Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Report On 250 Consecutive Toe To Finger Transplants. Indications, Results, Failures, and New Applications
Report On 250 Consecutive Toe To Finger Transplants. Indications, Results, Failures, and New Applications
2011;55(4):257-262
www.elsevier.es/ rot
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Inst it ut o de Cirugía Plást ica y de la Mano Dr. Piñal y Asociados, Hospit al Mut ua Mont añesa y Práct ica Privada,
Sant ander, Spain
KEYWORDS Abstract
Amput at ion; Purpose: Toe-t o-hand t ransfers are an essent ial part of hand rehabilit at ion aft er loss of a
Microsurgery; inger. Despite this, the likelihood of failure and the hypothetical morbidity in the donor
Toe-t o-han area, made t his procedure not very popular among surgeons. The purpose of t his paper
is t o present our clinical experience, highlight ing t he pit falls and t he new indicat ions.
Mat erial and met hods: Bet ween February 1995-January 2010 we performed 250 t oe-t o-
hand transfers for inger amputations. In metacarpal hands (23 cases) we transferred the
hallux from one foot and the 2nd and 3rd from the other, to achieve a three-ingered
(t ripod) grasp. The rest of t he pat ient s had mult i-digit , simple or part ial amput at ions. In 69
the thumb was reconstructed and the rest of transfers were for inger reconstructions.
Result s: Re-operat ion rat e due t o acut e ischaemia was 16%(10%int raoperat ive) and t he
overall success rate was 98.8% (3 failures). There was no partial necrosis in any case.
Regarding t he donor side, one pat ient was operat ed on due t o a painful neuroma; t he rest
did not have complaint s in t he donor area.
Conclusions: In our experience t oe-t o hand t ransfers are a safe and reliable met hod t o
rehabilit at e severe hand inj uries. Donor sit e morbidit y is direct ly relat ed t o t he number
of t oes harvest ed, and is well-t olerat ed by t he pat ient s, especially in severe inj uries.
© 2010 SECOT. Published by Elsevier España, S.L. All right s reserved.
PALABRAS CLAVE Informe sobre el trasplante de 250 dedos del pie a la mano consecutivos.
Amput ación; Indicaciones, resultados, fracasos y nuevas aplicaciones
Microcirugía;
Dedo del pie a la mano Resumen
Propósit o: Las t ransferencias de dedos del pie const it uyen un arma fundament al en la
rehabilit ación de las lesiones de mano. Sin embargo, no gozan de mucha popularidad
1888-4415/ $ - see front mat t er © 2010 SECOT. Published by Elsevier España, S.L. All right s reserved.
258 F. del Piñal et al
dada la posibilidad de fracaso y por las hipot ét icas secuelas en la zona donant e. Presen-
t amos nuest ra experiencia clínica, haciendo especial hincapié en las complicaciones y las
nuevas aplicaciones.
Mat erial y mét odos: En el periodo febrero de 1995 - enero de 2010 hemos realizado
250 t ransferencias de dedos del pie para amput aciones de t odos o part e de los dedos. En
las amputaciones de todos los dedos (23 casos) se trasplantaron el hallux de un pie y el
2.° y 3.er dedos del pie cont ralat eral para lograr una pinza t rípode. El rest o de los casos
corresponden a amput aciones mult idigit ales, simples o parciales de dedos, siendo 69
casos pulgares y el rest o, dedos t rifalángicos.
Result ados: La t asa de reint ervención por isquemia aguda fue del 16%(10%int raoperat o-
ria), con una supervivencia inal del 98,8% (3 fracasos) tras la revisión quirúrgica. No hubo
ninguna necrosis parcial. Respect o a la zona donant e, un pacient e fue int ervenido por
presentar un neuroma; el resto no reirió ningún tipo de molestias a la marcha, en el
seguimient o a largo plazo.
Conclusiones: En nuest ra experiencia, las t ransferencias de dedos del pie son un mét odo
seguro en la reconst rucción de lesiones graves de la mano. La secuela del pie es propor-
cional a la cant idad de dedos que se t omen, y es bien acept ada por el pacient e, en espe-
cial en las graves lesiones.
© 2010 SECOT. Publicado por Elsevier España, S.L. Todos los derechos reservados.
Introduction
Toe t ransfers have been a rout ine pract ice for more t han
40 years. 1 Alt hough init ially it s use was limit ed t o t he t humb,
it came t o be more widely used as survival rat es improved.
