Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Unit-9 231224 130203
Unit-9 231224 130203
Unit-9 231224 130203
UNIT 9
ALTERNATING SERIES
9.1 INTRODUCTION
In the previous unit we discussed some special tests for checking the
convergence or divergence of positive term series. You know that an infinite
series need not always be a positive term series. In fact, infinite series, in
general, can have both an infinite number of negative terms as well as an
infinite number of positiver terms. The series which have both negative and
positive terms may be classified into two major categories. The first category
consists of those infinite series whose terms are alternately positive and
negative. Such series are called Alternating Series. The other category is
one in which terms need not necessarily be alternatively positive and negative
that is to say, the infinite series whose terms are mixed and do not follow any
specific pattern.
The question, now arises: How to test the convergence of an infinite series
which has both positive and negative terms? The convergence tests
discussed in Unit 8 are not suitable for this purpose because these tests in
their present form cannot be applied to these series. Accordingly, the whole
content of the unit is divided into three sections.
Objectives
Therefore, after studying this unit, you should be able to
1 1 1 1
− + − + ...,
3 5 7 9
1⋅ 2 1⋅ 2 ⋅ 3 1⋅ 2 ⋅ 3 ⋅ 4
1− + − + ...,
1⋅ 3 1⋅ 3 ⋅ 5 1⋅ 3 ⋅ 5 ⋅ 7
and 1 − 1 + 1 − 1 + ...
∞
Defintion 1: An infinite series ∑a
n =1
n is called an alternating series if any two
∑ (−1)
n =1
n +1
an = a1 − a2 + a3 − a4 + ...., where each an > 0 . ... (1)
∑ (−1) n
an = − a1 + a2 − a3 + a4 + .... ... (2)
The second series can be obtained from the first if you multiply each term of
the first series by (−1) . Therefore, it is enough to discuss the convergence of
the first series.
Note that the terms of an alternating series are alternatively positive and
negative. The terms with positive signs are called positive terms and the terms
with negative sign are called negative terms.
264
Unit 9 Alternating Series
There is a very simple test for the convergence of an Alternating series. This
test is known as Leibniz Test after the name of Leibniz, the eminent German
mathematician.
∞
Theorem 1 (Leibniz Test): Let ∑ (−1)
n =1
n+1
an be an alternating series such that
i) an > 0 ∀ n = 1, 2, 3, K
iii) lim an = 0
n →∞
∞ ∞
Then the series ∑ (−1) n+1 an is convergent. Moreover, if s = ∑ (−1) n−1 an and
n =1 n =1
and, in general,
Therefore s2 n +1 − s ≤ s2 n − s + a2 n +1 ≤ ε.
Thus every partial sum of odd terms is within ε of s. Since ε > 0 is arbitrary
( sn ) converges to s and hence ∑ (−1) n +1
⋅ an is convergent and
∑ (−1)
n+1
an = s.
The sum between absolute value signs can be expressed in the form
an+ p if p is even
an+1 − ( a n+ 2 − a n−3 ) + ...
( an+ p−1 − a n+ p ) if p is odd
From Unit 7, you know that the condition lim an = 0 is necessary for the
n →∞
∞
convergence of the series ∑a
n =1
n . But according to Leibniz Test, if the given
series is an alternating series where the absolute value of the terms form a
monotonically decreasing sequence, then the condition lim an = 0 is also
n →∞
sufficient for the convergence.
Example 1: Using the Leibniz Test show that the following series converges.
∞
(−1) n+1 1 1 1 1
∑
n =1 n
= 1 − + − + ......
2 3 4 5
Let us check whether the conditions of the Leibniz Test are satisfied.
∞
1
We can write the series as ∑ (−1)
n =1
n +1
an , where an =
n
.
Here
Thus, the series satisfies all the conditions of the Leibniz Test.
It was proved as a well known result that the limit or sum of this series is
equal to ln 2 .
***
Example 2: Check whether the following series satisfies all the conditions of
the Leibniz Test.
266
Unit 9 Alternating Series
1 1 1 1
2 3 4 5
3−3 +3 −3 +3 L
1 ∞
Solution: Let an = 3 n . Then the series can be written as ∑ (−1)
n =1
n +1
an . Since
1 1
3 > 3 2 > 3 3 > K , therefore the first and second conditons of the Leibniz test
are satisfied.
