- stiffness changes;
- enforced displacements;
Page 14 Pipe Stress Analysis Printed 05/12/21
The controlled version of this CMF Document resides online in Livelink®. Printed copies are UNCONTROLLED.
Revision: Version 1.0
Petroleum Development Oman LLC Effective: Dec.-2021
- shock loadings;
- as limited by the nozzle loading requirements in applicable code / approved vendor
drawing.
B)All critical piping systems identified through (5.0, Item i to iii) shall be analysed for the
detailed analysis conditions listed in Table provided in Appendix-G.
Project line list shall be the basis for all the pipe stress calculation.
8.3.3 Pressure
8.3.4 Temperature
The maximum design temperature to be considered for the stress analysis for un-insulated
aboveground pipes shall be the black bulb temperature (82 deg C) or maximum design
temperature stated in the line list whichever is higher.
The minimum design temperature to be considered for the stress analysis for un-insulated
aboveground pipes shall be the lowest ambient temperature during winter (5˚C) or minimum
temperature stated in the line list whichever is lower.For the case of rotating equipment , the
nozzle loads shall be analysed with respect to Operating temperature and upset maximum &
minimum temperature.
Ref . APPENDIX-G for the Temperature conditions to be considered in the Analysis
Expansion stress range SHALL [PS] be evaluated using a differential temperature of maximum
metal temperature and minimum metal temperature of piping system (the piping system could
possible reach as per process condition) to confirm that the calculated stress range is within
the Code allowable.
Branch connection shall be modelled as per branch table of the applicable piping class. Stress
intensification factors (SIF) indices for 45° connection shall be considered carefully and stated
in all the calculations.
In the absence of any SIF Calculation, as a guideline SIF value for 45° can be considered as
2.25 times the SIF values of 90° branch.
For line with the diameter to thickness (D/t) ratio exceeds 100 (Example 42 inch or 48 inch lines
with standard wall thickness). Code ASME B31.3 does not provide any guidelines to calculate
the SIF for fittings of such size. For such cases, the SIF should be obtained from Vendors and
in case it is not available, SIF shoudl be calculated by Finite element analysis (FEA).
The controlled version of this CMF Document resides online in Livelink®. Printed copies are UNCONTROLLED.
Revision: Version 1.0
Petroleum Development Oman LLC Effective: Dec.-2021
Reaction forces shall be calculated for both open and closed relief system in line with API RP
520 Part II. A dynamic loading factor (DLF) of 2 shall be considered for all reaction forces.
However, this is not applicable for thermal relief valves.
Safety relief valve discharge piping SHALL [PS] be designed to withstand both the dead loads
and the reactive or thrust loads taking into account the most severe case, such as possible
flashing conditions and liquid entrainment in vapour flows.
In multiphase flow where slugging is expected in a piping system, slug loads shall be calculated
and applied in both axes axial (Fx) & orthogonal (Fy) directions as shown in the fig - 1 below at
all changes of direction.
However Slug force need not to be applied at the elbow in the vertical down comer. For Tee
connection the slug load need not to be considered.
Slug force shall be calculated based on formula given below. The slug forces will be acting on
the different elbows at different time and the input in the software shall consider the same.
Fig-1
Where,
If the calculated slug forces (static) with dynamic load factor 2 are extremely high which results
in huge civil foundations, then it is recommended to carryout dynamic analysis using Caesar-II
module: Water Hammer / Slug Flow (spectrum).
The controlled version of this CMF Document resides online in Livelink®. Printed copies are UNCONTROLLED.
Revision: Version 1.0
Petroleum Development Oman LLC Effective: Dec.-2021
The piping analysis shall consider the effects of pressure cycling, thermal cycling, and other
cyclic loading. The stress analyst shall determine the number of cycles a piping system to be
designed.
If the full displacement thermal cycle exceeds 7000, then fatigue analysis to be carried out as
per the code ASME B31.3
Wind loading shall be considered in all four directions of the horizontal plane +X, -X,+Z & -Z
and not acting simultaneously. For calculating wind load on pipe, the shape factor shall be taken
as 0.7.
Wind force shall be considered for the following piping:
Pipe outside diameter 200 mm (including insulation thickness) and larger for elevation 10 m
and above from the finished ground level. Wind velocity/wind pressure shall be as per civil
design basis or metrological data.
Seismic loads need not be considered unless otherwise specified as Oman is considered to be
under safe Zone. This should be consulted and confirmed with the civil team on each site zone
specific.
8.12 Surge
Settlement expected post hydro test shall be considered for all storage tanks or vessels. The
settlement values shall be estimated by civil engineer.
Differential settlement between for new tank/vessel and connected piping shall be considered
as sustained vector in stress calculation. For existing tanks (five years since installed)
settlement not required to be considered.
Vessel skirt growth is to be considered and modelled in the stress model; the vessel skirt growth
can be calculated with the following formula
The controlled version of this CMF Document resides online in Livelink®. Printed copies are UNCONTROLLED.
Revision: Version 1.0
Petroleum Development Oman LLC Effective: Dec.-2021
Where
K*h/√t 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22
F 1 0.8 0.54 0.38 0.28 0.22 0.18 0.16 0.14 0.12 0.11 0.1
K*h/√t 24 26 28 30 32 34
F 0.09 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08
Where,
K - Insulation factor
= 1.7 for fire brick insulation (Applicable for skirt and to check for
saddles)
8.16 Restraints
Lateral guides shall be provided as maximum as possible to control pipe movements and to
prevent buckling at the pipe section level. And also the line stops should be provided at
appropriate locations so as to prevent pipe linear displacement occured during any process
/operation upset scenario.
Guides/Stops should normally be modelled with no gaps and friction needs not be considered,
as it is insignificant. Any specific gaps provided on support must be noted on the stress sketches
and the isometrics. Friction shall be included in the analysis for vertical restraint
The controlled version of this CMF Document resides online in Livelink®. Printed copies are UNCONTROLLED.
Revision: Version 1.0
Petroleum Development Oman LLC Effective: Dec.-2021
When the piping system moves up or down due to thermal expansion, conventional rigid
support is not feasible, as it may not take load at all or it may act as a pivot. Under such
condition, it is recommended to use flexible support such as spring hangers. These spring
hangers sustain the primary load by their resistance against compression while allowing for free
thermal expansion.