So much so t hat , nowadays, t hese t ransfers are indicat ed in
bot h reconst ruct ion of severe inj uries (for example, mult i-
digit amput at ions) and in more minor inj uries (for example,
part ial t humb amput at ions) where t he t reat ment obj ect ive
is, essent ially, rest it ut io ad int egrum. 2
Our purpose is t o present an updat e on t he indicat ions,
result s, and donor sit e sequelae based on our experience
wit h 250 t ransfers.
One of t he primary reasons for discouragement among Figure 4 Rescue of an ischaemic t oe due t o hypert rophy of
surgeons who do this type of procedure is the risk of t he t unica media in a young pat ient . The t oe was revascularised
microvascular complicat ions. Aft er dissect ion and wit h t he via a bypass to the ibular digital artery at the DIP crease of the
t oe st ill connect ed t o it s vessels in t he foot , it is not 2nd toe (artery diameter approximately 0.3 mm).
Report on 250 consecutive toe to inger transplants. Indications, results, failures, and new applications 261
Figure 5 A) Amput at ion of t humb at t he level of t he t rapezio-met acarpal-phalangeal j oint . B) Simult aneous t ransfer of a t oe plus
a microvascular gracilis muscle lap for coverage. C) Final result.
relat ed t o a Buerger vasculopat hy, and t he t hird was due t o digit amput at ions, where t here is t ypically a loss of associat ed
poor post -operat ive management t hat made revision and soft t issue, we perform ot her microsurgical t issue t ransfers
early rescue impossible. along wit h t he t oe t ransfer in a single surgical procedure.
Because of our experience, enabling us t o short en t he This reduces rehabilit at ion t ime for t he hand and precludes
surgery t ime and achieve great er reliabilit y wit h t his t ype of other surgical procedures on healed areas (ig. 5).
t ransfer, we have expanded t he indicat ions along 2 lines: in The ot her line of int ervent ion has been t he so-called
complex reconst ruct ions and in “ minor” lesions. In mult i- mini-t ransfers: t ransfers of vascularised phalanges,
Figure 6 A) Amputation of distal thumb at the interphalangeal joint. B) Big toe modiied per the Wei technique (trimmed toe).
C-E) Result .
262 F. del Piñal et al
vascularised digit al nerves, and dist al t oe reconst ruct ions. hand surgery, Vol. 2, 4th ed. New York: Churchill Livingstone;
Generally speaking, these mini-transfers are technically 1999. p. 1327–52.
4. Del Piñal F, García-Bernal FJ, Delgado J, Sanmart ín M, Regalado
demanding in t hat t hey require reduct ion of t he bone,
J, Sant amaría C. Transferencias del segundo y t ercer dedo del
adapt at ion of t he soft t issues, and anast omoses wit h vessels pie en t ándem para reconst rucción de la mano met acarpiana.
of 0.5-0.8 mm. On t he ot her hand, morbidit y in t he foot is Rev Ort op Traumat ol. 2007;51:15–24.
minimal, and t hese mini-t ransfers enable hand anat omy 5. Del Piñal F, Herrero Fernández F, García Bernal FJ, Jado
and function to be almost fully recovered (ig. 6). Samperio E, Ot eo Maldonado JA. Reconst rucción de
amput aciones digit ales dist ales a IFP mediant e t ransferencia
del 2.◦ dedo del pie: Experiencia con 11 casos en adultos. Rev
Conclusions Ortop Traumatol. 2002;3:240–5.
6. Del Piñal F, García-Bernal FJ, Regalado J, St uder A, Cagigal L,
The t oes enable funct ion t o be improved in a t raumat ised Ayala H. The t ibial second t oe vascularized neurocut aneous
free lap for major digital nerve defects. J Hand Surg [Am].
hand. The obj ect ives will vary depending on t he severit y of
2007;32:209–17.
t he inj ury (t ripod grip or anat omical reconst ruct ion), and 7. Del Piñal F, García-Bernal FJ, Delgado J, Sanmart in M, Regalado
morbidit y in t he donor sit e area will vary depending on t he J, Cagigal L. Vascularized bone blocks from the toe phalanx to
amount of t issue harvest ed from t he foot . This surgical solve complex intercalated defects in the ingers. J Hand Surg
procedure does not involve any drawbacks in terms of [Am]. 2006;31:1075–82.
ambulat ion. 8. Del Piñal F, García-Bernal FJ, Regalado J, Ayala H, St uder A,
Cagigal L. Finger ost eomielyt is: t he role of vascularised bone
graft. J Hand Surg [Eur]. 2008;33:119.