1
n
However, lim an = lim 3 = 1 ≠ 0 . (Recall from Unit 6)
n →∞ n →∞
That means, the third condition of the Leibniz test is not satisfied.
***
Example 3: Show that the series
∞
2n + 1 3 5 7 9
∑ (−1)
n =1
n −1
= − + −
n(n + 1) 2 2.3 3.4 4.5
+ ...
is convergent.
2n + 1
Solution: For the given series we have, an = . Clearly, an > 0 and
n(n + 1)
lim an = 0. Now
n →∞
an+1 2n + 3 n(n + 1) 2n 2 + 3n
= ⋅ = 2 <1
an (n + 1) (n + 2) 2n + 1 2n + 5n + 2
***
Now see if you can solve these exercises.
1 1 1
E1) Show that the series 1 − + − + ... is convergent.
2! 3! 4!
1 1 1 1
E2) Show that the series p
− p + p − p + L converges for p > 0.
1 2 3 4
Here we make an important point. The first step in applying the Alternating
Series Test is to check that the terms actually alternate in sign. Clearly, the
series
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
1− + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + − ...
2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17
has positive and negative terms; yet, it is not an alternating series and
therefore the Alternating Series Test cannot be applied. The series diverges.
Nor does the alternating series
meet the requirements of the Alternating Series Test, even though an = e1/ n is 267
Block 3 Infinite Series
positive and decrease with n. The difficulty is that lim an ≠ 0 (Since as
n→∞
1
n
n→∞ e = 1. ) Thus the series diverges [Refer Theorem 1 in Unit 7].
∞
1 1 1
∑ n = 1+ 2 + 3 +L
n =1
You know that this series diverges. But the Alternating Harmonic Series (as
discussed in Example 1) namely
∞
1 1 1 1
∑ (−1)
n =1
n+1
n
=1− + − +L
2 3 4
1 1 1 1
i) 1− + − + L
2 4 8 16
and
1 1 1 1
ii) 1− + − + L
2 3 4 5
1 1 1 1
iii) 1+ + + + L and
2 4 8 16
1 1 1 1
iv) 1+ + + + L
2 3 4 5
obtained from (i) and (ii) by replacing each negative term by its absolute value
(i.e − k to + k ) . Then you know from Unit 7 that the series (iii) converges,
while the series (iv) diverges. This shows that if you replace an alternating
series with a series with all terms having positive signs, then in some cases
we get convergence whereas in other cases divergence. This leads us to
divide the convergent series into two classes, namely, the ‘absolutely
convergent series’ and the ‘conditionally convergent series’, which we define
as follows:
268
Unit 9 Alternating Series
∞
Definition 2 (Absolute convergence): A series ∑a n =1
n of real numbers is said
∞
to be absolutely convergent if ∑a
n =1
n is convergent.
. ∞
Definition 3 (Conditional Convergence): A series ∑a
n =1
n of real
∞
numbers is said to be conditionally convergent if ∑a
n =1
n converges and
∞
∑a
n =1
n does not converge i.e. the given series is convergent but not absolutely
convergent.
For example the series in (i) in the paragraph at the beginning converges
absolutely, while the series (ii) there converges conditonally.
∞ ∞
Note: We have defined ∑ an to be absolutely convergent if
n =1
∑| a
n =1
n | is
∞
convergent, but we have not said anything about the behaviour of ∑a
n =1
n itself.
∞ ∞
Whereas we have defined ∑a
n =1
n to be conditonally convergent if ∑a
n =1
n is
∞
convergent but ∑| a
n =1
n | is divergent.
sn = a1 + a2 + L + an .
| sn − sk | = | ak +1 + ak +2 + L + an |
≤ | ak +1 | + | ak + 2 | + L + | an | (Recall from Unit 3).
= | tn − tk | < ε . 269
Block 3 Infinite Series
Which shows that (sn ) n is a Cauchy sequence. This completes the proof.
∞ ∞
1
Solution: Here ∑ | an | = ∑
n =1 n =1 2n + 1
∞ ∞
1 1
Let bn =
n
for n = 1, 2, 3, K Then the series ∑ bn = ∑
n =1 n =1 n
is divergent.
Also
| an | n 1
lim = lim = .
n→∞ b n→∞ 2n + 1 2
n
∞
Hence by the Comparison Test, it follows that ∑| a
n =1
n | is divergent. Thus
∞
(−1) n+1
∑
n =1 2
n +1
is not absolutely convergent.