Spring hangers are of two types:
For Pedestal support (“F” type spring), the horizontal displacement of the pipe is limited to ± 6
mm only. However, the horizontal displacement can be permitted up to ± 15 mm if sliding
assembly is considered on the load flange. The limitation on horizontal displacement of pipe is
to avoid overturning of load column of spring due to friction load.
For Hanging supports (Spring Hanger), the angle of deflection due to horizontal displacement
of pipe shall be limited to ± 4 deg.
Variable spring hangers are recommended where the load variation is not exceeding the values
given below for various systems:-
6% for the systems connected to Compressor and turbines.
Constant effort hangers provide constant supporting force in both cold and operating conditions.
When piping stresses and reactions are known to be close to allowable, most preferred type of
flexible support is constant support hanger. For critical, high temperature piping, at hanger
location where the vertical movement of piping is high or the load variation is above the limiting
value indicated in clause 8.17.1, then constant effort hangers are recommended.
The reaction loads resulting from thermal movement shall include the effects of friction of the
pipe or pipe shoes on the pipe supports.
Generally, friction shall be considered at all vertical supports, particularly local to sensitive
equipment nozzles and long pipe runs. Application of Teflon or PTFE to supports should be
minimized due to prevailing environmental conditions at Oman (Sand storms in desert
condition)
Following Static friction coefficient shall be used in the calculations
Steel to Steel - 0.3
Steel to Concrete - 0.6
Steel to PTFE/Teflon,
The controlled version of this CMF Document resides online in Livelink®. Printed copies are UNCONTROLLED.
Revision: Version 1.0
Petroleum Development Oman LLC Effective: Dec.-2021
Piping model shall be extended up to the first fixed point on the tie-in/terminal point. In the
absence of fixed point the model shall be extended upto minimum two change of directions(
line stop & Guide) to get the effect of thermal displacement.
Boundary condition shall be considered up to guide & Line stop support and terminated with
appropriate rotational restraint if no anchor is existing.
In case tie-in with the buried pipeline, the model shall be extended till the first virtual anchor.
Analysis of buried piping shall be carried out up to virtual anchor for metallic pipe. In case of
non metallic piping entire buried portion to be included in the model.
For buried pipeline, analysis shall be as per applicable ASME pipeline codes ASME
B31.4/ASME B31.8/ISO 14692(GRE Piping).
Expansion joints / Expansion bellows and other such mechanical devices such as sway braces,
snubber, strut, swivel joint etc., shall not be used without COMPANY (Petroleum Development
Oman) approval.
Expansion & Swivel joints SHALL [PS] not be used for either of the following:
ii. in systems with fluid services other than Category D where they would be
subjected
to torsional loads.
The controlled version of this CMF Document resides online in Livelink®. Printed copies are UNCONTROLLED.
Revision: Version 1.0
Petroleum Development Oman LLC Effective: Dec.-2021
Pipe data-Pro database or any equivalent software may be used for rigid weight when actual
weight or weight in CAESAR software library is not available. Bolts weight shall be considered
for the pipe flanges as per the following:-
150# - 600# - Pipe size 10” and above
However, bolt weight shall be considered for all sizes at the equipment nozzles.
Actuated Valve weight can be considered as 1.5 times the manual valve if no vendor data is
available.
All the inactive supports in the maximum temperature design cases shall be checked with the
Code Compliance in sustained case as per the typical load case provided in Appendix-D.
For unloaded supports, the more conservative result obtained by the following iterative
procedure shall be applied whenever a pipe is lifted-off:
i). Calculate the vertical pipe centreline displacements at the applicable support locations in the
operational load case.
ii). Re-run all load cases for a new support arrangement where the supports unloaded in the
first iteration are now showing a vertical clearance equal to the in the first iteration determined
displacements at the applicable locations.
iii). Alternatively, the method suggested in the Appendix P of ASME B31.3 may be followed.
To prevent pipe lift-off from its supports, realistic wellhead growth shall be confirmed during
commissioning and startup through regular field measurements.
Insulation density shall be– as perapplicable material standard / code and if not, equivalent
densities shall be calculated and input in software.
If the line is in vapour service, or in liquid service with density less than water, then the
hydrostatic test weight shall be included in the analysis.
Expansion loops or offsets shall be provided in piping systems where improved flexibility is
required.
Cold-spring SHALL [PS] not be used to reduce thrust and moments on flanged joints or
equipment nozzles (refer to para. 319.2.4 in ASME B31.3).
The application of cold-spring for purposes other than to reduce thrust and moments on
flanged joints or equipment nozzles shall be subject to approval of the COMPANY’s
(Petroleum Development Oman) designated Mechanical Static technical authority.
The controlled version of this CMF Document resides online in Livelink®. Printed copies are UNCONTROLLED.
Revision: Version 1.0
Petroleum Development Oman LLC Effective: Dec.-2021
For piping connected to rotating equipment, the pipe stress analysis shall be based on the
following methods:
a) calculate piping loads on rotating equipment nozzles and combine in accordance with API
methods;
b) conduct a static, pulsation and mechanical analysis on piping systems for reciprocation
machinery or machinery subject to pulsating flows where the equipment code/applicable PDO
standard requires pulsation analysis.
Suction and discharge nozzle mating piping flanges (of rotating/reciprocating equipment) shall
be designed to maintain the misalignment within tolerances as specified in Appendix E of SP-
2404
The lateral misalignment shall be measured by disconnecting the piping flange with the
connected equipment.
The required support(Spring supports /adjustable supports / Guide ) adjacent to rotating
equipment nozzles to be considered in the analysis so that the flange alligment can be
achieved within the allowable limit . The constant spring support is highly preferred rather
than variable spring support at such critical location where the alignment of rotating equipment
nozzle is quite sensitive.
Refer APIRP 682 for the allowable measured misalignment limits.
In order to prevent transmission of vibrations to a compressor house, compressor piping shall
not be supported or otherwise connected to the building structure.