Evidence level 9. Del Piñal F, García-Bernal FJ, Regalado J, St uder A, Ayala H,
Cagigal L. A t echnique t o improve foot appearance aft er
t rimmed t oe or hallux harvest ing. J Hand Surg [Am].
Evidence level IV.
2007;32:409–13.
10. Del Piñal F, García-Bernal FJ, Regalado J, Ayala H, St uder A,
Cagigal L. Tandem 2nd–3rd toe transfer in mutilating hand
Protection of human and animal subjects injuries. J Hand Surg [Eur]. 2008;33:116.
11. Del Piñal F. Severe mut ilat ing inj uries t o t he hand: Guidelines
The aut hors declare t hat no experiment s were performed for organizing t he chaos. J Plast Reconst r Aest h Surg.
on humans or animals for t his invest igat ion. 2007;60:816–27.
12. Del Piñal F, Herrero F, García Bernal FJ, Jado E, Ros MJ.
Minimizing impairment in laborers with inger losses distal to
Conidentiality of data t he proximal int erphalangeal j oint by second t oe t ransfer. Plast
Reconstr Surg. 2003;112:1000–11.
13. Wei FC, Lutz BS, Cheng SL, Chuang DC. Reconstruction of
The aut hors will declare t hat t hey have followed t he bilat eral met acarpal hands wit h mult iple-t oe t ransplant at ions.
protocols of their work centre on the publication of patient Plast Reconst r Surg. 1999;104:1698–704.
dat a and t hat all t he pat ient s included in t he st udy have 14. Yu Z-J, Huang Y. Sixty-four cases of thumb and inger
received suficient information and have given their reconstruction using transplantation of the big toe skin-nail
informed consent in writ ing t o part icipat e in t hat st udy. lap combined with the second toe or the second and third
toes. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2000;106:335–41.
15. Frykman GK, O’Brien BM, MorrisonWA, MacLeod AM. Functional
Right to privacy and informed consent evaluat ion of t he hand and foot aft er one-st age t oe-t o-hand
t ransfer. J Hand Surg [Am]. 1986;11:9–17.
16. Barca F, Sant i A, Tart oni PL, Landi A. Gait analysis of t he donor
The aut hors declare t hat no pat ient dat a appears in t his
foot in microsurgical reconstruction of the thumb. Foot Ankle
art icle. Int . 1995;16:201–6.
17. Foucher G. Indications for reconstruction in inger mutilations.
In: Foucher G, edit or. Reconst ruct ive surgery in hand
Conlict of interest mut ilat ion. London: Mart in-Dunit z; 1997. p. 109–19.
18. García Julve G, Martínez Villen G. The multiple monoblock
The authors have no conlict of interest to declare. t oet o- hand t ransfer in digit al reconst ruct ion. a report of t en
cases. J Hand Surg [Br]. 2004;29(B):222–9.
19. Buncke GM, Buncke HJ, Oliva A, Lineaweaver WC, Siko PP. Hand
reconst ruct ion wit h part ial t oe and mult iple t oe t ransplant s.
References Clin Plast Surg. 1992;19:859–70.
20. List er GD, Kalisman M. Tsai T-M. Reconst ruct ion of t he hand
1. Cobbet t JR. Free digit al t ransfer: Report of a case of t ransfer wit h free microneurovascular t oe-t o hand t ransfer: Experience
of a great t oe t o replace an amput at ed t humb. J Bone Joint with 54 toe transfer. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1983;71:372–84.
Surg [Br]. 1969;51B:677. 21. Kitaoka HB, Alexander IJ, Adelaar RS, Nunley JA, Myerson MS,
2. Del Piñal F. Invit ed personal view art icle: The indicat ions for Sander M. Clinical rating system for the ankle-hindfoot, midfoot,
toe-transfer after ‘‘minor’’ inger injuries. J Hand Surg[Br]. hallux and lesser toes. Foot Ankl Int. 1994;15:349–53.
2004;29B:120–9. 22. Del Piñal F, García-Bernal FJ, Ayala H, Cagigal L, Regalado J,
3. Wei FC, Santamaria E. Toe-to-inger reconstruction. In: Green St uder A. Ischemic t oe encount ered during harvest ing: report
DP, Hotchkiss RN, Pederson WC, editors. Green’s operative of 6 cases. J Hand Surg [Am]. 2008;33:1820–5.