1 1 1
However, since < ∀ n , and lim = 0 , therefore by the
2n + 1 2n − 1 n →∞ 2n + 1
∞
(−1) n +1
Leibniz Test, ∑ is convergent. Hence the series is conditionally
n =1 2n + 1
convergent.
***
All the tests of convergence of infinite series discussed in Unit 8 for series of
positive terms can be used to decide absolute convergence of general series.
∞
cos nx
Example 5: Test the series ∑
n =1 n2
, x ∈ R, for convergence.
cos nx
Solution: Here an =
n2
∞
1 1
Since | cos nx | ≤ 1 , we get that | an | ≤
n2
. But ∑n
n =1
2
converges, (Why ?)
∞
This means that the series ∑a
n =1
n is absolutely convergent. Hence, the series
∞ ∞
cos nx
∑ an , i.e.,
n =1
∑
n =1 n2
is convergent. [See Theorem 2].
***
Now try the following exerices.
∞
1 1
E3) Test the conditional convergence of the series ∑ (−1)
n =1
n −1
3 + 5 .
n n
270
Unit 9 Alternating Series
n +1
(−1)
E4) Test the absolute convergence of the series ∑ 2n
.
1 1 1 1
1− p
+ p − p + p L converges conditionally.
2 3 4 5
In the next section we shall see that we can generate new series from an
infinite series with entirely different nature.
1 1 1
1− + − +L ... (4)
2 3 4
1 1 1 1 1
1+ − + + − + ... ... (5)
3 2 5 7 4
∞
1 1 1
∑ 4n − 3 + 4n − 1 − 2
n =1
n
Then the series in (8) is known as a rearrangement (changing the order of the
terms) of the series in (7). Another rearrangement can be obtained by
rearranging the terms of the series (7) so that each positive term is followed by
two negative terms which gives the series
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
1− − + − − + − − + ...
2 4 3 6 8 5 10 12
In this way we can have different permutation of the terms and get different
rearranged series. You may note that this is very peculiar about an alternating
series. This does not happen with positive term series as all the terms are of
positive sign only.
∞
Definition 4: Let ∑u
n =1
n be series. Let σ be a one-to-one function from N
∞ ∞
onto N . Then ∑ σ π(n) is said to be a rearrangment of
n =1
∑u
n =1
n .
1 1 1 1 1
For example 1 + − + + − + L is a rearrangement of the series
3 2 5 7 4 271
Block 3 Infinite Series
1 1 1 1
1− + − + L.
2 3 4 5
Next we shall check whether the rearrangement of a series will preserve the
convergence or divergence nature or it will alter the sum of the series.
For that we shall again look into the series in (4) given by
1 1 1
1− + − +L ... (6)
2 3 4
We have seen in Sec. 9.2 that this series converges by Leibniz test. Infact this
series converges to ln 2 . The proof of this is beyond the scope of this course.
Let us now consider the rearrangement of the series given in (5). That is
1 1 1 1 1
1+ − + + − + ... ... (7)
3 2 5 7 4
Let (sn ) n denote the sequence of the partial sum of the series
1 1 1
1− + − +L,
2 3 4
and (t n ) n denote the sequence of the partial sum of the rearrangement of the
series
1 1 1 1 1
1+ − + + − + L.
3 2 5 7 4
1 1 1
We set rn = 1 + + + ... + − ln . Then (rn ) is convergent. We leave this as
2 3 n
an exercise for you to try (see E8).
We now have
1 1 1 1
s2 n = 1 − + −L + −
2 3 2n − 1 2n
1 1 1 1 1 1
= 1 + + + ... + − + + ... +
3 5 2n − 1 2 4 2n
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
= 1 + + ... + − + + ... + − + + ... +
2 2n 2 4 2n 2 4 2n
1 1 1 1 1
= 1 + + L + − 2 + + L +
2 2n 2 4 2n
1 1 1 1
= 1 + + L + − 1 + + L +
2 2n 2 n
= [r2 n + ln 2n] − [rn + ln n]
= [r2 n − rn ] + ln 2n − ln n
2n
= [r2 n − rn ] + ln
n
= [r2 n − rn ] + ln 2
272
Unit 9 Alternating Series
Since (rn ) n is convergent, therefore (rn ) n is a Cauchy Sequence.
Consequently, there exists m ∈ N such that | r2n − rn | < ε for n ≥ m where
ε > 0 is any number.