Pulsation study results shall be implemented in piping stress analysis for finalising pipe
support design of piping system. Piping system design, pulsation study report and pipe stress
analysis calculation results shall be submitted to the COMPANY (Petroleum Development
Oman) for approval.
To prevent fatigue failure of compressor piping, the following checks shall be performed:
a. screen for the potential for flow induced vibrations per Appendix B;
b. conduct a piping flexibility analysis including pressure surge scenarios;
Compressor inter-stage and discharge piping shall be sufficiently flexible to allow expansion
due to the heat of compression.
8.30 Flowline
The fundamental natural frequency (using modal analysis) of flowlines shall be in excess of 4
Hz.
Flowline movements shall be below the level that would have a detrimental effect on operating
and maintenance personnel.
Production flowlines shall be designed for slugging loads anticipated during the life time of the
well.
Flare piping systems shall be analysed based on the project specific design envelop and to
consider the requirements for flare piping systems subject to two-phase flow.
The controlled version of this CMF Document resides online in Livelink®. Printed copies are UNCONTROLLED.
Revision: Version 1.0
Petroleum Development Oman LLC Effective: Dec.-2021
The minimum requirements for pipe stress analysis result shall be in compliance with the
applicable design code i.e. ASME B31.3/ISO 14692.
a) The analysis method and design load cases shall be subject to review and approval by the
COMPANY (Petroleum Development Oman) for the critical systems identified in the DCAF
b) The method of analysis shall be determined by the requirements of ASME B31.3
para. 319.4.2.
c) Detailed computerised analysis shall be used for all the critical lines including the following
scenarios:
i) when the service conditions are cyclic, low temperature (< - 45 °C (- 49 °F));
ii) when the service conditions are vibratory, when significant external displacements are
applied, when the terminal reactions are of concern or;
iii) when the maximum combined displacement stress range, (incorporating appropriate
applicable stress intensification factors, estimated by approximate or simplified methods)
exceeds the allowable stress range.
d) Buried lines operating at temperatures above 100 °C (210 °F) SHALL [PS] be checked for
upheaval buckling.
e) Stress analysis by manual methods shall be applied only when the conditions of
ASME B31.3, para. 319.4.2(b) are met and when the piping is symmetrical in all places, is of
simple configuration and is within the scope of published handbook methods.
i). Complex piping systems shall not be reduced to simple configurations by the otherwise-
unnecessary introduction of intermediate anchors or guides
f) All lines likely subject to vibration due to high velocity flow (where the classification of
susceptibility to failure is "high" based on (Appendix B, B.1), high-pressure drop, water
hammer or mechanical excitation (pulsation beyond the criteria specified in (Appendix B, B.2)
shall be analysed by dynamic analysis in accordance with (Appendix C).
i). Also refer to section 10.0 for additional guidance on piping in vibrating service.
g) For piping systems greater than DN 50 (NPS 2):.
i) excitation forces of two-phase slug and plug flow piping system shall be determined per
Section 2.3.5 of DEP 31.38.01.25-Gen. specification SP-2373.
ii) dynamic analysis shall be carried out in accordance with (Appendix C).
h) At points where flow conditions change (e.g., where diameter or flow direction change) the
possible occurrence of movements shall be analysed and adequate measures taken to hold
the pipes in place, without the pipes and the supporting structure being over-stressed by
expansion or settlement.
i) Longitudinal pressure strain shall only be taken into account for long runs of pipe for high
pressure piping systems (Category K system in accordance with Appendix D, Table D.2 of
DEP 31.38.01.24-Gen. specification SP-2376)
j) Consideration should be given to the following when determining whether the loads/stresses
resulting from nozzle/wellhead displacements will be regarded as primary (sustained loads)
or secondary (displacement strains):
i). secondary stresses are compared to secondary allowable values;
Page 23 Pipe Stress Analysis Printed 05/12/21
The controlled version of this CMF Document resides online in Livelink®. Printed copies are UNCONTROLLED.
Revision: Version 1.0
Petroleum Development Oman LLC Effective: Dec.-2021
ii) secondary allowables are higher than primary allowables (the secondary stress may even
exceed the material yield stress) due to the self-limiting character of loads.
k) In the case of nozzle/wellhead displacement, it shall be verified whether the displacement
induced loads are self-limiting, paying special attention to when a support is unloaded (pipe
lifted-off) in the operational load condition.
l) On wellheads, provisions shall be made (markers) to facilitate regular measurement and
checking of wellhead growth.
Pipe sag due to weight of piping and contents should be kept minimum and shall not exceed
15mm in sustained and hydro test. Where deflection exceeds this amount, pipe supports shall
be added or pipe support span to be reviewed. Temporary supports may only be added to
limit such deflection during hydro test only.
Allowable pipe sag for GRP shall be 12.5mm as per ISO 14692.
Where free draining is required, the pipe sag shall be limited to 3mm
Sagging of 15mm is allowed in steam lines (under ASME B31.3 code) in operating condition
provided adequate drip leg/ steam traps are provided at appropriate location.
Flanges and mechanical pipe joints shall be assessed for the applied external forces and
moments in critical stress lines to ensure that flange and bolt stresses are not excessive and
joint leakage will not occur for size 12” and above.
All sizes under high critical sour service defined in SP-1190 and piping identified as K-service
flange leakage calculation shall be carried out based on Equivalent Pressure Method as per
ASME Sec III Div.1, NC-3658.1 or based on bending moment method as per ASME Sec III
Div.1, NC-3658.2 and NC- 3658.3.
For flanges which are designed as per API 6A, in the flange leakage calculation the force and
moments shall be within the limits mentioned in API 6A & 6F.
Two phase lines shall be supported properly withhold downs, guides and axial stop to
avoid/minimize any possibility of vibration, which may occur during operation.
Mode analysis shall be performed for all the multi phase flow systems. The natural frequency
of those lines shall be in excess of 4 Hz and to ensure that the pipe supports are also provided
with natural frequency more than piping in the corresponding mode shape or with higher
stiffness.
In order to keep friction factor in dynamic condition consistent with static friction factor of 0.3,
friction stiffness factor 25 can be considered.