(−1) n+1
Now we consider the sequence ( s2 n+1 ). Since → 0 as n → ∞, we have
n
s2 n+1 − log 2 ≤ s2 n − log 2 + a2 n + 1 ≤ ε for n ≥ m.
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
t3n = 1 + − + + + + L + + −
3 2 5 7 4 4n − 3 4n − 1 2n
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
= 1 + − + + − + L + + −
3 2 5 7 4 4n − 3 4n − 1 2n
1 1 1 1 1 1
= 1 + + + + + L + +
2 3 4 5 4n − 1 4n
1 1 1 1 1 1
− 1 + + L + − 1 + + L +
2 2 2n 2 2 n
Thus,
1 1
t3n = (r4 n + ln 4n) − (r2n + ln 2n) − (rn + ln n)
2 2
1 1 3
= r4 n − r2 n − rn + ln 2
2 2 2
3
lim t3n = ln 2 .
n→∞ 2
1 1 1
Since t3n+1 = t3n + and t3n+2 = t3n + + .
4n + 1 4n + 1 4 n + 3
3
Therefore lim t n = ln 2 .
n→∞ 2
That means the series in (7) which is the rearrangement of the series in (6)
3
converges to a different limit ln 2.
2
This shows that the rearrangement of conditionaly convergent series may
change its sum or limit.
We state here without proof that this series is divergent. The proof is so
cumbursome that it is beyond the level of this course.
Hence the rearrangement not only changes the sum of the series but may
change its nature also. Now we ask under what conditions may we rearrange
the terms of the series without altering its value? An answer to this is given by
Riemann Rearragement Theorem which says that if an infinite series is
conditionally convergent, then its terms can be rearranged so that the new
series converges or diverges. The proof of the theorem is not easy and
therefore omitted.
We state two theorems (without proof) which will indicate the effect on the
convergence of a series if we rearrange the terms of the series.
∞
Theorem 3: If ∑u
n =1
n is an absolutely convergent series converging to s , then
∞
every rearrangement of ∑u
n =1
n also converges to s .
Thus, the order in which the terms occur is immaterial in absolutely convergent
series.
∞
Theorem 4(Riemann Rearrangement Theorem): Let ∑u
n =1
n be a conditionally
∑u
n =1
n which converges to α .
Bernhard Riemann You may note that we have already explained how the nature of the series
(1826-1866) changes with rearrangement for the series.
1 1 1 1 1
1+ − + + − +L .
3 2 5 7 4
1 1
E6) Show that ( rn ) n ∈r N where rn = 1 + + ... + − ln is convergent,
2 n
∞
E7) Suppose ∑u
n =1
n is a series of positive terms diverging to + ∞ . Show that
∞
every rearrangement of ∑u
n =1
n also diverges to + ∞ .
9.5 SUMMARY
In this unit we have covered the following:
i) Absolute convergence
ii) Conditional convergence
9.6 SOLUTIONS/ANSWERS
1
E1) Here an = . Also an > an+1 > 0 .
n!
1
Also lim an = lim → 0 as n → ∞.
n →∞ n→∞ n!
1 1 1 1
p
> p > p > ..... and lim p = 0.
1 2 3 n → ∞ n
1 1 1 1 1 1
E3) Since 3
+ 5 > 3
+ 5
, and lim 3 + 5 = 0.
n n (n + 1) (n + 1)
n →∞ n n
∞
1 1
Therefore by Leibniz test, ∑ (−1)
n =2
n −1
3 + 5 converges.
n n
∞
1 1 ∞ 1 ∞
1
But ∑ 3 + 5 = ∑ 3 + ∑ 5 also converges.
n =1 n n n=1 n n =1 n
∞
1 1
∑ (− 1)
n+1
This means that 3 + 5 is absolutely convergent, but not
n =2 n n
conditionally convergent.
∞
1
E4) The series ∑2
n= 0
n
is a convergent geometric series, so the series
275
Block 3 Infinite Series
n +1
(−1)
∑ 2n
is absolutely convergent.
E5) We have shown in E2 that the series converges for p > 0. But it is
absolutely convergent only for p ≥ 2. Hence this is conditionally
convergent for p ≥ 2 .
1 1 1
rn = 1 + + + ... + − ln
2 3 n
n
1 dx
=∑ ∫
k1 x
n n
1 dx
rn = ∑ −∫
n =1 k 1 x
k +1
1 dx 1
Observe that
k +1
≤ ∫k
≤ .
x k
1 n+1 dx n dx
n + 1 1 x ∫1 x
rn+1 − rn = −∫ −
n +1
1 dx
=
n +1
− ∫
n
x
1 1
{rn }n ≥1 ≤ − ≤0
n +1 n +1
n k +1 dx
Also rn = ∑ − ∫
k =1 k x
n
1 n−1 1 1
≥∑ −∑ = ≥0
n =1 k k =1 k n
rn ≥ 0 ∀ n
∞ ∞
E7) Suppose a rearrangement ∑u
n =1
π(n) of ∑u
n =1
n converges.
∞ ∞
Note that ∑ un is itself a rearrangement of
n =1
∑u
n =1
π ( n) .
∞
Hence, ∑u
n =1
n would converge, contradicting the hypothesis that
∞
∑u
n =1
n diverges.
∞
Hence, every rearrangement of ∑u
n =1
n also diverges.
276
Block 3 Miscellaneous Examples and Exercises
We shall first consider miscellaneous examples. You can solve the exercises
in a similar way. We advise you not to look at the solutions of the exercises
given at the end unless you have tried to solve them on your own.
Miscellaneous Examples
Example 1: Check whether the following statements are true or false. Give
reasons for your answers.
1 1 1
a) The sequence of the partial sums of the series 1 + + + ... + + ... is not
2! 3! n!
a bounded sequence.
1 1 1
b) The series 1 − + − + ... is convergent.
3 5 7
1 1 1
Solution: a) Let s n = 1 + + + ... + . Then (sn ) is the sequence of partial
2! 3! n!
sums which is monotonically increasing and is of positive terms. Therefore it
cannot be bounded. Thus the statement is true. We get that the statement is
true.
∞
1 1 1
c) Let us consider the series ∑ n. Then a
n =1
n =
n
→ 0 as n → ∞. But ∑ n is
divergent. Hence the statement is false.
***
1 1 1
Example 2: Show that the series 1 − 2
+ 2
− + ... is convergent.
3× 2 5×3 7 × 42
1 1 1 (−1) n−1
Solution: Let ∑ an = 1 − +
3 × 2 2 5 × 32
− ... . Here a n =
2n − 1
×
n2
. Then
***
277
Block 3 Infinite Series
Example 3: Using the comparison test or the limit comparison test determine
the convergence of the following series
∞
1 ∞
cos 2 (2n)
i) ∑
n =1 n + n
ii) ∑
n =1 n3
1 1
Solution: i) Let an = and bn = , for n = 1,2,..., so that
n+ n n
an n
lim = lim
n →∞ b n →∞ n + n
n
1
= lim
n →∞ 1
1+
n
= 1 ≠ 0.
∞
1
Since ∑ n is divergent, we deduce, from the Limit Comparison Test, that
n =1
∞
1
∑n+
n =1 n
is divergent.
2
ii) We use the Comparison Test. Since 0 ≤ cos (2n) ≤ 1, for n = 1,2,..., we
cos 2 (2n) 1
have 0 ≤ ≤ 3 , for n = 1,2,....
n3 n
∞
1
Since ∑ 3 is convergent, we deduce, from the Comparison Test, that
n =1 n
∞
cos 2 (2n)
∑
n =1 n3
is convergent.
***
Example 4: Use Ratio test to determine whether the following series are
convergent.
∞
n3 ∞
n 2 2n
i) ∑
n =1 n !
ii) ∑
n =1 n !
n3
Solution: i) Let an = , for n = 1,2,..., so that
n!
an+1 (n + 1) 3 n !
= ×
an (n + 1)! n 3
(n + 1) 2
=
n3
n 3 + 2n + 1 1 2 1
= 3
= + 2 + 3.
n n n n
a ∞
n3
Also lim n+1 = 0. Hence it follows, from the Ratio Test that
n →∞ a
∑
n =1 n !
is
n
convergent.
278
Block 3 Miscellaneous Examples and Exercises
n 2 2n
ii) Let an = , for n = 1,2,..., so that
n!
an+1 (n + 1) 2 2 n+1 n !
= × 2 n
an (n + 1)! n 2
2(n + 1)
=
n2
1 1
= 2 + 2 .
n n
a n+1 ∞
n 2 2n
Since lim
n →∞ a
= 0, it follows, from the Ratio Test that ∑
n =1 n !
is convergent.
n
***
Example 5: Prove that the following series is convergent and calculate its sum
∞
1 3
∑ 2 n
+ .
n(n + 1)
n =1
∞ ∞
1 1
Solution: We know that ∑
n =1 2
n
is convergent, with sum 1, and that ∑ n(n + 1)
n =1
is convergent, with sum 1.