Unless the Manufacturer/Supplier can submit documented design analysis or validation test
that higher loads/moments can be tolerated, allowable loads and moments on equipment
nozzles SHALL [PS] be in accordance with the relevant section for various equipments listed
below / applicable COMPANY (Petroleum Development Oman) equipment specifications
and their associated standards (e.g., ASME, API, ISO standards).
The controlled version of this CMF Document resides online in Livelink®. Printed copies are UNCONTROLLED.
Revision: Version 1.0
Petroleum Development Oman LLC Effective: Dec.-2021
The nozzle loads shall be qualified for various operating conditions that occur under various
credible scenarios. Stress analysis temperature (at which nozzle load to be checked) should
be checked with process group where large difference occur (> 30 deg C) between operating
and design temperature condition within the line list.
In case of multiple line from equipments connected to a common header, all possible
operating combination shall be considered. Where nozzle load exceeds stated allowable
loads, loads are to be transferred to equipment group in order to communicate this
requirement to the equipment vendor(s).
In case compressor various possible operating scenario including recycle case are to be
considered.
For qualifying the nozzle load of static equipments consider the design temperature and for
rotating equipments consider operating temperature as given in line list. Stress check shall be
carried out for minimum design temperature, minimum and maximum temperature range,
thermal expansion, sustained, hydrotest and occasional loads.
For qualifying the existing equipment nozzle in the absence of nozzle allowable details where
piping system is changed, it is recommended to run pipe stress analysis of the existing piping
system than compare the nozzle load of existing and new piping system. If required WRC can
also be performed to qualify the nozzles.
Pressure vessel nozzle loads shall be qualified based on SP 2069, Appendix-4. Where
required, nozzle flexibility may be included in the calculation. All calculation shall be
accordance with WRC 537 /WRC297
For the nozzle sizes above 24” & Pressure class rating #2500 and above, the calculated loads
shall be verified with static equipment engineer and to be included in the equipment
specification.
The allowable forces and moments on the Air cooled heat exchanger shall be qualified as per
clause 7.1.10 of SP-2070.
The allowable forces and moments on the plate type heat exchanger shall be qualified as as
per ISO 15547 for severe Service.
The allowable forces and moments on the fired heater shall be qualified as per clause 9.2 of
API 560/ISO 13705.
The piping nozzle load on the flare stack shall be as per SP 2069 and to be confirmed with
vendor.
The controlled version of this CMF Document resides online in Livelink®. Printed copies are UNCONTROLLED.
Revision: Version 1.0
Petroleum Development Oman LLC Effective: Dec.-2021
Loads acting on API centrifugal pump suction and discharge nozzles shall be limited to the
nozzle loadings permitted by the API 610 with factor for Table-5 allowable as 2. For Non-API
pumps nozzle loading shall be limited to allowable values provided by manufacturer.
Loads acting on API rotary pump suction and discharge nozzles shall be limited to the nozzle
loadings permitted by two (2) times the allowable as per clause 6.2 of API 676. For Non-API
pumps nozzle loading shall be limited to allowable values provided by manufacturer.
Anchor-free analysis/Nozzle disconnected case (WNC Case) shall be performed based on
allowable displacement of 3 mm in axial direction and 2 mm in lateral direction. In case of
system with spring hanger, this check shall be performed with spring in unlocked condition.
This will ensure strain free alignment of rotating equipment with connected piping.
Loads acting on API reciprocating pump suction and discharge nozzles shall be limited to two
(2) times the nozzle loadings permitted as per clause 6.6 of API 674. For Non-API pumps
nozzle loading shall be limited to allowable values provided by manufacturer. For the case of
pressure pulsation, the piping shall be supported with rigid supports to accommodate the
pulsation force and the pipe system routing / support types to be confirmed with vendor.
Small vertical in-line Pumps (15 kW & less) shall be supported immediately adjacent to suction
and discharge flanges using conventional pipe supports. Piping forces shall be determined
considering pump as a rigid but as an un-anchored system of the piping system.
Large vertical pumps furnished with casing foot-mount shall be supported on suitable
foundations
Loads shall be in accordance with two (2) times API 610 as a minimum.
Allowable nozzle loads for metering pumps (designed to API Small vertical in-line Pumps (15
kW & less) shall be supported immediately adjacent to suction and discharge flanges using
conventional pipe supports. Piping forces shall be agreed with the vendor.
As guide line centrifugal compressor nozzle loads shall be three (3) times API 617 (Annex
2E) or corresponding equivalent of NEMA SM 23 (Clause 8.4.6). This needs to be confirmed
with Rotating discipline engineer prior to finalise the analysis.
Nozzle load shall be evaluated considering friction on pipe support as well as without friction
on pipe support.
Whenever the calculated loads on the nozzle are above the allowable loads, the same shall
be verified with rotating equipment engineer and to be included in the equipment specification.
The allowable nozzle loads shall be discussed and agreed with rotating equipment engineer
during the start of the project and to be included in the equipment specification.
In order to prevent the vibration from the pressure pulsation, piping system should be
supported such a way that its frequency is higher than the critical frequency (normally 3rdh
Page 26 Pipe Stress Analysis Printed 05/12/21
The controlled version of this CMF Document resides online in Livelink®. Printed copies are UNCONTROLLED.
Revision: Version 1.0
Petroleum Development Oman LLC Effective: Dec.-2021
Harmonic frequency of the compressor) to avoid resonance. If the piping system is not able
to be maintained with the natural frequency more than compressor 3rdh harmonic frequency,
at least the natural frequency should be higher than the 2.4 times of max. run speed. It is
recommended to keep the piping system with minimum elbows on both suction and discharge
piping until the anchor point and to avoid frequent change of directions.
Compressor vendor shall carry out analogue (Pulsation) study for compressor suction and
discharge piping between compressor, suction/discharge knock out drums and air cooler on
the piping layout, which meets the requirement of static and dynamic stress analysis. Ensure
the required Hold down supports are placed in as per the recommendation by Pulsation study.
If there are changes in piping configuration as an outcome of analogue study, stress analysis
is to be performed again to meet the requirement of nozzle loads. It shall be ensured that the
system meets both the requirement i.e. static analysis and analogue study
Pipe rack, pipe supports and all related structures shall be designed to cater for analogue
study outcomes in all aspects.
The above work shall be completed before the compressor vendor carries out an acoustic
simulations/mechanical response study in accordance with API 618 para 3.9.
Allowable nozzle loads using nozzle flexibility shall comply with API 650, Appendix-P. As a
guideline, the forces and moments on the tank nozzle to be limited to 20 D and 40 D
respectively, where “D” is the diameter of the nozzle in mm, force in “Newton” and Moments
in “Newton-meter”.
Tank settlement, outward movement of the shell and nozzle inclination under full liquid load
conditions shall be taken into account when calculating bending moments and forces on tank
nozzles.
While considering the tank settlement, the first support foundation settlement also to be taken
into account while analysising the nozzle loads on the shell side.
The allowable forces and moments on the steam turbine nozzles shall comply with the nozzle
load criteria of NEMA SM 23
The allowable forces and moments on the auxiliary boiler/HRSG nozzles shall be as
recommended by the vendor.
The controlled version of this CMF Document resides online in Livelink®. Printed copies are UNCONTROLLED.
Revision: Version 1.0
Petroleum Development Oman LLC Effective: Dec.-2021
Packaged equipment such as Manifold, MSV, Metering skid etc., to be analysed as an integral
part of connected system for the critical lines as per clause 5.0 of this specification. Unless
agreed otherwise, the piping to packaged equipment shall be anchored on the vendor piping
as close as to the vendor interface as practical.
Vendor shall provide the required rigid supports (Gudies/line stops) on the pipings so as to
withstand the loads imposed during material handling & transport.
Stress analysis for piping connected to well head (Christmas tree) has to be carried out to
check for the allowable loads on the nozzle of Christmas tree.
Allowable flange loading for Christmas tree shall be as per API TR 6AF.and API TR AF2.
The maximum potential well head growth shall be obtained from sub-surface team.
For equipment not specified in clause 9.6.1 to 9.6.19 above, allowable loads and moments
SHALL [PS] be followed in accordance with vendor specified values in agreement with
Mechanical discipline lead. It is recommended that these discussions take place at the early
stages of the project.
The Contractor should provide additional flexibility in the piping rather than require additional
nozzle reinforcement.
Dynamic/cyclic piping loads transferred from the piping to equipment shall within the defined
allowable equipment nozzle loads.
Anchor-free analysis/Nozzle disconnected case (WNC Case) shall be performed for the piping
connected to the rotating equipments.
Anchor-free analysis/Nozzle disconnected case (WNC Case) shall be performed based on
allowable displacement of 3 mm in axial direction and 2 mm (effective) in lateral direction. In
case of system with spring hanger this check shall be performed with spring in unlocked
condition. This will ensure strain free alignment of rotating equipment with connected piping.
Ref. section 8.29 for the required criteria to ensure the missalligment within the allowable
limit.
.
10.0 VIBRATION
The effects of vibration in piping systems shall be investigated where appropriate. Where
necessary, additional stops, guides and hold-downs shall be added in order to reduce
vibration effects.
Areas of consideration as follows:
a) Vibration directly or indirectly imposed by rotating equipments.
b) Valves( e,g control valves/Blow down valves/Relive valve) or RO subject to large
pressure drops.
The controlled version of this CMF Document resides online in Livelink®. Printed copies are UNCONTROLLED.
Revision: Version 1.0
Petroleum Development Oman LLC Effective: Dec.-2021
In addition to the above, a detailed Piping SHALL [PS] be screened using (Appendix B) to
determine the susceptibility to failure due to flow-induced vibrations.
All piping systems potentially subject to vibration due to high velocity flow where the
classification of susceptibility to failure is "high" based on (Appendix B, B.1), high-pressure
drop, water hammer or mechanical excitation (pulsation beyond the criteria specified in
(Appendix B, B.2) shall be considered to be piping systems in vibrating service.
Piping classified as “high” susceptibility category, per (Appendix B) SHALL [PS] be further
assessed and designed in accordance with the requirements in Section 3 of the “Energy
Institute guidelines for the avoidance of vibration induced fatigue failure in process pipework”.
Equipment induced pulsations shall be limited to within the requirements specified in
specification SP-2341and API 674, as applicable.
Piping subject to pulsating vibrations, shall be anchored and guided by means of heavy duty
pipe clamps specially designed for this type of service.
The controlled version of this CMF Document resides online in Livelink®. Printed copies are UNCONTROLLED.
Revision: Version 1.0
Petroleum Development Oman LLC Effective: Dec.-2021
Trunnion calculation
Vibration Analysis
Analysis of Steam Piping and Condensate piping during system warm up conditions
Hydro-Test case
14.0 DOCUMENTATION
The pipe stress analysis report shall contain the following as a minimum:-
Description of Input data, Assumption, Recommendation and conclusion.
Extract of Process critical line list for specified system
Process Engineering Flow Scheme (PEFS) with system identification
Applicable Equipment drawing with data sheet
Applicable Piping Class
The controlled version of this CMF Document resides online in Livelink®. Printed copies are UNCONTROLLED.
Revision: Version 1.0
Petroleum Development Oman LLC Effective: Dec.-2021
The controlled version of this CMF Document resides online in Livelink®. Printed copies are UNCONTROLLED.
Revision: Version 1.0
Petroleum Development Oman LLC Effective: Dec.-2021
a. piping loads (including wind and seismic loads as applicable ) based on pipe stress analysis
conditions
b. piping loads based on operational conditions where the density of the liquid is higher than
water;
c. piping system’s pipe friction forces and (reaction) pipe anchor loads;
2. From flow induced vibration perspective, where the classification of susceptibility to failure
is "high" based on (Appendix B, B.1), the design shall address the bracing of these branches
to the run-pipe .
3. The DSS small bore branch ( 2” & less) with forged branch fittings (e,g nippolet/ weldoet)
shall be provided with bracing irrespective service coniditons and the same needs to be
considered while carrying out any detail analysis of system natural frequency.
4. Tubing design installation and support shall be in accordance with Energy Institute
"Guidelines for the design, installation and management of small bore tubing assemblies" 2nd
edition May 2013.