∞
1 3
Hence, by the Sum Rule and the Multiple Rule the series ∑ 2 n
+ is
n(n + 1)
n =1
convergent, with sum 1 + (3 × 1) = 4 .
***
∞
n
Example 6: Show that ∑ (−1)
n =1
n +1
3n + 2
diverges.
n
Solution: The series is an alternating series. Here an = (−1) n+1 .
3n + 2
n n 1
Therefore a n = . Also lim an = lim = .
3n + 2 n →∞ n→∞ 3n + 2 3
***
∞
Example 7: Give an example of a series ∑u
n =1
n of positive terms such that
u n+1
< 1 for each n, but the series diverges. Does this example contradict the
un
Ratio Test? Justify.
1 u n+1 n
Solution: Let ∑ u = ∑ n , then
n
un
=
n +1
< 1 ∀ n.
1
But the series ∑ n is divergent.
277
Block 3 Infinite Series
This does not contradict the Ratio Test because when we take the limits as
u n+1
n → ∞, we find that lim = 1.
n →∞ u
n
***
Example 8: Test the convergence of the series whose general term is
−n 3 / 2
1
1 + .
n
1
Solution: Let u n =
n 3/ 2
1
1 +
n
1/ n 1
Then lim (u n ) = lim n
n→ ∞ n →∞
1
1 +
n
1
= n
1
lim 1 +
n →∞
n
1
= < 1.
e
(−1) n n n
Solution: Let an = n
. Then a n = n
2 2
n +1
a n+1 n +1 1 n +1
= 2 =
an n 2 n
n
2
a n+1 1
∴ lim → <1
n →∞ an 2
n 2 − 3n + 4 1
Solution: Let an = 4
and bn = 2 . Then both an and bn are positive
5n − n n
280
Block 3 Miscellaneous Examples and Exercises
an n 2 − 3n + 4 n 2
and = ×
bn 5n 4 − n 1
n 4 − 3n 3 + 4n 2
=
5n 4 − n
1 − 3n −1 + 4n −2
=
5 − n −3
an 1 1 1
Then lim
n →∞ a
→ as n → ∞. Since ≠ 0, and the series
5 5
∑n 2
is convergent,
n
the given series is convergent.
***
Miscellaneous Exercises
n2 −1 n
E1) Find the values of x for which the series ∑ n 2 + 1x converges.
E2) Prove that the following series is convergent and calculate its sum
∞ 3 n 2
∑ −
n =1 4 n(n + 1)
.
E3) Interpret the decimal 0.999.... as infinite series, and hence represent
them as a fractions.
∞
(−1) n+1 n ∞
cos n
i) ∑ 3
n =1 n + 1
ii) ∑
n =1 2
n
SOLUTIONS/ANSWERS
E1) Hint: Apply D’Alembert’s Ratio test. Then the series converges for x < 1
and diverges if x > 1.
n
3 ∞
3
E2) The series ∑ is a geometric series, with a = r = . Hence, it is
n =1 4 4
3
convergent, with sum 4 = 3.
3
1−
4
277
Block 3 Infinite Series
∞
1
The series ∑ n(n + 1) is convergent, with sum 1 (cf. Sub-section 3.1.3).
n =1
3 n ∞
2
Hence, by the combination Rules ∑ − is convergent,
n =1 4 n(n + 1)
with sum 3 − (2 × 1) = 1.
E3) We interpret 0.999... as
9 9 9
1
+ 2 + 3 + ... .
10 10 10
9 1 1
This is a geometric series with a = and r = . Since < 1, this
10 10 10
9
a
series is convergent with sum = 10 = 1; hence 0.999... = 1.
1− r 1− 1
10
n +1
(−1) n
E4) i) Hint: an = , n = 1, 2...
n3 + 1
n
an = 3
, n = 1,2...
n +1
cos n
ii) Hint: Here an = .
2n
1
an ≤ since cos n ≤ 1.
2n
The series is absolutely convergent and hence convergent.
E5) i) Hint: Apply Leibniz test.
n2
ii) Let an =
2n 2 + 1
1 1
lim a n = lim =
n→ ∞ n→∞ 1 2
2+
n2
282