The controlled version of this CMF Document resides online in Livelink®. Printed copies are UNCONTROLLED.
Revision: Version 1.0
Petroleum Development Oman LLC Effective: Dec.-2021
1. Vertical pipes branching from columns and other vertical vessels shall have a resting support
near the nozzle and be guided at regular intervals to protect the pipe against vibrations, wind
load and/or buckling.
a. If the loads on this resting support are too high, a spring support should be positioned
at a lower elevation in order to reduce them.
b. For the required flexibility of the piping, attention should be paid to the location of the
lowest guiding support.
2. Pipe supports on pressure vessels shall be bolted to cleats welded to the vessel.
a. The cleats designed by the Contractor shall form an integral part of the pressure vessel.
c. Cleats and the connected pipe supports or supporting steel shall be designed as part of
the insulation system to mitigate water ingress.
1. Magnetic type level gauges with an operating temperature above 260 °C (500 °F) shall be
subjected to a differential thermal expansion stress analysis.
2. Loads on equipment nozzles, caused by the weight or thermal expansion of stand pipes with
level gauges or by magnetic type level gauges, shall be verified.
a. To verify the thermal expansion forces, it shall be assumed that the equipment is at design
temperature and the stand pipe or magnetic type level gauge is at ambient temperature.
Large cooling water pipes should be assessed for special supports to prevent subsidence.
a. The first pipe support shall be located sufficiently far away from the tank to allow for tank
settlement and the thermal expansion of the vertical pipe leg.
The controlled version of this CMF Document resides online in Livelink®. Printed copies are UNCONTROLLED.
Revision: Version 1.0
Petroleum Development Oman LLC Effective: Dec.-2021
1. For tank pipes of DN 500 and larger (NPS 20 and larger), spring or balanced supports
may be considered.
20.0 CHECKLIST
The Checklist shall be completed by pipe stress engineer and checking engineer.
Format of checklist is attached as Appendix-E.
The controlled version of this CMF Document resides online in Livelink®. Printed copies are UNCONTROLLED.
Revision: Version 1.0
Petroleum Development Oman LLC Effective: Dec.-2021
1. For systems where (A.1, Item 2) does not apply, refer to Table A.1 for span data applicable
to the following:
a. carbon steel pipes for sizes DN 50 (NPS 2) and above, STD wall and heavier, with a
maximum temperature of 350 °C (660 °F);
b.austenitic stainless steel pipes, schedule 40S and heavier, DN < 400 (NPS < 16), with a
maximum temperature of 350 °C (660 °F);
c.carbon steel pipes for sizes DN 15 (NPS ½) to DN 40 (NPS 1 ½), schedule 80 wall and
heavier, with a maximum temperature of 350 °C (660 °F).
2. For free draining pipes with a slope shallower than 1:240, Table A.1 shall not be used.
3. Spans shown in Table A.1 are based on straight pipe; other configurations shall be multiplied
by a shape factor in accordance with the sketch shown in Table A.1.
Table A.1 Maximum spans for carbon steel and heavy wall stainless steel
The controlled version of this CMF Document resides online in Livelink®. Printed copies are UNCONTROLLED.
Revision: Version 1.0
Petroleum Development Oman LLC Effective: Dec.-2021
2. The weight of insulation and sheeting is based on insulation thickness varying from 50
mm (2 in) for DN 15 (NPS ½ ) to 160 mm (6 ¼ in) for DN 1200 (NPS 48) and a density
of 190 kg/m3 (12 lb/ft3).
3. Spans limited by deflection. All other spans are limited by longitudinal bending stress.
The controlled version of this CMF Document resides online in Livelink®. Printed copies are UNCONTROLLED.
Revision: Version 1.0
Petroleum Development Oman LLC Effective: Dec.-2021
1. For systems where (A.2, Item 2) does not apply, refer to Table A.2 for span data applicable
to the following::
a. austenitic stainless steel pipes, schedule 10S with a maximum temperature of 350 °C
(660 °F);
b. duplex stainless steel pipes, schedule 10S and heavier, with a maximum temperature
of 280 °C (535 °F).
2. For free draining pipes with a slope shallower than 1:900, Table A.2 shall not be used.
3. Spans shown in Table A.2 are based on straight pipe; other configurations shall be multiplied
by a shape factor in accordance with the sketch shown in Table A.2.
Table A.2 Maximum spans for stainless steel, schedule 10S
The controlled version of this CMF Document resides online in Livelink®. Printed copies are UNCONTROLLED.
Revision: Version 1.0
Petroleum Development Oman LLC Effective: Dec.-2021
The controlled version of this CMF Document resides online in Livelink®. Printed copies are UNCONTROLLED.
Revision: Version 1.0
Petroleum Development Oman LLC Effective: Dec.-2021
B.1 GENERAL
1. Refer to the following sections for the screening requirements to prevent vibration induced
fatigue failure of piping systems due to the following types of vibrations:
2. For types of vibrations other than those mentioned in B.1, Item 1 or where vibration is
anticipated or where there is a history of vibration problems piping system shall be assessed
and designed in accordance to “Energy Institute guidelines for the avoidance of vibration
induced fatigue failure in process pipework”.
Flow induced vibrations (FIV) are more predominant in turbulent flow regime piping systems.
The turbulent flow regime generates potentially high levels of kinetic energy local to the turbulent
source. This energy is distributed across a wide frequency range, the majority of the excitation
is concentrated at low frequency. This type of vibration leads to displacement of piping system
and in some cases also leads to damage to pipe supports.
1.Table B.1 shall be followed for the susceptibility to failure of piping systems due to flow induced
vibrations:
The controlled version of this CMF Document resides online in Livelink®. Printed copies are UNCONTROLLED.
Revision: Version 1.0
Petroleum Development Oman LLC Effective: Dec.-2021
2. For flare and vent piping system FIV criterion, refer to SP-2373/DEP 31.38.01.25(Gen) Piping
– Process Design Requirement..
a. For “Negligible” classification for susceptibility to failure, piping system design shall
meet:
b. For “Medium” classification for susceptibility to failure, piping system design shall meet:
Around excitation sources (valves, tees, elbows) of piping systems, this implies that
the support span will be reduced to 2/3rds of the support span of Appendix-A
For liquid service piping systems with wall thickness less than or equal to Sch.10S,
the support span will be reduced to 2/3rds of the support span of Appendix-A
iii. For multiphase piping systems with wall thickness less than or equal to Schedule
10S, are to be designed in accordance with Section 3 of “Energy Institute guidelines for
the avoidance of vibration induced fatigue failure in process pipework”.
The controlled version of this CMF Document resides online in Livelink®. Printed copies are UNCONTROLLED.
Revision: Version 1.0
Petroleum Development Oman LLC Effective: Dec.-2021
4. If the piping system cannot meet detailed assessment “Energy Institute guidelines for the
avoidance of vibration induced fatigue failure in process pipework” requirements for medium and
high susceptibility failure categories, the piping system shall be evaluated using dynamic
analysis methods.
1. Pulsation due to periodic flow induced excitation, which is only relevant for gas lines (e.g.,
condensable gasses) containing dead legs, should satisfy the criterion described in Equation
B.1 or Equation B.2 as applicable.
Eqn B.1
2. If the criterion in B.3, Item 1 is not met for dead legs, then those dead legs in the piping
systems shall be assessed and designed in accordance to “Energy Institute guidelines to
prevent vibration induced fatigue failure in process pipework”.
3.If piping system cannot meet detailed described in B.3, Item 2, then the piping system shall be
evaluated using dynamic analysis methods and / or reference [T2-2] in the “Energy Institute
guidelines to prevent vibration induced fatigue failure in process pipework”.
If pulsations are limited to within the requirements of as specified SP-2341 and also in
accordance to Equation B.1 or Equation B.2, then no additional study is required.
4. If there are piping systems that will experience slug flow, or transient vibrations (flashing,
cavitation, and surge/momentum) then these piping systems shall be analysed per the “Energy
Institute guidelines for the avoidance of vibration induced fatigue failure in process pipework”.
5. If the piping system cannot meet the detailed assessment described in B.3, Item 4, then the
piping system shall be evaluated in accordance with Appendix C.
High frequency acoustic excitation is more predominant in gas piping systems with pressure
reducing devices (e.g., relief valve, control valve or orifice plate). This type of vibration takes the
form of local pipe wall flexure resulting in potentially high dynamic stress levels at circumferential
discontinuities on the pipe wall, fabricated tees or welded pipe supports, small bore connections.
1. For studying the effect of “high frequency acoustic excitation” on piping systems, sound
power level of piping system shall be calculated as per Equation B.3 or Equation B.4.
in Equations B.3 and B.4, SFF is a correction factor to account for multiple occurrences of sonic
flow in a line. If consecutive sonic conditions exist, then SFF=6; otherwise SFF = 0.
The controlled version of this CMF Document resides online in Livelink®. Printed copies are UNCONTROLLED.
Revision: Version 1.0
Petroleum Development Oman LLC Effective: Dec.-2021
Where:
P1 is upstream pressure (bara)
P2 is downstream pressure (bara)
W is flow rate (kg/s)
T is upstream temperature (K)
Mw is molecular weight (grams/mol)
Where:
P1 is upstream pressure (psia)
P2 is downstream pressure (psia)
W is flow rate (lbm/s)
T is upstream temperature (°R)
Mw is molecular weight (the ratio of the mass of a molecule to the unified atomic mass
unit (equal to 1/12 the mass of one atom of the isotope carbon-12).
2. Piping systems with sound power level (PWL) > 155 dB shall be further assessed and
designed in accordance to “Quantitative” methods of Section T-2, Energy Institute guidelines for
the avoidance of vibration induced fatigue failure in process pipework.
The controlled version of this CMF Document resides online in Livelink®. Printed copies are UNCONTROLLED.
Revision: Version 1.0
Petroleum Development Oman LLC Effective: Dec.-2021
C.1 GENERAL
The effect of a dynamic load on a piping system is the result of the interaction between the
dynamic excitation force or displacement and the dynamical properties of the piping system.
C.2.1 General
For the mechanically induced excitation type, mitigation attention is focused on keeping the
natural frequency of the pipe away from the source frequency or isolating the piping system
from vibrating equipment. Important mitigation contributors are support stiffness and mode
shape.
Fluid mechanical excitations dynamic loads are distributed over the piping system. Fluid
mechanical forces consist of two components, a friction component tangential to the pipe
wall and a pressure component normal to the pipe wall. In general, the friction component
is small compared to the pressure contribution. Since pressure forces act normal to the
pipe wall they are generally balanced by the circumferential pipe stress.
Transient dynamic loads are characterized by relatively large forces of relatively short
duration (fractions of a second).
The controlled version of this CMF Document resides online in Livelink®. Printed copies are UNCONTROLLED.
Revision: Version 1.0
Petroleum Development Oman LLC Effective: Dec.-2021
slug loads;
relief loads;
earthquake.
For the transient excitation the attention is focused on control of support location, type,
span and support stiffness.
1. The effects of the impact of a shock load on a piping system being hazardous for this
kind of dynamical load condition shall be assessed through a dynamic analysis.
2. The use of a pseudo static analysis shall be subject to approval from COMPANY
(Petroleum Development Oman).
C.4.1 General
a. Identify the source of vibration and establish or estimate the excitation forces.
b. Creation of a piping model with required nodes in order to properly describe the
various mode shapes.
d.If the natural frequencies are calculated and if dynamic loads (magnitude and time
history) are available, a response study may be performed.
1. To perform the dynamic analysis, a computer program with the following capabilities
shall be used.
i. friction factor;
The controlled version of this CMF Document resides online in Livelink®. Printed copies are UNCONTROLLED.
Revision: Version 1.0
Petroleum Development Oman LLC Effective: Dec.-2021
a. For mechanically induced vibration, the allowable piping natural frequency range
shall be determined by the excitation frequency or frequencies.
2. For compressor piping where the excitation consists of several harmonics the lowest
piping natural frequency should be higher than the third compressor harmonic.
3. If C.5.1, Item 2 cannot be met, then the predicted natural frequencies of piping system
shall be separated from the excitation frequencies by at least 20 %.
In this case, the piping system might experience vibration for a short moment during
start-up/shutdown.
The controlled version of this CMF Document resides online in Livelink®. Printed copies are UNCONTROLLED.
Revision: Version 1.0
Petroleum Development Oman LLC Effective: Dec.-2021
With respect to the allowable frequency range in transient vibrations, two characteristic time
scales of the time history of shock loads are of interest:
rising time;
duration.
The rising time is of importance for the excitation of high frequency mode shapes, and for
the duration for the excitation of low frequency mode shapes.
b. performing frequency domain analysis to find out the dynamic stresses and loads
at supports.
C.7.1.1 General
1.For mechanically induced vibration if a forced response analysis has been performed,
then the stresses in the piping system should be evaluated through the fatigue limit.
The controlled version of this CMF Document resides online in Livelink®. Printed copies are UNCONTROLLED.
Revision: Version 1.0
Petroleum Development Oman LLC Effective: Dec.-2021
The fatigue limit is the stress level equal to the allowable stress level at corresponding
107 cycles.
Based on this property, it can be concluded that if a component has lasted to its
endurance limit, it is unlikely to ever fail by fatigue unless conditions change.
With respect to the structural integrity a more reliable approach is taken if the magnitude
of the alternating stress component is calculated and the result is compared with the
endurance curve for the piping material. (See for instance, PD5500).
In practice safety factors for the allowable stress of 3 to 5 are not unusual.
2. Where a forced response analysis has been performed, the fatigue limit may be
applied.
C.8 DOCUMENTATION
1. In addition to Cl. 14.0 the dynamic analysis report shall include the following:
The controlled version of this CMF Document resides online in Livelink®. Printed copies are UNCONTROLLED.
Revision: Version 1.0
Petroleum Development Oman LLC Effective: Dec.-2021
T2 Operating Temperature
P1 Design pressure
H Hanger loads
W Weight
NOTE: - In case D1 is used for the tank settlement, D1 shall be treated as sustained vector.
The controlled version of this CMF Document resides online in Livelink®. Printed copies are UNCONTROLLED.
Revision: Version 1.0
Petroleum Development Oman LLC Effective: Dec.-2021
STRESS
SI NO LOAD CASE CONDITIONS
TYPE
The controlled version of this CMF Document resides online in Livelink®. Printed copies are UNCONTROLLED.
Revision: Version 1.0
Petroleum Development Oman LLC Effective: Dec.-2021
STRESS
SI NO LOAD CASE CONDITIONS
TYPE
L32 L4-L16 EXP Maximum Design temp. Expansion Condition
STRESS
SI NO LOAD CASE CONDITIONS
TYPE
The controlled version of this CMF Document resides online in Livelink®. Printed copies are UNCONTROLLED.
Revision: Version 1.0
Petroleum Development Oman LLC Effective: Dec.-2021
The controlled version of this CMF Document resides online in Livelink®. Printed copies are UNCONTROLLED.
Revision: Version 1.0
Petroleum Development Oman LLC Effective: Dec.-2021
C EQUIPMENT
1 Equipment to be modeled as rigid.
2 Nozzles on Equipments are modeled anchor with Connecting node.
Equipment Skirt growth not considered
D SUPPORT
1 Friction coefficient 0.3 considered on all +Y restraints.
Trunnion modeled as pipe with diameter at least one size lower than that
2
of main pipe. Ambient temperature is considered for the trunnion.
3 Supports are modeled with "Gap=0".
Variable Spring supports - Allowable load variation and Maximum
4
displacement shall be as per stress design basis.
Lines connected to the existing line - Existing line to be modelled till the
4
first line stop and next two guides.
E LOAD CASE EDITOR
1 For Pumps Standby/Operating load Cases.
2 Compressors recycle case.
3 Pump minimum flow recirculation case.
The controlled version of this CMF Document resides online in Livelink®. Printed copies are UNCONTROLLED.
Revision: Version 1.0
Petroleum Development Oman LLC Effective: Dec.-2021
4 Caesar II start run option performed and all warning messages reviewed.
5 Load cases are built as per Appendix - 1 of design basis.
6 Thermal stress range from maximum to minimum temperature.
The controlled version of this CMF Document resides online in Livelink®. Printed copies are UNCONTROLLED.
Revision: Version 1.0
Petroleum Development Oman LLC Effective: Dec.-2021
The controlled version of this CMF Document resides online in Livelink®. Printed copies are UNCONTROLLED.
Revision: Version 1.0
Petroleum Development Oman LLC Effective: Dec.-2021
The controlled version of this CMF Document resides online in Livelink®. Printed copies are UNCONTROLLED.
Revision: Version 1.0
Petroleum Development Oman LLC Effective: Dec.-2021
Note: However, minimum branch size requirement on the lines prone to vibration due to flow
induced or acoustic needs to be analyzed and qualified as per the Energy institute guidelines.
The controlled version of this CMF Document resides online in Livelink®. Printed copies are UNCONTROLLED.
SP-2390 Version-1.0
Petroleum Development Oman LLC Effective: Dec.-2021
a. piping exposed to flare radiation: 4. Blast loading (refer to 3.1, Item 4).
stress analysis accounts for the a. piping systems whose failure could
increase in temperature of the lead to major flammable fluid
piping system due to flare release or rupture in the event of
radiation. blast analysed for blast loading.
b. piping connected to flare tips: Stress analysis performed to limit
additional thermal cases (low the stresses due to blast,
pressure flare piping system wherever applicable;
subjected to radiation due to high b. maximum allowable stress in blast
pressure flare piping system and case is the minimum of 2.4 x S or
vice versa) analysed; 1.5 x SY, where S is the ASME B
c. low pressure / high pressure 31.3 allowable stress limit and SY
combined flare tip: analyse one is the pipe material yield stress.
operating and one standby and This blast over pressures is
the standby subjected to applied as wind loading in the
radiation temperature; appropriate directions.
The controlled version of this CMF Document resides online in Livelink®. Printed copies are UNCONTROLLED.
SP-2390 Version-1.0
Petroleum Development Oman LLC Effective: Dec.-2021
The controlled version of this CMF Document resides online in Livelink®. Printed copies are UNCONTROLLED.